Você está na página 1de 3

Netflix, Inc. v. Blockbuster, Inc. Doc.

188
Case
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA
3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document
Document 188
187 Filed
Filed 04/17/2007
04/18/2007 Page
Page 11 of
of 33

1 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP


JEFFREY R. CHANIN - #103649
2 DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825
ASHOK RAMANI - #200020
3 710 Sansome Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1704
4 Telephone: (415) 391-5400
Facsimile: (415) 397-7188
5 Email: jrc@kvn.com
djd@kvn.com
6 axr@kvn.com

7 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-defendant,


NETFLIX, INC.
8
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
9 DONN P. PICKETT - #72257
ADRIENNE L. TACLAS - #211232
10 Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
11 Telephone: (415) 393-2000
Facsimile: (415) 393-2286
12 Email: donn.pickett@bingham.com
adrienne.taclas@bingham.com
13
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant,
14 BLOCKBUSTER, INC.

15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17

18
NETFLIX, INC., a Delaware corporation, Case No. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)
19
Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
20 ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING
v. SCHEDULE
21
BLOCKBUSTER, INC., a Delaware Complaint filed: April 4, 2006
22 corporation, DOES 1-50,

23 Defendant.

24
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
25

26

27

28

393687.01 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE


CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)
Dockets.Justia.com
Case
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA
3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document
Document 188
187 Filed
Filed 04/17/2007
04/18/2007 Page
Page 22 of
of 33

1 WHEREAS, on April 16, 2007 Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Netflix, Inc.

2 (“Netflix”) and Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff Blockbuster, Inc. (“Blockbuster”)

3 appeared before the Court regarding certain discovery issues;

4 WHEREAS, the Court instructed Netflix and Blockbuster to meet and confer on a

5 proposed briefing schedule and hearing date on the issues surrounding Blockbuster’s reliance on

6 the advice of counsel;

7 WHEREAS, counsel for Netflix and Blockbuster have met and conferred, and reached

8 agreement on a proposed briefing schedule whereby any motion(s) will be filed by May 4, 2007,

9 with opposition(s) due on May 18, 2007, and reply brief(s) due on May 25, 2007, with a hearing

10 date set for June 8, 2007;

11 WHEREAS, the Court has indicated that it is available for a hearing on the matter on

12 June 8, 2007;

13 THEREFORE, Netflix and Blockbuster respectfully request that the proposed briefing

14 schedule set forth in the accompanying proposed order be adopted.

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1
393687.01 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)
Case
Case 3:06-cv-02361-WHA
3:06-cv-02361-WHA Document
Document 188
187 Filed
Filed 04/17/2007
04/18/2007 Page
Page 33 of
of 33

1 [PROPOSED] ORDER

2 Any motion(s) relating to the issues surrounding Blockbuster’s reliance on the advice of

3 counsel shall be filed no later than May 4, 2007.

4 Any opposition(s) to the motion(s) shall be filed no later than May 18, 2007.

5 Any reply brief(s) on the motion(s) shall be filed no later than May 25, 2007.

6 This matter is set for a hearing before Judge Spero on June 8, 2007.

8 Dated: April 17, 2007 Respectfully submitted,

9 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP

10

11 By: /s/ Eugene M. Paige ________________


Eugene M. Paige
12 Attorneys For Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant NETFLIX, INC.
13
Dated: April 17, 2007 Respectfully submitted,
14
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
15

16
By: /s/ Adrienne L. Taclas ______________
17 Adrienne L. Taclas
Attorneys For Defendant and
18 Counterclaimant BLOCKBUSTER INC.
19
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
S DISTRICT
21
ATE C
Dated: April 18, 2007 T
O
S

22
ED

RT
UNIT

23
R NIA

By: __________________________________
24 THE HON. JOSEPHhC. pero
SSPERO
sep C.
NO

Judge Jo MAGISTRATE JUDGE


UNITED STATES
FO

25
RT

LI

ER
H

26 N C
F
D IS T IC T O
R
27

28

2
393687.01 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. C 06 2361 WHA (JCS)

Você também pode gostar