STUDENTS' RATINGS ON TEACHER

Faculty Member:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Department:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Academic Year:

20XX/20XX

Faculty:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Semester:

Module:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Activity Type:

LECTURE

Class Size/Response Size/Response Rate: 9 / 1 / 11.11%

Contact Session/Teaching Hour :
Qn

3 / 6

Items Evaluated

Fac. Member
Avg Score

Fac. Member
Avg Score
Std. Dev

Dept Avg
Score
(a)

(b)

Fac. Avg Score

(c)

(d)

The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability.

4.000

0.000

4.056 ( 4.225)

3.990 ( 4.203)

The teacher has increased my interest in the

subject.

3.000

0.000

4.060 ( 4.225)

3.963 ( 4.186)

The teacher provides timely and useful feedback.

4.000

0.000

4.092 ( 4.338)

4.015 ( 4.264)

Department-specific question

4.000

0.000

4.092 ( 4.338)

Department-specific question

4.000

0.000

4.026 ( 4.225)

Department-specific question

4.000

0.000

4.053 ( 4.225)

Average of Q1 to Q6

3.833

0.000

4.074 ( 4.261)

Computed Overall Effectiveness of the Teacher.

4.000

0.000

4.132 ( 4.296)

4.054 ( 4.265)

Note:
1. A 5-point scale is used for the scores. The higher the score, the better the rating.
2. Computed Overall Effectiveness of the Teacher = 0.0866 + (0.4276 * Q1 score) + (0.3150 * Q2 Score) + (0.25 * Q3 Score).
3. Fac. Member Avg Score: The mean of all the scores for each question for the faculty member.
4. Fac. Member Avg Score Std. Dev: A measure of the range of variability. It measures the extent to which a faculty member's
Average Score differs from all the scores in the faculty member's evaluation. The smaller the standard deviation, the greater the
robustness of the number given as average.
5. Dept Avg Score:
(a) the mean score of same activity type (Lecture) within the department.
(b) the mean score of same activity type (Lecture), at the same module level ( level 6000 ) within the department.
6. Fac. Avg Score:
(c) the mean score of same activity type (Lecture) within the faculty.
(d) the mean score of same activity type (Lecture), at the same module level ( level 6000 ) within the faculty.

FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSES ON TEACHER

Faculty Member:
Department:
Faculty:
Module:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Academic Year:
Semester:

20XX/20XX
2

Frequency Distribution of responses (Qn 1: The teacher has enhanced my thinking ability.)
70

64.7

% OF RESPONDENTS

60
50.5

50

45
38.7

40

32.5

30

22

20

20
11

10

0.2

9.6
0

2.8
3

Self
Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type, at the same level within Department
Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Lecture), at the same level within Faculty

Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents)

ITEM\SCORE
Self
Teachers teaching all Modules of the
Same Activity Type (Lecture), at the
same level within Department
Teachers teaching all Modules of the
Same Activity Type (Lecture), at the
same level within Faculty

|
|
|
|

0 (.00%)

1 (100.00%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

23 (32.39%)

46 (64.79%)

2 (2.82%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

| 257 (38.70%)

335 (50.45%)

64 (9.64%)

7 (1.05%)

1 (.15%)

Frequency Distribution of responses (Qn 2: The teacher has increased my interest in the subject.)
70

64.7

% OF RESPONDENTS

60
50.5

50

45
38.7

40

32.5

30

22

20

20

11

10

9.6

0 0.2

2.8

Self
Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type, at the same level within Department
Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Lecture), at the same level within Faculty

Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents)

ITEM\SCORE
Self
Teachers teaching all Modules of the
Same Activity Type (Lecture), at the
same level within Department
Teachers teaching all Modules of the
Same Activity Type (Lecture), at the
same level within Faculty

|
|
|
|

0 (.00%)

1 (100.00%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

23 (32.39%)

46 (64.79%)

2 (2.82%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

| 257 (38.70%)

335 (50.45%)

64 (9.64%)

7 (1.05%)

1 (.15%)

Frequency Distribution of responses (Qn 3: The teacher provided timely and useful feedback.)
70

64.7

% OF RESPONDENTS

60
50.5

50

45
38.7

40

32.5

30

22

20

20
11
10

9.6

0 0.2

2.8

Self
Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type, at the same level within Department
Teachers teaching all Modules of the Same Activity Type (Lecture), at the same level within Faculty

Nos. of Respondents(% of Respondents)

ITEM\SCORE
Self
Teachers teaching all Modules of the
Same Activity Type (Lecture), at the
same level within Department
Teachers teaching all Modules of the
Same Activity Type (Lecture), at the
same level within Faculty

|
|
|
|

0 (.00%)

1 (100.00%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

23 (32.39%)

46 (64.79%)

2 (2.82%)

0 (.00%)

0 (.00%)

| 257 (38.70%)

335 (50.45%)

64 (9.64%)

7 (1.05%)

1 (.15%)

STUDENTS' COMMENTS ON TEACHER

Faculty Member:
Department:
Faculty:
Module:
Activity Type:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
LECTURE

Academic Year:
Semester:

20XX/20XX
2

What are the teacher's strengths?

Comments from students who gave an average score > 4.5 for the overall effectiveness of the teacher
Comments go here..

Comments from students who gave an average score 4.0 - 4.5 for the overall effectiveness of the teacher
Comments go here..

Comments from students who gave an average score 3.5 4.0 for the overall effectiveness of the teacher
Comments go here..

Comments from students who gave an average score 3.0 3.5 for the overall effectiveness of the teacher
Comments go here..

Comments from students who gave an average score < 3.0 for the overall effectiveness of the teacher
Comments go here..

What improvements would you suggest to the teacher?

Comments from students who gave an average score < 3.0 for the overall effectiveness of the teacher
Comments go here..

Comments from students who gave an average score 3.0 3.5 for the overall effectiveness of the teacher
Comments go here..

Comments from students who gave an average score 3.5 4.0 for the overall effectiveness of the teacher
Comments go here..

Comments from students who gave an average score 4.0 - 4.5 for the overall effectiveness of the teacher
Comments go here..

Comments from students who gave an average score > 4.5 for the overall effectiveness of the teacher
Comments go here..

STUDENTS' NOMINATIONS FOR BEST TEACHING

Faculty Member:
Department:
Faculty:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Module Code:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Comments go here..

Academic Year:
Semester:

20XX/20XX
2

No of Nominations: 30