Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
www.ehu.es/revista-psicodidactica
ISSN 1136-1034
UPV/EHU
Introduction
Many students feel more anxious and nervous in the foreign
language (FL) class than in any
other class (Campbell & Ortiz,
1991; Horwitz, Horwitz, & Cope,
1986; MacIntyre & Gardner, 1989),
and their anxiety seems to come
predominantly from the speaking
situation (Koch & Terrell, 1991;
MacIntyre & Gardner, 1994; Price,
1991). In fact, foreign language
anxiety (FLA) has been identified
as one of the major obstacles to
acquisition and fluent production
of foreign languages (Dewaele,
Petrides, & Furham, 2008; Williams & Andrade, 2008).
MacIntyre and Gardner (1994)
defined FLA as the feeling of tension and apprehension specifically
associated with second language
contexts, including speaking, listening and learning; and Horwitz
et al. (1986) described language
anxiety as a distinct complex of
self-perceptions, beliefs, feelings,
and behaviors related to classroom
language learning arising from the
uniqueness of the language learning
process (p. 28).
The effects of anxiety on foreign language learning have been
studied since the 1970s (Scovel,
1978; Tobias, 1979), but it was not
until the 1980s that a general theory
about foreign language classroom
anxiety appeared, presented by
Horwitz, the main researcher in this
area (Horwitz, 1995, 2000, 2001;
Horwitz et al., 1986; Horwitz &
learning therefore requires experimenting and improving the rule systems through use (Wilson, 2001).
However, errors can be the source
of anxiety in some individuals because they constitute an obstacle for
making positive social impressions
when speaking a new language
(Gregersen & Horwitz, 2002; Kim,
2009; MacIntyre & Gardner, 1989).
People who are highly concerned
about the impression others have of
them usually behave in ways that
minimize the possibility of obtaining disapproving evaluations: they
rarely start conversation and interact
minimally; they tend to sit passively
in the classroom, avoid activities
that could improve their language
skills, and may even skip class
entirely (Fukai, 2000; Gregersen,
1999-2000, 2007). By reducing the
number of interactions in the foreign language, the learner is missing
opportunities to realize where his/
her weaknesses are. Research has
shown that language production can
lead the learner to language gaps
awareness, and although becoming
aware of those gaps is not equal
to resolving them, it is certainly a
starting point to begin taking measures (Arnaiz, 2001; Izumi, 2002;
Swain & Lapkin, 1995).
Test anxiety also seems relevant
when examining the anxious foreign or second language learner and
it refers to a type of performance
anxiety springing from a fear of
failure. Test-anxious learners often
set unrealistic demands and feel that
the only acceptable performance is
10
11
12
Data analysis
As mentioned, the FLCAS was
used in this study. When items were
negatively worded, responses were
reversed and recoded, so that, at any
time, a high score represented high
anxiety.
Several sets of analysis were
conducted with these data including descriptive analysis, factor
analysis, correlation and regression
analyses. Descriptive statistics were
calculated for all the variables and
for the three factors identified. A
Factor analysis was carried out to
detect the underlying structure of
the FLCAS. Pearson correlations
were also computed between the
demographic variables and the total
FLCAS score, dimensions and items
in order to determine the relationships between them. A Regression
analysis was conducted to examine
and predict the anxiety according to
gender, age, level, and grade.
Results
Internal consistency and testretest reliability
Internal consistency was computed for the instrument. Cronbachs
alfa was .93. The scale in this study
13
Table 1
Means and Standard Deviations of Anxiety Items, Factors and Total Scores, with Gender
Differences
General (N=216) Female (n=119)
M (SD)
M (SD)
Anxiety
Male (n=97)
M (SD)
FLCAS 1
FLCAS 2
FLCAS 3
FLCAS 4
FLCAS 5
FLCAS 6
FLCAS 7
FLCAS 8
FLCAS 9
FLCAS 10
FLCAS 11
FLCAS 12
FLCAS 13
FLCAS 14
FLCAS 15
FLCAS 16
FLCAS 17
FLCAS 18
FLCAS 19
FLCAS 20
FLCAS 21
FLCAS 22
FLCAS 23
FLCAS 24
FLCAS 25
FLCAS 26
FLCAS 27
FLCAS 28
FLCAS 29
FLCAS 30
FLCAS 31
FLCAS 32
FLCAS 33
3.71 (1.21)
3.40 (1.30)
3.14 (1.33)
3.28 (1.38)
2.03 (1.12)
2.84 (1.30)
3.32 (1.24)
3.18 (1.18)
3.93 (1.14)
4.14 (1.14)
3.12 (1.37)
3.65 (1.28)
3.52 (1.36)
2.82 (1.34)
3.67 (1.17)
3.21 (1.29)
2.81 (1.26)
3.45 (1.21)
2.62 (1.18)
3.35 (1.32)
2.08 (1.00)
3.26 (1.18)
3.31 (1.28)
3.24 (1.32)
2.81 (1.26)
3.03 (1.44)
3.44 (1.24)
2.53 (1.19)
3.14 (1.35)
2.98 (1.25)
2.75 (1.40)
2.69 (1.21)
3.80 (1.09)
4.05 (1.06)
3.54 (1.22)
3.31 (1.29)
3.51 (1.25)
1.95 (1.06)
2.62 (1.25)
3.59 (1.21)
3.22 (1.19)
4.11 (1.04)
4.36 (0.95)
3.34 (1.29)
3.94 (1.16)
3.68 (1.30)
2.87 (1.31)
3.83 (1.09)
3.42 (1.29)
2.74 (1.28)
3.70 (1.10)
2.71 (1.17)
3.51 (1.31)
2.10 (1.04)
3.32 (1.22)
3.57 (1.23)
3.44 (1.22)
2.84 (1.27)
3.07 (1.43)
3.56 (1.21)
2.64 (1.25)
3.19 (1.32)
3.04 (1.22)
2.94 (1.47)
2.77 (1.22)
3.97 (1.02)
3.27 (1.25)
3.20 (1.38)
2.91 (1.34)
2.97 (1.49)
2.14 (1.20)
3.09 (1.31)
2.95 (1.19)
3.14 (1.16)
3.68 (1.21)
3.85 (1.31)
2.84 (1.43)
3.25 (1.34)
3.29 (1.42)
2.74 (1.40)
3.47 (1.25)
2.94 (1.24)
2.89 (1.25)
3.15 (1.25)
2.49 (1.17)
3.11 (1.30)
2.05 (0.95)
3.18 (1.14)
2.95 (1.26)
2.94 (1.38)
2.75 (1.26)
2.94 (1.43)
3.25 (1.25)
2.41 (1.12)
3.05 (1.39)
2.89 (1.29)
2.46 (1.25)
2.55 (1.18)
3.56 (1.15)
3623.5
4849.5
4613.5
4452.5
5203.0
4444.5
3972.5
5369.5
4394.5
4277.0
4483.5
3929.5
4747.5
5260.0
4652.5
4368.5
5147.5
4154.5
4969.0
4555.0
5482.5
4993.0
4027.0
4327.5
5312.0
5280.5
4741.5
4967.0
5165.5
5105.5
4505.0
4922.5
4328.0
4.56***
1.77
2.19*
2.67**
.95
2.64**
3.72***
.51
2.74**
3.22***
2.54*
3.86***
1.97*
.76
2.07*
2.71**
.89
3.22***
1.32
2.28*
.122
.92
3.48***
2.62**
.51
.58
1.86
1.09
.75
.86
2.26*
1.29
2.77**
Communication apprehension
3.30 (0.91)
3.50 (0.89)
3.04 (0.88)
3549.0
3.37***
Evaluation anxiety
3.10 (0.66)
3.17 (0.65)
2.99 (0.66)
4691.5
2.02*
Discomfort
2.63 (0.73)
M (SD)
2.59 (0.75)
M (SD)
2.66 (0.71)
M (SD)
5148.0
t
1.12
P
Total FLCAS
* p < .05;
** p < .01;
3.19
.002
14
Table 2
FLCAS Factor Analysis with Promax Rotation
Communication
apprehension
Evaluation
anxiety
Discomfort
FLCAS27
FLCAS24
FLCAS3
FLCAS18
FLCAS31
FLCAS13
FLCAS9
FLCAS20
FLCAS26
FLCAS16
FLCAS1
FLCAS23
FLCAS12
FLCAS7
FLCAS2
FLCAS29
FLCAS28
FLCAS4
FLCAS11
FLCAS25
FLCAS15
FLCAS8
FLCAS30
FLCAS19
FLCAS21
FLCAS22
FLCAS10
FLCAS32
FLCAS14
FLCAS5
FLCAS17
Eigenvalue
.842
.842
.808
.756
.752
.741
.734
.731
.728
.722
.664
.658
.655
.644
.642
.608
.595
.574
.546
11.54
1.78
.603
.584
.467
.448
1.660
% varianza
34.99
5.41
5.040
.650
.622
.594
.570
.482
.468
.413
.364
15
16
Table 3
Pearson Product-Moment Correlations Among Anxiety Items, Factors
and Total Scores
Age
Level
Grade
FLCAS1
FLCAS2
FLCAS3
FLCAS4
FLCAS5
FLCAS6
FLCAS7
FLCAS8
FLCAS9
FLCAS10
FLCAS11
FLCAS12
FLCAS13
FLCAS14
FLCAS15
FLCAS16
FLCAS17
FLCAS18
FLCAS19
FLCAS20
FLCAS21
FLCAS22
FLCAS23
FLCAS24
FLCAS25
FLCAS26
FLCAS27
FLCAS28
FLCAS29
FLCAS30
FLCAS31
FLCAS32
FLCAS33
.164*
.094
.195**
.059
.094
.172*
.186**
.055
.234**
.179**
.117
.229**
.208**
.045
.111
.206**
.104
.083
.164*
.176*
.126
.009
.148*
.239**
.017
.233**
.183**
.141*
.152*
.114
.216**
.184**
.144*
.084
.004
.150*
.059
.162*
.036
.094
.102
.117
.067
.053
.122
.121
.083
.094
.087
.039
.101
.049
.155*
.021
.102
.074
.241**
.069
.082
.108
.100
.151*
.062
.139*
.219**
.073
.228**
.110
.166*
.152*
.094
.022
.311**
.227**
.241**
.058
.120
.274**
.189**
.078
.095
.137
.119
.309**
.110
.150*
.184**
.123
.345**
.234**
.243**
.317**
.180*
.129
.193**
.298**
.154*
.059
.191**
Communication apprehension
.252**
.174*
.290**
Evaluation anxiety
.175*
.083
.291**
Discomfort
.199**
.131
.046
Total FLCAS
.251**
.157*
.304**
* p = .05;
** p = .01.
17
Table 4
Regression Model for Predicting Foreign Language Anxiety
Variable
(Constant)
Age
Gender
Grade
Level
Standart error
Beta
164.987
1.382
9.352
3.649
3.695
10.835
.447
3.255
.924
2.849
.205
.195
.268
.090
15.227
2.970
2.873
3.948
1.297
.000
.003
.005
.000
.196
Discussion
FLA research literature has paid
considerable attention to foreign
language anxiety. However, neither
the foreign languages included in
previous research nor the contexts
involved have been the same
as in the present study. The main
contribution of this research is to
underline the level of anxiety of 216
Spanish university students learning English. It also sheds light on
the roles that gender, age, language
level and grade play in the level of
anxiety of these learners. Thus, the
study offers a unique perspective
by focusing on the issue of foreign
18
19
20
21
References
Aida, Y. (1994). Examination of Horwitz, Horwitz and Copes construct
of foreign language anxiety: The case
of students of Japanese. Modern Language Journal, 78, 155-168.
Arnaiz, P. (2001). Output y enseanza
del ingls como lengua extranjera:
un estudio de casos [Output and
teaching English as a foreign language: a case study]. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation. University of
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las
Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Bacon, S., & Finnemann, M. (1992). Sex
differences in self-reported beliefs
about foreign language learning and
authentic oral and written input. Language Learning, 42, 471-495.
Bailey, P., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Daley, C. E. (2000). Correlates of anxiety at three stages of the foreign language learning process. Journal of
Language and Social Psychology,
19, 474-490.
Benson, J., Bandalos, D., & Hutchinson, S. (1994). Modeling test anxiety among men and women. Anxiety,
Stress and Coping, 7, 131-148.
Brown, J. D., Robson, G., & Rosenkjar, P. (2001). Personality, motivation, anxiety, strategies, and language
proficiency of Japanese students. In
Z. Dornyei, & R. Schmidt (Eds.),
Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 361-398). Honolulu:
University of Hawaii Press.
Campbell, C. M. (1999). Language anxiety in men and women: Dealing with
gender difference in the language
classroom. In D. J. Young (Ed.), Affect in foreign language and second
language learning: A practical guide
to creating a low anxiety classroom
atmosphere (pp. 191-215). Boston,
MA: McGraw Hill.
Campbell, C. M., & Ortiz, J. (1991).
Helping students overcome foreign
language anxiety: A foreign lan-
22
23
24
among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 52(3), 537-564.
Marcos-Llins, M., & Juan-Garau, M.
(2009). Effects of Language Anxiety
on Three Proficiency-Level Courses
of Spanish as a Foreing Language.
Foreign Language Annals, 42(1), 94111.
Martnez-Baztn, A. (2008). La evaluacin oral: una equivalencia entre las
guidelines de ACTFL y algunas escalas del MCER [Oral evaluation: an
equivalence between ACTFL guidelines and some CEFR scales]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Matsuda, S., & Gobel, P. (2004). Anxiety and predictors of performance in
the foreign language classroom. System, 32, 21-36.
Mills, N., & Pajares, F. (2006). A reevaluation of the role of anxiety: Selfefficacy, anxiety, and their relation
to reading and listening proficiency.
Foreign Language Annals, 39(2),
276-295.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Bailey, P., & Daley,
C. E. (1999). Factors associated with
foreign language anxiety. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 20, 217-239.
Onwuegbuzie, A., Bailey, P., & Daley, C.
(2000). Cognitive, affective, personality and demographic predictors of foreign language achievement. Journal
of Educational Research, 94(1), 3-13.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Bailey, P., & Daley,
C. E. (2001). Cognitive, affective,
personality, and demographic predictors of foreign language achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 3-15.
Prez-Paredes, P., & Martnez-Snchez,
F. (2000-2001). A Spanish version
of the foreign language classroom
anxiety scale: Revisiting Aidas fac-
25
26
Patricia Arnaiz is a professor at the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Her
PhD thesis (2001) focused on the output of English language learners. She
has done further research on this specific topic (El efecto de la planificacin
en la expresin oral en alumnos de primaria, 2010) and she has also studied
other aspects connected with the process of foreign language acquisition, as
can be observed in some of her books: FRECONWIN Corpus Canario de Ingls Escrito (2004); FRECONWIN Corpus Canario de Ingls Oral (2007); El
Marco Comn Europeo de Referencia para las Lenguas: adecuacin del documento a la enseanza universitaria (2009).
Flix Guilln is a professor at the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. He received his PhD in psychology in 1991 and his field of knowledge is Basic
Psychology. His major lines of research focus on anxiety in different sociocultural and educational contexts and self-concept. He has written several
books, book chapters and papers publishedin journals such as Perceptual &
Motor Skills, Psicothema, Journal Sport Behavior, Revista de Psicologa del
Deporte o Revista Mexicana de Psicologa.
Received date: 26-1-2011
ISSN 1136-1034
UPV/EHU
Introduccin
Muchos estudiantes sienten ms
ansiedad y nervios en la clase de
lengua extranjera (LE) que en ninguna otra clase (Campbell y Ortiz,
1991; Horwitz, Horwitz, y Cope,
1986; MacIntyre y Gardner, 1989),
y su ansiedad parece estar causada
sobre todo por situaciones de aprendizaje que tienen como objetivo la
prctica de la destreza de produccin oral (Koch y Terrell, 1991;
MacIntyre y Gardner, 1994; Price,
1991). De hecho, se considera que
la ansiedad constituye uno de los
mayores obstculos para lograr la
adquisicin y una produccin fluida
de la lengua extranjera (Dewaele,
Petrides, y Furham, 2008; Williams
y Andrade, 2008).
MacIntyre y Gardner (1994)
definieron la ansiedad en lengua
extranjera como un sentimiento
de tensin y aprensin especficamente asociado a contextos de segunda lengua, que afecta a la expresin y la comprensin oral y al
aprendizaje; y Horwitz et al. (1986)
describieron la ansiedad en la lengua como un complejo nico de
autopercepciones, creencias, sentimientos y comportamientos relacionados con el aprendizaje de la
lengua que se desprende de la especificidad inherente a dicho proceso (p. 28).
Los efectos de la ansiedad en
la lengua extranjera se han estudiado desde los aos setenta (Scovel, 1978; Tobias, 1979), pero no
fue hasta los ochenta cuando apa-
10
Mtodo
Participantes
En este estudio participaron
216 estudiantes espaoles, 120 mujeres (55.5%) y 96 hombres (44.5%),
con edades comprendidas entre
los 18 y los 39 aos (M = 20.39;
DT = 3.69). Los estudiantes pertenecan a seis titulaciones diferentes de las facultades de Formacin
del Profesorado, de Informtica y
de Traduccin e Interpretacin de la
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran
Canaria, Espaa, y sus niveles de
ingls eran el B1 (n = 117), el B2
(n = 87) y el C1 (n = 12). Los niveles de lengua se haban establecido
siguiendo las pautas del Marco Comn Europeo de Referencia para las
Lenguas: Aprendizaje, Enseanza
y Evaluacin (MCER), en ingls,
the Common European Framework
of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEFR),
marco utilizado para describir los logros de los aprendices de lenguas
extranjeras en Europa. El trabajo
de Martnez Baztn (2008) presenta
las correspondencias entre los niveles del MCER y los niveles determinados por el Consejo Americano para la Enseanza de Lenguas
Extranjeras, en ingls, The American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL). As, el
B1 correspondera al nivel Intermedio-Medio e Intermedio-Alto, el B2,
al Intermedio-Alto y Avanzado-Bajo
y el C1, al Avanzado-Medio y al
Avanzado-Alto.
11
12
Procedimiento
Se solicit permiso a los decanos de las tres facultades para administrar el cuestionario y los participantes dieron su consentimiento
por escrito para colaborar en la investigacin. Se asegur la estricta
confidencialidad tanto de los participantes como para los resultados
individuales.
Despus de que el investigador
explicara el propsito de la investigacin, se pidi a los participantes que completaran el cuestionario
sociodemogrfico. A continuacin,
se entreg la versin espaola de
la escala FLCAS y el investigador ley en alto las instrucciones
y anim a los participantes a hacer
preguntas para aclarar posibles dudas. El investigador les pidi que
pensaran en sus experiencias previas con el aprendizaje del ingls
en la universidad. Los participantes dispusieron de 20 minutos para
rellenar el cuestionario en horario
de clase. El periodo elegido para
aplicar los cuestionarios fue el segundo semestre del ao acadmico.
Se asegur a los aprendices que
los resultados no tendran ningn
efecto en su nota final ni en su expediente acadmico.
Anlisis de datos
Como ya se ha mencionado, se
utiliz la escala FLCAS en esta investigacin. En aquellos casos en
que los tems estaban expresados en
negativo, las respuestas fueron in-
Resultados
Consistencia interna y fiabilidad
test-retest
Se calcul la consistencia interna del instrumento. El alfa de
Cronbach fue de .93 y se obtuvo
una correlacin test-retest de .93
con un intervalo de cuatro semanas
(n = 68). Este resultado es igual al
obtenido por Horwitz et al. (1986)
en su estudio (r = .93), y revela una
alta fiabilidad interna.
13
14
Tabla 1
Medias y Desviaciones Tpicas de los tems, de los Factores y de las Puntuaciones Totales
de la Ansiedad, con Diferencias de Gnero
General (N=216) Mujeres (n=119) Hombres (n=97)
M (DT)
M (DT)
M (DT)
Ansiedad
FLCAS 1
FLCAS 2
FLCAS 3
FLCAS 4
FLCAS 5
FLCAS 6
FLCAS 7
FLCAS 8
FLCAS 9
FLCAS 10
FLCAS 11
FLCAS 12
FLCAS 13
FLCAS 14
FLCAS 15
FLCAS 16
FLCAS 17
FLCAS 18
FLCAS 19
FLCAS 20
FLCAS 21
FLCAS 22
FLCAS 23
FLCAS 24
FLCAS 25
FLCAS 26
FLCAS 27
FLCAS 28
FLCAS 29
FLCAS 30
FLCAS 31
FLCAS 32
FLCAS 33
3.71 (1.21)
3.40 (1.30)
3.14 (1.33)
3.28 (1.38)
2.03 (1.12)
2.84 (1.30)
3.32 (1.24)
3.18 (1.18)
3.93 (1.14)
4.14 (1.14)
3.12 (1.37)
3.65 (1.28)
3.52 (1.36)
2.82 (1.34)
3.67 (1.17)
3.21 (1.29)
2.81 (1.26)
3.45 (1.21)
2.62 (1.18)
3.35 (1.32)
2.08 (1.00)
3.26 (1.18)
3.31 (1.28)
3.24 (1.32)
2.81 (1.26)
3.03 (1.44)
3.44 (1.24)
2.53 (1.19)
3.14 (1.35)
2.98 (1.25)
2.75 (1.40)
2.69 (1.21)
3.80 (1.09)
4.05 (1.06)
3.54 (1.22)
3.31 (1.29)
3.51 (1.25)
1.95 (1.06)
2.62 (1.25)
3.59 (1.21)
3.22 (1.19)
4.11 (1.04)
4.36 (0.95)
3.34 (1.29)
3.94 (1.16)
3.68 (1.30)
2.87 (1.31)
3.83 (1.09)
3.42 (1.29)
2.74 (1.28)
3.70 (1.10)
2.71 (1.17)
3.51 (1.31)
2.10 (1.04)
3.32 (1.22)
3.57 (1.23)
3.44 (1.22)
2.84 (1.27)
3.07 (1.43)
3.56 (1.21)
2.64 (1.25)
3.19 (1.32)
3.04 (1.22)
2.94 (1.47)
2.77 (1.22)
3.97 (1.02)
3.27 (1.25)
3.20 (1.38)
2.91 (1.34)
2.97 (1.49)
2.14 (1.20)
3.09 (1.31)
2.95 (1.19)
3.14 (1.16)
3.68 (1.21)
3.85 (1.31)
2.84 (1.43)
3.25 (1.34)
3.29 (1.42)
2.74 (1.40)
3.47 (1.25)
2.94 (1.24)
2.89 (1.25)
3.15 (1.25)
2.49 (1.17)
3.11 (1.30)
2.05 (0.95)
3.18 (1.14)
2.95 (1.26)
2.94 (1.38)
2.75 (1.26)
2.94 (1.43)
3.25 (1.25)
2.41 (1.12)
3.05 (1.39)
2.89 (1.29)
2.46 (1.25)
2.55 (1.18)
3.56 (1.15)
3623.5
4849.5
4613.5
4452.5
5203.0
4444.5
3972.5
5369.5
4394.5
4277.0
4483.5
3929.5
4747.5
5260.0
4652.5
4368.5
5147.5
4154.5
4969.0
4555.0
5482.5
4993.0
4027.0
4327.5
5312.0
5280.5
4741.5
4967.0
5165.5
5105.5
4505.0
4922.5
4328.0
4.56***
1.77
2.19*
2.67**
.95
2.64**
3.72***
.51
2.74**
3.22***
2.54*
3.86***
1.97*
.76
2.07*
2.71**
.89
3.22***
1.32
2.28*
.122
.92
3.48***
2.62**
.51
.58
1.86
1.09
.75
.86
2.26*
1.29
2.77**
Aprensin comunicativa
3.30 (0.91)
3.50 (0.89)
3.04 (0.88)
3549.0
3.37***
3.10 (0.66)
3.17 (0.65)
2.99 (0.66)
4691.5
2.02*
Incomodidad
2.63 (0.73)
M (DT)
2.59 (0.75)
M (DT)
2.66 (0.71)
M (DT)
5148.0
T
1.12
P
** p < .01;
3.19
.002
15
16
Tabla 2
Anlisis Factorial de la FLCAS con Rotacin Promax
Aprensin
Comunicativa
Ansiedad ante
la evaluacin
Incomodidad
FLCAS27
FLCAS24
FLCAS3
FLCAS18
FLCAS31
FLCAS13
FLCAS9
FLCAS20
FLCAS26
FLCAS16
FLCAS1
FLCAS23
FLCAS12
FLCAS7
FLCAS2
FLCAS29
FLCAS28
FLCAS4
FLCAS11
FLCAS25
FLCAS15
FLCAS8
FLCAS30
FLCAS19
FLCAS21
FLCAS22
FLCAS10
FLCAS32
FLCAS14
FLCAS5
FLCAS17
Eigenvalue
.842
.842
.808
.756
.752
.741
.734
.731
.728
.722
.664
.658
.655
.644
.642
.608
.595
.574
.546
11.54
1.78
.603
.584
.467
.448
1.660
% varianza
34.99
5.41
5.040
.650
.622
.594
.570
.482
.468
.413
.364
Tabla 3
Correlaciones de Pearson entre los tems, los Factores y las Puntuaciones
Totales de la Ansiedad
Edad
Nivel
Calificacin
FLCAS1
FLCAS2
FLCAS3
FLCAS4
FLCAS5
FLCAS6
FLCAS7
FLCAS8
FLCAS9
FLCAS10
FLCAS11
FLCAS12
FLCAS13
FLCAS14
FLCAS15
FLCAS16
FLCAS17
FLCAS18
FLCAS19
FLCAS20
FLCAS21
FLCAS22
FLCAS23
FLCAS24
FLCAS25
FLCAS26
FLCAS27
FLCAS28
FLCAS29
FLCAS30
FLCAS31
FLCAS32
FLCAS33
.164*
.094
.195**
.059
.094
.172*
.186**
.055
.234**
.179**
.117
.229**
.208**
.045
.111
.206**
.104
.083
.164*
.176*
.126
.009
.148*
.239**
.017
.233**
.183**
.141*
.152*
.114
.216**
.184**
.144*
.084
.004
.150*
.059
.162*
.036
.094
.102
.117
.067
.053
.122
.121
.083
.094
.087
.039
.101
.049
.155*
.021
.102
.074
.241**
.069
.082
.108
.100
.151*
.062
.139*
.219**
.073
.228**
.110
.166*
.152*
.094
.022
.311**
.227**
.241**
.058
.120
.274**
.189**
.078
.095
.137
.119
.309**
.110
.150*
.184**
.123
.345**
.234**
.243**
.317**
.180*
.129
.193**
.298**
.154*
.059
.191**
Aprensin comunicativa
.252**
.174*
.290**
.175*
.083
.291**
Incomodidad
.199**
.131
.046
.251**
.157*
.304**
* p = .05;
** p = .01.
17
18
Anlisis de regresin
Se efectu un anlisis de regresin para determinar los predictores
de la ansiedad ante el aprendizaje de
la lengua extranjera. El objetivo del
anlisis de regresin (Mtodo Enter)
era determinar si las variables sociodemogrficas edad, gnero, calificacin y nivel influan en la ansiedad.
Se detect que haba una relacin significativa entre las va-
riables sociodemogrficas y la
ansiedad (p = .000; R 2 = 0.192;
R = 0.438), lo que significa que el
modelo de regresin presentado es
significativo. Tres de las variables,
la edad, el gnero y la calificacin,
explicaban el 19.2% de la varianza.
La calificacin fue la variable que
tuvo mayor impacto sobre la ansiedad, seguida de la edad y el gnero, como se puede apreciar en la
Tabla 4.
Tabla 4
Modelo de Regresin para Predecir la Ansiedad ante la Lengua Extranjera
Variable
(Constante)
Edad
Gnero
Calificacin
Nivel
Error tpico
Beta
164.987
1.382
9.352
3.649
3.695
10.835
.447
3.255
.924
2.849
.205
.195
.268
.090
15.227
2.970
2.873
3.948
1.297
.000
.003
.005
.000
.196
Discusin
La investigacin realizada dentro del rea del aprendizaje de una
LE ha prestado especial atencin
a la ansiedad. Sin embargo, ni las
lenguas extranjeras ni los contextos en que se han llevado a cabo los
trabajos han sido los mismos que
el del presente estudio. La principal aportacin de esta investigacin
es presentar el nivel de ansiedad de
216 universitarios espaoles aprendices de ingls como LE. Esta investigacin tambin arroja luz sobre
el papel que desempean el gnero,
la edad, la lengua, el nivel y la cali-
19
20
variable gnero no ha recibido suficiente atencin en el rea del aprendizaje de la segunda lengua (Jimnez Cataln, 2003; Sunderland,
2000, 2010). Tradicionalmente, el
gnero ha sido examinado como un
factor de variacin en sociolingstica, y las investigaciones en este
mbito han sealado que las mujeres tienden a formular ms preguntas en las conversaciones, recurren
a expresiones ms formales e interrumpen con menos frecuencia que
los hombres (Holmes, 1994; West
y Zimmerman, 1983). Adems, si
se tiene en cuenta que algunos estudios sobre el aprendizaje de una lengua extranjera han aportado evidencia de que las mujeres tienen una
actitud ms positiva hacia el aprendizaje de la lengua, estn ms motivadas, y se desenvuelven mejor en
una LE que los hombres (Bacon y
Finneman, 1992; Kaylani, 1996), la
necesidad de continuar analizando
cmo perciben ambos sexos el proceso de aprendizaje es incuestionable. En consecuencia, y con el
fin de comprender mejor la forma
como los hombres y las mujeres se
enfrentan al aprendizaje de la lengua, sera interesante medir su ansiedad utilizando una metodologa
cualitativa.
En lo que respecta a la edad, los
resultados sugieren que los aprendices ms jvenes tienden a ser ms
ansiosos, tienen ms aprensin comunicativa, ms ansiedad ante la
evaluacin y suelen sentirse ms
incmodos al hablar ingls. Por el
contrario, el estudio de Bailey et al.
21
22
Referencias
Aida, Y. (1994). Examination of Horwitz, Horwitz and Copes construct
of foreign language anxiety: The case
of students of Japanese. Modern Language Journal, 78, 155-168.
Arnaiz, P. (2001). Output y enseanza
del ingls como lengua extranjera:
23
24
25
26
Mills, N., y Pajares, F. (2006). A reevaluation of the role of anxiety: Selfefficacy, anxiety, and their relation
to reading and listening proficiency.
Foreign Language Annals, 39(2),
276-295.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Bailey, P., y Daley,
C. E. (1999). Factors associated with
foreign language anxiety. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 20, 217-239.
Onwuegbuzie, A., Bailey, P., y Daley, C.
(2000). Cognitive, affective, personality and demographic predictors of foreign language achievement. Journal
of Educational Research, 94(1), 3-13.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Bailey, P., y Daley,
C. E. (2001). Cognitive, affective,
personality, and demographic predictors of foreign language achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 3-15.
Prez-Paredes, P., y Martnez-Snchez,
F. (2000-2001). A Spanish version
of the foreign language classroom
anxiety scale: Revisiting Aidas factor analysis. Revista Espaola de
Lingstica Aplicada RESLA, 14,
337-352.
Price, M. L. (1991). The subjective experience of foreign language anxiety: Interviews with highly anxious
students. En E. K. Horwitz, y D. J.
Young (Eds.), Language anxiety:
From Theory and Research to Classroom Implications (pp. 101-108). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Rodrguez, M., y Abreu, O. (2003). The
stability of general foreign language
classroom anxiety across English and
French. The Modern Language Journal, 87(3), 365-374.
Scovel, T. (1978). The effect of affect. A
review of the anxiety literature. Language Learning, 28, 129-142.
Sparks, R., y Ganschow, L. (2007). Is the
Foreign Language Classroom Anxi-
ety Scale (FLCAS) measuring anxiety or language skills? Foreign Language Annals, 40, 260-287.
Spielmann, G., y Radnofsky, M. (2001).
Learning language under tension:
New directions from a qualitative
study. Modern Language Journal,
85, 259-278.
Sunderland, J. (2000). Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education. Language
Teaching, 33, 203-223.
Sunderland, J. (2010). Theorizing gender perspectives in foreign and second language learning. En R. M.
Jimnez-Cataln (Ed.), Gender perspectives on vocabulary in foreign
and second languages (pp. 1-22).
England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Swain, M., y Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive
processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 371-391.
Tobias, S. (1979). Anxiety research in
educational psychology. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 71, 573582.
West, C., y Zimmerman, D. H. (1983).
Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. En
B. Thorne, C. Kramarae y N. Henley
(Eds.), Language, gender and society
(pp. 103-118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Williams, K. E., y Andrade, M. R.
(2008). Foreign language learning
anxiety in Japanese EFL university
classes: Causes, coping, and locus
of control. Electronic Journal of
Foreign Language Teaching, 5(2),
181-191.
Wilson, M. (2001). The changing discourse of language study. English
Journal, 90(4), 31-36.
Worde von, R. (2003). Students perspectives on foreign language anxiety. Inquiry, 8(1), 21-40.
27