Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Summary
Methods for miscible flooding have been researched and
field tested since the early 1950's. This paper reviews
the technical state of the art and field behavior to date for
the major miscible processes: first-contact miscible,
condensing-gas drive, vaporizing-gas drive, and CO 2
flooding. Important technological areas selected for
review include phase behavior and miscibility,
sweepout, unit displacement efficiency, and process
design variations. COrflood technology is emphasized,
and several technical issues are identified that still need
to be resolved. Rules of thumb and ranges of conditions
are discussed for applicability of each process. A comparison is made of the incremental recovery and solvent
slug effectiveness observed in field trials of the different
processes. From the limited data available, there is no
clear-cut evidence that field results on average and for a
given slug size have been appreciably better or poorer for
one process compared with another.
Introduction
The search for an effective and economical solvent along
with development and field testing of miscible-flood
processes has continued since the early 1950's. Early
focus was on hydrocarbon solvents, and three types of
hydrocarbon-miscible processes were developed: the
first-contact miscible process; the vaporizing-gas drive
process, often called high-pressure gas drive; and the
condensing-gas drive process, sometimes called
enriched-gas drive.
First-contact miscible solvents mix directly with reservoir oils in all proportions and their mixtures always remain single phase. Other solvents are not directly miscible with reservoir oils, but under appropriate conditions
of pressure and solvent composition these solvents can
achieve miscibility in-situ by mass transfer of oil and sol01492136/83/00049992$00.25
Copyright 1983 Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME
APRIL 1983
vent components through repeated contact with the reservoir oil. Miscibility achieved in this manner is called
"multiple-contact" or "dynamic" miscibility. The
vaporIzmg-gas drive process achieves dynamic
miscibility by in-situ vaporization of the intermediatemolecular-weight hydrocarbons from the reservoir oil into the injected gas. Dynamic miscibility is achieved in
the condensing-gas drive process by in-situ transfer of
intermediate-molecular-weight hydrocarbons from the
injected gas into the reservoir oil.
Propane 01:' liquid petroleum gas (LPG) mixtures
typically were the solvents used in first-contact
hydrocarbon miscible flooding, whereas natural gas at
high pressure and natural gas with appreciable concentrations of intermediate-molecular-weight hydrocarbons
were injection fluids in vaporizing-gas drive and
condensing-gas drive floods. The high cost of propane,
LPG, or enriched hydrocarbon gas dictated that these
solvents be injected as slugs, which usually were driven
with natural gas. Flue gas and nitrogen also have been
found to achieve dynamic miscibility at high pressures
with some oils by the vaporizing-gas drive mechanism.
Hydrocarbon miscible processes have received extensive field testing since the 1950's, primarily in the U.S.
and Canada. More than 100 projects were initiated during this time period. \-9 The majority were small-scale
pilot tests involving one or at most a few injection wells;
however, a number of large projects were undertaken involving several thousand acres or more (> 4 X 10 6 m 2 ).
A few projects tested flue-gas injection.
Recent miscible flooding interest in the U.S. has
centered on the CO 2 process, although use of CO 2 for
oil recovery is not a recent idea. Research dates to the
early 1950's. CO 2 has several advantages compared
with hydrocarbon solvents or flue gas. It often achieves
dynamic miscibility at a significantly lower pressure than
natural gas or flue gas, so more reservoirs can be
815
SINGLE LIQUID
3600
PHASE
3200
2800
;ff:
o
o
'"
in
.3 2400
a::
:::J
gJ
w
2000
a::
a.
0% V
1600
1200
0% Ul
90
80
800
70
60 50
40 30 20 10
VOLUME PERCENT
LOWER LIQUID PHASE
20
40
60
80
100
100 VOL %
100 VOL %
C
L...L--"-----'''-------8.>L-_''----''-_'''--''-_-''-----''-~
C
0.83 g/cm 3); and 3,500 psi (24.1 MPa) is about the
lower limit for miscibility pressure, which may be
substantially higher than this. Phase relations with flue
gas or nitrogen are more unfavorable for dynamic
miscibility than for methane, causing a higher miscibility
pressure, although the pressure increase may be small
with some oils of high saturation pressure. 14,15
The mechanism by which CO 2 achieves dynamic
miscibility is not thoroughly understood at this time. The
bulk of evidence to date indicates that a vaporizing-gas
drive mechanism prevails when reservoir temperature is
greater than about 120F (49C). 1618 However, CO 2 is
a much more powerful vaporizer of hydrocarbons than
natural gas or flue gas. Hydrocarbons as heavy as the
gasoline and gas/oil fractions are vaporized into the CO 2
front in addition to intermediate-molecular-weight
hydrocarbons, and, because of this, development of
vaporizing-gas drive miscibility with CO 2 can occur
with little or no C 2 through C 6 components present in
the crude oil. 18
At temperatures lower than about 120F (49C) the
situation becomes more complex. 17 ,19,20 This is illustrated by the pressure-composition diagram of Fig. 1.
At pressures higher than about 1,600 psi (11.0 MPa) for
this particular CO 2 /oil system, two liquid phases coexist
in the multiphase region rather than the gas/liquid
equilibrium typical of vaporizing-gas drive systems. At
pressures between about 1, 150 and 1,400 psi (7.9 and
9.7 MPa), three phases can be in equilibrium-two liquids and a gas. This type phase behavior has been
reported in the literature several times. 11,19,21,22
Gardner et al. 19 experimentally determined pseudoternary diagrams to investigate the liquid/liquid and threephase regions of Fig. 1. Their diagrams are shown in
Figs. 2 and 3. At 2,000 psi (13.8 MPa), Fig. 2, two liquid phases are in equilibrium. For phase behavior of the
type shown in this figure, dynamic miscibility can be
achieved in a manner analogous to the vaporizing-gas
drive miscibility for gas/liquid phase behavior.
LEGEND
U . FLUX, 8/0/FT2
i< 0 . VISCOSITY CP
X . LENGTH. FT
100
Y HEIGHT. FT
- PLAIT POINT
K
tlp
80
PERMEABILITY, MD
SOLVENT -OIL DENSITY
DIFFERENCE. GM CC
60
I-- III - - 1 - - - IV - - - M
40
65
=====r::======-
~=::-I~I
CRUDE
100VOl%~~~~dL~__~~__~~~~__~100VOl%
10
100
III
27
---~
1000
IV-
10,000
2050
100.000
u~o' x
K 0tlp Y
Sweepout
Solvents typically are less dense and less viscous than
reservoir oils. Laboratory research and field testing have
shown that gravity tonguing and viscous fingering are
more severe than in waterflooding because of these properties. As a result, sweepout usually is poorer than in
waterflooding for equivalent PV of fluid injected.
Sweepout depends on mobility ratio and on the ratio of
viscous (horizontal) and gravity (vertical) forces. Four
flow regimes are possible in the vertical cross section,
depending on the viscous/gravity force ratio.24 This is
shown schematically in Fig. 4.
At very low values of viscous/gravity force ratio
(Region I), the displacement is characterized by a single
gravity tongue or finger overriding the oil. The geometry
of this finger and vertical sweepout depend on the particular viscous/gravity ratio of the displacement. At
higher values of viscous/gravity ratio (Region II), the
APRIL
1983
817
recovery if water is overinjected during alternate solvent/water injection. 43 Several studies with reservoir
rocks, however, have found little or no trapping of oil
caused by mobile water, at least for the water saturations
investigated, perhaps because of the mixed wettability of
these reservoir rocks. 49,57,61,62 Nevertheless, evaluation
of potential oil trapping is advisable if alternate solvent/water injection is planned.
Oil can be bypassed by miscible solvents because of
dead-end pore structure and because of microscopic-tomacroscopic permeability heterogeneities. Several
publications have shown the effect of laboratory corescale heterogeneities in carbonate cores. 62 ,63 There are
no data published so far showing a significant effect of
this sort in sandstones. Bypassed oil saturations ranging
from 0.13 to 25 % PV were reported for a series of cores
from one carbonate reservoir. 62 However, for reservoir
times and rates, some of the oil located in core-scale
heteroeneities may subsequently be recovered by diffusion. 6 Techniques are not well developed for determining the amount of oil that may be permanently bypassed
because of pore structure.
Gardner et al. 19 published calculations showing that
the magnitude of residual oil saturation caused by liquid
precipitation in CO 2 floods depends on the size of the
multi phase region and on the degree of fluid mixing during the displacement. This should be true for vaporizinggas drives as well.
There have been several field tests published where oil
saturations left behind solvent fronts were determined by
coring. A core taken 100 ft (30.5 m) from an injector in
the Seeligson condensing-gas drive flood showed good
permeability zones of this sandstone were essentially
swept clean of oil. 64 A pressure core taken behind the
enriched-gas front at South Swan Hills found an average
7.9% PV oil saturation in this carbonate formation. 65
Pressure cores taken in the Mead-Strawn sandstone
behind a CO 2 flood at distances of 50 and 100 ft (15.2
and 30.5 m) from an injection well had average oil
saturations of 10 and 5% PV stock-tank oil,66 and a
pressure core taken 35 ft (10.7 m) from a CO 2 injector in
the San Andres carbonate formation of west Texas found
oil saturations that varied from 3 to 30% PV stock-tank
oil. 67
Process Design Variations
Miscible floods have been designed for continuous solvent injection, for solvent slugs driven by a miscible gas,
and for solvent slugs driven by water. In addition, many
process designs have called for alternate water injection
for mobility ratio improvement, either with the drive gas
alone or with both the solvent slug and drive gas.
Essentially all first-contact miscible projects have used
relatively small slugs of LPG, approximately 1 to 12 %
hydrocarbon pore volume (HCPV), driven by natural
gas. Laboratory research has shown that mixing of
oil/solvent/drive gas by dispersion,68 aggravated by
viscous fingering, gravity tonguing, and channeling
caused by stratification, can rapidly dilute small solvent
slugs to concentrations that are no longer miscible. 69
Fingering can also cause drive gas to physically breach a
solvent slug and directly contact oil, with which it is
immiscible. 26
Condensing-gas drive projects typically have used
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY
APRIL
1983
Area
(acres)
10
Slug
Size'
(% HCPV)
10
Incremental
Recovery'
(%OOIP)
7.0
0.67
(KS)
Johnson
Ohio
1958
37
1.1
18
4,600
10
164
5.5
5 to 34"
Atlantic
1959
35
40
2,400
32
10
7.5
11.5
>0.9
(NE)
South Ward
1.5
2.2
(TX)
Adena Clar A
(CO)
Adena Hough
A (CO)
Hibberd Pool
South
Cuyama
(CA)
Phegly Unit
Union
1962
44
0.42
6.5
5,500
28
0.46
2.2
Union
1963
44
0.42
6.5
5,500
28
80
12.5
0.6
1.2
Atlantic
1963
35
1.7
23
4,300
60
80
7.4
Mobil
1964
37
30
4.900
785
13.5
1.6
3.7
0.85
>3
*Treated area .
Ultimate estimated from decline-curve analysis.
Project
SACROC main flood
Phases I and II
SAC ROC tertiary
pilot
Willard Wasson
Slaughter Estate
Twofreds
Little Creek' ,
Levelland 736
Incremental
Recovery
(%OOIP)
7'
Gross
C0 2 /0il Ratio
(Mcf/STB)
Slug Size
(% HCPV)
Breakthrough
(% HCPV)
12 to 15
2 to 5
10 to 18
3.5
15 to 20
20
26
10'
10 to 15
25 and
increasing
160
50 and
increasing
8 to 12'
18 and
increasing
3 and
increasing
18
6 and
increasing
5 to 7*
5 and
decreasing
26
15
15 to 20
6 to 7*
24
29 and
decreasing
APRIL
1983
CO 2 Miscible Projects
There have been at least 36 tests of this process in the
U.S., and in early 1982 there were at least 28 active projects. With one exception, all were started in the 1970's
and 1980's. 5,6,9,12,50-52,55,66,91,106-117 Most projects
were small-scale tests of less than 100 acres (405 000
m 2), although three were large enough to be considered
commercial-size floods rather than pilot tests. 50,55,108
Unlike the hydrocarbon-miscible processes, the majority
of CO 2 floods have tested tertiary recovery. Two of the
largest floods, however, are predominantly secondaryrecovery floods: SAC ROC [33,000 acres (133 x 10 6
m 2)]50 and Crossett [1,700 acres (6.9 X 10 6 m 2)].55
CO 2 was injected continuously or in very large slugs
in at least five projects, similar to continuous injection of
the high-pressure l1;as solvent in vaporizing-gas drive
projects. SS, 106,108, ITo,114 Moderate slug sizes were injected in the other projects, but in most of these tests no
attempt was made to achieve miscible displacement at
the trailing edge of the slug. 50 ,51,66,109,1l1-113 Instead,
the CO 2 slug was immiscibly driven with water, leaving
a residual CO 2 saturation in the reservoir. Alternate injection of water with the CO 2 slul1; was tried in about
half the projects. IO ,50-52,91,107,111-IT3 Most floods have
been in low-relief, essentially horizontal reservoirs,
although two projects were carried out in high-relief
reservoirs and were designed to be gravity-stable. 110,114
Projects have been about equally divided between sandstone and carbonate formations. Oil gravities generally
have been in the range of 30 to 50 API (0.78 to 0.88
g/cm 3) with viscosities less than 2 cp (2 mPas).
Field trials have shown that C02 miscible flooding is
a method for both secondary and tertiary oil recovery. At
Crossett, oil was displaced and banked by CO 2 flooding
in a reservoir that had been produced by solution-gas
drive and contained a free gas saturation at the start of
CO 2 injection. 55 The ability of CO 2 to displace and to
recover some of the residual oil left after waterflooding
has been demonstrated by such tertiary-recovery field
tests as the Little Creek, 106 SACROC, 109 and Slaughter
Estate pilot tests,52,91 and by the Twofreds project. 108
Most projects, both secondary- and tertiary-recovery
floods, have experienced early CO 2 breakthroughs,
usually after injection of 0.05 to 0.2 HCPV total fluid
821
20r--------.--------r--------r------~
>cr:
w
>
w
f-
aw
-,
~
60
x.<c--t-
50
~S
c'<?'
a a
40
-' f<{
a >
>=
cr: <{
30
:::; cr:
20
Cl-
z
f- w
z a
w
:::;
fZ
10
cr:
0
0
05
1.0
15
2.0
I.
5
(20% SLUG)
"
o'<<?'
".if.
/,
>!'"
, - WILLARD-WASSON (CALC.)
,/'
10
w w
cr:
-'
N~
cr: 0
'v\~
15
/,
\i::
( 10-18% SLUG)
o~~~--~--------~------~------~
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
no direct measure of incremental oil. Simulator projections, after history matching performance, indicated an
ultimate recovery of about 7% OOIP for slug sizes that
varied between 12 and 15% HCPV.
Incremental production for the selected projects shown
in Fig. 7 began after injection of about 0.1 to 0.2 HCPV
of total fluid. After a period of almost linear increase in
incremental recovery with cumulative injection, the
recovery curves bend over and gradually approach the
ultimate recovery value. As in hydrocarbon-miscible
floods, first incremental recovery in the tertiary-recovery
CO 2 floods has occurred either shortly before or coincidentally with C02 breakthrough, and the bulk of incremental oil is produced concurrently with the C02.
Lower-than-anticipated CO 2 injectivity has been
observed in a number of field trials. 52,55 This seems to
be particularly true in the low-temperature carbonate
reservoirs of west Texas. Lower-than-anticipated water
injectivity has also been observed when CO 2 and water
were injected alternately. 52 However, injectivity in the
Willard Wasson test, even with alternate injection of
CO 2 and water, did not deteriorate appreciably after fillup.51
Operating problems have been more severe than in
waterflooding, with corrosion, leaks, and scaling being
mentioned in addition to precipitation of a heavy
hydrocarbon from the crude occasionally being observed. Several excellent articles have been published
concerning operating practices in CO 2
floods. 50,51 ,55, 106, 118-121
Comparison of Processes
Incremental recovery and slug effectiveness in C02
floods are compared with these quantities from firstcontact and condensing-gas drive miscible floods in
Figs. 7 and 8 for selected projects where there are sufficient data to make the comparisons. Slug effectiveness is
defined here to be the incremental oil recovered per gross
reservoir barrel of miscible fluid injected. In condensinggas drive projects, the miscible fluid was considered to
be the lean gas/LPG mixture injected, rather than the
LPG only. Conceptually, for a given process in a given
reservoir, incremental recovery should increase and slug
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY
30
a.
LEGEND:
25
";?
>-'
.?
a: 20
w
.?
0
()
w 15
a:
.?
>
.1
10
w
a:
()
RICHGAS DRIVE
C02 FLOOD
ESTIMATED FROM SIMULATIONS
OR COMPARISONS BUT NOT
MEASURED DIRECTLY
DIRECTION OF INCREASE
10
40
C)
50
a:cn
...JC)
~,
...J1n
-I-
30
LEGEND:
0
-In
~a:
:::la:
.
.-
20
.?
.?
FIRSTCONTACT MISCIBLE
.
.
.1 . .-
...J
I-
o~
60
70
150
160
O~--L---~--~--~--~--~--~~--~~
10
20
30
40
50
60
SLUG SIZE, % HCPV
70
150
160
esses, with production of the bulk of incremental oil concurrently with solvent and drive gas.
4. Greatest field trial success to date has been
achieved with the vaporizing-gas drive method, probably
because the miscible fluid has been injected continuously
rather than as a slug and because mobility ratio for these
floods has been more favorable on average. The process
has had limited application, however, because of the
high miscibility-pressure requirement.
5. A low miscibility-pressure requirement often is a
significant advantage of COrmiscible flooding. This
process could have significant future application in areas
with economical CO 2 supplies from natural deposits or
surface sources.
6. Incremental recovery ranged from about 3 to 20%
OOIP for 16 first-contact miscible, condensing-gas
drive, and CO 2 -flood projects where this quantity could
be estimated from field data. Slug sizes of the miscible
injection fluids in these projects ranged from 4 to 160%
HCPV, and with few exceptions incremental recovery
was less than 1 STB/ gross RB (1 stock-tank m 3 / gross res
m 3) of miscible fluid injected, even for the smallest slug
sizes.
7. Within the data scatter for these 16 projects, there is
no clear-cut evidence that on average one process has
performed appreciably better or worse than another for a
given slug size.
Conclusions
1. After 30 years' research, there is a considerable
body of knowledge concerning the mechanisms of
miscibility and fluid flow. Even so, advances are needed
in a number of important areas such as: improved
understanding oflow-temperature CO 2 -flood miscibility
and of the factors affecting CO 2 mobility; improved
understanding of sweepout for tertiary recovery, slug
processes, and dynamic miscibility; and improved
predictive methods and/or guidelines for slug processes
for selecting between a miscible and immiscible drive
fluid and for estimating optimal slug size.
2. All the miscible processes are applicable for both
secondary or tertiary recovery in sandstone or carbonate
reservoirs.
3. In horizontal floods, relatively early solvent and
drive-gas breakthroughs should be expected for all procAPRIL 1983
References
1. Craig, F.F. Jr. and Owens, W.W.: "Miscible Slug Flooding-
171.
60. Raimondi, P., Torcaso, M.A., and Henderson, J.H.: "The Effect of Interstitial Water on the Mixing of Hydrocarbons During a
Miscible Displacement Process," Minerallnduslries Experimental Slalion Circular No. 61, Pennsy Ivania State U., University
Park (1961).
61. Christian, L.D. el al.: "Planning A Tertiary Oil Recovery Project for Jay/LEC Fields Unit," J. Pel. Tech. (Aug. 1981)
1535-44.
62. Spence, A.P. and Watkins, R.W.: "The Effect of Microscopic
Core Heterogeneity on Miscible Flood Residual Oil Saturation,"
paper SPE 9229 presented at the 1980 SPE Annual Technical
Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Sept. 21-24; accepted for
publication in Soc. Pet. Eng. J.
63. Wizard Lake D-3A Pool-Engineering Sludy of Primary Performance and Miscible Flooding, Texaco Exploration Co. Application to Alberta Oil and Gas Conservation Board, Calgary (Dec.
1968).
64. Walker, J.W. and Turner, J.L.: "Performance of Seeligson Zone
20B-07 Enriched-Gas-Drive Project," J. Pel. Tech. (April 1968)
369-73.
65. Griffith, J.D. and Cyca, L.G.: "Performance of South Swan
Hills Miscible Flood," J. Pet. Tech. (July 1981) 1319-26.
66. Holm, L.W. and O'Brien, L.J.: "Carbon Dioxide Test at the
Mead-Strawn Field," J. Pel. Tech. (April 1972) 431-42.
67. Bilhartz, H.L. and Charlson, G.S.: "Coring for In-Situ Saturations in the Willard Unit CO 2 Flood Mini-Test," paper SPE
7050 presented at the 1978 SPE Symposium on Improved
Methods for Oil Recovery, Tulsa, April 16-18.
68. Perkins, T.K. and Johnston, O.e.: "A Review of Diffusion and
Dispersion in Porous Media," Soc. Pel. Eng. 1. (March 1963)
70-84; Trans., AIME, 228.
69. Koonce, K.T. and Blackwell, R.J.: "Idealized Behavior of Solvent Banks in Stratified Reservoirs," Soc. Pel. Eng. J. (Dec.
1965) 318-28; Trans., AIME, 234.
70. Reitzel, G.A. and Calion, G.O.: "Pool Description and Periormance Analysis Leads to Understanding Golden Spike's Miscible
Flood," J. Cdn. Pel. Tech. (April-June 1977) 39-48.
71. "Banff Shoots for 97 % Recovery at Rainbow Key," PeT. Eng.
(April 1969) 56-58.
72. Martin, W.E.: "The Wizard Lake D-3A Pool Miscible Flood,"
paper SPE 10026 presented at the 1982 SPE IntI. Petroleum Exhibition and Technical Symposium, Beijing, China, March
19-22.
73. Moscrip, R. III: "Butane Injection in San Pedro Block D," Pel.
Eng. (Sept. 1958) B-IO-B-24.
74. Jenks, L.H., Campbell, J.B., and Binder, G.G. Jr.: "A Field
Test of the Gas-Driven Liquid Propane Method of Oil
Recovery," Trans., AIME (1957) 210,34-39.
75. Sturdivant, W.e.: "Pilot Propane Project Completed in West
Texas Reef," J. Pel. Tech. (May 1959) 27-30.
76. "Biggest Miscible Flood Turned to Water at Pembina," Oilweek
(Aug. 1961).
77. Ramsey, E.H.: "Operating a Miscible Flood, Central Bistri
Unit," Prod. Monthly (Sept. 1961) 12-15.
78. Marrs, D.G.: "Field Results of Miscible-Displacement Using
Liquid Propane Driven by Gas, Parks Field Unit, Midland County, Texas," J. Pel. Tech. (April 1961) 327-32.
79. Des Brisay, e.L. et al.: "Review of Miscible Flood Performance
Intisar 'D' Field, Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya," J.
Pet. Tech. (Aug. 1982) 1651-60.
80. Cordiner, F.S. and Popp, M.P.: "Application of Miscible Phase
Displacement Techniques to a Water-Drive Reservoir, Johnson
Field, Cheyenne County, Nebraska," Drill. and Prod. Prac.,
API (1962) 144.
81. Holm, L.W.: "Propane-Gas-Water Miscible Floods in WateredOut Areas of the Adena Field, Colorado," J. Pel. Tech. (Oct.
1972) 1264-70.
82. Connally, e.A. Jf.: "Tertiary Miscible Flood in Phegley Unit,
Washington County, Colorado," paper SPE 3775 presented at
the 1972 SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, April
16-19.
83. Blanton, J.R., McCaskill, N., and Herbeck, E.F.: "Performance
of a Propane Slug Pilot in a Watered-Out Sand - South Ward
Field," J. Pet. Tech. (Oct. 1970) 1209-14.
84. Weimer, R.F.: "LPG-Gas Injection Recovery Process, Burkett
Unit, Greenwood County, Kansas," J. Pet. Tech. (Oct. 1963)
1067-72.
APRIL 1983
85. Chambers, F.T.: "Tertiary Oil Recovery Combination WaterGas Miscible Flood - Hibbard Pool," Prod. Monlhly (Jan.
1968) 17.
86. "Miscible Drives: A Growing Tool for Oil Recovery," Oil and
Gas J. (March 23, 1959) 64-69.
87. Morgan, J.T. and Thompson, J.E.: "Reservoir Study of the
Camp Sand, Haynesville Field, Louisiana," paper SPE 7553
presented at the 1978 SPE Annual Fall Technical Conference and
Exhibition, Houston, Oct. 1-3.
88. "Propane and Ethane Enriched Gas Injected in the 14-12 Sand at
the South Coles Levee Field," paper presented at the 1961 API
Spring Meeting; Abstract in World Oil (May 1961) 135.
89. Bouck, L.S., Hearn, C.L., and Dohy, G.: "Performance of a
Miscible Flood in the Bear Lake Cardium Unit, Pembina Field,
Alberta, Canada," J. Pet. Tech. (June 1975) 672-78.
90. Coan, S.W.: "Profitable Miscible Flood in a Watered-Out
Reservoir," Oil and Gas J. (Dec. 12, 1966) Ill.
91. Enhanced Oil-Recovery Field Reports, SPE, Dallas (1975-81).
92. Des Brisay, C.L. and Daniel, E.L.: "Supplemental Recovery
Development of the Intisar 'A' and 'D' Reef Fields, Libyan Arab
Republic," J. Pel. Tech. (July 1972) 785-91.
93. Des Brisay, e.L., Gray, J.W., and Spivak, A.: "Miscible Flood
Performance of the Intisar 'D' Reef Field, Libyan Arab
Republic," J. Pel. Tech. (Aug. 1975) 935-42.
94. Herbeck, E.R. and Blanton, J.R.: "Ten Years of Miscible
Displacement in Block 31 Field," J. Pel. Tech. (June 1961)
543-49.
95. Tittle, R.M. and From, K.T.: "Success of Flue Gas Program at
Neale Field," paper SPE 1907 presented at the 1967 SPE Annual
Meeting, Houston, Oct. 1-4.
96. Lackland, S.D. and Hurford, G.T.: "Advanced Technology Improves Recovery at Fairway," J. Pel. Tech. (March 1973)
354-58.
97. Pottier, J. el al.: "The High Pressure Injection of Miscible Gas at
Hassi-Messaoud," Proc., Third World Pet. Cong., The Hague
(1967) 3. 533-44.
98. Dyes, A.B. et al.: "Alternate Injection of HPG and Water - A
Two Well Pilot," paper SPE 4082 presented at the 1972 SPE Annual Meeting, San Antonio, Oct. 8-11.
99. Burt, R.A. Jr.: "High Pressure Miscible Gas Displacement Project, Bridger Lake Unit, Summit County," paper SPE 3487
presented at the 1971 SPE Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Oct.
3-6.
100. Cone, C.: "Case History of the University Block 9 (Wolfcamp)
Field - A Gas-Water Injection Secondary Recovery Project," J.
Pet. Tech. (Dec. 1970) 1485-91.
101. Meltzer, B.D., Hurdle, J.M., and Cassingham, R.W.: "An Efficient Gas Displacement Project - Raleigh Field, Mississippi,"
1. Pel. Tech. (May 1965) 509-14.
102. Eckles, W.W., Prihoda, e., and Holden, W.W.: "Unique
Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery for Very High-Pressure Wilcox
Sands Uses Cryogenic Nitrogen and Methane Mixture," J. Pel.
Tech. (June 1981) 971-84.
103. Christian, L.D. et al.: "Planning a Tertiary Oil Recovery Project
for Jay-LEC Fields Unit," J. Pel. Tech. (Aug. 1981) 1535-44.
104. Haag, J.W.: "Analysis and Design of a Deep Reservoir, High
Volume Nitrogen Injection Project in the R-l Sand, Lake Barre
Field," paper SPE 10159 presented at the 1981 SPE Annual
Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Oct. 5-7.
105. "Oklahoma Field Gets Flue Gas Injection," Oil and Gas J.
(Sept. 12, 1977) 54.
106. Hansen, P.W.: "A CO 2 Tertiary Recovery Pilot, Little Creek
Field, Mississippi," paper SPE 6747 presented at the 1977 SPE
Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Oct.
9-12.
107. Graham, B.D. el al.: "Design and Implementation of a
Levelland Unit CO 2 Tertiary Pilot," paper SPE 8831 presented
at the 1980 SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium,
Tulsa, April 20-23.
108. Thrash, J.e.: "Twofreds Field - A Tertiary Oil Recovery Project," paper SPE 8382 presented at the 1979 SPE Annual
Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, Sept. 23-26.
109. Graue, P.J. and Blevins, T.R.: "SACROC Tertiary CO 2 Pilot
Project," paper SPE 7090 presented at the 1978 SPE Symposium
on Improved Methods for Oil Recovery, Tulsa, April 16-19.
110. Perry, G.E.: "Weeks Island'S' Sand Reservoir B Gravity Stable
Miscible CO 2 Displacement, Iberia Parish, Louisiana," Proc.,
ERDA Symposium on Enhanced Oil, Gas Recovery, and Im825
826
141.5/(131.5+ API)
E-Ol
1.589 873
E-03
1.0*
E-02
2.831 685
E-Ol
3.048*
(OF-32)/1.8
x 6.894757
E+OO
E-02
x 9.290304*
x
x
x
x
g/ em 3
m3
Pa's
m3
m
C
kPa
m2
SPEJ
Original manuscript received in Society of Pelroleum Engineers office Aug. 31, 1981.
Paper accepted for publication Dec. 14, 1982. Revised manuscript received Feb. 9,
1983. Paper (SPE 9992) first presenled at the 1982 SPE IntI. Petroleum Exhibition
and Technical Symposium held in Beijing, China, March 18-26.