Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
A PHOTOELASTIC
IN
HI
mm
will
munnHH
l Minniniiiai
IHHr
!:>i.li;:\
';i.'|l>
.'.
;i
'
HHH
SCHOOL
L POSTGRADUATE
;,
CALIF. 93940
KNOX LIBRARY
NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOl
DUOI.EY
MONTFREY CA
93943-5101
by
C'.
ABSTRACT
The equip-
ment used, the method of model construction and the calibration of the
are tested and the results are compared with theory and with each other,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
Page
1.
Introduction
2.
Model Design
3.
Model Construction
13
4.
Material Calibration
14
5.
Test Apparatus
21
6.
Test Procedures
25
7.
Results of Tests
33
8.
43
9.
Bibliography
44
Appendix
I
II
III
IV
45
49
64
77
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure
Page
Assembly Drawing
1.
Model
2.
11
3.
Model Materials
15
4.
Model I Assembled
15
5.
17
6.
20
7.
23
8.
24
9.
26
10
10.
11.
Model
Apart
12.
30
13.
31
14.
34
15.
36
16.
37
17.
38
18.
48
19.
Model I, Slice
Light Field
1.
50
20.
Model I, Slice
Light Field
2.
51
21.
Model
Field
I.
I,
27
Slices
and 4.
28
52
Figure
Page
22.
Model I, Slice
Light Field
5.
53
23.
Model I, Slice
Light Field
6.
53
24.
Model
I,
Slice 4.
56
I,
Slice 4.
57
25.
Model
26.
58
27.
Model I, Slice 4.
60
61
6
28.
Model I, Slice 4.
29.
30.
1.
65
31.
2.
66
32.
2.
67
33.
3.
68
34.
69
35.
71
36.
72
37.
1.
73
38.
1.
39.
40.
62
74
75
78
NOMENCLATURE
Inside radius
mean radius
Angstrom units
outside radius
modulus of elasticity
moment
fringe order
force
internal pressure
&
Poisson's ratio
IT
<T
stress (general)
(T
d^
(JX
<Tr
(T^
Section
1.
Introduction
years.
"stress freezing" has been known and applied for about thirty
many investigators because of the relative ease with which useful results
can be obtained for problems with complicated geometries or having complex
systems of loading, and for which analytical solutions are cumbersome or
are not known.
It was decided to investigate stress distributions in a cylindrical
pipe.
This
Section
2.
Model Design
The matching
coupling was 2-3/4 inches long, with an inside diameter of 1.500 inch
and an outside diameter of 2.200 inches.
slightly loose sliding fit with the pipe, or about 1.905 inches.
and
The
2.
tn|.C
V V
F-m
_.v
CM
L_
10
11
circular profile of
inch radius.
figures as Model I.
One
The dimensions selected for the models were convenient to fit the
in sizing the pipe stubs was the presence of the end closures.
These
were almost rigid constraints on the pipe when the loading was applied,
shells as presented by Timoshenko and Woinowsky-Krieger, the disturbances die out with increasing distance along the cylinder.
z/-j3 r/ -/*>-
/*
and where
U=
I
Poisson's ratio,
The theory
where
[5]
is
T~qq or 1.05
The "safe
'
length cal-
culated here can only be an estimate inasmuch as the theory was developed
for axi-symmetric shells in which the original stress system was bi-
axial, containing only membrane stresses, and in which the final stress
system created by the localized disturbances was composed of shell bending stresses super-imposed upon the original system.
metry has a triaxial stress system and other deviations from the assumptions of the above theory; these are more fully described in Section
Section
3.
7.
Model Construction
The material selected for the model components was Hysol CP5-4290 cast
the components was Hysol R9-2039 liquid resin and H2-3475 hardener.
These are stock items available from Hysol Corporation, 1100 Seneca
Avenue, Olean, New York.
epoxy must be machined using light cuts to avoid excessive heat generation.
(Figure 3 shows the rough stock, two pipe sections, two couplings
hardener, by weight.
out, and the excess was wiped from the inner and outer surfaces of the
assembly.
and hardener mixture directly into the open ends of the assembly, one
foil'
molds.
13
copper tubing was molded into place in one end closure in order to
provide a pressurizing connection for loading the model.
A typical com-
thoroughly degreased.
After
the surfaces had been prepared, the required quantity of cement was
Pot
The resin-hardener
about an hour.
Section 4.
Material Calibration
[3]
meter of the oil container in which the beams were suspended for the
stress freezing cycle.
fcflMWS*.,
''
Lais.
'
'
>
inch.
[1]
size and both surfaces were sanded by hand until thickness variation was
the final machining of the edges was done with a high speed rotary file.
in the oven.
insure that the calibration specimen followed the same temperature pro-
gram as the model in order to obtain a material fringe value best re-
A Speci-
re-
duce the error incurred by ignoring the additional bending moment caused
by this force.
1
1
i
- ^h
.-
i
i
i
1
>
UJ
41
-*-
'|
Ml-*
Jl
fM
*
VI
c-
5s
fc
rO
sc
V.
"
_.
^
V)
vi
)i
V)
In
u
v
c\<
$1
>0
Vo
^
o
fc
t
1
Q
O
O
N
t
j
^
-i*
^
.
f
i
o1
I
...
17
calibration loading weights; this was taken into account simply by weighing them while they were immersed in hot oil to closely approximate the
test conditions.
wavelength of 5461 A.
size, but further enlargement was done so that the total magnification
of the final prints was about five times actual size in order to facili-
A plot of fringe order vs. distance from the neutral axis of the
beam was made; then a best fitting straight line was drawn through these
points.
and lower edges of the beam yielded a total number of fringes corresponding to twice the fringe order at the extreme fibers.
Calculations to
find f, the material fringe value for stress, were then made.
photoelastic theory:
From
[2]
f.-G'z
ULL
4,1
t
where
<T
t
and
(f
z
point, psi
material fringe value for stress,
lb/irfringe
t =
From the equation for the extreme fiber stress in a beam in pure bending:
^A-
<T=
4.2
Z I
where
(f
h = beam height
I =
th
12
<r
6M
4.3
becomes
th
t
4.4
or
A1
Since this N is half the value of n, the number of fringes obtained from
the photograph, the final calibration equation is
it
^ /'"*- yy/ii^e
4.5
in- t~fringe
.
fr
One investigator,
Pih, found values of 1.354 and 1.362 lb/in/ fringe respectively for two
19
<
c
H
n
o
H
P
O
rH
CO
cd
o
H
-P
--Moo
o-l
cd
,a
H
cd
CMlTN
<M
H
P.
vO
CD
J"
:
cj
o
co
ii-i
CN
d
CO
CO
C0rQ
is
CM
,Q <D
H rH
rH tf
rH
II
w
CO
hO
cl
Hlr\
H
ON
P
cd
rt
11 1-5
O CO r
20
A
H
O
EH
[4]
from
[2]
critical temperature assures rapid response of the material upon application of a load, while temperatures below the critical temperature simply
result in a time delay in the response.
in order to be just
It was found
Section
5.
Test Apparatus
The heating and cooling cycle was accomplished in a Central Scientific Company constant temperature oven.
trol was available it was decided to use a temperature set point of the
maximum temperature of 280F., and to allow the oven to heat and cool
according to its natural time constant.
heat and cool too rapidly for stress freezing, but the writer found that
21
a container holding about one gallon of mineral oil provided even heating
of the models and also slowed the heating and cooling rates to acceptable
values.
See Figure
It easily contain-
ed the model being tested and a calibration specimen mounted on its load-
ing fixture.
The internal pressure loading of the models was applied by the hydrostatic pressure output from a dead weight gage tester.
This instrument,
fringes in the slices large enough to be useful, but the loading was small
Figure 8 shows the oven and the general arrangement of the loading piping
removed to make way for the loading piping, a thermocouple junction was
were led from the model back through the inside of the loading piping to
exit immediately outside the oven through a small stuffing box.
The
A filling and vent connection was placed in the high point of the piping
in order to fill the system with oil and to bleed off any entrapped air.
Some slight leakage was present around the thermocouple wires at the
first application of pressure.
N
O
W
w
<D
U
P
CO
&
>
O
bO
Ci
H
O
OO
H
P
>
bO
H
23
HM -H
o o o
1-1
-H K.
leaking stopped.
al, since the total volume of oil in the loading system was small and the
in the system the load could be maintained with little movement of the
loading piston.
travel was reached before the cooling cycle was complete, and some hurried maneuvering was required in order to refill the oil reservoir while
Section
Test Procedures
6.
The model was filled with colorless mineral oil, then it was placed
in the oil tank and connected to the loading piping.
This load was removed and the vent plug was removed to allow for expansion
of the oil during heating; thus, premature loading of a model was avoided.
The desired maximum temperature for the cycle was set into the oven
equilibrium temperature, 280 F.,was reached and the test load, 10 psig,
was applied.
reach equilibrium with the applied load, then the oven was turned off
having the same axis of symmetry and having junction planes normal to
the axis.
<T
<rz
<f^
the circumferen-
A thin
$i/ce
'
SL'ce 3
s %uc4-
/VE> V It-\AJ
SLICE 2
Slice
t
Tf/( Crf CI
>/9Z
.
f<7
/S9
,/?o
,/f2
&
./7S"
Figure 9.
( /tiCHL C J
26
I.
Si/a
if
4-
\\ \
\V
.,'
EUV VIEW
suce
Si'ce
slice
THICKNESS
.Z&0
2.
>2-2io
2.02.
Figure 10.
(iNci/LZ)
27
SLICE
Si.
Ll.
icl
i-
licss Ta
t.
incide with
(F^
and
<T
& and
ff
<T
longitudinal slices and ring slices, each of which would contain a pair
of principal stresses as described above.
The slicing plans for the models are shown in Figures 9 and 10.
and 4).
These were
made very nearly the same thickness so that inspection of the fringe
patterns afforded an easy check for symmetry of response of the model
to the applied loading.
Model
9.
Model
II was sliced in similar fashion as shown in Figure 10, but only one
using a succession of grit sizes, ending with worn 220 grit aluminum
oxide paper.
29
'.
_..,,,:,.
,,,.,,,
,:
:
,.,,. ,,
,,,...
:
the slice thickness was adjusted until it was constant within .001 inch
as measured with a micrometer caliper.
an immersion tank having glass sides was used for containing the slices
in the field of view of the polariscope.
Figure 12
Two light
Exposure
Fringe photo-
graphy was done with open aperture because it provided an evenly illuminated field.
light source superimposed upon the fringe pattern; this effect produced
poor negatives.
[2]
A zero order fringe then appeared on the thin end of the wedge.
This method was particularly applicable to the ring slices, where all
32
This last
Section
Results of Tests
7.
pressure loading.
tions for
<T
respectively.
and
<T&
[2]
*
The radial principal stress
'()(")
is:
<'-'<m<-$)
where
p,
7.1
7.2
a = inside radius
b = outside radius
r = radius
(variable)
Equations 7.1 and 7.2 may be combined to yield a stress difference equation:
33
34
7.3
Note that the photoelastic equation for a ring slice takes the form
9 -
<r
<r
-^-L
7.4
N = fringe order
where
f =
t =
Now the experimental values for the stress difference could be compared
with the theoretical values in order to check the reliability of the
test results.
Model
rearranged
x
/ 2fta l*
t_
photograph of ring slices, for the right hand side is a constant for a
given slice.
Unfortunately, no such simple result was available to use for checking the longitudinal stress,
(JZ -
(f
K
(JL
<T.
and
<Tq
(f
was present in
This radial stress
a
+>
<D
o
d
o
V)
o
B w
O 0)
Ph
>
CM
0)
O O
H H
r-l-P
CO
<0
~o
HH
G)
H
0)
^-3p
30t^333JJta ssmis
36
I?
(9
s.
/'.
yi.
'
i
1/1
0)
H H
rH-P
3/
PJ
0/
CO
/
/
O
O
}m
rH
57
<D
d^d
.9
o
o
vO
rH
<D
t>0
H
fe
o
1
1
r-
S
(7s<5^
- ^0
'
3ovi-&=?jjiq
37
tiaajj*
ft
-
H
P
1
Q)
&
H
O
P<
X
<H
H
Fh*H
O
& w
oo os
ctf
P.
>
vD
o o
H'H
H-P
CO
0)
o
Q
cj
H
O
f'W
J>- ctP
'
3ov=>a3jjiQ ss^^c
38
to that of
(T
cylinder
an edge moment at the junction of the smaller, 1.900 in. diameter
and the larger, 2.200 in. diameter cylinder.
plane of
of the change in the mean diameter of the cylinders at the
junction.
points
radial and circumferential strains in each of the two cylinders at
just away from the junction plane.
with the
strains be equal in the junction plane; this can be the case only
cylinexistence of additional shearing forces and edge moments within the
ders at the discontinuity.
slices
be used as a method of separating the stresses in the longitudinal
at locations where
tion of
<T^
fl^
and
<T
Determina-
The Lame'
The difference in
ordinates between the <-<fK curve and the -^. curve was plotted as the
curve for (T
vs. r.
217 /
where
TTflA;
<
rdr
7.6
J*
(f
2
f vs. r curve.
plied by 27T and the graph scale factor for the area units to yield the
value of
P.
The
SECTION
Pine
Coupling
18.3
16.3
7.
DIFFERENCE
17.3
17.3
6
6
generally followed what was expected considering that shell bending was
0^ is seen to be
shell bending moment at this section must have produced tensile stresses
in the outer fibers and compressive stresses in the inner fibers, all
superimposed on a constant
<T
Similarly, in the
<f^
bending effects in the opposite sense, for the largest values are near
the inner surface of the coupling.
determined values of
<f^_
edge effect" superimposed local compressive stresses upon the already ex-
isting tensile system; or second, that the low indicated fringe order near
a boundary may have resulted from the variation in slice thickness at the
If
Z appear
<T
to be believable.
1,
3,
patterns that there was some sort of stress concentration taking place at
the discontinuity of the junction, but the slice geometry and character-
obliterated the fine pattern which may have existed at the junction of
the cylinders.
somewhat smoother transition between the small cylinder and the large
the experimental values are all low by what appears to be a nearly con-
stant amount.
remarkably close to the theoretical curve, making the two sets of results
41
mutually inconsistent.
affect slice 3.
not completely justify the assumption that the Lame' values for
(Tr
could
be used to separate the principal stresses, but a static check was made
the section at the center of the coupling is shown in Figure 38, and the
337.
This tended
quantitatively useful.
Although good numerical results were not obtainable from the test
of Model II, some inferences may be gathered from Model I about the in-
The
ing the fringe pattern on either side of the groove would yield a pattern
of the analysis for the zone of slice 6 could be used to represent the
plain coupling.
psi, while the mean stress of the undiminished section is about 9 psi.
stress level in the section at the groove is affected largely by the decrease
42
in section area.
Section
8.
A one-piece model
with cast or cemented ends would be better because the effects would be
much clearer.
be eliminated.
the models and slices was not adequate to avoid some interference from
this effect.
43
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.
2.
3.
4.
Pih, H.
5.
44
APPENDIX I
MATERIAL AND MODEL DATA
45
If
290
Typical Properties
270 F
Critical temperature
@ 77 F
Tensilie strength
12000 psi
210 psi
@ 270 P
Modulus of elasticity
@ 77 n F
@ 270 F
Poisson's ratio
1+80000 psi
2190 psi
.500
57 lb/in -fringe
1.35 lb/in-fringe
@ 77 F
@ 270 F
Fringe value
280 - 300 F
Annealing temperature
***
Model
Actual Dimensions
Inside diameter
1.500 in.
1.898 in.
2.177 in
***
Model II
Actual Dimensions
'
'
Inside diameter
1.500 in*
1.891 in.
2.177 in.
46
LOcXl:
s>,
-MrlX
lb.
4.^'
~A
7T
,17
.ns
>
Pstns ,k
1
J7S/6.
lb.
Load Diagram
./7f ib
Shear Diagram
_.?'<? /6-'M
Moment Diagram
Gravity Load:
Density of epoxy
Density of oil
Apparent weight of beam
Load
o,oz
i)
<t
J b
1
\\i
y
I
.0^3 lb/in.
.030 lb/In 3
.021 lb
.002^ lb/in
,b
Al?a
$ *
<i
\>
\/
tii
5E_ifc__il
SLsL-Afc
-,ot*SU
,
.
1
J-
00.29
////?.
Load Diagram
r,t>e69iik
to^io
o<?62
Shear Diagram
n.
>b
^0<52
lb-'**
Moment Diagram
(Maximum momsnt in the center span is less than
1% of the applied moment.)
47
Figure
1'
ypical Dalibratio
'
'
2
1
3/
APPENDIX II
MODEL
49
u
en
d
r-{
rj
H
4
r
'
3 del
I,
2.
Ld.
bte:
For Dark
V)
d
r
o
p
.
en
0' r
C
tI
rl
H&
CO
r-l
o
6
H
r
crns for
Dark
.d.
'"
;
re 23.
"
53
'
'or
D.t
'
MODEL
Slice 2
tm
l+iZ*-?^ psi/fringe
r,in.
'982
.938
.873
.806
.117
5
s-
h.5
5
5.5
<fe-^,psi
26.6
29.2
33.6
25.2
28.8
32. h
36.0
39.6
39.5
4-2.5
Slice 5
r,
h
^.5
.926
.866
.784-
in.
<?r^, psi
0"
38. ^
3^.8
4-3.3
4-8.1
4-0.0
4-8.6
Slice 6
f
t
g 1.^7
7.8 psi/fringe.
7l75
r,
1.04
2.5
3.5
.992
.938
.902
4-
.84if
K5
5
.798
.115
in.
-<y
psi
15.6
19.5
19.9
21.9
23.4-
24-.
27.3
31.2
35.1
39.0
26.4-
4-
30.5
33.8
35.8
54
MODEL
Slice h
a 1#3Z*7.2 psi/fringe
Zona 5
-7
r,
3.5
.750
.786
.850
.910
2.5
3
in.
9*1-9
3nne 6
N
r, in.
2.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
:5
.750
.788
.832
.890
953
1.028
1.06 V
grz
>
lifA
18.0
21.6
25.2
21.6
*i-<T
psl
psi
-10.0
-7.6
.4.0
-l.*f
>
psi
18.0
21.6
18.0
Ik.k
10.8
7.2
3.6
^r,
psi
10.0
8.2
6.k
V.5
2.8
1.0
O.k
xv*
*
P si
k.h
3.3
8.2
10. If
17.6
23.8
21.6
psi
8.0
13A
l*f.9
21.6
20.5
W
6.0
10.5
11.6
9.9
8.0
6.2
3.2
9.6
8.8
7.6
6. If
3.*f
2one_ 2
r,
2.5
/96
.77
in.
V<, psi
1
18
21.6
55
,lVin
lb/in
a
o
cd
>
d
o
to
C
H
0)
o
H
H
M
H
CD
*
o
tuO
/V
&3K1~<20
-16.
S9A//Z/J
<
ii
-| = = -r = -- = r- = 5Y- = =
2*
t
-,t
IE
P*
- = = -- = - = -:
==
==
==
._
.:::::::::/.
_j
-J
4
.
~~~
t
1
___
_-
::
::
4
T
r
'
:::::
::::3
-<j
" r -^i-
5t
3
H
'
L
V
_j
._:_
4 it
I
it
til
L
V
3
\5
k-
V
A
H
"V
~l
V^
_\
rr
~\
r
\
<
'
51
t
j
>
Va
CT
^
__bl
\a
>_iv
"
|_*>.
._
:-
1
/
t
V\
:-
J
l
51
::::::::::;::::::::::::t::::::::
L _^
,_
:n:
is,
\a in
A
i
_=_:__::__n__:&
A^
3
-S
A
T
T
5T
3a
\
~7
'k
r"
---
*-
.... ...
^7
V7_
i
32
.
jj
::::_:
IT
~i
ft
S
(
mi
'
..
.,
- -
...
5
Sc
SS3"&J.$;
/Sc/P
57
-"
~jt
**--=.
Z:+__i_:
-/
V-
r
A
j
::_::_:
I
A
:its
..,
II
I
r
ft
_:-_
j:
^
^
4V
-A
1
It
s|t
t^
4lln
II-
VL
__
L_
_ _
"
&
&
V
_j
_i _
.,
&
J
t
f
it
tr
:::::::
iO
__
"i^fS
o
H
P
3
CO
0)
o
O
iH
o
H
P.
!h
>
a>
o
H
CO
Q)
fl
iH
0)
NJ
-P
C\J
58
RJ
iv-
vs. r
<ro^
A's
.125 lb.
/. P=(2*0(23.37)(.125)
= l8.3
lb.
18.3-17.3
17.3
x 100 = + 6#
VO
o
G
o
4->
w
H
a
>
o
o
o
O
H
CO
H
'd
<D
to
60
VO
<D
d
o
cd
fl
%
H
-p
W
w
CD
U
P
CO
<D
O
H
rH
CO
M
H
CO
C\J
ttf)
61
o
H
P
m
o
o
&
H
erf
o
H
P.
3
fc
e>
>
yS
h
r
Li
h
o
Hi
>
3
Is
<=3
o
H
H
CO
VO
M
H
-P
cm
P
H
""<v?,
62
CD
ON
<D
MODEL
STATIC CHECKS
l*f
AbA- .08
sq. units
A-^1.67
i;(':.'?
sq. units
P=
=16.3 lb.
Pss-p^/ia*
P-
(10)(tt)(.75)
=17.3 lb
16.^-17.3
x 100 = -6#
17.3
63
'.~
APPENDIX III
MODEL II FRINGE PHOTOGRAPHS AND CALCULATIONS
64
iH
H
P
'
3
Fh
<H
C
U
o
*"l*
+
-p
od
a,
rH
C>
o
I
M
i
.^
31.
n_
a
"
1
-'
>
"TV>
itter
I,
Slic
2.
Figure 33.
3.
68
'
"
1.^7
.226
c^-<rr> psi
in.
r,
2.5
6.06 psi/fringe
1.03
.95
15.1
18.2
21.2
3.5
.90
if
.8if
2*f.2
K5
.80
27.2
psi
<fc-<Vr (LfctmeQ,
20.3
23.9
26.6
30.5
33.6
Slice 3
f-l-ilZ
t
s-
6.79 psi/fringe
.202
r,
in.
*~<C
P si
d^, ^ <r
r
(Lame' ), psi
huh
^0.7
.85
*
'.
1.5
2
r,
in.
l.Cft
.92
.78
<^-0^.
psi
6.85
10.3
13.7
<
.9
;.6
.5
psi
d^, psi
5.95
6.7'
5.2
z t, lb/in
<T
6.2
6.2
l+.l
5f
i
lu
H
/
B
H
0)
&
V
o
cj
w
(
H
Jh
P.
<j
jr/
o
w
CD
cd
H>
u)f
rH
CO rH
v7
7
5;
H
M
CD
.H
-p
O
Ph
o
Q)
EH
en
0)
s>
*
('W
"1^-3
3w?Z^JU/a
71
S'&ZtL.S
Vj
'
-a
H
-P
/
!
*-/
0)
<^.
?H
0)
1
9
<
<H
8^
&
F-<o
0/
'
5#
*:
CO
\J
0/
*J#
o
W
o
3
H>
H
~o
M H
I
H
Ui/
<c
*/
T/
<k
tf
eoret
del
L,
f
vO
CO
bO
O
1
_Z_2_
,.
J
o
&
EH
'
'
If
--,
'
,":
zf
rt
iii
1
-zcx
"
t:
---zz:
|i
:=:-:
ill
r
'
;
5E:
-^iMritriti:II
<
z_
-i
i..
II
II
'
1
J_
J
J
I
'
'
'
.Li_
.
l.
cd
H
^
'
Li_
L
h
rL l
'
-P
\
j
/\
iO
NJ
L-I-J-
m
J iu
r /
'
.
1
0)
i
1
:+::-:~::::::
II
'
fifrj'":-::
-:
Ill
'
"
li
4~zjzL
-!-f"
'
I,
r ~"
k
"
<
.S3
it
L.
<d
LL.Lj
;
1
'
j
'
"J_
'.
1
!il
>
'
'
II
'
Ill
III
t ll
CI
).._..
it
'
MM
III
1':
>
'1
TL
LL
'
Hi
l
i
rq
:
1
._.
1-
_1
_a
zt izzzn
i
Mi
h-
r-t-
"
.tr
-l
Li
if
j
"
r-
ZL
ii
TV N
...
.!
_L_
j_
iZT
TMM
j_
-.
LL
I
Mr
U LLL
1
i
ii
II
i
i_
1
44-4:
ii
M
h
h-H
1
i
i
^2
~r
\i
"
CO
r+ -J~J
~
J--J--
-----
--
_j_.
fl
...
,
^
O
s
zp.
-I-
'cy
|
!
"
f-L
I"
i"
^^
Jl zL
a_~
i>
II
53
I
"
1:
;~
~x
_~
(vj
/I/
73
^r
->
'
<y=>Q&0
3$A//JJ
O
bO
-|__
i
IN-
~^
M/
5
a
'
If/f
H
CO
fl
O
H
'
0)
-o
L.
mIll
"
i
V)
i
&;
<D
Mj
|;
hh
f'4
Vj
I'M
rt
i\i
'
ii
'
_J
4--4--
JZ _iz__L
'
"
(Ml
"
_r
-f-4 +*
1
|
'
ho
!
'
4__L
T4-H iti H
:L
l|
^~
\]
MJ
JJJ_ JJ
\
""tii
!_
ZtZC
JZ
/Li
'
r
in
i
l;i
n
,i.i
4-t-
Mil
ii
-uz~
II
..
ZL
I
1
|
"o#
Or*
r"
_
^
y.
"
-?
4
t
t
It
t
Zt
2-,
tl
tl _ _ _
CM
-it
+
_
'
-,
4-
:_
,_
jEL
*~
_~
'
J_
^7
_^-
jL-
-t
._
2&Z
_L_j
r ___
__.
r
L
4-
47
t
it-
nitf
:.
_^.,_i_
~_~
0>
Z_8
*
7
.
r:
t
-- X
t
5
t
cv
-*f
_L
:_
_
Ji/>
-v
_ _l
I_2
C^/->
74
A
_/_
2
-S
__L
'
CO
co
ij
o
4- ^
w
4 I
l j
"
t
A
I__L
I j
4 I...
^
7
I
j.
P
CO
rH
1
f
t
I,*-
__
S2
X
V^
_/
T
t_
-<4U
_.
__
5i
r t
itt
-
CO
ZL
j
1
Ii_Z
^jl.
_: 3*
_._
8
_.
^l_
::
*
"
!l!
sir
i~ _ z
to
--
:/
_j
T
r
.a
-,
[7
_ _
o
H
P
1 t
t
^
t
J
t
g
IS
x
t
o
9
A^k
?*E,
^
<D
-t
If
I__
Q
^
-A
TVr\
^Baas
<*
g
Q^
o
o
to
a
o
H
id
CO
H
o
H
P.
c5
o
a)
>
o
o
o
H
CO
G)
ON
CD
75
l^f
A=A-2A8
a'=-
sq. units
1 [(3.^6.2H
lf(
+.045.0-5.846.2-f6.2+6.2+6.2)
3 L
-i
2(J+.
5+5.^6.146.246.2+6.2)/
_,
= (73.9)(2fT)(.025)^11.6
p.iTa
P=(10)(7T)( .75)
Per cent difference:
<-.
11. 6-17.
17.3
76
x ICO =-33#
I7.3/4
APPENDIX IV
STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN THE GROOVE IN MODEL I
77
....
.,...,.
"
-0
a
H
rH
OO
A
o
p
-p
nS
fl
.
,i P .:..:._
______
,2
._
i-
_,
._
,,,_-.
_...
.__
1.
jI
-_
ll-
rJS
_.
H
P
&
H
'
--
ilpi
~
I
ji
-4-
Zi J
vj ^1
__
10
/
_.
__.
.__.__..,
j-
|^_....
j_
-^
1<5
L
V
7
jr
(0
10
<D
t-t
t ~~1
/
'
T_
-H-
f"
xx
"II
it
-h
3_t_
^_
I
E
r
-I
-.-W
-sJ
*t
Jt
=
^_
I_
^.
in
-_ r
cs-
_II~I
...
__i
-4
"
7r
1
_
:t
7"
__ __ _
~
7
-- .
_.
:
~t_
t~
/-L
'S3
~J
rH
>
Q
O
t
\
^
...
__-
t.
-4
-u
~
15
(1)
0)
_
_t
C
O
rd
J
_
~7
_&
'
i
H
CO
Jj.
^j-t
L
r
H
H
-7&r
11
4-44
__.
7
L
..
L
- ^
J- ~_
__
rr
_
-
_
-
..
,___
___ ______ _ _
P
CO
"1
:
_____
-/
7
-/
:::::5::_:^::::::::::::::::::: a
(
*M
^/rcv;
y$3&x$
78
.
2.
Library
S. Naval Postgraduate School
Monterey, California
3.
4.
5.
20
U.
6.
U.
% FPO
San Francisco, Calif.
96630
7.
8.
79
Unclassified
Security Classification
ORIGINATING ACTIVITY
1.
title,
R&D
body ol abmtract mnd Indening annotation mutl be entered when the overall report
(Corporate author)
claaeilied)
la
2*.
Unclassified
U.
26 8ROUP
N.A.
REPORT TITLE
3-
4.
MS Thesis
AUTHORfS)
10 January 1966
20 May 1966
REPORT DATE
May 1966
a
CONTRACT OR 6RANT
PROJECT
7b. NO.
OF REFS
5
NO.
N.A.
b.
OF PACES
80
N.A.
NO.
N.A.
mav be aaalgned
thla report)
N.A.
d.
10.
AVAILABILITY/LIMITATION NOTICES
*m
flfc
11.
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
N.A.
13.
N.A.
ABSTRACT
DD
FORM
1473
Unclassified
81:
Security Classification
Unclassified
Security Classification
14-
LINK A
KEY WORDS
LINK
ROUE
WT
NOLC
LINKC
ROkC
WT
Photoelastic
Stress
Pipe Fittings
Internal pressure
INSTRUCTIONS
ORIGINATING ACTIVITY:
2a.
all
(2)
(3)
DESCRIPTIVE NOTES:
If
(5)
"U.
military agencies
report directly from
shall request through
8.
AUTHOR(S):
1L
NUMBER OF REFERENCES:
13.
enter the
offi-
lim-
55"
FORM
1
JAN 4
How-
etc.
Enter the
PROJECT
REPORT NUMBER(S):
ABSTRACT:
It is
be attached.
page count
this
tory notes.
7b.
ified
covered.
7a.
S.
DDC
REPORT TITLE:
5.
"U.
tt
(4)
ized.
4.
DDC"
26. GROUP: Automatic downgrading is specified in DoD Directive 5200. 10 and Armed Forces Industrial Manual. Enter
the group number. Also, when applicable, ahow that optional
markings have been us edjfor Group 3 and Group 4 as author-
3.
1473 (BACK)
Unclassified
82
Security Classification