Você está na página 1de 4

# The Java applet below calculates a number of values relating to the

## design of this type of bearing.

1. Assumptions
i) The pressure distribution is approximately 'half Sommerfeld', ie p
= 0 at theta = 0 and 180o and p = 0 between 180o and 360o. While
this gives a slightly different pressure distribution to some
alternatives, the overall load carrying capacity for this method is
very similar to the alternative methods.
ii) The oil inlet hole is located in the middle of the bearing at the
point of maximum film thickness where the oil film pressure is zero.
Values must be entered for the oil supply pressure and the diameter
of the oil inlet hole. The local film thickness is the dominant factor
determining the oil flow, see 'Basic Lubrication Theory', by Alastair
Cameron, 3rd Ed., 1981, Ellis Horwood.
2. Using the applet
The solution of the pressure distribution is iterative and uses
'relaxation'. However if over relaxation is used (ie an SoR factor
greater than 1) the solution often fails to converge. This can
normally be overcome by using a 'relaxation' factor (SoR factor) less
than 1, such as 0.9 which should be entered in the appropriate box.
It must be noted that using a factor of less than 1 means that a
large number of iterations will probably be needed, normally more
than 200 and possibly more than 1000. If the solution does not
converge with an SoR factor of 0.9 after 1000 iterations, further
increase the number of iterations, if the solution is diverging, reduce
the SoR factor and increase the number of iterations.
The text area on the right hand side first displays the film thickness
round the bearing (m) for the specified eccentricity ratio and then
lists the total radial force (N) after each iteration. If a sufficient
number of iterations has been chosen, then the total radial force
should be almost constant.
An even number of circumferential intervals and length
intervals must be chosen. About 42 circumferential and 14 length
intervals usually gives a reasonably good solution. However to
obtain more accurate values, particularly a reasonably accurate
value of the maximum oil film pressure in the centre of the journal,
180 intervals round the circumference should be specified with 16 or
more intervals specified along the journal length
For some of the inputs, suggested values are shown in brackets that

## are typical for mineral oils.

The eccentricity ratio 'epsilon' = 1 - ho/c
The text area at the bottom of the applet displays the pressure
distribution (MPa) in the bearing.
There is a large empty area at the bottom of the page (this simplifed
the program).
3. Suggested Procedure for Design)
A number of parameters may be under the control of the designer,
but there are another group which are dependent on the first group
and can be used to define operational limits for the bearing. This
applet assumes that the oil viscosity is constant throughout the film,
which is not very accurate as the oil temperature rises as it passes
through the bearing and as the viscosity is strongly dependent upon
the temperature, it means that bearing design normally involves
some iteration.
Given or controlled by the designer:
lubricant viscosity
speed, N
(journal length) and beta (the angle subtended by the
load bearing portion of the bearing). (For the
methodology here it is assumed that all the load is carried
by approximately 180o of the bearing).
The following are dependent upon the first group:
coefficient of friction
temperature rise
oil flow rate, Q
minimum film thickness, ho

## Many charts use US units for viscosity, ie reyns (usually plotted as

micro-reyns). To convert reyns to Pa.s, multiply by 6890.
In the absence of specific information, it may be assumed that
mineral lubricating oil has a density of about 850 kg/m 3 and a
specific heat of about 1675 - 1800 J/kgoC.
For hydrodynamic bearings, a length / diameter ratio of about 1 (say
0.8 to 1.3) is believed to be a good compromise. l/d ratios of <1 may
be used where a compact design is important, such as in a multicylinder automotive engine. Reducing the l/d ratio increases the flow
out of the bearing ends, which aids cooling.
The minimum film thickness acceptable depends upon surface finish
and should allow expected particles to pass through without causing
damage. For some applications, eg in automotive engines, filtering
is provided to remove particles whose size would be likely to exceed
the minimum film thickness. The following ho values have been
suggested:
0.0000025 m for finely bored small bronze bushes.
0.00002 m for commercial babbitted bearings.
0.0000025 < ho < 0.000005 m for automotive engines with
fine surface finish bearings and lubricant filtering.
Maximum oil temperatures should not be allowed to be excessive as
oxidation and degradation become rapid. For general purpose
machinery, an oil operating temperature of 60oC should give a good
long life. Above 100oC the rate of oxidation increases rapidly.
Temperatures of 120oC should be avoided in industrial equipment. In
automotive engines lubricant temperatures can reach 180 oC, but
automotive oils are specially formulated (and may even be fully
'synthetic') to withstand such conditions.
The list below gives typical values of bearing 'nominal' pressures
Electric motors, steam turbines, gear reducers, centrifugal
Automotive engines - main bearings 4 - 5 MPa

crankpin 10 - 15 MPa
Diesel engines - main bearing 6 - 12 MPa
crankpin 8 - 15 Mpa
4. Design Procedure
1 Select an l/d ratio, 1 is probably a good starting point.
2 Using the specified load and an appropriate 'nominal'
pressure, select the bearing length and diameter.
3 Specify an appropriate radial clearance, c, probably based on
either a close (H8/f7) or free (H9/d9) running fit.
4 Decide on an initial lubricant viscosity. Because viscosity
varies considerably with temperature, it is normally necessary
to carry out the calculations, below, at two values of viscosity,
one slightly below and the other slightly above the anticipated
final value.
5 Enter the various inputs in the text boxes adjacent to the
green labels, using the units specified.
6 Select and enter the first eccentricity ratio value in the
appropriate box
6 Click the yellow 'Read Data' button.
7 Check the output values. If the 'Resultant Force' does not
closely match the specified load, change the eccentricity ratio
(if the resultant force is less than the Load specified, increase
the eccentricity ratio) and run the calculation again.
8 Repeat the above calculations as needed, varying the inputs
as appropriate. .