Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
SUBMITTED BY
NAMRATA MAKHIJA
B.COM ( Hons.)
College Roll No.: 195
Shri Ram College Of Commerce
University Of Delhi
DECLARATION
I declare that the form and the contents of the project are original to the best
of my knowledge and also assure that this work has not been submitted for the
work of any other degree course or the work of any other university.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
No small task however can be completed without proper guidance and
encouragement. It gives me great pleasure to express my deep sense of
gratitude and reverence to every person who directly or indirectly has helped
to create a congenial atmosphere for successful completion of this project
report.
I express my sincere gratitude and thanks to my Mentor Mr. Vikas Madan
who has been a constant source of encouragement and under whose guidance I
have completed my project.
INTRODUCTION
Land is a critical resource for a densely populated country like India. There is no denying
the fact that India faces a huge housing shortfall, with the shortage being in the
vicinity of 20 million homes, not to mention the poor quality of the existing dwellings.
The expected investment needed to set things in order is ascertained to be
approximately Rs.1, 000 billion for housing and another Rs.2, 000 billion for
supporting infrastructure. With only 25% of this requirement expected to come from
the formal sector, a growing role for the housing finance sector is visualized.
Indias housing finance sector has emerged as one of the outstanding successes over the
last decade, second perhaps only to the countrys software industry. From a macro
perspective, the availability of cheap credit is helping to plug the long-standing inequity of
the ages expensive real estate manifested in a low property ownership ratio and home
ownership within a small cross-section of Indias population. Since the housing sector
interacts with all the other sectors of the economy, governmental support is assured. It is
estimated that it supports about 280 other industries or services in the economy through
employment and other commercial opportunities. A recent study indicates that out of
every Rs.100 spent on housing, Rs. 11.40 is returned back to the national exchequer by
way of stamp duty, registration and taxes.
Threats
This fast-changing environment has had a telling impact on housing finance companies:
spreads (the difference between interest income and expenditure) have come under
pressure. With their wide geographical presence and customer knowledge, the housing
finance companies are now tapping new opportunities to enhance their data.
The housing shortage was estimated by the National Buildings Organization in 1991 to be
about 31 millions units, composed of 20.6 million in rural areas, and 10.4 million in urban
areas, with; The rapid growth of urban population and its concentration in 300 cities with
a population exceeding 0.1 million has led to increasing congestion and overcrowding in
small houses, steady growth of slums and informal settlements and severe pressure on
civic services, in the context of the inadequate supply of affordable housing by public and
private sector and acute shortage of funds of the development of settlements and extension
of city level infrastructure.
Banks
HUDCO extends assistance benefiting the masses in urban & rural areas under a broad
spectrum of programmes as:
Housing
Urban Infrastructure
Consultancy Services
Building Technology
GIC Grih Vitta was incorporated in 1989 and acquired its present name of GIC Housing
Finance (GICHF) in 1993. The General Insurance Corporation of India and its
subsidiaries along with the Unit Trust of India, Industrial Finance Corporation of India
and the State Bank of India promote the company. The primary business consists of
granting housing loans to individuals and persons engaged in construction of houses/flats
for residential purposes. etc.
PNBHFL (Punjab National Housing Bank Housing Finance Limited)
PNB Housing Finance Ltd. (PNBHFL) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Punjab National
Bank, one of the largest nationalized banks in India engaged in providing housing loans
PNBHFL offers the Apna Ghar Yojana for construction or buying a house. It also offers
the Ghar Sudhar Yojana for renovation or repair of house or flat. It has home loan
facilities for NRIs and Line of Credit Facilities for companies to give loans to their
employees for construction or renovation of a house.
LICHFL (Life Insurance Corporation Housing Finance Limited)
LIC Housing Finance Limited is the second largest housing finance company in India.
Promoted in 1989 by the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) of India, the largest life
insurance provider in the country, the company went public in 1994.
LIC Housing Finance provides long-term housing finance to individuals and corporates
for the purchase and construction of new flats and houses, as well as for the repair and
renovation of existing ones. Some of the schemes that LICHFL offers are the Griha
Shobha, which is for NRIs, Griha Sudhar, where one can apply for a loan for renovations
and repairs in existing houses. Green Channel Facility is meant for professionals like
practicing doctors, CAs, computer engineers, etc.
Can Fin Homes Ltd.
Can Fin Homes Ltd (CFHL), jointly promoted by Canara Bank, Canbank Financial
Services Ltd., UTI, HDFC, and ICICI, was incorporated on 29th October 1987. CFHL
commenced operations in January 1988 with the main objective of providing Housing
BHFL offers Easy Title for registration of the property or land purchased, Easy Upgrade
loans for renovation of the existing house, which has been purchased or constructed at
least one year ago., Easy extend loans for extensions of an existing house, Easy Home
loans for outright purchase of a ready built house, Easy Build loans for construction of
house on self-acquired or inherited vacant plot of land, and Easy Bridge Loans for
purchase of a ready built house, when an individual already owns a property.
In 2001-02, the incremental disbursement of housing finance companies is estimated to
have increased by 17.3 per cent over 2000-01, to Rs 148.05 billion. The
disbursements of leading HFCs like HDFC, LIC Housing Finance and Canfin
Homes increased by 31.3 per cent, 25.5 per cent and 28 per cent respectively
over the previous year.
In 2001-02, the aggregate market share of all HFCs in aggregate retail disbursement
declined by 9.1 percent, to 59.2 per cent. Most HFCs lost their market shares to banks.
However, the largest losing segment has been the small and medium size HFCs (other
HFCs). This segment is estimated to have lost their market share by 7.2 percentage points.
Market share of HDFC, the largest player in the home finance market, declined from 31.4
per cent in 2000-01 to 30.5 per cent in 2001-02.
In 2001-02, total outstanding loan of HFCs is estimated to have increased by 19.8 per cent,
to Rs 385.73 billion. However, the outstanding assets of other HFCs is estimated to have
increased by only 9.5 per cent, due to lower incremental disbursements in 2001-02 coupled
with existing borrowers opting for refinancing from other aggressive players, like banks,
as a result of a decline in interest rates.
During the 2000-01 to 2001-02 period, banks have increased their focus on retail finance
market, particularly in housing finance due to lower NPA levels.
BANKS
In 2001-02, the incremental direct disbursement of banks (after adjusting for indirect
disbursements such as loans to HFCs, investment in NHB/HUDCO bonds and housing
loans to their employees) increased by 91 per cent over 2000-01, to Rs 86.91 billion.
The gross disbursements (including indirect disbursements) of leading banks like SBI
(including associate banks) and ICICI Bank (post merger) increased by around 115 per
cent and 600 per cent, to around Rs 45 billion and Rs 22 billion respectively over the
previous year. However, few other banks like Bank of Baroda, Corporation Bank, IDBI
Bank showed significantly higher growth rates, although on a lower base.In 2001-02, the
aggregate market share of all banks, in incremental direct disbursement, is estimated to
have increased by 10.1 per cent, to 34.8 per cent. The growth has been largely driven by
the cost advantages of banks over HFCs and lower credit off take from the corporate
segment.
Some HFCs also lend to corporates and state governments (LIC Housing Finance) for
their housing projects. Around 26 per cent of HDFCs incremental disbursements are
estimated to be loans to corporates for housing purposes. The incremental disbursement
to individuals (excluding loans to corporates and government bodies) is estimated at Rs
180-190 billion
Indian industry body, asserts that housing demand is poised to see a growth of around 80
Million for the lower-income and the lower-middle income groups. Housing Sector in
India is also likely to generate around 4 Million new jobs within a decade with a whooping
investment of US$ 670 Billion. Its also expected that housing and real estate sector will
undergo a revolutionary transformation to grow at around 14% annually. Presently, the
contribution of Indian Housing to the countrys GDP is modest at less than one percent.
It was also estimated by a research firm that by 2010 the demand would further grow to a
massive volume of around 400 Million Units. This will necessitate a minimum outlay of
US$ 890 Billion. There is a shortage of more than nearly 20 Million housing units in India
and this is a positive sign of the untapped opportunities for this sector.
Experts highlight that for every unit added as expenditure, there are rippling effects on
income generation capacity, with an increase of approximately 400%. Looking at the
impressive pace of the Indian economy in general and housing sector in particular, it can
be fairly concluded that the housing sector will grow at around 14%. The sector will also
contribute to employment generation with a capacity of creating roughly 3.2 Million new
job opportunities in the coming decade.
The research report also addresses the issues and facts that are critical to business
success:
-
11
the addition in housing stock, factors like increasing credit penetration is playing a major
role in driving the overall demand for housing loans.
Some of the factors that are expected to drive the credit growth in the housing sector in
the medium to long term include
Household formation
Access to finance
Increasing homeownership
Easier transaction
Loans to individuals
Loans to builders
employees.
During the 1995-96 to 1997-98 period, many small HFCs provided loans to builders at
high interest rates. With the subsequent decline in property prices, the builders were
unable to repay the loans, thereby affecting the financial performance of these
HFCs.During the 1998-99 to 2001-02 period, loans to individuals were the fastest growing
segment in the housing finance market. Banks and HFCs usually provide loans to
individuals for:
Purchase of property
Construction of property
Site loans
12
income recognition, asset classification, and capital adequacy, investment norms and asset
liability risk management. The Bank is also empowered to launch with schemes such as
Refinance scheme for HFCs and issue of Mortgage Backed Securities.
Establishment of national housing bank
To give a boost to the housing scenario in India and to narrow down the margin between
the housing demand and the availability of houses, the National Housing Bank was set up
in the year 1988. Even though there were a large number of agencies/institutions
providing direct finance to individuals for house construction, there was no organized
housing finance system as such before the establishment of National Housing Bank. This
was done by keeping in mind that a home seeker though does have a desire for a house but
lacks the resources for construction or buying it. To give an enhancement to private
housing finance institutions the National Housing Bank came into the picture. It is a
principal agency to promote housing finance institutions both at local and regional levels
and to provide financial and other support to such institutions. It is important to keep in
mind that the National Housing Bank itself does not give loans or finance individuals or a
party as such.
ECONOMIC FACTORS
Income levels
Rates of interest
Price of land/property
Rise in Construction
Tax Benefits
SOCIAL AND DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS
Increasing Urbanization
TECHNOLOGICAL FACTORS
14
Mortgage lending was once, and generally remains a national business. However, the
Internet is having a major impact on how business is originated, processed and funded, as
well as helping to erode national boundaries. Significant advances can be expected over
the next several years, and understanding the trends and options is key to preparing for
the future of mortgage lending.
MICROECONOMIC FACTORS
The competence of the housing finance industry to enhance shareholder value across the
long-term are explained through the following points:
NEW ENTRANTS
In the financing business, since entry barriers are low, the threat from new entrants is
high. This is particularly so in Indias housing finance sector. The industry space is highly
competitive with banks and financial institutions keen to capture market share.
BARGAINING POWER
In the housing finance industry, the customer possesses considerable bargaining power: a
diverse list of companies providing finance at varying interest rates. This broad horizontal
and vertical choice enables customers to migrate their selection of housing finance
providers within minutes on the basis of a lower cost.
SUBSTITUTE PRODUCTS/SERVICES
In India, there is a deep-rooted aversion to taking debt to finance acquisition. As a result,
prospective customers generally opt for self-finance. However, over the last few years,
there has been a change in the customer psyche: interest rates declined even as a better
range of real estate options has emerged.
SUPPLIER POWER
Thanks to a supply-side liberalization, the bargaining power of those who supply funds is
low. Banks and financial institutions are being increasingly preferred by individuals as
havens of capital, where savings can be parked for safety and liquidity. Besides, there is
another pull at work: the supplier must disburse loans to housing finance companies
because they represent low-risk and priority investment.
The fragmented nature of the housing finance industry is a major impediment for its
further growth. Despite this, the industry has managed to grow mainly due to consistent
decline in interest rates, tax incentives given by the government and changing income
profile of the Indian middle class population.
Conflicting Interests
While the private housing finance institutions are required to abide by the guidelines of
the NHB, the general financial institutions, which include the commercial banks, follow
the guidelines set by the RBI. Today, both these sections are competing with each other for
the same housing pie but their functioning and lending practices seem to bear no
similarity.
Asset liability mismatch is one of the biggest risks housing finance institutions are
confronted with. Funding of long term loans with short term deposits, leads to a mismatch
between assets and liabilities that can be overcome by adopting appropriate asset liability
management (ALM) techniques.
FDI Constraints
FDI guidelines for real estate development have come under a lot of flay. Guidelines
requirements such as a minimum capitalization of US$10 million for a wholly owned
subsidiary and US$5 million for joint ventures with Indian partners, development of a
minimum area of acres, a minimum lock in period of 3 years from completion of
minimum capitalization before repatriation of original investment, act as constraints to
foreign investors.
Growth in Assets
All the HFCs under consideration increased their asset base during FY2004 considerably,
with CanFin Homes increasing their assets by 6.50% -- almost five times as compared to
1.40% increase in FY2003.
Income
Total Income
22
TOTAL INCOME
2004
HDFC LTD.
3078
Growth(%)
3.44
LICHFL
985
Growth(%)
-2.83
CANFIN HOMES 129
Growth(%)
-8.11
SUNDARAM HFL 56
Growth(%)
38.26
(Rs. Million)
2003
2002
2976
2700
10.20
13.34
1014
882
14.97
18.25
140
140
0.52
9.30
41
22
83.51
222.93
2001
2382
18.20
746
15.99
128
12.63
7
371.92
2000
2016
643
113
1
-
While interest income of HDFC increased 7.00% during FY2004 (13.40% during FY2003)
to Rs. 2405 million, other income declined by 7.50% during FY2004 to Rs. 673 million
(Rs. 728 million last year).
Operating Expenses
Employee Expenses
23
GROWTH TRENDS
The Indian housing finance industry has grown by leaps and bounds in the past few years.
Total home loan disbursements by Banks and Housing Finance Companies (HFCs) has
risen from Rs. 29359.29 crores in 2001-02 to Rs. 51672.7 crores in 2002-03 witnessing a
phenomenal growth of 76% during this period. While the growth in fresh purchase of
housing assets may be lower than the disbursement growth because of the increasing
incidence of loan takeovers (by competitors), it still remains high.
There has been a significant change in the structure of the mortgage industry in the last
four years, with banks gaining market share in the direct housing finance segment. The
share of commercial banks in direct housing finance rose from 27% in FY2000 to 57% in
FY2003. This increase in banks share has been the result of a steady deposit growth for
banks, poor corporate credit off take, perception of low credit losses, and higher
profitability in the mortgage loan segment. All this has been facilitated further by RBI
regulations prescribing 50% risk weightage on mortgage loans, inclusion of qualifying
housing loans under priority sector lending, and maintenance of a minimum housing
finance allocation of 3% of incremental deposits.
LAW REVIEW
Involving the private sector in housing finance
For the past decade, the Government of India attempted to strengthen the housing sector
by introducing various loan schemes for the rural and urban population. The first attempt
in this regard was the National Housing Policy (NHP), which was introduced in 1988.
However, the growing realization of the insufficiency of public funds to meet the demands
for financial schemes in the housing sector is evident in the aims of the 2007 policy.
Innovative financial instruments that will spur the flow of funds from the private sector is
one of the focal points of this policy. Until now, most financial companies were reluctant to
lend to low-income groups because the small amounts do not justify the costs. Profit is the
overarching goal, and these institutions try to efficient in the mobilisation, disbursement
and recovery of funds. Finance companies are able to mobilize funds from shareholders
and investors by offering competitive rates of interests. These funds will be disbursed to
those who are deemed eligible, after assessment of application forms and personal
24
interviews. There are difficulties in assessing credit risks and a lack of clarity on
recoveries, land title and possession. These problems have led to a scenario where the
popular perception was that the requirements of low-income housing were incompatible
with formal housing finance.
Whereas today, in low-cost housing, the government is the sole financier, the Ministry of
Urban Development is exploring a new financial architecture that will make loans for lowcost houses affordable for both the lenders and borrowers. Despite the frenetic pace of
growth in housing finance over the past 5 years in India, mortgage penetration as a
percentage of GDP continues to remain low, at 4 percent. This means that there are
considerable growth opportunities in housing finance. This is further corroborated by the
fact that despite the impressive rate of growth in the housing finance sector in the recent
period, financing through the organised sector continues to account for only 25 percent of
the total housing investment in India.
The lending criteria set out by formal financiers are more appropriate to the life style of
the middle-level income group. To obtain a housing loan, a combination of conventional
(assets that can be mortgaged) and non-conventional collateral such as peer pressure is
required. Lack of mortgage insurance is also a reason why the private formal sector
bypasses the low-income segment.
DEVELOPMENT OF HOUSING FINANCE IN INDIA
The early development of housing finance in India is a result of the housing policies
implemented by the government. In the first Five Year Plan (1951-56), housing was
introduced into the policy framework at the national level. Affordability was emphasized,
and government support through subsidies and loans were deemed necessary. This plan in
fact became the benchmark for subsequent Five Year Plans for the next two decades.
The second plan (1956-61) strengthened the schemes of the first plan by expanding
coverage, and gave rise to State Housing Boards that still remain in existence. Despite
these efforts, by the fourth plan (1969-74), the government was faced with the dual
problem of a rapidly growing population and a slow growing housing stock. For the first
time, the government decided to encourage private and co-operative housing schemes by
providing financial assistance. However, the majority of activity still remained within the
25
public sector. The government also recognized the need to provide housing finance to lowincome groups and thus set up the Housing and Urban Development Corporation
(HUDCO) in 1970. HUDCOs mandate was to provide such groups with loans below peak
interest rates and with longer repayment periods.
It was during the fifth plan (1974-79) that as a completely private sector initiative, in 1977,
the first retail housing finance company, Housing Development Finance Corporation
(HDFC) was set up, seeking to provide financial assistance to individuals, groups, cooperative societies and companies for staff housing.
During the Sixth Plan period, other housing finance companies also entered the market.
Towards the mid and late 1980s a few housing finance companies were set up either as
private limited companies (e.g. Dewan Housing Finance Limited) or as a joint venture
with partnership from the state government (e.g. Gujarat Rural Housing Finance
Corporation) or bank sponsored housing finance companies (e.g. Can Fin Homes, SBI
Home Finance, PNB Housing Finance). Even state owned insurance companies like the
Life Insurance Corporation and the General Insurance Corporation of India set up
housing finance arms. The seventh plan period saw the UN Global Shelter Strategy, of
which India subscribed to, being passed in the UN General Assembly in 1988. This gave
the impetus to the drafting of a National Housing Policy for the first time. Another major
reform that took place at the time was the founding of the National Housing Bank (NHB)
in 1988. The NHB was founded to promote and regulate housing finance companies and to
mobilize additional resources for housing.
The National Housing Bank (NHB) was established in July 1988 under an act of
Parliament viz. the National Housing Bank Act, 1987. The act empowers the National
Housing Bank to first, issue directions to housing finance institutions to ensure their
growth on sound lines. Secondly, make loans and advances or render financial assistance
to scheduled banks and housing finance institutions or to any such authority established
by or under any central, state or provincial act and engaged in slum improvement. It may
also formulate schemes for the purpose of mobilisation of resources and extension of
credit for housing.
Public housing finance corporations have schemes that encourage beneficiaries to invest
their own money in their dwellings, but do not offer opportunities for beneficiaries to
26
deposit savings. The beneficiaries are granted larger housing loans, than what may be
available from informal sources. To make housing loans affordable for the urban poor,
direct subsidies are given for construction cost (e.g. the VAMBAY scheme) and/or indirect
subsidies on interest rates are provided. The latter could be in the form of the interest
differential subsidy amounts being remitted directly in the HFC loan accounts of the
borrowers, so as to bring down their loan liability. These loans are characterised by
conventional mortgage lending, have a longer-term tenor and repayments are in equal
monthly installments (EMIs).
The eighth plan recommended that reforms be made on both, the financial and legal
aspects to allow the mortgage market to develop further. It laid special emphasis on
government incentives to enhance the flow of credit to the housing sector through housing
finance institutions. Both the ninth (1997-2002) and tenth (2003-2007) plan recommended
further reforms to enable the government to play its role as a facilitator and encourage
the development of the mortgage market. Emphasis was particularly laid on market
friendly reforms for improving both taxes and infrastructure to help increase investments
into housing. The ninth and tenth five-year plans are also characterised by the aggressive
entry of commercial banks into housing finance.
DEVELOPING A FINANCE MARKET FOR LOW INCOME HOUSING
These are a few prerequisites for a well functioning housing finance system, which are
universal requirements for any country:
Concentrate on getting the primary market right, e.g. transparent property rights,
mortgage and credit registration, efficient mortgage collateral and repossession
procedures, before creating a secondary market to finance those loans.
Create transparent markets for lenders through approved valuation methods, house
price indices and data on mortgage industry.
27
Protect and inform the borrowers, for instance, by helping them compare
mortgages products.
Access to long-term funding sources and other instruments such as covered bonds,
mortgage backed securities.
Need for Self-Regulation: Attempts to devise a model code of conduct are still in a
nascent stage. Some of the issues that are trying to be addressed include transparency and
full dissemination of information to customers. Many financiers have been lobbying for
developers to move towards a mandatory rating of builders and development projects.
Such a move would have a two-fold effect. First, it would make it easier for a consumer to
know which builder is credible and would help the financier to ensure that the borrowers
project will not get stuck in needless litigation or land acquisition issues. This would
enable financiers to identify riskier propositions early on and pre-empt a possible default.
Secondly, it would force builders to be much more forthcoming about their projects and
financials, thus allowing only viable projects to attract investment.
28
Mortgage Insurance:
Mortgage insurance, mandatory in some countries if the loan to value ratio is high, is
completely missing in India. Mortgage insurance would enable the customer to get funds on
easier terms, without putting high down payments on the mortgage. In India, there are no
regulatory restrictions on loan to value ratios. When done with ratios as high as 90-95 percent,
lending poses a major risk to financiers if the borrower defaults. Further, most mortgages in the
Indian market are given primarily to salaried individuals. Mortgage insurance could enable
financiers to tap into other categories like low-income groups or self-employed individuals.
Secondly, in some countries where mortgage insurance is available, those mortgages generally
attract a lower risk weight. Lower risk weights would help financiers have more resources to
lend out. Even though the National Housing Bank has initiated the process of setting up a
Mortgage Credit Guarantee Company, the Reserve Bank of India is still examining the
regulatory framework and risk norms. Unfortunately, this has been pending for several years
now.
29
BIBLIOGRAPHY
The Economic Times, July 16, 2004, Home Mortgage
Market Rises 45% in 03-04
http://www.ficci.com/ficci/general/new_addition/housing_hig
hlights.pdf
http://www.bseindia.com/downloads/HomeLoans.pdf
http://www.housingfinance.org/IndustryInformation/Asia_In
dianHousingFinanceSystem.pdf
http://www.indiainfoline.com
http://www.hdfcindia.com/FinancialRes2004.htm
http://www.businessworldindia.com
http://www.debtonnet.com/research/evolution.pdf
http://www.thehindubusinessonline.com
http://www.economictimes.com
http://www.prdomain.com
30