Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Department of Mechanical Engineering, PES Institute of Technology, Bangalore, Karnataka 560 085, India
Central Manufacturing Technology Institute, Tumkur Road, Bangalore 560 022, India
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 19 December 2008
Received in revised form 10 April 2009
Accepted 17 April 2009
Keywords:
Laser
Prototyping
Wear
Metal matrix composite
Silicon carbide
Iron
a b s t r a c t
Laser sintering is currently one of the most popular techniques to develop innovative materials for many
of the high tech industrial applications owing to its ability to build complex parts in a short time. As such,
material researchers are focusing on developing advanced metal matrix composites through selective
laser sintering method to develop an intricate component eliminating delay in production time. In the
light of the above, the present work focuses on developing ironsilicon carbide (nickel coated) composites
using direct metal laser sintering technology. A laser speed of 50, 75, 100 and 125 mm/s were adopted.
Metallographic studies, friction and wear test using pin-on-disc have been carried out on both the matrix
metal and its composites. Load was varied from 10 to 80 N while sliding velocity was varied from 0.42
to 3.36 m/s for a duration of 30 min. A maximum of 7 wt.% of silicon carbide has been successfully dispersed in iron matrix by laser sintering. Increased content of SiC in iron matrix has resulted in signicant
improvement of both hardness and wear resistance. Lower the sintering speed, higher is the hardness and
wear resistance of both the matrix metal and its composites. However, coefcient of friction of composites
increased with increased SiC under identical test conditions. SEM observations of the worn surfaces have
revealed extensive damage to the iron pins, when compared with that of the composites.
2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
In this era of global competition, there is a need for customerdriven product development with reduced cost and lead-time.
Rapid prototyping has emerged as a key enabling technology
with its ability to shorten product design and development cycle.
Rapid prototyping (RP) refers to a class of technologies that
can automatically construct physical models directly from computer aided design (CAD) data. RP has emerged as a powerful
technology in reducing product development cycle (Srinivas et
al., 2006a,b). RP processes can be divided into three groups
based on the state of material before part formation, namely:
liquid, powder and solid sheets (Kruth, 1991). Powder based
process is based on the solidication of ne powder either
with laser or by the application of binding agent. Among all
the RP processes, direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) is the
most popular technique to produce metal prototypes and tooling directly from 3D CAD data using metal powders. Currently
few materials are developed for producing metal prototypes and
tooling. Development of materials using laser sintering technology is the most sought-after subject for the researchers. Maraging
steel, stainless steel, cobalt chrome and titanium are the lat-
Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 80 2672 1983; fax: +91 80 2672 0886.
E-mail address: csr gce@yahoo.co.in (C.S. Ramesh).
0924-0136/$ see front matter 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.04.018
5430
C.S. Ramesh, C.K. Srinivas / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209 (2009) 54295436
2. Experimental details
Coefcient of friction () =
Silicon carbide (greenish in color) in powder form was obtained
from M/s Grindwell Norton, Bangalore. Iron powder produced by
water atomization process was procured from M/s Sundaram fasteners limited, Hyderabad. The powders were sieved using 20 and
50 m sieves for silicon carbide and iron powders respectively. The
particle size of the sieved silicon carbide and iron powders was
evaluated using sedigraph and particle size counter equipments
respectively. The morphology of the powders was evaluated by
scanning electron microscope.
Silicon carbide was coated with nickel using electroless plating
process as described elsewhere (Ramesh et al., 2007a,b). Nickelcoated silicon carbide was mixed with iron powder in a conical
mixer. The powders were thoroughly mixed and the mixing time
was optimized to achieve a homogeneous mix. The quality of the
mix was evaluated by statistical analysis method as described by
Russel and Dotter (1984). A standard deviation in the range of
0.10.2 was achieved for the quality of mix of all the powders
mixed. Different powder mixtures were prepared with 1, 2, 3, 5
and 7 wt.% of nickel-coated silicon carbide with iron powder. Wear
and microstructure specimens were prepared using EOSINT M250
extended sinter-station with CO2 laser as a heat source. EOSINT
M250 sinter-station and the sintering process is described elsewhere (Gajendran et al., 2003). The wear specimens were built to a
size of 12 mm diameter and height of 28 mm while the specimens
for microstructure studies were built to a size of 10 mm diameter and to a height of 5 mm. The build orientation during sintering
was such that the axis of the cylindrical specimens was parallel to
the build direction. Laser power was maintained constant at 180 W
with laser beam diameter of 0.4 mm. Sintering speed was varied
from 50 to 125 mm/s in steps of 25, while hatch spacing, hatch width
and layer thickness were maintained constant at 0.2 mm, 5 mm and
F
N
(1)
V
NL
(2)
C.S. Ramesh, C.K. Srinivas / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209 (2009) 54295436
5431
Fig. 2. Scanning electron micrographs of coated and uncoated silicon carbide powders.
Fig. 3. Optical micrograph of laser-sintered (a) iron and (b) iron5 wt.%SiC composite sintered at laser speed of 100 mm/s.
5432
C.S. Ramesh, C.K. Srinivas / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209 (2009) 54295436
Fig. 4. Scanning electron micrograph of (a) iron and (b) iron5 wt.% SiC composites sintered at laser speed of 100 mm/s.
content. A maximum hardness of 740 VHN is achieved for composite with 7 wt.% of SiC. The drastic improvement of hardness can
be attributed to (a) high hardness of silicon carbide (b) the thermal mismatch between iron and silicon carbide which leads to the
generation of high density of dislocation at the interface of iron
and silicon carbide which in turn retards the plastic deformation.
Similar results are achieved by other researchers while producing aluminium alloy composite by inltration process (Sahin and
Acilar, 2003). Further, it is observed that hardness of the composite increases with decreased laser speed. At decreased laser speeds,
more heat energy is available, there by more melting of powder
takes place leading to increase in density. It is the increased density
that contributes to the increase in hardness.
3.5. Coefcient of friction
3.5.1. Effect of silicon carbide (SiC)
Fig. 7 shows the variation of coefcient of friction with increased
weight percent of silicon carbide in iron matrix. It is observed that
increased content of SiC a very hard reinforcement in a very soft
matrix results in increased coefcient of friction of the composite. Strongly bonded silicon carbide in the composite pins do act
as sharp cutting edges resulting in abrading of the hardened steel
counter disc as can be observed in Fig. 8. It is this phenomenon that
is largely responsible for the increased coefcient of friction when
compared to iron. The lower value of coefcient of friction of iron
can be mainly attributed to the material transfer from the softer
iron pin on to the hardened counter disc and also to the formation
of oxide lms, which act as solid lubricant (Ramesh et al., 2007a,b).
C.S. Ramesh, C.K. Srinivas / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209 (2009) 54295436
5433
Fig. 10. Variation of coefcient of friction of iron and iron5 wt.% SiC composites
with load.
Fig. 8. Optical macrophotograph of worn out wear track of hardened steel counter
disc.
tion in the friction during the sliding motion of the contacting parts.
However at all the laser speeds studied, the coefcient of friction
of iron composites is higher when compared with iron matrix.
3.5.3. Effect of load
The variation of coefcient of friction with normal load is shown
in Fig. 10. It is observed that increased load has resulted in decrease
in coefcient of friction for both iron and its composite in the
load range of 1050 N. However for loads beyond 50 N and up to
a steady load of 80 N, there is negligible effect on coefcient of friction. However at all the loads studied, the coefcient of friction
of iron is lower when compared with iron composites. The initial
steep decrease in coefcient of friction with increased load can be
explained to the higher probability of shearing of asperity junctions
because of the increased plastic deformation at higher loads. The
interlocking phenomena during the sliding motion of the contacting pair is not dominant owing to the greater extent of destruction
of asperity junctions leading to lowering of coefcient of friction
with increased load.
3.5.4. Effect of sliding velocity
The variation of coefcient of friction with sliding velocity is
shown in Fig. 11. It is observed that at all the sliding velocities stud-
Fig. 9. Effect of laser speed on coefcient of friction of iron and iron5 wt.% SiC
composites.
Fig. 11. Variation of coefcient of friction with sliding velocity of iron and
iron5 wt.% SiC composites.
5434
C.S. Ramesh, C.K. Srinivas / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209 (2009) 54295436
Fig. 12. Variation of wear rate of iron and ironSiC composites with varying SiC
content.
Fig. 15. Variation of wear rate with load and laser speed. (a) Variation of wear rate
with load and sintering speed for iron. (b) Variation of wear rate with load and laser
speed for iron composites.
C.S. Ramesh, C.K. Srinivas / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209 (2009) 54295436
5435
Fig. 16. SEM of worn surfaces at sliding velocity of 1.26 m/s and load of 20 N. (a) Iron-sintered at 100 mm/s. (b) Iron3 wt.%SiC sintered at 100 mm/s.
Alphas and Zhang (1994). Further, once the transferred layer are
established on the composite samples, the steel counter face can
be considered to be mainly in contact with the mixture of iron
and its oxide. The iron oxides are known to have low coefcient
of friction and these layers are expected to provide in situ lubricating effect (Rabinowicz, 1996; Bowden and Tabor, 1953). This
lubricating effect provides the materials with higher incorporation of reinforcement with higher wear resistance. The existence
of such transfer layer in case of aluminum based composites has
been reported by several researchers (Alphas and Zhang, 1994;
Biswas and Pramila Bai, 1981; Murali et al., 1982).
3.6.2. Effect of sliding velocity
The variation of wear rate of iron and its composites with
increase in sliding velocity is shown in Fig. 14. At all the sliding
velocities studied, ironsilicon carbide composite possesses lower
wear rate when compared with iron. A steep decrease in wear rate
is observed with increase in sliding velocity at a sliding velocity
beyond 0.84 mm/s and remains steady with further increase in sliding velocity for iron. The steep decrease in wear rate of iron can be
attributed to the fact that the higher sliding velocities result in promoting slightly higher temperature at the interfaces of the mating
part which may come out as the formation of oxide lms on the mating surfaces. These oxide lms in between the mating surfaces will
have a benecial effect in retarding the material transfer process
during sliding of the mating parts.
Once a stable lm is formed any further increase in sliding
velocity will not affect the adhesion process, there by unaffecting the material removal rate from the sliding surfaces resulting
in steady wear rate. However, in case of FeSiC composites there
is a steady increase in wear rate with increase in sliding velocity
beyond 0.84 m/s. This increase in wear rate of composite can be
mainly attributed to the fact that silicon carbide which is a very
hard phase present in the composite tends to disturb the formation
of protective lubricating lm of iron and its oxides. It is important to
ensure that the lubricating lm is continuous and not fragmented
for lower wear rate.
3.6.3. Effect of load
The variation of wear rate with contact load is shown in Fig. 15.
It is observed that initially for up to a load of 60 N, there is a drastic
reduction in wear rate. Beyond 60 N the wear rate is steady for the
load up to 80 N. However at all loads studied composites exhibit
lower wear rate when compared with iron. Further it is observed
that the laser speeds during the processing of composites have a
signicant effect on the wear rates of the developed composites.
A decrease in laser speed results in better wear resistance of the
5436
C.S. Ramesh, C.K. Srinivas / Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209 (2009) 54295436
Murali, T.P., Prasad, S.V., Surappa, M.K., Rohatgi, T.K., Gopinath, K., 1982. Friction and
wear behaviour of Al-alloy coconut shell char particulate composites. Wear 80,
149158.
Murali, K., Chatterjee, A.N., Saha, P., Palai, P., Kumar, S., Roy, S.K., Mishra, P.K., Roy
Choudhury, A., 2003. Direct selective laser sintering of irongraphite powder
mixture. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 136, 179185.
Prasad, S.V., Rohatgi, R.K., 1987. Tribological properties of aluminium alloy composites. J. Mater. 39 (11), 2226.
Rabinowicz, E., 1996. In: Ling, F.F., Witley, R.L., Ku, P.M., Peterson, M.B. (Eds.), Compatibility Criteria for Sliding Metals in Friction and Lubrication in Metal Processing.
ASME, New York, pp. 90102.
Ramesh, C.S., Seshadri, S.K., Iyer, K.J.L., 1991. A survey on aspects of wear of metals.
Indian J. Technol. 29, 179185.
Ramesh, C.S., Seshadri, S.K., 2003. Tribological characteristics of nickel composite
coating. Wear 255, 893902.
Ramesh, C.S., Srinivasa, C.K., Srinivas, K., 2007a. Friction and wear behaviour of rapid
prototype parts by direct metal laser sintering. Trib. -Mater. Surf. Interfaces 1
(2), 7379.
Ramesh, C.S., Srinivasa, C.K., Avadani, S.S., Channabasappa, B.H., 2007b. Electroless nickel plating on silicon carbide particles for MMC applications.
In: Kori, S.A., Claude, E., Mahadevappa, G. (Eds.), Proceedings of International Symposium on Advanced Materials and Processing. Bagalkot, India,
pp. 150154.
Russel, T., Dotter, 1984. Blending and premixing of metal powders. In: Metals Hand
Book, vol. 7, 9th ed, pp. 186187.
Sahin, Y., Acilar, M., 2003. Production and properties of SiCp-reinforced aluminium
alloy composites. Composites Part A 34, 709718.
Saka, N., Karalekas, D.P., 1985. Friction and wear of particle reinforced metal ceramic
composition. In: Ludema, K.C. (Ed.), Proc. Conf. Wear of Materials. ASME, New
York, pp. 784793.
Simchi, A., Petzoldt, F., Pohl, H., 2001. Direct metal laser sintering: material considerations and mechanisms of particle bonding. Int. J. Powder Metall. 37 (2),
4961.
Simchi, A., Pohl, H., 2003. Effect of laser sintering processing parameters on the
microstructure and densication of iron powder. Mater. Eng. A359, 119128.
Srinivas, C.K., Ramesh, C.S., Somashekar, B.S., 2006a. Sintering processes in production of industrial components. In: Proceedings of the National Conference
on Emerging Trends in Mechanical Engineering, BMS College of Engineering,
Bangalore, pp. 2325.
Srinivas, C.K., Ramesh, C.S., Prasad, S.V., 2006b. An overview of rapid prototyping
processes. Manuf. Technol. Today 5 (6), 2629.
Surappa, M.K., Prasad, S.V., Rohatgi, P.K., 1982. Wear and abrasion of cast Alalumina
particle composites. Wear 77, 295302.
Vaucher, S., Paraschivescu, D., Andre, C., Beffort, O., 2002. Selective laser sintering
of aluminiumsilicon carbide metal matrix composites. Materials Week 2002,
30.09.-02.10 2002, ICM-Munich. (ISBN3-88355-314-X).