Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Article information:
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by 361826 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for
Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines
are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
International
Journal of
Manpower
23,8
716
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/0143-7720.htm
Introduction
Though the issue of career plateaus and their detrimental effects on
performance and satisfaction is more than 20 years old (Ference et al., 1977),
it remains a very relevant topic. Moreover, due to organizational and
environmental changes, an increasing number of employees are affected by the
problem of career immobility (Trembley and Roger, 1993; Chay et al., 1995). In
addition, organizational performance may very well be related to this issue.
Both theory and practice show the increasing significance of human resources
as a key factor of international competitiveness (Sparrow and Hiltrop, 1994;
Sparrow and Cooper, 1998; Brewster and Harris, 1999).
In the common pyramid-shaped organization virtually everyone's career at
one time or another reaches a point where further hierarchical advancement is
unlikely. As organizations tend to reduce their staff in lean times, through
techniques such as business re-engineering, downsizing and spin-off activities,
further advancement within the organization becomes more unlikely, and
employees have to face the fact that they have to stay in the same position
longer than expected without any reduction in performance level. Beyond the
problems faced by workers in large organizations, employees in small-toInternational Journal of Manpower,
Vol. 23 No. 8, 2002, pp. 716-733.
# MCB UP Limited, 0143-7720
DOI 10.1108/01437720210453920
This article is based on data collected for an original research project conceived and conducted
by Wolfgang Elsik and the first author. See Eckardstein et al., 1997; Elsik and Nachbagauer,
1997.
Concepts of
career plateaus
717
International
Journal of
Manpower
23,8
718
Doubts about the validity of asking employees and supervisors about the
chance of further advancement (Orpen, 1986; Slocum et al., 1985; Stout
et al., 1988) have led to the definition of career plateaus ``as the point at which
future career mobility, including both upward and lateral moves, is in
reasonable doubt because the length of time in the present position has been
unduly prolonged'' (Veiga, 1981, p. 566). This operational definition stresses
long position tenure compared with the average workforce. Lateral moves
are excluded from the notion of career plateaus therefore we would rather
talk of career immobility, while plateau suggests the picture of the
impossibility of an upward move (Eckardstein et al., 1997; Gerpott, 1987;
Orpen, 1983).
Some researchers (Chao, 1990; Nicholson, 1993; Trembley and Roger, 1993)
have compared these two measurements of career plateau. Chay et al. (1995)
found that subjective measurement, the self-assessment of promotion
chances, explained more of the variance in work attitudes and behaviours
than did the objective measurement of job tenure or position immobility
(Eckardstein et al., 1997). Furthermore, the correlation between these two
measurements was not significant; in studies reporting a significant finding,
(Nicholson, 1993; Trembley and Roger, 1993) weak correlations were
observed.
It is therefore reasonable to suggest that the objective measurement of career
plateaus is more than an operationalization of Ference et al.'s notion of career
plateaus and has to be treated as an independent dimension. This is further
underpinned by reports of differing antecedents and consequences of both
dimensions.
There are two further suggestions worth considering here both of which
support the independence of the concepts. Chao (1990) argues that the way the
individual perceives, assesses and reacts to his present work depends more on
the subjective evaluation of career development than on the tenure alone. On
the other hand, feelings of being at a dead end may stem from a number of
influencing factors such as supervisor signals, personal commitment, general
advancement opportunities and practices, qualification and micro-politics and,
of course, long tenure. The objective aspect of career plateaus is determined
by past decisions whereas the subjective dimension is driven by further
expectations at work.
Both the subjective and the objective dimensions of the concept of career
plateau take as their starting point the immobility stemming from the common
structure of organizations, the pyramid. Here a career plateau is unavoidable,
given the scarcity of positions in higher layers (Ference et al., 1977; Bardwick,
1983, 1986). Hence we will refer to these two dimensions as structural career
plateaus.
But career itself, according to Schein's (1971) concept, is not necessarily
connected with hierarchical positions. Increasingly task and responsibility
have become critical variables for developmental opportunities beyond rank
and title. We will call the absence of new, challenging and varied tasks without
Concepts of
career plateaus
719
International
Journal of
Manpower
23,8
720
Figure 1.
Theoretical framework
Method
Subjects
The study was conducted at the Vienna University of Business Administration
and Economics (``Wirtschaftsuniversitaet'' WU) and at three secondary
colleges for business administration (``Handelsakademie'' HAK). The paperand-pencil questionnaire yielded a final sample of 165 faculty and 77 teachers,
representing a response rate of 69 percent and 28 percent, respectively.
The average age in the WU-sample was 39 years, 20 percent were female. A
total of 50 percent of the respondents had been with the university for seven
years or less, with a further 25 percent for more than 15 years. The average
tenure at the university was 10.3 years. The sample represents 45 percent of
tenured personnel and 50 percent of non-tenured personnel. The tenured part
consisted of full professors (27.9 percent with an internal hierarchy
comprising two stages), associate professors (5.5 percent assistant professors
with habilitation[1]), assistant professors (6.7 percent post-docs with tenure
but without habilitation) and (language) teachers at the university (4.9 percent).
The non-tenured part represents doctoral students (32.3 percent) and post-docs
(18.3 percent). A total of 4.9 percent were working on a contractual basis not
classified.
In contrast to the university 63 percent of the teachers in school were female.
The average age was 36 years with an average of ten years at school. About 45
percent of the teachers were appointed to permanent staff[2], also 37 percent
worked on a tenured contractual basis, while 18 percent had a non-tenured
contract. Finally, 91 percent were academics, and 9 percent non-academics.
Measures
Scales were developed after a comprehensive literature review of the area. All
scales were tested with factor analysis and alpha coefficients and resulted in
satisfactory discriminant validity and reliability. All items of scales are a fivepoint Likert-type (see Table I).
Beside demographic variables, the questionnaire comprised scales on
satisfaction with task, individual development and the organization as a whole
(following Neuberger and Allerbeck, 1978, with minor adaptations), affective
and continuance commitment (adapted and translated from Meyer and Allen,
1984). Performance measures included weekly working hours, self-assessment
of current performance (quality, quantity, and organizational utility) and recent
changes in performance level.
The structural subjective dimension of career plateau used a self-report to
assess the likelihood of further advancement, the structural objective
dimension of career plateau was computed as tenure above average of the
respective group in terms of layer, and task stagnation was measured by a
scale on work content and routine. All three variables were dichotomized.
Further items dealt with a possible enlargement of the scope of discretion and
responsibility, and the presence of niches or pet projects which the job might
offer.
Concepts of
career plateaus
721
International
Journal of
Manpower
23,8
722
Table I.
Outcome variables
characteristics
Scale
Items
Mean
SD
Min
Max
Val n
-coef.
Performance current
3.99
3.81
0.61
0.59
2.67
2.33
5.00
5.00
165
77
0.76
Performance change
3.54
3.36
0.65
0.65
1.67
1.00
5.00
5.00
165
77
0.80
Working hours
48.40
34.03
15.75
16.43
3.00
4.00
95.00
60.00
164
76
Satisfaction task
3.91
3.82
0.66
0.58
1.33
1.89
5.00
4.78
165
75
0.86
Satisfaction development
3.61
3.68
0.81
0.83
1.00
1.50
5.00
4.83
162
66
0.87
Satisfaction WU/HAK
10
3.15
3.42
0.62
0.70
1.20
1.00
5.00
5.00
165
75
0.82
Affective commitment
3.33
3.56
0.94
0.83
1.00
1.00
5.00
5.00
165
77
0.80
Continuance commitment
2.51
2.45
1.01
1.18
1.00
1.00
5.00
5.00
165
77
0.81
Results
Demographic variables
Results for the university group showed no significant correlations between all
three types of plateaued performers on the one hand and tenure and age on the
other hand. This contrasts with results for formal employment status: while
some 30 percent of the assistant professors (doctoral students and post-docs)
without tenure report themselves as having plateaued in one way or another,
91 percent of the assistant professors (post-docs) with tenure but without
habilitation are non-plateaued performers. In contrast, 67 percent of the
associate professors (lecturers) with tenure and habilitation report themselves
on some kind of plateau (2 18 31:77; p < 0:05). Top full professors (with
tenure) are excluded from this analysis, because by definition they cannot
be promoted as they are already on the top of the pyramid. In every case either
of the structural dimensions is less important than task stagnation.
In contrast to faculty, within the group of the college teachers both age (mult.
R2 0:125; p < 0:05) and tenure (mult. R2 0:189; p < 0:05) have a strong
impact on the subjective structural dimension of career plateau. Of the teachers
without tenure 77 percent report no plateau, while some 72 percent of the
teachers with tenure report themselves as having plateaued (2 6 16:45;
p < 0:05). These findings are underscored by the fact that teachers without
tenure are about eight years younger than their fellow teachers with tenure.
Position immobility had no effect.
Concepts of
career plateaus
723
Outcome measures
Correlation data for the outcome measures are shown in Table III. The analysis
for the influence of different concepts of career plateaus on the outcome
measures was conducted using ANOVA including MCA, with additional
analyses where necessary. Results for the WU and the HAKs regarding
performance, satisfaction and commitment are summarized in Table IV. Note,
that for the ANOVA in the WU-sample, top full professors (with tenure) are
excluded from this analysis, because by definition they cannot be promoted
as they are already on the top of the pyramid (n 133).
We found no significant correlations between current performance and
change in performance level and any kind of plateau both in schools and the
university. Data showed a significant difference for faculty regarding
performance in terms of working hours. Faculty on a work-content plateau
reported that they worked six hours less per week than their colleagues.
Both the objective structural and, in particular, the work-content dimension
of career plateaus have a marked effect on (dis)satisfaction with the task, while
Subjective structural plateau
SSP
Non-SSP
Objective structural plateau Objective structural plateau
OSP Non-OSP Total
OSP
Non-OSP Total Total %
Work-content
plateau
Total
WCP
3.0
7.1
4.5
11.4
7.6
18.6
0.8
1.4
9.1
2.9
9.8
4.3
17.4
22.9
NonWCP
5.3
22.9
14.4
22.9
19.7
45.7
13.6
21.4
49.2
10.0
62.9
31.4
82.6
77.1
8.3
30.0
18.9
34.3
27.3
64.3
14.4
22.9
58.3
12.9
72.7
35.7
100.0
100.0
Table II.
Frequencies in each
plateau group
0.12
0.20*
Working hours
0.25***
0.20*
Performance change
0.24***
0.46***
Continuance commitment
0.26***
0.13
0.43***
0.51***
Affective commitment
Performance current
0.50***
0.47***
Satisfaction WU/HAK
Table III.
Correlation coefficients
of outcome measures
0.67***
0.38**
0.01
0.22*
0.16**
0.11
0.17**
0.21*
0.10
0.02
0.38***
0.19
0.61***
0.02
Satisfaction
development
0.02
0.08
0.08
0.27**
0.13*
0.17
0.12
0.23*
0.49***
0.39***
WU/HAK
0.05
0.04
0.16**
0.13
0.31***
0.11
0.12
0.31**
0.04
0.02
0.05
0.03
0.18**
0.31**
Commitment
Affective
Continuance
0.28**
0.36**
0.32***
0.20*
0.26**
0.03
Performance
Current
Change
724
Satisfaction development
Task
International
Journal of
Manpower
23,8
Outcome measures
Total
Objective
structural P
Subjective
structural P
Work-content
plateau
Performance current
0.065
0.164
0.006
0.026
0.002
0.018
0.020
0.038
Performance change
0.043
0.117
0.000
0.000
0.007
0.000
0.002
0.010
Working hours
0.090
0.040
0.011
0.002
0.008
0.001
0.060*
0.001
Satisfaction task
0.302*
0.109
0.034*
0.031
0.001
0.007
0.232*
0.016
Satisfaction development
0.173*
0.044
0.002
0.006
0.036*
0.001
0.040*
0.000
Satisfaction WU/HAK
0.083
0.095
0.000
0.008
0.030*
0.017
0.012
0.004
Affective commitment
0.101
0.151
0.003
0.000
0.008
0.010
0.031*
0.064*
Continuance commitment
0.062
0.118
0.010
0.037
0.002
0.010
0.035*
0.065*
Concepts of
career plateaus
725
Table IV.
Results of the
ANOVAs with MCA
International
Journal of
Manpower
23,8
726
believe that these findings can be explained by taking into account previous job
expectations: it is plausible that the prospect of promotion is not the main
reason for working at the university, but rather the prospect of a varied and
interesting job. Thus, disappointed expectations may have different
consequences. A low likelihood of further promotion may influence the
emotional commitment to the university but does not affect the previous
decision to stay. If the main expectation and reason for working at the
university, the interesting job, is not met, another reason for staying within the
organization is needed. Here the side-bet-theory (Becker, 1960) suggests that
the search for rational reasons will improve the importance of previous
investments and the scarcity of alternatives.
Our findings regarding performance are in accordance with other studies. It
is not clear whether there is no difference or if the self-assessment of workrelated criteria hinders reliable ratings. On the other hand the difference in
working time for the work-content dimension but not the structural component
is plausible. When one fulfils an interesting task especially if one carries out
research work time is fleeting. With routine tasks, the reduction of working
time is a good means of obtaining a fair equilibrium of input and output. The
idea of equilibrium is underscored by the fact that there is no difference
regarding the self-assessment question, as there is no reason to suppose that
the social average differs between groups.
While the effect of task stagnation on satisfaction with the task is not really
surprising, it is interesting to see that major effects on satisfaction with
individual development occur only on a dual subjective plateau with no effect
of the objective dimension. Here, we assume the influence of compensating
effects of the two subjective dimensions. On the one hand, interesting tasks
may compensate for the scarcity of promotion opportunities, while routine
work can be understood as an unavoidable period until the next promotion
which provides the prospect of a more challenging task. If none of these seem
possible, further advancement is assessed to be low. As far as niches and the
improvement of scope are concerned, we can see that they can, albeit to a rather
small extent, have compensating effects for lacking task content and challenge.
It is again interesting that these effects are more common for universities than
for schools dominated by rather rigid structures.
A comparison of the samples of faculty and teachers reveals the importance
of task in the context of universities, while the effect of task and structure in
schools is more balanced. These findings, and the unexpected effects on
affective commitment and task satisfaction, support the assumption that the
faculty understand their university as a field of individual development in
terms of tasks, while schools give the impression of an organization where
personal development finds an end after a period of introduction. Schools are
typical examples of extremely flat organizations (i.e. teacher principal) where
most members reach their peak of development in the middle of the hierarchy.
Most surprisingly we found that one-third of the teachers believed in further
promotion in the context of an extremely flat formal hierarchy. Since it is not
Concepts of
career plateaus
727
International
Journal of
Manpower
23,8
728
likely that each one of them will become a principal, we believe that the
meaning of (structural) promotion is very obscure. Supported by the fact that
the question concerning the likelihood of further promotion resulted in the
clear-cut differentiation of two groups, we believe that the concept of
hierarchical promotion needs reconsideration. A first hint is given by the result
that three-quarters of teachers without tenure believed in their promotion,
while the same amount of teachers with tenure did not. This is best explained
by the supposition of a trinomial concept of hierarchy though not formal at
the schools (no tenure tenure principal). Data underpin the importance of
age, which has close connections to tenure and legal status for the creation of a
structural career plateau.
In contrast to schools such clear relationships do not exist at universities.
Rather, we can distinguish between two classes of faculty with an internal
differentiation: in both classes, feelings of task stagnation are decreased, as
rank gets higher. Subsequent to passing the step to the next class, i.e. after the
habilitation, lecturers start at the bottom again and hence report high rates of
task stagnation.
Conclusions
As already mentioned in the beginning, advancement possibilities decrease due
to decentralization and lack of hierarchical strategies. This reduction in
organizational levels leads to orders being handled more frequently in projects
with a limited period, and it promotes job rotation, in general. Work content
and tasks are undergoing faster changes than ever before. This makes
permanent learning and unlearning of work-relevant content a matter of course
and does not automatically lead to a hierarchical promotion. These conditions
cannot be changed under the given market conditions.
Empirical results show however that these forms of flexibility are connected
with a negative effect on performance, satisfaction, and commitment if the
individual employees have the feeling they cannot plan or influence their
career. It seems obvious that employees should monitor their own opportunities
in the organization. Alas, in many cases, plateaued performers become aware of
their situation when it is too late for efficient action. Employees should, if
alternatives are available, consider changing the organization before
qualification and motivation are heavily affected. Here, new qualifications can
give them access to even more positions.
Some warning signals are clearly seen at an organizational level. These
include a policy of lean management, vacancies in target positions, and, at a
personal level, diminishing qualification opportunities, long tenure in a
position, a reduction of status symbols and of interaction with important
managers, and narrowing of responsibility. Proactive action is possible only if
problems can be identified. Searches for actions may include talks with
supervisors and the arrangement of an individual career and development plan.
Not only direct supervisors are important, but also strategic impression
management, an increase of visibility and reputation, and networking. Other
Concepts of
career plateaus
729
International
Journal of
Manpower
23,8
730
opportunities is only one goal. Dual ladders also aim at the stimulation of and
reward for specialized functions, offering possibilities for more freedom at
work, and diminishing fluctuation and brain drain. It is becoming even more
important to increase the commitment of these internal specialists to the
company as it is getting more and more difficult to recruit them from the labour
market (Ridder, 1999). Motivating effects arising from one career system may
be expected only if recognizable career chances can be fulfilled within a
reasonable period. Wherever possible, the principle of precedence of those in
the ranks should apply (Mentzel, 1997).
A further point to be remembered is the consideration of compensation
effects: thus, pronounced content-related flexibility makes formal stability and
predictability of promotion important for employees. In contrast, it seems to
have extremely detrimental effects on performance, work satisfaction and
commitment if both factors are kept unforeseeable. From an organizational
viewpoint, this could lead to undesired effects of actions conducted out of
insecurity, such as short-term, individual utility maximizations at the expense
of others or a far too rigid orientation towards formal guidelines.
And last but not least our results confirm the principle of separation of
performance appraisals oriented towards the past and a future-oriented
support for employees. Lueger (1992) as well as others advocate that appraisal
and advancement systems should, by no means, be made into one evaluation
since personnel, successor and career line planning tools are based on data and
experiences oriented towards past achievements. A far-sighted career policy,
however, has to take into account future expectations of the employees and the
organizational context. This can be achieved by means of traditional personnel
management tools such as career appraisals, appraisals of potentials or
proactive qualifications for different development possibilities.
If well understood, career plateaus, though not avoidable in principle, need
not have pernicious effects on organizations. We have to turn away from the
image that problems connected with lost opportunities are unsolvable, but have
to be aware of their causes, types and effects in order to take proactive actions.
This means that we have to realize that the career path does not need to go only
in one direction.
Notes
1. A habilitation is required for applying for a post as full or associate professor, i.e. to get a
tenure, and is connected to the awarding of the venia docendi.
2. Most teachers are after years in service appointed to the permanent staff according to
public law. They are not only tenured and bear near to no risk to be moved to other schools,
but also have a specialized salary and pension system. All other teachers have contracts on
the basis of private law. They may be tenured or employed on a year to year basis.
References
Arthur, M.B. (1992), ``Career theory in a dynamic context'', in Montross, D.F. and Shinkman, C.J.
(Eds), Career Development: Theory and Practice, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL,
pp. 65-84.
Bardwick, J.M. (1983), ``SMR forum: plateauing and productivity'', Sloan Management Review,
Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 67-73.
Bardwick, J.M. (1986), The Plateauing Trap, Amacom, New York, NY.
Concepts of
career plateaus
Becker, H.S. (1960), ``Notes on the concept of commitment'', American Journal of Sociology,
Vol. 66, pp. 32-42.
Brewster, C. and Harris, H. (1999), International HRM. Contemporary Issues in Europe,
Routledge, London.
Carnazza, J.P., Korman, A.K., Ference, T.P. and Stoner, J.A. (1981), ``Plateaued and non-plateaued
managers: factors in job performance'', Journal of Management, Vol. 7 No. 2,
pp. 7-25.
Chao, G.T. (1990), ``Exploration of the conceptualization and measurement of career plateau: a
comparative analysis'', Journal of Management, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 181-93.
Chay, Y.W., Aryee, S. and Chew, I. (1995), ``Career plateauing: reactions and moderators among
managerial and professional employees'', International Journal of Human Resource
Management, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 61-78.
Clark, F.A. (1992), Total Career Management. Strategies for Creating Management Careers,
McGraw-Hill, London.
Domsch, M.E. (1994), ``Fachlaufbahn ein Beitrag zur Flexibilisierung und
Mitarbeiterorientierung der Personalentwicklung'', in Domsch, M.E. and Siemers, S.H.
(Eds), Fachlaufbahnen, Physica, Heidelberg, pp. 3-21.
Eckardstein, D.v., Elsik, W. and Nachbagauer, A. (1997), Formen und Effekte von
Karriereplateaus. Eine theoretische und empirische Analyse, Muenchen & Mering, Hampp.
Eckardstein, D.v., Lueger, G., Niedl, K. and Schuster, B. (1995), Psychische
Befindensbeeintraechtigungen und Gesundheit im Betrieb, Muenchen & Mering, Hampp.
Elsass, P.M. and Ralston, D.A. (1989), ``Individual responses to the stress of career plateauing'',
Journal of Management, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 35-47.
Evans, M.G. and Gilbert, E. (1984), ``Plateaued managers: their need gratifications and their
effort-performance expectations'', Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 21 No. 1,
pp. 99-108.
Ference, T., Stoner, J.A. and Warren, E.K. (1977), ``Managing the career plateau'', Academy of
Management Review, Vol. 2 No. 10, pp. 602-12.
Freimuth, J. (1991), ``Karriereplateaus und der interne Arbeitsmarkt. `Weisse Flecken' auf der
Landkarte der Personalpolitik'', Zeitschrift Fuehrung und Organisation, Vol. 60 No. 1,
pp. 29-34.
Gerpott, T.J. (1987), ``Parallelhierarchie'', Die Betriebswirtschaft, Vol. 47 No. 4, pp. 494-6.
Gerpott, T.J. (1988), Karriereentwicklung von Industrieforschern, Berlin.
Gerpott, T.J. (1994), ``Fachlaufbahnen in der industriellen Forschung and Entwicklung'', in
Domsch, M.E. and Siemers, S.H. (Eds), Fachlaufbahnen, Physica, Heidelberg, pp. 23-60.
Hall, D.T. (1985), ``Project work as an antidote to career plateauing in a declining organization'',
Human Resource Management, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 271-92.
Kelly, J.F. (1985), ``Coping with the career plateau'', Personnel Administrator, Vol. 30 No. 10,
pp. 65-76.
Leibowitz, Z.B., Kaye, B.L. and Farren, C. (1990), ``What to do about career gridlock'', Training
and Development Journal, Vol. 44 No. 4, pp. 28-35.
Mayerhofer, W. (1993), ``Personalentwicklung'', in Kasper, H. and Mayerhofer, W. (Eds), Personal,
Fuehrung, Organisation, Ueberreuter, Wien, pp. 153-218.
731
International
Journal of
Manpower
23,8
732
Near, J.P. (1985), ``A discriminant analysis of plateaued versus nonplateaued managers'', Journal
of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 26, pp. 177-88.
Neuberger, O. and Allerbeck, M. (1978), ``Messung und Analyse von Arbeitszufriedenheit.
Erfahrungen mit dem Arbeitsbeschreibungsbogen (ABB)'', Huber, Bern.
Nicholson, N. (1993), ``Purgatory or place of safety? The managerial plateau and organizational
agegrading'', Human Relations, Vol. 46 No. 12, pp. 1369-89.
OECD (1999), Employment Outlook, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development,
Paris, June.
Orpen, C. (1983), ``The career patterns and work attitudes of plateaued and non-plateaued
managers'', International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 32-6.
Orpen, C. (1986), ``The relationship between perceived task attributes and job satisfaction and
performance among plateaued and nonplateaued managers'', Human Systems
Management, Vol. 6, pp. 15-20.
Ridder, H.-G. (1999), Personalwirtschaftslehre, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.
Savery, L.K. (1990), ``Managing plateaued employees'', Management Decision, Vol. 28 No. 3,
pp. 46-50.
Schein, E.H. (1971), ``The individual, the organization, and the career: a conceptual scheme'',
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 7, pp. 401-26.
Schein, E.H. (1994), Karriereanker. Die verborgenen Muster in ihrer beruflichen Entwicklung,
3rd ed., Beratungssozietaet Lanzenberger, Darmstadt.
Slocum, J.W., Cron, W.L., Hansen, R.W. and Rawlings, S. (1985), ``Business strategy and the
management of plateaued employees'', Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28 No. 1,
pp. 133-54.
Sparrow, P. and Cooper, C.L. (1998), ``New organizational forms: the strategic relevance of future
psychological contract scenarios'', Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 15
No. 4, pp. 356-71.
Sparrow, P. and Hiltrop, J.-M. (1994), European Human Resource Management in Transition,
Prentice-Hall, New York, NY.
Stout, S.K., Slocum, J.W. and Cron, W.L. (1988), ``Dynamics of the career plateauing process'',
Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 32, pp. 74-9.
Trembley, M. and Roger, A. (1993), ``Individual, familial and organizational determinants of
career plateau'', Group and Organization Management, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 411-35.
Veiga, J.F. (1981), ``Plateaued versus nonplateaued managers: career patterns, attitudes, and path
potential, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 566-78.
Further reading
Becker, J. and Kurtz, H.-J. (1991), ``Karriere und Wertewandel. Downward-movement als
Instrument der Personalpolitik'', Zeitschrift Fuehrung und Organisation, Vol. 60 No. 1,
pp. 35-41.
Elsik, W. (1994), ``Karriere im schlanken Unternehmen?'', in Mueller, M. (Ed.), Lean Banking,
Ueberreuter, Wien, pp. 205-34.
Elsik, W. and Nachbagauer, A. (1997), ``Dimensionen und Wirkungen von Karriereplateaus'', Die
Betriebswirtschaft, Vol. 57 No. 2, pp. 218-34.
Lueger, G. (1992), Die Bedeutung der Wahrnehmung bei der Personalbeurteilung, Muenchen &
Mering, Hampp.
Concepts of
career plateaus
733