TEMS

RAN Tuning

--- GSM Voice

Reporting Date:

6/19/2014

Data Collection Date:

12/06/2014 3:0

Data Source:

Project: BDH_F
MS2

Created With:

TEMS Discover
5196)

Reporting Options:

Collection Date
15:00~06/14/20

 Ascom 2010-2012. All rights reserved.

TEMS is a trademark of Ascom.
All other trademarks are the property of their respective holders

TEMS Discovery

uning Report

SM Voice Only ---

9/2014

06/2014 3:00:38 PM~14/06/2014 10:18:22 AM

oject: BDH_Final, Composite: Tuy-PhuocS2

MS Discovery Professional(10.0.3 Build:

96)

llection Date Range: 06/12/2014

00~06/14/2014 10:18

Table of Contents

Methodology
Logfiles Used and Analysis Methods Applied
Conventions Used in This Report

RF Analysis (Based on Scanner Data)

Coverage
Cell Coverage Analysis

Voice
Coverage
Overall and Cell-level Performance Metrics
Accessibility
Retainability
Mobility

Drops in Connection with Handover

Downlink Service Integrity

Acronyms

Methodology

In this report, the performance of the GSM radio access network (RAN) is described in terms of accessibility, retainability, mobility

Mobile data was used for the Voice and Packet-switched Data sections of the report. Scanner data was used for the RF Analysis

User-defined Thresholds

Table 1 lists the names and values of user-defined thresholds used in this report. To change threshold values, please select "Con
Thresholds" menu from TEMS Discovery to access the User-Defined Threshold table. The user-should NEVER overwrite the val

User-Defined Thresholds

Values Units

RAN_Report_RxLev_High

-70 dBm

RAN_Report_RxLev_Medium

-85 dBm

RAN_Report_RxLev_Low

-100 dBm

RAN_Report_RxLev_Drop

-95 dBm

RAN_Report_RxQual_High

RAN_Report_RxQual_Medium

RAN_Report_RxQual_Low

RAN_Report_TA_Drop

60

RAN_Report_IE_Valid_Age

5000 ms

Voice_Call_Length_For_Dropped_Call_Rate_Calculation_1

60 second

Table 1 User-Defined Thresholds and Values

Logfiles Used and Analysis Methods Applied

The logfiles used as input to this report are listed in Table 2.

Name
MT1_TUY PHUOC_ 20140612_01
MT1_TUY PHUOC_ 20140613_01
MT1_TUY PHUOC_ 20140613_02
MT1_TUYPHUOC_ 20140614_01
MT1_TUYPHUOC_ 20140614_02
Table 2 Logfile List

The logfiles and devices used for accessibility report are concatenated and listed in table 3a. By default, the values for the "For_A
imported Discovery data sets. To selectively exclude certain file/device combinations from accessibility test, please use device at
to 0.
Log File Name

Device

MT1_TUY PHUOC_ 20140612_01

MS2

MT1_TUY PHUOC_ 20140613_01

MS2

MT1_TUY PHUOC_ 20140613_02

MS2

MT1_TUYPHUOC_ 20140614_01

MS2

MT1_TUYPHUOC_ 20140614_02

MS2

Table 3a List of Log files and devices used for accessibility test.

The logfiles and devices used for retainability report are concatenated and listed in table 3b. By default, the values for the "For_R
imported Discovery data sets. To selectively exclude certain file/device combinations from retainability test, please use device att
0.
Log File Name

Device

MT1_TUY PHUOC_ 20140612_01

MS2

MT1_TUY PHUOC_ 20140613_01

MS2

MT1_TUY PHUOC_ 20140613_02

MS2

MT1_TUYPHUOC_ 20140614_01

MS2

MT1_TUYPHUOC_ 20140614_02

MS2

Table 3b List of Log files and devices used for retainability test.

Conventions Used in This Report

Charts and tables in the report are based on the filtering conditions selected by the user at the time of report generation.

bility, mobility, and coverage.

RF Analysis section.

e select "Configuration \ User-Defined

write the values in the "Values" column.

Start Time

End Time

6/12/2014 15:00

6/12/2014 16:29

6/13/2014 7:51

6/13/2014 10:02

6/13/2014 13:07

6/13/2014 15:04

6/14/2014 8:10

6/14/2014 9:33

6/14/2014 9:59

6/14/2014 10:18

or the "For_Accessibility" attribute are set to 1 for all newly

se device attribute editing tool to change the "For_Accessibility"

Device

Start Time

End Time

6/12/2014 15:00

6/12/2014 16:29

6/13/2014 7:51

6/13/2014 10:02

6/13/2014 13:07

6/13/2014 15:04

6/14/2014 8:10

6/14/2014 9:33

6/14/2014 9:59

6/14/2014 10:18

or the "For_Retainability" attribute are set to 1 for all newly

se device attribute editing tool to change the "For_Retainability" to

Device

ion.

Start Time

End Time

6/12/2014 15:00

6/12/2014 16:29

6/13/2014 7:51

6/13/2014 10:02

6/13/2014 13:07

6/13/2014 15:04

6/14/2014 8:10

6/14/2014 9:33

6/14/2014 9:59

6/14/2014 10:18

RF Analysis (Based on Scanner Data)

The RF Analysis section of this report is based on scanner data collected with a GSM scanner.

Coverage
Table 1 shows the coverage classifications used in this document.
GSM Coverage Class

Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4

Conditions

RxLev >= -70 dBm AND RxQual <= 2

(RxLev >= -85 dBm AND RxQual <= 4) AND (RxLev < -70 dBm OR RxQual > 2)
(RxLev >= -100 dBm AND RxQual <= 6) AND (RxLev < -85 dBm OR RxQual > 4)
RxLev < -100 dBm OR RxQual > 6

Table 1 RF Analysis: Definition of Coverage Classes

Level 1 is the best and Level 4 is the worst classification; the levels are colored green, yellow, orange, and red respectively in tab
report to categorize the accessibility, coverage, mobility, and retainability measurements. In cases where no RxLev or RxQual me
classification is used. For this particular section, no RxQual measurements are available, so classification is based on RxLev onl

Overall Coverage

Table 2 shows the percentage distribution of the cell measurements across RxLev value ranges, as well as across coverage clas

GSM Coverage Class

Level1

Level2

Level3

Sample Count
Percentage

0
N/A

0
N/A

0
N/A

Table 2 RF Analysis: Coverage Class Distribution, Overall

Cell Coverage Analysis

The coverage statistics for each selected cell are listed in Table 3
Table 3 shows, cell by cell, the coverage distribution expressed in terms of coverage classes.

Cell Name

Table 3 RF Analysis: Coverage Class Distribution by Cell

Band

ARFCN

Level 1 Coverage

Level 2 Coverage

Count

Count

ctively in tables in this report. These classifications are used throughout the
r RxQual measurements were available during a call event, the No Data
n RxLev only.

overage classes.

el3

el 2 Coverage
%

Level4

Total

0
N/A

0
100.00%

Level 3 Coverage

Level 4 Coverage

Count

Count

Total
Samples

% of Total

Voice
The Voice section of this report include key parameters, such as RxLev (dBm), RxQual, FER, and MS TxPower.

Coverage
GSM Coverage Class

RxQual < 2

2 <= RxQual < 4

4<=RxQual<6

RxQual >= 6

Rxlev >=-70

3198
3474
264
0
0
6936

440
1071
76
0
0
1587

229
902
63
0
0
1194

115
558
23
0
0
696

-70 > Rxlev >= -85

-85 > Rxlev >= -100

Rxlev<-100
Rxlev Unknown

Total

Table 1 Voice: GSM Coverage Class Sample Count, Overall

GSM Coverage Class

RXQual < 2

2 <= RxQual < 4

4<=RxQual<6

RxQual >= 6

Rxlev >=-70

26.02%
28.26%
2.15%
0.00%
0.00%
56.43%

3.58%
8.71%
0.62%
0.00%
0.00%
12.91%

1.86%
7.34%
0.51%
0.00%
0.00%
9.71%

0.94%
4.54%
0.19%
0.00%
0.00%
5.66%

-70 > Rxlev >= -85

-85 > Rxlev >= -100

Rxlev<-100
Rxlev Unknown

Total

Table 2 Voice: GSM Coverage Class Percentage Distribution, Overall

GSM Coverage Class

Class 1

Class2

Class3

Class4

Distribution

26.02%

40.56%

12.48%

5.66%

Table 3 Voice: GSM Coverage Class Percentage Distribution Summary, Overall

Overall and Cell-level Performance Metrics

Call statistics for individual cells are listed in Table 4.

Cell

97-Pho-Duc-Chinh1_BDH
BCCH-1
BCCH-10
BCCH-18
BCCH-19
BCCH-21
BCCH-29

Call attempts

Call Setup
Failures

Call Setup OK

1
1

1
1

Dropped Call

Call Setup
Success Rate
(CSSR, %)

N/A
N/A
100
N/A
100
100
N/A

BCCH-31
BCCH-32
BCCH-33
BCCH-33_octBSIC-62
BCCH-37
BCCH-6
BCCH-8
BCCH-9
BD-Cau-Chu-Y2_BDH
BD-Tuy-Phuoc1_BDH
BD-Tuy-Phuoc2_BDH
BD-Tuy-Phuoc3_BDH
BD-Tuy-Phuoc4_BDH
BDVHX-Phuoc-An1_BDH
BDVHX-Phuoc-An2_BDH
BDVHX-Phuoc-An3_BDH
BDVHX-Phuoc-Quang1_BDH
BDVHX-Phuoc-Quang2_BDH
BDVHX-Phuoc-Quang3_BDH
BDVHX-Phuoc-Thanh1_BDH
BDVHX-Phuoc-Thanh2_BDH
BDVHX-Phuoc-Thanh3_BDH
Canh-Vinh1_BDH
Dieu-Tri1_BDH
Dieu-Tri2_BDH
Dieu-Tri3_BDH
Go-Boi1_BDH
Go-Boi2_BDH
Go-Boi3_BDH
Go-Boi4_BDH
Hoi-Son1_BDH
KCN-Phuoc-Thanh1_BDH
KCN-Phuoc-Thanh2_BDH
KCN-Phuoc-Thanh3_BDH
Khu-Bac-Ha-Thanh1_BDH
KS-Hoang-Dung1_BDH
KV6-Nhon-Binh1_BDH
KV6-Nhon-Binh2_BDH
KV-Cau-Ong-Don1_BDH
KV-Cau-Ong-Don2_BDH
KV-Cau-Ong-Don3_BDH
KV-Luat-Binh1_BDH
KV-Luat-Binh2_BDH
KV-Luat-Binh3_BDH
KV-Phuoc-An1_BDH
KV-Phuoc-An2_BDH
KV-Phuoc-An3_BDH
KV-Phuoc-Hoa3_BDH
KV-Vinh-Quang1_BDH
KV-Vinh-Quang2_BDH
KV-Vinh-Quang3_BDH
Nga3-Nhon-Ly3_BDH
Nga-Ba-An-Nhon-Bac1_BDH
Nga-Ba-An-Nhon-Nam2_BDH

3
7

15
3

1
7
11
3

4
8
7
8
5
2
6
5
5
5
3
6
2
1
18
4
1
7
4
6
4

3
8
7
8
5
2
6
5
3
4
3
6
2
1
18
4
1
6
4
6
4

3
2
5
1
1
4
3
3
6
3
7
5
6
5
3
5
1
8
6
20

2
1

3
2
5
1
1
4
3
3
6
3
5
5
6
5
3
5
1
8
4
20

1
3

N/A
33.33
100
N/A
73.33
100
N/A
100
N/A
75
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
60
80
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
85.71
100
100
100
N/A
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
71.43
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
66.67
100
N/A
N/A
N/A

Nhon-Hanh2_BDH
Nhon-Hanh3_BDH
Nhon-Phu1_BDH
Phu-Hau2_BDH
Phuoc-Hiep1_BDH
Phuoc-Hiep2_BDH
Phuoc-Hiep3_BDH
Phuoc-Hung1_BDH
Phuoc-Hung2_BDH
Phuoc-Hung3_BDH
Phuoc-My1_BDH
Phuoc-My2_BDH
Phuoc-My3_BDH
Phuoc-Nghia1_BDH
Phuoc-Nghia2_BDH
Phuoc-Nghia3_BDH
VMS-Phuoc-Son1_BDH
VMS-Phuoc-Son2_BDH
VMS-Phuoc-Son3_BDH
VMS-Van-My1_BDH
VMS-Van-My2_BDH
VMS-Van-My3_BDH

1
3
3

1
3
3

3
3
8

3
3
8

1
1
4
6
4
8
8
7
6
13
3
6
12
6

1
1
4
6
4
7
8
7
6
13
3
4
12
6

100
100
100
N/A
100
100
100
N/A
100
100
100
100
100
87.5
100
100
100
100
100
66.67
100
100

Table 4 Voice: Call Statistics by Cell (selected cells only)

Accessibility

Accessibility for voice is determined by the number of Call Setup Failures and their classification. Accessibility statistics for the te
overall.

Accessibility Events
Call Attempts
Call Setup Failures
Call Setup OK
CS call setup success rate (%)

Level 1
Count
%
13
3.75
0
0
13
3.95
100.00%

GSM Coverage Quality Classes Before Events

Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Count
%
Count
%
Count
%
8
2.31
9
2.59
5
1.44
1
6.25
4
25
5
31.25
7
2.13
5
1.52
0
0
88.00%
56.00%
0.00%

Unknow Level
Count
%
312
89.91
6
37.5
304
92.4
98.00%

Table 5 Voice: Accessibility Statistics (by Coverage Class and Overall)

Count of Call Setup Failures

GSM Coverage Class

RXQual < 2

2 <= RxQual < 4

4<=RxQual<6

RxQual >= 6

Rxlev >=-70

0
1
0
0
0
1

0
0
0
0
0
0

2
2
0
0
0
4

2
3
0
0
0
5

-70 > Rxlev >= -85

-85 > Rxlev >= -100

Rxlev<-100
Rxlev Unknown

Total

Table 6 Voice: Accessibility Statistics (by Coverage Class and Overall)

Distribution of Call Setup Failures

GSM Coverage Class

RXQual < 2

2 <= RxQual < 4

4<=RxQual<6

RxQual >= 6

Rxlev >=-70

0.00%
5.88%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
5.88%

0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%

11.76%
11.76%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
23.53%

11.76%
17.65%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
29.41%

-70 > Rxlev >= -85

-85 > Rxlev >= -100

Rxlev<-100
Rxlev Unknown

Total

Table 7 Voice: Accessibility Statistics (by Coverage Class and Overall)

Likelyhood of Call Setup Failures

GSM Coverage Class

RXQual < 2

2 <= RxQual < 4

4<=RxQual<6

RxQual >= 6

Rxlev >=-70

0
0.0003

0
0

0.0087
0.0022

0.0174
0.0054

0
-

0
-

0
-

0
-

-70 > Rxlev >= -85

-85 > Rxlev >= -100

Rxlev<-100
Rxlev Unknown

Table 8 Voice: Accessibility Statistics (by Coverage Class and Overall)

Retainability

Retainability for voice is measured in terms of dropped calls. Table 9 gives the overall dropped call statistics for the test area for e

Retainability IEs

Level 1
Count
%
13
3.95
0
0
0.00%
5580.67
93
0.00%

Call Setuo OK
Dropped Call
Raw GSM Dropped Call Rate (%)
Total GSM Call Hold Times (Seconds)
Number of Equivalent 60-Second Calls
60-Second Call CS Dropped Rate (%)

GSM Coverage Quality Classes Before Eve

Level 2
Level 3
Count
%
Count
%
7
2.13
5
1.52
0
0
1
10
0.00%
N/A
5580.67
2839.83
93
47.3
0.00%
2.00%

Table 9 Voice: Accessibility Statistics (by Coverage Class and Overall)

Count of Dropped Calls

GSM Coverage Class

RXQual < 2

2 <= RxQual < 4

4<=RxQual<6

RxQual >= 6

Rxlev >=-70

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0
1
0
0
0
1

1
7
0
0
0
8

-70 > Rxlev >= -85

-85 > Rxlev >= -100

Rxlev<-100
Rxlev Unknown

Total

Table 10 Voice: Accessibility Statistics (by Coverage Class and Overall)

% Distribution of Dropped Calls

GSM Coverage Class

RXQual < 2

2 <= RxQual < 4

4<=RxQual<6

RxQual >= 6

Rxlev >=-70

0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%

0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%

0.00%
10.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
10.00%

10.00%
70.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
80.00%

-70 > Rxlev >= -85

-85 > Rxlev >= -100

Rxlev<-100
Rxlev Unknown

Total

Table 11 Voice: Accessibility Statistics (by Coverage Class and Overall)

Likelyhood of Dropped Calls

GSM Coverage Class

RXQual < 2

2 <= RxQual < 4

4<=RxQual<6

RxQual >= 6

Rxlev >=-70

0.0087

-70 > Rxlev >= -85

0
0
-

0
0
-

0.0011
0
-

0.0125
0
-

-85 > Rxlev >= -100

Rxlev<-100
Rxlev Unknown

Table 12 Voice: Accessibility Statistics (by Coverage Class and Overall)

Voice: RxLev CDF for Dropped Calls

Dr opped Call

120
100
80
60
40
20
0
[Min, -110)

[-110, -95)

[-95, -85)

[-85, -81)

[-81, -70)

Figure 2 Voice: RxLev CDF for Dropped Calls

Voice: RxLev vs. RxQual for Dropped Calls

Row 254

7
6

2<=Q<4

Q>=4

[-70, 0)

Voice: RxLev vs. RxQual for Dropped Calls

Row 254

2<=Q<4

Q>=4

7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
L>-70

-70=>L>-85

-85>=L>-100

L<-100

Figure 4 Voice: RxLev vs. RxQual for Dropped Calls

Voice: RxQual CDF for Dropped Calls

Dr opped Call

120
100
80
60
40
20
0
[Min, 2)

[2, 3)

[3, 4)

Figure 5 Voice: RxQual CDF for Dropped Calls

Voice: MS TxPower CDF for Dropped Calls

Dr opped Call

120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Dropped to Idle

[4, 5)

80
60
40
20
0
Dropped to Idle

Figure 6 Voice: MS TxPower CDF for Dropped Calls

Voice: MS TxPower vs. RxLev for Dropped Calls

Row 317

15<=T<25

T>=25

7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
L>-70

-70=>L>-85

-85>=L>-100

Rxlev<-10

Figure 7 Voice: MS TxPower vs. RxLev for Dropped Calls

Mobility

Mobility is assessed in this report in terms of the success rate of handover attempts. Figure 8 gives some overall statistics on ha

Voice: Handover Performance Statistics

OK

Fail

600

OK

500
400
300
200
100
0
Intercell Handover

Intracell Handover

OK

500
400
300
200
100
0
Intercell Handover

Intracell Handover
Interc ell Handover

Figure 8 Voice: Handover Performance Statistics

Downlink Service Integrity

Table 7 lists, for each coverage class, the Frame Erasure Rate percentages.
BER Actual (%)

Class1
Class2
Class3
Class4

Table 7 Voice: Frame Erasure Rate

Max
Mean Min
11.2
0.4
16.7
0.88
24
3.48
25.4 13.95

FER Actual (%)

0
0
0
0

Max
Mean Min
31.2
0.73
73
1.13
100
7.15
100 55.98

FER Full (%)

0
0
0
0

Max
Mean Min
72.5
3.6
100
3.29
100 10.19
100 58.25

FER Sub (%)

0
0
0
1

Max
100
100
100
100

al >= 6

RxQual Unknown

Total

968
857
53
0
0
1878

4950
6862
479
0
0
12291

RxQual Unknown

Total

4%
4%
9%
0%
0%
6%

7.88%
6.97%
0.43%
0.00%
0.00%
15.28%

40.27%
55.83%
3.90%
0.00%
0.00%
100.00%

ss4

Unknown

Total

6%

15.28%

100.00%

15
58
3
0
0
96

al >= 6

Dropped Call
Rate (DCR, %)

N/A
N/A
0
N/A
0
0
N/A

Intercell Handover
OK

Fail

1
1
1
1
1

HO Success
Rate (%)

100
100
N/A
100
50
N/A
100

N/A
0
14.29
N/A
27.27
0
N/A
0
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16.67
0
0
0
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
12.5
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A

1
1
10
1
20

2
5

2
1
4
33
4
12
4
6
3
11
11
1
6
4
1
1
16
9
3
11
7
2
5
2
4
1
6
1
5
6
7
4
8
2
21
11
14
10
4
4
5
35
4
23
1
1
2

1
2

1
1

1
1

1
4

100
100
83.33
100
80
N/A
100
N/A
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
91.67
100
33.33
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
91.67
100
66.67
100
100
100
100
100
50
100
100
100
100
100
100
95.45
91.67
100
100
100
100
83.33
89.74
100
100
100
100
100

0
0
0
N/A
0
33.33
0
N/A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
0

4
3
1
1
8
16
10
3
11
2
3
1
5
14
26
10
21
17
7
7
10
6

2
2

2
3
2
1
4

100
75
100
100
80
88.89
100
100
100
100
75
100
100
87.5
89.66
100
91.3
100
87.5
63.64
100
100

istics for the test area are given in Table 5 for each coverage class and

Total
Count
%
347
100
16
100
329
100
95.00%

al >= 6

2
3
0
0
0
5

RxQual Unknown

Total

0
0
0
0
7

4
6
0
0
7
17

al >= 6

RxQual Unknown

Total

0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
41.18%
0.00%

23.53%
35.29%
0.00%
0.00%
41.18%
100.00%

76%
65%
0%
0%
0%
41%

al >= 6

RxQual Unknown

174
054

0
0

0
-

0
-

e test area for each coverage class.

sses Before Events

Level 4
Count
%
0
0
8
80
N/A
1465.5
24.4
33.00%

al >= 6

1
7
0
0
0
8

Unknow Level
Count
%
304
92.4
1
10
N/A
873.13
14.6
7.00%

Total
Count
%
329
100
10
100
N/A
20650.4
344.2
3.00%

RxQual Unknown

Total

0
0
0
0
1

1
8
0
0
1
10

al >= 6

00%
00%
0%
0%
0%
00%

al >= 6

RxQual Unknown

Total

0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
10.00%
0.00%

10.00%
80.00%
0.00%
0.00%
10.00%
100.00%

RxQual Unknown

087

125
0
-

0
0
-

[-70, 0)

Dropped Call
Range CDF %
[Min, -1
0
[-110, -9
0
[-95, -85
30
[-85, -81
60
[-81, -70
100
[-70, 0)
100
[0, Max]
100

[0, Max]

L>-70

70=>L> 85>=L> L<-100

-85
-100

Q<2
2<=Q<4
Q>=4

0
0
0

L<-100

Dropped Call
Range CDF %
[Min, 2)
0
[2, 3)
0
[3, 4)
0
[4, 5)
0
[5, Max]
100

[5, Max]

Dropped Call
Range CDF %
Dropped
100

0
0
6

0
0
4

0
0
0

Rxlev<70=>L> 85>=L>
100
-85
-100

L>-70
T<15
15<=T<2
T>=25

0
0
0

6
0
0

0
0
0

Rxlev<-100

statistics on handovers.

over

OK

Fail

Intercell Handover

562

39

Intracell Handover

0
0
0

over

FER Sub (%)

Mean Min
2.57
1.37
7.17
61.94

0
0
0
0

Acronyms
CDF
DL
EDGE
FER
GSM
MS
PDF
RAN
RxLev
RxQual
TX
UL

Cumulative Distribution Function

Downlink
Enhanced Data rates for Global Evolution
Frame Erasure Rate
Global System for Mobile communication
Mobile Station
Probability Density Function
Radio Access Network
Received signal strength (power level)
Received signal quality
Transmitter
Uplink

Important Note

Certain Fields or Charts may not be populated with values, particularly for the data collected with no
collection tools.

ed with non-TEMS