Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Sociological Forum.
http://www.jstor.org
The sociology of music has been an area largely left to European sociologists.
In an effort to generate greater domestic interest in the field, an examination
of Max Weber'smethodology and an update to his study of music is proposed. Fewer occupations or cultural projects are more social than making
music, and the domestic sociological community's absence from the debate
is deplorable given the dominant position our country possesses regarding
musical production. Weber'sSociology of Music, which combines urban theory, class/labor theory, rationalization theory, and even climatic changes, is
an excellent place to begin a thorough discussion of the social components
of music. Our present understanding of cultural theories, urban theories, and
Habermas's Communicative Action Theory can be employed to improve on
Weber'stheory;toward a new approach for the study of the sociology of music.
KEY WORDS: sociology of music; Max Weber; Jurgen Habermas; urban music; rationalization
theory.
INTRODUCTION
In developing his theory of the rationalization process, which led to the
rise of capitalism in the West, Max Weber analyzed the standardization and
growth of Western music in Europe as one of his illustrative examples. This
section in Economy and Society (Weber, 1921) was going to be the basis for
a book on the sociology of music that Weber planned to write. While sociological research on music has declined in significance within the discipline
of sociology, the methodological, theoretical, and historical research tools
1An earlier draft of this paper was presented at the Southwestern Social Science Association
meeting of March 1995.
2Department of Sociology, State University of New York, College at Brockport, 350 New
Campus Drive, Brockport, New York 14420.
633
0884-8971/01/1200-0633/0 ? 2001 Plenum Publishing Corporation
634
Turley
Weber employed are significant to contemporary historical and comparative researchers. The flaws and contributions of this seminal piece will be
examined in this paper in an effort to rekindle the sociological debate about
music.
Weber saw the rationalization of the Western cultures as the unique element that led to capitalism's rise in the West. Part of this rationalization process was the growth of bureaucracies, as the increasing capitalistic division
of labor compartmentalized and structured traditional organizations, like
education and government, into bureaucracies (Weber, 1921). Nowhere was
this more apparent than in the historic rise of the Roman Catholic Church.
Bureaucratization in the Church had a rationalizing/bureaucratizing effect
on the music the Church produced, and was eventually responsible for the
music "conventions" (accepted musical practices and rules for music writing and musicianship) associated with European classical music. Example
of this would be notational systems, structured harmony, organized choirs,
ensembles, orchestras, and the standardized construction of instruments.
A combination of processes led to the standardization of music notation,
standardized music instrument construction, and standardized performance
that produced the unique European music style we recognize. Weber's theory rested on a unique vision of the West, and the assumption that deeprooted structures, unknown to the human actors, were shaping historical
events (Eisenstadt, 1992). Weber applied a methodology of researching music notation in the Roman Catholic Church (the only institution to hold any
substantive, ancient records of music) to uncover the evidence of rationalization. The data he found proved his theory that it was indeed the church
monks who standardized notation to teach and pass on liturgical music. Similarly, musical instruments began to be constructed in a standardized form
to fit the requirements of the church music and various court orchestras,
which wished to employ this music notation.3 It must be added, however,
that Weber's method was designed to find this evidence at the possible exclusion of other evidence. The exclusive use of religious documentation as his
only data source would fit his theory of standardization and rationalization
in a bureaucratic organization, which then would produce rational music
forms. He then applied a Eurocentric, cross-cultural comparison, and was
unable to find music notation in other cultures. Weber thus concluded that
the rationalization process had produced these rational elements in music.
There is a strong fit between Weber's theory-method-data, but this is
because the researcher designed it this way. Weber's role as researcher is
3A standardized instrument construction process would lead to instruments with the same
pitch, sound, and similar timbre. This would be necessary for standardized notation to be
effective. Folk instruments constructed locally would not have this standardization, making
them difficult to write for, particularly in an ensemble.
635
imprinted indelibly on the theory. This does not negate his findings; but it
does, however, require a careful reading by the researcher who wishes to
evaluate Weber's theory. In this paper, a review of contemporary literature
concerning Weber's theories and his sociology of music will be followed by
a more detailed examination of Weber's theory of music development. This
examination will include his methodological practice, the historical data he
employed, his role as researcher, and his research assumptions. A varied
critique structure will begin with Weber's Eurocentric viewpoint, proceeding to competing explanations for a standardized music form in Europe by
using first Habermas's Communicative Action Theory (Habermas, 1988) to
demonstrate the rising influence of commerce and currency on music and the
musician. The second will be an urban culture approach by J. Blau (1989),
and the third an analysis of the musical community to bring the social study
of music back to the unit of production-the musician. A final, countersystem critique of Weber's thesis will be used to examine music production and
standardization in India. The final section will include an analysis of Weber's
many contributions to the sociology of music. Of special note is the inclusion
of social, economic, environmental, and spatial variables in his theory, as well
as Weber's identification of the structural and hierarchical institutions that
effect the social production of music.
WEBER'S IMPACT ON MODERN MUSICAL ANALYSIS
Max Weber was analyzing music in two ways. On one level, music was
an artifact of the historical rationalization process that brought on the development of capitalism in the West. On another level, music was a deeply
meaningful part of a society's culture that touched Weber personally. The
importance of including the period and life of Max Weber, in any evaluation
of his theory is emphasized in David Chalcraft's article "Weber, Wagner and
Thoughts of Death" (Chalcraft, 1993). While much of this article attempts to
uncover Weber's personal feelings about eroticism, death, the impact of music, and the German composer Richard Wagner (all in a Freudian manner),
the inclusion of Weber's inner motivations are extremely illuminating to the
reader of his works on cultural sociology. It is obvious that Weber's passion
for music led him to write about the sociology of music, and music's importance to his personal life led him to incorporate music into his grand theory
of rationalization. In a later edition of the Protestant Ethic and the Spirit
of Capitalism, Weber (1904) included references to Wagner's operas in an
effort to illustrate certain passages of the text. The combination and allusion
to artistic and musical works was not uncommon for Weber's day, though it
may seem odd for us now; to many it was a sign of a well-rounded, educated
scholar.
636
Turley
637
638
Turley
The theory states that the move from ancient to modern music gradually eliminated the mystical and "irrational" qualities of art and replaced
them with rational qualities. Weber approached music in a historical fashion, examining music from the primitive period to his contemporary period,
focusing particularly on the unique development of chordal harmony in the
West. The simple principle of a distance between tones in the music that
a musician might make or a singer might sing was replaced by the organized, standardized, "rational" principle of chordal harmony. To support
his argument of rationalization's effect on music, Weber linked many seemingly disparate social developments: Western Roman Catholic monasticism;
feudal structures in the Middle Ages; choral singing; music notation; the
construction of modern-style music instruments by guilds; and the influence
of spoken language on the construction of melody (Kasler, 1988:169). Two
key moments in music's rationalization, according to Weber, were the development of modern instruments and modern music notation. Weber traces
advancements in music instruments to the formation of professional guilds
of first artisans, and then performers. A symbiotic relationship developed
between artisans, who standardized and improved the construction of the
instruments, and the instrumentalists, who provided a fixed market for instruments. Written notation and standardization of musical instruments are
rational outcomes and developments in an organized society. Musicians and
composers inspired advancements among separate feudal courts as early
as the thirteenth century for better and more complex music, which fueled
demand for instruments. Instruments that were manufactured by the guilds
became increasingly popular in these courts, and this led to an increasing demand for skilled musicians. Orchestras and the rise of stringed instruments
followed during the Middle Ages. This combined Weber's economic and historical methodologies, and the historical progress of instrument construction
became increasingly rationalized, because of its commercial viability.
Weber linked economic, cultural, social, technical, and climatic factors
together in his analysis of a key instrument's "rational" history-the piano
(Kasler, 1988). This analysis is a working model of Weber's diverse methodology. Invented in Southern Europe, the piano did not diffuse as quickly there
as it did in Northern Europe because of the climate. The Northern European population was climatically housebound and housecentered. The piano
quickly became part of the middle-class culture, and no cultivated home was
without one (as entertainment and a status level piece of furniture) (Weber,
1921/1968:118). As rational capitalism fueled the consumption and production of music, music publishers and mass-produced machine-made pianos
rushed to fill the demand made by the hammer piano (Kasler, 1988). All of
the Western countries, and their colonies, sought this cultural figure piece
throughout the nineteenth and into the early twentieth century. Iron frames
639
640
Turley
hypothesized that the symptoms of this process would be even more evident
in the "irrational"and mystical arena of music production. It is obvious that
Weber had strong feelings about music and culture, and their importance to
society and its individuals. He brought his central theme of rationalism to
bear on music, to uncover its effects through his historical, socioeconomic
methodology. His methodological assumptions seem to be an important step
in evaluating his work.
The most prominent assumption in Weber's work on the sociology of
music is that the rationalization process exists. Weber centered a great deal
of his research on looking for evidence of rationalization in a number of
historical and cross-cultural sources. While producing a fascinating and innovative theory, there seems to be a single mindedness in his methodological
approach to finding this process. This narrow approach calls into question
whether there may be other explanations of the events he described. Critiques and countersystem proposals to Weber's theory will be discussed later
in the paper; however, a consequence of this unicausal focus was the absence of the role of musicians in notational or musical development in his
theory. Weber's theory does not address the role of musicians or the different classes of musicians (church choir directors, court players, orchestra
composers, traveling minstrels, local-folk musicians) in the diverse musical
environment of Europe. The role of musicians in developing techniques of
innovation in musical composition and instrumentation is unmentioned in
Weber's sociology of music, yet it had to be musicians and their knowledge
of music that spawned these developments. Different classes of musicians
from minstrels to orchestra conductors may have made the appropriation of
innovations from the lower classes of musicians invisible to Weber's theory.
An explanation of notational development that may challenge some of the
rationalization theory is the personal initiative of the musicians to appropriate a useful technology for improving their art. Traveling musicians could
have easily been the agents of transmission for music notation in Europe.
Unfortunately, they possessed no lasting written records to uncover, unlike
Catholic monks. It is also contrary to Weber's theoretical predictions that
musicians and music would have become more bureaucratized because of
the effect of rationalization. In fact, music has become less bureaucratized
from Weber's time period to the present, rather than more. Only classical
music and opera possess the highly formalized, standardized, and bureaucratized structures Weber's theory describes and predicts (Blau, 1989).
The second methodological assumption that runs through much of
Weber's work, and especially Economy and Society (Weber, 1921), is his socioeconomic approach. His study of the mutual and developmental relations
between society, law, religion, culture, economy, class, music, and domination was based ultimately on the analysis of socioeconomic variables within
641
642
Turley
643
the staging of an opera, is a highly hierarchized, specialized, and bureaucratized task. Weber's belief that orchestral music was the epitome of musical
evolution caused him to fixate on this mode of music production and chronicle its rational processes. Obviously, his own taste and the Western music
he was exposed to shaped Weber's focus on classical music. This does not
stain Weber's analysis of the rise of classical music's bureaucratic form. In
fact, the conductor-led orchestra is the most bureaucratized form of musical
performance; each instrument is hierarchized from first chair (or principle)
to last, and all instruments are organized into sections for musical arrangements. The trouble is that other types of music on the rise during Weber's
time were not bureaucratically driven (popular syncopated orchestras were
downsizing, as well as chamber ensembles, vaudeville acts, and ragtime),
but they were not analyzed by Weber. Current research suggests that aside
from major orchestras, ballets, and operas, music production is becoming
less bureaucratized; and as cultural institutions (art galleries, music clubs,
popular theatres, etc.) grow larger they actually become less bureaucratic
(Blau, 1989:179).
Weber's passion for Wagner's operas, and other German composers'
works, is an indication of where his cultural nationalism may have originated. It may seem strange that Weber advocated nationalism, but it is
definitely an odd nationalism he envisioned. Weber felt that Germany in the
1890s should preserve its cultural identity, increase its share of the world's
economic resources (like England and France had done), and engage in imperialism as part of this plan to leave Germany's mark on history for its
future generations (Beetham, 1985:135). Weber emphasizes the responsibility of a "power state" to maintain world culture and to the preservation
of cultural autonomy for smaller nations that may be under imperial rule
(Beetham, 1985:136-138). Obviously, he felt a certain allegiance to German
culture and felt that German culture was superior to other cultures, a belief
that probably stemmed from his identification and passion for Germany's
classical composers. Yet, it is odd for a nationalist to extend a universal reverence for culture to smaller nations and to recommend that their culture
be preserved. So, it would seem that Weber's interest in German operas and
culture was relatively benign and of little consequence to his writing.
Theodor Adorno would take a more critical view of Weber's nationalistic tendencies and directly identify his affection for Wagnerian opera as its
cause. In "The Climate for Fascism in Germany,"Adorno (1945b) implicates
the authoritarian images and anti-Semitic themes of Wagner's operas as a
direct cause of the decultivation of Germany's middle and lower classes. This
decultivation laid the ground work for the rise of fascism, a groundwork of
noncritical, knee-jerk patriots willing to lay blame on a convenient scapegoat.
Adorno would say that the themes and images in Wagner's operas influenced
644
Turley
645
as music notation would actually reach supremacy, beyond simple capitalistic rationality. The symbol becomes more important than the human actors
who produce it, a musician is only as good as the music he/she writes. Notational prevalence in Western music in the 1600s was not immediately used
for capitalist gain, but may have been a developing symptom of servicing
the steering media/symbolism (i.e. music notation). Habermas (1988) devotes many pages of his theory to discuss how human actors would become
"servicers" of a steering media (in Habermas' example it was money that
was the steering media). In this discussion of music it would be first the notational structure and then the publishing system that notation led to that
is the steering media that musicians service. It was a relatively short time in
the development of notation before a musician's worth was gauged primarily on how well he or she read or wrote musical notation. For a musician,
the most desirable job would be appointment to an aristocratic court or
Catholic bishop's court orchestra, and the competition was often based on
being able to compose written music for the court orchestra (a type of media
subsystem, in which the orchestral competition for the job was held by the
court) or at the least being able to read the written part for your instrument.
Music theory and pedagogy arose out of this notational system and these
institutional devices actually promoted Western music more than capitalistic endeavors. The symbol notation, not bureaucracies and rationalization,
directed and fueled the growth of Western music, which directed and focused music production in Europe. Eventually, the media-steered subsystem
(music notation) in the contemporary period become more important than
the musician who composed the music; music publishing and its exchange
into the other media-steered subsystem of monetary currency becomes infinitely more important to the capitalist system than the musician who wrote
it. A salient example would be the songs written by the great rock and roll
composer Chuck Berry (like "Maybelline," "Johnny B. Goode," "Roll Over
Beethoven," and "Sweet Little Sixteen," which were all Top Ten Hits) for
which he was paid only a few hundred dollars, despite the millions of dollars they have generated and continue to generate in music publishing. The
artist/musician was disposable once the record company and music publisher owned the notation, which was traded for currency and exchanged
like currency.
The growth of Western music production may not be connected with
the rational factors of notation, monasticism, and guilds at all. The second
critique and competing explanation is an urban culture production critique.
Judith Blau (1989) performed a contemporary study of the impact of urbanization on culture production in the 125 largest Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas (SMSA) in the United States. She found that once
a critical mass was attained in an area, the urbanization affected culture
646
Turley
647
648
Turley
may have been standardized into a symbol notation that monastic musicians
altered and appropriated for their purposes. It is equally plausible that local
communities of musicians in the Middle Ages were using a primitive notation
system that the monks adopted and wrote down, not the reverse. We know
that primitive music scale models were based on the hand (the Guidonian
hand) as early as A.D. 900-1000 (Apel and Daniel, 1960:124). The troubling
aspect of metatheories like Weber's, Habermas', or even the macrofocus of
Blau, is that the musician and the musician's environment are not present in
any of the analysis. How society, economics, technology, urbanization, race
relations, spatial organization, or community structure affects the musicians
and their production of art would seem central to a sociology of music. Yet,
rationalization is so removed from the mundane performance or composition of music that it can only describe elements that "may" lead to the
production of music. There needs to be a sociology that addresses the production of music by musicians in a theory of the middle range. The musician
is the real "producer" of music. Our social theory needs to be able to be
linked down to the human actor.
Indian music production provides a perfect counter-system analysis
(Sjoberg and Cain, 1971) to Western music production/notation, because
this music predates European music by almost 2000 years. Highly standardized and formalized, it possesses many parallel elements to Western music
like rhythm, melody, scales, and structured sections. Indian music also has
its own unique elements. Indian music is based on the Rag and Tal; Rag is
the melody line and Tal is the rhythmic form. There is no harmony in the
Western sense, but there is an important interplay of instruments. The three
basic instruments are the Tambura (whose function is the drone), the Tabla
(a pair of drums, which actually perform an expressive function more often than a strict rhythmic one), and the Sitar (a truly unique instrument of
three to four main strings with three to four drone strings, plus a dozen sympathetic strings that vibrate when the other strings are struck; its function
is melody, rhythm, and drone combined). In Western music, a song may be
based upon 1 of the 12 chromatic scale tones (whole to half-tone distance) of
which there are the major, minor, and diminished families. Indian ragas are
based upon more tones than the Western 12-note scale (e.g. a quarter-tone
scale distance and the family of scales numbers up to 20, depending upon
the region of India) (Nettl, 1985:37). The rhythmic meter of Indian music
is also very different. Western music is either 4/4 (simple straight beats),
3/4 (waltz tempo) or odd meter (e.g. 7/8, 9/8, or 5/4 best exemplified by Dave
Brubeck's jazz classic "Take Five"). Indian music is based on cycles of 7, 8,
10, 12, 14, or 16 beats, which are further subdivided to achieve an extremely
complex musical form (Courtney, Chandrakantha, Indian Classical Music.
Unpublished circulated paper).
649
650
Turley
651
be easier for modern sociologists to make the same errors that Weber made
(i.e. concentrate too much on the uniqueness of European music). Clearly,
a social phenomena of commodifying musical expression and influence has
grown to encompass most of the world's markets; any examination of modern music must account for this phenomena (ila Weber, though one need
not label it rationalization).
American sociologists, in particular, should be engaging in this debate
over music because of the United States' changing role in the world economy.
America will be less involved with direct industrial production and manufacturing and more involved with communication, information, administration,
and culture exports/services. Since popular music in the United States is one
of its most influential exports, and this is predicted to increase, it would be
advantageous for American sociologists to understand this cultural production. As general interest and commerce increases in music, inside and out
of academia, social researchers will be asked about this social phenomenon.
Presently, small groups of researchers are doing outstanding work on the
social components of music production, in particular Simon Frith's work on
popular music in England (Frith, 1989) and Ruth Finnegan's work on how
music is produced at the local/urban level (Finnegan, 1989). In relation to
the scope of music's impact on society, many more scholars' will be conducting research on music as a social study. Weber's writings on European music
history and production should serve as an outstanding beginning and guide
to a sociology of music.
CONCLUSION
Weber's two main interests, the rationalization process in Western capitalist development and his love of music, came together in his study of the
sociology of music. A fine piece of analysis, though clouded at times by his
desire to prove the rationalization effect and his Eurocentric viewpoint, it
should be used to further the social study of music. Weber's inclusion of a
wide variety of variables and his cross-cultural, historical comparisons are
a model for new work on music production. A similar model for a city-bycity case study approach could be constructed by combining Weber (1921),
Blau (1989), and a music community approach to discover large cultural
patterns in a culturally defined region; while endeavoring to include the musician as human agent. The musician comprises the actual "nuts and bolts"
of music production, and efforts should be made to understand this artist as
laborer, artisan, and creator. Attention should also be paid to a critical approach to culture/music production by checking theoretical models against a
"communicative action" metatheory approach or a Bourdieu class approach
652
Turley
(Bourdieu, 1984). Weber remains an outstanding starting point for music researchers and my intention is to demonstrate that by broadening Weber's
methodology it is possible to learn from his work and his mistakes to continue
the important work of the sociology of music.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author thanks Gideon Sjoberg and Parker Frisbie of the University
of Texas at Austin for their supportive remarks on this article as well as the
reviewers, for their helpful comments on earlier drafts.
REFERENCES
Adorno, Theodor
1945a What National Socialism has Done to
the Arts. Frankfurt, Germany: University of Frankfurt.
1945b The Climate for Fascism in Germany.
Frankfurt, Germany: University of
Frankfurt.
1962 Introduction to the Sociology of Music. New York: Seabury Press.
Apel, William, and Ralph Daniel
1960 The Harvard Brief Dictionary of
Music. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Becker, Howard
1971 Culture and Civility in San Francisco.
San Francisco, CA: Transaction Press.
Beetham, David
1985 Max Weber and the Theory of Modern
Politics. New York: Polity Press.
Blau, Judith
1989 The Shape of Culture. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre
1984 Distinction: A Social Critique of the
Judgment of Taste (R. Nice, Trans.).
Cambridge, NY: Harvard University
Press.
Chalcraft, David
1993 "Weber, Wagner and thoughts of
death." Sociology 27(August):443449.
Eisenstadt, Schmuel
1992 "Culture, Religions and development
in North American and Latin American civilizations." International Social
Science Journal 44:593.
Finnegan, Ruth
1989 The Hidden Musicians. Cambridge,
England: Cambridge University Press.
Frith, Simon
1989 Art Into Pop. London: Routledge
Press.
Gerth, Hans, and C. Wright Mills
1948 From Max Weber-Essays in Sociology. Gerth and Mills London: Oxford
Press.
Gilmore, Samuel
1990 Art Worlds: Developing the Interactionist Approach to Social Organization. University of Chicago Press:
Chicago, IL.
Habermas, Jurgen
1988 Theory of Communicative Action:
Vol. 2. Life World and System
(T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston, MA:
Beacon Press.
Hasse, John
1985 Ragtime. New York: MacMillan
Press.
Jameson, Frederick
1990 Late Marxism: Adorno or the Persistence of the Dialectic. London: Verso
Press.
Kasler, Dirk
1988 Max Weber: An Introduction To
His Life And Work (Philippa Hurd,
Trans.). New York: Polity Press.
Martin, Peter
1995 Sounds and Society: Themes in the
Sociology of Music. Manchester,
England: Manchester University
Press.
653
systems" In H. Turk and R. Simpson
(eds.), Institution and Social Exchange: 212-229. Indianapolis, IN:
Bobbs-Merril.
Sjoberg, Gideon, and Kathryn Kuhn
1989 "Autobiography and organizations:
Theoretical and methodological issues." Journal of Applied Behavioral
Science 25(4):309-326.
Straw, William
1991 "Systems of articulation, logics of
change: Communities and scenes in
popular music." In W. Straw and
J. Shepherd (eds.), The Music Industry in a Changing World. Special edition of Cultural Studies, 5(3):
368-388.
Turley, Alan
2000 Music in the City: A History of Austin
Music. Austin, TX: Duckling Publishing.
Weber, Max
1904 The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of
Capitalism. New York: Scribner and
Sons.
1921 Economy and Society. New York:
Scribner and Sons.
Wicke, Peter
1990 Rock Music. Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press.