Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
A
Pass
grade
must
be
achieved
on
all
of
the
specific
assessment
criteria
outlined.
Module Title: Research Methods
Tracey Dalton
Clearly
written,
well-presented
and
organised,
with
close
attention
to
academic
conventions
concerning
referencing,
quotations,
bibliography,
footnotes,
etc
Logical
in
structure,
well
laid
out
and
attentive
to
academic
writing
conventions
Commentary
Indicator
This
is
a
very
clearly
written
proposal,
well-presented
and
clearly
Pass
structured.
Academic
referencing
is
managed
reasonably
well
although
there
are
errors
which
should
be
corrected
in
the
course
of
Year
2:
When
two
publications
in
the
same
year
from
one
author
are
used,
the
year
should
be
labelled
e.g.
Udell
2005a,
Udell
2005b
The
convention
is
to
use
et
al
in
the
case
of
three
or
more
authors,
but
only
after
the
first
reference
mentions
all
by
name.
In
this
proposal,
et
al
appears
to
have
been
used
for
any
source
with
more
than
one
author.
In
the
case
of
two
authors,
they
should
always
be
named.
Different
journals
have
different
guidelines
about
this
and
it
will
need
to
be
checked.
Two
or
three
of
the
references
in
the
list
at
the
end
of
the
proposal
have
not
been
used
in
the
main
text.
Green
et
al
seems
to
have
been
cited
as
Pinder-Grover
et
al
(2012),
while
the
year
for
Mayer
is
unclear
(2001
or
2009).
Demonstrates
and
builds
upon
skilled
and
judicious
selection
of
relevant
materials
from
appropriate
sources,
with
evidence
that
key
sources
have
been
both
explored
and
acknowledged
appropriately
Commentary
Indicator
This
proposal
shows
evidence
of
good
engagement
with
the
literature,
as
Pass
well
as
some
useful
reflection
on
professional
practice
to
inform
the
proposal.
The
format
of
the
literature
search
is
included,
which
is
good
to
see.
The
origins
of
the
term
screencast
are
investigated,
as
well
as
the
challenges
for
students
entering
art
and
design
subjects
in
higher
education.
A
gap
in
research
has
been
identified:
the
use
of
screencasts
for
interior
design,
and
the
student
experience
(rather
than
the
output).
Further
areas
of
literature
which
will
need
to
be
reviewed
have
also
been
identified.
Context
and
Rationale
Criteria
Identification
of
the
current
forces
and
context
shaping
the
learning
environment
Identification
and
discussion
of
the
possible
relevance
and
significance
of
the
proposed
research
Indicator
This
proposal
has
presented
a
clearly
planned
and
carefully
selected
Pass
project
in
the
context
of
interior
design
teaching
at
third
level,
the
nature
of
the
participant
groups,
and
their
current
learning
environment.
However,
there
is
one
issue
relating
to
the
applied
nature
of
the
MSc
which
will
need
early
clarification
in
discussion
with
the
Supervisor.
The
MSc
project
in
the
second
year
is
designed
to
allow
students
to
show
the
skills
they
have
developed,
and
is
applied
in
nature.
No
doubt
Traceys
learning
from
the
MSc
has
already
supported
the
development
of
the
screencasts
discussed
in
this
proposal.
However,
the
proposal
states
that
the
screencasts
are
(in
effect)
complete
already
and
will
not
be
revised.
If
they
are
to
form
the
artefact(s)
to
be
submitted
for
the
MSc
then
some
work
should
be
undertaken
here
to
complement
the
other
facets
of
the
project
in
Year
2.
Alternatively,
a
new
resource
could
be
produced
based
on
the
findings
from
the
project.
Maybe
this
could
be
a
small
set
of
new
a
screencasts
informed
by
students
feedback,
or
designed
for
others
teaching
who
wish
to
use
screencasting
in
art
or
design
subjects.
The
participant
has
proposed
a
rigorous,
systematic
study
including
the
selection
of
research
methodology
and
methods
appropriate
to
the
context
of
the
work
Identification
and
description
of
the
target
group
for
the
implementation
and
evaluation
stages
of
the
study/project
Justification
of
the
research
approach
which
will
ensure
validity
and
reliability
All
ethical
issues
have
been
identified
and
considered
Identification
of
all
significant
limitations
and
assumptions
Commentary
Indicator
This
proposal
presents
a
clear
and
systematic
study
which
presents
a
clear
Pass
ontological
and
epistemological
position,
a
well-chosen
methodology
and
a
good
level
of
detail
in
relation
to
the
methods
planned.
The
research
questions
are
listed,
although
these
are
described
as
main
questions
and
ideally,
just
one
main
question
would
be
stated
with
some
sub-objectives
listed.
This
is
in
order
to
keep
the
focus
of
the
work
on
the
main
issue.
To
my
reading,
the
second
question,
Can
a
blended
learning
approach
help
to
overcome
new
challenges
in
first
year?
now
emerges
as
the
chief
research
question
in
this
project.
The
first
question
is
a
little
broad
and
also
assumes
benefits,
whereas
this
second
question
distils
the
issues
more
clearly.
The
target
group
for
this
work
has
been
identified,
and
the
work
has
been
scaled
down
from
some
of
the
initial
draft
plans
to
this
more
focused
design
with
one
group.
This
is
a
good
decision,
and
one
that
will
enable
deeper
data
collection
to
support
the
case
study
approach.
In
relation
to
the
research
methods,
a
mix
of
question
types
might
be
desirable
for
the
questionnaire,
rather
than
using
Likert
questions
alone.
This
can
be
discussed
with
the
Supervisor
early
in
the
project.
The
exemplar
question
How
useful
do
you
find
video
tutorials
in
your
learning?
is
somewhat
leading.
The
content
of
questions
is
not
an
essential
for
the
proposal
at
this
stage,
but
mixing
statements
in
Likert
questions
is
something
to
consider
for
later
on.
Questionnaires
using
Likert
type
questions
should
present
a
mix
of
statements
(some
contradictory)
to
gain
a
good
sense
of
students
responses.
Ethical
issues
have
been
managed
reasonably
well
overall
in
this
proposal,
and
the
process
is
quite
advanced
with
a
submission
already
having
been
made
to
the
DIT
Research
Ethics
Committee.
The
Ethical
Considerations
section
is
a
little
brief,
as
there
are
always
ethical
issues
in
every
project
other
sections
of
the
proposal
refer
to
these
in
more
depth.
Decisions
made
around
ethical
issues
should
be
continually
documented
for
the
eventual
journal
paper.
Limitations
and
timescale
have
been
managed
in
a
pragmatic
and
clear
way
in
this
proposal.
Feed
forward
This
proposal
presents
a
very
clear
and
well-planned
project
but
some
suggested
amendments
and
areas
to
bear
in
mind
for
Year
2
are
mentioned
here:
Identify
one
main
research
question
from
the
list
presented,
and
the
others
can
function
as
sub-questions/objectives
of
this
research.
Other
themes
and
questions
should
not
divert
focus
from
the
main
question.
Question
design
for
the
questionnaires
(and
indeed
for
other
methods)
should
be
investigated
so
that
leading
questions
are
avoided,
and
a
good
balance
of
statements
and
question
types
used
to
elicit
students
opinions
in
full.
Referencing
and
citation
guidelines
for
the
chosen
journal
will
need
to
be
adhered
to
strictly.
Overall decision/impression
Final Indicator
This is a very good and clear proposal, bringing the reader into the
Pass
teaching
context
in
which
the
screencasts
are
being
used,
and
giving
a
sense
of
the
novel
and
original
elements
of
this
work.
The
research
design
is
clear,
and
informed
decisions
have
been
taken
about
this
plan.
The
applied
element
of
the
MSc
(in
relation
to
the
artefact(s))
needs
a
little
further
consideration,
but
otherwise
this
case
study
will
have
the
potential
to
contribute
to
knowledge
in
this
area
and
to
inform
the
practice
of
other
lecturers
in
art
and
design
subjects.
Signature
of
Assessor:
**Indicates
core
criteria
that
apply
across
all
modules
that
contribute
to
the
MSc
in
Applied
eLearning