Phys. Lett. B740 (2015) 222

Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Physics Letters B
www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb
Search for H produced in association with top quarks and

constraints on the Yukawa coupling between the top quark and
the Higgs boson using data taken at 7 TeV and 8 TeV with
the ATLAS detector
.ATLAS Collaboration
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 10 September 2014
Received in revised form 21 November 2014
Accepted 25 November 2014
Available online 2 December 2014
Editor: W.-D. Schlatter
Keywords:
Higgs boson
Diphoton decay
t t H
Top quark
Yukawa coupling
tH
a b s t r a c t
A search is performed for Higgs bosons produced in association with top quarks using the diphoton decay
mode of the Higgs boson. Selection requirements are optimized separately for leptonic and fully hadronic
nal states from the top quark decays. The dataset used corresponds to an integrated luminosity of
4.5 fb1 of protonproton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV and 20.3 fb1 at 8 TeV recorded
by the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. No signicant excess over the background
prediction is observed and upper limits are set on the t t H production cross section. The observed
exclusion upper limit at 95% condence level is 6.7 times the predicted Standard Model cross section
value. In addition, limits are set on the strength of the Yukawa coupling between the top quark and
the Higgs boson, taking into account the dependence of the t t H and t H cross sections as well as the
H branching fraction on the Yukawa coupling. Lower and upper limits at 95% condence level are
set at 1.3 and +8.0 times the Yukawa coupling strength in the Standard Model.
2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). Funded by SCOAP3 .
1. Introduction
After the decades-long search for the Higgs boson [13], a particle consistent with the Standard Model (SM) Higgs boson has
been discovered at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) [4,5]. A notable property of the SM Higgs boson is its predicted large Yukawa
coupling to top quarks, Y tSM . The measurement of Y t is particularly important for understanding electroweak symmetry breaking
and allows for testing theories beyond the SM (BSM).
The value of Y t is indirectly tested by measurements sensitive
to gluon fusion, ggF, the dominant Higgs boson production mechanism at the LHC, which receives large contributions from loop
diagrams involving the top quark. In addition, Y t is probed in the
decay of the Higgs boson to two photons, H , as the decay
width also involves loop diagrams with top quarks [6]. However,
Y t can be directly measured in the production of topantitop quark
pairs, t t, in association with a Higgs boson [711], t t H .
The production of the Higgs boson in association with a single
top quark, t H ,1 is also sensitive to Y t . Three processes contribute
to t H production [1216]: t-channel (t Hqb) production, W t H pro-
E-mail address: atlas.publications@cern.ch.

1
For simplicity, t H refers equally to t H in this Letter.
duction and s-channel t H production. The s-channel production

is neglected in this Letter due to the much smaller cross section
compared to t Hqb and W t H production. Examples of Feynman diagrams for t Hqb and W t H production are shown in Fig. 1.
In the SM, t H production is suppressed by the destructive interference between t-channel diagrams with Higgs bosons emitted from top quark and W boson lines, as for example shown in
Fig. 1 (a) and Fig. 1 (b). In BSM theories [1316], however, Y t can
have non-SM values, and in particular the relative sign between Y t
and g H W W , which quanties the coupling between the Higgs boson and the W boson, can be different from the SM prediction,
which could lead to constructive instead of destructive interference
in t H production. Hence, the t H production cross section is not
only sensitive to the magnitude of Y t but, in contrast to t t H production, it is also sensitive to the relative sign of Y t with respect
to g H W W . A scale factor, t , is introduced to describe the relation
between Y t and its SM value: Y t = t Y tSM . Values of t = 1 imply modications of the BroutEnglertHiggs mechanism and are
assumed here to leave the top quark mass and decay properties
unchanged. Furthermore, only SM particles are assumed to contribute to the decay width of the Higgs boson.
This Letter reports a search for H in association with top
quarks using data recorded with the ATLAS detector [18]. Measurements in the H decay channel are challenging due to the
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.11.049
0370-2693/ 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). Funded by
SCOAP3 .
ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242
223
spectrometer. Three stations of precision drift tubes and cathode

strip chambers provide a measurements of muon tracks in the
region || < 2.7. Resistive-plate and thin-gap chambers provide
muon triggering capability up to || < 2.4. A detailed description
of the ATLAS detector can be found in Ref. [18].
3. Data and Monte Carlo samples
3.1. Data samples
Data used for this analysis were recorded in pp collisions at

s = 7 TeV and 8 TeV in 2011 and 2012, respectively. All events
Fig. 1. Feynman diagrams showing examples for t Hqb (a, b) and W t H production
(c, d). Higgs boson radiation off top quark and W boson lines is depicted. The t Hqb
process is shown in the four-avor scheme where no b-quarks are assumed to be
present in the proton [17].
small branching fraction in the SM, BR( H ) = 2.28 103 for

Higgs boson masses, m H , around 125 GeV. However, the diphoton
nal state allows the diphoton invariant mass, m , to be reconstructed with excellent resolution, strongly reducing the contribution from the backgrounds, which have a falling m spectrum,
referred to as continuum background in the following. The contribution from the continuum background can be derived from
data sidebands, thus not relying on theory assumptions. A previous search for t t H production by the CMS Collaboration has explored hadronic, diphoton and leptonic nal states of the Higgs
boson [19], setting an upper limit at the 95% condence level (CL)
on the ratio of the observed t t H production cross section to the
SM expectation, called the signal strength tt H , of 4.5.
This Letter also reports lower and upper limits at 95% CL on t ,
taking into account the changes in the t t H and t H cross sections
as well as the H branching fraction [1416]. BSM theories
with values of Y t = Y tSM are hence constrained.
2. The ATLAS detector
The ATLAS detector consists of an inner tracking detector system, electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeters, and an external
muon spectrometer. Charged particles in the pseudorapidity2 range
|| < 2.5 are reconstructed with the inner tracking detector, which
is immersed in a 2 T axial eld provided by a superconducting
solenoid, and consists of pixel and microstrip semiconductor detectors, as well as a straw-tube transition radiation tracker. The
solenoid is surrounded by sampling calorimeters, which span the
pseudorapidity range up to || = 4.9. High-granularity liquid-argon
(LAr) electromagnetic calorimeters are present up to || = 3.2.
Hadronic calorimeters with scintillator tiles as active material
cover || < 1.74, while LAr technology is used for hadronic
calorimetry from || = 1.5 to || = 4.9. Outside the calorimeter
system, air-core toroids provide a magnetic eld for the muon
2
ATLAS uses a right-handed coordinate system with its origin at the nominal interaction point (IP) in the centre of the detector and the z-axis along the beam
pipe. The x-axis points from the IP to the centre of the LHC ring, and the y-axis
points upward. Cylindrical coordinates (r , ) are used in the transverse plane, being the azimuthal angle around the beam pipe. The pseudorapidity is dened in
terms of the polar angle as = ln tan(/2). The transverse momentum is dened as p T = p sin = p / cosh , and the transverse energy E T has an analogous
denition.
satisfy data quality requirements ensuring proper functioning of

the detector and trigger subsystems. The resulting datasets correspond to integrated luminosities of 4.5 fb1 and 20.3 fb1 , respectively [20]. For the 7 TeV dataset, events were triggered with
a diphoton trigger with a threshold of 20 GeV on the transverse
energy of each photon candidate. For the 8 TeV dataset, these
thresholds were raised to 35 GeV for the highest-E T (leading) photon candidate and 25 GeV for the second-highest-E T (subleading)
photon candidate.
3.2. Monte Carlo samples
The contribution from the continuum background is directly
estimated from data. All processes involving H decays, however, are estimated using Monte Carlo (MC) simulation samples.
The production of t t H events is modeled using next-to-leadingorder (NLO) matrix elements obtained with the HELAC-Oneloop package [21], where Powheg-BOX [2224] is interfaced to
Pythia 8.1 [25] for showering and hadronization. CT10 [26] parton distribution functions (PDF) and the AU2 underlying event
tune [27,28] are used. Production of t Hqb is simulated with MadGraph [29] in the four-avor scheme with the CT10 PDF set, which
provides a better description of the kinematics of the spectator
b-quark than the ve-avor scheme [17]. Pythia 8.1 is used for
showering and hadronization. Production of W t H is simulated in
the ve-avor scheme by MadGraph5_aMC@NLO [30] interfaced
to Herwig++ [31] using the CT10 PDF set. All t H samples are
produced for three different values of t : 1, 0 and +1. In the
simulation of t t H , t Hqb and W t H processes, diagrams with Higgs
bosons radiated in the top quark decay are not taken into account
because such contributions are negligible [32].
Higgs boson production by ggF and vector-boson fusion (VBF)
is simulated with Powheg-BOX [33,34] interfaced to Pythia 8.1 for
showering and hadronization with CT10 PDF. Production of a Higgs
boson in association with a W or Z boson (W H , Z H ) is simulated
with Pythia 8.1 using CTEQ6L1 [35] PDF.
All MC samples are generated at m H = 125 GeV and are passed
through a full GEANT4 [36] simulation of the ATLAS detector [37].
The simulated samples have additional pp collision events, pile-up,
simulated by Pythia 8.1 added and weighted such that the average
number of interactions per bunch-crossing is the same as in data.
The cross sections for t t H production were calculated at NLO
in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) [7,9,38,39]. The cross sections
for t Hqb production are calculated for different values of t at LO
using MadGraph with the renormalization and factorization scales
set to 75 GeV, and with a minimum p T,q requirement of 10 GeV,
consistent with the generated MC samples. LO-to-NLO K-factors
are obtained by comparing the LO cross sections with the NLO
cross sections calculated using MadGraph5_aMC@NLO. The cross
sections for W t H production are calculated for different values
of t at NLO using MadGraph5_aMC@NLO with dynamic renormalization and factorization scales. Interference effects with t t H
production are not considered, but are believed to be small given
224
Table 1
Production cross sections for the various Higgs boson processes at 7 TeV and 8 TeV
before taking into account the BR( H ) at m H = 125 GeV. Also quoted are
the theoretical uncertainties from variations of the renormalization and factorization
scales and uncertainties on the parton distribution functions [63,64].
Process
[pb] at 7 TeV
[pb] at 8 TeV
t t H
0.008
0.086+
0.011
0.012
0.129+
0.016
0.003
0.040+
0.003
0.004
0.059+
0.004
t = +1
t = 0
t Hqb, t = 1
W t H, t = +1
W t H, t = 0
W t H, t = 1
0.0009
0.0111+
0.0008
ggF
VBF
WH
ZH
15.1 1.6
1.22 0.03
0.579 0.016
0.335 0.013
t Hqb,
t Hqb,
0.010
0.129+
0.009
0.0007
0.0029+
0.0006
0.0011
0.0043+
0.0008
0.004
0.016+
0.003
0.0012
0.0172+
0.0011
0.014
0.197+
0.013
0.0010
0.0047+
0.0009
0.0017
0.0073+
0.0013
0.006
0.027+
0.005
19.3 2.0
1.58 0.04
0.705 0.018
0.415 0.017
that W t H is produced mostly without a second high-p T b-quark

in the nal state.
The cross sections for ggF production were calculated at nextto-next-to leading order (NNLO) in QCD [4045]. In addition,
QCD soft-gluon resummation up to next-to-next-to-leading logarithms [46] is adopted to improve the NNLO calculation, and NLO
electroweak (EW) corrections are applied [47,48]. The cross sections for VBF production were calculated including NLO QCD and
EW corrections [4951]. In addition, approximate NNLO QCD corrections are applied [52]. The cross sections for W H and Z H
production were calculated at NLO [53] and NNLO [54] in QCD.
Moreover, NLO EW corrections [55] are applied.
The theoretical uncertainties on the Higgs boson production
cross sections come from varying the renormalization and factorization scales and from uncertainties on the parton distribution
functions [26,5658]. The Higgs boson decay branching fractions
are taken from Refs. [5962] and their uncertainties are compiled
in Refs. [63,64]. A summary of the cross-section values and their
uncertainties is given in Table 1.
4. Object and event selection
4.1. Object selection
Photons are reconstructed [65] from clusters of cells in the
electromagnetic calorimeter in the region || < 2.37 excluding the
transition region, 1.37 < || < 1.56, between the barrel and endcap
calorimeters. Unconverted photons are required to have no tracks
associated with them; clusters from photons converted in the material between the production vertex and the calorimeter are allowed to have one or two associated tracks. The energies of the
clusters are calibrated, separately for unconverted and converted
photon candidates, in order to account for energy losses upstream
of the calorimeter and for energy leakage outside of the cluster.
Photons are required to pass a set of selection requirements on
the reconstructed shower shape as well as the following isolation
requirements: the sum of the p T of all particles
featuring tracks

with p T > 1 GeV in a cone of size R ( )2 + ( )2 = 0.2
around
the photon is required to be smaller than 2.6 (2.2) GeV for
the s = 8 TeV (7 TeV) data. Tracks from converted photons are
excluded from the sum. Moreover, the sum of the E T values in the
calorimeter cells in a cone of size R = 0.4 around the photon is
required to be smaller than 6 (5.5) GeV for the 8 TeV (7 TeV) data.
The calorimeter isolation is corrected for photon energy leakage.
It is also corrected event-by-event by using the ambient energy
from pile-up and the underlying event [66,67]. Only events with
two photons are retained and a diphoton vertex is reconstructed
by a neural-network-based algorithm [68], which uses as input the

trajectories of the two photons and the tracks associated with different vertex candidates. The photon trajectory is determined from
the longitudinal prole of the photon shower in the calorimeter,
the average pp collision point, and for converted photons from the
direction of the associated tracks. The leading (subleading) photon
is required to have E T > 0.35 m (0.25 m ), and the diphoton mass is required to be between 105 GeV and 160 GeV.
Electrons are reconstructed [69] from clusters of cells in the
electromagnetic calorimeter with an associated track. Only clusters
in the region || < 2.47 are considered and are required to fulll
requirements on their shape to be consistent with an electron. The
electron E T has to be larger than 15 GeV. In addition, electrons
must be isolated: the E T in a cone of size R = 0.4 around the
electron and the sum of the transverse momenta of the tracks in
a cone of size R = 0.2 around the electron must be smaller than
20% and 15% of the electron E T , respectively.
Muons are reconstructed [70] by combining tracks in the inner
detector with tracks or track-segments in the muon spectrometer.
Muons are required to satisfy || < 2.7 and p T > 10 GeV and have
to be isolated: muons closer than R = 0.4 to a jet or to one of
the two photons are not considered. Moreover, the E T in a cone of
size R = 0.4 around the muon and the sum of the transverse momenta of the tracks in a cone of size R = 0.2 around the muon
must be smaller than 20% and 15% of the muon p T , respectively.
Jets are reconstructed from clusters of cells in the calorimeter
with the anti-kt algorithm [71] with a radius parameter of 0.4.
They are calibrated to the hadronic energy scale [72], and only
those with p T > 25 GeV and || < 2.5 are considered. The jet
energy is corrected for energy deposits from additional soft interactions in the event [73]. In order to suppress jets from additional
interactions, the jet vertex fraction (JVF) must be larger than 50%
for jets with p T < 50 GeV and || < 2.4. The JVF is dened from
the summed track p T as the fraction associated with the primary
diphoton vertex, where all tracks with p T > 0.5 GeV matched to
the jet are considered.
Jets containing b-quarks are identied with a neural-networkbased b-tagging algorithm, which combines variables from impact
parameter, secondary vertex and decay topology algorithms evaluating the track parameters associated with the jet [74]. Three
different working points (WP) with eciencies of 60%, 70% and
80% for identifying b-jets are used for 8 TeV data. For 7 TeV data,
a slightly different optimization of the b-tagging algorithm with
a WP corresponding to an eciency of 85% is used. The b-tagging
and mistagging eciencies are measured in data using dijet and
t t events [75].
The magnitude of the missing transverse momentum in each
event, E Tmiss , is calculated using clusters of cells in the calorimeter. Corrections are applied for identied photons, electrons, muons
and jets according to special E Tmiss object identication requirements [76].
In order to avoid double-counting of reconstructed objects,
electrons with a distance in space smaller than 0.4 to one
of the two photons, R (e , ), are not considered. In addition, jets
with R ( jet, ) < 0.4 or R ( jet, e ) < 0.2 are removed.
4.2. Event selection
In addition to the requirement of two good photons satisfying
the criteria described in Section 4.1, two different event selections
were optimized in order to eciently select leptonic t t H events
(leptonic category) as well as all-hadronic t t H events (hadronic
category). The optimization targeted an optimal expected limit on
the signal strength tt H in case no evidence for t t H production
is found. However, the requirements for the leptonic category are
225
Table 2
Expected numbers of H events (N H ) from an SM Higgs boson with m H = 125.4 GeV after the event selection. These combined yields are normalized to 4.5 fb1 for
the 7 TeV data and to 20.3 fb1 for the 8 TeV data, and are listed in the table along with the percent contribution of each Higgs boson production process with respect to
the sum of all Higgs boson production processes. The numbers of tted continuum background events (N B ) for the 7 TeV and 8 TeV data are also shown, where N B is the
integral of the continuum background in the m range 120130 GeV, which is determined by an unbinned signal-plus-background t to all categories with one common
scale factor for the H normalization. The uncertainty on N B is the statistical uncertainty calculated from N B = N tot N B / N tot , where N tot is the total number of
background events in the full m range 105160 GeV estimated from an unbinned signal-plus-background likelihood t, and N denotes the Poisson uncertainty on N.
Category
NH
VBF
WH
ZH
t t H
t Hqb
WtH
NB
7 TeV leptonic selection
0.10
0 .6
0.1
14.9
4.0
72.6
5.3
2.5
0 .5
0.5+
0.3
7 TeV hadronic selection
0.07
10.5
1.3
1 .3
1.4
80.9
2.6
1.9
8 TeV leptonic selection
0.58
1 .0
0.2
8 .1
2.3
80.3
5.6
2.6
8 TeV hadronic selection
0.49
7 .3
1.0
0. 7
1.3
84.2
3.4
2.1
ggF
kept loose enough in order to also allow high selection eciency

for t Hqb and W t H production.
In this analysis, we assume that the top quark only decays to
a W boson and a b-quark. The leptonic selection targets both the
single-lepton decays of the t t pairs, where one of the W bosons
decays leptonically and the other one decays hadronically, and the
dilepton decays of t t pairs, where both W bosons decay leptonically. Events are selected by requiring at least one electron or
muon, at least one b-tagged jet using the 80% (85%) WP for 8 TeV
(7 TeV) data and E Tmiss > 20 GeV. The E Tmiss requirement is imposed
to reduce backgrounds from nal states without top quarks and it
is not used for events with two or more b-tagged jets. Events with
an electronphoton invariant mass in the range 8494 GeV are rejected in order to reduce the background contribution from Z ee
events with one electron misidentied as a photon.
The hadronic selection targets events where both W bosons,
from the top quark decays, decay hadronically. No electrons or
muons may be identied in the event. Events must fulll requirements on the number of jets and the number of b-tagged jets. For
the 8 TeV dataset three sets of requirements are dened, out of
which at least one must be satised for an event to be considered:
1. At least six jets, out of which at least two must be b-tagged
using the 80% WP.
2. At least ve jets with an increased p T threshold of 30 GeV, out
of which at least two must be b-tagged using the 70% WP.
3. At least six jets with an increased p T threshold of 30 GeV, out
of which at least one must be b-tagged using the 60% WP.
These requirements were optimized to suppress in particular the
contribution from ggF Higgs boson production with H to
the hadronic category, while retaining good sensitivity to t t H production. For the 7 TeV dataset only events with at least six jets, at
least two of which are b-tagged with the 85% WP, are considered.
Table 2 summarizes the expected numbers of events in each
category for m H = 125.4 GeV, the Higgs boson mass measured by
the ATLAS Collaboration [68]. The breakdown into the different
Higgs boson production processes is given. The combined selection eciencies in the 7 TeV and 8 TeV data for t t H production at
m H = 125.4 GeV are approximately 14.6% and 14.8%, respectively.
For SM t Hqb (W t H ) production the combined selection eciencies for 7 TeV and 8 TeV are approximately 6.2% (12.9%) and 6.2%
(11.9%), respectively.
5. Analysis
In order to separate processes involving H decays from
the continuum background, a localized excess of events is searched
for in the m spectrum around m H = 125.4 GeV. Probability
distribution functions for the H resonance and continuum background m distributions are dened in the range of
105160 GeV as described below, and the numbers of Higgs bo-
0 .5
0.5+
0.3
0 .6
0.9+
0.4
0 .9
2.7+
0.7
son and continuum background events are estimated from an unbinned signal-plus-background likelihood t to the full m distributions in the leptonic and hadronic categories. Systematic uncertainties are taken into account as nuisance parameters, which are
tted within their external constraints.
The sum of a Crystal Ball function [77] and a Gaussian function
is used to describe the m distribution from H decays obtained from MC simulations [78]. The Gaussian function accounts
only for a small fraction of the total H resonance signal,
describing small tails of the shape which cannot be characterized
by the Crystal Ball function. The parameters of these functions
are interpolated between the values tted to a series of MC samples generated in steps of 5 GeV in m H , in order to allow for the
evaluation of the resonance shape for intermediate masses including m H = 125.4 GeV, where MC samples are not available. The
relative fraction of the Gaussian component with respect to the
full H resonance shape is not varied as a function of m H .
Shapes with different parameter values are dened for the 7 TeV
and 8 TeV data. The m resolution, which is quantied by half of
the smallest m interval containing 68% of the signal events, is
1.42 GeV for the 7 TeV data and 1.56 GeV for the 8 TeV data in
the leptonic categories. The values in the hadronic categories are
consistent with the ones in the leptonic categories within statistical uncertainties. The small difference in m resolution between
7 TeV and 8 TeV is due to a difference in the effective constant
term for the calorimeter energy resolution and due to the lower
level of pile-up in the 7 TeV data [68]. The m resolution is
dominated by the photon energy resolution. The small change in
acceptance for t t H production is interpolated using MC samples
generated with different hypothesized values of m H also. For all
other Higgs boson production processes, the difference in acceptance between m H = 125 GeV and m H = 125.4 GeV is found to be
negligible.
An exponential function, ea m , with a 0 is chosen for both
categories as a model for the continuum background following the
method previously used in Ref. [5]. The choice of t function is
validated in data control regions obtained by loosening the photon identication and isolation requirements. These control regions
are dominated by jets misidentied as photons, and the systematic uncertainties derived from these control regions (cf. Section 6)
are hence only approximate. In both the leptonic and the hadronic
category, the same continuum background shape is used for 7 TeV
and 8 TeV data, because the 7 TeV data alone is not expected to
strongly constrain the parameter a given the expected low number
of events.
In the range 105 GeV < m < 160 GeV, 3 (3) events are found
in the leptonic (hadronic) category in the 7 TeV and 5 (15) events
are found in the 8 TeV data. The results of the ts for the leptonic and hadronic categories are shown in Fig. 2, separately for
7 TeV and 8 TeV data. The tted numbers of continuum background events in a window of 120130 GeV are shown in Table 2.
226
Fig. 2. Distributions of the diphoton invariant mass, m , for the leptonic (left) and hadronic (right) category for data at 7 TeV (top) and data at 8 TeV (bottom). An unbinned
signal-plus-background likelihood t to the full spectra is used to estimate the number of events from continuum background (solid line) as well as from SM Higgs boson
production (dashed line). The signal strength, , is a parameter common to all categories and its best-t value is = 1.4 for m H = 125.4 GeV.
Table 3
Summary of systematic uncertainties on the nal yield of events for 8 TeV data from t t H , t Hqb and W t H production after applying the leptonic and hadronic
selection requirements. The uncertainties are also shown for other Higgs boson production processes that do not include the associated production of top quarks
and have signicant contributions to the event selection. These are W H production in the leptonic category and ggF production in the hadronic category. For
both t H production processes, the maximum uncertainty observed for all values of t generated (+1, 0, 1) is reported.
t t H [%]
Luminosity
Photons
Leptons
Jets and E Tmiss
Bkg. modeling
Theory ( BR)
MC modeling
ggF [%]
W H [%]
had.
lep.
had.
lep.
had.
lep.
had.
lep.
2.8
5.6
< 0.1
7.4
5.5
0.7
0.7
5.6
< 0.1
16
5.5
0.6
1.9
5.6
< 0.1
11
5.5
0.6
2.1
5.6
< 0.1
29
5.5
0.7
10
0.24 evt.
0.16 evt.
+10, 13
11
t Hqb [%]
3.3
W t H [%]
applied on the sum of all Higgs boson production processes

+14, 12
+11, 11
4.4
12
4.6
130
+7, 6
12
6. Systematic uncertainties
Systematic uncertainties from various sources affect both the
expected number of events for different Higgs boson production
processes and the m resonance shape. An overview of all systematic uncertainties for 8 TeV data is shown in Table 3 for t t H ,
t Hqb and W t H production. The uncertainties are also shown for
other Higgs boson production processes that do not include the
associated production of top quarks and have signicant contributions to the event selection. These are W H production in the
leptonic category and ggF production in the hadronic category.
The uncertainty on the integrated luminosity is 2.8% (1.8%) for
the 8 TeV (7 TeV) data as derived following the same methodology
as that detailed in Ref. [20] using beam-separation scans. For 8 TeV
data, the trigger eciency [79] was measured to be 99.5 0.2%.
For 7 TeV data, the eciency was measured to be compatible
+5.5, 5.4
100
with 100% within an uncertainty of 0.2%. The uncertainty in the

combined diphoton identication eciency is 1.0% (8.4%) [80] for
8 TeV (7 TeV) data. Due to the high jet multiplicity in this analysis an additional uncertainty of 4% is added to account for possible
mismodeling of the photon identication eciency. This additional
uncertainty is obtained from dataMC comparisons of electron efciencies in Z ( ee ) + jets events, where photon identication
requirements are applied to the electron clusters [81]. Analogously,
an additional uncertainty of 3% is assessed for the eciency of the
combined diphoton isolation requirement, and is added in quadrature to the nominal uncertainty of 2.3% (2.1%) in the hadronic (leptonic) category. The uncertainty on the photon energy scale [80]
was found to have a negligible effect on the expected yields. Its
effect on the peak position, however, is taken into account, but
has a negligible impact on the results. The uncertainty in the photon energy resolution translates into an uncertainty on the m
227
resolution, and is based on the resolution measured with Z ee

events [80]. The total m resolution uncertainty is 12% for both
the 7 TeV and 8 TeV dataset, which is less than 0.2 GeV.
The uncertainties due to the lepton reconstruction, identication, isolation, and energy/momentum scale and resolution combine to less than 1% for all channels. Uncertainties on the jet energy scale are taken into account, as well as uncertainties on the
jet energy resolution, and on the modeling of the JVF and of the
b-tagging eciencies. All object uncertainties which change the
energy or momentum of the corresponding objects are propagated
to the E Tmiss calculation, and additional uncertainties are taken into
account for energy deposits which only enter the E Tmiss calculation,
but are not part of other objects.
Systematic uncertainties due to the choice of the continuum
background t model are estimated by tting continuum background distributions in control regions with a Higgs boson plus
continuum background model and quantifying the apparent number of Higgs boson events introduced [5]. The systematic uncertainty is chosen to be the maximal apparent number of Higgs
boson events in a narrow mass range around 125.4 GeV. Since the
contributions from different background processes in the control
region may be different from their contributions in the four categories, the estimate of this uncertainty is approximate, but its
impact on the nal results is very small. An uncertainty of 0.24
(0.16) events is estimated in the 8 TeV hadronic (leptonic) category as the apparent number of Higgs boson events under the
Higgs boson peak. For the 7 TeV dataset, uncertainties of 0.12 and
0.01 events are estimated, where all of these numbers have a nonnegligible statistical component from the limited number of events
in the control regions considered. The number of events is lowest
in the control region for the hadronic category in 7 TeV data (266
events).
The theoretical uncertainties on the different Higgs boson production cross sections due to uncertainties in the PDF, missing
higher-order perturbative QCD corrections estimated by varying
the renormalization and factorization scales, and the BR( H )
are detailed in Refs. [26,5658,6264,82].
Additional uncertainties are included in MC modeling in Table 3. These take into account changes in the acceptance when the
renormalization and factorization scales are varied, an uncertainty
on the modeling of the underlying event, which is conservatively
estimated by comparing MC samples with and without multiple
parton scattering, and an uncertainty due to the limited number of events present in the MC samples after the event selection
and categorization are applied. Moreover, uncertainties of 100% are
assigned to the expected numbers of events from ggF, VBF and
W H production in association with additional b-jets. The size of
these uncertainties is motivated by recent measurements of t t and
vector-boson production in association with b-jets [83,84].
7. Results
In total, 5 candidate events with m in the range 120130 GeV
are found in the leptonic and hadronic categories. The total expected yield of Higgs boson production is 1.3 events compared to
1. 3
a continuum background of 4.6+
0.9 events (see Table 2). The m
spectra for the candidate events are shown in Fig. 2 together with
the tted continuum background and the total contribution from
H processes, where the signal strength, , is a parameter
common to all four categories. The best-t signal strength for all
2. 1
+0.6
H processes together is 1.4+
1.4 (stat.)0.3 (syst.), where the
quoted overall systematic uncertainty is derived by quadratically
subtracting the statistical uncertainty from the total uncertainty.
When the yields for all H processes, including t H production but not t t H production, are set to their respective SM ex-
Fig. 3. Negative log-likelihood scan for the t t H cross section times BR( H )
relative to the SM expectation, tt H , at m H = 125.4 GeV, where all other Higgs
boson production cross sections, including the cross section for t H production, are
set to their respective SM expectations.
Fig. 4. Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the t t H production cross section times BR( H ). All other Higgs boson production cross sections, including
the cross section for t H production, are set to their respective SM expectations.
While the expected limits are calculated for the case where t t H production is not
present, the lines denoted by SM signal injected show the expected 95% CL limits
for a dataset corresponding to continuum background plus SM Higgs boson production. The limits are given relative to the SM expectations and at m H = 125.4 GeV.
2. 5
+0.8
pected number of events, a best-t value of 1.3+
1.7 (stat.)0.4 (syst.)
is obtained for tt H , which is also shown in the scan of the likelihood in Fig. 3. This best-t value of tt H is consistent with
the SM expectation of one, but does not represent a signicant
excess over the predicted background rate, and CLs -based [85]
95% CL exclusion upper limits are set for t t H production times
BR( H ). Limits are set using the asymptotic formulae discussed in Ref. [86] with the prole likelihood ratio as test statistic.
The results are found to be consistent with limits derived from
ensembles of pseudo-experiments. The observed and expected upper limits for tt H at m H = 125.4 GeV are summarized in Fig. 4 as
well as in Table 4, where the expected limits assume tt H = 0. The
non-t t H Higgs boson production modes, including t H , are xed to
their SM expectations with corresponding theory and experimental uncertainties assigned. An upper limit of 6.7 times the SM cross
section times BR( H ) is observed. Upper limits at 95% CL are
also set on the signal strength of the sum of all H processes, , and the observed (expected) limit is 5.7 (3.8).
These results are also interpreted as 95% CL limits on the
strength parameter t of the top quarkHiggs boson Yukawa coupling. Variations in t not only change the production cross sections of the t t H and t H processes, but also affect BR( H ),
and the cross sections of the other Higgs boson production processes [82]. Fig. 5 illustrates the dependence of the t t H and t H
cross sections and of the BR( H ) on t . For t = 0, the t t H
228
Table 4
Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the t t H production cross section times BR( H ) relative to the SM cross section times BR( H ) at m H = 125.4 GeV.
All other Higgs boson production cross sections, including the cross section for t H production, are set to their respective SM expectations. In addition, the expected limits
corresponding to +2 , +1 , 1 , and 2 variations are shown. The expected limits are calculated for the case where t t H production is not present. The results are given
for the combination of leptonic and hadronic categories with all systematic uncertainties included, and also for leptonic and hadronic categories separately, as well as for the
expected limits additionally with only statistical uncertainties considered.
+2
+1
6 .7
4 .9
4 .7
11.9
10.5
7.5
7.0
3.5
3.4
2.6
2.5
Leptonic (with systematics)

Leptonic (statistics only)
10.7
6 .6
6 .4
16.5
15.1
10.1
9.6
4.7
4.6
3.5
3.4
Hadronic (with systematics)

Hadronic (statistics only)
9 .0
10.1
9. 5
25.4
21.4
15.6
14.1
7.3
6.8
5.4
5.1
Observed limit
Combined (with systematics)
Combined (statistics only)
Expected limit
Fig. 5. Production cross sections for t t H and t H divided by their SM expectations

as a function of the scale factor to the top quarkHiggs boson Yukawa coupling, t .
Production of t H comprises the t Hqb and W t H processes. Also shown is the dependence of the BR( H ) with respect to its SM expectation on t .
process is turned off, and the top quark contribution to t H production and to the loop-induced H decay is removed, leaving
mainly the contribution from W bosons. For values of t < 0, on
the other hand, the interference between contributions from W
bosons and top quarks to t H production and to the BR( H )
becomes constructive, thus enhancing the two processes with respect to their respective SM expectations. Cancellations of the
contributions of top quarks and W bosons to the loop-induced
H decay lead to a minimum of the BR( H ) around
a value of t = +4.7. The combined selection eciency differs
slightly for the three values of t for which t Hqb and W t H MC
samples were generated. From these, the eciency at different
values of t in the range [3, +10] is calculated by combining
reweighted MC samples with t = +1, 0 and 1. The weight for
each sample is assigned in such a way that the cross-section value
from the combination follows the prediction shown in Fig. 5. The
largest relative difference with respect to the eciency at t = +1
over the entire range is found to be 14% (20%) for t Hqb (W t H )
production.
All H processes are considered and 95% CL limits
are set on the total Higgs boson production cross section times
BR( H ) with respect to the SM cross section for different
values of t . Coupling strengths other than t are set to their
respective SM values. The continuum background plus SM Higgs
boson production (t = +1) is taken as alternative hypothesis.
The observed and expected limits on t at m H = 125.4 GeV
are summarized in Fig. 6, where the observed (expected) lower
and upper limits on t at 95% CL are 1.3 and +8.0 (1.2 and
+7.8). The expected limits assume t = +1. The form of the limit
curve shown in Fig. 6 is the result of the different dependencies of the different Higgs boson production processes as well as
the BR( H ) on t . The negative log-likelihood scan of t is
Fig. 6. Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the inclusive Higgs boson
production cross section with respect to the cross section times BR( H ) for
different values of t at m H = 125.4 GeV, where t is the strength parameter for
the top quarkHiggs boson Yukawa coupling. All Higgs boson production processes
are considered for the inclusive production cross section. The expected limits are
calculated for the case where t = +1. The CLs alternative hypothesis is given by
continuum background plus SM Higgs boson production.
Fig. 7. Negative log-likelihood scan of t at m H = 125.4 GeV, where

strength parameter for the top quarkHiggs boson Yukawa coupling.
t is the
shown in Fig. 7 and it shows that the data are consistent with the
SM expectation of t = +1. Although two different values of t exist with the same total number of expected events, there are no
double minima at zero shown in Fig. 6 because different relative
contributions from the Higgs boson production processes in different categories have lifted the degeneracy of the likelihood.
8. Conclusion
A search for
quarks in the H
and hadronic t t
to 4.5 fb1 and
Higgs boson production in association with top
decay channel is presented using leptonic

decays. Data at 7 TeV and 8 TeV corresponding
20.3 fb1 taken in pp collisions with the ATLAS
detector at the LHC were analyzed. No signicant excess over the

background prediction is observed and upper limits at 95% CL are
set on the t t H production cross section. The observed exclusion
limit at m H = 125.4 GeV is found to be 6.7 times the predicted SM
cross section. The corresponding lower and upper limits on the
top quarkHiggs boson Yukawa coupling strength parameter t are
found to be 1.3 and +8.0, which in particular constrain models
with a negative sign of the coupling.
Acknowledgements
We thank CERN for the very successful operation of the LHC,
as well as the support staff from our institutions without whom
ATLAS could not be operated eciently.
We acknowledge the support of ANPCyT, Argentina; YerPhI,
Armenia; ARC, Australia; BMWFW and FWF, Austria; ANAS, Azerbaijan; SSTC, Belarus; CNPq and FAPESP, Brazil; NSERC, NRC
and CFI, Canada; CERN; CONICYT, Chile; CAS, MOST and NSFC,
China; COLCIENCIAS, Colombia; MSMT CR, MPO CR and VSC CR,
Czech Republic; DNRF, DNSRC and Lundbeck Foundation, Denmark; EPLANET, ERC and NSRF, European Union; IN2P3-CNRS,
CEA-DSM/IRFU, France; GNSF, Georgia; BMBF, DFG, HGF, MPG and
AvH Foundation, Germany; GSRT and NSRF, Greece; ISF, MINERVA,
GIF, I-CORE and Benoziyo Center, Israel; INFN, Italy; MEXT and
JSPS, Japan; CNRST, Morocco; FOM and NWO, Netherlands; BRF
and RCN, Norway; MNiSW and NCN, Poland; GRICES and FCT,
Portugal; MNE/IFA, Romania; MES of Russia and ROSATOM, Russian Federation; JINR; MSTD, Serbia; MSSR, Slovakia; ARRS and
MIZ, Slovenia; DST/NRF, South Africa; MINECO, Spain; SRC and
Wallenberg Foundation, Sweden; SER, SNSF and Cantons of Bern
and Geneva, Switzerland; NSC, Taiwan; TAEK, Turkey; STFC, the
Royal Society and Leverhulme Trust, United Kingdom; DOE and
NSF, United States of America.
The crucial computing support from all WLCG partners is acknowledged gratefully, in particular from CERN and the ATLAS
Tier-1 facilities at TRIUMF (Canada), NDGF (Denmark, Norway,
Sweden), CC-IN2P3 (France), KIT/GridKA (Germany), INFN-CNAF
(Italy), NL-T1 (Netherlands), PIC (Spain), ASGC (Taiwan), RAL (UK)
and BNL (USA) and in the Tier-2 facilities worldwide.
References
[1] F. Englert, R. Brout, Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 321, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.321.
[2] P.W. Higgs, Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.
13 (1964) 508, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.508.
[3] G. Guralnik, C. Hagen, T. Kibble, Global conservation laws and massless particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 585.
[4] CMS Collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with
the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30, http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021, arXiv:1207.7235.
[5] ATLAS Collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716
(2012) 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020, arXiv:1207.7214.
[6] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurements of Higgs boson production and couplings
in diboson nal states with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 726
(2013) 88119, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013.08.010, arXiv:1307.
1427.
[7] W. Beenakker, et al., Higgs radiation off top quarks at the Tevatron and the
LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 201805, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.
87.201805, arXiv:hep-ph/0107081.
[8] L. Reina, S. Dawson, D. Wackeroth, QCD corrections to associated t th production at the Fermilab Tevatron, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 053017, http://dx.doi.org/
10.1103/PhysRevD.65.053017, arXiv:hep-ph/0109066.
[9] S. Dawson, C. Jackson, L. Orr, L. Reina, D. Wackeroth, Associated Higgs production with top quarks at the Large Hadron Collider: NLO QCD corrections, Phys.
Rev. D 68 (2003) 034022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.034022, arXiv:
hep-ph/0305087.
229
[10] M. Garzelli, A. Kardos, C. Papadopoulos, Z. Trocsanyi, Standard Model Higgs

boson production in association with a top anti-top pair at NLO with parton
showering, Europhys. Lett. 96 (2011) 11001, http://dx.doi.org/10.1209/02955075/96/11001, arXiv:1108.0387.
[11] R. Frederix, et al., Scalar and pseudoscalar Higgs production in association with
a topantitop pair, Phys. Lett. B 701 (2011) 427433, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.physletb.2011.06.012, arXiv:1104.5613.
[12] F. Maltoni, K. Paul, T. Stelzer, S. Willenbrock, Associated production of Higgs
and single top at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 094023, http://dx.
doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.64.094023, arXiv:hep-ph/0106293.
[13] V. Barger, M. McCaskey, G. Shaughnessy, Single top and Higgs associated production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 034020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/
PhysRevD.81.034020, arXiv:0911.1556.
[14] M. Farina, C. Grojean, F. Maltoni, E. Salvioni, A. Thamm, Lifting degeneracies in Higgs couplings using single top production in association with
a Higgs boson, J. High Energy Phys. 1305 (2013) 022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/
JHEP05(2013)022, arXiv:1211.3736.
[15] S. Biswas, E. Gabrielli, B. Mele, Single top and Higgs associated production as
a probe of the Ht t coupling sign at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 1301 (2013)
088, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2013)088, arXiv:1211.0499.
[16] P. Agrawal, S. Mitra, A. Shivaji, Effect of anomalous couplings on the associated
production of a single top quark and a Higgs boson at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 1312 (2013) 077, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2013)077, arXiv:
1211.4362.
[17] R. Frederix, E. Re, P. Torrielli, Single-top t-channel hadroproduction in the fouravour scheme with POWHEG and aMC@NLO, J. High Energy Phys. 1209 (2012)
130, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2012)130, arXiv:1207.5391.
[18] ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider,
J. Instrum. 3 (2008) S08003.
[19] CMS Collaboration, Search for the associated production of the Higgs boson
with a top-quark pair, J. High Energy Phys. 1409 (2014) 087, http://dx.doi.org/
10.1007/JHEP09(2014)087, arXiv:1408.1682;
CMS Collaboration, Search for the associated production of the Higgs boson
with a top-quark pair, J. High Energy Phys. 1410 (2014) 106, http://dx.doi.org/
10.1007/JHEP10(2014)106 (Erratum).
[20] ATLAS Collaboration, Improved luminosity determination in pp collisions at
s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013)
2518, http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2518-3, arXiv:1302.4393.
[21] G. Bevilacqua, et al., HELAC-NLO, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 986997,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2012.10.033, arXiv:1110.1499.
[22] P. Nason, A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo
algorithms, J. High Energy Phys. 0411 (2004) 040, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/
1126-6708/2004/11/040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146.
[23] S. Frixione, P. Nason, C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with parton
shower simulations: the POWHEG method, J. High Energy Phys. 0711 (2007)
070, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070, arXiv:0709.2092.
[24] S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, E. Re, A general framework for implementing NLO
calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, J. High Energy Phys. 1006 (2010) 043, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043, arXiv:
1002.2581.
[25] T. Sjstrand, S. Mrenna, P. Skands, A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput.
Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 852867.
[26] H.-L. Lai, et al., New parton distributions for collider physics, Phys. Rev. D 82
(2010) 074024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.82.074024, arXiv:1007.2241.
[27] ATLAS Collaboration, New ATLAS event generator tunes to 2010 data, Tech. Rep.
ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-008, https://cds.cern.ch/record/1345343, April 2011.
[28] ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS tunes of PYTHIA 6 and Pythia 8 for MC11, Tech.
Rep. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-009, https://cds.cern.ch/record/1363300, July 2011.
[29] F. Maltoni, T. Stelzer, MadEvent: automatic event generation with MadGraph,
J. High Energy Phys. 0302 (2003) 027, arXiv:hep-ph/0208156.
[30] J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, et al., The automated
computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections,
and their matching to parton shower simulations, J. High Energy Phys. 1407
(2014) 079, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079, arXiv:1405.0301.
[31] M. Bhr, et al., Herwig++ physics and manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 58 (2008) 639707,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-008-0798-9, arXiv:0803.0883.
[32] T. Han, R. Ruiz, Higgs bosons from top quark decays, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014)
074045, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.074045, arXiv:1312.3324.
[33] S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, E. Re, NLO Higgs boson production via gluon fusion matched with shower in POWHEG, J. High Energy Phys. 0904 (2009) 002,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2009/04/002, arXiv:0812.0578.
[34] P. Nason, C. Oleari, NLO Higgs boson production via vector-boson fusion
matched with shower in POWHEG, J. High Energy Phys. 1002 (2010) 037,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2010)037, arXiv:0911.5299.
[35] P.M. Nadolsky, et al., Implications of CTEQ global analysis for collider observables, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 013004, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.
78.013004, arXiv:0802.0007.
230
[36] GEANT4 Collaboration, S. Agostinelli, et al., GEANT4: a simulation toolkit, Nucl.

Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, Accel. Spectrom. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 506
(2003) 250.
[37] ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS simulation infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C 70 (2010)
823874, http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1429-9, arXiv:1005.4568.
[38] W. Beenakker, et al., NLO QCD corrections to t t H production in hadron collisions, Nucl. Phys. B 653 (2003) 151, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(03)
00044-0, arXiv:hep-ph/0211352.
[39] S. Dawson, L. Orr, L. Reina, D. Wackeroth, Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to pp t th at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003)
071503, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.67.071503, arXiv:hep-ph/0211438.
[40] A. Djouadi, M. Spira, P. Zerwas, Production of Higgs bosons in proton colliders: QCD corrections, Phys. Lett. B 264 (1991) 440, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
0370-2693(91)90375-Z.
[41] S. Dawson, Radiative corrections to Higgs boson production, Nucl. Phys. B 359
(1991) 283, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(91)90061-2.
[42] M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz, P. Zerwas, Higgs boson production at
the LHC, Nucl. Phys. B 453 (1995) 17, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213
(95)00379-7, arXiv:hep-ph/9504378.
[43] R.V. Harlander, W.B. Kilgore, Next-to-next-to-leading order Higgs production at
hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 201801, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/
PhysRevLett.88.201801, arXiv:hep-ph/0201206.
[44] C. Anastasiou, K. Melnikov, Higgs boson production at hadron colliders in
NNLO QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 646 (2002) 220, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S05503213(02)00837-4, arXiv:hep-ph/0207004.
[45] V. Ravindran, J. Smith, W.L. van Neerven, NNLO corrections to the total crosssection for Higgs boson production in hadronhadron collisions, Nucl. Phys.
B 665 (2003) 325, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00457-7, arXiv:
hep-ph/0302135.
[46] S. Catani, D. de Florian, M. Grazzini, P. Nason, Soft gluon resummation for Higgs
boson production at hadron colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 0307 (2003) 028,
arXiv:hep-ph/0306211.
[47] U. Aglietti, R. Bonciani, G. Degrassi, A. Vicini, Two loop light fermion contribution to Higgs production and decays, Phys. Lett. B 595 (2004) 432,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2004.06.063, arXiv:hep-ph/0404071.
[48] S. Actis, G. Passarino, C. Sturm, S. Uccirati, NLO electroweak corrections to
Higgs boson production at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B 670 (2008) 12,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2008.10.018, arXiv:0809.1301.
[49] M. Ciccolini, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, Strong and electroweak corrections to
the production of Higgs + 2-jets via weak interactions at the LHC, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 99 (2007) 161803, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.161803, arXiv:
0707.0381.
[50] M. Ciccolini, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, Electroweak and QCD corrections to Higgs
production via vector-boson fusion at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 013002,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.013002, arXiv:0710.4749.
[51] K. Arnold, et al., VBFNLO: a parton level Monte Carlo for processes with electroweak bosons, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 1661, http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.cpc.2009.03.006, arXiv:0811.4559.
[52] P. Bolzoni, F. Maltoni, S.-O. Moch, M. Zaro, Higgs production via vector-boson
fusion at NNLO in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 011801, http://dx.doi.org/
10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.011801, arXiv:1003.4451.
[53] T. Han, S. Willenbrock, QCD correction to the pp W H and Z H total
cross-sections, Phys. Lett. B 273 (1991) 167, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/03702693(91)90572-8.
[54] O. Brein, A. Djouadi, R. Harlander, NNLO QCD corrections to the Higgsstrahlung processes at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B 579 (2004) 149,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2003.10.112, arXiv:hep-ph/0307206.
[55] M. Ciccolini, S. Dittmaier, M. Krmer, Electroweak radiative corrections to associated W H and Z H production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003)
073003, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.073003, arXiv:hep-ph/0306234.
[56] M. Botje, et al., The PDF4LHC working group interim recommendations, arXiv:
1101.0538.
[57] A. Martin, W. Stirling, R. Thorne, G. Watt, Parton distributions for the LHC, Eur.
Phys. J. C 63 (2009) 189, http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-009-1072-5,
arXiv:0901.0002.
[58] R.D. Ball, et al., Impact of heavy quark masses on parton distributions and
LHC phenomenology, Nucl. Phys. B 849 (2011) 296, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.nuclphysb.2011.03.021, arXiv:1101.1300.
[59] A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski, M. Spira, HDECAY: a program for Higgs boson decays
in the Standard Model and its supersymmetric extension, Comput. Phys. Commun. 108 (1998) 56, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4655(97)00123-9, arXiv:
hep-ph/9704448.
[60] A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, M. Weber, Precise predictions for the
Higgs-boson decay H W W / Z Z 4 leptons, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 013004,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.013004, arXiv:hep-ph/0604011.
[61] S. Actis, G. Passarino, C. Sturm, S. Uccirati, NNLO computational techniques:
the cases H and H gg, Nucl. Phys. B 811 (2009) 182, http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.11.024, arXiv:0809.3667.
[62] A. Denner, S. Heinemeyer, I. Puljak, D. Rebuzzi, M. Spira, Standard Model Higgsboson branching ratios with uncertainties, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1753,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1753-8, arXiv:1107.5909.
[63] LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross
Sections: 1. Inclusive observables, S. Dittmaier, C. Mariotti, G. Passarino,
R. Tanaka (Eds.), CERN-2011-002, arXiv:1101.0593.
[64] LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 2. Differential distributions, S. Dittmaier, C. Mariotti, G. Passarino,
R. Tanaka (Eds.), CERN-2011-002, arXiv:1201.3084.
[65] ATLAS Collaboration, Expected photon performance in the ATLAS experiment,
Tech. Rep. ATLAS-PHYS-PUB-2011-007, https://cds.cern.ch/record/1345329,
April 2011.
[66] M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam, S. Sapeta, On the characterisation of the underlying event, J. High Energy Phys. 1004 (2010) 065, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/
JHEP04(2010)065, arXiv:0912.4926.
[67] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the inclusive isolated prompt pho
ton cross section in pp collisions at
s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector,
Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 052005, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.052005,
arXiv:1012.4389.
[68] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the Higgs boson mass from the H
and H Z Z 4 channels with the ATLAS detector using 25 fb1 of pp collision data, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 052004, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.
90.052004, arXiv:1406.3827.
[69] ATLAS Collaboration, Electron reconstruction and identication eciency measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2011 LHC protonproton collision data, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2941, http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/
s10052-014-2941-0, arXiv:1404.2240.
[70] ATLAS Collaboration, Muon reconstruction eciency and momentum resolu
tion of the ATLAS experiment in protonproton collisions at s = 7 TeV in
2010, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (9) (2014) 3034, http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052014-3034-9, arXiv:1404.4562.
[71] M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam, G. Soyez, The anti-k(t ) jet clustering algorithm, J. High
Energy Phys. 0804 (2008) 063, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2008/
04/063, arXiv:0802.1189.
[72] ATLAS Collaboration, Jet energy measurement and its systematic uncertainty in
protonproton collisions at s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C

(2014), in press, arXiv:1406.0076.
[73] M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam, Pileup subtraction using jet areas, Phys. Lett. B 659
(2008) 119, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2007.09.077.
[74] ATLAS Collaboration, Commissioning of the ATLAS high-performance b-tagging
algorithms in the 7 TeV collision data, Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2011-102,
https://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1369219, July 2011.
[75] ATLAS Collaboration, Calibration of the performance of b-tagging for c and
light-avour jets in the 2012 ATLAS data, Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2014-046,
https://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1741020, July 2014.
[76] ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of missing transverse momentum recon
struction in ATLAS with 2011 protonproton collisions at s = 7 TeV, Tech.
Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2012-101, https://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1463915, July 2012.
[77] M. Oreglia, Charmonium spectroscopy from radiative decays of the J /
and , Ph.D. thesis, 1980.
[78] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of Higgs boson production in the diphoton
decay channel in pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV with
the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D (2014), in press, arXiv:1408.7084.
[79] ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2010, Eur.
Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1849, http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1849-1,
arXiv:1110.1530.
[80] ATLAS Collaboration, Electron and photon energy calibration with the ATLAS
detector using LHC Run 1 data, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (10) (2014) 3071, http://dx.doi.
org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3071-4, arXiv:1407.5063.
[81] ATLAS Collaboration, Search for top quark decays t qH with H using
the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 1406 (2014) 008, http://dx.doi.org/
10.1007/JHEP06(2014)008, arXiv:1403.6293.
[82] LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 3. Higgs properties, S. Heinemeyer, C. Mariotti, G. Passarino, R. Tanaka
(Eds.), CERN-2013-004, arXiv:1307.1347.
[83] ATLAS Collaboration, A study of heavy avor quarks produced in associa
tion with top quark pairs at
s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector, Phys.
Rev. D 89 (2014) 072012, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.072012, arXiv:
1304.6386.
[84] ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the cross-section for W boson pro
duction in association with b-jets in pp collisions at
s = 7 TeV with
the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 1306 (2013) 084, http://dx.doi.org/
10.1007/JHEP06(2013)084, arXiv:1302.2929.
[85] A.L. Read, Presentation of search results: the CLs technique, J. Phys. G 28 (2002)
26932704.
[86] G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihoodbased tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1554, arXiv:1007.
1727.
231
ATLAS Collaboration
G. Aad 84 , B. Abbott 112 , J. Abdallah 152 , S. Abdel Khalek 116 , O. Abdinov 11 , R. Aben 106 , B. Abi 113 ,
M. Abolins 89 , O.S. AbouZeid 159 , H. Abramowicz 154 , H. Abreu 153 , R. Abreu 30 , Y. Abulaiti 147a,147b ,
B.S. Acharya 165a,165b,a , L. Adamczyk 38a , D.L. Adams 25 , J. Adelman 177 , S. Adomeit 99 , T. Adye 130 ,
T. Agatonovic-Jovin 13a , J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra 125a,125f , M. Agustoni 17 , S.P. Ahlen 22 , F. Ahmadov 64,b ,
G. Aielli 134a,134b , H. Akerstedt 147a,147b , T.P.A. kesson 80 , G. Akimoto 156 , A.V. Akimov 95 ,
G.L. Alberghi 20a,20b , J. Albert 170 , S. Albrand 55 , M.J. Alconada Verzini 70 , M. Aleksa 30 , I.N. Aleksandrov 64 ,
C. Alexa 26a , G. Alexander 154 , G. Alexandre 49 , T. Alexopoulos 10 , M. Alhroob 165a,165c , G. Alimonti 90a ,
L. Alio 84 , J. Alison 31 , B.M.M. Allbrooke 18 , L.J. Allison 71 , P.P. Allport 73 , A. Aloisio 103a,103b , A. Alonso 36 ,
F. Alonso 70 , C. Alpigiani 75 , A. Altheimer 35 , B. Alvarez Gonzalez 89 , M.G. Alviggi 103a,103b , K. Amako 65 ,
Y. Amaral Coutinho 24a , C. Amelung 23 , D. Amidei 88 , S.P. Amor Dos Santos 125a,125c , A. Amorim 125a,125b ,
S. Amoroso 48 , N. Amram 154 , G. Amundsen 23 , C. Anastopoulos 140 , L.S. Ancu 49 , N. Andari 30 ,
T. Andeen 35 , C.F. Anders 58b , G. Anders 30 , K.J. Anderson 31 , A. Andreazza 90a,90b , V. Andrei 58a ,
X.S. Anduaga 70 , S. Angelidakis 9 , I. Angelozzi 106 , P. Anger 44 , A. Angerami 35 , F. Anghinol 30 ,
A.V. Anisenkov 108,c , N. Anjos 12 , A. Annovi 47 , A. Antonaki 9 , M. Antonelli 47 , A. Antonov 97 , J. Antos 145b ,
F. Anulli 133a , M. Aoki 65 , L. Aperio Bella 18 , R. Apolle 119,d , G. Arabidze 89 , I. Aracena 144 , Y. Arai 65 ,
J.P. Araque 125a , A.T.H. Arce 45 , J-F. Arguin 94 , S. Argyropoulos 42 , M. Arik 19a , A.J. Armbruster 30 ,
O. Arnaez 30 , V. Arnal 81 , H. Arnold 48 , M. Arratia 28 , O. Arslan 21 , A. Artamonov 96 , G. Artoni 23 , S. Asai 156 ,
N. Asbah 42 , A. Ashkenazi 154 , B. sman 147a,147b , L. Asquith 6 , K. Assamagan 25 , R. Astalos 145a ,
M. Atkinson 166 , N.B. Atlay 142 , B. Auerbach 6 , K. Augsten 127 , M. Aurousseau 146b , G. Avolio 30 ,
G. Azuelos 94,e , Y. Azuma 156 , M.A. Baak 30 , A.E. Baas 58a , C. Bacci 135a,135b , H. Bachacou 137 , K. Bachas 155 ,
M. Backes 30 , M. Backhaus 30 , J. Backus Mayes 144 , E. Badescu 26a , P. Bagiacchi 133a,133b , P. Bagnaia 133a,133b ,
Y. Bai 33a , T. Bain 35 , J.T. Baines 130 , O.K. Baker 177 , P. Balek 128 , F. Balli 137 , E. Banas 39 , Sw. Banerjee 174 ,
A.A.E. Bannoura 176 , V. Bansal 170 , H.S. Bansil 18 , L. Barak 173 , S.P. Baranov 95 , E.L. Barberio 87 ,
D. Barberis 50a,50b , M. Barbero 84 , T. Barillari 100 , M. Barisonzi 176 , T. Barklow 144 , N. Barlow 28 ,
B.M. Barnett 130 , R.M. Barnett 15 , Z. Barnovska 5 , A. Baroncelli 135a , G. Barone 49 , A.J. Barr 119 , F. Barreiro 81 ,
J. Barreiro Guimares da Costa 57 , R. Bartoldus 144 , A.E. Barton 71 , P. Bartos 145a , V. Bartsch 150 ,
A. Bassalat 116 , A. Basye 166 , R.L. Bates 53 , J.R. Batley 28 , M. Battaglia 138 , M. Battistin 30 , F. Bauer 137 ,
H.S. Bawa 144,f , M.D. Beattie 71 , T. Beau 79 , P.H. Beauchemin 162 , R. Beccherle 123a,123b , P. Bechtle 21 ,
H.P. Beck 17 , K. Becker 176 , S. Becker 99 , M. Beckingham 171 , C. Becot 116 , A.J. Beddall 19c , A. Beddall 19c ,
S. Bedikian 177 , V.A. Bednyakov 64 , C.P. Bee 149 , L.J. Beemster 106 , T.A. Beermann 176 , M. Begel 25 ,
K. Behr 119 , C. Belanger-Champagne 86 , P.J. Bell 49 , W.H. Bell 49 , G. Bella 154 , L. Bellagamba 20a ,
A. Bellerive 29 , M. Bellomo 85 , K. Belotskiy 97 , O. Beltramello 30 , O. Benary 154 , D. Benchekroun 136a ,
K. Bendtz 147a,147b , N. Benekos 166 , Y. Benhammou 154 , E. Benhar Noccioli 49 , J.A. Benitez Garcia 160b ,
D.P. Benjamin 45 , J.R. Bensinger 23 , K. Benslama 131 , S. Bentvelsen 106 , D. Berge 106 ,
E. Bergeaas Kuutmann 16 , N. Berger 5 , F. Berghaus 170 , J. Beringer 15 , C. Bernard 22 , P. Bernat 77 ,
C. Bernius 78 , F.U. Bernlochner 170 , T. Berry 76 , P. Berta 128 , C. Bertella 84 , G. Bertoli 147a,147b ,
F. Bertolucci 123a,123b , C. Bertsche 112 , D. Bertsche 112 , M.I. Besana 90a , G.J. Besjes 105 ,
O. Bessidskaia 147a,147b , M. Bessner 42 , N. Besson 137 , C. Betancourt 48 , S. Bethke 100 , W. Bhimji 46 ,
R.M. Bianchi 124 , L. Bianchini 23 , M. Bianco 30 , O. Biebel 99 , S.P. Bieniek 77 , K. Bierwagen 54 , J. Biesiada 15 ,
M. Biglietti 135a , J. Bilbao De Mendizabal 49 , H. Bilokon 47 , M. Bindi 54 , S. Binet 116 , A. Bingul 19c ,
C. Bini 133a,133b , C.W. Black 151 , J.E. Black 144 , K.M. Black 22 , D. Blackburn 139 , R.E. Blair 6 ,
J.-B. Blanchard 137 , T. Blazek 145a , I. Bloch 42 , C. Blocker 23 , W. Blum 82, , U. Blumenschein 54 ,
G.J. Bobbink 106 , V.S. Bobrovnikov 108,c , S.S. Bocchetta 80 , A. Bocci 45 , C. Bock 99 , C.R. Boddy 119 ,
M. Boehler 48 , T.T. Boek 176 , J.A. Bogaerts 30 , A.G. Bogdanchikov 108 , A. Bogouch 91, , C. Bohm 147a ,
J. Bohm 126 , V. Boisvert 76 , T. Bold 38a , V. Boldea 26a , A.S. Boldyrev 98 , M. Bomben 79 , M. Bona 75 ,
M. Boonekamp 137 , A. Borisov 129 , G. Borissov 71 , M. Borri 83 , S. Borroni 42 , J. Bortfeldt 99 ,
V. Bortolotto 135a,135b , K. Bos 106 , D. Boscherini 20a , M. Bosman 12 , H. Boterenbrood 106 , J. Boudreau 124 ,
J. Bouffard 2 , E.V. Bouhova-Thacker 71 , D. Boumediene 34 , C. Bourdarios 116 , N. Bousson 113 ,
S. Boutouil 136d , A. Boveia 31 , J. Boyd 30 , I.R. Boyko 64 , I. Bozic 13a , J. Bracinik 18 , A. Brandt 8 , G. Brandt 15 ,
O. Brandt 58a , U. Bratzler 157 , B. Brau 85 , J.E. Brau 115 , H.M. Braun 176, , S.F. Brazzale 165a,165c , B. Brelier 159 ,
K. Brendlinger 121 , A.J. Brennan 87 , R. Brenner 167 , S. Bressler 173 , K. Bristow 146c , T.M. Bristow 46 ,
232
D. Britton 53 , F.M. Brochu 28 , I. Brock 21 , R. Brock 89 , C. Bromberg 89 , J. Bronner 100 , G. Brooijmans 35 ,

T. Brooks 76 , W.K. Brooks 32b , J. Brosamer 15 , E. Brost 115 , J. Brown 55 , P.A. Bruckman de Renstrom 39 ,
D. Bruncko 145b , R. Bruneliere 48 , S. Brunet 60 , A. Bruni 20a , G. Bruni 20a , M. Bruschi 20a , L. Bryngemark 80 ,
T. Buanes 14 , Q. Buat 143 , F. Bucci 49 , P. Buchholz 142 , R.M. Buckingham 119 , A.G. Buckley 53 , S.I. Buda 26a ,
I.A. Budagov 64 , F. Buehrer 48 , L. Bugge 118 , M.K. Bugge 118 , O. Bulekov 97 , A.C. Bundock 73 , H. Burckhart 30 ,
S. Burdin 73 , B. Burghgrave 107 , S. Burke 130 , I. Burmeister 43 , E. Busato 34 , D. Bscher 48 , V. Bscher 82 ,
P. Bussey 53 , C.P. Buszello 167 , B. Butler 57 , J.M. Butler 22 , A.I. Butt 3 , C.M. Buttar 53 , J.M. Butterworth 77 ,
P. Butti 106 , W. Buttinger 28 , A. Buzatu 53 , M. Byszewski 10 , S. Cabrera Urbn 168 , D. Caforio 20a,20b ,
O. Cakir 4a , P. Calaura 15 , A. Calandri 137 , G. Calderini 79 , P. Calfayan 99 , R. Calkins 107 , L.P. Caloba 24a ,
D. Calvet 34 , S. Calvet 34 , R. Camacho Toro 49 , S. Camarda 42 , D. Cameron 118 , L.M. Caminada 15 ,
R. Caminal Armadans 12 , S. Campana 30 , M. Campanelli 77 , A. Campoverde 149 , V. Canale 103a,103b ,
A. Canepa 160a , M. Cano Bret 75 , J. Cantero 81 , R. Cantrill 125a , T. Cao 40 , M.D.M. Capeans Garrido 30 ,
I. Caprini 26a , M. Caprini 26a , M. Capua 37a,37b , R. Caputo 82 , R. Cardarelli 134a , T. Carli 30 , G. Carlino 103a ,
L. Carminati 90a,90b , S. Caron 105 , E. Carquin 32a , G.D. Carrillo-Montoya 146c , J.R. Carter 28 ,
J. Carvalho 125a,125c , D. Casadei 77 , M.P. Casado 12 , M. Casolino 12 , E. Castaneda-Miranda 146b ,
A. Castelli 106 , V. Castillo Gimenez 168 , N.F. Castro 125a , P. Catastini 57 , A. Catinaccio 30 , J.R. Catmore 118 ,
A. Cattai 30 , G. Cattani 134a,134b , V. Cavaliere 166 , D. Cavalli 90a , M. Cavalli-Sforza 12 , V. Cavasinni 123a,123b ,
F. Ceradini 135a,135b , B.C. Cerio 45 , K. Cerny 128 , A.S. Cerqueira 24b , A. Cerri 150 , L. Cerrito 75 , F. Cerutti 15 ,
M. Cerv 30 , A. Cervelli 17 , S.A. Cetin 19b , A. Chafaq 136a , D. Chakraborty 107 , I. Chalupkova 128 , P. Chang 166 ,
B. Chapleau 86 , J.D. Chapman 28 , D. Charfeddine 116 , D.G. Charlton 18 , C.C. Chau 159 ,
C.A. Chavez Barajas 150 , S. Cheatham 86 , A. Chegwidden 89 , S. Chekanov 6 , S.V. Chekulaev 160a ,
G.A. Chelkov 64,g , M.A. Chelstowska 88 , C. Chen 63 , H. Chen 25 , K. Chen 149 , L. Chen 33d,h , S. Chen 33c ,
X. Chen 146c , Y. Chen 66 , Y. Chen 35 , H.C. Cheng 88 , Y. Cheng 31 , A. Cheplakov 64 ,
R. Cherkaoui El Moursli 136e , V. Chernyatin 25, , E. Cheu 7 , L. Chevalier 137 , V. Chiarella 47 ,
G. Chiefari 103a,103b , J.T. Childers 6 , A. Chilingarov 71 , G. Chiodini 72a , A.S. Chisholm 18 , R.T. Chislett 77 ,
A. Chitan 26a , M.V. Chizhov 64 , S. Chouridou 9 , B.K.B. Chow 99 , D. Chromek-Burckhart 30 , M.L. Chu 152 ,
J. Chudoba 126 , J.J. Chwastowski 39 , L. Chytka 114 , G. Ciapetti 133a,133b , A.K. Ciftci 4a , R. Ciftci 4a , D. Cinca 53 ,
V. Cindro 74 , A. Ciocio 15 , P. Cirkovic 13b , Z.H. Citron 173 , M. Citterio 90a , M. Ciubancan 26a , A. Clark 49 ,
P.J. Clark 46 , R.N. Clarke 15 , W. Cleland 124 , J.C. Clemens 84 , C. Clement 147a,147b , Y. Coadou 84 ,
M. Cobal 165a,165c , A. Coccaro 139 , J. Cochran 63 , L. Coffey 23 , J.G. Cogan 144 , J. Coggeshall 166 , B. Cole 35 ,
S. Cole 107 , A.P. Colijn 106 , J. Collot 55 , T. Colombo 58c , G. Colon 85 , G. Compostella 100 ,
P. Conde Muio 125a,125b , E. Coniavitis 48 , M.C. Conidi 12 , S.H. Connell 146b , I.A. Connelly 76 ,
S.M. Consonni 90a,90b , V. Consorti 48 , S. Constantinescu 26a , C. Conta 120a,120b , G. Conti 57 , F. Conventi 103a,i ,
M. Cooke 15 , B.D. Cooper 77 , A.M. Cooper-Sarkar 119 , N.J. Cooper-Smith 76 , K. Copic 15 , T. Cornelissen 176 ,
M. Corradi 20a , F. Corriveau 86,j , A. Corso-Radu 164 , A. Cortes-Gonzalez 12 , G. Cortiana 100 , G. Costa 90a ,
M.J. Costa 168 , D. Costanzo 140 , D. Ct 8 , G. Cottin 28 , G. Cowan 76 , B.E. Cox 83 , K. Cranmer 109 , G. Cree 29 ,
S. Crp-Renaudin 55 , F. Crescioli 79 , W.A. Cribbs 147a,147b , M. Crispin Ortuzar 119 , M. Cristinziani 21 ,
V. Croft 105 , G. Crosetti 37a,37b , C.-M. Cuciuc 26a , T. Cuhadar Donszelmann 140 , J. Cummings 177 ,
M. Curatolo 47 , C. Cuthbert 151 , H. Czirr 142 , P. Czodrowski 3 , Z. Czyczula 177 , S. DAuria 53 , M. DOnofrio 73 ,
M.J. Da Cunha Sargedas De Sousa 125a,125b , C. Da Via 83 , W. Dabrowski 38a , A. Danca 119 , T. Dai 88 ,
O. Dale 14 , F. Dallaire 94 , C. Dallapiccola 85 , M. Dam 36 , A.C. Daniells 18 , M. Dano Hoffmann 137 , V. Dao 48 ,
G. Darbo 50a , S. Darmora 8 , J.A. Dassoulas 42 , A. Dattagupta 60 , W. Davey 21 , C. David 170 , T. Davidek 128 ,
E. Davies 119,d , M. Davies 154 , O. Davignon 79 , A.R. Davison 77 , P. Davison 77 , Y. Davygora 58a , E. Dawe 143 ,
I. Dawson 140 , R.K. Daya-Ishmukhametova 85 , K. De 8 , R. de Asmundis 103a , S. De Castro 20a,20b ,
S. De Cecco 79 , N. De Groot 105 , P. de Jong 106 , H. De la Torre 81 , F. De Lorenzi 63 , L. De Nooij 106 ,
D. De Pedis 133a , A. De Salvo 133a , U. De Sanctis 150 , A. De Santo 150 , J.B. De Vivie De Regie 116 ,
W.J. Dearnaley 71 , R. Debbe 25 , C. Debenedetti 138 , B. Dechenaux 55 , D.V. Dedovich 64 , I. Deigaard 106 ,
J. Del Peso 81 , T. Del Prete 123a,123b , F. Deliot 137 , C.M. Delitzsch 49 , M. Deliyergiyev 74 , A. DellAcqua 30 ,
L. DellAsta 22 , M. DellOrso 123a,123b , M. Della Pietra 103a,i , D. della Volpe 49 , M. Delmastro 5 ,
P.A. Delsart 55 , C. Deluca 106 , S. Demers 177 , M. Demichev 64 , A. Demilly 79 , S.P. Denisov 129 ,
D. Derendarz 39 , J.E. Derkaoui 136d , F. Derue 79 , P. Dervan 73 , K. Desch 21 , C. Deterre 42 , P.O. Deviveiros 106 ,
A. Dewhurst 130 , S. Dhaliwal 106 , A. Di Ciaccio 134a,134b , L. Di Ciaccio 5 , A. Di Domenico 133a,133b ,
233
C. Di Donato 103a,103b , A. Di Girolamo 30 , B. Di Girolamo 30 , A. Di Mattia 153 , B. Di Micco 135a,135b ,

R. Di Nardo 47 , A. Di Simone 48 , R. Di Sipio 20a,20b , D. Di Valentino 29 , F.A. Dias 46 , M.A. Diaz 32a ,
E.B. Diehl 88 , J. Dietrich 42 , T.A. Dietzsch 58a , S. Diglio 84 , A. Dimitrievska 13a , J. Dingfelder 21 ,
C. Dionisi 133a,133b , P. Dita 26a , S. Dita 26a , F. Dittus 30 , F. Djama 84 , T. Djobava 51b , M.A.B. do Vale 24c ,
A. Do Valle Wemans 125a,125g , D. Dobos 30 , C. Doglioni 49 , T. Doherty 53 , T. Dohmae 156 , J. Dolejsi 128 ,
Z. Dolezal 128 , B.A. Dolgoshein 97, , M. Donadelli 24d , S. Donati 123a,123b , P. Dondero 120a,120b , J. Donini 34 ,
J. Dopke 130 , A. Doria 103a , M.T. Dova 70 , A.T. Doyle 53 , M. Dris 10 , J. Dubbert 88 , S. Dube 15 , E. Dubreuil 34 ,
E. Duchovni 173 , G. Duckeck 99 , O.A. Ducu 26a , D. Duda 176 , A. Dudarev 30 , F. Dudziak 63 , L. Duot 116 ,
L. Duguid 76 , M. Dhrssen 30 , M. Dunford 58a , H. Duran Yildiz 4a , M. Dren 52 , A. Durglishvili 51b ,
M. Dwuznik 38a , M. Dyndal 38a , J. Ebke 99 , W. Edson 2 , N.C. Edwards 46 , W. Ehrenfeld 21 , T. Eifert 144 ,
G. Eigen 14 , K. Einsweiler 15 , T. Ekelof 167 , M. El Kacimi 136c , M. Ellert 167 , S. Elles 5 , F. Ellinghaus 82 ,
N. Ellis 30 , J. Elmsheuser 99 , M. Elsing 30 , D. Emeliyanov 130 , Y. Enari 156 , O.C. Endner 82 , M. Endo 117 ,
R. Engelmann 149 , J. Erdmann 177 , A. Ereditato 17 , D. Eriksson 147a , G. Ernis 176 , J. Ernst 2 , M. Ernst 25 ,
J. Ernwein 137 , D. Errede 166 , S. Errede 166 , E. Ertel 82 , M. Escalier 116 , H. Esch 43 , C. Escobar 124 ,
B. Esposito 47 , A.I. Etienvre 137 , E. Etzion 154 , H. Evans 60 , A. Ezhilov 122 , L. Fabbri 20a,20b , G. Facini 31 ,
R.M. Fakhrutdinov 129 , S. Falciano 133a , R.J. Falla 77 , J. Faltova 128 , Y. Fang 33a , M. Fanti 90a,90b , A. Farbin 8 ,
A. Farilla 135a , T. Farooque 12 , S. Farrell 15 , S.M. Farrington 171 , P. Farthouat 30 , F. Fassi 136e , P. Fassnacht 30 ,
D. Fassouliotis 9 , A. Favareto 50a,50b , L. Fayard 116 , P. Federic 145a , O.L. Fedin 122,k , W. Fedorko 169 ,
M. Fehling-Kaschek 48 , S. Feigl 30 , L. Feligioni 84 , C. Feng 33d , E.J. Feng 6 , H. Feng 88 , A.B. Fenyuk 129 ,
S. Fernandez Perez 30 , S. Ferrag 53 , J. Ferrando 53 , A. Ferrari 167 , P. Ferrari 106 , R. Ferrari 120a ,
D.E. Ferreira de Lima 53 , A. Ferrer 168 , D. Ferrere 49 , C. Ferretti 88 , A. Ferretto Parodi 50a,50b , M. Fiascaris 31 ,
F. Fiedler 82 , A. Filipcic 74 , M. Filipuzzi 42 , F. Filthaut 105 , M. Fincke-Keeler 170 , K.D. Finelli 151 ,
M.C.N. Fiolhais 125a,125c , L. Fiorini 168 , A. Firan 40 , A. Fischer 2 , J. Fischer 176 , W.C. Fisher 89 ,
E.A. Fitzgerald 23 , M. Flechl 48 , I. Fleck 142 , P. Fleischmann 88 , S. Fleischmann 176 , G.T. Fletcher 140 ,
G. Fletcher 75 , T. Flick 176 , A. Floderus 80 , L.R. Flores Castillo 174,l , A.C. Florez Bustos 160b ,
M.J. Flowerdew 100 , A. Formica 137 , A. Forti 83 , D. Fortin 160a , D. Fournier 116 , H. Fox 71 , S. Fracchia 12 ,
P. Francavilla 79 , M. Franchini 20a,20b , S. Franchino 30 , D. Francis 30 , L. Franconi 118 , M. Franklin 57 ,
S. Franz 61 , M. Fraternali 120a,120b , S.T. French 28 , C. Friedrich 42 , F. Friedrich 44 , D. Froidevaux 30 ,
J.A. Frost 28 , C. Fukunaga 157 , E. Fullana Torregrosa 82 , B.G. Fulsom 144 , J. Fuster 168 , C. Gabaldon 55 ,
O. Gabizon 173 , A. Gabrielli 20a,20b , A. Gabrielli 133a,133b , S. Gadatsch 106 , S. Gadomski 49 ,
G. Gagliardi 50a,50b , P. Gagnon 60 , C. Galea 105 , B. Galhardo 125a,125c , E.J. Gallas 119 , V. Gallo 17 ,
B.J. Gallop 130 , P. Gallus 127 , G. Galster 36 , K.K. Gan 110 , J. Gao 33b,h , Y.S. Gao 144,f , F.M. Garay Walls 46 ,
F. Garberson 177 , C. Garca 168 , J.E. Garca Navarro 168 , M. Garcia-Sciveres 15 , R.W. Gardner 31 , N. Garelli 144 ,
V. Garonne 30 , C. Gatti 47 , G. Gaudio 120a , B. Gaur 142 , L. Gauthier 94 , P. Gauzzi 133a,133b , I.L. Gavrilenko 95 ,
C. Gay 169 , G. Gaycken 21 , E.N. Gazis 10 , P. Ge 33d , Z. Gecse 169 , C.N.P. Gee 130 , D.A.A. Geerts 106 ,
Ch. Geich-Gimbel 21 , K. Gellerstedt 147a,147b , C. Gemme 50a , A. Gemmell 53 , M.H. Genest 55 ,
S. Gentile 133a,133b , M. George 54 , S. George 76 , D. Gerbaudo 164 , A. Gershon 154 , H. Ghazlane 136b ,
N. Ghodbane 34 , B. Giacobbe 20a , S. Giagu 133a,133b , V. Giangiobbe 12 , P. Giannetti 123a,123b , F. Gianotti 30 ,
B. Gibbard 25 , S.M. Gibson 76 , M. Gilchriese 15 , T.P.S. Gillam 28 , D. Gillberg 30 , G. Gilles 34 , D.M. Gingrich 3,e ,
N. Giokaris 9 , M.P. Giordani 165a,165c , R. Giordano 103a,103b , F.M. Giorgi 20a , F.M. Giorgi 16 , P.F. Giraud 137 ,
D. Giugni 90a , C. Giuliani 48 , M. Giulini 58b , B.K. Gjelsten 118 , S. Gkaitatzis 155 , I. Gkialas 155,m ,
L.K. Gladilin 98 , C. Glasman 81 , J. Glatzer 30 , P.C.F. Glaysher 46 , A. Glazov 42 , G.L. Glonti 64 ,
M. Goblirsch-Kolb 100 , J.R. Goddard 75 , J. Godlewski 30 , C. Goeringer 82 , S. Goldfarb 88 , T. Golling 177 ,
D. Golubkov 129 , A. Gomes 125a,125b,125d , L.S. Gomez Fajardo 42 , R. Gonalo 125a ,
J. Goncalves Pinto Firmino Da Costa 137 , L. Gonella 21 , S. Gonzlez de la Hoz 168 , G. Gonzalez Parra 12 ,
S. Gonzalez-Sevilla 49 , L. Goossens 30 , P.A. Gorbounov 96 , H.A. Gordon 25 , I. Gorelov 104 , B. Gorini 30 ,
E. Gorini 72a,72b , A. Goriek 74 , E. Gornicki 39 , A.T. Goshaw 6 , C. Gssling 43 , M.I. Gostkin 64 ,
M. Gouighri 136a , D. Goujdami 136c , M.P. Goulette 49 , A.G. Goussiou 139 , C. Goy 5 , S. Gozpinar 23 ,
H.M.X. Grabas 137 , L. Graber 54 , I. Grabowska-Bold 38a , P. Grafstrm 20a,20b , K-J. Grahn 42 , J. Gramling 49 ,
E. Gramstad 118 , S. Grancagnolo 16 , V. Grassi 149 , V. Gratchev 122 , H.M. Gray 30 , E. Graziani 135a ,
O.G. Grebenyuk 122 , Z.D. Greenwood 78,n , K. Gregersen 77 , I.M. Gregor 42 , P. Grenier 144 , J. Griths 8 ,
A.A. Grillo 138 , K. Grimm 71 , S. Grinstein 12,o , Ph. Gris 34 , Y.V. Grishkevich 98 , J.-F. Grivaz 116 , J.P. Grohs 44 ,
234
A. Grohsjean 42 , E. Gross 173 , J. Grosse-Knetter 54 , G.C. Grossi 134a,134b , J. Groth-Jensen 173 , Z.J. Grout 150 ,
L. Guan 33b , F. Guescini 49 , D. Guest 177 , O. Gueta 154 , C. Guicheney 34 , E. Guido 50a,50b , T. Guillemin 116 ,
S. Guindon 2 , U. Gul 53 , C. Gumpert 44 , J. Gunther 127 , J. Guo 35 , S. Gupta 119 , P. Gutierrez 112 ,
N.G. Gutierrez Ortiz 53 , C. Gutschow 77 , N. Guttman 154 , C. Guyot 137 , C. Gwenlan 119 , C.B. Gwilliam 73 ,
A. Haas 109 , C. Haber 15 , H.K. Hadavand 8 , N. Haddad 136e , P. Haefner 21 , S. Hagebck 21 , Z. Hajduk 39 ,
H. Hakobyan 178 , M. Haleem 42 , D. Hall 119 , G. Halladjian 89 , K. Hamacher 176 , P. Hamal 114 , K. Hamano 170 ,
M. Hamer 54 , A. Hamilton 146a , S. Hamilton 162 , G.N. Hamity 146c , P.G. Hamnett 42 , L. Han 33b ,
K. Hanagaki 117 , K. Hanawa 156 , M. Hance 15 , P. Hanke 58a , R. Hanna 137 , J.B. Hansen 36 , J.D. Hansen 36 ,
P.H. Hansen 36 , K. Hara 161 , A.S. Hard 174 , T. Harenberg 176 , F. Hariri 116 , S. Harkusha 91 , D. Harper 88 ,
R.D. Harrington 46 , O.M. Harris 139 , P.F. Harrison 171 , F. Hartjes 106 , M. Hasegawa 66 , S. Hasegawa 102 ,
Y. Hasegawa 141 , A. Hasib 112 , S. Hassani 137 , S. Haug 17 , M. Hauschild 30 , R. Hauser 89 , M. Havranek 126 ,
C.M. Hawkes 18 , R.J. Hawkings 30 , A.D. Hawkins 80 , T. Hayashi 161 , D. Hayden 89 , C.P. Hays 119 ,
H.S. Hayward 73 , S.J. Haywood 130 , S.J. Head 18 , T. Heck 82 , V. Hedberg 80 , L. Heelan 8 , S. Heim 121 ,
T. Heim 176 , B. Heinemann 15 , L. Heinrich 109 , J. Hejbal 126 , L. Helary 22 , C. Heller 99 , M. Heller 30 ,
S. Hellman 147a,147b , D. Hellmich 21 , C. Helsens 30 , J. Henderson 119 , R.C.W. Henderson 71 , Y. Heng 174 ,
C. Hengler 42 , A. Henrichs 177 , A.M. Henriques Correia 30 , S. Henrot-Versille 116 , G.H. Herbert 16 ,
Y. Hernndez Jimnez 168 , R. Herrberg-Schubert 16 , G. Herten 48 , R. Hertenberger 99 , L. Hervas 30 ,
G.G. Hesketh 77 , N.P. Hessey 106 , R. Hickling 75 , E. Hign-Rodriguez 168 , E. Hill 170 , J.C. Hill 28 , K.H. Hiller 42 ,
S. Hillert 21 , S.J. Hillier 18 , I. Hinchliffe 15 , E. Hines 121 , M. Hirose 158 , D. Hirschbuehl 176 , J. Hobbs 149 ,
N. Hod 106 , M.C. Hodgkinson 140 , P. Hodgson 140 , A. Hoecker 30 , M.R. Hoeferkamp 104 , F. Hoenig 99 ,
J. Hoffman 40 , D. Hoffmann 84 , J.I. Hofmann 58a , M. Hohlfeld 82 , T.R. Holmes 15 , T.M. Hong 121 ,
L. Hooft van Huysduynen 109 , W.H. Hopkins 115 , Y. Horii 102 , J-Y. Hostachy 55 , S. Hou 152 ,
A. Hoummada 136a , J. Howard 119 , J. Howarth 42 , M. Hrabovsky 114 , I. Hristova 16 , J. Hrivnac 116 ,
T. Hrynova 5 , C. Hsu 146c , P.J. Hsu 82 , S.-C. Hsu 139 , D. Hu 35 , X. Hu 25 , Y. Huang 42 , Z. Hubacek 30 ,
F. Hubaut 84 , F. Huegging 21 , T.B. Huffman 119 , E.W. Hughes 35 , G. Hughes 71 , M. Huhtinen 30 ,
T.A. Hlsing 82 , M. Hurwitz 15 , N. Huseynov 64,b , J. Huston 89 , J. Huth 57 , G. Iacobucci 49 , G. Iakovidis 10 ,
I. Ibragimov 142 , L. Iconomidou-Fayard 116 , E. Ideal 177 , Z. Idrissi 136e , P. Iengo 103a , O. Igonkina 106 ,
T. Iizawa 172 , Y. Ikegami 65 , K. Ikematsu 142 , M. Ikeno 65 , Y. Ilchenko 31,p , D. Iliadis 155 , N. Ilic 159 ,
Y. Inamaru 66 , T. Ince 100 , P. Ioannou 9 , M. Iodice 135a , K. Iordanidou 9 , V. Ippolito 57 , A. Irles Quiles 168 ,
C. Isaksson 167 , M. Ishino 67 , M. Ishitsuka 158 , R. Ishmukhametov 110 , C. Issever 119 , S. Istin 19a ,
J.M. Iturbe Ponce 83 , R. Iuppa 134a,134b , J. Ivarsson 80 , W. Iwanski 39 , H. Iwasaki 65 , J.M. Izen 41 , V. Izzo 103a ,
B. Jackson 121 , M. Jackson 73 , P. Jackson 1 , M.R. Jaekel 30 , V. Jain 2 , K. Jakobs 48 , S. Jakobsen 30 ,
T. Jakoubek 126 , J. Jakubek 127 , D.O. Jamin 152 , D.K. Jana 78 , E. Jansen 77 , H. Jansen 30 , J. Janssen 21 ,
48
M. Janus 171 , G. Jarlskog 80 , N. Javadov 64,b , T. Javurek

, L. Jeanty 15 , J. Jejelava 51a,q , G.-Y. Jeng 151 ,
87
48,r
43
171
D. Jennens , P. Jenni
, J. Jentzsch , C. Jeske
, S. Jzquel 5 , H. Ji 174 , J. Jia 149 , Y. Jiang 33b ,
42
33a
26a
M. Jimenez Belenguer , S. Jin
, A. Jinaru
, O. Jinnouchi 158 , M.D. Joergensen 36 ,
K.E. Johansson 147a,147b , P. Johansson 140 , K.A. Johns 7 , K. Jon-And 147a,147b , G. Jones 171 , R.W.L. Jones 71 ,
T.J. Jones 73 , J. Jongmanns 58a , P.M. Jorge 125a,125b , K.D. Joshi 83 , J. Jovicevic 148 , X. Ju 174 , C.A. Jung 43 ,
R.M. Jungst 30 , P. Jussel 61 , A. Juste Rozas 12,o , M. Kaci 168 , A. Kaczmarska 39 , M. Kado 116 , H. Kagan 110 ,
M. Kagan 144 , E. Kajomovitz 45 , C.W. Kalderon 119 , S. Kama 40 , A. Kamenshchikov 129 , N. Kanaya 156 ,
M. Kaneda 30 , S. Kaneti 28 , V.A. Kantserov 97 , J. Kanzaki 65 , B. Kaplan 109 , A. Kapliy 31 , D. Kar 53 ,
K. Karakostas 10 , N. Karastathis 10 , M.J. Kareem 54 , M. Karnevskiy 82 , S.N. Karpov 64 , Z.M. Karpova 64 ,
K. Karthik 109 , V. Kartvelishvili 71 , A.N. Karyukhin 129 , L. Kashif 174 , G. Kasieczka 58b , R.D. Kass 110 ,
A. Kastanas 14 , Y. Kataoka 156 , A. Katre 49 , J. Katzy 42 , V. Kaushik 7 , K. Kawagoe 69 , T. Kawamoto 156 ,
G. Kawamura 54 , S. Kazama 156 , V.F. Kazanin 108 , M.Y. Kazarinov 64 , R. Keeler 170 , R. Kehoe 40 , M. Keil 54 ,
J.S. Keller 42 , J.J. Kempster 76 , H. Keoshkerian 5 , O. Kepka 126 , B.P. Kerevan 74 , S. Kersten 176 ,
K. Kessoku 156 , J. Keung 159 , F. Khalil-zada 11 , H. Khandanyan 147a,147b , A. Khanov 113 , A. Khodinov 97 ,
A. Khomich 58a , T.J. Khoo 28 , G. Khoriauli 21 , A. Khoroshilov 176 , V. Khovanskiy 96 , E. Khramov 64 ,
J. Khubua 51b , H.Y. Kim 8 , H. Kim 147a,147b , S.H. Kim 161 , N. Kimura 172 , O. Kind 16 , B.T. King 73 , M. King 168 ,
R.S.B. King 119 , S.B. King 169 , J. Kirk 130 , A.E. Kiryunin 100 , T. Kishimoto 66 , D. Kisielewska 38a , F. Kiss 48 ,
T. Kittelmann 124 , K. Kiuchi 161 , E. Kladiva 145b , M. Klein 73 , U. Klein 73 , K. Kleinknecht 82 ,
P. Klimek 147a,147b , A. Klimentov 25 , R. Klingenberg 43 , J.A. Klinger 83 , T. Klioutchnikova 30 , P.F. Klok 105 ,
235
E.-E. Kluge 58a , P. Kluit 106 , S. Kluth 100 , E. Kneringer 61 , E.B.F.G. Knoops 84 , A. Knue 53 , D. Kobayashi 158 ,
T. Kobayashi 156 , M. Kobel 44 , M. Kocian 144 , P. Kodys 128 , P. Koevesarki 21 , T. Koffas 29 , E. Koffeman 106 ,
L.A. Kogan 119 , S. Kohlmann 176 , Z. Kohout 127 , T. Kohriki 65 , T. Koi 144 , H. Kolanoski 16 , I. Koletsou 5 ,
J. Koll 89 , A.A. Komar 95, , Y. Komori 156 , T. Kondo 65 , N. Kondrashova 42 , K. Kneke 48 , A.C. Knig 105 ,
S. Knig 82 , T. Kono 65,s , R. Konoplich 109,t , N. Konstantinidis 77 , R. Kopeliansky 153 , S. Koperny 38a ,
L. Kpke 82 , A.K. Kopp 48 , K. Korcyl 39 , K. Kordas 155 , A. Korn 77 , A.A. Korol 108,c , I. Korolkov 12 ,
E.V. Korolkova 140 , V.A. Korotkov 129 , O. Kortner 100 , S. Kortner 100 , V.V. Kostyukhin 21 , V.M. Kotov 64 ,
A. Kotwal 45 , C. Kourkoumelis 9 , V. Kouskoura 155 , A. Koutsman 160a , R. Kowalewski 170 , T.Z. Kowalski 38a ,
W. Kozanecki 137 , A.S. Kozhin 129 , V. Kral 127 , V.A. Kramarenko 98 , G. Kramberger 74 , D. Krasnopevtsev 97 ,
M.W. Krasny 79 , A. Krasznahorkay 30 , J.K. Kraus 21 , A. Kravchenko 25 , S. Kreiss 109 , M. Kretz 58c ,
J. Kretzschmar 73 , K. Kreutzfeldt 52 , P. Krieger 159 , K. Kroeninger 54 , H. Kroha 100 , J. Kroll 121 ,
J. Kroseberg 21 , J. Krstic 13a , U. Kruchonak 64 , H. Krger 21 , T. Kruker 17 , N. Krumnack 63 ,
Z.V. Krumshteyn 64 , A. Kruse 174 , M.C. Kruse 45 , M. Kruskal 22 , T. Kubota 87 , S. Kuday 4a , S. Kuehn 48 ,
A. Kugel 58c , A. Kuhl 138 , T. Kuhl 42 , V. Kukhtin 64 , Y. Kulchitsky 91 , S. Kuleshov 32b , M. Kuna 133a,133b ,
J. Kunkle 121 , A. Kupco 126 , H. Kurashige 66 , Y.A. Kurochkin 91 , R. Kurumida 66 , V. Kus 126 , E.S. Kuwertz 148 ,
M. Kuze 158 , J. Kvita 114 , A. La Rosa 49 , L. La Rotonda 37a,37b , C. Lacasta 168 , F. Lacava 133a,133b , J. Lacey 29 ,
H. Lacker 16 , D. Lacour 79 , V.R. Lacuesta 168 , E. Ladygin 64 , R. Lafaye 5 , B. Laforge 79 , T. Lagouri 177 , S. Lai 48 ,
H. Laier 58a , L. Lambourne 77 , S. Lammers 60 , C.L. Lampen 7 , W. Lampl 7 , E. Lanon 137 , U. Landgraf 48 ,
M.P.J. Landon 75 , V.S. Lang 58a , A.J. Lankford 164 , F. Lanni 25 , K. Lantzsch 30 , S. Laplace 79 , C. Lapoire 21 ,
J.F. Laporte 137 , T. Lari 90a , F. Lasagni Manghi 20a,20b , M. Lassnig 30 , P. Laurelli 47 , W. Lavrijsen 15 ,
A.T. Law 138 , P. Laycock 73 , O. Le Dortz 79 , E. Le Guirriec 84 , E. Le Menedeu 12 , T. LeCompte 6 ,
F. Ledroit-Guillon 55 , C.A. Lee 152 , H. Lee 106 , J.S.H. Lee 117 , S.C. Lee 152 , L. Lee 1 , G. Lefebvre 79 ,
M. Lefebvre 170 , F. Legger 99 , C. Leggett 15 , A. Lehan 73 , M. Lehmacher 21 , G. Lehmann Miotto 30 , X. Lei 7 ,
W.A. Leight 29 , A. Leisos 155 , A.G. Leister 177 , M.A.L. Leite 24d , R. Leitner 128 , D. Lellouch 173 , B. Lemmer 54 ,
K.J.C. Leney 77 , T. Lenz 21 , G. Lenzen 176 , B. Lenzi 30 , R. Leone 7 , S. Leone 123a,123b , C. Leonidopoulos 46 ,
S. Leontsinis 10 , C. Leroy 94 , C.G. Lester 28 , C.M. Lester 121 , M. Levchenko 122 , J. Levque 5 , D. Levin 88 ,
L.J. Levinson 173 , M. Levy 18 , A. Lewis 119 , G.H. Lewis 109 , A.M. Leyko 21 , M. Leyton 41 , B. Li 33b,u , B. Li 84 ,
H. Li 149 , H.L. Li 31 , L. Li 45 , L. Li 33e , S. Li 45 , Y. Li 33c,v , Z. Liang 138 , H. Liao 34 , B. Liberti 134a , P. Lichard 30 ,
K. Lie 166 , J. Liebal 21 , W. Liebig 14 , C. Limbach 21 , A. Limosani 87 , S.C. Lin 152,w , T.H. Lin 82 , F. Linde 106 ,
B.E. Lindquist 149 , J.T. Linnemann 89 , E. Lipeles 121 , A. Lipniacka 14 , M. Lisovyi 42 , T.M. Liss 166 ,
D. Lissauer 25 , A. Lister 169 , A.M. Litke 138 , B. Liu 152 , D. Liu 152 , J.B. Liu 33b , K. Liu 33b,x , L. Liu 88 , M. Liu 45 ,
M. Liu 33b , Y. Liu 33b , M. Livan 120a,120b , S.S.A. Livermore 119 , A. Lleres 55 , J. Llorente Merino 81 , S.L. Lloyd 75 ,
F. Lo Sterzo 152 , E. Lobodzinska 42 , P. Loch 7 , W.S. Lockman 138 , T. Loddenkoetter 21 , F.K. Loebinger 83 ,
A.E. Loevschall-Jensen 36 , A. Loginov 177 , T. Lohse 16 , K. Lohwasser 42 , M. Lokajicek 126 , V.P. Lombardo 5 ,
B.A. Long 22 , J.D. Long 88 , R.E. Long 71 , L. Lopes 125a , D. Lopez Mateos 57 , B. Lopez Paredes 140 ,
I. Lopez Paz 12 , J. Lorenz 99 , N. Lorenzo Martinez 60 , M. Losada 163 , P. Loscutoff 15 , X. Lou 41 , A. Lounis 116 ,
J. Love 6 , P.A. Love 71 , A.J. Lowe 144,f , F. Lu 33a , N. Lu 88 , H.J. Lubatti 139 , C. Luci 133a,133b , A. Lucotte 55 ,
F. Luehring 60 , W. Lukas 61 , L. Luminari 133a , O. Lundberg 147a,147b , B. Lund-Jensen 148 , M. Lungwitz 82 ,
D. Lynn 25 , R. Lysak 126 , E. Lytken 80 , H. Ma 25 , L.L. Ma 33d , G. Maccarrone 47 , A. Macchiolo 100 ,
J. Machado Miguens 125a,125b , D. Macina 30 , D. Madaffari 84 , R. Madar 48 , H.J. Maddocks 71 , W.F. Mader 44 ,
A. Madsen 167 , M. Maeno 8 , T. Maeno 25 , A. Maevskiy 98 , E. Magradze 54 , K. Mahboubi 48 , J. Mahlstedt 106 ,
S. Mahmoud 73 , C. Maiani 137 , C. Maidantchik 24a , A.A. Maier 100 , A. Maio 125a,125b,125d , S. Majewski 115 ,
Y. Makida 65 , N. Makovec 116 , P. Mal 137,y , B. Malaescu 79 , Pa. Malecki 39 , V.P. Maleev 122 , F. Malek 55 ,
U. Mallik 62 , D. Malon 6 , C. Malone 144 , S. Maltezos 10 , V.M. Malyshev 108 , S. Malyukov 30 , J. Mamuzic 13b ,
B. Mandelli 30 , L. Mandelli 90a , I. Mandic 74 , R. Mandrysch 62 , J. Maneira 125a,125b , A. Manfredini 100 ,
L. Manhaes de Andrade Filho 24b , J.A. Manjarres Ramos 160b , A. Mann 99 , P.M. Manning 138 ,
A. Manousakis-Katsikakis 9 , B. Mansoulie 137 , R. Mantifel 86 , L. Mapelli 30 , L. March 146c , J.F. Marchand 29 ,
G. Marchiori 79 , M. Marcisovsky 126 , C.P. Marino 170 , M. Marjanovic 13a , C.N. Marques 125a ,
F. Marroquim 24a , S.P. Marsden 83 , Z. Marshall 15 , L.F. Marti 17 , S. Marti-Garcia 168 , B. Martin 30 ,
B. Martin 89 , T.A. Martin 171 , V.J. Martin 46 , B. Martin dit Latour 14 , H. Martinez 137 , M. Martinez 12,o ,
S. Martin-Haugh 130 , A.C. Martyniuk 77 , M. Marx 139 , F. Marzano 133a , A. Marzin 30 , L. Masetti 82 ,
T. Mashimo 156 , R. Mashinistov 95 , J. Masik 83 , A.L. Maslennikov 108,c , I. Massa 20a,20b , L. Massa 20a,20b ,
236
N. Massol 5 , P. Mastrandrea 149 , A. Mastroberardino 37a,37b , T. Masubuchi 156 , P. Mttig 176 , J. Mattmann 82 ,
J. Maurer 26a , S.J. Maxeld 73 , D.A. Maximov 108,c , R. Mazini 152 , L. Mazzaferro 134a,134b , G. Mc Goldrick 159 ,
S.P. Mc Kee 88 , A. McCarn 88 , R.L. McCarthy 149 , T.G. McCarthy 29 , N.A. McCubbin 130 , K.W. McFarlane 56, ,
J.A. Mcfayden 77 , G. Mchedlidze 54 , S.J. McMahon 130 , R.A. McPherson 170,j , J. Mechnich 106 ,
M. Medinnis 42 , S. Meehan 31 , S. Mehlhase 99 , A. Mehta 73 , K. Meier 58a , C. Meineck 99 , B. Meirose 80 ,
C. Melachrinos 31 , B.R. Mellado Garcia 146c , F. Meloni 17 , A. Mengarelli 20a,20b , S. Menke 100 , E. Meoni 162 ,
K.M. Mercurio 57 , S. Mergelmeyer 21 , N. Meric 137 , P. Mermod 49 , L. Merola 103a,103b , C. Meroni 90a ,
F.S. Merritt 31 , H. Merritt 110 , A. Messina 30,z , J. Metcalfe 25 , A.S. Mete 164 , C. Meyer 82 , C. Meyer 121 ,
J-P. Meyer 137 , J. Meyer 30 , R.P. Middleton 130 , S. Migas 73 , L. Mijovic 21 , G. Mikenberg 173 ,
M. Mikestikova 126 , M. Miku 74 , A. Milic 30 , D.W. Miller 31 , C. Mills 46 , A. Milov 173 , D.A. Milstead 147a,147b ,
D. Milstein 173 , A.A. Minaenko 129 , Y. Minami 156 , I.A. Minashvili 64 , A.I. Mincer 109 , B. Mindur 38a ,
M. Mineev 64 , Y. Ming 174 , L.M. Mir 12 , G. Mirabelli 133a , T. Mitani 172 , J. Mitrevski 99 , V.A. Mitsou 168 ,
S. Mitsui 65 , A. Miucci 49 , P.S. Miyagawa 140 , J.U. Mjrnmark 80 , T. Moa 147a,147b , K. Mochizuki 84 ,
S. Mohapatra 35 , W. Mohr 48 , S. Molander 147a,147b , R. Moles-Valls 168 , K. Mnig 42 , C. Monini 55 ,
J. Monk 36 , E. Monnier 84 , J. Montejo Berlingen 12 , F. Monticelli 70 , S. Monzani 133a,133b , R.W. Moore 3 ,
N. Morange 62 , D. Moreno 82 , M. Moreno Llcer 54 , P. Morettini 50a , M. Morgenstern 44 , M. Morii 57 ,
S. Moritz 82 , A.K. Morley 148 , G. Mornacchi 30 , J.D. Morris 75 , L. Morvaj 102 , H.G. Moser 100 , M. Mosidze 51b ,
J. Moss 110 , K. Motohashi 158 , R. Mount 144 , E. Mountricha 25 , S.V. Mouraviev 95, , E.J.W. Moyse 85 ,
S. Muanza 84 , R.D. Mudd 18 , F. Mueller 58a , J. Mueller 124 , K. Mueller 21 , T. Mueller 28 , T. Mueller 82 ,
D. Muenstermann 49 , Y. Munwes 154 , J.A. Murillo Quijada 18 , W.J. Murray 171,130 , H. Musheghyan 54 ,
E. Musto 153 , A.G. Myagkov 129,aa , M. Myska 127 , O. Nackenhorst 54 , J. Nadal 54 , K. Nagai 61 , R. Nagai 158 ,
Y. Nagai 84 , K. Nagano 65 , A. Nagarkar 110 , Y. Nagasaka 59 , M. Nagel 100 , A.M. Nairz 30 , Y. Nakahama 30 ,
K. Nakamura 65 , T. Nakamura 156 , I. Nakano 111 , H. Namasivayam 41 , G. Nanava 21 , R. Narayan 58b ,
T. Nattermann 21 , T. Naumann 42 , G. Navarro 163 , R. Nayyar 7 , H.A. Neal 88 , P.Yu. Nechaeva 95 , T.J. Neep 83 ,
P.D. Nef 144 , A. Negri 120a,120b , G. Negri 30 , M. Negrini 20a , S. Nektarijevic 49 , C. Nellist 116 , A. Nelson 164 ,
T.K. Nelson 144 , S. Nemecek 126 , P. Nemethy 109 , A.A. Nepomuceno 24a , M. Nessi 30,ab , M.S. Neubauer 166 ,
M. Neumann 176 , R.M. Neves 109 , P. Nevski 25 , P.R. Newman 18 , D.H. Nguyen 6 , R.B. Nickerson 119 ,
R. Nicolaidou 137 , B. Nicquevert 30 , J. Nielsen 138 , N. Nikiforou 35 , A. Nikiforov 16 , V. Nikolaenko 129,aa ,
I. Nikolic-Audit 79 , K. Nikolics 49 , K. Nikolopoulos 18 , P. Nilsson 8 , Y. Ninomiya 156 , A. Nisati 133a ,
R. Nisius 100 , T. Nobe 158 , L. Nodulman 6 , M. Nomachi 117 , I. Nomidis 29 , S. Norberg 112 , M. Nordberg 30 ,
O. Novgorodova 44 , S. Nowak 100 , M. Nozaki 65 , L. Nozka 114 , K. Ntekas 10 , G. Nunes Hanninger 87 ,
T. Nunnemann 99 , E. Nurse 77 , F. Nuti 87 , B.J. OBrien 46 , F. Ogrady 7 , D.C. ONeil 143 , V. OShea 53 ,
F.G. Oakham 29,e , H. Oberlack 100 , T. Obermann 21 , J. Ocariz 79 , A. Ochi 66 , M.I. Ochoa 77 , S. Oda 69 ,
S. Odaka 65 , H. Ogren 60 , A. Oh 83 , S.H. Oh 45 , C.C. Ohm 15 , H. Ohman 167 , W. Okamura 117 , H. Okawa 25 ,
Y. Okumura 31 , T. Okuyama 156 , A. Olariu 26a , A.G. Olchevski 64 , S.A. Olivares Pino 46 ,
D. Oliveira Damazio 25 , E. Oliver Garcia 168 , A. Olszewski 39 , J. Olszowska 39 , A. Onofre 125a,125e ,
P.U.E. Onyisi 31,p , C.J. Oram 160a , M.J. Oreglia 31 , Y. Oren 154 , D. Orestano 135a,135b , N. Orlando 72a,72b ,
C. Oropeza Barrera 53 , R.S. Orr 159 , B. Osculati 50a,50b , R. Ospanov 121 , G. Otero y Garzon 27 , H. Otono 69 ,
M. Ouchrif 136d , E.A. Ouellette 170 , F. Ould-Saada 118 , A. Ouraou 137 , K.P. Oussoren 106 , Q. Ouyang 33a ,
A. Ovcharova 15 , M. Owen 83 , V.E. Ozcan 19a , N. Ozturk 8 , K. Pachal 119 , A. Pacheco Pages 12 ,
C. Padilla Aranda 12 , M. Pagcov 48 , S. Pagan Griso 15 , E. Paganis 140 , C. Pahl 100 , F. Paige 25 , P. Pais 85 ,
K. Pajchel 118 , G. Palacino 160b , S. Palestini 30 , M. Palka 38b , D. Pallin 34 , A. Palma 125a,125b , J.D. Palmer 18 ,
Y.B. Pan 174 , E. Panagiotopoulou 10 , J.G. Panduro Vazquez 76 , P. Pani 106 , N. Panikashvili 88 , S. Panitkin 25 ,
D. Pantea 26a , L. Paolozzi 134a,134b , Th.D. Papadopoulou 10 , K. Papageorgiou 155,m , A. Paramonov 6 ,
D. Paredes Hernandez 34 , M.A. Parker 28 , F. Parodi 50a,50b , J.A. Parsons 35 , U. Parzefall 48 ,
E. Pasqualucci 133a , S. Passaggio 50a , A. Passeri 135a , F. Pastore 135a,135b, , Fr. Pastore 76 , G. Psztor 29 ,
S. Pataraia 176 , N.D. Patel 151 , J.R. Pater 83 , S. Patricelli 103a,103b , T. Pauly 30 , J. Pearce 170 , L.E. Pedersen 36 ,
M. Pedersen 118 , S. Pedraza Lopez 168 , R. Pedro 125a,125b , S.V. Peleganchuk 108 , D. Pelikan 167 , H. Peng 33b ,
B. Penning 31 , J. Penwell 60 , D.V. Perepelitsa 25 , E. Perez Codina 160a , M.T. Prez Garca-Esta 168 ,
V. Perez Reale 35 , L. Perini 90a,90b , H. Pernegger 30 , S. Perrella 103a,103b , R. Perrino 72a , R. Peschke 42 ,
V.D. Peshekhonov 64 , K. Peters 30 , R.F.Y. Peters 83 , B.A. Petersen 30 , T.C. Petersen 36 , E. Petit 42 ,
A. Petridis 147a,147b , C. Petridou 155 , E. Petrolo 133a , F. Petrucci 135a,135b , N.E. Pettersson 158 , R. Pezoa 32b ,
237
P.W. Phillips 130 , G. Piacquadio 144 , E. Pianori 171 , A. Picazio 49 , E. Piccaro 75 , M. Piccinini 20a,20b ,
R. Piegaia 27 , D.T. Pignotti 110 , J.E. Pilcher 31 , A.D. Pilkington 77 , J. Pina 125a,125b,125d ,
M. Pinamonti 165a,165c,ac , A. Pinder 119 , J.L. Pinfold 3 , A. Pingel 36 , B. Pinto 125a , S. Pires 79 , M. Pitt 173 ,
C. Pizio 90a,90b , L. Plazak 145a , M.-A. Pleier 25 , V. Pleskot 128 , E. Plotnikova 64 , P. Plucinski 147a,147b ,
S. Poddar 58a , F. Podlyski 34 , R. Poettgen 82 , L. Poggioli 116 , D. Pohl 21 , M. Pohl 49 , G. Polesello 120a ,
A. Policicchio 37a,37b , R. Polifka 159 , A. Polini 20a , C.S. Pollard 45 , V. Polychronakos 25 , K. Pomms 30 ,
L. Pontecorvo 133a , B.G. Pope 89 , G.A. Popeneciu 26b , D.S. Popovic 13a , A. Poppleton 30 , X. Portell Bueso 12 ,
S. Pospisil 127 , K. Potamianos 15 , I.N. Potrap 64 , C.J. Potter 150 , C.T. Potter 115 , G. Poulard 30 , J. Poveda 60 ,
V. Pozdnyakov 64 , P. Pralavorio 84 , A. Pranko 15 , S. Prasad 30 , R. Pravahan 8 , S. Prell 63 , D. Price 83 , J. Price 73 ,
L.E. Price 6 , D. Prieur 124 , M. Primavera 72a , M. Proissl 46 , K. Prokoev 47 , F. Prokoshin 32b ,
E. Protopapadaki 137 , S. Protopopescu 25 , J. Proudfoot 6 , M. Przybycien 38a , H. Przysiezniak 5 , E. Ptacek 115 ,
D. Puddu 135a,135b , E. Pueschel 85 , D. Puldon 149 , M. Purohit 25,ad , P. Puzo 116 , J. Qian 88 , G. Qin 53 , Y. Qin 83 ,
A. Quadt 54 , D.R. Quarrie 15 , W.B. Quayle 165a,165b , M. Queitsch-Maitland 83 , D. Quilty 53 , A. Qureshi 160b ,
V. Radeka 25 , V. Radescu 42 , S.K. Radhakrishnan 149 , P. Radloff 115 , P. Rados 87 , F. Ragusa 90a,90b ,
G. Rahal 179 , S. Rajagopalan 25 , M. Rammensee 30 , A.S. Randle-Conde 40 , C. Rangel-Smith 167 , K. Rao 164 ,
F. Rauscher 99 , T.C. Rave 48 , T. Ravenscroft 53 , M. Raymond 30 , A.L. Read 118 , N.P. Readioff 73 ,
D.M. Rebuzzi 120a,120b , A. Redelbach 175 , G. Redlinger 25 , R. Reece 138 , K. Reeves 41 , L. Rehnisch 16 ,
H. Reisin 27 , M. Relich 164 , C. Rembser 30 , H. Ren 33a , Z.L. Ren 152 , A. Renaud 116 , M. Rescigno 133a ,
S. Resconi 90a , O.L. Rezanova 108,c , P. Reznicek 128 , R. Rezvani 94 , R. Richter 100 , M. Ridel 79 , P. Rieck 16 ,
J. Rieger 54 , M. Rijssenbeek 149 , A. Rimoldi 120a,120b , L. Rinaldi 20a , E. Ritsch 61 , I. Riu 12 , F. Rizatdinova 113 ,
E. Rizvi 75 , S.H. Robertson 86,j , A. Robichaud-Veronneau 86 , D. Robinson 28 , J.E.M. Robinson 83 ,
A. Robson 53 , C. Roda 123a,123b , L. Rodrigues 30 , S. Roe 30 , O. Rhne 118 , S. Rolli 162 , A. Romaniouk 97 ,
M. Romano 20a,20b , E. Romero Adam 168 , N. Rompotis 139 , M. Ronzani 48 , L. Roos 79 , E. Ros 168 ,
S. Rosati 133a , K. Rosbach 49 , M. Rose 76 , P. Rose 138 , P.L. Rosendahl 14 , O. Rosenthal 142 , V. Rossetti 147a,147b ,
E. Rossi 103a,103b , L.P. Rossi 50a , R. Rosten 139 , M. Rotaru 26a , I. Roth 173 , J. Rothberg 139 , D. Rousseau 116 ,
C.R. Royon 137 , A. Rozanov 84 , Y. Rozen 153 , X. Ruan 146c , F. Rubbo 12 , I. Rubinskiy 42 , V.I. Rud 98 ,
C. Rudolph 44 , M.S. Rudolph 159 , F. Rhr 48 , A. Ruiz-Martinez 30 , Z. Rurikova 48 , N.A. Rusakovich 64 ,
A. Ruschke 99 , J.P. Rutherfoord 7 , N. Ruthmann 48 , Y.F. Ryabov 122 , M. Rybar 128 , G. Rybkin 116 ,
N.C. Ryder 119 , A.F. Saavedra 151 , G. Sabato 106 , S. Sacerdoti 27 , A. Saddique 3 , I. Sadeh 154 ,
H.F-W. Sadrozinski 138 , R. Sadykov 64 , F. Safai Tehrani 133a , H. Sakamoto 156 , Y. Sakurai 172 ,
G. Salamanna 135a,135b , A. Salamon 134a , M. Saleem 112 , D. Salek 106 , P.H. Sales De Bruin 139 ,
D. Salihagic 100 , A. Salnikov 144 , J. Salt 168 , D. Salvatore 37a,37b , F. Salvatore 150 , A. Salvucci 105 ,
A. Salzburger 30 , D. Sampsonidis 155 , A. Sanchez 103a,103b , J. Snchez 168 , V. Sanchez Martinez 168 ,
H. Sandaker 14 , R.L. Sandbach 75 , H.G. Sander 82 , M.P. Sanders 99 , M. Sandhoff 176 , T. Sandoval 28 ,
C. Sandoval 163 , R. Sandstroem 100 , D.P.C. Sankey 130 , A. Sansoni 47 , C. Santoni 34 , R. Santonico 134a,134b ,
H. Santos 125a , I. Santoyo Castillo 150 , K. Sapp 124 , A. Sapronov 64 , J.G. Saraiva 125a,125d , B. Sarrazin 21 ,
G. Sartisohn 176 , O. Sasaki 65 , Y. Sasaki 156 , G. Sauvage 5, , E. Sauvan 5 , P. Savard 159,e , D.O. Savu 30 ,
C. Sawyer 119 , L. Sawyer 78,n , D.H. Saxon 53 , J. Saxon 121 , C. Sbarra 20a , A. Sbrizzi 20a,20b , T. Scanlon 77 ,
D.A. Scannicchio 164 , M. Scarcella 151 , V. Scarfone 37a,37b , J. Schaarschmidt 173 , P. Schacht 100 ,
D. Schaefer 30 , R. Schaefer 42 , S. Schaepe 21 , S. Schaetzel 58b , U. Schfer 82 , A.C. Schaffer 116 , D. Schaile 99 ,
R.D. Schamberger 149 , V. Scharf 58a , V.A. Schegelsky 122 , D. Scheirich 128 , M. Schernau 164 , M.I. Scherzer 35 ,
C. Schiavi 50a,50b , J. Schieck 99 , C. Schillo 48 , M. Schioppa 37a,37b , S. Schlenker 30 , E. Schmidt 48 ,
K. Schmieden 30 , C. Schmitt 82 , S. Schmitt 58b , B. Schneider 17 , Y.J. Schnellbach 73 , U. Schnoor 44 ,
L. Schoeffel 137 , A. Schoening 58b , B.D. Schoenrock 89 , A.L.S. Schorlemmer 54 , M. Schott 82 , D. Schouten 160a ,
J. Schovancova 25 , S. Schramm 159 , M. Schreyer 175 , C. Schroeder 82 , N. Schuh 82 , M.J. Schultens 21 ,
H.-C. Schultz-Coulon 58a , H. Schulz 16 , M. Schumacher 48 , B.A. Schumm 138 , Ph. Schune 137 ,
C. Schwanenberger 83 , A. Schwartzman 144 , T.A. Schwarz 88 , Ph. Schwegler 100 , Ph. Schwemling 137 ,
R. Schwienhorst 89 , J. Schwindling 137 , T. Schwindt 21 , M. Schwoerer 5 , F.G. Sciacca 17 , E. Scifo 116 ,
G. Sciolla 23 , W.G. Scott 130 , F. Scuri 123a,123b , F. Scutti 21 , J. Searcy 88 , G. Sedov 42 , E. Sedykh 122 ,
S.C. Seidel 104 , A. Seiden 138 , F. Seifert 127 , J.M. Seixas 24a , G. Sekhniaidze 103a , S.J. Sekula 40 , K.E. Selbach 46 ,
D.M. Seliverstov 122, , G. Sellers 73 , N. Semprini-Cesari 20a,20b , C. Serfon 30 , L. Serin 116 , L. Serkin 54 ,
T. Serre 84 , R. Seuster 160a , H. Severini 112 , T. Sligoj 74 , F. Sforza 100 , A. Sfyrla 30 , E. Shabalina 54 ,
238
M. Shamim 115 , L.Y. Shan 33a , R. Shang 166 , J.T. Shank 22 , M. Shapiro 15 , P.B. Shatalov 96 , K. Shaw 165a,165b ,
C.Y. Shehu 150 , P. Sherwood 77 , L. Shi 152,ae , S. Shimizu 66 , C.O. Shimmin 164 , M. Shimojima 101 ,
M. Shiyakova 64 , A. Shmeleva 95 , M.J. Shochet 31 , D. Short 119 , S. Shrestha 63 , E. Shulga 97 , M.A. Shupe 7 ,
S. Shushkevich 42 , P. Sicho 126 , O. Sidiropoulou 155 , D. Sidorov 113 , A. Sidoti 133a , F. Siegert 44 , Dj. Sijacki 13a ,
J. Silva 125a,125d , Y. Silver 154 , D. Silverstein 144 , S.B. Silverstein 147a , V. Simak 127 , O. Simard 5 , Lj. Simic 13a ,
S. Simion 116 , E. Simioni 82 , B. Simmons 77 , R. Simoniello 90a,90b , M. Simonyan 36 , P. Sinervo 159 ,
N.B. Sinev 115 , V. Sipica 142 , G. Siragusa 175 , A. Sircar 78 , A.N. Sisakyan 64, , S.Yu. Sivoklokov 98 ,
J. Sjlin 147a,147b , T.B. Sjursen 14 , H.P. Skottowe 57 , K.Yu. Skovpen 108 , P. Skubic 112 , M. Slater 18 ,
T. Slavicek 127 , K. Sliwa 162 , V. Smakhtin 173 , B.H. Smart 46 , L. Smestad 14 , S.Yu. Smirnov 97 , Y. Smirnov 97 ,
L.N. Smirnova 98,af , O. Smirnova 80 , K.M. Smith 53 , M. Smizanska 71 , K. Smolek 127 , A.A. Snesarev 95 ,
G. Snidero 75 , S. Snyder 25 , R. Sobie 170,j , F. Socher 44 , A. Soffer 154 , D.A. Soh 152,ae , C.A. Solans 30 ,
M. Solar 127 , J. Solc 127 , E.Yu. Soldatov 97 , U. Soldevila 168 , A.A. Solodkov 129 , A. Soloshenko 64 ,
O.V. Solovyanov 129 , V. Solovyev 122 , P. Sommer 48 , H.Y. Song 33b , N. Soni 1 , A. Sood 15 , A. Sopczak 127 ,
B. Sopko 127 , V. Sopko 127 , V. Sorin 12 , M. Sosebee 8 , R. Soualah 165a,165c , P. Soueid 94 , A.M. Soukharev 108,c ,
D. South 42 , S. Spagnolo 72a,72b , F. Span 76 , W.R. Spearman 57 , F. Spettel 100 , R. Spighi 20a , G. Spigo 30 ,
L.A. Spiller 87 , M. Spousta 128 , T. Spreitzer 159 , B. Spurlock 8 , R.D. St. Denis 53, , S. Staerz 44 , J. Stahlman 121 ,
R. Stamen 58a , S. Stamm 16 , E. Stanecka 39 , R.W. Stanek 6 , C. Stanescu 135a , M. Stanescu-Bellu 42 ,
M.M. Stanitzki 42 , S. Stapnes 118 , E.A. Starchenko 129 , J. Stark 55 , P. Staroba 126 , P. Starovoitov 42 ,
R. Staszewski 39 , P. Stavina 145a, , P. Steinberg 25 , B. Stelzer 143 , H.J. Stelzer 30 , O. Stelzer-Chilton 160a ,
H. Stenzel 52 , S. Stern 100 , G.A. Stewart 53 , J.A. Stillings 21 , M.C. Stockton 86 , M. Stoebe 86 , G. Stoicea 26a ,
P. Stolte 54 , S. Stonjek 100 , A.R. Stradling 8 , A. Straessner 44 , M.E. Stramaglia 17 , J. Strandberg 148 ,
S. Strandberg 147a,147b , A. Strandlie 118 , E. Strauss 144 , M. Strauss 112 , P. Strizenec 145b , R. Strhmer 175 ,
D.M. Strom 115 , R. Stroynowski 40 , A. Strubig 105 , S.A. Stucci 17 , B. Stugu 14 , N.A. Styles 42 , D. Su 144 ,
J. Su 124 , R. Subramaniam 78 , A. Succurro 12 , Y. Sugaya 117 , C. Suhr 107 , M. Suk 127 , V.V. Sulin 95 ,
S. Sultansoy 4c , T. Sumida 67 , S. Sun 57 , X. Sun 33a , J.E. Sundermann 48 , K. Suruliz 140 , G. Susinno 37a,37b ,
M.R. Sutton 150 , Y. Suzuki 65 , M. Svatos 126 , S. Swedish 169 , M. Swiatlowski 144 , I. Sykora 145a , T. Sykora 128 ,
D. Ta 89 , C. Taccini 135a,135b , K. Tackmann 42 , J. Taenzer 159 , A. Taffard 164 , R. Tarout 160a , N. Taiblum 154 ,
H. Takai 25 , R. Takashima 68 , H. Takeda 66 , T. Takeshita 141 , Y. Takubo 65 , M. Talby 84 , A.A. Talyshev 108,c ,
J.Y.C. Tam 175 , K.G. Tan 87 , J. Tanaka 156 , R. Tanaka 116 , S. Tanaka 132 , S. Tanaka 65 , A.J. Tanasijczuk 143 ,
B.B. Tannenwald 110 , N. Tannoury 21 , S. Tapprogge 82 , S. Tarem 153 , F. Tarrade 29 , G.F. Tartarelli 90a ,
P. Tas 128 , M. Tasevsky 126 , T. Tashiro 67 , E. Tassi 37a,37b , A. Tavares Delgado 125a,125b , Y. Tayalati 136d ,
F.E. Taylor 93 , G.N. Taylor 87 , W. Taylor 160b , F.A. Teischinger 30 , M. Teixeira Dias Castanheira 75 ,
P. Teixeira-Dias 76 , K.K. Temming 48 , H. Ten Kate 30 , P.K. Teng 152 , J.J. Teoh 117 , S. Terada 65 , K. Terashi 156 ,
J. Terron 81 , S. Terzo 100 , M. Testa 47 , R.J. Teuscher 159,j , J. Therhaag 21 , T. Theveneaux-Pelzer 34 ,
J.P. Thomas 18 , J. Thomas-Wilsker 76 , E.N. Thompson 35 , P.D. Thompson 18 , P.D. Thompson 159 ,
R.J. Thompson 83 , A.S. Thompson 53 , L.A. Thomsen 36 , E. Thomson 121 , M. Thomson 28 , W.M. Thong 87 ,
R.P. Thun 88, , F. Tian 35 , M.J. Tibbetts 15 , V.O. Tikhomirov 95,ag , Yu.A. Tikhonov 108,c , S. Timoshenko 97 ,
E. Tiouchichine 84 , P. Tipton 177 , S. Tisserant 84 , T. Todorov 5 , S. Todorova-Nova 128 , B. Toggerson 7 ,
J. Tojo 69 , S. Tokr 145a , K. Tokushuku 65 , K. Tollefson 89 , E. Tolley 57 , L. Tomlinson 83 , M. Tomoto 102 ,
L. Tompkins 31 , K. Toms 104 , N.D. Topilin 64 , E. Torrence 115 , H. Torres 143 , E. Torr Pastor 168 , J. Toth 84,ah ,
F. Touchard 84 , D.R. Tovey 140 , H.L. Tran 116 , T. Trefzger 175 , L. Tremblet 30 , A. Tricoli 30 , I.M. Trigger 160a ,
S. Trincaz-Duvoid 79 , M.F. Tripiana 12 , W. Trischuk 159 , B. Trocm 55 , C. Troncon 90a ,
M. Trottier-McDonald 15 , M. Trovatelli 135a,135b , P. True 89 , M. Trzebinski 39 , A. Trzupek 39 , C. Tsarouchas 30 ,
J.C-L. Tseng 119 , P.V. Tsiareshka 91 , D. Tsionou 137 , G. Tsipolitis 10 , N. Tsirintanis 9 , S. Tsiskaridze 12 ,
V. Tsiskaridze 48 , E.G. Tskhadadze 51a , I.I. Tsukerman 96 , V. Tsulaia 15 , S. Tsuno 65 , D. Tsybychev 149 ,
A. Tudorache 26a , V. Tudorache 26a , A.N. Tuna 121 , S.A. Tupputi 20a,20b , S. Turchikhin 98,af , D. Turecek 127 ,
I. Turk Cakir 4d , R. Turra 90a,90b , P.M. Tuts 35 , A. Tykhonov 49 , M. Tylmad 147a,147b , M. Tyndel 130 ,
K. Uchida 21 , I. Ueda 156 , R. Ueno 29 , M. Ughetto 84 , M. Ugland 14 , M. Uhlenbrock 21 , F. Ukegawa 161 ,
G. Unal 30 , A. Undrus 25 , G. Unel 164 , F.C. Ungaro 48 , Y. Unno 65 , C. Unverdorben 99 , D. Urbaniec 35 ,
P. Urquijo 87 , G. Usai 8 , A. Usanova 61 , L. Vacavant 84 , V. Vacek 127 , B. Vachon 86 , N. Valencic 106 ,
S. Valentinetti 20a,20b , A. Valero 168 , L. Valery 34 , S. Valkar 128 , E. Valladolid Gallego 168 , S. Vallecorsa 49 ,
J.A. Valls Ferrer 168 , W. Van Den Wollenberg 106 , P.C. Van Der Deijl 106 , R. van der Geer 106 ,
239
H. van der Graaf 106 , R. Van Der Leeuw 106 , D. van der Ster 30 , N. van Eldik 30 , P. van Gemmeren 6 ,
J. Van Nieuwkoop 143 , I. van Vulpen 106 , M.C. van Woerden 30 , M. Vanadia 133a,133b , W. Vandelli 30 ,
R. Vanguri 121 , A. Vaniachine 6 , P. Vankov 42 , F. Vannucci 79 , G. Vardanyan 178 , R. Vari 133a , E.W. Varnes 7 ,
T. Varol 85 , D. Varouchas 79 , A. Vartapetian 8 , K.E. Varvell 151 , F. Vazeille 34 , T. Vazquez Schroeder 54 ,
J. Veatch 7 , F. Veloso 125a,125c , S. Veneziano 133a , A. Ventura 72a,72b , D. Ventura 85 , M. Venturi 170 ,
N. Venturi 159 , A. Venturini 23 , V. Vercesi 120a , M. Verducci 133a,133b , W. Verkerke 106 , J.C. Vermeulen 106 ,
A. Vest 44 , M.C. Vetterli 143,e , O. Viazlo 80 , I. Vichou 166 , T. Vickey 146c,ai , O.E. Vickey Boeriu 146c ,
G.H.A. Viehhauser 119 , S. Viel 169 , R. Vigne 30 , M. Villa 20a,20b , M. Villaplana Perez 90a,90b , E. Vilucchi 47 ,
M.G. Vincter 29 , V.B. Vinogradov 64 , J. Virzi 15 , I. Vivarelli 150 , F. Vives Vaque 3 , S. Vlachos 10 , D. Vladoiu 99 ,
M. Vlasak 127 , A. Vogel 21 , M. Vogel 32a , P. Vokac 127 , G. Volpi 123a,123b , M. Volpi 87 , H. von der Schmitt 100 ,
H. von Radziewski 48 , E. von Toerne 21 , V. Vorobel 128 , K. Vorobev 97 , M. Vos 168 , R. Voss 30 ,
J.H. Vossebeld 73 , N. Vranjes 137 , M. Vranjes Milosavljevic 13a , V. Vrba 126 , M. Vreeswijk 106 , T. Vu Anh 48 ,
R. Vuillermet 30 , I. Vukotic 31 , Z. Vykydal 127 , P. Wagner 21 , W. Wagner 176 , H. Wahlberg 70 ,
S. Wahrmund 44 , J. Wakabayashi 102 , J. Walder 71 , R. Walker 99 , W. Walkowiak 142 , R. Wall 177 , P. Waller 73 ,
B. Walsh 177 , C. Wang 152,aj , C. Wang 45 , F. Wang 174 , H. Wang 15 , H. Wang 40 , J. Wang 42 , J. Wang 33a ,
K. Wang 86 , R. Wang 104 , S.M. Wang 152 , T. Wang 21 , X. Wang 177 , C. Wanotayaroj 115 , A. Warburton 86 ,
C.P. Ward 28 , D.R. Wardrope 77 , M. Warsinsky 48 , A. Washbrook 46 , C. Wasicki 42 , P.M. Watkins 18 ,
A.T. Watson 18 , I.J. Watson 151 , M.F. Watson 18 , G. Watts 139 , S. Watts 83 , B.M. Waugh 77 , S. Webb 83 ,
M.S. Weber 17 , S.W. Weber 175 , J.S. Webster 31 , A.R. Weidberg 119 , P. Weigell 100 , B. Weinert 60 ,
J. Weingarten 54 , C. Weiser 48 , H. Weits 106 , P.S. Wells 30 , T. Wenaus 25 , D. Wendland 16 , Z. Weng 152,ae ,
T. Wengler 30 , S. Wenig 30 , N. Wermes 21 , M. Werner 48 , P. Werner 30 , M. Wessels 58a , J. Wetter 162 ,
K. Whalen 29 , A. White 8 , M.J. White 1 , R. White 32b , S. White 123a,123b , D. Whiteson 164 , D. Wicke 176 ,
F.J. Wickens 130 , W. Wiedenmann 174 , M. Wielers 130 , P. Wienemann 21 , C. Wiglesworth 36 ,
L.A.M. Wiik-Fuchs 21 , P.A. Wijeratne 77 , A. Wildauer 100 , M.A. Wildt 42,ak , H.G. Wilkens 30 , J.Z. Will 99 ,
H.H. Williams 121 , S. Williams 28 , C. Willis 89 , S. Willocq 85 , A. Wilson 88 , J.A. Wilson 18 ,
I. Wingerter-Seez 5 , F. Winklmeier 115 , B.T. Winter 21 , M. Wittgen 144 , T. Wittig 43 , J. Wittkowski 99 ,
S.J. Wollstadt 82 , M.W. Wolter 39 , H. Wolters 125a,125c , B.K. Wosiek 39 , J. Wotschack 30 , M.J. Woudstra 83 ,
K.W. Wozniak 39 , M. Wright 53 , M. Wu 55 , S.L. Wu 174 , X. Wu 49 , Y. Wu 88 , E. Wulf 35 , T.R. Wyatt 83 ,
B.M. Wynne 46 , S. Xella 36 , M. Xiao 137 , D. Xu 33a , L. Xu 33b,al , B. Yabsley 151 , S. Yacoob 146b,am , R. Yakabe 66 ,
M. Yamada 65 , H. Yamaguchi 156 , Y. Yamaguchi 117 , A. Yamamoto 65 , K. Yamamoto 63 , S. Yamamoto 156 ,
T. Yamamura 156 , T. Yamanaka 156 , K. Yamauchi 102 , Y. Yamazaki 66 , Z. Yan 22 , H. Yang 33e , H. Yang 174 ,
U.K. Yang 83 , Y. Yang 110 , S. Yanush 92 , L. Yao 33a , W-M. Yao 15 , Y. Yasu 65 , E. Yatsenko 42 , K.H. Yau Wong 21 ,
J. Ye 40 , S. Ye 25 , I. Yeletskikh 64 , A.L. Yen 57 , E. Yildirim 42 , M. Yilmaz 4b , R. Yoosoofmiya 124 , K. Yorita 172 ,
R. Yoshida 6 , K. Yoshihara 156 , C. Young 144 , C.J.S. Young 30 , S. Youssef 22 , D.R. Yu 15 , J. Yu 8 , J.M. Yu 88 ,
J. Yu 113 , L. Yuan 66 , A. Yurkewicz 107 , I. Yusuff 28,an , B. Zabinski 39 , R. Zaidan 62 , A.M. Zaitsev 129,aa ,
A. Zaman 149 , S. Zambito 23 , L. Zanello 133a,133b , D. Zanzi 87 , C. Zeitnitz 176 , M. Zeman 127 , A. Zemla 38a ,
K. Zengel 23 , O. Zenin 129 , T. eni 145a , D. Zerwas 116 , G. Zevi della Porta 57 , D. Zhang 88 , F. Zhang 174 ,
H. Zhang 89 , J. Zhang 6 , L. Zhang 152 , X. Zhang 33d , Z. Zhang 116 , Z. Zhao 33b , A. Zhemchugov 64 ,
J. Zhong 119 , B. Zhou 88 , L. Zhou 35 , N. Zhou 164 , C.G. Zhu 33d , H. Zhu 33a , J. Zhu 88 , Y. Zhu 33b , X. Zhuang 33a ,
K. Zhukov 95 , A. Zibell 175 , D. Zieminska 60 , N.I. Zimine 64 , C. Zimmermann 82 , R. Zimmermann 21 ,
S. Zimmermann 21 , S. Zimmermann 48 , Z. Zinonos 54 , M. Ziolkowski 142 , G. Zobernig 174 , A. Zoccoli 20a,20b ,
M. zur Nedden 16 , G. Zurzolo 103a,103b , V. Zutshi 107 , L. Zwalinski 30
1
Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

Physics Department, SUNY Albany, Albany, NY, United States
3
Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
4 (a)
Department of Physics, Ankara University, Ankara; (b) Department of Physics, Gazi University, Ankara; (c) Division of Physics, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara;
(d) Turkish Atomic Energy Authority, Ankara, Turkey
5
LAPP, CNRS/IN2P3 and Universit de Savoie, Annecy-le-Vieux, France
6
High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, United States
7
Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
8
Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, United States
9
Physics Department, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
10
Physics Department, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou, Greece
11
Institute of Physics, Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan
12
Institut de Fsica dAltes Energies and Departament de Fsica de la Universitat Autnoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
13 (a)
Institute of Physics, University of Belgrade, Belgrade; (b) Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
14
Department for Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
2
240
15
Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States
Department of Physics, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
17
Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics and Laboratory for High Energy Physics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
18
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
19 (a)
Department of Physics, Bogazici University, Istanbul; (b) Department of Physics, Dogus University, Istanbul; (c) Department of Physics Engineering, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep,
Turkey
20 (a)
INFN Sezione di Bologna ; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Universit di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
21
Physikalisches Institut, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
22
Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
23
Department of Physics, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, United States
24 (a)
Universidade Federal do Rio De Janeiro COPPE/EE/IF, Rio de Janeiro; (b) Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Juiz de Fora; (c) Federal University of Sao Joao del Rei (UFSJ), Sao Joao
del Rei; (d) Instituto de Fisica, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
25
Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, United States
26 (a)
National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest; (b) National Institute for Research and Development of Isotopic and Molecular Technologies, Physics Department,
Cluj Napoca; (c) University Politehnica Bucharest, Bucharest; (d) West University in Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania
27
Departamento de Fsica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
28
Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
29
Department of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada
30
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
31
Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
32 (a)
Departamento de Fsica, Ponticia Universidad Catlica de Chile, Santiago ; (b) Departamento de Fsica, Universidad Tcnica Federico Santa Mara, Valparaso, Chile
33 (a)
Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; (b) Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui ; (c) Department of
Physics, Nanjing University, Jiangsu; (d) School of Physics, Shandong University, Shandong; (e) Physics Department, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
34
Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire, Clermont Universit and Universit Blaise Pascal and CNRS/IN2P3, Clermont-Ferrand, France
35
Nevis Laboratory, Columbia University, Irvington, NY, United States
36
Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
37 (a)
INFN Gruppo Collegato di Cosenza, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit della Calabria, Rende, Italy
38 (a)
AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, Krakow; (b) Marian Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Krakow,
Poland
39
The Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
40
Physics Department, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, United States
41
Physics Department, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States
42
DESY, Hamburg and Zeuthen, Germany
43
Institut fr Experimentelle Physik IV, Technische Universitt Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
44
Institut fr Kern- und Teilchenphysik, Technische Universitt Dresden, Dresden, Germany
45
Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
46
SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
47
INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Frascati, Italy
48
Fakultt fr Mathematik und Physik, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitt, Freiburg, Germany
49
Section de Physique, Universit de Genve, Geneva, Switzerland
50 (a)
INFN Sezione di Genova; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit di Genova, Genova, Italy
51 (a)
E. Andronikashvili Institute of Physics, Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi ; (b) High Energy Physics Institute, Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
52
II Physikalisches Institut, Justus-Liebig-Universitt Giessen, Giessen, Germany
53
SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
54
II Physikalisches Institut, Georg-August-Universitt, Gttingen, Germany
55
Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie, Universit Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS/IN2P3, Grenoble, France
56
Department of Physics, Hampton University, Hampton, VA, United States
57
Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
58 (a)
Kirchhoff-Institut fr Physik, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitt Heidelberg, Heidelberg ; (b) Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitt Heidelberg, Heidelberg ; (c) ZITI Institut fr
technische Informatik, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitt Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
59
Faculty of Applied Information Science, Hiroshima Institute of Technology, Hiroshima, Japan
60
Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States
61
Institut fr Astro- und Teilchenphysik, Leopold-Franzens-Universitt, Innsbruck, Austria
62
University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States
63
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States
64
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, JINR Dubna, Dubna, Russia
65
KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Tsukuba, Japan
66
Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
67
Faculty of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
68
Kyoto University of Education, Kyoto, Japan
69
Department of Physics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
70
Instituto de Fsica La Plata, Universidad Nacional de La Plata and CONICET, La Plata, Argentina
71
Physics Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
72 (a)
INFN Sezione di Lecce; (b) Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Universit del Salento, Lecce, Italy
73
Oliver Lodge Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
74
Department of Physics, Joef Stefan Institute and University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
75
School of Physics and Astronomy, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
76
Department of Physics, Royal Holloway University of London, Surrey, United Kingdom
77
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
78
Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA, United States
79
Laboratoire de Physique Nuclaire et de Hautes Energies, UPMC and Universit Paris-Diderot and CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France
80
Fysiska institutionen, Lunds universitet, Lund, Sweden
81
Departamento de Fisica Teorica C-15, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
82
Institut fr Physik, Universitt Mainz, Mainz, Germany
83
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
84
CPPM, Aix-Marseille Universit and CNRS/IN2P3, Marseille, France
85
Department of Physics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States
86
Department of Physics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
87
School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
16

88
241
Department of Physics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
90 (a)
INFN Sezione di Milano; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit di Milano, Milano, Italy
91
B.I. Stepanov Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus
92
National Scientic and Educational Centre for Particle and High Energy Physics, Minsk, Belarus
93
Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
94
Group of Particle Physics, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
95
P.N. Lebedev Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
96
Institute for Theoretical and Experimental Physics (ITEP), Moscow, Russia
97
Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute (MEPhI), Moscow, Russia
98
D.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
99
Fakultt fr Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitt Mnchen, Mnchen, Germany
100
Max-Planck-Institut fr Physik (Werner-Heisenberg-Institut), Mnchen, Germany
101
Nagasaki Institute of Applied Science, Nagasaki, Japan
102
Graduate School of Science and KobayashiMaskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
103 (a)
INFN Sezione di Napoli; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit di Napoli, Napoli, Italy
104
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
105
Institute for Mathematics, Astrophysics and Particle Physics, Radboud University Nijmegen/Nikhef, Nijmegen, Netherlands
106
Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics and University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
107
Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, United States
108
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia
109
Department of Physics, New York University, New York, NY, United States
110
Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
111
Faculty of Science, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
112
Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States
113
Department of Physics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States
114
Palack University, RCPTM, Olomouc, Czech Republic
115
Center for High Energy Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States
116
LAL, Universit Paris-Sud and CNRS/IN2P3, Orsay, France
117
Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
118
Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
119
Department of Physics, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
120 (a)
INFN Sezione di Pavia; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
121
Department of Physics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
122
Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina, Russia
123 (a)
INFN Sezione di Pisa ; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica E. Fermi, Universit di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
124
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
125 (a)
Laboratorio de Instrumentacao e Fisica Experimental de Particulas LIP, Lisboa; (b) Faculdade de Cincias, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa; (c) Department of Physics, University of
Coimbra, Coimbra; (d) Centro de Fsica Nuclear da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa; (e) Departamento de Fisica, Universidade do Minho, Braga; (f ) Departamento de Fisica Teorica y del
Cosmos and CAFPE, Universidad de Granada, Granada (Spain); (g) Dep Fisica and CEFITEC of Faculdade de Ciencias e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal
126
Institute of Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Praha, Czech Republic
127
Czech Technical University in Prague, Praha, Czech Republic
128
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University in Prague, Praha, Czech Republic
129
State Research Center Institute for High Energy Physics, Protvino, Russia
130
Particle Physics Department, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom
131
Physics Department, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada
132
Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan
133 (a)
INFN Sezione di Roma; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Universit di Roma, Roma, Italy
134 (a)
INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata ; (b) Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
135 (a)
INFN Sezione di Roma Tre; (b) Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Universit Roma Tre, Roma, Italy
136 (a)
Facult des Sciences Ain Chock, Rseau Universitaire de Physique des Hautes Energies Universit Hassan II, Casablanca; (b) Centre National de lEnergie des Sciences Techniques
Nucleaires, Rabat; (c) Facult des Sciences Semlalia, Universit Cadi Ayyad, LPHEA-Marrakech; (d) Facult des Sciences, Universit Mohamed Premier and LPTPM, Oujda; (e) Facult des
sciences, Universit Mohammed V-Agdal, Rabat, Morocco
137
DSM/IRFU (Institut de Recherches sur les Lois Fondamentales de lUnivers), CEA Saclay (Commissariat lEnergie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives), Gif-sur-Yvette, France
138
Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States
139
Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
140
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheeld, Sheeld, United Kingdom
141
Department of Physics, Shinshu University, Nagano, Japan
142
Fachbereich Physik, Universitt Siegen, Siegen, Germany
143
Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
144
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford, CA, United States
145 (a)
Faculty of Mathematics, Physics & Informatics, Comenius University, Bratislava ; (b) Department of Subnuclear Physics, Institute of Experimental Physics of the Slovak Academy of
Sciences, Kosice, Slovak Republic
146 (a)
Department of Physics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town; (b) Department of Physics, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg; (c) School of Physics, University of the
Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
147 (a)
Department of Physics, Stockholm University; (b) The Oskar Klein Centre, Stockholm, Sweden
148
Physics Department, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
149
Departments of Physics & Astronomy and Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States
150
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
151
School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
152
Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
153
Department of Physics, Technion: Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
154
Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
155
Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
156
International Center for Elementary Particle Physics and Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
157
Graduate School of Science and Technology, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
158
Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
159
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
160 (a)
TRIUMF, Vancouver, BC; (b) Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
89
242
161
Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States
163
Centro de Investigaciones, Universidad Antonio Narino, Bogota, Colombia
164
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
165 (a)
INFN Gruppo Collegato di Udine, Sezione di Trieste, Udine; (b) ICTP, Trieste; (c) Dipartimento di Chimica, Fisica e Ambiente, Universit di Udine, Udine, Italy
166
Department of Physics, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, United States
167
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
168
Instituto de Fsica Corpuscular (IFIC) and Departamento de Fsica Atmica, Molecular y Nuclear and Departamento de Ingeniera Electrnica and Instituto de Microelectrnica de
Barcelona (IMBCNM), University of Valencia and CSIC, Valencia, Spain
169
Department of Physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
170
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
171
Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
172
Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
173
Department of Particle Physics, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
174
Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States
175
Fakultt fr Physik und Astronomie, Julius-Maximilians-Universitt, Wrzburg, Germany
176
Fachbereich C Physik, Bergische Universitt Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
177
Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
178
Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia
179
Centre de Calcul de lInstitut National de Physique Nuclaire et de Physique des Particules (IN2P3), Villeurbanne, France
162
Also at Department of Physics, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
Also at Institute of Physics, Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan.

Also at Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
c
d
e
f
Also at Particle Physics Department, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, United Kingdom.
Also at TRIUMF, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Also at Department of Physics, California State University, Fresno, CA, United States.
Also at Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia.
Also at CPPM, Aix-Marseille Universit and CNRS/IN2P3, Marseille, France.
Also at Universit di Napoli Parthenope, Napoli, Italy.
Also at Institute of Particle Physics (IPP), Canada.
Also at Department of Physics, St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Also
Also
Also
Also
Also
Also
Also
Also
Also
Also
Also
Also
Also
Also
Also
Also
m
n
o
p
q
r
s
t
u
v
w
x
y
z
aa
ab
ac
ad
ae
af
at
at
at
at
at
at
at
at
at
at
at
at
at
at
at
at
Chinese University of Hong Kong, China.

Department of Financial and Management Engineering, University of the Aegean, Chios, Greece.
Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA, United States.
Institucio Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avancats, ICREA, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Institute of Theoretical Physics, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ochadai Academic Production, Ochanomizu University, Tokyo, Japan.
Manhattan College, New York, NY, United States.
Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
LAL, Universit Paris-Sud and CNRS/IN2P3, Orsay, France.
Academia Sinica Grid Computing, Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Laboratoire de Physique Nuclaire et de Hautes Energies, UPMC and Universit Paris-Diderot and CNRS/IN2P3, Paris, France.
School of Physical Sciences, National Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhubaneswar, India.
Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Universit di Roma, Roma, Italy.
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology State University, Dolgoprudny, Russia.
Also at Section de Physique, Universit de Genve, Geneva, Switzerland.

Also at International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste, Italy.
Also at Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States.
Also at School of Physics and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
ag
Also at Faculty of Physics, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Also at Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute (MEPhI), Moscow, Russia.
ah
Also at Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics, Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary.
ai
Also at Department of Physics, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
aj
Also at Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China.
ak
Also at Institut fr Experimentalphysik, Universitt Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
al
Also at Department of Physics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Also at Discipline of Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Also at University of Malaya, Department of Physics, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Deceased.
am
an

Phys. Lett. B740 (2015) 222

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Phys. Lett. B740 (2015) 222

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Search for H produced in association with top quarks and

E-mail address: atlas.publications@cern.ch.

For simplicity, t H refers equally to t H in this Letter.

duction and s-channel t H production. The s-channel production

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

spectrometer. Three stations of precision drift tubes and cathode

Data used for this analysis were recorded in pp collisions at

small branching fraction in the SM, BR( H ) = 2.28 103 for

satisfy data quality requirements ensuring proper functioning of

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

that W t H is produced mostly without a second high-p T b-quark

by a neural-network-based algorithm [68], which uses as input the

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

7 TeV leptonic selection

7 TeV hadronic selection

8 TeV leptonic selection

8 TeV hadronic selection

kept loose enough in order to also allow high selection eciency

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

applied on the sum of all Higgs boson production processes

with 100% within an uncertainty of 0.2%. The uncertainty in the

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

resolution, and is based on the resolution measured with Z ee

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

Leptonic (with systematics)

Hadronic (with systematics)

Fig. 5. Production cross sections for t t H and t H divided by their SM expectations

Fig. 7. Negative log-likelihood scan of t at m H = 125.4 GeV, where

Higgs boson production in association with top

decay channel is presented using leptonic

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

detector at the LHC were analyzed. No signicant excess over the

[10] M. Garzelli, A. Kardos, C. Papadopoulos, Z. Trocsanyi, Standard Model Higgs

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

[36] GEANT4 Collaboration, S. Agostinelli, et al., GEANT4: a simulation toolkit, Nucl.

protonproton collisions at s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

D. Britton 53 , F.M. Brochu 28 , I. Brock 21 , R. Brock 89 , C. Bromberg 89 , J. Bronner 100 , G. Brooijmans 35 ,

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

C. Di Donato 103a,103b , A. Di Girolamo 30 , B. Di Girolamo 30 , A. Di Mattia 153 , B. Di Micco 135a,135b ,

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

M. Janus 171 , G. Jarlskog 80 , N. Javadov 64,b , T. Javurek

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

ATLAS Collaboration / Physics Letters B 740 (2015) 222242

Faculty of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

Also at Department of Physics, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.

Also at Institute of Physics, Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan.

Also at CPPM, Aix-Marseille Universit and CNRS/IN2P3, Marseille, France.

Also at Universit di Napoli Parthenope, Napoli, Italy.

Also at Institute of Particle Physics (IPP), Canada.

Chinese University of Hong Kong, China.

Also at Section de Physique, Universit de Genve, Geneva, Switzerland.

Also at Department of Physics, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Also at Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, China.