Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
2006-2007 (SEMESTER 2) EXAMINATION
Company Law
Answer any THREE questions only. All questions carry equal marks.
(a)
(b)
(c)
On the 1st December 2000 the Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) came
into effect in Hong Kong. The ordinance which set up the MPF requires
employees and employers respectively to pay 5% of salary into an
approved scheme which is then invested and can be retrieved by the
employee on retirement. Tung is the controller of a company called
Happy Ltd. which in turn owns a restaurant in Wanchai. Tung is
concerned about the MPF scheme as it will considerably increase his staff
salary bill. Consequently Tung decides to change his employees contracts
with their consent. On average Tung pays his staff $15,000 per month as
salary. He now changes the contracts so that each employee receives a
housing allowance which constitutes 90% of the money paid, the
remaining 10% being designated as "Salary". The MPF scheme applies
only to this latter part.
2. (a)
(b)
The articles of association of Ambrose Ltd. provide, inter alia, that Bertie
is to be the company's sales director until 2010 and the company's French
representatives should be paid ten per cent commission on all business
they introduce to the company. Claude is named in the articles as one of
those representatives. There is an agreement between Claude and the
company that he may appoint the other French representatives. That
agreement also provides that the company shall not deprive Claude of his
appointment or amend the terms of his commission. Claude has appointed
Daniel as a French representative. Eric has just acquired eighty per cent of
the shares of Ambrose Ltd. and intends to alter the company's articles to
delete the clauses relating to Bertie and Claude, and to reduce the
commission payable to the French representatives to five per cent. He also
intends to add an article whereby any member must sell his shares to a
specified person if a majority of the shareholders require him to do so.
Discuss the legal issues here.
3. On 1 March Lux Ltd. created a floating charge over its assets in favour of Grab
Bank as security for a loan of $7 million. The charge was not registered. On 1
April Lux Ltd. created a second floating charge in favour of Sting Bank as
security for an existing overdraft facility of $1 million. The charge contained a
term prohibiting Lux Ltd. from creating subsequent charges which would rank in
priority to Sting Bank.
Sting Bank's charge is duly registered. On 1 May Lux Ltd. purchased computer
equipment from Tiger Ltd. at a price of $8 million. Lux Ltd. paid $1 million in
cash and created a fixed charge over its book debts in favour Tiger Ltd. to secure
the balance of the purchase price. This charge was duly registered.
Discuss the legal implications of the above.
4. (a)
(b)
Ming, Ling and Ting are partners in a firm of painters and decorators. The
following events have recently taken place and you are asked to advise the
parties as to their legal rights and duties:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
Ming suggests that the firm should expand its business to include
fitting out bathrooms and kitchens.
(v)
Ling places an order for paint and paint brushes with Hung. When
Ming and Ting discover the price that Ling agreed to, they are very
upset and suggest that the firm should refuse to pay.
5. (a)
(b)
"The problem of ultra vires has now been solved by the Companies
(Amendment) Ordinance 1997". Discuss.
6. (a)
(b)
"In the process of winding up, the liquidator has considerable powers to
avoid certain transactions made on behalf of the company prior to
commencement." Discuss.
(c)
(ii)
(iii)
a claim for $1 million form Peter who lent the money to the
company two weeks prior to liquidation. The money was used to
pay the company's wage bill at the time;
(iv)
(v)
7. (a)
(b)
(c)
<<<End of Paper>>>