Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Talanta
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/talanta
s Cernohorsk
Miloslav Pouzar a, , Anna Krejcova a , Toma
y a , Kveta Peskova b
a
b
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 21 November 2007
Received in revised form 18 February 2008
Accepted 20 February 2008
Available online 4 March 2008
Keywords:
Cryogenic grinding
Contamination
Cross-contamination
Cellulose
Electro-waste
a b s t r a c t
The study of contamination effect during cryogenic grinding of pure cellulose was carried out. The optimisation of important parameters of the grinding process (pre-cooling time, grinding time, cooling time
and number of cycles) was performed and the different sources of a possible contamination of samples
(earlier processed sample, metal parts of grinding tool) were evaluated. The results of ICP-oa-TOF MS analysis after microwave digestion of cellulose samples were used in this study. Signicant contamination of
cellulose samples by Fe at the level 130 g kg1 caused by wearing of steel stoppers and an impact bar was
detected. Cross-contamination by Fe, Cr, Mn and Cu at the level 400, 200, 200 and 2100 g kg1 , respectively was caused by previous grinding of electro-waste sample. This cross-contamination was possible
to be avoided by changing of a polycarbonate part of a grinding vessel.
2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
During the process of the cryogenic grinding, a material is deeply
frozen in order to be more fragile and easier to grind. Chilling
leads to an increase in hardness of a ground matter, an insertion
of failures in its structure and consequently a reduction of time
and energy vital to favourable sample pulverization. This technique
is favourable and used when a sample with the highly homogeneous particle size distribution and a diameter below 100 m is
required [1]. Typical application area of that modern sample preparation method is elemental analysis of various biological materials
or foods using the direct introduction of slurries into GF AAS. The
cryogenic grinding solves problems with agglomeration of samples
containing a high portion of fat [2]. It is benecial for pulverization
of brous specimens [3,4] as well as for powdering of soft, elastic
and pasty matters [5,6], or tough and hard ones contrariwise [7].
This procedure is efcient for a fast and effective comminution and
homogenisation of heavily heterogeneous and complex mixtures
if a small portion sampled have to represent its whole bulk [8].
Prevention of a thermo-labile species degradation and xation of
high volatile compounds in the sample matrix during the process
of mechanical des-integration are another benets of the cryogenic
processing [9].
A hazard of sample contamination in the process of the cryogenic grinding strongly depends on a design of a mill used and
conditions selected for its operation. A type of ground matter
and desired limits of detection of applied analytical method are
another very important parameters usually mentioned in this context. Potential sources of the sample contamination in the process
of cryogenic grinding of plant materials were examined by Engelsen
and Wibetoe [2]. Yoshinaga and Morita [4] assigned the material of a grinding vessels as the probable source of a hair sample
contamination by Al, Fe and Mg. No signicant contamination of
cryogenically homogenised samples of breakfast cereals by Zn and
Fe was detected by Gouveia at al. [8].
The aim of this work was to evaluate main sources of contamination in the process of the cryogenic grinding. The bre cellulose
was chosen as a convenient material for this study because of
its physical character (elastic bres) and chemical composition
(poor organic matrix with minimum trace elements). Contamination caused by metal parts of grinding vessel was studied as well as
cross-contamination by previously ground sample.
2. Experimental
2.1. Instrumentation
The cryogenic impact grinder with a self-contained liquid nitrogen bath (4-5l) Model 6750 Freezer Mill (Spex, Certiprep, USA)
operated at the liquid nitrogen temperature was used in order to
comminute samples. The pulverization of frozen samples was car-
255
256
Table 1
The working parameters of ICP-oa-TOF MS
Parameter
Value
Ion optics
Skimmer
Extraction
Z1
Y mean
Y deection
Z lens mean
Z lens deection
Lens body
1 050 V
1 300 V
700 V
455 V
4V
1400 V
40 V
180 V
Pulse shaping
Fill
Fill bias
Fill grid
Pushout grid
Pushout plate
Blanker
Spectral frequency
Reectron
40 V
0V
40 V
390 V
492 V
200 V
33 kHz
690 V
Detection
Multiplier gain
Ion threshold
Integration window
Measurement
Mode
2800 V
8.4 mV
Auto
Pulse
counting/analog
Sample
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
Number of cycles
Grinding time (min)
Re-cooling time (min)
Pre-cooling time (min)
Mean length of bres (m)
Median length of bres (m)
P99 (m)
3
2
2
3
42.1
37.2
117
3
2
2
5
49.9
44.7
132
3
2
2
10
44.1
35.9
132
3
2
2
15
45.5
40.0
149
2
3
3
15
59.7
48.5
185
1
6
15
73.5
58.4
322
Fig. 2. The ED XRF spectrum of material of impact bar and end stoppers.
257
Table 3
Contamination caused by grinding set (samples C1 C3 ) and cross-contamination caused by previously ground sample (samples C4 C9 )
Fe (g kg1 )
Cr (g kg1 )
Mn (g kg1 )
Cu (g kg1 )
Pb (g kg1 )
Ag (g kg1 )
74 2.4
71 3.1
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
C1
C2
C3
195 5.9
187 5.4
209 7.2
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
397 8.6
483 12
451 13
326 11
312 11
294 9.9
222 6.3
197 5.7
206 6.7
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
241 6.5
188 5.9
224 5.8
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
2146 66
2205 63
2035 58
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
<LOD
7.6
25.4
7.5
25.0
10.4
34.8
7.9
26.3
6.6
22.1
LOD (3 a )
LQ (10 a )
a
5.6
18.8
: standard deviation of ve replicate measurements of the lowest calibration standard solution by ICP-oa-TOF MS multiplied by dilution factor.
The concentration of Fe at that standard was 1 g L1 and concentrations of the other elements were 0.1 g L1 . A signicant content
of Fe on the level of quantication limit of ICP-oa-TOF method used
was observed at all ground cellulose samples (C1 C3 ). Lower concentrations of Fe on the level of the detection limit were found in
both ungrounded crude and pelletized cellulose samples. As can be
seen from the same concentrations of Fe found out in the crude and
the pelletized cellulose, no contamination by Fe can be connected
with the process of the pellet preparation. In this case, the detected
Fe is probably natural component of the cellulose matrix. On the
other hand, signicantly higher concentrations of Fe in the ground
samples pointed out the serious contamination from the process
of the cryogenic grinding. Next constituents of the grinding set Cr
and Mo was not detected neither in crude and pelletized cellulose,
neither in ground samples. The contamination by these elements in
the process of cryogenic grinding was hence considered to be negligible. Our results are inconsistent with that obtained by Goueya et
al. [8]. The same grinding tool (Model 6750 Freezer Mill from Spex
Certiprep, USA) was used for homogenisation of breakfast cereals in that work. Real samples were ground with a consequently
increasing time and the relation of Zn and Fe concentrations on the
duration of grinding step was evaluated. No contamination caused
by wearing of metal parts of the mill was detected. Incomparable
results were obtained probably through the difference in the study
258
4. Conclusion
Two main sources of sample contamination in the process of
cryogenic grinding were studiedthe contamination caused by
friction of a grinding set and cross-contamination caused by previously ground sample. In the rst case, the signicant contamination
by Fe on the level of hundreds of microgram per gram was observed.
Wearing of steel stoppers and an impact bar was not only one source
of contamination by Fe. This element was an important part of
cross-contamination by previous ground electro-waste sample as
well. In contrast to other cross-contaminants (Cu, Cr and Mn), the
replacing of a polycarbonate part of grinding set did not solve the
cross-contamination by Fe.
Acknowledgements