Affirmance and Oath TakingAffirmance and Oath Taking
C RUDEN defines affirmance as
the act of maintaining the truth of
a thing and oath-taking as the act
of making a solemn appeal to God
to witness the truth of a declaration.
The two aspects of the above sub-
ject are namely; first, scriptural and
secondly, legal.
We are forbidden to take the oath
as Jesus declares in Math. 5:34 and
35 when He says; "I say unto you,
swear not at all; neither by heaven,
for it is God’s throne, nor by the
earth, for it is His footstool; neither
by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the
great King.” And further in James
5:12, where it is written, “But above
all things, my brethren, swear not
neither by heaven nor by the earth,
neither by any other oath; but let your
yea be yea; and your nay be nay; lest
ye fall into condemnation.” In Gen-
esis 14:22; Deut. 32:40, and Rev.
10:5 we find that the raising of the
hand is an integral part of the oath-
taking and is thus inseparable in
many cases from the oath proper.
As to affirmance; wisdom and pre-
caution must be exercised since the
nature of the statement by which you
give affirmance can make one partaker
in an oath. Upon the reading of the
oath by the administerer of such as
is the method of procedure when af-
firmance is used, one should meditate
before giving affirmance. Such an
oath as one used at one period in
history and which the Quakers, re-
fused to make affirmance to was as
follows: “I promise to tell the truth
and nothing but the truth, so help
me God at His holy dome” (day of
judgment). This would positively
be displeasing to God even in af-
firmance only, since it would signify
that it was agreeable to the person
affirming and such an oath would be
asking God to break His own word
and alter His divine plan. However,
this oath is not commonly found in
Governmental oath of this present
day.
ee let us consider the legal
aspect—
The federal Statute as to affirmance
(Title 1. Sec. 1 of the Code of these
United States of America) says; “A
requirement of an oath shall be
deemed as complied with by making
affirmance in judicial form.”
Since nothing is mentioned rela-
tive to the necessity of raising of
the hand it cannot be required. This
statement is in full effect at the pres-
ent time, according to the statement
made by the Clerk of the Federal
Court.
To erase the fact in any believer's
mind of the attitude which those ac-
cepting affirmance may take to those
who hold our views, the information
is that—any who volunteer to raise
the hand are considered inconsistent.
If at any time, through ignorance
of the law on the part of an admin-
isterer of an oath, should he ask the
affirmer to raise the hand it would
only be necessary to quote the above
Statute and the place wherein it can
be found in the Code of the United
States.Published by
APOSTOLIC CHRISTIAN PUBLISHING COMPANY
1327 W. Colvin Street
Syracuse, New York 13207
Free copies available