Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
11
No. 3
Sep. 2004
Key words: railway planning; environmental impact assessment; geographic information system; graph overlay
method
INTRODUCTION
Document code: A
Foundation item: Project(2002F008; 2003F012) supported by the Science and Technology Research and Development Planning Projects of
W U Xiatrping, et al: Comprehensive assessment method for environmental impact oI railway based on GIS
such as sound and movie, to show and further analyze environmental informationc13'143.
2.1
Basic principle
Firstly, divide the railway-passed district into
several units and sets up the database with the environmental information reflecting the impact on
ecology, noise, air and so on. Secondly, make the
environmental vulnerability grade maps for each
environmental assessment factor and overlay them
with the geographic map of the study area by using
buffer analysis and overlay analysis to obtain the
overlaid environmental vulnerability grade map
(usually called composite map), then design several railway alignments on the map and carry out the
comprehensive environmental impact assessment.
Finally, according to the assessment result, the
optimal alignment whose impact on environment is
the least could be selected out ['5'163.
2.2 Process of GIS based map overlay method
2. 2. 1 Selecting assessment factors and estimating weights of assessment factors
Assessment factors are determined by different railways. It is essential that a certain factor
should be assessed in detail if it has longtime, obvious, unrecoverable or accumulative impact on environment, or can be neglected if it has small or no
impact. In specific environmental impact assessment, factors should be selected first and the system structure of factors should be determined.
Since many factors are involved in a practical
railway environmental assessment, it is difficult to
define the weights of all factors simultaneously.
Analysis hierarchy process ( A H P ) digitizes the decision-maker's thoughts and makes some brief comparison, judgment and calculation among the factors to obtain their weights. In case of many assessment factors, it is more accurate to estimate
the weights by this method.
2.2.2 Making vulnerability grade map
For each assessment factor, the criterion vulnerability grade is determined by its own attribution. In this paper, the vulnerability grade is divided into 5 levels, with 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 respectively
standing for lower, low, middle, upper and high.
According to its grade, the vulnerability grade map
for each assessment factor can be made and stored
in the GIS map database.
2. 2.3 Overlaying vulnerability grade map of each
assessment factor to obtain composite one
The environmental vulnerability grade map for
each factor in the studied area is overlaid to obtain
the overlaid vulnerability grade map, in the overlaid environmental vulnerability grade map, the ith
341
XZdliiaj
(1)
j=t
where m is the number of factors whose vulnerability grade map is overlaid, ai is the weight of the
j t h assessment factor and l 0 is the vulnerability
grade of j t h factor in ith polygon, usually, l 0 ----1,
2, 3, 4, 5. The ith ~olygonal attribute of vulnerability grade L~ is ex ,ressed as follows:
"1,
ViE
2,
V,E El,2)
VIE[-2,3)
Li = , 3 ,
4,
[-0,1)
(2)
v,E r3,4)
V,E [4,5)
5,
V~ and L~ are stored in GIS attribute database,
and the vulnerability grade of the composite map
can be visualized by various colors.
2.2.4 Determining optimal corridor of least environmental vulnerability
The optimal corridor of least environmental
vulnerability is composed of polygons having small
grade attribute value. Railway alignments have
least environmental impact while they pass the corridor.
2.2.5 Designing railway alignments
In the optimal corridor of the least environmental vulnerability, several alignments can be designed, all of which are not only economical, but
also feasible in technology. The optimal corridor is
useful in the design of railway alignments.
2.2.6 Selecting optimal railway alignments
Assessment value E~ of each railway alignment
can be calculated by the following formula:
n
Ek = ~_aAkj Vki
(3)
j=l
CASE STUDY
342
,Journal CSUT
v i d e s a n e w w a y to a s s e s s t h e r a i l w a y e n v i r o n m e n t
i m p a c t a n d p r o m o t e s t h e m u t u a l c o r r e s p o n d e n c e of
railway construction and environment protection.
REFERENCES
[1]
Fig. 1
:2!
[31
Fig. 2
O v e r l a i d m a p of r a i l w a y a l i g n m e n t s and
environmental vulnerability grade
Table 1
E n v i r o n m e n t a l a t t r i b u t e d a t a of
geographic map
Factor
Air
N o i s e Ecology
Weight
0.22
0. 28
Table 2
0.20
~5]
Landscape
0. 30
[6]
R e s u l t s of a t t r i b u t e d a t a of a l i g n m e n t 1
Name of polygons
Vi
Area/mz
School
:
4.28
:
3 927.16
:
Orchard
2.28
517.23
Table 3
[-7]
[8]
R e s u l t s of a t t r i b u t e d a t a of a l i g n m e n t 2
Name of polygons
Vi
Area/mz
Kale yard
1.80
3 251.15
[-9]
Orchard
1.80
527.23
[10]
A c c o r d i n g to T a b l e s 2 a n d 3, t h e a s s e s s m e n t
v a l u e w a s c a l c u l a t e d . T h e a s s e s s m e n t v a l u e s of
each a l i g n m e n t s 1 a n d 2 a r e r e s p e c t i v e l y 385 4 2 4 . 1 8
m z , 493 6 2 1 . 1 7 m z , h e n c e , a l i g n m e n t 1 is a b e t t e r
one w h o s e i m p a c t on e n v i r o n m e n t is t h e less.
4
[4]
CONCLUSIONS
1) W i t h t h e G I S f u n c t i o n s of s p a t i a l a n a l y s i s ,
s u c h as o v e r l a y a n a l y s i s a n d b u f f e r a n a l y s i s , a n d
f u n c t i o n s of h a n d l i n g a t t r i b u t e d a t a , t h e G I S b a s e d
map overlay method overcomes the shortcomings
of t h e e x i s t i n g m a p o v e r l a y m e t h o d .
2) A m o n g so m a n y r a i l w a y e n v i r o n m e n t a l impact assessment methods, the GIS based map overlay m e t h o d is one of t h e m o s t effective m e t h o d s . It
can e f f i c i e n t l y select o u t t h e b e s t a l i g n m e n t w h i c h
h a s t h e l e a s t i m p a c t on e n v i r o n m e n t .
3) A s a r e a s o n a b l e c o m p r e h e n s i v e a s s e s s m e n t
method, the GIS based map overlay method pro-
[-11]
El2]
[13]
[141
[151
[16]
WU Xiao-ping, CHEN Xiu-fang. Research on planning and evaluation for track traffic under China's sustainable development strategy I-J]. Engineering Sciences, 2004, 2(1): 5 9 - 6 4 .
CHEN Feng. Study on Optimal Selection of Route
Alignment for High-speed Railway Based on Environmental Impact JR1. Beijing: Northern Jiaotong University, 2001 : 35 - 62. (in Chinese)
WU Xiao-ping. Research on Planning and Evaluating
Method for Track Traffic under China's Sustainable
Development Strategy ED1. Changsha: School of Civil
and Architectural Engineering, Central South University, 2003. (in Chinese)
KAN Shu-yu, WANG Lian-zi, ZENG Xue-gui, et al.
The Theory and Technique of Railway Design [M].
Beijing: China Railway Publishing House, 1993. 1 55. (in Chinese)
HAO Ying. The Design of Railway Location EM].
Beijing: China Railway Publishing House, 1998. 26 63. (in Chinese)
Mariano B. Transport and the environment: can technology provide the answers? [J]. Energy Policy,
1996, 24(8) : 685 - 687.
ZHAN Zhen-yan. The Modern Theory and Method for
the Design of Railway Alignment Selection [M]. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House, 1998. 56 88. (in Chinese)
WU Xiao-ping, WU Jan, SUN Rui-yi, et al. Multipleobjective decision-making system and applications
study for railway line schemes [J]. Chinese Railway,
2001, 5(1) : 2 4 - 26. (in Chinese)
McHarg I. Design With Nature l-M1. New York: Nature History Press, 1969. 22 - 37.
Leopold L B, Clarke F E, Hansaw B B, et al. A procedure for evaluating environmental impact [J]. Geological Survey Circular, 1971, 64(5) : 1 - 25.
Eleni S, Virginia R. A spatial framework for environmental impact assessment and route optimization
l-J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Transport, 2002, 153(1): 4 3 - 5 2 .
Salah S, Mounia B, Isam K. GIS platform for multicriteria evaluation of route alignments EJ]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1999, 125(2): 144- 151.
Annoni A, Smits P. Main problems in building European environmental spatial data[-J]. Remote Sense,
2003, 24(20): 3 8 8 7 - 3 902.
Goksel C, Seker D Z, Kabdasli S. Prediction of lagoons'
natural conditions using satellite data and GIS EJ]. Environ Sei Heal A, 2003,38 (8): 1 669 - 1 679.
LI Xiu-gang, WANG Wei, LI Fang, et al. GIS based
map overlay method for comprehensive assessment of
road environmental impact FJ]. Transport and Environment, 1999, 4(3): 147-158.
Dawson R W, Li B G. A GIS based road traffic noise
prediction model [J]. Applied Acoustics, 2002, 63
(6) : 679- 691.
(Edited by YANG You-ping)