Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Name:
Registration No:
Learning Center:
VINAY KUMAR
1402000509
SYSTEMS DOMAIN PRIVATE LIMITED
2862
Course:
MBA
Subject:
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Semester:
Subject Code:
Date of submission:
Marks awarded:
SECOND
MB0045
________________________________________
________________________________________
Signature of Coordinator
Evaluator
Signature of Center
Signature of
are desirable, these two are in conflicting tasks. It is, therefore, one of the
important functions of the financial management to constitute a dividend
policy which can balance these two contradictory view points and allocate
the reasonable amount of profits after tax between retained earnings and
dividend. All of this is based on formulation of a good dividend policy.
After solving, the doubling time formula shows that Jacques would double his
money within 138.98 months, or 11.58 years.
As stated earlier, another approach to the doubling time formula that could
be used with this example would be to calculate the annual percentage yield,
or effective annual rate, and use it as r. The annual percentage yield on 6%
Present Value (PV) is a formula used in Finance that calculates the present
day value of an amount that is received at a future date. The premise of the
equation is that there is "time value of money".
Time value of money is the concept that receiving something today is worth
more than receiving the same item at a future date. The presumption is that
it is preferable to receive $100 today than it is to receive the same amount
one year from today, but what if the choice is between $100 present day or
$106 a year from today? A formula is needed to provide a quantifiable
comparison between an amount today and an amount at a future time, in
terms of its present day value.
When we solve for PV, she would need $95.24 today in order to reach $100
one year from now at a rate of 5% simple interest.
Solution:
The generalised formula for shorter compounding periods is:
Fv(n) = PV(1+i/m)^mXn
Where, FVn= future value after n years
PV = cash flow today
i = nominal interest rate per annum
m = number of times compounding is done during a year
n = number of years for which compounding is done
M= 12/3 (quarterly compounding)
1000(1+0.10/4)^4*2
1000(1+0.10/4)^8
Rs 1218
The amount of rs 1000 after 2 years would be Rs 1218.
To see how operating leverage works, let's assume Company XYZ sold
1,000,000 widgets for $12 each. It has $10,000,000 of fixed
costs (equipment, salaried personnel, etc.). It only costs $0.10 per unit to
make each widget.
Using this information and the formula above, we can calculate that
Company XYZ's operating leverage is:
Operating Leverage = [1,000,000 x ($12 - $0.10)] / 1,000,000 x ($12 - $0.10)
- $10,000,000 = $11,900,000/$1,900,000 = 6.26 or 626%
This means that a 10% increase in revenues should yield a 62.6% increase
in operating income (10% * 6.26).
Why it Matters:
In a sense, operating leverage is a means to calculating a company's
breakeven point. However, it's also clear from the formula that companies
with high operating leverage ratios can essentially make more money from
incremental revenues than other companies, because they don't have to
increase costs proportionately to make those sales. Accordingly, companies
with high operating leverage ratios are poised to reap more benefits from
good marketing, economic pickups, or other conditions that tend to boost
sales.
Likewise, however, companies with high operating leverage are more
vulnerable to declines inrevenue, whether caused by macroeconomic events,
poor decision-making, etc.
It is important to note that some industries require higher fixed costs than
others. This is why comparing operating leverage is generally most
meaningful among companies within the same industry, and the definition of
a "high" or "low" ratio should be made within this context.
b) Financial Leverage: Financial leverage is the amount of debt that an
entity uses to buy more assets. This is done to avoid investing an
organization's own equity capital in such purchases.
The financial leverage formula is measured as the ratio of total debt to total
assets. As the proportion of debt to assets increases, so too does the amount
of financial leverage. Financial leverage is favorable when the uses to which
debt can be put generate returns greater than the interest expense
associated with the debt. Many companies use financial leverage rather than
acquiring more equity capital, which could reduce the earnings per share of
existing shareholders.
Example Able Company uses $1,000,000 of its own cash to buy a factory,
which generates $150,000 of annual profits. The company is not using
financial leverage at all, since it incurred no debt to buy the factory.
Baker Company uses $100,000 of its own cash and a loan of $900,000 to buy
a similar factory, which also generates a $150,000 annual profit. Baker is
using financial leverage to generate a profit of $150,000 on a cash
investment of $100,000, which is a 150% return on its investment.
Baker's new factory has a bad year, and generates a loss of $300,000, which
is triple the amount of its original investment.
Formula: Financial leverage=Operating Income/ Net Income
c) Combined leverage : This leverage shows the relationship between a
change in sales & the corresponding variation in taxable income. If the
management feels that a certain percentage change in sale would result in
percentage change to taxable income they would like to know the level or
degree of change & hence they adopt this leverage.
The formula which is used to calculate this is as followsDegree of combined leverage = Degree of operating leverage * Degree of
financial leverage.
4. Explanation of factors affecting capital structure
Ans: Factors affecting capital structure
(1) Cash Flow Position:
While making a choice of the capital structure the future cash flow position
should be kept in mind. Debt capital should be used only if the cash flow
position is really good because a lot of cash is needed in order to make
payment of interest and refund of capital.
(2) Interest Coverage Ratio-ICR: With the help of this ratio an effort is
made to find out how many times the EBIT is available to the payment of
interest. The capacity of the company to use debt capital will be in direct
proportion to this ratio.
(3) Debt Service Coverage Ratio-DSCR:
This ratio removes the weakness of ICR. This shows the cash flow position of
the company.
This ratio tells us about the cash payments to be made (e.g., preference
dividend, interest and debt capital repayment) and the amount of cash
available. Better ratio means the better capacity of the company for debt
payment. Consequently, more debt can be utilised in the capital structure.
(4) Return on Investment-ROI:
The greater return on investment of a company increases its capacity to
utilise more debt capital.
(5) Cost of Debt:
The capacity of a company to take debt depends on the cost of debt. In case
the rate of interest on the debt capital is less, more debt capital can be
utilised and vice versa.
(6) Tax Rate:
The rate of tax affects the cost of debt. If the rate of tax is high, the cost of
debt decreases. The reason is the deduction of interest on the debt capital
from the profits considering it a part of expenses and a saving in taxes.
Technological risk : The changes in technology affect all the firms not
capable of adapting themselves in emerging into a new technology.
Example The best example is the case of firms manufacturing motor cycles
with two stroke engines. When technological innovations replaced the two
stroke engines by the four stroke engines, those firms which could not adapt
to new technology had to shut down their operations.
The surging crude oil prices coupled with the governments delay in taking
decision on pricing of petro products eroded the profitability of oil marketing
companies in public sector like Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited.
Another example is the impact of US sub-prime crisis on certain segments
of Indian economy.
The changes in international political scenario also affected the operations of
certain firms.
Market risk
Factors like inflation, changes in interest rates, and changing general
economic conditions affect all firms and all industries. Firms cannot diversify
this risk in the normal course of business.
There are many techniques of incorporation of risk perceived in the
evaluation of capital budgeting proposals. They differ in their approach and
methodology as far as incorporation of risk in the evaluation process is
concerned.
a) NPV can be computed using risk free rate.
Year
Cash Flows(in
flows) in RS
PV factor at
10%
PV ofCash Flows
(inflow)
1
2
3
4
40000
50000
15000
30000
PV of Cash
inflows
PV of Cash
Outflows
NPV
0.909
0.826
0.751
0.683
36360
41300
11265
20490
109415
-100000
9415
Cash Flows(in
flows) in RS
PV factor at
20%
PV ofCash Flows
(inflow)
1
2
3
4
40000
50000
15000
30000
PV of Cash
inflows
0.833
0.694
0.579
0.482
33320
34700
8685
14460
91165
PV of Cash
Outflows
NPV
-100000
-8835
Most firms try to minimise the sum of the cost of holding cash and the cost of
converting marketable securities to cash.
Baumols cash management model helps in determining a firms optimum
cash balance under certainty. As per the model, cash and inventory
management problems are one and the same.
There are certain assumptions that are made in the model. They are as
follows:
1. The firm is able to forecast its cash requirements with certainty and
receive a specific amount at regular intervals.
2. The firms cash payments occur uniformly over a period of time i.e. a
steady rate of cash outflows.
3. The opportunity cost of holding cash is known and does not change
over time. Cash holdings incur an opportunity cost in the form of
opportunity foregone.
4. The firm will incur the same transaction cost whenever it converts
securities to cash. Each transaction incurs a fixed and variable cost.
For example, let us assume that the firm sells securities and starts with
a cash balance of C rupees. When the firm spends cash, its cash
balance starts decreasing and reaches zero. The firm again gets back
its money by selling marketable securities. As the cash balance
decreases gradually, the average cash balance will be: C/2. This can be
shown in following figure:
.
The firm incurs a cost known as holding cost for maintaining the cash
balance. It is known as opportunity cost, the return inevitable on the
marketable securities. If the opportunity cost is k, then the firms holding
cost for maintaining an average cash balance is as follows:
Holding cost = k (C/2)
Whenever the firm converts its marketable securities to cash, it incurs a cost
known as transaction cost. Total number of transactions in a particular year
will be total funds required (T), divided by the cash balance (C) i.e. T/C. The
assumption here is that the cost per transaction is constant. If the cost per
transaction is c, then the total transaction cost will be:
Transaction cost = c (T/C)
The total annual cost of the demand for cash will be:
Total cost = k (C/2) + c (T/C)