California State Bar Act: Business & Professions Code § 6106 moral turpitude. "The commission of any act involving moral turpitude, dishonesty or corruption, whether the act is committed in the course of his relations as an attorney or otherwise, and whether the act is a felony or misdemeanor or not, constitutes cause for disbarment or suspension."
The common definition of an act of moral turpitude is one that is contrary to honesty and good morals. It is an act of baseness, vileness or depravity in the private and social duties which a man owes to his fellow men, or to society in general, contrary to the accepted and customary rule of right and duty between man and man. Under state law, moral turpitude includes acts of dishonesty, including intentional misrepresentation or concealment of material facts, false statements, and half-truths. There is no distinction among concealment, omissions, half-truths, and overtly false statements.
Under Business & Professions Code § 6100, the California Supreme Court retains ultimate authority over lawyers in the state. "Nothing in the article limits the inherent power of the Supreme Court to discipline, including to summarily disbar, any attorney."
Court watchdogs and whistleblowers throughout California allege, and have documented that attorneys routinely engage in acts of moral turpitude without accountability or consequences. For example, Sacramento Superior Court whistleblowers allege and have documented that local family law attorneys who also work as part-time judges in the same court operate a RICO racketeering enterprise involving collusion and kickbacks between judges and attorneys.
Among other crimes, the Sacramento County Family Court criminal organization deprives the public of the federally protected right to honest government services, according to watchdogs. For more information, visit this URL: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/p/temporary-judges.html
For more about attorney misconduct and ethics: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/p/the-oligarchy.html
Título original
Moral Turpitude: California Business & Professions Code § 6106 - California State Bar Association - Moral Turpitude Defined and Applied - California Attorney Misconduct Legal Reference - Business & Professions Code § 6106 Commission of Any Act Involving Moral Turpitude, Dishonesty or Corruption - California Supreme Court Justice Leondra R. Kruger, Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuellar, Justice Goodwin H. Liu, Justice Carol A. Corrigan, Justice Ming W. Chin, Justice Kathryn M. Werdegar, Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye - California Business and Professions Code § 6100 Supreme Court Summary Disbarment
California State Bar Act: Business & Professions Code § 6106 moral turpitude. "The commission of any act involving moral turpitude, dishonesty or corruption, whether the act is committed in the course of his relations as an attorney or otherwise, and whether the act is a felony or misdemeanor or not, constitutes cause for disbarment or suspension."
The common definition of an act of moral turpitude is one that is contrary to honesty and good morals. It is an act of baseness, vileness or depravity in the private and social duties which a man owes to his fellow men, or to society in general, contrary to the accepted and customary rule of right and duty between man and man. Under state law, moral turpitude includes acts of dishonesty, including intentional misrepresentation or concealment of material facts, false statements, and half-truths. There is no distinction among concealment, omissions, half-truths, and overtly false statements.
Under Business & Professions Code § 6100, the California Supreme Court retains ultimate authority over lawyers in the state. "Nothing in the article limits the inherent power of the Supreme Court to discipline, including to summarily disbar, any attorney."
Court watchdogs and whistleblowers throughout California allege, and have documented that attorneys routinely engage in acts of moral turpitude without accountability or consequences. For example, Sacramento Superior Court whistleblowers allege and have documented that local family law attorneys who also work as part-time judges in the same court operate a RICO racketeering enterprise involving collusion and kickbacks between judges and attorneys.
Among other crimes, the Sacramento County Family Court criminal organization deprives the public of the federally protected right to honest government services, according to watchdogs. For more information, visit this URL: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/p/temporary-judges.html
For more about attorney misconduct and ethics: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/p/the-oligarchy.html
Direitos autorais:
Public Domain
Formatos disponíveis
Baixe no formato PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
California State Bar Act: Business & Professions Code § 6106 moral turpitude. "The commission of any act involving moral turpitude, dishonesty or corruption, whether the act is committed in the course of his relations as an attorney or otherwise, and whether the act is a felony or misdemeanor or not, constitutes cause for disbarment or suspension."
The common definition of an act of moral turpitude is one that is contrary to honesty and good morals. It is an act of baseness, vileness or depravity in the private and social duties which a man owes to his fellow men, or to society in general, contrary to the accepted and customary rule of right and duty between man and man. Under state law, moral turpitude includes acts of dishonesty, including intentional misrepresentation or concealment of material facts, false statements, and half-truths. There is no distinction among concealment, omissions, half-truths, and overtly false statements.
Under Business & Professions Code § 6100, the California Supreme Court retains ultimate authority over lawyers in the state. "Nothing in the article limits the inherent power of the Supreme Court to discipline, including to summarily disbar, any attorney."
Court watchdogs and whistleblowers throughout California allege, and have documented that attorneys routinely engage in acts of moral turpitude without accountability or consequences. For example, Sacramento Superior Court whistleblowers allege and have documented that local family law attorneys who also work as part-time judges in the same court operate a RICO racketeering enterprise involving collusion and kickbacks between judges and attorneys.
Among other crimes, the Sacramento County Family Court criminal organization deprives the public of the federally protected right to honest government services, according to watchdogs. For more information, visit this URL: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/p/temporary-judges.html
For more about attorney misconduct and ethics: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/p/the-oligarchy.html
Direitos autorais:
Public Domain
Formatos disponíveis
Baixe no formato PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd
"family member" means a spouse, parent, sibling, child, uncle, aunt,
niece, nephew, cousin, grandparent, or grandchild related by blood,
adoption, marriage, or domestic partnership.
California Business & Professions Code
6104. Corruptly or wilfully and without authority appearing as attorney for a party to an action or proceeding constitutes a cause for disbarment or suspension.
6105. Lending his name to be used as attorney by another person who
is not an attorney constitutes a cause for disbarment or suspension.
6106. The commission of any act involving moral turpitude,
dishonesty or corruption, whether the act is committed in the course of his relations as an attorney or otherwise, and whether the act is a felony or misdemeanor or not, constitutes a cause for disbarment or suspension. If the act constitutes a felony or misdemeanor, conviction thereof in a criminal proceeding is not a condition precedent to disbarment or suspension from practice therefor.
6106.1. Advocating the overthrow of the Government of the United
States or of this State by force, violence, or other unconstitutional means, constitutes a cause for disbarment or suspension.
6106.2. (a) It shall constitute cause for the imposition of
discipline of an attorney within the meaning of this chapter for an attorney to engage in any conduct in violation of Section 55.3 of the Civil Code. (b) Commencing January 1, 2013, it shall constitute cause for the imposition of discipline of an attorney within the meaning of this chapter for an attorney to engage in any conduct in violation of subdivision (b) or (c) of Section 55.31, or paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) or subdivision (b) of Section 55.32 of the Civil Code, or paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 55.32 of the Civil Code as provided in subdivision (c) of that section. (c) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2016, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2016, deletes or extends that date. 6106.2. (a) It shall constitute cause for the imposition of discipline of an attorney within the meaning of this chapter for an attorney to engage in any conduct in violation of Section 55.3, subdivision (b) or (c) of Section 55.31, or paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) or subdivision (b) of Section 55.32 of the Civil Code. (b) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2016.
6106.3. (a) It shall constitute cause for the imposition of
discipline of an attorney within the meaning of this chapter for an attorney to engage in any conduct in violation of Section 2944.6 or 2944.7 of the Civil Code. (b) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2017, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that is enacted before January 1, 2017, deletes or extends that date.
6106.3. (a) It shall constitute cause for the imposition of
discipline of an attorney within the meaning of this chapter for an attorney to engage in any conduct in violation of Section 2944.6 of the Civil Code. (b) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2017.
Motion to Dismiss for Loss or Destruction of Evidence (Trombetta) Filed July 5, 2018 by Defendant Susan Bassi: People v. Bassi - Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen, Deputy District Attorney Alison Filo - Defense Attorney Dmitry Stadlin - Judge John Garibaldi - Santa Clara County Superior Court Presiding Judge Patricia Lucas - Silicon Valley California -
California Judicial Branch News Service - Investigative Reporting Source Material & Story Ideas
Moral Turpitude: Concealment, Half-Truth, False Statement of Facts - No Distinction - California Compendium on Professional Responsibility State Bar Association -Moral Turpitude Defined and Applied - California Attorney Misconduct Legal Reference - Business & Professions Code § 6106 Commission of Any Act Involving Moral Turpitude, Dishonesty or Corruption - California Supreme Court Justice Leondra R. Kruger, Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuellar, Justice Goodwin H. Liu, Justice Carol A. Corrigan, Justice Ming W. Chin, Justice Kathryn M. Werdegar, Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye - California Business and Professions Code § 6100 Supreme Court Summary Disbarment
California Judicial Branch News Service - Investigative Reporting Source Material & Story Ideas
Opposition to Murgia Motion to Compel Discovery Filed August 9, 2018 by Plaintiff People of the State of California: People v. Bassi - Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen, Deputy District Attorney Alison Filo - Defense Attorney Dmitry Stadlin - Judge John Garibaldi - Santa Clara County Superior Court Presiding Judge Patricia Lucas - Silicon Valley California -
California Judicial Branch News Service - Investigative Reporting Source Material & Story Ideas
Definition: Unauthorized Practice of Law in California - Legal Reference Treatise - California Attorney General - State Bar of California Office of Chief Trial Counsel - Jayne Kim Chief Trial Counsel California State Bar
California Judicial Branch News Service - Investigative Reporting Source Material & Story Ideas
Moral Turpitude: Misleading the Court - California Compendium on Professional Responsibility State Bar Association -Moral Turpitude Defined and Applied - California Attorney Misconduct Legal Reference - Business & Professions Code § 6106 Commission of Any Act Involving Moral Turpitude, Dishonesty or Corruption - California Supreme Court Justice Leondra R. Kruger, Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuellar, Justice Goodwin H. Liu, Justice Carol A. Corrigan, Justice Ming W. Chin, Justice Kathryn M. Werdegar, Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye California Business and Professions Code § 6100 Supreme Court Summary Disbarment
California Judicial Branch News Service - Investigative Reporting Source Material & Story Ideas
Duties of Attorney: Fundamental Rules of Ethics-Common Honesty - California Compendium on Professional Responsibility State Bar Association -Moral Turpitude Defined and Applied - California Attorney Misconduct Legal Reference - Business & Professions Code § 6106 Commission of Any Act Involving Moral Turpitude, Dishonesty or Corruption - California Supreme Court Justice Leondra R. Kruger, Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuellar, Justice Goodwin H. Liu, Justice Carol A. Corrigan, Justice Ming W. Chin, Justice Kathryn M. Werdegar, Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye - California Business and Professions Code § 6100 Supreme Court Summary Disbarment
California Judicial Branch News Service - Investigative Reporting Source Material & Story Ideas
"GENERAL ORDER RE: EXPRESSIVE ACTIVITY" Restricting Free Speech Outside Santa Clara County Courthouses Issued by Presiding Judge Patricia Lucas on February 22, 2017 - Civil Rights - Free Speech - Freedom of Association - Constitutional Rights
California Judicial Branch News Service - Investigative Reporting Source Material & Story Ideas
Judge Bruce Mills Misconduct Prosecution by the Commission on Judicial Performance: Report of the Special Masters: Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law - Contra Costa County Superior Court Inquiry Concerning Judge Bruce Clayton Mills No. 201
California Judicial Branch News Service - Investigative Reporting Source Material & Story Ideas
Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (Trumbetta) Filed August 9, 2018 by Plaintiff People of the State of California:: People v. Bassi - Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen, Deputy District Attorney Alison Filo - Defense Attorney Dmitry Stadlin - Judge John Garibaldi - Santa Clara County Superior Court Presiding Judge Patricia Lucas - Silicon Valley California -
California Judicial Branch News Service - Investigative Reporting Source Material & Story Ideas
Federal Criminal Indictment - US v. Judge Joseph Boeckmann - Wire Fraud, Honest Services Fraud, Travel Act, Witness Tampering - US District Court Eastern District of Arkansas
California Judicial Branch News Service - Investigative Reporting Source Material & Story Ideas