Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Conceptual Framework
Information
Persons
(CMIE)
Events
Goods
Ideas
Places
(software codes)
Services
Properties
(stocks / bonds)
Experience
(Walt Disney)
Low
High
Intangibility
Augmented
product
Expected
product
Generic
product
Core
product
Degrees of
product
differentiation
Value
Valuebased
based
Value
prices
prices
Price
Value of
the
marketing
offer
Products
Products
features & quality
features & quality
Services Mix
Services Mix
& quality
& quality
illustrative
Brands like
Prudential, Peerless
etc..
Product type : A group of items within a product line
that share one of several possible forms of the product.
Example: term life for Life insurance .
Abstract
Evolution
Concrete
HLL perspective
Product assortment
Product dynamics
Breadth
Length
Depth
Number
Number of
of
Total
Total number
number
of
of items
items the
the
company
company
carries
carries
Number
Number of
of
versions
versions
offered
offered of
of
each
each product
product
in
in the
the line
line
Closeness
Closeness of
of
end
end use,
use,
HLL:
Toothpaste
has close-up
as a brand
with Blue and
Red variants
HLL:
Detergent
manufacturing
process is the
same for all
brands
different
different
product
product lines
lines
HLL:
Detergents,
HLL:
Detergents
cosmetics,
Toiletries,
category, Surf
Food etc..
& Wheel
Consistency
production
production
etc.
etc.
High Return
Profit Maximizers
High Growth
Value Capturers
Returns to
Investment
Stalled Businesses
Low to Average
Return
Strategy
Markets
Existing
Existing
New
Market
penetration
Market
development
Product
development
Diversified
growth
Products
New
As a product manager there are several options one can look at to augment size of
business
A typical flow
Sales and
Profits (Rs)
Sales
Profits
Introduction
Growth
Maturity
Product
Development
Time
Losses/
Investments (Rs)
Decline
20
Cosmetics
18
Perfumes
Cosmetics
16
Market Growth @
14
12
Beauty clinics
10
Perfumes
Body deodorants
Beauty
clinics
6
Hair grooming
Body deodorants
Hair grooming
Soaps
10x
2.5x
Soaps
2x
1.5x
1x
0.4x
0.3x
0.2x
Relative Market
Share
2008
2005
0.1x
Upward stretch
Price
Strategy
Line filling
Why Line filling ?
1. The company may close all price
points for competitive entry
2. The company may capture buyers
with marginal price sensitivity
Downward stretch
Why Down market Stretch ?
New-to-theworld
products
(Iridium)
Additions to existing
product lines
(Extending length of
the line thro
variants)
Re-positioning
(Liril)
Improvements and
revisions of
existing products
(Product upgradesLaptops)
Product Effectiveness
Imitation
Improvement
Imitation
Maxima Watch
Anchor
Toothpaste
Innovation
Improvement
Titan Flip
Time
New products adoption is affected by the rate of innovation and the rate of imitation
Fixed
Population Size
Innovators
(Buyers)
Innovators
Influence
Imitators
Imitators
(Buyers)
Timing of Purchases by
Imitators
Timing of Purchases by
Innovators
Graphical Model
dxt = (a + bx )(N x )
t
t
dt
Cumulative Sales
of a Product
Fixed
Population Size
Time
xt
Population size
a,b
Constants to be determined.
The actual path of the curve will
depend on these constants
Aware?
50%
Available?
80%
Try?
40%
Repeat?
50%
Market Share
8%
Model Diagnostics
Trial rate
Low
High
High
Improve to
Prospect
Dominate
Shape up or
Ship out
Introspect to
Improve
Repeat
Low
Trial Dynamics
Market fact
You never get
everyone to try
100%
% Population
Trying (Trial)
Time
X Repeat Dynamics
100%
% Repeaters
Among Triers
(Repeat)
Time
= Share Dynamics!
100%
Market share movement over
time
Share =
(Trial x Repeat)
Time
Triers ( # Tt )
t
CTRt = P X (At, Dt)
end of period
100
#PCB
Target
market
Product class
buyers
100
Offers lost
purchasers (OLP)
# OLP = (1-P) X PCB
100
#PT
Potential Triers
# PT = P X # PCB
100
#Tmax
#T = {a + bP *(A,D)} *BASE
Time or Cum.
market spent
A = Share of adequately aware
D = Share of distribution support
P = share of buyers who prefer the product
over competing products
The break up of the variables in the trial rate estimation and cumulative trial rate
Cumulative
Trial rate
Time
Advertising
Min
Max
ITRt
Max
Lost
opportunity
Max index of
Trial rates
Distribution
Min
CTRt - CTRt - 1
Min index of
Trial rates
Lost
opportunity
No excuse
Closer examination
Expensive
Inferior quality
Cover it up
Superior quality
Cheaper
Leave it alone
Product Reputation,
Consumer Awareness
Creating reputation
Branding
A brand is name, term, sign, symbol or design or a combination of them used to signal
value and differentiate offerings
Corporate brands
Product brands
Tata,
Fevicol from
L&T etc
Pidilite
Umbrella brands
Single brands
Multi brands
Short term
performance
orientation
Difficulty
Difficulty in
in
differentiation
differentiation
Mature
Mature market
market
(Price
key
(Price key variable)
variable)
More
More sophisticated
sophisticated
&
&
increasing
increasing
competition
competition
Monopoly products
High
uniqueness
(Intel)
Jointly optimized
products Banking ,
Insurance
Product uniqueness
Low
uniqueness
Hig
h
Low
Product
Manager
Assistant
Product
manager
Triangular product
organizations
Product
Assistant
Product
Manager
Research
Manager
Communication
Manager
Common Pool
Horizontal product
management team
Research
manager
Communication
manager
Sales manager
Distribution
manager
Finance
manager
Du Ponts Model
Marketing manager
Specialized
Consumers
Home
furnishings
Nylon
Dacron
Product
manager
Products
Orlon
Rayon
Mens
wear
Womens
wear
Strategic areas
New uses or user segments: Can Kool-Aid be made to appeal teenagers, young adult singles, young adult parents,
and so on?
Innovative product differentiation: Can Kool-Aid be made in different versions such as low calorie or super-sweet?
Add new product lines: Can Kool-Aid name be used to launch a new soft-drink line?
Stimulate nonusers: Can elderly people be persuaded to try Kool-Aid?
Stimulate light users: Can children be reminded to drink Kool-Aid daily?
Increase amount used on each occasion: Can more Kool-Aid be put in each package at a higher price?
Close existing product and price gaps: Should new sizes of Kool-Aid be introduced?
Create new product-line elements: Should Kool-Aid introduce new flavors?
Expand distribution coverage: Can Kool-Aid distribution coverage be expanded to Middle East and the Far East?
Expand distribution intensity: Can the percentage of convenience stores in West India that carry Kool-Aid be
increased from 70 to 90 percent?
Expand distribution exposure: Can offers to the trade win more space for Kool-Aid?
Penetrate substitutes positions: Can consumers be convinced that Kool-Aid is better than any other soft drinks?
Penetrate direct competitors position(s): Can consumers of any other brands be convinced to switch to Kool-Aid?
End of Deck
Product Strategies
Start of Deck 2
Product Strategies
Product-positioning strategy
Product-repositioning strategy
Product-overlap strategy
Product-scope strategy
Product-design strategy
Product-elimination strategy
New-product strategy
Diversification strategy
Product Strategies
Product-positioning strategy
Conceptual
Procedure
The desired position for a product
following procedure
compared to competing
products
market segments
Product-positioning strategy
Six
Six different
different approaches
approaches to
to positioning
positioning are
are .. ..
By
By attribute
attribute (monotone
(monotone -- Speed
Speed // Petrol
Petrol consumption
consumption // non
non monotonemonotone- colour
colour of
of car
car ))
By
By price/quality
price/quality equation
equation (Value
(Value for
for moneymoney- MUL
MUL 800)
800)
With
With respect
respect to
to application
application (( Iodex
Iodex for
for pull
pull // sprain
sprain // joint
joint pain)
pain)
By
By product
product user
user (Crayon
(Crayon pens
pens from
from Camlin
Camlin for
for Kids)
Kids)
With
With respect
respect to
to product
product class
class (Blue
(Blue tooth
tooth enabled
enabled mobile
mobile phones
phones as
as non
non Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi phones)
phones)
With
With respect
respect to
to aa competitor
competitor (Pepsi
(Pepsi v/s
v/s Coke)
Coke)
Product-positioning strategy
Possibility of cannibalism
- Nokia phones in same product range
Product-repositioning strategy
Existing users
Sales
Repositioning
Blip
Repositioning
New users
Time
Product-overlap strategy
Price
Surfmatic
Surf excel
Perceived Quality
(Value)
Market expansion and better coverage are clear benefits for the marketer
to pursue a over lap strategy
Product-overlap strategy
Competing brands
Ways to operationalize
the strategy
Retailer brands
competing with
manufacturer brands
Private labeling
- Shoppers Stop
competing with
Stop with other
apparel wear
Example
Advantages
Operational
effectiveness
(scale economics)
Disadvantages
High risk
May not be effective
for growth
Multi product
Product system
Monopolization of
cross subsidization
the market
Over spread in
single category may
increase risk
economics
Product-Design Strategy
s Value to buyer t
Type
Example
Standard
Products
Standard
Products With
Modifications
Customized
Products
No change in
basic offering
No predetermined
basic offering
Car
Car
Dilip Chabaria
MUL 800
Product-Elimination Strategy
Strategy
Activity
Harvesting
- Reduce advertising
expenditure
- Low key sales promotion
- Reduce the price and dump
- E.g. Godrej Type writers
Line simplification
Total
Disinvestment
Low profitability
Stagnant or decline in sales
volume
Obsolescence
(Technology failures - PUF for refrigerators)
Improvement / Modification
Maturity Stage.
4Ps employed by competitors are
more effective.
Types of strategies:
Improvement/Modification.
Innovation.
Expensive
No excuse
Inferior
Closer examination
Superior
Cover it up
Leave it alone
Cheaper
Product Change Options
after Competitive Teardown- Kenichi Ohmae
Product
Newness
Product Innovation
Screening
Business analysis
Prototype
Test marketing
Commercialization
Market Opportunities
Low
Technical opportunities
Moderate
Heavy
High
Selective
Moderate
Low
High
Limited
support
Sales
Time
Product
development
Quality function
deployment
Alpha testing
(Lab test)
Beta testing
( Simulated
market condition
tests)
Market
testing
Estimate trial
First repeat
purchase,
Adoption, and
purchase
frequency
Commercialization
Product launch
The speed of information affects the rate of adoption for the new product.
Parafitt & Collins model on market share prediction on new product / brand
launch
Illustrative
Illustrative
R = Projected percentage
of those who tried and
will repurchase the brand
Markets
Existing
New
Concentric Diversification
Existing
Products
New
Horizontal Diversification
Technologically unrelated.
Conglomerate Diversification
No relationship in business
End of Deck 2