Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
The attached
copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research
and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
and sharing with colleagues.
Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or
licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party
websites are prohibited.
In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the
article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or
institutional repository. Authors requiring further information
regarding Elseviers archiving and manuscript policies are
encouraged to visit:
http://www.elsevier.com/copyright
Available at www.sciencedirect.com
http://www.elsevier.com/locate/biombioe
Departamento de Ingeniera Rural y Agroalimentaria, Camino de Vera s/n. 46022 Valencia, Spain
Departamento de Produccion Vegetal, Universidad Politecnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera s/n. 46022 Valencia, Spain
article info
abstract
Article history:
This research quantified the available residual biomass obtained from pruning olive trees.
The additional biomass quantified could be used as a source of energy or as raw material for
the wood industry and would provide additional income for fruit producers and also a more
18 April 2011
sustainable system. Several factors were analyzed: Variety, aim of the pruning, age of the
plants, size of the plantation, crop yield and irrigation. Regression models were also calcu-
lated to predict the weight of dry biomass obtained per tree and tonnes of dry biomass
obtained per hectare according to the significant factors. These equations could implement
Keywords:
logistic planning as the Borvemar model, which defines a logistics network for supplying bio-
Borvemar model
energy systems. Olive tree varieties were classified into two groups for annual pruning: high
Biomass supply
residual biomass productivity (average yield 10.5 kg dry biomass tree1) and low productivity
Biomass logistics
(average yield 3.5 kg dry biomass tree1). Some varieties are in transition between the two
Biomass assessment
groups. There are no differences in biennial pruning, reaching an average residual biomass of
Ligneous biomass
33 kg tree1. This means that in Mediterranean areas the residual biomass from olive pruning
Energy wood
reaches an average 1.31 t ha1 in annual pruning and 3.02 t ha1 in biennial pruning.
2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1.
Introduction
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: borvemar@dmta.upv.es (B. Velazquez-Mart).
0961-9534/$ e see front matter 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.04.042
2.
3209
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 3 2 0 8 e3 2 1 7
Number
of levels
Levels
Variety
12
Fruit yield
Age
Aim of pruning
Pruning intensity
Irrigation
temperature of 17 C and relative humidity of 35%; and stovedried at 105 C. Daily measurements of both types were
carried out until the weight of the samples was stabilized.
3.1.
3.
Annual
Pruning
Biennial
Pruning
Arbequina
Blanqueta
Cornicabra
Frantoio
Grossal
Manzanilla
Picual
Royal
Serrana
Villalonga
Cornicabra
Farga
Manzanilla
Marons
Morrat
Regnes
Royal
Number
sampled
trees
127
128
126
124
125
127
132
123
128
129
125
126
131
125
123
120
123
kg biomass with
leaves tree1
kg biomass without
leaves tree1
20.651
28.765
16.254
8.006
4.399
37.800
39.091
9.850
33.645
15.218
52.000
131.41
79.700
172.22
111.283
78.173
43.100
10.876
14.771
8.403
4.239
2.174
19.443
20.309
5.192
17.294
7.167
26.384
67.439
41.205
89.138
57.433
40.315
22.183
6.271
8.735
4.936
2.431
1.336
11.479
11.871
2.991
10.218
4.621
15.792
39.907
24.204
52.301
33.795
23.740
13.089
1.003
1.549
0.589
0.724
0.371
2.050
1.317
0.437
2.838
1.540
1.381
2.985
3.530
4.590
2.948
1.727
1.309
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 3 2 0 8 e3 2 1 7
Average weight of
damp wood t ha1
Stn. Dev.
dry weight per ha
Annual
Biennial
2.312
4.520
1.504
2.646
1.305
3.025
0.883
1.555
3.2.
The most common olive tree growing spaces are 88 m2,
1010 m2 and 1212 m2 and these were the three sizes
studied. The categories chosen were: Lower than 66 m2(num.
trees 710, num. plots 79), between 66 and 102 m2 (num. trees
714, num. plots 79), and greater than 102 m2 (num. trees 718,
num. plots 80). In Fig. 3, the result obtained in the ANOVA LSD
intervals are depicted. When the residual biomass obtained in
annual pruning was evaluated, significant differences did not
exist for the sizes studied; nevertheless, in biennial pruning
we found that growing spaces greater than 103 m2 produced
Fig. 3 e LSD intervals at 95% level of confidence in the influence of plantation size in residual biomass generated by pruning
of olive trees.
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 3 2 0 8 e3 2 1 7
Table 4 e Contrast multiple of the residual biomass yielded by each variety in annual and biennial pruning.
Annual
Pruning
Biennial
Pruning
Variety
Sigma LSD
Grossal
Frantoio
Villalonga
Cornicabra
Arbequina
Blanqueta
Royal
Serrana
Manzanilla
Picual
1.335
2.431
4.621
5.281
6.271
8.735
9.049
10.217
11.479
11.851
1.310
1.310
1.310
1.400
1.657
0.926
1.657
1.310
2.139
11.657
X
X
X
Cornicabra
Regues
Manzanilla
Morruda
Farga
Morons
16.000
23.739
24.203
33.795
39.907
52.300
16.498
8.249
11.665
9.525
7.380
8.249
X
X
X
X
X
3.3.
Homogeneous Groups
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
3.4.
Aim of pruning
3.5.
Fruit production
3213
Fig. 4 e LSD intervals for the "age" factor in the amount of residual biomass from olive tree pruning at 95% level of
confidence.
3.6.
Absence/presence of irrigation
Fig. 5 e LSD intervals for the "aim of pruning" factor in the amount of residual biomass in olive tree pruning at 95% level of
confidence.
Fig. 6 e LSD intervals for the "fruit production" factor in the amount of residual biomass from olive tree pruning at 95% level
of confidence.
Fig. 7 e LSD intervals for the "irrigation" factor in the amount of residual biomass in olive tree pruning at 95% level of
confidence.
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 3 2 0 8 e3 2 1 7
Table 5 e Equations to predict the biomass obtained per tree from the pruning of olive trees.
Biennial pruning
BOTkg=tree 6:720 3:544,r 0:073,e 0:0283dc 2:608,h
BOTkg=tree 2:033 0:109,m 0:065,m,r 0:003,m,e 1:477,r,h 0:089,e,h
Annual pruning
BOTkg=tree 5:855 3:429,r 0:046,e 0:431,p 1:478,dc 0:024,hc 1:390,h
BOTkg=tree 1:036 0:2064,p2 0:535,p,dc 1:431,dc,h 0:769,h2
Linear model
Quadratic model
Linear model
Quadratic model
3.7.
Regression models for the prediction of the residual
biomass produced
Several regression models were developed to predict the dry
biomass obtained per olive tree in pruning operations (BOT )
from other variables that influence the available amount,
explicative or independent variables. A regression model was
also calculated that relates the residual biomass obtained per
hectare (BOH ) with these variables. Initial testing, for
simplicity, was by a linear model. Subsequently, to improve
the coefficient of determination (r2) non-linear relations
formed by the squares or products of the independent variables were analyzed. The results obtained are shown in Tables
5 and 6. The characteristic parameters of the regression
models calculated are indicated in Table 7. In the following
list, only the statistically significant variables in the present
analysis are named.
Qualitative variable:
- Non-irrigated land/Irrigation (r). Indicates presence or
absence of irrigation. To include this variable in the model, we
employed a dummy variable, which takes the value 0 when
the trees are cultivated in non-irrigated land and 1 when the
trees are cultivated with irrigation.
Quantitative variable:
- Height of tree (h). Indicates the height of the tree in meters.
- Age (e). Indicates the age of the tree in years.
Table 6 e Equations to predict the biomass obtained per hectare from the pruning of olive trees.
Biennial pruning
Linear model
Quadratic model
Linear model
Quadratic model
Table 7 e Characterization of models to predict the biomass obtained from the pruning of the olive trees.
Annual pruning
2
BOT
(kg tree1)
BOH
(t ha1)
Linear model
Quadratic model
Linear model
Quadratic model
Biennial pruning
2
Average
absolute error
Standard dev.
Error
p-value
68
71
65
73
0.604
0.307
0.101
0.083
0.561
0.292
0.090
0.070
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
61
66
63
73
Average
absolute error
Standard dev.
error
p-value
2.091
1.904
0.370
0.183
0.656
0.498
0.118
0.033
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
4.
b i o m a s s a n d b i o e n e r g y 3 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 3 2 0 8 e3 2 1 7
Conclusions
trees are younger than 10 years old. This is due to the fact that
in the oldest olive groves the trees had a smaller growing
space and therefore produced more biomass per hectare,
although the residues generated per tree were smaller. On the
other hand, in biennial pruning, the biomass obtained per
hectare does not differ according to the age or irrigation. This
means that the production of residual biomass is similar for
all trees if they have enough time for development (two years).
For biennial pruning the space allocated to each tree is
significant in the amount of residual biomass obtained per tree,
the greatest quantities of biomass being obtained from trees
with the largest space for growth. Although groves with
smaller allocated growing space have a greater number of
plants per hectare, since the development of each tree is highly
influenced by the proximity to its neighbours, the biomass
obtained in this area does not increase significantly in olive
trees. Little separation among trees increases competition for
water, nutrients and light and therefore slow growth with low
production of residual biomass. On the other hand, wider
separation provides larger crown diameters and therefore
greater residual biomass per tree. In this respect the olive tree is
different to other species of fruit trees, in which a greater
number of plants per hectare leads to greater residual biomass,
although high fruit production also increases biomass in olive
trees, as does the presence of irrigation. Pruning for rejuvenation is the most productive for residual biomass, since all
except the primary branches are removed.
references
3217