Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
A number of buildings are able to withstand moderate earthquakes eventhough not designed for
eartquake forces. Quite often this is because of latent strength of masonry infill which is normally
ignored in design. However in case of buildings on stilts , in stilt portion this latent strength is not
available, hence remain vulnerable. Feasibility of strengthenining this vulnerable portion is cheked
through a solved example for a case of six storied building. Calculations are based on 1984
version of Indian standard code of earthquake resistant design 1.Same exercise with 2002 version
of the code is not attempted as it arbitrarily imposes a load factor of 2.5 for buildings on stilts.
While reporting on the extent of damage caused by major earthquakes, many authors have noted
that , among RC buildings, buildings on stilts have suffered maximum damage. In a article on
failure of multistorey buildings in Ahmedabad during Gujrat earthquake (January 26, 2001) Dr
Ashok K Jain has noted that during past 75 years or so, different earthquakes all over the world
have repeatedly shown that a frame with a soft ground storey is the most vulnerable structural
system in a earthquake zone1. In a paper on lessons of Gujrat earthquake, Padamshree Dr A.S.
Arya has noted that most damaged buildings were built on stilts2.
a. Lack of strength contribution from infill walls. - Walls provide considerable reserve strength to
buildings during earthquake. That is why many buildings , even though not designed for
earthquake forces, survive moderate earthquakes. In many cases of failures of buildings on
stilt, it has been noted that upper stories , with walls, remain intact even after the failure.
b. Absence of plinth beams -. This is due to misconception that plinth beams are to be provided
only if walls are to be supported. Absence of plinth leaves ground floor columns laterally
unsupported and foundations unconnected to each other.
Solved example
Following are the design parameters assumed for solved example (Fig 1 ),
a. Building is in seismic zone III3
b. Importance factor 3 =1.0
c. Soil-foundation system factor3 = 1.2
d. Performance factor3 =1.6
e. Concrete grade of building = M15
f. Building is originally designed for vertical loads only.
g. Column sizes are worked out assuming 3% vertical steel has been originally provided.
h. Walls are strong enough to resist earthquake loads in portion above stilt.
i. Spacing of frames = 4m
j. All bays , except at ground storey, have 230mm thick masonry infill.
k. Safe bearing capacity of soil = 15 t/m2
20-02-05 Page 1 of 1
Pu 155.6 x 1.5
------------- = ------------------------ = 1.04
fck b d 1500 x 0.23 x 0.65
where,
Pu = Ultimate axial load on column,
fck = Characteristic strength of concrete.
b = Width of column
d = Depth of column
From the chart,
p/fck = 0.2 (corresponding to 0 moment)
hence , p = 0.2 x 15 n/mm2 =3%
where,
p = % vertical steel
Percentage steel required matches with assumed steel . Hence size of column considered is ok.
20-02-05 Page 2 of 2
=161.15 MT
Column moment(Refer Annexure I, for member no.2 ) =11.7 t-m
161.15 6 x 11.7
Soil pressure under seismic condition = +
3.22 x 3.22 3.22 x 3.222
Strengthening of columns ,
Pu 161.15 x 1.2
------------- = ------------------------ = 0.86
fck b d 1500 x 0.23 x 0.65
Mu 11.7 x 1.2
------------- = ------------------------ = 0.27
fck b d2 1500 x 0.65x 0.232
p/fck exceeds 0.2 ( the value corresponding to steel provided in existing columns).
Therefore column needs to be strengthened by increasing its size,
Try 75mm guniting all around. For the new column size,
Pu 161.15 x 1.2
------------- = ------------------------ = 0.43
fck b d 1500 x 0.38 x 0.8
Mu 11.7 x 1.2
------------- = ------------------------ = 0.081
fck b d2 1500 x 0.8x 0.382
Additional beams are provided on either side of existing beams to resist extra bending moments
and shear due to earthquake loads, Fig 7. From Annexure I,
Bending moments due to earthquake loads( for member number 9) = 5.9 t-m,
Providing 100mm wide x 420mm deep beam on either side of floor beams,
Bending moment per beam(M), =5.9/2 = 2.95 t-m
Mu 2.95 x 1.2
------------- = ------------------------ =190
b d2 0.1x 0.422
4
From Table 1 ,
Percentage steel required (p t) = 0.64
Hence, area of tension steel required = 0.64 x 10 x 42/100 =2 68cm 2
Provided 1-20mm dia. bar at top and bottom
20-02-05 Page 4 of 4
References
1. Jain, A. K. Failure of multistorey buildings in Ahmedabad: Lessons to relearn, The Indian
Concrete Journal, December 2001, Vol 75, No. 12.
2. Arya, A.S. Lessons of Kachchha Earthquake of January 26, 2001, Seminar on Seismic Assessment
and Retrofitting of Buildings, Mumbai February 16,2002.
3. -----------Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Bureau of Indian
Standards, .IS : 1893 (1984), New Delhi, India.
4. -----------Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete to IS:456-1978, SP-16(S&T) 1980, Bureau of Indian
standards, New Delhi, India.
5. -----------Building code requirements for structural concrete (318-02) and commentary (318R-02), American
Concrete Institute , Detroit
20-02-05 Page 5 of 5
20-02-05 Page 6 of 6
*********************************************************
* *
* TIME PERIOD FOR X 1893 LOADING = 0.76857 SEC *
* FACTOR C PER 1893= 0.644, LOAD FACTOR= 1.165 *
* FACTOR V PER 1893= 0.0495 X 512.40 *
* *
*********************************************************
20-02-05 Page 7 of 7
20-02-05 Page 8 of 8
20-02-05 Page 9 of 9
67. FINISH
20-02-05 Page 10 of 10
20-02-05 Page 11 of 11
20-02-05 Page 12 of 12
20-02-05 Page 13 of 13
20-02-05 Page 14 of 14
20-02-05 Page 15 of 15
20-02-05 Page 16 of 16
20-02-05 Page 17 of 17
20-02-05 Page 18 of 18