Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
DESIGN MANUAL
1970
Issued by the
Price $5.00
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Th. N.tlon.1 BuHdlng Cod. I. publlsh.d by the N.tlon.1 R....rch Council of C.n.d. 'or volunt.ry .doptlon by. provlncl.1 gov.rnm.nt. or munlclp.1 .dmlnlstr.tlon. Th. Cod. Is ...entl.lly
t
0'
minimum regul.tlon. r..pectlng the ,.ty of building. wHh r.f.r.nc. to public h Hh,
fir. protection .nd .tructur.1 .ufflcl.ncy. It I. not .nd Is not Int.nded to b t.xt-book of buDdIng d..lgn, .dvlc. upon which .hould bought from professlon.1 .ourc... Th. Cod. rel.t.. to
buDdlngs .nd .Impltructur.. but It I. not Int.nded for u wHh .peclallzed clvl engineering
.tructur... It.....ntl.1 purpo Is the promotion of public f.ty through the u of d..lr.bI.
buldlng .t.nd.rd. throughout C.n.d.
Th. Secr.t.ry,
Aocl.t. Commmee on the N.tlon.1 BuDding Cod.,
N.tlon.1 R....rch Council of C.n.d.
Ott.w.
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Issued by the
- ii-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
- IV - Copyright NRC-CNRC
PREFACE
Supplement 1\0. 4 to the National Building Code of Canada, 1970, has
been prepared in this form as a Canadian Structural Design Manual
for the convenience of structural designers throughout Canada. The Associate Committee hopes that it will prove convenient in use containing, as
it does, the complete wording of design codes for timber, masonry, concrete,
steel and aluminum with the Design Sections of Part 4 reprinted from the
Code itself. Additional explanatory material, prepared for the Associate
Committee by officers of the Division of Building Research, NRC, together
with the material on wind pressure and snow load coefficients for buildings,
etc., contained previously in Supplement No.3, "Structural Information
for Building Design in Canada", to the 1965 Code, are included for convenient reference.
The Associate Committee on the National Building Code records its
appreciation to the Canadian Standards Association for its cooperation in
the preparation of this volume, even to the extent of permitting the use of
direct offprints of CSA documents, as will be evident from the unavoidable
variation in type font. Special thanks are due to Dr. J. H. Jenkins, past
president of CSA, and members of the CSA staff under Mr. F. A. Sweet
for their personal interest in and assistance with this cooperative venture.
Comments on the utility of this volume will be especially welcome since
it is a new venture in order that the Associate Committee may be guided
in the preparation of the 1975 edition of the Code, work upon which is
a1ready in progress.
Part A and Part B (pages 1 to 509 inclusive) contain the various Sections
of Part 4, Design, NBC 1970 and the appropriate CSA design Standards.
Where a Table of Contents appears at the beginning of these Code Sections
and CSA Standards, the page numbers referred to appear at the top of the
page as in the actual document; the number which appears at the bottom
of each page relates to this Manual.
-v-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
...
- VI Copyright NRC-CNRC
1
19
39
43
47
S1
55
59
67
169
205
313
345
433
465
509
543
567
579
597
601
603
60S
609
-vii-Copyright NRC-CNRC
- yiiiCopyright NRC-CNRC
NATIONAL
BUILDING
CODE
OF
CANADA
PART 4 DESIGN
SECTION 4.1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Subsection
Subsection
Subsection
Subsection
Subsection
Subsection
Subsection
Subsection
4.1.1.
4.1.2.
4.1.3.
4.1.4.
4.1.5.
4.1.6.
4.1.7.
4.1.8.
General............. ........
Design Loads and Effects.
Dead Loads .............. " ..
Live Loads Due to Use and Occupancy.
Live Loads Due to Snow and Rain. .
Effects of Wind. . . . . .
.......
Effects of Earthquakes.
Other Effects . . . . . .
-1-
141
143
144
144
147
148
150
156
Copyright NRC-CNRC
1970
-2-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
141
SECTION 4.1
Definitions
4.1.1.2. Words that appear in italics are defined in Part 2 of this Bylaw.
Design Requirements
4.1.1.3.(1) Buildings and their structural members shall be designed to have
sufficient structural capacity.to resist safely and effectively all effects of loads
and influences that may be expected, and shall in any case satisfy the requirements of this Section.
!vlinimum
safety and
performance
Loads during
construction
Design basis
142
Deflections
Creep,
shrinkage
and other
effects
Dellections lisll:U in Sl:ntl'nce (I) shall be: taken into UL'COltnl in all
and structural members made of material susceptible to Jeflections, deformations, or changes in 10aJ distribution due to creer. shrinkage
or other e1ftcts in the material" of which they are composed.
Lateral
deflection of
tall buildings
due to wind
(3) The lateral deflection due to wind of slender buildings whose height is
greater than four times their minimum effective width shall not exceed the
following ratios:
Storey deflection to storey height
11500
Total deflection to total height
11500
These limits may be waived if the design is based on a detailed dynamic
analysis of the deflections and their effects.
(2)
~truclures
(Information on lateral deflection of tall buildings may be found in the chapter on wind
loads of NBC Supplement No.4, Canadian Structural Design Manual. 1970.)
Stability
under
compressive
stress
Structural
integrity
Drawings and
ca 1culations
Copyright NRC-CNRC
..........................
--.~--
143
,I
In
,lnd
to
4,
all
gc
is
~e
ic
y
e
s
Inspection of Construction
4.1.1.9. Engineering inspection of the construction of any building or part
thereof shall be carried out to ensure that construction is consistent with
design, by the person responsible for its design or by another person qualified
in the inspection of building construction.
Inspection of
construction
Loads
(2) Minimum design values of these loads as set forth in Subsections 4.1.3.
to 4.1.8. shall be increased to account for dynamic effects where applicable.
4.1.2.2.(1) Where a building or structural member can be expected to be subjected to loads, forces or other effects not listed in Article 4.1.2.1., such effects
shall be taken into account in the design, based on the most appropriate information available.
Loads not
listed
Load
combinations
+ L + (W or E)
+L +T
+ (W or E) + T
D + L + (W or E) + T
(v) D
(vi) D
(vii) D
(viii)
(2) The total of the combined load effects may be multiplied by the fol-
Probability
factors
144
Stress
reversal
Overturning
and sliding
Dead loads
4.1.3.1. The design dead load for a structural member consists of:
4.1.4.1. The design load on an area of floor or roof depends on the intended
use and occupancy and shall not be less than the uniformly distributed load
patterns in Article 4.1.4.3. or the concentrated loads in Article 4.1.4.4.,
whichever produces the most critical effect.
Uses not
stipulated
4.1.4.2. Where the use of an area of floor is not provided for in Articles
4.1.4.3. and 4.1.4.4., the design loads due to the use and occupancy of the
area shall be determined from an analysis of the loads resulting from
(a) the weight of the probable assembly of persons
(b) the weight of the probable accumulation of equipment and furnishing,
and
(c) the weight of the probable storage of materials.
Full and
partial
loading
4.1.4.3.(1) The uniformly distributed load shall be not less than the values
listed in Table 4.1.4.A, reduced as may be provided for in Sentence (4) or (5),
applied
(a) uniformly over the entire area, or
(b) on any portions of the area,
whichever produces the most critical effects in the members concerned.
More
than one
occupancy
(2) Where an area of floor or roof is intended for two or more occupancie!
at different times, the value to be used from Table 4.1.4.A shall be the greatest
value for any of the occupancies concerned.
Change in
occupancy
(3) When the occupancy of a building is changed, the building shall conform to the requirements of this Bylaw for the new occupancy.
Variation
with
tributary
area
-6-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
145
use and occupancy, excluding snow, is the load provided for in Sentence (I)
multiplied by
O.S
ISlVA
where A is the tributary area in square feet for this type of use and occupancy.
(5) Where a structural member supports a tributary area of tloor, roof or
combination of these greater than 200 sq ft (18.60 m2) for any use or
occupancy other than those indicated in Sentence (4), the design live load due
to use and occupancy. excluding snow, is the load provided for in Sentence (1)
multiplied by
0.3 + to/vB
where B is the tributary area in square feet for this type of use and occupancy.
(6) In areas of a building where partitions other than permanent partition.r
are shown on the drawings or where partitions might be added in the future,
allowance shall be made for the weight of such partitions. This allowance
shall be determined from the actual or anticipated weight of the partitions
placed in any probable position, but shall be not less than 20 psf (958 N/m2)
over the area of tloor being considered. Partition loads used in design shall be
shown on the drawings as provided in Clause 4.1.1.8.(2)(e).
Table 4.1.4.A
Forming Part of Sentence 4.1.4.3.(1)
Minimum
Design Load,
psf
40
SO
100
10
7S
SO
100
50
100
100
100
50
100
125
SO
100
SO
12S
2S0
-7-Copyright NRC-CNRC
146
Table 4.1.4.A (Cont'd)
Minimum
Design Load,
psf
100
40
100
1S
40
SO
100
100
ISO
60
100
SO
100
SO
40
SO
SO
SO
100
2S0
SO
SO
100
Column 2
4.1.4.4. The design load due to possible concentrations of load reSUlting from
use of an area of floor or roof shall not be less than that listed in Table
4.1.4.B. applied over an area of 2~ ft (162 mm) by 2~ ft (162 mm) located
so as to cause maximum effects.
-8-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
147
Table 4.1.4..B.
300
1,000
2,000
2,500
4,000
8,000
12,000
12,000
Column 2
not be less than the ground snow load specified in the Table of Climatic Data
in Part 1 of this Bylaw decreased or increased as provided for in Articles
4.1.5.2. to 4.1.5.4.
4.1.5.2.(1) The design snow load on a roof or other building surface subject
Ground
snow Joad
Roof snow
load
(2) A roof or other bUilding surface and its structural members subject to
snow accumulation shall be designed for the following two snow load distributions:
(a) full load distributed over the entire area, or
(b) full load distributed on anyone portion of the area and zero load on
the remainder of the area,
whichever produces the greatest effects on the member concerned.
Full and
partial
loading
4.1.5.3. The basic snow load coefficient Cs is 0.8, except for roofs exposed to
Snow load
coefficients
wind as provided for in Article 4.1.5.4. The basic snow load coefficient shall
be further increased or decreased to account for the following influences
(a) the decrease of snow load because of the effect of slope for roof slopes
exceeding 30 deg.,
(b) the accumulation of nonuniform snow load on gable and hip roofs,
(c) the accumulation of nonuniform snow load on arched and curved roofs,
(d) the accumulation of increased snow loads in valleys of butterfly as well
as multispan curved or sloped roofs,
(e) the accumulation of increased nonuniform snow loads due to drifting
snow on the lower of two-level or multi-level roofs, such as a canopy,
marquee or porch roof provided the upper roof is part of the same
building or of an adjacent building not more than 15 ft (4.6 m) away,
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-9-
148
(f) the accumulation of increased nonuniform snow loads on areas adjacent to roof Fojections such as penthouses. large chimneys, ventilating equipment,
(g) the accumulation of increased snow or ice loads on areas due to snow
sliding or melt water draining onto these areas from an adjacent roof
sloping towards this area. The magnitude and distribution of the increase shall be appropriate to the relative portions and sizes of the
surfaces.
(Information on eoefftcienta for snow loads on roofs ean be found In NBC Supplement
No.... Canadian Structural Desiarn Manual. 1970.)
Roofs
exposed
to wind
4.1.5.4. For roofs exposed to the wind, a basic snow load coefficient C, of 0.6
may be used instead of 0.8 if both the following conditions are satisfied:
Rain loads
4.1.5.5.(1) The design load. due to the accumulation of rain water on a surface whose position and shape, and deflection under load, is such as to make
such an accumulation possible, is that reSUlting from the 24-hr rainfall
specified in the Table of Climatic Data in Part 1 of this Bylaw over the
horizontal projection of the surface and all tributary surfaces. This provision
applies whether or not the surface is provided with drainage. such as rain
water leaders.
(a) if the roof is not shielded from the wind on any side, and is not likely
to become shielded by obstructions higher than the roof within a distance of 10h from the building (where h is the height of the obstruction
above the roof level),
(b) if the roof does not have any projections, such as parapet walls, which
prevent the snow from being blown off.
(2) Loads due to rain need not be considered to act simultaneously with
loads due to snow.
SUBSECTION 4.1.6. EFFECTS OF WIND
External
pressure
or suction
p
p
= qCeCgC
= the design external pressure acting statically and in a direction
p
=
=
(Information on pressure coefficients can be found in the chapter on wind loads In NBC
Supplement No... , Canadian Structural Deaiarn Manual. uno.)
-10-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
r
I
I
149
II
(2) The net design pressure due to wind on cladding shall be the algebraic
difference of the external pressure or suction as provided for in Sentence (1)
and the design internal pressure or suction due to wind calculated from either:
(a)
or
(b)
where
= qCeCpi
Pi = qCeCgCpi
Pl = the design
Pi
Internal
pressure
or suction
on cladding
WlDCl
loads in NBC
-11-Copyright NRC-CNRC
Reference
veJocity
pressure
Cladding
Deflection
of structural
members
Strength of
structural
members
Buildings for
post-disaster
services
Exposure
factor
150
Table 4.1.6.A.
Forming Part of Sentence 4.1.6.1.(4)
Height, ft
o to
Over
"
tt
"
"
"
"
40
60
90
130
190
270
420
740
Exposure Factor
40
to
60
to
90
to 130
to 190
to 270
to 420
to 740
to 1200
Column 1
Gust effect
factor
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.8
2.0
Column 2
Dynamic
effects of
wind
4.1.6.2. Buildings whose height is greater than four times their minimum
effective width or greater than 400 ft (122 m) and other buildings whose light
weight, low frequency and low damping properties make them susceptible to
vibration shall be
(a) designed by experimental methods for the danger of dynamic overloading and vibration and the effects of fatigue, or
(b) designed using a dynamic approach to the action of wind gusts.
(Information on dynamic approach to the action of wind gusts can be found In the
chapter on wind loads in NBC Supplement No.4, Canadian Structural Desia-n Manual,
1970.)
Full and
partial
loading
-12-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
151
(2) Nomenclature
In this Subsection:
D = the dimension of the building in feet in a direction parallel to
the applied forces.
D. = the dimension of the lateral force-resisting system in feet in a
direction parallel to the applied forces.
.
ht, h tl , hz
The height in feet above the base (i
0) to level .. ,..., "nu , or
urn respectively.
Level i
Any level in the building, i
1 first level above the base.
Level n
That level which is uppermost in the main portion of the
structure.
Level r
That level which is under design consideration.
W = Dead load including the following:
25% of the design snow load specified in Subsection 4.1.5.;
for areas used for storage, the full design live load modified
according to Sentence 4.1.4.3.(4);
the full contents of any tanks.
Wi, W z
That portion of W which is located at or is assigned to level
",... or "r" respectively.
I
Numerical reduction coefficient for base overturning moment
as defined in Clause 4.1.7 .1.(7)(a).
I z = Numerical reduction coefficient for moment at level "x" as
defined in Clause 4.1.7.1.(7)(b).
N = The total number of storeys above exterior grade to level ",,".
(N is usually numerically equal to ll).
T = Fundamental period of vibration of the buildillg or stmcture
in seconds in the direction under consideration.
R
Seismic regionalization factor which is a measure of the
seismic activity and risk in the area considered.
K
Numerical coefficient that reflects the material and type of
construction, damping, ductility, andlor energy-absorptive
capacity of the structure.
I = Importance factor of the structure.
F
Foundation factor.
C
Numerical coefficient for base shear as defined in Sentence
4.1.7.1.(4).
Wp = The weight of a part or portion of a structure, e.g. cladding,
partitions, appendages.
Cp
Horizontal force factor for part or portion of a structure, as
given in Table 4.1.7.B.
V p = Lateral force on a part or portion of the structure.
V = Minimum lateral seismic force at the base of the structure.
F, Portion of V to be concentrated at the top of the structure as
defined in Clause 4.1.7.1.(5)(a).
Lateral force applied to levelr.
Fs
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-13 -
152
(4) The minimum lateral seismic force assumed to act nonconcurrentIy
in any direction shall be:
V = 1,4 RKCIFW
where R = the values given in the Table of Climatic Data in Part 1 of
this Bylaw.
K = the value given in Table 4.1.7 .A.
C = 0.10 for all one and two-storey buildings
C
O.OS/vT for all other buildings
The maximum value of C shall be 0.10.
Except where properly substantiated technical data are submitted, T shall be
determined by one of the following formulae:
T = 0.05 hnh/D
or
T
0.1 N.
The latter formula applies to all buildings in which the lateral force-resisting
system consists of a moment-resisting space frame which resists lOOper cent
of the required lateral forces and the frame is not enclosed by or adjoined by
more rigid elements that would tend to prevent the frame from resisting
lateral forces.
(Information on natural periods of buildings can be found in the chapter on loads due
to earthquakes in NBC Supplement No.4. Canadian Structural Design Manual. 1970.)
= 1.3
W=2: W,
i=l
(5) (a) A portion Ft of the total lateral load V shall be concentrated at the
top of the structure, where
F; = 0.004V(hnIDs)2
The remainder V-Ft shall be distributed along the height of the bUilding
including the top level in compliance with the following formula:
F.{"= (V-F t ) W .. h,
n
2:W h,
i
i=1
(b) The total shear in any horizontal plane shall be distributed to the
various elements of the lateral-force resistive system in proportion to
their rigidities with due regard to the capacities and stiffnesses of the
nonstructural elements.
(6) Parts or portions of buildings and their anchorage shall be designed
for lateral forces V p where
Vp = 1,4 RCpWp
The appropriate values of Cp are given in Table 4.1.7.B. These forces shall act
at the centre of mass of the components considered.
-14-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
153
(7) (a) The overturning moment M at the base of the structure shall be
multipJied by I where
J
0.5 + 0.25/ .,yT2.
I shall not exceed 1.0.
Table 4.1.7.A.
Forming Part of Sentence 4.1.7.1.(4)
Value of K
0.67
0.80
1.00
1.33
2.00
3.00
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-15 -
Overturning
154
Table 4..1.:'.11.
Forming Part of Sentence 4.1.7.1.(6)
Category
Part or Portion of
Buildings
Direction
of Forco
Normal to
flat surface
Normal to
flat surface
Any
direction
1.00
Any
direction
0.20(1)
Any
direction
0.10
Any
direction
0.10
phragms(2)
Any
direction
Value of
Cp
0.20
1.00
I
I
2.00
per cent.
(2) Floors and roofs aetiq &8 diaphral1DB sball be desiped for a minimum foree eorr..
eponding to the value of Cp of 10 per eent applied to loade tributary from that
_tore)' unlesa a /l1'eater force F s 18 asaigned to the Iud under eonsideraUon &8 per
Clause -1,1.7.1.(5) (a).
-16-
' ',,)3
Copyright NRC-CNRC
155
(8) (a) Torsional eccentricities about the vertical axis of the building shall
be computed in all storeys. Tbe..design eccentricity shall be taken to be
l.S times the computed eccentricity, increased by an accidental eccentricity equal to O.OS times the plan dimension in the direction of the
computed eccentricity considered.
(b) Where the total torsional eccentricity determined according to Clause
(a) exceeds 2S per cent of the pIan dimension measured parallel to the
eccentricity, either:
(i) a dynamic analysis shall be carried out, or
(li) the effects of torsion in the statical analysis shall be doubled.
TonioDal
Meet.
(9) A building having setbacks wherein each plan dimension of the tower
is at least 7S per cent of the corresponding dimension of the structural system
of the lower part may be considered as a uniform building without setbacks
for the purpose of determining the seismic forces.
For other conditions of setbacks, the tower shall be designed as a separate
structure using the larger of the seismic coefficients at the base of the tower
determined by considering the tower as either a separate structure for its own
height, or as a part of the over-all structure.
General
Provisions
(2) All portions of the structure shall be designed to act as an integral unit
in resisting horizontal forces unless separated by a distance sufficient to avoid
contact under deflection from seismic action. Adjacent structures shall be
separated to prevent pounding due to earthquakes.
(3) The nonstructural components shall be detailed so as not to transfer
to the structural system any forces unaccounted for in the design. Any interaction of rigid elements such as walls and the structural system shall be
examined to show that the capacity of the structural system is not impaired
by the action or failure of the rigid elements.
(4) Except where the seismic regional factor R is zero, pile footings of
every building or structure shall be interconnected continuously by ties in at
least two directions, designed to carry by tension or compression a horizontal
force equal to 10 per cent of the larger pile cap loading, unless it can be
demonstrated that equivalent restraints can be provided by other means.
4.1.7.3.(1) Except as provided in Sentences (2) and (3) buildings in Zones I,
2 and 3 more than 200 ft (61 m) in height shall have ductile moment-resisting
space frames capable of resisting not less than 2S per cent of the required
seismic force for the structure as a whole.
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-17-
Special
PrOvitiOD1
156
SUBSECTION 4.1.8. OTHER EFFECTS
loads on
railings
4.1.8.1. The minimum design loads on a railing which guards a drop of more
than 18 in. (457 mm) are:
Horizontal load
(a) 150-lb per lineal foot (2188 N/m) applied horizontally at the top of
the railing for all occupancies except those provided for in Clause (b),
(b) a 125-lb (556 N) single point load applied horizontally at any location
at the top of the railing for occupancies where crowding by many people is very improbable, such as industrial catwalk areas.
Vertical load
(c) 100-lb per lineal foot (1459 N/m) applied vertically at the top of the
railing and acting separately from the horizontal load provided for in
Clauses (a) and (b).
4.1.8.2. Grandstands and any building used for assembly purposes to accommodate large numbers of people at one time shall be designed to resist all
inertia sway forces produced by the use and occupancy of the building or
structure. The inertia force shall be not less than 20 lb per lineal foot
(292 N/m) of seat parallel to each row of seats or 10 lb per lineal foot
(146 N/m) of seat perpendicular to each row of seats.
Impact and
vibrations
Factor
1.25
1.10
1.33
See CSA Standard B 44,
1966, Item 2.6.2.
Column 2
4.1.8.4. The minimum horizontal design loads on crane runway rails are:
(a) the lateral force which shall be
(i) for power-operated crane trolleys, 20 per cent, and for hand
operated trolleys, 10 per cent, of the sum of the weights of the lifted
loads and of the crane trolley excluding other parts of the crane,
(H) applied at the top of the rail, one-half on each side of the runway
and
(iii) considered as acting in either direction normal to the runway rail,
(b) the longitudinal force which sha11 be
(i) 10 per cent of the maximum wheel loads of the crane, and
(ii) applied at the top of the rail.
-18-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
NATIONAL
BUILDING
CODE
OF
CANADA
PART 4 DESIGN
SECTION 4.2
FOUNDATIONS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Subsection
Subsection
Subsection
Subsection
Subsection
Subsection
Subsection
Subsection
4.2.1.
4.2.2.
4.2.3.
4.2.4.
4.2.5.
4.2.6.
4.2.7.
4.2.8.
General..........................
Materials Used in Foundations. . . . . . ..
Design Considerations ........... . ..
Footings, Rafts and Foundation Walls. ..
Piles ............................
Piers and Caissons ..................
Special Foundations . . . .. ..........
Excavating, Placing and Filling ....... ,
159
164
165
167
169
174
175
175
-19-Copyright NRC-CNRC
1970
-20-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
159
SECTION 4.2
FOUNDATIONS
Definitions
4.2.1.2. Words that appear in italics are defined in Part 2 of this Bylaw.
Nomenclatul'e
4.2.1.3. Soil is that portion of the earth's crust which is fragmentary, or such
that some individual particles of a dried sample may be readily separated by
SoU,
agitation in water; it includes boulders. cobbles, gravel, sand, silt, clay and
organic mauer.
402.1.4.(1) A cohesionless soil identified as:
(a) "graver is a soil consisting of particles smaller than 3 in, (76 mm).
but retained on a No.4 sieve, and
(b) "sand" is a soil consisting of particles passing a No.4 sieve but retained
on a No. 200 sieve.
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-11-
Cohesionles5
soil. gravel
and sand
160
Cobbles and
boulders
Density of
cohesionless
soil
Cohesive
soil, silt
and clay
Consistencies
of cohesive
soils
-22-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
ri
i
161
II
Table 4.2.1.A.
0:
Consistency
Description
"very stiff"
"stiff"
"firm"
"soft"
"very soft"
Column 1
Column 2
Column 3
4.2.1.8. Organic soils and soils other than those identified in Articles 4.2.1.4.
to 4.2.1.7. shall require special investigations to determine suitable design
properties.
4.2.1.9. In this Section a soil or rock identified as
(a) "clay-shale" is fine-grained, finely laminated, will swell on wetting, and
will disintegrate on its first drying and wetting cycle,
(b) "till" is of glacial origin, unsorted and heterogeneous and can contain
a range of particle sizes including boulders, cobbles, gravel, sands, silts
and clays and can exist at any relative density or consistency, and
(c) "cemented sand and gravel" is a mixture of sand and gravel or boulders
thoroughly cemented together as a hard layer which will not soften in
its natural bed when wet.
4.2.1.10.(1) Rock is that portion of the earth's crust which is consolidated,
coherent and relatively hard, and is a naturally formed mass of mineral matter which cannot be readily broken by the hands.
(2) Rocks vary from "hard" through "medium hard" to "soft,"
(a) "hard" means rock comparable to concrete with a compressive strength
greater than 6000 psi (41,370 kN/m2),
(b) "medium hard" means rock comparable to concrete with a compressive
strength greater than 2500 psi (17,238 kN 1m2), and
( c) "soft" rock is comparable to brick masonry with a compressive strength
greater than 500 psi (3,448 kN/m 2 ).
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-23-
Other soils
Clay-shale
Till
Cemented
sand and
gravel
Rock
Approximate
compressive
strength of
rock
162
Classification
of rock
(3)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Defects in
rocks
(4) Defects in rocks which adversely affect the bearing capacity are:
(a) closely spaced, open, or steeply inclined bedding planes, joints, fault
zones, fractures or shear planes,
(b) unsoundness, such as close]y spaced seams of clay, fault gouge, soil or
softened rock. cavities,
(c) significant alteration of the strength of the rock by weathering, deromposition or disintegration in the mass or in part, and
(d) slaking or swelling behaviour in water.
Rock
considereo
as soil
Loads on
foundations
Design Conditions
4.2.1.11. The foundation of a building shall have a design capacity sufficient
to resist all loads as stipulated in Section 4.1 of this Bylaw.
Total and
differenti:JI
settlement
Design
criteria for
materials
4.2.1.13. In the design of the foundation of a building, the procedures, construction practices and stresses used shaH be those provided for in that Section
applicable to the materials used in the foundation modified as pro'. ided for in
Subsections 4.2.2. to 4.2.6.
Drawinp
Explorations
U.1.15. A soil exploration shall be carried out under the direction of a person competent in this field of work, who shall prepare a report on the results
of the site exploration, unless otherwise exempted by the authority having
jurisdiction by reason of the fact that the proposed structure is suffi.cieatly
flexible that differential settlep:lent will not affect its stability.
-24-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
163
4.2.U6.(1) Before any part of a foundation is placed and again before any
superstructure is placed on a foundation
(a) the authority having jurisdiction shall be notified and given an opportunity to inspect the site, and
(b) the permission of the authority having jurisdiction shall be obtained
to proceed.
1napecti0D of
foundation
(2) Where required by the authority having jurisdiction, the soil or rock
directly underlying footings, foundation piers or caissons and foundation walls
shall be inspected by a person competent in this field of work after excavation
and immediately prior to construction of the foundations.
(3) In the case of piled foundations for buildings as described above, the
instal1ation of all piling shall be subject to continuous resident inspection
carried out under the direction of a person who is competent in this field of
work. and who has full knowledge of the piling design requirements, the site
exploration data and the foundation reports for this site.
Inspection
of piles
(4) The person responsible for the inspection described in Sentence (3)
shall prepare a report or reports of such inspections describing the conditions
found and any necessary modifications of the design or of the construction
method. Each report shall carry the signature of the responsible person and
a copy of the report shall be sent to the authority having jurisdiction.
Inspection
report of
.Altered
(Z) Where a foundation has not been placed or located as indicated on the
plans, the error shall be corrected or the design capacity of the foundatio1l
recalculated for the altered conditions to the satisfaction of the authority
having jurisdiction.
Foundations
Incorrectly
located
Damaged
foundation
foundation
conditions
(a) the design capacity of the foundation shall be determined on the basis
of exploration and testing in accordance with Ciause 4.2.3.1.(1)(8)
or
(b) such material shall be removed so that the foundation will rest on
stable soil or rock.
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-25-
Fil1ed
around
organic
material
164
SUBSECTION 4.2.2. MATERIALS USED IN FOUNDATIONS
Preservative
treatment
Timber
4.2.2.1.(1) Where timber is exposed to soil or air above the permanent water
table it shall be treated with preservative in accordance with CSA 080Cl-1965, "Preservative Treatment by Pressure Process - All Timber Products," and also in accordance with
(a) CSA 080-C2-1966, "Preservative Treatment of Lumber, Timbers,
Bridge Ties and Mine Ties by Pressure Processes," or
(b) CSA 080-C3-1965, "Preservative Treatment of Piles by Pressure
Processes" and CSA 080-CI2-1965, "Creosoted Wood Foundation
Piles."
(2) Where timber has been treated as set forth in Sentence (1) it shall be
cared for as provided for in CSA 080-M4-1962. "Instructions for the Care of
Pressure-Treated Wood After Treatment:'
Concrete
4.2.2.2. Concrete used in foundation units shall be in accordance with Section
4.5 of this Bylaw but the minimum compressive strength shall be 3000 lb
per square inch (20,685 kN/m 2 ).
Reinforced
concrete
Prestressed
concrete
4.2.2.5. The concrete cover for steel ties and prestressed tendons in prestressed
concrete piles shall comply with the cover requirements for steel reinforcement in Article 4.2.2.4.
Sulphate
attack
-26-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
165
4.2.2.8. Where concrete in foundations is placed in contact with highly acid
soils it shall be made with a normal cement and thoroughly compacted to
reduce permeability to a minimum.
Acid attack
on concrete
Steel
4.2.2.9. Where steel is used in foundations, it shaH be in accordance with
dense concrete and separated from the soil by the thicknesses and types of
concrete described in Articles 4.2.2.3., 4.2.2.4., and 4.2.2.5.
Steel pipe
and tube
piles
Corrosion
of steel
Deterioration of Materials
4.2.2.11. Where a foundation is to be in contact with soil, water, or air that
Basis of
design
(2) The soil exploration shall be carried to that depth to which the
proposed structure will significantly increase the stress in the soil.
(3) Where a soil or rock below the bearing surface has a lower design
bearing pressure than that at the bearing surface as may be indicated by the
bearing values in Article 4.2.4.2., the design capacity of the foundation shall
not be greater than would cause the weakest soil or rock to be stressed beyond
its design bearing pressure.
Consideration
of weaker
underlying
soils
Frost action
and
adfreezing
Copyright NRC-CNRC
- 2.7-
166
(2) The bearillg surface of a foundation need not be below the level of
potential damage from frost where the foundation
(a) is designed against frost action, or
(b) bears directly on material not susceptible to frost action.
Sloping
ground
Eccentric
loads
Dynamii:
loading
Hydrostatic
uplift
High gronnd
water level
4.2.3.7. Where a foundation bears on gravel, sand or silt and where the water
table is within a distance below the bearing surface equal to the width of the
foundation U!lit, the design bearing pressure shall be 50 per cent of that
determined in Article 4.2.4.2.
Cases
requiring
determination
of settlement
4.2.3.8. The magnitude and rate of settlement of a structure shall be determined by exploration and analysis as provided for in Article 4.2.3.1. for the
following conditions:
(a) where a foundation or a surcharge adjacent to a building is to be placed
(i) above very soft clay or very loose sand, or weak organic soils, or
(ii) above soft clay where the load transferred will cause a net increase
of pressure on the clay of 250 psf (11,970 N/m2) or more, or
(iii) above firm clay where the load transferred wil1 cause a net increase
of pressure on the clay of 500 psf (23,940 N/m2) or more, or
(b) where dynamic loads are to be transferred by the foundation to
cohesionless soils in the very loose or loose condition.
Permafrost
-28-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
167
4.2.3.10. Where swelling or shrinking soils in which movements resulting from
moisture content changes may be sufficient to cause damage to a structure are
encountered or known to exist, the foundation conditions shall be assessed by
(a) a special investigation, or
(b) reference to recorded information in the form of successful local experience in the construction of bUildings with similar structural requirements, design bearing pressures and subsoil conditions.
Swelling and
shrinking
soils
I
l
4.2.4.2. For buildings three storeys or fewer in height and having a building
area of 6000 sq ft (558 m2) or less, the design properties of the soi; and the
bearing capacity of the foundation may be determined on the basis of clauses
(a) or (b) provided the type and condition of the soils or rock below the
bearing surface has been identified to a depth of at least twice the width of the
foundation unit below the bearing surface of the foundation unit.
(a) a plate load test, where the footing is 3 ft (915 mm) wide or less,
carried out in accordance with ASTM 01194-57(1966), "Bearing
Capacity of Soil for Static Load on Spread Footings." except that the
bearing plate shall be 12 in. by 12 in. (305 mm by 305 ml11) and the
de.\ign hcaring pressure of the soil is
(i) 1h the ultimate bearing capacity of the soil or,
(ii) 1h the pressure that would cause the bearing plate to settle 1 in.
(25 mm) whichever is the lesser, or
(b) the design bearing pressures appearing in Table 4.2.4.A, column 2,
where the type and condition d the soil or rock listed in column 1 can
be identified and described as set forth in Articles 4.2.1.3. to 4.2.1.7.,
4.2.1.9., and 4.2.1.10., and adjusted as may be required by the design
considerations described in Subsection 4.2.3.
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-29-
Design
capacity
Plate
load test
168
Table 4.%.4.A.
Forming Part of Clause 4.2.4.2.(b)
I~
Cohesionless soils
(see Articles 4.2.1.4. and 4.2.1.5.)
Dense sand, dense sand and gravel
Compact sand. compact sand and gravel
Loose sand, loose sand and gravel
Very loose sand, very loose sand and gravel
Cohesive soils
(see Articles 4.2.1.6. and 4.2.1.7.)
Dense silt
Compact silt
Loose silt
Very stiff clay
Stiff clay
Firm clay
Soft clay
Very soft clay
Miscellaneous soils and rock
(see Article 4.2.1.9.)
Till, dense or hard
Till, compact or firm
Till. soft
Cemented sand and gravel
Clay shale
Filled Ground
6,000
3,000
1,000
(2)
3.000
2,000
(2)
6.000
3.000
I.SOO
7S0
(21
8,000
3,000
12,
10,000
Rock
Up to
20,000
(2)
Column 2
(1)
-30-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
169
4.2.4.3. The settlement of footings shall be determined as described in Sub-
section 4.2.3. except that for a building of the size provided for in Article
4.2.4.2. the settlement may be determined in accordance with Article 4.2.4.4.
4.2.4.4. Where a load test has been carriell out as provided for in Clause
Settlement
of footings
Estimate of
settlement
Foundation Walls
4.2.4.5.(1) A foundation wall shall have sufficient thickness to support the
loads bearing on it and against it.
Wall
construction
Stresses on
retaining
walls
General
4.2.5.1. Piles shall be designed according to the requirements of this Subsec-
- 31-Copyright NRC-CNRC
Pile
capacity
170
Pile load
test
of a pile may be determined on the basis of a load test carried out in accordance with ASTM D1143-61T, "Load Settlement Relationship for Individual Piles Under Vertical Axial Load."
(2) Where a load test is carried out as provided for in Sentence (1) to twice
the proposed design capacity of the pile, the pile shall be deemed acceptable
provided its performance falls within all of the folio .ving limits:
(a) the rate of settlement under full test load is not more than 0.01 in.lbr
(0.25 mm/hr)
(b) the gross settlement under full test load is not more than 1.5 in.
(38 mm)
( c) the gross settlement under working load is not more than 0.75 in.
(19 mm)
(d) the net settlement after final rebound is not more than 0.75 in. (19 mm)
except that these values may be increased where it can be shown to the satisfaction of the authority having jurisdiction that such values are appropriate.
Special
load tests
(3) Where, on the basis of a soils investigation, a test carried out in accordance with Sentence (1) for the types of buildings described in Clauses
4.2.1.1.(1)(a) and (b) would fail to provide sufficient data to determine
adequately the long-term distribution of stress in the soil, the maximum
design capacity of the pile shall be determined by a test or tests designed for
the appropriate soil and loading conditions conducted and interpreted by a
person competent in this field of work.
(4) The maximum design capacity of a pile determined as provided for in
Sentences (1), (2) and (3) may be assigned to other piles where these piles are:
( a) of the same type and design,
(b) placed in the same type and condition of soil,
(c) driven or placed using the same driving equipment or placing methods,
and
(d) driven to meet the same criteria as the tested pile.
The number and location of additional load tests shall be as required by the
authority having jurisdiction.
End bearing
resistance
Frictional
resistance
(2) The design capacity of a friction pile may be determined on the basis
of frictional resistance between its surface and the ground with which it is in
permanent contact.
4.2.5.5. The design bearing pressure and the frictional resistance of the soil
shall be determined from:
(a) the properties of the soil by an appropriate investigation, or
(b) the records of successful local experience provided the piles are:
(i) of the same type and design,
(ii) placed in the same type and condition of soil,
(iii) driven or placed using the same type of driving equipment or
placing methods. and
-32-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
171
4.2.5.6. The total design capacity of a group of piles shall be determined by
an analysis satisfactary to the authori1y having jurisdiction but shall not:
(a) exceed the design capacity of a single pile times the number of piles
in the group, nor
(b) exceed the design bearing pressure of the supporting soil times the area
under the group plus the allowable unit shear stress times the bounding
length around the group times the thickness of the soil in which the
piles are embedded, nor
(c) cause settlements exceeding those described in Article 4.2.1.12.
Design
capacity of
pile groups
Piles in
subsiding
strata
Piles as
columns
(3) The portion of a pile in contact with air, water, peat, very soft clay, or
soils that do not provide adequate lateral support shall be considered to be
laterally unsupported and shall be designed in accordance with the appropriate requirements in Sections 4.3., 4.5., or 4.6. using the allowable stresses
in Article 4.2.5.15.
4.2.5.9. Where it is necessary to join together two parts of a pile the connection between the two parts shall be so constructed as to prevent their separation, to maintain their alignment, to support the load and, where necessary,
to be watertight.
connections
4.2.5.10.(1) When round timber piles are used they shall meet the requirements specified and be in accordance with CSA 056-1962, "Round Timber
Tunber
Pile
piles
Piles."
(2) For an end-bearing pile the stress shall be calculated by applying the
maximum load to the minimum cross-section.
(3) For a friction pile the maximum load may be applied to the crosssectional area at a point one-third of the length of the embedded portion of
the pile up from the tip.
Structural
steel piles
Precast
concrete
piles
-33-Copyright NRC-CNRC
172
Precast
prestressed
concrete
piles
Composite
piles
Connections
Spacing
Design
capacity
Stresses in
pile materials
Material
Timber
Unsawn
(a) Douglas fir or other woods
of comparable strength(l'))
(b) Jack pine, lodgepole pine, or
other woods of comparable
strength (5)
( c) Red pine or other woods of
comparable strength(ri)
Maximum allowable
stress
in compression (1)
1200 psi parallel to
grain
1000 psi parallel to
grain
7SO psi parallel to
grain
( a)
(b)
( c)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Sections
Pipe or tubing(2)
} 0.3 times yield steess
Reinforcing
Precast
Precast prestressed (3)
0.2 times
Cast in-situ in steel pipe left
compressIve
in place
strength
(d) Cast in-situ against the
soii(4)
Steel
Concrete
Column 1
Column 2
s~ified
Column 3
(2)
(3)
(")
(6)
4.2.6.A may be exceeded where hillher values can be substantiated on the basis of
reliable test data and demonstrated to the satisfaction of the authority ItIJ11inf1
jurisdiction.
Metal thinner than 0.18 in. shall not be considered as contributing to the structural
strength of the pile section.
Exclusive of the prestress.
The outer 1 in. of concrete shall not lie considered to be a structurlll part of the
pile unless the concrete is placed in small batches within the protection of a forming tube and is compacted prior to attaining an initial set.
CSA Stand:.lfd 086-1970, Code of Recommended Practice for Engineering Design in
Timber 'provides information on.\oods of comparable strength as well as other properties.
-34-Copyright NRC-CNRC
173
Arrangement of Piles
4.2.5.16. Where a column supported by a pile foundation does not have
Piles
supporting
columns
Piles
supporting
strip footings
or walls
(2) Where a wall that does have adequate lateral support is supported by a
pile foundation. the foundation may be a single row of piles.
4.2.5.18. 'Where piles are end-bearing the distance centre-to-centre of two piles
'5hall not be less than 1 ft (305 mm) plus the average butt diameter or diagonal
of the two piles.
Spacing of
piles
1.2.5.19.(1) Except as provided for in Sentence (2), where piles are not end
bearing, the distance centre-to-centre of two piles shall not be less than 2Yz
times the average butt diameter or diagonal of the two piles (see Clause
4.2.5.14.(b) ).
(2) Where piles are of unencased cast-in-place concrete and are placed
using a driven forming tube, the distance centre-to-centre of two piles shall
not be less than 2Yz times the average of the greatest shaft diameters of the
piles.
Pile driving
records
of head and packing, and number of blows per foot or inch as appropriate
during the driving process. These records shall be used to compare the behaviour of one pile with another, and in particular with a pile that has been
test-loaded.
(2) The ability of a driven pile to develop its design capacity may be
checked on the basis of its driving resistance where:
(a) the pile design capacity is less than 60 tons (534 kN), and
(b) it is impractical to determine the capacity as provided for in Articles
4.2.5.3. and 4.2.5.4., and
(c) the penetration per blow after a period of at least 24 he after driving
does not exceed that immediately after driving.
(3) Where a pile is known to be damaged or the driving records for any
pile indicates that the pile has been damaged, the load-carrying capacity shall
be a~sessed by the person referred to under Sentence 4.2.1.16.(3).
Damaged
piles
4.2.5.22.(1) Where a pile is driven into place and the tip or bead of the pile
Protection
of piles
during
driving
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-35-
174
(3) For prestressed concrete piles the driving cap or helmet shall be suffi.dently large and shallow so as not to bind the pile head if it twists during
driving, and thick cushion blocks of soft compressible wood or other
approved material shall be used to protect the pile heads from direct impact
in driving.
Movement
of adjacent
piles during
driving
(2) Except as provided in Sentence (3), piles shall not be redriven. Notification of the condition shall be given to the authority having jurisdiction who
may require that the condition of the foundation be assessed by a special
investigation.
(3) Where other than cast-in-place piles are used they shall be redriven
providing the pile movement is upward and without lateral displacement.
Jetting
or preexcavation
Tolerance of
alignment
Misaligned
piles
(2) Where piles deviate from required axial alignment or plan location by
more than permitted in Sentence (1), the condition of the foundation shall be
assessed by a special investigation and, where required, correction made by
the installation of additional piles, by strengthening the piles, by reduction in
capacity, by lateral bracing or other means acceptable to the authority having
jurisdiction.
Cast-in-placc
concrete
4.2.6.2. The provisions of Articles 4.2.1.16., 4.2.2.9., 4.2.5.2. to 4.2.5.7. inclusive, 4.2.5.14. and 4.2.5.18. relating to pile foundations shall also govern
the design, installation, inspection and testing of pier and caisson foundations.
-36-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
175
4.2.6.3. Mter the excavation for a pier or caisson has been completed, the
ground at the bottom of the excavation shall be inspected immediately and
the excavation shall be filled with concrete or other material forthwith. In no
case shall an excavation be left open overnight.
Inspection
of piers or
caissons
Piers or
caissons of
concrete
Tensile
stresses
Maximum
slope of bell
4.2.6.7. Outer shells of steel pipe or steel tubing thinner than 0.18 in. (4.6 mm)
shall not be considered as contributing to the structural strength of a pier or
caisson.
this Section may be used where such systems are based on analytical and
engineering principles, and where reliable test data demonstrate to the satisfaction of the authority having jurisdiction the safety of the foundation for
the purpose intended.
SUBSECTION 4.2.8. EXCAVATING, PLACING AND FILLING
Excavating
4.2.8.1. Where during excavations or placing of the foundation any condition
described in Article 4.2.1.17. is encountered, the foulldat ion design shall be
reassessed to the satisfaction of the authority having jurisdiction.
Altered
conditions
Protection
of adjacent
property
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-37-
Excavation
procedure
176
Placing of Foundations
Sensitive
soils
4.2.8.3.(1) Where soil that loses strength when remoulded is intended to support a foundation, precautions shall be taken to ensure that the soil is not
disturbed.
(2) Where cohesive soils which exhibit excessive tendencies to swell and
shrink are encountered, precautions shall be taken to limit moisture content
changes in the supporting soil so that detrimental effects will not occur.
(3) Where such precautions are not successful, the requirements of Sentence 4.2.1.17.(4) shall apply.
Freezing of
supporting
soU
Bearing
surface
on rock
Backfilling
Slag as fill
Compaction
of fill
4.2.8.7. A fill consisting of natural inorganic soil, slag or other material demonstrated to be suitable may be used for the support of the foundation of a
building provided it is compacted in a manner satisfactory to the authority
having jurisdiction.
Pre]oading
Filling
-38-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
l
NATIONAL
BUILDING
CODE
OF
CANADA
PART 4 DESIGN
SECTION 4.3
WOOD CONSTRUCTION
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-39-
1970
-40-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
179
SECTION 4.3
WOOD CONSTRUCTION
Application
4.3.1.1.(1) This Section applies to:
(a) all buildings used for the following occupancies
(i) Group A, Assembly Occupancies
(ii) Group B, Institutional Occupancies
(iii) Group F, Division I,High Hazard Industrial Occupancies
(b) all buildings exceeding 6000 sq ft (558 m2) in building area or exceeding 3 storeys in height used for the following occupancies
(i) Group C, Residential Occupancies
(ii) Group D, Business and Personal Services Occupancies
(iii) Group E, Mercantile Occupancies
(iv) Group F, Divisions 2 and 3, Medium and Low Hazard Industrial
Occupancies
(2) For buildings not listed in Sentence (1), requirements for design will
be found in Part 9 of this Bylaw.
Scope
4.3.1.2. This Section applies to buildings and their structural members made
from wood with respect to structurally graded lumber, lumber not structurally
graded, glued-laminated timber, plywood, piling, pole construction and major
fastenings.
Definitions
4.3.1.3. Words that appear in italics are defined in Part 2 of this Bylaw.
Minimum Safety and Performance
4.3.1.4. Buildings and their structural members shall be designed to resist
effectively all effects of loads and influences that may be expected and shall
satisfy the requirements of Section 4.1 of this Bylaw.
SUBSECTION 4.3.2. DESIGN REQmREMENTS
4.3.2.1. Except as set forth in Article 4.1.1.4., buildings and their structural
members made of wood shall conform to CSA Standard 086-1970, "Code of
Recommended Practice for Engineering Design in Timber," as contained in
NBC Supplement No.4, Canadian Structural Design Manual, 1970.
SUBSECTION 4.3.3. CERTIFICATION
Sawn Lumber
4.3.3.1. Sawn lumber for use in conformity with the requirements of CSA
Standard 086-1970 "Code of Recommended Practice for Engineered Design
in Timber", shall be identified by the grade stamp of an association or
independent grading agency approved to grade lumber by an appropriate
organization acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction.
Glued-Laminated Timber
4.3.3.2. All fabricators of glued-laminated timber shall be certified by an
appropriate organization acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction, in
conformity with the requirements of CSA Standard 0117-1965 "Qualification
Code for Manufacturers of Structural Glued-Laminated Timber".
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-41-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-42-
"T
t
I
I
I,
i
NATIONAL
BUILDING
CODE
OF
CANADA
1970
PART 4 DESIGN
SECTION 4.4
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-43-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-44-
SEcrION 4.4
AppUcation
4.4.1.1.(1) This Section applies to:
(a) all buildings used for the following occupancies
(i) Group A, A.ssembly Occupancies
(ii) Group B, Institutional Occupancies
(iii) Group F, Division 1, High Hazard Il1dustrial Occupancies
(b) all buildings exceeding 6000 sq ft (SS8 m2) in building area or exceeding 3 storeys in height used for the following occupancies
(i) Group C, Residential Occupancies
(ii) Group D, Busine.ss and Personal Services Occupancies
(iii) Group B, Mercantile Occupancies
(iv) Group F, Divisions 2 and 3, Medium ami Low Hazard Industrial
Occupancies
(Z) For buildings not listed in Sentence (1), requirements for design will
be found in Part 9 of this Bylaw.
'
Scope
4.4.1.2. This Section applies to buildings and their structural members made
from plain or reinforced masonry.
Definitions
4.4.1.3. Words that appear in italics are defined in Part 2 of this Bylaw.
-45-Copyright NRC-CNRC
-46-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
NATIONAL
BUILDING
CODE
OF
CANADA
PART 4 DESIGN
SECTION 4.5
-47-Copyright NRC-CNRC
1970
-48-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
187
SECI10N 4.5
Seope
4.5.12. This Section applies to buildings and their structural members made
from plain, reinforced and prestressed concrete whether precast or cast in
place.
Definitions
4.5.1.3. Words that appear in italics are defined in Part 2 of this Bylaw.
MinbD1IIIl Safety and Perfol'lll8Dee
U.1A. Buildings and their structural members shall be desianed to resist
eftectively all effects of loads and influences that may be expected and shall
satisfy the requirements of Section 4.1 of this Bylaw.
SUBSECI'ION 4.5.%. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
4.52.1. Except as set forth in Article 4.1.1.4. buildings and their structural
members made of plain and reinforced concrete shall conform to CSA
A23.3-1970. "Code for the Design of Plain or Reinforced Concrete Struc
tures," as contained in NBC Supplement No.4, Canadian Structural Desip
Manual,1970.
4.s2.z. Except as set forth in Article 4.1.1.4. buildings and their structural
members made of prestressed concrete shall conform to CSA A13S-1962,
"Prestressed Concrete," as contained in NBC Supplement No.4, Canadian
Structural Desian Manual, 1970.
-49-Copyright NRC-CNRC
-50-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
,.
NATIONAL
BUILDING
CODE
OF
CANADA
PART 4 DESIGN
SECTION 4.6
STEEL CONSTRUCTION
1970
191
SECI10N 4.6
STEEL CONSTRUCTION
Application
4.6.1.1.(1) This Section applies to:
(a) all buildings used for the following occupancies
(i) Group A, Assembly Occupancies
(ii) Group B, Institutional Occupancies
(iii) Group F, Division 1, High Hazard Industrial Occupancies
(b) all buildings exceeding 6000 sq ft (558 m2) in building area or exceeding 3 storeys in height used for the following occupancies
(i) Group C, Residential Occupancies
(ii) Group D, Business and Personal Services Occupancies
(iii) Group E, Mercantile Occupancies
(iv) Group F, Divisions 2 and 3, Medium and Low Hazard Industrial
Occupancies.
(2) For buildings not listed in Sentence (1), requirements for design will
be found in Part 9 of this Bylaw.
Scope
4.6.1.2. This Section applies to buildings and their structural members made
from structural and light gauge steel.
Definitions
4.6.1.3. Words that appear in italics are defined in Part 2 of this Bylaw.
Minimum Safety and Performance
4.6.1.4. Buildings and their structural members shan be designed to resist
effectively all effects of loads and influences that may be expected and sha11
satisfy the requirements of Section 4.1 of this Bylaw.
SllBSECTION 4.6.2. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
4.6.2.1. Except as set forth in Article 4.1.1.4., ,buildings and their structural
members made of structural steel shall conform to CSA S16-1969, "Stee]
Structures for Buildings," as contained in NBC Supplement No.4, Canadian
Structural Design Manual, 1970.
4.6.2.2. Except as set forth in Article 4.1.1.4., buildings and their structural
members made of light gauge steel shall conform to CSA S136-1963, "Design
of Light Gauge Steel Structural Members." as contained in NBC Supplement
No.4, Canadian Structural Design Manual, 1970.
-53-Copyright NRC-CNRC
-54-Copyright NRC-CNRC
NATIONAL
BUILDING
CODE
OF
CANADA
1970
PART 4 DESIGN
SECTION 4.7
ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-56-
195
SECI10N 4.7
ALUMINUM CONSTRUCI10N
AppHeation
4.7.1.1.(1) This Section applies to:
(a) all buildings used for the following occupancies
(i) Group A, Assembly Occupancies
(il) Group B, Institutional Occupancies
(iii) Group F, Division 1, High HaZlJrd Indurial Occllpancies
(b) all bllildings exceeding 6000 sq ft (558 m2) in building area or exceeding 3 storeys in height used for the following occupancies
(i) Group C, Residential Occupancies
(ii) Group D, Business and Personal Services Occupancies
(ill) Group E, Mercantile Occupancies
(iv) Group F, Divisions 2 and 3, Medium and Low Hazard Industrial
Occllpancies
(2) For buildings not listed in Sentence (1), requirements for design will be
found in Part 9 of this Bylaw.
Seope
4.7.1.2. This Section applies to buildings and their structural members made
from structural and light gauge aluminum.
Deftnitions
4.7.1.3. Words that appear in italics are defined in Part 2 of this Bylaw.
-57-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-58-
~~--r
I
t
I,
NATIONAL
BUILDING
CODE
OF
CANADA
PART 4 DESIGN
SECTION 4.8
CLADDING
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-59-
1970
-60-Copyright NRC-CNRC
199
SECTION 4.8
CLADDING
Application
4.8.1.1.(1) This Section applies to:
(a) all buildings used for the following occupancies
(i) Group A, Assembly Occupancies
(ii) Group B, IllStitutional Occupallcies
(iii) Group F, Division 1, High Hazard Industrial Occupancies
(b) all buildings exceeding 6000 sq ft (558 m2) in building area or exceeding 3 storeys in height used for the following occupancies
(i) Group C, Residential Occupancies
(ii) Group D, Business and Personal Services Occupancies
(iii) Group E, Mercantile Occupancies
(iv) Group F, Divisions 2 and 3, Medium and Low Hazard Industrial
Occupancies.
(2) For buildings not listed in Sentence (1), requirements for design will
be found in Part 9 of this Bylaw.
Scope
4.8.1.%.(1) This Section applies to the design of a building assembly with
respect to the control of groundwater, condensation, and the penetration of
wind and rain.
(2) The design and structural requirements of other Sections of this Part
and of other Parts of this Bylaw shall apply.
Definitions
4.8.1.3. Words that appear in italics are defined in Part 2 of this Bylaw.
Control of Condensation
4.8.1.4.(1) Where a building assembly is to be subjected to a temperature
differential and differential in water vapour pressure .and will be adversely
affected by condensation the assembly shall be designed to prevent condensation by providing a continuous vapour and air barrier in the assembly on the
high vapour pressure side of the material that has the major thermal resistance.
(2) Where a material or combination of materials that have a resistance
to water vapour flow equivalent to that of a vapour barrier are used on the
low vapour pressure side of the material that has the major thermal resistance
in a building assembly:
(a) a vapour barrier, for use in above-grade building construction, shall be
installed on the high vapour pressure side, and
(b) an air space ventilated to the outside or other method of equal effectiveness shall be provided for removing the water vapour that may pass
from the high vapour pressure side through the material with the major
thermal resistance.
(3) The requirements of Sentences (1) and (2) do not apply where proof is
provided to the authority having jurisdiction to show that the performance of
a building assembly is satisfactory with respect to the control of condensation.
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-61-
Vapour and
air barriers
200
Joints
Air
infiltration
and
exfiltration
Roofing
Parapets
Exterior
cladding
(6) Exterior wall cladding shall be so installed that it sheds water to prevent its entry into other components of the building assembly. Where there is
a likelihood of some penetration, drainage shall be provided to take water
back to the outside.
Through-wall
flashing
Control of Groundwater
4.8.1.6.(1) Where moisture from the ground can move upward into a wall
and cause deterioration of the materials in the wall assembly, a through-wall
flashing shall be installed in the wall below the materials likely to be so
affected.
(2) The portion of an exterior basement or cellar wall below ground level
or any floor slab in contact with the ground shall be dampproofed or waterproofed as appropriate in accordance with the requirements in Part 9 of this
Bylaw where such wall or floor is not impervious to water.
SUBSECTION 4.8.2. MATERIALS
Material
specifications
4.8.2.1. A material used as cladding, vapour barrier, flashing, thermal insulation or fastening device shall comply with the appropriate material requirements as set forth in Part 9 of this Bylaw.
Materials
resistant to
deterioration
Fastening
devices
-62-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
'. 201
SUBSBCTtON 4.8.3. PRACTICES
4.8.3J.. Where a ~aterial is used as cladding, vapour barrier, thermal insulation, sheathing paper, flashing or fastening device, the practices to be followed
in installing it shall be in accordance with the requirements set forth in the
appropriate sections of Parts 3, 4 and 9 of this Bylaw.
InitaUation
,radices
(2) Backing for cladding as provided for in Sentence (1) shall be so located,
secured and of a kind suitable for the type of fasteners to be used to attach
the cladding.
-63-Copyright NRC-CNRC
Attacllment
to
accomDlOdate
dCformatiol1$
I
,I
I
-64-Copyright NRC-CNRC
PART B
I
j
DESIGN CODES
Code of Recommended Practice for Engineering Design in Timber (CSA
086-1970)
Plain and Reinforced Masonry
Code for the Design of Plain and Reinforced Concrete Structures (CSA
A23.3-1970)
Prestressed Concrete (CSA A135-1962)
Steel Structures for Building (CSA Sl6-1969)
Design of Light Gauge Steel Structural lVlembers (CSA S136-1963)
The Structural Use of Aluminum in Buildings (CSA S157-1969)
Design of Light Gauge Aluminum Products (CSA S19(}-1968)
-65-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-66-
""
-67-Copyright NRC-CNRC
-68-Copyright NRC-CNRC
CONTENTS
Page
Members of the CSA Committee on Engineering Design in Timber. . .
STANDARD
1. Scope ........................... , . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . .. . . . ..
1.1 Scope. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
1 . 2 Reference Publications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
11
11
11
2. Definitions.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
2. 1 Technical Terms. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2 Lumber Terms. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12
12
14
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
17
17
18
18
18
18
18
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
21
22
22
22
22
-69-Copyright NRC-CNRC
27
27
4. Sawn Lumber. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
4.1 Scope..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .............................
4.2 :Materials........ . . . . . . .. ......... .....................
4.2.1 GeneraL ........................................ "
4.2.2 Identification of Lumber.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .........
4.2.3 Regraded Lumber ...... , ..........................
4.2.4 Sizes..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
4.3 Allowable Unit Stresses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
4.3.1 Structurally Graded Lumber.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ....
4. 3 . 2 Ti m ber Not Structurally Graded. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
4. 3. 3 Service Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
4.3.4 Lumber Graded by Non-Destructive Test. . . . . . . . . . . ..
4.3.5 Additional Species and Grades. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
4.4 Design of Structural Units. . . . . . . . .. ......................
4.4.1 Bending lVlembers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
4.4.1.1 Continuity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..... ...
4.4.1. 2 Lateral Support..... ... ...................
4.4.1.3 Decking....... .. .......... ..............
4.4.2 Slenderness Ratio for Stud vValls. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
30
30
30
31
31
31
31
31
32
33
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
43
43
43
44
44
44
46
48
6. Plywood........................... ........................
49
6. 1 Scope........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
49
-70-Copyright NRC-CNRC
23
27
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
50
50
SO
50
52
52
52
52
52
52
52
52
53
53
53
53
54
54
54
54
S4
S5
55
7. Timber Piling. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
56
7. 1 Scope..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
56
56
56
56
56
56
56
57
8.1 Scope..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
8.2 General Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .......
8.2 . 1 Reference Standard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
8.2.2 Preservative Treatment ........................... "
57
57
57
57
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-71-
8.3 Design..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
8.3.1 GeneraL..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
8.3.2 Column Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . ..
8.3.3 Embedded Portion. . ... . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
8.4 Allowable Unit Stresses for Poles... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
8.4.1 Round Poles ................. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ..
8.4.2 Sawn Poles .................... , . . .... . . .. .... . .. ..
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
9. Timber Fastenings. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9. 1 Scope..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.2 General Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.2.1 Materials..........................................
9.2. 1. 1 Split Ring Connectors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.2 . 1. 2 Shear Plate Connectors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.2. 1 . 3 Bolts and Lag Screws. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.2. 1.4 Truss Plates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.2.2 Conditions of Use. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.2.2.1 GeneraL..................................
9.2.2.2 Tightening and Initial Maintenance. . . . . . . . ..
9.2.2.3 Washers..... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.2.2.4 Maintenance of Edge Distance and End
Distance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.2.2.5 Fabrication................................
9.2.2.6 Bolt Holes........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9. 2.2. 7 Lag Screw Holes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.2. 2 . 8 Connector Grooves. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.2.3 EccentricJoints ....................................
9.2.4 Group of Fasteners. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.2.4.'1 GeneraL .............. " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.2.4.2 Row of Fasteners. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.2.4.3 Allowable Load............................
9.2.4.4 Cross-Sectional Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.3 Design of Timber Connector Joints ....................... "
9. 3. 1 General Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.3. 1. 1 Connector Unit .......................... "
9.3.1 .2 Concentric Grooves. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.3.1.3 Distance Factors. . . . . . . .. .................
9.3.1.4 Moisture Content Factor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.3.1.5 Lumber Thickness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.3.1.6 Lag Screw Connector Joints. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.3.1.7 Net Section........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.3.2 Allowable Loads ..................... , . . . . .. .. . . . ..
9.4 Design of Bolted Joints. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.4.1 GeneraL .......... , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...
9.4.2 Condition of Timber ................................
9.4.3 Service Conditions........ . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. .. ... ..
9.4.4 Side Members ... , ., ., ..................... , . . .....
9.4.4.1 Materials .............. , ............... , .,.
9.4.4.2 Dimensions...... . .... . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
58
58
58
58
58
58
58
58
59
59
59
59
-72.-Copyright NRC-CNRC
60
60
60
60
60
61
62
62
62
62
62
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
67
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
76
76
76
76
76
76
77
79
79
80
80
80
80
80
80
81
81
81
81
81
81
81
81
82
82
82
83
83
84
90
90
-73-Copyright NRC-CNRC
CSA STANDARD
086
PREFACE
This new edition of CSA Standard 086, Code of Recommended Practice
for Engineering Design in Timber, supersedes the first edition published
in 1959.
CSA Standard 086 has been prepared to provide an engineering basis
for design in wood products and some fastenings. I t assumes the use of
standard engineering design procedures and formulas, but includes engineering
assumptions and formulas unique to these materials. It also includes data on
applicable design methods, allowable unit stresses for materials, and allowable
loads on fastenings. Some useful data, including the methods used in assigning
allowable unit stresses for lumber, are included in the Appendices.
When applied to buildings, CSA Standard 086 is intended to be used in
conjunction with the National Building Code of Canada, and is incorporated
by reference in the 1970 edition of that Code. In the preparation of CSA
Standard 086, liaison has been maintained with the Secretariat and appropriate
Committees of the National Building Code of Canada, in order to assure that
it is consistent throughout.
The first edition, published in 1959, brought together design information
previously dispersed in technical periodicals and individual standards. In
this second edition, revisions have been made to incorporate the results of
the most recent research. Species groupings have been changed to conform to
commercial practice, revised working stresses have been given, the scope of
the plywood section has been broadened, and new material on fastenings is
incorpora ted.
This Standard was prepared by a Committee of professional engineers,
with balanced representation from producers of wood products, consulting
engineers, universities, government, and others. The Committee received
valuable advice and counsel from five Subcommittees, covering sawn lumber,
glued-laminated timber, plywood, poles and piles, and fastenings. Preparation
of this edition took place over a three-year period, with the aid of many
comments from interested segments of the general public.
This Standard sets out minimum requirements for the design of timber
buildings and other structures of usual proportions. It should not be con
sidered a textbook, and, of course, should be used only by competent engineers.
When members or structures are of such specialized nature or complex treatment that the provisions of this Standard are not directly applicable, such
competent engineers would be expected to provide minimum requirements
equivalent to those set out in this Standard.
Cooperation of the Forest Products Laboratories of Canada, of the De
partment of Fisheries and Forestry, Ottawa, the U.S. Forest Products Laboratory, the Division of Building Research of National Research Council, and
of the research facilities of the University of British Columbia and of Nova
Scotia Technical College, as well as the cooperation of many other research
and academic organizations in Canada and the United States, is gratefully
acknowledged.
This Standard was prepared by the CSA Committee on Engineering
Design in Timber under the jurisdiction of the Sectional Committee on
Structures, and was formally approved by these Committees.
REXDALE, DECEMBER, 1910
NOTE: In order to keep abreast of progress in the industries concerned, CSA
Publications are subject to periodic review. Suggestions for improvement
will be welcomed at all times. They will be recorded and in due course
brought to the attention of the appropriate committee for consideration.
Also, requests for interpretation will be accepted by the Committee. They
should be worded in such a manner as to permit a simple "yes" or "no"
answer based on the literal text of the requirement concerned.
All enquiries regarding this Standard should be addressed to Canadian.
Standards Association, 178 Rexdale Boulevard, Rexdale 603, Ontario.
REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS
A LIST OF PUBLICATIONS
REFERRED TO IN THIS STANDARD
IS INCLUDED IN CLAUSE 1.2.
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-75-
-76-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
11
086
CODE OF RECOMMENDED PRACTICE
FOR
ENGINEERING DESIGN IN TIMBER
1. SCOPE
1.1 Scope
1.1.1 This Standard provides design criteria for structurally graded
lumber, lumber not structurally graded, glued-laminated timber, plywood,
piling, pole construction, and major fastenings.
eSA Standards
C15(E)-1948, Douglas Fir Poles;
G40. 8-1960, Structural Steels with Improved Resistance to Brittle Fracture;
G40.12-1964, General Purpose Structural Steel;
015.1-1950, Eastern White Cedar Poles;
015.2-1969, The Physical Properties of Western Red Cedar Poles and
Reinforcing Stubs;
015.3-1960, The Physical Properties of Jack, Lodgepole, and Red Pine
Poles, and Reinforcing Stubs;
056-1962, Round Timber Piles;
080-1970, Wood Preservation;
0112.3-1960, Casein Glues for Wood;
0112.5-1960, Urea Resin Adhesives for Wood (Room- and High-Temperature Curing);
0112.7-1960, Phenol and Resorcinol Resin Adhesives for Wood (Roomand Intermediate-Temperature Curing);
0121-1961, Douglas Fir Plywood;
0122-1969, Structural Glued-Laminated Timber;
0141-1970, Softwood Lumber;
0177-1965, Qualification Code for Manufacturers of Structural GluedLaminated Timber;
S6-1966, Design of Highway Bridges.
ASTM * Standards
A47-68, Malleable Iron Castings;
A307-67, Low-Carbon Steel Externally and Internally Threaded Standard
Fasteners;
A446-67, Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) Steel Sheets of Structural Quality Coi1s,.
and Cut Lengths;
"'American Society for Testing and Materials.
-77-Copyright NRC-CNRC
12
D245-70, Establishing Structural Grades and Related Allowable Properties for Visually Graded Lumber;
DI761-68, Testing l\Jetal Fasteners in vVood.
General
Department of Forestry of Canada Publication 1104, Strength and
Related Properties of \\Tood Grown in Canada;
SAE Handbook, 1969;
National Building Code of Canada, 1970.
NLGA * Standard Grading Rules for Canadian Lumber, 1970.
Authority.
2. DEFINITIONS
2.1 Technical Terms. The following definitions apply in this Standard:
Adhesive means a substance capable of holding materials together by
surface attachment;
Butt-joint means a plain square joint between the ends of two pieces.
of wood or plywood;
Column
Solid column means a compression member consisting of a
single piece, or of pieces properly glued or fastened together to form a single
solid member;
Spaced column means a column consisting of two or more
individual members with their longitudinal axes parallel, separated at the
ends and intermediate points of their length by blocking, and joined at the
ends by connectors capable of developing the required shear resistance;
Density means weight per unit volume. In the case of wood, density
is usually expressed as pounds per cubic foot at a specified moisture content;
Depth means, in a bending member, the dimension of the member
parallel to the direction in which load is applied;
Edge distance means the distance from the edge of the member to the
centre of the nearest fastening;
End distance means the distance measured parallel to the axis of a
piece from the centre of a fastening to the square cut end of the member.
In the case of a connector, if the end of the member is not square cut, the
end distance shall be taken from any point on the centre half of the connector diameter drawn perpendicular to the centre line of the piece to the
nearest point on the end of the member measured parallel to the axis of a
piece (see Figure 5);
Fibre saturation point means the moisture content at which the cell
walls are saturated and the cell cavities are free of water-approximately
25-30 per cent moisture content;
Frame construction means structures erected with studs, joists and
rafters;
Glue means a substance capable of holding materials together by
surface attachment. Through general use the term is now synonymous with
the term "adhesive";
Glued-laminated timber (Glulam) means a structural timber
product obtained by gluing together a number of laminations having their
grain essentially parallel;
13
Lumber
Sawn lumber means the product of a saw mill not further
manufactured than by sawing, resawing, passing lengthwise through a
standard planing mill, and cross-cutting to length;
Nominal size lumber means the size by which lumber is known
and sold on the market. Actual size may differ considerably from the size
by which it is designated, depending upon sawing and dtessing procedures;
Rough lumber means lumber as it comes from the saw;
Yard lumber means lumber of those sizes and patterns which is
intended for general building purposes. The grading of yard lumber is
based on the intended uses of the particular grade and is applied to each
piece with reference to its size and length when graded, without reference
to further manufacture;
Moisture content means the weight of water in wood expressed as a
percentage of its oven-dry weight;
Ply means a thin layer or sheet of wood (veneer) ;
Plywood means sheets or panels of wood made of three or more layers
of veneer joined with glue and laid with the grain of adjoining veneers at
right angles.
Pole construction means a form of construction in which the principal
vertical members are round or sawn wood poles embedded in the ground and
extending vertically above ground to provide both foundation and vertical
framing members for the structure;
Preserva tive
Preservative treatment means, unless otherwise noted, impregnation under pressure with a wood preservative;
Wood preservative means any suitable substance that is toxic
to fungi, insects, borers, and other living, wood-destroying organisms;
Rolling shear means shear causin! wood fibres at right angles to the
principal shearing forces to tend to roll;
Scarf means a sloping cut, plain, hooked, serrated, or fingered, made
a t the end of a piece of wood or plywood for the purpose of joining pieces
together longitudinally;
Scarf-joint means a longitudinal end joint made by joining two
scarfs with glue;
-79-Copyright NRC-CNRC
14
Service condition
Dry service condition means a condition in which the average
equilibrium moisture content over a year is 15 per cent or less;
Wet service condition means all service conditions other than
dry;
Sheathing means either the first layer of exterior wall covering fastened
to the studs or the load-carrying surface fastened to the rafters or joists of
a roof;
Shrinkage means the decrease in the dimensions of wood owing to a
decrease of moisture content;
Slenderness factor means a factor used to modify allowable unit
stress in bending in the design of slender beams;
Slenderness ratio means the ratio of the effective length of a compres~
sion member to its least actual dimension;
Spacing of fasteners means the distance between fastenings measured
between centres;
Stiffener means a piece of wood of rectangular cross-section which is
glued or otherwise fastened to the webs between the inner surfaces of the
top and bottom flanges of a built-up beam;
Stressed skin means a form of construction in which the outer skin,
in addition to its normal function of providing a surface covering, acts
integrally with the frame members contributing to the strength of the
uni t as a whole;
Stress-graded lumber means lumber in which strength is the
controlling factor in its selection, and whose characteristics are so limited
that it may adequately fulfil a specific end use in a calculable manner;
Structurally graded lumber means lumber which has been stress
graded according t~ the provisions of specifications which have been established by methods prescribed in ASTM Standard D245, Establishing Structural Gradesand Related Allowable Properties For Visually Graded Lumber,
and to which allowable unit stresses for engineered design of single members
have been assigned in this Standard;
Stud means one of a series of slender wood structural members placed
vertically as supporting members in a wall, partition, or similar structural
unit;
Timber connector means a metal ring or plate that by being embedded in adjacent wood faces or in one wood face, acts in shear to transmit
loads from one timber to the other or from a timber to a bolt and thence
to a steel plate, respectively.
Beam means a timber with nominal width more than 2 inches greater
than nominal thickness, usually graded for use in bending with the load
applied to the narrow face (grading rules sometimes designate beams as
"beams and stringers");
Board means a piece of lumber that is less than 2 inches in nominal
thickness;
-80-Copyright NRC-CNRC
15
-81-Copyright NRC-CNRC
16
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-82-
17
The fungi that cause decay in wood require air, moisture, warmth, and a food source
of unpoisoned wood. A ir does not occur in wood until the wood cells are partially empty
of water, therefore continuously submerged wood does not decay. Decay may occur at
any moisture content between 20 per cent and complete saturation. Decay occurs from
about 40F to 115F and is optimum at 75F to POF. Wood may be treated by pressure
with approved preservatives. Some species may contain natural constituents which resist
decay depending on the species.
-83-Copyright NRC-CNRC
1
1
:
18
TABLE 1
SPECIES GROUPS
Group
Species
Balsam Fir
Pine (Lodgepole and Ponderosa only)
Spruce (all species)
Alpine Fir
NOTE: Names of species in Table 1 are standard commercial names. Additional information
01f, botanical names, commercial names and
species combinations are given in
Appendix H.
-84-Copyright NRC-CNRC
19
TABLE 2
MODIFICATION FACTORS FOR VARIOUS DURATIONS OF LOADING
Duration
of
Loadlna
Typical A.pplicationsf
Factor *
Continuoust
NormaU
2-Month
7-Day
I-Day
Instantaneous
Impact Loads.
... Factors listed are not cumulative. (See also Clause 3.3.2.2). Factors are not applicable to
modulus of elasticity. Modification factors for allowable loads on glulam rivets are given in
Table 43; factors given in Table 2 do not apply.
tContinuous application of full design load means that condition of loading under which a
structure is subjected to more or less continuous full design load as obtains in most storage
occupancies.
tNormal application of full design load means that condition of loading under which a structure
is subjected to the full design load only occasionally (as generally obtains in assembly, residential, business, and commercial occupancies, and under moving loads such as in bridges),
such that the cumulative period of full design load application does not exceed 10 years.
TypicaZ applications shown in Table 2 are not mandatory but are included for the guidance
of the designer.
Material or Fastenlq
Sawn lumber
Glued laminated lumber
Bolts
Lag screws
Truss plates installed in wood seasoned after treating
10
Plywood
Split ring and shear plate connectors
Truss plates installed in wood not seasoned after treating
20
NOTE:
The effect of fire-retardant treatment varies with the treatment, process, species, and the
wood product treated; a single factor cannot be established to cover all conditions.
20
3.3.2.4 Preservative Treatment. Allowable unit stresses otherwise permitted for wood and wood products need not be reduced because
of preservative treatment carried out in accordance with CSA Standard
080, \Vood Preservation, except as provided in Clause 3.3.2.3.
3.3.2.5 Length of Bearing. vVhen lengths of bearing or diameters of washers are less than 6 inches, and no part of the bearing area is
closer to the end of the member than 3 inches, the allowable bearing stress
may be multiplied by the appropriate modification factor as set forth in
Table 4 provided such bearing areas do not occur in positions of high
flexural stress.
TABLE 4
MODIFICATION FACTOR FOR VARIOUS LENGTHS OF BEARING
Length of Bearing
(Inches)
Y2
..~Y2
6 or more
Modification
Factor
1. 7S
1.38
1. 2S
1.19
1.13
1. 10
1.00
Timber, in common with some other materials, is subject to increasing deflection under
continuous loading of long duration. Some of this deflection is non-recoverable when
the load is finally removed from the timber. The designer should take cognizance of this
fact when designing timber structures in which excessive deflection is likely to become
unsightly or create other problems such as with sliding doors, or ponding of retained
water. In the most serious situations (such as continuous application of full design
load to green timbers in wet locations), the non-recoverable deflection is likely to equal
the original elastic deflection when the load was first applied. For timber used dry under
normal loading and with a limiting deflection span ratio of 1/360, long term nonrecoverable deflection may be disregarded. For other situations, the non-recoverable
deflection will be relative, depending upon the ratio of dead load to live load and the
cumulative effect of live load application during the life of the structure.
-86-Copyright NRC-CNRC
21
3V
(1)
(a)'
91 [2 + (a)']
= lOP (I-x)
(2)
where 1
span, inches;
P
concentrated load, pounds;
distance from reaction to load, inches; or
x
(b) For uniformly distributed loads on rectangular beams shearing
force (V) shall be calculated in accordance with Formula (3):
V = W(1-
21)
(3)
> d;
(5)
22
< d;
2b [d-(~)eJ
where F v
V
b
d
d1
d2
e
NOTE :
(6)
Notches or abrupt changes of section that will produce tension perpendicular to grain
stresses at the notch should be avoided. Stress concentrations produced are likely to cause
spliUing at the notch at low tension values and no satisfactory means are available for
determining this tension stress. A gradual change of section will reduce these stress
concentrations. Notches that produce compression perpendicular to grain are satisfactory,
subject to shear analysis outlined in Clause 3.4.1.4.
The formulae for allowable unit stresses in columns are for columns having rectangular
cross-sections. They may be used for other column cross-sections by substituting rvIZ
for d in the formulae, where r is the applicable radius of gyration of tJ,e column crosssection.
Recommended effective length factors "K" for compression members are contained in
Appendix D.
,(7)
Fe
-p
A- Fe
maximum allowable load, pounds;
area of column cross-section, square inches;
allowable unit stress in compression parallel to grain;
allowable unit stress in compression parallel to grain
adjusted to lid ratio.
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-88-
pa
23
3.4.2.2.3 Intermediate Columns. When the slenderness ratio of a column is greater than 10 but does not exceed C k , the maximum permissible unit stress F' c shall be obtained using Formula (8):
p. =
where C k
where fa
d
E
NOTE!
When
F. [ 1 - 1/3
'n:JT
2"
(d:dy]
(if
6F c = O. 641~Fo
effective length of simple column, inches;
least cross-sectional dimension, inches;
modulus of elasticity, psi.
(8)
(9)
Z:o
where Ie
36(~)' = (~)'
-89-Copyright NRC-CNRC
24
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-90-
25
_---End Block
Condition "a" with the connectors
, - - - - within 1/20 from the column end
d~ =
Dimension, in inches, of
sides of individual member
/.,.I++----Spacer Block
'-------End Block
FIGURE 1
SPACED COLUMN (CONNECTOR JOINED)
-91-Copyright NRC-CNRC
26
(_l )4J
F' e -- A
~ = Fe [1 - 7::S
1
Ckad 1
(11)
where C k ,. = !E ~ 12~2E = 1 01 IE
2 " 6F e
. ~Fo
(b) For Condition "b"
F' ()
F () [1 -
(12)
~ (_l
)4J
Ck~l
(13)
(14)
dimension of the least side of individual members of a
spaced column, inches (Figure 1);
distance between points of lateral support of continuous
or spaced columns, inches.
d1
TABLE 5
END SPACER BLOCK CONSTANTS FOR SPACED COLUMNS
End Spacer Block Constantt
lId Ratio of
Individual Member in
the Spaced Column'"
o to
Group A
Woods
11
Groups
BandC
Woods
Groups D.
EandF
Woods
15
20
33
73
27
61
25
30
35
114
155
94
128
40
195
236
162
195
45
50
55
277
318
358
229
263
296
60 to 80
399
330
o
21
48
75
101
128
154
181
208
234
261
*Constant for intermediate lid ratios may be obtained by straight line interpolation.
t For grouping
F', =
~ = (;~)
(r)'
oar
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-92.-
(15)
(16)
27
supports which provide restraint in a direction parallel to d 2 Of the permissible loads derived from the two methods of assessing a column, the
lesser shall not be exceeded.
3.4.2.3.9 Combined Stresses. When axial compression
in spaced columns is combined with bending stresses, the provisions of
Clause 3.4.4 shall be used only if the bending is in a direction parallel to the
dimension d 2 of the individual member (see Figure 1).
P/ A
a
where A
P
M
S
Fb
(17)
or
effective length associated with depth
member depth
NOTE:
-93-Copyright NRC-CNRC
28
where Fn
-94-Copyright NRC-CNRC
29
4. SAWN LUMBER
4.2.4 Sizes. For design purposes, the actual size (net dimensions)
of lumber shall be used. In Clause 4 of this Standard dimensions referred
to are nominal.
NOTE:
In developing allowable unit stresses in this Standard, variables of moisture content and
shrinkage, and their relaNonship to strength and stiffness, have been taken into account.
Accordingly, for either wet or dry service conditions standard lumber sizes applicable tv
dry lumber manufacture should be used in conjunction with Tables 8A. 8B, and 8D,
and actual mamtfactured size with Table 8C. Standard nominal sizes and net dimen.
sions of lumber and timbers are given in CSA Standard 0141, Softwood Lumber (reproduced in part in Appendix G of this Standard).
-95-Copyright NRC-CNRC
30
TABLE 6
GRADING RULES FOR SAWN LUMBER
Species
Gradlna Rule
All
Species
NOTES:
50
66
50
100
80
not be assigned to
31
-97-Copyright NRC-CNRC
32
33
TABLE 7
DECK LAYING PATIERNS AND DEFLECTION FORMULAE
Pattern
Simple Span
Controlled Random
s
I
J
J
t
t
g
'r
Description
*where.6.
w
I
E
I
Deflection Formula.
5wl4
.6.1 = 384EI
.6.2
wl4
l00EI
w/4
.6. 3 = 185EI
= 0.77
.6.1
= 0.42 .6.1
n
n
is
e
IS
d
ls
m
is
;!S
e.
-99-Copyright NRC-CNRC
...o
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Species
Group
No.1
No.2
No.3
Select Structural
Grade*
1,400
1,150
600
800
450
200
600
1,900
1,650
1,350
750
950
550
250
750
2,200
1,850
1,500
850
1,100
600
300
85-0--
Stress at
Extreme :Fibre
Shear
85
75
90
Lon~itudinal
RendinA
950
600
600
800
500
950
750
500
500
1,350
1,050
850
500
950
800
500
500
1,600
1,250
1,000
600
Parallel to
Grain
335
-------
235
460
Perpend Icular
to Grain
Compression
1,250
1,100
900
500
650
360
150
500
950
800
650
350
500
250
100
350
1,100
950
800
450
550
300
150
450
Tension
Parallel
to Grain
ALLOWABLE UNIT STRESSES FOR LIGHT FRAMING SIZES OF SAWN LUMBER CONFORMING TO
THE NLGA STANDARD GRADING RULES FOR CANADIAN LUMBER, Psi
THICKNESS-2 TO 4 INCHES; WIDTH-2 TO 4 INCHES
DRY SERVICE CONDITIONS
NORMAL DURATION OF LOAD
TABLE SA
(Continued)
1,930,000
1,930,000
1,740,000
1,540,000
1,540,000
1,540,000
1,540,000
1,540,000
1,620,000
1,620,000
1,460,000
1,300,000
1,300,000
1,300,000
1,300,000
1.300,000
1,400,000
1,400,000
1,260,000
1,120,000
1,120,000
1,120,000
L 120,000
1,120,000
Modulus
of
Elasticity
~
o
z
o
;..
;..
CN
.-6
.-6
Copyright NRC-CNRC
1,500
1,300
1,050
600
750
450
200
600
1,400
1,200
1,000
550
700
400
200
550
1,500
1.300
1,050
600
---7scr-450
200
60
65
60
800
650
400
700
600
400
400
850
700
550
350
600
500
3S0
1,150
900
700
450
800
650
450
180
235
245
900
750
600
350
450
250
100
350
850
700
600
300
400
250
100
300
900
750
600
350
1,350,000
1,350,000
1,220,000
1,080,000
1,080,060
1,080,000
1,080,000
1,080,000
1,210 ,000
1,210,000
1,080,000
970,000
970,000
970,000
970,000
970,000
1,250,000
1,250,000
1,130,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000.000
1,000,000_
SIZE: Allowable unit stresses for Construction, Standard and Utility grades apply only to members four inches in nominal width.
Altuwable unit stresses for Select Structural, No.1, No.2, No.3 and Stud grades of 3 inch X 4 inch, and 4 inch X 4 inch sizes shall be the tabulated values multiplied by the factors below:
All
Modulus
Extreme
Tension
Other
of
Fibre in
Parallel
Stresses
Bending
Elasticity
to Grain
1.00
Select Structural
1.00
0.93
0.93
No.1
1.00
0.80
0.62
0.62
No.2
1.00
0.89
0.42
0.42
No.3
1.00
1.00
0.35
0.35
Stud
1.00
1.00
0.35
0.35
NOTES: 1. Allowable unit stresses for Appearance grade meeting the requirements of the authorities listed in Table 6 shall be those listed for No.1 grade,
except that allowable unit stress in compression parallel to grain may be increased by 19 per cent.
2. Yellow Birch. Hard Maple. and Red and Whi&e Oak conforming to the grades in this Table haoe the same allowable unit stresses as the corresponding grades of Group A species.
3. An approximate mlue for modulus of rigidity may be estimated as 0.065 times the modulus of elasticity.
No.1
No.2
No.3
Select Structural
TABLE SA (Continued)
VI
:=
tt:I
1:1:1
...s:..,
CIl
...C'l
tt:I
1;1
C'l
=
Z
C'l
~
::=
~
tt:I
>
t='
tt:I
s:
s:t-J
t-J
::=
.",
t-J
0
0
t='
Ii
...
Copyright NRC-CNRC
NOTES:
1,900
1,600
1,300
750
1,400
1,200
950
550
1,650
1,400
1,150
650
1,300
1, toO
900
500
1,250
1,050
850
500
1,300
1,100
900
500
Select Structural
Select Structural
Select Structural
Select Structural
Select Structural
No.1
No.2
No.3
No.1
No.2
No.3
No.1
No.2
No.3
No.1
No.2
No.3
No.1
No.2
No.3
No.1
No.2
No.3
Select Structural
Grade
60
65
60
85
75
90
Longitudinal
Shear
Bending
Stress at
Extreme Fibre
750
700
550
350
900
800
650
400
1,000
900
750
500
1,200
1,050
900
550
1,150
1,050
850
550
1,400
1,250
1,050
650
180
235
245
335
235
460
Perpendicular
to Grain
Compression
Parallel to
Grain
1,350,000
1,350,000
1,220,000
1,080,000
1,210,000
1,210,000
1,080,000
970,000
1,250,000
1,250,000
1,130,000
1,000,000
850
750
600
350
800
700
550
300
850
750
600
350
1,620,000
1,620,000
1,460,000
1,300,000
900
800
650
350
1,400,000
1,400,000
1,260,000
1,120,000
1,930,000
1,930,000
1,740,000
1,540,000
1,250
1,050
850
500
1,toO
950
750
450
Modulus
of
Elasticity
Tension
Parallel
to Grain
except that allowable unit stress in compression parallel to grain may be increased by 19 per cent.
2. YellO'W Birch, Hard Maple, and Red and White Oak conforming to the grades in this Table have the same allowable unit stresses as the corresponding grades of Group A species.
3. A n approximate value for modulus of rigidity may be estimated at 0.065 times the modulus of elasticity.
1. AllO'Wable unit stresses for Appearance grade meeting the requirements of the authorities listed in Table 6 shall be those listed for No.1 grade,
Species
Group
ALLOWABLE UNIT STRESSES FOR JOIST AND PLANK SIZES OF SAWN LUMBER CONFORMING TO
THE NLGA STANDARD GRADING RULES FOR CANADIAN LUMBER, Psi
THICKNESS-2 TO 4 INCHES; WIDTH-6 INCHES OR MORE
DRY SERVICE CONDITIONS
NORMAL DURATION OF LOAD
TABLE 8B
CI'
CoN
0'\
...oI
Copyright NRC-CNRC
2. Yellow Birch, Hard Maple, and Red and White Oak conforming to -the grades in thts Table have the same allowable unit stresses as the corresponding grades of Group A species.
3. An approximate value for modulus of rigidity may be estimated at 0.065 times the modulus of elasticity.
...o
Copyright NRC-CNRC
85
85
1,150
950
1,100
900
1,150
950
Select Structural
No.1 Structural
Select Structural
No. 1 Structural
Select Structural
No.1 Structural
85
85
95
95
120
120
100
100
125
125
1,500
1,200
1,250
1,000
1.700
1,350
SeJect Structural
No. 1 Structural
Select Structural
No.1 Structural
hear
Lon~itudlnal
Parallel to
Grain
Perpendicular
to Grain
Compression
Tension
Parallel
to Grain
600
500
700
600
800
650
180
180
235
235
245
245
335
335
235
235
900
750
950
800
460
460
1,100
900
700
500
650
450
700
500
850
600
750
500
1,000
700
(a) BEAMS AND STRINGERS. - Depth more than 2 Inches Ill'eater than thickness
Stress at
Extreme Fibre
Select Structural
No.1 Structural
Grade
Species
Group
Bending
TABLE 8e
(Continued)
1,160,000
1,160,000
1,120,000
1.120,000
1,210,000
1,210,000
1,250.000
1,250,000
1,450,000
1,450,000
1,720,000
1,720,000
Modulus
of
Elasticity
~
~
o
<:H
00
...o
\II
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Select Structural
No. 1 Structural
650
550
750
650
850
750
1.000
850
950
850
1,200
1.050
180
180
235
235
1,120,000
1,120,000
1,160,000
1.160,000
700
550
750
600
1,210,000
1,210,000
750
600
245
245
1,250,000
1,250,000
900
750
335
335
1,450,000
1,450,000
1,720,000
1,720,000
800
650
1.050
850
235
235
460
460
Allowable unit stresses in tension parallel Ie grain for "beam and stringer" grades may be increased by 14 per cent when grade restrictions applicable
to the middle third of the piece are applied over the full length of the piece.
NOTES: 1. Bending stresses for "beams and stringers" apply only when a member is loaded on the narrow face.
2: "Posts and timbers" graded to "beam and stringer" rules may be assigned beam and stringer stresses.
3. Yelluw Birch, Hard Maple, and Red and White Oak have the same allowable unit stresses as Group A for Select Structural or No.1 Structural
grades respectively.
4. A n approximate value for modulus of rigidity may be estimated as 0.065 times the modulus of elasticity.
5. With sawn members thicker than 4 inches, which season slowly, care should be exercised to avoid overloading in compression before apprecwble
seasoning of tlte outer fibres has taken place, otherwise compression stresses for wet service conditions shall be used.
6. All grades listed in Table Be are graded for continuity except for all grades of beam and stringer size class.
85
60
Select Structural
No. 1 Structural
85
60
1,100
900
1,100
900
Select Structural
No. 1 Structural
120
80
95
65
1,400
1,100
Select Structural
No. 1 Structural
100
70
125
85
1,050
850
1,150
950
Select Structural
No.1 Structural
1.550
1.300
Select Structural
No. 1 Structural
(b) POSTS AND TIMBERS - Depth not more than 2 Inches greater than thickness
TABLE 8C (Continued)
\0
(",,)
:j
'""'
Z
Z
Cl
!:
40
TABLE 8D
ALLOWABLE UNIT STRESSES FOR PLANK DECKING, CONFORMING TO
THE NLGA STANDARD GRADING RULES FOR CANADIAN LUMBER, Psi
THICKNESS-l TO 4 INCHES; WIDTH-6 INCHES OR MORE
DRY SERVICE CONDITIONS
NORMAL DURATION OF LOAD
CoInpression
Perpendicular
to
Grain
Grade
Bendlnll
Stress at
Extreme
Fibre
Select
Commercial
1,800
1,550
460
1,930,000
1,740,000
Select
Commercial
1,350
1,150
235
1,620,000
1,460,000
Select
Commercial
1,600
1,350
335
1,400,000
1,260,000
Select
Commercial
1,250
1,050
245
1,350,000
1,220,000
Select
Commercial
1,200
1,000
235
1,210,000
1,080.000
=roup
es
NOTES:
Modulus
of
Elasticity
1. Bending stresses apply only when decking is loaded on the wide face.
2. An approximate value for modulus of rigidity may be estimated at 0.065 times the
modulus of elasticity.
TABLE 9
MODIFICATION FACTORS FOR SAWN LUMBER
UNDER VARIOUS SERVICE CONDITIONS
Modification Factor
Compression
Bendlnll
Nominal
Lumber
Service Thlckne
Condition: Inches
Stress
at
Extreme
Fibre
Lonllltudlnal
Shear
Parallel
to
Grain
PerpendicuJar
to
Grain
Tension
Parallel
to
Grain
Modulus
of
EIasticity
1.00
Dry
All
Thicknesses
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Wet
4 or Less
0.84
0.96
0.69
0.67
0.84
Over"
1.00
1.00
0.91
0.67
1.00
0.94
1.00
For lumber manufactured at more than 19 per cent moisture content, and used under either wet
or dry service conditions, the modification factor for "wet" service conditions shall be used for
longitudinal shear.
41
TABLE 10
MODIFICATION FACTORS FOR SAWN LUMBER OF 2- TO 4-INCH
NOMINAL THICKNESS WHEN MANUFACTURED
AT MAXIMUM 15 PER CENT MOISTURE CONTENT
ModiOcadon Factor
Bending
Moisture
Content at
Time of
Manufacture
(Per Cent)
15
Per Cent
Maximum
Service
Condition
Moisture
Content
Will Not
Exceed
15 Per Cent
at AnyTime
Stress
at
Extreme
Fibre
1.08
Compression
Longltudlnal
Shear
Parallel
to
Grain
Perpendlcular
to
Grain
Tension
Parallel
to
Grain
Modulus
of
Elastl-
1.05
1.17
1.00
1.08
1.05
-107-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
dty
42
5. GLUED-LAMINATED TIMBER
5.1 Scope. Clause 5 applies to the engineering design of glued-laminated
timber.
5.2.2 Conditions of Use. Design tables, methods and data for bending
members specified herein apply to horizontaHy laminated members, the
wide faces of whose laminations are normal to the direction of load, except
for vertical laminating (see Clause 5.4.3).
5.3 Allowable Unit Stresses
5.3.1 General
5.3.1.1 Unit stresses for normal duration of full design load for
stress grades of Douglas Fir glulam shall not exceed the values given in
Table 12, or bending stresses for beams calculated from Clause 5.3.3 as
modified by Clauses 3.3.2 and 5.3.2.
5.3.1.2 Allowable unit stresses for normal duration of full
design load for the same stress grades of other species groups shall be the
values obtained in Clause 5.3.1.1, multiplied by the factor for the appropriate species from Table 13.
5.3.1.3 When glued-laminated members are used in load-sharing
systems as defined in Clause 2.1, the allowable unit stress otherwise permitted for single member uses (but not modulus of elasticity) may be
increased 10 per cent.
(~)2
(19)
-108-Copyright NRC-CNRC
:i
43
Ie
d
b
~lb~
(20)
TABLE 11
EFFECTIVE LENGTH I. OF BEAM
Values of
EftecdTe Lenath
1. 611
1.921
1.841
1.691
1.061
1.921
-109-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
44
Fb [ 1 -
%(
~JJ
(22)
where Ck =
where E
Fb
(21)
F'b
= 0.40E
C2
(23)
M
R
b
d
45
TABLE 12
ALLOWABLE UNIT STRESSES (Psi) FOR GLUEDLAMINATED DOUGLAS
FIR AT NORMAL DURATION OF LOAD
Dry
Service Conditions
'S
,S
18c
Compresslon
Grade:
Type
of
Stress
:)
2M
Bending
Gradet
Bending at
Extreme Fibre
Longitudinal
Shear
Axial
Compression
26t
Tension
Grade
2M
Bending
Gradet
lSc
Compres~
sion
Grade:
16t
Tension
Grade
2,400
1,600
2,200
1,900
1,300
1,800
165
165
165
145
145
145
1,900:
1,200
1,400
1,500:
1,900:
1,400
1,400
1,500t
1,600
1,800
i
..,
Axial Compression
When Combined
With Bending
1,800
1,800
460
460
460
305
305
305
Tension Parallel
to Grain Where
Section Reduced
by Notches,
Daps, Connectors
or Abrupt
Changes in
Section
1,600
1,800
1,900
1,200
1,400
1,500
Tension Parallel
to Grain Where
no Stress
Concentration
Exists
2,000
2,300
2,400
1,600
1,800
1,900
65
65
65
55
55
55
1.93
1.93
1.93
1.69
1.69
1.69
Com pression
PeCer:dicular
to ram
Tension
Perpendicular
to Grain
Modulus of
Elasticity (X1OS)
Stress grades shall meet requirements of CSA Standard 0122, Structural Glued-Laminated
Timber.
tBending Grade should be used for members stressed in bending or in bending combined with
axial stress.
tCompression Grade should be used for members primarily stressed in axial compression.
Tension Grade should be used for members stressed in axial tension.
NOTE: Modify values for other species and load durations per Tables 2 and 13.
46
TABLE 13
FACTORS FOR ALLOWABLE UNIT STRESS FOR SPECIES GROUPS
Bending
Species
Group
Stress at
Extreme
Fibre
Compreaslon
Longltudlnal
Shear
Parallel
to
Grain
Tension
P~n-
dleu ar to
Grain
Pe~n-
Parallel
to
Grain
dleu
to
Grain
Modulus of
Elasticity
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.74
0.81
0.82
0.51
0.74
1.00
0.84
0.88
0.94
0.85
0.73
0.88
1.00
0.73
0.70
0.78
0.72
0.53
0.70
0.60
0.70
0.65
0.73
0.63
0.51
0.65
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.68
0.55
0.37
0.70
0.60
0.67
For Sitka spruce the factor for longitudinal shear shaU be 0.68.
(~~fa;) , or
3Ma
f r = 2Rbd
'
(25)
. t h e Iarger,
w h'IChever IS
(26)
where fr
da
R
and
Kr = A
+ B (~ ) + C (~ )2
where A, B, C
NOTE:
(27)
-112-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
47
TABLE 14
VALUES OF CONSTANTS FOR DETERMINATION OF RADIAL STRESS
IN PITCHED CAMBERED BEAMS
Slope of Upper
Surface of Beam
(Deiree8 from Horizontal)
230'
5
730'
10
15
20
25
30
Value of Constant
A
0.0079
0.0174
0.0279
0.0391
0.1747
0.1251
0.1284
0.1939
0.0937
0.0754
0.2162
0.2119
0.1722
0.0629
0.0893
0.1214
0.1649
0.0619
0.0608
0.0605
0.0603
0.1393
0.1238
0.1115
NOTE: Values of Krfor slopes given in Table 14 are shown graphically in Appendix F.
= [1.0
(28)
zontal.
5.4.2.5 The bending stress at points of tangency on either side
of the apex (ridge) in a pitched cambered beam of rectangular cross-section
shall be calculated by Formula (29):
6Mt
(29)
f b = bd 2
t
where M t = bending moment at point of tangency, inch-pounds;
d t = depth of beam at point of tangency, inches.
5.4.2.6 The bending stress fb, as calculated in Clause 5.4.2.4 or
5.4.2.5, shall not exceed the allowable unit bending stress permitted in
Clause 5.3.1.
-113-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
48
Upper
face
FIGURE 2
PITCHED CAMBERED BEAM
-114-Copyright NRC-CNRC
49
6. PLYWOOD
-115-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
50
-116-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
......
I
..&
..&
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Type of Stress
TABLE 15
56
75
223
451
1,800,000
1,125,000
117,000
375,000
243
493
1,800,000
1,125,000
117,000
375,000
440
56
75
440
1,610
1,360
1,055
416
2,080
1,875
1,665
295
2,220
1,875
1,665
303
1,760
1,450
1,055
432
1,665
1,665
1,665
2,430
2,000
1,665
321
----
_I.--
117,000
375,000
1,800,000
1,125,000
210
425
56
75
440
1,510
1,360
1,055
400
2,500
2,500
2,500
1,770
1,890
Good
1 Side
2,065
Good
2 Sides
117,000
375,000
1,600,000
1,000,000
211
428
56
75
352
117,000
375,000
1,600,000
1,000,000
194
392
56
75
352
1,290
1,090
845
333
1,775
1,500
1,330
242
1,330
2,000
1,510
Good
1 Side
117,000
375,000
1,600,000
1,000,000
182
370
56
75
352
1,210
1,090
845
320
1,665
1,500
1,330
236
1,330
2,000
1.415
Solid 2 Sides,
Solid 1 Side.
Select
Sheathlnll,
Sheathinll.
1,410
1,160
845
346
1,945
1,600
1,330
257
1,330
2,000
1,650
Good
2 Sides
Solid 2 Sides,
Solid 1 Side.
Select
Sheathinll.
Sheathinll.
Vt
.....
COl
COl
"~
~
d
t:1
o't:I
52
6.4.2 Deflection
6.4.2.1 General. The deflection of plywood structural assemblies
shall be calculated using standard engineering formulae.
NOTE:
For some plywood structural assemblies the deflection due to shear may be significant
and should be considered.
-118-Copyright NRC-CNRC
53
mblies
'1ificant
Jaded
~d for
20 of
~ar is
nber,
iriate
;epaicity
vood
lting
31t
"t;
"t.
-IT
(30)
e or
the
be
to
the
where t
36t ... 1t
TABLE 16
BASIC SPACING
:he
lar
is
1,
ge
Values of b
Aj!pUcable
ormula
1,
1,
1,
Is
(31)
(30)
(31)
Nominal
Thickness
of Plywood
(Inches)
,.
Face Grain
Parallel to Loniltudlna1
Members
(Inches)
Sanded
10.1
Unsanded
Face Grain
Perpendicular to Lollllltudlna1
Members
(Inches)
Sanded
UD88nded
12.1
17.5
11.0
15.3
15.5
15.6
16.5
Y2
25.6
33.1
40.3
23.0
26.8
36.3
25.3
30.7
36.3
28.2
38.8
40.2
%
%
54
Slope of Scarf
1 in
1 in
1 in
1 in
Percentage
12
10
8
5
85
80
75
60
TABLE 17
MAXIMUM TRANSMISSION OF ALLOWABLE TENSILE STRESS
Plywood
Thickness
(Inches)
}i
%l
% Sanded
% Unsanded
Yz
%
~
Minimum Length of
Splice Plate Measured
Perpendicular to the Joint
(Inches)
6
8
10
12
14
16
16
Percentage
I
Splice Plate
on One Side
Splice Plate
on Both Sides
6i
67
67
67
67
50
50
85
85
85
85
85
85
85
-120-Copyright NRC-CNRC
55
56
7. TIMBER PILING
7.1 Scope. Clause 7 applies to the engineering design of piling; calculation
of the bearing capacity of the soil is not included.
-122-Copyright NRC-CNRC
57
8. POLE CONSTRUCTION
8.1 Scope. Clause 8 applies to the engineering design of pole type structures; calculation of the bearing capacity of the soil is not included.
8.4.2 Sawn Poles. Allowable unit stresses for sawn poles shall be
those listed in Clause 4 for the appropriate grade and species.
-123-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
58
9. TIMBER FASTENINGS
9.1 Scope. Clause 9 applies to the engineering design of connections using
timber connectors, bolts, lag screws, glulam rivets, and truss plates.
-124-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
59
TABLE 18
CONNECTOR DIMENSIONS
Dimensions
(Inches)
Spilt Ring
2%
0.163
Depth of Metal
0.750
4-Inch Malleable Iron
l%-Inch
Pressed Steel
(Inches)
"-Inch Bolt
(Inches)
Yi-Inch Bolt
(Inches)
Diameter of Plate
2.62
4.02
4.02
0.81
0.81
0.94
Thickness of Plate
0.17
0.20
0.20
Depth of Flange
0.42
0.62
0.62
Shear Plate
9.2.2.3 Washers
9.2.2.3.1 A standard cut washer or its equivalent, or in
lieu thereof a metal plate or strap, shall be placed between the wood and
the bolt head, and between the wood and the nut, when a fastening is in
shear.
9.2.2.3.2 When a bolt head or nut bears directly on a
steel plate, washers may be omitted.
9.2.2.3.3 All bolts in direct tension or with a calculated
tension component shall be provided with steel plate washers, standard
-125-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
60
ogee washers, or malleable iron washers under heads and nuts. The area of
such washers shall be such that the unit bearing stress on the wood under
the washer shall not exceed the allowable unit stress in compression perpendicular to grain. If steel washers are used, the thickness shall be not
less than one-tenth the diameter or one-tenth the length of the longer side
of the washer (see Table 19).
TABLE 19
MINIMUM STANDARD WASHER SIZES FOR CONNECTOR JOINTS
Washer Sizes
(Inches)
4-lnch Shear Plate
2%-Inch
Shear Plate
~-Inch
Split Rinl!t
4-Inch
Split Rinl!t
Bolt
;::1-Inch
Bolt
2Ys
3%
Thickness
Ys
Type of Washer
2~-Inch
ea of
nder
pernot
side
61
TABLE 20
CONNECTOR FABRICATION DIMENSIONS
2~-Inch
4-Inch
Ring
(Inches)
Ring
(Inches)
%
4.08
0.21
0.50
2.56
0.18
0.375
4-Inch Plate
e
:h
2%-Inch
Plate
(Inches)
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
~e.
::lg
to
0.19
0.45
0.25
2.25
4.03
1. 55
4.03
1. 55
%
0.97
0.27
0.64
0.22
0.50
3.49
0.97
0.27
0.64
0.22
0.50
3.49
3V
(32)
2bd e
vertical shear, pounds;
the depth of the member less the
distance from the unloaded edge of the
member to the nearest edge of the
nearest connector, inches (See Figure 3) ;
the depth of the member less the
distance from the unloaded edge of the
member to the centre of the nearest
bolt, inches;
width of member, inches.
.II
where V
de (with connectors)
:r
U-Inch
Bolt
(Inches)
Bolt
(Inches)
!d
.11
s.
y
2.63
~-Inch
de (with bolts)
Connector Joint
Bolted Joint
FIGURE 3
"de" FOR MEMBERS WITH VARIOUS FASTENINGS
-117-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
62
-128-Copyright NRC-CNRC
t-I
-0
..
Copyright NRC-CNRC
12
> 19
> 28
> 40
>64
< 12
>
>
>
>
19
28
40
64
12
19
19
28
28 - 40
40
64
64
Al (in )t
< 12
,;.no..~
wo
.........,-
NOTES: 1. Al =
2. A2 =
;:;J
co aq
Ii "0
o-n 0..
_t'lI t'lI ~
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.97
0.98
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.92
0.95
0.97
0.98
1.00
1.00
0.92
0.94
0.97
0.99
1.00
1.00
0.84
0.88
0.93
0.96
0.97
0.98
0.85
0.89
0.93
0.96
0.97
0.99
0.76
0.82
0.88
0.92
0.94
0.95
0.78
0.84
0.89
0.92
0.94
0.96
0.68
0.75
0.82
0.87
0.90
0.91
0.71
0.78
0.85
0.89
0.91
0.93
0.61
0.68
0.77
0.83
0.86
0.88
'1
0.65
0.72
0.80
0.86
0.88
0.91
0.55
0.62
0.71
0.79
0.83
0.85
1.0
0.5
AI/AJ
..."G~
aq
10
I.J
Ii>
11
o-~
t'lIt'lI
0.59
0.66
0.76
0.83
0.85
0.88
0.49
0.57
0.67
0.75
0.79
0.82
0.54
0.61
0.72
0.80
0.84
0.87
0.43
0.52
0.63
0.71
0.76
0.80
0.49
0.56
0.68
0.78
0.82
0.86
0.38
0.48
0.59
0.69
0.74
0.78
0.44
0.51
0.64
0.75
0.80
0.85
0.34
0.43
0.55
0.66
0.72
0.76
12
0'\
tN
1:11
a:
::!
c=
~
~
a:
a:
=
8
'"
iii'
;:J;:::r
~o
TABLE 21
I.J
....
W
Copyright NRC-CNRC
NOTES:
35-42
30-35
24-30
0.90
0.93
0.96
0.98
0.93
0.94
0.98
1.00
0.94
0.96
0.98
1.00
0.96
0.97
0.99
1.00
0.98
0.99
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
40 - 64
65
119
120 - 199
200
64
40
65 - 119
120 - 199
200
0.95
0.97
0.98
0.99
0.82
0.88
0.93
0.96
0.86
0.90
0.95
0.97
0.92
0.95
0.97
0.98
0.96
0.98
0.99
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
40 - 64
65 - 119
120
199
200
0.89
0.93
0.96
0.98
0.90
0.93
0.96
0.98
0.94
0.97
0.98
0.99
0.98
0.99
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
40 - 64
65 - 119
120 - 199
200
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
40 - 64
65
119
120
199
200
0.80
0.87
0.91
0.95
0.87
0.92
0.95
0.97
0.94
0.96
0.98
0.99
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
:2
39
64
119
199
25
40
65
120
Al (inS)
18-24
12-18
2-12
AI/As
TABLE 22
0.75
0.82
0.89
0.93
0.80
0.86
0.92
0.95
0.85
0.90
0.94
0.97
0.89
0.92
0.96
0.98
0.85
0.90
0.94
0.97
0.73
0.81
0.87
0.92
0.69
0.77
0.85
0.90
0.74
0.81
0.88
0.93
0.80
0.86
0.92
0.95
0.84
0.89
0.94
0.96
0.80
0.86
0.92
0.95
0.67
0.75
0.82
0.89
0.63
0.71
0.81
0.87
0.68
0.76
0.85
0.90
0.74
0.82
0.89
0.93
0.58
0.67
0.78
0.84
0.64
0.72
0.82
0.89
0.69
0.79
0.87
0.92
0.74
0.83
0.90
0.93
0.70
0.79
0.86
0.91
0.75
0.82
0.89
0.93
0.79
0.86
0.92
0.95
0.56
0.66
0.75
0.84
0.61
0.70
0.78
0.86
to
0.53
0.63
0.76
0.82
0.60
0.68
0.80
0.87
0.65
0.76
0.85
0.90
0.69
0.80
0.88
0.92
0.67
0.75
0.83
0.90
0.51
0.62
0.72
0.81
0.49
0.59
0.73
0.80
0.57
0.65
0.78
0.86
0.61
0.73
0.83
0.89
0.64
0.76
0.86
0.92
0.62
0.72
0.80
0.88
0.46
0.58
0.69
0.79
11
0.46
0.56
0.71
0.78
0.55
0.62
0.77
0.85
0.58
0.71
0.81
0.89
0.59
0.73
0.85
0.91
0.58
0.69
0.78
0.87
0.42
0.55
0.66
0.78
11
CI>
~
o00
~
~Z
65
-131-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
66
Example: A 3-inch by 12-inch nominal sawn member has 4-inch shear plate
grooves in a staggered pattern on both faces, joined by a bolt
hole for a :u; -inc~ diameter bolt.
Case 1: Spacing parallel to grain equal to 8 inches (two connector diameters) or greater.
8" or greater
15.825 in 2
FIGURE 4
EXAMPLES OF DETERMINING NET SECTION
-132Copyright NRC-CNRC
ate
wIt
lia-
67
TABLE 23
1!4"
Penetration
B.D.F
Factors for
Allowable
Load on one
Connector
Unit and Bolt
Standard
10
11
1.00
Minimum
3~
4~
0.75
Standard
1.00
Minimum
3~
472
0.75
Species Group
Connector
2~-Inch
Split Ring,
4-Inch Split
Ring, or 4Inch Shear
Plate
2% Shear
Plate
ctor
When steel side Plates are used, full allowable loads may be used with minimum penetration..
lsion
unit
ified
-133 -
Copyright NRC-CNRC
68
TABLE 24
VALUES OF X
FOR
NORMAL DURATION OF FULL DESIGN LOAD
X, Allowable Load on Connector Unit, Pounds
Shear Plate Connectors
Spltt Ring
Connectors
(J
Angle of
Load
to Grain
(Degrees)
2J.i-Inch
O-P
4-Inch
Metal Side Plates
4-Inch
2~-Inch
Wood
Side
Plates
Group A
Woods
Group B
and e
Woods
GroupO,
E, and F
Woods
2,130
5,260
2,890
4,360
4,840
4,580
4,360
10
2,695
5,190
2,855
4,305
4,155
4,510
4,305
20
2,605
5,005
2,150
4,150
4,525
4,325
4,150
30
2,480
4,140
2,610
3,935
4,215
4,065
3,935
40
2,335
4,455
2,455
3,695
3,890
3,185
3,695
50
2,205
4,185
2,305
3,415
3,590
3,530
3,415
60
2,090
3,960
2,185
3,290
3,350
3,320
3,290
10
2,010
3,195
2,095
3,150
3,180
3,165
3,150
80
1,955
3,695
2,040
3,010
3,015
3,010
3,010
90-0
1.940
3.660
2.020
3.040
3,040
3,040
3.040
NOTE:
TABLE 25
FACTORS FOR SPECIES (KJ
[Species Group
Values of K.
A*
B
C
D
E
F
1.000
0.808
0.876
0.720
0.663
0.816
*For Yellow Birch, Hard Maple, Red and White Oak, use 117 per cent of value of Group A
Woods.
-134-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
TABLE 26
FACTORS FOR THICKNESS (KJ
CoDDector Type
and Size
Number of Faces
of a Piece
Contalnlni
CoDDectora
on a Bolt
Net
Thickness
of Timber
(Inches)
Values
of
K,
1%
1
1.000
0.831
2
1%
1.000
0.777
1%
1
0.982
0.666
3
2%
2
1%
1.000
0.947
0.806
0.667
1~
0.933
2~
2
1%
1.000
0.945
0.750
1~
1~
1.000
0.866
372
3
2%
2
1.000
0.950
0.863
0.744
0.667
1
2%-inch Shear Plate
2
1
4-inch Shear Plate
2
1~
-135-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
69
70
TABLE 27
VALUES OF K. FOR EDGE DISTANCE
Values of It.. Load at flO to Grain
Edge
Distance
(Inches)
1~
1%
2
2%
2M
2%
2~
2%
2%
2%
3
3%
3~
3%
3~
3%
3%
NOTES:
2~-Inch
6 _ 15
8 - 30
8_45 _90
0.935
0.957
0.978
1.000
0.880
0.900
0.920
0.940
0.830
0.851
0.873
0.894
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.960
0.980
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.915
0.936
0.958
0.979
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
8 - 15
--
0.930
0.953
0.977
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
6 _ 30
8_45_910
0.880
0.900
0.920
0.940
0.830
0.851
0.873
0.894
0.960
0.980
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.915
0.936
0.958
0.979
1.000
F
71
TABLE 28
VALUES OF K. FOR END DISTANCE
Compression
4-Inch SpUt Rlna or
Shear Plate
,,0
End
Distance
(Inches)
i~
2"
3
3}(
3%
3~
3"
4
4:}(
4:~
4:"
5
Ui
5"
6
~~
6~
ar
111
Tenalon
2~-Inch
Spilt
RID!. or
.2%- nch
Shear
Plate
!
4-Inch
Split
Ring
or
Shear
Plate
0 .. 45
0.625
0.648
0.672
0.719
0.766
0.625
0.645
0.684
0.724
0.625
0.659
0.693
0.625
0.789
0.813
0.859
0.906
0.953
0.743
0.763
0.803
0.842
0.882
0.710
0.727
0.761
0.795
0.830
0.646
0.667
0.708
0.750
0.797
0.625
0.641
0.674
0.707
0.739
0.625
0.652
0.679
0.705
0.710
0.727
0.761
0.795
0.830
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.921
0.961
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.866
0.898
0.932
0.967
1.000
0.833
0.875
0.917
0.958
1.000
0.772
0.804
0.837
0.870
0.902
0.732
0.759
0.786
0.812
0.839
0.866
0.898
0.932
0.966
1.000
0.732
0.759
0.786
0.812
0.839
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.935
0.967
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.866
0.893
0.920
0.946
0.973
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.866
0.893
0.920
0.946
0.973
1.000
(I _
(1 .. 90
--
(I ..
---
(I _
45
----
(1 .. 90
---
(I -
0 to (I-OOto
90
90
0.625
0.659
0.693
---0.625
0.652
0.679
0.705
NOTE: Values of a shown are for angle of load to grain. For intermediate mlues of
shown in the Table, straight line interpolation may be used.
-137-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
nol
72
I maintain edge
dista.nce
..
A = End distance
D Connector diameter
FIGURE 5
END DISTANCE FOR MEMBER WITH SLOPING END CUT
A = End distance
B = Unloaded-edge distance
C = Loaded-edge distance
R = Spacing
FIGURE 6
END DISTANCE, EDGE DISTANCE, AND SPACING
-138-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
F
OODE OF REOOMMENDED PBAGrICE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN IN TIMBER
73
TABLE 29
CONNECTOR SPACING FOR VALUES OF K. BETWEEN 0.75 AND 1.00
Anale of
Load to
Grain
Anale of
Connector
Row to
Grain
Degrees
Deareea
15
30
45
0
15
30
45
60
75
90 min.
NOTE:
6%;
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
4%
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
3%
3%
3%
3%
6
5%;
578
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
3%
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
4J4
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
6~
5~
3~
3%
3%
3~
3%;
3%
3%
3%
3%
3%
15
30
45
60
75
90
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
9
8%
5
5
8
7%
7
7~
678
5%
578
5
6~
5%
5%
5J4
7
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
578
5
4%;
4%
478
3~
K. - 1.00
5
5
5
5
478
3%
3%
K .... 0.75
4Y2
3Y2
o min.
60-90
K. = 1.00
K. - 0.75
3~
3~
4~
4~
4%:
478
478
478
3~
4
478
4~
6~
6~
678
5%;
5%
5Y2
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5~
5~
5%;
5%;
5%;
5~
5%
5%;
5~
Intermediate values of K. between 0.75 and 1.00 for intermediate connector spacing$:
may be interpolated on a straight-line basis.
TABLE 30
FACTORS FOR MOISTURE CONTENT (Km)
Condition of Timber
At Time of Fabrication
Seasoned
Unseasoned
Seasoned or Unseasoned
In Service
Seasoned
Seasoned
Unseasoned or Wet
Values of La
1.00
0.80
0.67
74
TABLE 31
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOADS ON SHEAR PLATES
Maximum Allowable Load
Pounds
Type of Load
2"'-lnch
Shear Plate
Bolt
U-Inch Bolt
2800
3870
4970
6630
6760
9020
2580
3440
4420
5890
6010
8020
-140-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
p
CODE OF RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN IN TIMBER
75
TABLE 32
MODIFICATION FACTORS FOR ALLOWABLE LOADS ON
BOLTS AND LAG SCREWS IN TIMBER SEASONED IN PLACE
Arrangement of Bolts
or Lag Screws
I.
s
5
f
Splice
Plate
Direction of Loading
Parallel
to Grain
Perpendicular
to Grain
All
1.0
1.0
Single Row
Parallel to Grain
Wood
Metal
1.0
1.0
0.4
1.0
Wood
1.0
0.4
Metal
0.4
0.4
All
1.0
0.4
0.4
0.4
Less
d
a
Type of
9.4.4.2 Dimensions
9.4.4.2.1 Tabulated loads apply when side members of
wood are each at least one-half the thickness of main member. If side
members are thicker than one-half the thickness of the main member, no
increase is permitted.
9.4.4.2.2 When wood splice plates are used on both
sides of a timber which is more than twice the thickness of one splice plate,
the allowable bolt load shall' be computed on the basis that the centre'
timber is exactly twice the thickness of one splice plate, or of the thinner
splice plate if the splice plates are not of equal thickness.
9.4.6 Combined Shear and Axial Load. Tabulated loads are for
loading acting perpendicular to the axis of a bolt. If the load in a twomember joint acts at an angle to the axis of a bolt, the allowable load
-141-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
76
.alf
:he
;he
Edge maroin
Row of bolts -
.....L.-.:.-.
T.
~ spaci1g
.--L.
perpe~iCUlar
I
Edoe maroin
to Grain
Center to center
T iI -.
-LJ ll
-=--..L
perpendicular to Grain
L.-t, __-
77
ed
:>0
~rs
le
le
;y
!e
n
FIGURE 7
PLACEMENT OF BOLTS IN JOINT
where P
Q =
N
Yp =
Yc =
K, =
Kr =
KT
PQ
(38)
P sin2S + Q cos2S
allowable load on bolt parallel to grain, pounds;
allowable load on bolt perpendicular to grain, pounds;
allowable load on bolt at any angle a to grain, pounds;
angle of load to grain, degrees;
allowable unit stress in bolt bearing parallel to grain, psi,
Table 33;
allowable unit stress in bolt bearing perpendicular to
grain, psi, Table 33;
projected area of bolt in main member, square inches;
factor for lid of bolt in main member for loads parallel
to grain, Table 34;
factor for lid of bolt in main member for loads perpendicular to grain, Table 35;
factor for diameter of bolt for loads perpendicular to
grain, Table 36.
-143-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
78
TABLE 33
ALLOWABLE UNIT STRESSES IN BOLT BEARING
FOR
NORMAL DURATION OF LOAD
(SIDE MEMBERS OF WOOD)
Allowable Unit Strees
Psi
Parallel
to Grain Yp
Species Group
Perpendicular
to Grain Y.
A
B
C
1,140
300
875
930
150
770
160
750
670
150
120
220
440
1,320
Allowable loads parallel to grain may be increased 25 per cent if steel side plates are used.
TABLE 34
FACTORS FOR lId OF BOLT IN MAIN MEMBER PARALLEL TO GRAIN
Value of Kl
lid of Bolt
In Main Member'
Group A
Woods
GroupB
and C Woods
Gr0'W D
and E oods
GroupF
Woods
1 to 2
2.5
3
3.5
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.99
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
4
4.5
5
6
0.96
0.92
0.85
0.72
0.99
0.97
0.92
0.80
1.00
0.99
0.97
0.88
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.94
7
8
9
10
12
0.62
0.54
0.48
0.43
0.36
0.69
0.60
0.53
0.48
0.40
0.76
0.66
0.59
0.53
0.44
0.81
0.71
0.63
0.56
0.47
NOTE:
Yellow Birch, Hard Maple, and Red and White Oak have the same factors as group A
Woods.
-144-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
p
CODE OF RECOMMENDED PRAGrICE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN IN TIMBER
79
TABLE 35
FACTORS FOR lId OF BOLT IN MAIN MEMBER PERPENDICULAR TO
GRAIN
Value of .K.r
Yellow Birch
urt:'~&le
Group A
Woods
Group C
Woods
GroupB, D, E
and FWoods
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.99
0.96
0.92
7
7.5
8
8.5
0.99
0.97
0.92
0.87
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.98
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.87
0.81
0.75
0.70
9
9.5
10
11
12
0.81
0.76
0.71
0.62
0.55
0.93
0.88
0.83
0.73
0.64
1.00
1.00
0.98
0.87
0.75
0.65
0.60
0.55
0.48
0.43
lId of Bolt
In Main Member
1 to 5 inc.
5.5
6
6.5
WhiteOak
TABLE 36
FACTOR FOR DIAMETER OF BOLT LOADS PERPENDICULAR TO GRAIN
Bolt Diameter'
(Inches)
Value of.K.y
2.50
1.95
1.68
1.52
Ys
~
~
1.41
1.33
1.27
1.19
1~
1.14
1.10
1.07
1.03
1.00
1~
1~
2~
3 up
-145-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
80
9.5.4.2 Dimensions
9.5.4.2.1 Tabulated values are for side members of wood
having a thickness equal to 3}/2 (or more) times the shank diameter of the
lag screw.
9.5.4.2.2 For wood side plates having a thickness equal
to twice the lag screw diameter, allowable loads determined from tabular
values shall be multiplied by a factor of 62 per cent; for intermediate values
straight-line interpolation may be used.
-146-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
p
CODE OF RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN IN TIMBER
81
9.5.6 Placement of Lag Screws in Joints. The spacings, end distances, edge distances and net section for lag screw joints shall be the same
as for joints with bolts of a diameter equal to the shank diameter of the
lag screw used (See Clause 9.4.7).
9.5.7 Allowable Loads in Lateral Resistance
9.5.7.1 Side Grain. The allowable load on one lag screw in a
joint shall be not greater than the value of P, Q, or N as determined by
Formula (39), (40), or (41), as applicable, modified by Clauses 3.3.2.1,
3.3.2.2, 3.3.2.3, and 3.3.2.4, but in no case shall the strength of steel parts
be exceeded :
(a) For loads parallel to grain;
P = Krd 2
(39)
(b ) For loads perpendicular to grain;
(40)
Q = K f K nd 2
(c) For loads at angle e to grain.
N =
PQ
(41)
Psin 2 e + Q cos2e
where Kf = constant for species group, Table 37;
Kn = factor for perpendicular-to-grain loads, Table 38;
shank diameter of lag screw, inches;
d
P
allowable load on lag screw parallel to grain, pounds;
allowable load on lag screw perpendicular to grain,
Q
pounds;
N
allowable load on lag screw at an angle e to grain, pounds.
9.5.7.2 End Grain. The allowable load on lag screws in lateral
resistance, when the lag screw is inserted parallel to grain in the end grain
of the main member, shall be no greater than two-thirds the resistance to
lateral loads perpendicular to grain when in side grain. No increase for
metal side plates shall be permitted.
-147-Copyright NRC-CNRC
82
TABLE 37
CONSTANTS FOR SPECIES GROUP
(SIDE MEMBERS OF WOOD-NORMAL DURATION OF LOAD)
Species Group
Value of Kf.
Value of K ..
2,100
1,800
1,900
1,650
1,550
1,800
360
320
435
2,400
860
590
430
480
*K, may be increased ZS per cent Jor steel side plates in parallel-Io-grain loading O1f,ly.
TABLE 38
FACTOR FOR PERPENDICULAR-TO-GRAIN LOADS
Lag Screw Diameter
(Inch)
Value of K.
1.00
0.91
0.85
0.16
0.11
0.65
0.60
0.55
0.52
0.50
-148-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
p
CODE OF RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN IN TIMBER
83
9.6.3 Limitations
9.6.3.1 Load values determined from Tables 39, 40, 41, 42, and
43 apply to glued-laminated Douglas Fir (species Group A).
9.6.3.2 Allowable load values determined from Table 39 or 40
shall be adjusted for service conditions of the timber in accordance with
Table 42.
-149-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
84
-150-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
\II
Copyright NRC-CNRC
NOTES:
A
B
1.
2.
3.
4.
2
3
4
5
6
A
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
.5
6
7
8
9
2
3
4
4.
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
I-
} L dIll
1.98
2.15
2.31
2.32
2.32
1.48
1.65
1.82
Load
(Kips)
2.93
3.05
3.05
2.25
2.38
2.52
2.66
2.79
2.10
8
9
11
3
4
5
6
7
I-
---
Load
(Kips)
For ~-inch holes in 'U-inch plates use 90 per cent of these values.
For 'U-inch holes in ~-inch plates use 90 per cent of these values.
For ~-inch holes in !-M-inch plates use 81 per cent of these values.
------
0.95
1.16
1.37
1.37
1.37
Load
(Kips)
1
---._---
;:::
Load
(Kips)
10
W
("t)
(p
12
j';::l
Load
(Kips)
- -- - - --'--
C'P
1.5
1.5
1.5
1..5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
2.92
3.03
3.26
3.48
3.48
2.48
2.59
2.70
2.81
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
11
13
2
3
4
5
7
9
11
13
15
2.85
2.95
3.06
3.16
3.37
3.58
3.80
4.00
4.00
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
11
3.98
4.14
4.30
4.38
4.38
13
15
17
19
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
2
3
5
7
9
3.23
3.32
3.48
3.65
3.81
- - --- - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - -
Load
(Kips)
22
24
26
28
30
13
14
16
18
20
8
9
10
11
12
5
6
1
"
GJuJam
Rivets per Row
;J
TABLE 39
"1
00
Vt
~
t:I:I
:j
zc
Z
~
C
lid
a~
!i
~
~
lid
oIS!:!
..'"
Copyright NRC-CNRC
0.8
2.5
NOTES:
"
Load
(Kips)
D
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.6
Load
(Kips)
"
4
2.4
Load
(Kips)
"
3.2
Load
(Kips)
8.S
1.0
5.5
4.5
3.5
Glulam
Rivets per Row
4.0
Load
(Kips)
2.5
10
TABLE 40
4.8
Load
(Kips
12
CIl
00
0'\
87
TABLE 41
FACTOR FOR ADJUSTING PERPENDICULAR-TO-GRAIN
LOADS WHEN MORE THAN ONE ROW IS USED
1
Number of Rows
1.00
Factor
...
6 or more
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
TABLE 42
MODIFICATION FACTORS TO
ALLOWABLE LOADS FOR ONE GLULAM RIVET ROW
FOR RIVET PENETRATION INTO TIMBER
PARALLEL- OR PERPENDICULARTO-GRAIN LOADING
Glulam Rivet
Penetration
Into Timber
(Inchee)
Averaae EquUlbrJum
Moisture Content
15 Per Cent or Leaa
lU
0.67
0.80
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.57
0.68
0.77
0.82
0.85
0.85
1~
2U
2~
3
3U
TABLE 43
MODIFICATION OF ALLOWABLE LOADS
FOR GLULAM RIVET ROW
FOR DURATION OF LOAD
Duration of Load
Typical ApplicatioDa
ModUlcatlon Factor
Continuous
0.95
Normal
1.00
Two Months
1.13
Seven Days
Concrete Formwork,
Arch centering.
1.18
Wind or Earthquake
1.22
Instantaneous or Impact
1.48
-153-Copyright NRC-CNRC
88
TI
o.~
O~~5~
rRockwell C4550
180,000 psi, minimum
165,000 psi, minimum
Heat treated finish
1~ to 3~ ~ inch
Hardness:
Ultimate tensile strength:
Yield strength:
Finish:
Length Overall (l)
All Dimensions in Inches
GLULAM RIVET
Va
Typical
.... Grain
o
o
o
o
o
Orientation or
rivet in plate
.....----1~-1 Minimum
~
Minimum
Plate thickness:
Holes:
Steel:
inch, Minimum
FIGURE 8
GLULAM RIVETS AND STEEL SIDE PLATES
-154-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
p
,
89
L
End Distance fiN'
(See Table 39)
Minimum 1 Inch
[>P
Steel Plate
PARALLEL-TO-GRAIN LOADING
Steel Plate
~
v
0.-. s
::v~ ~:
g..Y Cl::s
<,:\.!:l
t:'
Ot:
1------.,. . -'t~
<':\
Q(:t-t
ii1~
13~
C'-" "0
Minimum 1 Inch
;i;l
....:l
PERPENDICULAR-TO-GRAIN LOADING
ANGLE-TO-GRAIN LOADING
FIGURE 9
SPACING OF GLULAM RIVETS
-155-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
90
N =
PxQ
(44)
P sin 2 e Q cos2 e
where N
allowable load at angle e to the grain direction;
P
allowable load parallel to grain;
allowable load perpendicular to grain;
Q
e
angle between the direction of grain and the direction of
load.
9.7.1.3 The allowable design load for normal duration of load
shall be determined by dividing the "test load" at wood-to-wood slip of
0.030 inches by 1.6, or by dividing the ultimate test load by 3.0, whichever
is the lesser. The "test load" used in these determinations shall be the
average of not less than ten tests.
9.7.1.4 For load durations other than normal, the provisions of
Clause 3.3.2.2 shall apply. For material treated with fire retardant chemicals,
the provisions of Clause 3.3.2.3 shall apply. For various seasoning and
service conditions of timber, the factors given in Table 30 shall apply.
9.7.1.5 Joint design shall be based on the use of truss plates
on at least two opposite faces of all members connected at the joint.
9.7.1.6 Design shall be based upon installation of truss plates in
such a way as to prevent buckling of the plate or insertion of the teeth at
any angle other than normal to the direction of load application. Tooth
penetration in production joints shall be not less than that used in the
tests referred to in Clause 9.7.1.2.
9.7.1.7 Thickness of members used in production joints shall be
not less than that used in the tests referred to in Clause 9.7.1.2.
9.7.1.8 Only those teeth or nails having the following end and
edge distances shall be considered to be effective when calculating the
allowable load on a joint:
(a) End Distance. The greater of 3~ inch or one-half the length of the
tooth or nail;
(b) Edge Distance. The greater of Y2 inch or one-quarter the length
of the tooth or nail.
9.7.1.9 Truss plates shall not be considered to be effective in
transferring compression load at a joint.
-156-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
p
CODE OF RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN IN TIMBER
91
APPENDIX A
WEIGHT OF STRUCTURAL TIMBERS AND
SHRINKAGE CHARACTERISTICS
OF CANADIAN WOODS
:0
Ie
>r
el
n
Ie
n
NOTE:
TABLE Al
WEIGHT OF STRUCTURAL TIMBERS AND SHRINKAGE
CHARACTERISTICS OF CANADIAN WOODS
y
.f
Weight of Structural
Timbers
(Pounds Per Cubic Foot)
[.
)
e
Species
Shrlnkale
of Green Ize
(Per Cent)
From Green to Oven Dry
Green
12 Per Cent
Moisture
Content
Radial
TanaentJal
34
29
21
24
1.7
2.1
3.6
4.5
2.7
3.3
35
40
39
46
61
44
48
52
40
40
52
36
47
46
37
35
38
37
31
57
59
63
62
30
34
27
24
30
30
35
40
31
29
28
26
32
27
30
28
26
28
27
43
46
43
47
3.7
4.8
4.2
2.7
3.6
5.4
2.8
5.1
4.0
4.7
3.5
3.7
4.6
2.4
3.7
4.0
3.4
4.2
4.6
5.8
4.7
3.6
4.7
6.0
7.4
8.9
7.5
6.9
8.5
6.2
8.9
5.9
6.8
5.9
6.8
5.9
6.3
6.9
8.0
6.4
8.2
7.8
7.1
8.6
6.7
6.0
4.9
6.1
6.6
5.1
5.3
7.0
4.5
7.0
5.0
5.8
4.7
5.3
5.3
4.4
5.3
6.0
4.9
6.2
6.2
6.5
6.7
5.2
5.4
Averalle
92
APPENDIX B
CAMBER ALLOWANCES
NOTE: This A ppendix is not a mandatory part of this Standard.
B1. Camber in Trusses. The amount of camber built into a truss varies
with the use to which the truss is put and the expectancy of fuJI design load.
The following camber limits are suggestions only and for trusses in simple
span only:
(a) Bowstring Trusses
(i) With continuous glued laminated top chord, camber in bottom
chord only, U inch per 10 feet of span;
(ii) Segmental overlapping sawn chord trusses, camber in bottom
chord only, % inch per 10 feet of span;
(b) Triangular Trusses. Where possible camber should be built
into both top and bottom chords:
(i) With sawn timber or rod and sawn timber trusses, % inch
per 10 feet of span on bottom chord, at mid~point of half span
on top chord, % inch per 10 feet of span;
(ii) With glulam or rod and glulam timber trusses, % inch per
10 feet of span on bottom chord, at mid-point of half span on
top chord, U inch per 10 feet of span;
(c) Pratt and Howe Trusses. Camber both top and bottom chords
similarly:
(i) For sawn timber, or rod and sawn timber trusses, % inch
per 10 feet of span;
(ii) For glulam or rod and gIulam trusses, % inch per 10 feet of span.
B2. Crown in Sawn Timber Joists. Crown in sawn timber joists, beams,
etc., should be up, as with camber.
B3. Beams. A suggested camber for built~up and laminated beams is
equivalent to the deflection under twice dead load.
-158-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-159Copyright NRC-CNRC
94
APPENDIX C
PROPERTIES OF SECTIONS FOR
DOUGLAS FIR PLYWOOD*
NOTE: This A ppendix is not a mandatory part of this Standard.
Plywood
Thickness
(Inches)
Nominal
~S
Representative
Veneer Thicknesst
(Inches)
No.
of
Plies
Faces
Cores
Perp.
to Face
I
I
I!
Centres
Para.
to Face
Net
Thickness
(Inches)
1. 78
2.33
1.99
2.33
2.98
0.117
0.163
0.233
0.236
0.292
Area
In.I
Section
Modulus
In.'
%S
3
3
3
3
5
0.074
0.097
0.083
0.097
0.061
0.102
0.097
0.210
0.168
0.126
0.126
0.148
0.194
0.166
0.194
0.248
"S
[~
5
5
5
7
7
0.099
0.061
0.138
0.074
0.069
0.099
0.168
0.099
0.118
0.138
0.099
0.168
0.138
0.093
0.099
0.297
0.290
0.414
0.334
0.336
3.56
3.48
4.97
4.01
4.03
0.388
0.390
0.634
0.566
0.608
"U
"U
ifS
?flU
IS
5
7
7
7
7
0.098
0.096
0.057
0.100
0.068
0.168
0.093
0.158
0.158
0.198
0.218
0.135
0.145
0.100
0.135
0.414
0.462
0.4040.400
0.406
4.97
5.54
4.85
4.80
4.87
0.699
0.778
0.722
0.923
0.900
1S
lU
lU
HiS
1~ S
9
7
9
7
9
0.076
0.095
0.117
0.068
0.087
0.095
0.155
0.117
0.198
0.121
0.156
0.155
0.095
0.198
0.156
0.620
0.500
0.519
0.532
0.642
7.
6.00
6.23
6.38
7.70
1.28
1.10
1.30
1.17
1.53
I~U
7
9
9
11
9
0.095
0.095
0.058
0.088
0.120
0.198
0.155
0.162
0.130
0.120
0.155
0.095
0.162
0.106
0.178
0.500
0.475
0.602
0.600
0.774
6.00
5.70
7.22
7.20
9.29
1.27
1.31
1.46
~U
U~
Ir
1
1
1
S
S
U
1.72
2.11
-160-Copyright NRC-CNRC
p
CODE OF RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN IN TIMBER
95
APPENDIX C (Continued)
PROPERTIES OF SECTIONS FOR DOUGLAS FIR PLYWOOD
Plies Parallel-to Face
Grain
(12-lnch Widths)
Section
Modulus
in.'
Moment
of Inertia
in.'
Approximate
Weight
Pounds
First Moment
perM
of Areat
Square Feet
tn.-
0.0146
0.0237
0.0439
0.0427
0.0730
0.0781
0.113
0.146
0.154
0.161
0.102
0.097
0.210
0.168
0.252
1.22
1.16
2.52
2.02
3.02
0.0208
0.0188
0.0882
0.0564
0.275
0.00106
0.000913
0.00926
0.00474
0.0520
0
0
0
0
0.190
790
950
1.125
1.125
1.525
0.0961
0.122
0.194
0.195
0.228
0.235
0.207
0.392
0.390
0.423
0.198
0.336
0.198
0.354
0.414
2.38
4.03
2.38
4.25
4.97
0.170
0.489
0.210
0.485
0.634
0.0252
0.123
0.0353
0.131
0.194
0.118
0.339
0.141
0.299
0.392
1.525
1,825
1,825
2.050
2,225
0.262
0.288
0.317
0.403
0.450
0.383
0.556
0.544
0.619
0.650
0.336
0.279
0.474
0.474
0.594
4.03
3.35
5.69
5.69
7.13
0.576
0.432
0.942
0.784
1.27
0.160
0.118
0.360
0.264
0.550
0.389
0.254
0.574
0.489
0.791
2,225
2.225
2,600
2,600
3,000
0.638
0.530
0.640
0.659
0.864
0.891
0.784
0.852
0.902
1.06
0.380
0.465
0.468
0.594
0.484
4.56
5.58
5.62
7.13
5.81
0.855
0.951
0.855
1.55
1.18
0.362
0.369
0.322
0.768
0.564
0.572
0.577
0.595
0.941
0.804
3,000
3.000
3.000
3.375
3.375
0.694
0.717
0.916
1.07
1.33
0.898
0.855
1.04
1.21
1.45
0.594
0.620
0.648
0.650
0.480
7.13
7.44
7.78
7.80
5.76
1.36
1.32
1.83
1.64
1.28
0.615
0.596
1.04
0.880
0.646
0.839
0.930
1.26
1.10
0.858
3.375
3.375
3,750
3,750
3,750
-161-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
96
APPENDIX D
MINIMUM DESIGN VALUES OF EFFECTIVE
LENGTH FACTOR K FOR COMPRESSION MEMBERS
NOTE: This A ppendix is not a mandatory part of this Standard.
TABLE Dl
Degree of End Restraint
of Compression Member
Minimum Effective
Lenath Factor, k*
0.65
0.80
1.00
1.20
IT
;r
I'~
1.50
I "-,
Symbol
I
1
L..,.....l
I
2.00
2.00
'"
I .-,
Lj....l
I
I
",'"
J(
-Effective length Ie = Kl, where I is the length of the compression member taken as <the distance
between centres of members supporting the compression member in the plane in which buckling
is being considered. At a base or cap detail, the distance shall be measured from the outer
surface of the base or cap plate. The effective length factor K shall not be less than what would
be indicated by rational analysis. Where conditions of end restraint cannot be evaluated closely,
a conservative value for K shall be used.
-162-Copyright NRC-CNRC
p
CODE OF RECOMMENDED PRACTICE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN IN TIMBER
97
APPENDIX E
ALLOWABLE UNIT STRESSES FOR LUMBER
tS
NOTE:
E1. GENERAL
ELI Allowable unit stresses for visually graded sawn lumber for use in
this Standard were developed in accordance with the principles of ASTM
Standard ~245-70..!.. Establishing Structural Grades and Related Allowable
Propertiesor VIsually Graded Lumber, except that:
(a) Strength and variability values for clear wood were obtained from
Department of Forestry of Canada Publication 1104, Strength
and Related Properties of Woods Grown in Canada;
(b) Reduction factors for softwoods were applied to poplar species;
(c) Clauses 3.1.9, 3.2.6, and 4.6 of ASTl\1 Standard 0245-70 were
not applied to Douglas Fir for use in Canada.
(d) The increase in bending stress permitted for structurally graded
lumber used in load sharing systems was 10 per cent; and
(e) Increases of 10 per cent in other allowable unit stresses (not
including modulus of elasticity) were permitted for structurally
graded lumber used in load-sharing systems.
E1.4 Often load-carrying members are so arranged that loads are distributed
among several individual pieces. In such cases, advantage can be taken of
variability, which makes most pieces stronger and stiffer than the specified [
minimum. Allowable unit stresses for structurally graded lumber may be
increased 10 per cent when used in such "load-sharing systems" as defined
in Clause 2.1. Provision for such increase is given in Clause 4.3.1.
E1.5 Some lumber grades are established on the basis of the appearance
and general performance of the piece, with some characteristics affecting
strength not fully controlled. For these grades, allowable unit stresses have
not been assigned. Conservative estimates have been made, however, taking
into account the most severe limiting characteristics that can occur with some
additional limitations. These strength estimates are reflected in the provisions of Clause 4.3.2.
-163Copyright NRC-CNRC
98
TABLE El
Thlckness
When Lenllth
Lumber
Split Is
of
of
Multiply
Tabulated
Lo~ltudlnal
hear
Values by:
2-Inch Thick
No split
Y2 X width (wide face)
1 X width (wide face)
1Y2 X width (wide face), or more
2.00
1.67
1.33
1.00
No split
Y2 X thickness (narrow face)
1 X thickness (narrow face)
1Y2 X thickness (narrow face)
1% X thickness (narrow face), or more
2.00
1.72
1.42
1. 12
1.00
NOTE:
-164-Copyright NRC-CNRC
APPENDIX F
4
:k
o.
n
)r
if
1-
!r
e
g
FIGURE Fl
-165-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
C)0
100
TABLE Fl
CALCULATIONS FOR PLOTTING CURVES
FOR FORMULA 27
(CLAUSE 5.4.2.1)
Values of Kr for d./R
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
20 30'
0.0079
0.1747
0.1284
0.0079
0.0267
0.0479
0.0719
0.0983
0.1274
50
0.0174
0.1251
0.1939
0.0114
0.0318
0.0502
0.0124
0.0984
0.1285
100
0.0391
0.0754
0.2119
0.0391
0.0487
0.0626
0.0808
0.1032
0.1298
150
0.0629
0.0619
0.1122
0.0629
0.0708
0.0822
0.0970
0.1153
0.1310
200
0.0893
0.0608
0.1393
0.0893
0.0968
0.1011
25 0
0.1214
0.0605
0.1238
0.1214
0.1287
0.1385
0.1507
0.1654
0.1821
300
0.1649
0.0603
0.1115
0.1649
0.1120
0.1815
0.1930
0.2068
0.2230
NOTE:
Formula 27 - Kr
A+ B
(~)
+ C
0.1545
(~r
-166-Copyright NRC-CNRC
101
APPENDIX G
NOMINAL AND MINIMUM DRESSED SIZES
OF DIMENSION LUMBER AND TIMBERS
NOTE:
SOURCE:
Thicknesses
Face Widths
Mlnlmum Dressed
Item
Nominal
Dry.
Greent
Inches
Inches
o
5
Nominal
Dimension
Lumber
2
2%
3
3%
1%
2
2%
3
1~
2~6
2~
3~6
Dimension
Lumber
4
4%
3%
4
3~6
4~6
5 and
Thicker
% Off
Greent
Inches
7~
9~
11~
13~
15~
2
3
4
5
6
8
10
1%
2~-1l
3%
4%
5H
7~'4
9~
1l~
12
Timbers
Dry*
Inches
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
3
4
5
6
8
10
12
14
16
14
16
Mlnlmum Dressed
5 and
Wider
1~
2~
3~
4%
5%
7Y2
9Y2
11%
13%
15%
1~
2~
3~
4%
5%
7%
9%
11%
13%
15%
% Off
*Dry Lumber. For the purpose of this Standard, dry lumber is defined as lumber which has
been seasoned or dried to a moisture content of 19 per cent or less.
tGreen Lumber. For the purpose of this Standard, green lumber is defined as lumber having
a moisture content in excess of 19 per cent.
-167-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
102
APPENDIX H
COMMERCIAL SPECIES DESIGNATIONS FOR LUMBER
NOTE:
Douglas Fir-Larch
Douglas Fir
Western Larch
Hem-Fir
Hemlock-Tamarack
Eastern Hemlock
Tamarack
Spru("e-Pine- Fir
White Spruce
Black Spruce
Engelmann Spntce
Red Spruce
Jack Pine Lodgepole Pine
Alpine Fir
Balsam Fir
Western Cedars
Northern Pine
Jack Pine
Red Pine
A
B
-168Copyright NRC-CNRC
ERRATA
Page 3S8
Clause 3.2-Add to the definition of b the following:
.. lor one half the flange for detennining width-thickness ratios (b/ t)".
Page 373
Clause 16.2.4-ln the last line of Clause 16.2.4 (b) (ii), delete "Fbt;'.
Page 428
Appendix D-Change notes to graph on Page 84 (Appendix D) as follows:
"Co = 30
Fy/S but not more than 20"
.
..
m=
0.6F)'
ft
--"--:--=C-p-_.:..........,COc::---'--"~
Page SS8
Page S83
Equation (3) for Coefficient C-delete equation and replace with:
C= 0.05
VI'
Copyright NRC-CNRC
SUPPLEMENT No. 4
of
EXPLANATORY NOTE
ishreno
nuties
md
ual
'en
)se
lams
of
TABLE OF CONTENTS
or
les
he
Subsection 4.4.1
Page
General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 170
Subsection 4.4.2
Materials..................................... 171
Subsection 4.4.3
Subsection 4.4.4
Subsection 4.4.5
Subsection 4.4.6
Subsection 4.4.7
Subsection 4.4.8
-169-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Definitions
4.4.1.2 In this Section. the following definitions apply:
Ashlar masonry means masonry of natural or cast rectangular stone, usually laller
in size than brick, having sawed, dressed or squared beds, and joints laid in mortar wlth
proper bond;
.
Bearing, support means a structural member or system of structural members supporting
masonry and resisting all applied loads;
BuDding, helg,ht (in storeys) means the number of storeys contained between the roof
and the floor of the first storey;
Cast stone means a precast building stone manufactured from concrete;
Cavity wall means a construction of masonry laid up with a cavity between the wythes
tied together with metal ties or bonding units, the cavity of which mayor may not
contain insulation;
Column means a vertical compression member whose height exceeds three times its
thickness (least dimension) and having a width not exceeding three times the thickness;
Corrosion resistant (as applying to anchoring or bonding material) means treated or
coated to retard harmful oXldation or other corrosive action, e.g. steel, galvanized after
fabrication;
Curtain wall means a non-Ioadbearing exterior wall more than one storey in height,
vertically supported only at its base, or, having bearing support at prescribed vertical
intervals greater than one storey;
Faced wall means a wall in which the masonry facing and backing are so bonded as to
exert common action under load;
Gross cross-sectional area means the area parallel to the bearing surface of a masonrv
member calculated by using the over-all actual dimensions of the member:
-170-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
ion-
ing
)Of
les
ot
its
is;
lr
er
t;
11
o
Partition means an interior wall, one storey or part-storey in height, that is not load
bearing;
Pilaster means a projecting part of a masonry wall bonded thereto for the purpose of
strengthening such wall against lateral loads;
Rubble masonry means masonry ~f ~rregular or rough shaped stone units;
Solid masonry means masonry of solid or hollow units that does not have cavities
between the wythes;
Solid unit means a structural masonry unit with a net cross-sectional area of at least
15 per cent of its gross cross-sectional area in any plane parallel to its bearing surface;
Transformed section means an assumed section of one material having the same
elastic properties as the section of two materials;
Veneer means a non-Ioadbearing facing of masonry attached to the backing but not
bonded so as to exert a common reaction under load;
Virtual eccentricity means the eccentricity of the axial load plus the value calculated
by dividing the moment at the section by the axial load;
Wall means a vertical member whose width exceeds three times its thickness (least
dimension) ;
Wythe means a vertical section of a masonry wall, one unit in thickness;
Design Conditions
4.4.1.3 Materials used in masonry shall conform to Subsection 4.4.2.
4.4.1.4.(1) Masonry shall be designed to resist all loads prescribed in Section 4.1 of the
National Building Code of Canada, 1970, except as provided in Article 4.4.3.33.
(2) The structura I design and dimensioning of plain masonry shall be based on
(a) an engineering analysis conforming to Subsection 4.4.3, or
(b) in non-seismic areas, and in zone 1 seismic areas, the conventional methods conforming to Subsection 4.4.4.
(3) The structural design and dimensionin~ of reinforced masonry shall be based on an
engineering analysis conforming to Subsection 4.4.3.
4.4.1.5.(1) The construction of masonry shall conform to the appropriate requirements in
Subsections 4.4.3. to 4.4.8.
(2) Control joints shall be provided in masonry when necessary to relieve excessive
temperature and shrinkage stress.
4.4.1.6 The maximum thickness of a mortar joint in load-bearing masonry shall be
% in.
-171-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
TABLE 4.4.2.A
Forming Part of Sentence 4.4.2.1.(2)
Absorption and
Stren~th
Requirements(l)
Minimum
compressive
stren~th after 28 days,
psi
6500(2)
Mortar
4.4.2.8 Portland cement used in mortar shall conform to CSA A5-1961, "Portland Cements".
4.4.2.9 Where lime putty is used in preparing mortar, it shall be made by slaking quicklime in water for at least 24 hr or by soaking hydrated lime in water for at least 12 hr.
4.4.2.10 Gypsum used in mortar shall conform to CSA A82.21-1950, "Gypsum".
-172-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
--....,p-----'----------------------4.4.2.11 Masonry cement used in mortar shall conform to CSA A8-1956, "Masonry
Cement".
4.4.2.12.(1) Aggregate used in mortar shall conform to CSA A82.56-1950, "Aggregate for
Masonry Mortar".
(2) Where mortar is proportioned by volume, the aggregate shall be measured in a
damp, loose condition.
4.4.2.13 Water used in mortar shall be clean and free from injurious amounts of deleterious
substances such as oils, acids, alkalis, and organic materials.
4.4.2.14 Admixtures may be used when permitted by the authority having jurisdiction.
4.4.2.15.(1) Mortar types referred to in this Section shall:
(a) be proportioned as set forth in Table 4.4.2.B, or
(b) have a compressive strength conforming to Table 4.4.2.B determined in accordance
with CSA A179-1967, "Mortar for Unit Masonry."
(2) Type 0 or Type K mortar shall not be used where masonry is to be:
(a) directly in contact with soil, such as in a foundation wall, or
(b) exposed to the weather on all sides such as in a parapet wall, a balustrade, a chimney,
steps and landings.
TABLE 4.4.2.B
Forming Part of Sentence 4.4.2.15.(1)
Type
of
mortar
Minimum
average
compressive
strenlth
at 28 ays,
psi
2500
1800
750
350
75
I
Composition in parts by volume
Portland
cement
Masonry
cement
Lime
1 (type H)
none
none
72
1 (type H)
none
none
none
1 (type H)
none
none
1 (type H
or L)
none
none
none
none
over
Aggrega te(l)
t<)<1)
c..c::
c1:\ ....
to
..c::'.... 0
~ rn
0(1)"C
.J1
I
none
M to
over
1~
none
over
1~
to
:72
1
over
272 to 4
S?Jl
....
_ ;::s
0~\1.)
C
E
"t:! (1) .....
~-5:;
~o~
NE"i::
c;::s\1.)
~ rn E
:;] 2:i
rn ....
(1)
-..... \1.)
rn
05
Z.;:l
4.4.2.16 Where masonry units of glass are used, they shall be laid up with a mortar consisting of 1 part portland cement, 1 part high-calcium lime and not more than 4 parts
aggregate by volume.
4.4.2.17 Where masonry units of gypsum are used, they shall be laid up with a mortar
consisting of 1 part gypsum and not more than 3 parts aggregate, by weight.
4.4.2.18 Grout for use in grouted masonry shall conform to Table 4.4.2.C.
. ..
---~-- ~ ~~
TABLE 4.4.2.C
Forming Part of Article 4.4.2.18.
Parts by volume
Aggregate measured in damp, loose state
Description
Cement
Lime
Fine
Fine
Grout
o to 1/10
2 ~ to 3 times the
sum of the cementitious materials.
Coarse
Grout
o to 1/10
2 ~ to 3 times the
sum of the
cementitious materials.
Coarse
0
Metal Ties
4.4.2.19.(1) Steel structural members, anchors, ties or other supports for masonry required
to be corrosion resistant shall be galvanized in accordance with
(a) ASTM A153-67, uZinc Coating (Hot Dip) on Iron and Steel Hardware", (class 8.3
coating), for bonding or anchoring stone facing and for all bolts and hardware;
(b) ASTM A116-66, "Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) Iron or Steel Farm-Field and Railroad
Right-of-Way Wire Fencing", (class 3 coating), for masonry ties other than provided
for in (a); or
(c) ASTM A123-68, "Zinc (Hot Galvanized) Coatings on Products Fabricated from
Rolled, Pressed, and Forged Steel Shapes, Plates, Bars, and Strip", for structural
supports including shelf angles.
(2) Copper-coated metal tie wire shall conform to ASTM B227-65, "Hard-Drawn
Copper-Clad Steel Wire, (Grade 30HS)".
4.4.2.20 Insulation used between wythes in cavity walls shall be an approved water
repellent or water resistant type.
SUBSECTION 4.4.3 DESIGN OF PLAIN AND REINFORCED MASONRY BASED
ON ENGINEERING ANALYSIS
4.4.3.1. In this Subsection
gross cross-sectional area.
net cross-sectional area.
effective cross-sectional area of reinforcement.
cross-sectional area of web reinforcement.
a
angle between inclined web bars and axis of beam.
b
width of rectangular beam or column, or width of flange of T beam.
b'
width of web of a T beam.
C"
bending coefficient.
C.
eccentricity coefficient.
C.
slenderness coefficient.
d
effective depth of flexural members.
Em
modulus of elasticity of masonry in compression.
E.
modulus of elasticity of steel.
E"
modulus of rigidity of masonry.
e
virtual eccentricity,
el
the smaller virtual eccentricity occurring at the top or bottom of a vertical member
at lateral supports.
et
the larger virtual eccentricity occurring at the top or bottom of a vertical member
at lateral supports.
ell
virtual eccentricity about the principal axis which is normal to the width, b, of
the member.
e,
virtual eccentricity about the principal axis which is normal to the effective thickness, t, of the member.
f",
compressive stress in masonry.
/b
bearing stress on masonry.
fe.
compressive stress due to vertical loads.
f,
tensile stress in masonry.
A II
A..
A.
A"
-174-Copyright NRC-CNRC
P
f'.
f.
f.
111
h
j
P
Pfl
r
fb
s
t
u
V
'P
t1".
ed
'P11II
~o
.3
ld
General Requirements
~d
al
'n
[)
4.4.3.2.(1) This Subsection applies to the design and construction of plain masonry and
reinforced masonry where the design is based on engineering analysis of the structural
effects of the loads and forces acting on the- structure.
(2) Engineering inspection of masonry construction shall be carried out to ensure that the
construction is consistent with the design by the person responsible for its design or by
another person qualified in the inspection of masonry construction.
4.4.3.3 Mortar shall be of type M, S or N conforming to Sentence 4.4.2.15.(1),
4.4.3.4 The allowable stresses in masonry shan be based on its compressive strength,
as established in Article 4.4.3.6.
J'""
Determination of f'm
for the purpose of design
4.4.3.6.(1) Except as provided in Sentence (4), the compressive strength, I'm. shall be
established in advance of design by tests of specimens which:
(a) are built of the same type of materials under the same conditions. and insofar as
possible, of the same thickness and bonding arrangements as for the structure;
(b) if of hollow masonry, have unfilled cores, except for solid filled construction;
(c) are constructed so that the moisture content of the units, mortar consistency, mortar
joint thickness and workmanship are the same as will be used in the structure;
(d) if of brick masonry, are not less than 12 in. in height and have a height-to-thickness
ratio (hit) not less than 2 nor more than 5;
(e) if of concrete block or structural clay tile, are not less than 16 in. in height and
have a height-to-thickness ratio, hit, not less than 1.5 nor more than 3; and
(f) are stored in air at a temperature not less than 68 F and are tested after 28 days in
conformance with CSA A23.2.13-1967, 44Test for Compressive Strength of Moulded
Concrete Cylinders".
(2) The compressive strength of each specimen in Sentence (1) shall be calculated by
dividing its ultimate test load by its net cross-sectional area and the result multiplied by the
appropriate correction factor in Table 4.4.3.A.
-175-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
TABLE 4.4.3.A
Forming Part of Sentence 4.4.3.6.(2)
Correction factor(l)
Ratio of
height-to-thickness
hit
Brick
masonry
Concrete block or
structural clay tile
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
NA
0.73
0.80
0.86
0.91
0.95
0.98
1.00
0.86
1.00
1.11
1.20
NA
NA
NA
NA
(3) At least five specimens described in Sentence (1) shall be tested and the compressive
strength. J'"" shall be obtained by multiplying the average compressive strength determined
in conformance with Sentence (2) by
l'
where x
(4) Where the value of the compressive strength of masonry J'", is not determined in
accordance with Sentences (1) to (3), it shall be based on tests of the masonry units and
mortar in conformance with Sentences (5) to (11).
(5) Compressive strength test of clay or shale brick shall be conducted in conformance
with CSA A82.2-1967, "Methods of Sampling and Testing Brick", and for concrete brick in
conformance with CSA AI65.4-1965. "Concrete Brick Masonry Units".
(6) Compressive stren~th tests shall be made in conformance with
(a) CSA AI65.3-1964, "Solid Load-Bearing Concrete Masonry Units", for solid concrete block;
(b) CSA A165.1-1964, "Hollow Load-Bearing Concrete Masonry Units". for hollow
concrete block; and
(c) CSA A82.6-1944, "Standard Methods for Sampling and Testing Structural Clay
Tile", for structural clay tile.
(7) At least five units shall be tested as described in Sentence (5) or (6) and the compressive
strength shall be obtained by multiplying the average compressive strength of the specimens
by:
1 _
where x
x
n
0 . . /2:(x
x
- X)2
n-l
(8) At least five 2-in. mortar cubes shall be prepared from the same materials and in the
same proportions as those to be used in the masonry, cured and tested in accordance with
CSA A179-1967, HMortar for Unit Masonry". The average strength determined from
these tests shall conform to Article 4.4.3.3 for the type of mortar specified.
(9) The value of the compressive strength, J' fII' to be used in design of brick masonry
shall conform to Table 4.4.3.B.
-176-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
TABLE 4.4.3.B
Forming part of Sentence 4.4.3.6.(9)
Compressive strength of brick masonry (j'.) psi
Compressive
strength of
units, psi
Type M mortar
Type S mortar
Type N mortar
14,000 plus
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
4600
4000
3400
2800
2200
1600
1000
3900
3400
2900
2400
1900
1400
800
3200
2800
2400
2000
1600
1200
800
(to) The value of compressive strength, f'tn, to be used in the design of masonry constructed with solid concrete units, hollow concrete or structural clay tile units, or hollow
units filled with concrete or grout having a compressive strength at least equal to that of
the units shall conform to Table 4.4.3.C.
TABLE 4.4.3.C
Forming Part of Sentence 4.4.3.6.(10)
Compressive Strength of concrete block,
masonry or structural clay tile masonry
(f'.) psi
Compressive strength
of units(l),
psi
Type N mortar
6,000 plus
4,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
2,400
2,000
1,550
1,350
1,150
1,250
1,250
1,050
950
800
(11) In composite, faced walls, cavity walls or other structural members constructed"of
different kinds or grades of units or mortars the value of J''" used in design shall correspond
to the weakest combination of units and mortars of which the member is constructed.
except that in a cavity wall where only one wythe supports the vertical load the value of
f'. shall be appropriate for the materials in the loaded wythe.
Field Control Tests
4.4.3.7.(1) Where the value of J'", used in design is determined in accordance with Sentences 4.4.3.6. (1) to (3):
(a) at least four test specimens shall be made on site for each 5000 sq ft or portion thereof,
of wall constructed but not less than four test specimens per storey,
(b) at least five such test specimens shall be made for each type and strength of masonry
used in any building,
(c) the field control test specimens shall be constructed on the site without using a
jig near the walls being built and using the same materials and workmanship as the
site work and of a size conforming to clause 4.4.3.6.(I)(d) or 4.4.3.6. (l)(e),
(d) field control test specimens shall be wrapped in polyethylene and stored at the site
for 24 hr and stored in air temperatures not less than 68F thereafter,
(e) except as provided in (f), the test specimens shall be tested 28 days after being
constructed,
(f) field control test specimens may be tested at 7 days provided that the relationship
between 7 and 28-day strengths of the masonry has been established by previous
tests, or the compression strengths obtained from 7-day test results shall be assumed
to be 90 per cent of the 28-day value. and
-177-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
(g) the compressive strength of every test specimen shall be calculated in conformance
with Sentence 4.4.3.6.(2) and the average compression strength from any five consecutive 28-day field control tests or from the 28-day strengths predicted from
7-day tests in accordance with Clause (f) shall exceed the value of J'm used in the
design, and no individual test result shall have a value less than 0.80 J' ....
(2) If the requirements in clause (1) (g) are not met, the authority having jurisdiction
shall require proof that the strength of the structure is adequate.
4.4.3.8.(1) Where the value of f'm used in design is determined in accordance with Sentences
4.4.3.6.(4) to (11), at least five masonry units and five 2-in. mortar cube specimens shall
be made for each 5000 sq ft, or portion thereof. of wall but not less than five test specimens
of both units and mortar for each storey height and not less than five test specimens of
both units and mortar for any building.
(2) For tests of units referred to in Sentence (1), units shall be selected and tested in
conformance with:
(a) CSA A82.2-1967, "Methods of Sampling and Testing Brick", for clay or shale
brick units;
(b) CSA A165.4-1965 HConcrete Brick Masonry Units", for concrete brick units;
(c) CSA A165.1-1964, uHollow Load-Bearing Concrete Masonry Units", for hollow
concrete units;
(d) CSA A165.3-1964, uSolid Load-Bearing Concrete Masonry Units", for solid concrete units; and
(e) CSA A82.6-1944, "Methods for Sampling and Testing Structural Clay Tile", for
tile units.
(3) The average of any five consecutive compressive test results for units referred to in
Sentence (1) shall exceed the compressive strength of the units used in the selection of
Jf", as provided in Sentence 4.4.3.6.(9) or (10), and no individual test result shall be less
than 0.80 of that compressive strength.
(4) For tests of mortar cubes referred to in Sentence (1):
(a) the mortar shall be taken at random from the mortar boards currently in use but
care shall be taken that no old mortar from the edges of the boards is included;
(b) mortar test cubes shall be made, cured and tested in accordance with CSA A179-1967,
"Mortar for Unit Masonry";
(c) except as provided in (d), compression strength tests of mortar cubes shall be made
at an age of 28 days; and
(d) tests may be made after 7 days on mortar test cubes provided that the relationship
between 7- and 28-day strength of the mortar has been established by previous
tests, or the compression strengths obtained from 7-day test results may be assumed
to be 90 per cent of the 28-day value.
(5) The average compression strength of mortar cubes obtained from any five consecutive
28-day field control tests or from the 28-day strengths predicted from 7-day tests in accordance with Clause (d) referred to in Sentence (4) shall be at least 0.80 of the compressive
stren~th determined in accordance with Article 4.4.3.3 for the type of mortar used, and no
indiVidual test result shall have a value less than 0.67 of that strength.
(6) If the requirements in Sentences (3) or (5) are not met, the authority having jurisdiction shall require proof that the strength of the structure is adequate.
4.4.3.9 Loads and associated reduction factors shall conform to Section 4.1 of the National
Building Code of Canada, 1970, except as provided in Article 4.4.3.33.
4.4.3.10.(1) Except as permitted in Sentences (2) (3) and (4), all masonry in buildings
shall be reinforced to resist the effects of seismic forces, but such reinforcement shall not
be less than that required in Articles 4.4.3.30 and 4.4.3.32.
(2) Reinforcement need not be provided in seismic zone 1 provided the masonry is
designed to resist seismic forces without such reinforcement.
(3) Reinforcement need not be provided in seismic zone 2 provided it can be shown to
the satisfaction of the authority having jurisdiction that the masonry can resist seismic
forces without such reinforcement and the masonry does not enclose an elevator shaft or
stairway.
(4) Reinforcement to resist seismic forces need not be provided in masonry partitions
provided the partitions:
(a) do not exceed 40 lb/sq ft in weight;
(b) do not exceed 10 ft in height and are laterally supported at the top; and
(c) do not enclose elevator shafts or stairwells in seismic zones 2 and 3.
-178-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
p
Ice
In)m
Allowable Stresses
4.4.3.11 The allowable stresses in plain masonry of brick shall conform to Table 4.4.3.D.
he
TABLE 4.4.3.D
Forming Part of Article 4.4.3.11.
on
Maximum Allowable stresses in Plain Brick Masonry
:es
:111
ns
of
Type of Stress
or modulus
in
Compressive, AxiaI(l)
Walls
Columns
Compressive, flexural(1)
Walls
Columns
Tensile, Flexural (4,5)
Normal to bed joints(1)
M or S mortar
N mortar
Parallel to bed joints(2)
M or S mortar
N mortar
Shear(6)
M or S mortar
N mortar
,Ie
IW
It
Designation
Maximum allowable
stress or modulus,
psi
im
im
0.251'm
0.201'm
im
im
0.321'm
0.261'm
it
it
36
28
it
72
56
it
Vm
Bearing on masonry
ib
0.251'm(3)
Modulus of elasticity
Em
Modulus of rigidity
Ev
Vm
7,
e
p
s
:i
e
e
-179-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
4.4.3.12 The allowable stresses in plain masonry of concrete block or structural clay tile
shall conform to Table 4.4.3.E.
TABLE 4.4.3.E
Forming Part of Article 4.4.3.12.
Maximum Allowable Stresses and Moduli for Plain Concrete Block Masonry
and Structural Clay Tile Masonry(l)
Maximum allowable stress or modulus,.
psi
Type of stress
or modulus
Compressive, axial(2)
Walls
Columns
Compressive, flexural(2)
Walls
Columns
Tensile, flexural(i.6)
Normal to bed joints(2)
M or S mortar
N mortar
Parallel to bed joints(8}
M or S mortar
N mortar
Shear (8)
M or S mortar
N mortar
Bearing on masonry(4)
area
fm
fm
0.20 f'm
0.181'm
0.225 f'm.
0.20 f'm
fm
fm
0.301'm
0.24 f'm
0.30 f'm(l}
0.241'm(l)
it
it
36
28
23(1)
16(1)
ft,
ft,
56
46(1)
32(1)
Vm
Vm
fb
34
23
0.25 f'm
34(1)
23(1)
0.25 f'm
Modulus of elasticity
TO'
Modulus of rigidity
E...
'ID
-180-Copyright NRC-CNRC
--"P-.--.----~~----~-----ile
4.4.3.13 The allowable stresses in reinforced masonry of brick shall conform to Table
4.4.3.F.
TABLE 4.4.3.F
Forming Part of Article 4.4.3.13.
Maximum Allowable Stresses in Reinforced Brick Masonry
8,.
Type of stress
or modulus
Compressive, axial
Walls
Columns(l)
Compressive, flexural
Walls and beams
Columns(l)
Shear
No shear reinforcement
Flexural members
Shear walls(3)
With shear reinforcement
taking en tire shear
Flexural members
Shear walls(3)
Bond
Plain bars
Deformed bars
Bearing(2)
Maximum allowable
stress of modulus, psi
Desi~nation
I'm
I'm
0.40 I'm
0.32 I'm
0.25
0.20
fm
fm
fm
fm
Vm
Vm
v
v
2.
u
u
fb
80
160
0.25 f'm
Modulus of elasticity
Em
Modulus of rigidity
E ...
-181-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
4.4.3.14 The allowable stresses in reinforced masonry of concrete block or structural cla,'
tile shall conform to Table 4.4.3.G.
.
TABLE 4.4.3.G
Forming Part of Article 4.4.3.14.
Maximum Allowable Stresses in Reinforced Concrete Block and Structural
Clay Tile Masonry
Type of stress
or modulus
I Desi~nation
Maximum allowable
stress or modulus, psi
Jm
Jm
0.225 I'm
0.20 I'm
Jm
Jm
0.33 I'm
0.28 I'm
Compressive, axial
Walls
Columns(l)
Compressive, flexural
Walls and beams
Columns(l)
Shear
No shear reinforcement
Flexural members
Shear walls(2)
With shear reinforcement
taking entire shear
Flexural members
Shear walls{'t)
Bond
Plain bars
Deformed bars
Bearing on masonry{l)
u
u
J'b
Modulus of elasticity
Em
Modulus of rigidity
Ev
Vm
Vm
v
v
-182-Copyright NRC-CNRC
:::lay
TABLE 4.4.3.
Forming Part of Article 4.4.3.17.
Maximum Allowable Shear on Bolts and Anchors(l)
Diameter of bolt or
anchor, in
Minimum
embedment, in.(2)
Maximum
allowable shear, lb
4
4
4
4
270
410
5
6
7
8
550
750
1100
1500
1850
2250
tal
:he
er
ter
ot
~d
rs
ii.
-183-Copyright NRC-CNRC
TABLE 4.4.3.1
Forming Part of Sentence 4.4.3.20.
Slenderness Coefficients (C.)(l)
eI/e'}.
hIt
-1.0 -0.8
-5 or less 1.00 1.00
0.98 0.98
6
0.97 0.96
7
0.95 0.95
8
0.94 0.93
9
12
13
14
0.92
0.90
0.89
0.87
0.86
15
16
17
18
19
0.84
0.82
0.81
9
8
10
11
0.91
0.90
0.88
0.86
0.84
20
21
22
23
24
6
L 4
). 3
0.70
25
26
27
28
29
0.68
0.66
0.65
0.63
0.62
30
31
32
33
34
0.60
0.58
0.57
0.55
0.54
35
36
37
38
39
40
0.52
0.50
0.49
0.47
0.46
0.44
J. 1
1.00
0.98
0.96
0.94
0.92
1.00
0.98
0.96
0.94
0.92
1.00
0.98
0.96
0.93
0.91
1.00
0.98
0.95
0.92
0.90
1.00
0.97
0.94
0.92
0.89
1.00
0.97
0.94
0.91
0.88
1.00
0.97
0.93
0.90
0.87
1.00
0.96
0.93
0.89
0.85
1.00
0.96
0.92
0.88
0.84
0.91
0.89
0.87
0.85
0.83
0.90
0.88
0.86
0.84
0.81
0.89
0.86
0.84
0.82
0.80
0.88
0.85
0.82
0.80
0.78
0.86
0.84
0.85
0.82
0.83
0.80
0.77
0.73
0.70
0.82
0.78
0.74
0.71
0.67
0.80
0.76
0.72
0.68
0.64
0.81
0.79
0.77
0.75
0.74
0.79
0.77
0.75
0.'
0:
0.75
0.72
0.70
0.68
0.65
0.70
0.67
0.64
1-
0.83
0.81
0.79
0.77
0.76
0.79
0.76
0.73
I-~-
). 7
L 5
. 3
0.70
0.68
1-
- -- -
0.57
0.55
0.53
0.52
0.50
0.53
0.51
0.49
0.47
0.45
0.48
0.46
0.45
0.43
0.43
0.42
0.48
0.46
0.44
0.42
0.40
0.43
0.41
0.39
-0.38-
--
- - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -- --
--
Cs -
1- C" (~ - 5)
4.4.3.21.(1) Where a wall is laterally supported at more than one level, the effective
height, h, between supports shall be assumed as the clear height between such supports.
(2) Where a wall is not laterally supported at the top, its effective height, h, shall be
assumed as twice the height of the wall above the lateral support.
4.4.3.22.(1) Where a column is laterally supported at more than one level in the directions
of both principal axes, the effective height, h, in relation to any axis shall be...assumed as
the clear distance between such supports.
(2) Where a column is provided with lateral support in the directions of both principal
axes at the bottom and one principal axis at the top, its effective height in relation to the
axis about which the column has support top and bottom shall be assumed as the distance
between such supports and its effective height at right angles to this axis shall be assumed
as twice this distance.
(3) Where a column is not provided with lateral support at the top, its effective height
relative to two principal axes shall be assumed as twice its height above the lower support.
4.4.3.23.(1) Except as provided in Article 4.4.3.25, for all solid masonry walls the effective
thickness, I, shall be assumed as~the actftal thickness.
(2) Except as provided in Article 4.4.3.25, for cavity walls loaded on not more than one
wythe, the effective thickness shall be assumed as the actual thickness of the loaded wythe.
(3) Except as provided in Article 4.4.3.25, for cavity walls loaded on both wythes, each
wythe shall be considered to act independently and the effective thickness of each wythe
shall be assumed as its actual thickness.
4.4.3.24.(1) Except as provided in Article 4.4.3.25, for rectangular columns, the effective
thickness in the direction of each principal axis shall be assumed as the actual thickness in
that direction.
(2) Except as provided in Article 4.4.3.25, for non-rectangular columns, the effective
thickness, t, in relation to each principal axis shall be assumed as 3.5 times its radius of
gyration about the axis considered.
4.4.3.25 Where raked mortar joints are used, the effective thickness shall be assumed as
the effective thickness in Articles 4.4.3.23 and 4.4.3.24 reduced by the depth of the raking.
4.4.3.26.(1) Lateral movements due to loads, thermal effects and other causes shall be
taken into account in calculating the virtual eccentricity of loads on walls or columns.
(2) Where members are constructed of different kinds or grades of units or mortar, the
variation in the moduli of elasticity shall be taken into account and the eccentricity of the
load shall be measured from the centroid of the transformed section of the member.
(3) Where a cavity wall is loaded on one wythe, the eccentricity of the load shall be
measured from the centroid of the loaded wythe.
(4) Where a cavity wall is loaded on both wythes, the load shall be distributed to each
wythe according to the eccentricity of the load from the centroidal axis of the wall.
(5) For walls or columns of solid masonry subject to bending about not more than one
principal axis,
(a) the eccentricity of any load shall be measured from the centroid of the member, and
(b) the eccentricity coefficient C. shall be computed by:
(i) C. =
(ii)
C. =
+1
~(1
- ) where the virtual eccentricity exceeds t/6 but does not exceed
t/3; or
1
(iii) C. = - - - - where the virtual eccentricity exceeds t/3.
6 ~
1
t
(6) Where walls and columns are subject to bending about both principal axes, the
eccentricity coefficient, C(I, shall be computed by:
1
6eb/b
6etlt where (etb
ebt) does not exceed bt/6; or
(a) C, =
(b)
C. = % (1 - 2Zb - 2;t) where (e,b -I- ebt) exceeds bt/6 but does not exceed bt/3.
4.4.3.27.(1) Except as provided in Sentence (2), for cavity walls loaded on both wythes
A" shall be assumed as the gross cross-sectional area of the wythe under consideration.
(2) Where raked mortar joints are used, the thickness used in determining A" shall be
the actual thickness of the member reduced by the depth of the raking.
4.4.3.28.(1) Except as provided in Sentence (2), the allowable vertical load, P, on a plain
masonry wall or column subject to bending about not more than one principal axis shall
be computed by:
(a) P = CaimAn where the virtual eccentricity is less than t/20 and 1m is the allowable
axial compressive stress, or
-185-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
(b) P - C.C./,,.A .. where the virtual eccentricity is at least tl20 but does not exceed
113 and f m is the allowable flexural compressive stress.
(2) Where the virtual eccentricity exceeds t13, P in Sentence (1) shall be computed in
accordance with Clause (l)(b) except that the allowable flexural tensile stress.!t, in Articles
4.4.3.11 and 4.4.3.12 shall be substituted for fm.
(3) Except as provided in Sentence (4), the allowable vertical loads on rectangular
plain masonry walls and columns subject to bending about both principal axes shall be
calculated in conformance with:
(a) Clause (l)(a) where (etb + elit) is less than bt120, or
(b) Clause (l)(b) where (etb
elit) is at least equal to bel20 but does not exceed bel3.
(4) Where (e,b
ellt) exceeds btl3, walls and columns subject to bending about two
principal axes shall be reinforced and designed in accordance with Articles 4.4.3.29 and
4.4.3.31.
4.4.3.29.(1) Except as permitted in Sentences (2) and (4), the allowable load, P, on a
reinforced masonry wall subject to bending about not more than one principal axis shall be:
(a) P == C.fmA ft where the virtual eccentricity is less than e/l0 and fm is the allowable
axial compressive stress, or
(b) P = C.C.jmAft where the virtual eccentricity is at least tll0 but does not exceed tl3
or a value which would produce tension in the reinforcement and fm is the allowable
flexural compressive stress.
(2) Where the virtual eccentricity exceeds tl3 or a value which would produce tension
in the reinforcement, P in Sentence (1) shall be determined on the basis of a transformed
section and linear stress distribution. Reinforcement in compression shall be neglected
except as provided in Sentence (4). The compressive stress in the masonry shall not exceed
the al10wable flexural compressive stress, fm, and the tensile stress in the reinforcement shall
conform to Article 4.4.3.15. The vertical load determined in accordance with this Sentence
shall be modified by the slenderness coefficient in Article 4.4.3.20.
(3) Except as provided in Sentence (4), the allowable vertical load, P, on a reinforced
masonry wall subject to bending about both principal axes shall be calculated in conformance with:
(a) Clause (l)(a) where (e,b + ellt) is less than bellO,
(b) Clause (l)(b) where (e,b
e"t) is at least equal to btllO but does' not exceed bel3
or a value which would produce tension in the reinforcement, or
(c) Sentence (2) where (e,b + e,J) exceeds btl3 or a value which would produce tension
in the reinforcement.
(4) When the reinforcement in bearing walls is desi~ned, placed and tied in position as
for columns, the walls may be designed as columns In accordance with Article 4.4.3.31
provided the length of the wall considered as a column does not exceed the centre-to-centre
distance between concentrated loads nor exceed the width of the bearing plus four times
the wall thickness.
p
ed
in
les
ar
be
ld
a
e:
Ie
13
Ie
n
d
d
d
II
(2) Where the virtual eccentricity exceeds t/3 or a value which would produce tension
in the reinforcement, P in Sentence (1) shall be determined on the basis of a transformed
section and linear stress distribution. The compressive stress in the masonry shall not exceed
the allowable flexural compressive stress and the stresses in the reinforcement, I., shall
conform to Article 4.4.3.15. The vertical load determined in accordance with this Sentence
shall be modified by the slenderness coefficient in Article 4.4.3.20.
(3) Allowable vertical loads on rectangular reinforced masonry columns subject to
bending about both principal axes shall be calculated in conformance with:
(a) Clause (l)(a) where (e,b + e,J) is less than bt/l0.
(b) Clause (l)(b) where (e,b + eft) is at least equal to bt/lO but does not exceed bt/3
or a value which would produce tension in the reinforcement, or
(c) Sentence (2) where (e,b + e,J) exceeds bt/3 or a value which would produce tension
in the reinforcement.
4.4.3.32.(1) The cross-sectional area of vertical reinforcement in columns shall be at least
0.5 per cent and not more than 4 per cent of the gross cross-sectional area of the column
except that a column stressed to less than half of its allowable stress may have its reinforcement reduced to not less than 0.27 per cent.
(2) Lateral ties shall be not less than No.9 ASWG wire (0.1483 in. diameter) and the
spacing shall not exceed 16-bar diameters, 48-tie diameters, nor the least dimension of the
column whichever gives the smallest spacing. Ties may be placed in horizontal mortar
joints or in contact with the vertical steel.
(3) The ties shall be so arranged that every corner bar and intermediate bar is laterally
supported by a tie forming an included angle of not more than 135 degrees at the bar except
that an intermediate bar that is not more than 6 in. from a laterally supported bar need
not be supported, and where the bars are located around the periphery of a circle a circular
tie maybe used.
Shear Walls
4.4.3.33.(1) A plain masonry shear wall shall be designed so that no part of the wall is in
tension.
(2) Reinforced masonry shear walls shall be designed in conformance with Article
4.4.3.29.
(3) The maximum horizontal shear stress in a shear wall, V. w, shall not exceed the value:
(v or tim + 0.3Ic8)
where v or 11m = the allowable applicable shear stress.
(4) In computing the shear resistance of a shear wall, flanges or projections formed by
intersecting walls shall be neglected.
(5) In calculations of shear stresses in masonry shear walls subjected to earthquake
forces, the load probability combination factor in Section 4.1 of the National Building
Code shall not apply.
4.4.3.34.(1) Except as provided in Sentence (3), where masonry shear walls intersect a
masonry wall or walls to form symmetrical T or I sections, the effective flange width shall
not exceed one-sixth of the total wall height above the level being analyzed and its overhanging width on either side of the shear wall shall not exceed six times the thickness of
the intersected wall.
(2) Except as provided in Sentence (3), where masonry shear walls intersect a masonry
wall or walls to form L or C sections, the effective overhanging flange width shall not
exceed one-sixteenth of the total wall height above the level being analyzed nor six times
the thickness of the intersected wall.
(3) Limits on effective flange width in Sentences (1) and (2) may be increased where it
can be shown that such increases are justified.
(4) The vertical shear stress at the intersection of masonry walls shall not exceed the
allowable shear stress in Articles 4.4.3.11 to 4.4.3.14 for shear walls if the intersection is
laid up in true masonry bond conforming to Clause 4.4.5.18.(l)(a) or shall not exceed the
allowable shear values in Article 4.4.3.17 where metal bolts or anchors are provided.
Metal anchors shall be embedded to the depth required to develop the tensile strength
of the anchors.
4.4.3.35.(1) When floors or roofs are designed to transmit horizontal forces to walls, the
anchorage of the floor or roof to the wall shall be designed to resist the horizontal force.
(2) Steel anchors to resist shear force shall be designed in conformance with Article
4.4.3.17.
-187-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Flexural Members
4.4.3.36.(1) The design of flexural members of reinforced masonry shall be in accordance
with the following assumptions:
(a) A section that is plane before bending remains plane after bending,
(b) Moduli of elasticity of the masonry and of the reinforcement remain constant,
(c) Tensile forces are resisted only by the tensile reinforcement, and
(d) Reinforcement is completely surrounded by and bonded to masonry material.
4.4.3.37.(1) All members shall be designed to resist at all sections the maximum bending
moment and shears as determined by the principle of continuity and relative rigidity.
(2) The clear distance between lateral supports of a beam shall not exceed 32 times the
least width of the compression flange or face.
(3) Where compression steel is required in beams, it shall be anchored by ties or stirrups
not less than }4 in. in diameter, spaced not more than 16-bar diameters or 48-tie diameters
apart, whichever is less.
(4) In computing flexural stresses in walls where reinforcement occurs, the effective
width shall be not greater than four times the wall thickness.
4.4.3.38 Where tensile reinforcement at any section of a flexural member is required, the
ratio, p, of the area of tensile reinforcement to effective masonry area shall be at least
80lfll unless the tensile reinforcement at every section, positive or negative, is at least
one-third greater than that required by analysis.
4.4.3.39.(1) The shearing stress, v, as a measure of diagonal tension in reinforced masonry
flexural members shall be calculated by:
V
v == btl
except for members of I or T section where b' shall be substituted for b.
(2) Except for corbels, brackets and other short cantilevers, the maximum shear in a
flexural member shall be assumed as that occurring at a distance equal to the effective
depth d, of the member, from the face of the support.
(3) The effects of flexural compression in variable-depth members and the significant
effects of torsion shall be included in calculating the shear stress.
(4) Where the value of the calculated shearing stress exceeds the allowable shearing
stress permitted on masonry without web reinforcement, web reinforcement shall be provided to carry the entire shearing stress. Such reinforcement shall be continued for a
distance equal to the depth, d, of the member beyond the point theoretically required.
4.4.3.40.(1) Web reinforcement shall consist of:
(a) bars or stirrups perpendicular to or at an angle of at least 45 degrees with the longitudinal tension reinforcement,
(b) longitudinal bars bent so that the axis of the inclined portion of the bar makes an
angle of at least 30 degrees with the axis of the longitudinal portion of the bar, or
(c) combination of (a) and (b).
4.4.3.41.(1) The area of steel, AI" required in stirrups placed perpendicular to the longitudinal reinforcement shall be calculated by:
Vs
A" = f.,d
4.4.3.42.(1) The required area, A", of inclined stirrups or parallel bars bent up at different
distances from the support shall be calculated by:
A _
Vs
,,- f.,d (sin a + cos a)
(2) When the web reinforcement consists of a single bent bar or of a single group of
parallel bars all bent up at the same distance from the support, the required area, A", of
such bar or bars shall be calculated by:
A,,=--ff) sin a
(3) Only the centre three-fourths of the inclined-portion of a bent bar shall be considered effective as web reinforcement.
4.4.3.43 Where web reinforcement is required, it shall be spaced so that every 45-degree
line, representing a potential diagonal crack, extending from the mid-depth, d12, of the
-188-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
lce
beam to the longitudinal tension bars shall be crossed by at least one line of effective web
reinforcement.
4.4.3.44.(1) In flexural members in which tensile reinforcement is parallel to the compressive face, the bond stress, u, shall be calculated by:
V
U
ng
he
ps
~rs
V'e
Ie
5t
st
y
= "Zojd
(2) The tension or compression in any bar at any section shall be developed on each
side of that section by adequate embedment length, end anchorage, or hooks. A tension bar
may be anchored by bending it across the web at an angle of not less than 15 degrees with
the longitudinal portion of the bar and making it continuous with the reinforcement on
the opposite side of the member.
(3) Except at supports, every reinforcing bar shall be continued beyond the point at
which it is no longer needed to resist flexural stress, for a distance of not less than the
effective depth of the member but not less than 12 bar diameters.
(4) Tension bars shall not be terminated in a tension zone except where:
(a) the shear is not over one-half that permitted,
(b) additional stirrups in excess of those required are provided each way from the termination point, a distance equal to the depth of the beam. The stirrup spacing shall
r" is the ratio of the area of bars terminated to the total area
a
e
(6) At least one-third of the total reinforcement required for negative moment at a
support shall be extended beyond the extreme position of the point of inflection a distance
at least one-sixteenth of the clear span but not less than the effective depth of the member.
(7) At least one-third of the total reinforcement required for positive moment in simple
beams or at the simply supported end of continuous beams shall extend along the same
face of the beam at least 6 inches past the edge of the support. At least one-quarter of the
total reinforcing required for positive moment in a continuous beam shall extend along the
same face of the beam past the face of intermediate supports at least 6 inches.
(8) Plain bars in tension shall terminate in standard hooks, except that hooks shall not
be required on the positive reinforcement at interior supports of continuous members.
4.4.3.45.(1) Single separate bars used as web reinforcement shall be anchored at each
.end by
(a) welding to longitudinal reinforcement,
(b) hooking tightly around the longitudinal reinforcement through 1S0 degrees,
(c) embedment above or below the mid-depth of the beam on the compression side a
distance sufficient to develop by bond the stress in the bar, or
(d) standard hook as specified in Article 4.4.3.46 developing 7500 psi, plus embedment
sufficient to develop by bond the remainder of the stress in the bar; the effective
embedded length shall be assumed not to exceed the distance between the mid-depth
of the beam and the tangent of the hook.
(2) The ends of bars forming a single U-Stirrups or multiple U-stirrups shall be anchored
by one of the methods of Sentence (1) or shall be bent through an angle of at least 90
degrees tightly around longitudinal reinforcing bars not less in diameter than the stirrup
bar, and shall project beyond the bend at least 12 diameters of the stirrup bar.
(3) The loops or closed ends of single U-stirrups or multiple U-stirrups shall be anchored
by bending around the longitudinal reinforcement through an angle of at least 90 degrees,
.or by being welded or otherwise rigidly attached to such reinforcement.
(4) Hooking or bending stirrups or separate web reinforcing bars around the longitudinal reinforcement shall be considered effective only when these bars are perpendicular
to the longitudinal reinforcement.
(5) Longitudinal bars bent to act as web reinforcement in tension zones shall be continuous with the longitudinal reinforcement. The tensile stress in each bar shall be fully
.developed in both the upper and lower half of the beam by anchorage through bond or hooks.
-189-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
"
-190-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
and
(al to
yond
Olr of
~ters.
ered
ss in
lage
how
out
ng,
:0-
ore
le
i)
h
t
(6) Grouting of grouted masonry in Sentncee (1) shall be done in a continuous pour in
lifts of not more than 4 ft. It shall be consolidated by puddling or vibrating during pouring
and again after excess moisture has been absorbed and while the grout is plastic. The grout~
ing of any section between vertical grout barriers shall be completed in one day with no
interruptIons greater than 1 hr.
hollow masonry units in which certain cells contain reinJorcement and are filled with concrete
or grout.
(2) All reinforced masonry of hollow units shall be built so that walls and cross webs
forming cells to be filled shall be fully bedded in mortar to prevent leakage of grout. All head
joints shall be filled with mortar for a distance in from the face of the wall or unit not less
than the thickness of the face shells. Bond shall be provided by lapping units in successive
vertical courses or by equivalent mechanical anchorage.
(3) Vertical cells of hollow units to be filled in Sentence (1) shall have vertical alignment
sufficient to maintain an unobstructed continuous cell of at least 2 in. by 3 in. except that
where the total grout pour exceeds 8 ft such cells shall be at least 3 in. by 3 in.
(4) Cleanout openings shall be provided at the bottoms of all cells to be filled at each
lift or pour of grout where such lift or pour of grout exceeds 4 ft in height. Any overhanging
mortar or other obstruction or debris shall be removed from the insides of such walls. The
cleanouts shall be inspected before being Sf>::I.led.
(5) Vertical reinforcement shall be held in position at top and bottom and at intervals
not exceeding 192 diameters of the reinforcement.
(6) All cells containing reinforcement shall be completely filled with grout in lifts not exceeding 8 ft except that where the total grout pour exceeds 8 ft in height the grout shall be
placed in lifts not exceeding 4 ft. Grout shall be consolidated at the time of pouring by
puddling or vibrating during pouring and again after excess moisture has been absorbed
and while the grout is plastic.
(7) When the grouting is stopped for more than 1 hr, horizontal construction joints
shall be formed by stopping the pour of grout 1% in. below the top unit.
(8) The proportions of materials in fine or coarse grout shall conform to Article 4.4.3.18.
(9) All grout shall be used within 1% hr of initial mixing but before it has begun to set.
Placing Reinforcement
4.4.3.51.(1) The thickness of grout or mortar between masonry units and reinforcement
shall be not less than U in. except that U in. bars may be laid in %-in. horizontal mortar
joints, and No.6 ASWG (0.192-111. diameter) wires may be laid in VB-in. horizontal joints.
Spaces containing both horizontal and vertical reinforcement shall be not less than % in.
larger than the sum of the diameters of such horizontal and vertical reinforcement.
(2) Except in columns the clear distance between parallel bars shall be at least equal to
the diameter of the bar.
(3) Reinforcement shall be accurately placed and fixed rigidly in position during grouting
except that horizontal reinforcement may be placed as the work progresses.
(4) Splices shall be made so that the structural strength of the member is not reduced.
Lapped splices shall provide sufficient lap to develop by bond the working stress of the
reinforcement. Mechanical connections shall develop the strength of the reinforcement
and welded connections shall conform to CSA W186-1969, "Welding of Reinforcing Bars
in Reinforced Concrete Construction".
4.4.3.52.(1) Except as provided in Sentence (2), all reinforcing bars shall be completely
embedded in mortar or grout and have a coverage of masonry not less than:
(a) 3 in. at the tops and bottoms of footings and masonry in contact with soil,
(b) 2 in. over bars in masonry exposed to the weather except that 1% in. shall be per.
mitted over bars %-in. or less and not located in the upper face of the masonry,
(c) 1% in. over reinforcement in columns not exposed to weather or soil,
(d) 1% in. on the bottom and sides of beams or girders not exposed to weather or soil,
(e) ~ in. from the face of all walls not exposed to weather or soil,
(f) % in. at the upper face of any member not exposed to weather or soil, and
(g) one bar diameter over all bars.
(2) Reinforcement consisting of bars or wire U in. or less in diameter embedded in the
horizontal mortar joints shall have not less than %-in. mortar coverage from the exposed
face.
-191-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
TABLE 4.4.4.A
Forming Part of Sentence 4.4.4.3.(1)
Max. allowable
compressive stress,
psi (I)
Type of Mortar(lI}
Type of
masonry
Solid
masonry
Cavity
walls
- - - - - - - -- M
N
0
S
K
- - - - -- - -
...
...
...
Rubble stone
Ashlar granite
Ashlar limestone and marble
Ashlar sandstone and cast-stone
140
800
500
400
120
720
450
360
500
400
250
175
125
450
350
225
160
115
350
300
200
140
100
250
200
150
110
75
100
100
100
75
50
250
175
125
225
160
115
200
140
100
150
100
75
...
...
...
100
85
90
75
85
70
140
100
130
90
110
80
--
140
100
130
90
110
80
70
60
55
100
80
640 500
400 325
320 250
- - - -I -
...
... ...
... ...
- -- -- -- -
.. . ...
.. . ...
-- - ... ...
.. . ...
... ...
- - ---
4.4.4.4.(1) Where a masonry unit of natural stone directly supports a concentrated load,.
the maximum allowable compressive stress for th~t unit shall be 10 per cent of its compressive strength.
(2) The maximum allowable flexural stress for natural stone shall be one"sixth its modulus
of rupture.
(cept
:cept
din
4.4.4.5 The thickness of every masonry wall shall conform to the appropriate requirements
in Articles 4.4.4.8 to 4.4.4.16 and shall have a bearing capacity conforming to Article
4.4.4.7.
4.4.4.6 Every masonry partition or wall, including panel walls and curtain walls, shall be
laterally supported in conformance with the appropriate requirements in Articles 4.4.4.21.
4.4.4.22, 4.4.4.23, 4.4.5.8, and 4.4.5.10.
Bearing Capacity
(I),
the
:coron".
00
00
00
75
50
4.4.4.7.(1) The maximum allowable bearing capacity of masonry shall be the product of
its maximum allowable stress, provided for in Article 4.4.4.3 and
(a) its gross cross"sectional area when it is solid masonry, or
(b) its gross cross"sectional area minus the area of space between the wythes when it is
a cavity wall.
(2) For the purpose of calculating the areas of masonry the actual dimensions of the
cross-section of the masonry shall be used.
(3) Where masonry is constructed of more than one type of masonry unit its maximum
allowable bearing capacity shall be determined on the basis of the weakest unit.
d,.
~s-
4.4.4.11.(1) The thickness of every solid masonry curtain wall shall be at least 7 in. in
actual thickness for walls up to 36 ft in height above its bearing support.
(2) \~There a solid masonry curtain wall exceeds 36 ft in height, the top 36 ft of the wall
shall be at least 7 in. actual thickness and the wall thickness below this height shall be
-193-Copyright NRC-CNRC
increased in increments of at least 4 in. for each increment of 36 ft of height or part thereof
measured down from the top.
4.4.4.12.(1) Where a solid masonry wall is stiffened by pilasters of plain masonry the wall
thickness required in Articles 4.4.4.9 and 4.4.4.10 may be reduced between pilasters by
one-half of the thickness added by the pilaster to the wall thickness required without
pilasters, provided:
(a) no part of the wall after reduction is less than 8 in. in thickness,
(b) the centre-to-centre spacing of pilasters is not more than 25 times the reduced thickness of the stiffened wall, and
(c) the width of the pilasters is not less than one-eighth of their centre-to-centre spacing.
-194-Copyright NRC-CNRC
hereof
e wall
~rs by
[thout
icing.
~ring
: than
: than
vities
md
vities
tition
~d at
~ition
that
ween
ight.
e (1)
::l the
t. for
(3) Except as provided in Article 4.4.4.20, the depth of any chase or recess in any wall
shall not exceed one-third the thickness of the wall.
(4) The clear distance between chases in a wall shall be not less than four times the wall
thickness.
4.4.4.19.(1) Except as provided in Sentence (2), every chase or recess or bearing in masonry
walls of hollow units shall be built in as construction proceeds.
(2) Where necessary to cut a chase, dry pack concrete shall be used to form a chase of
required size in a wall of hollow masonry after the wall has been constructed.
4.4.4.20.(1) Every chase or recess having a width exceeding 20 in. or a depth exceeding
one-third the thickness of the wall shall be considered as an opening and any masonry
above such chase or recess shall be supported on a lintel or arch.
(2) The width of any sloping or horizontal chase or recess shall be assumed as the horizontal distance between the vertical lines through its extremities.
Lateral Support
4.4.4.21.(1) Except as provided in Sentence (2), a wall of masonry shall have lateral
supports at either horizontal or vertical intervals spaced not more than:
(a) 20 times the thickness of the wall where the wall is of solid masonry of solid units, or
(b) 18 times the thickness of the wall where the wall is of solid masonry of hollow units
or a cavity wall.
(2) Every partition shall be supported laterally at either horizontal or vertical intervals
of not more than 36 times the thickness of the wall.
4.4.4.22.(1) Except as provided in Sentence (2), where a wall of masonry does not have
lateral support along its top and if its height exceeds four times its thickness, it shall have
vertical lateral supports at horizontal intervals spaced in accordance with Sentence
4.4.4.21.(1).
(2) The portion of a wall extending from the sill of a window to the floor immediately
below shall be laterally supported along its top or have vertical lateral supports at horizontal
intervals spaced in accordance with Sentence 4.4.4.21.(1) where:
(a) its height exceeds three times its thickness, and
(b) the length of the wall below the window exceeds the limits in Sentence 4.4.4.21.(1).
Allowable Openings
4.4.4.23 Evidence shall be provided to show that openings do not cause stresses in the
wall greater than the values given in Article 4.4.4.3.
Columns
4.4.4.24.(1) Every masonry column shall be constructed of solid masonry of solid units
or hollow units filled with grout or concrete.
(2) Every masonry column shall have lateral supports spaced so that the vertical distance
between supports is not greater than ten times the least dimension of the column.
SUBSECTION 4.4.5 CONSTRUCTION PRACTICE
level
~gate
~ not
ying
ams.
onry
the
t17.
the
11 or
4.4.5.1.(1) The bearing support for any masonry shall have lateral stability and shall
provide:
(a) a level bearing surface or surfaces, and
(b) be of noncombustible material except for support of minor masonry decorative
features.
4.4.5.2.(1) The projection of a wall beyond the edge of a supporting member such as a
shelf angle or edge of a beam shall not exceed 17,;( in. except that this projection may be
increased to:
(a) 1% in. where ashlar facing not less than 3% in. in thickness with continuous horizontal joints is supported,
(b) 4Y2 in. in any masonry panel wall bonded by masonry units where such projection
does not exceed two-thirds of the distance between the outer face of the wall and
the centre of gravity of the wall and the first Cl)urse of masonry above the supporting
member is a full header course projecting at least 3% in. over the supporting member,
or
(c) 2 in. where beams are fireproofed in concrete or masonry units so that the space
between the web of the beam and the face of the fireproofing is completely filled or
-195-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
where there is at least 5 in. of solid masonry not less than 8 in. in width directly
above the beams, provided such projection does not exceed two-thirds the distance
between the outer face of the masonry and the centre of gravity of the supported
masonry.
(2) Where the projecting wall in Sentence (1) is of hollow units the first course on the
bearing support shall be of solid ul1its.
4.4.5.3 Masonry shall be tied or bonded to the lateral support so as to provide support
in both the inward and outward directions in accordance with Sentence 4.4.5.10.(1).
Support on Masonry
4.4.5.4.(1) Where masonry supports a concentrated load so that the resultant vertical
component of the applied loads passes through the axis of the width of the masonry, the
maximum allowable bearing capacity of the support shall conform to Articles 4.4.4.6,
4.4.4.7 or Subsection 4.4.3.
(2) Where applied loads in Sentence (1) have a horizontal thrust this thrust shall be
resisted by construction designed for that purpose.
4.4.5.5.(1) Except as provided in Article 44.5.6, where a wall of masonry supports a
continuous load such as a slab, a deck or wood joists spaced not more than 30 in. o. c.
(a) the support shall be continuous and of solid units to a depth at least 272 in. measured
down from the bearing surface, or a course of hollow units filled solidly with concrete
having a compressive strength of at least 2000 psi., and
(b) the width of bearing shall be at least 4 in. measured horizontally in from the face
of the wall.
4.4.5.6 Where a wooden plank deck is supported directly by a wall of masonry. the support
may be a corbelled ledge projecting 4 in. from the face of the wall.
4.4.5.7 Where masonry supports a load applied other than as provided in Article 4.4.5.5
and 4.4.5.6, the support shall be of solid brick units or other solid units with voids filled
with concrete, having a compressive strength of at least 2000 psi, to a depth of at least 8 in.
measured down from the bearing surface.
4.4.5.8 Where anchor bolts are to be placed in the top of a column, the column shall be
capped with concrete having a compressive strength of at least 3000 psi or 12-in. thick
reinforced masonry.
4.4.5.9.(1) \Vhere a wooden structural member is supported on masonry, the support shall
be constructed so that in the event of a fire the member can collapse without dislodging
the masonry in exterior walls.
(2) Where the end of a wooden structural member is built into an exterior masonry wall,
a 72-in. air space shall be provided at the sides, top and end of such member and a moistureproof barrier shall be installed on the bearing surface, or the wood shall be treated in accordance with CSA 080-1966, "Wood Preservation."
Anchora~e
of Masonry
-196-Copyright NRC-CNRC
tly
Ice
ted
:he
ort
Bonding
4.4.5.12 Except as required in Articles 4.4.5.16 and 4.4.5.17, where masonry walls have
two or more wythes, the wythes shall be bonded with masonry bonding units in conformance with Article 4.4.5.13 or with corrosion-resistant metal ties in conformance with
Article 4.4.5.14.
4.4.5.13.(1) Where masonry bonding units are used as provided in Article 4.4.5.12 they
shall:
(a) in the case of solid masonry walls;
ja
'ed
4.4.S.14.(I) Where metal ties are used as provided in Article 4.4.5.12, they shall:
(a) extend from within 1 in. of the outer face of the wall to within 1 in. of the inner face
cal
~he
:.6,
be
be
lck
of the wall,
(b) be spaced not greater than 18 o. c. vertically and 36 in. o. c. horizontally,
(c) be staggered from course to course where individual ties are used, and
(d) be placed on webs where hollow units are used and completely embedded in mortar,
or be anchored into a bedding surface containing not more than 25 per cent voids.
(2) Metal ties in Sentence (1) shall be at least %;-in. diameter corrosion-resistant steel
rods of continuous weld connected type or of individual type with 2 in. at each end bent
at 90 degrees or of other metal or shape providing equivalent strength, stiffness, bond and
corrosion resistance.
(3) Where the space between metal-tied wythes is filled with mortar or grout, the allowable stresses and other provisions for masonry bonded walls shall apply, and, where the
space is not filled, such walls shall conform to the requirements for cavity walls.
all
ng
4.4.S.15 Where there is an opening in a masonry wall of two or more wythes, the wythes
shall be bonded together with masonry bonding units or metal ties located within 12 in. of
and spaced not more than 36 in. o. c. around such openings.
~te
Lce
)rt
5.5
led
in.
4.4.5.16.(1) Solid masonry walls of rubble masonry shall be bonded with masonry bonding
)r-
units that:
(a) extend from face to face of the wall either as continuous units or by overlapping at
least 6 in.,
(b) constitute not less than one-seventh the face area of the wall, and
(c) are uniformly spaced.
nd
an
4.4.S.17.(1) The actual thickness of any ashlar facing unit shall be not less than 3% in.
LIl,
re-
Ashlar Masonry
is
90
at
ts
a
(8) For piers and buttresses each alternate course of ashlar facing having an area not
less than one-third the total surface area of the facing shall extend not less than 3 % in.
into the backing.
(9) Continuous vertical joints shall not be used in ashlar facing except where:
(a) the joints are not more than 4 in. in depth,
(b) bond stones have an area not less than one-third the surface area of the wall,
(c) bond stones are located so that in any tier of stones there are not more than two
stones between bond stones, and
(d) bond stones are distributed so that each bond stone is in contact with four 4-in.
stones unless alternate courses are continuous bonding courses and each bond
stone is recessed at each side for its height so that it laps the two adjacent stones.
Intersecting Walls
4.4.5.18.(1) Where two load bearing walls of plain masonry intersect or where a shear
wall intersects a wall, the joint at the intersection shall be:
(a) bonded in true masonry bond so that at least SO per cent of the units of one wall are
embedded in the other wall, or
(b) regularly toothed or blocked with 8-in. maximum offsets and the joints provided
with metal anchors conforming to Sentence (2) spaced at vertical intervals not
exceeding 9 ft, or
(c) provided with metal anchors conforming to the requirements of Sentence (2) spaced
at vertical intervals not exceeding 1 ft 4 in.
(2) Where metal anchors are used to connect intersecting walls:
(a) the anchors shall be of corrosion-resistant steel at least 0.375 sq in. (U by 1~ in.)
in cross-section or bolts of equivalent area,
(b) the anchor shall extend into the masonry at least 18 in. on each side of the joint
where possible and have a 2-in. 90-degree bend at the ends or shall be provided with
cross-pins at the ends for anchorage, and
(c) where there is not sufficient thickness of masonry to embed the anchors 18 in. into
the masonry, equivalent anchorage shall be provided by cross-pins or other means.
Glass Block
4.4.5.19.(1) Where a masonry wall is constructed of glass blocks:
(a) reinforcement shall be provided to resist all stresses due to wind, temperature and
shrinkage,
(b) reinforcement shall be placed in the horizontal joints and the vertical spacing between
such reinforcement shall not exceed 24 in. where the blocks are not greater than 8 in.
in height, and
(c) where the blocks are greater in height than 8 in., reinforcement shall be placed in
every horizontal joint.
(2) The reinforcement in Sentence (1) shall be of corrosion-resistant 20-gauge expanded
metal strips not less than 3 in. wide or two parallel corrosion-resistant steel wires not less
than No.9 ASWG (0.1483 in. diameter) spaced at least 3 in. apart.
(3) The reinforcement in Sentence (I) shall be continuous or lapped at least 6 in. at
splices.
Balustrades
4.4.5.20 Masonry balustrades shall be anchored to withstand the loads prescribed in
Article 4.1.8.1. fo the National Building Code of Canada, 1970.
CorbelUng
4.4.5.21.(1) Where a wall of masonry is corbelled:
(a) the corbel shall not project more than one-third the thickness of the wall,
(b) the corbel shall bear on at least an 8-in. depth of solid masonry of solid units or of
hollow units in which all voids are filled solidly with concrete to a depth of at least
8 in. measured down from the bearing surface,
(c) the corbel shall be of solid units,
(d) the projection of each course shall not exceed 1 in., and
(e) the courses shall be laid up using alternate courses of headers and stretchers so that
the top course is a header course.
-198-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
f
ot
In.
10
n.
ld
s.
Stack Bond
4.4.5.22.(1) Where stack bond is used in which vertical mortar joints between units in
masonry are continuous between courses, each wythe shall be reinforced longitudinally at
vertical intervals not exceeding 18 in. with:
(a) a fabricated mesh of two No.9 ASWG (0.1483 in. diameter) corrosion-resistant rods
spaced not more than 1 in. from each face of the stack bonded wythe and lapped
at least 6 in. at each splice, or
(b) other metal reinforcement providing equivalent stiffness, bond and corrosion resistance.
(2) Wythes of stack bonded walls shall be bonded together in accordance with Article
4.4.5.12.
4.4.5.23.(1) Except as provided in Article 4.4.5.9, wood shall not be built into masonry
construction except as plugs, blocks or strips for fastening strapping, flashing, conduits
and other light coverings and service equipment.
(2) Where wooden blocks or strips are used they shall not exceed 8 in. in length and shall
not be placed less than 32 in. o. c. horizontally and vertically.
Parapet Wall
4.4.5.24.(1) Every parapet wall shall be constructed of solid masonry of solid units or of
hollow units in which all voids are filled with concrete or mortar.
(2) Every parapet wall and masonry balustrade shall be ca{>ped with an impervious
coping of metal, vitrified tile, stone or other equivalent matenal except that coping of
concrete, stone or permeable masonry may be used provided such copings are flashed on
the top and back with corrosion-resistant metal, or through flashing shall be provided
under such coping for the full thickness of the wall.
(3) Every parapet wall less than 12 in. in thickness shall be protected on the back by
a noncorrosive flashing extending from the roof to the underside of the coping or to a line
at least 3 ft above the adjacent roof level.
Draina~e
of Walls
4.4.5.25 Weep holes at least Ys in. in diameter shall be provided immediately above the
base flashing in veneered walls having bearing support, and in cavity walls, at horizontal
spacing not exceeding 24 in. o. c.
-199-Copyright NRC-CNRC
TABLE 4.4.6.A
Forming Part of Article 4.4.6.4
Maximum Vertical
Spacing, in.
Maximum Horizontal
Spacing, in.
16
20
24
32
24
16
i'
ilil
,1
t'
(c) be supported by backing conforming to backing for glass veneer in Sentence 4.4.6.8.
(6),
Cd) be applied to its backing by means of full embedment in Type M mortar or other
approved means with all jomts filled, and
(e) be flashed at the top to prevent the penetration of moisture.
(2) Mosaic tile not exceeding U in. in thickness or 2U sq. in. in area, applied to a wall
on a mortar or plaster bed shall not De~deemed to be a veneer.
Glass Veneer
ve
~er
~s.
ed
Id
Dr
al
1.
:e
~-
4.4.6.8.(1) Glass veneer shall not be applied to the exterior of a wall at the height of more
than 18 ft or less than 6 in. above the top of foundation wall.
(2) Glass veneer shall be not less than U in. in thickness.
(3) Glass veneer units shall not exceed 8 sq ft in area and shall not exceed 4 ft in any
dimension.
(4) Glass veneer shall be set in approved asphaltic mastic cement applied over a priming
or bonding coat of a composition to ensure adequate adhesion of the two materials.
(5) Jointing or pointing cement used to butter the edges of glass veneer units shall be
subject to approval of the authority having jurisdiction.
(6) The backing for glass veneer shall provide a sound, dry, rigid plane surface consisting
of masonry, reinforced concrete, cement plaster on metal lath, or other approved noncombustible material.
(7) Cement plaster in Sentence (6) shall be at least !}i-in. thick conforming to the requirements of Section 29 of Part 9 of the National Building Code of Canada, 1970, applied
to metal lath supported vertically and horizontally at intervals not exceeding 12 in.
(8) Wood sheathing shall not be used as a base for the direct application of glass veneer.
(9) In addition to the mastic cement in Sentence (4), glass veneer more than 4 ft above
the top of foundation wall shall be supported by approved corrosion-resistant metal shelf
angles:
(a) not less than 2 in. in length,
(b) of not less than No. 16 gauge,
(c) located near each end of each glass unit and spaced not more than 2 ft o. c. horizontally and 3 ft o. c. vertically except that units not exceeding 1 ft in width may be
supported on a single support located near the centre of the unit,
(d) located so that the outside edge of the shelf angle is approximately Y8 in. from the
face of the veneer, and
(e) attached to the masonry backing by means of approved expansion bolts.
(10) Horizontal joints in glass veneer shall be cushioned with pads of adhesive cork or
of other approved pads extending from the back of the glass to within Y8 in. from the face.
(11) No glass unit shall touch any other glass unit.
(11) Every joint shall be filled with an approved joint cement to ensure watertight
construction.
(13) Every exposed edge of glass veneer shall be protected from the weather by noncorrosive flashing, and uncompleted exterior glass veneer shall be made watertight when
work is not in progress.
(14) Individual glass veneer units used in soffits shall not exceed 4 sq ft in area and shall
not exceed 30 in. in any dimension. Such units shall be held in place by wood or metal
mouldings providing a continuous bearing of not less than !}i in. for the glass.
(15) Where four corners of adjoining glass veneer units meet, moulding described in
Sentence (14), may be replaced by an approved screw and metal rosette attached to a
wood ground provided mastic cement is used behind the glass.
Facing on Precast Concrete
4.4.6.9 Where a thin slab of stone or other approved materials forms a facing for a precast
concrete wall panel such stone slabs shall not be deemed to be a veneer provided:
(a) the stone is bonded to the concrete back-up when the wall panels are cast, and
(b) evidence is provided to show that the facing and concrete back-up will act monolithically.
-201-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Limestone Veneer
4.4.6.10.(1) Veneers of Hmestone shall:
(a) conform to ASTM C568-67, "Dimension Limestone," classified as type II, medium
density,
(b) have an ultimate compressive dry strength not less than 5,000 psi when tested in
accordance with ASTM C170-50 (1958), "Compressive Strength of Natural Building
Stone",
(c) have a modulus of rupture of at least 850 psi when tested in accordance with ASTM
C99-52 (1958), "Modulus of Rupture of Natural Building Stone,"
(d) have a percentage absorption by weight not exceeding 5.3 when tested in accordance
with ASTM C97-47 (1958), "Absorption and Bulk Specific Gravity of Natural
Building Stone",
(e) have no visible bedding or cleavage plane, and
({) be not less than 3% in. in actual thickness.
(2) Except as otherwise specified, all limestone veneer shall conform to all other applicable
requirements of this Subsection.
(3) All limestone veneer that is applied more than 18 ft above finished ground level shall :
(a) bear on noncorrosive bearing supports spaced vertically not more than 36 times
the actual thickness of the stone,
(b) be supported against lateral loads by corrosion-resistant supports spaced so that
the allowable stresses in the stone are not exceeded but not farther apart vertically
than 30 times the thickness of the stone,
(c) be tied to each bearing support and to each lateral support with noncorrosive anchors
capable of resisting all inward and outward lateral loads, and
(d) be anchored to a backing with corrosion-resistant anchors spaced not more than
18 in. O.c. along the perimeter of each unit.
(4) The allowable stresses in limestone veneer units shall not exceed one-tenth of the
appropriate value determined in accordance with the standard methods of test listed in
Sentence (1).
(5) All limestone veneer shall be anchored and supported so that normal building movements will not cause loads to be transmitted from panel to panel or from floor to floor.
(6) Limestone that shows evidence of cracking or other deterioration shall not be used.
SUBSECTION 4.4.7
PREFABRICATED MASONRY
4.4.7.1 All provisions of this Section except Subsections 4.4.4, 4.4.5 and 4.4.6 shall
apply to prefabricated masonry except as provided in this Subsection.
4.4.7.2.(1) All details of jointing, inserts, anchors and openings shall be shown on the
drawings.
(2) Lifting devices designed for 100 per cent impact shall be provided in prefabricated
masonry sections and the material used in the lifting device shall:
(a) not be brittle, and
(b) be capable of resisting all forces which might arise during the process of erection.
4.4.7.3.(1) Elements shall be stored, transported and placed so that they will not be overstressed or damaged.
(2) Prefabricated masonry elements shall be adequately braced and supported during
the erection to ensure proper alignment and safety and such bracing or support shall be
maintained until permanent connections are made.
4.4.7.4.(1) Design and detailing of all joints and bearings shall be based on the forces to
be resisted and the effects of dimensional changes due to shrinkage, elastic deformation,
creep and temperature.
(2) Joints and connections shall be detailed to allow1mfficient tolerances for manufacture
and erection of the elements.
(3) Bearings shall be detailed to provide for stress concentrations, rotations and the
possible development of horizontal forces by friction or other restraints.
f
SUBSECTION 4.4.8
1m
in
ng
M
ce
al
Ie
I:
:8
4.4.8.4 Where the cleavage plane of stone masonry units is pronounced, the stone shall
be laid in the direction of its cleavage plane.
4.4.8.5 All nailing blocks, anchors, bolts, ties and inserts shall be placed as the work
proceeds.
'{
Weather Protection
4.4.8.6 Frozen materials or materials containing ice shall not be used in masonry.
4.4.8.7 Masonry shall not be laid when the temperature of the outside air is below 40F
unless means approved by the authority having jurisdiction are provided to heat the masonry
materials and protect the completed work.
4.4.8.8 Uncompleted masonry exposed to the weather shall be covered on the top surface
with a waterproof material except when construction is in progress.
Construction Safety
4.4.8.9 Masonry walls shall be adequately braced to resist wind pressure and other lateral
forces during construction as required by Part 8 of the National Building Code of Canada,
1970.
-203-Copyright NRC-CNRC
-2.04-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
BY THE
CMADIAN STANDARDS ASSOClAnON
(INCORPORATED 1919)
178 REXDALE 80UIlYARD
REXDALE 603, ONTARIO. CANADA
-205-Copyright NRC-CNRC
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-206-
p
CODE FOR THE DESIGN OF PLAIN OR REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES
CONTENTS
Page
List of l\tIembers of Joint CSA/NBC Committee on Reinforced Concrete Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9
Preface..... . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
10
STANDARD
1. Scope...... . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
1.1 Scope... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
1.2 Special Structures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
1.3 Reference Publications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
11
11
11
11
2. Definitions.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
11
3. General Requirements.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
3.1 Drawings......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
3.2 Inspection... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .... .................
3.3 New or Special Systems of Design or Construction. . . . . . . . . . ..
13
13
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
20
21
-207 ....
Copyright NRC-CNRC
15
21
21
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
27
27
27
28
28
28
28
28
28
29
29
30
31
31
31
32
32
33
33
33
-208-Copyright NRC-CNRC
34
35
35
35
37
37
38
38
40
40
41
41
42
-r ..----
--........
4
4
4
4
4:
:!
5
5
......
--------~-------.--- -~~~~~~~~~
42
42
42
42
43
43
43
43
43
44
45
45
45
47
47
47
48
49
49
50
50
50
50
50
51
-209-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
52
53
53
53
56
56
56
57
57
58
58
58
58
58
58
59
59
60
60
60
61
61
62
63
63
63
64
65
65
65
66
66
66
67
68
68
69
69
69
69
70
70
70
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
72
75
75
75
76
76
76
76
76
76
77
-210-Copyright NRC-CNRC
p
3
3
3
4,
5
5
5
5
77
77
78
78
78
78
78
79
79
80
80
81
81
82
82
84
87
87
94
94
94
94
94
94
94
95
95
95
95
95
95
11. Footings.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
11.1 Scope........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
11.2 Notations ............................................ "
11.3 Loads and Reactions .................................. "
11.4 Sloped or Stepped Footings. . . . . .. ......................
11.5 Bending Moment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
11.6 Shear and Bond. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
11. 7 Transfer of Stress at Base of Column. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
11.8 Plain Concrete Pedestals and Footings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
11.9 Footings Supporting Round Columns. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
11.10 Minimum Edge Thickness... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
95
95
96
96
96
96
97
98
99
99
99
-211-Copyright NRC-CNRC
99
99
99
99
99
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
101
102
102
102
102
102
102
102
'9
9
9
9
9
o
o
[)
)
)
)
JOINT CSA/NBC
COMMITTEE ON REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN
R. N. McMANUS (Chairman) ........ T. Lamb, McManus & Associates Ltd., Edmonton
W. G. !'LEWEs (Secretary) .......... . National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa
L. H. BUSH ........................ Dexter, Bush & Associates Ltd., Vancouver
T. A. CROSIER ..................... Crosier & Greenberg, Winnipeg
D. M. CURZON ...... , .............. Canadian Prestressed Concrete Institute, Toronto
T. M. DEVROOM ................... Department of Public Works, Ottawa
A. B. DOVE ....................... The Steel Company of Canada, Hamilton
R. H. DUNN ....................... Siporex Company, Toronto
E. J. GRANT ....................... University of New Brunswick, Fredericton
W. H. HASEGAWA ................... Portland Cement Association, Edmonton
B. A. HESKETH .................... Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal
H. W. HOPKINS .................... Canadian Pacific Railway Company, Montreal
M. W. HUGGINS ......... " ......... University of Toronto, Toronto
J. G. MACGREGOR ................. University of Alberta, Edmonton
G. E. MUNRO ...................... St. Lawrence Cement Company, Clarkson
P. ROBERGE ....................... Lalonde, Valois, Lamarre, Valois & Assoc., Montreal
J. W. STRZELECKI. ................. Canadian National Railways, Montreal
In addition to the members of the Committee, the following Subcommittee members made
valuable contribution to the development of this Standard:
-213-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
10
PREFACE
This new edition of CSA Standard A23.3. Code For the Design of Plain
or Reinforced Concrete, supersedes previous editions published in 1959 and
1966.
It differs mainly from the previous edition in that it has been editorially
rearranged to permit its inclusion, en toto, in the 1970 National Building
Code, Design Supplement. Although no major changes have been introduced
numerous changes of a minor nature have been made.
MAY,
1970
REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS
A LIST OF PUBLICATIONS
REFERRED TO IN THIS STANDARD
IS INCLUDED IN CLAUSE 1.3
Copyright NRC-CNRC
- 214-
11
A23.3-1970
CODE FOR THE DESIGN OF PLAIN OR
REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES
1. SCOPE
1.1 Scope This Standard applies to the design of building structures of
plain or reinforced concrete.
1.2 Special Structures For special structures such as arches, tanks,
reservoirs, grain elevators, shells, blast resistant structures, and chimneys,
the provisions of this Standard shall govern so far as they are applicable.
1.3 Reference Publications This Standard makes reference to the following publications and where such reference is made it shall be to that edition
of such publication as listed below:
CSA Standards
A23.1-1967, Concrete Materials and Methods of Concrete Construction;
A23.2-1967, Methods of Test for Concrete;
A23.2.12-1967, Making and Curing Concrete Compression and Flexure
Test Specimens in the Laboratory;
A23.2.13-1967, Compressive Strength of Moulded Concrete Cylinders;
A197-1968, Precast Concrete Wall Panels;
G30.6-1967, Minimum Requirements for the Deformations of Deformed
Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement;
G30. 7-1961, Special Large Size Deformed Billet-Steel Bars for Concrete
Reinforcemen t;
G30.1Q-1964, Deformed Billet-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement
with 60,000 Psi Minimum Yield Point;
S16-1965, Steel Structures for Buildings;
W186-1970, Welding of Reinforcing Bars m Reinforced Concrete
Construction.
ASTM * Standards
C33D-69, Lightweight Aggregate for Structural Concrete;
C496-69, Method of Test for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical
Concrete Specimens .
.National Building Code of Canada.
American. Society lor Testing and Materials.
2. DEFINITIONS
2.1 The following defini tions apply in this Standard:
Aggregate means inert material which is mixed with cement and water
to produce concrete;
- 2.15-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
12
-216-Copyright NRC-CNRC
'F'
CODE FOR THE DESIGN OF PLAIN OR REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES
13
s
s
I
I
petent engineer or architect, preferably the one responsible for its design,
or by a competent representative responsible to him, who shall keep a
record which shall cover:
(a) Quality and quantity of concrete materials;
(b) Mixing, placing, and curing of concrete;
(c) Placing of reinforcing steel;
(d) Sequence of erection and connection of precast members; and
(e) General progress of the work.
3.3 New or Special Systems of Design or Construction. New or special
systems of design or construction of concrete structures or structural elements not already covered by this Standard may be used where such systems
are based on analytical and engineering principles and reliable test data
which demonstrate to the satisfaction of the authority having jurisdiction
the safety of the resulting structure for the purpose intended. (See Clause
4.2.)
:l
D
L
-217-Copyright NRC-CNRC
14
4.4.2 The members selected for loading shall be subjected to a superimposed test load equivalent to 0.30 times the dead load plus 1. 7 times the
live load (0.30D
1.7L).
4.4.3 The test load shall be applied without shock to the structure and
in a manner to avoid arching of the loading materials.
4.4.4 The test load shall be left in position for 24 hours whereupon
readings of the deflection shall be taken.
4.4.5 The test load shall then be removed and additional readings of
deflections shall be taken 24 hours after removal of the test load.
-218-Copyright NRC-CNRC
test
L1ral
of a
ata t
ned
not
In
's).
Ita-
ure
Ire.
eer
ubhis
:est
the
for
15
tes
.all
m-
to
or
he
~r
he
of
materials testing, and construction practices used in or for plain concrete and
reinforced concrete shall conform to the following CSA Standards:
(a) A23.1, Concrete Materials and Methods of Concrete Construction;
and
(b) A23.2, Methods of Test for Concrete.
-219-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
16
TABLE 1
MINIMUM RADII OF BEND
Bar Size
#3, #4, or #5
#6, #7, or #8
#9, # 10, or # 11
# 145 or # 185*
Special fabrication is required for bends exceeding 90 degrees for bars of these sizes and grades
having a specified yield point of 50,000 psi or more.
-220-Copyright NRC-CNRC
f'
CODE FOR THE DESIGN OF PLAIN OR REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES
17
reinforcement may be curved from a point near the top of the slab over the
support to a point near the bottom of the slab at mid-span, provided such
reinforcement is either continuous over, or securely anchored to, the support.
'les
!ss
he
se
in
ag
)y
ld
ty
is
:h
rlt
Ie
ly
er
st
columns and between mul tiple layers of bars in beams) shall be not less than:
(a) The nominal diameter of the bars;
(b) 1%' times the maxim urn size of the coarse aggrega te; or
(c) 1 inch.
5.2.4.2 If reinforcemen t in beams or girders is placed in two or
more layers, the clear distance between the layers shall be not less than
1 inch and the bars in the upper layers shall be placed directly above those
in the bottom layer.
5.2.4.3 In walls and slabs other than concrete joist construction,
the principal reinforcement shall be centered not farther apart than:
(a) Three times the wall or slab thickness; or
(b) More than 18 inches.
5.2.4.4 In spirally reinforced and in tied columns, the clear distance between longitudinal bars shall be not less than:
(a) 1Y2 times the bar diameter;
(b) lY2 times the maximum size of the coarse aggregate; or
(c) 1Y2 inches.
5.2.4.5 The clear distances between bars stipulated in this Clause
shall also apply to the clear distance between a contact splice and adjacent
splices or bars.
5.2.4.6 Groups of parallel reinforcing bars bundled in contact to
act as a unit:
(a) May be used in flexural members or columns;
(b) Must be deformed bars with not over four in anyone bundle;
and
(c) Shall be used only when stirrups or ties enclose the bundle.
5.2.4.7 Bars in a bundle shall terminate at different points with
at least a 40-bar diameter stagger between terminations unless all of the
bars end in a support.
5.2.4.8 Where spacing limitations are based on bar size, a unit
of bundled bars shall be treated as a single bar of equivalent area.
It
is
~e
s,
11
n
e
-221-Copyright NRC-CNRC
18
- 222-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
..
19
- 2.2.3-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
20
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-224-
r
CODE FOR THE DESIGN OF PLAIN OR REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES
con:ical
:-,
~t
,s In
and
::::ers
'our
mit
;ign
~ter
lch
L~
li t;
by
les
of
ny
he
or
Id
IS
le
3.r
al
~s
e
e
21
*See
OJ
5.2.8.1 The reinforcement of footings and other principal structural members in which the concrete is deposited against the ground shall
have not less than 3 inches of concrete between it and the ground contact
surface.
5.2.8.2 If concrete surfaces after removal of the forms are to be
exposed to the weather or to be in contact with the ground, the reinforcement shall be protected with not less than:
-225-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
22
whose embedment is allowed * shall not displace more than 4 per cent of the
area of the cross-section of a column on which stress is calculated or which is
required for fire protection.
Special care should be taken to ensure that the physical and chemical properties of nonjerrous
malerials which may be available for use are not harmful to concrete.
,
CODE FOR THE DESIGN OF PLAIN OR REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES
23
ent
.ess
!en
by
of
.te.
ses
sts
8.3
~re
led
by
reed
ed
;ee
;s,
he
is
~s,
1e
ly
n-
~d
-227-Copyright NRC-CNRC
24
-228-Copyright NRC-CNRC
p
CODE FOR THE DESIGN OF PLAIN OR REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES
.s
e
,f
n
e
d
b'
d
d
II
n
n
n
s
e
1-
1
I'
e
e
e
,f
I
p'
Pf
PI
pw
R
25
- 2.2.9-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
26
R'
6.1.2.3 Stress
6.1.2.3.1 The moment, shear or stress effects of shrinkage
and temperature changes, determined in accordance with recognized
methods, shall be added to the computed moment shear or stress effects
at any cross-section due to loads, except that in monolithic beam and slab,
or slab construction, temperature changes and shrinkage may usually be
neglected if expansion joints are spaced at a maximum of 150- to 200-foot
centres, depending on the climate and the rigidity of the structure.
6.1.2.3.2 The effects of shrinkage and temperature
changes may be calculated on the basis of the expected temperature change
in the structure plus a shrinkage allowance equivalent to a 40F temperature
drop for shrinkage in the case of normal stone concrete and 50F for lightweight concrete.
6.1.3.1 General. All members of frames or continuous construction shall be designed to resist at all sections the maximum effects of the
prescribed loads as determined by the theory of elastic frames.
6.1.3.2 Approximate Methods. Approximate methods of frame
analysis may be used for buildings of usual types of construction, spans and
storey heights, in which:
(a) The simplifying assumptions given in this Clause may be
used; and
(b) The assumptions shall be consistent throughout the analysis.
6.1.3.3 Moment and Shear Coefficients. In the case of two or
more approximately equal spans (the larger of two adjacent spans not
exceeding the shorter by more than 20 ~er cent) with loads uniformly distributed, where the unit live load does not exceed three times the unit dead
- 2.30Copyright NRC-CNRC
f
CODE FOR THE DESIGN OF PLAIN OR REINFORCED CONCRETE ST.l:WCTURES
)y
27
load, the following moments and shears may be used in design in lieu of
more accurate analyses:
Positive moment
End spans
If discontinuous end is unrestrained ............... .!
11 w1'2
If discontinuous end is integral with the support ...
1~
wl'2
.n
n
it!
wl'2
e
:l
"
r
t
:l
w~'
wI'
28
-232Copyright NRC-CNRC
lot
us
en
to
.ot
be
he
ay
us
all
at
ed
or
ut
ve
ed
nt
of
'al
)e
Ie
a
d
29
:e
b
t
beam shall not exceed 50 times the least width, b, of compression flange
or face for beams supported at two or more points, or for cantilevers fully
supported laterally at the fixed and free ends.
-233-Copyright NRC-CNRC
m'
30
TABLE 2
MINIMUM THICKNESSES
(Forming part of Clause 6.1.4.4.3)
Minimum Overall Thickness'"
Member
Simply
Supported
One End
Continuous
Both Ends
Continuous
cantilever
1/25
1/30
1/35
1/12
Beams
1/20
1/23
1/26
1/10
"'The values given in Table 2 shall be used directly for reinforced concrete members made with
normal weight concrete (w = 145 pc/) and reinforcing steel with a yield point of 40,000 psi.
For other conditions, the values shall be modified as follows:
(a) For structural lightweight concrete having unit weights in the range 90-120 pounds per cubic
foot, the values in Table 2 shall be multiplied by 1.65 - 0.005w but not less than 1.09
where w is the unit weight in pounds per cubic foot;
(b) For reinforcement having yield strengths other than 40,000 psi, the values in Table 2 shall'
be multiplied by 0.5
0.0125 f" where f" is the yield strength in kips per square inch.
-234-
d-
or
ty
to
:-
2
1
31
crete and 400 for lightweight concrete, and on the transformed cracked section when pfy is greater; and
(c) In continuous spans, the moment oi inertia may be taken as
the average of the val ues obtained for the posi tive and
negative moment regions.
6.1.4.4.5 The additional long-time deflections may be
obtained by multiplying the immediate deflection caused by the sustained
part of the load by:
(a) 2.0 when A.' = 0;
(b) 1.2 when A.' = 0.5 As; and
(c) 0.8 when A.' = As.
6.1.4.4.6 lVlaximum limits for immediate deflection due
to live 10p-d, L, computed as in Clause 6.1.4.4.5 are:
(a) For roofs which do not support plastered ceilings ..... . l/180;
(b) For roofs which support plastered ceilings or for floors
which do not support partitions .................... . l/360.
6.1.4.4.7 For a floor or roof construction intended to
support or to be attached to partitions or other construction likely to be
damaged by large deflections of the floor, the allowable limit for the sum of
the immediate deflection due to live load, L, and the additional deflection
due to shrinkage and creep under all sustained loads computed as above
shall not exceed l/360.
f." ii.tX
~/-
10-
(1)
-235-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
32
than
6.1.5.1.3 Limits of Section of Column Built Monolithically With Wall. For a spiral column built monolithically with a
concrete wall or pier, the outer boundary of the column section shall be taken
either as:
(a) A circle at least 172 inches outside the column spiral; or
(b) As a square or rectangle, the sides of which are at least
172 inches outside the spiral or spirals.
6.1.5.1.4 Equivalent Circular Columns. As an exception to the general procedure of utilizing the full gross area of the column
section, it shall be permissible to design a circular column and to build it
with a square, octagonal, or other shaped section of the same least lateral
dimension; in such case, the allowable load, the gross area considered, and
the required percentages of reinforcement shall be taken as those of the
circular column.
-236-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
f
CODE FOR THE DESIGN OF PLAIN OR REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES
.ter
lnt
considerations of loading, a reduced effective area, Ag, not less than one-half
of the total area may be used for determining minimum steel area and load
capacity.
6.1.5.2 Limits for Reinforcement of Columns. In columns:
(a) Area of vertical reinforcement shall be not less than 0.01 or
more than 0.08 times the gross cross-sectional area; *
(b) l\1inimum size of bar shall be # 5 ;
(c) l\1inimum number of bars shall be six for spiral columns and
four for tied columns; and
(d) In spiral columns the ratio of spiral reinforcement, PSt shall
be not less than the value given by:
(2)
Ps= 0.45(A g /A e -1)f c '/fy
wherein fy is the yield strength of spiral reinforcement stipulated in Clause 6.2.4.2 but not more than 60,000 psi.
ler
celse
~es
pt
is,
e
:-d
le
in
7.
s,
33
... If the use of 8 per cent of steel would involve serious practical difficulties in the placing and
compacting of concrete, a lower percentage of steel should be used. The percentage of steel in a
column should not usually exceed 4 per cent if the bars in the column have to be lapped with
the bars from a column below.
-237-Copyright NRC-CNRC
34
6.1.5.4.4 In structures where lateral stability or resistance to lateral forces is provided by shear walls, rigid bracing, or by other
means, and where conditions of end restraint cannot be adequately determined, a hinged end shall be assumed.
6.1.5.4.5 Sidesway buckling shall be considered in defining the effective length, kh, in all structures which depend on the column
and beam stiffness for lateral stability.
6.1.5.5 Strength Reductions for Length of Compression
Members kh/r~70
6.1.5.5.1 The design of columns whose slenderness ratio
kh/r is not greater than 70 shall be based on the following:
(a) When compression governs the design of the section, the
axial load and moment computed from the analysis shall be
divided by the appropriate factor R as given in Items (i), (ii),
or (iii) below, and the design shall be made using the appropriate formulae for short members in Clauses 6.2.9.1 to 6.2.9.7
inclusive, and Clauses 6.3.6.1 to 6.3.6.6 inclusive:
(i) If relative lateral displacement of the ends of a column
is prevented and if the column is bent by applied
moments and forces so that there is a point of contraflexure between the ends, no correction for length shall
be made unless kh/r exceeds 27. If kh/r exceeds 27,
the factor:
R
1.20-0.0075 kh/r
(3)
shall be used, or the design shall be made according to
Clause 6.1.5.5.2;
(ii) If relative lateral displacement of the ends of a column is
prevented and if the column is bent in single curvature
by applied moments and forces, no correction for length
shall be made unless kh/r exceeds 10. If kh/r exceeds 10,
the factor:
R
1.07 -0.0075 kh/r
(4)
shall be used, or the design shaH be made according to
Clause 6.1.5.5.2;
(iii) The design of a restrained column for which relative
lateral displacement of the ends is not prevented shall be
made using the factor given in Formula (5), using an
effective length kh in the determination of which the
-238-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
r
CODE FOR THE DESIGN OF PLAIN OR REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES
th
ce
~d
Id
)e
m
::s
5S
~s
ts
,:r
35
r:t
~) ~
(6)
(c) When a column design is governed by the miflimum eccentricities specified for ultimate strength design in Clause 6.3.6.2.1,
the strength reduction for length shall correspond to the
actual conditions of curvature and end restraint.
6.1.5.5.2 The maximum slenderness ratio kh/r permitted
is 105. Columns exceeding kh/r = 70 shall be designed on the basis of calculations taking into account elastic and plastic deformations and the
duration of the loads. Such calculations shall be based on actual end restraints against rotations and on the lateral support conditions at the top
of the column, and they shall show that such a column is safe in bending
and buckling.
""
6.1.6 Anchorage
6.1.6.1 General Requirements
6.1.6.1.1 The calculated tension or compression in any
bar at any section must be developed on each side of that section by proper
embedment length, end anchorage, or hooks.
-239 ....
Copyright NRC-CNRC
36
-2.40-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
it
~i
nt
ill
st
::>r
37
-141-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
~---
38
r
E
.n
)r
d
lr
,e
m
N
LO
39
ratio of splitting tensile strength to the square root of compressive strength (see Clause 5.2.12)
axial load divided by area of member, Ac
the bending moment component about the X-axis of a column
divided by the section modulus of the transformed un cracked
section
the bending moment component about the V-axis of a column
divided by the section modulus of the transformed uncracked
section
allowable compressive stress in concrete
specified strength of concrete (see Clause 2.1)
allowable compressive stress in the structural steel core of a
composite column (see Clause 6.2.9.5)
allowable stress on unencased metal columns and pipe columns
allowable stress in column longitudinal reinforcement
tensile stress in web reinforcement
yield strength or yield point of reinforcement (see Clause 2.1)
unsupported length of col umn
ratio of distance between centroid of compression and centroid
of tension to the depth, d
radius of gyration of concrete in pipe columns
radius of gyration of metal pipe in pipe columns
bending moment
mom en t capacity at simultaneous crushing of concrete and
yielding of tension steel (balanced conditions) = N b eb
allowable bending moment about a principal axis of a column
subject to bending about that axis only and without axial load
torsional moment on a cross-section
torsional moment carried by web reinforcement
for a given axial load the bending moment capacity about the
X-principal axis of a column cross-section
the component about the X-axis of the allowable bending
moment of a column subject to bending about two axes
for a given axial load, the bending moment capacity about the
V-principal axis of a column cross-section
the component about the V-axis of the allowable bending
moment of a column subject to bending about two axes
f y /O.85fc'
load normal to the cross-section, to be taken as positive for
compression, negative for tension, and to include the effects of
tension due to shrinkage and creep (in shear calculations)
eccentric load normal to the cross-section of a column
in column design, the value of N below which the allowable
eccentricity is controlled by tension, and above which by compression
ratio of modulus of elasticity vf steel to that of concrete
sum of perimeters of all effective bars crossing the section on
the tension side, if of uniform size; for mixed sizes, substitute
4A s/D, where As is the total steel area and D is the largest bar
40
p'
pg
pw
R
s
t
u
V
V'
v
v'
v Cl
vt
Vt'
w Cl
x
y
Xl
X2
Yl
Y2
a
P
J1.
r
CODE FOR THE DESIGN OF PLAIN OR REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES
41
(b) Shear stresses shall not exceed the values given in Table 3 except
as provided in Clauses 6.2.7.1 to 6.2.7.10 inclusive;
(c) Bond stresses shall not exceed those given in Clause 6.2.8; and
(d) Stresses due to torsion or combined torsion and shear shall not
exceed those given in Clauses 6.2.7.5 and 6.2.7.6.
TABLE 3
ALLOWABLE STRESS
(Forming part of Clause 6.2.3)
Allowable Stress in Concrete
For Any Strenllth
of Concrete In
Accordance with
Clause 5.1
Description
Flexure: fo
Extreme fibre stress in compression
fo
Extreme fibre stress in tension in plain concrete
fo
fe' ==
3,000
Psi
fe' ==
4,000
Psi
fo' ==
5,000
Psi
1,125
1,350
1,800
2,250
1.6Vfc'
80
88
102
113
0.45f,,'
Va
1.1 Vfe'
55*
60*
70*
78*
Vo
1.2Vfc'
61
66
77
86
5Vi7
250
274
316
354
2Vfo'
100*
110*
126*
141*
On full area
0.25f,,'
625
750
1,000
1,250
0.375f,,'
938
1,125
1,500
1,875
Vo
Bearing: fc
-245-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
42
-246-Copyright NRC-CNRC
SI
si
51
it
>1
;e
5i
TABLE 4
d
e
['
t
..
Rante of Values
for Modular
Ration
I'
2,500
3,000
4,000
5,000
:l
e
e
e
43
10-12
9-10
7-8
6-7
* For
brackets and short cantilevers and other situations where pure shear dominates, that is,
where it is appropriate to consider shear as a measure of diagonal tension, see Clause 6.2.7.8.
M
V(f tanp
v=
bd
(8)
44
in which the negative sign applies where the bending moment, M, increases
numerically in the same direction as the depth, d, increases, and the positive
sign where the moment decreases in this direction.
6.2.7.1.2 For beams of 1- or T-section, b ' shall be substituted for b in Formulae (7) and (8).
6.2.7.1.3 For design, shear stresses between the face of
the support and a section, a distance, d, therefrom shall not be considered
critical and the maximum shear shall be taken as that at the section a
distance, d, from the face of the support.
6.2.7.1.4 Wherever applicable the effects of torsion shall
also be considered (see Clauses 6.2.7.5 and 6.2.7.6).
6.2.7.1.5 For members subject to flexural shear without
axial load the shear stress*, Va. permitted on an unreinforced web shall not
exceed 1.1 v'f[ unless a more detailed analysis is made in accordance wi th
Formula (9).
va
where,
Va
vt7+1,300p~d
(9)
*The permissible stresses for lightweight aggregate concrete are given in Clause 6.2.7.10.
Va
6.2.7.1.7 For members subject to shear and axial compression Vc shall not exceed the value given by Formula (11) where N is,
positive for compression:
(11}
6.2.7.2 Web Reinforcement
6.2.7.2.1 Wherever the value of the shear stress, v, computed by Formulae (7) or (8) exceeds the shear stress, Ve, permitted for the
concrete of an unreinforced web by Clauses 6.2.7.1.5 to 6.2.7.1.7 inclusive,
web reinforcement shall be provided to carry the excess.
-248Copyright NRC-CNRC
es
v-e
bof
~d
It
(c) Longitudinal bars bent so that the axis of the bent portion
makes an angle of 30 degrees or more wi th the axis of the
longitudinal portion of the bar; or
(d) Combinations of (a) or (b) with (c).
6.2.7.2.5 Stirrups or other bars to be considered effective
as web reinforcement shall be anchored at both ends according to the provisions of Clause 6.1.6.2.
6.2.7.3 Stirrups
6.2.7.3.1 The area of steel required in stirrups placed
perpendicular to the longitudinal reinforcement shall be computed by:
Av = V's/fvd
(12)
6.2.7.3.2 The area of inclined stirrups shall be computed
by Formula (14).
6.2.7.4 Ben t Bars
6.2.7.4.1 The inclined portion of any longitudinal bar
that is bent up for web reinforcement shall not be considered effective for
that purpose within a distance of 4 bar diameters from the centre of the
bends at the top and bottom of the inclined portion.
6.2.7.4.2 If the web reinforcement consists of a single
bent bar or of a single group of parallel bars all bent up at the same distance
from the support, the required area shall be computed by:
Av
I"
s'
45
V'
= fvS in
(13)
-2.49-Copyright NRC-CNRC
46
= 3+1.8~y
(16)
x
y
(17)
6.2.7.5.3 Re-entrant corners of all torsion resisting members shall be provided with suitable fillets.
6.2.7.5.4 If the gross shear stress due to torsion only at
any section exceeds 1.1 Vf:i, torsional reinforcement shaH be provided to
resist the excess.
6.2.7.5.5 If a section is subject to transverse shear in
addition to torsion, the sum of the shear stresses calculated separately for
the transverse shear (Formulae (7) or (8) and for torsion.(Formulae (15).
(16), (17), or (18)) shall be considered as the maximum unit shear stress at
the section and shall not exceed 1.1 v'f:i without web reinforcement except
that, where shear stresses due to torsion are less than 0.2Vf7 their effect
may be neglected.
6.2.7.5.6 Torsion reinforcement shall consist of transverse closed stirrups and longitudinal bars or equivalent spiral reinforcement
and at least one longitudinal bar shall be placed in each corner of the
stirrups, except that, if y exceeds 2x, bars shall also be provided at the
middle of each long side.
6.2.7.5.7 Longitudinal torsion reinforcement shall be not
less than # 4 in size.
6.2.7.5.8 The area of stirrups and longitudinal reinforcement required for torsion shall be computed using the following Formulae:
(a) Closed stirrups (total area of two legs):
A _ sM't
(19)
t 0. 6X ly 1f v
(b) Total area of longitudinal torsional reinforcement:
(20)
A tl -- At(Xl +Yt)
s
6.2.7.5.9 For beams subjected to combined transverse
bending and torsion, the web reinforcement required for the transverse shear
and bending shall be added to the reinforcement required for torsion.
-250Copyright NRC-CNRC
r
I
47
')
shall not exceed the values given in Clause 6.2.4.1 for allowable tension in
steel reinforcement.
6.2.7.6.2 In members with web reinforcement the sum
of the shear stresses v and Vt shall not exceed 5.5V:i provided v does not
exceed 5v'f:':
()
r
J
t
t
t
5v'V
-251-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
48
49
e
~-
d
e
d
l-
d
h
e
crete is'~used, the provisions of Clause 6.2 shall apply with the following
modifications:
(a) The shear stresses, Ve. and Vt permitted on an unreinforced
web in Clauses 6.2.7.1.5,6.2.7.5.4, and 6.2.7.5.10 shall be:
0.17 F apV'f:'
(25)
(b) Formula (9) shall be replaced by:
= 0 15 F 1,300pw
(26)
Ve
apV 0
1\1 Vd
If'+
6.2.7.10.2 Where Fsp has not been determined, permissible values for shear and torsion on an unreinforced web shall be calculated
using the formulae for normal weight concrete given in Clauses 6.2.7.1 to
6.2.7.9 multiplied by 0.75 for all-lightweight concrete and 0.85 for sand-lightweigh t concrete *.
:e
*This provision is not intended to apply to concrete weigMHg less than 95 pounds per cubic
foot dry.
a
b
6.2.8.2 To prevent bond failure or splitting, the calculated tension or compression in any bar at any section must be developed on each
side of that section by proper embedment length, and anchorage, or for
tension only, by hooks.
6.2.8.3 Anchorage or development bond stress, u, shall be computed as the bar forces divided by the product cf 2:0 times the embedment
length.
6.2.8.4 The bond stress, u, computed as in Clauses 6.2.8.1 to
6.2.8.3 shall not exceed the limits given below, except that flexural bond
stress need not be considered in compression, nor in those cases of tension
where anchorage bond is less than 0.8 of the permissible:
-153-Copyright NRC-CNRC
SO
*
3.4VC:
3-0 pSI.
(1') T op b ars.........................
D
or':'
(ii) Bars oth er t h an top b ars............ 4.8VC:
D
or 500 pSI.
(b) For tension bars with sizes and deformations conforming to
CSA Standard G30.7, Special Large Size Deformed BilletSteel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement:
(i) Top barst ...... : ........................... 2.1
(ii) Bars other than top bars ....................... 3vf/
(c) For all deformed compression bars:
6.SVfc' or 400 psi
(d) For plain bars the allowable bond stresses shall be one-half
of those permitted for bars conforming to CSA Standard
G30.6, Minimum Requirements for the Deformations of
Deformed Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement, but not
more than 160 psi.
vi:
*Top bars, in reference to bond, are horizontal bars so placed that more than 12 inches of concrete
is cast in the member below the bar.
tTop bars, in reference to bond, are horizontal bars so placed that more than 12 inches of concrete
is cast in the member below the bar.
- 2.54-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
()
f
j
f
e
51
52
6.2.9.6.2 A clearance of at least 3 inches shall be maintained between the spiral and the metal core at all points except that when
the core consists of a structural steel H-section the minimum clearance
may be reduced to 2 inches.
6.2.9.6.3 Spiral reinforcement shall conform to Formula
(2).
-256-Copyright NRC-CNRC
fte
se
6,
se
re
el
~r
'e
e
1
s
j
,
I
53
54
b'
d'
d"
E
e
e'
m'
N
LO
.t
tr
Pb
Po
:l
u
P
P'
Ph
Pf
Pt
pw
q
S
T
t
U
Uu
Vu
V u'
Veu
Vtu
I
Vtu
Vu
Vu '
W
X
Xl
X2
Y
YI
Y2
(3
if>
f1
55
fy/O.85fo'
m-l
load normal to the croas-section, to be taken as positive for
compression, negative for tension, and to include the effects of
tension due to shrinkage and creep
sum of perimeters of all effective bars crossing the section on
the tension side if of uniform size; for mixed sizes, substitute
4As/D, where As is the total steel area and D is the largest bar
diameter. For bundled bars use the sum of the exposed portions
of the perimeters
axial load capacity at simultaneous crushing of concrete and
yielding of tension steel (balanced conditions)
axial load capacity of actual member when concentrically
loaded
axial load capacity under combined axial load and bending
As/bd
As'/bd
reinforcement ratio producing balanced conditions at ultimate
strength as defined by Formula (54)
Asdb/d
Ast/Ag
As/b'd
Asfy/bd fo'
spacing of stirrups or bent bars in a direction parallel to the
longitudinal reinforcement
momen t, shear or stress effects of con tractions or expansions
caused by-moisture changes, temperature changes or creep
flange thickness in 1- and T-sections (in flexural computations)
overall depth of a rectangular section or diameter of a circular
section (in combined bending and axial load calculations)
total required ultimate strength capacity to resist ultimate
loads or forces or their related moment, shear or stress effects
bond stress at ultimate load
total shear at ultimate load
shear carried by web reinforcement at ultimate load
allowable shear stress carried by concrete at ultimate load
torsional shear stress at ultimate load
proportion of excess shear stress attributed to torsion
shear stress at ultimate load
proportion of excess shear stress attributed to direct shear
wind loads as stipulated in the National Building Code of
Canada, or their related moment, shear or stress effects
the smaller overall dimension of a rectangular section
the smaller dimension of a closed stirrup
the smaller dimension of the hole in a box section
the larger overall dimension of a rectangular section
the larger dimension of a closed stirrup
the larger dimension of the hole in a box section
angle between inclined web bars and longitudinal axis of
member
the angle which the sloping face of a beam makes with the
beam axis
strength variability adjustment factor (see Clause 6.3.2.5)
coefficient of friction
-259-Copyright NRC-CNRC
56
6.3.2 General
6.3.2.1 General
6.3.2.1.1 All provisions of this Standard except those of
Clause 6.2 shall apply to the design of members by ultimate strength method,
unless otherwise specifically provided in this Clause.
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-260-
'.
57
- 2.61-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
58
6.3.2.5 Computed Ultimate Strength Capacity. The computed ultimate strength capacity of a structure or structural component
shall be taken as the strength calculated in accordance with the requirements
and assumptions of Clause 6.3, multiplied by a strength variability adjustment factor, if>; and the value of if> shall be taken as 0.90 for flexure; 0.85 for
diagonal tension, bond and anchorage; and 0.75 for columns.
6.3.2.6 Control of Deflections and Cracking. The computed
deflection of members under full design load shall conform to the provisions
of Clause 6.1.4.4, and deflections shall always be checked whenever the
required net reinforcement ratio p, (p-p'), or (Pw-Pf) in any section of a
flexural member exceeds 0.18f//fy, or whenever the specified yield strength,
f y , exceeds 40,000 psi.
6.3.2.7 Crack Widths. In accordance with Clause 6.1.4.5 crack
widths in members under full design load shall be computed whenever the
specified yield strength exceeds 40,000 psi, and the crack widths shall not
exceed the limits stipulated in Clause 6.1.4.5.
6.3.3 Flexural Computations
6.3.3.1 Rectangular Beams with Tensile Reinforcement
Only
6.3.3.1.1 The ultimate design resisting moment of
rectangular beams with tension reinforcement only shall be calculated by:
Mu = [bd'fo'q(l
O.59q)]
[A'fY(d -~) ]
(53)
Mu
[(A,-A")fy(d-~)+A:fy(d-d')J
where a
(A s -A s ')fy/0.85fc'b.
-262Copyright NRC-CNRC
(55)
rlts
of
:th
;2)
.2,
re,
an
.1,
ng
ive
'Js.
n-
nt
ts
it-
or
xl
1S
le
a
1,
:k
le
)t
It
i)
59
6.3.3.2.2 Formula (55) is valid only when the compression steel reaches the yield strength, fyo at ultimate strength which is
satisfied when:
(56)
(57)
in which Au, the steel area necessary to develop the compressive strength of
overhanging flanges is:
(58)
Ad = 0.85(b - b')tfc' /fy
and,
(59)
- 2.63-Copyright NRC-CNRC
60
*For
brackets and short cantilevers and other situations where pure shear dominates, that is~
where it is inappropriate to consider shear as a measure of diagonal tension, see Clause 6.3.4.8.
6.3.4.1.2 For beams of 1- or T-section, b ' shall be substituted for b in Formulae (60) and (61).
6.3.4.1.3 For design, the shear between the face of the
support and a section a distance, d, therefrom shall not be considered
critical, and the maximum shear shall be considered as that at the section
a distance, d, from the face of the support.
6.3.4.1.4 Wherever applicable, the effects of torsion shall
also be considered (see Clause 6.3.4.5).
6.3.4.1.5 For members subject to flexural shear without
axial load the shear stress* v cu permitted on an unreinforced web shall not
exceed 2 Vfa' unless a more detailed analysis is made in accordance with
the following formula:
I
Vcu = ( 1.9Vfc'+2,500P~ud)
(62)
-164Copyright NRC-CNRC
.sa
Ian
50)
51)
10-
:he
mt
he
'ed
on
all
ut
ot
th
2)
se
I,
re
I)
t-
,s
61
6.3.4.3 Stirrups
6.3.4.3.1 The area of steel required in stirrups placed
perpeadicular to the longitudinal reinforcement shall be computed by:
Av = Vu's/fyd
(65)
6.3.4.3.2 The area of inclined stirrups shall be computed
by Formula (67).
A v -
vr::
Vu '
fysina
(66)
(67)
fyd (sina +cosa)
6.3.4.4.4 Bent bars used alone as web reinforcement shall
be so spaced that the effective inclined portion defined in Clause 6.3.4.4.1
meets the requirements.of Clause 6.3.4.7.1.
6.3.4.4.5 Where more than one type of web reinforcement
is used to reinforce the same portion of the web:
-265Copyright NRC-CNRC
62
6.3.4.5 Torsion
6.3.4.5.1 At ultimate load, sections subject to torsion or
to combined flexure and torsion shall be designed to withstand the twisting
moment due to torsional forces in addition to any other moment or force.
6.3.4.5.2 In the absence of more precise calculations, the
maximum shear stress due to torsion may be computed from Formulae (68),
(69), (70), or (71) as follows:
(a) For rectangular sections:
(i) The maximum shear on the longside of the rectangle
Vtu
C1M
= -tu
x2y
68)
69 )
where C 1 = 3+1.8x/y
(ii) The maximum shear on the short side
Vtu
CM
= -
Vtu
(70)
tu
x2y
where C2 = 2.2+2.6x/y
(b) For T, L, and I sections:
3M tub'
Lx 3y
6.3.4.5.3 Re-entrant corners of all torsion resisting members shall be provided with suitable fillets.
6.3.4.5.4 If the gross shear stress due to toniion only at
any section exceeds 2 Vf7. torsional reinforcement shall be provided to
resist the excess.
6.3.4.5.5 If a section is subject to transverse shear in
addition to torsion, the sum of the shear stresses calculated separately for
the transverse shear, Formula (60) or (61), and for torsion, Formula (68),
(69), (70), or (71) shall be considered as the maximum unit shear stress at
the section and shall not exceed 2 "\/'f: without web reinforcement except
that where ultimate shear stresses due to torsion are less than 0.4 Vfc'
their effect may be neglected.
6.3.4.5.6 Torsional reinforcement shall consist of transverse closed stirrups and longitudinal bars or equivalent spiral reinforcement, and at least one longitudinal bar shall be placed in each corner of
the stirrups, except that, if y exceeds 2x, bars shall also be provided at the
middle of each long side.
6.3.4.5.7 Longitudinal torsion reinforcement shall be not
less than # 4 in size.
-266-Copyright NRC-CNRC
t
CODE FOR THE DESIGN OF PLAIN OR REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES
63
6.3.4.5.8 The area of stirrups and longitudinal reinforcement required shall be computed using the following formulae:
(a) Closed stirrups, total area of two legs
sMtu'
A _
(72)
t 0.6 </>Xly1f y
(b) Total are of longitudinal torsional reinforcement
A tl
- At(Xl +Yl)
(73)
(74)
(75)
~u X (excess)
Vu Vtu
and in computing M tu ' from Vtu' the appropriate formula from Formulae (68)
to (71) shall be used.
6.3.4.5.11 All the stirrups in members subjected to
torsional stresses shall be transverse closed stirrups anchored as described
in Clause 6.1.6.2.6 or by welding to the main reinforcement with sufficient
weld to develop the calculated tensile stress in the bar.
Vtu' =
*For example, such situations may be found in brackets and short cantilevers.
-267-Copyright NRC-CNRC
64
-268-Copyright NRC-CNRC
e
y
s
:I
65
(79)
if>r~jd
(84)
(b) Bent-up bars that are not more than d/3 from the level of the
main longitudinal reinforcement may be included; and
(c) Critical sections occur at the face of the support, at each
point where tension bars terminate within a span, and at the
point of inflection.
6.3.5.1.2 To prevent bond failure or splitting, the calculated tension or compression in any bar at any section must be developed
-269Copyright NRC-CNRC
66
*Top bars, in reference to bond, are horizontal bars so placed that more than 12 inches of concrete
is cast in the member below the bar.
lu.
he
,es
at
,se
to
he
n-
to
~t-
moment which can accompany this loading condition in service, but not
less than O.OSt for spirally reinforced columns or 0.10t for tied columns
about either principal axis.
6.3.6.2.2 The maximum load capacities for members
subject to axial load as determined"by the requirements of this Clause
apply only to short members and shall be reduced for the effects of length
according to the requirements of Clause 6.1.S.S.
6.3.6.2.3 Members subjected to small compressive loads
may be designed for the maximum moment, Pue, in accordance with the
provisions of Clauses 6.3.3.1 to 6.3.3.4 and disregarding the axial load, but
the resulting section shall have a capacity, P b, greater than the applied
compressive load.
P ue' =
llf
rd
of
::>t
~te
67"
(86)
Pbeb
,t{O.8Sf.'ba
b(
d -d" -
(87)
6.3.6.3.5.
:s
IS
e.
d
is
Ir
o
e
it
I.
tJ
- 2.71-
tJ
Copyright NRC-CNRC
(89)
68
p.
(c)
0/::)
-1]e/eb
(92)
P u = 1 + [(P
P u = Po-(Po-Pb)Mu/Mb
(93)
(iii) For symmetrical reinforcement in single layers parallel
to the axis of bending, the approximate value of P u
given by Formula (94) may be used:
A.'fy +
btfc/
]
2
(94)
P u = 4> [ .d~d,+O.5 (3te/d ) + 1.18
6.3.6.4 Bending and Axial Load of Short MembersCircular Sections With Bars Circularly Arranged. The ultimate
strength of short circular members subject to combined bending and axial
load shall be computed on the basis of the equations of equilibrium taking
into account inelastic deformations, or by the empirical expressions given by:
(a) When tension controls:
Pu =
(95)
A.tfy +
Agfe'
]
4> 3e
9.6De
[ D.+l (O.8D+O.67D.)2+1.18
(96)
Pu =
1>{0.85btf.{~r-;-(i---O.5-:--r-+O-.6--=7~""-P-~-(i-o.5 )]}
(97)
Astfy +
P u = if> 3e
[ D. +1
Agfe'
12te
(t+O.67D.p+1.18
-272-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
(98)
8)
0)
69
6.3.6.6 Bending and Axial Load of Short MembersGeneral Case. When the reinforcement is placed in all four faces, or in
faces which are not parallel to the axis of bending, the design shall be based
on computations considering stress and strain compatibility and using the
assumptions in Clause 6.3.2.2.
Ie
tIl
b.
L)
y
!)
e
I
7.2.2 When burned clay or concrete tile fillers of material having a unit
compressive strength at least equal to that of the specified strength of the
concrete in the joists are used:
(a) Vertical shells of the fillers in contact with the joists may be included in the calculations involving shear or negative bending
moment; and
(b) No other portion of the fillers may be included in the design calculations.
7.2.3 The concrete slab over the fillers shall be not less in thickness than:
(a) 1~ inches in thickness; or
(b) 1/12 of the clear distance between joists.
- 2.73-Copyright NRC-CNRC
70
b'
B
=
=
CAneg CBneg
CAD C BD
CAL CBL
MAneg MBneg
MADpoS MBDPOS
=
=
MALPOS MBLPOS
A
m = B
=
t,
w
-274-Copyright NRC-CNRC
e
t
r
I,
71
(b) Concrete joists with fillers of hollow concrete units or clay tile, with
- or without concrete top slabs; and
(c) Concrete joists with top slabs placed monolithically with the joists.
8.3 Support Conditions. The slab shall be supported by walls or beams
on all sides and if not securely attached to supports shall be reinforced as
specified in Clause 8.4.
8.4 Corner Reinforcement. Where the slab is not securely attached to
the supporting beams or walls, to prevent corners from lifting, special
reinforcement shall be provided at exterior corners in both the bottom and
top of the slab, as follows:
(a) Reinforcement shall be provided for a distance in each direction
from the corner equal to 1/5 the longest span;
(b) Reinforcement in the top of the slab shall be placed parallel to the
diagonal from the corner or may consist of reinforcement placed in
two directions parallel to the sides of the slab;
(c) Reinforcement in the bottom of the slab shall be placed at right
angles to the diagonal or may consist of bars placed in two directions
parallel to the sides of the slab; and
(d) Reinforcement in each band shall be of equivalent size and spacing
to that required for the maximum positive moment in the slab.
8.5 General Design Requirements. The slab and its supports shall be
designed by methods which take into account:
(a) Effect of continuity and fixity at the supports;
(b) Ratio of wid th to length of the panel; and
(c) Effect of two-way action.
8.6 Minimum Slab Thickness. In no case shall the thickness, ts of cast
in place slabs be:
(a) Less than 4 inches;
(b) Less than the perimeter of the slab divided by 180 in the case of
discontinuous slabs; or
(c) Less than the perimeter of the slab divided by 200 in the case of
fully continuous slabs.
8.7 Maximum Spacing of Reinforcemen t. For solid slab construction
the centre to centre spacing of reinforcement shall be not greater than three
times the slab thickness or greater than 18 inches.
8.8 Two-Way Ribbed Construction. In two-way ribbed construction,
Clauses 7.2.2 to 7.2.7 shall apply, except that, where reinforcement is called
for in one direction it shall be provided in two directions.
8.9 Acceptable Design Method
8.9.1 The method of design given in this Clause satisfies the requirements of Clause 8.5, where dimensions of the supporting beams are such
that the following criterion is satisfied:
b't 3
~ not less than 2.0
(99)
ats
-175Copyright NRC-CNRC
72
8.9.3 Where the ratio, m, of short to long span is less than 0.5 the slab
shall be considered as a one-way slab, but negative reinforcement as required
for a short to long span ratio of 0.5 shall be provided along the short side.
8.9.4 Except as required by Clause 8.4 at discontinuous edges of twoway slabs, a negative moment ~ of the positive moment shall be assumed.
8.9.5 Critical sections for moment shall be assumed as follows:
(a) For negative moment-along the edges of the panel at the faces
of the supports; and
(b) For positive moment-along the centrelines of the panels.
8.9.6 Negative bending moments per foot in width for the middle
strips shall be computed by the use of Formulae (100) and (101) along with
the coefficients given in Table 5:
MAneg = CAnegXwXA2
(100)
MBneg = CBnegXwXB2
(101)
8.9.7 Positive bending moments per foot of width shall be computed as
the sum of Formulae (102) and (104) for the middle strip in the direction of
span A and Formulae (103) and (105) for the middle strip in the direction of
span B, using the coefficients given in Table 6 (the moments thus obtained
take into account the most disadvantageous case of live load in alternate
spans) :
(102)
MALPOS = C AL XwzXA2
(103)
MBLPOS = C BL X WlXB2
(104)
MADpoS
CAD XWdXA2
(105)
MBDPOS = C BD XWdXB2
8.9.8 The bending moments in the column strips shall be gradually
reduced from the full value at the edge of the middle strip to one-third of
these values at the edge of the panel.
8.9.9 Where the negative moment on one side of a support is less than
80 per cent of that on the other side, the difference shall be distributed between the two slabs in proportion to their relative stiffnesses.
8.9.10 The shearing stresses in the slabs shall be computed on the
assumption that the load, w, is distributed to the supports in accordance
with Clause 8.10.
8.10 Loads on Slab Supports
8.10.1 The loads on the supporting beams of a two-way rectangular
panel may be assumed as the load within the tributary areas of the panel
bounded by the intersection of 45-degree lines from the corners with the
median line of the panel parallel to the long side.
-176-Copyright NRC-CNRC
73
8.JO.2 The bending moments in the supporting beams may be determined approximately by using an equivalent uniform load per lineal foot
of beam for each panel supported, as follows:
wA
For the short span: 3
(106)
~l
wA (3
(107)
TABLE 5
(MAne~
m=
A/B Coeff.
C ... neg
1.00 CBneg
CAneg
0.95 CBneg
C. P
~C::I
--
r:r d
0 C
0.050
- 0.055 0.079
0.041 0.072 0.045
0.075
-
- 0.038 0.065
0.067 0.056 0.029
--
0.043 0.068
0.055
- 0.060 0.080 0.079
0.036 0.070 0.040
- 0.062 0.052 0.025
CAneg
0.85 CBneg
0.049 0.072
0;060
0.066 0.082 0.083
0.031 0.065 0.034
- 0.057 0.046 0.021
CAneg
0.80 CBneg
--
0.065
- 0.071 0.084 0.086 - 0.055 0.075
0.051 0.041 0.017
0.026 0.061 0.029
CAneg
0.75 CBneg
0.069
0.022 0.056
CAneg
0.90 CBneg
CAneg
0.70 CBneg
CAneg
0.65 CBneg
CAneg
0.60 CBneg
0.55
CAneg
CBneg
0.50
CAneg
CBneg
--
0.085 0.088
0.061 0.078
0.044 0.036 0.014
0.074
- 0.068 0.081
"- 0.081 0.086 0.091 0.038
0.029 0.011
0.017 0.050 0.019
-
0.084
- 0.092 0.089 0.09E
0.007 0.028 0.008
0.019
0.085 0.086
0.014 0.005
0.086
- 0.094 0.090 0.097
0.006 0.022 0.006
-
I 0.014
0.089 0.088
0.010 0.003
0.089 0.088
0.0811
0.010 0.035 0.011
-
-277-
0.09~
....
0.080 0.085
0.024 0.018 0.006
Copyright NRC-CNRC
74
TABLE 6
COEFFICIENTS FOR LIVE AND DEAD LOAD POSITIVE MOMENTS
(Forming part of Clause 8.9.7)
M,A.LPOS
MBI.pos
=
=G uXX
G ..
BL
WL
X A2
X B2
MADPOS
MBDPC?S
=GGAD XX WD
X A2
=
WD X B2
BD
C. 0
r:r d
0 C
GAL
GAD
G SL
G BD
0.036
0.036
0.036
0.036
0.027
0.018
0.027
0.018
0.027
0.018
0.032
0.02'1
0.032
0.02'1
0.032
0.02'1
0.032
0.02'1
0.027
0.018
0.035
0.033
0.032
0.02'1
0.032
0.02'1
0.035
0.033
0.028
0.020
0.030
0.023
0.030
0.023
0.028
0.020
0.95
GAL
GAD
GaL
G BD
0.040
O.NG
0.033
0.033
0.030
0.020
0.025
0.016
0.031
0.021
0.029
0.025
0.035
0.030
0.029
0.024
0.034
0.028
0.024
0.015
0.038
0.036
0.029
0.024
0.036
0.031
0.032
0.031
0.031
0.022
0.027
0.021
0.032
0.024
0.025
0.01'1
0.90
GAL
GAD
G BL
G nD
0.045
0.045
0.029
0.029
0.034
0.022
0.022
0.014
0.035
0.025
0.027
0.024
0.039
0.033
0.026
0.022
0.037
0.029
0.021
0.013
0.042
0.039
0.025
0.021
0.040
0.035
0.029
0.028
0.035
0.025
0.024
0.019
0.036
0.026
0.022
0.015
0.85
GAL
GAD
G BL
GUD
0.050
0.050
0.026
0.026
0.037
0.024
0.019
0.012
0.040
0.029
0.024
0.023
0.043
0.036
0.023
0.019
0.041 0.046
0.031 0.042
0.019 0.022
0.011 0.01'1
0.045
0.040
0.026
0.02~,
0.040
0.029
0.022
0.01'1
0.039
0.028
0.020
0.013
0.80
GAL
GAD
GaL
GaD
0.055
0.055
0.023
0.023
0.041
0.026
0.017
0.011
0.045
0.034
0.022
0.029
0.048
0.039
0.020
0.016
0.044
0.032
0.016
0.009
0.051
0.045
0.019
0.014
0.051
0.045
0.023
0.022
0.044
0.032
0.019
0.015
0.042
0.029
0.017
0.010
0.75
GAL
GAD
G BL
CaD
0.061
0.061
0.019
0.019
0.045
0.028
0.014
0.009
0.051
O.NG
0.019
0.018
0.052
0.043
0.016
0.013
0.047
0.033
0.013
0.00'1
0.055
0.048
0.016
0.012
0.056
0.051
0.020
0.020
0.049
0.036
0.016
0.013
0.046
0.031
0.014
0.00'1
0.70
GAL
GAD
G BL
G BD
0.068
0.068
0.016
0.016
0.049
0.030
0.012
0.00'1
0.057
0.046
0.016
0.016
0.057
0.046
0.014
0.011
0.051
0.035
0.011
0.005
0.060
0.051
0.013
0.009
0.063
0.058
0.017
0.01'1
0.054
0.040
0.014
0.011
0.050
0.033
0.012
0.006
0.65
GAL
GAD
G BL
G BD
0.074
0.0'14
0.013
0.013
0.053
0.032
0.010
0.006
0.064
0.054
0.014
0.014
0.06~
0.050
0.011
0.009
0.055
0.036
0.009
0.004
0.064
0.053
0.010
0.00'1
0.070
0.065
0.014
0.014
0.059
0.044
0.011
0.009
0.054
0.034
0.009
0.005
GAL
GAD
GaL
G BD
0.081
0.081
0.010
0.010
0.058
0.034
0.007
0.004
0.072
0.062
0.011
0.011
0.053
0.009
0.00'1
0.059
0.03'1
0.007
0.003
0.068
0.056
0.008
0.006
0.077
0.0'13
0.011
0.012
0.065
0.048
0.009
0.00'1
0.059
0.036
0.007
0.004
GAL
GAD
G BL
G BD
0.088
0.088
0.008
0.008
0.062
0.035
0.006
0.003
0.080
0.0'11
0.009
0.009
O.OSE
0.007
0.005
0.063
0.038
0.005
0.002
0.073
0.058
0.006
0.004
0.085
0.081
0.009
0.009
0.070
0.052
0.007
0.005
0.063
0.03'1
0.006
0.003
GAL
GAD.
G BL
GaD
0.095
0.095
0.006
0.006
0.066
0.03'1
0.004
0.002
O.OSB
0.08CJ
0.007
0.00'1
0.059
0.005
0.004
0.067
0.039
0.004
0.001
0.078
0.061
0.005
0.003
0.092
0.089
0.007
0.00'1
0.076
0.056
0.005
0.004
0.067
0.038
0.004
0.002
1.00
0.60
0.55
0.50
0.06~
0.07~
0.07~
-278Copyright NRC-CNRC
r
I
75
-279-Copyright NRC-CNRC
76
9.3 General
9.3.1 Slabs. Slabs with recesses or pockets made by permanent or
removable fillers between reinforcing bars may be considered flat slabs.
Slabs with panelled ceilings may be considered as flat slabs provided the
panel of reduced thickness lies entirely within the area of intersecting middle
strips, and is at least two-thirds the thickness of the remainder of the slab,
exclusive of the drop panel, and is not less than 4 inches thick.
Mo
(108)
in which F
1.1S-c/L but not less than 1;
(b) The thickness of slab shall be not less than shown in Table 7
where span L is the longest side of the panel.
TABLE 7*
THICKNESS OF SLAB
(Forming part of Clauses 9.4, 9.5.3.4, 9.5.3.5, and 9.7.4.1)
fy
40,000
50,000
60,000
75,000
L/40
L/36
L/33
L/28
or
or
or
or
4
4
4
4
inches t
inches
inches
inches
L/36
L/33
L/30
L/26
or
or
or
or
5
5
5
5
inches:
inches
inches
inches
.. Notwithstanding the requirements of Table 7, any slab which has been analyzed for deflection
including creep deflections may be considered to meet the requirements of this Standard if the
computed deflections increased by ~ satisfies the deflection limits of Clause 6.1.4.4, except
that, in no case shall the minimum thickness be less than 4 inches with drop panels or 5 inches
without drop panels.
tTo be considered effective, the drop panel shall have a length of at least one-third the parallel
span length and a projection below the slab of at least one-fourth the slab thickness.
:Span L to be taken as the length of the longest side of the panel.
-280Copyright NRC-CNRC
me
or
bs.
he
He
lb,
be
'ht
:he
he
ro-
he
he
ler
)8)
~on
the
e.pt
~es
llel
ed
of
5n
th
77
the liITlitations given therein. Flat slabs within the limitations of Clause 9.7,
when designed by elastic analysis, may have resulting analytical moments
reduced in such proportion that the numerical sum of the positive and
average negative bending moments used in design procedure does not exceed
the sum of the corresponding values as determined from Table 9.
9.5.2 Critical Sections. The slab shall be proportioned for the bending
moments prevailing at every section except that the slab need not be proportioned for a greater negative moment than that prevailing at a distance
A from the support centre line.
9.5.3 Size and Thickness of Slabs and Drop Panels
9.5.3.1 Subject to the limitations of Clause 9.5.3.4 the thickness
of a flat slab and the size and thickness of the drop panel, where used, shall
be such that the compression due to bending at any section, and the shear
about the column, column capital, and drop panel shall not exceed those
permitted in Clause 6.2 or Clause 6.3. When designed under Clause 9.7,
three-fourths of the width of the strip shall be used as the width of the
section in computing compression due to bending, except that on a section
through a drop panel, three-fourths of the width of the drop panel, shall be
used. Account shall be taken of any recesses which reduce the compressive
area.
9.5.3.2 The shear on vertical sections which follow a periphery,
bOt at distance, d/2, beyond the edges of the column, column capital, or drop
panel, and concentric with them, shall be computed as required and limited
in Clauses 6.2.7.1 to 6.2.7.10 inclusive (for design under Clause 6.2) or
Clauses 6.3.4.1 to 6.3.4.10 inclusive (for design by ultimate strength design).
9.5.3.3 If shear reinforcement is used, the first line shall be not
further than d/2 from the face of the support.
9.5.3.4 Slabs with drop panels whose length is at least one-third
the parallel span length and whose projection below the slab is at least onefourth the slab thickness shall be not less in thickness than stipulated in
Table 7.
9.5.3.5 Slabs without drop panels as described above shall be
not less in thickness than stipulated in Table 7.
-281-Copyright NRC-CNRC
78
-282-Copyright NRC-CNRC
he
oed
In-
of
)ss
in
a
nt
Id
ry
at
if
if
m
rl
al
l-
\.
79
(b) Each such bent may be analyzed in its entirety or each floor thereof
and the roof may be analyzed separately with its adjacent columns
as they occur above and below, the columns being assumed fixed
at their remote ends. Where slabs are thus analyzed separately, it
may be assumed in determining the bending at a given support
that the slab is fixed at any support two panels distant therefrom
provided the slab continues beyond that point;
(c) The joints between columns and slabs may be considered rigid,
and this rigidity (infinite moment of inertia) may be assumed to
extend in the slabs from the centre of the column to the edge of
the capital, and in the column from the top of slab to the bottom
of the capital. The change in length of columns and slabs due to
direct stress, and deflections due to shear, may be neglected;
(d) Where metal column capitals are used, account may be taken of
their contributions to stiffness and resistance to bending and shear;
(e) The moment of inertia of the slab or column at any cross section
may be assumed to be that of the cross section of the concrete.
Variation in the moments of inertia of the slabs and columns along
their axes shall be taken into account; and
(f) Where the load to be supported is definitely known, the structure
shall be analyzed for that load. Where the live load is variable but
does not exceed three-quarters of the dead load or the nature of the
live load is such that all panels will be loaded simultaneously, the
maximum bending at all sections may be assumed to occur under
full live load. For other conditions, maximum positive bending near
midspan of a panel may be assumed to occur under three-quarters
of the full live load in the panel and in alternate panels; and maximum negative bending in the slab at a support may be assumed to
occur under three-quarters of the full live load in the adjacent
panels only. In no case, shall the design moments be taken as less
than those occurring with full live load on all panels.
Copyright NRC-CNRC
80
TABLE 8
DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN COLUMN STRIPS AND MIDDLE STRIPS IN
PER CENT OF TOTAL MOMENTS AT CRITICAL SECTIONS OF A PANEL
(Forming part of Clause 9.6.3)
Moment Section
Neg,ative Moment at
Exterior Support
Strip
Negative
Moment
at
Interior
Support
Slab Supported
on Reinforced
Slab Supported
Concrete
Bearing Wall or
on Columns
Positive
and on Beams
Columns with
M.oment of Total Depth Beams of Total
Depth Equal
Equal to the
Slab Thlckness* or Greater than
3 Times the
Slab Thlckness*
Column strip
76
60
80
60
Middle strip
24
40
20
40
Total depth of
beam equal to
slab thickness
38
30
40
30
Total depth of
beam or wall
equal
to or
greater than 3
times slab
ness
19
15
20
15
* Interpolate for
NOTE:
- 2.84Copyright NRC-CNRC
81
tures not exceeding 125 feet high with maximum storey height
not exceeding 12 feet 6 incnes.
9.7.2 Columns
9.7.2.1 The minimum dimension of any column shall be as
determined by Items (a) and (b) as follows, but in no case less than 10
inches:
(a) For columns or other supports of a flat slab, the required
minimum average moment of inertia, Ie. of the gross concrete section of the columns above and below the slab shall
be determined from Formula (109) and shall be not less
than 1,000 in". If there is no column above the slab, the Ie
of the column below shall be (2-2.3h/H) times that given by
the Formula with a minimum of 1,000 in":
t 3H
10 =
(109)
0.5+~:
1+ 2. 2 (1+1.4W D;WL)
(110)
For positive moments:
(1- K)2
Rp = 1+1.2(1+0.10WD;WL)
(111)
The required slab thickness shall be modified by multiplying
WI by Rn in Formulae (113) and (114).
9.7.2.2 Columns supporting flat slabs designed by the empirical
method shall be proportioned for the bending moments developed by
unequally loaded panels, or uneven spacing of columns. Such bending
moment shall be the maximum value derived from:
WL 1 -W D L2
(112)
Rn
-285Copyright NRC-CNRC
82
Oo028L( 1-
(113)
where tl is in inches, Land c are in feet and w' is in pounds per square foot.
9.7.4.3 The total thickness, t2. in inches, of slabs with drop panels,
at points beyond the drop panel shall be at least:
t, = Oo024L( 1-
;U~f.' I;'~OO + 1
(114)
where t2 is in inches, Land c are in feet and w' is in pounds per square foot.
9.7.4.4 Where the exterior supports provide only negligible
restraint to the slab, the values of tl and t2 for the exterior panel shall be
increased by at least 15 per cent.
-286-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
83
TABLE 9
MOMENTS IN FLAT SLAB PANELS IN PERCENTAGES OF Mo
(Forming part of Clauses 9.5.1, 9.7.2, and 9.7.6)
A
Strip
Column
Head
Side
Support
Type
Exterior
I Interior
Negatin Positive Negative Positive Netadve
Moment Moment Moment Moment Moment
44
With
drop
36
24
56
36
72
6
40
32
28
50
6
10
40
66
20
20
17*
26
22*
10
20
20
18
24*
Column
strip
Without
drop
With
drop
Middle
strip
Without
drop
With
drop
Half
column
strip
adjacent
to
marginal
beam
or
wall
Without
drop
50
22
46
15
15*
16
16*
10
25
6
22
18
12
28
18
36
17
14
19
14
21
27
C
A
11
14
13
3
20
18
11
23
18
12
20
28
Interior Panel
Erterlor Panel
End
Support
Type
16
3
15
14
25
i
.
20
33
12
11
19
15
25
10
8
13
10
17
Increase negative moments 30 per cent of tabulated values when middle strip is continuou$
across support of Type B or C. No other values need. be increased..
.... ,287~
Copyright NRC-CNRC
84
B
Percen:t:, of Panel
Load to
Canied
by MaqInal Beam or
Wan In Addition to
Load. Directly SuperImposed Thereon
~
to Strip
EndSupcrt
at Ria t
Analea to
Strip
20
40
Reinforced concrete
integral with slab
B
bearing
walls
For intermediate proportions of total beam depth to slab thicknesses, values for loads
and moments may be obtained by interpolation. See also Figures 1 and 2.
(115)
-288Copyright NRC-CNRC
-0
:::IE
::l
..J
Il.
-2
II:
J.--
a
iii J.--
IU
::l
VI
.a..
Il.
II:
SUPPORT
+6
CENTRE
OF SPAN
-1------t
I
- -
SUPPOR:r
lit INTERIOR
I
CENTRE
OF SPAN
~
A
-10
EXTERIOR
SUPPORT
t-
T
',~,,~
:'{;';
EXTERIOR
- - J:~;~:L -
1st INTERIOR
SUPPORT
CENTRE
OF SPAN
lEXTERIOR
SUPPORT
1 1
:~:~:
-46
tEl
-,,*
- 23
J:':.'f.". .1
-18
:.~.'
-12
... 22
+11
+11
+9
~ DIRECTION
~
-50
-18*
- 25
ffiill
-19
-:t.:t:
-13
-32
'Y~"
sUi
I
I
I
I
-20 I
-16
:.:f
-121
I
.... :~.
l~::
-,.
-40 I
-10
-15
.~~:;:
- - :....:~:.:
"':i;~';
.... ~. -
-8
OF ALL MOMENTS ~
+28
+ 20
+ 14
+11
+7
---l\>!L-t
- -- - Jilli
-66
'.:.i'"i.
NKI
-24
-33
t1l
\'I~
- 25
:,~~
.., ....
+40
... 28
+20
+ 15
-6
-6
-3
:- 3
--~ ~
~ -- ~ - --~o------ ---m=-l----l-WF-l------r-~
1~-~
.,:..: 3fl
- - lr~:(L
d
SUPPORT
INTERIOR
FIGURE 1
* Increase negative moments 30 per cent when middle strip is continuous across a support of Type B or C; no other values need be increased.
o en
..J
::l
j !:
en
oo II:
-
..J
IU
0
:::IE U
II:
<[
CI
2:
..J VI
~ ii
~
Il.
END
MOMENT
PANEL
Copyright NRC-CNRC
CJ1
00
:.:I
to:!
~
a
z=
~
:.:I
n
12:1
""'
io
:.:I
~
~
0
I
-0
...,
Copyright NRC-CNRC
1&1
en
0..
::>
I--
I ___
-50 -'I
L..
I
II F71,'"
l.::.i.J I
r----,
-15*
SUPPORT
+20
+15
tlO
CENTRE
OF SPAN
INTERIOR
+24
+20
+12
CENTRE
OF SPAN
OF ALL MOMENTS
I
B
II
A
st
1
INTERIOR
SUPPORT
I
+9
CENTRE
OF SPAN
EXTERIOR
SUPPORT
JI
II ',.:."
.i."
IL.. ___
-72 J I
IT]'"
r----,
-22*
L:'!!.._J
+36
+26
+18
+14
-6
L-"L~
--r{JfT-t------=r-T~
--itJFT=i=====-1-l-~
L_:.I!_.1
:':"Lf;a
EXTERIOR
EXTERIOR
SUPPORT
~,"'-----.
DIRECTION
r---'
I F?l I
I Iit:d I
I ___
-56 .1I
....
-17*
st
1
INTERIOR
SUPPORT
8~
::I II..
::> it
::I VI
1&1
t.)
..,
~L
f
5 een
8- ~
! ~
<:t
..J
'":r: en::-
"..... 0..
END SUPPORT
MOMENT
PANEL
FIGURE 2
(...
>
~
~
>
00
0'1
87
-291-Copyright NRC-CNRC
------.~
88
TABLE 10
MINIMUM LENGTH OF NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT
(Formin~ part of Clause 9.7.7)
Minimum Distance Beyond Centre Line of Support to
End of StraIaht Bar or to Bend Point of Bent Bar
Strip
Column
strip
reinforcement
Middle
strip
reinforcement
Percentalle
of Required
Reinforcinll
Steel Area
to be Extended
at Least as
Indicated
Straillht
0.30L t
0.33Lt
o. 27L t
0.30Lt
Remaindert
0.2SL
0.2SL
Remainder
0.2SL
Bend Point
Where Bars
Bend Down
and Continue
as Positive
Reinforcement
or
0.20L
Straillht
0.2SL
To edge of
drop but at
or
least
0.20L
0.2SL
or
O.lSL
0.2SL
or
O.lSL
*At exterior supports where masonry walls or other construction provide only negligible restraint
to the slab, the negative reinforcement need not be carried further than 0.20L beyond the centre
line of such support.
tWhere no bent bars are used, the 0.27L bars may be omitted, provided the 0.30L bars are at
least 50 per cent of total required.
tWhere no bent bars are used, the 0.30L bars may be omitted provided the 0.33L bars provide at
least 50 per cent of the total required.
Bars may be straight, bent, or any combination of straight and bent bars. All bars are to be
considered straight bars for the end under consideration unless bent at that end and continued
as positive reinforcement.
NOTE: See also Figure 3.
....292 ....
Copyright NRC-CNRC
89
TABLE 11
MINIMUM LENGTH OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT
(Forming part of Clause 9.7.7)
Muimum Distance From Centre Line of Support to
End of Straight Bar or to Bend Point of Bent Bar
Strip
Column
strip
reinforcement
Middle
strip
reinforcement
Percentage
of Required
Reinforcinll
Steel Area
to be Extended
at Least as
Indicated
Straight
0.12SL
3 inches
Remainder *
0.12SL
50 per cent
0.1SL
SO per cent*
3 inches
Straillht
Minimum
embedment
in drop
panel of
16 bar
diameters
but at least
10 inches
at interior
supports;
6 inches
from faces of
supports at
exterior
supports
or
0.2SL
Minimum
embedment
in drop
panel of or
16 bar
diameters
but at least
10 inches
at interior
supports;
6 inches
from faces of
supports at
exterior
supports
or
0.2SL
O.lSL
0.2SL
3 inches
0.2SL
*Bars may be straight, bent, or any combination of straight and bent bars. All bars are to be
considered straight bars for the end under consideration unless bent at that end lflnd continued
as negative reinforcement.
NOTE: See also Figure 3.
-293-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-0
.....
Copyright NRC-CNRC
FIGURE 3
C
III
0.
-0
",I~
l:
0.
III
ID
... -!..-
b
d
SO ta 67
33 to 50-
34 Remainder _
33 - -
thon 100
toce ot support
Molt. 0.125L
to Exterior
Foee of support
MGx, 0.125 L
MOIt.O.25L
support
~-_----_------_-----L~
Molt.O.ZSL
Ice
i:l!!
I
--
DROP PANELS
b
d
t.
tnlerlor support
Exterior support
Edge of drop - -
4.
_ _.:..b_--1-~
Bend outside drop --.-..
Mo O.2SL
.
I
I
I
I
~ t"'(j~t---
~
16 Bar diG.ol 10"
I
___ ~--------=-l-
Edge of drop
cl
WITH
h~~U-I-'
1D:Ii
..,
lie
Remoinder-
50 -
I
I
33 -
or
I
I
34 -
J...--,.
Remainder --
50 -
* For bars not terminating in drop panel use lengths shown for panels without drops.
2
~
"
!::;;
=
.,
3
...
fit
0.
_
...
=z
At exterior supports. where masonry walls or other construction provIde only neg,Ug,ible restraint to the slab,
the negatIve reInforcement need not be carried further than O.20L beyond the centre lIne of such support;
any combInatIon of straiaht and bent bars may be used provided minimum requirements are met.
;...
>-
>-
~
t:!
1.1
VI
10
Copyright NRC-CNRC
~
o
III
4.
I-
100
MINIMUM e", OF
REQUIRED As
AT SECTION
WITHOUT
DROP PANELS
WITH
DROP
_ _d~---';I--""
PANELS
4.
I-
50Remainder...
50Rem~Mer~
III
50-
LENGTH
MARK
/'\.
033L
Mex.0'25L
O'30L
1/
r.......
I-I
Max.0'25L
f
E ,
d\
'\I
YI
Max.0'25L
I/'
V
ct. E xt.rior
0'27L
0'25L
support
O'20L
Face of support
0'15L
Int.rior support
__
I_,_Q-Ext.rior support
__________
Faee of support
_---:d=---+--.
f
I
Mox.O'2!5L-
:------~::;~~;o:;:;t-~:J---
~I----------------------------------~
1':..-----------------------1-- i--..!.----------------------.::;t-
t---lfJ
50
:I
\I
r--W~~~C;~f-S~;;;t-------~::.~:;:~ ~ P-=~:.-o~;
I-
III
~ ~~-----------r----T---------------------------------~3"~1l~~~~~.3r-..---------------------------------r-----
!i
I%
Ir !C
>- g
I- ..J
CD
_-'------'--_g-'
FIGURE 3 (Con't)
* For bars not terminating in drop panel use lengths shown for panels without drops.
""""
\0
~
Q
lIi'
"
S
z=
"
>
o~
~
~
I:'
"..,
-0
0-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
MIN.
1/2."
rt. COLUMN
025
i
COLUMN
LZ
L2
t-Z-MAX.
0.30
'~
*14-1.
Lr
Column Strip
-z"tUl(.
0.30
Middle Strip
FIGURE 4
MINIMUM LENGTH OF FABRIC SHEETS FOR SLABS
rt.
JLII
COLUM
t-2"WU
0.30 L
CH
CH
>
CI
>
i:II1
~CI
C'I.)
>
C'I.)
t-.l
\0
10
'I
Copyright NRC-CNRC
NOTES:
LARGER L
0.25
L2
LARGER L
0.33
0"
LARGER L
0.33
1. Welded wire fabric to be in the form of flat sheets (See Clause 9.5.4.6).
2. Splices at locations other than shown on this drawing shall conform to Clause 5.2.5.8.
LI
Column Strip
Middle Strip
60~~"1N. OF POs. AS
REO D. AT SECTION.
REMAINDER FURNISHED
BY CROSS-WIRES OF
COM PANIO" SHEET.
0.25
FIGURE 4 (Con't)
COLUMN
0.33 L
I;.N
\0
==
==
I:I!I
>
o".lj
==
-,
1
94
10. WALLS
10.1 Notations. The following notations apply in this Clause:
fc
fc'
h
t
10.2 General
10.2.1 Reinforced concrete and plain concrete walls whether bearing
or non-bearing, shall be designed for all forces and moments to which they are
subjected.
10.2.4 Isolated straight walls with a length less than ~ their unsupported height shall be designed as tied columns.
10.2.5 The limits of thickness in Clause 10.4 may be waived where
structural analysis shows adeq ua te strength and stab iii ty.
10.2.6 Consideration shall also be given to requirements for water
tightness, insulation and durability.
10.3 Walls Designed as Columns. When the reinforcement in reinforced
concrete bearing walls is designed, placed, and anchored in position as for
tied columns:
(a) The allowable stresses shall be those for tied columns;
(b) The ratio of vertical reinforcement shall not exceed 0.04; and
(c) The maximum spacing of the vertical reinforcement shall be as
specified in Clause 5.2.4.3.
10.4 Walls Not Designed as Columns
10.4.1 Allowable Compression. When bearing walls are not designed
as tied columns, the effects of any compression steel shall be ignored and the
allowable concrete compressive stress for design by Clause 6.2 shall be as
follows:
(a) For walls subject to compression over the whole of the critical
section the average compressive stress shall not exceed:
I. = 0.2251.'[1-(
4~t )']
(116)
(b) For walls subject to tension and compression, the maximum compressive stress shall not exceed:
I, = 0.451.'[1- (
4~t )']
(117)
10.4.2 Effective Length Concentrated Loads. In the case of concentrated loads, the length of the wall to be considered as effective for each
-298-Copyright NRC-CNRC
95
shall not exceed the centre to centre distance between loads, nor shall it
exceed the width of the bearing plus four times the wall thickness.
-299-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
96
C/
S
-300-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
91
11.6.2 Critical sections for bond shall be assumed at the same planes
as those prescribed for bending moment in Clause 11.5.2, also at all other
vertical planes where changes of section or of reinforcement occur.
11.6.3 Computation for shear to be used as a measure of flexural bond
shall be based on a vertical section which extends completely across the
footing, and the shear shall be taken as the sum of all forces acting over the
entire area of the footing on one side of such section.
11.6.4 The total tensile reinforcement at any section shall provide a
bond resistance at least equal to the bond requirement as computed from the
external shear at the section.
11.6.5 In computing the external shear on any section through a
footing supported on piles:
(a) The entire reaction from any pile whose centre is located 6 inches
or more outside the section shall be assumed as producing shear
on the section;
-301Copyright NRC-CNRC
98
(b) The reaction from any pile whose centre is located 6 inches or more
inside the section sh<tll.be assumed as producing no shear on the
section; and
(c) For intermediate positions of the pile centre, the portion of the pile
reaction to be assumed as prod ucing shear on the section shall
be based on straight-line interpolation between full value at
6 inches outside the section and zero value at 6 inches inside the
section.
11.6.6 For allowable shearing values, see Clauses 6.2.7.9 and 6.3.4.9.
11.6.7 For allowable bond values, see Clauses 6.2.8.1 and 6.3.5.1.
11.7 Transfer of Stress at Base of Column
11.7.1 The stress in the longitudinal reinforcement of a column or
pedestal
(a)
(b)
(c)
11.7.2 In case the transfer of stress in the reinforcement is accomplished by extension of the longitudinal bars, they shall extend into the
supporting member the distance required to transfer this stress to the
concrete by bond.
11.7.3 In cases where dowels are used:
(a) Their total sectional area shall be not less than the sectional area
of the longitudinal reinforcement in the member from which the
stress is being transferred;
(b) In no case shall the number of dowels per member be less than
four; and
(c) The diameter of the dowels shall not exceed the diameter of the
column bars by more than % inch.
-302-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
99
11.8.2 Where the stress permitted by Clause 11.8.1 is exceeded, reinforcement shall be provided and the member designed as a reinforced concrete column.
11.8.3 The flexural tension in the concrete of a pedestal or footing of
plain concrete shall not exceed 1.6v'77 for design by Clause 6.2 or 3.2v'i:'
for design by Clause 6.3.
11.8.4 The average shear stress shall satisfy the requirements of
Clauses 6.2.7.1 to 6.2.7.10 inclusive or Clauses 6.3.4.1 to 6.3.4.10 inclusive.
11.9 Footings Supporting Round Columns. In computing the stresses
in footings which support a round or octagonal concrete column or pedestal,
the "face" of the column or pedestal may be taken as the side of a square
having an area equal to the area enclosed within the perimeter of the column
or pedestal.
12.4 General
12.4.1 All details of jointing, inserts, anchors, and openings shall be
shown on the drawings.
-303Copyright NRC-CNRC
100
against corrosion due to the exposure conditions and the protection used
shall not embrittle the insert.
12.5 Curing
12.5.1 Curing by high-pressure steam, steam vapor, or other accepted
processes may be employed to accelerate the hardening of the concrete and
to reduce the time of curing required by Clause 5.1, provided that the
compressive strength of the concrete at the load stage is considered to be at
least equal to the design strength required at that load stage.
12.8.2 Unless the welds develop 125 per cent of the specified yield
strength of the steel used, reinforcement in the form of continuous bars or
fully anchored dowels shall be added to provide 25 per cent excess steel area
and the welds shall develop not less than the specified yield strength of the
steel.
12.9 Load-Bearing and Non-Load-Bearing Wall Panels. Precast loadbearing and non-load-bearing wall panels shall conform to CSA Standard
A197, Precast Concrete Wall Panels.
12.10 Minimum Size of Precast Columns. Precast columns may have
a minimum thickness of 6 inches and a minimum gross area of 48 square
inches provided structural adequacy is assured by rigorous analysis.
12.11 Joints and Bearings for Precast Members
12.11.1 Design and detailing of the joints and bearings shall be based
on the forces to be transmi tted, and on the effects of dimensional changes
due to shrinkage elastic deformation, creep and temperature.
-304-Copyright NRC-CNRC
101
-305Copyright NRC-CNRC
102
-306-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
103
APPENDIX A
1
)
a
a
t"r---
~I--_ _
Tensile Reinforcement.
EXAMPLE 1.
a
a
...
Centre of Gravity of
Tensile Reinforcement.
b
EXAMPLE 2.
....
aa
Centre of Gravity of
Tensile Reinforcement.
b
LEGEND:
EXAMPLE 3.
rein~
-1
104
APPENDIX B
CRITERIA FOR ESTIMATING
EFFECTIVE COLUMN LENGTHS
NOTE:
IlL of adjacent girders which are rigidly attached to the columns are known,
and is based on the assumption that all columns in the portion of the framework considered reach their individual critical loads simultaneously.
The equations upon which these nomographs are based are:
1. Sidesway prevented:
GuGL(~)2+(GU+GL)(1_~)+2
tan
1
4
k
2
tan nik
2, Sidesway permitted:
G uG L(n/k)2-36
n/k
6(G u +G L)
tan n/k
Subscripts u and L refer to the joints at the two ends of the column section
' conSI'd ere.
d G'IS dfi
LIe/Le
b emg
e ned as G
LI
IL
Ii
-308Copyright NRC-CNRC
1
I
:I
f
CODE FOR THE DESIGN OF PLAIN OR REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES
105
-309-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
106
TABLE Bl
MINIMUM DESIGN VALUES OF EFFECTIVE LENGTH FACTOR, k
FOR COMPRESSION MEMBERS
Degree of End Restraint
of Compression Member
Minimum Bftectlve
Length Factor, k
0.65
0.80 ...
1.00
1.20
'7~
I'~
1.50
'*
Symbol
I
!
IT
;,,"
I'
'-".....1
~-,
,."
I
,
Ir~
I.
2.00 ..
2.00
'" '"
j ..l
J!
Where fixity is obtained by connections to rotational members use alignment Figure Bl.
-310Copyright NRC-CNRC
...
Copyright NRC-CNRC
0.1-1
0 .6
0.7
0.8
10.0
5.0
0.1
1.0
(b)
Sidesway Permitted
..L
1.5
2.0
3.0
5.0
4.0
20.0
10.0
CD
GL
C')
1.0
2.0
3.0
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
fIJ
I,!I:I
zC')
C')
:=
C')
'Il
=
Z
:=
>
'Il
I,!I:I
..,
100.0
50.0
30.0
20.0
:=
CD
'Il
I,!I:I
0
0
-l
fIJ
'""'"
0
O...J
1.0
2.0
3.0
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
100.0
50.0
30.0
20.0
CD
GU
LO
t-
0.2
0.3
0.4
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
3.0
2.0
~~'O
GL
FIGURE Bl
(0 )
SideswayPrevented
...1-0.5
0---1
0.9
fO
0.2~
0.3
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
10.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
50!~
'u
-312-Copyright NRC-CNRC
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
1Y1III
CANADIAN STANDARDS ASsoalnON
(IIKORPOUTiD 1919)
-314-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
PRItSTRItSS&D CONCRBTB
CONTENTS
Page
List of Members of Committee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6
Preface..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . .... .... . . ...... ..
Reference Publications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
STANDARD
1. Scope ...................................................... .
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
14
15
15
15
15
15
16
16
16
r
!
17
17
17
17
17
18
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
21
21
21
22
4. :\Iaterials.......... . ............. .
4.1 Concrete and Grout. . . . . . . . .
. ........................ .
4.1.1 Concrete. . . .. ... ........... . .......... .
4.1.2 1\1 aximulll Size of Aggregate.. . . . . . . . . .. . ..... .
4.1.3 Grout..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .. . ...... .
4.1.4 Admixture~ ...... .
4.2 Prestressing Steel. ..... .
4.2.1 General. ..... .
4.2.2 High Tensile Strength \Vire... . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ........ .
4.2.3 Small Diameter High Stn:q,{th Strand ....... .
1.2.4 I.argc Diameter High Stn.'llgth Strand.
1.2.5 High Strength Alloy Bars ...
1 2.6 Testing ....... .
4.2.7 Tagging ... .
1.3 Materials-Auxiliary ..
22
22
22
22
22
23
23
23
23
24
27
27
28
28
28
S. Construction.
28
28
28
29
29
5.1
5.2
S.3
S.4
General
Dimensional Tolerances ..
Construction Sequence ...... .
Fonnwork .................... .
-316-Copyright NRC-CNRC
,
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
5.5
5.6
Concrete............. .................................
Stressing, Stressing -Equipment, and Materials ............. "
5. i Grouting and Jointing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
5.8 Composite Construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
5.9 Handling and Erection. " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
5.10 Test Loading ......................... , ............. ,. ...
-317-Copyright NRC-CNRC
29
29
30
31
31
31
-318-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
....
PREFACE
The need for a national standard on Prestressed Concrete became apparent
in the early stages of the use of this new material. In 1953 the Prestressed
Concrete Development Group of Canada was established to guide and assist
the orderly and safe development of prestressed concrete design and construction. In 1954 this Group suggested the development of a CSA Standard on
Prestressed Concrete.
The purpose of this Code is to provide a basic standard for the design of
prestressed concrete, as well as giving certain fundamental information on
construction practices peculiar to the material. The Code is not intended to
be all embracing for all structures, and it is recognized that individual users
may wish to, or find it necessary to supplement these basic requirements for
a particular structure. The Code does include, among other things, a solid
core of requirements which have been followed successfully around the world.
This Standard was prepared by the Committee on Prestressed Concrete,
under the jurisdiction of the Sectional Committee on Concrete, and was
formally approved by these Committees and the CSA Technical Council.
OTTAWA, MARCH, 1962
In order to keep abreast of progress in tile industries concerned, these
Standards are subject to periodic review. Suggestions for improvement
addressed to the General Manager, Canadian Standards Association, 178
Rexdale Blvd., Rexdale 603, Ont., will be welcomed at all times. They will be
recorded and in due course brought to the attention of the CSA Committee.
REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS
This Standard makes reference to the following:
eSA Standard A23.1-1960, Concrete Materials and Methods of Concrete
Construction
-319-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-310Copyright NRC-CNRC
r
A135-1962
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
1. SCOPE
1.1 Scope
1.1.1 This Code provides for the use of concrete in combination with a
prestressing element consisting of high tensile strength steel in the form of
wire, strand, or bar.
Composite construction means construction in which part of a loadcarrying member is precast and part is cast-in-place;
Creep means the time dependent deforlllat ion of steel or concrete under
sustained stress;
Effective prestress means the prestress in the tendons after all losses
have taken place;
End anchorage means the nlcchall il'ai device used to anchor the end
of a tendon permanently to the concrete:
Engineer means the engineer in re~ponsible charge of the work;
Flanged section means a section, with projecting flanges. in which
the neutral axis lies outside the flange;
Initial prestress means the stress in the tendons immediately after
transferring the prestressing force to the concrete;
Lead of strand means the distance measured along the strand, in
which each outer wire rotates one revolution around the axis of the strand;
Load factor means the factor by which any working load shall be
multiplied to obtain the corresponding part of the ultimate design load;
-321-Copyright NRC-CNRC
10
1.2.2 Loads
D
=
L
Mu =
W =
WI =
-322Copyright NRC-CNRC
...
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
WI
Vc
V"
11
= (D+ L) - WI =
= diagonal cracking
l' c
l' ci
1',
fIe
f,i
f.",
tJ.f.
l' fI
To
Tz
a
p.
3. DESIGN
3.1 Preliminary
3.1.1 General. All structural members shall satisfy the requirements
of this Code for the following conditions of loading, in accordance with the
rules and procedures set forth herein:
(a) Working Load;
(b) Ultimate Load; and
(c) Temporary Load.
3.1.2 Working Load. The workillg load shall be all the dead and live
loads specified in the relevant code. In the investigation of both working
load and temporary load (Clause 3.1.4), calculations shall be based on
elastic analysis. Generally accepted empirical formulae and approximations
may be used when these err on the side of safety.
3.1.3 Ultimate Design Load. The ultimate load for design purposes
shall be that obtained by multiplying the working load by the appropriate
load factors given in Clause 3.4.2. \Vind or earthquake load need only be
investigated at ultimate load.
3.1.4 Temporary Load. A temporary load is designated as any short
term load to which a structural member may be subjected during construction.
-313-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
12
6vK
3VJ":
Stresses in concrete
upon application of the initial prestress to it shall not exceed the following:
(a) Compression
(i) Factory produced members ........... 0.60 l' Cl
(ii) Field produced members ............. 0.55 i' ei
(b ) Tension
(i) For parts of members without non-prestressed reinforcement, other than those
parts which are subjected to residual ten_
sion in the vicinity of the beam ends.. 3V/'Ci.
(ii) For segmental members .............. NIL at joints
(iii) For members "'ith non-pre~tressed reinforcement ........................ 6Vj'r.'j
Reinforcement shall be placed at the
outer corners of the tensile zone to
resist the total tensile force when the
stress exceeds 3v1J"::. The reinforcement shall be assu med to resist this
force at a unit steel stress not exceeding
0.80 I'll or 40,000 psi, whichever is
smaller. In no case shall the tensile
stress in the concrete exceed 6V1' ,t.
-324-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
13
1.5D
2.51.,;
is greatest:
(i) 1.2D + 2.4L;
(ii) 1.8 (D + L);
(iii) 1.2D + 2.4L + 0.6W;
(iv) 1.2D + 0.6L + 2.4 rv;
(v) 1.8 (D + L + 0.5lV); or
(vi) 1.8 (D + 0.5L + W).
where: D
effect of dead load
L = effect of live load, including impact where
applicable
W = effect of wind load or earthquake load, or traction
forces
In calcula tions of ultimate flexural capacity ]v! u, the factor to be applied
to dead I J In any of the expressions in (a) or (b) above shall be reduced
tc' unity If this increases the value of Jvfu.
3.5 Ultimate Flexural Strength
3.5.1 General. Prestressed concrete members at ultimate load may be
categorized as either:
(a) Xormally reinforced; or
(b) Ovet-reinforced.
3.5.2 Normally Reinforced Members
3.5.2.1 Xormally reillforced members are defined as those III
which either of the following is less than 0.3:
- 32.5-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
14
(a)
P.fll"
l' c
-r-:-
An.jsll
p'.f'll f fl
d
.
(b) b'.dj'
(" or ange sectIOns.
T.
h
were:
. stee I = bd
All
. 0 f prestressmg
= ratIO
f
.
I
A'II f
I
ratio
0 compression stee = b.d or rectangu ar
P
I
.
A'II f or fI anged sections
.
sectIOns,
or b'.d
fsu = stress in p.restressing steel at ultimate load
Asr = As - A,! = steel area required to develop the
ultimate compression strength of the web of a
flanged section
A.!
1114
I'll
(1 - 0.5
tensioned construction; or
(b) fSII
f ..
15,000 psi in unbonded construction.
3.5.2.3 The ultimate flexural strength, Mv., for normally rem
forced members shall be computed from the following:
/
b ) (d-0.5t)t
PI:" - P~(
,,..j.,,
(b) bA.d.1'
c
'
1/
p'!, 1/ f
-
I' c
fI
d
.
or ange sectIOns.
-326Copyright NRC-CNRC
f'
PRJtSTlUtSSBD CONCRJl';'1"E
15
+ KL + J1.a)
fJ.
-327-Copyright NRC-CNRC
16
TABLE 1
WOBBLE FRICTION COEFFICIENT (K)
Type of Duct
Rigid Duct
Flexible Duct
NOTE:
K X .8 4
Wire
Strand
Bar
25
20
Rigid duct will maintain a smooth curve without the presence of the tendon. Flexible
duct may be easily displaced between points of support. Interpolation will be allowed
for semi-rigid ducts. Examples of flexible duct are:
(a) An inflatable rubber duct without interior stiffening; or
(b) A sheath whose whole stiffness is derived from the stiffness of the tendon.
TABLE 2
CURVATURE FRICTION COEFFICIENT (u)
-318-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
r
17
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
(V,,- Vc)s d h 11
d
d1'l1
an s a.. not excee
A 11
where: A
'It
7b'.sVJ':
1'11
Vu
b'
l' c =
1'1/ =
3.8.2 Pre-Tensioning
3.8.2.1 At ultimate load, the stresses in seven-wire strand
7-2 inch or less in diameter shall not exceed the values specified ill Table 3
unless evidence can be provided to the satisfaction of the authority havingjurisdiction showing that other values of stress arc justified.
-329-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
18
TABLE 3
PERMISSIBLE STRESS U...) IN PRESTRESSING STEEL
AT ULTIMATE LOAD FOR VARIOUS LENGTHS
OF EMBEDMENT
'ulD.
1pal
50
160,000
100
195,000
150
215,000
200
230,000
250
250,000
In Table 3:
III
D,
NOTE:
f,;
J'c
+ 5,500
X .1f,
-330-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
19
20
3.10 Continuity
3.10.1 Working and Temporary Load. \Vhere prestressed flexural
members are designed for continuity under either working or temporary
loads the requiremeIlts of Clauses 3.10.1.1 to 3.10.1.5 shall apply.
3.10.1.1 I\foments, shears. and thrusts produced by external
loads and prestressing forces shall be determ ined by elastic analysis.
3.10.1.2 The effect of the strains in the structure caused by
the application of the prestress shall be considered.
3.10.1.3 The effect of subsequent creep, shrinkage, and further
prestressing after initial prestressing shall be investigated. This is particubrly important when restraints are added during or after the initial
prestressing.
3.10.1.4 Careful consideration shall be given to the frictional
loss in continuous tendons.
3.10.1.5 The effect of reversals of stresses due to various combinations of loading shall be investigated.
3.10.2 CI tima te Load. I\Iomen ts, shears, and thrusts produced by
external loads shall be distributed by elastic analysis at ultimate load, and
components si1,tll be designed to resist them.
3.11 Modulus of Elasticity
3.11.1 Concrete. l 'nless established by tests to the satisfaction of
the authority having jurjsdictim~, the modulus of elasticity for deflection
purposes sh;l1l be computed from the following:
(a) (1.R X 106 + SOO("J psi for short term loading; or
(b) 0.5 (1.8 X 106 + SOOj'e) psi for permanent loading.
NOTE:
These vailles are approximate and shall not be used to compute creep losses in concrete.
-332-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
21
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
TABLE 4
MINIMUM COVER OF PRESTRESSING STEEL
Minimum Concrete
CoYer
Location
Inch.
1~
2~
NOTE: Concrek surfaces exposed to corrosif1e aJmospheres, such as in chemical plants, shall
bf ,we. spuial consitleraJitm.
-333-Copyright NRC-CNRC
22
-334-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
(b)
(c)
23
-335-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
24
TABLE 5
MINIMUM ULTIMATE STRENGTH OF UNCOATED WIRE
Nominal Diameter
Inc:hee
Sectional Area
Inc:hee l
Minimum Ultimate
Tenalle Strenath
.,.1
0.276
0.250
0.196
0.192
0.160
0.128
0.120
0.104
0.080
0.0598
0.0491
0.0304
0.0289
0.0201
0.0129
0.0113
0.0085
0.0050
225,000
230,000
240,000
240,000
250,000
260,000
260,000
270,000
280,000
-336-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
25
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
Inch
Inch
0.001
f).0015
0.002
0.0025
0.003
In tensile testing the ends oj the specimen may be secured in th.e tensile machine by the
use oj V-grips, but in the case oj questionahle values, the ends shall be socketed or
otherwise anchored by a recognized procedure.
TABLE 7A
MINIMUM BREAKING STRENGTH OF
UNCOATED SEVEN -WIRE 250 K STRAND
Nominal Strand
Diameter
Inch
.5~
.\/
: 1\
7'
/Ili
Minimum Breaklna
Strenllth
Pounds
9,000
14,500
20,000
27,000
36,000
Appl'OJ:imate Steel
Area
Square Iru:bea
0.036
0.058
0.080
0.10<)
0.144
-337-
APcroJ:imate
Weill t of Strand
per 1001 feet
Pounds
122
198
274
373
494
Copyright NRC-CNRC
26
TABLE 7B
MINIMUM BREAKING STRENGTH OF
UNCOATED SEVEN-WIRE 270 K STRAND
I App,""ma'e
Wel,h' of
Strand Per 1,000 Feet
Nominal Strand
Diameter
Minimum Breaking,
Streng,th
Approximate Steel
Area
Inch
Pounds
Square Inches
Pounds
10,500
17,000
23,000
31,500
41,300
0.039
0.063
0.085
0.117
0.153
132
215
292
.+00
525
~6
h
U6
J':2
4.2.3.3.3 The minimum breaking strength of 250 K uncoated 2-wire strand shall be in conformance with the values in Table 8.
~OTF;:
In tensile testirlg the ends of the specimen may be secured in the tensile machine by the
liSe of V-grips, but in the case nf questionable values, the ends shall br socketed or
otherwise anchored by a recognized procedure.
TABLE 8
MINIMUM BREAKING STRENGTH OF 250 K UNCOATED TWO-WIRE
STRAND
Nominal Strand
Diameter
Incb
0.24
).' OTE:
MinImum Breaking
Strengtb
Pound.
A~J:lmate
ApprOllimate Steel
Area
Square Inches
Weill t of Strand
per 1000 feet
Pounds
0.0226
77
5,650
Two-wire strand of strcngth other titan 250 K is considered as being outside the scope oj
this Standard.
The use of 2-wire strands of diameter other than that given in Table 8
is permitted provided that in such cases the ratio of minimum breaking
strength :steel area in the table is maintained.
4.2.3.4 Breaking Strength of Galvanized Strand. The minimum breaking strengt 11 of galvanized 250 K 7- or 2-wire strands shall be
90 per cent of the values given in Tables iA and 8 respectively.
).'on~:
The galmni:ing oj strand of strength olher than 250 K is considered as being outside lite
scope oj this Standard.
4.2.3.5 Yield Strength. The minimum yield strength, as determined by the 1 per cent extension under load method measured on a gauge
length of 24 inches, shall be 85 per cent of the specified minimum ultimate
tensile strength. The method of measurement shall be as specified for wire
in Clause 4.2.2.6.
4.2.3.6 The minimum total elongation under load shall be 3.5
per cent measured on a gauge length of 2+ inches. The method of measurement shall be as specified for wire ill Clause 4.2.2.8.
4.2.3.7 Stress-Strain Curves. One stress-strain'('urve shall he
made by the manufacturer for each 20 tOilS produced. A copy of this curve
shall be supplied by the manufacturer for each project.
-338-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
27
-339-Copyright NRC-CNRC
28
After rolling and heat treating, all bars shall be proof stressed, or cold
stretched, to 90 per cent of their specified ultimate strength.
4.2.5.3 Physical Properties. All high strength aHoy bars shall
conform to the following minimum requirements:
(a) Ultimate Tensile Strength
145,000 psi;
(b) Yield Strength at 0.2 per cent
offset
- 0.901'.;
(c) Elongation after rupture measured
on a gauge length of 20 diameters - 4 per cent; and
(d) Reduction of area after rupture - 15 per cent.
4.2.5.4 Stress-Strain Curves. One stress-strain curve shall be
made by the manufacturer for each 50 tons of material produced. A copy of
this curve shall be provided by the manufacturer for each project.
4.2.6 Testing
4.2.6.1 All prestressing steel shall be subject to the approval of
the design Engineer on the basis of tests carried out in a testing laboratory*
approved by the Engineer. Such tests shall be carried out on specimens of
the tendons truly representative of those to be used in the structure.
Svch a laboratory may be at the plant of the manufacturer.
4.2.6.2 Where wire. strand. or bar has rusted in storage, the use
of such material shall be subject to the approval of the Engineer. who will
determine whether the steel suffered deterioration in such storage, and
whether it shall be used. The Engineer, at his discretion, may require
physical tests to make such determination.
4.2.7. Tagging. The size of wire, strand, or bar, coil number, mark of
manufacturer, and customer's order number shall be marked on a tag
securely attached to each coil or bundle. This tag shall also identify the
steel with its own stress-strain curve. :0[0 unmarked steel shall be allowed
011 the site.
4.3 Materials-Auxiliary
4.3.1 Details of all auxiliary prestressing materials, if at variance with
the specified details, or if 110 details are specified, must be submitted to the
Engineer for approval. The Engineer may at his discretion require performance tests to be carried out on truly representative specimens of the
materials proposed for lise, and in a manner approved by him.
4.3.2 Anchorage systems s'hall be capable of permanently resisting the
ul t ima te strengt h of the tendons.
5. CONSTRUCTION
5.1 General. Clause S relates to the construction of prestressed concrete,
and designates a minimum sL)J1dard for carrying out the work. The const ruction shall comply wit h ('S.-\. Standard A23.1-1960, Concrete Materials
and :\1 et hods of Concrete Collstrllction.
5.2 Dimensional Tolerances. \Vhere usual construction procedure.:;
would not result in work consistent with design requirements, the design
drawings and/or specifications must designate the allowable tolerances.
The tolerance for the alignment of prestressing tendons shaIl be taken as
(d/100
!/8 inch) unless otherwise specified.
-340-Copyright NRC-CNRC
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
29
5.4 Formwork
5.4.1 The face of the forms shall be smooth to impart a good finish to
the concrete and be treated with a release agent to allow easy removal of
the forms without damaging the concrete. Care shall be exercised to keep
all prestressing materials and reinforcing steels free of the release agent.
30
(;SA STANDARD
A13~
-342Copyright NRC-CNRC
....
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
31
5.7.3.2
5.7.3.2.1 Buttering the two ends together with mortar
and forcing them together will not be allowed.
5.7.3.2.2 Joints over 2>'2 inches wide shall be made with
vibrated concrete of a strength equal to the parent concrete.
5.7.3.2.3 Joints 7'2 to 2}1 inches shall be made using a
sand: cement mortar of sufficient strength to develop the full strength of
the beam.
5.7.3.3 Care shall be taken to ensure proper curing of the joint,
especially in cold weather.
5.8 Conlposite Construction. \\"here composite construction is used ill
structure, the contact surface of the precast unit shall be rough. In this
context, a rough surface is defined as one in which the variations in the
surface texture are as follows:
(a) ~ inch for light roof or floor slabs; or
(b) % inch for all beams and any units subject to dynamic loading.
;J
5.10.2 Such a test shall not be performed until the partion subjected
to the load is at least 28 days old.
5.10.3 The test load shall not be applied until the member or members
involved have borne the full design dead load for at least 48 hours. This
stage shall be taken as the zero for deflection measurements.
5.10.4 The test load shall equal 1Y2 superimposed live loads plus that
part of the dead load, including the partition allowance which is not present,
and shall be applied in a manner that does not impose impact on the construction. This load shall remain in place for 24 hours and on removal of the
load, the deflection recovery in a further 24 hours shall be at least 85 per
cent, or another cycle of loading shall be applied.
5.10.5 If the construction does not recover at least 85 per cent of its
deflection due to the second application of live load measured after a lapse
of 24 hours, it will be deemed to have failed the test and it shall either be
strengthened or replaced.
-343-Copyright NRC-CNRC
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-344-
r
(SA STANDARD S16-1969
-345-Copyright NRC-CNRC
-346Copyright NRC-CNRC
CONTENTS
List of lVlembers of Committee on Steel Structures for Buildings. . . . . .
Page
9
Preface.. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ................
10
10
STANDARD
1. Scope ..................................................... .
13
2. Application ................................................ .
13
13
13
13
4. Drawings....................................... ..........
4.1 Design Drawings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
4.2 Shop Drawings. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ....
4.3 Erection Drawings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
15
15
15
16
16
16
16
17
17
17
18
19
8. Deflection Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
21
9. Camber..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .........
21
22
22
22
22
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
-347-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
.
.
.
.
.
24
24
24
25
25
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
25
25
25
26
26
26
26
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
26
26
27
27
27
28
29
31
31
31
32
32
32
.
.
.
.
.
32
32
33
33
34
.
.
.
.
35
35
35
35
.
.
.
.
37
37
37
37
37
-348Copyright NRC-CNRC
38
39
40
40
40
41
41
42
42
42
42
42
43
43
43
43
43
44
45
45
45
45
45
46
46
46
46
47
48
48
48
49
49
49
49
50
50
50
50
L' A'
-349-Copyright NRC-CNRC
50
51
51
52
53
56
23. General Requirements for Bracing ... ' .......... , , ..... , ...... ,
23.1 GeneraL........ . . . . . . .. . ........ ,...................
23.2 Bracing of Structures ............. , , , . , . , , , . . . . . . . . . . . ..
23.3 Bracing of Columns ............. , ................ ,.....
23.4 Bracing of Beams, Girders and Trusses. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
23.5 Special Consideration of Asymmetrical Sections. . . . . . . . . . ..
57
57
57
58
58
58
58
58
58
59
59
59
59
60
60
60
60
60
61
61
61
61
61
61
61
61
62
62
-350Copyright NRC-CNRC
54
54
56
62
62
62
63
64
64
64
64
64
65
65
27. Welding........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
27.1 Arc-Welding... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
27.2 Resistance Welding ................................... "
27.3 Fabricator and Erector Qualification... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
68
68
68
68
68
68
68
69
69
69
69
69
69
69
70
70
70
71
71
72
72
73
74
31. Fabrication....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
31.1 General...............................................
31.2 Straightness of Material.. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
31.3 Gas Cutting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
74
74
74
74
-351-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
31.4
31.5
31.6
31.7
31.8
31.9
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
76
76
76
33. Erection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
33.1 General................ .. .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ..
33.2 Temporary Loads and Stresses ......................... "
33.3 Adequacy of Temporary Connections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
33.4 Alignn:ent... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
33.5 Surface Preparation for Field Welding. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
33.6 Field Painting ........................................ "
33.7 Erection Tolerances. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
34. Inspection................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
34.1 General ............................................. "
34.2 Co-operation..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
34.3 Rejection ............................................ "
34.4 Inspection of High-Strength Bolted Joints.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
34.5 Inspection of Welding. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
34.6 Identification of Steel By Marking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
78
78
78
78
78
78
78
79
Appendix B -
80
Appendix C
82
84
85
Appendix D -
-352Copyright NRC-CNRC
4
4
4
5
5
5
r
STEEL STRUCTURES FOR BUILDINGS
5
5
5
5
5
7
7
7
7
7
0.0
....
N. C. LIND (Alternate)
J. SPRINGFIELD ..
10
eSA STANDARD S 16
PREFACE
This edition supersedes the sixth edition published in 1965 which was
preceded by those of 1924, 1930, 1940, 1954 and 1961.
Even though extensive rewriting was done for the 1965 edition, this
seventh edition exhibits quite considerable technical and philosophical changes.
The technical changes, not listed here, based on the latest developments
in world wide research including that done at Canadian Universities, reflect
the increased understanding of the behaviour of steel as a material and the
behaviour of steel elements, members, and structures throughout their
loading history. Such understanding forms the only proper basis for structural
design.
A major philosophical change incorporated in Section 7 on Loads and
Forces is that combinations of loads are multiplied by a factor of one or less
reflecting the probability that the loads will occur simultaneously thus allowing
one basis of allowable stresses to be specified throughout the Standard for
allowable stress design methods.
Throughout, every effort has been made to be simple, concise, and yet
precise.
The Standard sets out minimum requirements for the design, fabrication,
and erection of steel buildings of usual proportions, is not to be considered
as a textbook and, of course, should only be used by engineers competent in
this field. When more complex members or structures require more detailed
treatment than provided in the Standard, such competent engineers would be
expected to provide minimum requirements equivalent to those set out in the
Standard.
The inclusion of clauses relating to the fabrication and erection of
structures in the Standard should serve to remind designers that the supervision of construction by competent engineers is equally important as the
design. Design and construction must be considered together.
This edition has been adopted by the Associate Committee en the
National Building Code as the reference standard for Section 4.6 of the
National Building Code for 1970.
This Standard was prepared by the Committee on Steel Structures for
Buildings, under the jurisdiction of the Sectional Committee on Structures,
and was approved by these Committees.
REXDALE, DECEMBER, 1969
NOTE:
REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS
This publication makes reference to the following and the year dates
shown indlcate the latest is<;ues available at the time of printing;
CSA Standards A23.1-1967,
B95-1962,
G28-1968,
-354Copyright NRC-CNRC
r
STEEL STRUCTURES FOR BUILDINGS
G38-1953,
G40.1-1966,
G40.8-1960,
G40.11-1969,
G40.12-1964,
G40.13-1969,
G40.16-1969,
G40.17-1969,
G189-1966,
S136-1963,
W47-1947,
W48.1-1969,
W 48.3-1968,
W48.4-1969,
W48.5-1969,
W48.6-1969,
W55.2-1957,
VV55.3-1965,
W59.1-1969,
-355-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
11
12
Copyright NRC-CNRC
13
S16-1969
2. APPLICATION
2.1 This Standard applies unconditionally to steel structures for buildings
except as noted in Clause 2.2.
2.2 Supplementary rules or requirements may be necessary for unusual
types of construction and for steel structures which:
(a) Have great height;
(b) Are required to be movable or be readily disman tIed;
(c) Are exposed to severe environmental conditions;
(d) Are required to satisfy aesthetic, architectural, or other requirements of a non-structural nature;
(e) Employ materials or products not listed in Clause 6;
(f) Have other special features that could affect design, fabrication,
or erection.
3.2 Symbols. The following symbols are used throughout this Standard.
Deviations from them, and additional nomenclature, are noted where they
-357-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
14
appear. Dimensions in inches and forces in kips (1,000 pounds) are assumed
unless otherwise noted.
A
Area
Ao
Area of concrete flange in composite design
Af
Flange area
AI!.
Gross area
An
Critical net area
As
Area of steel beam in composite design
Ast
Area of stiffener or pair of stiffeners
Aw
Web area
a
Centre-to-centre distance between transverse web stiffeners
a'
Length of cover plate termination
b
Width of flange or plate, or leg of angle
Co
Maximum slenderness ratio for short columns in column formula
Maximum slenderness ratio for intermediate columns in column
Cp
formula
Cm
Coefficient used to determine equivalent uniform bending stress
in beam-columns
D
Outside diameter of circular section; diameter of rocker or
roller; also stiffener factor
d
Depth; overall depth of a SE"ction
E
Elastic modulus of steel (29,000 ksi assumed)
F
Allowable stress (ksi unless noted)
Fa
Allowable axial stress in compression
Fb
Allowable bending stress
F be
Allowable bending stress in compression
F bt
Allowable bending stress in tension
F' e
Specified compressive strength of concrete at 28 days
Fp
Allowable stress in compression due to bearing
Ft
Allowable axial stress in tension
Fv
Allowable shear stress
Fy
Specified minimum yield point or yield strength
F'e
Euler buckling stress divided by factor of safety
f
Computed stress (ksi unless noted)
fa
Computed axial stress in compression
fb
Computed bending stress
ft
Computed axial stress in tension
fv
Computed shear stress
g
Transverse spacing between fastener gauge lines (gauge distance)
h
Clear depth of web between flanges
I
Moment of inertia
K
Effective length factor
KL
Effective length
k
Distance from outer face of flange to web toe of fillet of I-type
sections
L
Length
Lor
Maximum unbraced length adjacent to a plastic hinge
Moment
M
Ml
Smaller end moment of a beam-column
M2
Larger end moment of a beam-column
Mp
Plastic moment
m
Coefficient used in column formula
N
Length of bearing of an applied load; number of shear connectors required
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-358-
l\u
P
PI
P,
Py
q
R
r
rt
S.
Str
s
T.S.
t
tf
V
V,
w
x
y
a
f3
y;
15
4. DRAWINGS
4.1 Design Drawings
4.1.1 Design drawings shall be drawn to a scale adequate to convey
the required information. The drawings shall show a complete design of the
structure with members suitably designated and located, including such
dimensions and detailed description as necessary to permit the preparation
of shop and erection drawings. Floor levels, column centres, and offsets
shall be dimensioned.
4.1.2 Design drawings shall show clearly the type or types of construction as defined in Clause 5 to be employed, and shall designate the material
or product Standards applicable to the members and details depicted (see
Clause 6). Drawings shall be supplemented by data concerning the assumed
loads, shears, moments, and axial forces to be resisted by all members and
their connections when needed for the preparation of shop drawings.
4.1.3 Where high-strength bolted joints are required to resist shear
between connected parts, the design drawings shall indicate the type of
joint, friction, or bearing, to be provided (see Clause 26).
4.1.4 If required, camber of beams, girders, and trusses shall be called
for on the design drawings.
4.2 Shop Drawings. Shop drawings giving complete information necessary
for the fabrication of the various members and components of the structure,
-359-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
16
including the required material and product standards and the location,
type and size of all mechanical fasteners and welds, shall be prepared in
advance of fabrication, and submitted for approval when so specified. Shop
drawings shall distinguish clearly between mechanical fasteners and welds
required for shop fabrication and those required in the field.
4.3 Erection Drawings. Erection drawings shall show the sizes and
locations of all members and shall show all necessary dimensions and details
for setting anchor bolts. Elevations of all column bases and bearing plates
shall be shown clearly. Erection drawings also shall show clearly all required
field connections, including the details and information necessary for
assembly of the structure.
5. TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION
5.1 General
5.1.1 Two basic types of construction and associated design assumptions, designated "Continuous" and "Simple", are permitted under the
conditions stated in Clauses 5.2 and 5.3 respectively. The proportioning
of members and their connections shall depend upon the type or types of
construction chosen and the forces to be resisted.
5.2.2 Two design methods are provided and either may be selected, as
applicable:
(a) Allowable Stress Method. lVlembers and frames shall be proportioned to resist the forces produced by the specified design loads
assuming moment distribution in accordance with the elastic
theory and without exceeding the allowable stresses given in
Clauses 16, 17, and, if applicable, 18;
(b) Plastic Desi~n Method. vVithin the limitations of Clause 30,
members and frames shall be proportioned, in accordance with the
plastic theory and the provisions of Clause 30, to resist the forces
produced by the specified design loads multiplied by the prescribed
load factor.
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-360-
STEEL STRUCTURES FOR BUILDINGS
17
5.3.2 For this type of construction the computed stresses shall not
exceed the allowable stresses given in Clauses 16, 17, and, if applicable, 18.
5.3.3 Simple construction may be used as the basis to design a building
frame for gravity loading. Lateral stability must be ensured by a suitable
system of bracing or shear walls or by the design of part of the structure
as continuous construction, except as provided in Clause 5.3.4.
5.3.4 A building frame designed to support gravity loads on the basis
of simple construction may be proportioned to resist lateral loads due to
wind or earthquake by distributing the moments resulting from such
loading between selected joints of the frame by a recognized empirical
method, provided that:
(a) The connection and connected members be proportioned to resist
the moments and forces caused by lateral loads;
(b) The beam or girder can support the full gravity load when assumed
to act as a sim pIe beam;
(c) The connection has adequate capacity for inelastic rotation when
subjected to full gravity and lateral loading ; and
(d) Tl:te stresses in the mechanical fasteners or welds of the connection
do not exceed the values given in Clause 16 when the connection is
assumed to be carrying the moment at which inelastic rotation
would occur.
-361-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
18
Structural Steel;
High Strength Low Alloy Structural Steel;
High-Strength Structural Steel;
High-Strength Low Alloy Structural Manganese
Vanadium Steel;
High-Yield Strength, Quenched and Tempered
Alloy Steel Plate, Suitable for Welding;
Structural Steel with 42,000 psi (29.5 kgfjmm2)
Minimum Yield Point (:Y2 in. (12.7 mm) Maximum
Thickness) ;
High Strength Low Alloy Columbium-Vanadium
Steels of Structural Quality;
High-Strength Low-Alloy Structural Steel with
50,000 psi l\1inimum Yield Point to 4 in. Thick.
6.1.5 Bolts
(a) ASTM A307,
6.1.6
Weldin~
Electrodes
6.2 Identification
6.2.1 Methods. The materials and products used shall be identified as
to specification, including type or grade, if applicable, by one of the following
means, except as provided in Clauses 6.2.2 and 6.2.3:
Copyright NRC-CNRC
~362-
19
7.2 Design loads and forces shall be those resulting from dead load and
live load acting in the most critical combination, using the appropriate
probability factor, 1/;.
7.3 Dead load shall include the weight of the steelwork plus all other
permanent construction supported thereby, including permanent partitions
and permanent equipment. Prestressing forces, if any, shall be included
wi th dead load effects.
7.4 Live load shall include loads due to use and occupancy of the building,
movable partitions, movable equipment, snow, rain, wind, earthquake,
soil or hydrostatic pressure, impact, and any other live loads stipulated
by the applicable Building By-law or the authority having jurisdiction.
7.5 Unless otherwise specified, the following loads and forces need not be
considered to act simultaneously:
(a) Wind loads in combination with earthquake loads;
(b) Snow loads in combination with rain loads.
7.6 If it can be shown by engineering principles, or if it is known by experience, that temperature or differential settlement affects structural safety
and serviceability, the effect shall be considered in strength computations.
-363-Copyright NRC-CNRC
20
TABLE 1
LOAD COMBINATIONS AND PROBABILITY FACTORS
Pro ba bi1i;ty
Factorq,
Dead Load
Wind or
Earthquake
1.0
0.7S
7.10 Suitable provision shall be made in the design for the effect of live
load which induces impact and/or vibration. In severe cases, such as structural supports for heavy machinery which causes substantial impact or
vibration when in operation, the possibility of harmonic resonance, fatigue,
or unacceptable vibration shall be investigated.
7.12 To provide for the effect of moving crane trolleys, the lateral force on
crane runways shall be not less than 20 per cent if power-operated, or 10 per
-364Copyright NRC-CNRC
- -.......
, ...- - - - - - = - - - - - -..
-~--
..-
21
cent if hand-operated, of the sum of the weights of the lifted load and the
crane trolley (exclusive of other parts of the crane) applied at the top of the
rail, one-half on each side of the runway. This lateral force shall be considered to act in either direction normal to the runway rail.
7.13 The longitudinal force on crane runways supporting power-propelled
cranes shall be not less than 10 per cent of the sum of the maximum wheel
loads of the crane, applied at the top of the rail.
7.14 Suitable provision shall be made for loads imposed on the steel structure during its erection and during subsequent construction of the building.
8. DEFLECTION REQUIREMENTS
8.1 Steel members and frames shall be proportioned so that deflection due
to design loads is within acceptable limits for the nature of the materials to
be supported and the intended use and occupancy.
8.2 Unless otherwise specified, deflection due to live load shall not exceed
1/320 of the span for members supporting floors, 1/360 of the span for
members supporting plastered ceilings, 1/240 of the span for members
supporting asphaltic roof coverings, and 1/180 of the span for members
supporting roofs of sheet metal and/or elastic membranes. Roofs with
insufficient slope to prevent ponding shall be designed to withstand any
loads likely to occur as a result of ponding.
8.3 Special consideration shall be given to floor systems which may be
susceptible to vibration (see also Clause 7.10).
8.4 The total sway (or drift) of complete structures under the influence of
design loads shall be computed by a rational method and shall be checked
to en~ure that:
(a) The validity of buckling strength assumptions used in design is
maintained;
(b) Non-structural elements whose nature is known at the time the
structural design is made will not be damaged as a result of deflection of the structure under design wind and gravity loads.
Unless otherwise specified, the total drift per storey under design wind
and gravity loads shall not exceed 1/480 of the storey height when walls
and partitions susceptible to cracking are to be provided nor 1/300 of the
storey height when walls, partitions, and other building elements are known
to be unaffected by such movement. These limits need not apply to industrial
buildings or sheds if it is known by experience that greater movement is
acceptable and does not result in hazard to occupants or adjacent construction.
8.5 In general, structures whose ratio of height to effectively resisting width
exceeds 4 to 1 or other unusually flexible structures shall be investigated
for their response to dynamic as well as static lateral loading. Cumulative
lateral movements shall be investigated and lateral accelerations of the
structure shall be checked to ensure that such accelerations are acceptable
to the intended occupancy of the building.
9. CAMBER
9.1 Camber of beams, trusses or girders, if required, shall be called for on
the design drawings. Trusses of 80 foot or greater span generally should be
-365-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
22
-366-Copyright NRC-CNRC
23
24
:::; 75/yF y
(b) Struts consisting of double angles in contact; angles or plates projecting from beams, columns or other compression members;
compression flanges; plate girder stiffeners ... bit:::; 100/V'F;
(c) Stems of tees ... bit:::; 130/yFy
14.1.2 The width of plates shall be taken from the free edge to the
first row of bolts or welds; the width of legs of angles, flanges of channel
and zees, and of stems of tees shall be taken as the full nominal dimension;
the width of flanges of beams and tees shall be taken as one-half the full
nominal width. The thickness of a tapered flange shall be measured halfway
between a free edge and the corresponding face of the web.
14.1.3 When a projecting element in compression exceeds the widthto-thickness ratio prescribed in Clause 14.1.1 and is stressed to less than
0.60 F y , the element will be acceptable if the ratio bit does not exceed the
value obtained by substituting 1.67 times the computed compressive stress
for the element in lieu of the specified minimum yield stress, Fy. Alternatively
if a portion of the width equal to the maximum value permitted by Clause
14.1.1 would satisfy the stress requirements, assuming the excess width
to be removed, the member will be acceptable. In such cases the sectional
properties of the member shall be based on the assumed effective width of
projecting compression elements. As a further alternative, a rational
buckling analysis of the compression element may be made in which case
the allowable compressive stress shall be 60 per cent of the critical buckling
stress of the element but not more than the allowable compressive stress
for the member as a whole.
14.2 Compression Elements Supported Along Two Edges
14.2.1 In members subject to axial compression, the unsupported
width of web, flange, or diaphragm plates between adjacent lines of mechanical fasteners or welds, or between the flanges in the case of rolled
shapes, or between the rounded corners of hollow structural sections shall
not exceed 255/yF y times the thickness of the element considered.
14.2.2 When the unsupported width exceeds the value given in
Clause 14.2.1 and is stressed to less than 0.60 F y , the element will be acceptable if the unsupported width does not exceed 197/Vfa times its thickness,
where fa. is the computed axial compressive stress in the element. Alternatively if a portion of the wid th no greater than 255/yF y times the thickness would satisfy the stress requirements the member will be considered
acceptable. As a further alternative, a rational buckling analysis of the
compression element may be made in which case the allowable compressive
-368Copyright NRC-CNRC
25
stress shall be 60 per cent of the critical buckling stress of the element but
not more than the allowable compressive stress for the member as a whole.
where
~: =
1.40
i:J
255/v'F';
26
of the member. Net width and area of parts containing holes shall be
computed in accordance with Clause 15.4.
Us inch
where s
g
4g
longitudinal spacing (pitch) in inches of any two successive
holes
transverse spacing (gauge) in inches of the same two holes.
15.4.2 The critical net area of the part is obtained from that series
of holes which gives the least net width; however net area taken through
one or more holes shall not be assumed to exceed the following limits:
(a)
F y/T.S. :s;; O. 70 ................ 85 per cent of gross area
(b) 0.70 < Fy/T.S. :s;; 0.85 ................ 90 per cent of gross area
(c) 0.85 < Fy/T.S ......... , .............. 95 per cent of gross area
15.4.3 In computing the net area across plug or slot welds the weld
metal shall not be taken as adding to the net area.
15.5 An~les. For angles the gross width shall be the sum of the widths
of the legs minus the thickness. The gauge for holes in opposite legs shall be
the sum of the gauges from the heel of the angle minus the thickness.
15.6 Pin-Connected Tension Members
15.6.1 In pin-connected tension members, the net area across the
pin hole, normal to the axis of the member shall be at least 1.33 times the
cross-sectional area of the body of the member. The net area beyond the pin
hole measured at any angle of 43 degrees or less to the axis of the member
shall be at least equal to the bearing force on the pin divided by 0.4 times
the yield stress of the part exerting the bearing force.
15.6.2 The distance from the edge of the pin hole to the edge of the
member, measured transverse to the axis of the member, shall not exceed
4 times the thickness of the material at the pin hole.
15.6.3 The diameter of a pin hole shall not be more than
larger than the diameter of the pin.
%2
inch
16.1.2 Allowable stresses are given in kips per square inch unless
otherwise stated (1 kip = 1 kilo-pound = 1000 pounds),
-370Copyright NRC-CNRC
27
16.1.3 The symbol "Fy" denotes the specified minimum yield point
or yield strength of the steel to be furnished. The symbol "T.S." denotes
the specified minimum tensile strength of the steel to be furnished.
16.1.4 If the use of unidentified steel is authorized, Fy shall be taken
as 30 ksi and T.S. shall be taken as 55 ksi (see Clause 6.2.2).
16.2 Structural Steel
16.2.1 Axial Tension (Ft )
(a) On net area, the lesser of,
F t = 0.60 F"
F t = 0.50 T.S.
except that when the ratio of net to gross area (An/Ag) of the member
is less than the ratio of yield to tensile strength (Fy/T .S.) of the
material comprising the member, F t shall be the lesser of,
F t = 0.60 T.S. (An/Ag)
F t = 0.50 T.S.
(b) On net area across pin holes,
F t = 0.45 Fy
(c) On unthreaded body area of threaded parts,
F t = 0.40 Fy
(If threads are upset, F t = 0.60 Fy on the critical net area)
<
<
Co ............................ , ..... Fa
0.60Fy
KL/r ~ C p " Fa = 0.60Fy - m (KL/r - Co)
KL/r ................................. Fa =
~~L~~)~
where Co
o 60F
m
_ 149,000
(C p )2
--:---~--=..:-
Cp - Co
Values of Co, C p and m as given in Table 2 may be used.
-371-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
28
TABLE 2
COEFFICIENTS FOR COMPRESSION FORMULAS
F;,
Co
Cp
33
20
119.5
0.094
36
20
111.5
0.105
38
20
107.0
0.112
40
20
103.0
0.120
42
20
99.3
0.127
44
20
96.1
0,135
46
20
93.2
0.142
50
20
87.9
0.158
55
19
82.5
0.175
60
18
78.0
0.192
65
1i
78.0
0.238
100
10
78.0
0.522
16.2.3 Shear (F v)
(a) Unstiffened webs of beams and girders, on gross area of web:
(i) h/w ~ 380/v'Fy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fv = 0.40F y
(11") 380/-v /-Fy
(iii) 551/v'Fy
152v'F;
h /w
~/Kv
(1'1') 16...,- "F
~ ............................ Fv 0.40F
_rK: ........... F v 65.7v'~
< hi:W ~ 190 ,,~
h/w
JKv
(1'1'1') 190 .,
Fy
... /Kv F
< hi.
," -< -'139 "F
y"
v
. )
JKv
(.Iv
239"F
<
(i) h/w
165
h/ .
'F
F'
1"'~12,000/'y .. v
- 372.-
[65. 7
~] "( + 11 F
hjw
[15,700 Kv]
(h/W)2"(
Copyright NRC-CNRC
29
= 5.34
_ 1 _
I -
4
+ (a/h)2
when a/h
~ 1
0.870
V1 + (a/h)2
0.30
7J = V1
(a/h)2
The values given in Table 3 may be used. The gross area of web
shall be taken as the product of web depth (h) and web thickness
(w), except that for rolled shapes the overall depth (d) may be
substituted for h.
TABLE 3
COEFFICIENTS FOR SHEAR FORMULAS
ath
'Y
0.25
0.33
0.50
0.67
0.75
1.00
1.25
1.50
1. 75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
Inf.
0.155
0.171
0.223
0.276
0.304
0.383
0.456
0.517
0.569
0.612
0.646
0.677
0.703
0.725
1.000
"
0.292
0.286
0.268
0.250
0.240
0.213
0.188
0.167
0.149
0.134
0.122
0.112
0.102
0.095
0
Ky
89.4
52.2
25.4
16.0
13.5
9.34
7.90
7.12
6.65
6.34
6.13
5.98
5.87
5.78
5.34
-373-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
30
eSA STANDARD S 16
-374Copyright NRC-CNRC
f
STEEL STRUCTURES FOR BUILDINGS
31
16.2.5 Bearing (Fp). Bearing stress on contact area shall not exceed
the following:
(a) On machined, accurately sawn or fitted parts,
Fp = 0.90 Fy
(b) Expansion rollers and rockers,
Fp = 0.70D (Fy ;
32
(e) A490
shear
(f) A490
shear
+
+
ax, a y
equ~to
Supports
(i) For compression members in frames which depend on their
own flexural stiffness to prevent sidesway in the direction
being considered:
Copyright NRC-CNRC
r
STEEL STRUCTURES FOR BUILDINGS
33
Cm = 0.85 for members bent in double curvature or subjected to moment only at one end;
Cm = 1.0 for members bent in single curvature due to
moments at both ends;
(ii) For compression members in frames which are braced in
accordance with Clause 23 to prevent sidesway in the direction
being considered :
Cm = 0.6
0.4 Ml/lVh for members bent in single curvature;
Cm = 0.6 - 0.4 MdM2 for members bent in double curvature, but not less than 0.4.
where Ml/lVh = ratio of smaller to larger moments at opposite
ends of the unbraced length, in the plane of
bending considered ;
em =
Between Supports
~t + ~ < 1.0
Ft
Fbt where F bt = tensile bending stress permitted if bending alone was
present (ksi)
F t = axial tensile stress permi tted if axial tension alone was
present (ksi)
ht = computed tensile bending stress at the point under
consideration (ksi)
ft = computed axial tensile stress at the point under
consideration (ksi)
17.2.2 If a net compressive bending stress is developed on a portion
of the section, the member shall be proportioned so that F be. the allowable
compressive bending stress (Clause 16.2.4) is not exceeded.
17.3 Bolts in Shear and Tension. Bolts subject to combined shear and
tension due to forces applied to the connected parts shall be proportioned
so that
-377-Copyright NRC-CNRC
34
where f,
= computed
TABLE 4
VALUES OF cr and "
Fastener
fJ
A307 bolts
20
12.5
60
15
50
30
80
20
67.5
40.5
(as defined in Clause 16.2.3) shall be proportioned so that the tensile stress
in the web due to bending in the plane of the web shall not exceed 0.60 Fy
nor F y (0.825 - 0.375 fvjF v) where fvjF v is the ratio of the computed
average shear stress in the web at the section being considered to the allowable shear stress given in Clause 16.2.3 (b).
-378Copyright NRC-CNRC
35
-379-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
36
TABLE 5
GUIDE TO DESIGN STRESSES FOR MEMBERS AND
CONNEctIONS SUBJEct TO REPEATED LOADS
Allowable Stress
Ksi
Type of Stress Due
to Repeated Load
Item
100,000
ApplicatioDs
F.
1-72 R
Tension; or TensionCompression
F. S 40
Tension; or TensionCompression in the
vicinity of notches,
sharp copes, transverse
fillet welds across
tension elements and
other stress raisers.
As-rolled steel
0.75 F.
1-72 R
F. S 40
F ..
1-72 R
Shear
F .. ;S 27
F,
1-72 R
Tension; or TensionCompression
Full Penetration
Groove Welds
(stress on effective
throat area)
F ..
1-72 R
F ..
Partial Penetration
Groove Welds and
Fillet Welds
(streIB on effective
throat area)
F,
F,
1-" R
1-~
F. $ 36
F.
1-~
0.75 F.
R
0.75 F.
1-" R
F. S 36
F, S 24
F ..
1-~
F .. S 24
22
1-~
24
F ..
1-" R
F .. S 18
16
1-" R
9.6
1-" R
12.4
1-72 R
8.2
1-72 R
15
1-72 R
15
1-72 R
14.4
1-~
20
F .. S 20
15
Shear, Bearing-type
connection (no stress
reversal)
Allowable
static
stress
15
15
l-R
t=1r
Tension
40
40
40
20
20
1-72 R
15
1-72 R
Shear, Bearing-type
connection (no stress
reversal)
Tension
NOTES:
F ..
1-72 R
Shear
A490 Bolts
2,000,000
Applications
F. S 30
Shear
A325 Bolts
600,000
Applications
Allowable
static
stress
54
20
15
l-R
-r=R
45
40
1. Ft
= allowable tensile stress for static loading or the value given in Table 5, which-
2. Fv
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-380-
T
I
37
4. For tension or tension-compression stress cycles, the larger numerical tensile stress
is the maximum stress. Thif l!.ther stress (negative value if compression) is the
minimum stress.
5. For tension or tension-compression cycles the maximum computed tensile stress
shall not exceed the allowable stress determined from Table 5.
6. Neither the maximum stress nor the minimum stress shall be greater than the
appropriate allowable stress for static load, as given in Clauses 16 and 17.
7. The allowable repeated stress for a greater number of load applications shall not
exceed that for a lesser number of load applications. (For certain values of R and
with F, > 30 ksi the expressions given in Table 5 may indicate the reverse of thu
statement. In such cases the allowable repeated stress is obtained from whichever
number of load applications results in the least value.)
19.4.2 When the web slenderness ratio (h/w) exceeds 760/~ the
maximum stress in the compression flange shall not exceed
F'bc = Fbc [1.0 - 0.0005 Aw/Afc (h/w - 760/VF bc )]
where F'bc = reduced allowable compressive stress (ksi)
Fbc = allowable compressive stress permitted by Clause
16.2.4.1 (ksi)
Aw = web area (inches2)
A,c = compression flange area (inches!)
h/w = ratio of web depth to web thickness.
19.4.3 Flanges of welded girders preferably shall consist of a single
plate or a series of plates joined end-to-end by complete penetration groove
welds.
-381-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
38
- 382-Copyright NRC-CNRC
39
located at the end of the web. The effective column length, KL, shall be
taken as not less than ~ of the length of the stiffeners in computing the
ratio KL/r. Only that portion of the stiffeners outside of the angle fillet
or the flange-to-web welds shall be considered effective in bearing. Angle
bearing stiffeners shall not be crimped. 'Bearing stiffeners shall be connected
to the web so as to develop the full force required to be carried by the
stiffener in to the web or vice versa.
TABLE 6
MAXIMUM INTERMEDIATE TRANSVERSE STIFFENER SPACING
Madmum Distance Between StHIenera
(a) in Terms of Clear Web Depth (h)
3h
Up to 150
Over 150
67,500 h
(h/W)I
A.
~ aw
where a
w =
h =
C =
Kv =
Fy =
Y =
[1 -
V1
::/h)'] CYD
40
D = stiffener factor
= 1.0 for stiffeners furnished in pairs
= 1.8 for single-angle stiffeners
= 2.4 for single-plate stiffeners
When the greatest shear stress, fv, in an" adjacent panel is less than that
permitted by Clause 16.2.3 (b), this gross area requirement may be reduced
in like proportion by multiplying by the ratio fv/F v.
T
STEEL STRUCTURES FOR BUILDINGS
41
19.10 Openings
19.10.1 Except as provided in Clause 19.1, the effect of all openings
in beams and girders shall be considered in the design. At all points where
the stresses in the net section are excessive, adequate reinforcement shall
be added to the member to provide the required strength and stability.
-385-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
42
20.4 Design
20.4.1 The design shall be in accordance with the requirements of
Clause 20. For any requirement not covered in Clause 20, the design shall
conform to the provisions of this Standard or, if applicable, to the provisions
of CSA Standard S136, Design of Light Gauge Steel Structural Members.
20.4.2 In general, open-web steel joists shall be designed as simply
supported, uniformly loaded, pin-jointed trusses with the compression
chord braced against lateral buckling by the deck. The uniform load shall be
assumed to be concentrated at the panel points of the compression chord
for the purpose of determining axial forces. When other design criteria are
specified, or are evident, such as non-uniform load, uplift, concentrated
load, loads suspended from the tension chord, fixed or cantilever ends, or
absence of the lateral support ordinarily furnished by the deck, the joists
shall be designed for these other conditions. Joists intended to act compositely with the deck shall be designed, verified, and approved in accordance
with Clause 5.1.2.
-386Copyright NRC-CNRC
43
this purpose, in which case they shall be proportioned to resist all moments
and forces necessary to ensure frame stability in addition to all loads
normally applied to the joists.
-387-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
44
For a section symmetrical about an axis in the plane of the joist web consisting of:
(a) A single component; or
(b) Two or more components interconnected in accordance with the
requirements of Clause 22.1.1; or
(c) Two or more components positively connected together between
panel points by means of the decking, so as to act as a single unit;
the radius of gyration shall be computed about the axis perpendicular to
the plane of the joist web.
For a section not symmetrical about an axis in the plane of the joist
web, or for two individual components not inter-connected between panel
points, the least radius of gyration of such section or component shall be
used. The slenderness ratio so determined shall be used to compute the
allowable axial compressive stress.
Ffbb
1.0
(b) At mid-panel
.h..
+ F.!ib -<
Fa
1.0
T
STEEL STRUCTURES FOR BUILDINGS
45
20.11 Bearings
20.11.1 Bearings at ends of joists shall be proportioned so that the
allowable bearing stress on the supporting material is not exceeded.
20.13.2 Connections and splices shall develop the design load without
exceeding the stresses given in Clause 16. Butt-welded splices shall develop
the specified minimum tensile strength of the member.
20.13.3 Splices may occur at any point in chord or web members.
20.13.4 Members connected at a joint shall have their gravity axes
meet at a point if practicable. Eccentricity on either side of the neutral
axis of a chord member may be neglected if the eccentricity does not exceed
the distance from the chord neutral axis to an outer fibre of the chord.
Otherwise, provision shall be made for the stresses due to eccentricity.
If a single angle web member is attached to the outside of the stem of a
tee or double angle chord, due consideration shall be given to the resulting
eccen trici ty .
20.15 Anchorage
20.15.1 Joists supporting up to 100 square feet of area shall be
anchored to steel supports at each end bearing by not less than two VB-inch
fillet welds each one inch long, or by a },1-inch diameter bolt, or by other
comparable means. On masonry supports, each joist shall be anchored to
the masonry by means of a %-inch diameter steel rod at least 8 inches long
embedded horizontally in the masonry, or by two 7-'2-inch diameter anchor
bolts embedded vertically in the masonry, or by other comparable means.
46
20.15.2 Joists supporting more than 100 square feet of area shall be
anchored to steel supports at each end bearing by not less than two ~-inch
fillet welds each 172 inches long, or by a %:-inch diameter bolt, or by other
comparable means. On masonry supports, each joist shall be anchored to
the masonry by means of a %:-inch diameter steel rod at least 12 inches
long embedded horizontally in the masonry, or by two %:-inch diameter
anchor bolts embedded vertically in the masonry, or by other comparable
means.
20.15.3 Joists required to furnish lateral support to the chords or
flanges of supporting steel members. shall be anchored to such members
and at their opposite ends by connections capable of withstanding a horizontal force of not less than 10 per cent of the end reaction of the joist.
20.15.4 Provision shall be made for any specified uplift force. In roof
construction, each joist shall be anchored to resist a net uplift of 10 pounds
per square foot of supported roof area unless otherwise specified.
20.16 Deflection
20.16.1 Deflections shall not exceed those permitted by Clause 8.
20.16.2 The deflection may be established by test or may be computed
assuming a moment of inertia equal to the gross moment of inertia of the
chords about the centroidal axis of the joist and multiplying the calculated
deflection derived on this basis by 1.10.
TABLE 7
MINIMUM CAMBER
Span of Joist
Feet
Minimum Camber
at Centre
Inches
40
50
60
70
to 49
to 59
to 69
to 79
80 to 89
90 to 99
100 to 120
20.19 Bridging
20.19.1 Diagonal or horizontal bridging transverse to the span of
joists shall be provided to support the joist chords against lateral movement
and to hold the joists in an approximately vertical plane during con-
-390Copyright NRC-CNRC
r
STEEL STRUCTURES FOR BUILDINGS
47
-391-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
48
20.21 Decking
20.21.1 Decking shall be of any suitable material capable of supporting
the required load at the specified joist spacing. Non-combustible decking
shall be used where non-combustible construction is required.
-392Copyright NRC-CNRC
r
STEEL STRUCTURES FOR BUILDINGS
49
-393-Copyright NRC-CNRC
50
--,394--Copyright NRC-CNRC
21.3.6 Vertical Shear and End Reactions. The web of the steel
beam shall be adequate to carry vertical shear forces due to the total design
-395-Copyright NRC-CNRC
52
load. End connections of the steel beam shall be adequate to transmit end
reactions due to the total design load.
N'
= N
[PM
lVlmax P-
1]
..,
53
TABLE 8
VALUES FOR SHEAR CONNECfORS
Maximum Horizontal Shear Load Per Connector
When Embedded in SoUd Concrete Slabt (KIPS)
Shear Connector
~
F' 0
= 3,000 psi
F' 0
3,500 psi
10
16
23
11
17
25
12
18
27
31
8L
9L
10L
33
9L
10L
11L
35
10L
llL
12L
Shear connector values given are approximately 80 per cent of computed ultimate and are
intended to be used only when horizontal shear is computed on an ultimate strength basis as
per Clause 21.3.7.
tConcrete shall be as defined in Clause 21.2. For other types of concrete, values for shear connectors must be established by tests.
tWhen concrete slabs are cast on 1 ~ inch deep cellular steel floor units or steel forms of similar
profile the maximum horizontal shear load for a %' inch diameter stud at least 3 inches in
length is 19 kips for all concrete strengths shown.
L = length of channel connector in inches.
P a = P e + Pc
allowable axial load on steel section alone (kips)
AsFa with Fa as defined in Clause 16.2.2.
Pc
allowable axial load on concrete area Ae (kips)
= AeF e with Fe as defined in Clause 21.4.3
where P e
21.4.3 The allowable concrete axial compressive stress (Fe) (ksi) shall
be computed in accordance with the following formulas. The slenderness
ratio (KL/r) to be assumed is that of the steel section alone.
KL/r ::; Co
Fe
0.40 F'o
<
C
F
4
Co) ]
C o < KL Ir _ p
e
O. 0
e
- (KL/r
(C _ - Co)
I
F' [1
KL/r > C p
Fe
0
where F' e = 28 day specified concrete cylinder strength (ksi)
Co. C p = slenderness ratios as defined in Clause 16.2.2 for the
grade of steel specified for the steel section.
-397-Copyright NRC-CNRC
54
-398-Copyright NRC-CNRC
55
-399Copyright NRC-CNRC
56
22.1.11 Battens shall have a length not less than the distance
between line(of bolts or welds connecting them to the main components of
the member and a thickness not less than 1/50 of this distance if the batten
consists of a flat plate. Battens and their connections shall be proportioned
to resist simultaneously a longitudinal shear force "q" and a moment "M"
where q = Qd (kips)
na
M = Od (inch-kips)
2n
d = longitudinal distance centre-to-centre of battens
(inches)
a = distance between lines of bolts or welds connecting the
batten to each main component (inches)
Q = 27'2 per cent of total axial force in member (kips)
n = number of parallel p]anes of battens.
22.2 General:Requirements for Tension Members
22.2.1 Tension members composed of two or more shapes, plates or
bars separated from one another by intermittent fillers shall have the components inter-connected at fillers spaced so that the slenderness ratio of any
component between points of inter-connection shall not exceed 240.
-400-Copyright NRC-CNRC
57
-401-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
58
23.3
Bracin~
of Columns
Bracin~
24.1
Ali~nment
24. CONNECTIONS
of Members. Axially stressed members meeting at a
joint shall have their gravity axes intersect at a common point if practicable;
otherwise the results of bending stresses due to the joint eccentricity shall
be provided for.
-402-Copyright NRC-CNRC
,.
59
Wa
< 30
A. t
;;
[AI
i~::i
w, (tb
+ 5k) ] C
60
24.9.2 In making alterations to structures, existing rivets and highstrength bolts may be utilized to carry stresses resulting from existing dead
loads, and welding may be proportioned to carryall additional loads.
24.10 HighStrength Bolts (in Friction-Type Joints) and Rivets in
Combination. In making alterations, rivets and high-strength bolts in
friction-type joints may be considered as sharing stresses due to dead
and live loads.
-404Copyright NRC-CNRC
61
25.4 Long Grips. A307 bolts which carry calculated loads, the grip of
which exceeds five diameters, shall have their number increased by 1 per cent
for each additional !16 inch in the grip.
25.6 Minimum Edge Distance. The minimum distance from the centre
of a bolt hole to any edge shall be that given in Table 9.
TABLE 9
MINIMUM EDGE DISTANCE FOR BOLT HOLES
Bolt Diameter
At Sheared Edge
Inches
Inches
Yz
%
1
%
VB
lYs
l%,
Over lU
1
lYs
I%,
lYz
1%*
2
2%,
1% X Diameter
At Rolled or
Gas Cut Edget
Inches
%
VB
1
lYs
l%'
lYz
1%
lU X Diameter
*At ends of beam framing angles this distance may be 1 %' inches.
tGas cut edges shall be smooth and free from notches. Edge distance in this column may be
decrease(/, Ys inch when hole is at a point where computed stress is not more than 0.2 Fy.
62
25.7 Maximum Edge Distance. The maximum distance from the centre
of any bolt to the nearest edge of parts in contact shall be 12 times the
thickness of the outside connected part with a maximum of 6 inches.
friction -type.
26.1.3 Friction-type shear joints, in which design load is assumed
to be transferred by the slip-resistance of the clamped faying surfaces,
shall be required :
(a) In connections subject to stress reversal;
(b) Where slippage into bearing cannot be tolerated.
FOR BUILDINGS
63
26.2.4 Other fasteners which meet the chemical composition requirements of ASTM Standard A325 or A490 and which meet the mechanical
requirements of the same Standard in full-size tests and which have body
diameter and bearing areas under the head and nut, or their equivalent,
not less than those provided by a bolt and nut of the same nominal dimensions prescribed by Clauses 26.2.1 and 26.2.2, may be used. Such alternative
fasteners may differ in other dimensions from the prescribed bolt and nut
dimensions. When such fasteners are proposed as an alternative to A325
or A490 standard bolts their use shall be subject to the approval of the
authority having jurisdiction.
26.2.5 If necessary, washers may be clipped on one side to a point
not closer than U of the bolt diameter from the centre of the washer hole.
26.2.6 Design drawings shall indicate the type or types of bolt which
may be used. Shop and erection drawings shall show the type of bolt to
be used.
26.3 Bolted Parts
26.3.1 Bolted parts shall fit together solidly when assembled and shall
not be separated by gaskets or any other interposed compressible material.
-407-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
64
-401Copyright NRC-CNRC
65
-409-Copyright NRC-CNRC
66
67
TABLE 10
BOLT TENSION
Minimum Bolt Tension. (kips)
Bolt Size
Inches
A325 Bolts
31
%
%
A490 Bolts
15
12
19
28
39
51
56
1~
1~
24
35
49
64
80
71
1%
102
121
85
103
1~
1%
148
200
262
Over 2
0.70T.S.
Equal to 70 per cent of specified minimum tensile strength given in A STM Standard A3Z5
and A490, rounded off to the nearest kip.
TABLE 11
NUT ROTATION FROM SNUG-TIGHT CONDITION
Disposition of Outer Faces of Bolted Parts
~ turn
% turn
% turn
Nut rotation is rotation relative to bolt regardless of the element (nut or bolt) being turned.
Tolerance on rotation: 30 degrees over or under. For coarse thread heavy hex structural bolts
of all sizes and length ant/, heavy hex semi-finished nuts.
tBevel washers are necessary when A 490 bolts are used.
iBolt length is measured from underside of head to extreme end of point.
-411-Copyright NRC-CNRC
68
TABLE 12
JOB INSPECTION TORQUE *
Job Inspection Terque
Foot-Poundst
Bolt Size
D
Inches
A325Bolts
A490 Bolts
105
210
370
595
890
1,100
1,550
2,040
2,700
130
260
460
750
1,120
1,575
2,230
2,910
3,880
27. WELDING
27.1 Arc ..Welding. Arc-welding design and practice shall conform to
CSA Standard W59.1, General Specification for Welding of Steel Structures
(Metal-Arc Welding).
69
(b) Column bases other than rolled steel bearing plates shall be planed
on all bearing surfaces e2'~ept as noted in Clause 28.2(c);
(c) The bottom surfaces of bearing plates and column bases which
rest on masonry or concrete foundations and are grouted to ensure
full bearing need not be planed.
30.2.2 One and two-storey rigid frames dependent upon frame stiffness
alone to prevent sidesway may be proportioned in accordance with Clause
30, except as noted in Clause 30.3.
30.3 Limitations
30.3.1 Members subject to repeated heavy impact or fatigue shall
not be designed by the plastic theory.
-413-Copyright NRC-CNRC
70
30.6 Tension Members. Tension members in plastically designed structures shall be proportioned so that
P, ~~ An Fy
where P f = factored axial load (kips)
An = critical net area of member (inches2)
F y = Specified minimum yield point (ksi)
In addition the ratio An/Ag shall be greater than F yjT.S.
30.7 Compression Members. Compression members in plastically
designed structures shall be proportioned so that
P f :s; 1. 67 Ag Fa
where P, = factored axial load (kips)
Ag = gross area of member (inches2)
Fa = appropriate allowable axial stress given in Clause
16.2.2, based on the largest unbraced slenderness ratio.
NOTE:
In a braced frame the effective length of a column shaU be taken as its actual length.
30.8 Beam-Columns
30.8.1 Published, recognized methods of beam-column analysis
acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction may be used to proportion
beam-columns in plastically designed structures. In lieu of such methods,
the requirements of Clause 30.8.2 shall be followed.
30.8.2 Beam-columns shall be proportioned so that the following
conditions are satisfied.
1\1y < 1.0
1\1py -
(a)
(b) P,
Py
(c) 1.
0.85
1.0
Cm)
with
286,OOOA
Pe
(L/r)2 and A equal to column area and L/r
equal to the slenderness ratio in the plane of bending
for which P is computed.
NOTE:
Ina braced frame the effective length of a column shall be taken as its actual length.
-414-Copyright NRC-CNRC
71
30.9 Shear
30.9.1 Unless reinforced by diagonal stiffeners or a doubler plate,
the webs of columns, beams, and girders shall be proportioned so that:
)If ::; O. 55 F y wd
where V, = shear force from factored loads (kips)
F y = specified minimum yield point of the steel (ksi)
w = web thickness (inches)
d = depth of member (inches)
<
tb
!f
5k
(~yb)
r;;:)
A..
[AI
a::.) -
w (tb
Sk) ] (::..)
-415Copyright NRC-CNRC
72
Their ends shall be fully welded to the inside face of the flange opposite
the concentrated tensile load. They may be fitted against the inside face
of the flange opposite the concentrated compression load. When ilie concentrated load delivered by a beam occurs on one side only, the web stiffener
need not exceed one-half the depth 6f the member, but the welding connecting it to the web shall be sufficient to develop F Y8t A. t
b/t<~
-VF;
Py
P
<
-
0.28
_1.4 PPI)
y
h
-
255
(ii) I:/ > 0.28
<
_
1y
W - v Fy
where P f = factored axial load (kips)
P y = product of column cross-sectional area and specified
minimum yield point (kips)
(e) Ratio of outside diameter to wall thickness of round tubes
D/t ::;
.J~y
30.12 Connections
30.12.1 All connections which are essential to the continuity assumed
as the basis of the design analysis shall be capable of resisting the moments,
shears, and axial loads to which they would be subjected by either fun or
partial factored loading.
30.12.2 Corner connections (haunches), tapered or curved for architectural reasons shall be so proportioned that the full plastic bending
strength of the section adjacent to the connection can be developed.
30.12.3 Splices located at inflection points occurring under factored
load shall have a flexural capacity at least equal to one-quarter of the
plastic moment capacity of the member.
30.12.4 Stiffeners shall be used, as required to preserve the flange
continuity of interrupted members at their junction with other members
in a continuous frame. Such stiffeners shall be placed in pairs on opposite
sides of the web of the member which extends continuously through the
joint.
I
-416-Copyright NRC-CNRC
73
_/M
210 r y/ V F y for 1\1
>
O. 5
( - 1. 0 ::;
:i
::;
1. 0 )
30.13.2 The provisions of Clause 30.13.1 need not apply in the region
of the last hinge to form in the failure mechanism assumed as the basis for
proportioning the structure, nor in members oriented with their weak axes
normal to the plane of bending.
30.13.3 Except for the regions specified in Clause 30.13.1 the maximum
unsupported length of members in plastically designed structures need not
be less than that which would be permitted for the same members designed
under the provisions of Clause 16.
74
30.14 Fabrication
30.14.1 The provisions of Clause 31 with respect to workmanship
shall govern the fabrication of structures, or portions of structures, designed
on the basis of maximum strength, subject to the limitations of Clauses
30.14.2 to 30.14.4.
30.14.2 The use of sheared edges in the tension area shall be avoided
in locations subject to plastic hinge rotation at ultimate loading. If used
they shall be finished smooth by grinding, chipping, or planing.
30.14.3 In locations subject to plastic hinge rotation at ultimate
loading, fastener holes in the tension area shall be subpunched and reamed
or drilled full size.
30.14.4 The requirements of Clause 30.14 shall be noted on design
and shop drawings when applicable.
31. FABRICATION
31.1 General. Unless otherwise specified, the provisions of Clause 31
shall apply to both shop and field fabrication.
31.3 Gas Cutting. Gas cutting shall be done by machine when practicable.
Gas cut edges which will be subjected to substantial stress or which are to
have weld metal deposited on them shall be free from gouges and nicks;
any such irregularities shall be repaired by grinding or by welding. Reentrant corners shall be free from notches and shall have the largest practical
radii, with a minimum radius of 31 inch.
shown on design drawings, holes shall be made !16 inch larger than the
nominal diameter of the fastener. Holes may be punched when the thickness
of material is not greater than the nominal fastener diameter plus % inch.
For greater thicknesses holes shall be drilled from the solid or either subpunched or sub-drilled and reamed. The die for all sub-punched holes or
the drill for all sub-drilled holes shall be at least % inch smaller than the
required diameter of the finished hole. Holes in A514 steel over 31 inch in
thickness shall be drilled.
-418-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
75
-419-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
76
32.2.2 In compression members, surfaces finished to bear and assembled during fabrication shall be cleaned before assembly but shall not
be primed unless otherwise specified.
32.2.3 Surfaces finished to bear and not assembled during fabrication
shall be protected by a corrosion inhibiting coating. The coating shall be
of a type that can be readily removed prior to assembly or shall be of a
type that makes such removal unnecessary.
32.2.4 Faying surfaces of high-strength bolted friction-type joints
shall not be primed or otherwise coated except as pennitted by Clause 26.
32.2.5 Joints to be field welded shall be kept free of primer or any
other coating which could be detrimental to achieving a sound weldment.
32.3 Surface Preparation. Unless otherwise specified, or approved, surface
preparation shall be in conformance with one of the following applicable
specifications of the Steel Structures Painting Council:
SSPC-SP2
Hand Tool Cleaning;
SSPC-SP3
Power Tool Cleaning;
SSPC-SP4
Flame Cleaning of New Steel;
SSPC-SPS
White Metal Blast Cleaning;
SSPC-SP6
Commercial Blast Cleaning;
SSPC-SP7
Brush-Off Blast Cleaning;
SSPC-SPI0
Near-White Blast Cleaning.
-420Copyright NRC-CNRC
77
33. ERECTION
33.1 General. The steel framework shall be erected true and plumb within
the specified tolerances. Temporary bracing shall be employed wherever
necessary to withstand all loads to which the structure may be subject
during erection and subsequent construction, including loads due to wind,
equipment and operation of same. Temporary bracing shall be left in place
undisturbed as long as required for safety (see also Clause 29),
-42.1-Copyright NRC-CNRC
78
-422Copyright NRC-CNRC
79
APPENDIX A
STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STRUCTURAL
STEEL FOR BUILDINGS
NOTE:
80
APPENDIX B
EFFECTIVE LENGTHS OF COMPRESSION
MEMBERS IN FRAMES
NOTE:
Bl. A variation in K between 0.65 and 2.0 would apply to the majority
of cases likely to be encountered in actual structures.
B3. When proportioning columns on the basis of effective lengths the
designer is presented with two basic situations which have a pronounced
effect upon the strength of axially loaded columns.
(a) If a structural frame depends entirely on its own flexural stiffness
to provide stability against unchecked lateral movement (sidesway), and if sufficient axial load is applied to the columns, the
effective length of these columns will exceed their actual lengths
or at best will be equal to it. That is, K always will be equal to or
greater than 1.0. The Standard defines such a frame as unbraced.
(b) If a structural frame is braced in such a way that unchecked
lateral displacement of one end of a column with respect to the
other is prevented (restricted translation or sidesway) then the
effective length would be less than or equal to the actual length.
That is K will be equal to or less than 1.0. The Standard defines
such a frame as braced.
B4. Figure B 1 illustrates the above for six idealized cases in which joint
rotation and translation are either fully realized or non-existent. Conditions
(a), (b). and (c) are such that lateral movement (translation) is prevented,
while conditions (d), (e), and (f) assume that translation of one end of the
column with respect to the other is possible.
B5. Figure B2 shows diagrammatically the difference in the effective
column length of a simple portal frame when sidesway is or is not prevented.
B6. If the column base in Figure B2 were truly pinned, K would exceed the
value of 2.0 shown for case (f) in Figure B 1 since the flexibility of the
horizontal member prevents the attainment of complete fixity at the top
of the column.
81
load. Thus in most cases K generally would be less than 2. The use of the
alignment chart (Figure Cl) with G L taken as 10 (or less where justified)
provides a convenient means of assessing K.
(d)
(c)
(b)
(a)
12~ [!~
.I.J(..u
I
,I
\
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
~~ r!l
,I
I
I
I
f
,,
(C)
I
I
I
I
I
I
(e)
ll,P'
I
t
I
14
mr
7!i 'rr
Theoretical K value
o5
o7
Reoommcnded design
value when ideal condi
tions are approximated
o 65
0.80
--1"
Rotation fixed
Translation fixed
Rotation free
Translation fixed
Rotation fixed
Translation free
Rotation free
Translation free
V!flI
y
17 7r
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
1.2
2.0
2.0
2.0
FIGURE Bl
~\
(0)
Side$woy
Inhibited
',---------"-
,
I
I'
"-
"-
,;
",;
Kll
,;
\
\
,l,;"
-~
KL
+P
""- "-
,;
"
""
I'
--I'
/
".
"
"-
,,
tP) :
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
'" I
--, - r -
I
I
,,
+p
,;
"-
Sideswoy
Uninhibited
+P
I
(b)
I
I
FIGURE B2
It
82
APPENDIX C
CRITERIA FOR ESTIMATING EFFECTIVE
COLUMN LENGTHS IN CONTINUOUS FRAMES
NOTE:
CI. Two cases influencing the design of columns in continuous frames are
considered:
(a) Sidesway of structure prevented;
(b) Sidesway of structure permitted.
C4. The equations upon which these nomographs are based are:
(a) Sidesway prevented:
GuG L (n/K)2
(Gu + GL) (1 _
n/K )
tan n/K
4
2
(b) Sidesway permitted:
GUG L (n/K)2 - 36
nlK
tan n/K
6 (Gu
GL )
+ 2 tan n/2K =
n/K
C5. Subscripts U and L refer to the joints at the two ends of the column
section being considered. G is defined as
G = 1:l c/Lc
1:lg/Lg
in which 1: indicates a summation for all members rigidly connected to that
joint and lying in the plane in which buckling of the column is being considered, 10 is the moment of inertia and Lo the unsupported length of a
column section, and Ig is the moment of inertia and Lg the unsupported
length of a girder or other restraining member. Ie and Ig are taken about
axes perpendicular to the plane of buckling being considered.
C6. For column ends supported by but not rigidly connected to a footing
or foundation, "G" may be taken as 10 for practical designs. If the column
end is rigidly attached to a properly designed footing, "G" may be taken as
1.0. Smaller values may be used if justified by analysis.
C7. Refinements in girder Ig/L. may be made when conditions at the far
end of any particular girder are known definitely or when a conservative
-416Copyright NRC-CNRC
83
estimate can be made. For the case with no sidesway, multiply girder
stiffnesses by the following factors:
1.5 for far end of girder hinged
2.0 for far end of girder fixed against rotation
(i.e. rigidly attached to a support which is itself relatively rigid)
CS. For the case with sidesway permitted, multiply girder stiffnesses
by 0.5 for far end of girder hinged.
~~~~~ ~
d~O d
aQ
VI"
~ N
I I ,. I
0
jt)
,. 1
II I I I
"l:I
00
\11,,111
0
~
iii i
add
N~
II I
:;;
"'"'
E
'cv
10
r/J
Z
o..
:J
...... 0
..::I
1/1
0
0
cv
"l:I
(j)
0
=>
"
I I III
II I I I
II I I I
eqqq q
000000 0
0000
QIO ~ N
cJ
==
E;r/J
I
0
~
0
~
~
0 q
~ N
000
e 10do .0
\:1"-
"At. hI! I I
'I
OOlm"... to 10
-=00000 0
I I
I I
"'"'r/J
t5:J
~ =:0
~
,.....
~~
~~
..::1<
~~
:~
00
~o
ccv
t-<
cv
0==
"l:I
cv
g
w
en
I"'-;
:>
10
<D,
0
ct
0:>'
_0
1/1
cv
:'S:!
(J)
"'"'
VI=-
a qq qqq q
00 1O'iIIt~ N
10-
II I I I I' I
(,0 10
00l0) "...
"":0000 0 0
I'I'l
84
APPENDIX D
GRAPH SHOWING ALLOWABLE STRESS
FOR COMPRESSION MEMBERS
NOTE:
50
KL/r ::; C n
Co < KLJr ::; C p
Cp
40
.~
Co
Fa = 0.6 Fy
F"
0.6Fy -m [KL/r-CoJ
200
< I".OL'/r <
= 30 1'\/5 but
}'
'IC~E
30
Plot
F, (ksl)
(1)
36
20
(2)
44
(.1)
(4)
(5)
(6)
50
55
60
65
(i)
100
10
100
150
200
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-418-
F'.
85
APPENDIX E
ASSUMED FACTORS OF SAFETY
NOTE:
-429 -
Copyright NRC-CNRC
86
TABLE El
ASSUMED FACTORS OF SAFETY
Type of Stress
Clause
16.2.1
16.3.2
16.2.2
KL/r
Co
Cp
<
KL/r
=:;
200
Bending:
-rE
.
(KL/r)2 at gross sectIon.
16.2.4
Mp
Unbraced sections.
Shear:
U nstiffened webs of beams.
16.2.3
Bolts
FyZ.
16.3.1
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-430-
-431-Copyright NRC-CNRC
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-432-
-433-Copyright NRC-CNRC
1
~
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-434-
CONTENTS
Page
List of Members of Committee on Design of Light Gauge Steel
Structural lVlembers ...... , ........... ,
, ........ .
Preface ....... .
Reference Publications ......... , ... .
7
7
STANDARD
1. Scope ...... '
2. Definitions .. '
10
4. Design Procedure.
4.1 GeneraL ............ ,
. , . , . , ... ,. ..... . .. ,., .... .
4.2 Properties of Sections. . .
................ .
4.2.1 GeneraL .................... '
4.2.2 Reduced Design \Vidths ............................ .
4.2.3 Effective Design vVidth (b) for Stiffened Compression
Elements and Sub-Elements of Multiple-Stiffened
Elements ......................................... .
4.2.4 Properties of Stiffeners .......... .
4.3 Stiffeners for Compression Elements ...................... .
4.3.1 Edge Stiffeners ................................ " . .
4.3.2 Intermediate Stiffeners for Multi-Stiffened Elements .. .
4.4 Maximum Allowable Flat Width Ratios ................... .
4.5 Maximum Allowable Web Depth ......................... .
4.6 Unusually Short Spans Supporting Concentrated Loads ..... .
11
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-435-
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
15
15
16
16
17
17
17
17
17
18
18
18
18
19
19
19
20
20
21
21
21
21
23
23
23
23
23
24
24
24
24
24
25
25
25
25
25
26
7. Bracing Reqljirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
7.1 General ............................ ..
7.2 Bracing of Compression lVlembers and Elements, . . .. . . . . . . ..
7.3 Box Beams ..... , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
7.4 Special Consideration for Asymmetrical Sections. . . . .. . . . . . ..
7.5 Wall Studs ............. , ............ , ...... , . . . . . . . . . . ..
27
27
27
27
27
27
29
29
29
29
29
30
30
30
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-436-
30
pi
9. Assembly" ........................................... .
9.1 Workmanship.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ....
9.2 Forming, Cutting, and Punching ..........................
9.3 Fasteners ..............................................
9.4 Straightening and Flattening ..................... .
9.5 Provision for Expansion and Contraction. .. . .............
9.6 Profiles and Distortion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ...........
9.7 Connections ............................................
.
.
.
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
.
.
.
.
31
31
31
31
11. Protection....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11.1 Corrosion of Thin Materials not Permitted ................ .
11.2 Storing and Protective Coating .......................... .
11.3 Protection during Assembly, Storing, and Handling ........ .
11.4 Quality of Protective Coating ........................... .
11.5 Coatings .............................................. .
11.6 Preparation of Surfaces for Coatings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ..
11. 7 Injuries to Coating or Members. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ....... .
11.8 Adequate Adhesion of Protective Coatings.. .. . . . . . . . . . .. .
11.9 Zinc Coated Sections or :Members ........................ .
31
31
31
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
-437-Copyright NRC-CNRC
.
.
.
MCCURDY (Chairman)
S. H. BONSER.
B. M. COREY .. .
R. DE PAOLI .. .
P. C. DINovo.
R. N. DOBSON.
R. J. GILL ..... .
J.
P.
HARRIS .. .
W. C. KIMBALL.
N. C. LIND . . . . .
G. R. K. LYE .. .
A. H. MACK . . . ,.
W. G. MITCHELL.
H. F.
J.
G. SUTHERLAND ..
D.
J.
PHILLIPS ...... .
L.
TARLTON ...
WINTRIP ..
S. YOUNG ...
-438Copyright NRC-CNRC
PREFACE
This Standard for "The Design of Light Gauge Steel Structural Members" is the first
specification of its kind published by the Canadian Standards Association.
The American Iron and Steel Institute first published their specification "Design of
Light Gage Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members" in the year 19!6, and have revised
it several times. The latest revision is dated 1962. The data used in compiling this Standard
were obtained chiefly from the results of large testing programs, directed by Dr. George
Winter of Cornell University.
I t has long been customary in structural design to relate working stresses and load
carrying capacity to the properties of the material as determined from standardized tests
of small specimens. It is now known that the mechanical properties of sheet and strip steel
may be significantly altered by the cold work that is exerted on it by forming it into structural sections. Utilization of the increased strength of a cold-formed structural member
that results from the forming process is a recent development that is assuming importance
in some structural applications of sheet and strip steel.
The strengthening effect of forming operations will vary widely, depending on the
composition and prior treatment of the material, the extent to which it is cold worked in
forming, the nature of the forming operation and the proportions of the sections. A compact
section that is formed from narrow strip in roll forming machines may experience a considerable increase in strength relative to the strength of the unformed material. A relatively
wide, thin section may experience such an increase only at the corners, and since in such a
section the corners constitute a small percentage of the total the net effect is slight.
The provisions of the Design Specification and the data contained in this Standard
give accurate results for carbon and low-alloy steels. They do not apply to non-ferrous
metals whose modulus of elasticity is substantially different from that of steel.
The flexibility of the forming processes facilitates the production of a great variety of
shapes, resulting in substantial economies. Designers should consult the manufacturers
when specifying special sections.
The Committee wishes to acknowledge their indebtedness to the many individuals,
Organizations, and Universities for their assistance in preparing this Standard. and wish to
especially thank the following for their generous contributions:
W. G. KIRKLAND ................ American Iron & Steel Institute, New York
DR. GEORGE WINTER ............. Cornell University-Ithaca, N.V.
DR. R. E. JAMIESON .............. McGill University-Molltreal
DR. A. H. CHlLVER ............... University College, London, England
PROF. M. R. HORNE .............. University of Manchester, England
This Standard was prepared by the Committee on Design of Light Gauge Steel Structural Members under the jurisdiction of the Sectional Committee on Steel Construction
and was approved by these Committees and the CSA Technical Council.
OTTAWA, JUNE, 1963
NOTE:
In order to keep abreast of progress in the industries concerned, CSA publications are
subject to periodic review. Suggestions for impruuement addressed to the General
Manager, Canadian Standards Association, 235 Montreal Road, Ottawa 7, will be
welcomed at all times. They will be recorded and in due course brought to the attention
of the appropriate committee for consideration.
REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS
This Standard makes reference to the following Publications:
CSA Standards G40.1-1959 -General Requirements for Delivery of Rolled Steel Plates,
Shapes, Sheet Piling, and Bars for Structural Use;
G40A-1959 -Medium Structural Steel;
G40.8-1960 -Structural Steels with Improved Resistance to Brittle
Fracture;
G40.9*
-Structural Quality Carbon Steel Strip;
G40.1o-1962-Structural Quality Carbon Steel Sheets;
S16-1961
-Steel Structures for Buildings;
W55.2-1957 -Resistance Welding Practice;
W59-1946 -Welding of Steel Structures (Metallic Electric-Arc Process);
-439-Copyright NRC-CNRC
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-440-
9
NaTE:
The A ssociation desires to call attention to the fact th(lt this Standard is intended to
include only the technical provisions necessary for the supply of the article herein
referred to, and is not intended to include normal contractual requirements.
S136-1963
DESIGN OF LIGHT GAUGE STEEL STRUCTURAL
MEMBERS
el
,p
,p
s,
1. SCOPE
1.1 This Standard shall apply to the design of structural members fabricated by cold-forming sheet strip and plate, and will apply also to the design
of any structural member fabricated by welding, riveting, and other methods,
in which the width: thickness ratio (wit) of any component may exceed
that normally allowed in other Canadian Standards Association Standards
for the design of steel structural members. It is intended to supplement and
not to conflict with such standards, if used in conjunction with same.
1.2 Properties of sections, for design purposes, are established within
practical limits. Design procedures utilizing suitable working stresses, and
based on the elastic theory, are presented. No attempt is made to specify
load requirements for the several categories into which structures and
structural members may be divided. Loads shall be those stipulated in the
local By-laws under which the structure is being designed or as determined
by the authority having jurisdiction.
2. DEFINITIONS
2.1 The following definitions apply in this Standard:
Effective design width (b) means the dimension substituted for the
Flat \Vidth when the flat width of an element is reduced for design purposes.
The Effective Design \Vidth shall be determined in accordance with the
requiremen ts of Clauses 4.2.3 and 4.6;
Effective width ratio (bit) means the ratio of the Effective Design
Width (b) to the thickness (t) of the element;
Flat width (w) means the clear distance between stiffeners or webs
less the fillet radius each side. \Vhen the fillet radius is less than three times
the thickness of material, the full clear distance may be used and the radii
disregarded;
Flat width ratio (wit) means the ratio of the Flat Width (w) to the
thickness (t) of the element;
~1ultiple-stiffened element means an element that is stiffened
between webs, or between a web and an edge, by means of intermediate
stiffeners which are parallel to the direction of stress and which conform to
the requirements of Clause 4.3.2;
Stiffened compression element means a flat compression element
(i.e. plane compression Hanges of flexural members and plane webs and
flanges of compression memhers) of which both edges parallel to the direction of ~tress are stiffened by connection to a stiffening means (i.e. web,
flange, stiffening lip, intermediate stiffener or the like) conforming to the
requiremen ts of Clause 4.3;
-441-Copyright NRC-CNRC
10
3.2 The listing in Clause 3.1 does not exclude the use of other steels, the
properties and suitability of which are established by either the producer
or the purchaser through analyses, tests, and other controls to the extent
and in the manner prescribed in Clause 8 and as approved by the authority
having jurisdiction.
3.3 The suitability of any steel after cold-forming shall be demonstrated by
the requirements of Clause 8.
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-442-
11
4. DESIGN PROCEDURE
4.1 General. All computations for safe loads, stresses, deflections and the
like, shall be in accordance with conventional methods of structural design
except as otherwise specified herein.
is
i
s
vi
10320t [1
vr-
2580 ]
(w/t)Vf
Rb
8040~ [1 -
Vf
2010 ]
(w/t)Vf
-443-Copyright NRC-CNRC
12
\Vhere: w
(b) When stiffened compression elements or subelements, are stiffened at each edge by means of a
web or flange.
Where (k) = (3 -
~) - 3~ (1
~) ~
Aeff =
(~) A full
Where Acff and Afull refer only to the area of the stiffener section
exclusive of any portion of adjacent elements. The centroid of the stiffener
is to be considered located at the centroid of the full area of the stiffener,
and the moment of inertia of the stiffener about its own centroidal axis shall
be that of the full section of the stiffener.
4.3 Stiffeners for Compression Elements
4.3.1 EdJ1e Stiffeners. In order that a flat compression element may
be considered a stiffened compression element, it shall be stiffened along
each longitudinal edge parallel to the direction of stress by a web, lip, or
other stiffening means having not less than the following minimum moment
of inertia
Imin = 1.83t4 V (w It)2 - 144 but not less than 9.2t 4
Where wit = flat width ratio of stiffened element;
I min = minimum allowable moment of inertia of stiffener (of any
shape) about its own centroidal axis parallel to the
stiffened elemen t.
\Vhere the stiffener consists of a simple lip bent at right angles to the
stiffened element, the required overall depth, Cd), of such lip may be determined as follows:
d = 2.St [(w/t)2 - 144]1/6 but not less than 4.8t
A simple lip shall not be used as an edge stiffener for any element having
a flat width ratio greater than 60.
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-444-
13
WI
\Vhere Is = moment of inertia of the full area of the multiplestiffened element, including the intermediate stiffeners, about its
own cen troidal axis.
NOTES 1.
-445Copyright NRC-CNRC
14
_ ~I,800,OOOth X ~100C
f
h
_ . av
Wmax -
Where
W max =
The amount of curling that can be tolerated will vary with different kinds of sections
and must be established by the designer. Amount of curling in the order of 5 per cent of
the depth of the section is usually not considered excessive.
4.5 Maximum Allowable Web Depth. The ratio (hft) of the webs of
flexural members shall not exceed 150
Where h = clear distance between flanges, inches;
t
thickness of web, inches.
Where a web consists of two or more sheets, the hft ratio of the individual sheets shall not exceed ................................ " 1SO
4.6 Unusually Short Spans Supporting Concentrated Loads. \Vhere
the span of the beam is less than 30w' (w' as defined in Table 1) and it
carries one concentrated load, or several loads spaced farther apart than
2w', the effective design width of any flange, whether in tension or compression, shall be limited by the ratio given in Table 1.
TABLE 1
SHORT WIDE FLANGES
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE RATIO OF EFFECTIVE DESIGN WIDTH
TO ACTUAL WIDTH
L/w'
30
2S
20
18
16
In Table 1: L
w' =
Ratio
L/w'
Ratio
l.OO
14
0.96
0.91
0.89
0.86
12
0.82
0.78
0.7.3
0.67
0.55
10
8
6
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-446-
&
DESIGN OF LIGHT GAUGE STEEL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS
15
)-
y
s
16
F
When (F) exceeds 30,000 psi and the ratio wit is less than 10 but
greater than that established above, the allowable value of (Fe)
shall be calculated as follows:
Fe = F (1
l~t) + 30,000
(b) For wit greater than 10, but not greater than 25:
Fe =
~ (F
For steels with yield point in excess of 50,000 psi, the value of (F)
to be used for the determination of (Fe) when wit exceeds 10 shall
be 30,000 psi;
(c) For (wit) from 25 to 60:
8,090,000
F or angIe struts: F e =
(w/t)2
For all other sections: Fe
20,000 - 282 (wit).
In the above formulae, (wit) is the flat width ratio as defined in
Clause 2.
Unstiffened compression elements having ratios of (wit) exceeding
approximately 30 may show noticeable distortion of the free edges under
allowable compressive stress without detriment to the ability of the member
to support load.
When (wit) exceeds approximately 60, distortion of the flanges is likely
to be so pronounced as to render the section structurally undesirable unless
load and stress are limited to such a degree as to render such use uneconomical.
-448Copyright NRC-CNRC
17
.f
t
18
CSA
srANDARD
S136
0.22 Bh
O.~ lh ]
[ 1.15-0.15n ] [ 1.33-0.33k ] k
~J
(b) For reactions of interior supports or for concentrated loads anywhere on the span
Pm~
~J
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-450-
p
DESIGN OF LIGHT GAUGE STEEL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS
b,
19
s.
n-
of
F.
~h
)y
~d
{-
(I{~~r)2
Where P
A
Fa
L =
K =
r =
~d
{o
Ir
ir
,r
Qf
t
t
= ~e
where Fe
F
20
(~L)
5.7.2 For primary members with effective slenderness ratio greater than
120, and subject to lateral loads, or to moments applied at the ends so that
the member deflects in single curvature, the quantity (Fb) in the formula
given above shall be replaced by
Fb [ 1 - fa
(KL/r - 120)2]
30,000,000
VO.3 (Mi
Mi)
0.41\;1 1:\1 2
larger of end moments;
smaller of end moments. In this formula, the sign of M2 is
negative if lV12 causes column curvature opposite to that
caused by MI.
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-452-
to
rlOt
lon
lte
Ice
In
lce
on
nd
~ss
leS
r-
ts
21
s-
'y
~s
IS
n
t
t
t
-453-Copyright NRC-CNRC
22
TABLE 2
MINIMUM DESIGN VALUES OF EFFECTIVE LENGTH FACTOR uK"
FOR COMPRESSION MEMBERS
Minimum Effective
Length Factor, K
Symbol
0.65
0.80
1.00
1.20
Ir~
/:J~
I..so
I "-,
2.00
2.00
IT
I.....,...J
I
/'
r-,
'-"T..J
I
/./
J!
bending.
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-454-
23
TABLE 3
EFFECTIVE LENGTH FACTOR FOR COMPRESSION
ELEMENTS OF STEEL JOISTS
Ll = Panel Length
Effective Length
for Design = 0.9L1
L2 = Panel Length
Effective Length
for Design = 0.9L2
,, . ...
KL=0.9Ll
6. CONNECTIONS
6.1 General
6.1.1 Stress in Connections. Connections shall be designed to
transmit the maximum stress in the connected member with proper regard
for eccentricity.
-455-Copyright NRC-CNRC
24
component parts. Due regard shall be given to the anticipated service conditions in choosing the means of connection. Except as specified herein or
unless otherwise required by the authority having jurisdiction, connecting
devices shall develop at least 2% times their design value before failure.
TABLE 4
SHEAR STRENGTH OF SPOT WELDS
Thickness of Thinnest
Outside Sheet
Inches
Pounds
0.010
0.020
0.030
50
125
225
0.040
0.050
0.060
350
525
0.080
0.094
0.109
1,075
1,375
1,650
0.125
0.155
0.185
2,000
3,000
4,000
725
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-456-
conn or
ting
lireallic
are
lard
1 of
lble
ice.
10n
25
1-
d
d
d
n
(c) 900,00o-f-but not greater than (32t), or greater than 3 times the
flat wid th of the narrowest unstiffened compression element in that portion of the connected material tributary
to the fastening.
6.4.2 Spacing refers to centre-to-centre distance between mechanical
fastenings, and the clear distance plus one-half inch if this is less than the
centre-to-centre distance in the case of welds.
-457-Copyright NRC-CNRC
26
where L
2 c Sw
mq
q
m
2w
+ h/3
~~: [ wh + 2d (h -
d) ]
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-458-
F
DESIGN OF LIGHT GAUGE STEEL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS
1m
mg
leI
CIS
27
7. BRACING REQUIREMENTS
7.1 General
7.1.1 Structural members and assemblies shall be adequately braced in
accordance with good engineering practice. Care shall be taken to ensure
that the bracing of entire structural systems is complete, particularly when
there is interdependence on walls, floors, and roofs acting as diaphragms.
e
t
-459-Copyright NRC-CNRC
28
wall material and its attachments to the stud comply with the following
requirements:
(a) Wall material or sheathing must be attached to both faces or
flanges of the studs being braced;
(b) The maximum spacing of attachments of waH material to the stud
being braced shall not exceed "amax " as determined from the
formula;
8E hk
a max = A2 f y 2
All terms are as defined in Clauses 7.5.3 and 7.5.4.
?
DESIGN OF LIGHT GAUGE STEEL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS
mg
or
ud
:he
29
to
It,
0-
:el
Ie
Jr
1-
IS
8.1 General
8.1.1 Scope. The provisions of Clause 8 are intended to apply to the
following:
(a) Determination of the mechanical properties of material as received
from the steel manufacturer. When the specification to which the
material is produced specifies minimum mechanical properties,
these minimum properties may be used without additional tensile
tests for design purposes;
(b) Determination of the modified mechanical properties of material
after cold-working or cold-forming, for the utilization of the change
in strength as permitted in Clause 5.1.2;
(c) Determination of the residual ductility of all cold-formed elements
in accordance with Clauses 8.2.3 and 8.2.4;
(d) Determination of load carrying capacity of structural elements or
assemblies for which the composition or configuration is such that
calculation of their safe-load-carrying capacity or deflection cannot be made in accordance with the provisions of Clauses 2 through
5 of this Standard.
8.1.2 Laboratory Reports. Tests shall be made by an approved
independent testing laboratory or by an approved manufacturer's testing
laboratory in accordance with Clause 8.2. Copies of the certified test reports
shall be available to the purchaser on request.
8.1.3 Published Properties. The minimum guaranteed mechanical
properties of materials used for design purposes shall be established in a
published material specification. The established properties shall be available on request to purchasers and, for approval, to authorities having
jurisdiction.
8.2 Procedure
8.2.1 Testing of Plain Material. For the purposes defined in Clauses
5.1.1 and 8.1(a) the determination of the mechanical properties shall be in
accordance with the provisions of CSA Standard G40.1-1959, General
Requirements for Delivery of Rolled Steel Plates, Shapes, Sheet Piling, and
Bars for Structural Use.
8.2.2 Testing of Cold-Worked l\1aterial
8.2.2.1 For the purposes defined in Clauses 5.1.2 and 8.1(b), the
determination of the mechanical properties shall be performed on the full
sectional area of the cold-worked or cold-formed section, if practicable.
Where this is not practicable, the test shall be made on a specimen cut from
the section in such a way as to include a portion of the section in which the
amount of cold-working and welding (if applicable) is deemed to be repre-
-461-Copyright NRC-CNRC
30
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-462-
p
DESIGN OF LIGIIT GAUGE STEEL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS
31
9. ASSEMBLY
Ion
at
les
Idde
he
~r-
ts
r-
.5
)t
n
L-
1.
e
~r
practice.
Cuttin~, and Punchin~. Cold-formed members shall be
shaped by press brakes or by roll forming, or by any mechanical means
which does not result in work hardening to an extent that would limit the
intended service. Components may be cut by slitting, shearing, sawing, or
flame cutting. All punched holes and sheared or flame cut edges of material
in members carrying calculated stress shall be clean and free from notches
and burred edges.
9.2 Forming,
-463-Copyright NRC-CNRC
32
-464-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
III
)e
19
3t
,e
Ir
g
r
-465-Copyright NRC-CNRC
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-466-
,.
THE STRUCTURAL USE OF ALUMINUM IN BUILDINGS
CONTENTS
Page
List of Members of Committee on Structural Use of Aluminum in
Buildings... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8
Preface ....................... '" . .... ............ .. .... .......
Reference Publications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
STANDARD
1. Scope...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
1.1 Application. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
1.2 Aluminum Alloys. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
11
11
12
12
12
13
14
14
14
14
4. Methods of Design... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
4.1
Elastic Analysis.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Plastic and Ultimate Load Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
4.2
4.3
Testing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
4.4 Other Methoos.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
6. Deflections.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
6.1
General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
6.2
Limiting Deflections in General Building Structures.. . . .. ..
15
15
15
7. Camber......................................... . . . . . . . . . ..
15
8. Materials................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
8.1
Identification. . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
8.2
Alloys .............................................. "
16
16
16
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-467-
11
8.3
8.4
8.5
Physical Properties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Steel Bolts. ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Other Materials. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
16
16
16
9. Material Thickness..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.1
Minimum Thickness.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.2
Width-Thickness Ratios. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
16
16
16
17
17
17
17
17
17
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
19
19
19
20
20
20
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-461'-
20
20
20
20
20
21
21
21
22
23
24
p
THE STRUCTURAL USE OF ALUMINUM IN BUILDINGS
16
16
16
16
16
16
17
17
17
17
17
17
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
l8
l8
19
19
19
!O
~o
:0
o
o
o
o
o
1
1
1
2
3
l
15. Plate
15.1
15.2
15.3
15.4
15.5
15.6
5
25
25
25
26
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
28
28
28
29
Girders. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Proportioning................................... , ....
Flange Construction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Compressive Web Stresses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Intermediate Stiffeners............................ ' . . ..
Bearing Stiffeners. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Splices.... ..........................................
29
29
29
29
30
30
30
16. Composite Concrete and Aluminum Beams ........... ' ..... " .
16.1 General .......................... , ................ ,..
16.2 Cleaning and Painting .............................. ' . ..
16.3 Ini rial Stress ........................................ "
16.4 IMethod of Calculation .... , ................. , . . . . . . . . ..
30
30
30
30
31
31
31
31
31
32
32
32
33
17.5
18.1
General...................... .......................
18.1.1 Primary Joints ....... , ............... , . . . . . . . ..
18.1.2 Use of Semi-Finished Bolts. . . . . . . . . . .. . .......
18.1.3 Other Fasteners... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
18.1.4 Field Welding .......................... '. . . . . . ..
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-469-
33
33
33
33
33
18.2
33
34
34
19. Connections... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
19.1 Eccentric Connections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
19.2 Symmetry............................................
19.3 Sharing of Load ..................................... "
19.4 Placement of Fasteners. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
19.5 Rivets or Bolts Through Fillers ........................ "
19.6 Milled Joints in Compression Members. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
20. Tests... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
20.1 General..............................................
20.2 Prototype Structural Units ........................... "
20.3 Part of an Existing Structure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
35
35
35
35
36
36
36
36
36
23. Fabrication....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
23.1 Handling.............................................
23.2 Storage...............................................
23.3 Layout... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
23.4 Straightening.........................................
23.5 Cutting..............................................
23.6 Finishing.............................................
23.7 Holes for Rivets and Semi-Finished Bolts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
23.8 Holes for Finished Bolts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
23.9 Assembly.............................................
23.10 Riveting ............................................ "
23.11 Welding of Aluminum. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
36
36
36
36
36
37
37
37
37
37
38
38
18.3
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-470-
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
p
THE STRUCTURAL USE OF ALUMINUM IN BUILDINGS
23.12
23.13
23.14
23.15
Welding Qualification. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Tolerances..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
Heating.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..............
Erection Marks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
39
39
39
39
24. Joint
24.1
24.2
24.3
24.4
39
39
40
40
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
26. Inspection.............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
26.1 General......................... ....................
26.2 Co-operation .. " .....................................
26.3 Defects...............................................
26.4 Identification of Material. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
41
41
41
42
42
Appendix A -
43
Appendix B
44
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
34
34
34
~4
~4
~4
l4
~4
;4
~5
:5
5
5
6
5
5
-471-Copyright NRC-CNRC
GSA
~'TANDARD
8157
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-472-
F
THE STRUCTURAL USE OF ALUMINUM IN BUILDINGS
PREFACE
This second edition of CSA Standard S157, supersedes the previous edition issued
in 1962.
Since the issue of CSA S157-1962, The Structural Use of Aluminum in Buildings,
continuing research and testing coupled with changes in structural practice has led to the
need for some modification in the recommendations made in this Standard.
To extend the applicability of the Standard to all alloys suitable for use in buildings,
allowable stresses are given in terms of the mechanical properties, and are then evaluated
for the more popular alloys.
Other changes include those relating to combined loads, testing, deflections, welded
members, and eccentric struts and ties.
The arrangement follows as closely as is practical that of CSA SI6-1965, Steel Structures for Buildings, to facilitate its use by those familiar with the earlier Standard.
This Standard was prepared by the Committee on Structural Use of Aluminum in
Buildings under the jurisdiction of the Sectional Committee on Structures and was formally
approved by these committees and the CSA Standards Review Board.
REXDALE, NOVEMBER, 1969
NOTE: In order to keep abreast of progress in the industries concerned, CSA Publications are
subject to periodic review. Suggestions for improvement will be welcomed at all times.
They will be recorded and in due course brought to the attention of the appropriate
committee for consideration.
Also, requests for interpretation will be accepted by the Committee. They should be
worded in such a manner as to permit a simple "yes" or "no" answer based on the
literal text of the requirement concerned.
All enquiries regarding this Standard should be addressed to Canadian Standards
Association, 178 Rexdale Boulevard, Rexda,le 603, Ontario.
REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS
This Standard makes reference to the following publications, and the dates shown
indicate the latest issue available at the time of printing:
CSA Standards A23.1-1967,
Concrete Materials and Methods of Concrete Construction;
A23.3-1966,
Code for the Design of Plain or Reinforced Concrete
Structures;
B33.1-1961,
Square and Hexagon Bolts and Nuts, Studs and Wrench
Openings;
B95-1962,
Surface Texture (Roughness, Waviness, and Lay);
GI64-1965,
Hot Dip Galvanizing of Irregularly Shaped Articles;
H.1 Series-1958, Alloy and Temper Designations of Non-Ferrous Metals
and Alloys;
HA Series-1968, Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys;
S190--1968,
Design of Light Gauge Aluminum Products;
S244-1969,
Welded Aluminum, Design and Workmanship (Inert Gas
Shielded Arc Processes);
W47.2-1967,
Aluminum Welding Qualification Code;
CGSB* Specifications 1-GP-69c-1964, Aluminum Paint;
I-GP-I08b-1961, Paint: Acid and Alkali Resistant, Black;
1-GP-132b-1968, Primer: Zinc Chromate, Low Moisture Sensitivity;
ASTM t Standard A307-67, Low-Carbon Steel Externally and Internally Threaded Standard Fasteners.
*Canadian Government Specifications Board.
tAmerican Society for Testing and Materials.
-473Copyright NRC-CNRC
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-474-
f"
11
S157-1969
THE STRUCTURAL USE OF ALUMINUM
IN BUILDINGS
1. SCOPE
1.1 Application
1.1.1 This Standard applies to the design, fabrication, and erection of
the structural aluminum, composed of sheet, plate, and extrusion, used in
buildings. It covers those items which are proportioned principally as a
function of the loads they must sustain.
Drawn Tube
HA.7.GS10
HAA.MC10
HA.S.GS10
HAA.GM31
HA.S.GSllN
HA.7.GSllN
HAA.GM41
HA.S.SGllR
HA.7.SGllR
H-\A.GR20
HAA.GSllN
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-475-
12
TABLE 2
Mechanical Properties for Aluminum Alloys and Products
Commonly Used in Buildings
Not-Welded
Tensile
Ultimate
Tensile
Yield
Welded
I've
Tensile
Ultimate
TensUe
Yield
/ Compresslve
Yield
GM41-H12A
Plate up to
1.5 Inches Thick
44
31
26
38
18
18
GS10-T6
Extrusions and
Drawn Tube
30
25
25
17
11
11
GSllN-T6
Sheet, Plate and
Drawn Tube
42
35
35
24
16
16
SGllR-T6
Extrusions
42
37
37
24
16
16
GM41-H32A
Sheet and Plate
Transverse
Longitudinal
GM50P
24
18
S5
20
15
2.2 Units. The units employed throughout this Standard are inches and
kips.
One kip = 1,000 pounds and kips per square inch is abbreviated ksi.
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-476-
p
THE STRUarURAL USE OF ALUMINUM IN BUILDINGS
13
ess-
Standard. Symbols have also been defined where they are used:
A
= area of cross-section
Ae
= effective cross-sectional area in tension
Ace
= area of compression flange
An
net area of cross-section
Aw
area of cross-section within 1 inch of weld
Be, Bp
intersection of straight line strut formula with ordinate, for
columns and plates respectively
Ce , C p = value of A at intersection of straight line strut formula with
elastic buckling curve, for columns and plates respectively
D
= diameter
Dc, Dp = slope of straight line strut formula, for columns and plates
respectively
E
elastic modulus
F
allowable stress
Fa
= allowable axial stress in compression
Fb
= allowable bending stress
Fe
= half elastic buckling stress
Fp
= allowable bearing stress
Fu
ultimate strength
Fv
allowable shear stress
Fw
allowable stress at a weld
F wt
allowable transverse shear stress in a fillet weld
F wI
= allowable longitudinal shear stress in a fillet weld
F wu
= ultimate strength at a weld
F wy
= yield strength at a weld
F wv
= allowable shear stress at a weld
Fy
= yield strength
I
= moment of inertia
Iw
moment of inertia of area within one inch of any weld, about
neutral axis of section
Iy
moment of inertia about Y axis
]
= torsion constant
K
= end fixity factor
L
= length
= length in bearing of webs
N
R
= radius of curvature
Sx
section modulus about X axis
Sn
section modulus of net section
a
length of a panel
b
= bread th of flat element;
distance between fasteners
d
= web depth
e
= eccentricity;
end edge distance
f
minimum axial tension stress in service
fa
applied axial stress
fb
applied bending stress
g
= transverse gauge of fasteners
k
= factor representing end effect in bearing of webs;
ratio of filler thickness to bolt diameter
In
= factor to give slenderness ratio for local buckling;
number of lines of bolts
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-477-
14
radius of gyration
rv
rf
s
3. PLANS
3.1 Design Drawings
3.1.1 Design drawings shall show the complete design of the structure
with sizes, sections, and the relative locations of members. Plans shall be
drawn to a scale large enough to convey the information adequately.
3.1.2 Plans shall include data for the design loads, and the shears,
moments and axial forces to be resisted by all members and their connections,
as may be required for the proper preparation of the shop drawings.
3.1.3 The design drawings shall carry the name and, where applicable,
the professional seal of the purchaser's representative.
3.2 Erection Diagrams
3.2.1 Erection diagrams shall show the sizes and locations of all members and give complete locations and details for all attachments and
anchorages.
3.2.2 These diagrams shall show clearly the extent of all riveted,
bolted, or welded connections with welding symbols and all other details
necessary for erection.
3.3 Shop Drawings. Shop drawings, giving complete information necessary
for the fabrication of the component parts of the structure, including the
location, type and size, of all riveted, bolted, and welded connections, shall
be prepared in advance of the fabrication. They shall clearly distinguish
between shop and field rivets, bolts, and welds.
4. METHODS OF DESIGN
4.1 Elastic Analysis. This Standard is based on the determination of
stresses using elastic analysis, and safety is assured by limiting the levels
of these stresses.
-478-Copyright NRC-CNRC
p
THE STRUCTURAL USE OF ALUMINUM IN BUILDINGS
15
5.2 Dead Loads. The dead loads to be used in design shall consist of the
weight of the structure and all permanent stationary construction which
is to be supported thereby.
5.3 Live and Other Loads. The live loads are those due to use, traffic,
cranes, impact, snow, and rain, or any combination of these forces which can
act simultaneously_ Other loads are due to wind, seismic, or thermal effects.
All loads shall be those stipulated by the National Building Code of Canada,
or by the Building By-Laws under which the structure is being designed, or
those determined by the authority having jurisdiction.
5.4 Incidental Loads. In all members which may be subject to man loads,
provision shall be made for a vertical load of 300 pounds applied at any point.
5.6 Thermal Effects. Provision shall be made for thermal expansion and
contraction, or for the forces created where such thermal movements are
restrained, commensurate with the service conditions of the structure.
6. DEFLECTIONS
6.1 General. Deflection shall be limited by the function of the member, to
ensure satisfactory performance. Special consideration shall be given to
structural elements supporting machinery or other sources of shock and
vibration.
6.2 Limiting Deflections in General Building Structures
6.2.1 The deflection, under live load of beams, girders, or trusses, and
supporting floors, shall not exceed 1/200 of the span.
-479-Copyright NRC-CNRC
16
8. MATERIALS
8.1 Identification. Acceptability of aluminum alloy material shall be
judged on the basis of evidence of conformance to the relevant CSA Standard
of the HA Series, Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys. Temper designations
are those given in the CSA H.1 Series, Codes for Alloy and Temper Designations of the Non-Ferrous Metals and Alloys.
8.2 Alloys
8.2.1 If the alloys given in Clause 1.2.1 :ire to be employed, they shall be
supplied to one of the specifications in Clauses 8.2.2, 8.2.3, and 8.204.
8.2.2 Bar, rod, wire, and extruded shapes shall conform to CSA Standards, HA.5.SG11R-T6, or HA.5.GS10-T6.
8.2.3 Sheet or plate shall conform to CSA Standards HAo4.GSllN-T6,
HA.4.GM41-H12A, or HAA.GM41-H32A. HAo4.GM41-H12A plate shall
not be greater than 1.500 inches in thickness.
8.2.4 Drawn tubes shall conform to CSA Standards HA.7.GS11N-T6,
HA.7.SG11R-T6, or HA.7.GS10-T6.
8.2.5 Rivets and bolts shall conform to CSA Standard HA.6.GS11N-T6,
or other suitable alloy agreed to by the purchaser's representative.
8.2.6 Aluminum welding wire shall conform to CSA Standards HA.6.S5
or HA.6.GM50P.
8.3 Physical Properties. The following typical physical properties may be
used for all aluminum alloys covered by this Standard:
Unit weight
0.098 pound/cubic inch
0.000013rF
Co-efficient of linear thermal expansion
Modulus of elasticity
10,000 ksi
Shear modulus of elasticity
3,800 ksi
9. MATERIAL THICKNESS
9.1 Minimum Thickness. No limit is set on the minimum thickness of
material, as structural elements will seldom be economical in very light
gauge sheet.
NOTE:
Where the function demands thin material, CSA Standard S190, Design of Light
Gauge Aluminum Products, should be used.
-480-
17
This requires that the width-thickness ratio be not greater than:that given
below:
be
rd
b ~ 6
t "
Outstanding flanges
Ins
.a-
be
b ~ 16
Webs
E. ~
60
Tubes
.!3- ~
20
Cover plates
E. ~
16
t "
t "
d'6,
t '-;;:
t "
all
'6,
I
'6,
9.2.2 For higher width-thickness ratios than those given in Clause 9.2.1,
the allowable stress shall be reduced according to Clause 14.9.
S5
Je
10.1 General. The concept of gross and net sections applies to riveted and
bolted construction. The effect of welded construction is treated in
Clause 14.
:h
'd
s,
!y
Ie
)f
s.
h
t\
,f
t
where s
4g
longitudinal spacing (pitch) of any two successive holes
(inches)
transverse spacing (gauge) of the same two holes (inches)
The least net width so obtained shall be used in calculating the net section.
10.5 Size of Holes. In computing net section, the diameter of a hole shall
be taken as the actual hole diameter for drilled or reamed holes. In the case
of punched holes the diameter shall be assumed to be !{6 inch greater than
the actual diameter.
-481-Copyright NRC-CNRC
18
An/(l+ Ane)
Sn v
Single angles*
A n -2bt/3
Double angles * :
Connected to one side of the gusset
An - bt
Connected to each side of the gusset
An - bt/2
Channels fixed by the web
An - bt
where An = total net area of the member (see Clause 10.4) (inches2 )
b = width of outstanding leges) (inches)
t = leg thickness, in the case of double angles, the thickness
of one angle (inches)
e = eccen trici ty (inches)
.
first moment of area
shape factor of net sectIOn =
f
d I
sec IOn mo u us
This may be taken as 1.2 if no exact calculation is made.
Sn = section modulus of net section (inches3)
... The gauge line, i.e. distance from heel to fastener, must not exceed half the leg width. If detailing
requires a greater eccentricity, a further reduction in area must be made.
11.2 Welded Members. The effective areas of members connected eccentrically by welds shall, in general, be computed as in Clause 11.1 except that
the allowable stress shall be calculated using Clause 14.4.3.
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-482-
F
19
Kx
Ky
K z (Single angles)
I bolt
2 bolts
AB
-3-
AB
AC
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.5
Member
th
~71
I-kL--j
k>05
I t 2k
A/"'L
~7
ec
!/
:Ar-'
T
L
-L
~>O<
Lye
AS
I
A
L-
T
T
-L
AB
OA5
0.5
I
I AI'LV
cPr
A
~
e
AS
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.45
0.5
OA
0.45
~I
AS
0.35
I
-'-I
Clouse 14.10.6.2
CompresSion, T Tension, T" C
FIGURE 1
EFFECTIVE LENGTH OF STRUTS
slender~
13.3.2 For tension members not governed by Clause 13.3.1 the slender~
ness ratio shall not exceed:
250+20f
where f is the minimum axial stress (ksi) sustained by the member.
13.4 Torsional Vibration. Double angle members, being prone to torsional
vibration where subjected to wind forces, shall be proportioned such that:
bL < 1 200
t
'
where b = width of longer leg, measured from the root fillet (inches)
L
length of member (inches)
t = thickness of leg (inches)
20
14.3.2 For combinations of dead load with live load plus wind, or
seismic, or thermal effects, the allowable stresses in members and fasteners
may be increased by one third, provided that the section is not less than
that required by Clause 14.3.1.
14.3.3 For combinations of dead load with live load and thermal
effects, plus wind or seismic forces, the allowable stresses may be increased
by one half, provided that the section is not less than required by Clauses
14.3.1 or 14.3.2.
14.3.4 Stresses created during erection, which will not occur again in
the life of the building, may be as allowed by Clause 14.3.2.
14.4 Basic Allowable Stress in Tension and Compression (F)
14.4.1 Parent Metal
F
where F
Fy
1
t
21
where F wp
allowable mean stress (ksi)
Aw = area of cross-section within 1 inch of a weld (inches 2)
A = gross area (inches 2)
F = allowable stress in the parent metal, from Clause 14.4.1
(ksi)
Fw
allowable stress at a weld from Clause 14.4.2 (ksi)
+ 2/3 (F/5)3/2
(B p /BO)3j2
= 0.41 Bp/Dp
other alloys and tempers:
= F + (F/5)3j2
= (B/70)3/2
= 0.67 Bp/Dp
rounded off to the nearest 0.5 ksi.
= F
-485-Copyright NRC-CNRC
22
alloys which are not fully heat-treated. F wp is the minimum value in the
central 80 per cent of the length of the member given by:
F wp = F -
It (F -
F w)
.25"
II-
iii
20
en
LU
a:
Ien
;J
15
~
!XI
10
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
SLENDERNESS RATIO,).
FIGURE 2
CURVES FOR DETERMINING ALLOWABLE AXIAL STRESS FOR WELDED
COLUMNS FOR VARYING VALUES OF BASIC MEAN STRESS F wp
-486-Copyright NRC-CNRC
p
THE STRUCTURAL USE OF ALUMINUM IN BUILDINGS
the
eld,
.4.1
ion
)Us
ns:
~nt
23
)1/2
where Sx
5SxL
( (I y J)1/2
= section modulus of compression flange in plane of bending (inches3)
= moment of inertia normal to plane of bending (inches4)
= torsion constant (inches4 )
= unbraced length of beam (inches)
14.6.6 Beams Containing Welds. The bending stress at any crosssection containing a weld shall not exceed F wp as obtained in Clause 14.5.2.2,
augmented by the appropriate factor in Clause 14.6.1.
Where lateral buckling may occur, the slenderness ratios obtained from
Clauses 14.6.2,14.6.4, and 14.6.5 shall be used in conjunction with a buckling
formula obtained from Clause 14.5.2.2.
14.7 Shear (F v)
14.7.1 Shear stress in plates and shear stress due to torsion in tubes:
Parent metal: Fv = 0.4 F y or 0.3 F u whichever is the lesser.
Within 1 inch of a weld: F wv = O.4F wy or 0.3 F wu whichever is the lesser.
14.7.2 Rivets and bolts, across the shank or threaded area, as applicable:
Fv = 0.25 Fu
24
0.6 (Bp - Dp
d
t)
but not greater than the stress
>
C p, F v
3X10"
(d/t)2
5X10"
(a/t)2 (1
0.8 Fu
If the edge towards which the stress is directed is less than twice the fastener
diameter, D, the allowable stress shall be reduced in the ratio:
edge distance
2D
teN
+ kd)
2
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-488-
p
25
5 X 10'
(2 d/t)2
nor shall the stress obtained by dividing the load or reaction, by an area
of web given by:
t(N
kR)
exceed F from Clause 14.4.1 or 14.4.2.
where N = length of bearing (inches)
d
= clear web depth (inches)
t
= web thickness (inches)
R
radius of root fillet (inches)
k
= 1 where centre of bearing is less than (N
d)/2 from
the end of the member
= 2 when centre of bearing is greater than (N + d)/2 from
the end.
~ess
as
ler
;D
p,
l)
l)
)f
26
I
I
TABLE 3
ALLOWABLE STRESSES IN SELECTED ALLOYS
SGllR-T6
(Extrusions)
GSllN-T6
(Sheet and
Plate)
GM41-HllA*
GM41-H31A
(Sheet and
Plate)
GSlO-T6
(Extrusions)
Tension, F:
21
13
19
Compression, F:
21
13
16
24
0.165
60
14
0.075
79
18
0.13
91
26.5
0.19
57
15
0.08
77
20
0.15
87
Bending, Fb:
Structural Shapes
Tubes
Bars and Plates
23
25
27
14
15.5
17
Shear, Fv:
Plates in Shear and
Tubes in Torsion
Bars in Torsion
Rivets and Bolts
12
15
10
8
10
11
14
10
Bearing, Fp:
Bolts, Rivets and Pins
Direct Bearing
34
21
22
13
35
16
Welded Connections:
Butt "Velds:
Tension and Compression,
Fw
Shear, Fwv
10
6
Columns Bo
Do
Co
Plates
Bp
Dp
Cp
Fillet Welds:
Filler Alloy
Transverse, F wt
Longitudinal, F wi
*For
GM50P
10
7
Tens.
21
23
25
6
3.5
Compo
17.5
19
21
11
6.5
S5
8
6
F
THE STRUCTURAL USE OF ALUMINUM IN BUILDINGS
27
14.9.5 Tubes
14.9.5.1 The axial stress in a tube or other curved wall shall
not exceed that given by Clause 14.5.1.2 for a slenderness ratio:
A = 5.7 (R/t)lf2
where R = radius of curvature (inches)
t
thickness (inches)
14.9.5.2 For tubes in bending the allowable stress obtained
from Clause 14.9.5.1 may be multiplied by:
5).
for A < C p
where A is from Clause 14.9.5.1
and C p is from Clause 14.5.1.2.
-491-Copyright NRC-CNRC
28
+
where fa
fb
F
~ F
fb
(1 -i:) "
fb
~ 1
fa-) -..-:
Fb (1
Fe
where fa = applied axial stress (ksi)
fb = applied bending stress (ksi)
Fa = allowable ax~al stress for buckling as a column about the
weak axis from Clause 14.5.1.1 or 14.5.2.2 (ksi)
fa
Fa
* If advantage is taken
the value oJ F.
Fb
(i:r + (i:r ~
p
THE STRUCTURAL USE OF ALUMINUM IN BUILDINGS
29
Jy
he
.1
at
rlt
t:
1. Whenever possible prototype testing under cyclic loading to different levels or preferably under variable loot! patterns expected to occur in service, should be conducted.
2. See Appendix B for additional information on repeated stress fluctuation.
is
15.1.2 For riveted or bolted construction the stress on the net section
-of the tension flange shall be found by multiplying the stress on the gross
section by the ratio of the gross section of the tension flange to the net
section as given by Clause 10. In determining this ratio the tension flange
shall be considered to consist of the flange angles and cover plates plus
-one-sixth of the web.
15.1.3 For welded construction the stress in the flanges shall not
exceed the value of F wp given by Clause 14.5.2.2.
ficient fasteners or welds to develop fully the plate beyond the end of the
next outside coverplate. In outside coverplates there shall be sufficient
fasteners or welds to develop fully the plates in 1/3 of their length at each
end. In no case, however, shall the pitch exceed the values required by
Clauses 9.2.1 or 14.9.3 as applicable.
-493-Copyright NRC-CNRC
30
be used when computing the sectiorr modulus of the cross-section, but the
full web shall be included in the moment of inertia when calculating
deflection.
-494-Copyright NRC-CNRC
31
r,
1,
16.4.2 All horizontal shear forces between the concrete and aluminum
shall be transferred by the use of approved shear connectors.
is
;S
16.4.3 The design shall also take into account the stresses created
due to the difference in thermal expansion between aluminum and concrete, using established engineering principles and in accordance with
Clause 16.4.1.
11
'g
,t
e
e
s
,.
"
11
1
.1
e
t
,
r)0
r
)
)-
;.
;.
= Qa/(l -
~:)
17.3.2 The maximum spacing of lacing bars shall be such that the
ratio L/r for that portion of single flange between consecutive connections
shall not be greater than 0.75 of that of the member as a whole, about its
weaker axis.
17.3.3 The inclination of lacing bars to the axis of the member shall
not be less than 45 degrees.
-495-Copyright NRC-CNRC
32
Sy~tems,
and at each point where the system is interrupted. End tie plates shall have
a length not less than the perpendicular distance between the lines of
fasteners connecting them to the flanges. Tie plates shall have a thickness
not less than 1/50 of the distance between the connecting lines of fasteners.
17.4.2 Not less than two fasteners shall be used to attach the tie
plate to each flange.
17.5 Battens for Compression Members
17.5.1 When battens are used in a compression member, they shall be
provided at the ends of the member and at points where the member is
stayed in its length, and shall, as far as practicable, be spaced and proportioned uniformly throughout.
17.5.2 The spacing of battens shall be such that the slenderness ratio
of the individual members between battens is less than 0.75 of that of the
member as a whole about its weaker axis and the allowable stress for
buckling in the plane of the battens shall be given by Clause 14.5.1 using
a slenderness ratio:
KrL =
where L
r
a
rc
17.6 Battens for Tension Members. When battens are used to secure
the parts of built-up tension members, they shall conform to the requirements specified for battens on compression members, except that their
lengths may be two-thirds of those specified. The maximum spacing centreto-centre shall be such that the slenderness ratio for the individual members
-496-Copyright NRC-CNRC
33
does not exceed 0.75 of that for the member as a whole about its more
slender axis.
:s
;.
bers shall be made with aluminum rivets, steel or aluminum finished bolts,
or welds, except as otherwise noted in this Standard. Steel bolts shall be
used when steel and aluminum are to be joined together.
18.1.3 Other Fasteners. Other fasteners may be used at the discretion of the authority having jurisdiction.
)
.,.
)
34
19.3 Sharing of Load. Welds, rivets, and bolts shall not be called upon
to share load.
f'
THE STRUCTURAL USE OF ALUMINUM IN BUILDINGS
urn
"ess
pe,
ore
be
'ed
di~ts
ed
he
ed
ld
or
111
:t
:t
11
11
35
forces acting in conjunction with 75 per cent of the calculated dead load
stress and no gravity live load, if this condition will produce more tension
than will full dead load and live load applied.
20. TESTS
20.1 General. Tests are an acceptable alternative to calculation.
20.2 Prototype Structural Units
20.2.1 Structural test units shall be made from material produced
to the same specification, and fabricated in the same way and to the same
tolerances as proposed for the final structure. Samples of materials from the
lots used for expected critically stressed members shall be subjected to
tension tests in accordance with CSA Standard HA.1.3, or, alternatively,
material properties may be established from manufacturers' release notes
for the lots of materials involved.
-499-Copyright NRC-CNRC
36
23. FABRICATION
23.1 Handling. Care shall be taken in handling to prevent scratching or
nicking of the aluminum. When required, pieces of wood or other soft
material shall be inserted between the aluminum and contacting objects
such as steel slings, metal working tables, and the like.
Condensation may cause staining. When temperature and moisture conditions are suck
that condensation may occur, heated and ventilated storage should be provided, if suck
condensation stains would be objectionable.
23.3 Layout
23.3.1 Hole centres may be centre-punched and cut-off lines may be
punched or scribed. Centre-punching and scribing shall not be used where
such marks would remain on fabricated material.
f
THE STRUCTURAL USE OF ALUMINUM IN BUILDINGS
:; in
37
lec-
kinks or bends shall be cause for rejection. If heating is used, Clause 23.14
shall apply.
ub-
23.5 Cutting
23.5.1 Material of all thicknesses may be sawn. Shearing shall not
wed
>tal
'ess
lec-
:la-
lct
,IS-
lot
ng
or
)ft
:ts
required, unless specifically called for on the drawings, for plate thickness
Y2 inch or less. Planing or finishing of sheared edges may be required on
thicker plate. Edges of material cut by gas tungsten arc need not be dressed
if the edges are to be welded; otherwise at least Ys inch shall be removed.
23.6.2 The edges of all plates which transmit loads directly by edge
bearing shall be planed or milled. Compression joints of built-up members
depending upon contact bearing shall have the bearing surfaces machined
to a common plane after the members are completed.
23.6.3 The surface finish of bearing surfaces which are to come into
contact with each other shall meet the finish requirements of CSA Standard
B95, Surface Texture (Roughness, Waviness and Lay),
23.6.4 Compression joints which depend upon contact bearing, when
assembled in the shop, shall bear evenly with respect to the centroid of the
contact area. At least 75 per cent of the entire contact area shall be in full
bearing and the separation of any remaining portion shall not exceed 0.01
inch except adjacent to toes of flanges where a localized separation not
exceeding 0.025 inch is permissible.
23.6.5 The ends of members and lacing bars shall be neat and free
from burrs.
ch
ch
)e
re
.3
Ie
Ie
to the nearest ~ inch; holes for semi-finished bolts shall be bolt diameter
plus }82 inch for holes less than Y2 inch in diameter, and bolt diameter
plus Ks inch for holes ~ inch or more in diameter.
23.9 Assembly. All parts of riveted members shall be well pinned or bolted
and rigidly held together while riveting. Drifting done during assembling
of any connection shall not distort the metal or enlarge the holes.
-501-Copyright NRC-CNRC
38
23.10 Riveting
23.10.1 Aluminum rivets shall be driven cold using power riveters of
either compression or manually-operated type, employing pneumatic,
hydraulic, or electric power. After driving, they shall be tight and their
heads shall be in full contact with the surface. Special care shall be used in
driving rivets whose grip exceeds five diameters.
23.11.2 Metal arc welding with flux coated electrodes shall not be permitted.
23.11.3 Filler and electrode wire alloys shall be compatible with the
parent metal alloys.
23.11.4 Filler and electrode wire shall be stored in the unopened
original containers in a manner to prevent contamination by moisture and
other foreign substances. It shall be kept clean and dry at all times.
23.11.5 Shielding gases (argon and helium) shall be of welding grade.
23.11.6 All areas to be welded shall be clean, dry and free from burrs,
slivers, and crevices that could entrap foreign matter. Solvent degreasing
should extend sufficiently far back from the joint to avoid grease or other
foreign matter flowing back into the joint during welding. Scratch brushing
may be used to reduce the oxide film thickness just prior to welding.
23.11.7 All joints shall have the required edge preparation and joint
spacing and shall be jigged to maintain alignment during welding. Tack
welds used for jigging shall be fully penetrated and of good quality so that
they do not represent defects in the weld of which they become part.
23.11.8 All butt joints shall have full penetration. The reinforcement
beads shall be uniform and with smooth transition from bead to parent
metal. The bead height shall be limited to %2 inch for U inch material and
lighter, VB inch for V2 inch material, %2 inch for ~ inch material, and
~ inch for 1 inch material and thicker. Intermediate thicknesses may be
determined by interpolation.
23.11.9 Fillet welds shall be of the required size and shall avoid severe
concavity or convexity. They shall be fused to the joint faces and penetrate
to the root intersection.
23.11.10 All welds shall be free from cracks, lack of penetration, lack
of fusion and essentially free from porosity and undercutting.
23.11.11 Weld starts and stops shall be made with a technique which
eliminates lack of penetration and fusion at the start and a crater at the
stop.
-502-Copyright NRC-CNRC
f
r
1
39
23.15 Erection Marks. Starn ped erection marks shall not be used on
stressed parts of the member.
NOTE:
-503-Copyright NRC-CNRC
40
-504-Copyright NRC-CNRC
r
THE STRUCTURAL USE OF ALUMINUM IN BUILDINGS
41
sed
be
lch
nt,
alt
{et
all
od
or
Itnt
ne
'es
:;s,
I),
er
tlC
)ll
y,
;B
r-
[1-
)r
11
IS
).
n
'e
e
:s
e
e
.f
e
I
26. INSPECTION
26.1 General. lVlaterial and workmanship at all times shall be subject to
inspection by qualified inspectors representing the purchaser's representative or the authority having jurisdiction.
-505-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
42
work is being done. The inspector shall at all times co-operate with the
contractor in order to avoid undue delay in the fabrication or erection of
the structure.
26.4 Identification of Material. The contractor shall satisfy the purchaser's representative that the material used for the work meets the
requirements of this Standard. Where required by the purchaser's representative, the alloy and temper of aluminum material shall be marked on
components until such components are identified for erection purposes.
-506Copyright NRC-CNRC
43
APPENDIX A
EQUIVALENT ALUMINUM ALLOYS
le
)r
rle
eIn
NOTE:
CANADA
Commercial
HA.4
GSllN-T6
HA.5
SGllR-T6
HA.5
GSlO-T6
HA.4
GM41-HllA
-H32A
6061-T6
6351-T6
6063-T6
5083-H12A
or H32A
65S-T6
B51S-T6
50S-T6
D54S-HI2A
H32A
GREAT BRITAIN
BS (General Engineering)
HS20-WP
HE30WP
HV9-WP
NP8*
U.S.A.
ASTM,
AA and Commercial
6061-T6
6351-T6
6063-T6
5083-H321
Alcan (International)
FRANCE
AFNOR
A-SGM*
A-GS*
GERMANY
DIN
AIMgSi 1*
3.2315
ITALY
UNI
Pe/AISi 1
MgMn*
3571
Pe/AlSi 0.4
Mg*
3569
SWITZERLAND
VSM
AISiMg*
10850
Extrudal*
The temper and composition of these alloys is to be such that the mechanical properties are no'
inferior to those required by CSA for the materials they replace.
44
APPENDIX B
REPEATED STRESS FLUCTUATION
NOTE:
Bl. GENERAL
Bl.l Twenty thousand repetitions of maximum live load represents 2
load cycles every day for over 27 years, and 100,000 repetitions of
maximum live load represents 10 loading cycles every day for over
27 years.
The maximum design loading rarely occurs in the life of a structure.
However, where a structural member is subject to a very large number
of repeated loadings or load fluctuations the possibility arises of its
failure occurring at a nominal stress, usually tensile, appreciably lower
than that permissible for static loading. When they occur, fatigue
cracks generally originate at a point of high stress, such as are-entrant
corner or a weld bead.
Care should be taken to avoid induced vibrations at a natural frequency of a structure or structural member. Vibration can result
in a large number of cycles of stress in a relatively short time.
To design against fatigue calls for good practice based upon experience
and testing. Careful detailing and fabrication are of major importance;
alloy choice is of much less significance.
-508-Copyright NRC-CNRC
,.
....
-509-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-510Copyright NRC-CNRC
CONTENTS
List of Ivlembers of Committee on Light Gauge Aluminum Products. .
Page
5
STANDARD
1. Scope ....... , , , , "
8
8
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
12
12
12
13
14
14
14
15
9. Beams.... . . .. . . . . . . . . .. ..... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.1 Effective Section for Bending Strength.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
9.2 Deflection ........... , ........ , .... , .... " ........ "...
15
15
15
- 511-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
13
13
9.3
9.4
9.5
16
17
17
.
.
.
.
18
18
18
18
19
12. Flat
12.1
12.2
12.3
12.4
12.5
.
.
.
.
.
.
19
19
20
21
21
21
.
.
.
.
22
22
22
23
.
.
.
.
23
23
24
24
24
24
25
16. Flat
16.1
16.2
16.3
16.4
.
.
.
.
.
25
25
25
26
26
26
26
26
.
.
.
.
27
27
27
29
Appendix B
- 512Copyright NRC-CNRC
28
F
5
16
17
17
18
18
18
18
19
19
19
20
21
21
21
P.
J.
C. D. CARRUTHERS
J.
C. CLARK ..
L. G. JAEGER ..
22
D. JOSEPH ... .
22
22
G. P. KOENS ..... .
23
C. MARSH ....... .
23
23
J. STONEHEWER ....
24
]. G. SUTHERLAND ..
24
E. O. THOMAS.
H. L. LEVELT. .... .
A. N. SHERBOURNE
Company
of
Canada
24
24
25
25
25
2S
26
Z6
Z6
~6
!6
!7
!7
!7
!8
:9
- 513-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Ltd.,
PREFACE
Since the publication of the first edition of CSA Standard S157-1962, The
Structural Use of Aluminum in Buildings, it has been apparent that there was
a need for a second Standard which would apply to the many aluminum
products which are either extruded or formed from sheet whose shape is dictated primarily by function rather than structural requirements. This new
Standard thus supplements CSA Standard S157-1962 and where possible, the
methods in the two Standards are similar.
The material in this Standard has been drawn from many sources. Since
the exact theoretical calculation of post-buckling strengths is an extremely
difficult procedure, the over-riding consideration has been to achieve maximum
simplicity consistent with economy and structural adequacy.
This Standard was prepared by the Committee on Light Gauge Aluminum
Products, under the jurisdiction of the Sectional Committee on Structures and
was formally approved by these Committees and the CSA Technical Council.
OTTAWA, APRIL, 1968
NOTE:
REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS
This Publication makes reference to the following:
CSA Standards B33.1-1961
- Square and Hexagon Bolts and Nuts,
Studs, and Wrench Openings;
G40.2-1959
Structura I Rivet Steel;
G164-1965
Hot Dip Galvanizing of Irregularly Shaped
Articles;
HA Series-1968 - Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys;
S157-1962
- The Structural Use of Aluminum In
Buildings;
W47.2-1967
- Aluminum Welding Qualification Code;
ASTM * Standard A307-65
Low-Carbon Steel ExternaIlv and Internally Threaded Standard Fasteners.
*American Society for Testing and }vlaterials.
- 514-Copyright NRC-CNRC
-------...r--'
---""=-"-'-,,---
~~"'~"-"-~-'"~--
S190-1968
DESIGN OF LIGHT GAUGE
ALUMINUM PRODUCTS
1. SCOPE
1.1 This Standard shall apply to the structural design of light gauge
aluminum products, either extruded or formed from sheet, whose overall
dimensions are dictated by their practical function, and where load carrying
ability is a necessary consideration. The requirements relate typically to
webs and flanges with width to thickness ratios greater than 40 and 15
respectively.
1.2 The products falling within the field covered by this Standard include
such items as formed roofing and siding, floor decking, curtain wall panels,
shear panels, folded sheet structural trim, ducting, sandwich panels, vehicle
bodies, and shipping containers.
1.3 This Standard does not cover loadings, protection, fabrication or suitability of the materials for any intended application.
1.4 Where a requirement is not covered by this Standard, the relevant
Clause in CSA Standard S157-1962, The Structural Use of Aluminum in
Buildings, shall apply.
2. GENERAL
2.1 Buckling of a wall is not regarded as the equivalent of collapse and such
buckling may occur in the working range. If, because of some requirement
for flatness, this buckling cannot be tolerated, the working stress shall be
kept below that causing initial buckling (see Clause 12.1.1).
2.2 The aluminum alloys referred to in this Standard are not intended to
be exclusive but have been selected from those most likely to be employed;
the methods are applicable to any alloy.
2.3 The design expressions adopted in this Standard do not exclude the use
of more accurate treatments approved by the Engineer.
3. DEFINITIONS
3.1 The following definitions apply in this Standard:
Approved means approved by the Engineer;
Effective shape means a shape in which only the effective widths are
considered ;
- 515-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
4. MATERIALS
4.1 Sheet, Plate and Extrusions. Aluminum alloys shall conform to the
requirements of the pertinent CSA Standard of the HA Series-1968, Specifications for Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys (HA.4 and HA.S) and shall
preferably be selected from those given in Table 1. (See Appendix A for
equivalent alloy designations.)
TABLE 1
ALLOYS AND TEMPERS
Minimum Mechanical Properties
Ksf
Alloy. Temper
Parent Metal
Welded
F"
Fy
Fsu
F. y
FB
HAA.MCI0-H14
HA.4.MC10-H16
20
24
17
21
12
14
10
12
40 l
HAA.GM41-H llA
HA.4.GM41-H32
42
45
25
34
25
27
15
20
90
HAA.GR20-H32
HA.4.GR20-H34
31
34
23
26
19
20
HA.5.GSI0-T5
HA.5.GS10-T6C
22
26
16
21
42
38
Fu
Fy
F.u
14
38
18
23
14
15
62 }
68
25
10
15
13
16
10
13
44 ~
52 )
17
10
10
37
25
22
84
24
16
15
35
23
21
76
24
16
15
48
84 l
NOTE:
- 516-Copyright NRC-CNRC
10
RIVET ALLOYS
IS
Ksi
MelO
GM4l
GR20
or
GSlO
SGllR
GSll1\
Minhnum Ultimate
Shear Strenl!1th
Rivet Alloy
HA.6-
Parent Metal
HA.4- or HA.5-
990-F
10
GMSOR-F
GSI1P-T6A
24
20
GSllP-T6A
20
l-
II
r
4.3 Bolts. The aluminum alloy for bolts shall preferably be HA.6.GSllNT6, for which Fsu = 25 ksi.
4.4 Filler Wire. The aluminum alloy for filler wire in welds shall usually be
selected from those given in Table 3, which gives the filler alloy when joining
dissimilar alloys.
TABLE 3
FILLER ALLOYS
Minimum Ultimate Shear Strenl!1th
Filler Alloy
HA.6-
Parent Alloys
HA.4- or HA.5-
Ksl
Lonl!1ltudinal
Transverse
MelO
GM4l
GR20
to
\
GSIO
SGllR
GS111\
:\ OTE:
to
MelO
GM4l
GR20
GSlO
SGllR
GSll1\
GSlO
SGllR
GSl11\
GMSOR
18
24-
S5
15
20
4.5 Alternative Alloys. Where alloys other than those given in Clauses 4.1
to 4.4 are to be adopted, it shall be shown to the satisfaction of the Engineer
that their use in the particular design provides a margin of safety and
standard of performance not less than those provided for by this Standard.
- 517-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
10
6. ALLOWABLE STRESSES
6.1 General. The allowable stresses given are those applicable under the
worst combina tion of dead, live and im pact loading specified for the prod ucts.
These stresses may be used for vehicles and other products subjected to
dynamic loading, but care must be taken to ensure that re-entrant corners,
bends, changes of section, welded attachments, and other discontinuities do
not introduce serious stress-raisers that can lead to fatigue failures. Stresses
due to wind forces, or load combinations including wind, may be 33 per
cent higher.
6.2 Tension and Compression. The applied stres3 in tension on the net
cross-sectional area or in compression on the gross area shall not exceed the
applicable value given in Table 4. A safety factor of 1.65 on the guaranteed
yield strength or 2 on the guaranteed ultimate strength, whichever gives the
lesser stress, shall be employed for those alloys not included in Table . 1.
- 518-Copyright NRC-CNRC
r
11
TABLE 4
ALLOWABLE STRESSES, Ksi
Alloy
Tension
Compression
F
Shear
F.
Constants for
Bucklina Formulaet
Bearina*
FB
HA.4.MC10-H14
HA.4.MC10-H16
10
12
6
7
16
19
11
13
0.06
0.08
100
100
HA.4.GM41-H11A
HA.4.GM41-H32
15
21
9
12
24
34
17
25
0.12
0.215
100
80
HA.4.GR20-H32
HA.4.GR20-H34
14
16
8
10
22
26
16
18
0.11
0.13
100
100
HA.5.GSI0-TS
HA.S.GSI0-T6
10
13
6
8
16
21
11
14:
0.05
0.075
87
79
HA.S.SGI1R-T6
21
13
34
23
0.155
61
19
11
30
21
0.135
63
---
4
10
8
Rivets
Bolts
HA.6.990-F
HA.6.GMSOR-F
HA.6.GSll P-T6~\
HA.6.GSI1N-T6
-----
10
6.3 Shear. The applied shear stress shall not exceed the values given in
Table 4. For other alloys the allowable shear stress shall be taken as 60 per
cen t of the allowable tensile stress.
6.4 Bearing
6.4.1 The applied bearing stresses for bolts, rivets, and pins, shall not
exceed the values given in Table 4. For other alloys the allowable bearing
stress shall be taken as 1.6 times the allowable tensile stress.
6.4.2 The safe bearing stress given in Table 4 applies for compressive
loads, or for tension loads when the end distance, measured from the centre
of the hole to the end, is at least twice the fastener diameter. For lesser end
distances the safe bearing stress for tension loads is:
e
25
where e
= end distance, measured from the centre of the hole, not less
- 519-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
12
6.5.2 For other alloys the safety factors in Clause 6.2 shall be applied
to the welded strength.
6.5.3 The influence of welds parallel to the direction of stress may be
disregarded.
TABLE 5
ALLOWABLE STRESSES AT WELDED JOINTS
Tension
Compression
Shear
Ksi
Kst
Mel0
GM41
GR20
3
11
GSI0
SGllR
GS11N
10
10
4
6
6
Parent Alloys
HA.4- or HA.S-
TABLE 6
ALLOWABLE SHEAR STRESSES IN FILLET WELDS
Filler Alloy
HA.6-
Transverse
Shear
Lonlitudlnat
hear
Kst
Ksi
10
7,
GMSOR
S5
When welding MC10, GR20, and GS10 the shear stress in the parent
metal may govern.
For other filler alloys the safe shear stress shall not exceed the minimum
ultimate shear stress divided by 2.5.
6.7 Fasteners. The shear stress in a rivet or bolt shall not exceed the appropriate value given in Table 4. For other alloys and other types of fastener the
safe load shall give a safety factor of not less than 2.5 on the ultimate load
of the fastener.
(;)2+(i:)2 ~ 1
where f = applied tension or compression stress, ksi
f. = applied shear stress, ksi
F = allowable tension stress from Table 4, ksi
FII = allowable shear stress from Table 4, ksi
-520-Copyright NRC-CNRC
13
LiF<
7. TENSION MEMBERS
7.1 Net Width - Riveted or Bolted Joints. The net section for concentrically loaded members shall be the gross section minus the area removed
by the holes in line across the section.
In the case of a chain of holes extending across a part in any diagonal or
staggered line, the net width of the part shall be obtained by deducting from
the gross width the sum of the diameters of all the holes in the chain, and
adding, for each gauge space in the chain, the quantity:
S2
where s
e)
n
An/(1+A
Zn ll
An 2 wt/3
- 521-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
14
8. COMPRESSION MEMBERS
8.1 Struts Failing by Flexural Buckling. The allowable axial stress on
the effective area of a concentrically loaded strut shall be given by:
). < C, Fe = B-D)' :::; F
5 XI0 4
). > C, Fe -).-2where Fe
F
F+~y/2
( ~)3/2
D
80
C = 0.41 BID
For other tempers and other alloys:
2
B = F+-1 -
(F)3/
2 5
D =
(7~y/2
C = 0.67 BID
B shall be rounded down to the nearest 1 ksi
).
where
0 21+),22)1/2
),1 =
),2
r
J
15
where w
t
Sw
t
ft~<F
a,_
fa I-Fe
where fa. = mean axial stress, ksi
fb = bending stress due to eccentricity, ksi
Fe
5 X 104/).2
F = allowable stress from Table 4, ksi
8.4.2 Single Angles. Single equal leg angles and unequal leg angles
connected by the longer leg shall be proportioned such that:
9. BEAMS
9.1 Effective Section for Bending Strength. In a beam cross-section, the
width of flat walls subjected to uniform compressive stress shall be replaced
by an effective width (Clause 12.2); the thickness of walls subjected to a
stress varying from tension to compression shall be replaced by an effective
thickness (Clause 12.4.2). The section modulus of the effective section shall
be such that the maximum bending stress does not exceed the value given
i~ Table 4 for tension and compression.
16
A= w
t
V~l +k)
kips/inch
1-(i~y/3
k
=
~ ksi
wt'
thickness, inches
9.3.2.3 Stiffeners
9.3.2.3.1 If the web does not buckle, each stiffener shall
be designed to carry safely, acting as a strut equal in length to the web
depth, a load equal to the maximum shear force at the stiffener.
9.3.2.3.2 If buckling is permitted, then the stiffener shall
be designed to carry safely an axial load of:
F~wt+kV~
where Fs
shear buckling stress from Clause 9.3.2.1, kSl
V = maximum shear load at the stiffener, kips
a = stiffener spacing, inches
w = clear web depth, inches
k is from Clause 9.3.2.2
The effective length of the stiffener shall be taken as:
w
KL
[1+k2(3-2a/w) JI/2
-514-Copyright NRC-CNRC
17
,ksi
T
allowable compressive stress from Table 4 .
.-\t the ends of beams the load shall not exceed half the value given by
the above expression, or N t F, whichever is the lesser.
9.4.2 \Vhen radiused bends between web and flange are used to transmit
local loads, the load shall not exceed that given by Clause 9.4.1 reduced by:
R
10- per cent
t
9.5.2 Open Shapes. The compressive stress due to bending shall not
exceed the value obtained from Clause 8.1 using the slenderness ratio:
A=
0.8!::
ry
)!
_
Lt.
J1/4
[(4r yd +C
-515-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
18
In
the plane of
For angles and T's the expression for the slenderness ratio given in
Clause 9.5.1 shall be used.
Lateral restraint shall be provided at all points of loading; otherwise a
full analysis shall be made to show the stability of the system.
+f b/(I-;:) or (fa+fm)
whichever is greater,
where fmax = maximum compressive stress, which shall not exceed the
allowable stress for the material in prismatic beams or
for the chord in latticed beams, ksi
L~
= applied axial stress, ksi
fb = applied bending stress in the span. It is due to the
maximum moment in the span when the end moments
are zero, or the mid-span moment when end moments are
applied, but not less than half the maximum end moment,
ksi
fm = stress due to moment at a support, ksi
Fe
5 X 104;;'2 ksi
A = slenderness ratio for buckling in the plane of bending as
defined in Clause 8.1
10.2 Shear Load. The maximum shear load in the plane of bending shall
be given by:
Vmax V/(I-;:)
=
where V max = maximum shear force for which the member shall be
designed, kips
V
= applied shear load, kips
fa and Fe as in Clause 10.1
10.3 Beam - Columns Failing Laterally. When axial load and bending
moment cause failure by lateral buckling, the combination of stresses shall
be such that:
-516-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
?
19
where fa
applied. axial stress, ksi
Fa = axial stress to cause failure as a column about the weak
axis, ksi
fb
applied bending stress, ksi
F b bending stress to cause fateral buckling with the applied
moment distribution, ksi
Fe
5Xl0 4/),2
),
slenderness ratio for buckling in the plane of the applied
moment, as defined in Clause 8.1
11. MEMBRANES
11.1 A flat panel carrying a uniformly distributed load normal to its surface,
and acting as a membrane, shall be designed
fastening, can resist safely a force given by:
Circular plates
so
4.5t(~y/3 kips/inch
< b,
inches
TABLE 8
V ALUES OF m FOR LOCAL BUCKLING
Ed~e
support
(a)
(b)
2.9
0----0
1.6
-527-
(d)
(c)
I"".:
...,
1.4
~
1.2
Copyright NRC-CNRC
20
12.1.2 When the applied stress is greater than one half the critical
value obtained by Clause 12.1.1, then Clause 12.2 shall be satisfied.
12.1.3 Where the wall is part of a shape the values of m shall be
taken as:
webs
1.5
flanges 4 ..
< 2bt
~ > 2;,
h fectlve
f'
tee
WI'd t h'IS
t
thickness, inches
m is from Clause 12.1.3
The stress caused by the applied load on this effective width shall not
exceed the allowable compressive stress from Table 4.
The safe load obtained represents one half the ultimate load, and local
buckling may occur in the working range (see Clause 2.1).
TABLE 9
LIMITING WIDTH TO THICKNESS RATIOS
bit
Webs
Flanlle&
hit
Webs
MC1O-H14
MC10-H16
33
29
13
11
55
50
Gl\I41-H11A
GM41-H32
26
23
10
8
45
38
GR20-H32
GR20-H34
27
26
10
10
46
43
GS10-T5
GS10-T6
SG11R-T6
GS11N-T6
40
33
27
28
15
13
10
11
55
48
38
40
Alloy, Temper
B F
The effective width of webs shall be distributed equally between the supported edges.
The effective width of flanges shall be adjacent to the supported edge.
- 528Copyright NRC-CNRC
p
DESIGN OF LIGIIT GAUGE ALUMINUM PRODUCTS
21
al
)e
which causes local buckling of the walls, the gross section shall be assumed
to be active.
1-
12.3.2 Any flat wall in a column section which buckles at a stress less
than the applied axial stress shall be replaced by its effective width as
obtained using Clause 12.2 and the section properties shall be computed
using the resulting effective section. The applied stress on the effective
section shall not exceed the value obtained using Clause 8.1.
12.4 Effective Section, Bending
12.4.1 The elements of beams subjected to uniform compressive stress
shall be treated as walls in columns (Clause 12.2).
12.4.2 1n those walls of a section in which the stress varies from tension
to compression, the breadth of the wall shall be maintained, but the thickness shall be reduced in the ratio:
te = 3 X 10 < 1
t
F(h/t)2 where te = effective thickness, inches
t = wall thickness, inches
F = allowable compressive stress from Table 4, ksi
h = distance from the neutral axis to the extreme compressive
fibre, inches
For values of h/t less than those given in Table 9 no reduction need
be made.
4
1.5
m = 4
). =
Copyright NRC-CNRC
22
stiffened sheet
A=
formed sheet
1.3~(11r)1/2
r t
where L = panel length, inches
w = panel width, inches
I = moment of inertia of the stiffened panel per unit width,
inches4 jinch
r
radius of gyration of the cross section, inches
11 = ratio of deveJoped width to net width of the corrugated
profile
sheet thickness, inches
t
r
or A
1.3~( ~) 1/4
-530-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
p
DESIGN OF LIGIIT GAUGE ALUMINUM PRODUcrS
23
13.3 Shear Loading. The shear stress in a panel of stiffened or formed sheet,
shall not exceed 60 per cent of the value obtained from Clause 8.1 using
the slenderness ratio:
Stiffened sheet
a
A = 1.5 t{P/2
Formed sheet
A=
0.45~( ~y/2
fJ =
+ (R/t)1/2)
35
or A = ~
t
whichever is the
where R =
t =
w
lesser,
radius of curvature, inches
sheet thickness, inches
arc length of panel, inches
14.1.2 In shallow curved panels, where w < 4(Rt)1/2, the axial stress
shall not exceed that given by Clause 8.1 using the slenderness ratio:
Al
A = [ 1 + (At! A2)4 ]1/2
-531-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
24
3.3~
t
where Al
A2
a
w
1+(;)2
=
=
or 1.6w/t
whichever is the lesser
5. 7(R/t) 1/2
panel length in the direction of a generator, inches
arc length of the panel, inches
i > 3.3(~)1/2, A = 6~
i < 3.3(~)"'. , 3.3m"2(~r
=
where a
length of wall along a generator, inches
R = radius of curvature, inches
t = sheet thickness. inches
3 whichever is the
where R =
a
t =
lesser,
radius of curvature, inches
length of generator, inches
sheet thickness, inches
14.3.2 For a curved panel the slenderness ratio shall be given by:
Al
[1+(;")'J"
14.3.1
-532-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
25
where Al
a
r
air
length of wall between transverse stiffeners, inches
radius of gyration of stiffened sheet, inches
,1.2 = 5.7(1']R/t)1/2
= ratio of developed width to net width of formed profile
1']
The wall between stiffeners shall satisfy Clause 14.1.2, or shall be treated
as flat and use made of Clause 12.2.
Bending
f =
(tl +t2)W
M
dwt
where P
total axial load, kips
w
wid th of panel, inches
tl and t2
thicknesses of the two skins, inches
d
= overall thickness of the panel, inches
t
= thickness of the skin considered, inches
lVl
= total applied moment, kip inches
16.2 Panel
16.2.1
Bucklin~
2L
<
w, ),
-L)~3JI/2-
=--[- (
1 + 1.18w
> w,
A = 1.2(i
-533-Copyright NRC-CNRC
26
16.2.2 Flexible Cores. For flexible core materials the stress obtained
from Clause 16.2.1 shall be divided by:
1+ 2 Fet)
God
stress obtained by applying Clause 16.2.1, ksi
skin thickness, inches
panel thickness, inches
shear modulus of the core, ksi
(
where Fe =
t =
d =
Ge =
16.3 Skin Buckling. The stress in the skin due to axial load, bending
moment, or shear, shall not exceed the value obtained from Clause 8.1 using
a slenderness ratio of:
100
i.
-:-=---;;::-~
where Ee = elastic modulus of the core for stress normal to the surface,
ksi
G e = shear modulus of the core in a plane normal to the skin, ksi
Aluminum skins bonded to more rigid materials, such as timber or
honeycomb cellular cores, may be designed to the safe stress given in
Table 4, so long as the cell width, or the width in the direction of stress of
any unsupported area, does not exceed lOt in extent, where t is the skin
thickness. For larger unsupported areas Clause 12.2 shall apply.
16.4.2 Tension. The ultimate strength of the bond between the skin
and core material, and the ultimate tensile strength of the core material
itself, for a direction of stress normal to the surface, shall not be less than:
3/2
500
kSl
272
f
DESIGN OF LIGHT GAUGE ALUMINUM PRODUCTS
27
-535-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
\II
Copyright NRC-CNRC
NIC
Great Britain
BSI
Hll
N3
3003
l\IC10
D3S
H32
N8
5083
GM41
D54S
H14,
H34
N4
5052
GR20
57S
H16
H9
6063
GS10
50S
T4
H30
6351
T5
H2O
6061
tThis is the customary filler alloy in the USA and can be assumed to have the same properties as GM50R.
tWas GSllR in CSA HA Series-1958.
6053
1\1
P
Great Britain
'vV
UH
~4H
>'2H
*Alcan is discontinuing the use of these designations and is adopting those of the Aluminum Association.
Tempers
1100
990
2S
USA
Aluminum Association
and ASTM
Canada
CSA - HA Series 1968
Alcan*
Alloys
WP
T6
N6
5356t
N21
4043
GM50R S5
33S
56S
Alloy designations accepted as equivalent to those given in this Standard. Composition and properties may not be identical
in all cases, and the allowable stresses may require some adjustment.
~OTE:
APPENDIX A
EQUIVALENT ALUMINUM ALLOYS
'=
:lI-
:lI-
:lI-
I!.":l
IX>
F
29
APPENDIX B
ALLOWABLE STRESSES IN COMPRESSION
(See Clause 8.1)
NOTE:
_ - - - - SG11RT6
_---GM41H32
GS11~-T6
GR20-HH
G~I.t 1-1-1 11:\ ~--..rP>r--.....pilk"""'r'-i
GR20-H32
GSIO-T6
~ICIO-HI6
10
Vi
GSIO-T5 - -
MCIOHI4--
:.::
of----!ir-"
~+----+--'
Q::
!;;
~~-+----r-~---+----~
-l
co
.(
-l
-l
.(
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
SLENDERNESS RATIO, A
-537-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
200
220
-538-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
- 539-Copyright NRC-CNRC
-540-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
f'
PART C
COl\1MENTARIES ON PART 4 OF THE NBC
The commentaries in this Part apply only to the size and occupancy classification of
buildings regulated by Part 4.
C1.
C2.
C3.
C4.
CS.
C6.
C7.
-541-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-542Copyright NRC-CNRC
r
SUPPLEMENT No. 4
COMMENTARY NO.1
WIND LOADS
by
A. G.
DAVENPORT
W. A.
DALGLIESH
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Reference Wind Speed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 544
Exposure Factor .............................................. 545
Gust Effect Factor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 546
Sample Calculation of Gust Effect Factor ........................ 547
Vortex Shedding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 548
Pressure Coefficien ts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 549
Rounded Structures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 549
Icing ......................................................... 549
Structural Members, Trusses ............................. " .... 550
Shielding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 550
Lateral Deflection of Tall Buildings Under Wind Loading .......... 550
Construction Stages ........................................... 550
References ................................................... 550
SUPPLEMENT No.4
COMMENTARY NO.1
WIND LOADS
by
A. G. Davenport and W. A. Dalgliesh
Three different approaches to the problem of determining design wind loads on buildings
are mentioned in Subsection 4.1.6., "Effects of Wind", of the 1970 edition of the National
Building Code(t).
The first approach, called "simple procedure", is similar to that in the 1965 and 1960
editions of the NBC. It is supplied along with numerical values for all the factors involved,
except for climatic data (given in Reference 2, the tables of which are contained in Part D
of this Supplement for the convenience of the user) and pressure coefficients (given in this
Commentary). This simple procedure gives approximately the same wind pressures and
suctions as the earlier editions and is intended for the majority of buildings for which wind
loading doe!'! not have a major effect on the structural design.
The two other approaches to wind load analysis are referred to in Article 4.1.6.2. of the
1970 NBC, where the designer is required to use either (a) special wind tunnel tests or
other experimental methods, or (b) a dynamic approach to the action of wind gusts to be
called "detailed procedure", whenever the building is likely to be susceptible to windinduced vibration. This may be true, for example, of tall and slender structures or doubly
cantilevered canopies, for which wind loading plays a major role in the structural design.
Background information on the need for, and development of, new and more accurate
methods of predicting wind loading effects on structures can be found in references 3, 4 and 5.
Special wind tunnel tests in which the relevant properties of the building plus immediate
surroundings and of the oncoming flow must be adequately represented are recommended
whenever the cost, the unusual nature of the building or site, or other such considerations
can justify the expense involved. For many cases for which the simple procedure is inadequate, however, there is still no clear indication of the need for a special wind tunnel test.
The third approach, the "detailed procedure", was devised(6) specifically for this intermediate category of wind loading problems, although it can be used in other situations if
its scope and limitations are recognized. The detailed procedure consists of a series of
calculations involving (i) the intensity of wind turbulence for the site as a function of
height and of the surface roughness of the surrounding terrain, and (ii) properties of the
building sllch as height, width, natural frequency of vibration and damping. The endproduct of the calculations is the gust effect factor, Cu, which is multiplied by the reference
wind pressure, g, and the exposure factor, CII , to give that static design pressure which
is expected to produce the same peak load effect as the actual turbulent wind for the
appropriate probability level. The format of the simple procedure in the NBC has been
arranged to permit an easy transition to this more detailed consideration of wind effects.
r
r
The Climatic Information Supplement (Supplement No.1) to the 1970 edition of the
NBC contains a description of the procedures followed in obtaining the reference wind
pressures, g, for three different levels of probability of being exceeded per year (1/10, 1/30
and 1/100), that is, the values commonly referred to as having return periods of 10, 30
-544-Copyright NRC-CNRC
--..
---------------~---'-"""."..
r-
"-'".".
and 100 years respectively. These values of q are tabulated in Supplement No.1 for many
Canadian locations along with other climatic design data; these tables are contained ir.
Part D of this Supplement for the convenience of the user. A reference giving more detail
on the choice of the conversion factor, C, from wind speed to velocity and a table for
converting from pressure in pounds per sq uare foot to speed in feet per second are also
supplied in Supplement No.1 to the NBC.
EXPOSURE FACTOR, C,
Simple Procedure
s
.1
I)
l,
)
s
1
1
e
r
In the simple procedure of the 1970 Code(l) the exposure factor, C., is exactly the same
as the old height factor, C", in the earlier editions of the Code. The name has been changed
to describe better the function of this factor when applied in the detailed analytical procedure where it reflects not only changes in wind speed with height, but also the effects of
variations in the surrounding terrain. For the simple procedure, CIS is based on the 1/5
power law which is appropriate for wind gust pressures in open terrain (1/10 power law for
wind gust speeds). The Wind gust referred to is thought to last about 3 to 5 seconds and to
represent a "parcel" of wind which is assumed effective over the whole of most ordinary
buildings.
Detailed Procedure
For the detailed procedure the exposure factor, CIS' is based on the mean wind speed
profile, which varies considerably depending on the general roughness of the terrain over
which the wind has been blowing before it reaches the building. This dependence on terrain
is much more significant than is the case for the gust speed profile, i.e., variation of gust
speed with height, and hence three categories have been established as follows.
Exposure A (open or standard exposure).--open level terrain with only scattered buildings, trees or other obstructions, open water or shorelines thereof. This is the exposure on
which the reference wind speeds are based.
C.
Z)O.28
= (30
' C"
~ 1. O.
(2)
Exposure B.-suburban and urban areas, wooded terrain, or centres of large towns.
CIS
Z)O.IiO
= 0.6 (60
' C. ~ 0.5.
(3)
CIS = 0.4
c~or72,
C"
0.4.
(4)
the height, Z, to the elevation in question; for the leeward face, C. is evaluated once at ~
the height, H, of the building.
Detailed Procedure
The calculation procedure for the gust effect factor, Cg , is given in detail below, including
a sample calculation of Cg worked out in complete detail. In the detailed procedure the
gust effect factor is the ratio of the expected peak loading effect to the mean loading effect.
Cg therefore makes allowances for the variable effectiveness of different sizes of gusts and
the load magnification effect caused by gusts in resonance with the structure vibrating as
a single-degree-of-freedom cantilever. Co is defined as follows:
Cg =1+g (;)
(6)
where
(T = standard deviation of total loading effect
M= mean value of total loading effect
g = peak factor of total loading effect.
The standard deviation divided by the mean, (T/M, is the "coefficient of variation" for the
total loading effect:
(7)
where
=a factor related to the surface roughness coefficient of the terrain
K
=0.08 for Exposure A
=0.10 for Exposure B
=0.14 for Exposure C
=exposure factor, previously defined, obtained from Figure C1-1
=background turbulence factor, obtained from Figure Cl-2 as a function of height
H and width D of the windward face of the structure
=size reduction factor, obtained from Figure C1-3 as a function of the ratio of
s
width D to height H of the windward face of the structure and the reduced
frequency.
F =gust energy ratio at the natural frequency of the structure, obtained from Figure
C1-4 as a function of the wave number (natural frequency (cycles/sec) divided
by mean wind speed Cft/sec) at height H of structure)
= critical damping ratio.
Suggested values for buildings are 0.01 for steel frames and 0.02 for reinforced concrete
frames. On the other hand, the critical damping ratio for welded steel stacks may go as
low as 0.001 for moderate amplitudes of displacement. Prestressed concrete structures
having no microcracks due to tension may also have very low values for structural damping.
The peak factor, g in Eqtiation (6), gives the number of standard deviations by which
the peak load effect is expected to exceed the mean load effect, and is given in Figure C1-S
as a function of the average fluctuation rate. The average fluctuation rate, U, can be estimated as follows:
(8)
\\'h,,;;:,"
1:,}
-546Copyright NRC-CNRC
r
Explanatory Notes Regarding q/J1. and g
The response of a tall, slender building to a randomly fluctuating force can be evaluated
rather simply by treating it as a rigid, spring~mounted cantilever whose dynamical properties are specified by a single natural frequency and an appropriate damping value. The
variance of the output quantity, or loadin~ effect, is the area under the spectrum of the
input quantity (the forcing function) after It has been multiplied by the transfer function.
The transfer function is the square of the wel1~known dynamic load magnification factor
for a one~degree~of-freedom oscillating mechanical system.
In the case of wind as the random input, the spectrum of the wind speed must first be
multiplied by another transfer function, called the "aerodynamic admittance function"
which in effect describes how the turbulence in the wind is modified by its encounter with
the building, at least insofar as its ability to produce a loading effect on the structure is
concerned.
For the purposes of calculating trIp., the spectrum of the wind speed is represented by an
algebraic expression based on observations of real wind. The aerodynamic admittance
function is also an algebraic expressi on, computedon the basis of somewhat simplified assumptions but appearing to be in reasonable agreement with the limited experimental
evidence at present available. The spectrum of wind speed is a function of frequency having
the shape of a rather broad hump (Figure Cl-4). The effect of the aerodynamic admittance
is to reduce the ordinates of the curve to the right of the hump more and more as the frequency increases. This is partly a reflection of the reduced effectiveness of small gusts in
loading a large area. The effect of the dynamic load magnification factor, or mechanical
admittance, is to create a new peak, or hump, centred at the natural frequency of the structure, usually well to the right of the broad peak which represents the maximum density
of input power of the wind.
The area under the loading effect spectrum, the square root of which is the coefficient
of variation trIp., is taken as the sum of two components: the area under the broad hump,
which must be integrated numerically for each structure, and the area under the resonance
peak, for which a single analytic expression is available. These components are represented
10 Equation (7) by Band sFI/3 respectively. The factor KICII can be thought of as scaling
the result for the appropriate input turbulence level. If resonance effects are small, then
sFI/3 will be small compared to the background turbulence B and vice versa. Note that
although CII is normally a function of height, in Equation (7) it is evaluated at a particular
height (usually H, the hei.vht of the building) and is treated as a single-valued parameter
for calculating CuIf this method for calculating Cu is used for buildings or parts of buildings that are not
well represented by the simple model of a rigid cantilever oscillating about a spring-mounted
base, additional sources of error will be introduced, although these are perhaps not very
important when resonance effects are small. In the absence of a more precise analysis the
present method can serve as a guide to the peak gust loading on buildings that are not
tall and slender, or even for windows or wall panels located on the windward sides of buildings. In considering a portion of the windward face, use the dimensions of the element
for D and H in Equations (7) and (8), the natural frequency of the element itself for no,
and the velocity Vz (where Z is the height of the element above ground) rather than VB,
the velocity at the top of the structure. Similarly, CII should in this case be evaluated at
height Z for Equation (7).
The peak factor, g, depends on the average number of times the mean value of the loading
effect is crossed during the averaging time of one hour (3600 seconds). The functional
relationship in Figure CI-5 was shown by Davenport(7) to hold when the probability distribution of the mean loading effect was normal (Gaussian).
As stated in Article 4.1.6.3. of the 1970 Code, structures must be able to withstand
partial, or unbalanced loading as well as the full design load. All structures, particularly
those susceptible to unbalanced loading due to wind, such as double overhang girders and
canopies, members subject to stress reversal, and structures with broad frontal area, should
be capable of withstanding the effects of a reduced dynamic factor equal to 0.75 Cu acting
over any portion of the structure.
Sample Calculation of Cg
To illustrate the calculation of a gust effect factor the following sample problem will be
worked in detail:
Required: To obtain the gust effect factor for a building with the following properties:
Height
- 600 ft
Whlth
-100ft
Depth
- 100 ft
Fundamental natural frequency
0.2 cps
Critical damping ratio
0.015
Terrain for site
Exposure B
Reference wind
at 30 ft open terrain 90 ft/sec.
(1/
~!Y-0-.1-0(-0-6-2-+-0-.-11-X-0-.2-8) = 0.375
,1.90'
p.
0.015
0.2
0.11 XO.28
= 0.17 5/sec.
"0.11 X 0.28 + 0.015 X 0.62
VORTEX SHEDDING
Slender exposed structural elements and tall slender cylindrical structures such as chimney
stacks, observation towers, and in some cases, high-rise buildings, should be designed to
resist the dynamic effects of vortex shedding. When the wind blows across a slender prismatic or cylindrical body, vortices are shed alternately from one side and then the other
giving rise to a fluctuating force acting at right angles to the wind direction along the length
of the body. A structure may be considered slender in this context if the ratio of height to
diameter exceeds 5. The frequency n of the vortex shedding and of the force fluctuations
is given by:
(9)
VD X 1~.
For bodies with angular sections such as a rectangular, rolled steel shape and the like,
S=0.15.
If the structure is free to oscillate in the plane normal to the wind, large oscillations
will develop when the vortex shedding frequency is resonant with the natural frequency
of the structure. The dynamic influence will be approximately equivalent to the influence
of a static force per unit height, FL, acting in the direction of oscillations:
FL=
0;/ C~ qcr
(10)
where
fJ
CL
qcr
For tapered stacks there is some reduction in the effective length over which thf> vortex
shedding forces act. If the diameter of a section of the stack at height Z is Dz then the
velocity at which vortices are shed from this section resonant with the structure is given
by the Equation (9), where n is set equation to the resonance frequency of the stack. The
-548-Copyright NRC-CNRC
F
height over which these resonant eddy sh~~ct(1mg forces then act is determined by the
of stack over which the diameter only changes
5 per cent from the value D z.
on tapered stacks the vortex excitation can take
over a range of wind velocities
sponding to the variation in diameter of the
For each velocity the fluctuation
only acts over a limited section of the stack.
PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS
Pressure coefficients are the non-dimensional
of ,,"ind-induced pressures on a buildthe wind speed that would be measured
ing to the dynamic pressure (velocity pressure)
(usually) at the top of the building in the undisturbed air stream. Pressures on the surfaces
of structures vary considerably with the shape. wind direction and the profile of the wind
velocity. Pressure coefficients are usually determined from wind tunnel experiments on
small-scale building models, although in a few recent instances measurements on full-scale
cases tha t these pressures be measurbuildings have been used directly. I t is essen tial in
ed in a wind tunnel in which the correct velocity
is simulated; experiments in uniform
flow can be highly misleading lU).
The pressure coefficients given in Figures Cl-6 to Cl-20 are all time-averaged values,
that is, they refer to the mean value of the pressure on a surface. In addition, all pressure
coefficients except the local pressure coefficients Cp '" usually represent a spatially averaged
pressure. The local maximum and minimum
acting over a small area are designated by Cp * and are appropriate for cladding
'I
)
Rounded Structures
For rounded structures (in contrast to sharp-edged structures) the pressures vary with
the wind velocity, depending on the Reynolds' number, Re. (defined following Eq. (9,
In Figures Cl-ll, Cl-12, Cl-15, and Cl-20, which have been translated and reproduced
from the Swiss
(10), the Reynolds' number is expressed by dvqwhere d is the diameter
of the sphere or
in feet and q is the velocity pressure in pounds per square foot.
To convert to R e, multiply dVq by 1.8 X 105
The roughness of rounded structures may be of
importance. Common
well-laid brickwork without parging can be considered as
a "moderately smooth"
surface (Figure C1-11). Surfaces with ribs projecting more than per cent of the diameter
are considered as "very rough". In case of doubt, it is recommended to use those Cn values
which result in the greater forces. For cylindrical and spherical objects with substantial
stiffening ribs, supports, and attached structural members,
pressure coefficients depend
on the type, location, and relative magnitude of these
Icin~
In locations where the strongest winds and icing may
members, cables and ropes must be calculated assuming an
and local experience. For the iced condition values of
wire cables for a "rough" surface should be used.
en
-549-
simultaneously. structural
covering based on climatic
in Table Cl-15 for thick
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Shielding,
For members that are located behind each other in the direction of the wind the shielding
effect may be taken into account. The windward member and those parts of the leeward
member that are not shielded should be designed with the full pressure q, whereas the
shielded parts of the leeward member should be designed with the reduced pressure lJ.z
according to Figure C1-18.
For constructions made from circular sections with dv'i< 2.5 and A./A ::::;;0.3, the shielding
factors can be taken by approximation from Figure C1-18. If dv'q>2.5, the shielding
effect is small and for a solidity ratio A./A ::::;;0.3, it can be taken into account by a constant
shielding factor k:r; =0.95.
(4rno2g~KSF).1
ell
C.13
(11)
where
A
.1
CII
no
Cg
CONSTRUCTION STAGES
It should also be noted that the shape of a structure may change during erection. The
wind loads, therefore, may be temporarily higher during erection than after completion
of the structure(13). These increased wind loads should be taken into account using the
appropriate coefficients from Figures C1-6 to C1-20.
References
(1) National Building Code of Canada, 1970. National Research Council of Canada
Associate Committee on the National Building Code, Ottawa, NRC No. 11246.
(2) Climatic Information for Building Design in Canada. Supplement No.1 to the Na
tional Building Code of Canada, 1970. National Research Council of Canada,
Associate Committee on the National Building Code, Ottawa, NRC 11153.
(3) Dalgliesh, W. A. and \V. R. Schriever. Recent Research on Wind Forces on Tall
Buildings. Proc., Canadian Structural Engineering Conference, Toronto, 19/20
February 1968, University of Toronto Press.
-550-Copyright NRC-CNRC
s
s
s
s
gj
5
5
(4) Davenport, A. G. New Approaches to the Design of Structures Against Wind Action.
Proc., Canadian Structural Engineering Conference, Toronto, 19/20 February
1968, University of Toronto Press.
(5) Proceedings, International Research Seminar on Wind Effects on Buildings and
Structures. Ottawa, 1967-published September 1968 by University of Toronto
Press.
(6) Davenport, A. G. Gust Loading Factors. Journal Structural Division, Proc., Am.
Soc. Civ. Engrs., Vol. 93, June 1967, pp. 12-34.
(7) Davenport, A. G. Note on the Distribution of the Largest Value of a Random Function
with Application to Gust Loading. Proc., Institution Civil Engineers, Vol. 28,
June 1964, p. 187-196. London.
(8) Jensen, M. and N. Franck. Model Scale Tests in Turbulent Wind, Part II. Danish
Technical Press, Copenhagen, 1965.
(9) Leutheusser, H. J. and W. D. Baines. Similitude Problems in Building Aerodynamics.
Journal of Hydraulics Division, Proc., Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., Vol. 93, May 1967,
p.35-49.
(10) Normen fur die Belastungsannehmen, die Inbetriebnahme und die Uberwachung
der Bauten. (Standards for Load Assumptions, Acceptance and Inspection of
Structures). Schweizerischer Ingenieur und Architekten Verein (Swiss Association
of Engineers and Architects), No. 160, Zurich, Switzerland, 1956.
(11) Chang, F. K. Wind and Movement in Tall Buildings. Civil Engineering, Am. Soc.
Civ. Engrs., VoL 37, p. 70-72, August 1967.
(12) Vossers, G. Fundamentals of the Behaviour of Ships in \Vaves. International Shipbuilding Progress, VoL 9, No. 93, May 1962, p. 197-230.
(13):;"Walshe, D. E. Measurements of Wind Force"on a Model of a Power Station Boiler
House at Various Stages of Erection. National Physical Laboratory, NPL Aero
Report 1165, September 1965, Teddington, England.
-551-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
1000
800
300
c; 200
0:::
(.!)
>
0
al
<
I::J:
(.!)
L!.I
:I:
II
100
80
"
it J
E~
BV r{
~/'
~
J
II
1/
60
50
40
III
II ,
II
1/
EXPOSURE C, V
0
LI.I
V~
I
/
;::)
,. III I
till
U-
600
500
400
I-
I
I
IJ
"
..l
I~~
30
I
20
1-11-1-
10
1
.2
.3.4.5.6.81
10
EXPOSURE FACTOR, Ce
Figure Cl-l
-552-Copyright NRC-CNRC
r
1000 ~~=4~+=~~==~=r==c=~~==~~~~
:::
500
400
I-
u....
,,"""~----'3I1r+-->!r-+
~~~~~~~+-~~
~XO~ ][,
:,>4/3]
dx
--__~--__--r__T--~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~--+--4--~--r--+--~~--~
200
U.I
0:::
:::>
I-
:::>
0:::
l-
100
V')
u....
0
80
I-
:c
<.!)
60
U.I
:c
50
40
30
20
10 ~~--~~--~--~~--~~--~--~~~~~~~
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
BACKGROUND TURBULENCE FACTOR, B
Figure Cl-2
-553-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
...I
VI
VI
Copyright NRC-CNRC
0::::
I.I.J
U
:::J
I.I.J
LL..
0::::
I.I.J
C1
:::J
I.I.J
:z
>-
c:
xl >:1:
. 002
1'-..
~-..
.02 .03
I"
f'
1'",-
"'~
~,
"'~
'\
""\.
I,
.2
I"r\ 1\
\.
,
"
.3 .4.5.7
~~
1"-
i\ ~~
~\ ~ ~ ~~
'"
"I"
I\.
"
,
1\
"~ r\~
"I\..
"-"~
1"'-
'""-"" "
~~
~r\.
I"
,
,
i ' '"
""" , ""
,q~
... ,
.05.07.1
"-
"',,-
"-
"'"'
O.~ ~
f'
.007.01
~"
I~
"" ~
r"""
",
Size reduction factor as a function of width, height and reduced frequency of structure
. 004
'" '""
1.0
""~
1BnoH ] [
110noD ]
1+~
1+v;-
r--~
~""
'"
~""
"'
,
"
"" 'OS
=~.~
~t....
I' ~t....
~,
.... ~
D/H
"'
s-~[
- 3
.... ~
'-
,~
'" ~
Figure Cl-3
'"
1
.001
.2
.3
5
4
1.
2.
3.
5.
4.
1.0
VI
VI
VI
Copyright NRC-CNRC
.2
07
.0
.0
.0
"
~".
10- 4
~. 04
t;; . 05
I...L.I
~.
e::::
(!)
>- 1
<
e::::
I-
LL...
.3
.5
.4
.7
1.0
1/ ",...
vl~
x2 )
4/3
"'-
""'11110.
"--..
nO/VH
8 10- 2
"
WAVES/FT,
WAVE NUMBER,
8 10- 3
, -..-,
"- ..
(4000 no/V H )
(1 +
Figure C14
Xo
F ..
x2
-- "'-
'"
-~ '--.
u:um.:uon
8 10- 1
'-II
'-II
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Cl
a..
LLJ
:::.::::
LI...
IU
e::::
. 02
1.0
2. 0
3. 0
4. 0
5.0
6. 0
. 04
...
-- e
.4
.6.81.0
2.
Figure Cl-5
f 17 tttt
tts -
'Mitome - '-c?'''
4.
6.
f"'>f.tr*,*Hn\Jt.J"'&flli[WiWbM'1#t::fttiMt&ir-ifli,Wryw:*'!lii"'i,(fuMt')&;Y\f2-ftt~k\TM'- -ill,,-Fffl'';:%hNt-i-39>it%'!t1:iiMXft+'
.2
'-'
..
0.577
)2 log v T +
e
/2 log 1.IT
...-
T = 3600 sec.
------
.06.08.1
-I.-
----t
Cp
+0.7
ELEVATION OF BUILDING
+0.8
+0.4
o
-0.4
0..
(..)
-0.8
~O.'6,
I~""""y
1.0 tan a,
rise
run
~ c1 varies dependi ng on
surroundings - roof
should be checked for
the range of pressures
and suctions indicated
by the shaded area
-1. 2
-1. 6
Figure Cl-6
-557-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Cp
-1.0
-0.5
CP '" 0.8
'-..-----~r=======~--~-------~
ELEVATION OF BUILDING
Figure Cl-7
Cp
-0.7
- O. 7
l~
0.1 D
.1
l.
INTERIOR PRESSURES
Cpi
+0. 7
-0.5
wa II.
Figure Cl-8
3.
-0.7
4.
-0. 3
End wall pressure coefficients, local suction maxima on the roof, and
interior pressures for use with Figures Cl-6 and Cl-7
-559-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
20
CLOSED PASSAGE
BETWEEN LARGE WALLS
n:b:l : 1:1:10
EXTERNAL PRESSURE
COEFFICIENTS
pe
C .: INTERNAL PRESSURE
pl
COEFFICIENTS
=0
OPENINGS
Figure Cl-9
2I
FREE STANDING
PLATES, WALLS
AND BILLBOARDS
Uniformly distributed
-0,5
+0,7
-1. 1
-1. 3
' q. h L
n
- FORCE COEFF. FOR
F n ::: C
C
P-i
EI;gl/hct
~fn fi1
n
WALLS ABOVE GROUND
l/h
-0
a :::. sl
10+00
End wAils)
2.,0
=40
a :::. 3L
10
1.3
1. IS
1.6
=SO
a =, 4L
1.8
h~/h=l
l/h
&~d::;
10
L I p :::0
1 2.
1. Z. 1. 1
IFn I
a=.SL
I
0.1.
f:> =40
r-a =, 3L
I, 5
~~
~p~=5=0~r---+---~~
~
.a =.4L
1.5
Figure Cl-l0
-560-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
22
d.h
F
C n q C e A where A
C , FORCE COEFFICIENT FOR
d,/7f>25
n
Slenderness hid
--II"'
2.S
7
1
Cn
Cn
Cn
Cross sect. and roughness
TOTAL FORCE
CYLINDERS,
CHIMNEYS,
TANKS
hid. 25
Moderately smooth,
0.7
(metal, timber, concrete~
0.6
O.~
Rough surface
(rounded ribs h
0.9
O.S
0, 7
1.2.
1.0
O.S
1.4
1.2.
1.0
:0
~~ tliao~'",~i
. o
_
~
C'I
II
-I
('4
h"
~-cr
t-,..c:.3d
:0"
.r:
Pl
1=00:
,_
"
t+l
.-~.-
L /d ol=
50
Cpe
14
2.
C pe
C pe
= 2.%d)
d..rq> 2.5
+1.0 +0. sl+o. 1 -0,7 -1. 2. -1. 6 -1. 7 -1. 2.1-0. 7 -0. S -0.4
Stack fully operating C pi +0, 1
Cpl. ' q
Pi
-0,8
Stack throttled C pi
Pe C pe ' q
0.4
0.4
Ap
=Pi
- Pe
Figure Cl-11
23
SPHERES
F = C
TOTAL FORCE
for
dfq>
A=
rrt'Z
C n: FORCE COEFFICIENT
C
pe
0.2.
d {(l>
Figure Cl-12
1'2.
and moderately
smooth surface
Spheres
-561-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
,
I
24
.1
~b
if
A-~/BJ
/
0 ~
AN'
P
Q
ARE.A TO 5CALe
Figure Cl-13
25
C
L
P
A
B
D
M
0
Q
N
90 -0.3 -0.3 +0.9 -0.3 -0.8 -0.7 -0.5 -0.3 -0.1 -0.1
30 Section "m" C '" = -1. 8 with C pe "'min.
-2.5
oe
"c"
D
5I1AD.E.D
30 +0.6 -0.3 +0.2 -0.4 -0,1 -0.4 -0.7 -0.9 -0.7 -0.4
y~~]
O +0.7 -0,2 -0,3 -0, 3 -0.1 -0,5 -0.8 -0.8 -0.4 -0. 1
.L ~ ~ G!~ J-k'fQQh
- 0.1
-1.5
+0.6
+0.7
+ O. 8
+0.4
-'it"- 01 d
Fn~
,fr!ll
~~
...!!:..
pe
q' C
C
pe
external pressure
coefficient
-1. 0
dZ
Figure Cl-14
-562-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
POLES, RODS
26
a WIRES
l/d >100
C: FORCE COEFFICIENTS
n
d-Iq
<2.5 >25
= d
.,
0
Figure CI-1S
STRUCTURAL MEMeERS
SINGLE a ASSEMeLED
SECTIONS
27
L =
Length of member
and C
+Ft.
0_
=;?-
+F~
t.
k CtcoqCeA
,~
h -!-42.43h
+Z.O
-1. 9
-Z.O
80 -Z.O +0.1
-1.4
~ +Ft
if+Ft.
1JJE+ n oojI~
~y
,h ~
O!4~h
~
C
too
noc
tZ.05
too
1f+Ft.
t+Ft.
1f+Ft
noo
+1. 6
-+/1+-
f.:h-J
olh
too
0
noo
O'Sh
too
+Z.O
+1. 9
noc>
+Z.1
+0.1
too
nca
too
+Z.O
1+0.75
+Z.O
//
DO~
I. l .I~
r ex:
Figure Cl-16
+0.4
0_,
2: 0. 5
+0.9
+0.6
+Z.4 -1. 6
~+F.
~-I~ 0011~ o~~~
-t+
90
For slenderness,
hOC i. to b . . . ,d,
-1. 6 +Z. 1 ~
*+Ft
+Z.Z
_
t
0
noo
toO
0
+Z.05
+Z. 1 +1. 8 +0.85 +0.85 +1.5 -0. 1 +1. Z +0.9 +1. 85 +0.6
-0.1
o +1.4
no<>
35 -1. 8
00
1t
ibJ 0>13*
-UfO'lh
~Ih
O45h
/lh
90 +Z.O +1.7
1.1
+Ft
~
o"1L!~ O~h+~Fnc:t>
OC C n
1.3
+Ft
C
C
C
C
C
C
too
nco
no<> too
too
no<>
nO<:! ~too
0" +1. 9 +0.95 +1. 8 +1.8 +1. 7'"' +0.1 +1. 6
0
0/
0.9
k. CnooqCeA
11 F hFti
1.Z
too
+~h
oc.
0.7
= Area
Tangential force
noo
0.5
l.Z
l.Z
Fn
llha:
k
10
ZO
35
50
100
00
PLANE TRUS'E'
28
MADE FROM
SHARP-EDGED SECTIONS
= Section area
.L
A =h
t
A / A = Solidity ratio
s
For wind normal to surface A: Normal force F =k C
n
n
I[Q]~ ~l2JI~t
lC
noo
o.
1 O. 15
0.2
SHIELDING
~r~r
t>'I.
..:-
~ 0.25
2.0
i. t>q
20
50
00
1.0
1.0
SHIELDING FACTOR
~ 0.1
PLANE 01
MEMBER II
qx =k x . q
0.5
ht
FACTORS
PLANE OF
MEMBER I
~Fn
03 to
Figure Cl-17
29
. q. C e As
.1
l
D
AYA
00
0.2 p.3
0.4 0.5
0.6 0.8
0
1.0
0
Figure Cl-18
Shielding factors
-564-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
30
~~~;:R A:~I;~:~E
Length of bridge
WITHOUT VEHICLES
CASE I
lB
It
1~ F,
ht
F d
~
Windward girder F I
k C
Leeward girder FU
k C
= Length
:at.
't
.. - ~ ~~
~F.
hv
Do
lB
=h
.
vl
k C
v
q' As
noo
Leeward girder FII = k C
' kxq As
noo
Deck horiz. load
=1.l q' d'
B
0.8. q. b.L
Deck vert, load F
vert.
B
Traffic load F
=C qA
n
1
vI
F
C . 2/3 q A2
n
v2
l
~lhv~ ~ ~
e4~;j
Fvert
Cn
Railway vehicle
1l. S'
1.S
Highway vehicle
10.0'
l.l
5.6'
1.0
Pedestrian
Figure Cl-19
31
q' A
0' vohiel., Al = h vI l v ,
Windward girder FI
~ WITH VEHICLES
q'
0.6 q' b . LB
ver~
. k
noo
= 1.0
q' As
noO
or h L
length of member
= angle formed by wind direction and the
normal to member axis
k x - a function of A/A and x/b
THREE - DIMENSIONAL
TRUSSES
AsiA ~ 03
L = true
f'
L Fm
FORCE ON MEMBER
m
F m = k Coo~ q. C e' Acos ~
(Shielded member F
k
oot3 :
Coeff.
Coef.
Coo
m
kxq
Coo~'
Ce'AcoS~)
:: k\3' C
and \.,.C
noo
too
,k, kx: SEE FIG. Cl-16 FOR C n oe and C too
values
ROUND MEM6E.~S, SMOOTH ROUND ME.M6ERS, MOI1EI\AULY
4~OUGH SU~J!ACf..S d C!. <'2'5 511100TH SURFACES d,[q >2'5
k" Coo
kx
Coo
kx
1. 00
ISO
0.98
See
See
See
O. 58
0.9
Fig.
0.53
for
Cl-16
30
0.93
Fig.
Fig.
4S
0.88
CI-l6
C1-l6
60
0,80
0.95
OlStant
0.4l %=l5
0.l8
Figure Cl-20
Three-dimensional trusses
-565-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-566-Copyright NRC-CNRC
r
NBC OF CANADA, 1970
SUPPLEMENT No. 4
COMMENTARY NO.2
SNOW LOADS
by
W. R.
SCHRIEVER AND
D. A.
LUTES
PETER
formerly with
Building Structures Section
Division of Building Research
National Research Council of Canada
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Variations of Snow Loads on the Ground and on Roofs ............ 568
Design Roof Loads in the National Building Code ................ 570
Determination of Design Snow Loads on Roofs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 570
Detailed Explanations of Figures C2-1 to C2-9 ... ................ 571
References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 573
-567-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
SUPPLEMENT No. 4
COMMENTARY NO.2
SNOW LOADS
by
W. R.
SCHRIEVER,
D. A.
LUTES, AND
B. G. \V.
PETER
Climate Variation
The wide climate variations existing in Canada produce wide variation in snow load
conditions across the country. Coastal regions (both Atlantic and Pacific), because of
frequent thaws during the winter, are usually characterized by snow loads of short duration,
often caused by a single storm. The mountainous regions of British Columbia and Alberta
experience the heaviest snow loads in the country, lasting the entire winter and varying
considerably with elevation. Prairie and northern regions have very cold winters, with
small annual snowfalls; owing to frequent strong winds there is considerable drifting of
snow both on roofs and on the ground. Finally, the central region, including Ontario and
Quebec, is marked by varying winds and snowfalls, and sufficiently low temperatures in
many places to allow snow accumulation all winter. In this area high uniform loads as
well as high drift loads occur.
-568-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
T
Effect of Wind on Snow Accumulation on Roofs
In perfectly calm weather falling snow would cover roofs and the ground with a uniform
blanket of snow. If this calm continued, the snow cover would remain undisturbed and
the prediction of roof loads would be relatively simple; the design snow load could be
considered as a uniformly distributed load and equal to a suitable statistical maximum
of the ground snow load.
Truly uniform loading conditions, however, are rare and have been observed only in
certain areas of the British Columbia mountains and occasionally in other areas on roofs
that are well sheltered on all sides by high trees. In most regions snowfalls are accompanied
or followed by winds. Snowflakes, having a large surface area for their weight, are easily
transported horizontally by the wind. Consequently since many roofs are well exposed to
the wind little snow will accumulate on them.
Over certain parts of roofs the wind speed will be slowed down sufficiently to let the
snow "drop out" and accumulate in drifts. This can be visualized by reference to the action
of snow fences which cause the snow to "settle out". These areas on roofs could be called
"areas of aerodynamic shade", and occur mostly behind vertical projections on the roof.
An example of this is the area behind a penthouse on a flat roof where drifts often accumulate. Naturally, since the wind direction is not always the same drifts on all sides of a
penthouse would generally have to be considered.
Lean-to roofs, i.e., roofs situated below an adjacent higher roof, are particularly susceptible to heavy drift loads because the upper roof can provide a large supply of snow.
Canopies, balconies and porches also fall into this category. The drift loads that accumulate
on such roofs often reach a multiple of the ground load and depend mainly on the difference
of elevation of the two roofs and on the size of the upper roof. The distribution of load depends on the shape of these drifts which varies from a triangular cross-section (with the
greatest depth nearest to the higher roof) to a more or less uniform depth.
Flat roofs with projections such as penthouses or parapet walls often experience triangular
snow accumulations that reach the top of the projections on the building, but usually the
magnitude of the load is less than on lean-to roofs.
Peaked and curved roofs subjected to winds at approximately right angles to the ridge
provide aerodynamic shade over the leeward slope. This sometimes leads to heavy unbalanced loads, since most of the snow is blown from the windward slope to the leeward
slope, producing loads that exceed the ground load on occasions. Curved roofs show similar
or even more unbalanced distributions (little snow on top and heavy snow near the base
of the arch). On the other hand it is true that many small peaked roofs on residences, in
exposed areas, usually (but not always) accumulate little snow compared with that on
the ground.
Meltin~
Snow
Redistribution of snow load can occur not only as a result of wind action. On sloped
roofs there are two problems connected with the melting of snow at temperatures slightly
below freezing. Firstly, melt water can refreeze on eaves and cause high ice loads (also
water back-up under shingles). This can at least partly he solved by taking steps to decrease
the heat loss from the upper parts of the roof. Secondly, if a roof slopes and drains on to a
lower one, melt water sometimes accumulates by refreezing on the lower roof or it is retained
in the snow.
Since flat roofs in general do not provide as good drainage as that naturally obtained
with sloped roofs, snow and ice will remain on flat roofs longer than on sloped roofs. On
large flat roofs of industrial and commercial buildings, heavy loads are observed near projections such as air ducts (which sometimes act like snow fences in retaining snow). When
this snow melts it may drain into the lower areas in the centre of bays (i.e., areas of maximum
-569-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
deflection) because usually the drains are located at columns (high points). This redistribution of load causes further deflection and can lead to a very dangerous situation.
Snow Removal
Although it is fairly common practice in some areas to remove snow from roofs after
heavy snowfalls, the NBC does not allow a reduction of the design snow load to account
for this for the following reasons:
(a) Snow removal cannot be relied upon. Experience in several countries has shown that
during and after extreme snow storms traffic is at a standstill and snow removal crews
cannot be obtained.
(b) Snow cannot be effectively removed from the centre of large roofs.
(c) Unbalanced loading can occur as a result of snow removal from one side although
actually the NBC guards against this possibility by requiring each roof member and
roof structural assembly to be designed for full load on any portion of the area and
zero load on the remainder of the area.
I
I'
Historical Notes
In the past, e.g. in the 1953 National Building Code of Canada(2), design snow loads
were often considered to be equal to the ground snow load with reductions allowed for
sloped roofs only. Such design load values were admittedly rough and have resulted in
overdesign in some roofs while allowing underdesign in others, particularly in areas subject
to high drift load. Information on which to base a more refined assessment of the loads
was, however, not available until a countrywide survey of actual snow loads on roofs was
undertaken by the Division of Building Research with the help of many volunteer observers(3). This survey provided evidence on the relationship between ground and roof loads
and enabled the committees responsible for the 1960 revision of the National Building
Code (4) to make some changes in the roof loads compared with the ground load. The roof
load was set at 80 per cent of the ground load, the ground load being based on a return
period of 30 years and adjusted to allow for the increase in the load caused by rainwater
absorbed by the snow (see Ref. 5).
With the advent of the 1965 Code some further changes were made by the Revision
Committee on Structural Loads and Procedures which have led to a more rational approach
to snow loads for the design of roofs. All roof loads were directly related to the snow load
on the ground and consequently the column for the roof snow load in the table of Design
Data for Selected Locations in Canada in Supplement No.1 was omitted. The basic roof
load was again 80 per cent of the ground load except that for roofs exposed to the wind a
roof load of 60 per cent of the ground load could be used under certain conditions described
further below. This reduction of roof load for exposed roofs to 60 per cent of the ground
load was only made because at the same time allowance was made for a variety of influences
causing accumulations of snow loads on roofs. This was done by means of "snow load coefficients" or shape factors which are shown in the form of diagrams and simple formulae
in Figures C2-1 to C2-7. Explanations of the use of these coefficients are given in following
sections.
Chan~es
by the designer and the authority having jurisdiction to be more appropriate for the particular roof being designed and if based on applicable field observatlOns or on model tests.
In an effort to provide guidance to designers, the Division of Building Research has published a collection of case histories of interesting non-uniform snow loads(6),
Figures C2-! to C2-3 are for the basic roof shapes. These are the simple Bat and shed
roofs, simple gable and hip roofs and thirdly simple arch and curved roofs. These roofs
can be loosely classified as single span roofs. More complex roof shapes can then often be
considered as combinations of these three roofs shapes. The basic roof shapes can be either
combined with equal eave heights producing a valley or unequal eave heIghts resulting in
a multi-level roof.
Valleys in two-span and multi-span roofs lead to increased loads in the troughs from the
influence of the wind and, with steeper slopes, from sliding, creeping or melting snow.
Coefficients for valley areas are presented in Figure C2-4.
On multi-level roofs the areas on the lower roofs that are adjacent to the higher roofs
are subjected to heavier snow loads due to drifting. The coefficients for the increased load
on the lower level of multi-level roofs are provided in Figure C2-5.
Where the upper roof is sloped towards the lower roof so that snow may slide or melt
onto the lower roof, the lower roof should be designed for increased loads. This is specified
in Figure C2-6.
Finally, the snow load distribution is influenced by vertical projections. The coefficients
for this condition are provided in Figure C2-7.
Jt may be difficult for the designer in practice to make a clear distinction between those
roofs that will be fully exposed to the winds and those that will not. To guard against the
danger of a roof designed with the reduced coefficients becoming sheltered by future higher
building and causing possibly higher loads, it would be prudent for the designer to require
a distance of at least 15 ft from the property line to make the roof eligible for the reduction.
This corresponds to the distance used in Article 4.1.5.3. for multi-level roofs. It should be
noted that it is the designer's responsibility to use his own judgement in arriving at the
best possible design snow load assumption.
Where a roof has projections, such as parapet walls, the reduction of 25 per cent should
only be applied to roof areas that are relatively well exposed, i.e. those areas that lie outside
a strip 10 times the height of the vertical projection.
Alternatin~
I t should be noted that on all roof areas, including those to be designed for increased or
decreased loads according to Figures C2-! to C2-7, the design snow load shall be applied
(a) with the full load on the entire area, or
(b) with the fun load distributed on any portion of the area and zero load on the
remainder of the area,
whichever produces the greatest effects on the members concerned (see Sentence 4.1.5.2.(2)
of the NBC). The reasons for this overriding requirement are that snow very seldom accumulates evenly and to guard against unbalanced loading by snow removal from one
side. Consequently, since certain structural members (such as certain diagonals of trusses)
are subject to stress reversals or otherwise sensitive to changes in load distribution, nonuniform loading must always be considered by the designer in addition to uniform loading.
-571-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
It should be noted, however, that higher loads have been observed where an upper roof
was very long (measured perpendicularly to the step between the upper and lower roofs).
On the other hand, for relatively short upper roofs (say less than 50 ft) a reduction below
the value calculated from Figure C2-5 may be judged adequate by the designer.
The reduction of 25 per cent for exposed roofs should only be considered applicable to
the areas of the roof further than 10 times the difference of roof height from the upper roof.
-572-Copyright NRC-CNRC
r
r
!
Limits have been placed on the coefficients so that they will not be less than the basic
coefficients nor greater than 2. The reduction of 25 per cent for exposed roofs should be
considered applicable only to areas of the roof that are unprotected, i.e. some distance
(estimated at 10 times the height h) away from the projection. Since narrow projections
seldom produce significant snow accumulations, drift load from projections need only be
considered when the length of the projection in feet exceeds one-sixth of the specified ground
snow load in pounds per square foot.
REFERENCES
(1) Climatic Information for Building Design in Canada, Supplement No.1 to the National
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
-573-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
T
I
I
ROOF SHAPES
CASE I
Ii 1! ! i ! i i ! I 1~
LIMITATIONS
! Jc s*
CASE II
for o(~ 20 0 use Case I only
d>
for
20 0
Typical values:
o to
30 0
40
50 0
60 0
70 0 to 90 c
shelt
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
for ~
for
A >1..
R.
expd
0.6
0.45
0.3
0.15
Figure C2-1
Flat and shed roofs
1 - 10
Case I only
10
Case I
*.
Cs
c(.30
O. 8 --;0-
Case II
es#
1.25 (0.8 _
~~30
Figure C2-2
Gable or hip roofs
Figure C2-3
Arch roofs
Notes:
*For roofs exposed to wind according to Article 4.1.5.4., aU values of C. marked with an asterisk (*) may
be reduced by 25 per cent.
All load distributions shown in these Figures are also to be applied as strip loading (full and zero load)
according to Sentence 4.1.5.2.(2).
In Figures C2-1 and C2-2. note that the term (0: - 30)/50 is only valid for slopes 0: greater than 30
as provided in Sentence 4.1.5.3.(a).
-574-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
r
I
ROOF SHAPES
LIMITATIONS
CASE I
CASE II
.15
hg
15..h
when
15 ...b... > 3.
=2
0.8*
use
use
Cs
0.8*
Cs
3.0
when
CASE III
<
when
h
h
< 5
>
ft use
15 ft use
W=lO
W" 30
f3!:
100
<
f3
Figure C2-4
Valley areas of two-span and multi-span
curved or s10ped roofs
<
15 It
Figure C2-5
Lower roofs of multi-level roofs
Notes:
*For roofs exposed to wind according to Article 4.1.5.4.. all values of C. marked with an asterisk ("')
may be reduced by 25 per cent.
All load distributions shown in these Figures are also to be applied as strip loading (full and zero load)
according to Sentence 4.1.5.2.(2).
In Figure C2-4 note that the term (a - 30)/50 is valid only for slopes a greater than 30 a!l provided in)
Sentence 4.1.5.3.(a).
-575-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
ROOF SHAPES
---
c s lOllg
when 10h<0.8*
g
when 10h>2.0
g
when Q < g
"6
<;= O.
use
Cs
8~'
2.0
use C s = 0.8*
Z h
when
when
h
Figure C2-6
Lower of multi-level roofs with the
upper roof sloped toward the lower roof
use
h
h
< 5 ft use
> 15 ft use
W= 10
W 30
g.
height of projection in ft
ground snow load in psf
W'"
J...
length of projection in ft
Figure C2-7
Areas adjacent to roof projections
Notes:
*For roofs exposed to wind according to Article 4.1.5.4 .. all values of C. marked with an asterisk (*) may
be reduced by 25 per cent.
All load distributions shown in these Figures are also to be applied as alternating strip loading (full and
zero load) according to Sentence 4.1.5.2.(2).
-576-Copyright NRC-CNRC
VI
......
......
I
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Figure C2-8
Ii
iii
0.8*
21 to 30
i i ' i"
40
0.4
50
0.5
I :W,I
II: !
ffiTTiililiil
60
70
Example Sheet 1: Snow load coefficients C. for uniform and unbalanced load conditions on gable and hip roofs with varyipg slopes.
0 to 20
0.25*
o I:rn
0.2*
fTTTJ I I
*FOT roofs exposed to the wind according to Article 4.1.5.4. all values marked with an asterisk (*) may be reduced by 25 per cent.
All load distributions sbown in these Fi(Ures are also to be applied as alternating strip loading (full and zero load) according to Sentence 4.1.5.2.(2).
Notes:
i' i'
CS
~~~I\
UNBALANCED LOADS
UNIFORM LOADS
iii
0.8*
GO
--.
VI
Copyright NRC-CNRC
48
30
24
24*
50'
~24
'
I I
::II
~l) f"'););
--.lh =5'
,/777n))
h=IO'
"l71
2d
~!' ~.
I: ro~1 .1
80
30'
200'
.1
I'
to Article 4.1.5.4. all values marked with an asterisk (.) may be reducedby 25 per cent.
are also to be applied as alternating strip loading (full and zero load) according to Sentence 4.1.5.2.(2).
multi~tevel
I..
~,.*
~':rm
Example Sheet 2: Design snow loads in psf for various differences in roof elevations for
typical ground snow loads.
I-~
WI
TIDJII!!ill il!
2t
i'!' i 1111
80*
r
I: i I !III! i!] I
III I
Notes:
"'For roofs exposed to the wind
All load distributions shown in
Figure C2-9
30 PSF
60 PSF
100 PSF
GROUND
SNOW
SUPPLEMENT No. 4
COMMENTARY NO.3
EARTHQUAKE LOADS
by
R. H.
FERAHIAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Objectives of Earthquake Design ............................... 581
Seismic Regionalization ........................................ 581
Definition of Seismic Zones ..................................... 582
Structural Response to Ground Motion .......................... 582
Direction of Earthquake Forces ............................... " 583
Minimum Earthquake Forces (NBC 1970) ....................... 583
Coefficient C. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 583
Coefficient K. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .................................. 584
Importance Factor 1. ......................................... 585
Foundation Factor F. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..... .................... 585
Vertical Accelerations ......................................... 586
Distribution of the Base Shear. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 586
Overturning Moments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 587
Torsional Moments ........................................... 587
Setbacks. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 588
Drift and Separation of Buildings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 588
Design Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 588
Special Provisions ............................................. 589
Dynamic Analysis. . . . . . . .. .................................. 589
Acknowledgement ............................................. 590
References. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 590
-579-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-580-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
SUPPLEMENT No. 4
COMMENTARY NO.3
EARTHQUAKE LOADS
by
R. H.
FERAHIAN
SEISMIC REGIONALIZATION
Major earthquakes have occurred, and are likely to occur in Canada, in two regions:
along the West Coast and in the St. Lawrence and Ottawa River valleys(3.4). Detailed
information on the occurrence of earthquakes is given in seismic resionalization maps
which are derived from an analysis of the seismicity of the various reglons of Canada(6.7).
From these studies has emerged the present seismic probability map for Canada prepared
by W. G. Milne and A. G. Davenport(S).
The new map is based on a computer analysis of the past earthquakes throughout the
country, The data are handled as statistical samples in the same manner as the maximum
floods or snow loads are calculated, making use of the extreme-value theory of statistics.
The seismic sample used is for the period 1899-1963. The results for this sample are cor-
-581-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
roborated by those from a larger but less reliable sample dating back to 1638. The intensities
and horizontal ground accelerations corresponding to certain probabilities of annual exceedance are given in Table C3-A for some representative cities in Canada. Comparable
data are shown also for representative cities in California. If similar acceleration values
are needed for any locality in Canada, they can be obtained at a nominal charge from the
Dominion Observatory, Ottawa, by arrangement through
The Secretary,
Associate Committee on the
National Building Code,
National Research Council,
Ottawa 7, Ontario.
Instrumental seismic recording in Canada is only 70 years old and there are no Canadian
records of strong motion earthquakes. Because of this limitation on the seismic sample,
and other uncertainties, the values quoted in Table C3-A are subject to certain confidence
limits. For example, for Vancouver the horizontal ground acceleration based on a probability of annual exceedance of 1/100 is given as 8 per cent of gravity; in fact it could lie
anywhere within 5 and 20 per cent of gravity.
In order to apply these accelerations directly to the design of a structure in a given locality
it would be necessary to estimate the magnification of the ground motions due to the nature
of the soil, to estimate the damping and ductility (i.e. energy-absorptive capacity) of the
structure, and to know the behaviour of the multi-degree-of-freedom structure under the
probable range of earthquake disturbances. The state of knowledge at present is such that
a large element of engineering judgement is involved in estimating the effects of these
factors on the structural behaviour.
Where
-582-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Similar base shear force relations apply with reasonable accuracy to multi-storey buildings
having many modes of vibration. For usual buildings of moderate-heights (up to 20 or
30 storeys) the principal earthquake response is associated with the fundamental mode of
vibration, and the base shear is dependent primarily on the period of this mode.
The base shear values induced by a moderate-size earthquake such as EI Centro, 1940,
exceed the requirements imposed by modern building codes. This discrepancy appears
justified by past experience which shows that buildings designed according to such codes
have resisted intense ground motions with little distress. It is now recognized that structures
designed to withstand elastically the relatively smaller loads specified by such codes suffer
plastic deformation during even moderate earthquakes. The energy dissipated in plastic
deformation thus reduces the structural responses. The lower base shears specified in the
codes are only justified if a structure possesses ductility, i.e. the capacity to deform and
absorb energy without major structural failure(ll,13,14).
(2)
V=iRKCIFW
This is essentially equation (1) modified to take into account the most important factors
involved in the response of buildings to earthquakes. The factor S(t) in equation (1),
which expresses the characteristics of the earthquake disturbance, is replaced by the regionalization factor, R, as has already been described. Each of the other factors will now be
discussed.
COEFFICIENT C
The coefficient C is given by the formula
C= 0.05
(3)
3VT
which is an empirical formula recommended by the Seismology Committee of the Structural
Engineers Association for California(15), It was chosen to reflect the dependence of spectral
acceleration on the fundamental period of the structure.
The period need not be determined precisely, only accurately enough to establish proper
values of C which is not very sensitive to small changes in the period T. In lieu of more
accurate estimates, the following empirical equations can be used for buildings:
T=O.~~n
(4)
(where T, h n and D are terms as defined in Sentence 4.1.7.1.(2) of Part 4 of the NBC), or
T=Ql~
These equations generally give values of T that are low. Equation (4) was proposed by
and it is a result of approximately 1600 vibration observations made in 430
buildings, 150 observations on 42 elevated tanks, and 250 special observations. Eighty
per cent or the observed periods fall above those calculated from the recommended formula,
10 per cent are subject to a possible error of less than 25 per cent on the unsafe side, and
the remaining 10 per cent are in error between 25 to 40 per cent. Equation (5) is found to
give similarly reliable results for multi-storey buildings with moment-resisting frames.
U~CGS(29),
If the designer wishes, he may submit properly substantiated technical data for establishing the period T for the contemplated structure, It will be a rather unusual building
-583-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
that would make this calculation neccessary. Even then the analysis can only account for
some of the multiplicity of variables in the structure. The difficulty is especially magnified
in buildings that depend on the interaction of the frame and the core for the resistance
of the lateral forces. Sometimes the formula would give better agreement with the measured
periods than the analysis(lil). At present considerable information is being gathered about
the actual behaviour of buildings by measurement of their periods(f>2-M), damping, and
characteristic modes. Research is also being done on the effect of the structure foundation
interactions(25). It is believed, however, that the effect of structure foundation interaction
on the period will be of practical significance only in a few exceptional cases which are
beyond the scope of codes.
COEFFICIENT K
The coefficient K assigned to different types of structural systems is a judgement factor
that reflects experience in design and construction, as well as analysis for the evaluation
of the performance of structures in major and moderate earthquakes in California
and Alaska. I t endeavours basically to account for the energy-absorptive capacity of
the structural system by damping and inelastic action. Types of construction that are
recognized to.have performed well in earthquakes are assigned lower values of K. The K
values of Table 4.1.7.A of the NBC specifically recognize the following:
(1) The capability of a structure to absorb energy, within acceptable deformations and
without failure, is a very desirable characteristic of any earthquake-resistant design.
(2) In buildings where shear walls resist the seismic forces, a second line of seismic re
sistance is desirable to provide stability in cases of damage to a portion of the shear wall
system. This may be accomplished by a combination of walls acting as the primary bracing
system together with a complete frame, ductile moment-resisting or otherwise, acting as
a second line of seismic resistance.
(3) The K values assigned to buildings are lower than those assigned to other structures
because buildings by their nature are normally endowed with a multiplicity of nonstructural
and noncomputed resisting elements which effectively give the building large damping
during critical vibrations; thus buildings have an actual lateral force-resisting capacity
greater than that of the assumed lateral force-resisting system acting alone.
The following should be noted when choosing the K value for the structure:
(1) In considering the completeness of a space frame it could be assumed that the action
of a multi-storey building frame is not significantly influenced by the presence of a minor
portion of bearing walls, e.g. around a stair well. Basement walls, and walls not more than
one storey high that are supported directly on foundation walls, need not be frame sup
ported.
(2) For structures to qualify for K values of 0.67 and 0.8 they should have ductile
moment-resisting, complete space frames(14-Ul). The ductility exhibited by moment-resisting
space frames of structural steel conforming to ASTM A36-69, ASTM A441-68, CSA
G40.4-1959 or CSA G40.12-1964 has long been accepted as the desirable standard. The
ductility factor for these structures is approximately four for some visible nonstructural
damage (possibly with minor structural damage) and greater for structural damage. (See
also the section in this Commentary on dynamic analysis.) In fact, until the acceptance of
ductile reinforced concrete in the Uniform Building Code(16) and California's SEAOC
Code(l6J, systems using materials other than steel had to be tested and studied to prove
that they provide energy-absorptive capacity equivalent to that of steel. A more direct
approach would be to require that the engineer prove that his structure has the energy
absorptive capacity-needed to withstand the appropriate design earthquakes. Some forms
of timber construction also exhibit adequate ductility. On the other hand, many of the
commonly used constructions lack this quality, e.g. poorly designed shear walls in reinforced
concrete, precast concrete, and unreinforced or inadequately reinforced masonry.
The 1970 edition of the National Building Code does not give rules for the detailing of
reinforced concrete structures for the ductility required to qualify them for K values of
0.67 and 0.8. Rules for such structures, however are given in Sections 2630,2631 and 2632
of the Uniform Building Code(16).
(3) In the case of both moment-resisting ductile or non-ductile space frames, it is essential
that it be shown that neither the elastic nor inelastic action including failure of the more
rigid elements, will impair the vertical or lateral load-carrying capacity of space frames,.
(4) In order to qualify for K = 0.8, the structure must have a complete ductile moment
resisting space frame and shear walls designed so that the total required lateral force is
resisted in accordance with the relative rigidities of the walls and the space frame. In
addition, the following must be satisfied:
-584-Copyright NRC-CNRC
1I
(a) the complete ductile moment-resisting space frame shall be designed to carry as
a system separate from the shear walls the total vertical loads and at least 25
per cent of the total required lateral force, Le., 25% of
(~ (0.8)' CIFW)
(b) the shear walls when acting alone (i.e. independent of the ductile moment-resisting
space frame), must be capable of carrying the total lateral force. In essence these
walls have to be provided at their edges with encased structural steel elements
of ASTM A 36-69, A 441-68, CSA G40.4 or CSA G40. 12 or with built-in concrete
columns specially detailed for ductility. These encased elements have to be designed to carry the appropriate tributary dead and live loads plus the vertical
loads resulting from the prescribed horizontal forces on the shear walls. These
edge members and other built-in elements can form constituent members of the
space frame. When the rules given in references 15 and 16 are complied with in
the design of the shear walls, then it may be assumed that the action or failure
of these walls will not impair the vertical and lateral load-resisting ability of the
embedded members of the space frame.
(5) K will be taken as 1 for all buildings that do not qualify for K =0.67 or K ==0.80,
and do not require that K be equal to 1.33. Thus for a building to qualify for K = 1 it
must have a complete vertical load-carrying space frame which does not meet the requirements of a ductile moment-resisting space frame. A reinforced concrete building deSigned
according to the requirements of Section 4.5 of the NBC of Canada would qualify for
either K = 1.00 or 1.33.
Although there is no requirement to provide lateral moment resistance in such frames.
it is strongly recommended that nominal moment resistance be incorporated in the design.
In structural steel, this might be in the form of top and bottom clip angles at beam-tocolumn connections. In reinforced concrete, continuity and good anchorage of longitudinal
steel, and stirrups over the length of beams framing into columns would be good design
practice. This provides a nominal secondary line of defence even though all required lateral
forces are resisted by other shear-carrying structural systems.
(6) K will be taken as 1.33 for structural systems without a comrlete load-carrying
space frame, characterized by shear walls carrying usually all the latera forces and bearing
walls carrying substantially vertical dead and live loads. The bearing walls mayor may not
be a significant part of the shear wall system.
(7) Cross-braced towers supporting elevated water tanks required K to be equal to 3.00.
This high value is considered appropriate because of the poor performance of such structures, and the special importance of maintaining their integrity in case of fire following an
earthquake.
IMPORTANCE FACTOR I
Some structures are designed for essential public services such as electrical generating
stations, fire stations, and hospitals and schools. It is imperative that these structures be
operative after an earthquake. These structures are assigned an I factor of 1.3. This importance factor is based on the judgement that these structures should be designed with higher
factors of safety. This factor is not intended to cover the design considerations associated
with special purpose plants such as nuclear power plants(20).
FOUNDATION FACTOR F
Many codes do not introduce a variation in the base shear coefficients for different soil
conditions. The basic reasons for this are:
(1) the lack of strong motion records for widely varying soil conditions;
(2) the complex inter-relationship between the response of the structure and the characteristics of the associated soil;
(3) the difficulty in assessing simple soil parameters to define the dynamic characteristics
of different soil conditions(21) and layering (22).
Quantitative knowledge of soil behaviour during earthquakes is still in the research
phase and direct applications have been limited to critical projects such as nuclear power
plants. As a first approximation the NBC introduces the factor F which is made equal to
1.5 for soils having low dynamic shear modulus such as highly compressible soils. This is
again a judgement factor that recognizes that the seismic ground motion is magnified on
loose and compressible soils(23) and also that most of the damaged buildin~s have been on
such soils(U). There are no detailed descriptions of foundations or soil studies at such sites
to enable the investigating engineer to probe exhaustively the cause of the failure. Poor
detailing, factors unaccounted for in the design, and also long-term soil distress. e.g. settle..ment, could have been the reasons for the numerous failures of structures on compressible
-585-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
soils. Nevertheless, experience indicates that the designer should exercise extra care when
dealing with structures on such soils.
It is quite possible that on these loose soils the structure-foundation interaction (26)
might, due to the increasing damping and the rocking of the structure, reduce the base
shears, especially for stiffer structures. This may well compensate for the magnified ground
motion caused by the looseness of the foundation soil. There is not enough information at
present to back this hypothesis, but in the meantime, it is believed that the retention of
the foundation factor errs on the side of safety.
I t should again be emphasized that in addition to the influence of the site conditions on
the predominant periods of the ground motion and the magnitude of the seismic forces,
the designer should consider the possibility of ground failure beneath the structure due to
slides on slopes, active local fault displacements, and liquefactions of sands(l,2.26) in areas
of high water table. The advice of an experienced soils engineer is recommended for evaluation of the suitability of the site and the nature of its behaviour under the anticipated
seismic forces and movements.
VERTICAL ACCELERATIONS
Ground motion due to earthquake is three-dimensional with horizontal, transverse, and
vertical components. I t is found, however, that outside the epicentral zone the vertical
accelerations are 30 to 60 per cent of the horizontal accelerations. In the immediate vicinity
of the epicentre the vertical acceleratioQs could be higher.
Under abnormally high vertical accelerations, columns at the higher floors, especially
at the roof level, could be adversely affected. There is not enough information at present
to warrant including in the NBC of Canada rules treating the vertical accelerations, even
though some codes(21) have such rules. Certain special structures have been noted (28) where
these accelerations may have led to instability or unusual reductions in the factors of safety.
:Z;wih i
i=l
VD == F,
+F
DoD
(7)
Vz=F,+~Fi
(8)
i=x
OVERTURNING MOMENTS
Of the many tall slender structures that have been subjected to violent earthquakes,
none has been recorded as having simply toppled over asa unit. The seismic codes have
generally required the calculation of and the provision for overturning moments, assuming
that the building is a fixed-ended cantilever beam loaded with static lateral earthquake
forces acting in the same direction. The NBC in the past had followed this simple procedure.
The application of this concept to tall or slender structures is generally over-conservative(30),
because the maximum total mcments and shears at a given level of the building do not
occur for the same combinations of modal components. A more realistic determination of
the maximum overturning moment can be made by the methods of dynamic analysis, but
such computations are generally unnecessary if judicious reduction factors are applied to
the bending moments calculated from the equivalent static shears.
If a structure did respond in the fundamental mode exclusively, then the overturning
moment at the base would be the sum of the moments corresponding to the forces Fx about
the base. However, since some part of the base shear represents contributions from modal
responses higher than the fundamental, the base moment would most probably be less than
that calculated using the equivalent static shears. This perhaps more clearly indicated by
Table C3-C which shows the base moment in terms of the base modal shear for an idealized
uniform structure.
Considering the case of pure triangular distribution of a base shear, without the assignment of any of the base shear to the top of the structure, then the base moment would be
M = 0.667 V h n This is between the coefficients in the fundamental mode for a sheardeflecting and a moment-deflecting structure. The base shear actually represents the sum
of shears of several modes; thus the base overturning moment should be something less
than M = 0.667 V h n Similarly, the overturning moment M can be represented as
(9)
where
J is a
reduction factor.
The NBC 1970 does allow reduction of bending moments calculated from the equivalent
static shears but it is more conservative than SEAOC or the UBC (Figure C3-1). Observations at Anchorage(l) and Caracas(31) corroborate the need for this extra safety. The
NBC 1970 does not allow J to be less than 0.5.
TORSIONAL MOMENTS
When the base of a structure is set into motion by an earthquake, the mass of the structure
tries to keep to its state of rest with the force of its inertia acting in a direction opposite to
earthquake motion. These inertial forces act through the centre of gravity of the masses,
e. g. at each floor level. If the centre of mass and the centre of rigidity(15,32) do not coincide
due to the asymmetrical arrangement of the structural elements, then torsional stresses
will be generated. The designer should endeavour to make the structural system as symmetrical as possible and should consider the effect of torsion on the behaviour of the structural elements.
A realistic approach to aseismic torsional design should consider the effect of the dynamic
magnification(33,34) of the torsional moments as calculated by methods of statics, the effect
of simultaneous action of the two horizontal components of the ground disturbance, and
accidental torsion. Accidental torsional moments are those included to account for the
possible additional torsion that can arise due to errors in the estimates of the relative
rigidities, errors in the estimate of dead and live loads at the floor levels, addition of wall
panels and partitions after completion of the building, dependence of the stiffness on the
mode of vibration and its variation with time and inelastic or plastic action.
Most of these concepts and effects have to be accounted for by use of arbitrary factors
until more information and better theoretical methods of analysis become available.
The provisions of the NBC reflect the practice in Mexico City(34). It recognizes the
dynamic nature of the torsion and the effect of the simultaneous action of the two horizontal
ground components of motion by increasing the comp'uted torsion by 50 per cent. It recognizes the part played by accidental torsion by specIfying an additional torsion due to an
eccentricity of 0.05 times the plan dimension in the direction of the computed eccentricity.
The NBC also specifies that when the total torsional eccentricity exceeds 25 per cent of the
appropriate plan dimension, a dynamic analysis shall be mandatory or the effects of torsion
in the static analysis shall be doubled. This recognizes the importance and complexity
of the torsional resistance under these conditions and also probably accounts for the larger
dynamic magnification.
-587-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
The elements that resist torsion depend upon the stiffness of the diaphragm, as well as
the rigidities and locations of the resisting elements. Torsional-resisting elements as part of
the lateral load-resisting system should preferably be provided near the periphery of the
building, further from the centre of rotation than the centre of gravity of the tributary
load. For complete diaphragms interconnecting all resisting elements in both directions
(such as a complete reinforced concrete floor slab), all elements can be marshalled to resist
torsion resulting from shears in any direction.
Torsional effects are particularly significant in the core-type buildings (all stiffening
elements in a central core away from the periphery), in odd-and irregularly-sha~d buildings
(such as the L-shaped buildings), and in buildings with the core located at one Side or corner.
These are some examples of torsional situations that should be avoided in building layouts.
Torsional effects should also be evaluated carefully and dynamically for parts of structures
relative to the whole. For example, it is important that the torsional effects of projecting
wings on buildings be considered in relation to the motion of the building as a whole.
SETBACKS
A setback is any horizontal offset in the plane of an exterior wall of a building. The shear
and overturning moment from the upper wall should be transferred across the setback to
the wall below. The effects of setbacks on the dynamic response characteristics of buildings
are very complex(35). It is believed, however, that the specifications of the NBC of Canada
1970 are simple and adequate for the design of most structures.
A building with relatively small setbacks can most convieniently be treated as a uniform
building.
A more comprehensive analysis of setbacks has been made by the Seismology Committee
of SEAOC(l6). The results given therein are more consistent with the true nature of the
behaviour of buildings with setbacks and are recommended as an alternative basis for
design. The analysis, however, is rather complicated for the purposes of a code. Dynamic
analysis could always be used, but it need not be a rigorous mathematical study, as this is
unwarranted.
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
The nonstructural components of the structure should be so detailed as not to transfer
to the structural system forces unaccounted for in the design. If they are designed as isolated
components, then the connections should be designed accordingly(39), so that they are
capable of accommodating the anticipated movement due to drift and temperature changes.
If, on the other hand, these components are rigidly attached to the structure, then their
-588-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
effect on the behaviour of the structure should be studied and allowed for in the elastic,
plastic, and fracture stages. A classic example is the stair that may act as a stiffening
element only for a portion of the structure. Failures of buildings in the Caracas 29 July,
1967 earthquake (31,40) were caused by the partition tile walls which acted as shear walls
until failure, changing the relative rigidity of the bents from those assumed in the design.
Most of the failures in structures under seismic loading are due to poor detailing, especially
at beam and column connections. This becomes the governing factor in good aseismic
behaviour of buildings built of precast elements. Special attention should be paid to these
connections(l41) .
Diaphragms should be carefully studied to ensure their capability of load distribution(42).
When the shear wall incorporates numerous openings, the design should account for its
real behaviour under lateralloads(43}, i. e. whether the wall acts as a unit or as a number of
units because of the reduced rigidities due to the openings. Overstress at the openings
should be examined. This is a common cause of damage to lintels(44) above door openings
and to piers between window openings.
Construction joints should be designed to transfer earthquake forces without transverse
or rotational slippage(45).
Attention should be paid to the combined stresses at the external and re-entrant corners(46).
Unreinforced masonry buildings have fared very badly when subjected to earthquakes(l).
In reinforced masonry structures, the presence of reinforcing will provide ductIlity and
will ensure against brittle failure. Examples and Detail Sheets for the aseismic design of
reinforced masonry can be found in the handbook "Seismic Design of Buildings"(39}.
Part 4 of the National Building Code of Canada 1970 through reference to the section
uPlain and Reinforced Masonry" in this supplement requires that all masonry in zones
3 and 2 (with few exceptions) be reinforced. These elements include exterior loadbearing
and non-Ioadbearing walls, parapet walls, interior loadbearing walls, as well as non-load.
bearing partitions which weigh more than 40 psf or are more than 10 ft high. Masonry
elements around stair and elevator shafts are required to be reinforced to ensure a safe
means of egress from the structure. It is provided, however, that unreinforced masonry
may be used in zone 2 if it can be proved to the satisfaction of the authority having jurisdiction that the proposed structure can withstand the design earthquake forces.
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
The NBC specifies that except in zone zero and for those cases listed in the next paragraph, buildings higher than 200 ft shall have structural systems for which K is either
0.67 or 0.80. Analyses (47) of buildings of about 200 ft in height has shown that if damage is
to be minimized in a moderate earthquake, the structure must incorporate the ductile
features associated with these low K values.
In order not to stifle innovation and impose undue restrictions on the designer, the NBC
allows other structural systems that have been approved by the authority having jurisdiction when evidence is provided to show that the proposed system can withstand the
appropriate design earthquake with ductility and energy-absorptive capacity equivalent
to that for structures with K = 0.67 and 0.8. This requirement is further reduced for
seismic zone 1 in that buildings higher than 200 ft with shear walls carrying the total
lateral forces are permitted in lieu of a ductile complete moment-resisting space frame if
the ductility of these walls is ensured by proper detailing(Ui.16).
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
The NBC allows the use of dynamic analysis for the evaluation of the seismic design
loads. For conventional multi-storey buildings the NBC approach is quite adequate but
some buildings higher than 200 ft may require dynamic analysis to verify the seismic
adequacy of their structural systems. Similarly buildings with irregular layouts, large
setbacks or unusual taper, or uncommon industrial structures should be designed on the
basis of dynamic analysis.
The seismic static loads given by the Code may be used as a preliminary estimate for the
evaluation of the member sizes of these structures. The judgement of an experienced
structural engineer must be relied upon to decide when dynamic analysis is needed.
Dynamic analysis requires the choice of the design earthquake, acceptable damage
criteria, and the prediction of the structural response for the chosen design earthquakes.
Strictly speaking ,dynamic analysis is a mathematical prediction of the structural response(ll,47J. Even if a good representative mathematical model of the structure is available
the results of the analysis are only as good as the choice of the probable design earthquakes
-589-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
and the structural parameters such as damping, ductility, and the period of the structure.
The certainty with which these parameters can be estimated provides a measure of the
accuracy of the analysis.
As already mentioned, there are no Canadian records of strong motion earthquakes;
consequently, after establishing the probable design ground acceleration, an appropriate
seismic record must be chosen based on earthquakes from other parts of the world or some
other form of simulation. It is probably appropriate to use California earthquakes(lo.12.4S)
for the west coast of Canada since they are both part of the circum-Pacific belt of seismicity.
Earthquakes in Eastern Canada, however, appear to have unique characteristics(4) which
may not be accurately simulated by the California earthquakes. Nevertheless, the universal
practice is to use certain California earthquake records, which are in convenient form for
computer analysis(49.50).
For major earthquakes in zone 3, in lieu of more reliable local data, the estimated maximum intensity, as measured on the modified Mercalli Scale (1931), falls between VIII and
IX and the corresponding horizontal ground acceleration may be taken as 50 per cent of
gravity. Housner gives similar estimates of maximum earthquakes and their corresponding
ground accelerations for other zones(55).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Section of the National Building Code dealing with loads due to earthquakes
has llsed the results of the recent research and experience in earthquake engineering in
Canada, California, Japan and Mexico. In particular, except when more recent evidence
suggests otherwise, it closely parallels the recommendations of the Seismology Committee
of the Structural Engineers Association of California as set out in their" Recommended
Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary, 1967",
REFERENCES
(1) The Prince \Villiam Sound, Alaska, Earthquake of 1964 and Aftershocks, Vol. II,
Research Studies, Seismology and Marine Geology. U.S. Department of Commerce,
U.S. Environmental Science Services Administration, U.S. Coast and Geodetic
Survey, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 1967.
(2) The Niigata Earthquake, 16 June 1964, and Resulting Damage to Reinforced Concrete Buildings. International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering,
Tokyo, Japan, February 1965.
(3) Hodgson, J. H. There are Eearthquake Risks in Canada. Canadian Consulting
Engineer, Vol. 7, No.7, July 1965.
(4) Hamilton, Angus C. Seismic Regionalization of Eastern Canada, Proc. Symposium on
the Design for Earthquake Loadings, McGill University, Sept. 1966.
(5) Smith, W. E. T. Earthquakes of Eastern Canada and Adjacent Areas, 1534-1927.
Publications of the Dominion Observatory, Ottawa, Vol. 26, No.5, 1962.
(6) Smith, W. E. T. Earthquakes of Eastern Canada and Adjacent Areas 1928-1959.
Publications of the Dominion Observatory, Ottawa, Vol. 32, No.3, 1966.
(7) Milne, \V. A. and K. A. Lucas. Seismic Activity in Western Canada 1955 to 1959
Inclusive. Publications of the Dominion Observatory, Ottawa, Vol. 26, No.1, 1961.
(8) Davenport, A. G. and W. G. Milne. Distribution of Earthquake Risk in Canada.
4th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, January 1969.
(Also Bulletin, Seismological Society of America, Vol. 59, No.2, p. 729-754, April
1969.)
(9) Ferahian, R. H. Comparison of the Probabilities of \Vind and Earthquake Loads in
the NBC 1970. National Research Council of Canada, Division of Building Research,
Building Research Note 72, Ottawa, 1970.
(10) Housner, G. W. Behavior of Structures During Earthquakes. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., October 1959.
Cherry,
S. Basic Dynamic Principles of Response of Linear Structures of Earthquake
(11)
Ground Motions. Proc. Symposium on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver,
September 1965.
(12) Housner, A. W. et a1. Spectrum Analysis of Strong Motion Earthquakes. Bulletin,
Seismological Society of America, Vol. 43, 1953.
(13) Penzien, J. Dynamic Response of Elasto-Plastic Frames. Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs.,
Paper 3284, Vol. 127, 1962, Part II.
(14) Blume, J. A. et al. Design of Multistorey Reinforced Concrete Buildings for Earthquake Motions. Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Illinois, 1961.
-590Copyright NRC-CNRC
-591-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
(37) Robertson, L. E. and P. W. Chen. Glass Design and Building Code Implications of
Recent Wind Load Research for Tall Buildings. Conference on Glass in Building
Design and Construction, Washington, D.C., 1966.
(38) Bouwkamp, J. G. Behavior of Window Panels Under In-Plane Forces. A report to
the Division of Architecture, Dept. of Public Works, State of California, February
1960.
(39) Seismic Design for buildings. Dept. of Army Technical Manual TM5-809-10, Washington, D.C., March 1966. Plate 2-16, p. 2-62.
(40) Degenkolb, H. J. Seismic Tremor Shook Caracas Severely. Eng. News-Record, August
1967.
(41) As in Ref. 39, Plates 2-44 to 2-47.
(42) As in Ref. 39, Plates 2-19 to 2-40.
(43) Same as Ref. 1, pages 200-202, 206-213.
(44) Same as Ref. 1, pages 76-95, 194, 195.
(45) Same as Ref. 1, page 144.
(46) Same as Ref. 1, pages 81-83.
(47) Clough, R. W. and K. Lee Benuska. FHA Study of Seismic Design Criteria for High
Rise Buildings. A report prepared for the Technical Studies Program and the
Federal Housing Administration, HUD TS-3, August 1966.
(48) Seed, H. B. et al. Characteristics of Rock Motions During Earthquakes. Journal of
the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., Sept. 1969,
p. 1100-1218.
(49) California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, July 1969, "Strong Motion
Earthquake Accelogramme" Digitized and Plotted Data.
(50) Imperial College of Science and Technology, Engineering Seismology Department,
London SW7, Great Britain, "Digitized Earthquake Records".
(51) Crawford, R. and H. S. Ward. Determination of the Natural Periods of Buildings.
Bulletin, Seismological Society America, Vol. 54, No.6, December 1964, p. 17431756.
(52) Ward, H. S. and R. Crawford. Wind-Induced Vibrations and Building Modes. Bulletin,
Seismological Society of America, Vol. 56, No.4, August 1966, p. 793-813.
(53) Cloud, W. K. Forced Vibration of the Mt. McKinley Building p. 333-356 of Ref. 1.
(54) Ward, H. S. Dynamic Characteristics of a Multi-storey Concrete Building. Proc.
Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol. 43, August 1969, p. 553-572.
(55) Housner, G. W. Engineering Estimates of Ground Shaking and Maximum Earthquake
Magnitude. Fourth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago,
Chile, 1969.
-592-Copyright NRC-CNRC
Copyright NRC-CNRC
o
2. 0
Figure C3-1
1.0
4. 0
5. 0
6. 0
PERIOD T, SEes
3. 0
7.0
8. 0
\II
-0
Copyright NRC-CNRC
VI
II-III
VI-VII
VI-VII
VI
1.0
<0.5
1.0
1.5
1.5
V
V
V
1(2)
IV
II
A(3)
VIII
VI
V
V
V
V
IV
V-VI
VI
1/10
3.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.0
VI
V
IV
IV
III-IV
IV
III
IV
IV-V
1(2)
1/30
4.5
4.5
4.0
3.0
<0.5
12.0
2.5
1.5
2.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
A(3)
VIII
VIII
VII-VIII
VIII
III
X
VII
VI
VI
V-VI
VI
V
VII
VII-VIII
1(2)
1/100
ESTIMATED PROBABILITY(l)
La Mal Baie
Quebec City
Montreal
Ottawa
Toronto
Saint John
Halifax
Vancouver
Victoria
Prince
Rupert
Calgary
San
Francisco
Los Angeles
San Diego
Locality
20.5
16.0
11.0
11.0
<0.5
50.0
6.5
3.0
4.5
2.5
4.5
2.0
8.0
10.0
A(3)
TABLE C3-A
X
IX
VIII-IX
IV
III
50.0
34.0
20.5
26.5
0.5
11.0
5.0
7.0
4.0
8.0
~ 3.0
17.0
21.0
VIII
VI-VII
VII
VI
VII
VI
VIII
VIII-IX
A(3)
1/200
1(2)
TABLE C3-B
DEFINITION OF SEISMIC ZONES
TABLE
Zone
Seismic Factor
R
A100;:: 6
6 > A 100 ~ 3
3 > A 100 ~ 1
1 > A 100
Range of A100
(Percent of Gravity)
TABLE C3-C
RATIO OF BASE MOMENT TO BASE SHEAR
TIMES HEIGHT (M/V'h n ) FOR IDEALIZED STRUCTURE
TABLE
Mode
MomentDeflecting Structure
ShearDeflecting Structure
o. 729
0.636
0.209
0.212
0.127
O. 127
-59.5-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
,
I
-596-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
f
!
SUPPLEMENT No.4
COMMENTARY NO.4
SERVICEABILITY CRITERIA FOR DEFLECTIONS
AND VIBRATIONS
by
D. E.
ALLEN
DEFLECTIONS
Excessive structural deflections can create a variety of problems: cracks or crushing in
non-structural components such as partitions; lack of fit for doors, etc.; walls out of plumb
or eccentricity of loading caused by rotation; unsightly droopiness; and ponding. Cracks,
besides being unsightly, may transmit unwanted sound through partitions or water and cold
air through exterior surfaces and, as a result, promote corrOSlOn. Control of cracking in
structural concrete is separately covered in CSA A23.3-1970, "Code for the Design of
Plain or Reinforced Concrete Structures".
There are usually a number of alternative design solutions to problems caused by excessive
deflection. Partition cracking, for example, can be avoided either by making the supporting
structure stiff enough or by providing flexible joints in the partitions. Similarly, to avoid
cracking, plastered ceilings should be hung from the floor beams, not rigidly attached to
them.
The deflection criteria in Table C4-A apply to conventional forms of construction under
conventional conditions of use. The most severe deflection requirement, 1/360, for members
supporting plastered ceilings, partitions, etc.(l), may not be sufficient for cracking of plaster
or rigid partitions(lI). As an aid to the designer for new or unusual cases, more detailed
deflection criteria are suggested in Ref. (2); case histories of damage due to excessive
deflections (including also differential settlement and temperature movements) are given
in Refs. (4) to (7).
VIBRATIONS
Two types of vibration problems arise in building construction: "resonance" problems
and translent problems. "Resonance" problems can be caused by periodic forces (usually
generated by machines or persons) synchronizing with a natural frequency of vibration
of the structure. Resonance problems caused by machines can be avoided by special design
provisions, whereas resonance problems caused by persons will not occur if the natural
frequency of the floor is greater than about 5 cycles per second(8,lll). This latter condition
is satisfied by most floor systems but may be a problem for long-span systems.
Transient vibrations in floor systems due to foot impact may cause discomfort to the
occupants or annoyance as a result of china rattling, etc. In Table C4-A, the deflection
criteria of 1/360 for wood floors(l) and 1/320 for steel floors which do not support brittle
components essentially attempt to govern such vibration effects. These figures apply to
conventional construction for conventional use and may not be adequate for new types of
construction, especially those without partitions, or for special conditions of use such as
gymnasium floors.
-597-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
The criteria in Table C4-A control vibration effects due to foot impact by control1ing
the stiffness of the floor and hence its amplitude of vibration. Other ways of avoiding
vibration effects due to foot impact are to increase the damping(lO) or to increase the mass.
Partitions and other non-structural components are very helpful in reducing discomfort(SI).
Further information on vibration characteristics and design considerations are given in
Refs. (8) to (15),
REFERENCES
(1) Russell, W. A. Deflection Characteristics of Residential Wood-Joist Floor Systems.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
Housing and Home Finance Agency, Housing Research Paper 30, Washington,
D.C., Apri11954.
Allowable Deflections. Subcommittee 1, ACI Committee 435. Journal, Am. Concrete
Inst., Vol. 65, No.6, June 1968, p. 433.
Plewes, W. G. and G. K. Garden. Deflections of Horizontal Structural Members.
National Research Council of Canada, Division of Building Research, Canadian
Building Digest No. 54, Ottawa, June 1964.
Mayer, H. and H. Rusch. Bauschaden als Folge der Durchbiegung von Stahl betonBauteilen (Building Damage Caused by Deflection of Reinforced Concrete Building
Components). Deutscher Ausschuss fUr Stahlbeton, Heft 193, Berlin 1967. National
Research Council of Canada Technical Translation TT1412, 1970.
Pfeffermann, O. Les Fissures dans les Constructions Consequences de Phenomenes
Physiques Naturels. Annales de l'lnstitut Technique du B.timent et des Travaux
Publics, No. 250, October 1968.
Skempton, A. W. and D. H. MacDonald. The Allowable Settlements of Buildings.
Proc., Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol. 5, Part III, 1956, p. 727.
Khan, F. R. and M. FinteL Effects of Column Exposure in Tall Structures
Design
Considerations and Field Observations of Buildings. Journal, Am. Concrete Inst.
Vol. 65, No.2, February 1968, p. 99.
Vermeyden, I. P. Strength and Stiffness of Wood Joists. Heron, Vol. 9, No.2, (1961).
Hurst, H. T. The Wood-Frame House as a Structural Unit. National Forest Products
Assoc., Techn. Services Div., Tech. Report No.5, Washington, 1965.
Lenzen, K. H. Vibration of Steel Joists - Concrete Slab Floors. Engineering Journal
of Am. Inst. Steel Const., Vol. 3, No.3, July 1966, p. 133.
"Full-Scale Testing of New York World's Fair Structures - Vol. I. The Bourbon
Street Structure". Building Research Advisory Board, National Academy of Sciences
Pub. 1720, 1969.
Floor Joist System Saves Steel. Engineering News-Record, Vol. 181, No.4, July 25,
1968, p. 19.
Vibration Problems in Prestressed Concrete. Netherlands Committee for Concrete
Research, C.U.R. Report No. 17, The Hague, 1960.
Nelson, F. C. The Use of Viscoelastic Material to Damp Vibration in Buildings and
Large Structures. Engineering Journal of Am. lnst. Steel Const. Vol. 5, No.2,
April 1968, p. 72.
Onysko, D. M. Performance of Wood-Joist Floor Systems. Forest Products Laboratory Information Report OP-X-24, Canadian Forestry Service, Department of
Fisheries and Forestry, Januray 1970, Ottawa.
-598-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
VI
-0
-0
Copyright NRC-CNRC
TABLE C4:-A
Notes:
Wall members
1 (1)
180
1 (1)
180
180
(1)
(2)Immediate live
load deflection plus
creep deflection due
to dead load plus
permanent live load.
(3)Immediate live
load deflection.
1 (3)
360
1 (3)
180
(2)
CSA A23.3-1970
Reinforced Concrete
CSA 086-1970
Timber
(6)
(5)
1 app rles to
180
sheet metal or elastic
membrane roof cover
(4)There is a warning
clause on vibrations.
1 (6)
or
180
1
360
1 (')
320
CSA S16-1969
Structural Steel
1
180
1
180
1
200
1
-360
CSA S157-1969
Structural Aluminum
--
-600Copyright NRC-CNRC
SUPPLEMENT No.4
COMMENTARY NO.5
PONDING LOADS ON FLAT ROOFS
by
D. E.
ALLEN
(1)
where: E
I
L
S
modulus of elasticity
moment of inertia of the beam
span
beam spacing
unit weight of water.
'Y
F or a series of parallel beams, when the stiffness is less than the critical value, rain water
will accumulate in local areas, and thereby overload one or more beams. Even if a roof
beam is stiffer than critical by Eq. (1), calculated moments and deflections may be amplified
due to ponding effect.
The occurrence of ponding depends not only on the flexibility of the roofing system, but
also on the location of roof drains, and the slope and camber of the roof. Location of roof
drains should take into account not only the roof slope but also deflection of the roof
system under rain and snow. If roof drainage is effective, ponding due to excessive flexibility will not be a problem. Further information is given in Refs. (1) to (7).
A practical criterion against ponding problems is to require member stiffness to be at
least twice the critical stiffness given in Eq. (1). In terms of the allowable deflection/span
ratios in the National Building Code of Canada (see Commentary No.4: Serviceability
Criteria for Deflections and Vibrations - Table C4-A), this criterion can be expressed as
follows:
WL
~ 98.4L(~) allowable
(2)
where W L is the design load in psf specified for deflection calculations and ([) allowable is
the allowable deflection span ratio. Critical values of WL in Eq. (2) are given in Table C5-A.
When WL is less than the critical value in Table C5-A, the effects of ponding should be considered. This applies particularly to large flat roofs in areas of heavy rainfall. Table C5-A
is based on the assumption of beams simply supported on rigid supports; further information
for two-way systems (beams on flexible supports) is given in Refs. (3) and (4).
REFERENCES
(1) Sawyer, D. A. Ponding of Rainwater on Flexible Roof Systems. Proc. Am. Soc. Civ.
Engrs., Journal of Structural Division, Vol. 93, ST1, February 1967, p. 127.
(2) Haussler, R. W. Roof Deflection Caused by Rainwater Pools. Civil Engineering,
Vol. 32, October 1962, p. 58.
(3) Marino, F. J. Ponding of Two-Way Roof Systems. Engineering Journal of Amer.
Inst. of Steel Const., Vol. 3, No.3, July 1966, p. 93.
(4) Commentary on the Specification for the Design, Fabrication and Erection of Structural
Steel for Buildings. Amer. Inst. of Steel Construction, New York, 12 February 1969.
(5) Salama, A. E. and M. L. Moody. Analysis of Beams and Plates for Ponding Loads
Proc., Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., Journal of Structural Divi'5ion, Vol. 93, ST1, February
1967, p. 109.
-601-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
(6) Chinn, J., A. H. Mansouri and S. F. Adams. Ponding of Liquids on Flat Roofs. Proc.,
Am. Soc. Civ. Engrs., Journal of Structural Division, Vol. 95, ST5, May 1969, p. 797.
(7) Sawyer, D. A. Roof-Structural Roof-Drainage Interactions. Proc. Am. Soc. Civ.
Engrs., Journal of Structural Division, Vol. 94, ST1, January 1969, p. 175.
TABLE C5-A
CRITICAL VALUES OF W L IN PSF FOR PONDING
Deflection/Span Ratio
(See Table C4-A)
1
180
1
240
20 ft
= 40 ft
L = 60 ft
L = 100 ft
11
22
33
55
16
24
41
- 602.-Copyright NRC-CNRC
SUPPLEMENT NO. 4
COMMENTARY NO.6
LOAD COMBINATIONS FOR STRUCTURAL DESIGN
by
D. E. ALLEN
Building Structures Section
Division of Building Research
National Research Council of Canada
Article 4.1.2.3. of the NBC of Canada, 1970, is intended to provide an acceptable and
relatively uniform degree of safety in the design of structural members under different load
combinations. The rules are to be used for strength considerations, i. e. allowable stress,
plastic or ultimate strength design, and not for serviceability considerations such as deflection. The rules take into consideration the probability of simultaneous occurrence of
the design loads stipulated in Subsections 4.1.3. to 4.1.8. They are not intended to take
into account the change in material strengths with changes in duration of loading.
The rules for load combinations given in the design procedures referred to in Clause
4.1. 1.4. (a) have the same intent as Article 4.1.2.3. and therefore are not to be applied
simultaneously with Article 4.1.2.3. The modification factor for duration of load in CSA
086-1970, "Code of Recommended Practice for Engineering Design in Timber", however,
is applied simultaneously with Article 4.1.2.3., since this factor takes into account change
of material strength with changes in duration of loading.
SIMULTANEOUS LOADS
As dead load is nearly constant throughout the life of a structure, a combination of dead
load with any other load constitutes a basic combination in which the basic safety factors
are applicable*. When dead load is combined with two or more other loads the simultaneous
occurrence of the full design values of each of the load effects is less likely to occur than the
basic combination above. Sentence 4.1.2.3.(2) takes this into consideration by allowing
reductions in the total effect due to combinations of the dead load effect with two or more
other load effects.
"'The only exception to this is for ultimate strength design of reinforced and prestressed concrete as given
in CSA A23.3-1970, "Code for the Design of Plain or Reinforced Concrete Structures", and in CSA
A135-1962. "Prestressed Concrete", where the safety factor for dead load is less than the safety factor
for live load.
Because of the very short duration of some design loads, the probability of their simultaneous occurrence is extremely small. Thus, according to Sentence 4.1.2.3.(1), earthquake
load is not considered simultaneously with wind load. In load combinations (v) and (viii),
however, horizontal crane loads (part of L) are combined with wind or earthquake loads.
This was considered necessary because in certain industrial buildings cranes are continuously
in use.
So far the discussion is concerned with load effects which are additive. Stress reversal,
overturning and sliding, discllssed in the following, are cases where the load effects are
counteracting.
applied to the wind effect and a load factor of somewhat less than 1.0 is applied to the dead
load effect.
Since this approach to the safety factor is not at present used in the 1970 National Building
Code, empirical rules are given in CSA A23.3-1970, "Code for the Design of Plain or Reinforced Concrete Structures", and in CSA SI6-1969, "Steel Structures for Buildings". In
any case, for structures such as towers that are subject primarily to wind load and dead
load only, the designer should take special precaution in designing members subject to
stress reversal. A safe empirical rule is to apply the usual safety factor to the full design
wind effect minus half the dead load effect. For reinforcing steel in a beam, column, or
shell this gives an ultimate strength required for stress reversal, U, given by
U = 1.8W - 0.9D
where W is the wind load effect and D the dead load effect, (compare with Eq. (45) of CSA
A23.3-1970, "Code for the Design of Plain or Reinforced Concrete Structures"). A similar procedure should be used for prestressing steel.
Copyright NRC-CNRC
1
SUPPLEMENT No. 4
NO.7
STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY
by
D. E.
ALLEN,
A new article has been introduced in the 1970 edition of Section 4.1 of the Code as follows:
"4.1.1.7. Building and structural systems shall provide such structural integrity that
the hazards associated with progressive collapse due to local failure caused by severe
overloads or abnormal loads not specifically covered in this Section are reduced to a level
commensurate with good engineenng practice."
The intent of this clause is to ensure that in the event of a reasonably foreseeable overload
or abnormal circumstance such as an explosion, fire or impact, a local failure will not
result in collapse of the whole building or a large part of it.
PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE
Progressive collapse is the phenomenon in which local failure results in the collaese of a
whole building or large parts of a building remote from the original point of failure. A
notable example occurred in a 22-storeyapartment block built from precast concrete loadbearing panels at Ronan Point{l), England, when a local domestic gas explosion on the 18th
storey blew out one panel wall, which in turn led to the collapse of the whole corner of the
building in the fol1owing manner. The removal of the wall panel led to the collapse of the
slab and wall panels immediately above and the failure progressed upwards to the top
floor. The falling panels broke the floor below, which resulted in progressive collapse of
wall and floor below, which resulted in progressive collapse of wall and floor panels of
that corner right down to the bottom.
Another example(2) was the collapse of an arena roof under snow load. Fracture of one of
the laminated wood roof trusses led to a lateral progressive failure of the whole roof. There
are also examples of progressive collapse during construction.
STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY
For a structure not to be susceptible to progressive collapse, it must have certain properties denoted by the term "structural integrity" as follows:
(I) Alternative paths of support.
In the event of failure of a loadbearing element, the
structure will bridge or cantilever over the local failure with the result that, at most, only
members immediately adjacent to the local failure will be affected. In addition to this,
the structure below should be able to withstand the falling elements without collapse.
This property is achieved by suitable arrangement and interconnection of components,
and by the provision of ties in the structure as a whole and across the joints. In the case of
one-way systems such as long-span trusses or girders, for example, the components can be
inter-connected by cross-bracing.
(2) Ductility in the members and joints. - Energy generated by impact, explosion or
expansion due to fire is absorbed locally if the members and connections behave in a ductile
manner when overloaded. Joints relying on friction due to gravity only are brittle in nature.
Ductility is also an important structural property for earthquake resistance.
ABNORMAL LOADS TO BE CONSIDERED
It is obviously not economical, in fact it is impossible, to design structures for absolute
safe t>.' , i.e. for any possible situation that could occur, such as an aeroplane crashing into
a budding. Abnormal loads, overloads or understrengths to be considered in causing local
failure leading to progressive collapse should be reasonably foreseeable, that is, have some
reasonable probability of occurrence. Internal explosions, impact from vehicles, falling
objects during construction or as a result of local failure, fires, defects such as excessive
settlement or construction deviations can in certain situations be of this category.
-605-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
1
I
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Each problem will have to be solved in its own way, but in general the design approaches
to the danger of progressive collapse can be categorized as follows:
(1) Elimination of Certain Risks or Loads
It may be expedient not to permit the use or storage of substances that can readily
result in explosive mixtures in buildings susceptible to progressive collapse. Alternatively,
it may be possible to design for explosion pressure relief(ll,12). Some structural members
such as critical columns can be protected from vehicle impact by means of fenders.
(2) Desig,n of Structures to Resist Abnormal Load
If the nature and magnitude of the abnormal load can be foreseen, it may be possible
to design the structure to resist it. In the case of gas explosions, for example, British recommendations() give design pressures of 720 psf, or 360 psf if there is adequate pressure
relief(9).
(3) Structural Integrity
It may be stated in very general terms, that since both the nature and magnitude of
abnormal loads are often not predictable, structural integrity appears to be a better principle to follow than designing for the abnormal load.
(4) Increased Reliability of Key Members
It is not always possible to provide alternative paths of support in the event of failure
of certain key members. Such key members, e. g. lower storey columns in a tall building
or primary members in a long-span roof, should be more reliable than other structural
members. Greater reliability can be achieved by (a) the use of increased safety factors;
(b) consideration of the effects of possible abnormal loads; (c) better control of materials
and workmanship by inspection and testing.
Further discussion on the implications of progressive collapse, gas explosions, etc. in
structural design is given in Refs. (12) to (14),
-606-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
References
(1) Report of Inquiry into the Collapse of Flats at Ronan Point, Canning Town. Ministry
of Housing and Local Government, H.M.S.O., London, 1968.
(2) Morrison, C. F., W. R. Schriever, and D. E. Kennedy. The Collapse of the Listowel
Arena. Canadian Consulting Engineer, Vol. 2, No.5, May 1960, p. 36.
(3) Structural Stability and the Prevention of Progressive Collapse. Institution of Structural Engineers Memorandum RP /68/01. London, December 1968.
(4) Institution of Structural Engineers Memorandum RP/68/02. Notes for Guidance
Which May Assist in Interpretation of Appendix I to Ministry of Housing and
Local Government Circular 62/68, London, Decerpber 1968.
(5) British Standard Code of Practice for Large Panel Structures. Addendum No.1 to
CP116 The Structural Use of Precast Concrete. British Standards Institution, London.
(6) The Building (Fifth Amendment) Regulations 1970. Ministry of Housing and Local
Government, London, April 1970.
(7) Larsen-Neilson Flats - GLC to begin work on Strengthening. Building, 21 March
1969, p. 121.
(8) Recommandations Internationales Unifiees pour Ie Calcul et l'Execution des Constructions en Panneaux Assembles de Grand Format. Comite Europeen du Beton, Bulletin d'Information No. 60, Paris, 1967. (English translation by Cement and Concrete Association, London, 1968).
(9) Guidance on the Design of Domestic Accommodation in Load-Bearin~ Brickwork
and Blockwork to Avoid Collapse Following an Internal ExplOSiOn. Institution of Structural Engineers Memorandum RP/68/03. London, 1969.
(10) Haseltine, B. A. and K. Thomas. Load Bearing Brickwork - Design for Accidental
Forces. Clay Products and Technical Bureau Technical Note, Vol. 2, No.6, July
1969.
(11) Astbury, N. F. Brickwor~and Gas Explosions. The British Ceramic Research Assoc.,
Tech. Note No. 146, September 1969.
(12) Rasbash, D. J. and K. L. ~tretch, Explosions in Domestic Structures. The Structural
Engineer, Vol. 47, No. 10, October 1969, p. 403.
(13) The Implications of the Report of the Inquiry into the Collapse of Flats at Ronan
Point, Canning Town. The Structural Engineer, Vol. 47, No.7, July 1969, p. 255.
(14) Comments of the Institution of Structural Engineers to the Ministry of Housing and
Local Government on the Proposed (Fifth) Amendments to the Building Regulations. The Structural Engineer, Vol. 47, No.9, September 1969, p. 376.
-608-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
SUPPLEMENT No. 4
COMMENTARY NO.8
TEMPERATURE CHANGES IN BUILDING
COMPONENTS
by
W. R. SCHRIEVER
Building Structures Section
Division of Building Research
National Research Council of Canada
When building materials expand and contract due to temperature changes, considerable
forces may be produced in restrained structural elements, I.e., in those elements that are
not free to expand and contract with the changes in temperature. Often these forces are
compounded with those produced by shrinkage, by creep and by moisture content changes
and are, therefore, difficult to analyse or predict. In many situations, however, it is very
important for the structural designer to consider the probable structural effects of the
forces produced by temperature changes along with all other forces; indeed the designer is
required to do so by Sentence 4.1.2.1.{l) of the National Building Code (1970).
In addition to expansion and contraction, temperature changes may produce differential
deformation, or warping, of materials as a result of a gradient in temperature through the
thickness of materials or assemblies. Again this may tend to complicate the assessment of
deformations or stresses, but a rational judgement must be made in design if building
elements are to perform in a satisfactory manner.
If these forces are not properly considered, the stresses resulting from such forces can lead
to serious failures (usually cracking) in materials and structural members. Failures occur
when clearances are insufficient, when fasteners do not allow movement or deformations,
or, in the case of restrained elements, when the elements are not strong enough to withstand
the stresses induced. An elementary review of the phenomenon of thermal and moisture
deformations in building materials is given in reference (I), from which Table C8-A is
reproduced to give an indication of the order of magnitude of movement to which various
materials are liable.
-609-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
....
o
Copyright NRC-CNRC
0.024
0.056
0.08
0.056
0.08
0.11
3 X 10-6
7 X 10-6
10 X 10-6
7 X 10-6
10 X 10-6
14 X 10-6
Marble
and Dense
Limestone
Sandstone
Reinforced
Polyester
Steel
Copper
Aluminum
0.024
0.05
3 X 10-6
6 X 10-6
Per
Cent
0.13
0.10
0.07
0.10
0.07
0.03
0.03
0.06
In./
10 ft
of 80F
0.32
0.23
0.16
0.23
0.16
0.07
0.07
0.14
Per
Cent
0.38
0.28
0.19
0.28
0.19
0.08
0.08
0.17
In./
10 ft
of 230F
Deformation Due to
Temperature Change
Brick
Normal
Dense
Concrete
Coefl. of
Thermal
Expansion
per deg F
none
none
none
<.001
0.07
<.001
0.007
0.03
Per
Cent
30 X 106
17 X 106
10.3 X 106
15X106
5 X 106
10 X 106
3 X 106
2.5 X 106
Modulus of
Elasticity
E
0.08
0.008
0.04
In./
10 ft
Moisture
Deformation
on Wetting from
Dry to Saturated
(or Vice Versa)
40000T
50000T
40000T
(yield point)
15000T
0.39
0.29
0.13
1.00
0.008
0.24
12000C
400T
0.006
600T
0.25
25000C
0.47
0.35
0.15
1. 20
0.01
0.29
0.007
0.30
0.02
0.24
0.016
0.20
6000C
500T
0.01
0.12
In./
10 ft
0.01
0.10
Per
Cent
250T
2500C
Failing
Stress
Compo or
Tension
Deformation
Required to
Cause Failure
TABLE C8-A
...
The daily temperature changes that should be considered will depend on the climate
of the locality and may often be as much as 80 F degrees in materials exposed to outside
weather conditions. The seasonal temperature changes are considerably larger and, as
explained(2), may be as much as 230 F degrees for dark-coloured materials backed by
insulation. Considering the 80 F degree change, the corresponding deformation in reinforced
concrete would be of the order of 0.05 per cent. It may be noted that this temperature
deformation is five times the strain necessary to cause tension cracking in concrete if fully
restrained.
An example of the importance of considering temperature variations is the case of multistorey apartment and office buildings with exterior columns partially, and in some cases
fully, exposed to the weather. Exposed columns, when subjected to seasonal temperature
variations, change their length relative to interior columns, which remain unchanged in a
controlled environment. Although in low buildings, this causes insignificant structural
problems, in tall buildings temperature stresses become significant and must be investigated
thoroughly.
Dimensional changes occur not only as the result of temperatures changes, but also from
shrinkage, moisture content changes, chemical processes and creep deformation in the
component materials of a building. If the building or component is not free to contract
or expand, tensile or compressive stresses result. These stresses can be relieved or reduced
to tolerable limits by contraction and expansion joints. Such joints are particularly important to allow contraction to take place along certain preselected lines rather than to produce
cracks along accidental lines of least resistance.
- 611-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-612-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Supplement No.4
PART D
DESIGN DATA FOR SELECTED LOCATIONS IN CANADA
This Part contains a table of climatic design information reprinted from
Supplement No.1 of the NBC of Canada, 1970.
-613 -
Copyright NRC-CNRC
-614-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Province
and
Location
I
!
Design Temperature
January
July 2iti%
2%% 1%
Dry Wet
OF OF . OF
OF
Degree
Days
below
65F
15
One Ann.
Min. Day I Tot.
Rain Rain Pcpn.
in.
in.
in.
Gnd.
Snow
Load
psf
Hourly Wind
Pressures
1/10 1/30
psf
psf
1/100
psf
Earth
quake
R
factor
British Columbia
Abbotsford. ......... ,
Agassiz . ...............
Alberni ..................
Ashcroft ................
Beatton River..........
13
7
22
-14
36
11
4
20
-19
-40
84
87
87
95
78
68
69
65
69
64
5735
5464
5865
7452
12831
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
4.0
4.5
4.5
2.0
2.0
60
60
67
9
17
50
60
52
27
60
8.7
11.5
9.8
5.9
4.6
11.5
15.6
12.1
7.3
5.7
14.9
20.8
14.7
9.0
7.0
4
2
4
1
1
18
11
10
17
18
15
-16
7
14
15
79
91
86
84
80
64
69
68
67
64
5900
9565
5496
5600
5980
0.3
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.3
4.5
2.0
(5
4.0
4.0
55
21
59
50
53
58
80
55
40
57
9.5
5.1
9.9
9.5
9.3
12.1
6.9
13.2
12.1
12.1
15.1
9.1
17.2
15.1
15.4
4
1
2
4
4
18
-17
5
21
35
15
-22
-II
19
-40
81
89
88
81
81
64
66
67
64
64
6000
8743
7946
5800
10800
0.3
0.5
0.6
0.3
0.6
4.0
2.5
2.0
4.0
2.5
53
15
29
38
15
57
"4
67
35
49
9.3
4.7
4.7
10.1
6.5
12.1
6.1
6.1
12.1
7.8
15.4
7.8
7.8
14.3
9.2
4
0
0
4
1
Dog Creek
Duncan
Elko
Fernie .... ...........
Fort Nelson ... ......
-20
21
20
21
-41
-24
19
24
-25
-44
87
85
85
84
84
68
64
66
66
64
9383
5900
9000
9144
12777
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.0
4.0
3.5
4.0
2.5
15
32
20
41
16
37
35
50
80
44
6.5
10.1
5.6
6.8
4.0
7.8
12.1
7.8
8.9
5.0
9.2
14.3
10.4
11.5
6.2
1
4
0
0
1
34
-17
-19
15
2
39
-22
23
12
-3
80
8f
86
85
89
64
64
64
67
69
10874
10504
9093
6055
5808
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.5
2.5
3.5
2.5
4.5
4.0
15
52
18
65
62
53
161
75
45
69
6.4
5.0
5.6
9.8
8.5
7.5
6.1
6.7
12.6
11.5
8.8
7.3
8.0
16.1
15.2
1
1
0
4
2
-10
0
-16
2
2
16
-5
21
1
1
94
91
88
76
76
69
69
66
62
62
6799
6776
8965
7562
7600
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
5.5
6.0
10
12
15
97
88
35
41
38
70
90
6.4
7.1
4.7
7.9
7.9
7.8
8.9
6.1
9.4
9.4
9.4
11.1
7.8
11.2
11.2
1
1
0
4
4
17
-3
-32
18
14
14
8
-37
15
11
84
95
81
66
85
67
69
64
68
5500
5934
10500
6839
5500
0.3
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
4.5
2.5
2.5
3.0
5.0
60
17
18
56
70
44
60
55
30
50
9.5
6.5
5.1
10.2
9.7
12.1
8.2
6.1
12.1
12.6
15.2
10.3
7.3
14.3
16.2
4
1
1
4
4
20
-5
19
19
9
17
11
15
15
5
78
88
84
78
76
64
67
66
66
62
5554
7200
5412
5700
6472
0.3
0.6
0.3
0.4
0.5
3.0
2.5
4.5
5.0
9.2
37
29
55
70
177
46
65
40
40
60
9.8
4.7
9.2
9.2
9.7
12.1
6.1
11.5
11.5
11.5
14.8
7.8
14.2
14.2
13.6
4
0
4
4
4
Osoyoos ..................
Pentieton ................
Port Alberni.. ..........
Port Hardy ............
Port McNeill ..... ....
3
3
22
21
21
2
-1
20
19
19
91
91
87
70
73
69
69
65
61
62
6500
6522
5865
6730
6400
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.5
2.0
2.0
4.5
5.5
5.0
11
12
67
60
50
30
27
52
53
52
6.3
8.3
9.8
10.1
10.1
8.9
11.0
12.1
12.1
12.1
12.3
14.2
14.7
14.3
14.3
1
1
4
4
4
15
31
15
-16
-29
12
37
11
23
34
79
82
71
90
87
64
65
60
69
66
5362
9755
7029
8368
9072
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.4
4.0
2.0
5.5
4.5
2.5
35
22
94
13
19
65
59
33
49
58
8.8
4.4
8.8
7.4
5.2
11.5
5.3
10.4
9.4
6.1
14.8
6.4
12.3
11.9
7.1
4
1
4
1
1
Revelstoke ..............
Riehmond ..............
Salmon Arm ............
Sandspit. ......... .......
Sidney ....................
16
19
10
20
21
21
15
15
18
19
91
81
92
63
77
68
66
69
63
7756
5400
7530
6705
5700
0.6
0.3
0.6
0.5
0.2
4.0
4.5
2.0
4.0
4.0
39
57
20
70
31
88
34
50
28
25
5.0
9.3
6.0
11.2
9.6
6.1
11.5
7.3
13.2
11.5
7.3
14.1
8.9
15.5
13.7
2
4
1
4
4
Smithers ..................
Smith River ............
Squamish
Stewart.. .................
TayloI .....................
.. 22
51
12
10
-34
26
54
8
13
-39
79
80
84
76
80
63
63
67
61
64
9693
13917
5800
8648
10800
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.6
2.5
2.0
4.5
3.5
18
18
100
72
15
39
48
63
160
55
6.6
4.0
7.9
6.8
6.6
7.8
5.3
10.4
8.2
7.8
9.2
6.8
13.5
9.9
9.1
2
2
4
4
1
2.S
Temperature
January
July 2%%
Dry Wet
2'1z% 1%
of
of
of
of
Province
and
Location
Degree
Days
below
65F
IS
One Ann.
Tot.
Min. Day
Rain Rain Pcpn.
in.
in.
in.
Hourly Wind
Pressures
Gnd.
Snow
Load
psf
1/10
psf
1/30
psf
1/100
psf
Earth
quake
R
factor
Terrace
Tofino .. ...... , ............
Trail ...... ........ ........
Ucluelet
Vancouver ................
-5
27
3
27
19
-10
26
-2
26
15
80
66
91
66
78
66
8300
6000
6711
6000
5515
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.3
4.5
6.0
2.5
5.5
4.5
47
95
24
106
57
75
40
62
40
34
7.5
11.3
4.9
11.3
9.3
8.9
13.2
6.7
13.2
11.5
10.6
15.4
8.9
15.4
14.1
2
4
0
4
4
Vernon ...................
Victoria ....................
Williams Lake ..........
Youbou ....................
-5
23
-23
22
-10
20
-28
20
91
76
87
87
69
62
67
65
7420
5579
9300
6200
0.6
0.2
0.4
0.4
2.0
3.5
2.0
4.5
16
26
65
41
25
44
50
6.6
9.9
6.2
9.6
8.2
12.1
7.3
1l.5
10.1
14.5
8.6
13.7
4
1
4
Alberta
Athabaska ................
BanfL ......................
Beaverlodge ..............
Brooks ..... ..............
Calgary. .... ..... ..........
-32
-22
-35
-26
-25
-37
-26
41
-31
-29
82
81
82
90
85
67
64
64
67
64
11493
10551
10682
9700
9703
0.1'
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.9
3.5
2.5
3.0
3.5
3.5
17
18
17
13
17
40
56
47
20
19
6.4
8.1
5.7
8.2
8.3
7.8
9.4
6.9
9.9
9.7
9.4
11.0
8.4
12.0
11.3
0
0
0
0
0
Campsie ..................
Camrose ..................
Cardston ......... , .......
CI'fGsholm . ............
Cold Lake
-30
-28
-24
-26
-33
-35
-33
-29
-31
-38
82
85
85
85
83
66
67
65
65
68
11019
10500
8863
9400
11800
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.6
4.0
3.5
4.0
3.5
3,0
18
15
18
17
17
42
27
30
15
41
6.6
4.5
15.5
13.7
6.5
8.2
6.1
19.3
16.6
7.8
10.1
8.1
24.0
20.0
9.2
0
0
0
0
0
Coleman
Coronation
Cowley
Drumheller
Edmonton .....
..
-25
-24
-26
25
-26
-30
28
-31
-29
29
83
87
84
86
83
65
67
65
66
67
9400
10624
9446
10200
10268
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.9
4.0
2.5
3.5
2.5
4.0
20
14
19
14
18
45
30
37
21
27
11.2
4.9
15.2
6.6
6.6
14.4
6.7
19.0
8.2
8.5
18.2
8.9
23.5
10.1
10.7
0
0
0
0
0
-30
43
-38
-27
42
35
47
43
-30
46
83
82
80
83
84
64
66
65
67
65
10837
13700
11307
10800
13113
0.6
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.3
3.0
2.5
2.0
4.(}
2.5
20
15
18
18
13
46
32
44
30
50
7.6
6.4
5.5
6.6
4.5
8.9
7.8
6.7
8.2
5.5
10.5
9.4
8.1
10.2
6.6
0
0
0
0
0
Grande Prairie
Habay
Hardisty .. ...... .........
High River ................
Jasper ............. ......
37
42
27
-25
-28
43
45
-31
29
32
81
84
87
84
84
64
65
67
64
64
11129
12900
10900
9752
10112
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.8
0.4
3.0
2.5
2.5
5.0
3.0
18
14
14
20
14
46
50
25
38
52
7.7
4.2
5.0
10.6
7.6
9.2
5.0
6.7
12.6
8.9
10.9
6.0
8.8
15.0
lOA
0
0
0
0
0
40
32
28
-24
39
44
-38
-33
-31
42
83
83
86
88
84
65
67
66
66
67
12500
11256
10527
8644
12462
0.4
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.6
2.5
3.0
3.5
3.5
3.5
15
17
18
17
16
52
40
30
22
42
4.1
6.5
4.9
13.4
6.5
5.0
7.8
6.5
16.0
7.8
6.1
9.2
8.4
19.0
9.2
0
0
0
0
0
Manning....................
Medicine Hat ............
Peace Rivet ...............
Penhold ................. ,
....
Pincher Creek
39
-26
-37
-28
26
43
-30
43
-33
-31
82
93
80
85
85
65
69
65
65
65
12100
8852
11700
10602
9198
0.5
0.4
0.6
0.7
0.5
2.0
3.0
2.0
4.0
3.5
14
14
13
16
21
50
27
47
30
37
4.5
8.2
4.9
6.5
14.7
5.5
10.2
6.1
7.8
18.3
6.7
12.5
7.4
9.3
22.6
0
0
0
0
0
Ranfurly .................. 30
Red Deer .................. 28
Rocky Mountain Hou e 25
Slave Lake ................ 34
Stettler .................... -27
-35
33
28
40
-32
86
86
83
81
87
67
65
64
66
66
10964
10302
10167
11385
10243
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
3.5
4.5
4.0
3.0
3.0
17
16
23
18
16
31
30
41
42
25
4.9
6.5
5.5
5.8
5.0
6.1
7.8
6.7
7.1
6.7
7.5
9.3
8.1
8.6
8.8
0
0
0
0
0
Suffield ....................
Taber ........................
Turner Valley ............
Valleyview ................
Ve.neville ..................
-26
-25
-25
36
-29
-31
-31
-29
42
-33
92
89
83
81
85
69
67
64
65
67
9820
8703
10445
11200
11000
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.7
2.5
3.0
4.0
2.0
3.5
13
15
23
18
17
22
22
35
44
31
9.0
12.0
10.7
7.4
5.3
11.0
14.4
12.6
8.9
6.7
13.3
17.2
14.9
10.8
8.4
0
0
0
0
0
Vpnnilion ................
W.i.;;ner ......................
Wainwright ..............
Wetaskiwin ..............
Whitecourt ..............
Wimborne ................
-31
-34
-28
-27
32
26
36
40
32
-31
-38
30
86
81
86
85
82
85
68
66
67
66
65
65
11253
11316
11000
10383
11229
10300
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.7
3.0
2.5
2.5
3.0
2.5
3.5
17
17
15
17
21
17
28
43
26
28
48
27
4.8
5.8
5.1
5.0
6.7
6.4
5.9
7.1
6.7
6.7
8.2
7.8
7.2
8.6
8.6
8.7
10.1
9.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
62
68
-616-
Hi
Copyright NRC-CNRC
'F
Province
and
Location
Design Temperature
January
Juiy2'h%
2WYo 1%
Dry Wet
OF OF
OF
OF
Degree
Days
below
65F
15
One Ann.
Min. Day Tot.
Rain Rain Pcpn.
in.
in.
in.
Hourly Wind
Pressures
Gnd.
Snow
Load
psf
1/10
psf
1/30
psf
1/100
psf
Earth
quake
R
factor
Saskatchewan
Assiniboia ................
Battrum ...................
Biggar
Broadview ................
Dafoe
25
26
29
29
32
29
30
33
33
38
89
89
88
85
84
71
70
69
72
70
9800
9900
10805
11147
11640
0.6
0.3
0.5
0.6
0.6
3.0
2.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
14
14
14
17
16
24
30
36
41
33
9.2
lO.2
9.9
5.8
5.9
11.0
12.6
12.6
6.7
7.1
13.1
15.5
15.9
7.7
8.6
0
0
0
0
0
Dundurn .................
Estevan ....................
Hudson Bay
Humboldt ................
Island Falls ..............
30
-25
33
32
-38
-34
-30
-37
-37
-41
87
89
84
83
80
70
73
71
70
69
10714
9950
11842
11500
13000
0.4
0:8
0.7
0.6
0.4
3.0
3.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
14
17
16
15
19
35
43
50
35
36
8.2
8.8
5.8
6.1
9.4
9.9
10.7
7.1
7.5
1l.8
11.9
13.0
8.6
9.2
14.6
0
0
0
0
0
Kamsack ..................
Kindersley ................
Lloydm instet ...........
Maple Creek ............
Meadow Lake
-29
27
-30
-25
-33
-33
-32
-35
29
-38
85
90
85
89
83
'72
69
68
70
69
11517
10450
11500
9500
12000
0.7
0.4
0.6
0.4
0.6
3.0
3.0
2.5
3.0
2.5
16
13
15
14
15
50
35
31
32
42
6.6
9.4
6.2
9.8
7.6
7.8
12.1
7.8
12.1
9.4
9.1
15.2
9.7
14.7
11.6
0
0
0
0
0
Melfort ...................
Melville ....................
Moose Jaw................
Nipawin ..................
North Battleford ......
34
-28
27
-36
-29
-40
-33
-32
-41
-33
83
85
89
82
86
70
71
71
70
69
11700
11300
9894
12000
11082
0.6
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.6
3.0
3.5
2.5
3.0
3.0
16
16
15
16
13
38
47
28
43
;9
5.4
6.7
7.5
5.6
9.4
6.7
7.8
8.9
7.1
12.9
8.3
9.1
10.6
8.9
17.3
0
0
0
0
0
-35
-29
-29
30
28
-41
-34
34
34
-32
84
85
88
86
88
70
71
71
69
69
11630
11100
10806
10856
11460
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.6
3.0
2.5
3.0
3.0
3.0
16
17
15
14
14
44
41
35
35
35
5.5
7.1
7.1
7.5
9.1
7.1
8.2
8.2
9.2
12.1
9.1
9.5
9.5
11.2
15.6
0
0
0
0
0
Strasbourg
Swift CUrrent
Uranium City ..........
Weyburn ..................
Yorkton ..................
-29
25
-47
27
28
-34
-29
-50
-32
33
86
89
79
89
85
71
70
66
72
72
10800
9849
15000
10500
11362
0.6
0.3
0.3
0.7
0.7
3.5
2.5
2.0
3.0
3.5
15
15
13
16
17
41
24
37
35
50
7.0
9.5
7.8
8.0
6.6
8.2
1l.8
9.4
9.4
7.8
9.7
14.4
11.4
11.0
9.1
0
0
0
0
0
Manitoba
Beausejour ..............
Boissevain ................
Brandon ..................
Churchill..................
Dauphin .................
26
-24
26
38
26
29
28
29
-40
29
83
89
87
75
86
73
74
73
66
72
10700
10269
10828
16728
10798
0.6
0.9
0.8
0.3
0.6
3.5
4.0
4.0
3.5
3.5
20
19
19
14
18
46
40
46
66
52
6.4
9.1
7.8
10.0
6.6
7.8
11.0
9.4
12.3
7.8
9.4
13.1
11.3
15.1
9.2
0
0
0
0
0
36
28
-32
28
-40
-40
-30
-35
-30
-43
81
83
78
82
81
69
73
69
73
68
12414
11057
13200
10900
14300
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.3
3.0
4.5
2.5
3.0
2.0
17
19
20
20
16
45
45
62
48
38
8.7
6.3
7.6
5.9
9.8
11.0
7.8
8.9
7.1
12.1
13.6
9.5
10.4
8.6
14.8
0
0
0
0
0
Morden ....................
Neepawa
Pine Falls ................
Portage Ia Prairie ....
Rivers ....................
-22
25
28
22
27
25
-29
30
25
30
89
86
81
87
85
74
73
73
74
73
10068
10899
11000
10800
10884
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.8
4.0
4.0
4.0
5.0
4.0
21
20
19
20
19
38
53
46
40
47
8.3
7.0
6.0
7.5
7.5
9.9
8.5
7.3
8.9
8.9
11.8
10.2
8.9
10.7
10.6
0
0
0
0
0
25
-25
25
26
-35
-28
28
28
29
38
87
87
85
84
80
74
74
74
74
68
10700
10700
10800
10800
14400
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.4
3.5
3.5
3.5
3,.5
f'1.0
20
20
22
20
16
45
45
47
45
56
7.3
7.3
6.5
6.8
10.7
8.7
8.7
7.8
8.2
12.6
10.3
10.3
9.2
9.9
14.9
0
0
0
0
0
Steinbach ................
Swan River ..............
The Pas ....................
Thompson ..............
Transcona ................
-25
30
32
35
25
-28
33
35
38
28
87
84
81
80
87
74
72
71
69
74
10700
11500
12281
13900
10700
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
3,5
3.0
3.0
2.0
3.5
21
17
17
17
20
45
52
59
50
45
6.5
6.2
7.3
10.1
7.3
7.8
7.3
8.9
12.1
8.7
9.3
8.7
10.8
14.3
10.3
0
0
0
0
0
Virden
Whiteshell
Winnipeg
27
28
-25
30
30
28
86
82
87
73
73
74
10800
10900
10679
0.8
0.6
0.6
4.0
3.0
3.5
18
20
20
46
48
45
7.4
5.9
7.3
8.9
7.1
8.7
10.7
8.5
10.3
0
0
0
OA
Province
and
Location
II'
Degree
Days
below
65F
15
Min.
Rain
in.
~~n.
m.
Gnd.
Snow
Load
psf
Tot.
P~pn.
Hourly Wind
Pressures
1/30
pst
1/100
psf
Earthquake
Rfactor
Ontario
Ailsa Craig. ...............
Ajax ........................
Alexandria ..............
Alliston ....................
Almonte ..................
-2
-11
-7
-14
1
5
-16
-11
-18
88
87
86
85
86
74
75
74
74
74
7300
7500
8400
8300
8700
1.2
1.1
0.9
1.1
1.0
3.5
3.0
3.0
4.5
3.0
38
32
37
30
33
40
43
58
65
60
8.3
9.0
6.4
4.6
6.2
10.4
11.0
7.8
6.1
7.8
12.9
13.3
9.4
7.9
9.6
1
1
2
1
2
Ansonville ..............
Armstrong ..............
Arnprior ..................
Atikokan ................
Aurora ....................
27
38
-16
-29
4
-32
44
-20
-34
-8
86
83
87
85
86
71
71
74
72
74
11400
12458
8800
11066
7900
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.1
2.5
4.0
3.0
3.5
4.0
30
27
31
25
29
69
82
60
65
48
6.4
4.3
5.7
4.2
6.4
7.8
5.1
7.1
5.1
8.2
9.4
6.0
8.7
6.0
10.5
1
0
2
0
1
Bancroft ..................
Barrie ......................
Barriefield ................
Beaverton ............
Belleville ................
-15
9
-7
-10
7
-19
-13
-10
14
11
84
85
82
86
86
73
73
75
73
75
9100
8200
7800
8400
7709
1.1
1.1
0.9
1.1
1.3
2.5
5.0
4.5
5.5
3.0
30
32
34
34
32
73
60
50
50
50
4.8
4.4
7.3
5.0
6.7
6.1
6.1
8.9
6.7
8.2
7.6
8.1
10.8
87
10.1
1
1
1
1
1
Belmont ..................
Bowmanville ............
Bracebridge ............
Bradford ..................
BramptoJl ...............
4
-3
-13
-7
0
0
-17
-11
4
88
86
84
86
87
75
75
72
74
75
7300.
7600
8800
8100
7721
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.1
3.5
3.0
4.5
4.5
6.0
37
32
40
30
31
38
44
69
52
50
7.3
9.6
4.0
5.0
6.6
9.4
11.5
5.3
6.7
8.2
12.0
13.7
6.8
8.8
10.2
1
1
1
1
1
Brantford ................
Brighton ..................
Brockville ................
Brooklin ..................
Burks Falls ..............
3
-5
9
3
-14
1
8
-13
7
18
88
86
85
87
84
75
75
75
75
71
7202
7800
7900
7800
9300
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.1
1.1
4.0
3.0
3.5
3.0
4.0
31
32
38
31
36
48
48
54
44
106
6.5
8.7
6.6
8.0
4.2
7.8
10.4
8.2
9.9
5.5
9.2
12.4
10.1
12.2
7.1
1
1
2
1
1
Burlington ..............
Caledonia ................
Campbellford ..........
Camp Borden ..........
Cannington ..............
3
4
9
8
9
0
1
13
-12
13
88
88
87
85
86
75
75
74
73
74
6800
7200
8100
8200
8400
1.0
1.1
1.3
1.1
1.1
4.0
4.0
3.5
4.5
5.0
31
31
31
28
32
40
46
55
65
50
7.5
6.6
6.1
4.5
5.1
8.9
7.8
7.8
6.1
6.7
10.5
9.2
9.8
8.1
8.7
2
2
1
1
1
13
-7
4
31
6
-17
11
1
-36
3
86
87
88
82
90
74
74
74
71
75
8600
8200
7243
10900
6503
1.0
1.2
1.2
0.9
1.1
3.0
3.0
3.5
3.5
4.0
33
31
38
30
30
58
52
41
64
27
6.2
6.5
7.8
4.0
6.7
7.8
8.2
9.9
5.1
8.2
9.7
10.3
12.5
6.3
10.1
2
1
1
1
1
Chelmsford ..............
Chesley....................
Clinton ....................
Coboconk ................
Cobourg ..................
15
0
4
12
4
20
4
0
16
7
86
86
86
85
86
70
72
73
73
75
9700
7800
7600
8700
7700
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.2
3.0
3.0
3.5
5.0
3.0
30
35
35
38
32
55
100
50
60
45
6.0
6.9
7.8
4.7
9.7
8.2
8.9
9.9
6.1
11.5
11.0
11.4
12.5
7.8
13.6
I
I
I
1
1
Cochrane ................
Colborne ................
Collingwood ............
Cooksville ................
Cornwall ..................
-28
-5
-32
-6
2
9
10
2
-14
85
86
84
87
86
71
75
72
75
75
11412
7700
8400
7000
8200
0.9
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.0
2.5
3.0
4.0
5.5
2.5
31
32
32
31
38
68
45
85
40
55
5.4
9.2
5.3
7.7
6.3
6.7
11.0
7.1
9.4
7.8
8.2
13.0
9.3
11.5
9.5
I
1
1
1
2
Corunna ..................
Deep River ..............
Deseronto ..............
Dorchester Sta . ......
Dorion ....................
6
-20
7
3
27
2
24
11
1
32
90
88
84
88
82
74
73
75
75
70
7000
9500
7500
7400
10800
0.9
0.9
1.1
1.3
0.7
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.0
32
29
33
36
29
30
56
50
42
68
7.3
4.2
6.7
6.9
5.2
8.9
5.0
8.2
8.9
6.1
10.8
6.0
10.1
11.5
7.1
I
2
Dresden ..................
Dryden ....................
Dunbarton ..............
Dunnville ................
Durham ..................
5
29
1
7
2
2
32
4
4
-6
90
78
87
87
85
75
72
75
75
73
6800
11147
7400
7000
8474
1.1
0.9
1.1
1.0
1.1
3.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.0
31
25
32
35
35
29
62
42
48
110
6.7
4.2
9.0
7.0
6.5
8.2
5.1
11.0
8.2
8.2
10.1
6.0
13:3
9.7
10.3
I
0
1
2
1
Dutton ....................
Earlton
Edison ....................
Elmvale....................
Embro ....................
5
-26
28
9
3
2
32
32
13
1
89
87
82
84
86
75
71
72
72
"5
6900
10792
11000
8400
7600
1.1
3.5
3.5
3.5
5.0
3.5
35
29
2S
33
35
32
53
62
75
52
7.1
6.6
4.2
4.9
6.9
8.9
8.5
5.0
6.7
8.9
11.1
10.7
6.0
8.9
11.3
1
1
0
1
1
~.
.~ u
-6
.g
1.(i
0.9
1.1
1.3
-618-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
1
1
1
Province
and
Location
Design Temperature
January
July2~%
2~1% A%
'tFet
F
F
Degree
Days
below
65F
15
One Ann.
Min. Day Tot.
Rain Rain Pcpn.
in.
in.
in.
Gnd.
Snow
Load
psf
HoudyWind
Pressures
1/10 1/30
psf
pst-
1/100
psf
Earth
quake
R
factor
Englehart ..................
Espanola ..................
Exeter ......................
Fergus ....................
Fonthill ..................
26
13
4
2
6
32
17
1
-6
3
87
84
88
85
87
71
70
74
74
75
10900
9300
7500
8452
6800
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.2
1.0
4.0
3.5
3.5
3.5
4.0
29
32
38
33
33
56
55
45
85
50
6.1
5.9
7.8
5.4
7.0
7.8
7.8
9.9
6.7
8.2
9.8
10.1
12.5
8.3
9.7
1
1
1
1
2
Forest ......................
Fort Erie ..................
Fort Frances ............
Fort William ............
GalL ........................
6
7
27
-23
1
2
5
-31
-27
3
89
87
85
83
86
74
75
73
70
75
7031
6600
10700
10405
7600
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.7
1.2
3.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
4.0
34
34
28
28
33
35
55
62
73
55
8.1
7.6
4.2
5.2
5.5
9.9
8.9
5.1
6.1
6.7
12.1
10.5
6.0
7.1
8.1
1
2
0
1
1
Gananoque ..............
Georgetown ............
Geraldton ................
Glencoe ....................
Goderich ..................
7
0
31
5
4
-11
-4
36
2
1
83
86
83
90
85
75
75
71
75
73
7800
7817
12000
7000
7712
0.9
1.1
0.8
1.1
1.1
3.5
5.0
3.0
3.5
3.5
36
32
27
35
31
52
55
63
34
50
7.3
5.7
4.2
6.5
8.3
8.9
7.1
5.0
8.2
10.4
10.9
8.8
6.0
10.3
13.0
1
1
0
1
1
Gore Bay..................
Graham ....................
Gravenhprst ............
Grimsby ..................
Guelph ....................
-9
35
13
5
0
-13
-40
17
2
-4
86
84
84
88
85
70
71
72
75
75
9009
11838
8700
6592
7749
1.0
0.9
1.1
1.0
1.2
2.5
4.0
4.5
4.5
4.5
32
27
40
31
33
45
70
62
38
60
6.3
4.3
4.0
7.6
5.2
7.5
5.1
5.3
8.9
6.3
9.0
6.0
6.9
10.5
7.5
1
0
1
2
1
Guthrie ....................
Hagersville ..............
Haileybury ..............
Haliburton. ...............
Hamilton ................
10
5
25
-15
3
-14
2
30
19
0
85
88
87
84
88
73
75
71
73
75
8300
7200
10700
9038
6821
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.0
5.0
4.0
3.5
3.5
4.0
33
33
29
34
31
56
44
56
75
40
4.5
7.0
6.6
4.0
7.6
6.1
8.2
8.2
5.1
8.9
8.1
9.7
10.2
6.5
10.5
1
1
1
1
2
Hanover. ...................
Hastings ..................
Hawkesbury ............
Hearst ......................
Honey Harbour ........
0
9
-13
28
-10
-4
13
-18
32
13
87
87
86
04
84
73
74
74
71
72
8000
8200
8800
11900
8400
1.1
1.3
0.9
0.8
1.0
3.0
3.5
3.5
2.5
5.0
36
31
39
28
35
106
55
62
56
80
7.0
6.1
6.5
4.2
5.3
8.9
7.8
7.8
5.3
7.1
11.3
9.8
9.3
6.6
9,4
1
1
2
1
1
Hornepayne ............
Huntsville ................
Ingersoll ..................
Jarvis ......................
Jellicoe
35
14
3
5
32
-40
-18
1
2
37
84
84
87
88
83
71
71
12066
8726
7400
7100
11800
0.8
1.0
1.3
1.1
0.8
3.0
4.0
3.5
4.0
3.0
25
36
35
34
28
54
104
46
41
65
4.0
4.0
6.9
6.9
4.2
5.1
5.2
8.9
8.2
5.1
6.3
6.7
11.3
9.7
6.0
0
I
I
I
0
Kapuskasing ............
Kemptville................
Kenora ....................
KilIa10e
Kincardine ..............
28
12
-28
18
3
31
16
31
22
0
84
86
83
87
84
71
75
73
73
72
11560
8338
10796
9074
7800
0.8
1.1
0.9
1.0
1.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
3.0
3.0
28
34
25
28
35
56
57
62
55
75
4.8
6.2
4.2
4.9
8.4
5.9
7.8
5.0
6.1
10,4
7.2
9.7
6.0
7.5
12.8
1
2
0
1
1
Kingston ..................
Kinmount ................
Kirkland Lake ..........
Kitchener ................
Lakefield ................
7
13
27
1
10
-10
17
32
-3
-14
82
85
87
85
86
75
73
71
75
74
7724
8800
11269
7566
8500
0.9
1.1
1.0
1.3
1.2
4.5
4.0
3.5
4.0
3.5
34
38
29
33
30
50
65
62
60
60
7.3
4.2
6.2
5.7
5.5
8.9
5.5
7.8
7.1
7.1
10.8
7.0
9.7
8.7
9.0
38
7
9
-1
0
-44
4
13
5
-4
82
90
87
82
85
70
75
74
71
74
13021
6547
8400
8000
8500
0.7
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.3
2.5
3.5
4.0
3.0
3.0
24
30
32
35
38
69
22
55
75
94
5.0
7,4
5.5
6.9
7.1
6.1
8:9
7.1
8.9
8.9
7.3
10.8
9.0
11.3
11.1
0
1
1
1
London ....................
Lucan ......................
Maitland ..................
Markdale
Martin ......................
3
4
9
3
32
1
0
13
7
37
88
88
85
84
84
75
75
75
73
72
7349
7395
7900
8600
11600
1.3
1.0
1.1
0.9
3.5
3.5
3.0
3.0
4.5
38
38
38
33
26
42
42
54
100
67
7.6
8.2
6.6
6.0
4.3
9.9
10,4
8.2
7.8
5.1
12.8
13.1
10.1
9.9
6.0
1
1
1
1
0
Matheson ................
Mattawa ..................
Midland ..................
Milton ......................
Milverton ................
27
19
9
1
0
32
23
13
3
-4
86
87
84
87
85
71
72
11400
9800
8400
7500
8300
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.3
3.0
3.5
5.0
5.0
3.0
29
31
34
31
38
68
55
80
6.3
5.1
5.3
6.7
6.5
7.8
6.1
7.1
8.2
8.2
9.5
7.3
9.4
10.0
10.3
1
2
1
1
1
..................
..................
.................
72
75
75
72
75
74
1.3
SO
80
-619-Copyright NRC-CNRC
1
1
1
1
Degree
Days
below
65F
15 One Ann.
Tot.
Min. Day
Rain Rain Pcpn.
in.
in.
in.
Gnd.
Snow
Load
psf
-14
2
-32
-9
-2
-18
-2
-36
-14
-6
84
86
84
86
84
73
74
70
75
74
8900
8076
12723
8105
8800
J.l
1.3
0.7
1.0
1.2
4.0
3.0
2.5
3.0
3.0
38
38
31
38
33
65
60
56
55
110
4.0
7.3
4.1
6.3
6.1
5.2
9.4
5.0
7.8
7.8
6.6
12.0
6.1
9.6
9.7
1
1
1
2
1
Muskoka Arpt.
Nakina ....................
Napanee ..................
Newcastle ................
New Liskeard ..........
-13
-30
-7
-3
-25
-17
-34
-11
-6
-30
84
83
84
86
87
72
71
75
75
71
8758
11969
7600
7600
10700
1.1
0.8
1.1
1.1
1.0
4.5
3.0
3.5
3.0
3.5
40
28
33
32
29
62
65
50
44
56
4.0
4.2
6.7
9.6
6.6
5.3
5.0
8.2
11.5
8.2
6.8
6.0
10.1
13.7
10.2
0
1
1
1
Newmarket
Niagara Falls ............
North Bay ................
Norwood
Oakville ..................
-6
5
-17
-10
2
-10
2
-21
-14
-1
86
87
84
87
87
74
75
70
74
75
8000
6881
9677
8300
6700
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.0
4.0
3.5
4.0
3.5
4.5
30
32
33
32
31
50
48
54
60
40
5.4
6.9
5.4
6.1
7.8
7.1
8.2
6.5
7.8
9.4
9.3
9.7
7.8
9.8
11.3
1
2
2
1
1
Orangeville ..............
Orillia ......................
Oshawa ....................
Ottawa ..................
Owen Sound ..........
-4
-11
-2
-13
-1
-8
-15
-5
-17
5
85
85
87
87
84
74
73
75
74
72
8526
8463
7600
8693
7762
1.2
1.1
1.1
0.9
1.0
3.0
5.0
3.0
3.5
3.0
33
34
32
35
33
80
52
42
60
87
5.2
4.0
9.0
6.2
6.9
6.7
5.5
11.0
7.8
8.9
8.5
7.4
13.3
9.6
11.4
1
1
2
1
Pagwa ......................
Paris ........................
Parkhill ....................
Parry Sound ............
Pembroke ................
-29
3
5
-10
-18
-33
1
2
13
-22
83
87
89
83
88
71
75
74
71
73
11599
7400
7300
8480
9100
0.8
1.2
1.2
1.0
0.9
3.0
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
30
37
37
38
29
63
50
40
85
55
4.0
6.5
8.4
5.1
4.5
5.2
7.8
10.4
7.1
5.5
6.6
9.3
12.8
9.7
6.7
0
1
1
1
2
Penetanguishene ......
Perth ........................
Petawawa ................
Peterborough ..........
Petrolia
9
12
-19
-9
5
-13
16
23
-13
2
84
86
88
87
90
72
74
73
74
75
8400
8300
9200
8300
6900
1.0
1.1
0.9
1.2
1.0
5.0
3.0
3.5
3.5
3.0
34
34
29
31
32
80
58
56
60
31
5.3
6.2
4.1
6.1
7.3
7.1
7.8
5.0
7.8
8.9
9.4
9.7
6.1
9.8
10.9
1
2
2
1
1
Picton
Plattsville ................
Point Alexander ......
Porcupine ................
Port Arthur ............
-5
2
20
28
-23
-9
-2
-24
-33
27
85
85
88
87
83
75
75
73
71
70
7500
7600
9500
11400
10405
1,1
1.3
0.9
0.9
0.7
3.0
3.5
3.5
3.0
3.0
33
33
29
28
28
48
58
56
68
73
7.8
6.2
4.2
5.7
5.2
9.4
7.8
5.0
7.1
6.1
11.4
9.7
6.0
8.8
7.1
1
1
2
1
1
6
7
2
6
2
3
4
-2
3
1
88
87
87
88
83
75
75
75
75
71
7000
6700
6800
7046
7800
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
4.0
4.0
5.5
4.0
3.0
36
34
31
34
36
32
55
40
38
87
7.2
7.6
7.7
7.5
8.3
8.9
8.9
9.4
8.9
10.4
11.0
10.4
11.5
10.7
12.9
1
2
1
1
1
-4
-6
6
9
3
-7
10
3
13
-1
86
87
89
85
85
75
74
75
75
75
7700
8100
7000
8000
7400
1.2
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.2
3.0
3.5
4.0
3.0
3.5
32
31
36
38
33
45
45
32
54
50
9.7
6.5
7.1
6.6
6.3
11.5
8.2
8.9
8.2
7.8
13.6
10.3
11.1
10.1
9.6
1
1
1
2
1
Raith .......................
Red Lake ................
Renfrew ..................
Ridgeway ................
Rockland ................
-30
29
17
7
14
35
-32
-21
5
-18
83
82
87
87
87
71
72
74
75
74
11100
11400
8787
6600
8800
0.8
0.7
0.9
1.0
0.9
3.0
4.0
3.0
4.0
3.5
27
21
30
34
36
70
62
62
55
62
4.3
4.6
5.4
7.6
6.3
5.1
5.5
6.7
8.9
7.8
6.0
6.5
8.2
10.4
9.5
0
0
2
2
2
5
3
5
6
-15
2
-1
1
2
20
88
87
89
90
85
75
75
75
74
70
6537
7600
7073
7061
9500
1.0
1.3
1.0
0.9
1.0
3.5
3.5
3.5
3,5
2.5
31
38
36
32
32
38
50
35
30
50
7.6
7.3
6.9
7.3
6.7
8.9
9.4
8.9
8.9
7.8
10.5
12.0
11.3
10.8
9.1
2
1
1
1
Schreiber ................
Seaforth ..................
Simcoe ....................
Sioux Lookout ........
Smiths Falls ............
-30
3
5
-29
12
34
-1
2
32
-16
81
87
88
83
86
70
74
75
11131
7800
7100
11313
8300
0.8
1.2
1.1
0.9
3.0
3,5
4.0
4.5
3.0
31
36
35
27
34
48
53
38
63
57
5.2
7.8
6.9
4.3
6.2
6.1
9.9
8.2
5.1
7.8
7.1
12.5
9.8
6.0
9.7
1
1
1
0
2
Province
and
Location
........... ,
........ H
72
75
1.1
- 62.0-
Hourly Wind
Pressures
1/10 1/30
psf
psf
1/100
psf
Copyright NRC-CNRC
Earthquake
Rfactor
Hourly Wind
Pressures
Design Temperature
January
July 2Va%
2i?% 1% ~ Wet
F OF
I"
OF
Days:
below
65F
Smithville. ............... ..
Smooth Rock Falls. .. .
Southampton ......... .
South Porcupine ..... .
Stirling.................... ..
5
-28
2
-28
-9
2
-32
-2
-33
-13
87
85
83
87
86
75
71
71
71
74
7200
11500
7811
11400
7976
1.0
0.8
1.0
0.9
1.3
4.5
2.5
3.0
3.0
3.0
32
30
37
28
31
41
62
87
68
51
7.0
4.9
7.9
5.7
5.9
8.2
6.1
9.9
7.1
7.5
9.7
7.5
12.4
8.8
9.5
2
1
Stratford ................... I
Strathroy ................ .
Sturgeon Falls ........ ..
Sudbury.................. ..
Sundridge ............ .
2
4
-16
-15
-15
-2
1
-20
-20
-19
85
90
85
86
84
75
75
70
70
71
7900
7200
9500
9600
9400
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.1
4.5
3.0
3.5
3.0
4.0
38
37
33
29
36
61
38
55
55
94
7.0
7.4
5.3
6.1
4.8
8.9
9.4
6.7
8.5
6.1
11.3
1l.8
8.3
11.4
7.6
1
1
1
1
1
Tavistock
Thamesford ............. .
Thedford ................ ..
T~llsonbu:g ............ ..
Tunagaml.. .............. ..
2
3
5
5
-22
-2
-1
2
1
-26
85
87
89
88
87
75
75
74
75
71
7700
7400
71 00
7200
10200
1.3
1.3
1.1
1.1
1.1
3.5
3.5
3.5
4.0
3.5
35
36
34
35
29
60
46
37
38
60
7.1
6.9
8.5
6.5
5.7
8.9
8.9
10.4
8.2
7.1
11.2
11.4
12.8
10.3
8.8
1
1
1
Timmins ................ ..
Toronto ................... .
Trenton ................ ..
Trout Creek
Trout Lake ............ ..
-28
1
-5
-16
-36
-33
-3
-9
-20
40
87
87
86
84
77
71
75
75
71
68
11400
6827
7510
9600
14040
0.9
1.0
1.3
1.1
0.5
3.0
5.0
3.0
3.5
3.5
28
31
32
34
25
68
40
50
80
78
5.3
8.1
7.3
4.9
7.0
6.7
9.9
8.9
6.1
8.2
8.3
12.1
10.8
7.5
9.7
Uxbridge ................ ..
Vanier ..................... .
Vittoria .................. ..
Walkerton ............... .
Wallaceburg ............ ..
-7
-13
-11
-17
3
-3
86
87
88
88
90
74
74
75
73
75
8170
8600
7100
7647
6668
1.2
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.1
4.0
3.5
4.5
3.5
3.0
31
35
35
36
31
44
60
40
100
27
6.0
6.2
7.4
7.4
6.7
7.8
7.8
8.9
9.4
8.2
9.9
9.6
10.8
11.9
10.1
1
2
1
1
1
Waterloo.. ................
Watford ....................
Wawa .. ...... ..............
Weiland ....................
West Lorne ..............
1
5
-32
6
5
-3
2
-37
3
2
85
90
81
87
89
75
75
70
75
75
7566
7000
10331
6691
6900
1.3
1.1
0.9
1.0
1.1
4.0
3.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
33
34
36
34
35
60
35
50
52
30
5.7
7.1
5.0
6.9
7.2
7.1
8.9
5.9
8.2
8.9
8.7
11.1
6.9
9.7
11.0
Whitby....................
White River ..............
Wiarton .... ................
Windsor ....................
Wingham ..................
-2
39
1
7
2
-5
44
-3
4
2
87
84
83
90
87
75
71
71
75
73
7500
11674
8063
6579
7800
1.1
0.8
1.0
1.1
1.1
3.0
3.5
3.0
3.0
3.5
32
30
37
33
36
43
46
80
22
81
9.0
4.2
6.9
6.1
7.3
11.0
5.0
8.9
7.5
9.4
13.3
6.0
11.4
9.2
12.0
Woodstock................
Wyoming ..................
3
5
1
2
85
90
75
74
7542
7000
1.3
1.0
3.5
3.0
34
32
50
33
6.4
7.3
8.2
8.9
10.4
10.9
Arvida ......................
-12
-21
-28
-13
-20
-17
-25
-32
-19
-24
85
85
84
82
85
74
71
71
73
71
8600
10700
11537
9372
10528
0.8
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.7
3.5
3.0
3.0
4.0
3.0
41
38
33
41
39
60
72
69
81
75
4.9
4.9
5.0
8.0
5.2
6.1
6.1
6.1
9.9
6.7
7.4
7.5
7.4
12.2
8.5
Asbestos ..................
Aylmer.....................
Bagotville ................
Baie Comeau ............
Beaconsfield..............
-14
-13
22
-16
-10
-19
-17
-26
-20
-16
84
87
84
76
86
73
74
71
67
74
8800
8700
10734
10400
8200
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.8
3.5
3.5
3.0
3.0
3.0
42
35
38
35
38
70
60
74
102
54
5.4
6.2
5.5
11.4
6.6
6.7
7.8
7.1
14.4
7.8
8.2
9.6
9.0
17.9
9.2
Bedford ....................
Beloeil......................
Brossard ................ ..
Buckingham ............
Cacouna ..................
-10
11
-11
-14
-13
-15
-16
-16
-18
-18
85
85
85
87
80
74
74
74
74
71
8200
8400
8300
9000
9900
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.7
3.0
3.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
38
39
37
36
35
55
58
58
62
85
6.4
5.9
6.5
6.4
8.6
7.8
7.1
7.8
7.8
11.0
9.4
8.5
9.2
9.4
13.8
Campbells Bay..........
Camp Valcartier .......
Chicoutimi
Coaticook ................
Contrecoeur ...........
-18
-13
-20
-12
-12
-22
-19
-24
-17
-17
88
82
83
83
85
74
73
71
73
74
8900
9400
10104
9194
8800
0.9
3.5
0.8 . 4.0
0.7
3.0
0.9
3.0
3.5
0.8
30
41
35
39
38
58
81
75
55
70
4.9
8.0
5.2
5.6
5.6
6.1
9.9
6.7
7.1
6.7
7.4
12.2
8.5
8.9
8.0
4
2
2
Cowansville ..............
Dolbeau ...... ............
Dorval......................
Drummondville .......
Farnham ..................
-11
-23
-10
-16
84
73
8400
10900
8203
8700
8418
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.9
39
32
38
43
38
55
75
54
72
55
6.4
4.5
6.6
5.0
6.5
7.8
5.5
7.8
6.1
7.8
9.4
6.7
9.2
7.4
9.3
Province
and
Location
Quebec
Acton Vale ..............
Alma ........................
Amos ......................
Ancienne Lorette......
!---.-:==-.--r:-::;;-::-;;o;-r;;r-! Degree
6
1
-13
-11
J! I ii
-16
85
I!
H
74
3.0
2.5
3.0
4.0
3.0
Gnd.
Snow
Load
psf
Earthquake
R-
factor
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
o
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
4
4
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Province
and
Location
Fort Olimo ...........
Fort Coulonge .......
Gagnon ...................
Gaspe ......................
Gatineau ................
Design Temperature
hffi
Dry
OF
74
88
76
79
87
-9
13
-32
-13
-17
GatinealrPointe ......
Gentilly ....................
Gracefield ..............
Granby ....... ............
Great Whale River ....
-13
13
-19
-12
-34
-18
23
-17
-37
87
85
86
84
76
Harrington Harbour .
Havre St. Pierre .........
Hemmingford ..........
HuU ........................
Iberville ..................
-16
-9
-13
-10
18
-21
-14
-17
-15
64
74
85
87
85
-18
-24
-24
-40
-16
85
85
85
76
84
-39
-16
-18
-16
-19
58
86
85
85
81
-16
-24
-17
-18
15
86
86
85
84
85
82
82
82
85
84
Joliette ....................
Jonquiere ................
Kenogami ................
Knob Lake ..............
Knowlton ................
Kovik Bay ...............
Lachine ..................
Lachute ..................
Lafleche . .................
La Malbaie ..............
La SaUe ....................
La Tuque ................
Laval ......................
Lennoxville
Lery ........................
-13
-13
-20
20
37
-11
-37
10
-13
-11
-14
-10
-19
-11
-13
-10
-13
-17
IS
Min.
Degree
Days
be1ew
65F
74
67
67
74
in.
One
Day
Rain
in.
Ann.
Tot.
Pcpn.
in.
15445
8900
13700
9800
8700
0.2
0.9
0.4
0.4
0.9
2.0
4.0
2.5
4.5
3.5
74
65
8700
8900
9300
8400
14843
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.3
64
74
74
74
11194
11200
8400
8700
8500
0.4
0.4
0.9
0.9
0.9
8954
10500
10515
14880
8500
July2'h%
~et
74
74
73
74
71
71
66
73
-
74
74
74
71
74
73
74
73
74
Hourly Wind
Pressures
Gnd.
Snow
Load
psC
1/10
psC
1/30 1/100
psf
psf
16
30
33
35
35
75
58
112
120
62
11.2
5.0
7.6
17.0
6.2
13.8
6.1
8.9
20.4
7.8
16.9
7.3
10.4
24.4
9.6
1
2
1
1
2
3.5
4.5
3.5
3.0
2.5
35
42
32
39
26
62
85
60
56
60
6.2
4.8
5.0
5.5
13.3
7.8
5.9
6.1
6.7
16.0
9.6
7.1
7.3
8.1
19.1
2
2
2
2
0
3~0
50
38
39
35
38
lOB
3.5
3.0
3.5
3.0
125
55
62
55
15.0
15.7
6.4
6.2
6.5
19.7
19.3
7.8
7.8
7.8
25.5
23.7
9.4
9.6
9.3
1
2
2
2
2
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.3
0.9
4.0
3.0
3.0
2.5
3.0
33
35
35
28
39
81
75
75
90
55
5.2
5.3
5.3
7.0
5.8
6.3
6.7
6.7
8.2
7.1
7.5
8.4
8.4
9.7
8.6
2
4
4
1
2
17400
8200
8900
8300
9800
0.2
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.8
2.0
3.0
3.5
3.0
4.5
13
38
40
37
32
70
54
65
58
85
14.1
6.6
6.5
6.5
8.2
17.6
7.8
7.8
7.8
10.4
21.9
9.2
9.2
9.2
13.1
2
2
2
2
4
8200
9818
8400
8893
8300
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
3.0
3.0
3.5
4.0
3.0
38
34
42
40
38
54
75
60
55
55
6.6
4.2
6.6
4.9
6.5
7.8
5.0
7.8
6.1
7.8
9.2
6.0
9.1
7.5
9.2
2
2
2
2
2
9200
9000
9400
9200
8680
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
4.0
4.5
4.0
4.5
3.0
41
45
41
39
39
81
84
81
82
55
8.0
8.0
8.0
4.5
5.4
9.9
9.9
9.9
5.5
6.7
12.2
12.2
12.2
6.6
8.2
4
4
4
2
2
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.6
0.9
3.0
3.0
4.0
3.5
3.0
34
31
36
35
39
65
59
62
106
78
5.0
4.9
6.3
11.1
9.4
6.1
5.9
7.8
14.4
12.1
7.4
7.0
9.5
18.4
15.3
1
2
2
2
2
Rain
Earthquake
Rfactor
-13
-13
-12
19
-19
-19
-18
-17
Malartic ....................
Maniwaki ................
Masson
Matane ....................
Megantic ..................
-27
-20
-14
11
-16
-31
-24
-18
-15
-20
85
85
87
75
81
Mont loti
Mont Laurier
Montmagny ...... .......
Montreal ........ .........
Montreal Nord ........
-12
-20
-13
-10
-10
-16
-24
-19
-16
-16
74
84
82
86
86
69
73
73
74
74
9924
9793
9000
8203
8200
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
35
33
38
42
42
103
65
85
54
54
11.3
5.0
8.2
6.6
6.6
14.7
5.9
10.4
7.8
7.8
18.8
6.9
13.1
9.2
9.2
2
2
4
2
2
-10
-37
-27
-10
-10
-16
-40
-32
-16
-16
86
75
85
86
86
74
67
71
74
74
8200
14398
11400
8200
8200
0.8
0.3
0.9
0.8
0.8
3.5
2.0
3.5
3.5
3.0
42
31
32
42
38
54
103
65
54
54
6.6
6.0
5.4
6.6
6.6
7.8
7.1
6.7
7.8
7.8
9.2
8.4
8.2
9.2
9.2
2
1
1
2
2
Pi nco urt
Plessisville ................
Pointe Claire ............
Port Alfred
Port Cartier ..............
-10
-14
-15
-19
-16
-23
-26
85
84
86
83
78
74
74
74
71
65
8300
9400
8200
10500
11000
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.5
3.0
4.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
38
43
38
37
42
55
80
54
75
115
6.5
5.4
6.6
5.2
14.0
7.8
6.7
7.8
6.7
17.3
9.2
8.2
9.2
8.5
21.2
2
2
2
4
4
-39
-16
-19
18
16
63
85
82
84
74
74
73
73
69
16549
8300
8937
8700
9900
0.2
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.7
2.0
3.0
4.5
3.5
3.5
15
37
45
41
35
43
58
84
63
92
13.2
6.5
8.0
4.9
10.0
16.9 121
7.8
9.9 12.2
6.1
7.5
12.6 15.7
1
2
4
2
4
-13
-10
-19
-21
-36
-11
-13
13
-12
73
73
73
74
73
71
73
74
68
73
-622-
Copyright NRC-CNRC
- - - - - - - - _...._ - .
Province
and
Location
Degree
Days
65 F
'one Ann.
i Day Tot.
Rain Rain! Pcpn.
in.
in.
in.
bel~w
15
Min.
Gnd.
Snow
Load
psf
Hourly Wind
Pressures
1/10 1/30 1/100
psf
psf
psf
Earth
quake
R
factor
-13
22
-11
-11
-27
18
-26
-16
17
32
80
84
83
85
85
71
71
73
74
71
9900
10521
9000
8400
11400
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.9
4.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
3.5
35
29
39
42
32
85
72
55
60
63
8.6
4.5
6.3
6.6
5.4
1l.0
5.5
7.8
7.8
6.7
13.8
6.6
9.5
9.1
8.2
4
2
2
2
1
-16
-10
-13
-23
-13
20
15
-18
-28
-19
81
85
85
84
82
73
74
74
71
73
9871
8300
9000
11000
9000
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.8
3.5
3.0
3.0
2.5
4.5
38
38
42
30
45
79
55
70
75
84
5.6
6.5
5.9
4.6
8.0
6.7
7.8
7.1
5.5
9.9
8.0
9.2
8.5
6.5
12.2
2
2
2
2
4
St. Hubert
St. Hubert de
Temiscouata ........
St. Hyacinthe ............
St. Jerome ................
St. Johns ..................
-11
-16
85
74
8337
0.8
3.0
37
58
6.5
7.8
9.2
-14
-12
-13
78
85
84
85
71
74
74
74
10600
8524
9283
8500
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
3.5
3.0
3.0
3.0
36
40
42
38
85
60
70
55
8.6
5.6
6.0
6.5
11.0
6.7
7.1
7.8
13.8
8.0
8.4
9.3
4
2
2
2
-10
-18
-17
-18
-15
-17
10
-10
-13
37
-21
-16
16
-19
-40
82
86
86
82
76
73
74
74
73
66
9700
8200
8200
8900
14880
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.3
4.0
3.5
3.5
4.0
2.5
37
42
42
44
28
70
54
54
84
90
5.3
6.6
6.6
7.6
7.0
6.3
7.8
7.8
9.4
8.2
7.5
9.2
9.2
11.5
9.7
2
2
2
4
I
Senneterre
...
Seven Islands ..........
Shawinigan ..............
Shawville ..................
Sherbrooke ..............
-28
-22
-15
-17
-13
-32
-27
-20
-21
-18
85
78
85
88
84
71
64
74
74
73
11400
11327
9380
8900
8490
0.9
0.5
0.8
0.9
0.9
3.0
3.5
3.5
3.5
4.0
40
42
36
30
39
70
116
81
58
55
5.0
14.3
4.1
5.4
4.3
6.1
17.6
5.0
6.7
5.5
7.3
21.5
6.1
8.2
6.9
1
4
2
2
2
SilIery........................
Sorel ........................
Sutton
Tadoussac ................
Temiscaming ............
-13
-12
-11
-15
-21
-19
-17
-16
-19
-25
82
85
84
80
87
73
74
73
70
71
9000
8868
8600
9871
9581
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.7
1.1
4.5
4.0
3.0
3.5
3.5
45
36
39
32
32
84
80
55
85
60
8.0
5.0
6.4
8.4
5.0
9.9
6.1
7.8
10.7
6.1
12.2
7.3
9.4
13.5
7.3
4
2
2
4
2
-14
-13
-14
-27
-9
-19
-18
-18
-31
-14
83
85
87
85
85
73
74
74
71
74
9815
9306
8900
11169
8300
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
4.0
4.5
4.0
3.0
3.0
41
40
36
35
38
81
84
62
64
54
7.6
4.5
6.4
5.0
6.5
9.4
5.5
7.8
6.1
7.8
11.6
6.6
9.4
7.3
9.3
2
2
2
1
2
Varennes ..................
Vercheres ................
Verdun......................
Victoriaville ..............
Ville d' Anjou ............
-11
-11
-10
-14
-10
-16
-17
16
-19
-16
85
85
86
84
86
74
74
74
74
74
8500
8700
8200
9250
8200
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
40
38
42
43
42
60
65
54
80
54
5.9
5.6
6.6
5.4
6.6
7.1
6.7
7.8
6.7
7.8
8.5
8.0
9.2
8.2
9.2
2
2
2
2
2
Ville Marie
Waterloo ..................
WestmounL ..............
WiudsorMills
-24
-12
-10
-13
-28
-17
-16
-18
87
84
86
84
71
73
74
73
10557
8400
8200
8500
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.9
3.5
3.0
3.5
5.0
28
39
42
40
62
55
54
60
6.3
5.4
6.6
4.9
7.8
6.7
7.8
6.1
9.5
8.2
9.2
7.5
1
2
2
2
New Brunswick
Alma ........................
Bathurst ....................
Campbellton. .............
Chatham ...................
Edmundston ............
-5
-10
-14
-10
-16
-10
-15
18
-15
-20
80
86
84
87
81
69
71
71
71
72
8400
9462
9358
9065
9796
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
4.5
3.0
4.5
3.0
3.0
39
35
40
37
36
60
80
112
62
69
7.9 ~0.4
8.9
7.0
7.8
9.9
6.1
7.8
6.3
8.2
13.6
11.3
12.5
9.8
10.6
1
2
2
2
2
Fredericton ..............
Gagetown -
Grand Falls ..............
Moncton ..................
Oromocto ................
-10
-9
-16
-7
-9
16
15
-21
-12
-15
86
84
82
85
85
70
70
72
71
70
8671
8235
9635
8711
8700
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.9
4.5
4.0
3.0
3.5
4.5
41
41
38
39
41
60
60
66
75
60
6.2
7.5
6.0
9.6
7.4
7.8
9.9
7.8
12.1
9.4
9.7
12.9
9.9
15.0
11.9
2
2
2
1
2
Sackville....................
Saint John ................
St. Stephen ..............
Shippigan ..................
Woodstock ................
-5
-7
-8
7
14
-10
12
-13
-12
19
83
79
82
84
87
70
68
69
69
71
8420
8453
8400
9500
8756
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.5
0.9
4.0
5.0
5.0
2.5
3.5
38
48
45
35
37
63
53
50
92
63
8.6
8.0
9.4
10.8
5.7
11.0
9.9
11.5
13.2
7.1
13.9
12.2
14.0
16.0
8.7
1
2
2
1
2
u~~~
. . . u
~.*
Design Temperature
DegreeDays
15
Min.
One
Day
~et
bel~w
Rain
65 F
in.
Rain
in.
Ann.
Tot.
Pcpn.
in.
5
-3
5
2
4
-10
8
1
-2
0
82
82
82
79
80
70
70
69
68
68
8400
8400
7700
8100
7718
0.6
0.4
0.6
0.5
0.6
4.0
4.0
5.0
4.5
5.5
40
46
52
53
54
Deber!
Digby .. ...............
Greenwood
Halifax
Kentville
-7
5
1
4
0
-12
1
2
0
4
82
77
83
80
83
70
69
70
68
70
8399
7076
7591
7361
7792
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
4.0
5.0
5.0
5.5
5.0
Liverpool
Lockeport ..
Louisburg
Lunenburg
New Glasgow
7
7
6
6
5
3
3
1
2
10
82
78
80
81
81
68
68
69
68
70
7362
7300
8100
7700
8400
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.4
North Sydney
PictOLl ..
Port Hawkesbury ..
Springhill ..
Stewiacke ...
5
-5
1
-4
5
0
-10'
-6
9
-10
82
81
82
82
82
70
70
70
70
70
8100
8400
8200
8400
8300
5
-5
-7
-1
9
0
-10
-12
-5
5
82
83
81
82
73
70
70
70
70
68
8049
8400
8226
7900
7340
-3
-1
-3
.J
-6
5
8
8
81
81
81
82
70
70
70
69
5
2
5
20
6
1
2
12
24
2
75
76
81
80
69
67
67
68
62
5
1
25
7
5
10
5
27
3
10
81
82
81
71
81
68
68
67
32
7
11
6
1
36
2
17
2
6
75
68
63
77
76
66
32
5
32
35
1
36
46
56
45
60
41
51
42
Province
and
Location
Nova Scotia
Amherst ,.'.
Antigonish
Bridgewater
Canso ....
Dartmouth
Sydney
Tatamagouche
TrLlfo ...
Wolfville
Yarmouth
January
2W;;'
OF
...
...
...
...
Labrador City ..
Port aux Basques ....
St. Anthony
...
St. John's
Stephenville
...
Twin Falls
Wabana
Wabush Lake
...
...
Yukon
Aishihik
Dawson
Destruction Bay
Watson Lake
Whitehorse .. ............
.%
July 2\1,,%
Gnd.
Snow
Load
psf
Hourly Wind
Pressures
Earthquake
R
factor
1/10
1/30
1/100
psf
psf
psf
60
65
45
55
45
8.6
8.6
8.5
10.1
11.0
lOA
11.0
12.1
11.0
13.9
12.6
13.9
14.3
14.0
42
44
41
54
41
53
48
58
45
56
8.1
8.3
7.6
lOA
13.3
13.0
12.8
14.0
13.0
1
2
5.5
5.0
4.0
5.0
4.0
57
57
53
55
45
1
1
2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.5
3.5
4.0
3.0
4.0
4.0
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
8486
8400
8440
8900
804
I
I
I
1
1
804
704
10.4
9.9
11.0
9.9
37
40
45
45
58
9.1
9.3
10.8
8.9
11.5
12.6
11.5
804
lOA
14.4
14.2
14.8
14.6
12.8
50
45
50
45
42
50
60
65
55
63
9.7
8.4
12.3
8.0
8.1
1l.5
10.4
14.4
10.4
10.4
13.6
12.8
16.8
13.3
13.3
2
I
1
1
1
3.5
3.5
4.0
5.0
4.5
51
44
41
41
49
49
58
53
56
55
9.7
8.3
7.7
7.4
8.6
11.5
13.6
13.0
12.6
13.0
13.1
2
1
9.9
9.9
10.7
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
4.0
3.5
4.5
4.0
43
43
39
37
66
68
62
75
8.6
8.7
9.4
12.7
10.4
10.4
11.5
15.0
12.7
12.5
14.0
17.8
I
I
I
8440
9200
10138
12603
9190
0.6
0.6
0.3
0.3
0.6
4.0
4.0
3.5
3.0
4.5
57
48
36
29
54
47
72
91
128
48
11.9
10.8
9.6
9.6
16.4
14.4
13.2
11.5
11.5
20.1
17.4
16.0
13.7
13.7
24.3
2
2
1
1
2
8978
9254
11887
8378
9352
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.5
0.4
3.5
4.0
2.5
4.0
90
62
103
55
~.O
45
40
29
54
37
12.0
9.6
6.0
12.3
9.6
14.4
1l.5
7.1
14.4
11.5
17.2
13.7
8.4
16.8
13.7
1
2
1
2
1
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.3
2.5
4.0
3.0
4.0
3.5
31
56
32
57
40
110
75
111
68
68
14200
8800
10896
8991
8717
86
6.6
11.4
11.9
12.6
12.9
7.8
13.2
16.0
15.3
15.0
9.2
15.3
21.0
18.6
17.5
1
2
2
2
1
75
77
75
66
68
66
14300
8900
14200
0.3
0.6
0.4
2.5
4.0
2.5
29
55
31
110
60
110
6.6
11.7
6.6
7.8
14.4
7.8
9.2
17.6
9.2
1
2
1
49
59
48
63
45
72
79
74
74
76
61
61
60
61
61
14747
15067
14300
15768
12898
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
10
13
12
14
13
26
58
50
50
34
6.0
4.2
6.2
4.2
4.0
7.3
5.0
7.3
5.0
5.4
8.9
6.0
8.7
6.0
7.1
4
2
4
4
4
54
45
78
75
63
60
13740
12475
0.3
0.2
2.0
17
11
54
27
4.0
5.8
5.0
7.1
6.2
8.7
4
4
68
004
1.5
1.5
-624-
72
72
11.5
lOA
Copyright NRC-CNRC
I
1
I
I
I
1
2
1I
Province
and
Location
!;
Northwest Territories
Aklavik
Alert
Arctic Bay ...
Baker Lake ..
Cambridge Bay .... ".
-48
48
-46
76
54
55
71
60
61
43
68
57
67
63
70
-50
-50
-50
-48
-52
-48
-50
-40
-43
-46
-49
Chesterfield ..
Clyde ....., ., ., , . ...
Coppermine .. .....
Coral Harbour
Eskimo Point. ...
-43
-47
-38
-40
Eureka
Fort Good Hope
Fort Providence ....
Fort Resolution ..
Fort Simpson .....
-49
-51
-46
-44
-50
-51
-53
-49
-47
-53
55
81
75
79
82
Fort Smith
Frobisher..
Hay River
Holman 1sland ..
Inuvik
-46
-42
-41
-46
48
-49
-45
-45
-48
-50
83
59
81
64
77
51
-49
-52
-37
-48
-53
-51
-55
-39
I-50
51
49
81
56
71
>
......
lsachsen
Mould Bay ..
Norman Wells
Nottingham Island ....
Port Radium
Rae .. .......... ..... , ....
Rankin Inlet . ..... ..
Resolute
Resolution Island ..
...
Yellowknife
-48
-40
-47
-32
47
-40
-50
-43
-49
-35
-49
75
68
51
45
76
Degree
Days
below
6SoF
18017
23488
20933
19790
21628
-
19568
19881
19484
19452
18200
IS
Min.
Rain
in.
0.2
1.5
II
2.0
50
54
45
61
56
9.2
12.8
6.9
18.5
10.2
11.0
16.6
8.7
25.0
12.3
13.0
21.2
10.9
33.2
14.9
0
4
1
1
0
0.1
63
13.0
12.4
8.2
4
0
2
0
2
0.2
0.2
2.5
10
II
9
12
1.5
2.5
3.0
1.5
2.5
3
12
10
II
12
25
60
48
45
56
9.9
9.9
5.5
6.1
6.3
12.6
14.1
6.7
7.5
7.8
15.9
19.3
8.1
9.2
9.5
I
I
0
0
1
1.5
13
14
12
5
10
37
50
50
25
46
6.3
11.8
5.5
13.3
8.1
7.8
14.4
6.7
16.3
11.5
9.5
17.5
8.1
19.9
15.8
0
2
0
2
4
4
3
13
12
9
30
22
63
85
54
9.5
9.9
8.6
9.6
7.9
12.1
12.6
12.1
12.1
9.9
15.2
15.9
16.4
15.0
12.4
2
I
2
1
48
52
27
Il'l
42
7.2
9.6
8.3
17.7
7.2
11.0
13.8
13.0
29.5
11.0
0
0
2
2
0
0.1
0.1
15800
19300
22673
16021
15634
IjlOO
psf
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
24269
23594
16111
17705
16726
1/30
psf
15.1
18.3
0.3
0.2
0.3
O. I
0.2
63
1/10
psf
11.0
14.4
10.4
10.4
7.1
14176
17876
14518
19926
18200
Earth
quake
R
factor
7.7
1\.2
8.3
8.8
6.2
65
62
Hourly Wind
Pressures
46
43
19
32
32
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
61
Gnd.
Snow
Load
psf
10
6
6
7
6
17028
14651
147%
146511
64
Day Tot.
i Pcpn.
in.
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.5
1.0
0.2
0.1
62
63
64
63
24220
~IAn".
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
2.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.5
2.0
- 62.5-
9
11
5
16
8
8.9
11.5
10.4
23.1
8.9
Copyright NRC-CNRC
19681970
C. D. Carruthers (Chairman from July 1970)
R. F. Legget (Chairman to July 1970)
D. C. Beam*
G. C. Lount
J. D. Beaty
I. Maclennan
R. A. Bird
D. A. Matheson
S. D. C. Chutter
H. H. G. Moody
W. G. Connelly
A. T. Muir
R. F. DeGrace
L. P. Picard
K. R. Rybka
S. A. Sasso*
R. A. W. Switzer
I. Campbell (ex officio)
P. Dobush (ex officio)
C. G. E. Downing
T. R. Durley (ex officio)
L. A. Kay (ex officio)
A. F. Duffus
J. J. Dussault
W. R. Edmonds*
H. Elder
J. L. Jolicoeur
H. A. Lawless
Copyright NRC-CNRC