Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Sedimentary Geology
jo u rn a l h o m ep ag e: w w w .el se vie r.c o m/ lo ca te/ se dg e o
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 10 August 2012
Received in revised form 30 July 2013
Accepted 31 July 2013
Available online 6 August 2013
Editor: J. Knight
Keywords:
I Formation
Iquitos Arch
Zircon grain typology
Heavy detrital minerals
UPb geochronology
a b s t r a c t
Integrated data on paleocurrents, the morphology of detrital minerals and zircon grains, chemical compositions
and UPb geochronology, reveal that the ow of the modern Solimes-Amazonas River has changed from west to
east since the PlioPleistocene. This nding is supported by several lines of evidence, including paleocurrent directions and detrital mineral assemblages in the I Formation and in recent sediments. The I Formation, which
was most likely deposited during the Pliocene, has NE and SE paleocurrents, a high proportion of stable detrital
mineral assemblages and UPb zircon ages that we interpreted as being derived from the Amazonian craton (e.g.,
the Rondonian-San Igncio and Sunsas-Grenvillian geochronologic provinces) and neighboring provinces, including the Neoproterozoic to Cambrian Brazilian Pampean mobile belts. A small proportion is derived from
the Cambrian to Silurian Famatinian continental arch. Another source is the Precambrian and Paleozoic basement
from the Andes cordillera, which includes several metamorphic inliers in Colombia, Peru and Bolivia. The overlying recent deposits have different provenances and are characterized by a more variable detrital assemblage with
zircon grains that are enriched in trace elements and depleted in Si and have Mesoproterozoic ages. In our interpretation, the erosion of the Iquitos Arch after deposition of the I Formation allowed the westward expansion of
the Solimes-Amazonas system in the Plio-Pleistocene.
2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The uplift and subsequent orogenic deformation of the Andes has
caused important paleogeographic changes in western Amaznia since
the Miocene. The marine connection with the Caribbean sea closed,
the courses of the Magdalena and Orinoco rivers changed, Andean foreland basins formed due to exural subsidence and the Amazonas
established a connection to the Atlantic, increasing the mass accumulation rates of terrigenous sediments in the Amazonas fan (e.g., Hoorn
et al., 1995; Hooghiemstra and Van der Hammen, 1998; Dobson et al.,
2001; Roddaz et al., 2005b; Wesselingh and Salo, 2006; Latrubesse
et al., 2007; Figueiredo et al., 2009). Because the effects of these changes
are not clear, different proxies for the geodynamics of the SolimesAmazonas River must be considered. Hoorn et al. (1995); Dobson
et al. (2001) and Wesselingh and Salo (2006) stated that the architecture of the modern Solimes-Amazonas River formed since the
Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: ahorbe@ufam.edu.br (A.M.C. Horbe), marcelo.motta@cprm.gov.br
(M.B. Motta), carolina_almeida@ufam.edu.br (C.M. de Almeida), elton@unb.br (E.L. Dantas),
lucieth@gmail.com (L.C. Vieira).
0037-0738/$ see front matter 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2013.07.007
late Miocene. Campbell et al. (2001) interpreted that the Andean contribution to the Atlantic occurred in the end of the Pliocene (2.5 Ma),
while Bezzerra (2003) and Rossetti et al. (2005) interpreted it as occurring in the late PleistoceneHolocene.
The aim of this paper is to study detrital minerals from the I Formation and associated recent deposits along the Solimes River, both
of which represent the youngest sedimentation event recognized in
the Amazonia region, to establish their sediment sources (provenance)
and to investigate the formation of the modern Solimes-Amazonas
River and their connection to the Atlantic Ocean. These two units are
part of the large sedimentary Solimes-Amazonas basin and therefore
might clarify the geological evolution and timing of the development
of the present course of the Solimes-Amazonas River systems. In addition, we will discuss the in uence of the Iquitos Arch and Andes rocks in
the sedimentation and landscape evolution of western Amaznia. To
answer these questions, we selected the six most signi cant outcrops
in the cliffs, islands and bars along the Solimes River between the cities
of Tef and Manaus (Fig. 1). According to Maia et al. (1977) and Melo
and Villas Boas (1993), the cliffs along the river correspond to the I
Formation, whereas the islands and bars are composed of recent riverbed sediments.
Fig. 1. (A) Location map showing the main Paleozoic sedimentary basins: Amazonas in the east side, Solimes in the center and the Peru and Bolivia foreland Amazon basin (NAFB and
SAFB after Roddaz et al., 2005a, 2005b) in the west side in a SRTM image. The limits of the I Formation in black (CPRM, 2006) and the limit of the Solimes-Amazon hydrographic
basin in red; (B) Geology and location of the samples in the study area, S stratigraphic section of the I Formation, SD samples from recent deposits. The Solimes Formation occurs in
a large region in the west of the I Formation and in a few outcrops in the study area (1B); (C) Simpli ed chronostratigraphic diagram of the studied units in the Solimes Paleozoic basin.
2. Geological setting
The western portion of the Amazonas River in Brazil is called the
Solimes River and drains the Andean cordillera, the sedimentary rocks
of the Solimes Paleozoic basin, and the Central Brazil and Guyana shields
(Amazonian craton) (Fig. 1A, B). The two youngest sedimentary units of
the Solimes Paleozoic basin are the Solimes Formation (called the
Pebas Formation in Peru and Colombia) and the I Formation (Fig. 1C).
Several studies have investigated the sedimentary environment and
palynology of the Solimes Formation (e.g., Caputo and Silva, 1991;
Hoorn, 1994; Hoorn et al., 1995; Leguizamn Vega, 2005; Wesselingh
and Salo, 2006; Latrubesse et al., 2007). These studies indicate that the
Solimes Formation occupied a large lowland area adjacent to the Andean foreland basins (Roddaz et al., 2005a) (Fig. 1A) and was deposited
during the late Miocene (1110 Ma; Cozzuol, 2006; Latrubesse et al.,
2007) in a uvio-lacustrine to transitional marine environment. Its
upper part is composed of thin to thick sandstone layers interspersed
with massive white-reddish clay layers that are centimeters to meters
thick, and the lower part is composed of gray-greenish clay layers that
contain plant fossil, sh teeth and scales, evidence of bioturbation and
root marks. The Andes and the Amazonian craton are considered to be
the source area for the rocks that make up this formation (Hoorn
et al., 1995; Latrubesse et al., 2007).
In contrast, the I Formation, which overlies the eastern part of the
Solimes Formation (Fig. 1) above an erosive unconformity (Maia et al.,
1977; Leguizamn Vega, 2005), has not been well studied and cannot
be dated by biostratigraphy because of the lack of fossils. It is characterized predominantly by whitish to reddish yellow sandstone that is
intercalated with grayish-reddish silty-clay lenses and is thought to be
PlioPleistocene (Maia et al., 1977; Melo and Villas Boas, 1993) or Late
PleistoceneHolocene (Rossetti et al., 2005) in age. The I Formation
has been correlated to the Madre de Dios Formation in Peru
(Campbell et al., 2006). However, the exact extents of the I and
Solimes Formations are controversial because they are present in a
large, fairly inaccessible region. Moreover, Leguizamn Vega (2005)
described sedimentary rocks related to the Solimes Formation along
the Solimes River (Fig. 1B). Quaternary deposits overlie both the
Solimes and I Formations along the Solimes-Amazonas River.
They formed by the erosion of the Andes and Amazon craton cover
the lowland regions that formed an extensive Quaternary uvial plain
tens of kilometers in length during avulsion of the Solimes-Amazonas
Rivers (Latrubesse and Franzinelli, 2002).
11
Fig. 2. Schematic sections of the I Formation and proportion of detrital grain minerals in the 0.1250.062 mm and 0.2500.125 mm fractions.
I Formation from the upper part (Fig. 7). These data suggest that the
two units have different source areas (provenance).
Table 1
Detrital mineral grains' (Fig. 4) average content in % identi ed in the I Formation (n = 61) and recent deposits (n = 19) (Tr = trace amount; = not found).
I Formation
Mineral
Mica
Andalusite
Sillimanite
Zircon
Kyanite
Staurolite
Pyroxene
Tourmaline
Garnet
Amphibole
Monazite
Rutile
Epidote
Anatase
Brookite
Titanite
Topaz
Olivine
Recent deposits
Lower part
Upper part
0.2500.125 mm
0.1250.062 mm
0.2500.125 mm
0.1250.062 mm
18
1459
126
324
223
122
119
115
112
19
16
18
13
1
Tr
Tr
Tr
Tr
18
3048
130
230
122
128
123
116
19
119
14
112
16
13
Tr
Tr
Tr
Tr
838
14
433
246
233
121
115
16
13
117
15
18
15
12
Tr
771
12
134
446
126
113
118
19
12
116
16
111
12
1
Tr
0.2500.125 mm
0.1250.062 mm
12
210
114
419
437
136
245
15
111
328
17
220
Tr
2
12
19
245
128
129
1056
113
19
240
214
27
13
Fig. 4. Macroscopic characteristics of detrital mineral grains found in the I Formation and in the recent deposits.
Thus, the zircon morphology suggests that types D, S12 and S13
may be related to tholeiitic and calc-alkaline granite magma sources.
However, types S8 and S24, which occur only in the lower portion of
the I Formation, and type S3 in the recent sediments, appear to be
sourced from aluminous leucogranites, monzogranites and granodiorites, which are major crustal magma derivatives. Type S18, which
is more common in the uppermost portion of the I Formation,
could be correlated with more alkaline granitic magma source
rocks (Pupin, 1980). In all cases, the main sources are reworked continental crust.
In addition to the different zircon grain types, the chemical composition based on the ratio of Zr + Hf + Y + REE + Nb + Ta + W +
Fig. 5. Proportion of detrital mineral grains in the recent sediments in the 0.1250.062 mm and 0.2500.125 mm fractions.
Fig. 6. Ternary diagrams: (A) zircontourmalinerutile (ZTR) and (B) ZTREpPAmp (epidote (Ep) + pyroxene (P) + amphibole (Amp))KSAnd (kyanite (K) + sillimanite (S) + andalusite
(And)). Black dots 0.1250.062 mm fraction, gray dots 0.2500.125 mm fraction.
15
Fig. 7. Distribution of zircontourmalinerutile (ZTR), mica and andalusite along the I Formation sections.
and 20% of these zircons, respectively, are in the upper part. The upper
part also contains almost 7% of the detrital zircons that are older than
2.6 Ga (Fig. 10A, B). The recent deposits have a UPb age spectrum
that is similar to that of the I Formation, but the proportions of zircons
with ages from 0.6 to 0.7 Ga and 1.3 Ga are different (Fig. 10C).
5. Discussion
5.1. Mineral provenance
The complex geologic evolution of western Amaznia, the juxtaposition of several geological provinces and the insuf cient geochronological
data make it dif cult to determine the precise source area of the I Formation sediments. However, the detrital zircon UPb age spectrum,
which is dominated by Mesoproterozoic zircon ages from 1.6 to 1.0 Ga
(Fig. 10, Supplementary data le), indicates that the provinces of the
southwest Amazonian craton, and primarily the Rondonian-San Igncio
and Sunsas-Grenvillian provinces (Tassinari and Macambira, 1999;
Santos et al., 2000; Geraldes et al., 2001; Ruiz et al., 2004; Fuck et al.,
Table 2
Detrital zircon grains' type (Fig. 8) contents in % identi ed in the I Formation (n = 61)
and recent deposits (n = 19) (Tr = trace amount; = not found).
Zircon types
I Formation
Recent deposits
Part
D
S2
S3
S7
S8
S11
S12
S13
S17
S18
S19
S22
S24
J4
J5
I
G1
P4
Lower
Upper
41
1
3
3
5
7
15
1
6
3
3
5
37
6
6
12
12
4
7
4
2
1
26
8
Tr
8
13
8
4
10
12
3
4
1
17
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by CNPq (Conselho Nacional de
Desenvolvimento Cient co e Tecnolgico, grant no. 620003/2006-
Fig. 10. UPb geochronology data of detrital zircon grains from the I Formation (A. lower
part, B. upper part) and C. recent deposits. See Supplementary data le for full data set.
Fig. 9. Zr + Hf + Y + ETR + Nb + Ta + W + Pb + Th + U versus Si concentration in
the zircon grains from the I Formation (A. lower part, B. upper part) and recent deposits
(C).
Bhn, B., Pimentel, M.M., Matteini, M., Dantas, E.L., 2009. High spatial resolution analysis
of Pb and U isotopes for geochronology by laser ablation multi-collector inductively
coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-MC-ICP-MS). Anais da Academia Brasileira
de Cincias 81, 99114.
Campbell Jr., K.E., Heizler, M., Romero-Pittman, L., Prothero, D.R., 2001. Upper Cenozoic
chronostratigraphy on the southwestern Amazon basin. Geology 29, 595598.
Campbell, K.E., Frailey, C.D., Romero-Pittman, L., 2006. The Pan-Amazonian Ucayali Peneplain, late Neogene sedimentation in Amazonia, and the birth of the modern Amazon
River system. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 239, 166219.
Caputo, M.V., Silva, O.B., 1991. Sedimentao e tectnica da Bacia do Solimes. In: Raja
Gabaglia, G.P., Milani, E.J. (Eds.), Origem e Evoluo das Bacias Sedimentares. Petrobras,
pp. 169193.
Cardona, A., Cordani, U.G., Ruiz, J., Valencia, V.A., Armstrong, R., Chew, D., Nutman, A.,
Sanchez, A.W., 2009. UPb zircon geochronology and Nd isotopic signatures of the
pre-mesozoic metamorphic basement of the eastern Peruvian Andes: growth and
provenance of a Late Neoproterozoic to carboniferous accretionary orogen on the
Northwest margin of Gondwana. Journal of Geology 117, 285305.
Casquet, C., Fanning, C.M., Galindo, C., Pankhurst, R.J., Rapela, C.W., Torres, P., 2010. The
Arequipa Massif of Peru: new SHRIMP and isotope constraints on a Paleoproterozoic
inlier in the Grenvillian orogen. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 29,
128142.
Cozzuol, M.A., 2006. The Acre vertebrate fauna: age, diversity, and geography. Journal of
South American Earth Sciences 21, 185203.
CPRM, Companhia de Pesquisas e Recursos Minerais, 2006. Mapa geolgico do Estado
do Amazonas. Sistema de informaes Geogr cas SIG, Programa Geologia do
Brasil, Escala 1:1.000.000. Ministrio de Minas e Energia. Rio de Janeiro em CDROM.
19
Fig. 11. Geological map of the Amaznia region showing the geochronological provinces of the Amazon craton and surrounding regions after Tassinari and Macambira (1999), Fuck et al.
(2008), Cardona et al. (2009) and Decou et al. (2013). The red arrows and the gray arrow indicate respectively the position of the main primary sources and the sediment ow direction of
the I Formation and of the recent deposits. The estimate position of Iquitos and Purus Arch is shown in red dotted lines (Roddaz et al., 2005a).
Decou, A., von Eynatten, H., Dunkl, I., Frei, D., Wrner, G., 2013. Late Eocene to Early Miocene
Andean uplift inferred from detrital zircon ssion track and UPb dating of Cenozoic forearc sediments (1518S). Journal of South American Earth Sciences 45,
623.
Dobson, D.M., Dickens, G.R., Rea, D.K., 2001. Terrigenous sediment on Ceara Rise: a Cenozoic
record of South American orogeny and erosion. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology
Palaeoecology 165, 215229.
Figueiredo, J., Hoorn, C., van der Vem, P., Soares, E., 2009. Late Miocene onset of the Amazon
River and the Amazon deep-sea fan: evidence from the Foz do Amazonas basin. Geology
37, 619622.
Figueiredo, J., Hoorn, C., van der Vem, P., Soares, E., 2010. Late Miocene onset of the Amazon River and the Amazon deep-sea fan: Evidence from the Foz do Amazonas Basin.
Geology 38 e213.
Fuck, R.A., Neves, B.B.B., Schobbenhaus, C., 2008. Rodinia descendants in South America.
Precambrian Research 160, 108126.
Geraldes, M.C., Schmus, R.V., Condie, K.C., Bell, S., Teixeira, W., Babinski, M., 2001. Proterozoic
geologic evolution of the SW part of the Amazonian craton in Mato Grosso state, Brazil.
Precambrian Research 111, 91128.
Hooghiemstra, H., Van der Hammen, T., 1998. Neogene and Quaternary development of
the neotropical rain forest: the forest refugia hypothesis, and a literature overview.
Earth-Science Reviews 44, 147183.
Hoorn, C., 1994. An environmental reconstruction of the paleo-Amazon River system
(Middle-late Miocene, NW Amazonia). Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 112, 187238.
Hoorn, C., Guerrero, J., Sarmiento, G., 1995. Andean tectonics as a cause for changing
drainage patterns in Miocene northern South America. Geology 23, 237240.
Latrubesse, E.M., Franzinelli, E., 2002. The Holocene alluvial plain of the middle Amazon
River, Brazil. Geomorphology 44, 241257.
Latrubesse, E.M., Silva, S.A.F., Cazzuol, M., Absy, M.L., 2007. Late Miocene continental sedimentation in southwestern Amazonia and its regional signi cance: biotic and geological
evidence. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 23, 6180.
Ruiz, A.S., Geraldes, M.C., Matos, J.B., Teixeira, W., Schmus, W.R.V., Schmitt, R.S., 2004. The
15901520 Ma Cachoeirinha magmatic arc and its tectonic implications for the
Mesoproterozoic SW Amazonian craton crustal evolution. Anais da Academia Brasileira
de Cincias 76, 807824.
Santos, J.O.S., Hartmann, L.A., Gaudette, H.E., Groves, D.I., Mcnaughton, N.J., Fletcher, I.R.,
2000. A new understanding of the provinces of the Amazon craton based on inte-
gration of eld mapping and UPb and SmNd geochronology. Gondwana Research 3, 453488.
Tassinari, C.C.G., Macambira, M.J.B., 1999. Geochronological provinces of the Amazonian
craton. Episodes 22, 174182.
Wesselingh, F.P., Salo, J.A., 2006. A Miocene perspective on the evolution of the Amazonian
biota. Scripta Geologica 133, 439459.