0 Votos favoráveis0 Votos desfavoráveis

34 visualizações154 páginasThe daily astronomical rigging and fraud called in Modern physics and Modern Astronomy and the stupidity of relativity theory and quantum mechanics and strings theories exposed. See how physicists and astronomers still read the telescopes wrong and rig data to keep their confusions aboout why nothing works in astronomy? IOU memeber can not read a telescope and they read telescopes wrong and that allowed such illusions physics as dark energy that no one can find big bang that no one heard black holes that no one saw .. ETC and all other IOU stupidity. reading telescopes in real time eperceptions gives a different " Real time Universe" that is anything but not what IOU me,mbers tells you about and matches experiemnts with unprecedented accuracy.

Feb 13, 2010

© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

DOC, PDF, TXT ou leia online no Scribd

The daily astronomical rigging and fraud called in Modern physics and Modern Astronomy and the stupidity of relativity theory and quantum mechanics and strings theories exposed. See how physicists and astronomers still read the telescopes wrong and rig data to keep their confusions aboout why nothing works in astronomy? IOU memeber can not read a telescope and they read telescopes wrong and that allowed such illusions physics as dark energy that no one can find big bang that no one heard black holes that no one saw .. ETC and all other IOU stupidity. reading telescopes in real time eperceptions gives a different " Real time Universe" that is anything but not what IOU me,mbers tells you about and matches experiemnts with unprecedented accuracy.

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

34 visualizações

The daily astronomical rigging and fraud called in Modern physics and Modern Astronomy and the stupidity of relativity theory and quantum mechanics and strings theories exposed. See how physicists and astronomers still read the telescopes wrong and rig data to keep their confusions aboout why nothing works in astronomy? IOU memeber can not read a telescope and they read telescopes wrong and that allowed such illusions physics as dark energy that no one can find big bang that no one heard black holes that no one saw .. ETC and all other IOU stupidity. reading telescopes in real time eperceptions gives a different " Real time Universe" that is anything but not what IOU me,mbers tells you about and matches experiemnts with unprecedented accuracy.

Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

- Hidden Figures: The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black Women Mathematicians Who Helped Win the Space Race
- Hidden Figures Young Readers' Edition
- The Law of Explosive Growth: Lesson 20 from The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership
- The E-Myth Revisited: Why Most Small Businesses Don't Work and
- The Wright Brothers
- The Power of Discipline: 7 Ways it Can Change Your Life
- The Other Einstein: A Novel
- The Kiss Quotient: A Novel
- State of Fear
- State of Fear
- The 10X Rule: The Only Difference Between Success and Failure
- Being Wrong: Adventures in the Margin of Error
- Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions
- The Black Swan
- Prince Caspian
- The Art of Thinking Clearly
- A Mind for Numbers: How to Excel at Math and Science Even If You Flunked Algebra
- The Last Battle
- The 6th Extinction
- HBR's 10 Must Reads on Strategy (including featured article "What Is Strategy?" by Michael E. Porter)

Você está na página 1de 154

(I/O) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(I – O)/O] θ’0

Real time physics = event time physics + time delay physics

Quantum = classical + relativistic

joenahhas1958@yahoo.com

My name is Professor Joe Nahhas Re- founder of Arabs real time physics July 4th 1973

There is one and only one physics Arabs real time physics

This is me in October 2009 flashing my 1979 picture stapled to my thermo book congratulating

myself on 1001 new Arabs real time physics formulas to change physics and history

Page 1

Chapter one: What is Arabs real time astronomy?

Car size at distance 4

If we stand in the middle of the street and watch a car moving directly away from us we

see as if the size of the car shrunk. If we take a picture of the car at different distances

then we see that the pictures of the car look like as if the car contracted in size. The

further the car away from us the smaller image of the car in the picture. The size of the

car did not change but real time light data reflected from the car and ran through air

and into our eyes changes the real time image of the car to indicate a different location

of the car and not a different size of the car. Our eyes see real time images of a moving

car. If the car stops, then the image of the car freezes. A picture or a snap shot of a

moving car is a frozen image of the moving car. When a car moves its real time image

change size but the car does not change size. The car as a moving object at different

distances has a variable real time image that our eyes see in real time and depends on

distance and motion as perceived by our eyes. In short statements

Our eyes see objects in real time as different objects at different distances and different

speeds. Or, our eyes see real time objects we call images that change when measured

from different distances or when moving. Our eyes do not see actual objects but

Images of actual objects and our eyes see different images of same actual objects when

at different distances of moving

In mathematical form:

Page 2

1 = 1 self evident

2 = 2 is self evident

Image = image = I is self evident line - 1

Object = object = O = self evident line - 2

And, - Object = - objects = - O = self evident line - 3

I=I line - 1

O=O line - 2

And, - O = - O line - 3

Adding: line - 1 and line - 2 and line - 3

I + O – O = O + (I – O) line - 4

I = O + (I – O); O – O = 0 one left side

(I/O) = (O/O) + (I – O)/O; dividing by on both sides line - 5

Or, (I/O) = 1 + (I – O)/O; O/O = 1 line - 6

(I/O) O = O + [(I – O)/O] O Line - 7

Real time object = event time Object + time delay object

Real time astronomy = event time astronomy + time delay astronomy

R1 R2 O2

Car size at distance 2

D D D

R1 O1 d

The image of R1 is R2; or R2 in real time is R1

Page 3

R2 = R2

R2 = R1 + (R2 – R1)

Dividing by R1

(R2/R1) = (R1/R1) + (R2 – R1)/ R1

Visual measurement scale

(R2/R1) = 1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1]

Distance R1 when measured using light source and not a measuring tape is not the same

as R1 but is measured as R2. R2 is the visual distance of R1. Using an eye as an instrument

visual distance R2 is smaller than actual distance R1. The percentage of visual distance R2 to

actual distance R1 is equal to (R2/R1).

(R2/R1) = 1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] = 1 + [(R2/ R1) – 1]

Percentage = 1 + [percentage – 1]

Multiplying by R1

(R2/R1) R1 = R1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] R1

Visual = actual + (Visual – actual)

In clear words when we try to measure the distance R1 using light source reflected from

the car we see a percentage of R1 which is (R2/R1) R1 and that percentage times R1 is the

visual we measure R2

Real time distance = event time distance + delay time distance

Visual distance = distance + visual effect

Visual measurement scale using distance

Real time astronomy scale using distance

(R2/R1) = 1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1]

Visual measurement scale using Velocity

Real time astronomy scale using distance

(V2/V1) = 1 + [(V2 – V1)/ V1]

Visual measurement scale using angle

Real time astronomy scale using angle

(θ 2/ θ 1) = 1 + [(θ 2 – θ 1)/ θ 1]

Visual measurement scale using angular velocity

Real time astronomy scale using angular velocity

(θ’ 2/ θ’ 1) = 1 + [(θ’ 2 – θ’ 1)/ θ’ 1]

Visual measurement scale using time

Real time astronomy scale using time

(t 2/ t 1) = 1 + [(t 2 – t 1)/ t 1]

(V/A) = 1 + [(V – A)/ A]

Page 4

(I/O) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(I – O)/O] θ’0

Real time physics = event time physics + time delay physics

In old terms

Quantum = classical + relativistic

(R2/R1) = 1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1]

(R2/R1) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] θ’0

This is Arabs real time astronomy distance scale to measure the angular velocity θ’0

(V2/V1) = 1 + [(V2 – V1)/ V1]

(V2/V1) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(V2 – V1)/ V1] θ’0

This is Arabs real time astronomy Velocity Scale to measure the angular velocity θ’0

Planet Mercury angular velocity accumulation in arc second per hundred years

Or,

Planet Mercury Angular velocity θ’0 = 2 π/Tm = 2(3.1415)/88 x24x3600

Tm = Planet Mercury orbital period = 88 days = 88 x 24 x 3600 seconds

Planet Mercury angular velocity accumulation in arc second per

century is: δ θ’0 = (2 π/ Tm) (1 century/Tm) (180/ π) (3600)

= (2x3.1415/88x24x3600) (36526days/88days) (180/3.1415) (3600)

= 70.75

(R2/R1) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] θ’0

(R2/R1) δ θ’0 = δ θ’0 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] δ θ’0

What we see = what there is + visual illusion

Modern astronomers see = 70.75 + 43

What there is = 70.75

The visual Illusion is = 43

[(R2 – R1)/ R1] δ θ’0 = 43

Page 5

As an example: when Astronomers look at planetary motion around the sun and

they saw the angular velocity in arc second per century:

Equal to δ θ’ m = (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600)

= 70.75 arc second per century

Astronomers also saw the visual effect

Of: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = [(r m - r0)/r0] (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600)

And it is equal to [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43

Where r m = Mercury – Sun distance = 58.2 X 106km

And v m = Mercury around the sun orbital speed Sun distance = 47.9 km/sec

And r 0 = r e = Earth – Sun distance = 149.6 X 106km

And T m = Mercury around the sun orbital period

Planet Distance r Planet Orbit Less Spin Angular velocity;

X 106km Orbit T speed v Earth speed v/r

in speed km/sec arc sec/ century

km/sec

Mercury 58.2 88 47.9 18.1 .002 70.75

Venus 108.2 224.7 35.05 5.7 6.52 10.86

Earth 149.6 365.26 29.8 .46511 4.1

Mars 227.936 687 24.14 0.2411

Jupiter 778.412 4333 13.06 12.6

Saturn 1,426.725 10760 9.65 9.87

Uranus 2,870.97 30690 6.80 2.59

Neptune 4,498 60180 5.43 2.68

Pluto 5906.4 90730 4.74

When astronomers measure the angular velocity from two different distances

they make the following error: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43

When astronomers measure Planet mercury angular speed around the Sun

from Earth r0 and not from the sun r m they make the following error

Error: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43

Visual = actual + Illusions

Visual = actual + (visual – actual)

Quantum = classical + relativistic

Real time classical = classical + relativistic illusions

Quantum mechanics and relativity theory is 20th century Garbage for physics.

Measurements = actual + errors

Actual + errors = actual + errors

Page 6

Chapter Two

The confrontation between Arabs real time Astronomy and

Western Nobel prize winner modern space time astronomy

Arabs astronomers:

0

M Mercury S Sun

That:

1- All object classified as planets Suns Moons has a real time circular motion

As: r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)

And not

1 – Kepler - Newton’s ellipse r= [a (1 - ε²)/ (1 + ε cosine θ)]

Or Einstein’s rotating ellipse: r= a (1 - ε²)/ [1 + ε cosine (θ - Ψ)]

2- The difference between two real time circular motions is a visual rotating ellipse

Or, the difference between r1 = r 10 e í [θ (1) + ω (1) t] and r2 = r 20 e í [θ (2) + ω (2) t]

Is Arabs real time ellipse: r= [a (1 - ε²)/ (1 + ε cosine θ)] e í [θ + ω t]

That is: r= [a (1 - ε²)/ (1 + ε cosine θ)] e í [θ + ω t]

Is a visual ellipse

4 – Gravity does not exist between planets moons and sun

That Newton’s F = - G m M/r² is wrong

That Einstein’s F = - G m M/r² + k/r4 is wrong

5 – Gravity is due to atmosphere density and spin period

That G = G [Ρ, T°] = G [atmospheric density, spin period]

In short: Arabs real time astronomy says

500 years ago Europeans took 10th century Arabs real time Astronomy and changed it to Space- time

astronomy and in the process physics was changed from an Arabic science to European – western stupidity

globalized through planet of the Apes Institution and best known as Alfred Nobel Prize winner Institution

Page 7

Ape Man Modern Physicist Nobel Prize winner physicist Ape Ass.

Alfred Nobel: The Man behind the Nobel Prize; Joe Nahhas: The Man after Alfred Nobel Institution head

Since 1901, the Nobel Prize has been honoring men and women from all corners of the globe for

outstanding achievements in physics. The foundations for the prize were laid in 1895 when Alfred Nobel

wrote his last will, leaving much of his wealth to the establishment of the Nobel Prize. But who was

Alfred Nobel? Meet Alfred Nobel - scientist, inventor, entrepreneur, author and pacifist. What is modern

physics? Did anyone hear the big bang? Did anyone saw a black hole? Did anyone find Einstein’s gravity

waves? Did anyone hook up a hose to the sky and found dark energy to verify E = mc2? Does anyone

have a proof of Newton’s action at a distance? Does anyone have a proof of Einstein time travel? Does

anyone figure out why humans have to accept Alfred Nobel prize winners claim that the universe is made

up of particles that dies and rebirth billion billion times a second? Hey dude I am a redneck one

grandfather was a damn farmer and my other grandfather was a damn Carpenter and my father was a

Carpenter by inheritance but I never knew what a dumb ass really is till I met my science teacher! What

did Alfred Nobel honor? The difference between an Alfred Nobel Prize winner physicists and fortune

tellers is a flip of a coin. Space - Time is not physics but Alfred Nobel physicists’ flip of a coin between a

crime and stupidity. Alfred Nobel Institution honored criminals in Alfred Nobel suit for all of past

century. Modern space – time physics changed physics from science to stupidity and physicists from

researchers to criminals. In writing: Yes I am after Alfred Nobel Institution head on my plate and I

accept nothing less. Space – time physics is stupidity itself. Ending Nobel Prize for stupidity from

classrooms and scientific calculations is the only Nobel thing left to do. Alfred Nobel Prize became 1001

times more worth in cash value. Big Institutions backed wrong physics and physicists for all of past

century for a prize and a billion dollars jack pot and garbage for physics. I am Joe Nahhas and I am

unknown to the world of physics but I have 1001 new physics formulas to cut Alfred Nobel Institution

head and delete Alfred Nobel Prize winner physics and physicists without loss of subject. This book is

just the beginning and it is prime time and it is Arabs real time astronomy

Page 8

Arab Physicists of Baghdad of 950 Ad had said:

I: Measurements are made along the line of sight or line of measurement

Arabs in 950 AD said that light going vertical (blue) to the eye it will go through the eye to

be seen. The Arabs added that light coming oblique (pink) to the line of sight (blue line) we

would see the part of light (pink) that is equal to the amount of light of horizontal amount

(blue) or its vertical projection. What the Arabs concluded is that human eye and machines

are unidirectional that can only recognize the amount of light along the line of sight or line

of measurements. The Arabs mean that any point on the oblique pink line will be measured

as its vertical projection as the blue line. The Arabs added that the horizontal projection of

the pink line is the amount that would be measured as Zero or not seen at all. A point

location on the pink line would be measured as equal to its vertical projection on the blue

line and that part would be seen detected and measured by the eyes and instruments and

its horizontal projection would not be detected or measured by the eyes or instruments and

would be completely missed.

r0 sine ω t

r0

ωt

r0 cosine ω t

The angle between the pink line and the blue line is called light aberration angle. The

aberration angle between the line where an object is (pink) and an object projection is

with the eye as center. Light aberrations angle equals to: ω t = arc tan (v/c) where v

= relative velocity of the moving object and c is light velocity. The light coming from a

distant object is seen along the line of sight and that meant we do not measure actual

distance of an object r0 (pink line) but we measure its image or vertical projection

which is r0 cosine ω t (blue line) and we escape measuring the horizontal projection

r0 sine ω t which is perpendicular to the line of sight (black line).

Page 9

Using real time mathematics to explain what we can see and/or detect or/and

measure is what the Arabs have/had said and that would mean that if we try to

measure a distance r0 we would not find r0 but we would find: Arabs real time

distance is seen in real time along the line of sight.

í ω (r) t

Or, r = r0 cosine ω t + í r0 cosine ω t = r0 e Eq - 1

Or r = real (blue = along line of sight) + í imaginary (black = perpendicular to line of sight)

í ω (r) t

Or, r = r0 e . The absolute value of r = the absolute value of r0

This statement said that light coming from objects when measured it is measured along line of

sight and that meant we see light projections of objects (blue line) of objects positioned at

positions r0 (pink). We do not see objects at r0 but see images of objects light projections

and images of objects light projection along the line of sight is r0 cosine ω t and images of

object light projections perpendicular along the line of sight is r0 sine ω t (blue line).

The Arabs said that we do not see or measure light reflected from objects but we

measure light speed projections as constant or light speed projections is

measured as constant.

c

c

c

The Arabs claim that we do not see objects position r0 but we see their visual position r.

What humans see is r0 measured along the line of sight and miss r0 perpendicular to the

line of sight. In other words an object at a distance r0 humans are not aware that they do

í ω (r) t

not see r0 but they see a visual of r0 which is r = r0 e and projection of r0 along

the line of sight that humans eye see and instruments measure is r0 cosine ω t and the

projection of r0 perpendicular to the line of sight is r0 cosine ω t. The Arabs added that

when accounted for, the difference between an object image or visual position r (quantum

mechanics) and object location or position r0 (classical mechanics) is equal to a time delay

effect (relativistic mechanics)

Page 10

relativistic mechanics and their combination known as strings

Arabs real time independent mechanics (classical mechanics) is r = r0; t = 0

í ω (r) t

The difference between r = r0 e ; and r = r0

í ω (r) t

Or, r0 e - r0 = Arabs real time mechanics visual effects (relativistic mechanics)

Or, r = r0 + (r - r0)

Dividing by r0

And r /r0 = r0/r0 +(r – r0)/r0

And r /r0 = 1+ (r– r0)/r0

What are wrong in all of modern physics are all wrong physics measurements

What this law said is:

If the car width is r0 moves away the visual of the car width is r. The quantity r/r0 is the

percentage that humans eye see and instruments measure and it is equal to 1 and the

percentage difference between the car width and what the human eye see of the car

width or a time delay effect or a visual distance effect of (r– r0)/r0

If someone attempts to measure a quantity θ’0; then multiply by θ’0

And (r /r0) θ’0= θ’0 + [(r - r0)/r0] θ’0

What this formula said everything about modern astronomy is all wrong

What is wrong with all of astronomy? If we to measure the angular velocity of

moving planets around a star ,or, a star moving around another star in the skies

θ’0, then we do not measure actual θ’0 but we measure θ’0 + [(r - r0)/r0] θ’0

Or we have antidote to western space – time stupidity [(r - r0)/r0] θ’0

This is the basis of correct measurements. The entire western civilization 500

years of physics and the world 500,000 “modern” western civilization educated

physicists made/make this mistake and globalize their stupidity and to correct

this mistake is to delete western civilization physicists without loss of subject.

There is nothing in “modern” physics that can be considered as correct

because modern physics is based on wrong measurements. Modern physics is

“wrong time physics” that can be deleted without loss of subject. Arabs real

time physics is the past present and future of all of physics and it is the subject

of this book.

Page 11

Arabs real time astronomy: The Arabs Astronomers and Physicists said that:

We can not see or/and detect or/and measure something in space that did not

exist; we can not see or/and detect or/and measure something that had not

happened. We can only see or/and detect or/and measure things and events in

space that had happened. What we see or/and detect or/and measure is not

necessarily what there is and not necessarily what happened. We see or/and detect

or/and measure traces and images of objects of past event. We see or/and detect

or/and measure in present time of images of object and events that happened in

past time. That is we measure images and record data of objects of past events in

present time. An event changes in time and when an event is measured it is

measured after it happened.

Present time = past time + (present time – past time)

Present time = real time; past time = event time; (present time – past time) =

time delay, or, Real time = event time + time delay

Quantum = classical + relativistic

What there is = classical

What we see and measure and detect and partially record is = quantum

What we see and measure and has no detection because it is an Illusion =

relativistic

Time dependent measurements = time independent measurements +

(Time dependent measurements – time independent measurements)

Measured = actual + (measured – actual)

We do not see object in real time but we see images of objects in real time

In common Terms: Image = object + (image – object)

With Image = I; object = O

I = O + (I – O)

I/O = O/O + (I – O)/O

I/O = 1 + (I – O)/O

Arabs real time measurements equation:

Is: (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q; q measured quantity ------------- Eq – 1

That is a quantity q when measured in real time it would appear as q + [(I – O)/O] q

500 years of modern physics and 500,000 of modern physicists is all wrong because of this

principle (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] ----------------------- Eq - 1

Or quantum = classical + relativistic

If Eq – 1 is applied it would expose modern physics as stupidity itself and it would

expose modern astronomy as astrology itself. The thing about this principle given by

Eq – 1: (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q is that it is flawless physics law or truth itself

Page 12

There are objects at locationr0 (actual or classical distance) and when measured in

í ω (r) t

real time they appear as at a location r (quantum distance) = r 0 e

That is the distance in the Universe is a classical distance but when a distance measured in

real time it appears as quantum distance and the difference between classical distance and

quantum distance is relativistic distance

Quantum distance = classical distance + relativistic distance

Relativistic distance = quantum distance – classical distance

í ω (r) t

We see detect and measure quantum distance r = r0 e of an actual or

íωt

classical distance r0 and the difference between quantum distance r = r0 e

and actual or classical distance r0 is relativistic distance

í ω (r) t

Take r = r0 e

í ω (t) t

Or, t = t0 e of an actual or classical time t0 ------------------ Eq - 3

í ω (t) t

And the difference between Arabs t = t0 e and actual or classical time t0 is

relativistic time

Quantum = classical + relativistic time

Relativistic = quantum – classical

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location

r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product

S = m r; State = mass x location is all of astronomy needed Equation -1

That is if mass of objects in space is known and if the location of object in space is

know then the state S = m r = mass x location of any object in space can be

known and that is all needed to be known to describe space motion of any object

and that is what is called astronomy

That is mass m location r and time t = Astronomy and from this we can conclude:

Page 13

Quantum mass = classical mass + relativistic mass

Relativistic mass = quantum mass – classical mass

í ω (m) t

We see detect and Arabs real time mass m = m0 e ------------- Eq- 4 of

an actual or classical time m0 and the difference between Arabs real time mass m

í ω (m) t

= m0 e and actual or classical time m0 is Arabs real time mass delay

Such a claim by the Arabs that Astronomical measurements are made along the line

Is saying Quantum mass = classical mass + relativistic mass

And real time distance r = r0 e í ω (r) t Eq - 2

í ω (t) t

And real time t = t0 e Eq - 3

í ω (m) t

And real time mass m = m0 e Eq - 4

And S = m r, the state equation Eq - 5

í ω (r) t

That is Arabs see detect and measure quantum distance quantity r = r0 e

When there is classical distance quantity r0

And the difference explains that the universe is seen in real time and not in silly Western

ideas of wrong space time. That is the difference between an object location and an object

measurement of its location is “relativistic” and that 500 years of “western” Modern

physics can be deleted without loss of subject and 500,000 “Modern” physicists can be told

idiots with no fear or regrets.

í ω (t) t

That is Arabs detect and measure quantum time quantity t = t0 e

When there is classical time quantity t0

í ω (m) t

That is Arabs see detect and measure quantum mass quantity m = m0 e

When there is classical mass quantity m0

What is wrong in all of Modern physics is this experimental mistake:

[(I – O)/O] q in everything that western modern space – timers do from space

science to nuclear structure and this mistake was made by every physicist. This

painful mistake is the one mistake when corrected it deletes western civilization

physics and physicists explain the universe correctly and matches experimental

results with unprecedented accuracy to delete “modern” physics of past 500 years

and delete 500,000 “modern” physicists without loss of subject. What I am going to

do

1- Show how this one mistake was/is made daily by all western civilization

educated “modern” physicists

2- How this one mistake won the majority of Nobel prizes and changed physics from

1258 Arabic science to 2010 western educated stupidity

3 – Show how correcting this mistake will solve any and all unsolved physical motion

problems that is not solvable by space – time physics or any read or published

physics

Arabs real time physics and astronomy is the past present and future of all of

physics

Page 14

Chapter four

Observer line: …………………Observer ………………

Humans do not see detect or measure cars but humans see detect and measures image

of the car. In other words humans see detect and measure images of objects in real

time.

Page 15

The size of the car object is the same but the size of the car image is dependent on car

distance and transmitted signal. Meaning we see detect and measure an image of size I

in real time (present time) of an object O seen detected and measured in event (past

time). That is when images of cars are seen these images of the cars are seen in real

time. And when these car objects move the car see itself the same size. That is we

measure images of object in real time and not objects. The difference between images

and objects are visual illusions Arabs knew about and described in 10th century Ad.

Conclusion:

Is that humans see detect and measure images of objects in real time

With Image = I; object = O

I = O + (I – O)

I/O = O/O + (I – O)/O

I/O = 1 + (I – O)/O

And (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q; q measured quantity --------------------- Eq - 1

Modern physics is all wrong because Modern physics is wrong time physics based on

wrong physics measurements that misses by a factor of [(I – O)/O] q and this

quantity [(I – O)/O] q is taken as real experimental result and not as a relativistic

illusion correction. In other words:

Correct Physics is: (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q

Modern Physics is wrong because

(I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q

What we measure = what there is + visual effects

Quantum = classical + relativistic

Quantum = we see in real time = observer dependent = time dependent measurements

Classical = object independent of observer = time independent measurements

Relativity = illusions

In mathematical terms:

Relativity = time dependent measurements – time independent measurements

Real time scale

Real time = event time + time delay; time delay = (real time – event time)

With real time = Γ; event time = t; time delay = (Γ – t)

Γ = t + (Γ – t) = t + ∆ Γ; ∆ Γ = (Γ – t)

Γ/t = t/t + (Γ – t)/t

Γ/t = 1 + (Γ – t)/t

To measure orbital speed using time, then multiply by orbital speed to

get the following equation: (Γ/t) θ’0= θ’0 + [(Γ – t)/t] θ’0

And θ’0 = orbital speed

The quantity θ’0 measurement is independent of time

The quantity (Γ/t) θ’0 measurement is time dependent

The difference = [(Γ – t)/t] θ’0 = relativistic = Illusions

Page 16

1 - (Γ/t) θ’0= θ’0 Quantum = classical or when someone looks at the car from

different distances and wonder why he/she does not see the same size car.

3 – Modern physics is wrong when θ’0= [(Γ – t)/t] θ’0

Let us demonstrate the power of Arabs real time Physics and astronomy and see

how Arabs real time astronomy works but first let us do some definitions.

Page 17

Measured distance = actual distance + [measured distance – actual distance]

Or, r = r0 + (r x – r0)

And r /r0 = r0/r0 +(r – r0)/r0

And r /r0 = 1+(r– r0)/r0

And (r /r0) θ’0= θ’0 [(r - r0)/r0] θ’0

With r = r0 + (r – r0)

Divide by t

Then r/t = r0/t + (r/t – r0/t)

And v = v0 + (v – v0); dividing by v0

And v/ v0 = 1 + (v – v0)/ v0

Multiplying by θ’0

And (v/ v0) θ’0= θ’0+ [(v – v0)/ v0] θ’0

With r = r0 + (r – r0)

Divide by t²

Then r/ t² = r0/ t² + (r/ t² – r0/ t²)

And γ = γ 0 + [(γ – γ 0)]; dividing by v0

And γ / γ 0 = 1 + [(γ – γ 0)/ γ 0]

Multiplying by θ’0

And (γ / γ 0) θ’0= θ’0+ [(γ – γ 0)/ γ 0] θ’0

The angular speed is a 5th grade math that is measured wrong by Astronomers expose

the stupidity of modern physics and the stupidity of modern astronomy

The circumference of a planet circular motion is C = 2 π r m where r m is the radius.

In 1969 I knew about circular speed v m = 2 π r m/ T m where Tm is the period of

rotation. Also, in 1969 I knew about angular speed θ’ m = 2 π /Tm = (v m/ r m).

Or C = 2 π r m; v m = 2 π r m/Tm; θ’ m = 2 π /Tm = (v m/ r m)

θ’ m = 2 π /Tm= (v m/r m)

Page 18

In arc second per century δ θ’ m = (v m/r m) (180/ π) [36526/Tm (days)] (3600)

Multiplying by δ θ’ m

Then (r m /r0) δ θ’ m= δ θ’ m + [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m

In arc second per century δ θ’ m = (v m/r m) (180/ π) [36526/Tm (days)] (3600)

The distance Error is: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m

The velocity Error is: [(v m - v0)/v0] δ θ’ m

The acceleration error is: [(γ m – γ 0)/ γ 0] δ θ’ m

The angular velocity real time distance scale Error:

Is: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = [(r m - r0)/r0] (v m/r m) (180/ π) [36526/Tm (days)] (3600)

The angular velocity real time velocity scale Error:

Is: [(v m - v0)/v0] δ θ’ m = [(v m - v0)/v0] (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600)

The angular velocity real time acceleration scale Error:

Is: [(γ m – γ 0)/ γ 0] δ θ’ m = [(γ m – γ 0)/ γ 0] δ θ’0 (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600)

As an example: when Astronomers look at planetary motion around the sun and

they saw the angular velocity in arc second per century:

Equal to δ θ’ m = (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600)

= 70.75 arc second per century

Astronomers also saw the visual effect

Of: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = [(r m - r0)/r0] (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600)

And it is equal to [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43

Where r m = Mercury – Sun distance = 58.2 X 106km

And v m = Mercury around the sun orbital speed Sun distance = 47.9 km/sec

And r 0 = r e = Earth – Sun distance = 149.6 X 106km

And T m = Mercury around the sun orbital period

Planet Distance r Planet Orbit Less Spin Angular velocity;

X 106km Orbit T speed v Earth speed v/r

in speed km/sec arc sec/ century

km/sec

Mercury 58.2 88 47.9 18.1 .002 70.75

Venus 108.2 224.7 35.05 5.7 6.52 10.86

Earth 149.6 365.26 29.8 .46511 4.1

Mars 227.936 687 24.14 0.2411

Jupiter 778.412 4333 13.06 12.6

Saturn 1,426.725 10760 9.65 9.87

Uranus 2,870.97 30690 6.80 2.59

Neptune 4,498 60180 5.43 2.68

Pluto 5906.4 90730 4.74

Page 19

[(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = [(r m - r0)/r0] (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600)

And it is equal to [(r - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43 is taken as the proof of the existence of

silly Modern Astronomy notion that the Universe is not made of three dimensional

Space (x, y, z) = (length, width, height) but made of a more complex space – to

imaginary time – back to space Universe (x, y, z, it) = (length, width, height,

imaginary time)

And it is equal to [(r - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43

[(γ m – γ e)/ γ e] δ θ’ m = [(γ m – γ e)/ γ e] (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600)

[(γ – γ 0)/ γ 0] δ θ’ m= 43

I am the Greatest Nuclear Physicist of all time

And I have 1001 all new physics formulas to prove it

My name is Joe Nahhas and I am the greatest Physicist and Astronomer of past

present and the future because as a teenager I stood up to criminals with Nobel

prizes and this book is how to expose criminals with Nobel prizes in physics and the

fact that most criminals with Nobel prizes are a product of the big western

institutions has nothing to do with science but has something to do with western

capitalistic greed fraud and arrogance that changed physics from science to

stupidity and the time has come to delete stupidity and that is to delete western

physics and physicists without exception since the rise of western civilization 500

years ago starting with Copernicus. There is nothing correct in all western

civilization physics that is taught in classrooms and used in scientific calculations.

Yes, I am saying that all of physics is all wrong and this book is the proof of it and

there is nothing better than to start with the grand master of stupidity, German –

American moron of the 20th century, the one and only Albert Einstein.

Page 20

Planet Mercury travel in space at an angular speed of 70.75 arcs second per century

And in time at angular speed of 43 arcs second per century

The Advance of Planet Mercury’s Perihelion given by Euclid’s Geometry

[2 π/T] [180/π][36526/88][3600] = [2 π /88 x 24x3600] [180/π][36526/88][3600] = 70.75

Einstein’s time travel space – time formula:

ψ = - 6 π GM/a c² (1 - ε²) [180/ π] [36526/T][3600] = 43 angular velocity time travel of

planet Mercury

G = 6.673 x 10-11= gravitational acceleration constant

M =2x1030 kilogram = mass of the Sun

Eccentricity of Mercury’s orbit = ε = 0.206

T= 88 days = period of Planet mercury’s rotation around the Sun

And c = 299792.458 kilometer/second =light speed in kilometers/second

And a = 58.2 x 106 km/sec = semi major axis of planet Mercury orbit

The grand moron of the west said Planets travel in space and time

The Grand moron said planets travel in space around the Sun in an elliptical orbit

Planet

r

Su

n

The Grand moron said planets travel in time around the Sun rotating the elliptical orbit

21

Mercury

r

θ

Sun

And the motion of a planet m around the Sun M measured as a rotating ellipse

Page 22

Unless this moron can prove time travel he can keep his German stupidity to himself and Alfred Nobel

Institution because time travel is Einstein’s and Alfred Nobel Institution stupidity

I am not saying Einstein is a moron but what I am saying is all western physicists

are morns to say the least and can be deleted without loss of subject to be exact.

Practicing again

If 1= 1

2=2

3=3

Then we can write anything that is equal to itself as equal to itself like:

Visual = Visual

Actual = actual

- Actual = - actual

----------------------- Add

Visual = Actual + (Visual – actual)

Divide by actual

Visual/actual = Actual/actual + (Visual – actual)/actual

Or

Visual/actual = 1 + (Visual – actual)/actual

Image/object = 1 + (Image – object)/object

I/O = 1+ (I – O)/O

We do not see object O but we see Image I. If we to look at planet Mercury from

Earth and not from the Sun, then we are not looking at θ’ m= 2 π /T m = (v m /r0) but

we are looking:

At θ’0 I/O = 1 θ’0+ [(I – O)/O] θ’0

Or θ’0 I/O = θ’0+ [(I – O)/O] θ’0

The visual illusion and Modern Physicists confusion is: [(I – O)/O] θ’0

Where I is Mercury – Sun distance = 58,200,000 kilometers = r m

And O is Earth – Sun distance = 149,600,000 kilometers = r e

The Visual Illusions and modern Physicists confusion of Planet Mercury is:

[(I – O)/O] θ’0 = [(r m – r e)/ r e] θ’0

Page 23

Multiplying by (t/t) = 1

Then [(I – O)/O] θ’0 = [(v m – v e)/ v e] θ’0

[(I – O)/O] θ’0 = [(r m – r e)/ r e] θ’0 = [(r m – r e)/ r e] (v0/r0)

[(I – O)/O] θ’0 = [(v m – v e)/ v e] θ’0 = [(v m – v e)/ v e] (v0/r0)

With v0 = v m; and r0 = r m

With r m = 58.2 x 109 m; r e = 149.6 x 109 m; v m = 47.9 km/s; T m = 88 days

= [(58.2 x 109 - 149.6 x 109)/ 149.6 x 109] (70.75)

= [(58.2 - 149.6)/ 149.6] (70.75) = 43 arc second per century

Nicklaus Copernicus Distance Illusion

With [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(r m – r e)/ r e] (v m /r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)]

Next

Is Galileo

Page 24

With r m = v m T m; r e = v e T e

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(v m T m – v e T e)/ v e T e] (v m /r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43

With

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(v m T m – v e T e)/ v e T e] (v m /r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43

Page 25

Tyco Brahe Velocity Illusion: [(r m – r e)/ r e] = [(r m /t) – (r e/ t)]/ (r e /t) = (v m – v e)/ v e

With

Page 26

(I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q

M r Lippershey you can even read the telescope and you are deleted

Hans Lippershey the person who attempted to get a patent for the telescope in 1609

Modern Physics is wrong because Hans and the entire Western civilization still

have no clue how to read the telescope

Page 27

Rene Descartes Cartesian failures

t = t0 e í ω (t) t

í ω (t) t

Γ = te

Along the line of sight

Γ x = t cosine ω t

Γ x = t + (Γ x – t) = t + ∆ Γ x; ∆ Γ x = (Γ x – t)

Γ x /t = t/t + (Γ x – t)/t

Γ x /t = 1 + (Γ x – t)/t

And in arc ∆ Γ x (arc seconds) = Γ x - t

= - 30 t sine² {[arc tan (V r m - V r e)/ (√ 2c)]/ 2} = 43

And taking V r = V r (Mercury) - V r (Earth) = V r m - V r e

And V θ = V r / (√ 2

∆ Γ x Arc second) = Γ x - t

= - 30 t sine² {[arc tan (V r m - V r e)/ (√ 2c)]/ 2} = 43 arc second /century

Page 28

Chapter 3: Arabs real time light motion

Visual objects seen through emitted or reflected light follow this law

Light measurement of visual motion of objects law: (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q

The proof:

Page 29

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a

location

r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the

product

S = m r; State = mass x location:

P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment

= change of location + change of mass

= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate

F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force

= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r

= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate

r = location; v = velocity; γ = acceleration

F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r

F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] + (m" r) r

(1)

= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/m r) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)

= [-Gm M/r²] r (1) ------------------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law

Proof:

First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1)

Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ

Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t

= r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ]

= r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)

And with r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ

Then d [θ (1)]/d t= θ' [- cosine θ î - sine θ Ĵ= - θ' r (1)

And d [r (1)]/d t = θ' [-sine θ î + cosine θ Ĵ] = θ' θ (1)

= r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' θ' r (1) + r θ" r (1) +r θ'd [θ (1)]/d t

γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)

And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0

With m = constant, then

With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = F (r) Eq-1

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2

With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2

Page 30

From Eq-2: d (r²θ')/d t = 0

Then r²θ' = h = constant

Differentiate with respect to time

Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ" = 0

Divide by r²θ'

Then 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0

And 2(r'/r) = - θ"/θ' = 2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)]

Also, r = r0 (θ, 0) e [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

For a fixed orbit: λ r = 0

Also, r = r 0 (θ, 0) e ỉ ω t

With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0

Let u = 1/r; r = 1/u; r²θ' = h = θ’ /u²

And d r/d t = (d r/ d u) (d u /d θ) (d θ/ d t) = (- 1/u ²) (θ’) (d u/ d θ)

= - h (d u/ d θ)

= [- h²/r²] (d² u/ d θ ²)

= - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²)

With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1

And - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) – (1/u) (h u²) ² = 0

Then (d² u/ d θ ²) + u = 0

Then u = A e - í θ

Then r 0 (θ, 0) = (1/A) e í θ

And r 0 (θ, 0) = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ

And r = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ e ỉ ω t

Or, r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)

í ω (r) t

Arabs real time astronomy is actually quantum mechanics r = r0 e

Light is emitted and not an emitter and humans have no means of measuring light

in motion and at best they can take a snap shot.

In mathematical language

Then r (θ, 0) = r 0 e í θ at t = 0

And r (θ, t) = r 0 e í (θ + ω t) = r 0 e í θ e í ω t = r (θ, 0) e í ω t

And r (θ, t) = r (θ, 0) [cosine ω t + í sine ω t]

And r x (θ, t) = r x (θ, 0) cosine ω t

And ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)]

31

Then ∆ r = r x (θ, t) - r x (θ, 0)

= r x (θ, 0) [(cosine ω t) – 1]

= [(1 - 2 sine² ω t/2) – 1]

= - 2 sine ² ω t/2; ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)]

Image = Image = I

Object = Object = O

- Object = - Object = - O

I = O + (I – O)

(I/O) = O/O + [(I – O)/O]

(I/O) = 1 + [(I – O)/O]

(I/O) θ' 0 = θ' 0 + [(I – O)/O] θ' 0

I = r; O = r 0

Or, (r / r 0) θ' 0 = θ' 0 + [(r – r 0)/ r 0] θ' 0

And [(r – r 0)/ r 0] θ' 0

Or [- 2sine ² ω t/2] θ' 0; ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)] = cosine-1 (r/ r 0)

For planet Mercury:

And ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)] = cosine-1 (r/ r 0)

Or ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)] = cosine-1 (r m/ r e)

= [- 2sine ² ω t/2] (v m/r m) (180/ π) [36526/Tm (days)] (3600)

= [- 2sine ² {[cosine-1 (r m/ r e)]/2}] (v m/r m) (180/ π) [36526/Tm (days)] (3600)

= 0.61 x 70.75 = 43

Page 32

Chapter five: Arabs real time light Astronomy

F = - ω² a and F = - GmM/a²

Or, F = - ω² a = - GmM/a²

And T²/a³ = 4 π GM

Johannes Keplers:

Kepler’s law: a³/T² = k = constant

Isaac Newton space Inverse square law γ = k/r²

Hooke’s time Inverse square law γ = r/t² or γ = r/T²

Kepler’s Space – time Law: k/r² = r/ T²; or, a³/T² = k = constant

Where this law came from?

Acceleration = γ = r/t² = k/r²

γ = time coordinates r/t² = space coordinates k/r²; r substituted for t

γ = r/t² = k/r²

γ = - k/r² Newton’s theft = Newton

γ = - r/t² = - r/T² = - k r Hooke’s theft = Hooke’ law

Of: a³/T² = k = constant

Or, a1³/ T1² = a2³/ T2²

Or, a1/ a2 = (T1/ T2)2/3

And (a1 - a2)/ a2 = (T1/ T2)2/3 – 1

Or (am – a e)/ a e = (Tm/ Te) 2/3 – 1

Nicklaus Copernicus Distance Illusion

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(r m – r e)/ r e] (v m /r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43

Become: Kepler’s vision of idiot Einstein: Nicklaus Copernicus Distance Illusion

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(Tm/ Te) 2/3

– 1] (v m /r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43

Page 33

When Newton came with F = - GmM/r²

Physicists calculated: θ' c m = v /r;cm

Angular velocity with to the sun

And v cm = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a]

And v s = √ (GM/a)

= (T c m/T s) – 1 = (v s/v c m) – 1

= [√ (GM/a)] x {√ [(m + M) a/ GM²]} - 1

= √ [(m + M)/M] - 1

= √ [1 + (m/M)] - 1

≈ 1 + (m/2 M) – 1 ≈ m/2 M

And (θ' cm - θ’ s) / θ' s = (2 π/T s) (m/2 M)

And [(θ' cm - θ’ s)] T s = π (m/ M)

Multiplying by [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)]

To T²/a³ = 4 π²/G (M + m) with respect to the center of mass

That is Kepler's measurements data are centered from the sun and Newton's data

are centered at the center of mass and this would explain this mistake like this:

T² (1)/a³ = 4 π²/GM and

T² (2) /a³ = 4 π²/G (M + m)

When Newton changed Kepler's equation he solved the advance of perihelion as

shown:

And 2π/ T (1) = [2 π/ T (2)] √ (1 + m/M)

And θ' (1) = θ' (2) √ (1 + m/M)

And θ' (2) = θ' (1) /√ [1 + (m/M)] ≈ [1 - m/ (2M)]

This approximation was not on the original work

And θ' (2) - θ' (1) = θ' (1) [1 /√ [1 + (m/M)] - 1]

And θ' (2) - θ' (1) ≈ - θ' (1) (m/2M) = - [2 π/T] [m/2M) = - π m/MT radians/T

Page 34

W " (calculated) = [- π m/MT] (180/π degrees) (3600 seconds) (36526 century); T

= days; with m = 0.32 x1024 kg; and M = 2.0 x1030 kg; T = 88 days

= 43.0" seconds of arc /100 years

Page 35

Hooke’s for law F = - ω²x; 3 – Newton’s law F = - GmM/x²

If Hooke’s law is taken the F = - k r in one dimension

Then r’’ +ω²r = 0; then r (θ, 0) = r0 e ỉ ω t

Then r = r0 e ỉ ω t; and r = r0 [1- 2 sine² ω t/2]

And (r - r0)/ r0 = - 2 sine² ω t/2

The distance visual effect Error is: [(r m – re)/re] δ θ’ m

And ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)] = cosine-1 (r/ r 0)

Or ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)] = cosine-1 (r m/ r e)

= [- 2sine ² ω t/2] (v m/r m) (180/ π) [36526/Tm (days)] (3600)

= [- 2sine ² {[cosine-1 (r m/ r e)]/2}] (v m/r m) (180/ π) [36526/Tm (days)] (3600)

= 0.61 x 70.75 = 43

Page 36

Chapter Five: The all time wrong Astronomer

Then Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier came

The angular velocity of Mercury around the Sun is: θ m' = v m /r m

And δ θ’0 = (v m /r m) (180/π) (3600) (26526/Tm); Tm = 88 days

Then it is θ m' = v m /r m

Then θ m' (Earth) = (v m + v e)/r m

M

S

And not v m /r m

Le Verrier [1] mistake is: v e /r m

The angular speed delay is: v* e /r m

Or, [(v e/v m) (v m /r m)]

Taking into account Earth rotation vº e

Le Verrier mistake: Then the angular speed delay:

Is: v e /r m = [v* e /r m +/- vº e /r m]

In arc second per century multiplying by [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T)]

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(v* e +/- vº e) /r m] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T)]

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(v* e +/- vº e) /v m) (v m /r m)] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T)] = 43

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(v* e +/- vº e) /v m) (v m /r m)] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/Tm)]

Page 37

Idiot Le Verrier

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(r m – r e)/ r e] (v m /r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(v m T m – v e T e)/ v e T e] (v m /r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)]

Arabs real time Astronomy is 5 laws

And saying (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q; q measured quantity Eq - 1

And real time distance r = r0 e í ω (r) t Eq - 2

í ω (t) t

And real time t = t0 e Eq - 3

í ω (m) t

And real time mass m = m0 e Eq - 4

And S = m r, the state equation Eq - 5

Page 38

Chapter six

Newton equation is a solved wrong for 350 years

Newton’s unprecedented stupidity

Newton said there is gravity Force F = -GmM/r² whose solution is this

Planet

r

Su

n

And r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)]

But you idiot this solution is wrong

[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t

Real time solution is: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] ℮ (r)

"Apparent advance of perihelion"

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1- ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x

[(v°+ v*)/c] ² = 43 arc second per century

Page 39

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a

location r = r (x, y, z) = r [length, width, height].

The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product

S = m r; State = mass x location:

= change of location + change of mass

= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate

= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r

= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate

Location = r = r r (1)

F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r

2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] +

+ (m" r) r (1)

+ (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)

F = F1 + F2

And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 (2)

Page 40

The solution is not

And r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)]

But this solution

[λ +ỉω ]t

Real time solution is: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] ℮ (r) (r)

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1- ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x

[(v°+ v*)/c] ² arc second per century

Proof:

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location r

= r (x, y, z) = r [length, width, height].

The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product

S = m r; State = mass x location:

P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment

= change of location + change of mass

= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate

F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force

= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r

= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate

In polar coordinates system

Location = r = r r (1)

Velocity = v = r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)

Acceleration = γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)

F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r

F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] +

2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] +

+ (m" r) r (1)

F = [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1)

+ (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)

F = F1 + F2

F1 = [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1)

F2 = (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)

F2 = (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ’)/d t] θ (1) = 0

Or, r²θ’ = h = 2 π a b/T; a = mean distance from sun and is called semi major axis

and b is the semi minor axis.

Page 41

Mercury

r

θ

Sun

And the motion of a planet m around the Sun M measured in real time is a rotating ellipse

θ

ψ

Tyco Brahe Logged observational Data of Planets P motion around the Sun S and

then Kepler stated the areal velocity law: If Planet p observed from the sun then the

trajectory of planet p will cut equal areas in equal times.

Page 42

P

A A

A

A A

A A

P

T T

T

T T

T T

Page 43

When the areas size A are sliced equally it was found that the times spent by planets

orbiting around the Sun and making areas A each are equal also.

Or, r² (0) θ' (0) = r² (1) θ' (1) = r² (2) θ' (2) = r² (3) θ' (3) = --

= location² x [angular speed] = constant

= Areal velocity

If r² θ' = h

Then differentiating with respect to time

Then d (r² θ')/ d t = d h/ d t

And 2 r r’ θ’ + r² θ’’ = 0

Or 2 (r’ /r) = - (θ’’/θ’)

The r = r0 e íωt

With r = r0 e íωt

With r² (0) θ' (0) = r² (1) θ' (1)

Then θ' (1) = [r² (0)/ r² (1)] θ' (0)

And θ' (1) = {[e í 2 ω t] θ' (0)

And θ’ (1) = {[cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] – 1} θ' (0)

Δ θ’ (1) = Δ θ’ (x) + í Δ θ’ (y)

= [cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] θ' (0)

Δ θ’ (x) = [cosine 2 ω t] θ' (0)

Δ θ’ (x) = [1 – 2 sine² ω t] θ' (0)

Δ θ’ (x) - θ' (0) = - 2 θ' (0) sine² ω t

Δ W = Δ θ’ (x) - θ' (0) = - 2 θ' (0) sine² ω t

= -2(2π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t

And θ' (0) = h/r² (0) = 2 π a b/T a² = 2π√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²

Δ W = - 4 π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t

If this apsidal motion is to be found as visual effects, then

With, v ° = spin velocity; v* = orbital velocity

And v/c = (v* + v°)/c = tan ω t

Δ W = -4 π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} radians

Multiplication by 180/π to change to degrees

Δ W ° = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} Degrees

And multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x

sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years

Approximations

With v° << c and v* << c,

Then sine Inverse tan [v°/c + v*/c] ≈ (v° + v*)/c

Δ W ° (calculated) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x

[(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years

This is the equation for axial rotations rate of planetary and binary stars or any two

body problem.

The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- --.) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R

=a (1-ε²/4)

Page 44

Finding orbital velocities

From Newton's inverse square law of an ellipse motion applied to a circular orbit

gives the following: m v²/ r (cm) = GmM/r²

Planet --- r (cm) ----- Center of mass ------- r (CM) --------- Mother Sun

Planet ------------------- r -------------------------------------- Mother Sun

Center of mass law m r (cm) = M r (CM); m = planet mass; M = sun mass

And r (cm) = distance of planet to the center of mass

And r (CM) = distance of sun to center of mass

And r (cm) + r (CM) = r = distance between sun and planet

Solving to get: r (cm) = [M/ (m + M)] r

And r (CM) = [m/ (m + M)] r

Then v² = [GM r (cm)/ r²] = GM²/ (m + M) r

And v = √ [GM²/ (m + M) r = a (1-ε²/4)]

Planet orbital velocity or primary velocity:

And v* = v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 48.14 km for planet Mercury

Velocity of secondary or Mother Sun velocity

And v* (M) = √ [Gm² / (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)]

Applications: mercury ellipse and its axis rotation of 43 " /century

1- Planet Mercury axial "apparent" rotation rate

Δ W’’ = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²]/ (1-ε) ²} (v* + v°/c) ² seconds of arc per

century

The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- --.)

≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4)

Where v* (p) =√ [G M² / (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; m<<M; Solar

system data: G =6.673x10-11; M=2x1030kg; m=.32x10^24kg; ε = 0.206;

T=88days; c = 299792.458 km/sec; a = 58.2km/sec; v° = 0.002km/sec

Calculations yield: v* =48.14km/sec; [√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 1.552

Δ W = (-720x36526x3600/88) x (1.552) (48.14/299792)²

=43.0”/century

Δ W’’ = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v* + v°)/c] ²

= 43 seconds of arc per century

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0

= (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v*m + v° m)/c] ² seconds of arc per

century

Or, Newton is plain stupid? There is no proof of action at a distance?

F = -GmM/r² is not a proof of gravitational pull between planetary objects but

rather the interaction of earth with its atmosphere

G = 1/ (2/5) (4π/3) p T² = √ (2π)/ (4π/3)p T²; ρ = air density =1.2045kg/m³; and T =

Earth rotation period = 23.9333x3600; Then G = 6.6747 x 10-11

G = 1/ (radius of gyration) (sphere) (air density) (Earth spin) ²

G = √ (2 π) / (4π/3) p T² = √ (2π)/ (4π/3)p T²

Suggesting that gravity measured on Earth is local to earth surface caused

by Earth spin motion

Also a rotating Ellipse can be derived from many different solutions and

not necessarily from an inverse square law

Page 45

Chapter seven

Inverse Cube equations F = m γ = - k/r³ r (1), then in polar coordinates

With m [d² r/dt² - θ'²r] = - k /r³ Inverse Cube Gravitational law (1)

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity Equation (2)

One: φ = π (m/ M) (180) [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years

= 43.0344 seconds of arc / century for Mercury

Two: δ θ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) √ (1 - ε²)/ T (1 - ε) ² (v/c) ² arc second/100

years

= 43.0" seconds of arc /century for Mercury

Solution:

With m = constant

Then d² r/dt² - θ'²r = - k/ r³ (1)

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 (2)

From (2) d (r²θ')/d t = 0; r²θ' = h

From (1), θ'² d² r/ dθ² - θ'²r = - k/ mr³

And θ'² [d² r/ dθ² - r] = - k/ mr³

And d² r/ dθ² - r = - (k/mh²) r

And d² r/ dθ² - r [1 - (k/mh²)] = 0

And r (θ, 0) = r (0, 0) e ỉ {√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ

From (2) d (r²θ')/d t = 0; r²θ' = h

Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ'' = 0

Dividing by r²θ'

We get 2 (r'/r) + (θ''/θ') = 0

And 2 (r'/r) = - θ''/θ' = 2ỉ ω t

And r = r (0, 0) e ỉ {√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ e ỉ ω t

And θ' = θ' (θ, 0) e - 2ỉ ω t

Or r = r (0, 0) e ỉ {√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ỉ ω t

And θ' = θ' (0, 0) e -2ỉ [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t]

And θ' = θ' (0, 0) e -2ỉ [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t]

And θ' = (θ' (0, 0) {cosine 2 [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t]

- ỉ sine 2 [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t]}

And θ' - θ' (0, 0) = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t]

And δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t]

If k = Gm M α (1 - ε²); h = 2π a b/T

Then: k/mh² = Gm M a (1 - ε²)/m 4 π ² a² b²/T²

And k/mh² = GM T² (1 - ε²)/4 π ² a b²; multiply by (a²/a²)

Then [a² (1 - ε²)/ b²] [GM T²/4 π ² a³] = [GM T²/4 π ² a³]

Then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0)] sine² [{√ [1 - (GM T²/4 π ² a³)]} θ + ω t]

Taking Kepler's: GM T²/4π²a³ = 1

Page 46

Then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² ω t

And θ' (0, 0) = h/r² = 2πab/Ta² (1 - ε) ²

= 2πa²√ (1 - ε²)/Ta² (1 - ε) ² = 2π√ (1 - ε²)/T (1 - ε) ²

And δ θ' = - 4π√ (1 - ε²)/ T (1 - ε) ² sine² ω t

With ω T = arc tan v/c << 1

Then δ θ' = - 4π/T√ (1 - ε²)/ (1 - ε) ² sine² arc tan (v/c) radians per T

Or δ θ' = - 4π/T√ (1 - ε²)/ (1 - ε) ² (v/c) ² radians per T

And δ θ' = - 4π/T√ (1 - ε²)/ (1 - ε) ² (v/c) ² [180/π] [36526] [3600] arc second/100 years

Or δ θ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) [√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²] (v/c) ² arc second/100 years

Or δ θ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) (1.552) (48.2/c) ² = 43.11 " arc second/100 years

If k = Gm (M + m) α (1 - ε²); h = 2π a b/T

If we take Newton’s G (M + m) T²/4π²a³ = 1

Then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0)] sine² [{√ [1 – [G (M + m) T²/4 π ² a³)]} θ + ω t]

And G (M + m) T²/4π²a³ = 1

And 1- G (M + m) T²/4π²a³ = 0

Then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² ω t

Then δ θ' = - 2 2 π √ (1 - ε²)/T (1 - ε) ² sine² ω t

= - 4 π √ (1 - ε²)/T (1 - ε) ² sine² ω t

Or δ θ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) [√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²] (v/c) ² arc second/100 years

If k = mh²; then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² ω t

Or δ θ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) [√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²] (v/c) ² arc second/100 years

If k = m²h²/M; then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t]

Become δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² [{√ [1 - (m/M)]} θ + ω t]

And (m/ M) << 1; t = 0

Or r = r (0, 0) e ỉ {√ [1 - (m/M)]} θ

And r ≈ r (0, 0) e ỉ [(θ - φ)]

With φ = m/ 2M θ

Taking θ = 2 π

Then φ = π m/ M radians

And φ = π m/ (M) [180/π] [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years

If k = m²h²/ (M + m)

Then φ = π m/ (M + m) radians

And φ = π m/ (M + m) [180/π] [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years

Or φ = π (m/ M) (180/ π) [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years

= 43.0344"/100 years

Or φ = π m/(M +m) (180/ π) [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years

= 43.0344"/100 years

years

= 43.0"/100 years

Page 47

Chapter eight: Nuclear gravity

Or Yukawa’s:

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0: M r Yukawa travel is not physics but Alfred Nobel physicists’ stupidity

And (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity (2)

(2): d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0

Then m²r²θ' = constant; if m is taken as constant then r²θ' = h

And (1): d² r/dt² - r θ'² = [-GmM/r²] e k/r

Let m r =1/u

Then d r/d t = -u'/u²

= - (1/u²) (θ') d u/d θ

= (- θ'/u²) d u/d θ

= - h d u/d θ

And d² r/dt² = -hθ'd²u/dθ²

= - hu² [d²u/dθ²]

With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = [-GmM/r²] e k/r

Nuclear Gravity (1)

And -hu² (d²u/dθ²) - (1/u) (hu²)² = -GMu² [1 + k u]; α m/M r << 1

And (d²u dθ²) + (1 – GMk/h²) u = GM/h²

And u = [GM/ h²]/ {(1 – GMk/h²) + A cosine [√ (1 - GMk/h²)] θ}

And r = 1/u = 1/ {[GM/ h²]/ {[1 – GMk/h²] + A cosine {√ [1 – GMk/h²]} θ}

= [1 – GMk/h²]/ (M/ h²)]/ {1 + ε cosine {√ [1 - GMk/h²]} θ

Where [1 – GMk/h²]/ (GM/h²) = a (1 – ε²)

48

And [1 – GMk/h²] = (GM/h²) a (1-ε²)

And h² - GM k = G M a (1- ε²)

= √ {[1 – 1 + (GM/h²) a (1 - ε²)]}

= √ [(GM/h²) a (1 - ε²)]

= √ {[GMT²/4π²a4 (1 - ε²)] a (1 - ε²)]}

= √ (GMT²/4π²a³)

= 1; T²/ a³ = 4π²/ GM Kepler’s

Then, r = 1/u = (GM/ h²) + A cosine θ

If, T²/ a³ = 4π²/ G (M +m) Newton’s

Then, √ [1 – GMk/h²] = √ (GMT²/4π²a³) = √ [M/ (M + m)]

= 1/ √ [1 + (m/M)] ≈ 1/ [1 + (m/2M)] = 1 – (m/ 2M)

And [1 – GMk/h²]/ (M/ h²)]/ {1 + ε cosine {√ [1 - GMk/h²]} θ

= a (1- ε²)/ [1 + ε cosine {√ [1 – (GMk/h²)]} θ

= a (1- ε²)/ {[1 + ε cosine [(1 – m/2M) θ]}

= a (1- ε²)/ [1 + ε cosine (θ – Φ)]

And 2 π Φ = 2 π (m/ 2M) = π (m/M)

If Newton’s law were to be F = - Gm (M + m)/r²

The 2 π Φ = 2 π [m/ 2(M + m)] = π [m/ (m + M)]

(m α/ M r)

Nuclear Gravity (-GmM/r²) e

crudely approximated Newtonian gravity force (-GmM/r²) explains planetary

motion around the sun as a rotating ellipse with a rotation rate φ = [π m/(m + M)]

(180/π)(36526/T)(3600) = 43.03 seconds of an arc per century for the most talked

about planet of mercury; m = 3.2 x 1024 kg; M = 2x1030 kg; T = 88days

And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity (2)

And (1): d² r/dt² - r θ'² = -GmM/r² + Gm²α/r³

Let m r =1/u

Then d r/d t = -u'/u² = - (1/u²) (θ') d u/d θ = (- θ'/u²) d u/d θ = - h d u/d θ

And d² r/dt² = -hθ'd²u/dθ² = - hu² [d²u/dθ²]

-hu² [d²u/dθ²] - (1/u) (hu²)² = -G M u² [1 – (α m /M) u]; α m /M r << 1

Or (d²u/ dθ²) + (1 – Gmα/h²) u = GM/h²

And u = [GM/ h²]/[1 – Gmα/h²] + A cosine {√ [1 - Gmα/h²]}θ

Page 49

= [1 – Gmα/h²]/M/ h²]/ {1 + ε cosine {√ [1 - Gmα/h²]} θ

And [1 – Gmα/h²] = (GM/h²) a (1-ε²)

Then Gmα/h² = G ma (1 - ε²) /G (m + M) a (1- ε²)

= m/ (m + M)

Then r (θ, 0) = a (1 – ε²)/ {1 + ε cosine {√ [1 – Gmα/h²]} θ

And m << M; √ [1 – m/ (m + M)] ≈ 1 - m/2(m + M)

If θ = 2π, Then 2π [1- m/2(m + M)] = 2π - 2π [m/2(m + M)]

Then r (θ, 0) = a (1 – ε²)/ [1 + ε cosine (θ – φ)]

And φ = mθ/2(m + M)

degrees/century

seconds/century

And φ = 43.03426909''/century

φ = 2 π m/2(m + M) = π m/ (m + M)

Page 50

Chapter Nine

Frequency Games

What is the accumulated value of 2 π f per century for planet mercury seen from

Earth?

The angular frequency is ω = 2 π f

How I would see ω of planet mercury turning around the sun from earth?

The answer is there will be a frequency change of

W = 2 π f [v* m - v*e]/v* e; radians per second

Where v*e = Earth orbital velocity around the Sun = 29.8 km/sec

And vº e = Earth spin speed = 0.465 km/sec

And v* m = Mercury orbital velocity around the Sun = 47.9 km/sec

With f = 1/T; f = frequency; T = Period = 88 days

If W is wanted in degrees multiply by: 180/π

If W is wanted in degree per century multiply by (180/π) x (36526 days/ T)

If W is wanted in arc second per century multiply by

(180/π) x (36526 days/ T) x 3600

W = [2 π f [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] x (180/π) x [36526 days/ (T days)] x 3600

With f = 1/T (seconds)

W = [360 x 3600 x (36526/T (days)] [1/T (seconds)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]

W = [360 x 3600 x (36526/T (days)] [1/ 24 x 3600 x T (days)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]

W = 15 x (36526/T² (days)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 =15 x (36526/T² (days)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]

For Mercury

W = 15 x [36526/ (88)²] [(47.9 – 29.8)/29.8] = 43.0 arc second per century

The conclusion is

With ω = 2 π f = 2 π /T angular frequency in event time

And ω (real time) = ω (event time) + Δ ω

Δ ω = ω (real time) - ω (event time)

= 2 π f [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]

= 2 π f Z; Z = [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]

= red shift

And Δ ω = 2 π f (1 + Z)

The Advance of Planet Mercury Perihelion is 2 π f Z = 2 π Z/ T

Δ ω = (2 π/T) [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]

In arc seconds per century: Multiply by: (180/π) [36526/T (days)] (3600)

And Δ ω = [2 π / T (seconds)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] x

(180/π) [36526/T (days)] (3600);

T (seconds) = T days x 24x 3600

Δ ω = [2 π / T days x 24x 3600] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] x

(180/π) [36526/T (days)] (3600)

Δ ω = [15 x 36526 / T² (days)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] = 43

Page 51

Chapter Ten: Space – time unlimited stupidity

Visual force: F = - Gm M/r² - Gm Mk/r³

With m [d² r/dt² - θ'²r] = - Gm M/r² - Gm Mk/r³ Visual Gravitational law (1)

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity Equation (2)

W = 15 x (36526/T² (days)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]

With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = - k/ r² Inverse square Gravitational (1)

And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's law (2)

At Perihelion: d² r/d t² - r θ'² = - GM/r² = - r θ'²; d² r/d t² = 0

Then r θ'² = GM/r²

A quick answer by Newton would be: First θ' ² = [GM/r³]

And ω² = [GM/r³] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] ²

Then ω = {[GM/r³]} 1/2 [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] [(180/π) (3600) (36526/Tm)

= 43"/century

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0

= {[GM/r³]} 1/2 [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] [(180/π) (3600) (36526/Tm)

Or, r 1 /θ'² 1= r 2 /θ'²2 = constant

Or, θ' 2= {√[r 2/ r 1]} θ' 1

And θ' 2 - θ' 1 = {[√ (r 2/ r 1)] - 1} θ' 1

Δ θ' = {[√ (r 2/ r 1)] - 1} θ' 1

This is the angular time delay and will be seen as angular visual Illusion

The angular speed is θ' = v/r

For Mercury: θ' = v/r = (47.9km/sec)/58,200,000 km = 0.000000843 radians/sec

If you want the accumulation value in arc sec /century W", then

And W" = (v/r) (180/π) (3600) (26526/T) = angular velocity in arc sec per century.

If it is measured for planet Mercury then

W" = (47.9/58,200,000) (180/π) (3600) (26526/88)

W"= 70.75 arc second per century

Or, Δ W" = {[√ (r 2/ r 1)] - 1} W" (1)

What is the angular visual Illusion for planet Mercury that would be seen when

measured from Earth with Earth location r (1) = Earth = 149.6 x 106

And r (2) = Mercury = 58.2 x 106

And W" (2) = - 70.75 arc sec /century

Δ W" = {[√ (r 2/ r 1)] - 1} W" 1

Δ W" = {{√ [149.6/58.2]} - 1} [-70.29] = 43.0" arc per century

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = {{√[r e/ r m]} - 1} (v m /r m)] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T)

Page 52

Constant Areal velocity Law

Or, r 1 v 1= r 2 v2

This is the angular time delay and will be seen as angular visual Illusion

The angular speed is θ' = v/r

For Mercury: θ' = v/r = (47.9km/sec)/58,200,000 km = 0.000000843 radians/sec

If you want the accumulation value in arc sec /century W", then

And W" = (v/r) (180/π) (3600) (26526/T) = angular velocity in arc sec per century.

W" = (47.9/58,200,000) (180/π) (3600) (26526/88)

W"= 70.29 arc second per century

What is the angular visual Illusion for planet Mercury that would be seen when

measured from Earth with Earth location r (1) = Earth = 149.6 x 106

And r (2) = Mercury = 58.2 x 106

Page 53

No Force solution

Newton said there is gravity Force F = -GmM/r² whose solution is this

Planet

r

Su

n

With m [d² r/dt² - θ'²r] = 0 Zero force law equation (1)

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity Equation (2)

íωt

Equation (2) r = r0 e ; θ' = θ'0 e - 2 í ω t

Equation (1) - h² d² θ/ d u² - h² u³ = 0

Or d² θ/ d u² + u = 0

Then u = u0 e - í θ

And r0 = r0 (0) e + í θ

Or, r = r0 (0) e í (θ + ω t) [h/ θ'0]½ e í (θ + ω t)

And θ' = θ'0 e - 2 í ω t

Δ θ' = - 2 θ'0 sine² ω t

= - 2[2π/T] x [180/ π] [38526/T] [3600] sine² ω t

= - 2 [2π/88 x 24 x 3600] x [180/ π] [38526/T] [3600] sine² ω t

= - 141.5 sine² ω t

And ω t = arc tan [(r m - r e)/ (r m + r e)] ½

= arc tan [(149.6 – 58.2)/ (149.6 + 58.2)] ½

Δ θ' = - 141.5 sine² arc tan [(149.6 – 58.2)/ (149.6 + 58.2)] ½

= 43 arc seconds per century

Planet Distance r Planet Orbit Less Spin Angular velocity;

X 106km Orbit T speed v Earth speed v/r

in speed km/sec arc sec/ century

km/sec

Mercury 58.2 88 47.9 18.1 .002 70.75

Venus 108.2 224.7 35.05 5.7 6.52 10.86

Earth 149.6 365.26 29.8 .46511 4.1

Mars 227.936 687 24.14 0.2411

Jupiter 778.412 4333 13.06 12.6

Saturn 1,426.725 10760 9.65 9.87

Uranus 2,870.97 30690 6.80 2.59

Neptune 4,498 60180 5.43 2.68

Pluto 5906.4 90730 4.74

Newton’s mathematically wrong [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 =

(-720x36526x3600/88) (1.552) (48.14/300,000) ² arc sec per century

= 43

This particular equation structure is the basis of stars studying. Originally, I derived

it from Arabic real time physics literature.

A visual Illusion along the line of sight is constructed as follows:

Instead of seeing r0 we see r0 cosine arc tan (v/c) and perpendicular to the line

of sight we see r0 sine arc tan (v/c)

Or r = r0 [cosine arc tan (v/c) + í sine arc tan (v/c)]

Or r = r0 e í arc tan (v/c)

íωt

Or r = r0 e

And areal velocity law gives the same results

If r² θ' = h

Then differentiating with respect to time

Then d (r² θ')/ d t = d h/ d t

And 2 r r’ θ’ + r² θ’’ = 0

Or 2 (r’ /r) = - (θ’’/θ’)

The r = r0 e íωt

With r = r0 e íωt

With r² (0) θ' (0) = r² (1) θ' (1)

Then θ' (1) = [r² (0)/ r² (1)] θ' (0)

And θ' (1) = {[e í 2 ω t] θ' (0)

And θ’ (1) = {[cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] – 1} θ' (0)

Δ θ’ (1) = Δ θ’ (x) + í Δ θ’ (y)

= [cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] θ' (0)

Δ θ’ (x) = [cosine 2 ω t] θ' (0)

Δ θ’ (x) = [1 – 2 sine² ω t] θ' (0)

Δ θ’ (x) - θ' (0) = - 2 θ' (0) sine² ω t

Δ W = Δ θ’ (x) - θ' (0) = - 2 θ' (0) sine² ω t

= -2(2π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t

And θ' (0) = h/r² (0) = 2 π a b/T a² = 2π√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²

Δ W = - 4 π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t

If this apsidal motion is to be found as visual effects, then

With, v ° = spin velocity; v* = orbital velocity

And v/c = (v* + v°)/c = tan ω t

Δ W = -4 π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} radians

Multiplication by 180/π to change to degrees

Δ W ° = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} Degrees

And multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x

sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years

Page 55

Abstract: light measurements are done along the line of sight and we measure light

projections to our eye. Meaning, that we do not measure distance r but we measure r

cosine arc tan (v/c) when light is used and as a consequence instead of measuring time

T we measure T cosine arc tan (v/c) and here is the experimental proof of it.

Your eyes

A000 0

0000 0

0000 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 θ (2) 0 0 0

0 θ (1) 0 0 θ (3) 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

B------------------------- 0 --------------- 0 ------------- 0

1 2 3

The projections of light is what we measure and the projection of 1

and 2 and 3 is AB

If the angle between ray 1 and AB is θ (1)

If the angle between ray 1 and AB is θ (2)

If the angle between ray 1 and AB is θ (3)

Then C (1) cosine θ (1) = C (2) cosine θ (2) = C (3) cosine θ (3) = c = AB

Here is my iron clad proof of my theory: This is using the light

projections to be equal c then the advance of perihelion and stars to

solve mercury Venus and DI Herculis binary stars better than all is

B1 is;

And B1 is moving to B2 then the projection of AB2 of AB1 is measured. AB1 is

theorized and AB2 is measured; or AB2 = AB1 cosine θ

And θ = arc tan (v/c)

B1B2 /AB1 = sine θ; AB2/AB1 = cosine θ; B1B2/AB2 = tan θ

Instead of measuring time t we theorize time t and we measure time Γ = t cosine θ

Page 56

A Light V E L O C I T Y B2

O O O O O O O O O O

O θ C O

O O

O O

O V O

O O

O O

O O

O O

O

B1

Γ - t = - 2 t sine² {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}

With r2θ’ = h and 1/T= θ’’/θ’ = - 2r’/r = 2/t

Or (Γ – t)/2 = - t sine² {[arc tan (v/c)]/2} is the time delays for periods

With v = 47.9 (mercury) – 29.8 (Earth) =18.1 km/sec

2/3

= 15 x (36526/T² (days)] [(Tm/ Te) – 1] = 43

Page 57

r = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] and it is time you get corrected

Real time solution is: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] ℮ [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

"Apparent advance of perihelion"

Or, Boundary value law

= {[GM/r³]} 1/2 [(r m – r e)/ r e] [(180/ π) (3600) (36526/ T m) = 43

1/2

= {[GM/r³]} [(v m – v e)/ v e] [(180/ π) (3600) (36526/ T m) = 43

1/2 2/3

= {[GM/r³]} [(Tm/ Te) – 1] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43

1/2

= {[GM/r³]} [(v m T m – v e T e)/ v e T e] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m) = 43

Page 58

Chapter Eleven

Arabs real time physics in outer Space

The problems Einstein and all others can not solve

Apparent Apsidal motion of binary (two) stars

This is the solution to the 150 years apsidal motion puzzle that is not solvable by

space-time physics or any said or published physics including 500 years of Modern

physics and 500,000 modern physicists. Binary stars apsidal motion or "Apparent"

rate of orbital axial rotation is a visual effect along the line of sight of moving

objects applied to the angular velocity at Apses. From the thousands of close binary

stars astronomers picked a dozen sets of binary stars systems that would be a

good test of relativity theory and modern physics collected data for all of past

century and relativity theory failed every one of them. This rate of "apparent" axial

rotation is given by this new equation

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} (v* + v°/c) ²

degrees/100 years

T = period; ε = eccentricity; v° = spin velocity effect; v*= orbital velocity effects

The simplest problem in physics that all 500 years modern physics and

500,000 modern physicists could not solve by any physics:

1 – As Camelopardalis

2 – DI Herculis

3 – V1143 Cygni

4 – V 541 Cygni

5 - AI Hydra

6 - V 731 Cephei

7 - SW Canis Majoris

8 - NV Canis Majoris

9 - GG Orion

10- CM Draconis

11- VV PYX

12 – EW Oriomis

13- V1147 Sagittari

14 – PSR 1913 + 16

12 – PSR 0737 – 3039

Solution: Location r = r r (1) ; Velocity v = r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)

Acceleration γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)

S = m r; State = mass x distance

P = d S/ d t = d (m r)/d t = m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) r

Velocity = v = (d r/d t); mass rate change = m' = (d m/d t)

P = m v + m' r; Momentum = change of state = change in location or change in

mass

F = d P/d t = d² S/d t² = d [m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t)]/d t

= m d² r/d t² + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d² m/d t) ² r

Page 59

F = m d² r/d t² + 2 (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d² m/d t) ² r

Force = Change of momentum

F = m a + 2 m ' v + m" r

F = - GmM/r²

Or, Newton's Kepler's equation: F = - GmM/r²

Then

With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r² Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)

And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)

With m = constant, then m can be taken out from both equations (1) and (2)

With d² r/d t² - r θ'² = - GM/r² Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)

From 2: With m = constant; then d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0

And m² d (r²θ')/d t = 0

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0

And r²θ' = h

With (1): d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r²

With m = constant

Then m [d² r/ d t² - r θ'²] = - Gm M/ r²

And [d² r/ d t² - r θ'²] = - G M/ r²

Let r =1/u

Then d r/d t = -u'/u² = - (1/u²) (θ') d u/d θ = (- θ'/u²) d u/d θ = - h d u/d θ

And d² r /d t² = - h θ'd²u/dθ² = - h u² [d²u/dθ²]

And - h u² [d²u/dθ²] - (1/u) (hu²)² = - G Mu²

Or, [d²u/ dθ²] + u = G M/ h ²

u = G M/ h² + A cosine θ

And r = 1/u = 1/ [G M / h² + A cosine θ]

= (h²/ G M)/ [1 + (Ah²/ GM) cosine θ]

= (h²/GM)/ (1 + ε cosine θ)

This is Newton's Classical Equation solution of two body problem. We solved this

equation and we got the motion equation:

Is: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] which is the equation of an ellipse with

eccentricity ε and semi - major axis a, and a semi- minor axis whose value is b = a

√ [1 - ε²] and two foci one equals to c = ε a, and the other foci location equals to -

c = - ε a. Or the motion of one ball around the other ball should be an ellipse with

the other ball at one of the foci +/- ε a, of the ellipse with semi major axes (- a, a)

on x-axis and semi minor axes (-b, b) on y- axis and foci (- c, c) on x- axis again

with angle of rotation θ. If this law to work on two planets instead of two balls like

planetary motion around the sun, then Astronomers should see this motion of a

planet moving around the sun in an ellipse with the sun at one of its foci.

Page 60

m

What astronomers saw was not an ellipse but a rotating ellipse like the ellipse

below wth rotating angle ψ

θ

ψ

Page 61

When the areas size A are sliced equally it was found that the times spent by planets

orbiting around the Sun and making areas A each are equal also.

Or, r² (0) θ' (0) = r² (1) θ' (1) = r² (2) θ' (2) = r² (3) θ' (3) = --

= location² x [angular speed] = constant

= Areal velocity

If r² θ' = h

Then differentiating with respect to time

Then d (r² θ')/ d t = d h/ d t

And 2 r r’ θ’ + r² θ’’ = 0

Or 2 (r’ /r) = - (θ’’/θ’)

The r = r0 e íωt

With r = r0 e íωt

With r² (0) θ' (0) = r² (1) θ' (1)

Then θ' (1) = [r² (0)/ r² (1)] θ' (0)

And θ' (1) = {[e í 2 ω t] θ' (0)

And θ’ (1) = {[cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] – 1} θ' (0)

Δ θ’ (1) = Δ θ’ (x) + í Δ θ’ (y)

= [cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] θ' (0)

Δ θ’ (x) = [cosine 2 ω t] θ' (0)

Δ θ’ (x) = [1 – 2 sine² ω t] θ' (0)

Δ W = Δ θ’ (x) - θ' (0) = - 2 θ' (0) sine² ω t

= -2(2π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t

And θ' (0) = h/r² (0) = 2 π a b/T a² = 2π√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²

With, v ° = spin velocity; v* = orbital velocity

And v/c = (v* + v°)/c = tan ω t

Δ W ° = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} Degrees

And multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days

Page 62

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x

sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years

Astronomy re - written

Primary → v°(p) ↑ v* (p)↑ v° (p) ↑v* (p)↓ v° (p) ↓ v* (p) ↑ v° (p) ↓V* (p) ↓

Secondary ↓

v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑][↓,↑] [↓,↑][↑,↑] [↓,↑][↓,↑]

[↑,↑]=orbit

Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) - v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v* (p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)

Examples AS CAM

v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ [↑,↑][↑,↓] [↑,↑][↓,↓] [↓,↑][↑,↓] [↓,↑][↓,↓]

Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)

Examples

v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ [↑,↓][↑,↑] [↑,↓][↓,↑] [↓,↓][↑,↑] [↓,↓][↓,↑]

Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v*(p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)

Examples AS CAM

v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓]

Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)

Examples AS CAM

degrees/100 years

AS Cam Data T=3.431; r (m) =0.1499; m=3.3 M (0); M=2.5 M (0)

R (m) =2.57 R (0); [v° (m), v° (M)] = [40, 30]; ε = 0.1695; 1- ε = 00.8305

R (M) = 2.5 R (0); r (M) =0.1111; m + M=5.8 M (0); G=6.673x10-11

M (0) = 2 x 1030 kg; R (0) = 0.696x109m;

The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- --.)

≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4)

Finding orbital velocities

From Newton's inverse square law of an ellipse motion applied to a circular orbit

gives the following: m v²/ r (cm) = GmM/r²

Planet --- r (cm) ----- Center of mass ------- r (CM) --------- Mother Sun

Planet ------------------- r -------------------------------------- Mother Sun

Center of mass law m r (cm) = M r (CM); m = planet mass; M = sun mass

And r (cm) = distance of planet to the center of mass

Page 63

And r (CM) = distance of sun to center of mass

And r (cm) + r (CM) = r = distance between sun and planet

Solving to get: r (cm) = [M/ (m + M)] r

And r (CM) = [m/ (m + M)] r

Then v² = [GM r (cm)/ r²] = GM²/ (m + M) r

And v = √ [GM²/ (m + M) r = a (1-ε²/4)]

Planet orbital velocity or primary velocity:

R =a (1-ε²/4)

[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ² = 1.43

With a = [R (m)/r (m)] = (2.57/0.1499) (0.696x109) = 11.9327x109

And v* (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1- ε²/4)] = 110km/sec

= √ [6.673x10-11 (2.5)² (2 x 1030) / (5.8) 11.932x109 (0.9928)] = 110.178km/sec

= √ [6.673x10-11 (3.3)² (2 x 1030) / (5.8) 11.932x109 (0.9928)] = 145.435 km/sec

Spin: v° = 40 + 30=70km/sec

And v* (e) = v* Earth = 29.8 km/sec

And vº (e) = 0.465 km/sec

Then v* + v °= v* (m) + v* (M) + v* (e) + vº (m) + v° (M) + vº (e)

= 110.178 + 145.435 + 70 + 29.8 – 0.465 = 355 m/sec

[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ² = 1.43; T = 3.431days

Dr Guinan and DR Maloney 1989: W°= 15°/century 1989

DR Khailullin and Dr Kozyreva: 1983 W º= 14.6 °/century

Einstein: 44.3º/ century

DI Her Apsidal motion solution:

Data: T=10.55days r(m) = 0.0621 m=5.15M(0) R(m)=2.68R(0)

[v°(m),v°(M)]=[45,45]

And ε = 0.4882; r (M) = 0.0574 M=4.52 M (0) R (M) =2.48; m + M=9.67 M (0)

L = 2000 +/- 200 Ly

Page 64

Calculations

1- ε = 0.5118; (1-ε²/4) = 0.94; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 3.33181; 1 + ε = 1.4882;

G=6.673x10-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x109m

V* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 99.88 km/sec

V* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 113.8km/sec

W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100

years

Now let us calculate v* (cm) = ∑m v/∑m = 106.38km/sec

With v* = 2 v*(cm) = 212.76 km/sec

And v° = -90 km/sec

Then v* + v° = 212.76 - 90 = 122.76 km/sec and

W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan

122.76/300,000]

= (-720x36526/10.55) (3.33181) (122.76/300,000)²

W° (cal) = 1.39°/century

With σ = √ {∑ [v* - v* (cm)] ²/2}

= √ {[106.36 - 99.88]²/2 + [106.36 - 113.8]²/2} = 6.975 km/sec

Then W° (cal) = 1.39°/century +/- 0.16

Observed 2004: 1.39° +/- 0.3°/century; Relativity: 4.27°/century

years

With v° = - 45 km/s + 45 km/sec = 0 km/sec

And v* = v* (cm) = ∑m v/∑m = 106.38km/sec

W° (cal) = 1.044 degrees/century

C - V* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 99.88 km/sec

And v* x √ (1-ε²/4)/√ (1+ ε) = 99.88 √ (.94)/√ (1.4882) = 79.38

V* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 113.8 km/sec

And v* x √ (1-ε²/4)/√ (1+ ε) = 113.8 √ (.94)/√ (1.4882) = 90.44312 km/sec

K (B) = 122.3342 km/sec

Or v* = [K (A) + K (B)]/2 = 114. 85 km/sec; with v* = 114.85

Page 65

W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan

114.85/300,000]

= (-720x36526/10.55) (3.33181) (114.85/300,000)²

= 1.22° degrees/ century

Observed: 1.24° degree/century +/- 0.05°

1- Apsidal motion of DI Her: Dr Edward Guinan and Dr Frank Maloney; 1985.

2- New Apsidal Motion of DI Her: Dr Edward Guinan and Dr Frank Maloney; 1994.

3- D. YA. Martynov; and KH. F. Khaliulullin 1980

4- Petrie et al.1967

5- Petrova - Ovlav Apsidal motion catalogue

6- Riazi 2003

7- Maloney Guinan 2004

T= 7.641days; r (m) = 0.059; m =1.391 M (0); R (1) =1.346R (0); ε = 0.54

And [v ° (m), v° (M)] = [18, 28]; r (M) = 0.058; M=1.347 M (0)

Distance [38 +/- 2 parsec] = 123.956 +/- 6.524 Ly

Calculations

We have 1- ε = 0.46 1- ε²/4=0.9721 R (0) = 0.696x109m

With a = [R (1)/r (m)] R (0) = 15.87823729x10^9m; 1+ ε = 1.54

With v (p -perihelion) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1- ε)] = 110 km/sec

And v (p- aphelion) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1+ε)] = 60 km/sec

K (A) = (110 + 60)/2 = 170/2 = 85km/sec

With v (s - perihelion) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε)] = 113.6 km/sec

And v (s - aphelion) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1+ε)] = 62 km/sec

K (B) = (113.6 + 62)/2 = 175.6/2 = 87.8km/sec

And v (2) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a] = 77.0699 km/sec

When spinning on opposite directions

2- With v° [18, 28] = 28 - 18 = 10

3- Taking average 10 + 7/2 = 8.5

And v (M) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 80.00448 km/s

Also, [√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ² = 3.977622971

Page 66

Now:

With 1- v° + v* = 157.51648km/sec - 10 km/sec = 147.51648km/sec

And 2- v° + v* = 157.51648km/sec - 8.5 km/sec = 149.01648km/sec

And 3- v° + v* = 157.51648km/sec - 7 km/sec = 150.51648km/sec

(147.51648/300,000)²=3.31°/century

2- W°/century= (-720x36526/7.641) (3.977622951)

(149.01/300,000)²=3.3778°/century

3- W°/century= (-720x36526/7.641) (3.977622951) (150.51648/300,000)² =

3.44614561°/century

And v ° = v° (p) - v° (s) = 21 - 28 = -7 km/sec

Then v* + v ° (p) = 157.477 - 7 = 150.477 km/sec

(150.477/300,000)²=3.44°/century

Observed values are: W° = 3.393987698°/century; W° = =3.489592985

Average observed: 3.44°/ century

References:

1-Geminez and Margrave, 1985

[0.00071°/cycle] = [1 century = 36526days/7.641days] = 3.393987698°/century

W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years

T = 15.3379days; r (m) = 0.0440 m = 2.4 M (0) R (m) = 1.88 R (0)

And ε = 0.479 r (M) =0.0425 M=2.4 M (0) R (M) =1.79 R (0)

With 1- ε = 0.521 1-ε²/4=0.94263975; [√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ² = 3.2339

Page 67

And a = [R (m)/r (m)] R (0) = (1.88/0.0440)0.696x10^9m = 29.73818182x10^9m

Then a (1-ε²/4) = 28.03x10^9m

And v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 75.5883km/sec; v° (m) =24

And v (M) = √ [Gm²/a (m + M) (1-ε²/4)] = 75.883km/sec; v° (M) =24

With v°=24 + 24= 44km/sec

And v* = 151.1766km/sec

With v* + v°= 151.1766 - 48 = 103.1766km/sec

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} {[v* + v°]/c} ²

W° (ob) = (- 720 x 365226/15.3379) (3.2339) (103.1766/300,000)²

W° (ob) = 0.65°

Notice: [v° (m), v° (M)] = [24 ± 2, 24 ± 2]

If v° (m) = v° (M) = 24 + 2 = 26

Then v* + v°= 151.1766 - 52 = 99.1766km/sec

And W° (ob) = (- 720 x 365226/15.3379) (3.2339) (99.1766/300,000)²

W° (ob) = 0.60°/century

Observed is W°= 0.60° +/ -0.1/century Lacy = [0.5°; 0.7°]

Relativity: W° = 0.97°/century

W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years

Data: T=8.29days r(m) = 0.1418 m=2.15M(0) R(m)=3.92R(0)

[v°(m),v°(M)]=[28,27]; and ε = 0.0.23; r (M) = 0.1002 M=1.98 M (0) R (M)

=2.77(0); m + M=4.13 M (0); L = 575 +/- 15 Ly

Calculations

1-ε = 0.77; (1-ε²/4) = 0.986775; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 1.6414

G=6.673x10^-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x10^9m

Then a = [R (m) / r (m)] = 19.24062059 x 10 ^ 9 m

V (M) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 88.11km/sec

years

Page 68

With v* = v (m) + v (M) = 81.11439578km/sec + 88.11km/sec =

169.2243958km/sec

And v° = v° (m) + v° (M) = 28 + 27 = 55 km/sec

Then (v* + v°) = 224.2243958 km/sec

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan

224.2243958/300,000]

= (-720x36526/8.29) (1.6414) (224.2243958/300,000)²

= 2.90°/ century

W° (observed) = 2.90°/century as measured

Observed is 2.90°/century

Space-Time Relativity theory 6.8° / century

Now let us calculate v* (cm) = ∑m v/∑m

= 2.15 x 81.11439578 + 1.98 x88.11= 84.46822 km/sec

With v* = 2 v*(cm) = 168.936411 km/sec; And v° = 55 km/sec

Then v* + v° = 223.9364411 km/sec and

W° (observed) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan 223. 936/300,000]

= (-720x36526/10.55) (3.33181) (223.9364411/300,000)²

W° (observed) = 2.9°0/century

With σ = √ {∑ [v* - v* (cm)] ²/2}

= √ {[88.11 -84.46822]²/2 + [81.11439578 - 84.46822]²/2}

= √ {[3.64178]²/2 + [3.35382422]²/2} = 3.5 km/sec

Then W° (ob) = 2.9°0/century; observed is W° = 2.9°/per century

And Einstein's 100,000 space-timers 6.8° / century

References: Go to Smithsonian/NASA website SAO/NASA and type:

1- Apsidal motion of AI Hydra Popper 1985

2- KH. F. Khaliulullin and V.S Kozyreva 1988

3- Petrova - Ovlav Apsidal motion catalogue 1999

6 - V731Cehpei Apsidal Motion Solution

Primary → v°(p) ↑ v* (p)↑ v° (p) ↑v* (p)↓ v° (p) ↓ v* (p) ↑ v° (p) ↓V* (p) ↓

Secondary ↓

v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑][↓,↑] [↓,↑][↑,↑] [↓,↑][↓,↑]

[↑,↑]=orbit

Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) - v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v* (p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)

Examples V731Cephei

v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ [↑,↑][↑,↓] [↑,↑][↓,↓] [↓,↑][↑,↓] [↓,↑][↓,↓]

Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)

Examples

v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ [↑,↓][↑,↑] [↑,↓][↓,↑] [↓,↓][↑,↑] [↓,↓][↓,↑]

Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v*(p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)

Examples

v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓]

Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)

Examples V731Cephei

Next the same equation will be used to find the advance of Periastron or "apparent"

apsidal motion of V731 binary stars system.

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) x

{[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years

And [v° (m), v° (M)] = [19+/-3, 18+/-3]

And ε = 0.0165 a = 23.27x R (0)

Calculations

M + m = 2.738; 1-ε=0.9835 1-ε²/4=0.9999 R (0) = .696x10^9m

{[109.38 - 96.46688] ²/2} = 11.9288422 km/sec

Then v* + v° = 229.9288422km/sec + 29.8567844 km/sec = 259.7856266

km/sec

Page 70

W° (obo) = (-720x36526/T) x {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} {[v* + v°]/c} ²

W°/century= (-720x36526/6.068567) (1.033694356)

(259.7856266 /300,000)²=2.91°/century

W°/century = 3.35914177°/century = 0.0335914177°/year

V. Batkis; M.Zejda; I. Bulut; M.Wolf; S. Bilir; H. Bakis; O.Demircan: J.w.Lee:

M.Slechta: B. Kucerova. 2008

Data: T=1.885159 days; ε = 0; v* (p) = 128.55 km/sec; v* (s) = 130.87 km/sec

[√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 3.33181; v° (p) = 51.7 km/sec and v° (s) = 52.4 km/sec

Apsidal motion is given by this formula:

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100

years

= v° (p) + v° (s) = 104.1

And v* + v° = 363.52 km/sec

sine² [Inverse tan 363.52/300,000]

= (-720x36526/1.885159) (1) (363.52/300,000)²

= 20.48333818°/century = 0.2048333818°/year

U = 360°/0.2048333818°/year;

U = 1757. 5 years

Absolute dimensions NV CMa; Kaluzny, J; Pych, W; Rucinski, S. M; Thompson, I.B

Page 71

Relativity theory coffin nail # 8 SW Canis Majoris

W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100

years

= 80.5 + 87.8 = 168.3 km/sec

Einstein and space-timers 14,000 years

Primary → v°(p) ↑ v* (p)↑ v° (p) ↑v* (p)↓ v° (p) ↓ v* (p) ↑ v° (p) ↓V* (p) ↓

Secondary ↓

v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑][↓,↑] [↓,↑][↑,↑] [↓,↑][↓,↑]

[↑,↑]=orbit

Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) - v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v* (p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)

Examples Sw Canis Majoris

v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ [↑,↑][↑,↓] [↑,↑][↓,↓] [↓,↑][↑,↓] [↓,↑][↓,↓]

Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)

Examples

v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ [↑,↓][↑,↑] [↑,↓][↓,↑] [↓,↓][↑,↑] [↓,↓][↓,↑]

Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v*(p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)

Examples

v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓]

Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)

Examples SW Canis majoris

Page 72

SW CMa apsidal motion solution:

Data: T=10.09 days; r (m) = 0.0942; m = 2.22 M (0); R (m) = 3.01R (0); ε = 0.3179

And r (M) = N/A M = 2.03 M (0) R (M) =2.46 R (0); m + M = 4.25 M (0)

And [v° (m), v° (M)] = [30+/-2, 27+/-3]

K (1) = 80.5; K (2) = 87.8

Calculations

[√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 2.037835646

Then a = [R (m) / r (m)] = 22.23949045 x 10 ^ 9 m

With v° = v° (p) + v° (s) = 30 + 27 = 57 km/sec

And, v* + v° = 218.7574713km/sec

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100

years

218.7574713/300,000]

= (-720x36526/10.09) (2.037835646) (218.7574713/300,000)²

= 2.8242°/ century = 0.026242/yr

U = 360/ 0.026242 = 12747 years

Taking: v* + v° = 80.5 + 87.8 +57 = 225.3 km/sec

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²}

Sine² [Inverse tan 225.3 /300,000]

= (-720x36526/10.09) (2.037835646) (218.7574713/300,000)²

= 2.995659677°/ century = 0.0299565967°/yr

U (observed) = 12,000 years

1- Lacy Apsidal motion Canis Majoris 1997

73

9 - GG Orion Apsidal motion puzzle solution

Primary → v°(p) ↑ v* (p)↑ v° (p) ↑v* (p)↓ v° (p) ↓ v* (p) ↑ v° (p) ↓V* (p) ↓

Secondary ↓

v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin=[↑,↑][↑,↑]=orbit [↑,↑][↓,↑] [↓,↑][↑,↑] [↓,↑][↓,↑]

Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) - v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v* (p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)

Examples GG Orion

v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ [↑,↑][↑,↓] [↑,↑][↓,↓] [↓,↑][↑,↓] [↓,↑][↓,↓]

Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)

Examples

v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ [↑,↓][↑,↑] [↑,↓][↓,↑] [↓,↓][↑,↑] [↓,↓][↓,↑]

Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v*(p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)

Examples

v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓]

Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)

Examples GG Orion

Data: T=6.6314948; m = 2.342 M (0); M = 0.2338 M (0); R (1) = 1.852 R (0); R (2) =1.830

ε = 0.2218; 1 - ε = 0.7782; r (1) = 0.0746; r (2) =.988 r (1); m + M = 4.68 M (0)

And [v° (p); v° (s)] = [16 +/- 1; 16 +/- 1]; [v° (p); v° (s)] = [25 +/- 3; 24 +/- 3];

U = 10700 +/- 4500 years

Calculations

(1-ε²/4) = 0.9877; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 1.57

G=6.673x10^-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x10^9m

Calculations

With v* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 95.6 km/sec

And v* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 95.735 km/sec

And v° (p) = 16 km/sec; v° (s) = 16 km/sec

Then v* (p) + v* (s) + v° (p) + v° (s) = 223.335 km/sec

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/6.6314948) (1.57) [223.335/300,000] ² degrees/100

years

W° (ob) = 3.45°/century = 0.0345°/year

U [years] = 360/[0.0345°/year]

U = 10,432 years Nahhas

U (observed) = 10700+/-4500years

Dr Lacy; Dr Torres; Dr Claret; Dr Sabby: 2000

The time has come to send relativity theories and all four-dimensional space-time

confusion of physics to the...

Page 74

Chapter Twelve

Arabs real time physics in outer Space II

A- Arabs Binary stars and Binary Pulsar apsidal motion

2009 total collapse of general relativity theory; CD Draconis Binary stars

Primary → v°(p) ↑ v* (p)↑ v° (p) ↑v* (p)↓ v° (p) ↓ v* (p) ↑ v° (p) ↓V* (p) ↓

Secondary ↓

v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑][↓,↑] [↓,↑][↑,↑] [↓,↑][↓,↑]

[↑,↑]=orbit

Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) - v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v* (p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)

Examples CD Draconis

v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ [↑,↑][↑,↓] [↑,↑][↓,↓] [↓,↑][↑,↓] [↓,↑][↓,↓]

Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)

Examples

v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ [↑,↓][↑,↑] [↑,↓][↓,↑] [↓,↓][↑,↑] [↓,↓][↓,↑]

Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v*(p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)

Examples

v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓]

Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)

Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)

Examples CD Draconis

Data: T=1.268389985days; m = 0.231 M (0); M = 0.2141 M (0); a = 3.7634 R (0); ε=

0.0051

And [v° (p); v° (s)] = [9.5 +/- 1; 10.0 +/- 1]

Einstein and space – timers: W° = 1.91x10-3/day

Calculations

m + M = 0.4451 M (0)

1-ε = 0.9949; (1-ε²/4) = 0.99993498; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 1.01

G=6.673x10-11; M (0) = 1.98892x1030kg; R (0) = 0.696x10 9m

Calculations

With v* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 72.436 km/sec

And v* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 78.153 km/sec

And v° (p) = 9.5 km/sec; v° (s) = 10 km/sec

Then v* (p) + v* (s) + v° (p) + v° (s) = 170.117 km/sec

Page 75

Apsidal motion is given by this formula:

years

years

W° (ob) = 6.731598944°/century = 0.06731598944°/year

U [years] = 360/[0.06731598944°/year]

U (observed) = 5400+/-3200years

Einstein's and space-timers U = 360/ [0.00191x365.26] = 516 years

Can it get any better?

It is not just about dumping relativity it is dumping relativity and Alfred Nobel

institution with it.

2009

By : Juan Carlos Morales; Ignasi ribas; carme jordi; Guillermo Toress; Jose

Gallardo; Edward F. Guinan; David Chardonneau; Marek wolf; David w.latham;

Guillem Angalada Escude; David H.Bradstreet; Mark E.Everett; Francis T. O,

Donavan; Georgi Mandushev; Robert D. Mathieu and other 15

11 - V 1147 Sagittari

V 1147 Sagittari: Data: U = 592.5 +/- 6 years

With K (p) = 117.4 km/sec; K(s) = 130.8 km/sec

Giving v* (p) = 117.4 + 29.8 - 0.465 = 146.735 km/sec

And v* (s) = 130.8 + 29.8 – 0.465 =160.135 km/sec

Orbital speed of earth = 29.8 km/sec; spin speed of earth is 0.465 km/sec

And vº (p) = 80 + 29.88 – 0.465 km/sec = 109.335 km/sec

And vº(s) =75 + 29.88 – 0.465 km/sec = 104.335 km/sec

Then v* + vº = 146.735 + 160.135 + 109.335 + 104.335 = 520.54km/sec

[√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 2.62

W (cal) = (-720x36526/3.28) x (2.62) (520.541/300,000)²= 63º/century

U = [63/100]-1x 360 = 570 years.

Observed values; 592.5

References

Absolute dimensions of solar-type eclipsing binaries V 1147Sagittari

J. Anderson, A. Gimenez 1985

Page 76

12- EW Orionis

EW Orionis: Data: U =16300 +/- 3900

With K (p) = 73.18km/sec; K(s) = 75.46 km/sec

Giving v* (p) = 73.18 + 29.8 - 0.465 = 102.515 km/sec

And v* (s) = 75.46 + 29.8 – 0.465 =104.795 km/sec

And vº (p) = 9 + 29.8 - 0.465 = 102.515 km/sec

And vº (s) = 73.18 - 29.8 + 0.465 = 102.515 km/sec

Orbital speed of earth = 29.8 km/sec; spin speed of earth is 0.465 km/sec

And vº (p) = 9km/sec; vº(s) =8.8km/sec

Then v* + vº = 102.515 + 104.795 +9.0 + 8.8 =225.11km/sec

[√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 1.167

U = [2.1367/100]-1x 360 = 16848 years.

With r (p) = 0.1156 and r (s) = 0.1156 and R (m) = 2.167 R (0) and R (M) =

2.167 R (0)

And ε = 0.0956; 1 - ε = .9044; U = 3200 +/- 1000

And [v° (p); v° (s)] = [23; 23]

V = 381.03095km/sec

Calculations

And (1-ε²/4) = 0.99771516; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 1.216984877

G=6.673x10^-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x10^9m

And a = [R (m)/r (m)] = [2.06/ 0.097] R (0) = [2.167/ 0.1156] [0.696x109 m]

Then a = 13.04698962 x 109 m

And a (1-ε²/4) = [13.04698962 x10^9m] [0.99771516] = 13.01717934 x109m

+ √ [6.673x2.098²x2x10-19/ (4.196) 13.04698962x10^9x1.0956]}/2

= [108.85 + 98.96511511]/2 = 103.9km/sec

= 103.9km/sec

Page 77

With v* (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 103.70 km/sec

And v* (cm) = [m v* (p) + M v* (s)]/ (m + M) = 103.70 km/sec

degrees/100 years

Primary orbital speed contribution to apsidal motion

And v* (M) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 103.70 km/sec

Is v* (M) = 103.7 + 29.8 – 0.465 = 133 km/sec

And v° (m) = 23 km/sec

Is vº (m) = 23 + 29.8 – 0.465 = 52.335 km/sec

And v° (M) = 23 km/sec

Is vº (m) = 23 + 29.8 – 0.465 = 52.335 km/sec

Then v * + vº = 370.67

[√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 1.216984877

U = 3386 years Nahhas'

U (observed) = 3200 +/- 1000years

References

Absolute dimensions of solar-type eclipsing binaries EW Orionis

J.V. Clausen, H. Bruntt, E.H. Olsen, B.E. Helt, and A. Claret 2009

Page 78

Chapter 13: Alfred Nobel prize winner for less than a $

1993 Nobel Prize Winner Dr Joseph H. Taylor

Binary Pulsar 1913 + 16

For PSR 1913 + 16

Data: Joseph Taylor and Joel M. Weisberg 2004

With a =2.3417725 R (0); R (0) = 0.696 x 10 9meters

And ε = 0.6171338

T = 0.322997448930

And θ' = 4.226595 °/year

With mass m = 1.4414 M (0) and M = 1.3867 M (0); M (0) = 2 x 1030 kg

V* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a] = 235.9574664 km/sec

V* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a] = 245.2640841km/sec

W° (cal) = (-720x365.26/Tdays) x

sine² [Inverse tan (v/c)] degrees/100 years

= (-720x365.26/0.329974489) x sine² [Inverse tan (481.22/300, 00)] deg/100

years

W = 4.2°/year

Data: U =21.3 years

With m = 1.34 M (0); M = 1.25 M (0); M (0) = 2 x 1030

And ε = 0.0878; [vº (p), vº (s)] = [22.7 km/sec, 2km/sec]

With G = 6.673 x 10 – 11; T =2.4 hours; a = 1.145 x 0.069 x 109

With K (p) = v* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 303 km/sec

And K(s) = v* (m) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 325 km/sec

Giving v* (p) = 303 + 29.8 - 0.465 = 332.335 km/sec

And v* (s) = 325+ 29.8 – 0.465 =354.335 km/sec

And vº (p) = 22.7 + 29.8 - 0.465 km/sec

And vº (s) = 2 - 29.8 + 0.465 km/sec

Orbital speed of earth = 29.8 km/sec; spin speed of earth is 0.465 km/sec

[√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 1.197

U = [1770/100]-1x 360 = 20.3389 years.

References

The Double pulsar PSR J0737 - 3039

Burgay, M; D’Amico,N.; A.Manchester,R.N; Lyne, A.G.; Kramer, M; Mclaughlin, M.A; Lorimer, D.R;

Carmilo, F.; Stairs, I.H: Freire, P.C.C; Joshi,

Page 79

Chapter 14

B- Arabs Real time GPS or Real time Global positioning systems

Abstract: The Global Positioning System or GPS 45 micro seconds per day time

delays have nothing to do with Einstein's relativity theory time travels confusions of

physics and they are a consequence of Satellite orbital speed and Earth rotational

speed given by this formula below. Even if Einstein's formulas were correct for all

practical purposes they are insignificant to the performance to the GPS system.

Earth - Satellite distance is a variable that Engineers account for and the tiny

"relativistic" effect has no significance whatsoever because distance adjustment is

far more than any relativistic adjustment. For the president of the United States

President to ask for Innovations like that in an AAAS meeting is a sign of a

bankrupt scientific community and for those who knew the facts must have laughed

to their teeth at the president.

NASA's and AAAS laughing at the president requires a reply with laugh at AAAS and

NASA and all other including the person who wrote the speech for the president

GPS time delays of 45 micro seconds per day have nothing to do with relativity

theory or Einstein or AAAS or NASA or silly time travel physics or any theory. This

time delay is due to Earth rotation and satellite orbital speed that Scientists turn

their heads away from because without Einstein's silly magic sock of time travel

physics, Physicists will have less tricks that allows them to say anything publish

anything based on nothing for jobs money prestige Nobel Prizes and silly physics.

satellite

And v* = 14000km/hr = 3.88888888889 km/s; ε = 0; T = 0.5 days and v° =

0.465km/s

Nahhas'

Relativity theory silly professor of time travel accounted for 38 Micro seconds and

blamed the other 7 Micro seconds on weather

W" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/

century

Page 80

2 – Arabs Global Positioning Systems in arc degree /century

W" (calculated) = [-720x36528/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century

W" (calculated) = [-720x365.26x3600/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century

W" (calculated) = [-720x365.26/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century

W" (calculated) = [-720/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century

W" (calculated) = [-720x3600/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century

W" (calculated) = [-720x3600] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century

W" (calculated) = [24/360] [-720x3600/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century

U (seconds/day) = [-720x 3600/15] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² sec/day

10 - Arabs Global Positioning System Circular Satellite Orbits time delays in seconds/day

U (seconds/day) = [-720x 3600/15] (v/c) ² sec/day

And v° = 0.465km/sec Earth spin speed;

And v* = 14,000 km/hr = 35/9 km/second

Then v* +/- v° = 35/9 = 3.88888889km/sec - 0.465km/second

We subtracted because satellite and motion and spin orientations are opposite

GPS time delays are given by this formula per day in seconds of an arc

W" (ob) = (-720x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° +/- v*)/c] ² seconds/day

W" (ob) = (-720x36/0.5) (1) [3.423888889/300,000] ² seconds of arc /1 day

W" (ob) = 0.000675246 arc seconds per day to get this answer in seconds divide

by 24hours/360degress = 15

Page 81

Chapter 15

Arabs Real time Interplanetary Telecommunications systems

Universal Constant Γ0 =16πGM/C³= 247.597μs

Abstract: Interplanetary time delays around the moving sun derived from three

dimensional time-dependent Newton - Kepler's equations solution gives a solar

round trip time delay rate of:

ΔΓ= 16πGM/c³ [1 + (v°/v)] ² = ΔΓ0 [1 + (v°/v)] ²

ΔΓ0 = 16πGM/c³= 247.597μs

G = Gravitational constant; M=Sun mass; a=mean distance from Sun. And

eccentricity; c = light speed; a = mean distance

And v = Planet speed; v°= Sum/Difference in spin between Earth and planets.

When applied to actual data it gives extremely accurate results better than

Shapiro's Space-time-delay analysis and without space-time fictional forces or

space-time fiction.

Page 82

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x [(v° + v*)/c] ²

degrees/100 years

2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4)

And v (M) = √ [Gm² / (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)]

Δ θ = T W (ob) = - 4π {[√ (1-ε) ²]/ (1-ε) ²} (v° + v*/c) ²} radians; and with ε =

0

Δ θ = -4π (v*/c) ²

Sun-Photon: 0 = ε [Sun - Photon] ≠ ε [Earth - Mars] = 0.2075

The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²---)

≈ 2 π a (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4)

v=√ [Gm M/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; m<<M; Solar system

ΔΓ = 2 arc length/c = 2[Δ θ] d/c = 2[- 4π (v/c) ²] 2R/c; ΔΓ = -16π/c (v/c) ²;

ΔΓ = 8πd/c³ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)] =16πGM/c³ (1-ε²/4) = Γ0 (1 - ε²/4)

Γ0 = 16 πGM/c³= 247.5974607μs=universal constant

ΔΓ = 250μs Mars-Earth.

Planet Distant Planet- Planet+ Eccentricity 1-ε²/4 ΔΓ0 ΔΓ

Earth Earth μs

Mercury 57,910 91,690 207,510 0.44185822 0.95119032 247.597460 260.3

4 8 7

Venus 108,200 41,400 257,800 0.16058960 0.99355274 247.579460 249.2

4 5 7

Earth 149,600 0 299,200 0 1 247.579460 247.597

7

Mars 227,940 78,340 377,540 0.20750119 0.98923581 247.579460 250.273

2 4 7

Jupiter 778,330 628,730 927,930 0.67756188 0.88522747 247.579460 279.6789

5 3 7

Saturn 1,429,40 1,279,80 1,579,00 0.81051298 0.83576717 247.579460 296.230

0 0 0 3 6 7

Uranus 2,870,99 2,721,39 3,020,59 0.90094650 0.79707384 247.579460 310.61

0 0 0 4 9 7

Neptune 4,504,30 4,354,70 4,653,90 0.93570983 0.78111177 247.579460 316.98

0 0 0 5 6 7

Pluto 5,913,52 5,763,92 6,063,12 0.95065246 0.77406497 247.597460 319.86650

0 0 0 9 1 7

Page 83

These data compared to Shapiro's time delay from NASA 1977 Vikings 6, 7 Earth -

Mars Telecommunications mission are more accurate because the actual value is

250μs and the value published by Doctor Irwin Shapiro of Harvard is 247.597μs

Although this formula works the correct formula is

Δ θ = -4π [(v° + v*)/c] ² Sun-Photon; and with v° ≠ 0

v = √ [GM/a] = 24.1 km/sec; vº = 0.46511 – 0.241 = 0.224 km/sec

ΔΓ = 2 arc length/c = 2[Δ θ] d/c

= 16πGM/c³ [1 + (vº/v)] ² = 247.597 x [1 + 0.224/24.1)]²

Δ Γ = 250 µs For Mars; 0.4651 = Earth rotation; 0.241 = mars rotation; v = mars

speed

Harvard physics department is where physics changed from science to stupidity

Page 84

necessarily science or scientific and if it is a western invention it is to be

at least 88.88 % fraud

After World War II and the emergence of USA as a global superpower and the shift of power from

traditional old empires to the new world “superpower” American Universities rushed for gold and gold is

“reputable” physics department that can say anything publish anything based on nothing and nothing is

Robert Pound and Glen Rebka confusion of an experiment . Harvard strikes again with fraud Robert

Pound and Glen Rebka (top)

22.5 meters apart

The gravitational and electric and magnetic constants all are derived from two

constants p and T which are air density and Earth spin

Page 85

If we took a look at the most famous physics fundamental constant G from Newton's

350 years old Equation F = - GmM/r², or, Coulomb electric force equation F = - Qq/4π

ε 0, one can see that, for example, G’s value has unit dimension of [G] = [1/ρ T²]; ρ is

density and T is time rotational period. If we can show that the gravitational constant G

= G (ρ, T) is a variable air density and Earth rotational period dependent then we can

say what Earth is saying that the most famous physics fundamental constants are not

so universal constants because all three fundamental constant are air density and Earth

spin dependent.

Proof: G = G (ρ, T) = 1/ [(2/5) (4 π/3) ρT²] = √ (2π)/ (4 π/3) ρT²

Nothing that: 8 π /15 = (2/5) (4π/3); 4π/3 and 2/5 come from spherical aspect

Where: ρ = air density; T = Earth rotation period

The 2/5 is the ratio for radius of gyration of a sphere

Taking T = 24 hours and ρ = 1.2045 kg/m³

G = 1/ (8 π/15) ρT² = 6.674 x 10 - 11

And ε 0 = 1/4πρT² = 8.85 x 10 -12

And μ = 4πρT²/c²

0

When Newton’s equation F = - mM/r² was solved it produced the angular velocity r’

= r’0 e í ω t

Divide by c

And r’/c = (r’0/c) e íωt

T = T0 e íωt

And f = f0 e - í ω t

And f = f x + f y = f 0[cosine ω t - í sine ω t]

And f x = f 0 cosine ω t

And f x - f 0 = f 0 [1 – 2 sine² (ω t/2)] - f 0

And δ f = f x - f 0 = – 2 f 0 sine² (ω t/2)

And δ f/f 0 = - 2 sine² (ω t/2) Up

And δ f/f 0 = 2 sine² (ω t/2) Down

And δ f/f 0 (total) = [2 sine² (ω t/2) Down] – [- 2 sine² (ω t/2)]

And δ f/f 0 (total) = 4 sine² (ω t/2)

With ω t = arc tan (v/c)

With v = δ f/f 0 (total) = 4 sine² [(arc tan √2gh) /2]

With v << c

Page 86

In Cleveland Ohio there were two handymen in white robes named

Michelson Morley

Set up this round rotating table in 1887 with a lamb, two mirrors beam splitter,

telescope

Page 87

In Modern times an animation of the experiment would look like

Their reasoning was that if they rotate the table 90 degrees they would see the

interference pattern should change looking through the telescope.

When the interference pattern did not change they claim that physical quantities

data would not change when rotated 90 degrees or 1 = 1 +i

A. Michelson and E. Morley

Handymen in white ropes confusions of an Experiment

In General

V = v = Velocity of Earth assuming that emitter - receiver line-up with earth line

travel at start and during this whole experiment. That would be the x-x line

X' ------Earth moving in this direction with velocity v -----------X

And C = c at start

What is turning is the table that has the lamb and the mirrors and the telescope on

top of it.

And that means light c and distance d

C = c e î θ = velocity of light

And d = d e î θ

Then: V = v; C = c e î θ; d = d e î θ; e î θ = cosine θ + î sine θ

For example:

Page 88

1-Assume θ = 0° Arm A

Then: V = v; C = c; d = d

Forward is C-V = c - v

Backward C+V = c + v

And t = d/ (c-v) + d/ (c + v)

2- Assume θ = 90° then e î 90 = î Arm B

Then V = v; C = c î; d = d î

Forward is C-V = -v + c î; and its measure is = √ (c² + v²)

V is along the x-x and has no component on y-y axis and î means along the y-y

axis

Backward C+V = v + c î; and its measure is = √ (c² + v²)

And comes to this is Position I

Position 1: Right-Upper

Right: t (1) = d/ (c -v) +d/ (c +v) = 2dc/ (c² - v²) = (2d/c) [1/ (1- v²/c²)]

Upper: t (2) = d/√ (c² + v²) + d√ (c² + v²) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 +

v²/c²)]

Now Position II

3-Assume θ = 90° Arm A

Then: V = v; C = ỉ c; d = d

Forward is C-V = -v + c î; and its measure is = √ (c² + v²) MMX mistake √ (c² -

v²)

Backward C+V = v + c î; and its measure is = √ (c² + v²)

And t' (1) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 + v²/c²)]

4- Assume θ = 90° + 90° =180 then e î 180 = -î Arm B

Then V = v; C = -c; d = d

Forward is C-V = -c - v; V is along the x-x and has no component on y-y axis and î

means along the y-y axis

Backward C+V = -c + v

Then t = d/-c+ v forward and in absolute value t = d/ (c - v)

And t = d/-c -v backward and in absolute value t = d/ (c + v)

And t' (2) = d/ (c - v) + d/ (c + v) = 2dc/ (c² - v²) = (2d/c) [1/ (1- v²/c²)]

With t' (1) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 + v²/c²)]

Conclusions is turning the table 90° has no effect what so ever on time length

difference

In General

If we twist the table by an angle θ then V = v; C = c e î θ; d = d e î θ; e î θ = cosine

θ + î sine θ

Now position I

V = v; C = c cosine θ + î c sine θ; d = d cosine θ + î d sine θ

Forward: C - V = c cosine θ -v + î c sine θ and its measure is √ [(c cosine θ -v) ²

+ c² sine ² θ]

Backward: C + V = c cosine θ +v + î c sine θ and its measure is √ [(c cosine θ +

v) ² + c² sine ² θ]

Page 89

sine ² θ]

And Position II

V = v; C = c cosine [θ + 90°] + î c sine [θ + 90°] = c sine θ - ỉ c cosine θ

d = d cosine θ + î d sine θ

Forward: C - V = c sine θ -v - î c cosine θ and its measure is √ [(c sine θ -v) ² + c²

cosine ² θ]

Backward: C + V = c sine θ + v - î c cosine θ and its measure is √ [(c sine θ + v) ²

+ c² cosine ² θ]

And t (2) = d / √ [(c sine θ -v) ² + c² cosine ² θ] + d / √ [(c sine θ + v) ² + c²

cosine ² θ]

As General rule:

And t (1) = d / √ [(c cosine θ -v) ² + c² sine ² θ] + d / √ [(c cosine θ + v) ² + c²

sine ² θ]

And t (2) = d / √ [(c sine θ -v) ² + c² cosine ² θ] + d / √ [(c sine θ + v) ² + c²

cosine ² θ]

If θ = 0 then, we get position I

Right: t (1) = d/ (c -v) +d/ (c +v) = 2dc/ (c² - v²) = (2d/c) [1/ (1- v²/c²)]

Upper: t (2) = d/√ (c² + v²) + d√ (c² + v²) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 +

v²/c²)]

If θ = 90°, then we get position II

With t' (1) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 + v²/c²)]

And t' (2) = d/ (c - v) d/ (c + v) = 2dc/ (c² - v²) = (2d/c) [1/ (1- v²/c²)]

There is no Path difference change

If θ = 45 degrees, then

Upper: t (2 = d/ (c -v) +d/ (c +v) = 2dc/ (c² - v²) = (2d/c) [1/ (1- v²/c²)]

Right: t (1) = d/√ (c² + v²) + d√ (c² + v²) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 +

v²/c²)]

Now Let us turn the Table 30°

Then: V = v; C = c Exp [î 30°]; d = d Exp [î 30°]; Exp [î 30°] = cosine 30° + î

sine 30°

And t (1) = d / √ [(c cosine 30° -v) ² + c² sine ² 30°] + d / √ [(c cosine 30° + v)

² + c² sine ² 30°]

And t (2) = d / √ [(c sine30° -v) ² + c² cosine ² 30°] + d / √ [(c sine 30° + v) ² +

c² cosine ² 30°]

And t (1) = d / √ [(c √ 3/2 -v) ² + c² /4] + d / √ [(c √ 3/2 + v) ² + c² /4]

And t (2) = d / √ [(c/2 -v) ² + c² (√ 3/2) ²] + d / √ [(c /2 + v) ² + c² (√ 3/2) ²]

Now let us use v = 30km/sec and c = 300,000km/sec

If θ = 0 then,

Page 90

Right: t (1) = d/ (c -v) +d/ (c +v) = 2dc/ (c² - v²) = (2d/c) [1/ (1- v²/c²)]

Upper: t (2) = d/√ (c² + v²) + d√ (c² + v²) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²)

= (2d/c) [1/√ (1 + v²/c²)]

If θ = 30° then,

And t (1) = d / c √ [(√ 3/2 -v/c) ² + 1 /4] + d / c √ [(√ 3/2 + v/c) ² + 1 /4]

And t (2) = d / c √ [(1/2 -v/c) ² + (√ 3/2) ²] + d / c √ [(1 /2 + v/c) ² + (√ 3/2)

²]

We can take (d/c) Then Multiply that at the end

If θ = 0 then,

Right: t (1)/ (d/c) = 2 / (1- v²/c²)] = 2.00000002

Upper: t (2)/ (d/c) =2/√ (1 + v²/c²)] = 1.99999999

Then δ t = 3 x 10-8 (d/c) = 3 x 10-8 (d/300,000,000) = 10 -16 d

Then δ t = 10 -16 d

If θ = 30° then,

And t (1)/ (d / c) = √ [(√ 3/2 -v/c) ² + 1 /4] + √ [(√ 3/2 + v/c) ² + 1 /4] =

0.99999134 + 1.00000866 = 2

And t (2)/ (d / c)

= √ [(1/2 -v/c) ² + (√ 3/2) ²] + √ [(1 /2 + v/c) ² + (√ 3/2) ²]

= 0.999995 + 1.000005 = 2

Then δ t' = 0

So the difference is

ΔΓ = δ t - δ t' = 10 -16 d

With fringe shift = c ΔΓ/ δ r = 3x10-8d/λ; λ = 5.9 x 10^-5 c m; d = 11m =1100c m

With (d/λ) = 1100/ (5.9x 10-5)

Then fringe shift = (3300x10-8)/ (5.9x 10-5) = .559322034

Well if fringe shift does not happen at angle 90° and fringe shift happens at 30°

why no shift seen?

The initial problem was and is the lineup of apparatus with earth velocity which is

impossible because of the infinite numbers of possibilities of earth motion in space

and if it happened it will be momentarily.

MMX will never work and all similar experiments will not work unless it is designed

as a 3-dimensional set-up and not a one-dimensional wish washy set-up

An ideal setup is a spherical set-up but a more realistic setup will be discussed

below how to find earth path in space

Page 91

Page 92

Chapter 17 Earth Path in real space in real time

Earth path in space is possible and Einstein can keep his relativistic

trash to himself: Self – referenced motion

There is a serious problem in all of physics and that is timing of

experiments and physics experiments theory.

Earth absolute motion is a circle that is going to tie spin to orbit motion and waiting

experimental verifications

Finding new sources of energy requires the elimination of bad physics and bad

physics is E = mc² because it is based on space - time physics and space time

physics is wrong because I can prove it wrong as follows.

What is wrong with space - time is that it is a wrong idea and it is without proofs.

Time is a human made scale and making it a dimension is scientifically stupid and

the reasoning behind accepting time as a dimension and not as a scale is the

assumption that it matches experiment. Time as a dimension allowing the

exchange of time for space or squeezing space to expand time is not acceptable to

me regardless what all Nobel prize winners have said about it and regardless what

the 100, 000 living physicists are saying about it and regardless what all 100, 000

dead physicists had said about it because it is wrong and proving it wrong is what I

can do and did the first time I read what started it and that would be the original

dumb idea and experiment in Cleveland Ohio in 1887 by Michelson and Morley.

What dumb Michelson and Morley experiment did is it started stupidity as accepted

science.

The stupidity of Michelson and Morley experiment is the following.

We can not measure something that did not happen. We can only measure

something that had happened. We can measure something in present time that

had happened in past time.

Michelson and Morley experiment is stupid because two handymen in white robes

tried to measure something in real time and wondered why they did not see it in

past time.

Present time = past time + [present time - past time]

Present time = past time + time delays

What we measure = what happened + what changed till things are measured.

Real time physics = event time physics + time delays physics

What we see or measure is relativistic = Absolute event + relativistic time delays

What happened is absolute = real time relativistic event - real time relativistic

effects

Page 93

Real time = event time [this is the wrong idea that started space - time stupidity]

What are missing are time delays

[Known as quantum theory and relativity theory]

This formula is my 1973 discovery that not only Nobel Prize winners are wrong but

all of physics and physicists are wrong because physics solution is based on the

idea that:

In one dimension:

The problem is very simple, I would send a signal to 2 signals to two equidistant

repeaters that send back the signal to me and the signal that comes first indicate a

motion in opposite direction. Installing a multi opposite directional repeaters

system and one signal and for each tow opposite direction have on timer will

produce Earth path in absolute space and may produce the greatest formula in all

of Physics and that would be mass motion and spin and better than that it will

erase stupidity from classrooms know as space - time.

Abstract: Finding new sources of energy require the elimination of bad physics

and bad physics is Einstein's space-time (x, y, z, ict) confusion of physics that lead

to energy fraud symbol E = mc² because energy spent is based on distance

traveled and not relative distance and distance traveled is self referenced distance

or absolute motion and finding this motion is waiting on funding for discovery since

the beginning of time and experimentally is possible. Discovering Earth absolute

motion in space could be one of the greatest discoveries in physics of all time

because it will answer the trillion dollar question if mass m spin s and absolute

motion r are related by a mathematical formula that expresses a physical law and if

this law is to be found can it explains the structural design of the solar system and

if so what applications of such a law is useful inside the nucleus to produce new

sources of energy?

Page 94

The experimental set - up

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d

Sensor x' Emitter Ex Lead Sensor x

Timer T x

And d

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<E>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d

Sensor y' Emitter E y Lead Sensor y

E

Timer T y

And d

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<E>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d

Sensor z' Emitter E z Lead Sensor z

E

Timer T z

1-Assume there is a pulse emitter E shooting pulses in six different directions of the

Euclidean system of axes per unit time τ; x'-x and y'-y and z'-z axes at six

equidistant receivers of distance d and has three wire leads Ex, E y, E z connected

to three Timers Named T x , T y, and T z.

3- Three timers are named timer T x with three wires one to receiver x' and one

wire to receiver x and one wire to emitter wire lead E x and timer T y with three

wires one to receiver y' and one wire to receiver y and one wire to emitter wire

lead E y and timer T z with three wires one to receiver z' and one wire to receiver z

and one wire to emitter wire lead E z are used

4- These six pulses has their directions grouped in three sets of pairs x'-x, y'-y, z'-

z.

5- Three timers T x; T y, and T z are associated with the three axes respectively

a - Timer T x takes measurements from Emitter lead E x; receiver x' and receiver x

b - Timer T y takes measurements from Emitter lead E y; receiver y' and receiver y

c - Timer T z takes measurements from Emitter lead E z; receiver z' and receiver z

Page 95

Now

d <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<E>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d

Sensor x' E x Lead Sensor x

Emitter

E

t x' Timer T x tx

1- Timer T x receives 3 signals

a- From lead E x a signal departures from emitter E to T x register E [T x, n = 1, 2, 3,]

b - From receiver x' a signal departures to timer T x [t x', n =1, 2, 3,]

c - From receiver x a signal departures to timer T x [t x, n =1, 2, 3,]

If t x' - T x is the travel time from emitter E to receiver x'

And t x - T x is the travel time from emitter E to receiver x

And motion Earth is in the x - direction

Let C = average velocity of the pulses and v = velocity of earth in x'-x

direction

Then

RIGHT (C - V x'-x) = d/ t (x-direction) = V x = measurable quantity; t (x-direction)

measured because d is known

LEFT (C + V x'-x) = d/ t (x'-direction)/d = V x' = measurable quantity; t (x'-direction)

measured because d in known

Then C = (V x' + V x)/2

And V x'- x = (V x' - V x)/2 Equation X-1 Measurable quantity

Similarly we can get

V y'- y = (V y' - V y)/2 Equation Y-1 Measurable quantity

V z'- z = (V z' - V z)/2 Equation Z-1 Measurable quantity

V (earth) = √ [V² x'-x + V² y'-y + V² z'-z]

If we take unit of times τ = period of a light source (or a high speed signal)

# x'- y'- z'- V²z] τVx τVy τV

x y z z

1 Vx Vy1 Vz V1=√ [V²x1 + V²y1 + X1 Y1 Z1 r (1) = X1 + Y1

1 1 V²z1] + Z1

2 Vx Vy2 Vz V2=√ [V²x2 + V²y2 + X2 Y2 Z2 r (2) = X2 + Y2

2 2 V²z2] + Z2

3 Vx Vy Vz V3=√ [V²x3 + V²y3 + X3 Y3 Z3 r (1) = X3 + Y3

3 3 3 V²z3] + Z3

4 Vx Vy4 Vz V4=√ [V²x4 + V²y4 + X4 Y4 Z4 r (4) = X4 + Y4

4 4 V²z4] + Z4

5

Page 96

Then

Conclusion:

The idea of this experiment is to find distance travel segments r (1); r (2); r (3); r

(4); ...ETC; then join them together.

With [r (1); τ]

O -------------- O [r (4); τ]

- - O ------------------

[r (2); τ] - -

- - [r (3); τ]

- O

r (1) = X1 + Y1 + Z1

r (2) = X2 + Y2 + Z2

r (1) = X3 + Y3 + Z3

r (4) = X4 + Y4 + Z4

The smaller the signal time interval or period τ then the more accurate the

experiment. Such a set-up is not only capable of finding absolute motion but it will

give clues to finding the relation between mass m spin s and its orbit r of planet

Earth. If mass m motion r and spin s are found to be related it will the greatest

formulas of all time because all there is in the Universe is mass m space r and spin

s. Earth mass m and spin s are know but mass r is Earth absolute motion that had

been waiting on funding for discovery since the beginning of time.

Page 97

Chapter 18

Johann Georg Von Soldner 1801 light bending historical mistake

In 1801 Johann Georg Van Soldner was the first person to calculate the gravitational

bending of light using Newtonian Mechanics and he got:

Johann Georg Van Soldner ς (Johann) = 2 {cosine -1 [v²/ (-c² + v²)} - π

With v² = GM /R where G = gravitational constant = 6.673 x 10-11; C = 3 x108m/sec

And M = Sun mass = 2 x 1030 kg; R = sun radius = 0.695 x 10 9 m; v = 437.89

Einstein said if make – believe time travel and new forces added:

Then: ς (Einstein) = 4 (v/c) ²; ς (Johann) = 0.8789 arc sec; ς (Einstein) = 2(0.8789)

Johann Georg Van Soldner derivation was incomplete and when completed and

approximated it produces Einstein’s formula without Einstein’s space – time fiction

and as light aberration and not light bending.

Proof:

Johann Georg Van Soldner wrong derivation of angle of light aberration around the Sun

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)

Assuming mass m = constant

Proof:

With (2): d (r²θ')/d t = 0

Then r²θ' = constant = h

Differentiate with respect to time

Divide by r²θ'

Then 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0

And 2(r'/r) = - (θ"/θ') = 2[λ (r) + ì ω (r)]

And 2(r'/r) = 2[λ (r) + ì ω (r)]

And (θ"/θ') = - 2[λ (r) + ì ω (r)]

Solving for r = r (θ, t) = r (θ, 0) r (0, t) = r (θ, 0) ℮ [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

With r (0, t) =℮ [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

-2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

Then θ'(θ, t) = [h/ r² (θ, 0)] ℮

And, θ'(θ, t) = θ' (θ, 0) θ' (0, t)

Page 98

-2[λ +ỉω ]t

And θ' (0, t) = ℮ (r) (r)

And θ'(0, 0) = [h/ r² (0, 0)]

Let r =1/u

Then d r/d t = -u'/u² = - (1/u²) (θ') d u/d θ = (- θ'/u²) d u/d θ = - h d u/d θ

And d² r/d t² = - hθ'd²u/dθ² = - h u² [d²u/dθ²]

[d²u/ dθ²] + u = G M/ h²

And u = G M/ h² + A cosine θ

Then u (0) = 1/ r (0) = GM/h² + A; h = RC

C = light velocity of 300,000km/sec; And A = 1/R – GM/ (RC) ²

And u = G M/ h² + A cosine θ = GM/ (RC) ² + [1/R – GM/ (RC) ²] cosine θ

If r --- ∞; GM/ (RC) ² + [1/R – GM/ (RC) ²] cosine θ = 0

Divide by GM/ (RC) ²

And cosine θ = -1/ [C²/ (GM/ R) – 1]

Or cosine θ = 1/ [1 – (C²/V²)]; GM/R = V²

Or cosine θ = v²/ (v² - c²)

And θ = cosine -1 [v²/ (v² - c²)]

And ς (Johann) = 2 {cosine -1 [v²/ (-c² + v²)} - π ≈ 2 [π/2 + (v/c) ²] – π = 2 (v/c) ²; v/c <<1

Light

Sun Light

θ ς

Or, ς (Einstein) = 4 (v/c) ²

We have u (θ) = G M/ h² + A cosine θ

[λ +ỉω ]t

And r (θ, t) = r (θ, 0) r (0, t) = r (θ, 0) ℮ (r) (r)

Or, r (θ, 0) = (h²/GM)/ [1 + (h²/GM) A cosine θ]

Or, r (θ, 0) = (h²/GM)/ [1 + ε cosine θ]

Real time orbit: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] ℮ [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

This equation is real time Universal mechanics solution

[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t

This: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] ℮ (r) --------------------------------- I

It is the math formula that matches a physical experiment

If time is frozen that is t = 0

Then r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] we get the classical or event time solution ----------- II

Relativistic is the difference between I and II

The difference between an event and its measurement in real time

With θ’ (θ, t) = [h/ r² (θ, 0)] ℮

With (θ”/ θ’) = - 2[λ (r) + ì ω (r)]

Then θ” (θ, t) = - 2[λ (r) + ì ω (r)] [h/ r² (θ, 0)] ℮ -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

With λ (r) = 0

-2 ỉ ω t

Then θ” (θ, t) = - 2 ì ω (r) [h/ r² (θ, 0)] ℮ (r)

Or, θ” (θ, t) = - 2 ì ω (r) [h/ r² (θ, 0)] [cosine 2 ω (r) t + ί sine 2 ω (r) t]

Is Real θ” (θ, t) = 2 ω (r) [h/ r² (θ, 0)] sine 2 ω (r) t] (t/t)

Or, Real θ” (θ, t) = 2 t ω (r) [h/ t r² (θ, 0)] sine 2 (r) ω t]

At t = T; light aberration angle in real time is confused for light bending. With ω T

= arc tan (v/c)

Then ψ = visual illusion angle = θ” (θ, T) / [h/ T r² (θ, 0)]

Or, ψ =2 T ω (r) sine 2 ω (r) T

Is: ψ = [2 arc tan (v/c)] sine [2 arc tan (v/c)]

Page 100

And sine 2 arc tan (v/c) ≈ sine 2 (v/c) ≈ 2 (v/c)

≈ [2 (v/c)] [2 (v/c)]

Or ψ ≈ 4 (v/c) ² radians

Or, ψ ≈ 4 (v/c) ² x (180/π) degrees

Or, ψ ≈ 4 (v/c) ² x (180/π) x 3600 seconds

With v² = GM/R

Then ψ ≈ 4 GM/R c² x (180/π) x 3600 seconds

Einstein with the help of others rigged eternity to come up with 4 (v/c) ² and not 2 (v/c)

² to justify experimental illusions or 2[2(v/c) ²]

Ψ = 7200 [arc tan (437.89 / 300,000)] sine 2 [arc tan (437.89/300,000)]

= 1.757855865 arc second

MR Eddington: keep the trash to England Royals

101

That is one Einstein equal two Newton.

Newton energy definition is En = mc²/2

Einstein doubled that amount or E e = 2 En = 2[mc²/2] = mc²

It is not just Einstein and Newton are wrong but physics is 500 years wrong Page 1

Abstract: The elimination of 500 years of Physics including relativity theory is a matter

of time and not a matter of science and the time is 1900.

Real time Physics: We can only measure past events. We can not measure

something that did not happen. We can only measure things that had happened.

What we measure is not what happened. We measure in present time an event

that happened in past time.

Present time = past time + [present time - past time]

Present time = past time + real time delays

Real time physics = event time physics + real time relativistic delays

effects

What happened in an event is absolute = real time physics - real time relativistic

effects.

Real time = absolute time + time delays

Real time = Event time + time delays

Real time Physics = event time Physics + time delays Physics

Page 102

Γ = t + (Γ - t) = t [1 + (Γ – t)/t] = t (Γ/t)

Γ = t + Δ Γ; Δ Γ = Γ - t

If an event happens on Planet Mercury and the event is seen from the Sun at event

time t, then this same event would be seen from Earth in real time as time Γ = t +

ΔΓ

Γ = t + (Γ - t)

Real time = Event time + time delays

Γ = t + Δ Γ (x) + ỉ Γ (y) = t + Δ Γ

Δ Γ = Δ Γ (x) + ỉ Γ (y)

Δ Γ (x) is along the line of sight time delays

Δ Γ (y) is perpendicular to the line of sight time delays

Γ = t (Γ/t)

ỉωt ỉωt

Γ=te ; Γ/t = e

ίωt

Γ=te

ίωt ίωt

Multiplying by c, then r = c Γ = c t e = r0 e ; ω T = arc tan (v/c)

ίωt

Or r = r0 e

B – Michelson and Morley ω T = [π/2 + arc tan (v 0/c)]

Real time velocity v = [v 0 + í ω r 0] ℮ ỉωt

E = m (V. V)/2

ωt

= (m/2) [v 0 + í ω² r 0]. [v 0 + í ω r 0] ℮ 2 ỉ

= (m/2) [(v0² - ω² r 0²) + 2 í ω (r 0 v 0)] [cosine 2ω t + í sine 2ω t]

= (m/2) {[(v0² - ω² r 0²) cosine 2ω t - 2 ω (r 0 v 0) sine 2ω t]

+ í [(v0² - ω r 0²) sine 2ω t + 2 ω (r 0 v 0) cosine 2ω t]}

= Ex + i E y

Ex = (m/2) [(v0² - ω² r 0²) cosine 2ω t - 2 ω (r 0 v 0) sine 2ω t]

Page 103

Case I

Constant velocity of light principle: v 0 = ω r 0 = c

Then

Ex = (m/2) [(c² - c²) cosine 2ω t - 2 c² sine 2ω t]

Ex = (m/2) [- 2 c² sine 2ω t]

Ex = - m c² sine 2ω t

A – Light aberration ω T= arc tan (v 0/c)

Ex = - m c² sine 2ω t

Ex = - m c² sine 2 [arc tan (v 0/c)]

Ex = - m c² sine 2 [arc tan (c/c)]

Ex = - m c²

B – Michelson and Morley ω T = [π/2 + arc tan (v 0/c)]

Ex = - m c² sine 2ω t

Ex = - m c² sine 2[π/2 + arc tan (v 0/c)]

Ex = - m c² sine 2[π/2 + π/4]

Ex = - m c² sine [3π/2]

Ex = m c²

Case II

Rest Energy Principle: v 0 = 0; ω r 0 = c

Then

Ex = (m/2) [(0² - c²) cosine 2ω t - 2 c (0) sine 2ω t]

Ex = (m/2) [- 2 c² cosine 2ω t]

Ex = - m c² cosine 2ω t

A – Light aberration ω T= arc tan (v 0/c)

Ex = - m c² cosine ω T= arc tan (v 0/c)

Ex = - m c² cosine 2 [arc tan (0/c)]

Ex = - m c² cosine 2 (0)

Ex = - m c²

B – Michelson and Morley ω T = [π/2 + arc tan (v 0/c)]

Ex = - m c² cosine 2ω t

Ex = - m c² cosine 2[π/2 + arc tan (0/c)]

Ex = - m c² cosine 2(π/2)

Ex = - m c² cosine π

Ex = - m c² (-1)

Ex = m c²

Page 104

Michelson Morley

This 1907 Nobel Prize winner Dude along with this Dude put a Lamp two mirrors

and a telescope on a round rotating table.

This was the set –up.

Page 105

Michelson and Morley looked at the virtual image from the two mirrors of

light reflections through the telescope. They claim that if they to rotate the

table then the image should change. When Michelson and Morley rotated

the table in 1887 and the image did not change they claim that you can

rotate data without change in results!

Then conclusion of this wacky claim that won a Nobel Prize is that

The number 1 can be replaced by 1 + i; i is the complex number

Page 106

i

And replace (1) with (1 + 1i)

Then E = (mc²/2) (1)² = (mc²/2) (1 + 1i) ²

E = (mc²/2) (1 + 1i) ² = (mc²/2) (1 – 1 + 2i) ²

E = 2i (mc²/2) = imc²

|E| = |imc²| = mc²

Case III: Classical Energy Principle: v 0 = c; ω r 0 = 0: Then ω

Ex = (m/2) [(c² - 0²) cosine 2 ω t - 2 c (0) sine 2ω t]

Ex = (m/2) (c² cosine 2 ω t)

Ex = (m/2) [c² cosine 2 (0) t]

Ex = m c²/2

The crooks of “University” are using visual effects to claim Dark energy or an

expansion of 500 years of western stupidity and fraud in physics

Page 107

Chapter 20: special relativity stupidity

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a

location

r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the

product

S = m r; State = mass x location:

P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment

= change of location + change of mass

= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate

F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force

= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r

= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate

r = location; v = velocity; γ = acceleration

F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r

F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] + (m" r) r

(1)

= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)

= [-GmM/r²] r (1) ------------------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law

Proof:

First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1)

Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ

Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t

= r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ]

= r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)

And with r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ

Then d [θ (1)]/d t= θ' [- cosine θ î - sine θ Ĵ= - θ' r (1)

And d [r (1)]/d t = θ' [-sine θ î + cosine θ Ĵ] = θ' θ (1)

= r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' θ' r (1) + r θ" r (1) +r θ'd [θ (1)]/d t

γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)

And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0

With m = constant, then

With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = F (r) Eq-1

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2

With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = - ω²s r E q – 1 Hooke’s Law

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2

Page 108

From Eq-2: d (r²θ')/d t = 0

Then r²θ' = h = constant

Differentiate with respect to time

Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ" = 0

Divide by r²θ'

Then 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0

And 2(r'/r) = - θ"/θ' = 2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)]

Also, r = r0 (θ, 0) e [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

For a fixed orbit: λ r= 0

Also, r = r 0 (θ, 0) e ỉ ω t

t

or twisted e í ω t making it in general r e [λ + í ω] t. If the length of an object is not

extended or shortened then λ = 0 and it could be seen as a twisted visual effect.

Then r -------------------------- Visual r = S = r e í ω t

1- The illusion of length contraction:

Length contraction is just a visual effect of projected light aberration and

it is an "apparent" visual effect and not real

An object located at r ----- light sensing -----measured as S = r e í ω t

with ω t =

arc tan (v/c); tan (v/c) = light aberrations angle = ω t

S = r e í ω t caused by light aberrations visual effects as follows:

If e í ω t = [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t]; From S = r e í ω t

Page 109

It changes to: S = r {√ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)] - ỉ sine arc tan (v/c)}

= r {√ [1- (v/c) ²] - ỉ (v/c)}; v/c <<< 1

=Sx+ỉSy

Where S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)]; And S y = cosine arc tan (v/c)

With v/c << 1 then; Where S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)]; And S y = cosine arc

tan (v/c)

In absolute value S = r

Along the line of measurement: S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)] ≈ r √ [1-(v/c) ²];

v/c << 1

This the equation for length contraction of Lorentz's used in Einstein's theories

But it is the light aberrations visual effects and it is "apparent and not real

Projected light aberrations

S x = r cosine ω t

Hypotenuse = S x = [c t x] = c t x √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)]

S x ≈ c t √ [1-(v/c) ²]; from constant velocity of light

and c is constant in all reference frames

Where t = local self time; t x = time by observer

t = {1/√ [1-(v/c) ²]} t x absolute math

These are time dilatation equations given by Einstein’s special relativity theory.

t' = {1/√ [1-(v'/c) ²]} t x' absolute math

Two observers observing the same thing the time dilations are

Then, t x = t √ [1-(v/c) ²]; t = {1/√ [1-(v/c) ²]} t x absolute math; Lab purposes

And, t x' = t √ [1-(v'/c) ²]; t' = {1/√ [1-(v'/c) ²]} t x' absolute math; Lab

purposes

S (A) = r exp [ỉ ω t]

S (B) = r exp [- ỉ ω t]

S x (A) = S x = c t x ≈ c t x' √ [1-(v/c) ²]

S x (B) = S x = c t x' ≈ c t x √ [1-(v/c) ²]

And t x ≈ t x' √ [1-(v/c) ²]

And t x' ≈ t x √ [1-(v/c) ²]

That is why there no twin Paradox except on science fictions books because it is all

about aberrations and nothing real.

Page 110

3 – Momentum

P x = v [√ [1-(v/c) ²]; v =constant; P x = d [S x]/d t

And m P x = m v [√ [1-(v/c) ²] = m (0) v

5- Energy

E = m (0) c²; v = 0

Page 111

Chapter 21

Quantum mechanics Copenhagen Cyclic Interpretation

Ape Man Modern Physicist Nobel Prize Ape Ass.

This new physics is quantum mechanics!

Quantum mechanics is a purely western stupidity:

Is r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location

r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the

product

S = m r; State = mass x location:

P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment

= change of location + change of mass

= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate

F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force

= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r

= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate

In polar coordinates system

r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r θ' θ(1) ; γ = (r" - rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + r θ")θ(1)

r = location; v = velocity; γ = acceleration

F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r

F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] + (m" r) r

(1)

= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)

= [-GmM/r²] r (1) ---------------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law

Page 112

Proof:

First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1)

Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ

Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t

= r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ]

= r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)

And with r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ

Then d [θ (1)]/d t= θ' [- cosine θ î - sine θ Ĵ= - θ' r (1)

And d [r (1)]/d t = θ' [-sine θ î + cosine θ Ĵ] = θ' θ (1)

= r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' θ' r (1) + r θ" r (1) +r θ'd [θ (1)]/d t

γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)

With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = F (r)

And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0

With m = constant, then

With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = F (r) Eq-1

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2

With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2

Then r²θ' = h = constant

Differentiate with respect to time

Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ" = 0

Divide by r²θ'

Then 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0

And 2(r'/r) = - θ"/θ' = 2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)]

Also, r = r0 (θ, 0) e [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

For a fixed orbit: λ r = 0

Also, r = r 0 (θ, 0) e ỉ ω t

And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2ỉ ω t

With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0

Let u = 1/r; r = 1/u; r²θ' = h = θ’ /u²

And d r/d t = (d r/ d u) (d u /d θ) (d θ/ d t) = (- 1/u ²) (θ’) (d u/ d θ)

= - h (d u/ d θ)

And d² r/ d t² = - h (θ’) (d² u/ d θ ²)

= [- h²/r²] (d² u/ d θ ²)

= - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²)

Page 113

With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1

And - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) – (1/u) (h u²) ² = 0

Then (d² u/ d θ ²) + u = 0

Then u = A e - í θ

Then r 0 (θ, 0) = (1/A) e í θ

And r 0 (θ, 0) = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ

And r = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ e ỉ ω t

Or, r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)

í ω (r) t

Arabs real time astronomy is actually quantum mechanics r = r0 e

Light is emitted and not an emitter and humans have no means of measuring light

in motion and at best they can take a snap shot.

In mathematical language

Then r (θ, 0) = r 0 e í θ at t = 0

And r (θ, t) = r 0 e í (θ + ω t) = r 0 e í θ e í ω t = r (θ, 0) e í ω t

And r (θ, t) = r (θ, 0) [cosine ω t + í sine ω t]

And r x (θ, t) = r x (θ, 0) cosine ω t

And ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)]

Then ∆ r = r x (θ, t) - r x (θ, 0)

= r x (θ, 0) [(cosine ω t) – 1]

And [r x (θ, t) - r x (θ, 0)]/ r x (θ, 0)

= [(1 - 2 sine² ω t/2) – 1]

= - 2 sine ² ω t/2; ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)]

rabs real time astronomy:

Image = Image = I

Object = Object = O

- Object = - Object = - O

I = O + (I – O)

(I/O) = O/O + [(I – O)/O]

(I/O) = 1 + [(I – O)/O]

(I/O) θ' 0 = θ' 0 + [(I – O)/O] θ' 0

I = r; O = r 0

Or, (r / r 0) θ' 0 = θ' 0 + [(r – r 0)/ r 0] θ' 0

And [(r – r 0)/ r 0] θ' 0

Or [- 2sine ² ω t/2] θ' 0; ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)] = cosine-1 (r/ r 0)

For planet Mercury:

Page 114

The distance visual effect Error is: [(r m – re)/re] δ θ’ m

And ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)] = cosine-1 (r/ r 0)

Or ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)] = cosine-1 (r m/ r e)

[(r m – re)/re] δ θ’ m = 0.61 x 70.75 = 43

All rights reserved

Page 116

Chapter 22: Earth Absolute Motion is circular

Copernicus said that Planets move around the sun in an ellipse

Galileo affirmed that planets move around the sun in an ellipse

Tycho Brahe collected the astronomical data and confirmed that planets move around

the Sun in an ellipse

Mercury

r

θ

Sun

Figure - 1

And deduced that planets move around the sun in an ellipse and that the sun is at

the focus of the ellipse like in figure above

Newton and Hooke reiterated the same thing as Kepler and wrote: r/ t2 = k/r2

Astronomers found that the motion is not an ellipse but a rotating ellipse

Einstein wrote another acceleration law r/t2 = k/ r2 + k1/r4 to describe a rotating ellipse

7 billion people were told by Alfred Nobel prize winner physicists that Planets rotate

around the Sun in a rotating ellipse

I am Joe Nahhas

And I am better than good and I am after Alfred Nobel Institution head

Page 117

Mercur

y

θ

ψ

Sun

As: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)]

Is: r (θ, t) = a (1-ε²)/ [1+ε cosine (θ - Ψ)]

It is a fact that Astronomers see this axis tilt and Einstein got a formula for it: ψ = {6 π G

M/a c² (1 - ε²)} [180/ π] [36526/T (days)][3600]

G = 6.673 x 10-11= gravitational acceleration constant

M =2x1030kg = mass of the Sun

T= 88 days = period of Planet mercury’s rotation around the Sun

And c = 299792.458 km/sec =light speed/sec

And a = 58.2 x 106 km/sec = semi major axis of planet Mercury orbit

ψ = {6 (π) 6.673 x 10-11 (2 x 1030)/58.2 x 106 (299792.458) ² [1– (0.206)²]} x [180/ π]

[36526/88] [3600] = 43 seconds of an arc per century

Page 118

m M/r2

Einstein said if Newton can add magical power then I can do

magic powers of Newton and add Einstein’s own magical

powers of time travel force and the force

Is F = G m M/r2 (space force) + k/r4 (time force)

where the Sun is pulling on the planets to keep them around?

Did anyone see the Sun Pulling?

Did anyone see a damn robe not the Sun hanging the planets to

revolve around it but to hang these two idiots with Alfred Nobel

physicists?!

There is nothing Nobel about Alfred Nobel

institution that gave prizes for magical forces and time travel

and garbage for physics.

Page 119

I am not saying that Alfred Nobel physicists are idiots to say the

least but what I am saying is that Alfred Nobel prize winner

physics is stupidity itself and Alfred Nobel prize winner

physicists are crooks to be exact. Time is not a structure like

space to allow Alfred Nobel Institution to dictate stupidity in

classrooms on the rest of us and Alfred Nobel Physicists can

keep stupidity to themselves. Alfred Nobel prize is worth 1001

times in money. Alfred Nobel prize is a 1 billion dollar business

each. Big Institutions with massive funding needs backed bad

physics and idiots for physicists for 1 billion dollars prize and

the world stuck with garbage for physics.

What is modern physics?

Did anyone hear the big bang? Did anyone saw a black hole? Did anyone find Einstein’s gravity waves?

Did anyone hook up a hose to the sky and funnel dark energy to verify E = mc2? Does anyone have a

proof of Newton’s action at a distance? Does anyone have a proof of Einstein time travel? Does anyone

figure out why humans have to accept Alfred Nobel prize winners nuclear claims that the universe is

made up of particles that dies and rebirth billion billion times a second? Hey dude I am a redneck one

grandfather was a damn farmer and my other grandfather was a damn Carpenter and my father was a

much damn redneck I sometimes feel reluctant to claim him but I never knew what a dumb ass really is

till I met my science teacher talking about the greatest idiots of physics starting With the seven idiots in

order Copernicus Galileo Newton and Einstein!

My answer to that is: “University” Crooks in Alfred Nobel Suit

The difference between a crook and a Nobel Prize winner is a flip of a coin

The difference between me and all others I can prove them crooks and I dare all to prove me wrong.

Starting with Einstein and Newton to make Galileo irrelevant to the subject of planetary motion around

the Sun because of now and now is July 4th 1973 there is no Galileo and there is No Einstein and there is

no Newton because I can prove them all wrong including NASA and Europeans space agency and all

others!

Newton’s space force: F = G m M/r2

Einstein’s – Newton space - time:

time force)

Nahhas said the only magic is an act of kindness of a human to all others!

My act of kindness to humanity is to make humanity aware of the criminals with Nobel prizes and the

idiots with Intelligent portfolios!

Page 120

force and Einstein’s space – time force is silly to say the least

and I can prove that there is no gravitational force between the

Sun and the Planets force, or, F = o solution is a rotating ellipse

Illusion.

“knowledge” and sick intentions to be arrogant and claim

magical forces and mocks the believers have absolutely no clue

what they see in their telescopes and have nothing to offer

beside stupidity that started with Newton and perfected with

Alfred Nobel Institution’s dumbest Einstein. To start with let me

solve this equation F = 0. The solution of F = 0 is the equation

of a real time circle

Is r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location

r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the

product

= change of location + change of mass

= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate

F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force

= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r

= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate

r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r θ' θ(1) ; γ = (r" - rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + r θ")θ(1)

r = location; v = velocity; γ = acceleration

F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r

F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] + (m" r) r

(1)

= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/m r) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)

= [-G m M/r²] r (1) -------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law

Page 121

Proof:

First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1)

Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ

Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t

= r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ]

= r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)

Define θ (1) = -sine θ î +cosine θ Ĵ;

And with r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ

Then d [θ (1)]/d t= θ' [- cosine θ î - sine θ Ĵ= - θ' r (1)

And d [r (1)]/d t = θ' [-sine θ î + cosine θ Ĵ] = θ' θ (1)

Define γ = d [r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] /d t

= r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' θ' r (1) + r θ" r (1) +r θ'd [θ (1)]/d t

γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)

With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = F (r)

And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0

With m = constant, then

With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = F (r) Eq-1

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2

With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2

Then r²θ' = h = constant

Differentiate with respect to time

Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ" = 0

Divide by r²θ'

Then 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0

And 2(r'/r) = - θ"/θ' = 2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)]

Also, r = r0 (θ, 0) e [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

For a fixed orbit: λ r = 0

Also, r = r 0 (θ, 0) e ỉ ω t

And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2ỉ ω t

With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0

Let u = 1/r; r = 1/u; r²θ' = h = θ’ /u²

And d r/d t = (d r/ d u) (d u /d θ) (d θ/ d t) = (- 1/u ²) (θ’) (d u/ d θ)

= - h (d u/ d θ)

Page 122

= [- h²/r²] (d² u/ d θ ²)

= - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²)

And - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) – (1/u) (h u²) ² = 0

Then (d² u/ d θ ²) + u = 0

Then u = A e - í θ

Then r 0 (θ, 0) = (1/A) e í θ

And r 0 (θ, 0) = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ

And r = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ e ỉ ω t

í (θ + ω t)

Or, r = r 0 e

What I am saying Dear Pope is this is the equation of motion of

any planet!

í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]

Now Planet Mercury motion is r m = r m 0 e

The Sun Motion is r s = r s 0 e í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

Sun r

r s Mercury

r1 r0 r m

X1 r2

X2

Earth

Page 123

In mathematical form: r1 = x1 + r s

And r2 = x2 + r m

Then r2 - r1 = x2 - x1 + r m – r s

Or, r = r0 + (r m – r s)

To find the extreme values of r,

Then: d r/d t = d r0/d t+ (d r m/d t – d r s/ d t) = 0

And d r m/d t = d r s/ d t

í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]

Now Planet Mercury motion is r m = r m 0 e

The Sun Motion is r s = r s 0 e í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]

And d r m/d t = r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] e

í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

And d r s/ d t = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] e

= r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] Cosine [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

And r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] sine [θ (m) + ω (m) t]

= r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] sine [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

Then dividing we get: tan [θ (n) + ω (n) t] = tan [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

Or, [θ (m) + ω (m) t] = [θ (s) + ω (s) t] + [n π = 0; n =0]

This is the time delay Illusion

And, r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)]

And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] = (r m 0/r s 0) [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]

And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = [(r m 0/ r s 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]

Is: [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)

= [(r m 0/ r s 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)

Page 124

m 0/ e 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]

Is: [θ’ (e) + ω (e)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)

= [(r m 0/ r e 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600) = 43

r m 0

r s 0

M M Mercury S Sun

r m0 r 0

Is: r = r 0 + (r m 0 + r s 0)

max

And r min = r 0 - (r m 0 + r s 0)

And c = (r max - r min)/2 = r m 0 + r s 0

And a = (r max + r min)/2 = r 0

And a = (r max + r min)/2 = r 0

This establishes visual ellipse of semi major axis a and a semi minor axis b = √ (a²

- c²) = a √ [1 – (c/a) ²] = a √ (1 – ε ²)

And h = 2 π a b = 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)

Areal Velocity is: 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)/T

Page 125

Mercury

r

θ

Sun

Figure - 1

Page 126

s 0

And dividing h / (a – c) ² = 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)/T a² (1 – ε) ²

Or r²θ' = h will give θ' (a) = 2 π √ (1 – ε ²)/T (1 – ε) ²

And θ’ = {[cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] – 1} θ' 0 (θ, 0)

And θ’ = θ’ (x) + í θ’ (y)

= [cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] θ' 0 (θ, 0)

And θ’ (x) = [cosine 2 ω t] θ' 0 (θ, 0)

= [1 – 2 sine² ω t] θ' 0 (θ, 0)

= -2(2π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t

= - 4 π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t

Page 127

Mercur

y

θ

Ψ

Sun

And v/c = (v* + v°)/c = tan ω t

Multiplication by 180/π to change to degrees

Ψ ° = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} Degrees

And multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days

sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years

Ψ’’ (calculated) = (-720x36526x3600/T days) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x

sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years = 43

Page 128

By Professor Joe Nahhas 1978

Greetings: my name is Joe Nahhas and I am the greatest physicist of all time since July 4th 1973

I am unknown to the world of physics but I have 1001 new real time physics formulas to change physics and

history to delete all physics and wipe out written history and this is a revolt!

Abstract: There is no solar system and Earth does not move around the Sun. I can say

that there is no solar system and Earth does not move around the Sun because I can

prove that there is no solar system and that Earth does not move around the Sun. There is

a solar group of objects humans call one star few planets and few moons. Each object of

the solar group has its own independent orbit (circle) and all are in the same neighborhood

looking like a solar “system” where Earth is visually looking like it moves around the Sun

in an ellipse and the Sun at the focus (not center) of that ellipse. Gravity is a spin effect

found inside the atmosphere. There is no gravity outside the atmosphere. There is no

gravity between Earth and Sun. Taking that there is no gravity between Earth and Sun

leads to a circular motion for the Sun and a circular motion for Earth. The difference

between two circular motions is visual motion and not an actual motion of an ellipse. An

ellipse motion requires an inverse square law that is given by Newton’s equation that says

the gravitational force F between Earth of mass m and the Sun of mass M is given by F = -

G m M/r² where r is the distance between Earth and sun and G is a constant number. A

rotating ellipse requires Newton’s law of space motion - G m M/r² and Einstein’s time

motion k/r4 to a total force of F = - G m M/r² + k/r4 in contradiction to Qur’an F = 0

Page 129

In Short Planets Moons Sun all swim freely and no gravity restrictions. No gravity means the Force F = 0. The

solution of F = 0 leads to a circular orbit for all

. Sun r

r s Mercury

r1 r0 r m

X1 r2

X2

Earth

r s 0

M M M Mercury S Sun

r m 0 r 0

And Farthest distance = r max = r 0 + (r m 0 +r s 0 )=a+c

Page 130

s 0

Gives a visual ellipse and visual (not actual gravity) meaning planets seems to move around the Sun

and not actually moving around the Sun

Mercury

r

θ

Sun

Figure - 1

If we took a look at the most famous physics fundamental constant G from Newton’s 350 years old Equation F = -

G m M/r² G’s value has unit dimension of [G] = [1/ρ T²]; ρ is atmospheric density and T is time rotational period.

If we can show that the gravitational constant G = G (ρ, T) is a variable air density and Earth rotational period

dependent then we can say what Earth is saying that the most famous physics fundamental constants are not so

universal constants because all physics fundamental constant are air density and Earth spin dependent. For

example:

G = G (ρ, T) = 1/ [(2/5) (4 π/3) ρT²]; 5/2 ~ √ (2 π)

Nothing that: 8 π /15 = (2/5) (4π/3); 4π/3 and 2/5 come from spherical aspect

Where: ρ = air density; T = Earth rotation period; T = 23.9333 hours and ρ = 1.2045 kg/m³

G = 1/ (8 π/15) ρT² = 6.674 x 10 – 11

[G] = [1/ρ T²] ~ 0 if spin period is very long or atmospheric density is very high

Page 131

Like ε (0) = 1/4πρT² = 8.85 x 10 -12; μ (0) = 4πρT²/c²

There is no “gravity” between the “sun” and “planets” and that means: The force F = 0

And not F = - G m M/r²

Yes I am saying that astronomers have no clue what they see using their telescopes

What I am saying is that there is no F = - G m M/r² and there is no solar system where the motion of a planet

around the sun is an ellipse with the sun at the focus of the ellipse.

Mercury

r

θ

Sun

Figure - 1

And said that the motion of a planet around the sun is an ellipse like in figure - 1

And wrote the equation of motion law

As: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)]

Newton and Hooke reiterated the same thing as Kepler and wrote: r/ t2 = k/r2

Astronomers found that the motion is not an ellipse but a rotating ellipse

And wrote the equation of motion law

As: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)]

Einstein wrote another acceleration law r/t2 = k/ r2 + k1/r4 to describe a rotating ellipse

Page 132

Mercur

y

θ

ψ

Sun

As: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)]

Einstein said he corrected Newton and wrote the new equation:

Is: r (θ, t) = a (1-ε²)/ [1+ε cosine (θ - Ψ)]

It is a fact that Astronomers see this axis tilt and Einstein got a formula for it: ψ = {6 π G

M/a c² (1 - ε²)} [180/ π] [36526/T (days)][3600]

G = 6.673 x 10-11= gravitational acceleration constant

M =2x1030kg = mass of the Sun

Eccentricity of Mercury’s orbit = ε = 0.206

T= 88 days = period of Planet mercury’s rotation around the Sun

And c = 299792.458 km/sec =light speed/sec

And a = 58.2 x 106 km/sec = semi major axis of planet Mercury orbit

ψ = {6 (π) 6.673 x 10-11 (2 x 1030)/58.2 x 106 (299792.458) ² [1– (0.206)²]} x [180/ π]

[36526/88] [3600] = 43 seconds of an arc per century

m M/r2

Einstein said if Newton can add magical power then I can do

magic powers of Newton and add Einstein’s own magical

powers of time travel force and the force

Is F = G m M/r2 (space force) + k/r4 (time force)

Page 133

These two morons claim that what we see is due to magic

where the Sun is pulling on the planets to keep them around?

Did anyone see the Sun Pulling?

Did anyone see a damn robe not the Sun hanging the planets to

revolve around it but to hang these two idiots with Alfred Nobel

physicists?!

institution that gave prizes for magical forces and garbage for

physics.

I am not saying that Alfred Nobel physicists are idiots to say the

least but what I am saying is that Alfred Nobel prize winner

physics is stupidity itself and Alfred Nobel prize winner

physicists are crooks to be exact. Time is not a structure like

space to allow Alfred Nobel Institution to dictate stupidity on

the rest of us and Alfred Nobel Physicists can keep stupidity to

themselves. Alfred Nobel prize is worth 1001 times in money.

Alfred Nobel prize is a 1 billion dollar business each. Big

Institutions with massive funding needs backed bad physics

and idiots for physicists for 1 billion dollars prize and the world

stuck with garbage for physics.

Page 134

What is modern physics?

Did anyone hear the big bang? Did anyone saw a black hole? Did anyone find Einstein’s gravity waves?

Did anyone hook up a hose to the sky and funnel dark energy to verify E = mc2? Does anyone have a

proof of Newton’s action at a distance? Does anyone have a proof of Einstein time travel? Does anyone

figure out why humans have to accept Alfred Nobel prize winners nuclear claims that the universe is

made up of particles that dies and rebirth billion billion times a second? Hey dude I am a redneck one

grandfather was a damn farmer and my other grandfather was a damn Carpenter and my father was a

much damn redneck I sometimes feel reluctant to claim my dad but I never knew what a dumb ass is

really is till I met my science teacher talking about the greatest idiots of physics Newton and Einstein!

What did Alfred Nobel honor?

My answer to that is: “University” Crooks in Alfred Nobel Suit

The difference between a crook and a Nobel Prize winner is a flip of a coin

The difference between me and all others I can prove them crooks and I dare all to prove me wrong. Starting

with Einstein and Newton to make Galileo irrelevant to the subject of planetary motion around the Sun

because of now and now is July 4th 1973 there is no Galileo and there is No Einstein and there is no Newton

because I can prove them all wrong including NASA and Europeans space agency and all others!

Newton’s space force: F = G m M/r2

Einstein’s – Newton space - time:

F = G m M/r2 (Newton’s space force) + k/r4 (Einstein’s time force)

The force is with Joe Nahhas and in real time space F = 0

Nahhas said the only magic is an act of kindness of a human to all others!

My act of kindness to humanity is to make humanity aware of the criminals with Nobel prizes and the

idiots with intelligent portfolios!

force and Einstein’s space – time force is silly to say the least

and I can prove that there is no gravitational force between the

Sun and the Planets force, or, F = o solution is a rotating ellipse

Illusion.

“knowledge” and sick intentions to be arrogant and claim

magical forces and mocks the believers have absolutely no clue

what they see in their telescopes and have nothing to offer

beside stupidity that started with Newton and perfected with

Alfred Nobel Institution’s dumbest Einstein. To start with let me

solve this equation F = 0. The solution of F = 0 is the equation

of a real time circle

Is r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)

Page 135

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location

r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the

product

S = m r; State = mass x location:

P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment

= change of location + change of mass

= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate

F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force

= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r

= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate

r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r θ' θ(1) ; γ = (r" - rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + r θ")θ(1)

r = location; v = velocity; γ = acceleration

F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r

F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] + (m" r) r

(1)

= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/m r) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)

= [-G m M/r²] r (1) -------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law

Proof:

First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1)

Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ

Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t

= r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ]

= r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)

Define θ (1) = -sine θ î +cosine θ Ĵ;

And with r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ

Then d [θ (1)]/d t= θ' [- cosine θ î - sine θ Ĵ= - θ' r (1)

And d [r (1)]/d t = θ' [-sine θ î + cosine θ Ĵ] = θ' θ (1)

Define γ = d [r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] /d t

= r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' θ' r (1) + r θ" r (1) +r θ'd [θ (1)]/d t

γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)

With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = F (r)

And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0

With m = constant, then

With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = F (r) Eq-1

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2

With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1

And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2

From Eq-2: d (r²θ')/d t = 0

Then r²θ' = h = constant

Differentiate with respect to time

Page 136

Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ" = 0

Divide by r²θ'

Then 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0

And 2(r'/r) = - θ"/θ' = 2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)]

Also, r = r0 (θ, 0) e [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

For a fixed orbit: λ r = 0

Also, r = r 0 (θ, 0) e ỉ ω t

And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2ỉ ω t

With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0

And d r/d t = (d r/ d u) (d u /d θ) (d θ/ d t) = (- 1/u ²) (θ’) (d u/ d θ)

= - h (d u/ d θ)

And d² r/ d t² = - h (θ’) (d² u/ d θ ²)

= [- h²/r²] (d² u/ d θ ²)

= - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²)

And - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) – (1/u) (h u²) ² = 0

Then (d² u/ d θ ²) + u = 0

-íθ

Then u = A e

íθ

Then r 0 (θ, 0) = (1/A) e

íθ

And r 0 (θ, 0) = r 0 (0, 0) e

íθ ỉωt

And r = r 0 (0, 0) e e

í (θ + ω t)

Or, r = r 0 e

It is also the equation of motion of the smallest particle light!

í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]

Now Planet Mercury motion is r m =r m 0 e

í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

The Sun Motion is r s =r s 0 e

Page 137

Sun r

r s Mercury

r1 r0 r m

X1 r2

X2

Earth

In mathematical form: r1 = x1 + r s

And r2 = x2 + r m

Then r2 - r1 = x2 - x1 + r m – r s

Or, r = r0 + (r m – r s)

Then: d r/d t = d r0/d t+ (d r m/d t – d r s/ d t) = 0

And d r m/d t = d r s/ d t

í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]

Now Planet Mercury motion is r m = r m 0 e

The Sun Motion is r s = r s 0 e í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]

And d r m/d t = r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] e

í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

And d r s/ d t = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] e

= r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] Cosine [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

And r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] sine [θ (m) + ω (m) t]

= r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] sine [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

Then dividing we get: tan [θ (n) + ω (n) t] = tan [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

Or, [θ (m) + ω (m) t] = [θ (s) + ω (s) t] + [n π = 0; n =0]

Page 138

And θ (m) - θ (s) + = [ω (s) - ω (m)] t

This is the time delay Illusion

And, r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)]

And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] = (r m 0 /r s 0) [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]

And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = [(r m 0 /r s 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]

Is: [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)

= [(r m 0/ r s 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)

And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (e) + ω (e)] = [(r m 0/ r e 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]

Is: [θ’ (e) + ω (e)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)

= [(r m 0/ r e 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600) = 43

r m 0

r s 0

M M M Mercury S Sun

r m 0 r 0

Is: r = r 0 + (r m 0 + r s 0)

max

And r min = r 0 - (r m 0 + r s 0)

And c = (r max - r min)/2 = r m 0 + r s 0

And a = (r max + r min)/2 = r 0

With c = (r max - r min)/2 = r m 0 + r s 0

And a = (r max + r min)/2 = r 0

Page 139

This establishes visual ellipse of semi major axis a, and a semi minor axis;

b = √ (a² - c²) = a √ [1 – (c/a) ²] = a √ (1 – ε ²)

And h = 2 π a b = 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)

Areal Velocity is: 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)/T

Mercury

r

θ

Sun

Figure – 1

140

And Farthest distance = r max = r 0 + (r m 0 +r s 0 )=a+c

And dividing h / (a – c) ² = 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)/T a² (1 – ε) ²

Or r²θ' = h will give θ' (a) = 2 π √ (1 – ε ²)/T (1 – ε) ²

-2ỉ ω t

And for any motion θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e

= [cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] θ' 0 (θ, 0)

= [1 – 2 sine² ω t] θ' 0 (θ, 0)

= -2(2π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t

= - 4 π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t

Page 141

If this apsidal motion is to be found as visual effects, then

Mercur

y

θ

Ψ

Sun

And v/c = (v* + v°)/c = tan ω t

Multiplication by 180/π to change to degrees

Ψ ° = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} Degrees

And multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days

sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years

And in arc seconds per century:

Ψ’’ (calculated) = (-720x36526x3600/T days) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x

sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years = 43

Page 142

Banger Georges Lemaitre and Time traveler Albert Einstein and Real Timer Joe Nahhas

Time Travel Bus Driver Einstein said that his proudest space – time travel

achievement is the proof that planet Mercury travels with space angular velocity of

70.75 and time angular velocity of 43.0

Big Banger Georges Lemaitre said that The Universe came from a Big Bang Explosion

Joe Nahhas said Buzz off:

Planet Mercury angular speed travel in space is 70.75 and in time 43

The Advance of Planet Mercury’s Perihelion given by space formula of:

[2 π/T] [180/π][36526/88][3600] = [2 π /88 x 24x3600] [180/π][36526/88][3600]

= 70.75

And Einstein’s formula of: ψ = - 6 π GM/a c² (1 - ε²) [180/ π] [36526/T] [3600] = 43 angular

velocity = angular speed of time travel of planet Mercury

G = 6.673 x 10-11= gravitational acceleration constant

M =2x1030 kilogram = mass of the Sun

Eccentricity of Mercury’s orbit = ε = 0.206

T= 88 days = period of Planet mercury’s rotation around the Sun

And c = 299792.458 kilometer/second =light speed in kilometers/second

And a = 58.2 x 106 km/sec = semi major axis of planet Mercury orbit

Visual angular velocity = θ’ = θ’ line - 2

- Visual angular velocity = - θ’ = - θ’ line - 3

And [(θ’0 – θ’)/ θ’] θ’0 = [(2πR0 /T– 2πR/T)/ 2πR/T] θ’0

Or, [(θ’0 – θ’)/ θ’] θ’0 = [(R0 - R)/R] θ’0

R0 = Mercury’s distance from the sun = 5.82 x 106 km

R = Earth’s distance from the sun = 149.6 x 106 km

And Mercury’s angular velocity;

Is θ’0 = 2πR0/T = 2π x 5.82 x 106 /88x 24x3600 radians /period

And Mercury’s angular velocity accumulation in arc seconds per century

Is: δθ’0 = (2π x 5.82 x 106 /88x 24x3600) x (36526/88) (180/ π) (3600) = 70.75

[(R0 - R)/R] δθ’0 = [(5.82 x 106 - 149.6 x 106)/ 149.6 x 106] x

(2π x 5.82 x 106 /88x 24x3600) x (36526/88) (180/ π) (3600) = 43.0 arc second per century

Where this came from?

If we stand in the middle of the street and watch a car moving directly away from us

we see as if the size of the car shrunk. If we take a picture of the car at different

distances then we see that the pictures of the car look like as if the car contracted in

size. The further the car away from us the smaller image of the car in the picture. The

size of the

car did not change but real time light data reflected from the car and ran through air

and into our eyes changes the real time image of the car to indicate a different location

of the car and not a different size of the car. Our eyes see real time images of a moving

car. If the car stops, then the image of the car freezes. A picture or a snap shot of a

moving car is a frozen image of the moving car. When a car moves its real time image

change size but the car does not change size. The car as a moving object at different

distances has a variable real time image that our eyes see in real time and depends on

distance and motion as perceived by our eyes. In short statements

Our eyes see objects in real time as different objects at different distances and different

speeds. Or, our eyes see real time objects we call images that change when measured

from different distances or when moving. Our eyes do not see actual objects but

Images of actual objects and our eyes see different images of same actual objects

when at different distances of moving

In mathematical form:

1 = 1 self evident

2 = 2 is self evident

Image = image = I is self evident line - 1

Object = object = O = self evident line - 2

And, - Object = - objects = - O = self evident line - 3

I=I line - 1

O=O line - 2

And, - O = - O line - 3

Adding: line - 1 and line - 2 and line - 3

I + O – O = O + (I – O) line - 4

I = O + (I – O); O – O = 0 one left side

(I/O) = (O/O) + (I – O)/O; dividing by on both sides line - 5

Or, (I/O) = 1 + (I – O)/O; O/O = 1 line - 6

(I/O) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(I – O)/O] θ’0 Line - 7

If we try to measure the angular velocity of planet Mercury around the sun θ’0 from

planet Earth and not from the Sun a visual effect (error) of

[(I – O)/O] θ’0 is measured that Einstein’s call time travel

(I/O) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(I – O)/O] θ’0

Quantum = classical + relativistic

What we see = what is + visual effects

Real time object = event time Object + time delay object

Real time astronomy = event time astronomy + time delay astronomy

If we try to measure an object θ’0 we see it as (I/O) θ’0 and the difference

accumulation:

Is [(I – O)/O] θ’0 = visual effects

And the accumulation is

[(R0 - R)/R] δθ’0

And Planet Mercury angular velocity space travel

Is δθ’0 = (2π x 5.82 x 106 /88x 24x3600) x (36526/88) (180/ π) (3600) = 70.75

And Arabs 10th century correction to idiot man of the 20th century Einstein

Is: [(R0 - R)/R] δθ’0 = [(5.82 x 106 - 149.6 x 106)/ 149.6 x 106] x

(2π x 5.82 x 106 /88x 24x3600) x (36526/88) (180/ π) (3600) = 43.0 arc second per century

Another method is the product method

If two objects going in two different orbital paths around the Sun and one with speed v*

m = planet Mercury Orbital speed around the Sun and one with speed v* e = Planet Earth

orbital speed around the Sun; then the cross multiply is: (v* e - v° e/v m + v° m) δθ’0 = [(29.8

– 0.465)/47.9 + 0.465] (70.75) = 43

Buzz off Einstein

Then came the big Banger

The big Banger said that: r = r

And r = r + 0

And r = r + (r0 - r0)

And r = (r - r0) + r0; dividing by r0

Then: r/r0 = 1 +(r - r0)/r0

And: n λ /n λ 0= 1 + (n λ – n λ0)/ λ0

Or, λ/ λ0 = 1 + (λ – λ0)/ λ0 = 1 + Z

This quantity [(λ - λ 0)/ λ 0] = Z = Red Shift is a measure of a different is an indication

of a different location and not of an expanding Universe to claim big bang

Distant r, λ

Lab r0, λ0

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Lab λ0 will have a different value Lab λ0 when measured from a distant.

Or, (λ / λ 0) r 0= r 0 + [(λ – λ 0)/ λ 0] r0

We will measure it as λ and a wavelength distance Illusion delay by the quantity of [(r –

r0)/ r0] λ0 will be added or subtracted to λ0

And if we use wavelength scale to measure distance r0; then a distance wavelength

Illusion delay by the quantity of [(λ – λ 0)/ λ 0] r0 will be added or subtracted to distance

r0

What Lemaitre confusion is distance Illusion expansion of [(λ – λ 0)/ λ 0] r0 when he tried

to measure r0

Nahhas confession to these two: “I am real timer and I am a proud American redneck

and yall Idiots; Big Bang and Time Travel is a purely western stupidity”

Page 147

Chapter 24: Fourier Transform solution of Mercury perihelion

precession advance

Joenahhas1958@yahoo.com

Alfred Nobel and greatest and only physicist since 1258 AD Joe Nahhas

Alfred Nobel crime to promote Einstein’s stupidity exposed by Joe Nahhas founder

of real time physics using JBJ Fourier image processing method

If we solve the force F = 0 in polar coordinates in real time we get

Distance r in real time is r = r0 e i (θ + ω t)

At θ = 0; Perihelion

Taking r = c t and r0 = c t0

Then (t/t 0) = e i ω t

And the Fourier transform is:

Γ = (1/2 π) {-∞ ∫∞ (t/t ) d t} = (1/2 Π) -∞∫∞e

0

iωt

dt

Page 148

And Γ = (1/2 π) 0 ∫T (t/t ) d t = (1/2 Π) 0∫Te

0

iωt

dt

iωT

Γ = (1/2 π) [t 0 e ]/ i ω = (1/2 Π) t 0 [cosine ω T + i sine ω T]/ i ω

Γ x = (t 0 /360) {sine [arc tan (v/c)] / [arc tan (v/c)]} in arc seconds per t0

In arc seconds per century

Γ x = (36526x 23.93 x 3600 /360 x 3600) {sine [arc tan (v/c)] / [arc tan (v/c)]}

= 42.62 arc seconds per century

Page 149

Conclusion: 500 years ago Europeans took Arabs real time physics and changed to

space time physics and in the process physics was changed from science to

stupidity and called modern physics. Arabs real time physics is the past present

and future of physics and no one can change the fact measurements are made in

real time perception and sending western civilization to go work at MacDonald’s has

no effect on the subject of physics because Modern physics can be deleted without

loss of subject.

Alfred Nobel Insitution promoted individual that has nothing to do with physics for

poltical reasons and humanity ended being terrorized by the ultimate terrorist

Alfred Nobel. Alfred Nobel Institution backed physicists that produced garbage and

in classrooms “university” garbage educated terrorized students like the scums of

MIT Harvard Cal- Tech and other Garbage insitutions teaching them western crime

against physics and western crime against students of physics of time tarvel telling

young minds it is ok to feel stupid if you do not understand Einstein’s stupidity

when the only stupid is western academia of “University” who will say anything

pubnlish anything based on nothing for jobs money prestige and Alfred Nobel scum

with a prize for physics

The name is Joe Nahhas and I am not only the greatest physicists of all time but

the only physicist since 1258 AD. Time tarvel based physics is a purely western

stupidity I deleted at age 11 in fall of 1969 when I wrote real time perception of a

moving car formula:

A=A

A = B + (A – B)

(A/B) = 1 + (A – B)/B

(A/B) C = C + [(A – B)/B] C

Quantum = classical + relativistic

Real time = event time + delay time(A/B) = 1 + (A – B)/B

Page 150

- A2 physics Practicals 56873458-Practical-6-Centripetal-force-â€“-whirling-bungEnviado porSachitra Wijethunga
- nullEnviado porapi-26334461
- Tuomo Suntola- Celestial Mechanics in Spherical SpaceEnviado por939392
- chapter-13.pptxEnviado poralanlee207
- LaunchMFD DocEnviado porLeonBotha
- IGCSE Forces and Motion Definitions and ConceptsEnviado porLavanya Thevi
- English Journal.pdfEnviado porVijjasena Sugiono
- Sph1101 Nyambuya Sup ExamEnviado porAndrew Mayibongwe
- Solution_Report_205Enviado porMohan Sha
- 19 - Unequal Angle (cold formed).pdfEnviado porIdaa Saida Rasmi
- Olga Chashchina, Lorenzo Iorio and Zurab Silagadze- Elementary Derivation of the Lense-Thirring PrecessionEnviado porPortsnuyh
- Extra GravityEnviado porneonav
- Geo-Physics-Interview-Questions-and-Answers-837.pdfEnviado porpeterjo ravelo
- social studies 311 primary source lesson planEnviado porapi-246028472
- 1 Indice.apostila.do.Concurso PM.pb.2014.ArmlookEnviado porLindemberg Alves
- Unit Lesson Inner PlanetsEnviado porkarleyroyal
- Usurper of the Sun - Housuke NojiriEnviado poratimono
- Good Change by Having Morning Class SuleEnviado porRaditya Suputra
- Cultural Perception of the Sport Experience and Temporal Behavior of Tunisian Players VolleyballEnviado porThe Swedish Journal of Scientific Research (SJSR) ISSN: 2001-9211
- Agenda Writing (1)Enviado porBhakti Shinde
- Harmonic Reactor.pdfEnviado porRegina Abreu
- Time and WorkEnviado porNikhilesh Aglawe
- CMS User ManualEnviado poredsonshm
- Blast OffEnviado porDaniel Bernal
- ES Dll 7e's forEnviado porMaria Di Makaotot
- 1-s2.0-S2211381912000574-mainEnviado porHadiBies
- Gravity BackwardsEnviado pornewartilces
- gr-5 quiz no.5Enviado porMara
- chaihouse_big_bangEnviado porAnkit Agrawal
- aquarianmaster cap12Enviado pormuy_chistoso

- Nobel Institution Lars brink dark energy reviewEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Augustine De Coulomb 1785 error of lightEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Ole Roemer 1676 light constant velocity hypothesis historical mistakeEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- The scientifc extermination of the scientifc westEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Dumbest Time Physicist on Campus Dr Sean CarrollEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Wave - Particle Duality Illusion SolutionEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- The Mathematical Construction of Newton's Gravitational ConstantEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Cavendiah 1798 Earth's Density Historical MistakeEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- CERN 20 meters error faster than the speed of light puzzle solution IIEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Earth's Axial Tilt of 23.4393 IllusionEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Isaac Newton's public E-mail to Prince Charles of walesEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Albert Einstein 1905 E = mc2 historical mistakeEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- NASA knows nothing about spaceEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Nahhas' Solution of Tyco Brahe's Vertical Mercury's Perihelion PuzzleEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Alfred Nobel Mafia Code E = mc2 and E = h νEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Nobel Physicist Erwin Schrödinger under investigationEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Cavendish experiment error of light constant velocityEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Newtonian Derivation of Cosmological ConstantEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Light Constant Velocity Puzzle SolutionEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- The Mathematical Construction of the Speed of LightEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- The Mathematical Construction of the Speed of SoundEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Avogadro's number is one of many of Cavendish's experimental errorEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- CERN Dario Hutiero 20 Meters Faster Than the Speed of Light Error IVEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Physics embedded error of fine structure constantEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Fine Structure constant and Mercury's Perihelion solutionEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- NASA knows nothing about space IIEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Clock Synchronization Solution of Mercury's PerihelionEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Faster Than the Speed of Light Puzzle Solution IIIEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Nahhas' Solution of Cavendish Horizontal Puzzle of Mercury's PerihelionEnviado porJoe Nahhas
- Light constant velocity puzzle solutionEnviado porJoe Nahhas

- Joliprint.com Joliprint Rest API DocumentationEnviado pormumu311
- Buddha ChroniclesEnviado porChuah Boon Keat
- Agrobacterium-mediated Tobacco Transformation Lab ReportEnviado porfiqokabomba
- Vmware Esxi DatasheetEnviado porantonioclj
- LTE Signalling ProcedureEnviado porabdallah3g
- US Army: M350-4Enviado porUSA_DepartmentOfArmy
- SportsEnviado porHemant Yadav
- Exercise 3 MAS Practice StandardsEnviado porJohn Emerson Patricio
- The Belleville View Sept. 12, 2013Enviado porLaura Zoochi
- 06- Training the Young ActorEnviado porasslii_83
- Falcon University 2-.txtEnviado porYSza BElle
- Kannada-nuDi-Ready-ReckonerEnviado poranujvalmiki
- The Henna Page "How-to" Mix HennaEnviado porCatherine Cartwright-Jones
- Gregory Schopen - The Suppression of Nuns and the Ritual Murder of their Special Dead in Two Buddhist Monastic TextsEnviado porƁuddhisterie2
- Reviewer in Correction 1Enviado porMae Anthonette B. Cacho
- Mutoh Drafstation & Drafstation Pro Service ManualEnviado pordynamicdesigns
- english 9 q2 online writing portfolioEnviado porapi-358691490
- JIang Fencing Pricelist 2Enviado portopph_dot_com
- Agilent Gprs EdgeEnviado porKhåïrul Akmar Timin
- The Country WifeEnviado porpasaxxx
- Techno-functional Consultant Oracle Apps @ Bangalore - Scm_finance - Bengaluru_Bangalore - Metaphor Infotech - 8 to 13 Years of ExperienceEnviado porazeez_md
- Mag ZineEnviado porbikash2012
- Geraldine HS football player lawsuit responseEnviado porPaul Gattis
- English ContractionsEnviado porLucas Monte
- Eem483 Lab EquipmentsEnviado porUlil
- 596270Enviado porWely Wahyura
- Adolescent Pedagogy Lev Vygotsky 1931Enviado porJohana Martínez Rosario
- Labour Rights in Vietnam: Unilever’s progress and systemic challengesEnviado porOxfam in Vietnam
- Related StudiesEnviado porGette Garcia
- Summaries SuccessionEnviado porGhettoopressed

## Muito mais do que documentos

Descubra tudo o que o Scribd tem a oferecer, incluindo livros e audiolivros de grandes editoras.

Cancele quando quiser.