Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Abstract
Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) or morning sickness is one of the
most common complaints of pregnant women.
vomiting can lead to feelings of anxiety and worry about the negative impact it can bring
to the fetus.
beverage, is widely available in our country. It has several effects on the gastrointestinal
tract, including antiemetic properties. Despite the many studies using ginger for
treatment of NVP, there is no agreed upon treatment for NVP here in the Philippines.
This meta-analysis showed that ginger was better than placebo in reducing the severity
of nausea and frequency of vomiting episodes. The risk of no relief from nausea and
vomiting using ginger was only 0.29 (95% CI 0.17, 0.50, p < 0.001). Furthermore, this
paper has shown that the risk of cumulative side effects was only 0.32 (95% CI, 0.21,
0.47, p < 0.001), clearly favoring the ginger treatment arm. One study has reported that
fetal outcomes are within the normal range in the ginger group.
analysis has shown that ginger may be used as an alternative choice of treatment for the
management of the aforementioned symptoms.
Introduction
Helicobacter pylori may play a role in hyperemesis gravidarum. In this study, 61.8% of
pregnant women with hyperemesis were found to be positive for the H. pylori genome,
compared with 27.6% of pregnant women without hyperemesis.3
The physical and emotional impact of NVP often results in anxiety and concern
about possible fetal effects. NVP negatively impacts family relationships and has major
consequences on the pregnant womans working capabilities.4
carminative and absorbent properties.5 Several trials have shown that ginger may be
effective for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in the general population. Despite
the many studies using ginger for treatment of NVP, here in the Philippines, there is no
agreed upon treatment for NVP.
Ginger is a perennial plant typically growing two to four feet in height and
preferring warm, humid climates. It has narrow, glossy, bright green leaves, and its
summer flowers are yellowish green.9 Ginger has been used in several forms, e.g. tea,
preserves, syrup, and capsules.
ingredients constitute ginger. Steam distillation of powdered ginger produces ginger oil,
containing
zingiberene.
a high
proportion
of sesquiterpene
hydrocarbons,
predominantly
gingerols, which can be converted to shogaols, zingerone, and paradol. The compound
6-gingerol may be responsible for the characteristic taste of ginger. Zingerone and
shogaols are found in small amounts in fresh ginger and in larger amounts in dried or
extracted products.5
and peristalsis due to anticholinergic and antiserotonin action.10 The exact mechanism,
however, is not clearly understood.
The compounds 6-gingerol and 6-shogaol have been shown to have a number of
pharmacological activities, including antipyretic, analgesic, antitussive, and hypotensive
effects.
Ginger has also been studied for motion sickness, post-surgical and
There are no evidence-based guidelines that exist for the management of NVP.
Traditionally, dietary and lifestyle changes have been the mainstay of treatment, and
there is little reason to question the assumption that dietary recommendations are safe.6
Such dietary advice consists of eating small portions of food at frequent intervals,
ingesting dry toast or crackers upon arising, and eating bland low-fat foods.7
Among the many histamine antagonists (H1 blockers), the following have been
indicated
for
nausea
and
vomiting:
buclizine,
cyclizine,
dimenhydrinate,
antagonists
such
as
phenothiazines,
domperidone,
droperidol,
Evidence from controlled trials has shown that all of the following are safe and
effective for treatment of varying degrees of NVP: bendectin/diclectin (doxylamine,
pyridoxine), antihistamine (H1 blockers), and phenothiazines. If success is not achieved
with one of these agents, then it is reasonable to switch to another. Also, many of these
agents may be used in combination (e.g antihistamines, pyridoxine, metoclopromide,
along with non-pharmacologic approaches).6
Several studies have suggested acupressure as treatment for NVP. The most
common location for acupressure is the pericardium 6 (P6) or Neiguan point, located
three fingerbreadths above the wrist on the volar surface.3
The efficacy of P6
Ninety-two and a half percent of patients who completed the study had a
studied the efficacy of ginger in the prevention of nausea and vomiting in 120 patients
undergoing major gynecologic surgery. This study concluded that ginger is effective in
the prevention of nausea and vomiting after major gynecologic surgery.11
ginger may be an effective therapy for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy; however,
more observational studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm the
encouraging preliminary data on ginger safety.12
The efficacy of ginger as treatment for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy had
been discussed in detail in several randomized trials.
regarding its efficacy and safety in the treatment of nausea and vomiting of pregnant
women in their first trimester of pregnancy. So far, no similar on-going meta-analysis
in the local setting is currently being undertaken. Moreover, the use of ginger has not
been widely utilized here in the Philippines despite the fact that ginger is widely
cultivated here in our country.
There is paucity of data to support or detract the claims that ginger is effective in
the treatment of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. This review will therefore
investigate the cumulative effects of ginger as well as its safety on the treatment of
nausea and vomiting of pregnant women.
General Objective
Specific Objective:
1. To determine the efficacy of ginger using a meta-analysis of randomized
controlled trials
2. To measure the severity of nausea and vomiting and the number of episodes
3. To make symptom assessment using Likert scales
The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth trial registry was searched for metaanalysis of studies on nausea and vomiting in pregnancy, hyperemesis gravidarum, and
ginger treatment. No articles were found. The search was expanded to MEDLINE,
EMBASE and LILACS using the keywords nausea, vomiting, pregnancy, hyperemesis
gravidarum, ginger and meta-analysis under publication type and covered the period
1966 to 2008. A search of the following journals: Philippine Journal of Obstetrics and
Gynecology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, British Journal of
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Obstetrics and
Gynecology was done and cross referencing from bibliographies of relevant articles.
Ten out of one hundred and twenty potentially relevant studies screened met the
inclusion criteria and contained usable data.
10
Methodology
A total of 10 studies were assessed. These studies were published between 1991 to
2008. The latest study reviewed was published in 2008 (study 8) while earliest was
published back in 1991 (study 1). Majority of the studies were based in Asia
predominantly Thailand (Study 2, 4,7,9) while two studies were based in Australia
(study 5,6), one study based in the United States (study 3), one in Denmark (study 1)
and one in Iran (study 8).
A predefined data collection form was used by each reviewer to abstract each
study to assess study characteristics, particularly that of the participants, methodology,
intervention and outcomes. Method of randomization, allocation concealment, dropout
rates and intention to treat analysis was determined and recorded using the data
extraction form of the pregnancy and childbirth review groups. Data was encoded in
RevMan 4.2.10.
Peto Odds ratios was computed using the random effects model.
Heterogeneity was determined using the chi-square test and I squared test for
heterogeneity.
11
Results
Figure-1 Literature Yield
Potentially relevant studies
identified: citations or abstracts
screened for retrieval (n= 120)
12
A total sample pool of 1,041 pregnancies was included at the start of the trial.
Sample size ranged from 30 (study 1) to 291 subjects (study 6). After the clinical trial,
the sample size recorded was 966 (range from 23 to 235).
Random assignment to the ginger arm ranged from 13 to 120 while the range for
the control/placebo arm was from 10 to 115.
Nature of Interventions
13
Trial Endpoints
All trials primarily investigated the effect of ginger on nausea severity using a
visual analogue scale (VAS), nausea frequency, as well as vomiting episodes using Likert
scales ranging from a 4-point system (study 1) to a 10-point system (study 3). We
observed differences in the qualifying criteria across severity grade as established in
each trial, hence a composite assessment of the mean change in scores were not done
and could even lead to difficulty in the interpretation of the scores when statistically
combined. A more specific tool such as the Rhodes Index form was utilized in three
studies (study 5,6,9). One study investigated the change in health status using the MOS
36-item Short Form Health Survey (Study 6). In all studies, within-group comparison
of symptom scores from baseline to post-treatment date was done as well as betweengroup comparisons were made.
In all studies, authors concluded a significant drop in the symptom scores from
baseline.
Ginger was better than placebo in reducing the severity of nausea and the
frequency of vomiting episodes in all trials except for trial 5 which claimed otherwise
concerning gingers anti-emetic potential.
Six studies documented the adverse effects of ginger which were predominantly
minor such as heart burn , abdominal discomfort while sedating effects were reported
14
among those who used dimenhydrinate as control. One study (1) documented changes
in maternal body weight, while one study investigated any fetal effects of ginger (study
5). The latter study claimed no adverse fetal effects compared to the general sample of
controls compared in the study.
Included Trials
Table-1 summarizes the included trials in this study, with the study design,
nature of participants, interventions, trial endpoints, results and the quality score (value
assigned to represent the validity of a study either for a specific criterion).
Table-1
General Description of Included Trials, Meta-analysis of Ginger
for Nausea & Vomiting in Pregnancy, 2008
Study
(Year)
1FisherRasmussen
(1991)
Nature of
Participants
Design
Randomized
double blind
cross-over trial
30 women
with AOG
<20 weeks
G=14,
C=13
Interventions
250 mg
ginger QID
for 4 days
Trial
Endpoints
2Vutyavanich
(2001)
Randomized
double blind
controlled trial
3Keating
(2002)
Randomized
double blind
controlled trial
70 women
with AOG
<17 weeks
G=35,C=3
5
250 mg
ginger QID
for 4 days
versus
placebo
26 women
with AOG
<12 weeks
G=13,C=1
3
250 mg
ginger QID
versus
placebo for
2 weeks
Scale for
nausea
severity and
vomiting (4point
system)
Change in
body
weight
VAS for
nausea &
vomiting, no.
of vomiting
episodes ,
adverse
effects on
pregnancy
Nausea scale
(10-point)
Vomiting
episodes
Improvement in
the nausea scale
scores with 28/32
in the ginger group
and 10/35 in the
control group
(p<.001)
Nausea
improvement with
ginger (10/13)
versus 2/10 in
control
Cessation of
vomiting in 8/12 in
the ginger group
while 2/10 in the
placebo
Reduced mean
4Sripramote
Randomized
138
500 mg
Nausea
Quality
Score
Results
15
(2003)
double blind
controlled trial
women
with AOG
< 16
weeks
G=64,
C=64)
ginger
versus
10mg
vitamin B6
TID for 3
days
scores
Vomiting
frequency
Minor sideeffects
5Willets
(2003)
Randomized
double blind
placebocontrolled trial
6Smith
(2004)
Randomized
double blind
controlled trial
7Pongrojpaw
(2007)
Randomized
double blind
controlled trial
120
women
with AOG
< 20
weeks
G=60,
C=60
125 mg
ginger
extract
(equiv= to
1.5 g ) given
QI D for 4
days
291
women
with AOG
< 16
weeks
G=120,
C=115
170
women
with AOG
< 16
weeks
1.05 mg
ginger vs 75
mg vitamin
B6 daily for
3 weeks
Nausea &
vomiting
scores at day
7,14,21
0.5 mg
ginger
versus 50
mg
dimenhydri
nate for 7
days
VAS scores
for nausea
Frequency of
vomiting
Rhodes
nausea index
Birthweight,
gestational
age, APGAR
scores
8Ensiyeh
(2008)
Randomized
double blind
controlled trial
70 women
with AOG
< 17 weeks
G=35,
C=35
1gram
ginger vs
40 mg
vitamin B6
for 7 days
VAS for
severity of
nausea, no.
of vomiting
episodes
9Chittuma
(2007)
Randomized
double blind
controlled trial
126
women
with AOG
< 16
weeks
123
returned
for followup
650 mg
ginger vs 25
mg vitamin
B6 given
TID for 4
days only
Rhodes
symptom
score
including
frequencies,
duration and
episodes of
nausea
% sideeffects
change in scores
post-treatment
between ginger &
placebo but not
significant
Vomiting episodes
reduced
significantly in both
groups
Sedative effects for
ginger = 26.6% vs
32.8% ; heart
burn=9.4% vs 6.3%
Nausea scores and
retching episodes
lesser in favor for
ginger
No difference in
vomiting
Fetal outcomes
within normal
range in the ginger
group
Vomiting, retching
scores were similar
in both groups
Vomiting episodes
statistically greater
in the ginger group
vs control during
day 1-2
No significant
difference seen
during day 3-7
Drowsiness greater
in dimenhydrinate
(77.64% vs 5.88%)
Drop in VAS scores
dropped from
baseline in favor for
ginger (29/35) vs
23/34 in control
Decreased vomiting
in both groups
(non-significant
difference)
Mean change in
scores in favor for
ginger
Minor side-effects
in ginger-25.4% vs
23.8% in the
control
16
17
Discussion
In
18
all studies except 1 (study 5), ginger was better than placebo in reducing the severity of
nausea and frequency of vomiting episodes (Figure -2). The aromatic, spasmolytic,
carminative and absorbent properties of ginger suggest that it has direct effects on the
gastrointestinal tract. Ginger acts within the gastrointestinal tract by increasing tone
and peristalsis due to anticholinergic and antiserotonin action.10 Study 5, however,
concluded that the nausea scores and retching episodes are less in the ginger arm, but
there is no difference in vomiting.
Herbal products are generally perceived as being natural and free of side
effects.14 However, ginger has few recorded side effects. In large doses, ginger may
increase gastric exfoliation and antiprostaglandin activity in vitro.10 Hence, another
primary endpoint of this meta-analysis is the determination of adverse events associated
with ginger treatment. From Figure 3, the risk of cumulative side effects was only 0.32
(95% CI 0.21, 0.47, p < 0.001), clearly favoring the ginger treatment arm. Pregnant
women who took ginger reported unfavorable effects which include sedation, heart
burn, and mild abdominal discomfort. Only one study (study 5) reported that fetal
outcomes are within normal range in the ginger group. The sedative effect of ginger is
not well understood.
Publication Bias
Publication bias is of concern for all systematic reviews which may lead to a false
positive overall result. This review is not without publication bias. Sources of this bias
19
may include failure to search for studies with very small effect sizes despite our
exhaustive search, studies that did not report the outcomes completely and
heterogeneity of the individual studies included.
Conclusions
Nausea and vomiting remain a considerable quandary with regard to its effect in
pregnancy. This meta-analysis presented the efficacy of ginger on the treatment of
nausea and vomiting. The antiemetic efficacy of ginger was found to be equal to that of
the control group. Hence, ginger may be used as an alternative choice of treatment for
the management of the aforementioned symptoms.
The adverse events described with use of ginger showed a very small cumulative
risk relative to the benefit that may occur from its use.
Recommendations
An update of this meta-analysis will be done accounting for the studies in which
only abstracts were included as we await full text responses from the respective authors.
20
References
1.
Koch, K.
Cunningham, W et al. Williams Obstetrics 22nd ed. USA: McGraw Hill, 2005.
3.
Quinlan JD, Hill DA. Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Am Fam Physician
2003; 68:121-8.
4.
The
6.
7.
Meltzer DI.
9.
10.
Nanthakomon T, Pongrojpaw D.
postoperative nausea and vomiting after major gynecologic surgery. J Med Assoc
Thai 2006 supp; 89(4):S130-6.
21
11.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Comparison of the
22