Q&A Report

March 25, 2015 | CR James

Here are a few good questions that people asked. As always for reports like this, a lot of
times I'll end up adding (sometimes massively) to the original answer given so that it's more
informative and clear for the reader of this report.
Another thing, I like to do is pick a series of Q/A that work together to build a
message/lesson.
Enjoy!

Latest Report (March 2015)

49 Pages

Click here for more information

Note: If you already own a copy, go back to the download page (or email
crjames100@gmail.com, if you didn't bookmark it) and download the New Bonus Report:
The 7 Reasons Why a Horny Woman
Would Reject You For Sex [PDF]

Hi CR,
Okay here is my situation. I think I overly demanded sex from my wife
to the point where she lost the drive for it.
We have not been intimate for about 10 months. As a matter of fact
we have been apart on different continent for the past 7 months.
She's finally coming back home to me and she basically said that I
have to woo her again and find ways to make her feel for me again. I
am scared that I might not know how to do this. I plan on meeting her
at the airport with flowers, I plan on buying romantic cards, etc.
I don't even know what to do or where to start.
Special regards,
[Chris L.]

Ok [Chris L.]
There are different ways to approach this.
In general, relationships don't work when one person is trying to
control the situation.
But in reality, many women aren't trying to play a power game. In
most cases, where they're trying to control things, it's important to
remember (if this is the case) that they're compassionate, smart,
generally fair, and they mean well.
A lot of times they don't fully understand how to express what they
really want. And, they dont know what it's like to take a 'value-based'
approach.
So the only thing left (when they're trying to get what they want) to
take a power/controlling angle.

It's kind of like a guy who says (in a demanding way) to the woman,
"I've done A + B + C for you, and all I want is sex. It's been XXX days
since we've done it. And if you don't have sex with me by Friday, the
relationship is over."
Even if he's a good warm-hearted guy who is driven my fairness, he
is still using a power-based structure (NOT a value-based structure).
Here's the difference
Power-based structures are often driven by fear (i.e. What if she
never changes?, What if [negative event in the future] takes place?)
Fear-focused people are constantly asking themselves the question,
"What if this goes on forever?"
This leads to them making quick decisions/rules immediately
(because at least they can STOP "the fear of XYZ happening"
forever).
Value-based structures are driven by confidence, growth-thinking,
clarity, and understanding basic human nature.
So Jim (who is in a loving & generally healthy relationship) could end
up getting turned down by his wife for several weeks
BUT if he takes a Value-based Approach, he's more likely to focus on
a series of simple truths. And then make decisions based on that.
So he'll deeply understand that in most cases:
Women just want to be loved/valued/respected
Women want connections with a real/sincere/open guy
Women are designed to get turned on
Women have been turned on before
Women want to feel special/unique
Women like to cuddle and laugh
Etc. Etc. Etc.
+

A guy can say things to make a woman feel special

A guy can say things to direct her mind to certain topics.
A guy can say things to make her focus on specific aspects of HIM,
HERSELF, THEIR RELATIONSHIP, LIFE, SEX, ETC
A guy can say things make shifts in: her perspective, her beliefs, her
feelings, etc
A guy can communicate to her new rules: And she'll have a
(somewhat predictable) response to that.
A guy can instantly change his standards: And she'll have a
(somewhat predictable) response to that.
Etc. Etc. Etc.
If Jim is focused on confidence, growth-thinking, clarity, and
understanding basic human nature He's going to focus on the
above list. He's going to believe that he is capable of making
progress/growth in those areas. He's going to have the confidence
that he'll figure it out.
If Jim were to operate with a power/fear based line of thinking, he's
more likely to focus on "what if she never has sex with me again"...
This slight shift in thinking LEADS TO a totally different game plan for
fixing the problem.
Fear can be helpful at times. But whenever you 'swim in fear' too long
(and sometimes it doesn't take long), it distorts reality and makes you
delusional to some degree.
Typically the more you are operating with value-based structures,
you'll end up projecting more confidence by default (which of course,
women are responsive to). And on top of that you'll think in terms of
progress.
There's more to it than that, but that's the basics.
And although you'll see that the success rate is light-years better, the
side effect is something very interesting!
It's this

By default, you'll be able to detect when people are using powermethod or value-methods.
It's like having special glasses on.
That brings us full-circle.
When you're on the 'opposite side' of a power-based statement
BUT you have confidence + you realize that the person means
well, then it won't offend you at all.
And by power-based statement, we mean, she says something like,
"blah blah blah hey listen you need to do X or else Y".
When you're on the 'opposite side' of that, it won't offend you.
And that's great because we don't make our best decisions when
we're offended or pissed off or depressed or hyper-sensitive, etc.
So you're less likely to say:
"How dare you talk to me like that?"
OR
"Who the &#$@!! do you think you're talking to?"
And I'm not saying that those are "wrong" responses. It depends on
what you want + other details that paint the full picture.
With that said
If the strategy is to 'get the relationship on track' + 'have a healthy sex
life' + 'create sparks/impact', then it's best to take a different approach
(instead of reacting to her reaction)
And normally when a woman reacting in a negative way, deciding to
'react to her reaction' rarely fixes the real problem.

It's always better to 'assume that she means well' + 'assume that she
is caring and wants to have a loving and intimate relationship' and
then figure out her perspective And the come up with a game plan.
It's important to know that women attach meanings to things. (We all
do.)
So if she FEELS as though she's never turned on, then she'll think
about what that means. And over time she could get to a point where
she says/assumes/believes that 'you're not the one' or 'she doesn't
want to spend her whole life in a relationship where she doesn't feel
any sparks'.
I will say that years ago, I did an excessive version of burning out my
wife's sex drive (back when we were boyfriend/girlfriend).
It didn't feel that way at the time.
Unknowingly I brilliantly made it so that it was hard for me to create
sparks/tension/attraction.
But I was playing a power game.
During those years I was arrogant and felt entitled and had no
concept that women need to be warmed up It was layers of 'bad
philosophies'.
My whole reality of how things worked was based on my past
experiences with other women (that never involved a 'warming up'
process)
As far as burning out a woman's libido
It's very common!
But it's fixable.
You just have to make different decisions.

When it comes repairing/fixing/improving a sex life (or relationship),

there are two (MAIN) ongoing strategies that should ALWAYS be at
work.
Ongoing Strategy #1. Evaluating what's going on: (1) What does she
want? (2) Is she reacting to false assumptions about you? (3) Is she
reacting to false assumptions about your intentions? (4) How does
she perceive you? (5) What are her assumptions about you as it
relates to sex (or the relationship)?
The list goes on. You get the point.
Ongoing Strategy #2. Making different decisions (game plans). This
will be based on the right questions and answers for Ongoing
Strategy #1.
It's really that simple.
And then there's the mindset part (we can think of this as Ongoing
Strategy #3) - which is a combination of managing your emotions and
managing your perspective.
For example, a guy could be knowledgeable/skilled when it comes to
women, but if he's too emotional (or gets emotional at the wrong
time), it will create problems in a way that he might not understand.
From time to time, everyone gets sad/angry/etc.
But (as an example) if a single guy is always crying on his 'first dates',
it doesn't matter if he has a good reason, it's going to send a bad
message.
That's an obvious example.
What's not so obvious are the 'emotions' that the guy displays that he
thinks is acceptable.
For example, let's look at things in reverse.
It's no different than if a guy met a new woman that he really liked,

but 90% of their time together, she was just crying or being angry
about something.
Even if he understood her reasons, that's not the point.
The reason why that creates a problem, is because he doesn't want
to "be in the role" of a cheer-up guy that often.
It's kind of like how some people are wired in a way where the can
hang around a bunch of loud screaming kids for 10 hours.
where "other people" end up getting burnt out (like me).
It has to do with some people are comfortable (or wired to handle)
being in "certain roles".
Some guys (and this is outside the scope of SV - but a part of it) tend
to FORCE women into a "role" she doesn't want to be in for an
extended amount of time and they end up 'burning her out' or 'killing
their ability to create sparks'.
And to make matters worse, they eventually go to a counselor - not
'technically' a bad decision. It just depends. If the woman is burnt out
via "not liking the role" that the guy is forcing her into + the counselor
(who in all likelihood is 'reasonably intelligent' and compassionate)
ends of FORCING HER in 'negative roles' for an extended period of
time, the situation will get worse (not better).
It happens all of the time.
I know because I read books by these guys years ago. I did the whole
'open up' and 'communicate feelings' and everything else and it didn't
work.
In certain situations, this is a really bad idea!
Aside from that, a lot of times, guys are unknowingly pressuring
women to be in these "emotional-management roles" that is
overwhelming to them big time! They burn out women in ways they
have no concept of.

It's a silent sex driver killer.

It can destroy good relationships.
Getting back on track, the other side of having the right mindset
(Ongoing Strategy #3), is the perspective management.
These are more logically based. And they take place inside the guy's
mind.
He thinks:
"Hey I do XYZ all of the time. She never does XYZ."
"Whenever I do XYZ and she makes me out to be the bad guy."
It has a logical structure.
So he may not be burning out a woman emotionally, but he is
'emotionally' reacting to his 'false logical structures'.
A lot of times, no one is the "bad guy".
Both people want the same things - but are going about it in different
ways.
But they end up evaluating the other person the wrong way.
The reality is people are different. Person A has strengths and
weaknesses. Person B has strengths and weaknesses.
Just because the guy might think more optimistically and strategically,
doesn't mean she's a bad person.
More than likely she's more advanced in other areas.
That's why as a 'strategy trick', it's a good move to just decide that
you see her in a better way.
See her as a woman who means well + See her as a woman who just

wants to be happy + See her as a woman who is

warm/compassionate, etc.
What does this do?
It forces you to NOT play the "good guy game" and other "power
games".
The way our brains are wired (as humans), it's super easy to make
ourselves the good guy in just about any situation. It's also just as
easy to make someone else the bad guy.
In general, you need to have a series of conversations with the goal
of making progress.
And the more progress you make, the better you'll be at: Ongoing
Strategy #1 and Ongoing Strategy #2.
Here's the reality that you may have already thought about
Option #1. There's a chance that she's saying what she's saying and
she's already made her mind up. In other words, it doesn't really
matter what you do.
Option #2. She wants to see a spark and feel attracted to you, and
she believes it's possible.
Option #3. She's not optimistic that things will change, but she's
holding out to hope.
If I were in your shoes, I would work with the assumption that it's
fixable (assuming she's worth it) and just work on making steady
gradual progress.
I don't have your experiences/memories to evaluate whether she's
worth the effort - that's your call.
A lot of times people will obsess over what's really going on. And
anytime you're doing that, you're not creating impact. I don't know if
that applies to you, but it's something to think about.

Much success [Chris L]!

Best Regards,
CR James

Hey, your follow-ups are awesome. :)

As far as a few of my details, lol... sexually, I'm like on level 8 and
he's on like level 4.
It's a general maturity mismatch, relationship wise (he's never been in
one longer than 1.5yrs, w/all the experience that entails) and intuition
wise (just generally not in tuned to physical things, ex., goes too fast,
doesn't listen too a woman's movement, rubs too hard, etc.).
I hadn't asked you before because I just knew your answer would be
"teach him... and have fun!!!"... and I get that, but the teaching only
takes if the person can pick up on nuances. And nobody has time for
that all the time.
[Christina K.]

Hey [Christina K.]

Actually that's not what my answer would have been.
It would have been "teach him... and have fun!!!!" (4 exclamation
marks. Not 3)

Seriously, most guys can be super sensitive to this sort of thing.

Women, too.
With that in mind, teaching directly isn't that effective. That's the real
reason why it wouldn't be my answer.
In fact, anything that has the structure of 'you should do x instead of
y' often offends people - even if you think you're being indirect.
Hands down, the best approach is a complimentary approach with a
'strategic message' built-in
Compliments are a great way to make someone feel good.
But as a strategy, it's a great way to send a 'specific strategic
message'.
If it weren't for the fact that most people tend to emotionally shut
down when criticized (or when they think they're being criticized) you
could just say:
"Dude. The last few times we screwed, you were going waaaaaaay
too fast."
OR
"Hey Honey, can you try not to grab me too hard the next time we do
it?"
OR
"Hey Honey.um. you know I love you right? I was
wondering.um. the next time we do it, can you try not to rush into
it. Women like to be warmed up a bit first. And sometimes I'm not
quite there yet like you are and when you just plow right into it blah
blah blah."
Sometimes a little bit of criticism isn't that bad, especially if you're
taking the time to point out positive stuff every once in awhile.

Some books/experts talk about the right ratio or "sandwiching"

(compliment criticism compliment)
That's certainly better than 'criticism criticism criticism'.
But, if you take a 'strategic signal sending' approach, you never really
have to use 'common criticizing structures'.
In other words, instead of 'common criticizing structures' like:
"Next time, don't do XYZ."
"I don't like it when you XYZ! (sigh)"
"Can you try not to XYZ. You do realize that blah blah blah"
"[womanly over-smiling] "Next time honey, can you try not to XYZ."
So instead of those 'common criticizing structures', you would use
{PRESTO!!} a complimentary structure, like: "Hey Honey. I have to
tell youI loooove the way you make love to me you somehow
know exactly when to go slow and when to speed up blah blah blah...
(kiss)(kiss)you're amazingly sexually intuitive blah blah blah it's like
you're reading my body movements..."
[And you would send a steady stream of compliments like that - to
build a 'theme' or 'seed' in his mind that he is a sexual success
WHILE silently training him to 'give it to you like you want it.' If I'm
being a 'dork in the sack' (according to my woman's preferences) this
is how I would want to be 'trained' ]
OR
"Hey Honey. I loooove the way you make love to me. You always kiss
and nibble on my neck in the right spot - I'm getting turned on thinking
about it. I was fantasizing the other day of me wearing some sexy red
lingerie for you. We ended up doing it slowly and passionately the
whole time. In this fantasy we would pause and kiss blah blah blah..."
Something that has that structure.
If you're creative enough, you never have to criticize to get your point
across.

Sometimes it takes a few rounds before you'll see the adjusted

behavior. It's a better approach.
Best Regards,
CR James

Hey CR hope all is well. I recently read your blog post and you
mentioned how most men try to impress women but instead it is
better to be impressed by a woman.
My question is how do you get a woman to care that you are
impressed with her as in how do you get a woman from being
unaffected by you being impressed with her to her getting pleasure
from you being impressed by her?
Thanks
[William G.]

Hey [William G.]

You're welcome...
It's a combination of (1) being someone she likes/values/respects +
(2) having the right impact on her.
In other words, you can go back in time to high schoolor
whenever.. or just (in your mind) pick two women.

[Woman #1] One that you find to be very hot and irresistible - there's
something about her that you really like.
[Woman #2] One that you are absolutely not interested in at all.
That's the 'nice' way of saying she's the total opposite of everything
you're looking for.
Now, imagine that Woman #1 one day pulls you aside and says
"There's something I just gotta tell you. Ok. Here I go. I have the
biggest crush on you and for some reason I can't stop thinking about
you. No one has ever had this effect on me. I'm hoping you feel the
same way about me."
A few days later, Woman #2 says:
"There's something I just gotta tell you. Ok. Here I go. I have the
biggest crush on you and for some reason I can't stop thinking about
you. No one has ever had this effect on me. I'm hoping you feel the
same way about me."
Naturally you would start being more attracted to Woman #1.
But with Woman #2, there would be no change.
So what does this tell us.
It tells us that if we want a woman to become more attracted to us,
we essentially have to determine if we're more like Woman #1 or
Woman #2.
Overall you should focus on making improves with:
(1) SV/Personality/Who you are
(2) Impact
Woman #1 becomes more desirable by focusing mainly on (2) Impact
(i.e. saying or doing something that makes you feel good/special/etc.)
Woman #2 becomes more desirable by focusing mainly on (1)
SV/Personality/Who you are (i.e. becoming more like Woman #1)

Both are done by sending different messages/signals.

It's best to focus on both!
To make this even more clear.
If you're making different decisions and she ends up seeing you as
"more motivated", "more ambitious", "more confidence", "you seem
like you expect things to go your way" those are examples of a
TYPE 1 upgrade or you're making an improvement with (1)
SV/Personality/Who you are.
If you're transforming in some way and she ends up seeing you as
"more nonchalant", "more honest", "more passionate about
life".AND those are things that matter to her. those are more
examples of a TYPE 1 upgrade or you're making an improvement
with (1) SV/Personality/Who you are.
On the other hand.
If you end up "being more kind to her" (and that really matters to
her)and you end up being funnier (and that really matters to
her)and you end up "surprising her with some sort of small gift or
experience".and you end up "making comments about what you
think is special/unique about her". those are examples of a TYPE 2
upgrade or you're making an improvement with (2) Impact.
As you can see, there's a difference. Impact is something that you do
to her or for her.
Explaining in super simple terms: You can like a woman because
she's pretty and smart (that's a TYPE 1 effect) but once she starts
talking about how much she likes you and doing nice things for you,
that's a TYPE 2 effect.
In fact, if you analyze your past, when a woman/girl went from 'not
being too crazy over you' to 'strangely attracted (madly in love)',
normally it was a result of an unintentional increase in (1)
SV/Personality and/or (2) Impact.

To make it even more clear.

If there were two women that were twins. Plus they had the same
personality (let's say they both were fun, silly, caring and down to
earth - but only one of them, Twin #2, talked about how much she
liked youa few times she pulled you aside and kissed you and
started giggling and said "Sorry I couldn't help myself"where with
Twin #1 there was zero impact. Chances are, you're going to like
Twin #2, because the Overall Attraction Score is higher.

Twin
#1
(*) Looks
B
(1) SV/Personality
B+
(2) Impact
F
(Overall Attraction Score) D

Twin #2
B
B+
A+
A-

Overall, the more you do (1) well, the more impact you'll get from (2)
and vice versa.
On top of that, your compliments will have a greater impact.
So those are the basic layers to becoming more attractive: (1) + (2).
There's also another layer: (3) Psychological Impact - these are
'methods' that either help you do (1) or (2) in a creative way OR they
shift her thinking by some other effect.

For example, tactics like 'framing' or 'methods that leverage how she
processes things' are under the category of (3) Psychological Impact.
Note: If you have a copy of 77 Ways To Create Sexual Value, the 77 methods are split up
into 5 Categories. Each of those categories relate to what we just talked about.
Category #1
Category #2
Category #3
Category #4
Category #5

helps with
helps with
helps with
helps with
helps with

(1) SV/Personality
(3) Psychological Impact
(3) Psychological Impact
(3) Psychological Impact
(2) Impact

A common Psychological Impact tactic is making the woman jealous.

When done the wrong way, it's corny or transparent or over-the-top or
'too much'.
When done in a creative way, it's not really a 'jealous tactic', it's
something similar that helps her ZOOM IN on qualities that are
already there.
Each Psychological Impact tactic works on her mind in a different
way.
If you look for patterns or listen as she reveals how other guys have
impacted her (psychologically) or you understand how she processes
things, you'll be able to come up with methods that are worth trying.

CR James I know it has been a few months, (family tragedy and after
effects) however, shortly I will finish getting all of your products I can.
Until then though I realize that most of your signals are given
through regular communicating, and if I'm reading correctly through
willful projection.
This if I'm correct is similar to mirror electron theories in physics, and

sort of how I assume anchoring, (I've studied some NLP,) work. I may
be wrong, but that is my perception thus far. So I was wondering can
you generate signals of power and dominance in a similar manner.
I'm not advocating dominant aggressive behavior in any way,
however those perceptions are another sexual trigger in many
women's psychology. In fact combined with your super magnetism
and viper confidence it could be too much for some women. I would
like to know your thoughts on this, and maybe the formula of "signal
ingredients" I might use to go about this. Of course you may have
written about this already, and I haven't read it yet.
[Keith J.]

Hey [Keith J.]

Long time no hear. It's been a few months.
Sorry to hear about the family tragedy. I hope everything is getting
better.
Good observation. I also think that's part of how NLP anchoring
works. Your expectation fuels it a bit.
(But a lot of NLP guys grossly exaggerate what it's capable of.
Imagine a 594 lb woman with a haircut similar to one of the guys on
the show Vikings tapping you discreetly on the left knee - for a
sequence of times - as she elicited horny memories of times when
you had fun sex. If she failed to get you in the sack, it probably has
little to do with her effectiveness with unconscious influencers. A
subtle unconscious prime just is not on the 'order' of
real/observable/desired preferences.)
And also, whether it's described as quantum physics or body
language or intuition or confidence, women REALLY DO respond
strongly to our mindset/energy/frequency.

I've had lots of interesting stuff happen.

I'm pretty sure you have too.
As far as dominance, that's a good question and I know what you
mean... I know you don't mean it in a dangerous/harmful way... but as
far as my thoughts... I think it depends on the woman...
Some women are very submissive. Some women are very dominant.
And the same could be said about guys.
But as far as what you're saying
Some women are very receptive to dominance signals - most of the
time.
Some women are receptive to dominance signals - in certain
situations.
Some women are rarely/never responsive to it (for example, they
associate it with feeling inferior)
But overall, some (most) tend to switch from a passive state to a
dominate state...
And just like getting her aroused, these states can be triggered
(based on effectiveness).
And effectiveness is all about 'just doing stuff' (that kinda makes
sense) and seeing how she responds.
It depends on the application, but one method that works great (for
creating sexual tension) in terms of bringing out a more passive side
is appealing to "how she wants to be perceived".
So if she likes feeling cute and playful.
Then you could give her some sort of 'cute and playful' nickname
...i.e. 'baby doll, kitty, etc.

something that gets her focused of feeling cute and playful where
being passive happens by default.
In terms of a formula:
How she wants to be perceived + Treating her this way + Projecting
Confidence/Expectation.
Are you referring to a way to getting her turned on or make her more
submissive during sex?

That works for me. It is actually easier your way than I was picturing it
in my head. Further, it mirrors something I read about a month back
where the state you project her in is one of the most hypnotic
techniques there is. Psychologically they start enacting the role
without thinking about it. My question stemmed from that since there
are women who gravitate to men who exude dominance and power,
(not always both at the same time always) it would be another thing in
the arsenal when you realize you're dealing with one of them. I
have to revisit my opinion on state control, (both personal and
through interaction,) because I'm just now realizing the mistakes I've
made due to my failure to grasp their importance till now.
thx

You're welcome...
Imagining/projecting that she is a certain way is very effective!
Over time, I find it to be a great tool for being fair.
If in the current moment, a guy think she's selfish, hard to manage,
sexually stubborn, prudish, non-adventurous, etc, etc, etc it messes
things up.

She's going to react (and intuitively detect) these negative labels.

As humans, we're programmed to "label" and "categorized" which is a
good thing.
Unfortunately, some people do it without having all of the information.
So they end up labeling a woman as being "sexually stubborn" or
"prudish" when that's not what's really going on.
That's the first problem.
The second problem is what happens after that - and that's how the
guy reacts to a woman he believe is "sexually stubborn" or "prudish".
The type of things you say to a women who you believe is sexually
fun, admires you, submissive, loves sex will be much different than
how you react to a woman you believe is sexually boring, doesn't like
sex that much, looks down on you
So when you "pretend" that she is sexually fun, down to earth, loves
sex it can be very effective!
And you're being fair + there is other stuff going on.
And not just because she's "adapting" to your perspective - but a
large part of it is you are FLUSHING OUT negative labels.
I use to be more dominant (in a bad way) with my wife early on...
Although I didn't realize it until she called me 'controlling' one day
which kind of shocked me at the time...
My idea of a controlling guy is the guy who says you can't wear that.
You can't do that. Where are you going?
I've never been that guy.
That's my image of a controlling guy.

But there are different levels of controlling when you're looking at it

from her perspective.
Everyone has different experiences. I might not have been controlling
to most women, but to her I was.
In my case, I was doing more fault-finding (with the idea that I'm
helping her improve) instead of just fully accepting and appreciating
her for being the unique person that she is.
When she complained and shared problems/fears, I would use
'critical structures' to get her to see the relationship between her
actions and her results.
Very logical. But she FELT criticized. Plus, there was other stuff.
So I backed off and accepted her more and allowed her to be free.
And changed my language and approach.
Digging deeper
Most women have loving parents and people in their lives that want
the best for them.
So if a woman has parents (and other family members, friends, etc.)
constantly telling her she needs to do A instead of B!!!
.in one area of lifeand she needs to do C instead of D!!!!over
time (for some women - not all) it creates an enormous amount of
pressure!
And it puts her in 'certain negative roles' that elicits certain negative
feelings/stress.

Looking at the big picture.

The last thing they need is "another person" like that in their lives.

Stately differently: It feels really amazing/refreshing to have someone

tell her, "You're fine the way you are!" There's nothing wrong with A.
That's who you are. If the whole world is doing B, good for them.
There's nothing wrong with A. You're amazing. Do what you want. Be
who you are!"
All of this is important because when I became less controlling and
more accepting + paying attention to other things that affect how she
feels', I ended up seeing more of her passive/trusting/submissive side
more often.
Not that it was a goal, but it ended up upgrading my perspective on
what makes a woman enter trusting/submissive roles (where you can
see that they 'enjoy' and 'get pleasure' out of being lead).
There's definitely a right way to do it. Plus, you have to know the
woman (because she might not ever be the type that 'enjoys staying
in a more passive role' for an extended period of time).
Best Regards,
CR James

Latest Report (March 2015)

49 Pages

Click here for more information

Note: If you already own a copy, go back to the download page (or email
crjames100@gmail.com, if you didn't bookmark it) and download the New Bonus Report:
The 7 Reasons Why a Horny Woman
Would Reject You For Sex [PDF]