Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/236961459
CITATIONS
DOWNLOADS
VIEWS
972
460
6 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:
Arokiyaraj Selvaraj
Saravanan Muthupandian
Mekelle University
26 PUBLICATIONS 88 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Vijayakumar Badathala
MARINA LABS
22 PUBLICATIONS 38 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
R&D, Vel Tech High Tech Dr.Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala Engineering College, Avadi, Chennai 600062, India
Department of Biotechnology, SRM University, Kattankulathur, Chennai 603203, India
c
Department of Bio-Environmental Chemistry, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305 764, South Korea
d
Department of Advanced Zoology and Biotechnology, Loyola College, Chennai 600034, India
b
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Received 8 November 2012
Received in revised form 30 April 2013
Accepted 7 May 2013
Available online 24 May 2013
The present study intended for the chemical synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles (IO-NPs) followed by
characterization and evaluation of antibacterial activity after treating with Argemone mexicana L. leaf
extract. The formation of IO-NPs was conrmed by the colour change and further examined by UVvis
spectroscopy. The morphology was characterized by using SEM and TEM, which showed spherical
particles of uniform size ranged between 10 and 30 nm and the crystallites were determined through
XRD. The peaks in XRD pattern are in good agreement with that of face-centered cubic form of iron oxide
nanoparticles. FT-IR spectroscopy conrmed the attachment of bioactive molecules of plant on the IONPs surfaces. Furthermore, the antibacterial efcacy of IO-NPs, plant extract and IO-NPs treated with
plant extract was screened against Escherichia coli MTCC 443, Proteus mirabilis MTCC 425 and Bacillus
subtilis MTCC 441. The results showed a noteworthy inhibition on P. mirabilis and E. coli with IO-NPs
treated plant extract. This outcome may pave a way for using the magnetic nanoparticles as a drug
carrier system to cure bacterial diseases.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
A. Magnetic materials
B. Chemical synthesis
C. Electron microscopy
C. X-ray diffraction
1. Introduction
Antibiotic resistance, a well-known phenomenon in nature
assumes signicant public health importance when it gets
amplied many folds due to human misuse and neglect [1]. It
has become a serious public health concern with economic and
social implications throughout the world [2]. To overcome this, a
newer area of research, i.e. nanoparticles in controlling bacterial
growth is carried out by many authors. The antimicrobial activities
of aluminum oxide, silver nanoparticles, gold nanoparticles and
iron oxide nanoparticles have been previously reported [35]. Due
to their antibacterial activities, metallic nanoparticles represent an
effective solution for overcoming bacterial resistance [6].
Magnetic nanoparticles have applications in biomedicine due to
their controllable size of less than 100 nm which give them the
ability to attach with microbial cells. Magnetic biomaterials
provide the ability to be directed and concentrated within the
target tissue by means of external magnetic eld and be removed
once therapy was completed [7]. The drug loaded magnetic
nanoparticles helps in the controlled release of drug which reduce
side effects due to their lower dosage and minimize or prevent
3324
2.4. Microorganisms
3325
Fig. 1. UVvisible spectral analysis of synthesized IO-NPs and the peak noted
around 315 nm.
Fig. 2. (a) FT-IR spectroscopy analysis of IO-NPs and Argemone mexicana leaf extract
and (b) FT-IR spectroscopy analysis of IO-NPs treated with Argemone mexicana.
3326
Table 1
Antibacterial activity of IO-NPS, plant extract and IO-NPs treated with Argemone mexicana.
Bacteria
E. coli
P. mirabilis
B. subtilis
IO-NPs (mg/disc)
Streptomycin (mg/disc)
12.5
25
50
12.5
25
50
12.5
25
50
30
7
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
10
8
10
12
9
11
16
7
12
17
8
13
18
10
14
14
9
Fig. 6. The antibacterial assay of (a) IO-NPs alone, (b) ethanolic extract of Argemone
mexicana and (c) combination effect of IO-NPs with Argemone mexicana against the
bacterial pathogens.
References
[1] H.C. Neu, Science 257 (1992) 10641073.
[2] A. Kapil, Indian J. Med. Res. 121 (2005) 8391.
[3] J.S. Kim, E. Kuk, Y.K. Nam, K. Jong-Ho, S.J. Park, L. Hu, Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol.
Med. 3 (2007) 95101.
[4] W.Y. Chen, L. Ju-Yu, C. Wei-Jen, L. Liyang, D. Eric Wei-Guang, C. Yu-Chie, Nanomedicine 5 (2010) 755764.
[5] M. Valodkar, S. Modi, A. Pal, S. Thakore, Mater. Res. Bull. 46 (2011) 384389.
[6] M. Saravanan, A. Nanda, Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 77 (2010) 214218.
[7] T.K. Indira, P.K. Lakshmi, Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Nanotechnol. 3 (2010) 10351042.
[8] Y. Zheng, Y. Cheng, F. Bao, Y.S. Wang, Mater. Res. Bull. 41 (2006) 525529.
[9] P. Li, L. Juan, W. Changzhu, W. Qing sheng, L. Jian, Nanotechnology 16 (2005)
19121917.
[10] A.R. Shahverdi, A. Fakhimi, H.R. Shahverdi, S. Minaian, Nanomed. Nanotechnol.
Biol. Med. 3 (2007) 168171.
[11] W.Y. Chen, L. Ju-Yu, C. Wei-Jen, L. Liyang, E.W. Guang Diau, Y.C. Chen, Nanomedicine 5 (2010) 755764.
[12] P. Antoniea, C. Dorina, N. Claudia, T.F. Mihai, Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 6 (2012) 1054
1060.
[13] B.S. Inbaraj, T.Y. Tsai, B.H. Chen, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 13 (2012).
[14] D.E. Mihaiescu, A.M. Grumezescu, A.S. Rumezescu, D.E. Buteica, P.C. Mogosanu,
O.M. Balaure, Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 7 (2012) 253260.
[15] D.S. Fabricant, N.R. Farnsworth, Environ. Health Prospect. 109 (2001) 6975.
[16] C.M. Chiariandy, C.E. Seaforth, R.H. Phelps, G.V. Pollard, B.P. Khambay, J. Ethnopharmacol. 64 (1999) 265270.
3327
[17] R.N. Chopra, S.L. Nayar, I.C. Chopra, Glossary of Indian Medicinal Plants, Council of
Scientic and Industrial Research, New Delhi, 1986.
[18] Y.S. Kim, Y.H. Kim, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 267 (2003) 105110.
[19] A.W. Bauer, W.M.M. Kirby, M. Sherries, Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 45 (1966) 493496.
[20] R.M. Cornell, U. Schwertmann, The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions,
Occurrences and Uses, 2nd ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003.
[21] J. Yang, S.B. Park, H.G. Yoon, Y.M. Huhd, S. Haam, Int. J. Pharm. 324 (2006)
185190.
[22] I. Bhattacharjee, A. Ghosh, N. Chowdhury, S.K. Chatterjee, G. Chandra, S. Laskar,
Z. Naturforsch. C 65 (2010) 533536.
[23] O. Gerko, J. SolGel Sci. Technol. 37 (2006) 161164.
[24] L. Stanciu, Y.H. Won, M. Ganesana, S. Andreescu, Sensors 9 (2009) 29762999.
[25] N. Tran, A. Mir, D. Mallik, A. Sinha, S. Nayar, T.J. Webster, Int. J. Nanomed. 5 (2010)
277283.
[26] C. Lee, J.Y. Kim, W.I. Lee, K.L. Nelson, J. Yoon, D.L. Sedlak, Environ. Technol. 42
(2008) 49274933.
[27] L. Dassonneville, K. Bonjean, M.C. Pauw-Gillet, P. Colson, C. Houssier, J. QuetinLeclercq, L. Angenot, C. Bailly, Biochemistry 38 (1999) 77197726.
[28] L. Guittat, P. Alberti, F. Rosu, S. Van Miert, E. Thetiot, L. Pieters, V. Gabelica, E. De
Pauw, A. Ottaviani, J.F. Roiu, J.L. Mergny, Biochemistry 85 (2003) 535541.
[29] J.L.S. Taylor, T. Rabe, L.J. McGaw, A.K. Jager, J. Van Staden, Plant Growth Regul.
(2001) 2337.
[30] M.A. Kohanski, M.A. DePristo, J.J. Collins, Mol. Cell 37 (2010) 311320.
[31] H. Sies, Exp. Physiol. 82 (1997) 291295.
[32] H. Park, J. Kim, J. Lee, J. Hahn, M. Gu, J. Yoon, Water Res. 43 (2009) 1027
1032.