Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
a r t i c l e i n f o
abstract
Article history:
Received 27 March 2007
Accepted 21 August 2008
Available online 10 September 2008
Although there are many studies in the literature that explain modern costing
approaches including activity-based costing (ABC), the number of studies that present
real life applications is very few. This is especially true for logistics and transportation
applications. One of the main difculties in land transportation companies is to
determine and evaluate true cost of their operations and services. If used and
implemented properly, ABC can be very helpful for transportation companies to
determine cost of their operations with higher correctness. In this paper, an application
of ABC to a land transportation company that is located in Turkey is presented in detail.
In order to improve the effectiveness of the ABC an integrated approach that combines
ABC with business process modeling and analytical hierarchy approach is proposed. It is
gured out that the proposed approach is quite effective in costing services of the land
transportation company compared to the existing traditional costing system which is
in use.
& 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Transportation costs
Activity-based costing
Logistics
1. Introduction
Present age of rigorous international competition and
rapidly improving technologies and improving information systems has forced companies to use new business
management techniques (Baykasoglu and Kaplanoglu,
2006c). Market structures of products and services
enforced companies to manage their costs according to
business competition. Under severe competition, companies need to become leaner, responsive and agile, with
ever-increasing efciency and effectiveness (Agrawal and
Mehra, 1998). In order to retain the competitive status, a
company should be able to provide high-quality services/
products in a short period of time with lowest possible
cost. In order to be able to provide lower costs, accurate
cost information is critical for every aspect of business,
and it affects the pricing policies and performance reviews
(Gupta and Galloway, 2003). This is not a critical issue for
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Baykasoglu, V. Kaplanoglu / Int. J. Production Economics 116 (2008) 308324
309
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Baykasoglu, V. Kaplanoglu / Int. J. Production Economics 116 (2008) 308324
310
RESOURCES
Resource Drivers
Activity
Centers
FIRST STAGE
...
...
...
...
...
...
Activity Drivers
SECOND STAGE
COST OBJECTS
Fig. 1. Cost assignment procedure in ABC (Tsai and Kuo, 2004).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Baykasoglu, V. Kaplanoglu / Int. J. Production Economics 116 (2008) 308324
311
ARTICLE IN PRESS
312
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Baykasoglu, V. Kaplanoglu / Int. J. Production Economics 116 (2008) 308324
313
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Baykasoglu, V. Kaplanoglu / Int. J. Production Economics 116 (2008) 308324
314
START
1- Determining company
processes, activities and resources
ABC
Design
AHP
AHP
Process
Performance
Measurment
6- Cost determination
Is process
improvement
necessary
NO
Cost report
STOP
Fig. 5. ABC application framework.
Table 1
Main processes and related sub-processes
Main processes
Export process
Sub-processes
1. Operation
2. Loading, customs clearance,
transportation preparation
3. Transportation
4. Customs clearance arrival
Import process
1. Operation
2. Loading, customs clearance,
transportation preparation
3. Transportation
4. Customs clearance arrival
5. Returning to center
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Baykasoglu, V. Kaplanoglu / Int. J. Production Economics 116 (2008) 308324
315
Table 2
Main activities for export process
Operation
Transportation
Customs clearance
arrival
Customs clearance
arrival of export
transportation
Informing customer
about arrival of export
freight
Table 3
Main activities for import process
Operation
Loading, customs
clearance,
transportation
preparation
Transportation
Customs
clearance arrival
Returning to
center
Submissions of truck
documents for
import
Transportation activities
for each of the import
transportation services
Returning after
import
Loading import
transportation freight
Collecting transportation
information of import
Informing
customer about
arrival of import
freight
Customs
clearance arrival
for import
Inform customer
about loading of
import freight
Customs clearance
for import freight
Informing customer
about vehicle and freight
of import
Unloading
Truck
maintenance after
import
Driver accounting
after import
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Baykasoglu, V. Kaplanoglu / Int. J. Production Economics 116 (2008) 308324
316
Table 4
Activities in groups
1. Taking information of demand
2. Transportation rate determination
3. Preparation of freight agreement
4. Vehicle scheduling and preparation
5. Departure of vehicle to customer
6. Preparation of loading notication
7. Customs clearance
8. Other transportation documents preparation
9. Submission of documents and advance pays
10. Vehicle refueling
11. Transportation
12. Collecting transportation information
13. Informing customers about vehicle and freight
14. Preparing and sending arrival notication to customers
15. Customs clearance-arrival
16. Vehicle maintenance
17. Driver accounts calculation
SubAltProses
i+1
Processi+1
Consist of
Time
Requires
Money
Activities
Consumes
Entities
SubAltses i i
Process
Resources
Entities
SubAltProses
i-1
Process i-1
Processes
Process I
Proses
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Baykasoglu, V. Kaplanoglu / Int. J. Production Economics 116 (2008) 308324
Table 5
Overheads of the company
317
Table 5 (continued )
Overheads
Overheads
Amount ($)
First-stage cost
drivers
1,144,008
Distance (km)
Amount ($)
18. Advertising
Documents expenses
Stationery costs
Newspaper expenses
Computer maintenance costs
32,370
Number of
transportation
80,257
Number of
personnel
107,526
Number of
personnel
3. Indirect labor
Staff training
121,203
Number of
personnel
19. Donations
Other costs
Motoring ne costs
Number of
transportation
Total
4. Withholding tax
Return of tax
50,523
311,866
Number of
vehicles
6. Tax of building
Insurance of building
10,007
Area used
72,516
Number of
vehicle drivers
63,213
Distance (km)
9. Customs costs
Tickets bought during
transportations
17,863
Number of
transportation
24,504
Transaction
duration
24,150
Number of
personnel
2,320,889
Table 6
Activities which use Area Used as a driver
1. Taking information of demand
2. Transportation rate determination
3. Preparation of freight agreement
4. Vehicle scheduling and preparation
5. Preparation of loading notication
6. Other transportation documents preparation
7. Preparing and sending arrival notication to customers
8. Driver accounts calculation
Table 7
Pair-wise comparison matrix
Activities
First-stage cost
drivers
5,621
Transaction
duration
18,092
Amount of
freight (kg)
9538
Area used
30,053
Number of
personnel
5902
Number of
customer
191,676
Number of
customer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
a
1.00
1.00
0.50
2.00
0.50
1.00
0.20
0.33
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
0.50
1.00
0.33
0.50
2.00
1.00
1.00
0.25
1.00
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
4.00
1.00
0.33
0.50
0.50
0.25
2.00
2.00
1.00
3.00
1.00
3.00
0.50
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
0.33
1.00
0.20
0.50
5.00
3.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
5.00
1.00
3.00
3.00
2.00
2.00
4.00
2.00
2.00
0.33
1.00
ARTICLE IN PRESS
318
Table 8
Allocation of coefcients
Activities
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.15
0.16
0.13
0.18
0.19
0.05
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.08
0.03
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
0.16
0.13
0.18
0.19
0.10
0.05
0.05 0.50 0.50
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.15
0.08 0.05
0.10
0.15 0.05 0.50 0.50
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.03
0.97
0.15
1.00 1.00
0.05 0.05
0.05 0.05
0.05 0.05
0.05 0.05
0.10 0.10
0.05 0.05
0.05
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.05
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.10
0.06 0.05
1.00
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.10
0.05
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Baykasoglu, V. Kaplanoglu / Int. J. Production Economics 116 (2008) 308324
319
Table 9
Total cost consumptions of the activities and their second-stage cost drivers
No.
Activities
Overheads ($)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
45,356
23,123
120,449
58,212
36,217
19,772
36,319
119,819
18,160
18,160
1,681,226
29,080
22,089
19,028
18,160
36,319
19,403
Transportation duration
Transportation duration
Number of transportation
Number of transportation
Number of transportation
Transportation duration
Number of transportation
Transportation duration
Number of transportation
Transportation duration
Distance freight amount
Distance
Distance
Number of transportation
Number of transportation
Distance
Number of transportation
Total
2,320,889
Table 10
Second-stage cost driver data
No.
Transportation services
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Belgium Exports
Belgium imports
England exports
England imports
France exports
France imports
Germany exports
Germany imports
Greece exports
Greece imports
Holland exports
Holland imports
Iran imports
Ireland exports
Italy exports
Italy imports
Norway exports
Norway imports
Poland exports
Poland imports
Russia exports
Russia imports
Spain exports
Spain imports
Sweden exports
Sweden imports
Ukraine exports
Ukraine imports
Total
Total number of
transportation
Total amount of
freight carried (ton)
Transportation
duration (days)
Total distance
(km)
49
119
19
11
107
92
73
114
36
46
7
5
10
2
12
11
12
35
107
23
66
31
2
1
4
38
13
3
825
2130
283
164
2253
1036
1208
1731
639
1,027
118
67
147
28
256
177
24
690
2,196
382
1258
628
49
17
43
582
252
56
375
1366
195
132
1072
1054
644
1192
178
204
64
46
63
19
113
113
112
819
923
164
864
441
21
11
49
700
96
31
183,989
457,878
71,244
42,125
345,451
327,575
270,096
400,597
68,269
83,140
23,120
15,700
32,741
7,800
31,535
26,778
48,124
165,540
361,219
81,482
217,296
86,929
6,551
2,778
17,046
172,171
40,448
8410
151,881,256
975,386,006
20,183,671
6,901,155
778,375,116
339,326,658
326,177,564
693,582,097
43,637,268
85,348,531
2,722,611
1,044,600
4,801,500
218,205
8,074,764
4,741,514
1,145,977
114,222,600
793,207,557
31,092,065
273,380,706
54,568,524
321,141
48,337
730,747
100,187,321
10,201,228
472,667
1,048
18,266
11,061
3,596,032
4,821,981,384
Table 9. The second-stage cost drivers data are represented in Table 10.
The unit allocation coefcients are found by dividing
each element of Table 10 by the sum of its column. For
example, 0.047 of total number of transportation of
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Baykasoglu, V. Kaplanoglu / Int. J. Production Economics 116 (2008) 308324
320
Table 11
The unit allocation coefcients of the second-stage cost derivers
No.
Transportation services
Total number of
transportation
Total amount of
freight carried (ton)
Transportation
duration (days)
Total distance
(km)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Belgium exports
Belgium imports
England exports
England imports
France exports
France imports
Germany exports
Germany imports
Greece exports
Greece imports
Holland exports
Holland imports
Iran imports
Ireland exports
Italy exports
Italy imports
Norway exports
Norway imports
Poland exports
Poland imports
Russia exports
Russia imports
Spain exports
Spain imports
Sweden exports
Sweden imports
Ukraine exports
Ukraine imports
0.047
0.114
0.018
0.010
0.102
0.088
0.070
0.109
0.034
0.044
0.007
0.005
0.010
0.002
0.011
0.010
0.011
0.033
0.102
0.022
0.063
0.030
0.002
0.001
0.004
0.036
0.012
0.003
0.045
0.117
0.016
0.009
0.123
0.057
0.066
0.095
0.035
0.056
0.006
0.004
0.008
0.002
0.014
0.010
0.001
0.038
0.120
0.021
0.069
0.034
0.003
0.001
0.002
0.032
0.014
0.003
0.034
0.123
0.018
0.012
0.097
0.095
0.058
0.108
0.016
0.018
0.006
0.004
0.006
0.002
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.074
0.083
0.015
0.078
0.040
0.002
0.001
0.004
0.063
0.009
0.003
0.051
0.127
0.020
0.012
0.096
0.091
0.075
0.111
0.019
0.023
0.006
0.004
0.009
0.002
0.009
0.007
0.013
0.046
0.100
0.023
0.060
0.024
0.002
0.001
0.005
0.048
0.011
0.002
0.031
0.202
0.004
0.001
0.161
0.070
0.068
0.144
0.009
0.018
0.001
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.002
0.001
0.000
0.024
0.164
0.006
0.057
0.011
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.021
0.002
0.000
Total
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Table 12
Allocation of the activity costs to the cost objects
No Transportation services Activity costs distribution ($)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Belgium exports
Belgium imports
England exports
England imports
France exports
France imports
Germany exports
Germany imports
Greece exports
Greece imports
Holland exports
Holland imports
Iran Imports
Ireland exports
Italy exports
Italy imports
Norway exports
Norway imports
Poland exports
Poland imports
Russia exports
Russia imports
Spain exports
Spain imports
Sweden exports
Sweden imports
Ukraine exports
Ukraine imports
10
11
1538
5601
800
541
4396
4322
2641
4888
730
837
262
189
258
78
463
463
459
3358
3785
673
3543
1808
86
45
201
270
394
127
784
5632 2722 1693
670 1698
4062
849
616 52,955
2856 13,677 6610 4112 2442 4124 14,797 2062 2243 340,077
408
2184 1055
657
349
659
2112
329
320
7037
276
1264
611
380
236
381
1430
191
217
2406
2241 12,298 5943 3698 1916 3708 11,613 1854 1760 271,387
2203 10,574 5110 3179 1884 3188 11,418 1594 1730 118,309
1346
8390 4055 2523 1151 2530
6976 1265 1057 113,725
2492 13,102 6332 3940 2131 3951 12,912 1975 1957 241,823
372
4138 2000 1244
318 1248
1928
624 292
15,215
427
5287 2555 1590
365 1594
2210
797
335 29,758
134
805
389
242
114
243
693
121
105
949
96
575
278
173
82
173
498
87
76
364
132
1149
556
346
113
347
682
173
103
1674
40
230
111
69
34
69
206
35
31
76
236
1379
667
415
202
416
1224
208
186
2815
236
1264
611
380
202
381
1224
191
186
1653
234
1379
667
415
200
416
1213
208
184
400
1712
4023 1944 1210 1464 1213
8872
607 1345 39,825
1930 12,298 5943 3698 1650 3708
9998 1854 1515 276,559
343
2643 1278
795
293
797
1777
399
269
10,841
1806
7586 3666 2281 1545 2287
9359 1144 1419
95,317
922
3563 1722 1071
788 1074
4777
537
724
19026
44
230
111
69
38
69
228
35
35
112
23
115
56
35
20
35
119
17
18
17
102
460
222
138
88
139
531
69
80
255
1463
4367 2111 1313 1251 1317
7583
659 1149
34,931
201
1494
722 449
172
451
1040
225
158
3557
65
345
167
104
55
104
336
52
51
165
12
13
14
15
16
17
1488
3703
576
341
2794
2649
2184
3240
552
672
187
127
265
63
255
217
389
1339
2921
659
1757
703
53
23
138
1392
327
68
1130
2813
438
259
2122
2012
1659
2461
419
511
142
96
201
48
194
165
296
1017
2219
501
1335
534
40
17
105
1058
249
52
890
2161
345
200
1943
1670
1326
2070
654
835
127
91
182
36
218
200
218
636
1943
418
1198
563
36
18
73
690
236
55
849
2062
329
191
1854
1594
1265
1975
624
797
121
87
173
35
208
191
208
607
1854
399
1144
537
35
17
69
659
225
52
1858
4624
720
426
3489
3308
2728
4046
690
840
234
159
331
79
319
271
486
1672
3648
823
2195
878
66
28
172
1739
409
85
907
2203
352
204
1981
1703
1352
2111
667
852
130
93
185
37
222
204
222
648
1981
426
1222
574
37
19
74
704
241
56
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Baykasoglu, V. Kaplanoglu / Int. J. Production Economics 116 (2008) 308324
321
Table 13
ABC cost result
No.
Transportation services
Total
overheads ($)
Direct
costs ($)
Total
costs ($)
Total number of
transportation
Unit costs
($)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Belgium exports
Belgium imports
England exports
England imports
France exports
France imports
Germany exports
Germany imports
Greece exports
Greece imports
Holland exports
Holland imports
Iran imports
Ireland exports
Italy exports
Italy imports
Norway exports
Norway imports
Poland exports
Poland imports
Russia exports
Russia imports
Spain exports
Spain imports
Sweden exports
Sweden imports
Ukraine exports
Ukraine Imports
80,341
416,166
18,668
9552
334,996
176,450
156,172
311,405
31,713
50,259
4998
3242
6869
1277
9626
8037
7593
71,489
337,504
23,331
138,802
39,802
1323
620
2916
65,256
10,548
1937
125,649
239,911
52,490
26,818
194,906
182,051
178,966
253,070
40,273
42,905
15,012
5086
9811
2646
21,137
11,392
34,790
101,593
249,292
48,078
78,677
35,345
2965
1473
8232
95,017
26,174
2953
205,990
656,077
71,158
36,370
529,902
358,501
335,137
564,475
71,986
93,164
20,010
8328
16,680
3923
30,763
19,429
42,383
173,081
586,796
71,409
217,478
75,147
4288
2093
11,148
160,272
36,721
4889
49
119
19
11
107
92
73
114
36
46
7
5
10
2
12
11
12
35
107
23
66
31
2
1
4
38
13
3
4204
5513
3745
3306
4952
3897
4591
4952
2000
2025
2859
1666
1668
1961
2564
1766
3532
4945
5484
3105
3295
2424
2144
2093
2787
4218
2825
1630
of Demand) is conducted by using transportation duration as a second-stage cost driver. First column of Table 12
is found by multiplying the 1 1 matrix of taking
information of demand (see Table 9) with a 1 28 matrix
of transportation duration column of Table 11. Table 12
represents the allocation process of the activity costs to 28
different transportation services.
After allocating each activity cost to cost objects with
their related cost distribution coefcient the total cost
consumption of every cost object can be determined (see
Table 13). The resulting cost estimates are obtained after
summing the total overheads and total direct costs for
each cost object and then dividing by the total number of
transportation. The average of the overheads and direct
costs are found and used as a unit cost for each cost
element because every cost object is assumed as standard
for each transportation service.
(1)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Baykasoglu, V. Kaplanoglu / Int. J. Production Economics 116 (2008) 308324
322
Table 14
Traditional costing results of transportation services
No.
Transportation services
Direct
costs ($)
Total number of
transportation
Unit direct
costs ($)
Indirect
cost ($)
Total
cost ($)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Belgium exports
Belgium imports
England exports
England imports
France exports
France imports
Germany exports
Germany imports
Greece exports
Greece imports
Holland exports
Holland imports
Iran imports
Ireland exports
Italy exports
Italy imports
Norway exports
Norway imports
Poland exports
Poland imports
Russia exports
Russia imports
Spain exports
Spain imports
Sweden exports
Sweden imports
Ukraine exports
Ukraine imports
125,649
239,911
52,490
26,818
194,906
182,051
178,966
253,070
40,273
42,905
15,012
5086
9811
2646
21,137
11,392
34,790
101,593
249,292
48,078
78,677
35,345
2965
1473
8232
95,017
26,174
2953
49
119
19
11
107
92
73
114
36
46
7
5
10
2
12
11
12
35
107
23
66
31
2
1
4
38
13
3
2564
2016
2763
2438
1822
1979
2452
2220
1119
933
2145
1017
981
1323
1761
1036
2899
2903
2330
2090
1192
1140
1483
1473
2058
2500
2013
984
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
2215
4779
4231
4977
4653
4036
4193
4666
4435
3333
3147
4359
3232
3196
3538
3976
3250
5114
5117
4544
4305
3407
3355
3697
3687
4273
4715
4228
3199
Table 15
ABC and TCA comparison
No.
Transportation
services
ABC
costs ($)
Traditional
costs ($)
Difference
percent (%)
Transportation
price ($)
Prot/loss
(Traditional) ($)
Prot/loss
(ABC) ($)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Belgium exports
Belgium imports
England exports
England imports
France exports
France imports
Germany exports
Germany imports
Greece exports
Greece imports
Holland exports
Holland imports
Iran imports
Ireland exports
Italy exports
Italy imports
Norway exports
Norway imports
Poland exports
Poland imports
Russia exports
Russia imports
Spain exports
Spain imports
Sweden exports
Sweden imports
Ukraine exports
Ukraine imports
4204
5513
3745
3306
4952
3897
4591
4952
2000
2025
2859
1666
1668
1961
2564
1766
3532
4945
5484
3105
3295
2424
2144
2093
2787
4218
2825
1630
4779
4231
4977
4653
4036
4193
4666
4435
3333
3147
4359
3232
3196
3538
3976
3250
5114
5117
4544
4305
3407
3355
3697
3687
4273
4715
4228
3199
13.7
23.3
32.9
40.7
18.5
7.6
1.6
10.4
66.7
55.4
52.5
94.0
91.6
80.4
55.1
84.0
44.8
3.5
17.1
38.7
3.4
38.4
72.4
76.2
53.3
11.8
49.7
96.3
4592
4373
5895
4784
3455
4623
3678
4372
2177
1297
6429
4514
1165
7800
3289
5530
4340
9805
3402
2519
5843
1698
4104
4224
4526
9382
5231
1605
187
143
918
131
582
429
988
62
1157
1851
2069
1282
2031
4262
687
2280
774
4687
1142
1786
2437
1657
406
537
253
4667
1003
1594
388
1140
2150
1478
1498
726
913
579
177
729
3570
2848
503
5839
725
3764
808
4859
2082
586
2548
726
1959
2131
1739
5165
2406
25
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Baykasoglu, V. Kaplanoglu / Int. J. Production Economics 116 (2008) 308324
323
6. Conclusion
In this paper, an application of ABC method to a land
transportation company is presented. In the present ABC
model, SIMPROCESS is used for process modeling and AHP
methodology is employed to determine cost driver
parameters. Detailed explanations are given in the paper
in order to present how an ABC-based approach can be
used for costing services of a land transportation company. The results obtained from the ABC analyses are also
compared with the traditional cost accounting practice of
the company in order to see if there is a difference. It is
observed that there is a considerable difference between
the current cost assignment procedures of the company
and the results obtained from ABC. The present traditional
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the University of Gaziantep Research Fund (Project Number: MF.07.04). The rst
(corresponding) author is also grateful to Turkish Acad BA) for supporting his scientic
emy of Sciences (TU
studies.
References
Agrawal, S.P., Mehra, S., 1998. Cost management system: an operational
overview. Managerial Finance 24 (1), 6078.
Baykasoglu, A., 2001. Process modelling for manufacturing process
selection. Teknoloji 1 (2), 8394.
Baykasoglu, A., Bartk, E., 2005. Modelling work processes of a logistic
company for performance improvement and training. Third International Logistics & Supply Chain Congress, 2324 November 2005,
Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 133138.
Baykasoglu, A., Kaplanoglu, V., 2006a. Faaliyet tabanl maliyetlendirmenin bir lojistik is-letmesine uygulanmas. In: Proceedings of the Fifth
GAP Engineering Congress, 2628 April 2006, S- anlurfa, Turkey, pp.
182189 (in Turkish).
Baykasoglu, A., Kaplanoglu, V., 2006b. Application of business process
modeling and simulation to a logistics company. AMSE06: International Conference on Modelling and Simulation, 2830 August 2006,
Konya, Turkey, pp. 977982.
Baykasoglu, A., Kaplanoglu, V., 2006c. Developing a service costing
system and an application for logistic companies. International
Journal of Agile Manufacturing 9 (2), 1318.
Baykasoglu, A., Dereli, T., Ylankrkan, A., Ylankrkan, N., 2003. Applica retim
tion of activity based costing to a SME in Gaziantep, III. Ulusal U
Aras-trmalar Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitab. In: Proceedings of III.
National Production Research Symposium, Istanbul Kultur University, Istanbul, 1920 April 2003, pp. 235242.
Ben-Arieh, D., Qian, L., 2003. Activity-based cost management for design
and development stage. International Journal of Production Economics 83 (2), 169183.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
324
Marasco, A., 2008. Third-party logistics: A literature review. International Journal of Production Economics 113, 127147.
Nachtmann, H., Al-Rifai, M.H., 2004. An application of activity based
costing in the air conditioner manufacturing industry. The Engineering Economist 49, 221236.
No, J.J., Kleiner, B.H., 1997. How to implement activity-based costing.
Logistics Information Management 10 (2), 6872.
zbayrak, M., Akgun, M., Turker, A.K., 2004. Activity-based cost
O
estimation in a push/pull advanced manufacturing system. International Journal of Production Economics 87, 4965.
Partovi, F.Y., 1991. An analytic hierarchy approach to activity-based
costing. International Journal of Production Economics 22, 151161.
Pohlen, T.L., La Londe, B.J., 1994. Implementing activity-based costing
(ABC) in logistics. Journal of Business Logistics 15 (2), 123.
Qian, L., Ben-Arieh, D., 2008. Parametric cost estimation based on
activity-based costing: A case study for design and development of
rotational parts. International Journal of Production Economics 113,
805818.
Raz, T., Elnathan, D., 1999. Activity-based costing for projects. International Journal of Project Management 17 (1), 6167.
Rotch, W., 1990. Activity based costing in service industries. Journal of
Cost Management 4 (2), 414.
Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Saaty, T.L., 1988. Decision Making for Leaders. RWS Publications,
Pittsburgh, PA.
Satoglu, S.I., Durmusoglu, M.B., Dogan, I., 2006. Evaluation of the
conversion from central storage to decentralized storages in cellular
manufacturing environments using activity-based costing. International Journal of Production Economics 103, 616632.
Schniederjans, M.J., Garvin, T., 1997. Using the analytic hierarchy process
and multi-objective programming for the selection of cost drivers in
activity-based costing. European Journal of Operational Research 100
(1), 7280.
Stapleton, D., Pati, S., Beach, E., Julmanichoti, P., 2004. Activity-based
costing for logistics and marketing. Business Process Management 10
(5), 584597.
Themido, I., Arantes, A., Fernandes, C., Guedes, A.P., 2000. Logistic costs
case study-an ABC approach. Journal of the Operational Research
Society 51 (10), 11481157.
Tatsiopoulos, I.P., Panayiotou, N., 2000. The integration of activity based
costing and enterprise modeling for reengineering purposes. International Journal of Production Economics 66, 3344.
Thyssen, J., Israelsen, P., Jorgensen, B., 2006. Activity-based costing as a
method for assessing the economics of modularizationA case
study and beyond. International Journal of Production Economics
103, 252270.
Tornberg, K., Jamsen, M., Paranko, J., 2002. Activity-based costing and
process modeling for cost-conscious product design: A case study in
a manufacturing company. International Journal of Production
Economics 79 (1), 7582.
Tsai, W.H., 1998. Quality cost measurement under activity-based costing.
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 15 (7),
719752.
Tsai, W.H., Kuo, L., 2004. Operating costs and capacity in the
airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management 10 (4),
269275.
Van Damme, D.A., Van Der Zon, F.L.A., 1999. Activity based costing and
decision support. International Journal of Logistics Management 10
(1), 7182.
Zhuang, L., Burns, G., 1992. Activity-based costing in non-standard route
manufacturing. International Journal of Operations and Production
Management 12 (3), 3860.