Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Federation
National
of IndianRailwaymen
3, CHELMSFORDROAD,NEW DELHI- 11O055
Afliliated to :
Indian l.lationalTrade Union Congress (!NTUC)
International Transport Workers' Federation (lTF)
Its.NFIR/PNIU/107
Dated:11106/2015
PNM
Item No.
31/2015
32/2015
33/2015
34/2015
35/2015
36/2015
37/2015
38/2015
39/2015
40/2015
41/2015
42/2015
43/2015
44/2015
45/2015
46/2015
47/2015
48/2015
49/2015
50/2015
51/2015
Subject
Reduction of Duty hours and revision of classification of Engineering & Traffic Gateman
as Continuous.
Grant of pay fixation under rule S 13 to the erstwhile Group D staff promoted to
same grade pay of 1800/- (PB-I).
Denial of promotions against vacancies of Loco Pilots on Zonal Railways consequent
to Court cases Railway Boards intervention - urged.
Problems faced by the Loco and Traffic Running Staff while performing running
duties reg.
Safety Related Retirement Scheme (SRRS 2004) renamed as Liberalized
Active Retirement Scheme for Guaranteed Employment for Safety Staff
(LARSGESS) Deletion of 33 years service condition for Loco Pilot Category urged.
Abnormal delay in forwarding inter railway/inter divisional transfer applications of
Railway employees Remedial measures-requested.
Simultaneous creation of posts of Ticket Checking Staff when new trains are
introduced or runs extended-reg.
Granting promotion opportunity as JE against 25% Intermediate Apprentice quota to
those Technicians initially appointed as Technician-III on compassionate ground.
Mis-interpretation of Railway Boards orders resulting denial of LARSGESS to
ESM/TCM/WTM, GP 1900 reg.
Cashless facilities to the RELHS beneficiaries on the Indian Railways reg.
Appendix - 3 IREM Examination-Change of pattern Clarification on
exemption-reg.
Clarification regarding consideration of service rendered as Fireman, Loco Pilot
(Shunting), ALP etc., for coverage under LARSGESS-reg.
Provision of rail net/internet connections to the offices of the recognized Unions and
provision of CUG SIMs to the Office Bearers at Branch level-reg.
Abnormal delay in finalization of proposals relating to D&AR cases Staff put to
hardship reg.
(a)Cadre restructuring benefit and promotion of Catering Staff of
Parliament House Catering Unit - reg.
(b)New Catering Policy 2010 Repatriation of 188 Deemed Deputationist officials
(DDOs) from IRCTC to Railways-reg.
Grant of financial upgradation under MACPS to the Technical
Supervisors of DC Traction and presently working as JE/SSE.
Grant of MACP to the former Traffic Signallers/A2 Signallers absorbed as
ASMs/SMs on North Eastern Railway-reg.
Conversion of 43 Non-Incentive posts into Incentive posts Carriage Repair Shop,
TPTY South Central Railway.
Irregularities in implementation of cadre restructuring JEs/SSEs (P.Way) East
Central Railway.
Training Module for Loco Pilot (Shunting) on Indian Railways wrong
interpretation by Southern Railway - reg.
Absorption of Quasi Administrative staff in erstwhile Group D (PB-I GP 1800/-)
case of West Central Railway-reg.
52/2015
53/2015
54/2015
55/2015
56/2015
57/2015
58/2015
59/2015
60 /2015
Item No.31/2015
Sub:
Grant of pay fixation benefit under rule S 13 to the erstwhile Group D staff
promoted to same grade pay of 1800/- (PB-I).
Ref:
(i)
(ii)
Prior to 01/01/2006, the Group D posts were carrying different duties and
responsibilities with higher pay scales. With the implementation of revised pay structure
and merger of all Group D pay scales with revised GP 1800 PB-1, a new situation
has arisen wherein the duties and responsibilities of higher nature performed by staff
against the pre-revised higher pay scales also carry GP 1800/- only, but however, pay
fixation under erstwhile F.R. 22C/present S-13, has not been extended.
Although GP 1800/- has been allotted to all erstwhile Group D posts, the benefits of pay
fixation when posted from same grade pay to same grade pay shouldering higher
responsibilities should have been given, but unfortunately it has not been done.
NFIR, therefore, urges upon the Railway Board to consider granting pay fixation under rule
S-13 (erstwhile FR 22-C) to the staff posted against the post of identical Grade Pay of Rs.1800/- (PBI), shouldering higher duties/responsibilities.
1
Item No.33/2015
Sub:
Problems faced by the Loco and Traffic Running Staff while performing
running duties reg.
Ref:
Ref:
(i)
(ii)
Those candidates selected at the age of 25 years through RRB as ALP and completed
induction training thereafter will not be in a position to fulfil 33 years qualifying service
condition when they attain the age of 55-57 years.
(b)
Those Technicians who join as Assistant Loco Pilot through lateral induction against
prescribed quota will also not be able to fulfil the 33 years qualifying service
condition as Loco Pilot.
(c)
The Ex-Servicemen joined as ALP will also not be able to fulfil 33 years qualifying service
condition as they are being inducted through RRB with upper age relaxation.
In view of the above, need has arisen to review the 33 years qualifying service condition
for ensuring that the LARSGESS is made applicable to Loco Pilot category in a real sense.
NFIR, therefore, requests the Railway Board to see that modified instructions are issued duly
deleting the condition of 33 years service for Loco Pilots to facilitate them to retire under
LARSGESS and avail employment opportunity to their wards.
Item No.36/2015
Sub:
In order to overcome the above difficult situation, NFIR urges upon the Railway Board to
arrange to conduct thorough review for streamlining the extant procedure for ensuring that
empanelled candidates are made available adequately for meeting the requirement and at the same
time for sparing the staff who sought inter railway/inter divisional transfer without much loss of time.
The subject is listed for discussion in the ensuing PNM Meeting.
Item No.37/2015
Sub:
Simultaneous creation of posts of Ticket Checking Staff when new trains are
introduced or runs extended-reg.
--------Although 2500 posts in the Ticket Checking category have been sanctioned vide Railway
Boards letter No. 2012/TG-V/10/COMMITTEE dated 26/12/2013, still there is very heavy shortage
of Ticket Examiners on the Zones due to non-creation of required number of posts for manning the
coaches as good number of trains were introduced during the past one decade. As the expectations of
passengers have risen and law & order situation deteriorated, there is absolute need to ensure
provision of adequate number of Ticket examiners for manning the coaches. At present the Ticket
Examiners are heavily over burdened with heavy additional work load in view of shortage.
In this context, NFIR invites Railway Boards attention to Boards orders vide letter No.
E(G)2003/EC/2-3 dated 31st October 2003 on the subject of review of cadre in Coach Maintenance
Depots. Vide this order, the Railway Board had decided that the posts required for maintenance of
rakes in coaching complexes in the context of introduction of new trains (2003-04 and onwards) will
be created on the lines being done for the crews by way of periodic review to the extant this involves
introduction/induction of coaches in new trains. NFIR is of the view that similar decision needs to be
given by the Railway Board for creation of the posts of Ticket Checking Staff for efficient manning
of coaches.
Incidentally, it is mentioned that the Committee constituted by the Railway Board on Ticket
Checking Staff in the year 2003 had also given its report for creation of posts on the lines the posts of
Running Crews are provided as and when new trains are introduced without linking to the money
value/matching surrender. Unfortunately no action has been taken on the report so far.
NFIR therefore urges upon the Railway Board to review the extant policy and accord
approval for creation of posts of Ticket Examiners when new trains are introduced/additional coaches
are attached or runs of the coaching trains are extended on the lines of provision of Running
Crews.
Item No.38/2015
Sub:
On Zonal Railways, good number of persons have been appointed as Technician Grade-III on
compassionate ground against 50% direct recruitment quota vacancies (item no. i above) and they
have also been subjected to 3 years regular training before their absorption in GP 1900/- as
Technician Gr III. These Technicians in course of time get promoted to the posts of Technician
Grade-II (GP 2400), Technician Grade-I (GP 2800/-) & Sr.Technician (GP 4200/-) duly clearing the
4
prescribed tests. All such staff naturally aspire for promotion opportunity as JE but however the same
is denied on the plea that they do not possess the ITI qualification.
NFIR contends that denial of opportunity to face selection to the post of JE against
Intermediate Apprentice quota of 25% vacancies is not justified for the reason that they have
undergone three years training initially and acquired skills equal to those possessing ITI. NFIR,
therefore, requests the Railway Board to issue instructions to the Zones/PUs, making eligible of those
Technicians who were initially appointed on compassionate ground as Technician-III for promotion
as JE against 25% Intermediate Apprentice quota.
Item No.39/2015
Sub:
Ref:
been finalised by the Railway Board so far, despite NFIRs reminder dated 06/04/2015, and the
scheme is yet to be implemented.
NFIR, therefore, urges upon the Railway Board to issue instructions for implementation of
the Smart Card Scheme as agreed to already.
Item No.41/2015
Sub:
Ref:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(b)
(c)
3.
The revised policy instructions have caused disappointment among staff who feel that earlier
system was facilitating them to prepare and clear the examination (two papers Part I and Part II).
It is also disappointing to note that greater flexibility has not been given in the case of those
staff who passed Part-I either in the year 2012 or in any other previous years. Para 2 (ii) of Boards
letter dated 03/03/2015 has clamped certain restrictions which need to be addressed for providing
opportunity to all irrespective of the year in which they passed Part-I examination.
NFIR, therefore, requests the Railway Board to review for restoring the instructions dated
6/11/2006 and in the meanwhile issue modified instructions duly granting exemption as sought
above.
6
Item No.42/2015
Sub:
It is noticed that the references/proposals sent by Zonal Railways relating to disposal of D&A
rules cases continued to remain pending at Railway Board level for years together, causing severe
hardship to the retired staff as their settlement dues have been with-held for years.
In this connection, NFIR suggests to the Railway Board to prescribe time limit for disposal of
cases in the interest of justice. For Railway Boards appreciation, a few cases are cited below as
example:
(a) Shri Y. Joseph, SSE (C&W), Central Railway, Miraj (retired from service on 31/03/2010)
GM (P) Central Railways letter No. HPB/M-DAR/YJ/PA dated 11/07/2013 to Railway
Board and NFIRs letter No. II/5/Pt. I dated 13/09/2013, 15/01/2014 & 11/04/2014.
(b) Shri S.V. Rao, Ex. AEE/Workshops, Kharagpur, SE Railway (retired from service w.e.f.
19/03/1990). NFIRs letter No. II/5 dated 07/12/2012, 03/09/2013, 19/10/2013, 24/01/2014 to
Railway Board.
(c) Shri KVP Ratna Raju, Chief Booking Supervisor (retired), S.C. Railway, Rajamundry,
Vijayawada Division:- GM/P/SC Railways letter No. SCR/P-HQ/425- DAR/A/C
1/BZA/K.V.P.R/35/2012 dated 4/06/2013 to Railway Board & NFIRs letter No. II/35/Part.
10 dated 04/11/2013 to Railway Board.
(d) Mr. Ram Kishan, Retired Technician II (Body Shop, CRWS/Bhopal, W.C. Railway
(Retired 4 years back). GM/WCR letter No.WCR/PHQ/DAR/RB dated 13/08/2014 to
Railway Board and Boards reference to GM/WCR vide letter No.E(D&A)2013AE 182 dated
03/07/2014.
NFIR, therefore, urges to see that systems are improved duly fixing time line for speedy
disposal of pending proposals of above nature. The status of progress made on the above cases may
also be furnished to the Federation.
Item No.45 (a)
Sub:
Ref:
(i)
promotion
of
Catering
Staff
of
On Northern Railway, the promotion quota vacancies against 33% quota in the pay scale of
Rs. 3200-4900/GP 2000 have not been filled by those in GP 1800/-, resulting no promotion
opportunity of those Bearers/Waiters in GP 1800/-. The 16 % quota vacancies to be filled through
competitive examination/selection for promotion to GP 2000/- have also not been filled since last
more than one decade.
The Northern Railway mentioned in its letter to Board that only five people are available in
GP 1800/- as on 01/01/2011 which is totally incorrect as large number of catering staff working in
Rail Bhavan/Parliament House Catering Unit are in GP 1800/- with no promotion benefit.
Summing up, NFIR requests the Railway Board to kindly consider the above points for
issuing orders for mitigating the hardships of catering staff.
Item No.45 (b)
Sub:
Ref:
Deputationist
----------On receiving reports that the names of all staff absorbed in IRCTC and still aspiring for
repatriation back to Railways have not been included in the list of Catering Staff circulated under
Boards letter No. E(NG)I-2003/TR/10/Pt. III dated 02/03/2015 for their repatriation back to
Railways, NFIR vide letter dated 01/06/2015 requested Railway Board to issue instructions to the
Managing Director/IRCTC and Zonal Railways for preparation of supplementary list of catering staff
who for the reasons beyond their control could not exercise option but are still desirous to go back to
Railways. NFIR requests the Railway Board to issue instructions accordingly.
The subject matter will be discussed in the ensuing PNM Meeting.
Item No.46/2015
Sub:
Ref:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
the
Technical
While inviting attention of the Railway Board to the above cited correspondence on the
subject, Federation desires to place following facts for proper appreciation:(i)
(ii)
In terms of instructions issued by the Railway Board vide letter No. PC-III/83/UPG/3
dated 21/06/1985 to the GM/Central Railway, the posts of Operators in DC Traction were
re-designated as Chargeman (operation) in pay scale Rs. 425-700, while extending
benefit of restructuring w.e.f. 01/05/1984 and nothing else can be construed.
Apart from above, NFIR wishes to clarify that the category of former
operators/chargeman and subsequently designated as JE have been allotted following
scales of pay/grade pay by the successive Pay Commissions:4th CPC
Rs. 425-700
(iii)
5th CPC
Rs. 5000-8000
6th CPC
PB-2+GP Rs. 4200
The position advised by the Railway Board vide letter dated 10/08/2010 on the basis of
report sent by Central Railway stating that the above category of staff has earned three
9
(iv)
(v)
promotions upto GP 4600 (Rs. 7540-11500) is totally incorrect particularly in view of the
position explained under items (i) and (ii) above.
As a matter of fact, placement of these staff in respective scales of pay and grade pay,
cannot take away the rights of staff either for promotion to next Grade Pay or for
financial upgradation under MACPS on completion of length of service of 10/20/30 years
in GP 4600/-, 4800/- & 5400/- respectively mainly because recruitment/entry grade of
these staff is now PB-2+GP Rs. 4200/-.
In support of above contention, Federation desires to reproduce the contents of condition
no. 5 mentioned in the Annexure to the MACP Scheme circulated under Railway Boards
letter dated 10/06/2009 which clearly covers the case of former Chargeman (operation)
DC Traction.
Promotion earned/upgradations granted under the ACP Scheme in the
past to those grades which now carry the same Grade Pay due to merger of
pay scales/upgradations of posts recommended by the Sixth Pay Commission
shall be ignored for the purpose of granting upgradations under Modified
ACPS.
NFIR, therefore, requests the Railway Board to issue necessary clarification to the
GM/Central Railway for granting financial upgradation in GP 4600, 4800 & 5400 to the Chargeman
(operation) DC Traction/JE whose recruitment grade pay is PB-2+GP 4200.
The subject matter is being placed for discussion in the ensuing PNM meeting.
Item No. 47/2015
Sub:
Ref:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
10
NFIR, therefore, requests the Railway Board to review the decision and issue instructions to
the General Manager, N.E. Railway to grant benefit of 3rd financial upgradation under MACPS to the
former Traffic Signallers/A2 Signallers absorbed as ASM.
The subject will be discussed in the ensuing PNM meeting.
Item No.48/2015
Sub:
Ref:
(i)
(ii)
The erroneously drawn seniority list of JE. P. Way has been circulated.
The employees joined East Central Railway on request transfer from other zones on
acceptance of bottom seniority have not been placed in their respective positions as per rules.
The inter-railway request transfers have been accepted and posted against the posts of JE-II
(P.Way) meant for promotion quota.
2.
Federation has further been given to understand that the panel of SSE/P. Way in GP 4600/formed vide East Central Railway, Danapur Divisions E.O.O. No. 651/2014 (Docket no.
E/Engg/Rect/Gr C/P. Way/Works/2013 dated /11/2014) giving benefit under Cadre Restructuring
Scheme w.e.f. 01/11/2013, contains the names of the candidates who have been allotted higher
positions in the seniority list wrongly, violating the rules laid down by the Railway Board as briefly
stated in para 1 above. This has resulted into deprival of promotion to those otherwise eligible to be
borne on the panel of SSE (P. Way).
11
3.
It has also been noticed that Sr.P.Way Supervisors were deprived of promotion as JE
(P.Way) as a result of acceptance of inter-railway transfer applicants against promotion quota.
4.
It is further seen that the Railway Administration has not been responding to the
representations for remedying injustice meted out to the staff.
NFIR therefore requests the Railway Board to arrange to investigate into the matter for
ensuring rectification of all irregularities and granting promotion benefits to the genuinely eligible
staff.
Item No.50/2015
Sub:
Ref:
(i)
(ii)
Ref:
(i)
instructions contained in letter No. E(NG)II/99/RR-1/15 dated 30th May 2000 followed by letter No.
E(NG)II/99/RR-1/15 Vol. IV dated 03/05/2006 wherein Board had permitted the Zonal Railways to
consider regular absorption of quasi administrative staff in the Railways against erstwhile Group D
vacancies (GP 1800). The West Central Railway in the said reference has raised a question as to
whether the minimum educational qualification presently in vogue (Railway Boards letter No.
E(NG)II/2009/RR-1/10/Pt. dated 05/01/2011 refers) is to be applied in the case of remaining staff or
the instructions issued earlier under letter dated 30th May 2000 and 3rd May 2006, referred to above,
are to be made applicable.
2.
In this connection, NFIR wishes to state that the Railway Board vide instructions dated 30th
May 2000, had categorically made it clear that only those staff of Quasi administrative
offices/organizations who were on roll continuously for a period of atleast three years as on
10/06/1997 and are still on roll, subject to fulfilment of educational qualification required for
recruitment to Group D posts are required to be absorbed. The instructions relating to 3 years
service were however liberalized vide Boards letter dated 03/05/2006.
3.
The Railway Board may please appreciate that the minimum educational qualification and
age limit which was in vogue at a given time i.e. 30th May 2000/3rd May 2006 shall be the criteria for
screening and absorption of quasi administrative staff against erstwhile Group D vacancies. It is
unfortunate to note that the West Central Railway has unnecessarily chosen to make a reference to
Railway Board when the GM is competent to take decision for absorption of the staff on the basis of
the educational qualification in vogue at that point of time as well as the age. The delay of a decade
in this case is due to administrative reasons best known to the authorities.
NFIR, therefore, urges the Railway Board to kindly issue clarification to the General
Manager/West Central Railway to screen and absorb the Quasi Administrative staff who fulfilled
conditions existed as on 30th May 2000/3rd May 2006.
Item No.52/2015
Sub:
Ref:
(i)
(ii)
13
Item No.53/2015
Sub:
Ref:
(i)
Ref:
(i)
2.
NFIR has also been given to understand that since the issue of filling up the posts of Crew
Controllers/Power Controllers etc is still under consideration in the Railway Boards office as
communicated to the Zonal Railways by the Railway Board under letter no. E(P&A)II/2009/RS-17
dated 27/03/2014 & 23/07/2014 respectively, obviously the selection has been finalized on Western
Railway (Ratlam Division) based on Boards instructions dated 12/11/2012 till final decision is
taken.
3.
Federation feels sad in conveying that the Western Railway authorities instead of issuing
posting orders to the selected and trained incumbents, have cancelled the selection vide DRM(P),
Ratlams letter No. E/L/1025/3/TRO/Part-6 dated 02/12/2014 under the influence of some vested
interests without citing any reason. The Western Railway Headquarters Office instead of providing
correct guidance to the Divisional authorities to implement panel have made a reference to the
Railway Board vide letter No. EM/834/8/2(AVC) Vol V dated 17/12/2014 to complicate the matters
further.
The improper action on the part of authorities in the Western Railway Headquarters and also
in the Division is questionable in view of the fact that at present the vacancies of Chief Loco
Inspector on Ratlam Division continued unfilled.
NFIR, therefore, requests the Railway Board to kindly intervene and see that immediate
instructions are issued to the General Manager, Western Railway, to restore the said selection panel
of CLIs, and issue posting orders to the selected and trained candidates.
Item No.55/2015
Sub:
Ref:
15
2.
In this connection, NFIR desires to mention that the instructions issued by the Railway Board
under letter dated 17/11/2005 were pursuant to discussion on NFIRs PNM item no. 23/2005, for
offering the candidates possessing Diploma in Mechanical/Electrical/Electronics Engineering, the
post of JE-II in scale Rs 5000-8000, presently in GP Rs 4200/-. Nowhere, it has been indicated for
subjecting the candidates to 2nd suitability test. Federation further desires to state that the extant
instructions of Railway Board provide for holding suitability test for Group C posts comprising of
written test & viva-voce and further laid down that the suitability of the candidate for a particular
post shall be adjudged subsequently by a Committee of three senior scale officers (which is 2nd stage
through viva-voce) for the purpose of allotment of a category/post to the candidate.
3.
Federation also conveys that on South Central Railway, the candidates proposed to be
considered for the post of JE-II, GP 4200 & 4600 are subjected to second screening test, which is
against the extant provisions of Railway Board. When the matter was dealt by the NFIR affiliate
SCRE Sangh at GM Level in the meeting, the Zonal Railway Administration has referred the matter
to the Board vide letter no. SCR/P-HQ/122/CGA/SCRES/2013 dated 06/01/2015 seeking
clarification on the following:(i)
(ii)
4.
In this connection, Federation desires to state that instructions already exist that
compassionate ground appointment be granted in the intermediate grade where Direct Recruitment
Quota in GP upto Rs. 4200/- is more than 25%. (Railway Boards letter No. E(NG)II/2009/RC1/SCR/39 dated 04/06/2010-RBE No. 80/2010). These instructions further provide that in cases
where request is for considering appointment in posts of GP 4200/- or more but where DR Quota is
25% or less such cases are to be referred to Railway Board for consideration. In order to avoid delay
these powers may be given to GMs.
NFIR, therefore, requests the Railway Board to issue suitable instructions so that the cases
could be settled expeditiously.
Item No.57/2015
Sub:
Ref:
GM/W.Rly, without appreciating the difficulties faced in managing train services in the absence of
Guards.
NFIR, therefore, requests the Railway Board to consider the difficult situation prevailing on
the Divisions of Western Railway and accord approval to the proposal of GM/Western Railway as a
one time dispensation as a special case.
Item No.58/2015
Sub:
Ref:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(ii)
In terms of para 4.2 of Railway Boards letter dated 8th October 2013, the selections can
be finalised as upto 01/11/2013. Rightly, the administration, having finalised selection for
promotion to the post of Station Master GP 4600/- well before 8th October 2013, had
issued promotion & posting orders as per panel published on 31st October 2013. Some of
these Station Masters have declined promotion (probably they have been ordered transfer
on promotion), with hope that they would be granted promotion under cadre restructuring
on as is where is basis with effect from 01/11/2013 in terms of Boards letter dated 08th
October 2013.
Vide para 11 of Boards letter dated 08th October 2013, it has been stated that such of the
staff who had refused promotion before issue of these orders and stand debarred for
promotion, may be considered for promotion in relaxation to the extant provisions as a
onetime exception. This very para has been given different interpretation by the Railway
Board vide letter No. PC-III/2013/CRC/7 (Pt. II) dated 15/12/2014 addressed to CPO
(A), Western Railway ignoring the fact that the incumbents were selected as a result of
finalization of selection and promoted on 31/10/2013 against the vacancies already
existed prior to 31/10/2013. In the instant case, the staff have declined promotion because
the cadre restructuring would benefit them with advantage of retention on promotion.
3.
A careful scrutiny of Western Railways letter No. ET/1025/4/4/ADI(L) dated 19/11/2014
would throw light that the case referred by Western Railway is very genuine and aimed at giving
benefit to those seniors selected against pre - October 2013 vacancies of Station Masters in GP
4600/- as promotions have been ordered on 31st October 2013. Hence, those who declined the said
promotion are required to be considered against restructured posts for promotion w.e.f. 01/11/2013.
NFIR, therefore, urges the Railway Board to review the case de-novo for protecting the
genuine interests of empanelled and promoted station masters on Western Railway.
Item No.59/2015
Sub:
Ref:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
17
Further to above references, NFIR brings the following issues for quick redressal :(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
The Uniform supplied is non-branded and substandard. The staff are bitterly complaining
against poor quality of cloth.
NFIR, therefore, requests the Railway Board to redress the above issues satisfactorily for
enhancing the morale of staff.
Item No.60(a)
Sub:
(i) Creation of 367 revenue non-gazetted posts for Habibganj - Bina 3rd Line
of Engineering Department on Bhopal division, W.C. Rly.
(ii) Creation of 281 revenue non-gazetted posts for maintenance of new track
at Mawai-Chatarpur of Engineering department on Jabalpur division.
(i)
S.No.
Proposal regarding
13,15,06,800
10,24,55,088
288
Federation has also been given to understand that the WCR have sent the above proposals
duly enclosing prescribed check list and other related documents required by the Board. Federation
also reminds that the above proposals have been pending in the Railway Board awaiting sanction
causing practical difficulty for the Zonal Railway in maintenance of the new assets since built and
equally burdening the existing staff with heavy additional work load.
NFIR, therefore, requests the Railway Board to communicate sanction for creation of the
above mentioned posts duly providing matching money value from Railway Boards Vacancy Bank
early for maintenance of new assets by the Open Line Administration.
18
19