Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
The Environment and Security Initiative (ENVSEC) transforms environment and security risks into
regional cooperation. The Initiative provides multistakeholder environment and security assessments and facilitates joint action to reduce tensions and increase cooperation between groups and
countries. ENVSEC comprises the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE),
Regional Environmental Centre for Central and Eastern Europe (REC), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), United
Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) as an
associated partner. The ENVSEC partners address environment and security risks in four regions:
Eastern Europe, South Eastern Europe, Southern Caucasus and Central Asia.
CLIMATE CHANGE
IN THE WEST BALKANS
This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part in any form
for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission
from the copyright holders, provided acknowledgement of the
source is made. UNEP and Zo Environment Network would appre
ciate receiving a copy of any material that uses this publication as
a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for
any commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in
written form from the copyright holders. The use of information from
this publication concerning proprietary products for advertising is
not permitted.
Text:
Geoff Hughes
Maps and graphics:
Matthias Beilstein, Yann Demont
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ADAPTATION
IN THE REGION
68
VULNERABILITY
42
GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS AND
MITIGATION
28
CLIMATE CHANGE
IN THE REGION
20
BACKGROUND
08
FOREWORD
This report forms part of an awareness-raising
campaign by the United Nations Environment
Programme and the Environment and Security
initiative on the effects of climate change.
Representatives of governments, international orga
nizations, civil society organizations and research
institutions and other experts from the region have
compiled this booklet with the objective of revealing
and explaining the linkages between people and
the environment in the Balkans. Climate change
is a complex process that can exacerbate threats
caused by persistent poverty, by weak institutions
for the management of resources and for conflict
resolution, by a history of broken communication
channels and mistrust between communities and
nations and by inadequate access to vital natural
resources such as water and arable land.
Our intention is to stimulate a policy debate and
to contribute to a society that is better informed
about upcoming environmental challenges, even
tually strengthening the basis for planning for
the inevitable consequences of climate change.
Effective governance and political and economic
Jan Dusik
Acting Regional Director for Europe
United Nations Environment Programme
Guest list of the official COP 15 Royal Climate Change dinner in Copenhagen http://kongehuset.dk/publish.php?id=23249
H.E. Prime Minister Sali Ram Berisha (Albania)
H.E. President Stjepan Mesi (Croatia)
H.E. President Gjorge Ivanov (Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia)
H.E. Prime Minister Milo Dukanovi (Montenegro)
H.E. President Boris Tadi (Serbia)
Climate change in the West Balkans: Key findings, trends and projections
ALBANIA1
BOSNIA
AND
HERZEGOVINA
CROATIA
THE FORMER
YUGOSLAV
REPUBLIC OF
MACEDONIA
MONTENEGRO
SERBIA
n.a.
increase, enhancement
decrease, reduction
variable
Information related to vulnerability assessment and adaptation options is based on the study focused on the Drini River Cascade (area from Kukes up to the Lezha Plain).
Air temperature change covers only 11-year period 1990-2000 compared to reference period (1961-1990).
Precipitation change covers only period 1999-2008 compared to reference period (1961-1990).
Lower river flows are expected although scenarios are to be introduced in Second National Communication; water managers are still using historical climate data to design water
infrastructure and guide management decisions.
In West Balkan countries reliable health statistics on the impacts of climate change on population health, illness and mortality do not exist, since mandatory health records do not contain information for
such a complex evaluation. According to National Communications under the UNFCCC, estimated data indicate an increase in the number of strokes and mortalities, mostly as a result of higher temperatures.
Greenhouse gas emissions are available only for the base year (1990).
Basic systems providing information on water resources were never rebuilt after the breakdown of the former Bosnia and Herzegovina Hydrometeorological Service during the early 1990s.
One of proposed adaptation measures is the development of a Hydrological Information System.
Sources: Most recent National Communications to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
7000
Croatia
6000
5000
4000
3000
Montenegro
2000
Bosnia and
Herzegovina
Albania
Kosovo*
Serbia
1000
0
1995
2000
2005
UNSC 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.
2009
Source: World Bank, 2011.
R U S S IA
Vienna
Budapest
R U S S IA
AVienna
U STR IA- H U N GARY
Budapest
Zagreb
R U S S IA
R O M A N I A
Bucharest
Zagreb
Budapest
Belgrade
E RY B I A
A U S T RSarajevo
I A - H U N G AS R
R O M A N I A
Bucharest
Sofia
Zagreb
Belgrade
SarajevoMONTENEGRO
S E R B IA
R O M A N I A
Belgrade
Bucharest
Sofia
OTTO MAN
EMPIRE
I T A L Y SarajevoMONTENEGRO
Constantinople
S E R B IA
O T T O M A NSofia
EMPIRE
MONTENEGRO
Congress of Berlin
Constantinople
Constantinople
Congress of Berlin
1878
CZECHOSLOVAKIA
Congress of Berlin
Vienna
Budapest
AUSTRIA
CZECHOSLOVAKIA
Vienna
Zagreb
AUSTRIA
Zagreb
POLAND
SOVIET UNION
POLAND
SOVIET UNION
H U N GARY
Vienna
Zagreb
AUSTRIA
Budapest
CZECHOSLOVAKIA
H U N GARY
Belgrade
Budapest
SOVIET UNION
R OB UML G
A ANR IIA A
Constantinople
B U LGAR IA
TURKEY
I TALY
1923
ALBANIA
G R E E C E
Constantinople
I TALY
1923
ALBANIA
G R E E C E
Constantinople
1923
TURKEY
SLOVAKIA G R E E CU EK R A I N E
Treaty of Lausanne
Vienna
AUSTRIA
Vienna
SLOVENIA
AUSTRIA
Sofia
TURKEY
Budapest
SLOVAKIA
H U N GARY
U K R A I MOLDOVA
N E
Budapest R O M UA K
N RI AA I MOLDOVA
N E
Zagreb SLOVAKIA
C R O AHT U
I AN G A R Y
Vienna
Bucharest
SLOVENIA BOSNIA AND Budapest
AUSTRIA
Zagreb
Belgrade R O M A N I A MOLDOVA
C RHERZEGOVINA
O AHT U
I AN G A R Y
Bucharest
Sarajevo
SLOVENIABOSNIA
B UA LNGIAAR I A
Zagreb AND YUGOSLAVIA
Belgrade R O M
Sofia
C RHERZEGOVINA
OAT IA
Bucharest
Sarajevo
THE FORMER YUGOSLAV
BOSNIA
AND
REPUBLIC OF
B
U LGAR IA
YUGOSLAVIA
Belgrade
MACEDONIA
I T A L Y HERZEGOVINA
Sofia
Istanbul
ALBANIA
Sarajevo
THE FORMER YUGOSLAV
I TALY
1995
Dayton Agreement
I TALY
1995
Dayton Agreement
1995
Dayton Agreement
B U LGAR IA
REPUBLIC OF
YUGOSLAVIA
TURKEY
MACEDONIA
Istanbul
G
R
E
ESofia
C E
ALBANIA
THE FORMER YUGOSLAV
REPUBLIC OF
MACEDONIA
ALBANIA
G R E E C E
TURKEY
Istanbul
TURKEY
G R E E C E
R O M A N I A
B U LGAR IA
Bucharest
Sofia
R O M A N I A
B U LGAR IA
Bucharest
Sofia
Constantinople
I TALY
1913
I TALY
1913
ALBANIA
G R E E C E
OTTO MAN
Constantinople
EMPIRE
OTTO MAN
1913
EMPIRE
CZECHOSLOVAKIAG R E E C E
SOVIET UNION
After Balkan Wars
Vienna
Budapest
AUSTRIA
CZECHOSLOVAKIA
Zagreb
SOVIET UNION
H U N GARY
Budapest
CZECHOSLOVAKIA
H U N GARY
R O M A N I A
SOVIET UNION
Bucharest
Belgrade
Budapest
R O M A N I A
Y U HG UONS GL A
AV
R IYA
Bucharest
Belgrade
Sarajevo
B UA LNG IAAR I A
R O M
Y U G O S LAV IA
Sofia
Bucharest
Belgrade
Sarajevo
B U LGAR IA
Sarajevo
Treaty of Lausanne
S E R B IA
Belgrade
I T A L Y SarajevoMONTENEGRO
ALBANIA
S E R B IA
Sofia
Bucharest
Sofia
Bucharest
S E R B IA
Zagreb
Belgrade
SarajevoMONTENEGRO
R OBucharest
M A N I A
LAV IA
I T A L Y Y U G O S ALBANIA
R U S S IA
R O M A N I A
Budapest
Belgrade
A U S T RSarajevo
IA- H U N GARY
Vienna
Zagreb
AUSTRIA
POLAND
Belgrade
Sarajevo
Treaty of Lausanne
Zagreb
R O M A N I A
Bucharest
Belgrade
Sarajevo
Y U G O S LAV IA
Budapest
AVienna
U STR IA- H U N GARY
Vienna
Zagreb
AUSTRIA
Y U HGUONSGL A
AV
R IYA
R U S S IA
AVienna
U STR IA- H U N GARY
OTTO MAN E M PI R E
I TALY
1878
Budapest
Zagreb
AVienna
U STR IA- H U N GARY
I TALY
1878
R U S S IA
Vienna
B U LGAR IA
LAV IA
I T A L Y Y U G O S ALBANIA
Sofia
Sarajevo
B U LGAR IA
Istanbul
TURKEY
I TALY
1945
ALBANIA
G R E ESofia
C E
I TALY
1945
ALBANIA
G R E E C E
1945
TURKEY
SLOVAKIA G R E E CU EK R A I N E
AUSTRIA
Vienna
SLOVENIA
AUSTRIA
Istanbul
TURKEY
Budapest
SLOVAKIA
H U N GARY
Istanbul
U K R A I MOLDOVA
N E
Budapest R O M UA K
N RI AA I MOLDOVA
N E
Zagreb SLOVAKIA
C R O AH
T IUA N G A R Y
Vienna
Bucharest
SLOVENIABOSNIA AND Budapest
AUSTRIA
Zagreb
Belgrade R O M A N I A MOLDOVA
C RHERZEGOVINA
O AHT U
I AN G A R Y
SERBIA
Bucharest
Sarajevo
SLOVENIA BOSNIA
B U LGAR IA
Zagreb ANDMONTENEGRO
Belgrade R O M A N I A
Sofia
C RHERZEGOVINA
OAT IA
Kosovo*
Bucharest
SERBIA
Sarajevo
THE FORMER YUGOSLAV
BOSNIA
AND
REPUBLIC OF
B
U LGAR IA
Belgrade
MONTENEGRO
MACEDONIA
I T A L Y HERZEGOVINA
Sofia
Kosovo*
Istanbul
ALBANIA
SERBIA
Sarajevo
THE FORMER YUGOSLAV
B U LGAR IA
REPUBLIC OF
MONTENEGRO
T
URKEY
MACEDONIA
I TALY
Kosovo*G R E ESofia
Istanbul
ALBANIA
C E
2011
T UandRtheK
* This designation is without prejudice to positions
on status, and is in line with UNSC 1244
MACEDONIA
T A L onY the Kosovo Declaration
ICJIOpinion
of Independence.
Istanbul
ALBANIA
2011
EY
G R E E C E
T Uand
R the
KE
* This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSC 1244
ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.
G R E E C E
2011
* This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSC 1244 and the
ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.
11
Graz
A U S T R I A
Szkesfehrvr
Veszprm
Subotica
Sav
Karlovac
Pula
be
Danu
C R O A T I A
Osijek
Timishoara
Brcko
Sarajevo
Split
Pescara
Bijelo Polje
MONTENEGRO
Dubrovnik
Manfredonia
Benevento
I T A L Y
Salerno
Potenza
Taranto
Sofia
Pristina
Tirana
MACEDONIA
Bitola
ALBANIA
Brindisi
Korche
Ioannina
E
Larisa
Kerkyra
Cosenza
Khaskovo
Kavala
Kastoria
Vlor
Arta
Catanzaro
Lamia
A G E A N
Volos
Crotone
12
Serres
imo
nas
Thessaloniki
Str
Stara-Zagora
Dimitrovgrad
Krdzhali
Durrs
Lecce
Plovdiv
Blagoevgrad
Veles
Gostivar
Slive
Ya
Pernik
Skopje
Veliko Trnovo
Gabrovo
Kyustendil
Shkoder
Bar
Bari
Raz
B U L G A R I A
Leskovac
s
Axio
Napoli
Giurgiu
Ruse
Pleven
Vratsa
Kosovo*
Podgorica
C
S
Foggia
Novi Pazar
BUCURETI
Danube
Nis
Craiova
Vidin
Mostar
Ploieti
Piteshti
Bor
Morava
Kragujevac
Buz
Olt
S E R B I A
i na
Dr
HERZEGOVINA
DrobetaTurnu Severin
One
Braov
Ramnicu
Valcea
Belgrade
Tuzla
Sibiu
R O M A N I A
Panchevo
BOSNIA AND
res
Mu
Sfntu
Gheorghe
l
hu
Novi Sad
Slavonski Brod
Banja Luka
Zadar
Deva
Tisza
v
Dra
Zagreb
Arad
Pecs
Rom
Bacu
Cluj-Napoca
Szeged
Ljubljana
Rijeka
Kecskemet
H U N G A R Y
SLOVENIA
Trieste
Bistria
Zalaegerszeg
n
to
Bala
Klagenfurt
Piatra
Neam
Zlau
S E A
POPULATION AND
MIGRATION
The demography of the Balkans is anything but static.
Populations are ageing, fertility rates are declining
and people are moving from rural to urban areas.
Ethnic distributions within countries have political
implications regarding the rationale for statehood,
and international ethnic migration within the region is
high as is emigration to other nearby states, Europe,
the United States and other western countries.
7
6
5
Croatia
Bosnia and
Herzegovina
Albania
4
3
2
1
0
1995
Montenegro
2000
2005
2009
Source: World Bank, 2011.
13
18
16
14
12
10
8
Serbia
Montenegro
6
4
Croatia
Albania
Bosnia and
Herzegovina
0
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
400,000
800,000
1,200,000
14
Szombathely
Graz
A U S T R I A
Szkesfehrvr
Veszprm
Zalaegerszeg
Klagenfurt
Sav
Pula
Subotica
C R O A T I A
Karlovac
Szeged
Osijek
Deva
R O M A N I A
Brcko
DrobetaTurnu Severin
Belgrade
Tuzla
S E R B I A
HERZEGOVINA
Kragujevac
Sarajevo
Buz
Ploieti
Piteshti
BUCURET
Craiova
Bor
Vidin
Giurgiu
Ruse
Raz
Split
Mostar
Pescara
Bijelo Polje
MONTENEGRO
Dubrovnik
S
Foggia
Manfredonia
Benevento
Salerno
Potenza
Taranto
Leskovac
Sofia
Tirana
MACEDONIA
Kerkyra
50
Crotone
Kavala
Kastoria
Vlor
Ioannina
Population density
Krdzhali
Thessaloniki
Korche
G
Cosenza
Serres
Bitola
E
Larisa
A G E A N
Volos
Arta
Catanzaro
Lamia
S E A
15
Slive
Stara-Zagora
Dimitrovgrad
Khaskovo
Blagoevgrad
Veles
ALBANIA
Lecce
Plovdiv
Kyustendil
Skopje
Durrs
Brindisi
Gabrovo
Pernik
Gostivar
Veliko Trnovo
B U L G A R I A
Pristina
Shkoder
Bar
Bari
I T A L Y
Napoli
Pleven
Vratsa
Kosovo*
Podgorica
Nis
Novi Pazar
One
Braov
Ramnicu
Valcea
Panchevo
BOSNIA AND
Sfntu
Gheorghe
Sibiu
re
Mu
Novi Sad
Slavonski Brod
Banja Luka
Zadar
Arad
Timishoara
Rom
Bacu
Cluj-Napoca
Tisza
Zagreb
Ljubljana
Rijeka
Kecskemet
Pecs
Piatra
Neam
Bistria
H U N G A R Y
SLOVENIA
Trieste
Zlau
Ya
Migration 2010
Albania
Bosnia and
Herzegovina
Croatia
Kosovo*
The former
Yugoslav
Republic
of Macedonia
Montenegro
Serbia
4321
Total
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
Stock of Emigrants
Stock of Immigrants
N/A
* This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSC
1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.
Source: World Bank, 2010.
16
Age pyramids
350 230
115
115
230
350
350 230
115
115
230
350
females
115
115
230
350
100+
90-94
80-84
70-74
60-64
50-54
40-44
30-34
20-24
10-14
0-4
230
230
115
115
230
350
males
0
0 115 230 350
Thousands
Montenegro
350
350
Kosovo*
350 230
Croatia
115
350
230
115
115
230 350
115
115
230
Serbia
115
230
350
350
230
350
17
AUSTRIA
HUNGARY
Ljubljana
Zagreb
SLOVENIA
Rijeka
Novi Sad
Banja Luka
Zadar
Knin
Split
ROMANIA
Subotica
CROATIA
Brcko
BOSNIAHERZEGOVINA
Sarajevo
Gorazde
Mostar
Belgrade
SERBIA
Novi
Pazar
MONTENEGRO
Dubrovnik
Podgorica
Pristina
Kosovo
BULGARIA
Skopje
THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF
ITALY
MACEDONIA
ALBANIA
GREECE
18
Albania
Finland
Norway
Croatia
Sweden
Denmark
Map produced by ZO Environment Network, March 2012.
Source: World Bank, 2010 ( www.worldbank.org).
Ireland
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Germany
Poland
Belgium
Czech Republic
France
Switzerland
Hungary
Austria
Slovenia
Other Europe
Croatia
Bosnia and
Herzegovina
Serbia
Other
Montenegro* Kosovo* +
The former Yugoslav
Republic of
Macedonia
Portugal
Albania
Spain
Canada
Italy
Greece
ali
str
Au
United States
Turkey
19
CLIMATE CHANGE IN
THE REGION
CLIMATE CHANGE
IN THE REGION
21
CLIMATE CHANGE
IN THE REGION
The Balkan countries experience a range of
climates out of proportion to the size of their
geographic area.
Albania has a Mediterranean climate with mild,
wet winters and hot, dry summers, as does the
southern part of Montenegro and the coastal and
lowland areas of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The
climate in the remaining areas of Bosnia and
Herzegovina ranges from temperate continental
to alpine. Most of Croatia has a moderately warm,
rainy climate. The far north of Montenegro has a
continental climate, and the central and northern
parts have some characteristics of mountain
climate, but with Mediterranean Sea influences on
temperature and precipitation.
22
i n
AUSTRIA
AUSTRIA M O L D O V A
H U N G A R Y
SLOVENIA
C R O AT I A
BOSNIA AND
SLOVENIA
R O M A N I A
MONTENEGRO
Kosovo*
R O M A N I A
C R O AT I A
BOSNIA AND
S E R B I A
HERZEGOVINA
M
H U N G A R Y
HERZEGOVINA
S E R B I A
MONTENEGRO
Kosovo*
B U LGAR IA
ALBANIA
I T A L Y
MACEDONIA
G R E E C E
B U LGAR IA
ALBANIA
I T A L Y
MACEDONIA
G R E E C E
C per year
-0.005 0
-0.2
-0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3%
23
Pula
Panchevo
Banja Luka
B O SBALKANS
NIA AND
CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE WEST
Brcko
Belgrade
Tuzla
Ploieti
DrobetaTurnu Severin
Piteshti
BUCURETI
Craiova
S E R B I A
Giurgiu
Bor
HERZEGOVINA
Kragujevac
Ruse
Vidin
Sarajevo
The Balkans are getting warmer and are projected significant increase in the incidence of dry days.
Razgrad
to continue on this Split
warming trend generally in In the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Pleven
Mostar
proportion to the expected increase
in global where the frequency and intensity
of floods and
Vratsa
Novi Pazar
Nis
temperatures. Similarly, the region is receiving
droughts
has
already
increased
Ioannina
Kerkyra
Cosenza
Crotone
Larisa
Volos
Arta
Lamia
Catanzaro
Increase
Decrease
Risk of desertification
Risk of floods
Drought and heat waves
Projected change in mean seasonal and annual river flow
between 2071-2100 and the reference period 1961-1990
Increase
Stable
Decrease
* This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSC 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.
Sources: Global Risk Data Platform ( www.preventionweb.net/english/maps); European Environment Agency ( www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/sensitivity-to-desertification-index-map); European Environment Agency
( www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/projected-change-in-mean-seasonal-and-annual-river-flow-between-2071-2100-and-the-reference-period-1961-1990); Climate Wizard ( www.climatewizard.org);
The Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe (REC) ( www.rec.org/topicarea.php?id=11§ion=events&event=12).
24
Zalaegerszeg
n
B al at o
Klagenfurt
Arad Mur
eshu
Subotica
Timishoara
C R O A T I A
Osijek
Slavonski Brod
Sa
va
Pula
Novi Sad
BOSNIA AND
Brcko
Sarajevo
Morava
Kragujevac
Split
Craiova
Bor
Pescara
Bijelo Polje
Dubrovnik
Podgorica
C
S
Manfredonia
Foggia
Benevento
Leskovac
Durrs
I T A L Y
Potenza
Brindisi
Lecce
Taranto
Plovdiv
Stara-Zagora
Dimitrovgrad
Krdzhali
MACEDONIA
Bitola
Korche
Kerkyra
Crotone
Str
imo Serres
nas
E
Larisa
A G E A N
Volos
Arta
Lamia
Catanzaro
Kavala
Thessaloniki
Kastoria
Vlor
Ioannina
S E A
Slive
Gabrovo
Tundzh
Khaskovo
Blagoevgrad
Veles
Veliko Trnovo
Tirana
G
Cosenza
Sofia
Kyustendil
Skopje
ALBANIA
Salerno
B U L G A R I A
Pernik
Kosovo*
Gostivar
Bari
Pristina
Shkoder
Bar
Raz
Vratsa
Nis
s
Axio
Napoli
Novi Pazar
MONTENEGRO
Giurgiu
Ruse
Pleven
BUCURET
Danube
Vidin
Mostar
Ploieti
Piteshti
Olt
S E R B I A
i na
Dr
HERZEGOVINA
Zadar
Braov
Buz
Ramnicu
Valcea
Belgrade
Tuzla
Sibiu
DrobetaTurnu Severin
One
Sfntu
Gheorghe
R O M A N I A
Panchevo
Banja Luka
Deva
a
Tisz
Karlovac
Rijeka
Rom
Bac
Cluj-Napoca
Szeged
Pecs
Dr
Zagreb
Ljubljana
av
a
Piatra
Neam
Bistria
Kecskemet
H U N G A R Y
SLOVENIA
Trieste
Zlau
Siret
A U S T R I A
Szkesfehrvr
Veszprm
Evro
Szombathely
Graz
25
Present risks intensified by climate warming
Risk of floods
Ya
26
Low
High
Business as usual
Dramatic impacts
Economic Growth
27
GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS AND
MITIGATION
GREENHOUSE
GAS EMISSIONS
AND MITIGATION
29
Bosnia and
Herzegovina
8
7
6
5
Serbia and
Montenegro
4
3
Montenegro
Albania
1
0
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
10
0
1995
30
China
2000
2005
4,000
2,000
2008
2005
2006
2007
2008
Sources: World Bank, United Nations, 2011.
6,000
15
2004
8,000
USA
20
2003
China
7,031
USA
5,461
European Union (27)
4,186
0
Sources: World Bank, United Nations, 2011.
AUSTRIA
HUNGARY
SLOVENIA
CROATIA
ROMANIA
BOSNIA AND
HERZEGOVINA
MONTENEGRO
SERBIA
BULGARIA
Kosovo*
MACEDONIA
I T A L Y
ALBANIA
50000
G R E E C E
20000
10000
5000
31
AUSTRIA
HUNGARY
SLOVENIA
CROATIA
304
ROMANIA
1108
663
BOSNIA AND
HERZEGOVINA
SERBIA
294
BULGARIA
Kosovo*
MONTENEGRO
THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF
MACEDONIA
I T A L Y
ALBANIA
182
655
32
G R E E C E
33
ALBANIA
Between 1990 and 2000, Albanias GHG emissions
associated with land use change and forestry
declined significantly, while emissions in all other
sectors increased. Because land use change
and forestry represented such a large proportion
of total emissions in the base year (45 per cent),
the total emissions for the country declined in the
period by 3 per cent. The increase in emissions
in the energy sector combined with the decline in
land use change and forestry emissions resulted
in the energy sector having the highest proportion
of total emissions in Albania in 2000. The waste
sector shows the highest percentage increase, but
in absolute terms, waste emissions rose less than
in any other sector except industrial processes.
waste
agriculture
industrial processes
energy
-100%
-50%
0%
50%
100%
150%
Note: no data available on transport and fugitive emissions from fuels for Albania.
Note: comparison between base year and year with latest available data.
34
200%
250%
300%
350%
35
CROATIA
In both 1990 and 2007, the energy sector in
Croatia accounted for almost 70 per cent of the
countrys total GHG emissions. Emissions in the
waste, fugitive emissions, transport and energy
sectors all increased between 1990 and 2007,
while in the agriculture and industrial processes
sectors emissions declined. Absorption of GHG
emissions in the land use change and forestry
sector increased, thus further reducing total
emissions. The highest percentage changes
occurred in transport, land use change and
forestry and waste. The overall GHG emissions
during this period increased by 6 per cent.
Croatia has already implemented an impressive
array of mitigation measures across all sectors,
and has identified additional measures as either
adopted or planned. In the energy sector, the
country has implemented measures to promote
the use of renewable energy sources in electricity
generation, the application of cogeneration and
36
- 50%
- 40%
- 30%
- 20%
- 10%
Note: Croatia is the only Annex I country from the region and therefore
has committed to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases by 5 per cent as
compared to the base year (1990) during the first mandatory
period (2008-2012) under the Kyoto Protocol.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Note: comparison between base year and year with latest available data.
Source: Fifth national communication of the Republic of Croatia, 2010.
37
GHG emissions change from 1990 to 2002 in the former Yugoslav Republic
of Macedonia
land use change
and forestry
waste
agriculture
industrial processes
fugitive emissions from fuels
transport
energy
- 90%
- 80%
- 70%
- 60%
- 50%
- 40%
- 30%
- 20%
- 10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
Note: comparison between base year and year with latest available data.
Source: Second national communication of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, 2008.
38
MONTENEGRO
Montenegros overall GHG emissions decreased
between 1990 and 2003 by 2 per cent, with
the largest contribution coming from land use
change and forestry. While energy emissions
increased slightly in this period, the proportion of
total emissions attributable to the energy sector
increased slightly from 51 per cent to 54 per
cent. The largest percentage change in emissions
came from absorption in the land use and forestry
sector, but in 2003 this sector accounted for only
17 per cent of total emissions.
In its initial communication to the UNFCCC,
Montenegro identifies emission reduction stra
tegies for each sector. Strategies for the energy
- 70%
- 60%
- 50%
- 40%
Note: comparison between base year and year with latest available data.
- 30%
- 20%
- 10%
0%
10%
20%
39
SERBIA
Between 1990 and 1998 Serbias GHG emissions
declined by 22 per cent with most of the reduction
coming from the energy sector, which accounted
for 79 per cent of Serbias GHG emissions in 1998.
Emissions in the land use change and forestry and
waste sectors experienced significant percentage
changes, but these sectors represent a small
proportion of overall emissions.
Serbias mitigation plans for the energy sector
include improving energy efficiency and using
more renewable energy sources. Automation,
monitoring and waste energy utilization are the
main strategies for reducing emissions in the
- 20%
- 10%
Note: comparison between base year and year with latest available data.
40
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
A green economy results in improved human wellbeing and social equity, while significantly reducing
environmental risks and ecological scarcities. In
its simplest expression, a green economy can be
thought of as one that is low-carbon, resourceefficient and socially inclusive.
United Nations green economy report
41
VULNERABILITY
VULNERABILITY
43
44
Vulnerability index
Tajikistan
Albania
Kyrgyz Republic
Armenia
Uzbekistan
Georgia
Azerbaijan
Turkmensitan
Turkey
Moldova
The former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia
Serbia
Russia
Bosnia and
Herzegovina
Bulgaria
Kazakhstan
Romania
Belarus
Ukraine
Latvia
Poland
Croatia
Lithuania
Slovakia
Hungary
Estonia
Czech Republic
Slovenia
0
10
15
20
25
45
EXPOSURE AND
SENSITIVITY
The exposure index measures the strength of
future climate change relative to todays natural
variability, and includes both annual and seasonal
temperature and precipitation indicators. It
combines the number of additional hot, dry and
wet years; hot, dry and wet summers; and hot, dry
and wet winters projected over the 20702100
period relative to the 19611990 period. On this
relative scale, the higher scores signify higher
exposure.
46
Exposure index
Serbia
The former
Yugoslav
Republic
of Macedonia
Croatia
Bosnia and
Herzegovina
Albania
10
15
20
25
Sensitivity index
Serbia
The former
Yugoslav
Republic
of Macedonia
Croatia
Bosnia and
Herzegovina
Albania
0
10
15
20
25
47
48
Szombathely
Graz
A U S T R I A
Szkesfehrvr
Veszprm
Zalaegerszeg
n
to
Bala
Klagenfurt
Nere
tv a
Ta
mi
Tirana
Elbasan
complex
Durrs
ALBANIA
Taranto
Brindisi
Lecce
S em
Vlor
an
V jo
Pleven
B U L G A R I A
Sofia
Podgarec
Korche
se
MACEDONIA
Bitola
Kavadarci
Plovdiv
Serres
Kavala
G
Ioannina
Kerkyra
E
Larisa
A G E A N
Volos
Arta
Lamia
Gabrovo
S E A
49
Slive
Stara-Zagora
Dimitrovgrad
Khaskovo
Thessaloniki
Kastoria
Veliko Trnovo
Krdzhali
ma
Stru
Potenza
Bari
Salerno
Leskovac
Giurgiu
Ruse
Raz
Vratsa
Nis
BUCURET
Danube
ar
Vard
I T A L Y
Craiova
Manfredonia
Vidin
Suplja-Stena
Dubrovnik
Bor
complex
Ploieti
Piteshti
Olt
Benevento
Napoli
Stan Terg
MONTENEGRO
S
Foggia
Morava
Bijelo Polje
Buz
Zeta
in a
Dr
tina
Ce
A
Pescara
S E R B I A
One
Braov
Ramnicu
Valcea
Kolubara
Novi Pazar
Mojkovac
Sfntu
Gheorghe
Sibiu
DrobetaTurnu Severin
Rom
Bac
R O M A N I A
Panchevo
Srebrenica Kragujevac
Sarajevo
Mostar
Zajaca
Tuzla
HERZEGOVINA
Split
Vares
res
Mu
l
hu
Belgrade
Brcko
Bos
na
a
Un
Zadar
Novi Sad
BOSNIA AND
Jajce
Deva
Timishoara
Timok
Banja Luka
Osijek
Slavonski Brod
Vrb
as
Pula
Arad
Tisza
Sav
be
Danu
C R O A T I A
Karlovac K u p a
Subotica
Piatra
Neam
Bistria
Cluj-Napoca
Szeged
Pecs
v
Dra
Zagreb
Ljubljana
Rijeka
Kecskemet
H U N G A R Y
SLOVENIA
Trieste
Zlau
Ya
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
All societies have inherent abilities to deal
with certain variations in climate, yet adaptive
capacities are unevenly distributed, both across
countries and within societies.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Fourth Assessment Report
Adaptation is a risk management strategy that
intends to respond to the inevitable effects of
climate change, and to enhance resilience the
capacity to respond to a change in a function or in
an environmental condition by resisting damage
and recovering quickly. Ecosystems with a higher
capacity to adapt are less vulnerable to the effects
of climate change. For regions or countries or
economic sectors, the capacity to adapt similarly
determines their degree of vulnerability.
The West Balkan countries face several challenges
to their capacity to adapt. Countries with well
established, effective governance and strong,
stable economies have a distinct advantage in
their adaptive capacity. As the recent history of
conflict in the region recedes into the past, the
Balkan countries are experiencing varying levels of
success in establishing effective governance and
in bringing stability and growth to their economies.
A countrys adaptive capacity may be evidenced
at the systemic level (governance, economy), the
institutional level (ministries, organizations) and at
the individual level (household, farm).
50
Croatia
Serbia
10
12
14
Source: World Bank, 2011.
51
ALBANIA
Exposure
Sensitivity
Adaptive capacity
10
52
15
20
25
a
Bijelo Polje
rnic
Mojkovac
Kolasin
Vlasotince
Leskovac
Berane
Rozaje
Plav
Pristina
Pernik
Vranje
K o s o v o *
Pec
Herceg-Novi
Podgorica
Kotor
Gnjilane
Orahovac
Urosevac
Prizren
Lake
kee Skadar
Ska
kadar
Va
rd
Pc
in
Skopje
Tetovo
r
Lezhe
s
Tre
Gostivar
Burrel
Lac
Kavaje
Bulqize
Debar
Elbasan
Struga
L kee Ohrid
Lake
O
Ohrid
Lake Prespa
Pogradec
Kucove
Patos Berat
Vlore
Kilkis
Edessa
Gianitsa
Thessalonik
Naousa
Veria
Kastoria
n
mo
liac
Ha
Tepelene
Kozani
on
Katerini
Gravena
Dri
Gjirokaster
Bitola
Florina
Corovode
um
ica
Strumica
Gevgelija
Korce
Str
Sarande
Trikala
0
25
50
75 km
Korfu
Korfu
Ioannina
Axios
ma
Se
Kavadarci
Prilep
Lushnje
Fier
Vijo
Radovis
Tirana
ALBANIA
Shkum
b
Kicevo
Stip
Rek
a
n
Erze
Shijak
Mat
Kruje
Blag
Kocani
Sveti Nikole
lnica
ega
Br
Veles
ka
Peshkopi
Mat
ja
Dup
Kriva
Palanka
ma
Stru
Kukes
ja
Bo
Durres
Psac
Kumanovo
Shkoder
Bar
B U L G A
Kjustendil
Presovo
Ha
lia
cm
Dakovica
Cetinje
Ulcinj
Podujevo
Beli Drim
Li
M O N T E N E G R O
Mitrovica
Crna
om
a
Novi Pazar
Karditsa
Igoumenitsa
* This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSC 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.
to
53
BOSNIA AND
HERZEGOVINA
Exposure
Sensitivity
Adaptive capacity
10
54
15
20
25
Pecs
Subotica
V o j v o d i n a
Sombor
Osijek
Kutina
Zrenjan
Pozega
Un
a
Tis
Sisak
Dakovo
D an u
Vukovar
Slavonski Brod
Sav
a
Novi Sad
be
Tim
is
Kupa
Karlovac
Prijedor
a
Vrb
Bihac
Banja Luka
a
San
Bosanski
Petrovac
sna
Bo
Doboj
B O S N I A
A N D
Jajce
Zadar
Travnik
Brcko
Bijeljina
Tuzla
SERBIA
Valjevo
Zenica
na
Dr
i
Bugojno
a
tin
Ce
H E R Z E G O V I N A
a
va
ret
Ne
Gorazde
l
m
Mostar
Pljevla
Ta
ra
Hvar
N
Bijelo Polje
MONTENEGRO
Korcula
Lim
Brac
Niksic
Trebinje
Berane
Dubrovnik
Pec
Herceg-Novi
50
E
Cacak
Uzice
Sarajevo
Sibenik
Split
Belgrad
Sabac
100
150
Podgorica
200 km
(UN
Lake Skadar
D ri n
Bar
Shkoder
A L B 55
ANIA
Lezhe
Kuk
CROATIA
Exposure
Sensitivity
Adaptive capacity
10
56
15
20
25
Klagenfurt
Kranj
Celje
av
Sombor
Virovitica
Sisak
Subotica
Dr
Karlovac
Szeged
n
Da
Pecs
Zagreb
Trieste
Kutina
S l
a v
Osijek
o n i
a
Pozega
Krk
Dakovo
V o j v o d
SERBIA
Vukovar
Prijedor
Cres
Bihac
Bosanski
Petrovac
Sav a
Brcko
Banja Luka
V
Pag
Zre
Novi Sad
Slavonski Brod
Pula
Doboj
B O S N I A
Bijeljina
A N D
Sabac
Bel
Tuzla
Jajce
Zadar
ka
Travnik
A
d
Sibenik
Valjevo
Zenica
Bugojno
Krin
H E R Z E G O V I N A
Uzice
Sarajevo
Ancona
Hodm
Koprivnica
Novo Mesto
Istria
Kaposvar
Szekszard
S L O V E N I A
Rijeka
H U N G A R Y
Nagykanizsa
Varazdin
Ljubljana
Gorizia
Balaton
Ba
a
av
Jesenice
ITALY
Mu
ra
Maribor
Dr
Cac
Gorazde
Split
Brac
Hvar
S
Teramo
ITALY
t
Korcula
Pescara
Bijelo Polje
MONTENEGRO
a
Dubrovnik
25
Pljevla
Mostar
50
75 km
Trebinje
Berane
Niksic
Pec
Podgorica
Herceg-Novi
Bar
Shkoder
57
Lezhe
ALB
10
58
15
20
25
Novi Pazar
Ibar
Polje
Vlasotince
Leskovac
Mojkovac
Berane
sin
Mitrovica
Rozaje
Podujevo
Sofia
Li
Pristina
Pec
Pernik
Vranje
Dr
Beli
Dakovica
im
Orahovac
na
Gnjilane
rav
a
K o s o v o *
Mo
Plav
z
Ju
B U L G A R I A
Kjustendil
Presovo
Urosevac
Prizren
ar
Psaca
Kriva Palanka
Kumanovo
der
Kukes
cin
ja
Blagoevgrad
Str
um
ic
Va
rd
Va
rda
r
Re
k
Gevgelija
Crn
a
Struga
Lake Ohrid
Ohrid
St
Elbasan
mbin
Lake Prespa
Kilkis
Bitola
Lushnje
Florina
E
Gianitsa
Veroia
Kastoria
Ha
lia
liac
Ha
hice
n
mo
* This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSC 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo
KozaniDeclaration of Independence.
Vijo
s
Thessaloniki
Korce
su
m
Corovode
Tepelene
Edessa
cm
on
Berat
Pogradec
Seres
rym
o
Axios
ev
oll
n
ma
Se
Kucove
Patos
Sandanski
ar
Shku
Kavadarci
Prilep
Tirana
ALBANIA
Radovis
Strumica
Kicevo
Shijak
vaje
ma
Debar
Stip
Veles
ka
Mat
Bulqize
galn
Bre
Burrel
Kruje
Kocani
ica
Sveti Nikole
s
Tre
Gostivar
Peshkopi
Mat
Stru
Skopje
Tetovo
n
Fa
Lezhe
Samokov
Dupnica
25
50
75 km
Katerini
59
Gravena
MONTENEGRO
Exposure
No information availble
Sensitivity
Adaptive capacity
10
60
15
20
25
Cacak
Moravica
Sarajevo
Uzice
Konjic
Za
pad
na
Kraljevo
Gorazde
BOSNIA AND
HERZEGOVINA
Trsten
Ib
Ivanjica
Mo
rav
a
Priboj
Foca
Ra
sin
a
Prijepolje
ac
Uv
Lim
Ce
hoti Pljevla
na
Mostar
Raska
Sjenica
Ta
ra
Zabljak
Gacko
Novi Pazar
Bijelo Polje
Ko
ma
rni
ca
Bileca
Mojkovac
Shavnik
Ibar
M O N T E N E G R O
Dubrovnik
Plav
eta
Kotor
Podgorica
Cetinje
Orahovac
Rahoveci
Dakovica
Gyakove
Bajram Curri
ri
iD
Bel
Tivat
K o s o v o *
Ce
m
Herceg-Novi
Pec
Peje
Li
Andrijevica
Budva
Prizren
Lake Skadar
Shkoder
Ulcinj
Bo
a
jan
Kukes
Tetovo
A L B A N I A
Va
rd
Bar
Gostivar
Lezhe
0
25
50
75 km
Mitrovica
Rozaje
Kolasin
Niksic
Trebinje
Berane
Klin
a
Stolac
Peshkopi
* This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSC 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.
Kruje
Shijak
Burrel
Bulqize
Debar
61
Kicevo
SERBIA
Exposure
Sensitivity
Adaptive capacity
10
62
15
20
25
H U N G A R Y
Hodmezovasarhely
Szekszard
H U N G A R Y
Pecs
Szeged
Arad
Alba Iulia
Subotica
Mureshu
l
Sombor
Timishoara
V o j v o d i n a
a
Tis
Osijek
C R O A T I A
R O M A N I A
Zrenjanin
Dan
ube Novi Sad
Tim
ish
Vukovar
Slavonski Brod
Hunedoara
Lugoj
Petrosani
Resita
Targu Jiu
Bijeljina
Sabac
Sav
Pancevo
Belgrade
Jiu
Brcko
Drobeta
Turnu Severin
Valjevo
BOSNIA AND
HERZEGOVINA
Sarajevo
Krusevac
Novi Pazar
Dubrovnik
Mitrovica
Berane
Niksic
Herceg-Novi
Pec
Podgorica
25
50
75
100 km
Bojana
Kukes
ALBANIA
Lezhe
Sofia
K o s o v o *
Tetovo
Gostivar
Pernik
Vranje
Kjustendil
Kumanovo
Skopje
Blagoevgrad
Kocani
Veles
a
Strum
Shkoder
BULGARIA
Leskovac
Pristina
Prizren
Lake Skadar
Bar
r
Isku
Trebinje
Ibar
Bijelo Polje
MONTENEGRO
Vratsa
rav
Mo
Pljevla
Ta
ra
Montana
Nis
na
J uz
Lim
Mostar
Vidin
be
Danu
Kraljevo
Gorazde
Bor
Kragujevac
Cacak
Uzice
Craiova
Timok
Zvornik
Morava
Smederevo
Tuzla
* This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSC 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence.
Burrel
63
KOSOVO*
Exposure
No information availble
Sensitivity
Adaptive capacity
10
64
15
20
25
Ra
sin
a
Prijepolje
Lim
Uv
ac
Raska
Sjenica
Prokuplje
ca
Topli
r
Iba
Dren
Novi Pazar
Kursumlija
A
Leskovac
Lab
Ibar
M O N T E N E G R O
Mitrovica
Mitrovice
Berane
Lausa
Durakovac
im
Pec
Peje
Plav
Klina
Kline
Podujevo
Podujeve
Obilic
Kastrioti
Pristina
Prishtine
Kosovska Kamenica
Kamenica
Kosovo Polje
Fushe Kosova
K o s o v o *
Vranje
Lipljan
Lipjan
Gjilan
Gnjilane
v
or a
aM
n
Juz
m
Ce
Dakovica
Gyakove
Orahovac
Rahoveci
r
li D
Be
Bajram Curri
im
Urosevac
Ferizaj
Drin
Kacanik
Prizren
Presovo
Vitina
Viti
r
Klisu
Kac.
Velika Krusa
e Skadar
Psaca
Kumanovo
Shkoder
Kukes
Lezhe
Saraj
Restelica
Restelice
cin
ja
Ilinden
Sveti Nikole
Bre
Gostivar
0
25
50
75 km
Stip
Veles
ka
s
Tre
Mat
Skopje
Tetovo
Vard
ar
A L B A N I A
Vlasotince
Vucitrn
Vushtrri
Klin
a
Andrijevica
ca
tni
Si
Rozaje
Kolasin
nica
abla
Mojkovac
Burrel
Kruje
65
Bulqize
Debar
Annual precipitation
Croatia
Serbia
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
1950
120
120
100
100
80
80
60
60
1970
1980
1980
1990
2000
1990
2000
1960
1970
Albania
Montenegro
1950
1960
1990
2000
1950
1960
1970
1980
Kosovo*
120
No data
100
80
* This designation is without prejudice to positions on status,
and is in line with UNSC 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo
Declaration of Independence.
60
1950
66
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
Annual temperature
Croatia
Serbia
C
12
12
11
11
10
10
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
1950
12
12
11
11
10
10
1970
1980
1990
2000
1980
1990
2000
1960
1970
Albania
Montenegro
1950
1960
1980
1990
2000
1950
1960
1970
Kosovo*
12
No data
11
10
9
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
67
ADAPTATION IN THE
REGION
ADAPTATION IN
THE REGION
69
COUNTRY PLANS
Four of the six countries in this report included
adaptation plans in their national communications
to the United Nations Framework Convention
on Climate Change. These plans are outlines
and generic statements of intent to adopt more
detailed strategies related to specific challenges,
and they are indicative of the direction a country is
likely to follow.
In the short term, Albania intends to focus on
improving its monitoring and warning systems for
coastal areas, agriculture and forestry. Longerterm plans contemplate participation in the
Drought Management Centre for Southeastern
Europe; the construction of a range of coastal
protection structures; and the development of land
management strategies such as levelling and
terracing together with water control measures
for agriculture.
Adaptation plans in Bosnia and Herzegovina
centre on coping with drought. Measures under
consideration include modifications in crop
rotation, the application of new technologies
to improve soil structure, the installation of
windbreaks and the establishment of a drought
early warning system. The plans also envision an
information and education campaign related the
public health and climate change.
70
Proposed activities
Public
Health
Water
Resources
Agriculture
and Forestry
Conduct research on the impacts of climate change on planting dates and cultivars,
and on yields, pests and diseases
Conduct research on the effects of extreme events on agriculture and forestry
Develop databases on droughts and forest fires
Land Use,
Buildings ans
Transportation
Tourism
Coastal
Zones
Evaluate the impact of sea level rise on groundwater and water availability
Improve early warning and response systems
Biodiversity and
Ecosystems
Energy
General
Note: Information presented in this table is excerpted from table 2 in the South-East European Climate Change Framework Action Plan for Adaptation.
71
WATER RESOURCES
IN THE BALKANS
Although all of the West Balkan countries have
fresh water resources sufficient to meet the needs
of sustainable development, climate change
is expected to disrupt water regimes. As the
requirements for drinking water grow, and the
demands for hydropower production increase, the
water resources of the region may come under
pressure from users with conflicting interests. New
international boundaries add yet another wrinkle.
Twenty years ago the Balkans had six
international river basins. Now, as a result of the
new international borders, they have thirteen, as
well as four transboundary lake basins. In terms
of exposure and sensitivity, water resources in
the Balkans are particularly vulnerable to climate
change, and what happens in the water sector will
influence what happens in agriculture and energy,
two other highly vulnerable sectors.
The implications for the development of adaptation
strategies are enormous. The water resources
problem is more regional than national in scale,
and effective adaptation in the region cannot
occur on a strict country-by-country basis. This
means that the Balkan countries must work
together on regional adaptive strategies, and that
their capacity to cooperate on mutual problems is
a major element in their overall adaptive capacity.
72
Szombathely
290
to
863
nub
v
Dra
753 985 5581150
Sava
232
113
1570
157
ora
Nere
tv a
MONTENEGRO
Podgorica
Tirana
22
ALBANIA
96
204
S em
an
V jo
Lake
Ohrid
146
se
52
50
100
500 1000
Khaskovo
Krdzhali
Prespa
Lakes
Slive
Gabrovo
Tundzh
77
MACEDONIA
Veliko Trnovo
Stara-Zagora
Dimitrovgrad
ma
Stru
57
Crna
I T A L Y
350
Skopje
66
318 116
Sofia
Drin
ar
B U L G A R I A
Kosovo*
320
Raz
ok
104
rd
Va
Lake Skadar
682
93
va
ora
S. M
92
va
Giurgiu
Ruse
Danub
e
Tim
57
31
336
BUCURET
5683
Great
Morava
111
154
W.
M
Zeta
342
S E R B I A
Ib a
Braov
Ploieti
5684
235
1722
in a
Dr
tina
Ce
180
231
R O M A N I A
5600 5678
395
HERZEGOVINA
is
Tam
Buz
Belgrade
BOSNIA AND
Sarajevo
41
792
1179
Bos
na
a
Un
Vrb
as
197
Tisza
802
R O A T I A
One
Sfntu
Gheorghe
2607
314
274 C
K u pa
Da
Zagreb
Rom
Bac
H U N G A R Y
525
168
Piatra
Neam
Bistria
SLOVENIA
Ljubljana
Bala
182
Zlau
Siret
A U S T R I A
Szkesfehrvr
(2350 Budapest)
Veszprm
Evro
Graz
A G E A N
S E A
73
Ya
REGIONAL INITIATIVES
All six of the West Balkan countries covered in
this report are founding members of the Drought
Management Centre for Southeastern Europe,
the mission of which is to coordinate and facilitate
the development, assessment and application
of drought risk management tools and policies in
South-Eastern Europe with the goals of improving
drought preparedness and reducing drought
impacts. These goals fit comfortably in adaptation
plans, and by virtue of their participation in the
Drought Management Centre the countries stand
to advance their knowledge and capacity.
In its national communication to the UNFCCC,
Bosnia and Herzegovina makes a strong case for
a regional approach to climate change adaptation,
and suggests that the provision of water, energy,
transport and communications is enhanced by
regional cooperation. In this spirit, five of the
West Balkan countries all but Croatia reached
agreement on a South-East European Climate
Change Framework Action Plan for Adaptation
creating a common platform for subregional
cooperation on climate change.
74
76
Zalaegerszeg
n
to
Bala
Klagenfurt
Banja Luka
Osijek
a
Un
Ta
mi
Belgrade
tina
Ce
Sarajevo
Morava
Kragujevac
MONTENEGRO
Dubrovnik
Podgorica
Napoli
Salerno
Potenza
Taranto
Kosovo*
Tirana
Pernik
Gostivar
MACEDONIA
Lecce
Sem
Vlor
an
se
Ioannina
Kerkyra
Crotone
Kavala
Kastoria
Vjo
E
Larisa
A G E A N
Volos
Arta
Catanzaro
Lamia
S E A
Slive
Gabrovo
Tundzh
Stara-Zagora
Dimitrovgrad
Krdzhali
Thessaloniki
Korche
G
Cosenza
Serres
Bitola
Veliko Trnovo
Khaskovo
Blagoevgrad
Veles
ALBANIA
Brindisi
Plovdiv
Kyustendil
Skopje
Durrs
Bari
I T A L Y
Sofia
uma
Str
Benevento
B U L G A R I A
Pristina
Drin
Shkoder
Bar
Pleven
Vratsa
ar
Manfredonia
Giurgiu
Ruse
Raz
Leskovac
rd
Va
S
Foggia
Bijelo Polje
Zeta
Pescara
Nere
tv a
BUCURET
Danube
Vidin
Nis
Novi Pazar
Ploieti
Piteshti
Craiova
Bor
Braov
Buz
Olt
S E R B I A
ina
Dr
Bos
na
Brcko
Tuzla
Sibiu
DrobetaTurnu Severin
One
Sfntu
Gheorghe
Ramnicu
Valcea
Mostar
res
Mu
l
hu
R O M A N I A
Panchevo
HERZEGOVINA
Split
Deva
Timishoara
Novi Sad
Slavonski Brod
BOSNIA AND
Zadar
Arad
Timok
Vrb
as
Sav
be
Danu
Pula
Subotica
C R O A T I A
Karlovac K u p a
Szeged
Rom
Bac
Cluj-Napoca
Tisza
av
Dr
Zagreb
Ljubljana
Rijeka
Kecskemet
Pecs
Piatra
Neam
Bistria
H U N G A R Y
SLOVENIA
Trieste
Zlau
Siret
A U S T R I A
Szkesfehrvr
Veszprm
Evro
Szombathely
Graz
77
Ya
REFERENCES
Angelini, S., V. Re, E. Guadagno, M. Montini and F. Volpe,
unfccc.ba/en/unfccc/national-communication/snc.
Water
Administration,
2009:
Albanias
Second
National
http://unfccc.int/essential_background/library/items/3599.
php?such=j&symbol=ALB/COM/2%20E#beg.
reports/annex_i_natcom/submitted_natcom/items/4903.php.
from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/macnc2.pdf.
library/items/3599.php?such=j&symbol=%20SRB/COM/1%20
E#beg.
Geneva, UNEP/GRID-Arendal.
library/items/3599.php?such=j&symbol=MNE/COM/1%20E#beg.
Pfeiffer, Nils, 2009: Kosovo and Climate Change: A Strategic
Approach to the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference 2009.
Pristina, Balkan Investigative Reporting Network.
78
79