Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
barasingha is called so because of its antlers, which are conspicuous in males. The word means
twelve-tined. These antlers are shed and regrown every year.
The hard ground barasingha is a large specialised deer and depends on a narrow range of food items in
the wild. It is almost totally graminivorous, and grasslands are crucial for its survival though it shows a
preference for water plants. Often the deer wades in water, frequently dipping its muzzle, to feed on
them.
In the first three decades of the 20th century, this royal deer species was distributed in many districts of
Madhya Pradesh and also in the adjoining States of Maharashtra, Bihar and Odisha. The absence of
biotic pressure, on account of low human and cattle density, supported wilderness areas of very large,
unfragmented, multi-tiered woodlands and large grassy expanses in and around the Kanha ecoregion.
The region was then only sparsely dotted by small villages which practised marginal agriculture.
The barasingha roamed these grasslands and clearings in large number and enjoyed safe access to most
of its habitats for foraging, breeding and fawn rearing. Consequently, a large population of this deer,
fragmented but with good recruitments every year, could survive the slow but sure onslaught of
poaching and habitat loss caused by encroachment for agriculture and altered land-use patterns. In
1938, an estimation of this deer population around the present Kanha National Park suggested that
there were around 3,000 animals.
The barasingha population began to shrink in the years preceding Independence and just after. In spite
of many laws meant to protect forests and wildlife, this sizeable population of deer was gradually
getting exposed to illegal hunting and poaching. Its habitat faced problems such as illicit felling of
trees, encroachment for shifting cultivation, illegal cattle grazing and forest fires. Royal hunts and
trigger-happy Army officers only added to the problem. The emphasis on grow more food after
Independence also led to large chunks of forestland being brought under the plough. Gun licences were
granted generously to villagers to protect their crops from herbivores, and guns were used gleefully
against wildlife.
Fortunately, in the meantime, some measures for the conservation of wildlife were taken, which
included stringent enforcement of existing laws and declaring potential wildlife areas as sanctuaries.
Still, the Madhya Pradesh government had to impose a ban on the hunting of this species in 1954.
These measures, however, came too late to be effective. Illegal hunting and poaching continued
unabated, restricting the barasingha population to the Kanha National Park where the population
declined to an all-time low of a mere 66 animals in 1970. Its fate was almost sealed.
Conservation efforts
It was now clear that all-round efforts were needed to save and propagate this small population. Serious
conservation efforts started in the early 1970s. Protecting the deer and its habitat from all forms of
poaching and destruction was accorded top priority by the tiger reserve management. A special
predation-proof enclosure was erected in 1972 to closely monitor and manage a small number of
founders for assured multiplication and future release back into the wild. The enclosure area was
expanded in 2007.
As early as the late 1960s, the strategy of relocating forest villages, unheard of earlier, was
implemented to reclaim additional habitat for this deer species. Wildlife habitats were protected from
wanton fires and illegal cattle grazing. Besides expanding grassland areas by uprooting invasive shrub
and tree species and improving them through the eradication of weeds and other unwanted species and
planting palatable grass species, new shallow waterbodies were developed and water plants propagated
to suit the deers exclusive food habits.
These interventions paid dividends, albeit slowly, and the deer population in Kanha has been restored
to, if not a safe, at least a less risky, 600 animals. It took some 45 years to establish this population, a
worryingly long time.
The special biology and ecology of this deer are what have made it endangered and difficult to
mangage. Not only is the deer a food specialist (meaning, an animal with restricted food preferences;
the barasingha feeds on only grass and does not eat leaves, shoots or flowers), the female of the species
comes into the estrous cycle only once a year and gives birth to only one fawn after a gestation period
of about nine months. Consequently, the population is faced with many challenges, resulting in a low
growth rate. This is now an established fact that small populations are challenged by a number of
intrinsic and extrinsic factors that increase the likelihood of the population going extinct simply
because the population is small.
Relocation strategy
Amid this internationally renowned conservation success, some wildlife officers were redeveloping and
refining an old concept of establishing geographically separate populations of this deer species in the
Satpura Tiger Reserve and the Van Vihar National Park. The writings of British naturalists and forest
officers, especially Captain James Forsyth and A.A. Dunbar Brander, suggest that a small population of
this deer species occurred in what is now the Satpura Tiger Reserve about 125 years ago. At present
too, the area harbours very good barasingha habitat. The Van Vihar National Park has excellent ex-situ
facilities to conserve a small number of these ungulates.
Narendra Kumar, Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (PCCF), Wildlife, Dr Suhas Kumar,
Additional PCCF, Wildlife, and J.S. Chauhan, Field Director, Kanha, all pragmatic, and strong
proponents and actual implementers of this concept, were clear that this population was still at risk and
that it was sheer luck that no epidemic had so far caused mass fatalities. Besides, having grown from a
mere 66 animals, it was also a highly inbred population with inherent genetic risks for diseases. A
rough calculation suggests that the present population is composed of animals of the 10th or 11th
generation. Another technical justification for these separations was enhancement of biodiversity
conservation values in these protected areas.
While there were many takers for this idea, there were doubting Thomases too! A rather discouraging
history of past efforts also sometimes dampened spirits and served as constant reminders to exercise the
utmost caution. Besides being an endemic and Schedule I animal, the barasingha was also the State
animal of Madhya Pradesh, reason enough to recall that discretion was the better part of valour. In
1982, all 12 animals died during a long-distance transportation from Kanha to the Bandhavgarh
National Park. Three attempts were also made between 1981 and 1990 to translocate a total of around
25 animals from Kanha to Supkhar, within the Kanha National Park itself. These captures and shortdistance translocations met with some success. Most animals survived, and the reintroduced animals
have slowly built up the Supkhar small population.
These operations, though courageous and progressive, were fraught with the constraints of those times.
Unsophisticated and unstandardised drugs, ordinary transportation trucks, and unrefined capture and
restraint techniques were some of the reasons for the past failures. The same constraints worked
constantly against any such capture-and-transport project involving wild animals until a few years back
when South African expertise and techniques were successfully adopted to transport around 50 Indian
gaur from Kanha to the Bandhavgarh Tiger Reserve in two batches in January 2011 and March 2012.
A comprehensive capture, transportation and release protocol was prepared to the minutest detail and
nothing was left to chance. In a significant departure from traditional capture techniques, it was also
decided that a passive capture method, using no chemicals/drugs, would be employed. Rigorous mock
drills were conducted in the field and long sessions were held to discuss every eventuality and assign
specific duties to the staff under J.S. Chauhans meticulous supervision.
Capture and transit
Inspired by the South African capture and translocation technique, the boma method was employed to
capture the barasingha in the barasingha enclosure itself. The word boma is a South African term for
capture-enclosures or large cages. It consisted of a wide funnel tapering into an animal selection-cumloading chute. The main structure of the boma was made of steel sections, but the wings of the funnel
were extended with the help of chain-link fence supported with grass mats to make it opaque for
animals.
Besides, a large transportation truck was customised to carry 15-20 captured barasingha comfortably.
The truck container could be divided into two compartments by a sliding door operated from outside. It
had grilled windows on the upper sides to ensure proper ventilation. Several openings on the lower
sides of the container could be used to look in on the animals and slip in water saucers. The container
was floored with natural anti-skid material like plant twigs, leaves and grass to prevent animal hooves
from slipping and getting injured. The container was also fitted with CCTV cameras to monitor the
animals from the driver cabin during transportation.
The transportation truck was closely linked to a ramp camouflaged with plastered soil and grass to
make it look natural to the animals. In this way, the transportation truck, the ramp and the chute of the
boma became one composite structure at the capture site. This structure was installed several days
before the actual capture operation in the field so that the animals could get habituated to its presence
and could freely enter and exit it.
The capture operation began in the cool hours of the late afternoon. Several crews of the capture team
entered the barasingha enclosure from the direction exactly opposite to the boma structure. They were
equipped with helmets, wore padded jackets and carried handy makeshift reflectors. The crews moved
towards the grazing animals, which were now slightly uncomfortable, to drive them gently towards the
boma and into the chute. Reflectors were used to further dazzle and confuse the animals. Utmost care
was taken not to make them panicky and each attempt was made in a leisurely way. As and when the
animals entered the narrow selection chute, sliding gates were closed one by one to hold and further
push them into the truck. The operation took several attempts to capture the required number of
animals.
If some confusion arose and the animals ran back, the attempt was suspended for half an hour or so and
then remade.
The transportation convoy included, besides the truck, three more vehicles carrying senior officers,
wildlife veterinarians with emergency drugs and equipment and support staff. The animals were
monitored from time to time during the journey, and it took almost 12 hours to cover around 350 km
and reach the destination enclosure into which these founders were released. Sixteen animals reached
safely in two trips, and there was not a single fatality!