KRITERIA PENTAKSIRAN PERSEMBAHAN POWERPOINT

Excellent. Very proficient presenter who included all elements in each

category.
3
Good. Met all criteria in each category with some rated as excellent while
others rated as adequate.
2
Fair. Presentation adequate though omitted some of the category
elements.
1
Needs improvement. Major category elements omitted or of such poor
quality that presentation effectiveness was severely diminished.
Name:
CONTENT / ISI KANDUNGAN
Introduction
Pengenalan
Main points
Isi utama
Transitions
Susunan
Knowledge
Pengetahuan
Conclusion
Kesimpulan
DELIVERY / PENYAMPAIAN
Eye contact
Pandangan mata
Expression
Air muka
Enthusiasm
Semangat
Gestures
Bahasa badan/Gerak geri
Use of notes
Kefasihan
Q&A
Menjawab Soalan/Respon
Demeanor
Sikap
VISUAL AIDS /
Readable
Boleh dibaca
Labels
Label
Visual appeal
Sedap mata memandang

Name:

Name:

Name:

Oral Presentations: CONTOH #1

Category
KATEGORI
Organization
(15 points)
SUSUNATUR
(15 MARKAH)

Content
(45 points)

Presentation
(40 points)

Score

Scoring Criteria
KRITERIA PENSKORAN
The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic
and audience.
Jenis pembentangan yang sesuai dengan topik dan
penonton.
Information is presented in a logical sequence.
Maklumat yang disampaikan dalam urutan yang
sepatutnya.
Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of
references.
Pembentangan dilakukan dengan menyatakan
sumber rujukan yang sepatutnya.
Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the
problem well, and establishes a framework for the
rest of the presentation.
Technical terms are well-defined in language
appropriate for the target audience.
Presentation contains accurate information.
Material included is relevant to the overall message
/purpose.
Appropriate amount of material is prepared, and
points made reflect well their relative importance.
There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the
presentation.
Speaker maintains good eye contact with the
audience and is appropriately animated (e.g.,
gestures, moving around, etc.).
Speaker uses a clear, audible voice.
Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth.
Good language skills and pronunciation are used.
Visual aids are well prepared, informative, effective,
and not distracting.
Length of presentation is within the assigned time
limits.
Information was well communicated.
Total Points

Total
Points
MARKA
H
5

5
5

5
5
10
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
100

Score
SKOR

Scoring Rubric for Oral Presentations: Example #3

PRESENCE
Body language & eye contact
Contact with the public
Poise
Physical organization
LANGUAGE SKILLS
Correct usage
Appropriate vocabulary and grammar
Understandable (rhythm, intonation,
accent)
Spoken loud enough to hear easily
ORGANIZATION
clear objectives
logical structure
Signposting - creativity
MASTERY OF THE SUBJECT
pertinence
depth of commentary
spoken, not read
able to answer questions
VISUAL DESIGN
Graphics / color
Handouts
Readability (font size)
OVERALL IMPRESSION
very interesting / very boring
pleasant / unpleasant to listen to
very good / poor communication
JUMLAH SKOR
JUMLAH KESELURUHAN

SKOR
2
3