Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
WORKSHOP OUTCOMES
Upon successful completion of Training the par ticipants would be
1. Able to distinguish PEOs and POs
2 Able to establish correlation among PEOs,
2.
PEOs POs,
POs Gas and COs
3. Able to identify, design and apply appropriate assessment methods
for PEOs, POs and COs
4 Able
4.
Abl to recognize
i
the
h contribution
ib i
off co-curricular/extrai l /
curricular activities in the attainment of POs
5. Able to analyze the ef fectiveness of the indirect assessment
methods / rubric used to measure PEOs, POs and COs
6. Able to identify the scope for continuous improvement and to
propose corrective measures
7. Able to correlate the Programme Specific Criteria with Programme
Curriculum and Faculty competency
8. Able to assess all the criteria in the NBAs SAR
WORKSHOP STRUCTURE
DAY - 1
Over view of OBE parameter s and Assessment Tools by Resource Per sons
Presentation of Phase I task by individual par ticipants
Presentation of task byy individual par
p ticipants
p
related to workshop
p outcomes
1 & 2
Task Assignment to par ticipants related to workshop outcomes 5 & 6
DAY - 2
Presentation of task by individual par ticipants related to workshop outcomes
3 & 4
Ef fectiveness of Assessment tools and Continuous Improvement in
attainment of PEOs,
PEOs POs and COs by Resource Per sons
Presentation of task by individual par ticipants related to workshop outcomes
5 & 6
Task Assignment to par ticipants related to workshop outcomes 7 & 8
DAY - 3
Programme Specific Criteria, Students and Faculty by resource per son
Presentation of task by individual par ticipants related to workshop outcomes
7 & 8
Interactive Review on NBAs SAR
CONTENTS
WHAT IS ACCREDITATION
INSTITUTIONAL/PROGRAMME
ACCREDITATION
Institutional Accreditation
evaluation of overall institutional quality, but it does not focus on
individual academic programmes.
Programme Accreditation
evaluation of a specific academic programme of study, rather than
an institution as a whole.
Technical Programmes
A totally independent body
National Board of Accreditation (NBA)
Diploma level to Post Graduate level in Engineering and Technology,
Management, Architecture, Pharmacy, Hospitality and Mass
Communication
SIGNIFICANCE OF ACCREDITATION
At National Level
Students and parents to select the institutions and programs for
admission.
Employers in deciding about the institutions for recruitment of
graduates.
Institutions to avail the benefits from regulatory bodies and funding
agencies institutions.
Institutions in deciding about transfer of students from other
institutions
At International Level
Mobility of students for pursuing higher studies and employment in
other countries
Growing number of institutes , types (univ, deemed, private, autonomous,
programs
g
affiliated )) and p
BENEFITS OF ACCREDITATION
Students get quality education and better employment
opportunity.
Alumni share their experience and participate in curricular
updates in view of emerging technology and tools.
Development of faculty benefits of realization of efforts,
opportunity of attempting more complex problems,
problems career
advancement, consultancy & sponsored R&D
Exchange of views opportunities supplement each other
req irement
requirement.
Employer in industr y / academia/ public services get well
grounded practice engineers with requisite technical and
b h i
behavioral
l skills
kill / graduate
d t attributes.
tt ib t
Institution builds up a Brand.
Continuous improvement
p
towards excellence.
WASHINGTON ACCORD
III-A
WA contd
All members accept the defined Graduate
Attributes.
Washington Accord is applicable only for UG
Engineering Programmes.
If India wants to reap the benefits of its large
human
u a resource
esou ce a
and
d to beco
become
e knowledge
o edge
society and global supplier of trained HR it
is must to be a full signatory of Washington
Accord - Countries like Australia have a
demand for Engineers.
13
Signatories of WA
Australia Represented by Engineers Australia (1989)
Canada Represented by Engineers Canada (1989)
Chinese Taipei Represented by Institute of Engineering Education Taiwan (2007)
Hong Kong China Represented by the Hong Kong Institute of Engineers (1995)
Ireland Represented by Engineers Ireland (1989)
p Represented
p
by
y Japan
p Accreditation Board for Engineering
g
g Education ((2005))
Japan
Korea Represented by Accreditation Board of Engineering Education of Korea
(2007)
Malaysia - Represented by Board of Engineers Malaysia (2009)
New Zealand Represented by Institution of Professional Engineers NZ (1989)
Singapore Represented by Institution of Engineers Singapore (2006 )
South Africa Represented by Engineering Council of South Africa (1999)
Turkey Represented by MUDEK (2011)
United Kingdom Represented by Engineering Council UK (1989)
United States Represented by Accreditation Board for Engineering
and
dT
Technology
h l
(1989)
Provisional Members of WA
Bangladesh Board of Accreditation for Engineering and Technical Education
Germanyy German Accreditation Agency
g
y for Study
y Programs
g
in Engineering
g
g and
Informatics
India National
National Board of Accreditation
Guiding Principles
Autonomy of Signatory
Transparency to Accreditation System
Free from Government and other influences
Basis - Education Framework
Entry level qualifications
N b off years off th
Number
the program
Recognition of the program by Competent
Accreditation Authority and Reputation of
the Institute
Obstacles
Differences in Education System
Accreditation system
Disciplines
ACCREDITATION MODELS
Minimal Model
Often numeric and law-based
Provides a prescription for a minimal core and very general parameters for
the
h rest off the
h curriculum
i l
Input-Output Model
Often involving direct prescriptions of curriculum and faculty
composition
Makes the accrediting process uniform and potentially fair
Relativelyy easyy to maintain
Outcome Model
Focuses on the objectives and outcomes of the program
Requires evidence of measurement and attainment of objectives and
outcomes
INPUT-OUTPUT
INPUT
OUTPUT BASED ACCREDITATION
financial resources
lab equipment
Infrastructure facilities
faculties
Program
me
Number of students
graduating
quantitative grades of
students
success rate of
students
Number of quality of
students
Measureable Input
Measurable Outputs
SHIFT
Input-output:
from
Input- output
based
Assessment
Outcomes:
to
Outcomebased
Assessment
Inputp
outout based Assessment
Infrastructure, Students, Teachers, Support
staff, Management, Curriculum, Calendar.
Pass %, Number of publications, placement etc.,
clearpicture
l
i t
ofwhatis
important for students to be abletodo
importantforstudentstobe
able to do
Startingwitha
Thenorganizingthecurriculum,
Then
organizing the curriculum,
delivaryandassessment tomake
sure learning happens
surelearninghappens
OBE
(Education)
OBC
OBLT
OBA
Mission
Graduate
Att ib t
Attributes
23
24
constituencies
25
II-B (2)
Consultation
C
lt ti
- Industr y
- Alumni
- Students
St d t
- Management
- P
Professional
f
i
l Bodies
B di
- Faculty
- Parents
- Data
D t on ffuture
t
- Data on trends in
development in the profession
B)
- Summar y of views during consultation
C)
- Accepted views - objectives
D)
- Identification and designing of courses with defined
objectives.
Elective and core courses.
E)
- Courses to achieve objectives
26
Engineering knowledge
Problem analysis
Design & Development of Solutions
Investigation of Complex Problem
Modern tool usage
Engineer and society
Environment& sustainability
Ethics
Individual & team work
Communication
Lif l g llearning
Lifelong
i g
Project management & finance
27
28
. . .
GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES
. . .
GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES
. . .
GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES
31
32
ACCREDITATION CRITERIA
1. Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives
2. Programme Outcomes
3. Programme Curriculum
4. Students Per formance in the Programme
5. Faculty Contributions
6 Facilities and Technical Suppor t
6.
7. Academic Suppor t Units and Teaching-Learning Process
8. Governance, Institutional Suppor t and Financial Resources
9. Continuous Improvement
37
CORRELATION : PEOS
PEOS, POS AND COS
COs
GA
GAs
POs
Mission
PEOs
38
PEOs
PEO1
Socially responsible
T h i l career
Technical
.
PEO2
PEO3
Program Outcomes
Explain
p
with reason the above correlation
40
Program Outcomes
i
ii
iii
iv v
vi
vii
viii
ix
..
41
..
..
Units
LAB
CHEM30AL General
Chemistry Laboratory
II
LEC
EE1 El
Electrical
ti l
Engineering Physics I
LEC
OTH
EE3 Introduction to
Electrical Engineering
DES
S
Program outcomes
EE115D
5 Design
es g S
Studies
ud es in
Electronic Circuits
OTH
OTH
EE99 Student
Research Program
LEC
Strong Contribution
Week Contribution
No Contribution
42
Curriculum Content
(% of total number
of credits of the
program )
Total
number of
contact
hours
Total
Number of
credits
POs
PEOs
Mathematics
Science
Computing
Humanities
Professional core
.
..
43
..
Course
Title
Tutorial
Practical#
(T)
(P)
Credits
Total Hours
..
Total
Type
Achivement
PO
Project (.)
Design
Published
PO 3
P j t (.)
Project
( )
A li ti / lti di i li
Application/multi-disciplinary
P t t
Prototype
PO2
..
..
44
PROGRAM CURRICULUM
CONTRIBUTIONS OF PROFESSIONAL
CORE
How the core courses are contributing to PEOS and POs
Any courses specific to meet any of the PEOS and POs
Course content contribution to meet the POs
Draft the content/syllabus in tune
45
Exams
Assignments
Projects
Tutorials
Labs
Presentations
46
RUBRIC
Rubrics is set of performance indicators which define and
describe the important component of the work being
completed
p
Information to/about individual student competence
(Analytic)
Communicate
C
i t expectations
t ti
Diagnosis for purpose of improvement and feedback
Overall examination of the status of the performance of a
group of students? (Holistic)
47
48
Always relies on
others to do the
work
Satisfactory
3
Collects some
basic
information;
most refer to the
topic
i
Performs nearly
all duties
Exemplary
Score
4
Collects a great
deal of
information; all
refer to the topic
Performs all
duties of
assigned team
roles
Rarely does the Usually does
Always does the
assigned work; the assigned
assigned work
often needs
work; rarely
without having
reminding
needs reminding to be reminded.
Usually does
Listens, but
most of the
sometimes talk
talking; rarely too much
allows others to
speak
Listens and
speaks a fair
amount
49
When to Assess
Upon
U
graduation
Upon
course completion
51
52
53
Assessment Tool
Assessment frequency
Assessed by
Reviewed by
Employer survey
Every year
Institute
Institute/Department
Alumni survey
Once or twice a
Department
Institute
Assignments
two months
Faculty
Faculty
Examinations
Semester end
Faculty
Faculty/Department
End-of-course survey
Faculty
Faculty/Department
Every year
Institute
Department
Any other
Department
Assignments
two months
Faculty
Faculty
Examinations
Semester end
Faculty
Faculty/Department
P j t
Projects
E
Every
six
i
F
Faculty
lt
F
Faculty/Department
lt /D
t
t
Any other
POs
COs
Group tasks
54
1. PEO (..)
2. PEO (..)
Assessment tool
Specific query/Problem
Goal (%)
Evaluation(%)
Industrial Survey
Query ((....))
80%
85%
Alumni Survey
Query(.)
..
Alumni survey
Query ((.))
..
Industrial Survey
Query (....)
80%
85%
Alumni Survey
Query(.)
..
..
55
2 CO ((..))
2.
Assessment tool
Specific query/Problem
Goal$ (%)
Evaluation(%)
End
de
examination
a
at o
Problem
ob e ((....))
80%
85%
Rubric
Query(.)
..
Alumni survey
Query (.)
(
)
..
Assignment
Problem
80%
85%
Industry Survey
Query(.)
..
..
((....))
56
Units
LAB
CHEM30AL General
Chemistry Laboratory II
LEC
Program outcomes
a
58
AccreditationunderTIERI
More appropriate for autonomous institutions and
universities
minimum of 750 points in aggregate out of 1000 points ,
minimum
i i
score off 60% in
i each
h criteria
it i - accreditation
dit ti ffor
5 years under TIER-I system.
minimum of 600 points in aggregate (without any
stipulation), - prospective candidate for accreditation
under TIER-I.
AccreditationunderTIER II
More appropriate for non
i tit ti
institutions/affiliated
/ ffili t d institutions
i tit ti
autonomous
Non-autonomous
Institution Tier II
DOsandDONTsforpreparingtheSAR
DOs:
TheSARmust
be concise, p
pointed, and adequate
q
in length
g and breadth for the
purpose of accreditation.
provide relevant information as per the format specified for the
individual programme.
be printed on one side of paper with double spacing, using font
12 Times
Ti
N
New
R
Roman,
with
ith att least
l t one inch
i h (2.54
(2 54 cm)) margin
i
on all sides.
contain carefully compiled and authentic data.
data
proper presentation of data in appendices with charts, graphics,
and visuals wherever applicable.
applicable
provide relevant data for the past three years, unless specified
p
programme
p
g
manual.
otherwise in the respective
DOsandDON TsforpreparingtheSAR
DOsandDONTsforpreparingtheSAR
DONTs:
DontsendthefollowingobjectswiththeSAR:
Original documents
documents.
Publications such as books, journals, newsletters,
thesis, etc.
PARTA
I. InstitutionalInformation
I. 1.
Nameandaddressoftheinstitutionandaffiliating
university:
(Instruction: The name, address of the institution, and the
name of
the university, which has given affiliation to
this institution,
institution are to be listed here.)
here )
I. 2.
Name,designation,telephonenumber,andemail
address
ofthe
contactpersonfortheNBA:
(Instruction: The name of the contact person with other
(Instruction:Thenameofthecontactperson,withother
details,hastobelistedhere.)
10-December-13
65
I. InstitutionalInformation
I.3.
Cont..
Description
Institution started with the following programmes
(intake strength)
NBA AICTE accreditation visits and accreditation
NBA-AICTE
granted, if any
Addition of new programmes, increase in intake
strength of the existing programs and/or
accreditation status
I. InstitutionalInformation
Cont..
I. InstitutionalInformation
Cont..
Year of Establishment
CFYm1
CFYm2
Location
CFYm3
I. InstitutionalInformation
I .10
0
Cont..
Internally
te a y acqu
acquired
ed fu
funds:
ds
Nameofthe
internalsource
CFY
CFYm1
CFYm2
CFYm3
Students fee
Students
I. InstitutionalInformation
Cont..
I. 11
Category
Scholarship Assistance
Amount
10-December-13
70
I. InstitutionalInformation
Cont..
I. 12
Basis/criterionforadmissiontotheinstitution:
All India entrance / state-level entrance /university
entrance / 12th standard mark sheet / others:
(Instruction: The basis/criterion for student intake has to
be listed here.)
I. 13 Total number of engineering students
CAYCAYm1
CAYm2
CAYm3
I. InstitutionalInformation
Cont..
I. 14 Totalnumberofemployees
(Instruction: Total number of employees,
employees both
men and
data may be
t hi and
teaching
d
supporting
ti
staff.)
t ff )
10-December-13
72
I. InstitutionalInformation
Cont..
Items
CAYm1
Teaching staff in
engineering
Teaching staff in
science &
humanities
Max
CAYm2
Min
CAYm3
F
F
(
(Instruction:
Staff strength,
g both teachingg and non-teaching,
g over the
last three academic years has10-December-13
to be listed here.)
73
I. InstitutionalInformation
Cont..
A.RegularStaff
CAY
Items
Min Max
Teaching
T
h
staff in
eengineering
g ee g
Teaching
staff in
science &
humanities
NonN
teaching
staff
CAYm1
Min
CAYm2
CAYm3
Min
Max
F
10-December-13
74
II. DepartmentalInformation
II.1.
II
1 N
Name and
d address
dd
off the
th department:
d
t
t
II.2. Name, designation, telephone number, and e-mail
address of the contact person for the NBA:
II.3. History of the department including date of
introduction and number of seats of various
programmes of study along with the NBA accreditation
,if any:
Program
Description
UG in..............
UG in..............
......................................
......................................
MCA..............
PG in..............
10-December-13
75
II. DepartmentalInformation
Cont.
II. DepartmentalInformation
Cont.
CAY
CAYm1
CAYm2
CAYm3
Teaching staff
in the
department
Non-teaching
staff
t ff
Total
10-December-13
77
II. DepartmentalInformation
Cont.
II.7.1. Summary of budget for the CFY and the actual expenditure
incurred in the CFYm1, CFYm2 and CFYm3 (for the
Department):
)
Items
Budg
eted
in
CFY
Actual
expenses
in CFY (till
)
Budgeted
in CFYm1
Actual
Expens
es in
CFYm1
Budge
ted in
CFYm
2
Actual
Expens
es in
CFYm2
Budget
ed in
CFYm3
Actual
Expens
es in
CFYm3
Laboratory equipment
Software purchase
Laboratory
consumables
Maintenance and
spares
Travel
Miscellaneous
ll
expenses for academic
activities
Total
10-December-13
78
II. DepartmentalInformation
Cont.
II. DepartmentalInformation
Cont.
Description
Started with .................seats in .............
Intake increased to ............. in .............
Intake increased to ............. in .............
Accredited in .
from
previous
II. DepartmentalInformation
Cont.
CAY
CAYm1
CAYm2
CAYm3
Min Max.
Min.
Max Min.
Min Min.
Min Max.
Max Max.
Max Min.
Min Max.
Max
Teaching
staff with the
program
Nonteaching
staff
10-December-13
81
III.ProgrammeSpecificinformation
Cont.
III.8. Summary of budget for the CFY and the actual expenditure
incurred in the CFYm1, CFYm2 and CFYm3 (exclusively for
this programme in the department):
Actuaal Expenses
in CFYm3
Budgeted in
CFYm3
C
Actuaal Expenses
in CFYm2
Budgeted in
CFYm2
C
Actuaal Expenses
in CFYm1
Budgeted in
CFYm1
C
Actuaal expensees
in CFY (till )
Budgeeted in CF
FY
Items
Laboratory equipment
Software purchase
Laboratory consumables
Maintenance
e ce andd spares
sp es
Travel
Miscellaneous expenses
p
for
academic activities
Total
10-December-13
82
PARTB
1. Vision,MissionandProgramme
EducationalObjectives(100)
1.1. Mission and Vision (5)
1.1.1.
1.1.2.
1. Vision,MissionandProgrammeEducational
Objectives(100)
C t
Cont
1.1.3.
1.2. Programme
g
Educational Objectives
j
((15))
1.2.1 Describe the Programme Educational Objectives
(PEOs) (2)
(Listandarticulatetheprogrammeeducationalobjectives ofthe
programmeunderaccreditation)
1.2.2.
StatehowandwherethePEOsarepublishedand
State
how and where the PEOs are published and
disseminated(2)
(Describeinwhichmedia(e.g.websites,curriculabooks)thePEOsare
publishedandhowthesearedisseminatedamongstakeholders)
10-December-13
84
1. Vision,MissionandProgrammeEducational
Objectives(100)
Cont
1.2.3 .List the stakeholders of the programme (1)
(List stakeholders of the programme under consideration for
accreditation and articulate their relevance)
1. Vision,MissionandProgrammeEducational
Obj i (100)
Objectives(100)
Cont
1 3 Attainment of Programme Educational Objectives (30)
1.3.
1.3.1.
J
Justify
y the contributions of the Programme
g
Curriculum towards attainment of the PEOs
(15)
(Describe
contribute
Educational
1.3.2.
in
working
g
1. Vision,MissionandProgrammeEducational
Obj i (100)
Objectives(100)
Cont
14 A
1.4.
Assessment off the
h
attainment
i
Educational Objectives (40)
off
P
Programme
1. Vision,MissionandProgrammeEducational
Objectives(100)
Cont
1. Vision,MissionandProgrammeEducational
,
g
Objectives(100)
Cont
10-December-13
89
2. ProgrammeOutcomes(225)
g
(
)
2.1. Definition and Validation of Course Outcomes and
Programme Outcomes (30)
2 1 1 List
2.1.1.
Li the
h Course
C
O
Outcomes(COs)
(CO ) and
d Programme
P
Outcomes (POs) (2)
(List the course outcomes of the courses in programme
curriculum
and programme outcomes of the programme under accreditation)
2 1 2 State
2.1.2.
St t how
h
and
d where
h
th POs
the
PO are published
bli h d and
d
disseminated (3)
(Describe in which media (e.g.
(e g websites,
websites curricula books) the POs are
published and how these are disseminated among stakeholders)
10-December-13
90
2. ProgrammeOutcomes(225)
g
(
)
Cont
2.1.4. Indicate how the defined POs are aligned to the Graduate
Attributes prescribed by the NBA (10)
(Indicate how the POs defined for the programme are aligned with the
Graduate Attributes of NBA as articulated in accreditation manual.)
2.1.5. Establish the correlation between the POs and the PEOs
(10)
(Explain how the defined POs of the program correlate with the PEOs)
10-December-13
91
2. ProgrammeOutcomes(225)
g
(
)
Cont
2. ProgrammeOutcomes(225)
g
(
)
Cont
2.2.4.
2
2 4 Indicate the extent to which the laboratory and project
course work are contributing towards attainment of the
POs (10)
( )
(Justifythebalancebetweentheoryandpracticalfortheattainmentof
thePOs.Justifyhowthevariousprojectworks(asampleof20%best
and average projects from total projects) carried as part of the
andaverageprojectsfromtotalprojects)carriedaspartofthe
10-December-13
programmecurriculumcontributetowardstheattainmentofthePOs.)
93
2. ProgrammeOutcomes(225)
Cont
2. ProgrammeOutcomes(225)
g
(
)
Cont
95
2. ProgrammeOutcomes(225)
g
(
)
Cont
d)
e)
2.4.
2. ProgrammeOutcomes(225)
g
(
)
Cont
2.4.2.
2
4 2 Indicate
I di
how
h
results
l off assessment used
d for
f improvement
i
of course delivery and assessment (10)
(Articulatewithrationalethecurriculardeliveryandassessment
(Articulate
with rationale the curricular delivery and assessment
improvementsbroughtinafterthereviewoftheattainmentofthePOs)
2.4.3.State the p
process used for revising/redefining
g/
g the POs ((15))
(Articulate with rationale how the results of the evaluation of the
POs have been used to review/redefine the POs in line with the
Graduate Attributes of the NBA.)
10-December-13
97
3. ProgrammeCurriculum(125)
3.1. Curriculum (20)
3.1.1.
Course
Code
..
Total
#Seminars,
3. ProgrammeCurriculum(125)
Cont
10-December-13
99
3. ProgrammeCurriculum(125)
Cont
Mathematics
Science
Computing
Humanities
P f i
Professional
l
core
.
..
Curriculum
Total number
Content
off contact
t t
(% of total
hours
number of
credits of the
programme )
Total
POs
Number
of credits
components
PEOs
10-December-13
100
3. ProgrammeCurriculum(125)
Cont
the
3. ProgrammeCurriculum(125)
Cont
10-December-13
102
4 Students
4.
StudentsPerformance(75)
Performance(75)
Admission intake in the programme
Item
CAY CAY
m1
CAY
m2
CA
Y
m3
4. StudentsPerformance(75)
Cont
Number of Students
admitted in 1st year
+ admitted via
lateral entry in 2nd
1st
year (N1 + N2)
year
3rd
year
4th year
CAY
CAYm1
CAYm2
CAYm3
CAYm4 (LYG)
(
)
CAYm5
(LYGm1)
CAYm6
*successfully completed implies
10-December-13
(LYGm2)
zero backlogs
104
4. StudentsPerformance(75)
Cont
LYG
(CAYm4)
LYGm1
(CAYm5)
LYGm2
(CAYm6)
4. StudentsPerformance(75)
Cont
Or
Assessment = 2 API
Average Assessment for three Years
10-December-13
106
4. StudentsPerformance(75)
Cont
Number of students
g
admitted for higher
studies with valid qualifying scores/ranks,
and
N
=
Total number of
students who were admitted
in the batch10-December-13
including lateral entry subject to
107
maximum
4. StudentsPerformance(75)
Item
Cont
LYG
LYG
m1
LYG
m2
4. StudentsPerformance(75)
Cont
ProfessionalActivities(15)
4.3.1. Professional societies / chapters and
organising engineering events (3)
(Instruction:Theinstitutionmayprovidedataforpastthree
(Instruction
The institution may provide data for past three
years).
4. StudentsPerformance(75)
Cont
ProfessionalActivities(15)
4.3.4. Entrepreneurship initiatives, product designs, and
innovations (3)
(Instruction: The institution may specify the efforts and
achievements.)
5. FacultyContributions(175)
ListofFacultyMembers:ExclusivelyfortheProgramme
st o acu ty e be s
c us ve y o t e og a
e
/SharedwithotherProgrammes
Name of
Qualification,
the
university, and year
faculty
of graduation
member
Designation and
date of joining
the institution
Distribution of
teaching load (%)
1st Year
UG
PG
Number of
research
publications in
journals and
conferences
since joining
IPRs
10-December-13
111
5. FacultyContributions(175)
Cont
5.1
StudentTeacherRatio(STR)(20)
STR is desired to be 15 or superior
Assessment =
20 15/STR; subject to
maximum
assessment of 20
STR = (x + y + z)/N1
where, x
= Number of students in 2nd year of
the
th
programme
y
= Number of students in 3rd year of
the
programme
z
= Number of students in 4th year of
the
programme
N1
= Total number of faculty members in
the programme (by considering
f ti
fractional
l lload)
d)
10-December-13
112
5. FacultyContributions(175)
Year
x+y+z
Cont
N1 STR Assessment
((max. = 20))
CAYm2
CAYm1
CAY
Average assessment
10-December-13
113
5. FacultyContributions(175)
y
(
)
Cont
5. FacultyContributions(175)
5.2.
Cont
Assessment
where, CRI
=
=
=
=
=
where, x
y
Year
CAYm2
CAYm1
20 CRI
Cadre ratio index
2 25 (2x + y)/N; subject to max.
2.25
max CRI = 1.0
10
Number of professors in the programme
Number of associate professors in the
programme programme
y
CRI
Assessment
CAY
Average assessment
10-December-13
115
5. FacultyContributions(175)
5.3.
Cont
FacultyQualifications(30)
A
Assessment
= 6 FQI
Q
where, FQI
where x
where,
y
Z
FQI
Assessment
CAYm2
CAYm1
CAY
Average assessment
10-December-13
116
5. FacultyContributions(175)
5.4.
Cont
5.5.
117
5. FacultyContributions(175)
Cont
Sum
N (Number of faculty positions
required for an STR of 15)
Assessment = 3 Sum/N
Average assessment
10-December-13
118
5. FacultyContributions(175)
y
(
)
56
5.6.
Cont
F l R
Faculty
Retention
i (15)
Assessment
3 RPI/N
where RPI
10-December-13
119
5. FacultyContributions(175)
Cont
CAYm2 CAYm1
CAY
120
5. FacultyContributions(175)
5.7.
Cont
5. FacultyContributions(175)
Cont
Average
g assessment
10-December-13
122
5. FacultyContributions(175)
5.8.
Cont
Average assessment
10-December-13
123
5. FacultyContributions(175)
5.9.
Cont
FundedR&DProjectsandConsultancy(FRDC)
Work (20)
Work(20)
Assessment of R&D and consultancy projects = 4
((Sum of FRDC by
y each faculty
y member)//N
)//
(Instruction: A faculty member scores maximum 5
points, depending upon the amount.) A suggested
scheme
h
is
i given
i
below
b l
ffor a minimum
i i
amount off Rs.
R 1
lakh:
Five points for funding by national agency,
points for fundingg by
y state agency,
g y
Four p
Four points for funding by private sector, and
Two points for funding by the sponsoring
trust/society.
/ i
10-December-13
124
5. FacultyContributions(175)
y
(
)
Cont
10-December-13
125
5. FacultyContributions(175)
Cont
5. FacultyContributions(175)
Cont
FIP points
CAYm2
CAYm1
CAY
...........................
...........................
Sum
N
Assessment of FIP = 2 Sum/N
Average assessment
10-December-13
127
6. FacilitiesandTechnicalSupport(75)
5.10. Description of classrooms, faculty rooms, seminar,
and conference halls:
halls (Entries in the following table
are sampler entries)
Room description
Usage
N off Classrooms
No.
Cl
Classroom
Cl
for 2nd
year
Shared /
exclusive
Capa
city
T t i l rooms
Tutorial
No. of Seminar
rooms
No. of Meeting
rooms
No. of Faculty rooms
(n)
10-December-13
128
6. FacilitiesandTechnicalSupport(75)Cont..
6.1. Classrooms in the Department (20)
6 1 1 Adequate number of rooms for lectures
6.1.1.
(core/electives), seminars, tutorials, etc., for the
program (10)
(Instruction: Assessment based on the information
provided in the preceding table.)
612 T
6.1.2.
Teaching
hi aids---multimedia
id
l i di projectors,
j
etc. (5)
(Instruction: List the various teaching aids available)
6.1.3. Acoustics,, classroom size,, conditions of chairs/benches,
/
,
air circulation, lighting, exits, ambience, and such other
amenities/facilities (5)
(Instruction Assessment based on the information provided in the
(Instruction:
preceding table and the inspection thereof.)
10-December-13
129
6. FacilitiesandTechnicalSupport(75)Cont..
6.2. Faculty
y Rooms in the Department
p
((15))
6.2.1. Availability of individual faculty rooms (5)
(Instruction:
(I
i
A
Assessment
b d on the
based
h information
i f
i provided
id d
in the preceding table)
10-December-13
130
6. FacilitiesandTechnicalSupport(75)Cont..
6.2.3. Usage of room for counselling/discussion with
( )
students (5)
(Instruction: Assessment based on the information provided in the
preceding table and the inspection thereof.)
Space,
Number of Quality of Laboratory
number of experiment instrumen manuals
ts
students
s
10-December-13
131
6. FacilitiesandTechnicalSupport(75)Cont..
6.3. Laboratories in the Department to meet the
q
and the POs ((25))
Curriculum Requirements
6.3.1. Adequate, well-equipped laboratories to meet
the curriculum requirements and the POs (10)
(Instruction: Assessment based on the information
provided in the preceding table.)
table )
6.3.2. Availability
y of computing
p
g facilities in the
department (5)
(Instruction: Assessment based on the information
provided
d d in the
h preceding
d
table.)
bl )
10-December-13
132
6. FacilitiesandTechnicalSupport(75)Cont..
6.3.3. Availability of laboratories with technical support within
and beyond working hours (5)
(Instruction:Assessmentbasedontheinformation providedinthe
precedingtable.)
10-December-13
133
6. FacilitiesandTechnicalSupport(75)Cont..
6.4. Technical Manpower Support in the Department (15)
Name of
the
technical
staff
Designati
on (payscale)
Exclusive / Date of
shared
joining
work
Qualification
At
Now
Joining
Other Resp
technical onsi
skills bility
gained
10-December-13
134
6. FacilitiesandTechnicalSupport(75)Cont..
6.4.1. Availabilityofadequateandqualifiedtechnical
supportingstaffforprogrammespecific
laboratories (10)
(Instruction:Assessmentbasedontheinformationprovidedinthe
preceding table )
precedingtable.)
10-December-13
135
7. AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
pp
g
LearningProcess(75)
Students Admission
Admission intake (for information only)
Item
CAY CAYm1
Sanctioned intake strength in the
institute (N)
Number of students admitted on merit
basis (N1)
Number of students admitted on
management quota/otherwise (N2)
Total number of admitted students in
the institute (N1 + N2)
CAYm2 CAYm3
(Instruction: The intake of the students during the last three years against
the sanctioned capacity may be reported here.)
10-December-13
136
7. AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
LearningProcess(75)
Cont.
Admission quality (for information only)
Divide the total admitted ranks (or percentage marks)
into five or a few more meaningful ranges
Rank range
More than 98 percentile
95 98 percentile
95--98
l
90--95 percentile
80--90 percentile
......................
......................
Admitted without rank
(Instruction: The admission quality of the students in terms of their ranks in the
entrance examination may be presented here.)
Tabular data for estimating student
student-teacher
teacher ratio and faculty qualification for first
10-December-13
year common courses
137
7. AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
pp
g
LearningProcess(75)
Cont.
List of faculty members teaching first year courses:
Name off
N
faculty
member
Date of Department
p
Qualific
Q
lifi Designa
D i
joining the with which
institution associated
ation tion
b
off
Distribution
teaching load (%)
1 t year UG
1st
PG
10-December-13
138
7. AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
LearningProcess(75)
Cont.
7.1. Academic Support Units (35)
7.1.1.
Assessment of First Year Student Teacher
R ti
Ratio
(FYSTR) (10)
Data for first year courses to calculate the FYSTR:
Year
CAYm2
CAYm1
CAY
Average
g
assessment
Number of
students
(approved
intake
strength)
Number of faculty
members
(considering
fractional load)
FYSTR
Assessment = (10
15)/ FYSTR (Max. is
10)
10-December-13
139
7. AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
LearningProcess(75)
Cont.
7.1.2. AssessmentofFacultyQualificationTeachingFirst
YearCommonCourses(15)
( )
Assessment of qualification = 3 (5x + 3y + 2z0)/N, where x + y + z0
N and z0 Z
x
=
Number of faculty members with PhD
y
7. AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
LearningProcess(75)
Cont.
7.1.2. AssessmentofFacultyQualificationTeachingFirst
YearCommonCourses(15)
( )
Assessment of qualification = 3 (5x + 3y + 2z0)/N, where x + y + z0
N and z0 Z
x
=
Number of faculty members with PhD
y
7. AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
LearningProcess(75)
Cont.
Year
N Assessment of faculty
qualification
CAYm2
CAYm1
CAY
Average assessment of
faculty qualification
10-December-13
142
7. AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
LearningProcess(75)
Cont.
713 B
7.1.3.
Basic
i science/engineering
i
/
i
i laboratories
l b t i
( d
(adequacy
of space, number of students per batch, quality and
availability of measuring
instruments, laboratory
manuals, list of experiments) (8)
Laboratory Space
Space,
description number of
students
Software
used
Type of
Quality of
experimen instruments
ts
Laboratory
manuals
(Instruction: The institution needs to mention the details for the basic
science/engineering laboratories for the first year courses. The descriptors as
listed here are suggestive in nature.)
10-December-13
143
7 AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
7.
AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
LearningProcess(75)
Cont.
7.1.4. Language laboratory (2)
Language SSpace,
laboratory number of
students
stude
ts
Software
used
Type off
T
Q lit off
Quality
experiments instruments
Guidance
(Instruction:Theinstitutionmayprovidethedetailsofthelanguagelaboratory.
p
)
Thedescriptorsaslistedherearenotexhaustive).
10-December-13
144
7 AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
7.
AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
LearningProcess(75)
Cont.
7.2.
721 T
7.2.1.
Tutorial
t i l classes
l
t address
to
dd
student
t d t questions:
ti
size of tutorial classes, hours per
subject given in
the timetable (5)
Provision of tutorial classes in timetable:
YES/NO
Tutorial classes taken by faculty / teaching
assistants / senior students /
others...................
th
Number of tutorial classes per subject per
week:
10-December-13
Number of students
per tutorial class:
145
7 AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
7.
AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
LearningProcess(75)
Cont.
Number of subjects with tutorials: 1st year........... 2nd
year........... 3rd
3 d year........... 4th
4 h year...............
(Instruction: Here the institution may report the details of
the tutorial classes that are being conducted on various
subjects
j
and also state the impact
p of such tutorial classes).
)
10-December-13
146
7 AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
7.
AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
LearningProcess(75)
Cont.
Nuber of subjects
j
with tutorials: 1st y
year........... 2nd
year........... 3rd year........... 4th year...............
(Instruction: Here the institution may report the details of
the tutorial classes that are being conducted on various
subjects and also state the impact of such tutorial classes)
classes).
10-December-13
147
7. AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
pp
g
LearningProcess(75)
Cont.
7.2.2. Mentoring system to help at individual levels (5)
Type of mentoring: Professional guidance / career
advancement / course work specific / laboratory
p
/ total development
p
specific
Number of faculty mentors:
Number of students per mentor :
Frequency
q
y of meeting:
g
(Instruction: Here the institution may report the details of the
mentoring system that has been developed for the students for various
purposes and also state the efficacy of such system).
system)
10-December-13
148
7 AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
7.
AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
LearningProcess(75)
Cont.
7.2.3. Feedback analysis and reward / corrective measures
taken if any (5)
taken,
Feedback collected for all courses: YES/NO Specify the feedback
collection process
:
Percentage off students
d
participating: Specify
S
f the
h feedback
f db k
analysis process
:
Basis of reward / corrective measures, if any:
Number of corrective actions taken in the last three years:
(
(Instruction:
The institution needs to design
g an effective
ff
ffeedback
questionnaire. It needs to justify that the feedback mechanism it has
developed really helps in evaluating teaching and finally contributing to
the quality of teaching).
teaching)
10-December-13
149
7 AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
7.
AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
LearningProcess(75)
Cont.
7.2.4. Scope for self-learning (5)
(Instruction: The institution needs to specify the scope for selflearning
/ learning beyond syllabus and creation of facilities for selflearning
self learning /
learning beyond syllabus.)
150
7. AcademicSupportUnitsandTeaching
LearningProcess(75)
Cont
Cont.
7.2.7. Co
Co-curricular
curricular and Extra-curricular
Extra curricular Activities (5)
(Instruction: The institution may specify the Co- curricular
and extra-curricular activities, e.g., NCC/NSS, cultural
activities,
ti iti etc)
t )
7.2.8. Sports
p
ggrounds, facilities, and q
qualified sports
p
instructors (5)
(Instruction: The institution may specify the facilities available
and
d their
th i usage in
i brief)
b i f)
10-December-13
151
8. Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
FinancialResources(75)
8.1. Campus Infrastructure and Facility (10)
811
8.1.1.
Maintenance of academic infrastructure and
facilities (4)
(Instruction:Specifydistinctfeatures)
8.1.2.
facility,
Hostels
No.ofrooms
No
ofrooms
Assistance
No.ofstudents
No
ofst dents
accommodated
Hostelfor
Boys:
Hostelfor
Girls:
10-December-13
152
8 Governance
8.
Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
InstitutionalSupportand
FinancialResources(75)
Cont.
153
8. Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
,
pp
FinancialResources(75)
Cont.
recruitment,
and
8. Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
FinancialResources(75)
Cont.
824 T
8.2.4.
Transparency and
d availability
l b l off correct
unambiguous information (3)
8. Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
FinancialResources(75)
8.3.
Cont.
10-December-13
156
8. Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
,
pp
FinancialResources(75)
Item
Infrastructural built-up
Library
L b t
Laboratory
equipment
i
t
Laboratory consumables
Teaching and non-teaching
staff salary
R&D
Travel
Other, specify
Total
Cont.
8. Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
,
pp
FinancialResources(75)
Cont.
how
the
10-December-13
158
8. Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
FinancialResources(75)
8.4.
Cont.
SummaryofbudgetfortheCFYandtheactualexpenditureincurred inthe
CFYm1 and CFYm2 (exclusively for this programme inthedepartment):
CFYm1andCFYm2(exclusivelyforthisprogramme
in the department):
Items
Budgete
Actual
Budgete
dinCFY expensesin
din
CFY
CFY
CFYm1
Actual Budgeted
Actual
Expenses inCFYm2 Expenses
in CFYm1
inCFYm1
in CFYm2
inCFYm2
(till)
Laboratoryequipment
Softwarepurchase
p
R&D
Laboratoryconsumables
Maintenanceandspares
Travel
Miscellaneousexpensesfor
academicactivities
Total
10-December-13
159
8 G
8.
Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
I i i
lS
d
FinancialResources(75)
Cont.
10-December-13
160
8 G
8.
Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
I i i
lS
d
FinancialResources(75)
Cont.
10-December-13
161
8. Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
FinancialResources(75)
Cont.
8 G
8.
Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
I i i
lS
d
FinancialResources(75)
Cont.
Number of new
volumes added
CFYm2
CFYm1
CFY
10-December-13
163
8 G
8.
Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
I i i
lS
d
FinancialResources(75)
Cont.
CFY
Science
As soft copy
py
As hard copy
Engg. and Tech.
As soft copy
As hard copy
Pharmacy
As soft copy
As hard copy
Architecture
As soft copy
As hard copy
Hotel Management As soft copy
As hard copy
10-December-13
164
8 G
8.
Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
I i i
lS
d
FinancialResources(75)
Cont.
8 G
8.
Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
I i i
lS
d
FinancialResources(75)
Cont.
Expenditures
Comments
Book Maga
Magazine/journ
ine/jo rn Magazine/jour
Maga ine/jo r Misc.
Misc
als (for hard nals (for soft Contents
copy
copy
py
py
subscription) subscription)
CFYm2
CFY 1
CFYm1
CFY
10-December-13
166
8 G
8.
Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
I i i
lS
d
FinancialResources(75)
Cont.
8 Governance
8.
Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
InstitutionalSupportand
FinancialResources(75)
Cont.
8 Governance
8.
Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
InstitutionalSupportand
FinancialResources(75)
Cont.
10-December-13
169
8 Governance
8.
Governance,InstitutionalSupportand
InstitutionalSupportand
FinancialResources(75)
8.8.
Cont.
CounsellingandEmergencyMedicalCareand
Firstaid(5)
Availability of counselling facility (1)
Arra ge e t for emergency
Arrangement
e erge c medical
edical care (2)
Availability of first-aid unit (2)
(Instruction:Theinstitutionneedstoreporttheavailabilityof
thefacilitiesdiscussedhere.)
10-December-13
170
8 ContinuousImprovement (75)
8.
8.8.
10-December-13
171
9 ContinuousImprovement (75)
9.
9.1.
Cont
Cont.
F
From4.1
4 1
Items
LYG
LYGm1
LYGm2
Assessment
Success index
9.2.
LYG
LYGm1
LYGm2
Assessment
API
10-December-13
172
9 ContinuousImprovement (75)
9.
9.3.
Cont
Cont.
F
From5.1
5 1
Items
CAY
CAYm1
CAYm2
Assessment
STR
9.4.
From5.3
Items
LYG
LYGm1
LYGm2 Assessment
FQI
10-December-13
173
9 ContinuousImprovement (75)
9.
95
9.5.
Cont
Cont.
From5.7and5.9
Items
LYG
LYGm1
LYGm2
Assessment
FRP
FPPC
10-December-13
174
9. ContinuousImprovement (75)
9.6.
Cont.
Module
Any other
description contributory
institute/
industry
Target
audience
Usage
and
citation
citation,
etc.
...............
..................
10-December-13
Assessment =
175
9 ContinuousImprovement (75)
9.
Cont
Cont.
Improvement
brought in
Contributed by
Comments,
if any
CAY
CAYm1
CAYm2
.........
..
10-December-13
176
Declaration
The head of the institution needs to make a declaration as per the
format given below:
This Self-Assessment Report (SAR) is prepared for the current
academic year (
) and the current financial year (
)
on
behalf of the institution.
institution
I certify that the information provided in this SAR is extracted from the
records and to the best of my knowledge, is correct and complete.
I understand that any false statement/information of consequence may
lead to rejection of the application for the accreditation for a period of
two or more years. I also understand that the National Board of
A
Accreditation
d
( A) or its sub-committees
(NBA)
b
will
ll have
h
the
h right
h to decide
d d
on the basis of the submitted SAR whether the institution should be
considered for an accreditation visit.
10-December-13
177
If the information provided in the SAR is found to be wrong during the visit or
subsequent to grant of accreditation,
accreditation the NBA has right to withdraw the grant of
accreditation and no accreditation will be allowed for a period of next two years
or more and the fee will be forfeited.
I undertake that the institution shall co-operate the visiting accreditation team,
shall provide all desired information during the visit and arrange for the meeting
as required for accreditation as per the NBA
NBAss provision.
I undertake that, the institution is well aware about the provisions in the NBAs
accreditation manual concerned for this application,
pp
, rules,, regulations
g
and
notifications in force as on date and the institute shall fully abide to them.
Place:
Date:
eNBAAccreditationProcess
St
Step
1 Online
1:
O li
R i t ti
Registration
P
Process
(f institutions
(for
i tit ti
not registered
g
with NBA))
Step 2: Apply for Accreditation
Step 3: Onsite Visit of Evaluation Team to the Institute
St
Step
4 Consideration
4:
C
id ti
off Evaluation
E l ti
R
Report
t by
b
Evaluation Accreditation Committee (EAC)
(
)
Step 5: Issuance of Accreditation Status
Step 6: Appeal against the Accreditation Status
Functions of Evaluators
study the SAR provided by the institution/university,
institution/university and identify
areas where additional information is required and issues tha
require an in-depth
in depth analysis during the visit.
Evaluate the SAR, collect and analyse all information that is
detrimental to the quality of the programme.
assist the Chairperson in conducting the visit.
visit
ensure
e su e tthat
at tthe
e report
epo t o
of tthe
ee
evaluation
a uat o tea
team is
sp
prepared
epa ed
and submitted to the NBA at the end of the final day visit.
Functions of Chairperson
p
finalise the schedule of visit.
chair
chair all meetings
meetings, coordinate the visit and provide
guidance to the evaluation team
address, on behalf of the evaluation team,
issues common to all programmes being evaluated,
including governance, institutional support and other
i f t t l facilities.
infrastructural
f iliti
study the SAR provided by the institution/university
and coordinate with evaluators to identify areas where
additional information is required and issues that require
an in-depth analysis during the visit.
Functions of Chairperson
Contd...
Accreditation Visit
The entire process of an accreditation visit comprises four activities
Pre-visit activities
Activities during the visit
Report writing
Seeking 3600 feedback
Activities
Duration
45 minutes
15 minutes
30 minutes
2 hours
Lunch
II
30 minutes
1 hour
Visit to classes
30 minutes
30 minutes
30 minutes
Verification of pprogramme
g
documents/evidence
2 hours
30 minutes
Lunch
III
30 minutes
1 hour 30 minutes
30 minutes
C d off exit
Conduct
i meeting
i
1 hour
h
1 hour
SAMPLE QUESTIONS
TO THE HEAD OF INSTITUTION
What are faculty workloads like? How do you balance the work load
between teaching and research?
How many of you are involved in the academic leadership course for
Course Coordinators?
events
i l d d
included
an
engineering graduate?
How active is the industry
industry-institute
institute interaction partnership cell?
What programme changes have been made from the input by industry-institute interaction
partnership cell?
What
Wh t are th
the strengths
t gth and
d weaknesses
k
off your department
d
t
t and
d supportt d
departments?
t
t ?
Are any major curriculum changes planned? What? When?
What are the major needs for growth and development of the curriculum?
Do you make recommendations for faculty salary and increments?
How much time is available to the faculty for professional development?
g for facultyy p
professional development?
p
What is the budget
Are faculty sent abroad under faculty exchange programme?
TO FACULTY
What are faculty workloads like? How do you balance your load
between teaching and research?
What are the good things that are happening in the programme?
What are the unwanted things that are happening in the programme?
TO FACULTY
C t
Cont
Are you involved in the assessment/evaluation of programme educational objectives
and programme outcomes? How?
Are you involved in programme improvements? How?
Is there sufficient student elective choice in the programmes? Would more choice be
advisable?
d i bl ?
How is the Honours program different from the graduate programme?
Is the development of engineering design skills adequate? How is design embedded
into the programme?
How are the issues of engineering ethics, sustainability and the environment, and
business
bus
ess sstudies
ud es co
covered
e ed throughout
oug ou the
ep
program?
og a
Are the students exposed to issues related to globalization and changing
technologies?
Wh
Whatt proportion
ti off fifinall year projects
j t are iindustry
d t b
based?
d? H
How are th
they supervised
i d
and managed?
Are lectures recorded and made available to students?
What professional society are you a member of? Are you active? Do you hold any
office?
TO FACULTY
Cont.
How do you ensure that appropriate assessment techniques are being used?
Does the same instructor usually teach both lecture and laboratory
related courses? If not, how do they coordinate?
Is there adequate
q
secretarial and technician service available to you?
y
portions of
TO FACULTY
Cont.
TO STUDENTS
How has your educational experience measured up to your expectations?
Comment on facilities such as laboratory,
laboratory IT access
access, information resources and
project work.
Are you providing feedback as part of a quality/programme improvement
mechanism?
To what extent does the programme provide for your personal and
professional
f i
l
capabilities
biliti
d l
development?
t? Are
A
th
there
measures off your
personal development and
performance
such
as
team-work,
leadership, management, communication and
presentation skills, self
learning capacity etc? Are these systematically addressed
in
subjects
studied?
Have issues such as g
globalisation,, ethics and sustainable practices
p
been
addressed yet?
What improvement would you make if you had a magic wand?
Did you make
k use off online
li llearning
i ffacilities?
iliti ? Wh
Whatt are th
they?
? D
Do th
they make
k a
difference?
TO STUDENTS
Cont.
Do you feel that you have an understanding of the targeted outcomes for your
programme and the real nature of engineering practice in your chosen domain? How
was this understandings established?
How successful are faculty members as role models of the professional engineer?
How accessible are faculty?
Did you get exposure to sessions or guest lectures by practising professionals? Are
these well organised and well presented?
What do you think are the key attributes an employer would be looking for in a graduate
engineer?
How effective are subject/unit outline documents in communicating and interlinking
objectives, learning outcomes, activities and assessment strategies within individual
units?
Is assessment well coordinated with objectives and targeted learning outcomes within
academic units?
Are there other avenues of embedded professional practice exposure other than
placement activities such as industry visits, field trips, industry assignments, case
studies, industry based projects etc.? Is there sufficient exposure to professional
practice?
TO STUDENTS
Cont.
open
TO STUDENTS
Cont.
To what extent does the program provide for your personal and professional
capabilities development? Are there measures of your personal development
and performance such as team-work, leadership, management,
communication and presentation skills
skills, self learning capacity etc? Are these
systematically addressed in subjects studied?
Are you acquiring the expected / required skills?
Are the faculty members competent in the subjects they teach?
Are facultyy members available and helpful
p to you
y at times convenient to you?
y
Why did you choose this institution/department / programme?
Are the laboratory equipment/tools/accessories well
well-maintained?
maintained?
How good is the hands-on experience?
Do you plan to continue your education after graduation? Where? When?
Do you plan to accept a job after graduation? Where? When?
TO STUDENTS
Cont.
What type of job can you get as a graduate of this programme? At what
salary?
y
What is your overall view of the programme?
Would you recommend it to a friend?
Are you providing feedback as part of a quality/programme improvement
mechanism?
Evaluation Guidelines
Criterion 1: Vision, Mission and Programme Educational Objectives (100)
Minimum qualifying points: 60
Item
no.
1.1
Item
description
Mission and
Vision
Points
5
Evaluation Guidelines
Cont
Cont..
Item
no.
Item
description
Points
1.2
Programme
Educational
Objectives
15
Evaluation Guidelines
Cont
Cont..
Item
no.
1.3
1.4
Item
description
Points
Attainment of
Programme
Educational
Objectives
30
Assessment of
attainment of
Programme
Ed
Educational
i l
Objectives
40
Evaluation Guidelines
Cont..
Item
no.
15
1.5
Item description
Points
10
Item
description
Definition and
Validation of
Course
Outcomes and
Programme
Outcomes
Points
30
Evaluation guidelines
Item
description
Attainment of
Programme
Outcomes
Points
Evaluation guidelines
40
Item
description
Assessment of
attainment of
Programme
Outcomes
Points
125
Evaluation guidelines
Item
description
24
2.4
Use of
assessment
results towards
improvement
of the
programme
Points
30
Evaluation guidelines
Item description
Curriculum
Points
20
Evaluation guidelines
3.2
Curriculum
components and
relevance to the
Pos and the PEOs
15
3.3
Core engineering
courses and their
relevance to
Programme
Outcomes
including design
experience
60
Item description
Points
Evaluation guidelines
3.4
Industry
interaction/internship
10
3.5
Curriculum
Development
15
3.6
Course Syllabi
Criterion 4: Students
Students Performance in the Programme (75)
Item
no.
Item
description
Points
Evaluation guidelines
4.1
Success rate
20
4.2
Academic
performance
20
Assessment = 2 API
where, API = Academic performance index
= Mean of CGPA of all the students on
a 10-point CGPA system
Or = ((Mean of the percentage
p
g of marks of all
students)/10
Item
description
Points
Evaluation guidelines
43
4.3
Placementt andd
Pl
higher studies
20
Assessment = 20 (x
( + 1.25y)/N
1 25 )/N
where, x = No. of students placed,
y = No. of students admitted for the higher
studies,
studies
N = No. of students admitted in the first year and
students admitted via lateral entry in that batch subject to
max. assessment points = 20
Percentage of students to be considered based on first
year and lateral entry.
Assessment: 3 points for each item
4.4
Professional
activities
15
E l ti guidelines
Evaluation
id li
5.1
Studentteacher
ratio
20
5.2
Faculty
cadre ratio
20
Assessment = 20 CRI
Cadre ratio index (CRI) = 2.25 (2x + y)/N; based on
1:2:6 subject to max. CRI = 1.0
x = No. of professors in the programme
y = No. of associate professors in the programme
Item description
Points
Evaluation guidelines
5.3
Faculty
qualifications
30
Assessment = 6 FQI
Faculty qualification index (FQI) =
(10x + 6y + 2z0)/N2,
where, x+y+z0 N2, z0 z
x = No. of faculty members with PhD
y = No.
No of faculty members with ME/MTech
z = No. of faculty members with BE/BTech
5.4
Faculty
C
Competencies
i
correlation to
Programme
S ifi Criteria
Specific
C it i
15
Item description
Points
Evaluation guidelines
5.5
Faculty as
15
participants/resour
ce persons in
i
faculty
development/train
i activities
ing
ti iti
5.6
Faculty retention
Assessment = 4 RPI/N
R
Retention
i point
i index
i d (RPI) = Sum
S
off the
h retention
i
points to all faculty members
One retention point for each year of experience at
th institution,
the
i tit ti
subject
bj t to
t maximum
i
five
fi points
i t to
t
a faculty member.
15
Item
description
Faculty
research
publications
Points
20
Evaluation guidelines
Faculty points in research publications (FRP)
Assessment of FRP = 4 (Sum of the research
publication points scored by each faculty member)/N
(Instruction: A faculty member scores maximum five
research publication points, each year, depending upon
the quality of the research papers published in the past
three years.)
The research papers considered are those (i) which can
be located on internet and/or are included in hard-copy
volumes/ pproceedings,
g ppublished by
y well-known
publishers, and (ii) the faculty members affiliation, in
the published paper, is of the current institution.
5.8
Faculty
intellectual
property
g
rights
10
Item
description
Points
Evaluation guidelines
59
5.9
Funded
R&D
Projects and
consultancy
y
(FRDC)
work
20
5.10
Facultyy
interaction
with outside
world
10
Item description
Points
6.1
Classrooms in the
department
20
Evaluation guidelines
6.2
Faculty rooms in
the department
15
Item description
Points
Evaluation guidelines
63
6.3
Laboratories
L
b
i in
i the
h
department to meet
the curricular
requirements and the
POs
25
Ad
Adequate well-equipped
ll
i d laboratories
l b
i
to
run all the programme-specific curriculum
(10)
Availability of computing facilities for the
department exclusively (5)
Availability of laboratories with technical
support within and beyond working hours
(5)
Equipments to run experiments and their
maintenance number of students per
maintenance,
experimental
setup,
size
of
the
laboratories,
overall
ambience,
etc.
(5)
6.4
Technical manpower
support
15
Item
description
7.1
Academic
Support Units
Points
35
Evaluation guidelines
Item
description
p
Teaching
Learning
Process
Points
40
Evaluation guidelines
Item description
Points
Campus
infrastructure and
facility
10
Evaluation guidelines
8.2
Organisation,
governance and
governance,
transparency
10
Item description
Points
Evaluation guidelines
8.3
Budget allocation,
utilisation, and
public accounting
10
8.4
Programme Specific
Budget Allocation,
Utilisation
10
8.5
Library
20
Internet
05
8.7
05
8.8
Counselling and
emergency
medical care and
first aid
first-aid
05
It
Item
d
description
i ti
P i t
Points
E l ti guidelines
Evaluation
id li
9.1
Improvement in
success index of
students
9.2
Improvement in
academic
d i
performance index
of students
9.3
Improvement in
STR
9.4
Enhancement of
faculty qualification
index
Item description
Points
Evaluation guidelines
9.5
Improvement
p
in facultyy
research publication,
R&D, and consultancy
10
9.6
Continuing education
10
9.7
15
New
facilities
in
terms
of
infrastructure/equipment/facilities added
to augment the programme.
9.8
Overall improvement
since last accreditation
accreditation,
if any, otherwise,
since establishment
20
Evaluation Report
Evaluation Report for NBA Accreditation of Undergraduate
Engineering Programmes
(Note: This report must be in textual form supported by the findings listed for
id ifi d iin evaluation
identified
l i guidelines)
id li
)
________________
(Programme Evaluator 2)
_______________
(Team Chairperson)
Criterion 1: Vision,
Vision Mission and Programme Educational Objectives
Item
no.
Max.
points
Item description
1.1
1.2
15
1.3
30
1.4
Assessment of attainment of
Programme Educational Objectives
40
15
1.5
IIndicate
di
how
h results
l off assessment off
achievement of PEOs have been used
for redefining PEOs
10
Total
100
Points
awarded
Remarks
Item no.
Item description
2.1
30
2.2
40
2.3
Assessment of attainment of
Programme Outcomes
125
2.4
30
Total
Points
awarded
Remarks
225
Findings:
Signature
Max.
points
Item description
31
3.1
Curriculum
20
3.2
15
3.3
60
3.4
Industry interaction/internship
10
3.5
Curriculum Development
15
3.6
Course Syllabi
5
Total
Points
awarded
Remarks
125
Findings:
Signature
Max.
points
Item description
4.1
Success rate
20
42
4.2
A d i performance
Academic
f
20
4.3
20
4.4
Professional activities
15
Total
Points
awarded
Remarks
75
Findings:
Signature
It
Item
d
description
i ti
Max.
M
points
5.1
Student-teacher ratio
20
5.2
20
5.3
Faculty qualifications
30
5.4
15
5.5
15
5.6
Faculty retention
15
57
5.7
20
5.8
10
5.9
20
5.10
10
Total
Findings:
Points
P
i t
awarded
R
Remarks
k
175
Signature
Max.
points
p
Item description
6.1
Classrooms
20
6.2
Faculty rooms
15
6.3
Laboratories including
computing facility
25
64
6.4
T h i l manpower support
Technical
15
Total
Points
awarded
Remarks
75
Findings:
Si
Signature
t
Item description
Max.
Max
points
7.1
35
7.2
Teaching Learning
Process
40
Total
75
Points
awarded
Remarks
Findings:
Si
Signature
t
Item description
Max.
Max
points
8.1
10
8.2
10
83
8.3
Budget Allocation
Allocation, Utilisation
Utilisation, and Public
Accounting
10
8.4
10
8.5
Library
20
8.6
Internet
8.7
8.8
Total
75
Points
awarded
Remarks
Fi di
Findings:
Signature
Item description
Max.
points
9.1
9.2
9.3
Improvement in Student-Teacher
Student Teacher Ratio
9.4
9.5
10
9.6
Continuing Education
10
9.7
15
9.8
20
Total
75
Points
awarded
Remarks
Fi di
Findings:
Signature
Summary of Evaluation
S.
No.
Criterion
Max.
points
Qualifying
points
Points
awarded
Qualified?
100
60
Yes/No
Programme Outcomes
225
135
Yes/No
Programme Curriculum
125
75
Yes/No
Students performance
75
45
Yes/No
Facultyy Contributions
175
105
Yes/No
75
45
Yes/No
75
45
Yes/No
75
45
Yes/No
Continuous Improvement
75
45
Yes/No
1000
600
Total
Specific remarks for those criteria in which points awarded are less than the qualifying
points:
...................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................
________________
________________
(Programme Evaluator1)
(Programme Evaluator 2)
________________
(Team Chairperson)
Chairpersons Report
Name of the programme
Name and address of the institution
Dates of the accreditation visit
Name, designation, and affiliation of
pprogramme
g
evaluator 1
Name, designation, and affiliation of
programme evaluator 2
(Requested to submit individual report for each programme)
_______________________________________________________________
Strengths:..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................
Weaknesses:.........................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................
Deficiencies, if any: ...........................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
Additional remarks
remarks, if any:
any:.................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................
(Team Chairperson)
Institute Specific
I.1.
I2
I.2.
Composition of governing
governing, senate
senate, and other academic and administrative
bodies; their functions; and responsibilities. List of all the meetings held in
the past three years along with the attendance records. Representative
minutes and action taken reports of a few meetings of such bodies along
with the list of current faculty members who are members of such bodies.
I.3.
Institute Specific
Cont..
I 4 Budget
I.4.
B d t allocation
ll
ti and
d utilisation,
tili ti
audited
dit d statement
t t
t off accounts.
t
I.5. Informative website.
I 6 Library resources
I.6.
resources---books
books and journal holdings
holdings.
I.7. Listing of core, computing, and manufacturing, etc., labs.
I.8. Records of T&P and career and guidance cells.
I.9. Records of safety checks and critical installations.
I.10. Medical care records and usages
g of ambulance,, etc.
I.11. Academic calendar, schedule of tutorial, and makeup classes.
I.12. Handouts/files along with outcomes, list of additional topics to meet the
outcomes.
I.13. Set of question papers, assignments, evaluation schemes, etc.
I 14 Feedback form
I.14.
form, analysis of feedback
feedback, and corrective actions
actions.
I.15. Documented feedback received from the stakeholders (e.g., industries,
parents, alumni, financiers, etc.) of the institution.
I.16. List of faculty who teach first year courses along with their qualifications.
I.17. Results of the first year students.
Programme Specific
Each programme for which an institution seeks accreditation or reaccreditation must
have in place the following:
P.1
P.2
P.3
P.4
P.5
P.6
P.7
P.8
P9
P.9
S
Sample
l b
bestt and
d average project
j t reports/thesis
t /th i
Programme Specific
Cont..
P.12
P.13
p
along
g with DOIs and p
publication/citation details
List of facultyy publications
P.14
List of R&D and consultancy projects along with approvals and project
completion reports
P 15
P.15
Li and
List
d proofs
f off ffaculty
l iinteraction
i with
i h outside
id world
ld
P.16
P 17
P.17
List of programme
programme-specific
specific laboratories and computing facility within
department.
P.18
P.19
P 20
P.20
P.21
P.22
P.23
P.24
Programme Specific
Cont..
P.25
P.26.
P.27.
P.28.
P.29.
P 30
P.30.
Stakeholders
St
k h ld iinvolvement
l
t iin th
the process off iimprovementt off th
the
PEOs and the Pos
P.31.
P.32.
Feedback Forms
Purpose
This form is designed to have a fair opinion of the team which has visited your institution.
institution This
will enable the NBA to improve its system and make it more effective. We thank you in
advance for the time and effort you are investing in filling out this form.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
1. ________
2. ________
3. ________
4. ________
5. ________
6. ________
7. ________
8. ________
9. ________
10. ________ 11. ________ 12. ________
6. Please comment on the evaluation methodology adopted by the team during
th visit.
the
i it
7. Whether the evaluators have tendered any advice to improve the system? If
yes, please specify.
(i)
Name of the Evaluator:
(ii) Advice:
8. Whether any
y of the evaluators were specific
p
about the relevant topics
p
related to the
programme? If no, please specify.
9. Whether the evaluators interacted with students and faculty in groups or with students
and faculty
y in private?
p
If yyes,, please
p
specify
p
y the name of the students/faculty.
y
10. Whether the head of the institute or any representative of the management was also
present during the interaction? If yes, please specify.
(i) Name of the representative
:
(ii) Observation of the representative about interaction
:
11. Whether evaluators have been facilitated by the institute for outdoor activity? If yes,
please specify.
specify
(i) On whose insistence
:
(ii) What activity
:
12 Whether
12.
Wh th the
th exitit meeting
ti mett the
th purpose i.e.,
i
to
t share
h
the
th visiting
i iti tteams
perceptions
ti
and general observations about the institution and programmes.
Feedback Form to be filled by the Chairperson about the Institution and Team Members
Purpose
This form is designed to have a fair opinion about the team members who have assisted you during the
visit. This will enable the NBA to improve its system and make it more effective. We thank you in
advance for the time and effort you are investing in filling out this form.
1.
2.
3
3.
4.
5.
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
1. ________
2. ________
3. ________
4 ________
4.
5 ________
5.
6 ________
6.
7. ________
8. ________
9. ________
10. ________ 11. ________ 12. ________
6. Please comment on the evaluation methodology adopted by the evaluators.
7. Whether the evaluators have tendered any advice to improve the system? If
yes, please specify.
((i)) Name (s)
( ) of the Evaluator :
(ii) Advice
:
8. Whether the evaluators were specific about the relevant topics related to the
programme? If no, please specify.
y in groups
g
or with students
9. Whether the evaluator interacted with students and faculty
and faculty in private? If yes, please specify the name of the students/faculty .
10. Whether the evaluator has been facilitated by the institution for outdoor activity? If
yes, p
please
ease spec
specify.
y
(i) On whose insistence
:
(ii) What activity
:
11 Please comment on the general behaviour and etiquette of the evaluators during the
11.
visit.
12. Please comment on the general behaviour and etiquette of the Head of the
Institution/other key officials .
13. Please comment on the cooperation and coordination rendered by the institution .
general behaviour of the visiting
g team ((Chairperson
p
and
14. Please comment on the g
evaluators) during the visit? Whether hospitality was extended to the visiting team? If
yes, please specify the participants and the kind of hospitality offered.
Signature of the Chairperson
F db k F
Feedback
Form to
t be
b filled
fill d b
by th
the E
Evaluator
l t about
b t th
the IInstitution,
tit ti
Co-evaluator and Chairperson
Purpose
p
This form is designed to have a fair opinion about the team members who have assisted you during the
visit. This will enable the NBA to improve its system and make it more effective. We thank you in
advance for the time and effort y
you are investing
g in filling
g out this form.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
10. Whether the chairperson has been facilitated by the institute for outdoor activity. If
yes, please specify .
(i) On whose insistence
:
(ii) What activity
:
11. Please comment on the general behaviour and etiquette of the chairperson during
the visit.
12 Pl
12.
Please commentt on th
the generall b
behaviour
h i
and
d etiquette
ti
tt off th
the H
Head
d off th
the
Institution / other key officials.
13 Please comment on the general behaviour and etiquette of the co
13.
co-evaluator.
evaluator
14. Please comment on the cooperation rendered by the co-evaluator.
15. Please comment on the cooperation and coordination rendered by the institution
Signature of the Chairperson
II
III
IV
Thank YOU