Case 2:06-cv-00049-WBS-DAD Document 32 Filed 01/03/2007 Page 1 of 2

1 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP

THEODORE T. HERHOLD (State Bar No. 122895)
2 ttherhold@townsend.com
MATTHEW R. HULSE (State Bar No. 209490)
3 mrhulse@townsend.com
ROBERT D. TADLOCK (State Bar No. 238479)
4 rdtadlock@townsend.com
379 Lytton Avenue
5 Palo Alto, California 94301
Telephone: (650) 326-2400; Facsimile: (650) 326-2422
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant
SYNVASIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
7
Morgan W. Tovey (SBN 136242)
8 William Ross Overend (SBN 180209)
REED SMITH LLP
9 Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111-3922
10 Telephone: (415) 543-8700; Facsimile: (415) 391-8269
11 Gregory J. Vogler (admitted pro hac vice)
Robert A. Surrette (admitted pro hac vice)
12 William B. Gont (admitted pro hac vice)
McANDREWS HELD & MALLOY
13 500 West Madison Street, Suite 3400
Chicago, IL 60661
14 Telephone: (312) 775-8000; Facsimile: (312) 775-8100
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant
15 STRYKER CORPORATION
16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17 SACRAMENTO DIVISION
18 SYNVASIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Case No. 2:05-CV-01515-WBS-DAD
(Consolidated)
19 Plaintiff,
v.
20 STRYKER CORPORATION,
Defendant.
Case No. 2:06-CV-00049-WBS-DAD
21 SYNVASIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC., (Consolidated)
Plaintiff,
23 v. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO
24 STRYKER CORPORATION, AMEND THE DATE NOTICED TO HEAR
SYNVASIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S MOTION
Defendant.
25 FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF
INFRINGEMENT OF THE ‘353 AND ‘253
26 PATENTS
27
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO AMEND THE DATE NOTICED
TO HEAR SYNVASIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT OF INFRINGEMENT OF THE ‘353 AND ‘253 PATENTS
CASE NO. 2:05-CV-01515-WBS-DAD AND CASE NO. 2:06-CV-00049-WBS-DAD
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
 Case 2:06-cv-00049-WBS-DAD Document 32 Filed 01/03/2007 Page 2 of 2

1 Having considered Synvasive Technology, Inc.’s and Stryker Corporation’s Stipulation

2 Requesting to Amend the Date Noticed to Hear Synvasive Technology, Inc.’s Motion for Partial
3 Summary Judgment of Infringement of the ‘353 and ‘253 Patents, and good cause appearing therefor,
4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Stipulation Requesting to Amend the Date Noticed
5 to Hear Synvasive Technology, Inc.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement of the
6 ‘353 and ‘253 Patents is GRANTED, and that:
7 1) The hearing of Synvasive’s motion for partial summary judgment is moved to February 5,
8 2007 to coincide with the noticed hearing of Stryker’s summary judgment motions.
9 2) The briefing schedule for the opposition and reply will be adjusted to correspond to the
10 February 5, 2007 hearing date so that, in accordance with Local Rule 78-230(c) and (d), any
11 opposition to Synvasive’s motion may be filed with the Clerk no later than January 22, 2007, and a
12 reply to the opposition may be filed no later than January 29, 2007.
13

14
Dated: December 29, 2006
15

16

17

18

19

20

21

23

24

25

26

27

28
-1-
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO AMEND THE DATE NOTICED
TO HEAR SYNVASIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT OF INFRINGEMENT OF THE ‘353 AND ‘253 PATENTS
PDF createdCASE
withNO.pdfFactory trial version
2:05-CV-01515-WBS-DAD www.pdffactory.com
AND CASE NO. 2:06-CV-00049-WBS-DAD