Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Page4- 1
Page 4 - 2
situation have been determined, the following step is their estimation. The
estimation of the impact must be as far as possible quantitative.
This is the most important aspect of the whole procedure. Very often the
impacts are defmed by qualitative criteria which are arbitrary and not
measurable, so that an unacceptable degree of uncertainty is present before
any assessment. Furthermore the impacts must be defined by criteria enough
easily measurable Qr in a way compatible with the degree of detail of the
project and with times to obtain an answer from relevant authorities about
the environment acceptability of the project. So, especially for small
hydropower plants, Environmental Impact Assessment it's recommendable
to refer to a biotic indexes, more easily measurable than biotic ones and
from which anyway these latter depend.
Page 4 - 3
For projects falling under the categories, submissions will be as summarized in the
following chart:
WithinECA
Not within
ECA
EIS
ECP
EIS
NotECP
For the Buguias I Mini Hydropower Projects, it is not located inside an ECA, and it is
not categorized as a Environmentally Critical Project due to its capacity classification,
which is below the 10 MW mark for each individual site. It does not employs a dam
with pondage, it is well below the established 2Million cu.m. dam capacity as a
measure to include under ECP' s. Therefore an lEE checklist was submitted to the
DENR-EMB Office who shall decide whether an Environmental Compliance
Certificate should be issued.
Page 4 - 4
Environmental Impact
Comparing hydroelectric projects with other sources of electrical generation, mini
hydro plants produce power that is compatible with the environment. In contrast with
thermal electric generating systems, hydropower projects produce no air or thermal
pollution. Also hydropower impacts are reasonably well understood and, therefore,
predictable to a moderate degree of accuracy. Hydro electric generation is an
economic use of water that does not consume the resource. Additionally, small and
mini hydropower projects tend to create reduced environmental impacts relative to
large-scale plants.
Impact Identification
The proposed projects employs a small dam or diversion weir with no significant
impounding capacity except to raise intake water level to appropriate levels to allow
entry to the conveyance systems. Except for the impounded water, there are no major
modifications of the land. The impounded area is confined within approximately five
hundred meters of river stretch thus the rising water level is far below from the
settlements which are located uphill land far from the project site, so resettlement is not
necessary for them.
A Summary Matrix of predicted environmental issues or impacts and their level of
significance at various stages of development of the project is shown following.
Significant impacts identified on the physical resources include the issue on water and
land use conflict, and on the socio-cultural aspect, the overall public acceptability of
the project as experienced with other previous similar projects.
Page4- 5
Low
Dam&
Intake
1. Construction Phase
1.1 Physical Environment
- Air Quality I Dust Pollution
-Noise
-Water Quality and Quantity
-Land Use Conflict/Conversion
1.2 Biological Environment
- Destruction of Vegetation
- Loss of Topsoil
1.3 Socio-Economic Environment
-Loss of Agricultural Livelihood
- Displacement of Settlements
-Occupational Risks to Workers
2. Operational Phase
2.1 Physical Environment
-Noise
-Water Quality and Quantity
2.2 Biological Environment
- Effect on Aquatic Life
- Loss of Productivity of Land
- Pre-emption of Wildlife
Habitat
2.3 Socioeconomic Environment
- Trespassing
- Increase in Land Values
- Shift to non-Agricultural
Livelihood
Legend:
Pressure
Forebay
Headrace
Penstock
Power
Transmis-
Pipe
House
sion Line
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
2
2
2
2
2 - Significant Impact
1 - Moderate Impact
0 - Insignificant
Page 4 - 6
The indigenous people's concerns and other possible socioeconomic, political and
cultural impacts will be of uttermost priority on such mini hydropower projects.
Discussions and enlightenment on these matters must be made and resolutions arrived
at. These impact mitigations will be resolved during public consultations as part of the
requirement for environmental clearance from the DENR and NCIP. Following
includes Program for Environment and Social Obligation for the environmental
Management, Community Relations and Social Obligations.
Annexes include Initial Environmental Examination Checklist and MOA Obligations
with the Indigeous Peoples and the Hosts Communities.
Page 4 - 7
Environmental Management
The Proposed Buguias I Mini Hydropower Projects has been granted Environmental
Compliance Certificates (ECC) under the Philippines Environmental Impact
Statement System (PD 1586) being a mini hydropower resource development project
with respect to its construction, operation and phase-out.
The Power Station shall be operated in accordance with all environmental and other
Philippine and local laws and regulations in force as of the date the Power Plant was
constructed and shall comply with any changes in such laws and regulations and any
new laws and regulations.
Action Plans for Compliance to Environmental Laws and Regulations as follows:
ENVIRONMENTAL
PARTICULARS
ACTION PLANS/
REMARKS
LAWSIREGULATIONS
EIS
Project has been exempted
P.D. No. 1586 of 1978
(EIS System)
from EIS requirement, with
MC No. 01 Dated 05Jan05
conditions that the Project
shall
comply
with
environmental laws, rules and
regulations that include RA
8749, RA 9003, RA 6969,
among others.
P.D. No. 984 of 1976
Air Pollution Control
Renewal of Permit to Operate
R.A No. 8749 (Phil. Clean
Air Pollution source and
Control Installation from the
Air Act/PCAA)
DENR as required.
DAO No. 2000-81 IRR
Emission
Monitoring
Environmental
conducted
by
retained
Monitoring! Standards consultant, Ambient air and
noise monitoring
CEMS
Continuous Emission Comply
with
Monitoring Systems
requirements as DENR issued
guidelines
P.D. No. 984 of 1976
DAONo. 35
Water
Control
Page 4 - 8
Page4- 9