TECHNOLOGY WHITE PAPER

Fronthaul Networks
a Key Enabler for LTE-Advanced

Author:
Ulrich Kohn
ADVA Optical Networking
ADVA Optical Networking All rights reserved.

The rules of competition in regards to Mobile Services are rapidly changing.

Customers no longer select a carrier based on pricing but rather on service
quality. This pushes mobile network operators to further increase radio access
capacity and provide continuous network coverage. Providing a superior user
experience is the most effective way to keep churn at a low rate and attract
new users.
However, growing capacity and completing coverage in mobile networks is
limited by availability of spectrum. This is addressed by LTE-Advanced, which
introduces innovative radio features for highest spectral efciency in radio
access even within overlapping cell sectors by interference coordination and
radio spectrum control with multipoint connections. Technologies for reusing
spectrum allow the installation of additional low power cells (Small Cells)
within a Macro Cell. This improves coverage and increases the overall cell
capacity.
Such advanced technologies, however, add additional requirements to the
network interconnecting base stations and the Evolved Packet Core (EPC). The
inter-cell communication needs to meet more stringent demand for delay and
delay variation. In addition, the mobile backhaul network (MBH) must be capable
of distributing phase and time information in a highly accurate manner. Those
requirements can hardly be met by existing mobile backhaul networks, creating
a challenging task for either migrating existing networks or complementing the
installed base with alternative concepts.

The latest LTE features for spectral

reuse and maximizing cell capacity.

This paper describes the latest LTE features for spectral reuse and maximizing
cell capacity. It outlines the impact on the mobile backhaul network and
introduces a fronthaul network as an innovative approach to connecting
a rapidly increasing number of Small Cells in a future proof and highly
efcient way. Guidance for best practice fronthaul network implementation
is provided.

Increasing Capacity in the Radio Access Network

As mobile operators extend network capacity they install additional cells within
the coverage of a Macro Cell as shown in Figure 1. In a heterogeneous network
scenario those additional cells could be a different mobile technology operated
in a different spectrum (e.g WiFi) or it might be low power Small Cells using
the same mobile technology operating in the same spectrum as the Macro Cell.
In case of the latter, efcient radio resource management must avoid interference
that compromises the capacity benet of installing additional base stations. LTE is
designed to handle interference from neighboring cells and it introduces different
technologies to avoid, mitigate or constructively benet from interference.

WHITE PAPER
Fronthaul Networks a Key Enabler for LTE-Advanced

Macro Cell

Small Cell

Figure 1: Macro Cells and Small Cells operating in same spectrum

with overlapping coverage

Interference Cancellation with eICIC

(enhanced Inter-Cell Interference Coordination)
Inter-cell Interference coordination was introduced with LTE Release 8 and is
based on optimizing transmit power levels across neighboring cells for minimum
interference e.g. by lowering power for users close to the antenna sites allowing
re-use of this spectrum. With LTE-Advanced Release 10 another scheme was
added. With eICIC (enhanced inter-cell interference coordination) the Macro
Cell frame structures Almost Blank Subframes (ABS), which are used for low
power signaling purposes, are re-used by low power radio base stations which
operate within the coverage area of the Macro Cell. All sites require common
time and phase information in order to synchronize their frame sequence for
coordinated access to commonly used time slots. Hence, availability of highly
accurate phase and time information is a critical prerequisite for applying this
LTE-Advanced feature.

Macro Cell Timeframes

ABS

ABS

ABS

Figure 2: Multiple use of Almost Blank Subframes (ABS)

WHITE PAPER
Fronthaul Networks a Key Enabler for LTE-Advanced

Interference Avoidance with CoMP Coordinated Multipoint Transmission

There are further means to avoid interference by implementing time and space
diversity technologies or by synchronizing the signal provided from several base
stations.

Beam forming can be achieved by

combining the radio signal from
antennas at different sites.

Beam forming technologies are based on MIMO (Multiple Input Multiple

Output) schemes, which spatially segment a cell and allow user terminals to
operate in the same spectrum. Figure 3 depicts spectral reuse in overlapping
cells by steering beams to several terminals. Such beam forming can also
be achieved by combining the radio signal from antennas at different sites.
The involved sites need to coordinate their radio frequency signal in a
highly accurate way, which requires phase synchronization and high-capacity
connectivity with low latency.

Figure 3: Beam forming as a means to avoid interference

Hence, those LTE-Advanced technologies put some additional requirements on
the backhaul network. Stringent time and phase synchronization with accuracy
in the order of 1s is required for most LTE-Advanced features. In addition some
schemes need high capacity inter-site communication.
Most requirements can be met by implementing high-quality time synchronization
and in addition inter-cell communication using respective interfaces of the LTE
architecture. Such implementation however involves signicant complexity.

Impact on Mobile Backhaul Architecture

The above outlined technologies
allow a higher spectral efciency
within overlapping sectors.

The above outlined technologies allow a higher spectral efciency within

overlapping sectors. The required interference management calls for strict
coordination of access to the radio spectrum in neighboring cells. Hence, a
close cooperation is required among the base stations.
The X2 interface dened within the LTE network architecture can be used
for such inter-cell coordination. With present mobile backhaul networks, this
interface is frequently connected through the service edge router, which links the
different Radio Base Stations with its controller or Service Gateway respectively,
as shown in Figure 4 with the red solid line.

WHITE PAPER
Fronthaul Networks a Key Enabler for LTE-Advanced

Control trafc must be exchanged

with stringent delay requirements
of less than 1 ms.

Control trafc must be exchanged with stringent delay requirements of less

than 1 ms. Each radio signal needs to be supplied with highly precise time/
phase information with an accuracy in the order of 1s. Location-based
services demand even lower tolerance of some 100ns as phase differences
among several radio signals are used to calculate the location of user
equipment.

Preferred X2 connection
for lower delay

Edge Router
RNC

Carrier Ethernet

IP/MPLS
Servicing
Gateway

Typical X2 connection creates too much delay

MME

Figure 4: Inter-cell communication in LTE

Present design practice cannot meet the delay target. Backhaul architectures
which switch/route X2 closer to the base station become necessary as indicated
with the dotted path in Figure 4. This, however, requires a signicant change in
network architecture, which may result in signicant investment.

Time and Phase Synchronization in Mobile Backhaul Networks

Most present mobile backhaul networks are able to distribute information for
frequency synchronization by either using SyncE or packed-based frequency
synchronization based on IEEE1588 (Precise Timing Protocol). However, those
implementations are not able to provide accurate time and phase synchronization.
There are various strategies how networks can be made capable for distribution
of precise phase information. GPS receivers can be co-located with Radio
Base Stations but come at high cost and are not suitable for in-door locations.
Alternatively, the MBH network can be upgraded with improved synchronization
distribution capability, which requires PTP mapped into Ethernet in combination
with processing of time stamps within any network node by an embedded
Boundary Clock. In many cases, such upgrades result in a rebuild of the
complete network.
Mobile Network Operators prepare
their infrastructure for emerging LTEAdvanced.

As Mobile Network Operators prepare their infrastructure for emerging LTEAdvanced, they analyze different strategies on how the backhaul network
can provide the required functions. Favorable solutions will allow migrating
rather than overbuilding the existing network. A combination of GPS-based
synchronization delivery with network based IEEE 1588 packet-based
methods known as Assisted Partial Timing Support (APTS) nicely combines
accuracy of satellite based solutions with the high availability of terrestrial
communication networks.
ADVA Optical Networking offers unique synchronization delivery and assurance
technology for implementing synchronization distribution in installed networks,
making best use of satellite systems as well as network based methods such as
4

WHITE PAPER
Fronthaul Networks a Key Enabler for LTE-Advanced

IEEE1588 and SyncE. This, however, is not covered in this White Paper, but more
detailed information can be found on www.advaoptical.com.
A commercial as well as a highly attractive, technical approach for relaxing the
backhaul requirements is based on re-partitioning the Radio Access Network by
pooling some functions at a central site and minimizing equipment that needs to
be mounted at the antenna site.

Performing interference coordination

and spectrum allocation at a central
site.

Performing interference coordination and spectrum allocation at a central

site by a common clock and time unit eliminates the need to accurately
distribute synchronization information to each antenna site and relaxes
the real-time communication requirements between the controlled sites.
Centralized processing also increases efciency as overall power consumption
is reduced. Installation and maintenance costs will decrease as a larger share
of the equipment is installed in a controlled environment.

Centralized Baseband Processing and Fronthaul Network

A radio base station can be functionally separated into
a Baseband Unit (BBU, sometimes also referred to as Digital Unit DU),
which generates and processes a digitized baseband Radio Frequency (RF)
signal
a Radio Unit (RU), which creates the analog transmit RF signal from the
baseband signal and sources it to the antenna, and respectively digitizes
the RF receive signal
With todays Radio Base Stations, both units are integrated into a single network
element. Figure 5 shows a scenario with overlapping cells in which the radio
inter-cell communication is handled through the X2 interface.

RBS

MBH

RU
BBU

S1
RBS
RU
BBU

RBS
RU
BBU

X2

Figure 5: Radio Base Stations use X2 interface

to communicate with each other

Separating both units creates opportunities for network optimization. Figure 6

shows how the architecture is impacted by introducing a split radio base station.
The active radio frequency unit, which is called Remote Radio Head (RRH) is
connected to the pooled digital units by means of a CPRI (Common Public Radio
Interface) interface. This interface was specied by an industry cooperation with
5

WHITE PAPER
Fronthaul Networks a Key Enabler for LTE-Advanced

participation from Ericsson AB, Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd, NEC Corporation,
Alcatel Lucent and Nokia Siemens Networks GmbH & Co. KG. It transports the
digitized radio frequency signal as well as management and control data. The
transmission network connecting RRH with BBU is called fronthaul network
underling the difference with the backhaul network, which connect the DUs with
the edge of the evolved Packet Core (ePC).
Small form factor Remote Radio
Heads (RRH) simplify installation
and reduce power consumption.

Small form factor Remote Radio Heads (RRH) simplify installation and
reduce power consumption of active equipment at the antenna site. As
the characteristic of the RF signal is generated at the collocated, pooled
Baseband Units, a tight coordination of the radio signals is achieved. Besides
the cost advantages, the improved interference management translates into
a higher cell utilization as well as improved quality of service.
Centralized Baseband
Processing

RRH
RRH
RRH

3
3
RRH
RRH
RRH

3
RRH
RRH
RRH

BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU

MBH

Fronthaul Network

Figure 6: Connecting Remote Radio Heads with a pool of Baseband Units

Optical fronthaul networks form basis for the next step of innovation towards
software dened radio access networks, which can be upgraded from one radio
technology to another simply by management command. As the CPRI interface
does not depend on the radio technology, a upgrade from 3G to LTE or LTE-A only
increases data rate in the fronthaul transmission network. Bitrate transparent
transmission allows a network upgrade without any impact on the transmission
network.
Transmission between BBUs and the Remote Radio Heads will in most cases be
done with ber systems as data rates of several Gbit/s need to be transported
and distances of up to 40km need to be bridged with low latency and low jitter
in the range of 10ns.
Copper and Microwave transmission systems might be an alternative in certain
cases, however, both technologies come with some limitations which make a
wider application quite unlikely.
Although the latest microwave transmission systems are capable of transporting
data at multiple Gbit/s speed, restrictions on availability of spectrum and
distance limitation at high frequencies, e.g., in the E-Band at 60/80 GHz, need to
be considered. In addition, cost of scaling capacity is signicantly less favorable
with microwave transmission, making ber-based solutions ideal. Copper is a
theoretical option as well, however, it requires highly sophisticated vectoring and
6

WHITE PAPER
Fronthaul Networks a Key Enabler for LTE-Advanced

bonding technologies for achieving the required data rates. Distance limitations
further reduce the relevance of this technology.
CWDM/DWDM will improve ber
utilization.

Although CPRI interfaces can be connected by grey interfaces and dedicated

ber, CWDM/DWDM will improve ber utilization. As fewer bers are used,
cost for ber provisioning is lower. Active C/DWDM technology can monitor
the transmission network for fast and efcient fault isolation. Resilient optical
transmission improves availability while optical switching allows to implement
1:N protection of BBUs.
Single Fiber Working (SFW) solutions are an attractive approach for highcapacity transport in fronthaul networks featuring low ber handling expenses.
In addition, network sharing is supported by WDM technology as trafc from
different wavelengths is securely isolated from each other.

Conventional
Radio Base Stations

Centralized
Baseband Processing

Spectral Efciency

Moderate

High due to interference

coordination

Bandwidth
Requirements

Moderate: 0.11 Gbit/s

High: 110 Gbit/s

Interconnection Media
to Antenna Site

Microwave, ber, copper

Fiber

Synchronization

Stringent phase alignment

Centrally at pooling site

Inter-Cell
Communication

Critical latency requirements

Relaxed requirements due to colocation of BBUs; but stringent

latency requirements between
BBU and RRH

Installation Cost

High

Moderate as less equipment at

antenna site

Table 1: Comparing conventional base station with

centralized baseband processing
Optical transmission can easily scale to higher bandwidth by increasing the
data rate of an optical channel or by adding additional wavelengths. This allows
expanding the capacity of a network without signicant investment. Low ber
attenuation allows larger distances which makes it possible to further centralize
BBU pools and reduce the number of active sites in a network.

WHITE PAPER
Fronthaul Networks a Key Enabler for LTE-Advanced

CPRI Characteristics
The CPRI interface is used to transport a digitized radio baseband signal in
2G/3G and LTE networks as well as with WiMAX. As no compression technology
is applied, the line rate per carrier and per antenna becomes quite signicant
depending on oversampling rate, resolution per sample, number of antennas per
sector and sectors per antenna site. The list below shows some congurations
with respective CPRI line rates:
Application

Channels

Antenna Conguration

CPRI Line Rates

WCDMA

4 x 5 Mbit/s

1 sector, MIMO 2x2

1228.0 Mbit/s

LTE

20 Mbit/s

1 sector, MIMO 2x2

2457.6 Mbit/s

WCDMA
LTE

1 x 5 Mbit/s
20 Mbit/s

3 sector, MIMO 2x2

9830.4 Mbit/s

Table 2: CPRI line rates

The CPRI signal is specied with a

simple multiplexing structure based
on a lowest line rate of 614.4 Mbit/s.

The CPRI signal is specied with a simple multiplexing structure based on a

lowest line rate of 614.4 Mbit/s. Higher capacity signals utilize multiple base
streams in parallel. Hence, the CPRI signal allows aggregating of signals.
Different mobile radio technologies can be transported in parallel with the
same interface. Different topologies as rings, chains or trees are supported
with up to 6 consecutive multiplexing stages.

Antenna Site
Sector 1
Sector 2

Sector 3

Digital Units at Pooling Site/

Macro Base Station Site

RRH

RRH

RRH

BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU

Figure 7: Antenna site featuring three sectors with 2x2 MIMO and
centralized Digital Unit

Resilience can be implemented by protection switching of CPRI signals or by

using inherent spatial redundancy of multiple antennas (MIMO), see Figure
8 showing two antennas per sector. If one RRH should fail, the sector is still
covered, however without featuring MIMO.
Stringent delay and jitter requirements have to be met.

WHITE PAPER
Fronthaul Networks a Key Enabler for LTE-Advanced

Antenna Site
Sector 1

Sector 2

Sector 3

RRH

RRH

RRH

Figure 8: Implementing resilience by utilizing spatial redundancy

Providing Connectivity in Fronthaul Networks

Mobile Operators have various options
for connecting cell sites with the
central baseband units.

Mobile Operators have various options for connecting cell sites with the
central baseband units. They may decide to install ber to the cell site, rent
dark ber, share ber and the transmission system with another operator or
lease bandwidth from a wholesale bandwidth provider. Any of those models
comes with specic requirements for the fronthaul transmission network
in regard to scalability, operational requirements, resilience and trafc
segregation.
The following operational models shall be outlined and favorable technical
solutions will be discussed:
Self-Provided Fronthaul Network: Mobile Operator owns / leases ber
and connects pooled BBUs with RRHs through owned fronthaul network
Wholesale CPRI Connectivity Provider offers CPRI connectivity service
over own ber infrastructure
Fronthaul Network Sharing: Various MNOs share antenna sites and
pooling sites. A shared fronthaul network needs to isolate trafc and
provide means to manage performance per connection
The fronthaul capacity demand depends on remote-site parameters such as
number of antennas, available spectrum, MIMO conguration and mix of mobile
technologies such as 2G, 3G, 4G and WiFi/WiMAX. Hence, the number of CPRI
interfaces as well as the per-interface capacity will vary signicantly across a
mobile network but also among mobile networks.

Self-Provided Fronthaul Network

A typical fronthaul network scenario is shown in Figure 9. A passive DWDM/
CWDM solution connects the centralized pool of baseband units with the antenna
sites, providing one CPRI channel per sector. Various topologies such as chains
and trees are supported. Rings allow implementing protection schemes either
by using spatial redundancy or optical switching. Today, most operators do not
9

WHITE PAPER
Fronthaul Networks a Key Enabler for LTE-Advanced

consider resilience with the transmission network. This might, however, change in
the future as operators move towards more centralized architectures increasing
the number of centrally located BBU units which aggravates the impact of ber
breaks.

RRH
RRH
RRH

RRH

RRH
RRH

BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU

RRH
RRH

BBU

Fronthaul Network

RRH

Figure 9: Passive Fronthaul Network

As this approach is based on colored interfaces plugged into radio equipment,

the fronthaul network is managed by the radio access network.
The main advantages of such passive WDM solution are:
cost effectiveness as no transponders are required reducing spares
and simplifying installation.
low latency and lowest jitter as no active signal processing negatively
impacts transmission performance
low space and no power consumption as the network in essence only
consists of passive lters.
However, there are several disadvantages to passive WDM systems that have
prevented these systems from catching ground in the access domain. Frequently,
operational responsibility for transmission networks and radio networks are split
in an organization due to very different competence requirements necessary to
maintain those technology domains. Hence, operational support tools should be
aligned with such organizational separation and demarcation devices should be
applied for fast and efcient fault isolation.
There are two different types of demarcation devices: active solutions, which
multiplex operational management data with user trafc, and passive solutions,
which work completely independent from user data. The latter does not
compromise the advantages outlined above, as no active component is required
at the cell site for ber monitoring purposes.

10

WHITE PAPER
Fronthaul Networks a Key Enabler for LTE-Advanced

With Optojack, ADVA developed a range of optical assurance solutions which

allow monitoring performance and integrity of optical connections without
interfering with the user trafc. Access Link Monitoring (ALM) is the latest addition
to this solution suite and allows monitoring the integrity of a ber connection.
As shown with Figure 10, an Access Link Monitoring unit at the baseband unit
site is supervising the ber connection to the antenna sites and can detect any
open connector or ber break. Hence, there is a cost efcient means to support
operations and maintenance of the passive fronthaul networks without the need
for additional active termination units at each antenna site.

RRH
RRH
RRH

RRH

RRH
RRH

BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU

Access Link
Monitor

RRH
RRH

BBU
BBU
BBU

Fronthaul Network

RRH

Figure 10: Passive Fronthaul Network Solution Featuring Optical Monitoring

Wholesale Bandwidth Provider

Laying ber is quite an expensive
effort in metropolitan environments.

Laying ber is quite an expensive effort in metropolitan environments. Thus,

certain Mobile Operators are interested in leasing CPRI connectivity from
a Wholesale Bandwidth Provider. Those providers might be incumbents
or competitive operators but could also be regional corporations such as
utilities or property owners sharing one characteristic: they own ber and can
provide connectivity among cell sites and pooling sites in an urban/metropolitan
environment.
As the number of sites can be quite signicant, automated means for provisioning
but also assuring service quality are essential. A favorable implementation of
a fronthaul solution operated by a Wholesale Bandwidth Provider is shown in
Figure 11.
The Mobile Operator hands off grey CPRI signals while the Wholesale Bandwidth
Provider translates these into distinct wavelengths. The transponders can align
with different CPRI bitrates and tunability allows changing connectivity in a
hard-wired optical multiplexing scheme. Service quality is assessed at each
demarcation point for service assurance but also for troubleshooting purposes.
As environmentally hardened equipment is applied at the antenna site and size
restrictions apply, fronthaul transmission solutions are designed for this specic
application.
11

WHITE PAPER
Fronthaul Networks a Key Enabler for LTE-Advanced

RRH SFP TRP

RRH SFP TRP
RRH SFP TRP

RRH SFP TRP

RRH SFP TRP

RRH SFP TRP

TRP
TRP
TRP
TRP
TRP
TRP
TRP
TRP
TRP

RRH SFP TRP

RRH SFP TRP

SFP
SFP
SFP
SFP
SFP
SFP
SFP
SFP
SFP

BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU
BBU

Fronthaul Network

RRH SFP TRP

TRP - Transponder

Figure 11: Active Fronthaul Network

While this solution provides sophisticated means for monitoring the performance
for each channel independently, it adds cost for additional transponders. This
might be justied as the improved service quality generates higher revenue. In
cost sensitive environments the passive Access Link Monitoring outlined above
might be an interesting alternative.

Fronthaul Network Sharing

By sharing the same feeder ber, a common fronthaul network can be used
by different operators running own radio equipment at the cell sites. The main
difference to the above discussed scenarios relates to the number of channels
required to connect each site. Higher channel count systems are more favorable
for those applications and DWDM technology is the solution of choice as it
provides more wavelength than CWDM systems. The connectivity network might
be operated by either one of the Mobile Network Operators or might be provided
by a Wholesale Bandwidth Provider. In any of those cases, there is a need for
clear service demarcation, which favors a transponder-based backhaul solution
as outlined in the above paragraph.

12

WHITE PAPER
Fronthaul Networks a Key Enabler for LTE-Advanced

Emerging Technologies
Initially, fronthaul systems are applied for connecting a relatively low number
of antenna sites. This allows applying commercially available passive C/DWDM
system. The monitoring deciency of this approach can be solved with ADVA
Optojack ALM technology. This approach benets from cost advantages of
passive network architecture without compromising maintenance requirements.
As fronthaul networks gain momentum, operators will push baseband unit
pools deeper into the network, extending the number of remote antenna sites
connected to the central BBU pool. In parallel to this centralization, more
complex MIMO schemes will be applied for making better use of the scarce radio
spectrum. Those two trends will increase the number of CPRI interfaces per
fronthaul network as well as the bandwidth per interface.
Presently available DWDM systems provide the required capacity but often suffer
from high cost. Hence, innovative approaches for cost-optimized DWDM systems
are investigated:
Seeding technologies provide a wavelength source for upstream
transmission and avoid the need for colored wavelength transmitters at
the cell site. Those technologies are tested in eld trials today, but suffer
from ber-plant reections and consequently bandwidth and distance
limitations.
Wavelength-tunable, low-cost lasers, together with suitable control
concepts, are a promising approach for DWDM front- and backhaul which
meets both, commercial as well as operational requirements.
CPRI compression can reduce bandwidth requirements and allow growing
end-user bandwidth up to a factor of 3:1 without the need for adding
capacity in the fronthaul network. There is however a certain performance
degradation of the RF signals which needs to be considered when analyzing
the overall benet.
ADVA is actively investigating all technologies outlined above. The resulting
innovations will make optimized fronthaul solutions available which meet the
future demand for higher channel count and capacity. A specic focus is put
on operational simplicity as centralized BBU pools will need to serve a higher
number of antenna sites.

13

WHITE PAPER
Fronthaul Networks a Key Enabler for LTE-Advanced

Summary
Advanced mobile technologies put new challenging requirements on traditional
mobile backhaul architectures. The introduction of a fronthaul network provides
various advantages as it relaxes backhaul delay and jitter requirements and
improves re-use and utilization of the scarce radio spectrum.
Line rates of digitized RF baseband signals make optical transmission systems
the preferred solution in fronthaul networks. C/DWDM technology improves ber
utilization and minimizes ber handling cost. Passive C/DWDM transmission
systems in combination with advanced monitoring solutions such as Optojack
Access Link Monitoring combine the advantage of minimized power consumption
at the antenna site with the ability to independently monitor the transmission
network from the radio system. Alternatively, active, transponder-based
systems provide a clear demarcation which is favorably applied with Wholesale
Bandwidth scenarios.
Different transmission network architectures align with operational models such
as wholesale, self-provided networks or network sharing. Various innovative
photonic technologies can be applied to optimizing applications with stars, rings
and chains and support more centralized baseband processing architectures.
This simplies the radio access transport network and reduces the number of
active sites.

ADVA Optical Networking specializes

in transmission network solutions for
operators, enterprises and the public
sector.

ADVA Optical Networking specializes in transmission network solutions for

operators, enterprises and the public sector. Based on the competence of well
recognized experts in photonic transmission and the widely applied FSP 3000
DWDM/CWDM portfolio, ADVA Optical Networking has developed fronthaul
transmission solutions which allow operators and wholesale bandwidth
providers to capitalize on the signicant benet of central baseband
processing with BBU pooling. Optojack a unique technology for nonintrusive monitoring of ber infrastructures meets operational requirements in
a most favorable way. Independent from topology, line rate and channel count,
an optimized solution is provided.

14

WHITE PAPER
Fronthaul Networks a Key Enabler for LTE-Advanced

About ADVA Optical Networking

At ADVA Optical Networking were creating new opportunities for tomorrows
networks, a new vision for a connected world. Our intelligent telecommunications
hardware, software and services have been deployed by several hundred
service providers and thousands of enterprises. Over the past twenty years, our
innovative connectivity solutions have helped to drive our customers networks
forward, helped to drive their businesses to new levels of success. We forge close
working relationships with all our customers. As your trusted partner we ensure
that were always ready to exceed your networking expectations.

The ADVA FSP 3000

ADVA Optical Networking

North America, Inc.
5755 Peachtree Industrial Blvd.
Norcross, Georgia 30092
USA

ADVA Optical Networking SE

Campus Martinsried
Fraunhoferstrasse 9 a
82152 Martinsried / Munich
Germany

For more information visit us at www.advaoptical.com

ADVA Optical Networking

Singapore Pte. Ltd.
25 International Business Park
#05-106 German Centre
Singapore 609916

Version 02 / 2014

ADVA Optical Networkings scalable optical transport solution is a modular

WDM system specically designed to maximize the bandwidth and service
exibility of access, metro and core networks. The unique optical layer design
supports WDM-PON, CWDM and DWDM technology, including 100Gbit/s
line speeds with colorless, directionless and contentionless ROADMs.
RAYcontrol, our integrated, industry-leading multi-layer GMPLS control
plane, guarantees operational simplicity, even in complex meshed-network
topologies. Thanks to OTN, Ethernet and low-latency aggregation, the
FSP 3000 represents a highly versatile and cost-effective solution for packet
optical transport.

15