Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Objective
1.To determine the overall heat transfer coeffecient for
the laminar flow.
2.To determine individual heat transfer coeffecient of the
film for the set up.
3.To verify the Seider Tate equation which describes
laminar flow heat transfer
Theory
1.We are using double pipe heat exchanger in external
pipe cold fluid(Water) flows and in inside pipe hot fluid
(mono ethylene glycol flows).
2. Heat is being transferred from hot fluid to cold fluid
through the metal wall.
3.In metal wall heat transfer occur by the mode of
conduction, where as heat transfer between fluid and wall
is by the phenomena of convection.
Theory
4.A significant resistance is present and the total
resistance is the sum of the individual resistance which is
given by
5.Heat transfer rate is given by Q=VCp(T2-T1).
where T2 is outlet temperature of hot fluid .
T1 is inlet temperature of hot fluid .
6.since the temperature will be different on the different
point so we will use L.M.T.D method.
Theory
7.Since we know the total resistance
Q=U1A1TLMTD
8.TLMTD=(T1-t1)-(T2-t2)/ln(T1-t1)/(T2-t2)
9.Seider Tate equation is given by
Nu=1.86(Re)0.3(Pr)0.3
where Nu is Nusselt,s number.
Re is Reynold,s number
Pr is Prandel number
sink
Schematic of
the experiment
Hot
cold
Temperature
indicator
volume measuring tube
volumetr
ic flow
rate
indicator
Temperature sensor
Yellow-Cold fluid
Ash-Hot fluid
source
Motor Pumps
Experimental Procedure
First we calculate the
Zero error in the
temperature sensors
Calculation Procedure
First we calculated the
volume flow rate
assuming reynolds
number to be 4000
We calculated inside
and outisde heat
transfer coefficient for
different flow rates.
Sr
no
1.
volumetric
flow rate
Q
(Kcal/h
r)
T1(C)
T2
(C)
T2-T1
(C)
t1
(C)
t2
(C)
l.m.t.d
U(Kcal/hr.
m^2.C)
u(m/sec)
46
42.1
3.9
27.4
29.9
15.38
2075.88
156.24
536.53
46
41.9
4.1
27.3
29.7
15.43
1860.62
138.67
44.25
510.23
44.9
40.2
4.7
27.4
29.5
14.05
1942.39
115.03
4.
32.2
371.28
44.6
39.9
4.7
27.3
29.2
13.95
1424.26
83.71
5.
24.34
388.14
44.4
37.9
6.5
27.3
29.1
12.80
1622.22
63.27
6.
13.06
246.71
43.6
35.9
7.7
27.4
29
11.27
1171.05
33.95
60.1
575.03
2.
53.34
3.
Sr no
1/U
1/u^0.3
1.
60.1
0.0005
0.861781344
2.
53.34
0.000537
0.896749015
3.
44.25
0.000515
0.954371556
4.
32.2
0.000702
1.061051886
5.
24.34
0.000616
1.164792023
6.
13.06
0.000854
1.433422399
S.no
V(cm^3/sec)
U(Kcal/hr.m^2.C)
hi
60.1
2000
2128
53.34
1861
1971
44.25
1942
2062
32.2
1424
1488
24.34
1622
1705
13.06
1171
1214
S.no
V
(cm^3/se
c)
Nu
Re
Pr
Gz=Re*P
r*d(i)/L
ln(Re)
ln(Nu)
log(Gz)
60.1
67.37
2282
53.2
999
7.7328
4.2103
6.907396
53.34
62.41
2025
53.2
887
7.6135
4.134
6.788073
44.25
65.32
1680
53.2
736
7.4266
4.1793
6.601241
32.2
47.12
1222
53.2
535
7.1087
3.8526
6.283352
24.34
54.00
924
53.2
404
6.8289
3.9890
6.003507
13.06
38.43
496
53.2
217
6.2063
3.6489
5.38094
Calculation of error
1.The slope for the graph of ln(Nu) vs ln(Gz)
comes out to be 0.3492.
and according to equation it is=0.30
so error=13.33%
Graph
Results
1.From the plot of 1/U vs 1/u1/3 the Y
intercept which we got =2.83*10-5
2.To prove sieder equation lnNu vs lnGz we
got the slope of the curve is 0.34
3.The error in the slope is 4.77%
Conclusions
1.When we decrease the volumetric flow rate
we observe that the overall heat transfer
coefficient is also decreased.
2.When we decrease the volumetric flow rate
we observe that Nusselts number decreases.
3.When we decrease the volumetric flow rate
we observe that Graetz number decreases.
Remarks
1.Error in Temperature sensor may cause error
in the measurements.
2.If we use rotameter to calculate volumetric
flow rate instead of the cylindrical
arrangement we can get more accurate values
3.More proper insulation can be done for hot
fluid.
THANK YOU