Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Q2 2015
officerofthewatch.com - 2015
INTRODUCTORY NOTES
The aim of this report is to highlight trends and information regarding the number of inspections that
are being conducted each quarter, the number of deficiencies that are being issued in each inspection
that resulted to the detention of a vessel as well as to identify the various ports where more than 3
detentions have been recorded during each quarter. Such information may serve as supportive material
or as mere reference to professionals or individuals involved in the maritime industry who would like to
have a quick view to the subject of PSC inspections worldwide.
The tables contained in this report summarize the number Total Inspections, Inspections With
Deficiencies and Inspections Without Deficiencies that have been conducted in the major PSC MoUs
areas. Moreover they highlight the number of detentions per specific type of vessel per PSC MoU. The
information contained within this report is based in data available in the Black Sea MoU, the
Mediterranean MoU, the Paris MoU, the Tokyo MoU and USCG website.
The present publication is an electronic version in .pdf format of the Officer of the Watch blog PSC
quarterly report and may be used as reference when access to the internet is not available.
Definition to the various ship types that are being mentioned within this report is given at the end of this
publication.
For any queries, suggestions or feedback regarding the present publication please contact us by sending
a direct message to info@officerofthewatch.com.
This publication was developed and prepared by Stavros Kairis, founder of the OOW blog, Mechanical
Engineer working in the Maritime Industry. More information on the officerofthewatch.com initiative
can be found at the end of this document.
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 1 of 24
Black Sea
Mediterranean
Paris
Tokyo
Total
Inspections
1722
1354
4454
10702
With
Deficiencies
1145
683
2251
7744
Without
Deficiencies
577
671
2203
2958
Total
Detentions
34
72
118
316
No. of
Vessels
Defs /
Vessel
No. of
Vessels
Defs /
Vessel
No. of
Vessels
Defs /
Vessel
No. of
Vessels
Defs /
Vessel
18.9
5.0
25
11.8
102
8.7
20
16.1
59
11.1
56
14.2
134
13.3
Chemical
Tanker
4.7
9.3
Oil
Tanker
6.2
11.0
Container
Ship
3.0
11.9
28
9.4
Vessel Type
Bulk
Carrier
General
Cargo Ship
Note: Regarding the number of detentions and the Total Inspections & Inspections Ended with
Deficiencies tables 5 types of vessels have been chosen for the analysis: Bulk Carriers, General Cargo
Ships, Chemical Tankers, Oil Tankers, Containerships. These types of vessels are the ones that are used
for the PSC analysis of this report.
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 2 of 24
Vessels Detained
Average Deficiencies of
Detained Vessels
Batumi, Georgia
28.0
Bourgas, Bulgaria
18.0
Constanta, Romania
21.3
10
20.6
Tulcea, Romania
13.0
Varna, Bulgaria
14.0
Samsun, Turkey
7.0
Kdz.eregli, Turkey
14.0
Rize, Turkey
3.0
Fatsa, Turkey
16.0
Illichivsk, Ukraine
15.0
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 3 of 24
Vessels Detained
Average Deficiencies of
Detained Vessels
Alexandria, Egypt
8.3
Aliaga, Turkey
13
7.2
Antalya, Turkey
12.7
Ashdod, Israel
39.0
Damietta, Egypt
9.5
Gemlik, Turkey
13.8
Haifa, Israel
3.0
Iskenderun, Turkey
13.3
Izmir, Turkey
6.0
Larnaca, Cyprus
6.0
Tekirdag, Turkey
4.2
Karabiga, Turkey
19.2
Limassol, Cyprus
11.0
Ambarli, Turkey
9.6
Tuzla, Turkey
10.0
Istanbul, Turkey
10.0
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 4 of 24
Average Deficiencies of
Detained Vessels
Gulluk, Turkey
10.0
Bandirma, Turkey
6.0
Zarzis, Tunisia
5.0
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 5 of 24
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 6 of 24
Average Deficiencies of
Detained Vessels
Belgium - Antwerpen
21.6
Bulgaria - Burgas
18.0
Bulgaria - Varna
13.0
6.3
Cyprus - Larnaca
6.0
Cyprus - Limassol
11.0
Germany - Bremen
12.5
Germany - Cuxhaven
17.0
Germany - Hamburg
31.0
Germany - Wismar
3.0
Greece - Drepanon
21.0
Greece - Kalilimenes
40.0
Greece - Piraeus
8.4
Greece - Thessaloniki
24.0
Ireland - Foynes
21.0
Italy - Brindisi
12.5
Italy - Crotone
16.0
Italy - Taranto
13.0
Italy - Venice
7.0
Netherlands - Rotterdam
7.5
Poland - Gdynia
23.5
Poland - Police
10.0
Poland - Szczecin
13.0
Romania - Constanta
21.5
Romania - Tulcea
14.0
7.0
Slovenia - Koper
15.0
Spain - Pasaia
18.0
Spain - Sevilla
14.0
13.0
8.0
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 7 of 24
Average Deficiencies of
Detained Vessels
Italy - Civitavecchia
6.0
Sweden - Uddevalla
7.0
4.
Canada - Contrecoeur
16.0
Canada - Sorel
36.0
2.0
Poland - Gdansk
7.0
14.0
Italy - Gaeta
11.0
10.5
12.0
2.5
18.0
Portugal - Setubal
12.0
Italy - La Spezia
14.0
Italy - Naples
3.0
10.0
Croatia - Rijeka
11.0
Greece - Igoumenitsa
19.0
Italy - Salerno
7.0
4.0
Greece - Kalymnos
15.0
6.0
Spain - Algeciras
9.0
Italy - Trieste
4.5
Italy - Palermo
7.0
1.0
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 8 of 24
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 9 of 24
Vessels Detained
Average Deficiencies of
Detained Vessels
10.0
Bangkok, Thailand
6.0
Banten, Indonesia
5.0
Beihai, China
7.0
8.2
2.0
13.6
Caofeidian, China
9.0
Coronel, Chile
4.0
12.0
Dalian, China
16.6
7.0
Dandong, China
9.6
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 10 of 24
Average Deficiencies of
Detained Vessels
5.0
Fushiki, Japan
6.0
Fuzhou, China
25.0
6.0
8.0
Guangzhou, China
8.8
30.0
5.6
Hakata/Fukuoka, Japan
9.5
4.6
Himeji, Japan
14.5
11
15.9
6.0
Iquique, Chile
5.0
Jiangyin, China
14.0
15.0
Kawasaki, Japan
16.6
Kobe, Japan
11.3
Kochi, Japan
13.0
Kuantan, Malaysia
20.0
9.0
5.0
Lianyungang, China
13.8
Lumut, Malaysia
10.0
Maizuru, Japan
13.0
2.0
12.5
25.0
Moji/Kitakyushu, Japan
27.0
5.0
16
10.1
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 11 of 24
Average Deficiencies of
Detained Vessels
Nanao, Japan
8.0
Nanjing, China
8.5
Nantong, China
5.0
4.6
Niigata, Japan
1.0
Ningbo, China
6.1
Osaka, Japan
16.6
Otaru, Japan
10.5
Penang, Malaysia
14.0
9.0
18.0
5.0
5.5
17.6
Qingdao, China
9.0
Qinhuangdao, China
9.0
Rizhao, China
11.0
6.0
Shanghai, China
7.7
Shenzhen, China
11
13.1
Singapore, Singapore
10
17.3
4.0
9.7
Tamano, Japan
26.0
Tangshan, China
10
9.2
8.5
Tianjin, China
10
14.7
Tokyo, Japan
12.5
Tomakomai, Japan
13.6
1.0
9.0
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 12 of 24
Average Deficiencies of
Detained Vessels
Weihai, China
8.5
Xiamen, China
17.1
Yangjiang, China
11.0
Yantai, China
10.6
Yingkou, China
11.0
Yokkaichi, Japan
10.0
Yokohama, Japan
12.0
Zhangjiagang, China
10.0
Zhanjiang, China
6.0
Zhoushan, China
8.3
Zhuhai, China
4.0
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 13 of 24
Vessel Type
Defs / Vessel
Bulk Carrier
15
1.6
2.0
Chemical Tanker
3.5
Oil Tanker
3.0
Containership
1.5
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 14 of 24
Vessels Detained
Average Deficiencies of
Detained Vessels
Alameda, California
1.6
Baltimore, Maryland
1.0
Houston, Texas
3.0
Miami, Florida
5.0
Mobile, Alabama
1.0
1.5
1.0
Seattle, Washington
1.0
1.5
Honolulu, Hawaii
5.0
5.0
1.0
2.0
Portland, Oregon
1.0
1.0
USCG Ports
#
1.
VESSEL INFO
(Vsl type/Flag/RO/Port)
Containership
Saint Vincent and
the Grenadines
Miami, Florida
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 15 of 24
VESSEL INFO
(Vsl type/Flag/RO/Port)
2.
Bulk Carrier
Liberia
Bureau Veritas
Additionally, the chief mate was unfamiliar with how to energize the vessel's
9GHz radar.
3 - The company should establish programs for drills and exercises to prepare for
emergency actions. The vessels SMS does not contain a program or indicate
emergency drills are to be conducted or records of same should be maintained.
4 -The company should ensure that all personnel involved in the company's SMS
have an adequate understanding of the relevant rules, regulations codes and
guidelines. Vessel master not aware of the manning violation of having an able
body seaman fill the position of an engineering officer. Additionally, the master
sailed for two weeks without a flag state endorsement based on his embarkation
date compared to his application for endorsement.
5 - The safety management system should include procedures ensuring that nonconformities, accident and hazardous situations are reported to the company,
investigated and analyzed with the objective of improving safe and pollution
prevention. The vessel lost its anchor during its inbound transit and the NAVTEX
was found to be inoperable: no non-conformity reports were made to the
company.
6 - The company should ensure that inspections are held at appropriate intervals.
Maintenance checklist are not being conducted at appropriate intervals;
equipment maintenance reports are conducted monthly at times and weekly at
other times.
7 - The company should identify equipment and technical systems the sudden
operational failure of which may result n hazardous situations. The safety
management system should provide for specific measures aimed at promoting
the reliability of such equipment or systems. there are no maintenance checklist
for the 9GHz radar and the main and auxiliary steering gear systems.
8 - The company should establish and maintain procedures to control all
documents and data which are relevant to the safety management system; The
engineering, deck and port arrival/ departure checklists when used, were not the
checklist provided and prescribed to be used in the vessels SMS manual.
0230 - Number/composition. Failure to comply with the applicable safe manning
requirements of the Administration. Vessel does nothave the required
engineering officer. The ship identified an able body seaman as its engineering
officer
1282 - Manholes flush scuttles. Manholes and flush scuttles in position 1 or 2
within superstructures other than enclosed superstructures shall be closed by
substantial covers capable of being made watertight. Scuttle to the forward void
has a damaged gasket, deteriorated cover and is missing two clamping devices.
0620 - Inflatable liferafts. After any survey of the ship under reg 8 has been
completed, no change shall be made in the items covered by the survey without
the sanction of the administration. Starboard life raft is a 16 person craft; the
SOLAS Safety Equipment Certificate requires a 25 person craft.
0620 - Inflatable liferafts. Every life raft shall be serviced at intervals not
exceeding 12 months. The port side 10-person life raft has not been inspected
since December 2013 and no flag state documentation existed extending the
interval to 17months.
0936 - Steering gear. Auxiliary steering gear shall be of adequate strength and
sufficient to steer the ship at navigable speed and capable of being brought
speedily into action in an emergency. The auxiliary steering gear is only capable of
5 degree movement to starboard and 20 degreemovement to port.
2550 - Maintenance of ship and equipment. The crew failed to follow procedures
for the proper stowage and maintenance of the liferafts. Each liferaft was stowed
with the painter line attached to the life raft cradle. The vessel must take
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 16 of 24
3.
4.
5.
VESSEL INFO
(Vsl type/Flag/RO/Port)
New Orleans,
Louisiana
Containership
Panama
NKK
Los Angeles,
California
General Cargo Ship
Antigua and
Barbuda
DNVGL
Mobile, Alabama
General Cargo Ship
Antigua and
Barbuda
GL
Honolulu, Hawaii
6.
Oil Tanker
Greece
ABS
New Orleans,
Louisiana
7.
Chemical Tanker
Norway
LR
Alameda, California
Page 17 of 24
VESSEL INFO
(Vsl type/Flag/RO/Port)
8.
Bulk Carrier
Panama
NKK
Houston, Texas
9.
Containership
St.Kitts & Nevis
International
Register of Shipping
Miami, Florida
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 18 of 24
VESSEL INFO
(Vsl type/Flag/RO/Port)
Chemical Tanker
Hong Kong
DNVGL
Los Angeles,
California
11.
Bulk Carrier
Panama
Bureau Veritas
Baltimore, Maryland
12.
Containership
Panama
NKK
Seattle, Washington
13.
Bulk Carrier
Marshall Islands
DNVGL
New Haven,
Connecticut
10.
Page 19 of 24
VESSEL INFO
(Vsl type/Flag/RO/Port)
14.
Bulk Carrier
Cyprus
LR
San Francisco,
California
15.
Bulk Carrier
Greece
LR
New Orleans,
Louisiana
Bulk Carrier
Cyprus
DNVGL
St. Petersburg,
Florida
Bulk Carrier
Panama
NKK
New Orleans,
Louisiana
16.
17.
18.
19.
Oil Tanker
Greece
ABS
Alameda, California
Bulk Carrier
Hong Kong
DNVGL
New Orleans,
Louisiana
of steel or other approved material. Vessel's engineering staff repaired a fuel oil
pipe behind the NO. 2 fuel oil tank temporarily with an unapproved cement box
patch.
0710 - Fire prevention Bilges in the engine room have more than 12 inches of oil
residue as wall as the lagging on M/E auxiliary engines are excessively oiled.
0710 - Fire prevention Numerous leaks were observed on the cargo hatch
hydraulic system. Additonally various piping found to be wasted in numerous
locations.
1560 - Charts Nautical charts and nautical publications such as Sailing Directions,
List of Light, Notice to Mariners, tide tables and all other nautical publication
necessary for the intended voyage, shall be adequate and up the date. Vessel
conducted a 05 hour transit from San Pablo Bay to port of Stockton without the
required charts on board (18660 and 18663). Vessel is not required to be
equipped with ECDIS per regulations until 2017, and crew relied solely on Pilots;
electronic navigation charts for transit.
0610 - Lifeboats Before the ship leaves port and at all times during the voyage, all
lifesaving appliances shall be in working order and ready for immediate use. PSCO
observed starboard lifeboat brake inoperable resulting in uncontrollable lowering
evolution. Additionally, PSCO observed starboard lifeboat winch inoperable and
unable to recover lifeboat.
0730 - Appliances (general equipment) The Port State Control Officer found #1
heavy fuel oil service tank and #2 heavy fuel oil settling tank pneumatic shut-off
valves held open with wire tied, preventing them from closing.
0735 - Personal equipment fire fighting PSCO discovered that there are no selfcontained breathing apparatus onboard. All SCBA's and associated bottles were
sent ashore for maintenance prohibiting vessel from responding to a fire onboard
requiring the use of a fire fighter's outfit.
0715 - Detection PSCO discovered a plastic bag over fire detection system within
the engineering work shop. The Chief Engineer state that the bag was there for 3
days as not to activate fire section systems during normal workshop operations.
2550 - Maintenance of ship and equipment PSCO believes that there is objective
evidence in discovered deficiencies to believe that the ship is not being
maintained or operated as required in relation to fire fighting
systems/maintenance. Request ISM audit be conducted by the certificate issuing
authority.
0610 - Lifeboats Before the ship leaves port and at all times during the voyage, all
life-saving appliances shall be in working order and ready for immediate use.
Rescue boat on port side cannot be fully retrieved into stowed position.
2050 - Operation of machinery A ship when in a port of another Contracting
Government is subject to control by officers duly authorized by such Government
concerning operational requirements in respect of the safety of ships, when there
are clear grounds for believing that the master or crew are not familiar with
essential shipboard procedures relating to the safety of ships. Upon testing of
emergency generator, PSCO found generator was not operationally ready due to
quick closing valve not fully open, resulting in the insufficient supply of fuel from
the service tank, due to crew previously testing fuel quick closing valve and not
resetting supply valve properly.
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 20 of 24
VESSEL INFO
(Vsl type/Flag/RO/Port)
20.
Bulk Carrier
Panama
LR
Baton Rouge,
Louisiana
21.
22.
Bulk Carrier
Malta
LR
Baltimore, Maryland
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 21 of 24
VESSEL INFO
(Vsl type/Flag/RO/Port)
23.
Bulk Carrier
Marshall Islands
NKK
Portland, Oregon
24.
Bulk Carrier
Marshall Islands
NKK
Alameda, California
Bulk Carrier
Hong Kong
NKK
New Orleans,
Louisiana
Chemical Tanker
Marshall Islands
DNVGL
Baltimore, Maryland
25.
26.
27.
Bulk Carrier
Cyprus
DNVGL
New Orleans,
Louisiana
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 22 of 24
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 23 of 24
DISCLAIMER
The information contained in this publication is for general information purposes only. The information
is provided by OOW and while every effort is being made to keep the information up to date and
correct, OOW makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the
completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the information, products,
services etc contained in the publication for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is
therefore strictly at your own risk.
In no event will OOW be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or
consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits
arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this publication.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
o f f ic e r o f t h e w a t c h . c o m , 2 0 1 5
Page 24 of 24