Critics have often pointed the finger at religious texts as the source for chaos and destruction. A new voice has arose, a voice which calls for a reunderstanding of all components of religion. The purpose is to educate the masses about the common principles and foundations that all religions in the world share.
Critics have often pointed the finger at religious texts as the source for chaos and destruction. A new voice has arose, a voice which calls for a reunderstanding of all components of religion. The purpose is to educate the masses about the common principles and foundations that all religions in the world share.
Critics have often pointed the finger at religious texts as the source for chaos and destruction. A new voice has arose, a voice which calls for a reunderstanding of all components of religion. The purpose is to educate the masses about the common principles and foundations that all religions in the world share.
Religious Tolerance in the 21st Century by: Ali Qureshi
Chaos, confusion and war. These are often the terms used to describe when various religions interact. Critics have often pointed the finger at religious texts as the source for this anarchy and destruction, however, ignorance gives the blind eye towards divine religious scriptures that speak of peace and tranquility towards other religions. This epistemology was truly tested at the turn of the millennium, when 19 Al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked airplanes and used them for the sole purpose to notcause havoc. This tragedy created ripple effects all throughout the world as scholars and students alike, questioned the inspiration behind the motives of these attacks. A large following of people, concluded that religion was responsible for this intolerance, and categorized a certain belief system and ethnic group under this heading with bias. However, a new voice has arose, a voice which calls for a reunderstanding of all components of religious nature. From the primary sources of influential religious leaders to the study of human interaction, scholars have reasoned that when studying religion at its purest nature, one can apprehend that all religions in the world ask for one common action upon their believers; virtue and to speak out against vice. The defense of religion by apologists has many columnists speaking of a religious intellectual movement. A movement not represented by violence and uprising, rather an intellectual revolution, in which the purpose is to educate the masses about the common principles and foundations that all religions in the world share. For example, the concept of charity discussed in the Quran, known as Zakat, obliges every able Muslim to give back to their community; monetary donations, food and other necessities to those who are in need. The same comparison can be drawn to Christianity, whereas Jesus Christ, led by example hinting to a way of life whereby if we put others first, we can find true happiness. These examples are just a small fraction of the diverse amount of interfaith relationships. Our daily lives revolve around hearing the negative aspect of religion; holy war. We are constantly being bombarded with images and scenes that portray certain religions in an unholy manner. As humans, we put our biases against other faiths based on the actions of a diminutive minority. This base of judgment has proven to lead towards stereotypes, discrimination and even genocide. Following the horrific terrorist attacks on September 11th 2001, many Muslims living in the west were faced with a complex situation. The selfish actions of 19 men had placed many honest and hard working Muslims in a jeopardized position in which they were constantly being portrayed as terrorists and barbaric in various aspects of the media. This demonic image, often placed Muslim youths growing up in the west into a dilemma; should they practice their religion in fear of being socially rejected? With these rising tensions came solutions as outspoken members of each religious and ethnic communities came together to form think tanks. The purpose of these think tanks was to unite humanity on one basis, a dictum in which every single religion places enormous emphasis on; tolerance and acceptance of one another. With the combined efforts of many intellectuals, scholars and leaders, the notion of salvation, whether believed to be in this life or in the hereafter can be achieved by speaking out against prejudices and extremism. Verily, those who interpret the sacred scriptures are wrong-doing and going against the Supreme Ruler's decree giving humanity the duty to correct and educate both sides of the brewing conflict. The first step to achieving acceptance is for a dialogue to take place between the moderates and extremists. Likewise, a dialogue must take place between those that speak for generalization. For as said and repeated numerous times by historians, an ideology cannot be destroyed however it can be corrected through a refinement process that may prove to be lengthy but can touch and save the lives of unsung strangers.
Dec 3rd, 2008
The ********* often credited with being multi-cultural, would not have gained such a high reputation if not for its emphasis on community, excellence and respect. These foundations have enticed students to look beyond superficial biases, and rather look at one another as part of a collective unit. For this collective unit represents the notion of humanity although everyone has their own unique faith, they have points where they share common similarities. These similarities help the average person to choose the path of willful co-existence and bring forth humanity to the road of progressive development.