Concept Paper English Language Activities 08

ACTION SONG
(PRIMARY SCHOOL)
ACTION SONG COMPETITION

PRIMARY SCHOOLS (LEVEL 1)
Introduction
The Action Song Competition is held with the following objectives:
1.
To encourage and increase the use of English Language among the

younger pupils.
2.
To build confidence and sense of ease with English Language among the
younger pupils.
3.
To develop skills of integrating scripting of music and movement with

language.
4.
To provide a platform for fun and happy learning.
Competition Rules
Eligibility
This competition is open to Level 1 pupils only.
Team
Each team should comprise 15 students accompanied by 2

teachers. Performers and musicians should be from within
this 15 team member.
Time
On-stage presentation is allocated 5 8 minutes. No marks

will be awarded thereafter. A time allocation of 2 minutes is
allocated for stage arrangements, with the teachers as stage
technicians.
Theme
Choice/selection of theme is open.
Script
Scripts can be original or adapted from any authentic texts.
Contestants are not allowed to refer to any notes or texts

during presentation.
Copies of the script must be submitted to the organizers two

weeks prior to the competition.
Scripts should not touch on sensitive issues such as race,

religion, colour, personalities, politics, etc.
Presentation :
Creativity is encouraged. Nevertheless, movements should

not exceed and overwhelm the articulation of the song by the
contestants.
Background :
/ Props
Props and background aids should be at minimum level.
Music
Use of recorded music is allowed. (tape should not have

voices or words)
Use of musical instruments is allowed. However, musicians

must sing and perform together with the team members
during presentation.
Judges
The competition shall be judged by an odd numbered panel

of 3/5 judges.
Decisions
Points will be allocated according to the score sheet and

aggregated.
Judges will collectively determine the placing by a clear

majority vote.
The decision of the judges is final.
Individual team marks will not be disclosed.
Trophy, cash prizes, plaques and certificates will be awarded

to the winning teams.
Prizes
ADJUDICATION GUIDELINES
1.
Marks for presentation will be awarded based on the following band :

Maximum
5
10
20
40
2.
Very poor
1
1-2
1-4
1-8
Poor
2
3-4
5-8
9-16
Fair
3
5-6
9-12
17-24
Good
4
7-8
13-16
25-32
Excellent
5
9-10
17-20
33-40
Adjudication :
2.1
Language Proficiency (40 marks)

Marks awarded will be based on the following :
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
2.2
correct, clear and accurate pronunciation

clear enunciation, articulation and intonation
use of correct grammar
appropriate and effective choice of words
fluency
Delivery and Presentation (40 marks)

i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
2.3
well coordinated and creative choreography, movements, music

rhythm, timing and tempo
confident presentation
variety of voice, intonation, speech
team cooperation and coordination
Theme (10 marks)

i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
2.4
interesting and appealing to audience

meaningful
continuous, developmental in sequence, action
values integrated
Costumes and Props (10 marks)

i.
suitable
ii.
creative and effective
SCORE SHEET
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACTION SONG COMPETITION
NATIONAL LEVEL YEAR __________
Lang.
Presentation Theme Costume Penalty
TEAM Proficiency
Delivery
Props
max
Total Placing Time
(40 m)
(40 m)
(10 m)
(10 m)
(-10 m)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Name of Adjudicator :
Signature :
Date :
FREQUENCY COUNT
NATIONAL LEVEL YEAR _________
PLACING
TIME
Judge
1
Judge
2
Judge
3
TEAM NO.
Judge
4
Judge
5
FINAL
PLACING
Name of Chief Adjudicator
Signature
Date
:
6
RESULT
NATIONAL LEVEL YEAR __________
PLACING
CONTESTANT NO./NAME
SCHOOL/STATE
FIRST
SECOND
THIRD
Chief Judge
Judge 1
Judge 2
Judge 3
Judge 4
Date
STORYTELLING
(PRIMARY SCHOOL)
STORYTELLING COMPETITION
RULES AND GUIDELINES
1.0
2.0
3.0
INTRODUCTION
1.1
Storytelling is an effective teaching and learning activity to help improve

the standard of English among pupils.
1.2
The Storytelling Activity/Competition will be carried out at school, district

/ division, state and national levels.
OBJECTIVES
2.1
To enhance pupils confidence in using English.
2.2
To give pupils the opportunity to use English in an interesting, authentic

and a creative manner.
2.3
To enhance and improve the listening and speaking skills.
2.4
To instill pupils interest in reading and writing in English.
RULES AND REGULATIONS

3.1.
The competition is open to all government aided schools. Only ONE

contestant will represent his/her state at the national level.
3.2
The competition is divided into two sections :

Section 1
Section 2
3.3
:
:
Prepared
Impromptu
- any stories
For Section 1, contestants are to observe the following rules :

3.3.1 Stories presented can be authentic, adapted or originally written.
3.3.2 Stories presented must not touch on sensitive issues such as
race, religion, politics, colour, personalities, etc.
3.3.3 Stories must be educational with moral values.
3.3.4 Props, backdrops and sound effects are not allowed. Aids used
during the presentation are considered part of the costume. If
the aids are deliberately detached from the story teller, they will
be considered as props and is an infringement.
3.3.5 Time allocated to present the story is 7 10 minutes. The bell
will be rung at the 10th minute. No marks will be awarded
thereafter.
3.4
For Section 2, contestants are to observe the following rules :

3.4.1 Contestants choose a card.
3.4.2 After 30 seconds, contestants will begin their story
3.4.3 Contestants tell a story based on the word written on the
chosen card.
3.4.4 Stories told should not be the same as the prepared story
Presented
3.4.5 Time allocated to present the impromptu story is 2 3 minutes.
The bell will be rung at the 3rd minute. No marks will be awarded
thereafter.
3.5
Infringement
3.5.1 A maximum of 10 marks will be deducted if a contestant :
3.6
touches on sensitive issues such as race, religion, politics,

colour, personalities, etc.
presents a story below the minimum stipulated time
use props, backdrops and electronically-aided sound effects.
A contestant will be disqualified if :

3.6.1 he/she reads or refers to notes/reading materials
3.6.2 he/she is prompted by another person
4.0
ADJUDICATION
4.1
The competitions should be judged by an odd numbered panel of

at least 3 judges.
10
5.0
4.2
The contestant with the majority of votes will be declared the winner.
4.3
PRIZES
5.1
6.0
Prizes for the national level competition is as follows :

First
RM 300.00
Certificate
Challenge trophy and replica
Sponsored prizes (optional)
Second
RM 150.00
Certificate
Third
RM 80.00
Certificate
Consolation
RM 30.00
Certificate
CONCLUSION
6.1
It is our fervent hope that more pupils be trained and encouraged to

participate in the school and district levels competitions.
6.2
The cooperation of schools, District / Division Education Offices and

Sate Education Departments are needed to ensure the smooth running
and success of the competitions.
11
STORYTELLING
COMPETITION
FOR PRIMARY SCHOOLS
ADJUDICATION FORMS
SCHOOLS DIVISION
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION
12
13
SCORE SHEET
Contestant
No.
Language
Proficiency
(35 marks)
ENGLISH LANGUAGE STORYTELLING COMPETITION

NATIONAL LEVEL YEAR .
LEVEL 2
SECTION 1 (PREPARED)
SECTION 2 ( IMPROMPTU)
Presentation
Theme /
Language Presentation
Theme
Costume
Penalty
/ Delivery
Storyline
Proficiency
Delivery
/Storyline
(5 marks)
(-10 marks)
(20 marks)
(10 marks)
(15 marks)
(10 marks)
(5 marks)
Total
Placing
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Judge's Name
Signature
14
FREQUENCY COUNT

LEVEL 2
JUDGE
PLACING
FINAL PLACING
CONTESTANT NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Signature of Chief Judge

Name
Date
TIME
15
SHEET

LEVEL 2
CONTESTANT
NO.
TITLE OF STORY
TIME
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Signature
Name of
Timekeeper
Date
16
RESULTS

LEVEL 2
PLACING
CONTESTANT
NO.
SCHOOL / STATE
TITLE OF STORY
FIRST
SECOND
THIRD
Signature of Chief Judge

Name
Date
17
CHORAL SPEAKING
(PRIMARY SCHOOL)
CHORAL SPEAKING COMPETITION FOR PRIMARY SCHOOLS
18
Choral Speaking is the interpretation of poetry or prose by a group, comprising

anything from half a dozen to a hundred speakers. It involves a full and varied
use of the individual voices that make up the group. There may be divisions of
the whole group into light and dark voices, broken and unbroken, male and
female, treble and so on. Individual voices may be used as solo
Introduction
Choral Speaking is a competition organized by the Ministry of Education. The
competition aims at encouraging and increasing the usage of English among
students. It builds confidence in students to speak, render, memorise and
express in English.
Competition Rules
Eligibility
This competition is open to students from Year 4 to Year 6 only.
Each Choral Speaking team is to come from ONE school only.
Time
Each team is given a presentation time limit of 5 to 8 minutes. No marks
will be awarded thereafter.
Team
Each team should comprise 30 35 students. A conductor should be
appointed from these students.
Each team should be accompanied by 4 teachers-in-charge.
Material
Selection of material is free and can be in the form of poetry or short
prose.
Materials must be originally written and authentic.
Participants are not allowed to refer to any notes or printed materials
during the performance.
Materials presented must not touch on sensitive issues, such as race,
religion, colour, personalities, etc.
Copies of choral speaking texts must be submitted to the organizers two
Attire
19
All participants should wear school uniform when competing.

Boys - white, short-sleeves shirts and dark blue short / long pants
Girls - turquoise pinafore/skirt and white blouse/ baju kurung
Conductor : the use of gloves is allowed
Ties, bows and jackets are not allowed
Exclusions
There should be no inclusions of music, singing, sketches, skits or drama,
costuming, props to enhance the presentation or artificial sound effects
which are electronically or physically aided.
Stage Arrangement
The arrangement of the teams on the stage will be in a fixed 3-tiered rows.
Judges
All state and national level competitions should be adjudged by 5 judges.
The judges for these levels will be appointed by the State Education
Department and Schools Division, Ministry of Education respectively.
Decisions
Points will be allocated according to the score sheet and aggregated.
Judges will collectively determine the placing by a clear majority vote.
Prizes
Cash prizes and certificates of participation will be awarded to the winning
teams.
20
PRIMARY SCHOOLS
MALAYSIA
ADJUDICATION FORMS
MALAYSIA
21
SCORE SHEET
ENGLISH LANGUAGE CHORAL SPEAKING COMPETITION

PRIMARY SCHOOLS
NATIONAL LEVEL YEAR ____
Team
No.
Sub.
Matter
(10 m)
Pronunciatio
n
(20 m )
Enunciati
on
(30 m)
Variet
y
(10
m)
Special
Effects
(10 m)
Rhythm &
Timing
(10 m)
General
Demeanour
(10 m)
Penalt
y
(-10
m)
Tota
l
Time
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Name of Judge :
Signature :
1.
Subject Matter :
Point of view of interest and audience appeal
2.
Pronunciation :
Accuracy in pronunciation
3.
Enunciation :
Articulation, Clarity and Expression
4.
Variety :
Variety of intonation, mood and tempo
infringements
5.
6.
7.
8.
Date :
Sound Effects :
Sound imitation (vocalised)
Rhythm and Timing
Orchestrated rhythm and timing
Demeanour :
Stance and bearing
Penalty :
A total of 10 marks to be deducted if : sensitive issues touched, attire
extra time, below minimum stipulated time, exclusions included, excessive
movements
Maximum
Marks
V. Poor
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
22
10
20
30
1, 2
1-4
16
3, 4
58
7 12
5, 6
9 12
13 18
7, 8
13 16
19 24
9, 10
17 20
25 - 30
SCORE SHEET

PRIMARY SCHOOLS
Team
No.
Sub.
Matter
(10 m)
Pronunciatio
n
(20 m )
Enunciati
on
(30 m)
Variet
y
(10
m)
Special
Effects
(10 m)
Rhythm &
Timing
(10 m)
General
Demeanour
(10 m)
Penalt
y
(-10
m)
Tota
l
Time
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Name of Judge :
1.
Subject Matter :
2.
Pronunciation :
3.
Enunciation :
4.
Variety :
infringements
Signature :
5.
6.
7.
8.
Date :
Sound Effects :
Rhythm and Timing
Demeanour :
Stance and bearing
Penalty :
movements
23
Maximum
Marks
V. Poor
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
10
20
30
1, 2
1-4
16
3, 4
58
7 12
5, 6
9 12
13 18
7, 8
13 16
19 24
9, 10
17 20
25 - 30
SCORE SHEET

PRIMARY SCHOOLS
NATIONAL LEVEL
Team
No.
Sub.
Matter
(10 m)
Pronunciatio
n
(20 m )
Enunciati
on
(30 m)
Variet
y
(10
m)
Special
Effects
(10 m)
Rhythm &
Timing
(10 m)
General
Demeanour
(10 m)
Penalt
y
(-10
m)
Tota
l
Time
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Name of Judge :
1.
2.
3.
4.
Subject Matter :
Pronunciation :
Enunciation :
Variety :
Signature :
5.
6.
7.
8.
Date :
Sound Effects :
Rhythm and Timing
Demeanour :
Stance and bearing
Penalty :
24

infringements

movements
Maximum
Marks
V. Poor
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
10
20
30
1, 2
1-4
16
3, 4
58
7 12
5, 6
9 12
13 18
7, 8
13 16
19 24
9, 10
17 20
25 - 30
SCORE SHEET

PRIMARY SCHOOLS
Team
No.
Sub.
Matter
(10 m)
Pronunciatio
n
(20 m )
Enunciati
on
(30 m)
Variet
y
(10
m)
Special
Effects
(10 m)
Rhythm &
Timing
(10 m)
General
Demeanour
(10 m)
Penalt
y
(-10
m)
Tota
l
Time
16.
Name of Judge :
1.
2.
Subject Matter :
Pronunciation :
Signature :
5.
6.
Date :
Sound Effects :
Rhythm and Timing
25
3.
Enunciation :
4.
Variety :
infringements
7.
8.
Demeanour :
Stance and bearing
Penalty :
movements
Maximum
Marks
V. Poor
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
10
20
30
1, 2
1-4
16
3, 4
58
7 12
5, 6
9 12
13 18
7, 8
13 16
19 24
9, 10
17 20
25 - 30
26
FREQUENCY COUNT

PRIMARY SCHOOLS
NATIONAL LEVEL YEAR ______
ADJUDICATOR
PLACING TIME
3
TEAM
NO.
FINAL
PLACING
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Chief Adjudicator :
Signature :
Adjudicator 1
Signature :
Adjudicator 2
Signature :
Adjudicator 3
Signature :
27
Adjudicator 4
Signature :
RESULT
PRIMARY SCHOOLS
CHAMPION
Team No
School
Team No
School
2ND PLACING
3RD PLACING
Team No
...
School
Team No
School
BEST CONDUCTOR
Name
Chief
Adjudicator
Adjudicator 2
Signature
28
Adjudicator 3
Adjudicator 4
Adjudicator 5
TIME SHEET
PRIMARY SCHOOLS
NATIONAL LEVEL YEAR _____
TEAM
TIME TAKEN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Signature
29
Name of Timekeeper
Date
CHORAL SPEAKING
(SECONDARY SCHOOL)
30
CHORAL SPEAKING COMPETITION FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS

Choral Speaking is the interpretation of poetry or prose by a group, comprising
anything from half a dozen to a hundred speakers. It involves a full and varied
use of the individual voices that make up the group. There may be divisions of
the whole group into light and dark voices, broken and unbroken, male and
female, treble and so on. Individual voices may be used as solo.
Introduction
Choral Speaking is a competition organized by the Ministry of Education. The
competition aims at encouraging and increasing the usage of English among
students. It builds confidence in students to speak, render, memorise and
express in English.
Competition Rules and Regulations
Eligibility
This competition is open to students from Form 1 to Form 4 only.
Each Choral Speaking team is to come from ONE school.
Time
Each team is given a presentation time limit of 8 to 10 minutes.
No marks will be awarded thereafter.
Team
Each team should comprise 30 35 students. A conductor should be
appointed from these students.
Each team should be accompanied by 4 teachers-in-charge.
Material
Selection of material is free and can be in the form of poetry or short
prose.
Materials must be originally written.
Participants are not allowed to refer to any notes or printed materials
during the performance.
Materials presented must not touch on sensitive issues, such as race,
religion, colour, etc.
31
Attire
Copies of choral speaking texts must be submitted to the organizers two

All participants should wear school uniform when competing.

Boys - white, short-sleeve shirts and olive-green long pants
Girls - turquoise pinafore/skirt and white blouse/ baju kurung
Conductor : the use of gloves is allowed
Ties, bows and jackets are not allowed
Exclusions
There should be no inclusions of music, singing, sketches, skits or drama,
costuming, props to enhance the presentation or artificial sound effects
which are electronically or physically aided.
Stage Arrangement
The arrangement of the teams on the stage will be in a fixed 3-tiered
rows.
Judges
National level competitions should be adjudged by 5 judges.
The judges for this level will be appointed by Schools Division, Ministry of
Education.
Decisions
Points will be allocated according to the score sheet and aggregated.
Judges will collectively determine the placing by a clear majority vote.
Prizes
Cash prizes, plaques and certificates of participation will be awarded to
the winning teams.
32
SECONDARY SCHOOLS
MALAYSIA
ADJUDICATION FORMS
MALAYSIA
33
34
SCORE SHEET

SECONDARY SCHOOLS
Team
No.
Sub.
Matter
(10 m)
Pronunciatio
n
(20 m )
Enunciati
on
(30 m)
Variet
y
(10
m)
Special
Effects
(10 m)
Rhythm &
Timing
(10 m)
General
Demeanour
(10 m)
Penalt
y
(-10
m)
Tota
l
Time
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Name of Judge :
Signature :
1.
Subject Matter :
2.
Pronunciation :
3.
Enunciation :
4.
Variety :
infringements
5.
6.
7.
8.
Date :
Sound Effects :
Rhythm and Timing
Demeanour :
Stance and bearing
Penalty :
movements
Maximum
Marks
V. Poor
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
35
10
20
30
1, 2
1-4
16
3, 4
58
7 12
5, 6
9 12
13 18
7, 8
13 16
19 24
9, 10
17 20
25 - 30
SCORE SHEET

SECONDARY SCHOOLS
Team
No.
Sub.
Matter
(10 m)
Pronunciatio
n
(20 m )
Enunciati
on
(30 m)
Variet
y
(10
m)
Special
Effects
(10 m)
Rhythm &
Timing
(10 m)
General
Demeanour
(10 m)
Penalt
y
(-10
m)
Tota
l
Time
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Name of Judge :
1.
Subject Matter :
2.
Pronunciation :
3.
Enunciation :
4.
Variety :
infringements
Signature :
5.
6.
7.
8.
Date :
Sound Effects :
Rhythm and Timing
Demeanour :
Stance and bearing
Penalty :
movements
36
Maximum
Marks
V. Poor
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
10
20
30
1, 2
1-4
16
3, 4
58
7 12
5, 6
9 12
13 18
7, 8
13 16
19 24
9, 10
17 20
25 - 30
SCORE SHEET

SECONDARY SCHOOLS
NATIONAL LEVEL
Team
No.
Sub.
Matter
(10 m)
Pronunciatio
n
(20 m )
Enunciati
on
(30 m)
Variet
y
(10
m)
Special
Effects
(10 m)
Rhythm &
Timing
(10 m)
General
Demeanour
(10 m)
Penalt
y
(-10
m)
Tota
l
Time
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Name of Judge :
1.
2.
3.
4.
Subject Matter :
Pronunciation :
Enunciation :
Variety :
Signature :
5.
6.
7.
8.
Date :
Sound Effects :
Rhythm and Timing
Demeanour :
Stance and bearing
Penalty :
37

infringements

movements
Maximum
Marks
V. Poor
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
10
20
30
1, 2
1-4
16
3, 4
58
7 12
5, 6
9 12
13 18
7, 8
13 16
19 24
9, 10
17 20
25 - 30
SCORE SHEET

SECONDARY SCHOOLS
Team
No.
Sub.
Matter
(10 m)
Pronunciatio
n
(20 m )
Enunciati
on
(30 m)
Variet
y
(10
m)
Special
Effects
(10 m)
Rhythm &
Timing
(10 m)
General
Demeanour
(10 m)
Penalt
y
(-10
m)
Tota
l
Time
16.
Name of Judge :
1.
2.
Subject Matter :
Pronunciation :
Signature :
5.
6.
Date :
Sound Effects :
Rhythm and Timing
38
3.
Enunciation :
4.
Variety :
infringements
7.
8.
Demeanour :
Stance and bearing
Penalty :
movements
Maximum
Marks
V. Poor
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
10
20
30
1, 2
1-4
16
3, 4
58
7 12
5, 6
9 12
13 18
7, 8
13 16
19 24
9, 10
17 20
25 - 30
39
FREQUENCY COUNT

SECONDARY SCHOOLS
NATIONAL LEVEL YEAR ______
ADJUDICATOR
PLACING TIME
3
TEAM
NO.
FINAL
PLACING
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Chief Adjudicator : .
Signature :
Adjudicator 1
: .
Signature :
Adjudicator 2
: .
Signature :
Adjudicator 3
: .
Signature :
40
Adjudicator 4
: .
Signature :
RESULT
PRIMARY SCHOOLS
CHAMPION
Team No
School
Team No
School
2ND PLACING
3RD PLACING
Team No
...
School
Team No
School
BEST CONDUCTOR
Name
Chief
Adjudicator
Adjudicator 2
Signature
41
Adjudicator 3
Adjudicator 4
Adjudicator 5
TIME SHEET
SECONDARY SCHOOLS
NATIONAL LEVEL YEAR _____
TEAM
TIME TAKEN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Signature
42
Name of Timekeeper
Date
PARLIAMENTARY
STYLE DEBATE
(SECONDARY SCHOOL)
43
TAN SRI DATUK WIRA ABDUL RAHMAN ARSHAD CHALLENGE TROPHY

PARLIAMENTARY STYLE ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEBATE
1.
Name
Tan Sri Datuk Wira Abdul Rahman Arshad English Language Debate
2.
Format
2.1
A team representing a school shall consists of 3 main debaters and

2 reserves
2.2
The proposition team is known as the Affirmative or the Government while

the opposition team is known as the Negative or Opposition.
2.3
Allocation of time and speaking order;

AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
TIME
1st Speaker
1st Speaker
8 minutes
2nd Speaker
2nd Speaker
8 minutes
3rd Speaker
3rd Speaker
8 minutes
Reply Speech
Reply Speech
4 minutes
st
nd
1 / 2 Affirmative
st
nd
1 / 2 Negative
2.4
The third debater from both teams shall not introduce any new arguments.
Their role is mainly to rebut.
2.5
While the debater is speaking the opposition team can offer Point(s) of
Information (formal interjections). The debater may accept or
decline it.
2.6
first
After all the debaters have spoken once, the 1 st or 2nd debater for each
side gives a reply speech with the Negatives Reply being delivered
and the Affirmative second.
44
3.
Eligibility
3.1
residential
4.
The competition is open to all students from Form 1 5 from all

Government-aided secondary schools Malaysia, excluding fully
schools.
3.2
A school is allowed to send only one team to participate in the

competition.
3.3
Each team should comprise of at least one Bumiputera student who is a

speaking member of the team.
3.4
Every member of a participating team should come from the same school.
Adjudication
4.1
All debates shall be adjudicated by an odd numbered panel of at least 3

adjudicators.
4.2
At National level competitions, a panel of 5 adjudicators

should adjudicate.
4.3
Adjudicators should be briefed on the rules of adjudication 30 minutes

before the debate.
4.4
Adjudicators should not adjudicate the team from their own

schools/districts/states unless there is no adjudicators available.
4.6
A debate is won by the team which scored a majority of votes from the
adjudicators on the panel. Team marks or winning margins of
adjudicators are not to be added together to decide the
winner.
4.7
Immediately after a debate, the Speaker will collect the score sheets from
the adjudicators. There should be no discussions among the
adjudicators
when deciding the winner of the debate.
4.8
Once the score sheets has been handed in, the adjudicators shall meet
and confer to decide the Best Debater. They shall refer to the
adjudicators
comment sheets to decide the winner.
45
5.
Procedure of Debate
5.1
The Debate Process

5.1.1 The debate topics will be given to the competing teams 2 weeks
before the competition.
5.1.2 The teams will draw the stand ONE hour before a debate
commences.
5.1.3 The draw should take place as schedule on time.
already
5.1.4 Any team that is late would have to inform the organizers within 5
minutes of the scheduled time, failure of which, the team
present will be allowed to draw.
5.1.5 A team which is late (more than 5 minutes without information on
whereabouts) would automatically take on the other position.
5.1.6 The team will then be quarantined in their quarantine rooms for
ONE hour to prepare for the debate.
5.1.7 Only the team members competing (3 main debaters and 2
reserves) will be allowed in the quarantine room.
5.1.8 The team is allowed to use only printed reference materials in the
quarantine room. No electronic gadgets are allowed in.
5.1.9 Teams are required to be seated at the debate venue (s) 5 minutes
before the start of the debate.
5.2
The Role of the Chairperson / Speaker

5.2.1 Each team will be chaired by a Chairperson who will be addressed
as Mr. Speaker or Madam Speaker.
5.2.2 The Speaker is responsible for the smooth running of the debate.
5.2.3 The Speaker will read out the rules of the debate and then proceed
to introduce the timekeeper, adjudicators and debaters.
46
5.2.4 The Speaker must refrain from making any comments concerning
the debate or debaters during the debate.
5.2.5 The Speaker must ensure that the adjudicators must be given
enough time to fill in their marks before the next debater is
called.
5.3
The Role of the Timekeeper

5.3.1 The Timekeeper must ensure that each debater is given 8 minutes
to deliver his / her speech.
5.3.2 The Timekeeper will ring the bell once after the 1 st minute and at
the end of the 7th minute to signal the time allocated for
Points of
Information. At the end of the 8th minute, the bell will
be rung
twice.(placards may be used by the timekeeper
to indicate the
remaining time left, at intervals of one minute).
5.3.3 A maximum time of 3 minutes will be given to both teams to
prepare for Reply Speech.
5.3.4 During the Reply Speech, the Timekeeper will ring the bell once at
the 3rd minute to signal that the debater has 1 minute left. At
end of the 4th minute, the bell will be rung twice to signal the
the debate.
the
end of
6.
Points of Information
6.1
A Point of Information is a formal interjection. It can be:

i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
a question
a remark
a clarification
a correction of word (s) or statement (s)
6.2
A Point of Information may be offered by a member of the opposition team

from the 2ND minute to the 7th minute of the time allocated to the debator.
Points of Information are not allowed during the 1 st and Final
minutes of
the speech. A bell will be rung to signal the beginning and
the end of the
time allocated for Points of Information.
6.3
to the
A time limit of 15 seconds is allowed for each Point of Information.

Therefore, the Points of Information put forth must be concise and
point.
47
6.4
No heckling or harassment or barracking is allowed at any time during the

debate.
6.5
Giving and taking Points of Information should be done politely. A debater

is required to raise his / her hand and to stand when putting forth a
of Information. Rude, abusive or aggressive behaviour in both
will lead to a reduction of marks from the STYLE section.
Point
instances
6.6
A debator may either accept the Point of Information or decline it. If

accepted, the opponent may make a short point or ask a question
deals with some issues of the debate (preferably one just made by
debater).
6.7
A debater MUST give or take at least 2 Points of Information during the

course of the debate.
that
the
6.7.1 A debater who does not offer the minimum number of Points of
Information will be marked down for SUBSTANCE and
STRATEGY.
Substance for failing to take advantage of

opportunities.
Strategy for failing to understand the role of the
debater under this style.
6.7.2 A debator who fails to accept any Points of Information would be

marked down for SUBSTANCE AND STRATEGY.
Substance for failing to allow the other side to

make their point.
Strategy for not understanding the role of the
debater under this style or cowardice in not
accepting a challenge.
6.8
No Points of Information may be offered during the Reply Speeches.
6.9
The Etiquette of Points of Information
obliged
A Point of Information is offered by standing and saying Point of

Information or something similar. The debater on the floor is not
to accept every point. He / She may ;
Ask the interrupter to sit down;

Finish the sentence and then accept the point
Accept the point there and then
48
REFERENCE FOR THE SCORE SHEET

1.0
Marks are awarded to each debater according to :

SUBSTANCE
STYLE
STRATEGY
LANGUAGE
1.1
SUBSTANCE
a.
Substance covers the arguments that are used divorced from the
speaking style. It is as if you are seeing the arguments written down
than spoken. You must assess the weight of the arguments without being
influenced by the magnificence of the orator that presented them.
b.
Substance also includes an assessment of the weight of the rebuttal or

clash. This assessment must be done from the standpoint of the
reasonable person.
rather
average
c.
The adjudicators job is to assess the strength of an argument regardless

of whether the other team is able to knock it down. If a team
introduces weak arguments it will not score highly in
substance, even if
the other team does not refute. Two consequences
flow from these.
d.
First, if a major argument is plainly weak, an opposing team which doesnt

refute may well have committed greater sin than the team which
introduced it. In effect the team has lead the other team to get away
weak argument. This is not an automatic rule but it is true in many cases.
Of course, it must be a major argument not a minor example which
opposing team correctly chooses to ignore in favour of attacking
significant points.
e.
Second, adjudicators have to be careful not to be influenced by their own

beliefs, nor their own specialized knowledge. For example if you
lawyer and you know that a teams argument was debunked by the
International Court of Justice (ICJ) last week, you should
with a
the
more
are a
49
probably not
decision was a
1.2
take into account this special knowledge unless the ICJ s

matter of extreme public notoriety .
STYLE
a.
The term is rather misleading. Adjudicators are not looking for debaters
who are stylish.
b.
Style covers the way the debaters speak. This can be noted in many
ways, in funny accents, body language (movement, poise,
meaningful
gestures and eye contact) and with the use of specific
terminology. Be
tolerant of different ways of presenting arguments.
1.3
c.
Use of palm cards and notes are allowed and should not be penalized,
unless a debater is reading from them heavily.
d.
Be tolerant of speaking styles and speed of delivery. Penalised only when

a debaters style has gone beyond what everyone would expect.
STRATEGY
a.
Strategy requires some attention. It covers two concepts:

i.
ii.
The structure and timing of the speech.

Whether the debater understood the issues of the debate.
.
b.
Structure
A good speech has a clear beginning, middle and end. Along the way
there are signposts to help us see where the debater is going. The
sequence of arguments is logical and flows naturally from
point to point.
This is true of
the first debater outlining the
Governments case as it is of
the
third
debater rebutting
the
Governments case. Good speech structure,
therefore, is one component of
the strategy.
c.
Timing is also important, but it must not be taken to extremes. There are
two aspects of timing:
i. speaking within the allowed time limit.
ii. Giving an appropriate amount of time to the issues in the speech.
50
d.
A debater ought to give priority to important issues and leave unimportant

one to later. It is generally a good idea to rebut or begin with an attack on
the other side by subsequent debaters, before going on to the debaters
own case. This is because it is more logical to get rid of the opposing
arguments first before trying to put something in its place.
e.
So, the adjudicator must weigh not only the strength of the arguments in
the SUBSTANCE category, but also the proper time and priority given in
the STRATEGY category.
f.
Understanding the Issues

Closely related to the last point is that the debater should understand what
the important issues were in the debate. It is a waste of time for a rebuttal
speaker to deal with points if crucial arguments are left unanswered. Such
a speaker would not understand the important issues of the debate, and
should not score well in Strategy. By contrast, a speaker who understood
what the issues were and dealt with them thoroughly should score well in
Strategy.
g.
1.4
It is very important that adjudicators understand the difference between

Strategy and Substance. Imagine a debate where a debater answers
critical issues with some weak rebuttal. This debater should get poor
marks for Substance, because the rebuttal was weak. But the debater
should get reasonable mark for Strategy because the right arguments
were being addressed.
LANGUAGE
a.
Language refers to using appropriate expressions containing correct

sentence structures and grammar.
b.
It also covers pronunciation, fluency, rhythm, intonation and clarity of

speech. Of course, English being a foreign language here,
adjudicators
shouldnt be looking for Queens English in our debaters. But
any
expression which is mumbled or not clearly understood
should not
merit high marks in the Language section.
c.
1.5
On the other hand, any good language expression, including the use of
figures of speech, idioms, etc. appropriate and apt to the occasion, may
merit positive marks for Language.
REBUTTAL
51
a.
The use of general cases has consequences for rebuttal or clash. The
Opposition team cannot concentrate on attacking the examples
used by
the Government. The examples might be weak, but the
central case might
still be sound. Instead, the team will have to concentrate on
that case,
because that is where the debate actually is.
b.
not
1.6
1.7
There is another consequence for rebuttal. It may be that a team has used
a number of examples to illustrate the same point. If they can all be
disposed off by the same piece of rebuttal, the rebutting team does
have to attack each of the examples individually as well.
THE REPLY SPEECH

a.
The thematic approach to argument outlined above becomes

critical in the Reply Speeches. These have been described as an
`adjudication from our side and really amount to an overview of the major
issues in the debate.
b.
A Reply speaker does not have time to deal with small

arguments or individual examples. The debater must deal with the two or
three major issues in the debate in global terms, showing how they favour
the debaters team and work against the opposition team. As a general
rule , a Reply speaker who descends to the level of dealing with individual
examples probably doesnt understand either the issues of the debate or
the principles of good arguments.
POINTS OF INFORMATION
a.
A `Point of Information is offered in the course of speech by a member of

the opposing team. The debater may either accept or decline. If
accepted,
the opponent may make a short point or ask a question that
deals with
some issues in the debate (preferably one just made by the
debater). It is,
a formal interjection.
b.
Points of Information bring about a major change in the role of the

debaters in a debate. In this style, each debater must take part from
beginning to end, not just during their own speech.
c.
The debaters play this role by offering Points of Information. Even if the
points are not accepted, they must still demonstrate that they are
in the debate by at least offering. A debater who takes no
debate other than by making a speech would be marked
Substance and Strategy.
involved
part in the
down for
52
LIST OF EXPRESSION TO REQUEST, ACCEPT OR DECLINE POINTS OF

INFORMATION
TO REQUEST
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
Point of Information, please.

Point of Information.
P.O.I. please.
P.O.I
Point.
TO ACCEPT
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
vi.
TO DECLINE
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.
Yes.
Yes, please.
Yes, Sir / Miss.
Please.
Please go ahead.
Yes, accepted.
No, thank you.
No, thanks.
Denied.
Sorry, Sir / Miss.
Sorry.
If the opponent ( during his / her Point (s) of information ) is taking too much of your
time, you can ask him / her to sit down if he / she has exceeded the 15 seconds time
limit.
You may use these expressions:
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
Please sit down Sir / Miss. You are taking too much of my time.
You are taking too much of my time. Please sit down.
Kindly sit down. You have exceeded the time limit for POI.
Your time limit is up.
*** please note that it is of utmost importance that debaters be polite at all times during
the course of the debate especially when accepting or declining Point(s) of
53
Information.
GLOSSARY
1.
adjudicator
a person called to judge a debate to determine the winner
2.
barracking
to criticize loudly, shout or jeer against a team or debater.
3.
case line
please refer to Stand
4.
clarification
to seek further information or explanation on matters.
5.
comment sheet-
a sheet where the adjudicators write his / her comments

during the proceedings of the debate.
6.
confer
to discuss and come to a consensus decision.
7.
electronic gadgets- electrical items such as computers, hand phones, radio

cassette player, Walkman, etc.
8.
harassment -
to trouble, torment or confuse by continual persistent

attacks, questions, etc.
9.
heckling
to interrupt by taunts.
10.
majority vote -
the winner is determined by the number of votes given to the

winning team.
11.
marked down -
please refer to the reduction of marks
12.
point(s) of
information
a formal interjection where the opposing team can ask

questions , clarify, make a remark or correct a word or
statement.
13.
rebuttal
to refute or disprove the opponents arguments by

offering contrary contentions or arguments.
14.
reply speech -
an arena where a debater will sum up the teams arguments
54
and then rebut the oppositions major arguments brought up

during the debate.
15.
reduction of marks- in Parliamentary Style Debate marks are not deducted from a
teams or individuals marks but are reduced.
16.
Speaker
a person who chairs a debate and ensures the smooth

running of the proceedings.
17.
stand
from which angle the team is going to argue the case
18.
strategy
how each team member work together to argue the case.
19.
substance
the arguments presented during the debate.
55

TAN SRI DATUK WIRA ABDUL RAHMAN ARSHAD
CHALLENGE TROPHY
SECONDARY SCHOOLS, MALAYSIA
NATIONAL LEVEL YEAR : __________
RESULT
WINNING TEAM
TEAM
: GOVERNMENT / OPPOSITION
SCHOOL
: _________________________
STATE
: _________________________
56
Adjudicators Signature :
1/2/3/4/5
_____________________________
(

CHALLENGE TROPHY
VOTING
BEST DEBATER
DEBATER
Adjudicator
1
Adjudicator
2
Adjudicator
3
Adjudicator
4
Adjudicator
5
57
Chief Adjudicator :
___________________________
(

CHALLENGE TROPHY
RESULT
BEST SPEAKER
TEAM
: GOVERNMENT / OPPOSITION
NAME
: _________________________
SCHOOL
: _________________________
58
CHIEF ADJUDICATOR : ______________________

(
)
59

TAN SERI DATUK WIRA ABDUL RAHMAN ARSHAD CHALLENGE TROPHY
SCHOOL:
ADJUDICATORS SCORE SHEET
TOPIC :
ROLE
WEIGHTAGE %
(Minutes)
NAME
1
10%
1M
2
10%
1M
3
5%
1M
4
60%
3M
FIRST AFFIRMATIVE
MARKS
TEAM : AFFIRMATIVE
5
5%
1M
6
10%
1M
1
10%
1M
2
40%
3M
3
40%
3M
SECOND AFFIRMATIVE
4
10%
1M
1
40%
3M
2
30%
2M
3
20%
2M
4
10%
1M
THIRD AFFIRMATIVE
1
50%
2M
2
50%
2M
REPLY SPEECH
26-30
21-25
16-20
11-15
6-10
26-30
21-25
16-20
11-15
6-10
26-30
21-25
16-20
11-15
6-10
14-15
12-13
10-11
8-9
6-7
18-20
15-17
12-14
9-11
6-8
18-20
15-17
12-14
9-11
6-8
18-20
15-17
12-14
9-11
6-8
9-10
7-8
5-6
86100
70-85
5669
4055
2439
86100
7085
5669
4055
2439
86-100
70-85
5669
4055
2439
45-50
3644
3035
2429
18-23
TICK (_/)
SUBSTANCE
(30)
TICK (_/)
STYLE
(30)
MARKS
TICK (_/)
STRATEGY
(20)
TICK (_/)
LANGUAGE
(20)
TOTAL(100)
GRAND TOTAL :
ADJUDICATORS NAME :
/350
WINNING TEAM : AFFIRMATIVE/NEGATIVE

ADJUDICATORS SIGNATURE :
DATE :
60

TAN SERI DATUK WIRA ABDUL RAHMAN ARSHAD CHALLENGE TROPHY
SCHOOL:
ROLE
WEIGHTAGE
%
(Minutes)
NAME
ADJUDICATORS SCORE SHEET
TOPIC :
1
10%
1M
2
25%
2M
3
10
%
1M
4
5%
1/2M
5
35
%
2M
FIRST NEGATIVE
MARKS
TEAM : NEGATIVE
6
5%
1/2M
7
10%
1M
1
40%
3M
2
30%
2M
3
20%
2M
SECOND NEGATIVE
4
10%
1M
1
40%
3M
2
30%
2M
3
10%
1M
4
10%
1M
THIRD NEGATIVE
5
10%
1M
1
50%
2M
2
50%
2M
REPLY SPEECH
26-30
21-25
16-20
11-15
6-10
26-30
21-25
16-20
11-15
6-10
26-30
21-25
16-20
11-15
6-10
14-15
12-13
10-11
8-9
6-7
18-20
15-17
12-14
9-11
6-8
18-20
15-17
12-14
9-11
6-8
18-20
15-17
12-14
9-11
6-8
9-10
7-8
5-6
86100
70-85
5669
4055
2439
86100
7085
5669
4055
2439
86-100
70-85
5669
4055
2439
45-50
3644
3035
2429
18-23
TICK (_/)
SUBSTANCE
(30)
TICK (_/)
STYLE
(30)
MARKS
TICK (_/)
STRATEGY
(20)
TICK (_/)
LANGUAGE
(20)
TOTAL(100)
GRAND TOTAL :
/350
WINNING TEAM : AFFIRMATIVE/NEGATIVE
61
ADJUDICATORS NAME :
ADJUDICATORS SIGNATURE :
DATE :
62

CHALLENGE TROPHY
REPLY SPEECH
NEGATIVE
AFFIRMATIVE
REBUTTAL
REBUTTAL
SUMMARY
SUMMARY

63

ADJUDICATORS COMMENT SHEET
1ST AFFIRMATIVE
1ST NEGATIVE
2ND AFFIRMATIVE
2ND NEGATIVE
3RD AFFIRMATIVE
3RD NEGATIVE
NAME :
NAME :
NAME :
NAME :
NAME :
NAME :
POI(INTERJECTED)
POI(INTERJECTED)
POI(INTERJECTED)
POI(INTERJECTED)
POI(INTERJECTED)
POI(INTERJECTED)
POI(ANSWERED)
POI(ANSWERED)
POI(ANSWERED)
POI(ANSWERED)
POI(ANSWERED)
POI(ANSWERED)
Definition:
Defn
Agree/Refute
New Definition :
Defn
Agree/Refute
Redefine :
Rebut 2nd
Affirmative:
Rebut 2nd
Negative:
Rebut 3rd
Affirmative:
Rebut 1st
Affirmative :
Rebut 1st
Negative :
Rebut 1st
Affirmative:
Rebut 2nd
Affirmative:
Rebut 1st Negative:
Specify Stand :
Specify Stand :
Specify Role :
Specify Role :
Argument 2 :
Argument 2 :
Argument 1 :
Argument 1 :
Argument 3 :
Argument 3 :
Reaffirm Case :
Reaffirm Case :
Reaffirm case :
Reaffirm case :
POI
POI
POI
POI
POI
IP
Rebut 1st
Affirmative:
64

ELABORATIONS ON ASPECTS OF ADJUDICATION

1.
SUBSTANCE
2.
STYLE
3.
Presentation on the way the debaters speak include body language, eye contact and voice modulation.
Be tolerant of speaking style and speed of delivery.
STRATEGY
4.
Arguments divorce from speaking style

Assess weight of rebuttal
Assess points of argument
Assess weight of argument without influence of oratory
Covers structure and time

Good speech has beginning, middle and ending
Speaking within the time limit
Appropriate amount of time given to issues in the speech
Focus of rebuttal mainly on main issues presented in the debate
Critical issues with weak rebuttal would mean lower score for SUBSTANCE but reasonable mark may be
awarded for STRATEGY because the right arguments were addressed
LANGUAGE
Appropriate expression.
Correct sentence structure and grammar
Pronunciation, fluency, rhythm, intonation and clarity
Good language and expression appropriately used e.g. idioms and figures of speech
65

DRAW
TEAM
QUARTER-FINAL
1
SCHOOL/STATE
QUARTER -FINAL 2
SCHOOL/STATE
QUARTER -FINAL
3
SCHOOL/STATE
QUARTER -FINAL
3
SCHOOL/STATE
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
OVERSEER :__________________________________
(
TIME :
)
DATE :
66

DRAW
TEAM
SEMI-FINAL 1
SCHOOL/STATE
SEMI-FINAL 2
SCHOOL/STATE
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
OVERSEER : __________________________________
(
TIME :
)
DATE :
67

DRAW
TEAM
FINAL
SCHOOL/STATE
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
OVERSEER : __________________________________
(
TIME :
)
DATE :
68

RESULT
TEAM
QUARTER-FINAL
1
SCHOOL/STATE
QUARTER -FINAL 2
SCHOOL/STATE
QUARTER -FINAL
3
SCHOOL/STATE
QUARTER -FINAL
3
SCHOOL/STATE
WINNING
TEAM
BEST DEBATER
Chief Adjudicator QF1
: .
Signature :
: .
Signature :
: .
Signature :
: .
Signature :
69

RESULT
TEAM
SEMI-FINAL 1
SCHOOL/STATE
SEMI-FINAL 2
SCHOOL/STATE
WINNING TEAM
BEST DEBATER
Chief Adjudicator SF1
: .
Signature :
Chief Adjudicator SF2
: .
Signature :
70

RESULT
TEAM
FINAL
SCHOOL/STATE
WINNING TEAM
BEST DEBATER
Chief Adjudicator : .
Signature :
71
COMPETITION SCHEDULE
QUARTER/SEMI/FINAL 1/2/3/4
SMK AAA
The retirement age
of workers should
00/00/2000
Time :
Chief Adjudicator :
Quarantine : 0800 am
Pn. Alice Lee
Competition : 0900 am
Adjudicators :
Venue Quarantine :
1. Pn. Missnah Ali
Meeting Room 1(Affirmative)2. Pn. Nora Ahmad
Meeting Room 2 (Negative) 3. Pn. Atikah Adam
be raised.
SMK BBB
4. Pn. Sheery Lim

Competition : Ballroom
Time Keepers :
Pn Siti Abu
Pn Amah bt Salim
LOCATION :
Ground Floor : (Palace Wing)
Speaker
Pn Angelina Lim
Meeting Room 1 & 2

Ballroom
Emcee
Pn Jalilah bt Salim
72
DRAMA
(SECONDARY SCHOOL)
73
ENGLISH LANGUAGE DRAMA COMPETITION

FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS
1.0
Introduction
The Drama Competition serves as a platform for students and teachers to
promote and demonstrate creative ideas in their work.
Drama motivates
students to use English and therefore improves their command of the language.
It is hoped that Drama themes such as peace, prosperity, love, sacrifice,
dynamism, integration and/or historical events can instill values amongst
students to be more sensitive and appreciative towards local arts.
2.0
3.0
Objectives
2.1
To support the nations efforts to encourage the use of the English

language amongst students.
2.2
To encourage students to appreciate drama as it promotes integration and

inculcates moral values.
2.3
To provide the opportunity for students and teachers to show their talents
and creativity in the art of dramatisation; the usage of English which
incorporates script writing, directing, stage management and other
technical aspects.
General Rules
3.1
This competition is open to all students from Forms 1 to 5 in all

government-aided schools. Each team comprises a maximum of 15
participants (including the technical crew: stage manager, technical
coordinator, set and prop assistant) and two teachers-in-charge.
3.2
All team members must be from the same school.
3.3
The winning team will represent the state at the national level.
3.4
Duration of stage performance is limited to 20 minutes.
74
3.5
The drama should incorporate at least one of the following themes :

3.5.1
3.5.2
3.5.3
3.5.4
3.5.5
3.5.6
3.5.7
Patriotism
Love
Socio-cultural
Dynamism
Harmony
Historical Events
Myths / Legends
3.6
Participating teams are encouraged to use original scripts. Nevertheless,

translated scripts or interpretation of established plays are allowed.
3.7
Drama scripts and synopsis should be typed using Font 12 Times New
Roman on A4 paper and sent to the Organising Committee two weeks
before the competition proper.
3.8
Judging is based on these criteria:3.8.1 Creativity of Drama
35 %
3.8.2 Language
30 %
3.8.3 Overall Coordination & Presentation
25 %
3.8.4 Positive Values / Message
10 %
Total
3.9
4.0
100%
Teams which do not abide the rules will be disqualified.
Guidelines
4.1
Language
4.1.1 It is compulsory to use English language throughout the drama
presentation. Nevertheless, limited use of certain Malay registers is
allowed.
4.1.2 Use of vulgar words is strictly prohibited.
4.1.3 Scripts must not touch on sensitive issues such as race, religion,
politics, colour, personalities, etc.
75
4.2
Theme
4.2.1 The drama must portray the selected theme(s). This criterion will be
evaluated through the script and presentation.
4.2.2 Themes must not touch on sensitive issues such as race, religion,
politics, colour, personalities, etc.
4.3
Costumes
4.3.1 Participants should wear appropriate and decent clothes that suit
the characters they portray.
4.4
Set and Props

4.4.1 Minimise use of set and props.
4.4.2 Sets and props should not hinder the movement of the team
members on stage.
4.4.3 Use of sharp objects (such as knives, keris, etc.), fire, inflammable
and dangerous chemical substances is strictly prohibited.
4.4.4 Each team is responsible for the setting up (5 minutes) and clearing
of sets and props (5 minutes).
4.4.5 Safety of sets and props should be ensured at all times.
4.5
Music
4.5.1 Each team should have technical assistant(s) to coordinate music
and recordings.
4.5.2 All equipment and its operation is the responsibility of every
participating team.
4.6
Lighting and Additional Equipment for Special Effects

4.6.1 Participants can utilise their own additional equipment. However,
the equipment used must be suitable on stage and does not disrupt
the flow of the drama presentation.
4.6.2 Each team is responsible to coordinate lighting and special effects.
4.7
Demeanour
4.7.1 Participants should not portray indecent actions, excessive
movements that are provocative.
4.7.2 The presentation should take into account the comfort and safety of
the audience and actors.
4.8
Duration of Time
76
4.8.1 Time allocated for each presentation is 20 minutes. Timing of the

presentation starts with the first movement, first word uttered by the
actor(s) or any sound effects.
4.9
Adjudication
4.9.1 There will be a panel of five judges at the state and national levels.
4.9.2 The team with the majority of votes will be declared the winner.
4.9.3 The decision of the judges is final.
4.10
Prizes
Prizes are awarded as follows:4.10.1
4.10.2
4.10.3
4.10.4
4.10.5
Champion
Second
Two Consolation Prizes
Best Performer
Best Script

77
NATIONAL LEVEL YEAR _______

CREATIVITY
OF DRAMA
(35 marks)
LANGUAGE
(30 marks)
Creative /
Innovative ideas
in presentation
(20 marks)
T
E
A
M
Storyline &
development of
ideas, dramatic
structure in plot
(10 marks)
Words clearly
articulated;
comprehensible
(30 marks)
Props
(5 marks)
OVERALL
COORDINATION
AND
PRESENTATION
(25 marks)
Flow of Drama
between Cast,
Delivery; Interplay
and cooperation
emphasised; within
the allocated time
( 20 marks)
POSITIVE
VALUES /
MESSAGE
(10 marks)
Positive
Values
emphasised/
projected
(10 marks)
T
I
M
E
T
O
T
A
L
Effective utilisation
of space
(5 marks)
1
2
3
4
Name of Adjudicator: ______________________
Signature:_____________
Date: ________________
FREQUENCY COUNT
78
P
L
A
C
I
N
G

ADJUDICATOR
PLACING
1
TIME
RESULT
TEAM NUMBER
1
2
3
4
Name of Chief Adjudicator: _________________ Signature: ____________
Name and Signature :
Adjudicator 2: ________________________________
Adjudicator 3: ________________________________
Adjudicator 4: ________________________________
Adjudicator 5: ________________________________
RESULT
79

NATIONAL LEVEL YEAR _________
PLACING
TEAM NUMBER
STATE / SCHOOL
CHAMPION
SECOND
CONSOLATION
CONSOLATION
BEST PERFORMER
Name of Chief Adjudicator : ____________
_____
Signature
__________
Date
: __________________

80
SCOPE OF ADJUDICATION: A GUIDE
CREATIVITY OF DRAMA
Freshness or
uniqueness of the content
New / unusual / different
perspective
Storyline
Development
Plot
Coordination: scenes &
timing
(Music and theme)
(Music and scenes)
Dialogues
Costumes
Suitable props
OVERALL
COORDINATION &
PRESENTATION
LANGUAGE
Dialogues
Overall
pronunciation /
comprehensible
Words
properly
projected
Voice
consistent with
the character
Lines & cues
memorised well
Language
spread
Emphasise
interplay &
cooperation
Team members
work well together
Many characters
have significant
roles in the play
Enjoyable
presentation &
pleasing to the
audience
Choreography
Music effect
POSITIVE
VALUES /
MESSAGE
Well
projected
81
PUBLIC SPEAKING
(PRIMARY & SECONDARY
SCHOOL)
PUBLIC SPEAKING COMPETITION

82
1.0
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE

1.1
The standard of English among students in Malaysia is a cause for

concern. This is reflected by the low academic achievement of students in
the public examinations. The percentage of passes for the English
Language subject in the said examination has always been around 60%.
As compared with the other subjects, the percentage of English Language
passes has always been the lowest. There has bee a hue and cry among
members of the public over the issue.
1.2
The Ministry of Education has been sensitive about the matter. Various
steps have been taken to arrest the situation and these include activities
carried out in the classroom as well as outside the classroom. Various
Divisions of the Ministry of Education and State Education Department
implement their own projects and programmes to help raise the standard
of English among students. Schools too, conduct their own activities for
the purpose.
1.3
In this context the Schools Division of the Ministry of Education also

carries out a number of support programmes to help the students achieve
better results in the English Language subject. Some of the activities
carried out by the said Division are debates, choral speaking, story-telling,
English-in-camp and essay writing competition. However, it is felt that
more activities are needed for students to get better and more exposure to
the language.
1.4
Starting this year (2000) Schools Division, Ministry of Education has

decided to introduce public speaking competitions for students in the
primary as well as the secondary schools. Speaking is one of the four
main language skills for students to be proficient in. As we advance into
the new millennium students are expected to be able to master at least
two languages, namely Bahasa Melayu and English Language. This would
make it easier for them to function as they are able to play a more relevant
and functional role in their daily life. In the new millennium too, the world
becomes smaller and more global in nature. Technology too gets more
advanced. Thus, proficiency in the English Language becomes a
necessity, as one needs to interact with one another and keep abreast
with the latest developments in technology. One who does not master the
English language in the new millennium will be at the losing end.
1.5
Through public speaking competitions it is hoped that an awareness is

created among students on the importance of upgrading themselves in the
English language. It would also serve as a catalyst for students to start
using and learning English in a more serious manner.
83
2.0
AIM
3.0
To encourage the development of oral communication skills among

students.
To promote the use of plain English.
To promote better understanding between young people.
ELIGIBILITY
3.1
This competition is divided into 2 categories namely:
4.0
3.2
For the secondary school category, students from Forms 1 5 of all

Government aided secondary schools including fully residential schools in
Malaysia can take part.
3.3
For the primary school category, only students from years 4 6 of all
Government aided primary schools in Malaysia can take part.
COMPETITION LEVELS
4.1
The competition is held at the following levels:
5.0
The secondary school category

The primary school category.
School
District
State
National
4.2
At the school level, as many students as possible should be encouraged

to take part in this competition. The winner of the competition at school
level will represent the school at the district level competition.
4.3
The winner of the competition at district level will represent the district at
the state level competition.
4.4
The winner of the competition at the state level will represent the state at
the national level competition.
INCENTIVES AND PRIZES
84
5.1 The reward is in the participation! Additional incentives are provided at each
level of the competition as follows:
LEVEL
School
District
State
INCENTIVES AND PRIZES
To be determined by the school

To be determined by the district
To be determined by the state
Placing
National
Primary School
Category
1st
Prizes
2nd
3rd
consolation
RM 300.00
Challenge
Trophy
Replica
Challenge
Trophy
Certificate
RM 150.00
Replica
Challenge
Trophy
Certificate
RM 80.00
Replica
Challenge
Trophy
Certificate
RM 30.00
Certificate
85
Placing
National
Prizes
1st
Secondary
School Category
2nd
3rd
consolation
6.0
RM 500.00
Challenge
Trophy
Replica
Challenge
Trophy
Certificate
RM 300.00
Replica
Challenge
Trophy
Certificate
RM 200.00
Replica
Challenge
Trophy
Certificate
RM 50.00
Certificate
COMPETITION FORMAT
6.1
The competition is divided into two sections, as follows:

Section 1
Section 2
6.2
:
:
Prepared Speech
Impromptu Speech
any topic
For section 1 (Prepared Speech) contestants are to observe the following

rules:
Secondary school contestants will deliver a prepared speech of six
(6) minutes on a topic of their choice.
Primary school contestants will deliver a prepared speech on a
topic of their choice for 4-6 minutes.
A warning bell will be sounded at eh 5 th minute and a final bell at
the 6th minute.
86
6.3
For section 2, (Impromptu Speech) contestants are to observe the

following rules:
7.0
Contestants are given a topic four minutes before they are due to
present the speech;
All contestants speak on the same topic;
The time allowed for the impromptu speech is three minutes;
A warning bell sounds at two minutes and a final bell at three
minutes.
ADJUDICATION
7.1
Judging is nationally standardized. Judges are required to undertake a

substantial briefing to gain full understanding of the judging criteria and to
work within the guidelines set.
7.2
Judging Criteria
7.2.1 The judging criteria for both the Prepared Speech and the
Impromptu Speech are on two aspects as follows:
a)
Subject Matter
b)
Is the subject matter of the speech suitable and

substantial?
Is the speech original and intelligent in its exploration of
the subject?
Does the speaker develop the argument and the line of
thought logically and effectively?
Is there a satisfactory conclusion which lends a sense of
finality to the speech?
Does the speech carry a worthwhile and convincing
message?
Use of Plain English
Is the message or point of view conveyed in clears,

correct, comprehensible and appropriate language?
Are tone, pace, pauses and projection effective?
Does the speaker avoid distractions?
Is the speakers style confident, fluent and natural?
Does the speaker avoid:
.. ineffectual repetitions e.g. Ladies and Gentlemen
.. pompous and condescending language
87
.. over dramatics
.. awkward pauses
.. conspicuous use of notes, reading, shuffling palm cards
.. inappropriate quotations
.. jokes that are irrelevant or inappropriate?
7.2.2 Additional judging criteria for the Impromptu Speech also include
the following:
8.0
Does the speaker demonstrate the ability to think clearly and

creatively?
Does the speaker express their views with conviction and/or
humour?
Are the speakers remarks accurate, relevant, interesting
and lucid?
Does the speaker use plain English?
Does the speaker use clears, correct, simple and fluent
speech?
Does the speakers impromptu speech vary greatly from the
prepared speech?.
NOTES FOR TEACHERS, CONTESTANTS AND JUDGES

8.1
THE PREPARED SPEECH

For your audience to enjoy listening to you, you must enjoy having an
audience! To hold their attention you must persuade your audience to
walk with you as you share with them your thoughts, ideas and opinions.
The subject matter should show originality, logical development, continuity
of ideas and knowledge of your topic. The language should be delivered in
such a way that it is easy to hear and understand. You should use clear,
correct, simple and fluent speech. A person at ease is a comfortable
person to be with. If you become anxious the audience will pick that up.
You must aim to be at ease and in control of the situation.
You must be able to command the attention of the audience. You must
have them looking at you, quiet and receptive, wanting to hear what you
have to say. This is termed platform presence and is a necessary art to be
developed in order to be a successful speaker. Remember that people do
not listen to speeches, they listen to people speaking! Prepare your
speech for here and now, this audience, these people. Use words that are
understandable and attractive, and know your subject. That way you can
speak with confidence, monitor the reaction of the audience and stay in
tune with them.
88
Topics chosen must not touch on sensitive issues, such as race, religion,
colour, personalities, etc.
8.2
THE IMPROMPTU
The impromptu talk requirement for this competition sometimes causes
unnecessary anxiety for the students.
8.2.1
8.3
Hints on how to approach the impromptu :

Draw on lifes experience and knowledge.
Brainstorm the topic on a sheet of paper.
Think your perspective through, selecting from and expanding into
headings, key words or points from the brainstorming session.
Approximately four headings should be sufficient to sustain the
required impromptu speech. Jot these down on paper.
Decide upon the structure or sequences of the talk by numbering
your headings. The first one you wrote down may not be the most
appropriate to begin your speech with.
Transfer the first of your headings and end with a definite
statement, rhetorical question or perhaps a relevant quotation.
Prepare your opening last. Inevitably it will emerge as your
preparation takes place. Open with a definite statement, or turn the
topic into a rhetorical question followed by a comment that gives
some indication of what is to follow.
Close on a decisive note.
As judging is bound by strict criteria, students and teachers preparing for

participation should pay careful attention to the following aspects of
speech making :
Openings and conclusions.
Speeches should not touch on sensitive issues eg. Race, religion,
politics.
Logical development of theme.
Choice of words.
Accepted pronunciation.
Use of correct grammar.
Careful, or limited use of quotation.
Originality (in particular, avoidance of plagiarism)
8.4 An effective plain English speech :

Is on a topic of importance.
Has decisive openings and conclusions.
Avoids clichs, buzz words and colloquial expressions.
89
Uses words which are carefully chosen.

Uses accepted pronunciation (e.g. Oxford or Macquire Dictionary)
Pays attention to the correct use of grammar.
Contains a limited use of quotations, if any.
Is original.
Does not plagiarise the work of others.
8.5 An effective Plain English Award contestant

Speaks confidently and articulates clearly.
Avoids over-dramatisation and shouting for emphasis.
Avoids distracting mannerisms.
Uses pace, pause and projection to good effect.
Understands the effective uses of gestures, posture
contact.
Times a speech accurately.
and eye
Schools Division
Ministry of Education.
Oct 2006
90
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS
MALAYSIA
ADJUDICATION FORMS
91
92
SCORE
SHEET
ENGLISH LANGUAGE PUBLIC SPEAKING COMPETITION

( PRIMARY/SECONDARY )
Prepared Speech
60 marks
C
O
N
T
E
S
T
A
N
T
Prepared
Speech
TOPIC
Subject
Matter
(30 m)
Originality, dev. of
ideas, continuity,
depth of
knowledge, within
time allocation
Marks
Tim
e
Use of
Plain
English
(30 m)
Clear, correct, simple
and fluent speech,
language easy to hear
and understand (overdramatic gestures
discouraged)
Impromptu Speech
40 marks
Subject
Matter
(20 m)
Wide knowledge of
global affairs,
sincerity, credibility,
spoken with
conviction,
accurate, relevant,
interesting, lucid
remarks
Marks Time
Use of
Plain
English
(20 m)
Clear, correct,
simple and
fluent speech
P
L
T
O
T
A
L
A
C
I
N
G
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Name of Adjudicator :
Signature :
93
Date :
94
FREQUENCY COUNT
PRIMARY / SECONDARY
ADJUDICATOR
PLACING
3
CONTESTANT
FINAL
PLACING
NO.
1
2
3
4
5
Name of Chief Adjudicator
Signature
Name and Signature :

Adjudicator 1
Adjudicator 2
Adjudicator 3
Adjudicator 4
RESULT
95

PRIMARY / SECONDARY
PLACING CONTESTANT NO.
STATE /
SCHOOL
FIRST
SECOND
THIRD
Chief Adjudicator
Signature
:
Date :
96

Concept Paper English Language Activities 08

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Concept Paper English Language Activities 08

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

ACTION SONG

ACTION SONG COMPETITION

To encourage and increase the use of English Language among the

To develop skills of integrating scripting of music and movement with

To provide a platform for fun and happy learning.

This competition is open to Level 1 pupils only.

Each team should comprise 15 students accompanied by 2

On-stage presentation is allocated 5 8 minutes. No marks

Choice/selection of theme is open.

Scripts can be original or adapted from any authentic texts.

Contestants are not allowed to refer to any notes or texts

Copies of the script must be submitted to the organizers two

Scripts should not touch on sensitive issues such as race,

Creativity is encouraged. Nevertheless, movements should

Props and background aids should be at minimum level.

Use of recorded music is allowed. (tape should not have

Use of musical instruments is allowed. However, musicians

The competition shall be judged by an odd numbered panel

Points will be allocated according to the score sheet and

Judges will collectively determine the placing by a clear

The decision of the judges is final.

Individual team marks will not be disclosed.

Trophy, cash prizes, plaques and certificates will be awarded

Marks for presentation will be awarded based on the following band :

Language Proficiency (40 marks)

correct, clear and accurate pronunciation

Delivery and Presentation (40 marks)

well coordinated and creative choreography, movements, music

Theme (10 marks)

interesting and appealing to audience

Costumes and Props (10 marks)

Name of Chief Adjudicator

Storytelling is an effective teaching and learning activity to help improve

The Storytelling Activity/Competition will be carried out at school, district

To enhance pupils confidence in using English.

To give pupils the opportunity to use English in an interesting, authentic

To enhance and improve the listening and speaking skills.

To instill pupils interest in reading and writing in English.

RULES AND REGULATIONS

The competition is open to all government aided schools. Only ONE

The competition is divided into two sections :

For Section 1, contestants are to observe the following rules :

For Section 2, contestants are to observe the following rules :

touches on sensitive issues such as race, religion, politics,

A contestant will be disqualified if :

The competitions should be judged by an odd numbered panel of

The decision of the judges is final.

Prizes for the national level competition is as follows :

It is our fervent hope that more pupils be trained and encouraged to

The cooperation of schools, District / Division Education Offices and

ENGLISH LANGUAGE STORYTELLING COMPETITION

ENGLISH LANGUAGE STORYTELLING COMPETITION

Signature of Chief Judge

ENGLISH LANGUAGE STORYTELLING COMPETITION

ENGLISH LANGUAGE STORYTELLING COMPETITION

Signature of Chief Judge

CHORAL SPEAKING COMPETITION FOR PRIMARY SCHOOLS

Choral Speaking is the interpretation of poetry or prose by a group, comprising

All participants should wear school uniform when competing.

ENGLISH LANGUAGE CHORAL SPEAKING COMPETITION

ENGLISH LANGUAGE CHORAL SPEAKING COMPETITION

ENGLISH LANGUAGE CHORAL SPEAKING COMPETITION

Variety of intonation, mood and tempo

A total of 10 marks to be deducted if : sensitive issues touched, attire