Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Excellent
(HD) Score: 8-10
(15%)
Problem Identification
-very clear and specific focus
- problem statement/question is engaging and provocative
- skillful use of complementary analytical tools leading to
excellent insights into the identified problem(s)
2. Problem Identification
- clear identification of the problem
- brief outline of the project's objectives
(25%)
Project objectives
-explicit SMART aims and/or objectives
-full and convincing justification is given
Page 1 of 18
2. Problem Identification
- clear identification of the problem
- brief outline of the project's objectives
Problem Identification
Excellent
(HD)
Score:
-very
clear8-10
and specific focus
- problem statement/question is engaging and provocative
- skillful use of complementary analytical tools leading to
excellent insights into the identified problem(s)
Project objectives
-explicit SMART aims and/or objectives
-full and convincing justification is given
(25%)
evaluated with
strong
Excellentattention to detail and demonstrates excellent
(HD) Score: 8-10
synthesis
of sources and viewpoints
- review very strongly and clearly positions the project
proposal thesis in context of the current research/knowledge
Page 3 of 18
Excellent
(HD) Score: 8-10
Research Methodology(10%)
-excellent and insightful rationale for research approach
and data collection methods
- shows potential ability to systematically gather highly
relevant information
-critical awareness of the strengths and weaknesses of
approach
4. Research Methodology
- research methods are well explained
and show a clear direction
- Gantt chart for execution of project
report (weeks 5 - week 12) is well
planned
(20%)
Page 4 of 18
Research Methodology(10%)
PART 1: PROJECT PROPOSAL
(15%)
-excellent and insightful rationale for research approach
Area/Weighting
Excellent
and data collection
(HD) Score: 8-10
methods
Page 5 of 18
Excellent
(HD) Score: 8-10
Language
-appropriate language, clear, accurate & to maximum effect
- excellent to outstanding command of grammar & spelling;
editing is thorough
5. Appropriate Documentation
- vocabulary/grammar/structures
suitable for a client business proposal
- logical sequence of text, readability
and structure
Logical sequence
- outstanding logical flow and cohesion
- text and data presented astutely, creatively and effectively
(15%)
Adapted from:
Dissertation Marking Criteria & Standards Information for Students.pdf
http://www.ling.mq.edu.au/postgraduate/resources/
Page 6 of 18
IMPORTANT NOTE: THIS MARKING RUBRIC ONLY REFERS TO CRITERIA TO MARKING YOUR PROJECT PROPOSAL COMPONENT WORTH 15
THE REMAINING 10% CONTRIBUTION MARK TOWARDS ASSIGNMENT 1.
Reasonable
(Di) Score: 7
Reasonable
(Cr) Score: 6
-thesis statement clearly states the papers purpose in one or -thesis statement states the papers purpose in one or two
two sentences
sentences
Problem Identification
- clear and specific focus
- problem statement/question posed is challenging
- very good use of analytical tools that logically leads to
identified causes/problems
Project objectives
-well-defined SMART aims and/or objectives
- convincing justification is given
Problem Identification
- clear focus
- problem statement/question lends itself to readily available
answers
- good use of 2 or more analytical tools with some sound
reasoning; some gaps are evident in the analysis
Project objectives
- clear aims and objectives that are generally SMART
- clear and justified rationale is given
Page 7 of 18
IMPORTANT NOTE: THIS MARKING RUBRIC ONLY REFERS TO CRITERIA TO MARKING YOUR PROJECT PROPOSAL COMPONENT WORTH 15
THE REMAINING 10% CONTRIBUTION MARK TOWARDS ASSIGNMENT 1.
Problem Identification
Reasonable
(Di)
Score:
7 specific focus
- clear
and
- problem statement/question posed is challenging
- very good use of analytical tools that logically leads to
identified causes/problems
Problem Identification
Reasonable
(Cr)
Score:
6
- clear
focus
- problem statement/question lends itself to readily available
answers
- good use of 2 or more analytical tools with some sound
reasoning; some gaps are evident in the analysis
Project objectives
-well-defined SMART aims and/or objectives
- convincing justification is given
Project objectives
- clear aims and objectives that are generally SMART
- clear and justified rationale is given
Page 8 of 18
IMPORTANT NOTE: THIS MARKING RUBRIC ONLY REFERS TO CRITERIA TO MARKING YOUR PROJECT PROPOSAL COMPONENT WORTH 15
THE REMAINING 10% CONTRIBUTION MARK TOWARDS ASSIGNMENT 1.
(Cr) Score: 6
Page 9 of 18
IMPORTANT NOTE: THIS MARKING RUBRIC ONLY REFERS TO CRITERIA TO MARKING YOUR PROJECT PROPOSAL COMPONENT WORTH 15
THE REMAINING 10% CONTRIBUTION MARK TOWARDS ASSIGNMENT 1.
Reasonable
(Di) Score: 7
Reasonable
(Cr) Score: 6
Research Methodology(10%)
- comprehensive and persuasive rationale for research
approach and data collection methods
Research Methodology(10%)
- fairly comprehensive rationale for research approach and
data collection methods
- shows potential ability to gather highly relevant information - shows potential ability to gather useful and appropriate
information
- deep awareness of the strengths and weaknesses of
approach
-awareness of strengths and weaknesses of approach
Gantt Chart (5%)
- Gantt chart looks feasible and responsibilities are outlined
well. A clear schedule is given and there is consideration for
the critical path and dependencies.
Referencing (5%)
- harvard style is used; appropriate & consistent in-text
citations with minor errors
Referencing (5%)
- harvard style is used; mostly accurate & consistent in-text
citations with some errors
Page 10 of 18
IMPORTANT NOTE: THIS MARKING RUBRIC ONLY REFERS TO CRITERIA TO MARKING YOUR PROJECT PROPOSAL COMPONENT WORTH 15
THE REMAINING 10% CONTRIBUTION MARK TOWARDS ASSIGNMENT 1.
Research Methodology(10%)
- comprehensive and persuasive rationale for research
Reasonable
approach and data collection methods
Research Methodology(10%)
- fairly comprehensive rationale for research approach and
Reasonable
data collection methods
(Di) Score: 7
(Cr) Score: 6
- shows potential ability to gather highly relevant information - shows potential ability to gather useful and appropriate
information
- deep awareness of the strengths and weaknesses of
approach
-awareness of strengths and weaknesses of approach
Gantt Chart (5%)
- Gantt chart looks feasible and responsibilities are outlined
well. A clear schedule is given and there is consideration for
the critical path and dependencies.
Referencing (5%)
- harvard style is used; appropriate & consistent in-text
citations with minor errors
Referencing (5%)
- harvard style is used; mostly accurate & consistent in-text
citations with some errors
Page 11 of 18
IMPORTANT NOTE: THIS MARKING RUBRIC ONLY REFERS TO CRITERIA TO MARKING YOUR PROJECT PROPOSAL COMPONENT WORTH 15
THE REMAINING 10% CONTRIBUTION MARK TOWARDS ASSIGNMENT 1.
Reasonable
(Di) Score: 7
Reasonable
(Cr) Score: 6
Language
Language
-appropriate language, clear, accurate & effective
-appropriate language, clear and accurate but with some
- very good command of grammar & spelling; very few typos errors
- reasonable to good command of grammar & spelling; some
Logical sequence
typos present
- very good logical flow and cohesion
- text and data presented discerningly and effectively
Logical sequence
- good logical flow and cohesion
- text and data presented effectively for the most part
Page 12 of 18
Weak
(NN/PA) Score:1- 5
Problem Identification
- some focus but lacking clarity
- problem statement/question was developed requiring little
creative thought
- satisfactorily uses 2 or more analytical tools but overall
findings are a bit superfical
Project objectives
- appropriate aims and objectives,some of which are SMART
- reasonable justification is given
**Fail - specific problem is not identified and/or does not
relate to thesis statement. Objectives are not SMART,
Page 13 of 18
Problem Identification
Weak
(NN/PA)
5 lacking clarity
- someScore:1focus but
- problem statement/question was developed requiring little
creative thought
- satisfactorily uses 2 or more analytical tools but overall
findings are a bit superfical
Project objectives
- appropriate aims and objectives,some of which are SMART
- reasonable justification is given
**Fail - specific problem is not identified and/or does not
relate to thesis statement. Objectives are not SMART,
weak or little justification is given. Only 1 or no analytical
tool used.
Page 15 of 18
Weak
(NN/PA) Score:1- 5
Research Methodology(10%)
- adequate rationale for research approach and data
collection methods
-appropriate methods chosen, but without full awareness of
reliability and validity issues
- some awareness of the strengths and weaknesses of
approach; some inaccuracies may be present in
understanding
Gantt Chart (5%)
- Gantt chart is too simple and does not have a realistic
schedule or timeline.
Referencing (5%)
- uses harvard style but with significant inconsistencies
and/or omissions in the in-text citations and reference list
**Fail - i. Inappropriate methods, no rationale given, little to no
awareness demonstrated of strengths and weaknesses of
approach,
ii. incomplete or inaccurate citations and no way to check the
validity of the information gathered
Page 16 of 18
Research Methodology(10%)
- adequate rationale for research approach and data
Weak
collection methods
(NN/PA) Score:1- 5
-appropriate methods chosen, but without full awareness of
reliability and validity issues
- some awareness of the strengths and weaknesses of
approach; some inaccuracies may be present in
understanding
Gantt Chart (5%)
- Gantt chart is too simple and does not have a realistic
schedule or timeline.
Referencing (5%)
- uses harvard style but with significant inconsistencies
and/or omissions in the in-text citations and reference list
**Fail - i. Inappropriate methods, no rationale given, little to no
awareness demonstrated of strengths and weaknesses of
approach,
ii. incomplete or inaccurate citations and no way to check the
validity of the information gathered
Page 17 of 18
Weak
(NN/PA) Score:1- 5
Language
- appropriate language for the most part but with significant
errors
- adequate command of grammar and spelling, but several
typos present
Logical sequence
- most sections have logical flow and cohesion
- text and data presented satisfactorily, with some areas
needing improvement
**Fail -Does not meet minimum standards stated above
Page 18 of 18