Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
6, 761775
INTRODUCTION
761
762
(1)
(2)
c
r ()
0
n [aw
(3)
at sin 2( r )]
(4)
(5)
f j ij A ik nck
c
f j
(6)
c
f nnj
c
f ssj
c
f t tj
in which
is the
contact force
atc the cth contact
plane. The three
c
c
terms f n , f s and f t are the contact forces
along the directions of n, s and t, respectively,
which form the local coordinate system at the
contact point (as shown in Fig. 1). A ik is a tensor
related to the contact normal distribution of the
granular assembly containing M contacts in a
representative volume V ; A ik satises A ik F kq
iq , where Fik (A ik )1 (2rM=V )N ik ; N ik is
the fabric tensor of the rst kind (Kanatani, 1984)
representing the sample mean of the contact normal distribution, for which N ik (2=15)Dik
(1=3) ik . As can be observed from equation (6),
c th contact
3
l 1c
c th contact
2
1
s
Local coordinate system
763
764
Table 1. Appraisal of available methods for evaluating the fabric of a granular assembly
Data treated
Homogenized
physical quantities
Capability
Limitation{
(1), (3){
(a), (b)
(1), (3)
Method
Electrical-resistance
method
Main requirement
(d), (e)
Elastic stiffness
M
1X
M
C ijkl
lci k cjl lck
4rn i k cji n k E(n) d
V c
V
(7)
lci
ln il
2rnci
Here
is the branch vector connecting the two adjacent particles' centroids at the cth
contact point, where r is the radius of the spherical
particles; l is the branch vector length; and n il is
the unit branch vector, which is identical with the
contact normal nci . The term k cjl k cn ncj ncl k cs scj scl
k ct lcj lcl is the local contact stiffness; k cn , k cs and
k ct are the contact stiffnesses along the directions
of n, s and t, respectively. E(n) is the density
function of the contact normal in the n direction.
:
The integration
2 ( )E(n) d stands for the double
integration 0 0 (:)E(, ) sin d d.
For a non-idealized granular material, the branch
vector length of each contact is no more a constant
2r. Inserting the directionally averaged branch
vector length l(n) into equation (7) directly, the
elastic stiffness becomes a function of E(n) and
l(n). The directionally averaged branch vector
length l(n) accounts for the combined effects of
shape and orientation of a non-spherical-particle
assembly. Consequently,
765
n
[l(n)]2 n p k jl [l(n)]n q E(n) d
C ijkl
M
n
l i k jl l k E(n) d
V
M
n
(9)
In this work, E(n) and l(n) describe the
geometric fabrics of a non-idealized granular
material; they are represented by equations (1)
and (2), respectively. Hence, the direction-dependent geometric fabrics of a non-idealized granular
material are described by the three fabric tensors
Dij , Dsij and r pqik . Dij accounts for the anisotropic contact normal distribution; Dsij accounts for
the shape and orientation of the particles; and
r pqik accounts for the directional deviation of the
branch vector direction and the contact normal
direction. The directional deviation between the
contact normal and the branch vector may result
in a reduction in the global elastic stiffness of
the granular assembly. It is, in fact, very difcult
to determine the effect of this deviation rigorously without applying some means of microscopic observation or discrete-element simulation.
Rothenburg & Bathurst (1992) formulated the
stress homogenization (averaging over the contact
forces) of a biaxially loaded elliptical-particulate
assembly. In their formulation, the deviation between the contact normal and the contact vector
(the vector connecting the contact point and the
particle centroid) is neglected. They found that
the discrepancy between the discrete-element
method simulated results and the calculated results for the stress was acceptable before failure.
The present work does not attempt to explore
this aspect further. Neglecting the directional
deviation between the contact normal and branch
vector, equation (9) reduces to
C ijkl
M
V
(10)
For a non-spherical-particulate assembly, equation (10) should be regarded as only an approximation to the elastic stiffness since the angular
deviation between the contact normal and the
branch vector is ignored. It should also be noted
that the intermediate scale is not taken into account
in the proposed model; it is assumed that the
intermediate scale does not exist and does not
develop during loading.
The total contact number per unit volume
(M=V ) in equation (10) can be estimated from the
equation suggested by Oda et al. (1982)
M
3N t
V
(1 e)(8r3e )
(11)
766
f r (n)
f (n) tan
(12)
!
k n k n (n)
(13)
in which f n (n) and f r (n) are the averaged normal
and shear contact forces, respectively; is the
stiffness ratio; Gs and s are the shear modulus
and Poisson's ratio, respectively, of the solid making up the particles; and is the inter-particle
frictional angle. According to the HertzMindlin
contact theory, C1 (1=2)(16=9) R [Gs =(1
s )]2 and C2 2(1 s )=(2 s ); 1=3.
The relative curvature of each contact R equals
r=2 for an ideal granular assembly with a particle
radius equal to r. For a non-spherical granular
assembly, the relative curvature of each contact
depends on the neighbouring particle size, shape
and contact point. In the present work, a directiondependent equivalent relative curvature R (1=4)l
(1=4)l(n) is proposed to account for the effects
of the particle shape and preferred orientation of
a non-ideal granular assembly on the contact
stiffness.
Both the kinetic (directional contact force distribution) and the geometric fabric can be approximated by fabric tensors. Although it is possible to
calibrate the kinetic and geometric fabrics simultaneously by the proposed method of calibration,
only the parameters related to the geometric fabric
are obtained by optimized calibration in the subsequent development. Therefore, the contact force
distribution has to be estimated. Except in isotropic
compression, it is difcult to derive an analytical
solution for the contact force distribution in a nonidealized granular assembly. The contact force distribution can be evaluated incrementally using a
proper micromechanics model (Chang et al.,
1991). However, the integration procedure is rather
time-consuming. The evolution of the packing
structure must also be considered; this results in
further difculties. For practical purpose, a simple
approach is preferable. Neglecting the directional
deviation between the contact normal and branch
vector, the present work approximates the averaged
contact force distribution by the following equation. This equation is modied from equation (6):
f j [l(n)]
1
ij Bik n k
(M=V )l(n)
(14)
in which f j (l) is the contact force in the n direction with a branch vector length equal to l;
f j (l) f n (l)n j f s (l)s j f t (l)t j . The directional
branch vector length is represented by equation (2)
(15)
Since natural granular deposits are often transversely isotropic, further elaboration on the relation
between the elastic stiffness tensor and the wave
velocity of a transversely isotropic elastic material
will follow (White, 1965). By using the Voigt
notation, the stress increment and strain increment
can be expressed as m [ 11 , 22 , 33 ,
12 , 13 , 23 ]T and n [11 , 22 , 33 ,
12 , 13 , 23 ]T respectively. Therefore, the
global constitutive law can be expressed as
m E mn n , in which m, n are the tensor indices
16. The indices 4, 5 and 6 denote the planes 12,
23 and 13, respectively. Fig. 1 illustrates the coordinate system. For a transversely isotropic granular material with axis 3 as the symmetrical axis,
the number of independent elastic constants re-
(19)
(20)
Vsh, and Vsv, are dened in Fig. 3. In the following, the elastic wave is assumed to propagate and
be polarized along the principal axes. S ij represents
the shear wave velocity, in which the rst index i
denotes the principal axis of wave propagation and
the second index j denotes the principal axis of
Direction of
wave propagation
3
V sv,
V p,
Directions of
particle motion
V sh,
Fig. 3. Directions of primary and shear wave propagation and polarization through a transversely isotropic
material
767
n
X
[U i (fxg) V i ]2
(21)
i1
in which fxg is the vector containing the undetermined parameters. The non-linear optimization,
then, aims to search for a set of unknown parameters fxg corresponding to a series of U i (fxg)
(i 1, n) such that the object function (i.e. the
squared-error function) is a minimum.
Calibration of the geometric fabric of transversely
isotropic granular materials
The velocity calculated on the basis of the
proposed micromechanics-based model depends on
several parameters including Dij , Dsij , e, re , , ,
Gs and . Among them, the fabric tensors Dij
and Dsij are responsible for determining the anisotropy of the wave velocity, while the other ones
mainly affect the magnitude of the velocity. The
model deserves particular elaboration for the determination of Dij and Dsij .
With the proposed three-element procedure, the
calibration of the packing structure and other microfeatures of natural granular materials from a
data set of measured wave velocities becomes
possible. This paper focuses on the determination
of the fabric tensors of transversely isotropic granular assemblies. The change in the geometric fabric
of a granular assembly due to stresses is also
explored. For a transversely isotropic granular material with axis 3 as the symmetrical axis, the
components of the fabric tensor must satisfy
Dij 0 and Dsij 0 for i 6 j, and D11
768
Ds11
and
Ds22
parameters, D33
D22 (1=2)D33
(1=2)Ds33 .
Hence, only two
and Ds33, are
necessary for describing a material's fabric. A
higher D33 means that more contact normals are
along axis 3 than other directions. A negative Ds33
implies most particles have their longest axes
parallel to the 12 plane. The absolute value of
Ds33 increases with (a) increasing atness and
slenderness of the particles and (b) increasing
concentration of the longest axis on the 12 plane.
VERIFICATION OF THE PROPOSED
METHODOLOGY
769
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
770
450
Measured shear wave velocity (Agarwal, 1992)
S 32
S 13
400
S 12
350
300
250
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
175
200
450
Calculated shear wave velocity
S hv (5 S 32 5 S 13)
S hh (5 S 12)
400
350
300
250
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
771
772
Bellotti et al., 1996); they found that, for isotropically stressed sand in the laboratory, the velocity of
shear waves polarized in the horizontal plane is
larger than for waves polarized vertically. It is seen
from Fig. 8 that the proposed micromechanics
model correctly describes the above-mentioned
phenomenon. The parameters and Gs calibrated
from the data of stress stages 19 were treated as
constants in the subsequent study for evaluating
the contact normal evolution of the sand particles
during loading and unloading.
Contact normal evolution during loading/unloading
Calibration of the microfeatures from the wave
velocity measured during biaxial loading/unloading
tests on the same specimen was then carried out.
Stress stages 1316 were lateral loading (denoted
by LL), while stress stages 1619 were lateral
unloading (denoted by LU). The axial stress (in
the direction of axis 3) remained constant
( 275:8 kPa) during both LL and LU. For LL, the
lateral stress (in the direction of axis 1 and axis 2)
increased from 1034 to 2785 kPa; for LU, the
lateral stress decreased from 2785 to 1034 kPa.
Both the experimental results of Oda et al.
(1985) and the numerical simulation of Rothenburg
& Bathurst (1992) show that the preferred particle
orientation of a non-spherical assembly does not
change signicantly during loading/unloading unless the stress state is close to failure. Hence, the
Table 2. Calibrated microfeatures of washed mortar sand under isotropic compression (0 69275:8 kPa)
Hypothetical shapeinduced fabric
Calibrated parameters
Ds33
0:1
0:2
0:3
Gs : GPa
D33
833
0301
0.646
829
0301
0.419
828
0301
0.188
830
0301
0.040
380
360
340
Measured S hv
320
Measured S hh
300
280
260
240
220
50
60
80
100
200
300
400
500
773
0.6
LL
0.4
0.2
20.3
20.2
0.0
20.2
20.1
0.0
20.4
20.6
0.0
LU
Shape-induced
s
fabric tensor D 33
0.1
0 .2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
774
380
360
340
Measured S hv
320
Measured S hh
300
280
260
240
220
50
60
80
100
200
300
400
500
380
360
340
Measured S hv
320
Measured S hh
300
280
260
240
220
50
60
80
100
200
300
400
500
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
Agarwal, T. K. (1992). Micromechanics of granular materials and its relation to wave velocity. PhD thesis,
Norfolk, Virginia. Old Dominion University.
Arthur, J. R. F. & Menzies, B. K. (1972). Inherent anisotropic in a sand. Geotechnique 22, No. 1, 115128.
Arulmoli, K. & Arulanandan, K. (1994). Review of an
electrical method for evaluation of stress ratio required to cause liquefaction and dynamic modulus. In
Dynamic geotechnical testing II, ASTM STP 1213,
pp. 118133. Philadelphia: American Society for
Testing and Materials.
Bellotti, R., Jamiolkowski, M., Lo Presti, D. C. F. &
O'Neill, D. A. (1996). Anisotropy of small strain stiffness in Ticino sand. Geotechnique 46, No. 1, 115131.
Chang, C. S. & Misra, A. (1990a). Packing structure and
775