Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
6, 727739
KEYWORDS: clays; compressibility; gravels; laboratory tests; shear strength; soil classication.
clay contents down to about 2030%. These studies have used rather ne particles of granular
material in order that the procedures that are used
to determine the liquid limit should not be unduly
affected by the presence of the coarse material.
However, the fall cone technique for estimation of
the liquid limit, now adopted as standard in many
countries (e.g. British Standards Institution, 1991)
can readily be used with any soil mixture that can
be compacted into the testing containerthe presence of particles of size greater than 0425 mm,
which should be excluded according to the standard procedures, does not prevent the cone from
penetrating the soil. In addition, as has been known
for many years (Statens Jarnvagars Geotekniska
Kommission 19141922, 1922; Wroth & Wood,
1978; Muir Wood, 1990), the fall cone can be used
to do more than just estimate the liquid limit.
Since the act of penetration by the fall cone is
controlled by the strength of the soil, the device
provides directly a strength measurement (equivalent to a hardness test for metals) and, by invoking
ideas of critical state soil mechanics, the link
between cone penetration and water content itself
provides an indication of the compressibility of the
soil.
INTRODUCTION
727
728
729
Clay content: %
Depth: mm
20
0
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Nominal
clay
content %
20
90
40
80
70
60
60
80
50
100
40
120
30
140
(a)
Depth: mm
15
0
20
Water content: %
25
30
35
40
Nominal
clay
content %
20
90
40
80
70
60
60
80
50
100
40
120
30
140
(b)
Fig. 1. Variation with depth of (a) gravel content and (b) water
content at end of tests in consolidation tube
VOLUMETRIC VARIABLES
Vc
V c Vg
(2)
Vw
Vc Vg
(3)
Masses
mw
Volume
Water
Vw
V
mc
Clay
Vc
mg
Gravel
Vg
730
fg
Vg
1C
1
v
vg
Vw V c V g
(10)
(5)
mc mg Gs
C
Vc
C
Vc
1 C 1 fg
C
fg
vc
(7)
C
mc
These all relate to the clay matrix. Correspondingly, we can dene the granular specic volume
vg :
V w Vc Vg
v
1C
Vg
(9)
90
Clay
content: %
80
Water content: %
vg
70
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
60
50
40
30
20
10
15
20
Cone penetration: mm
25
30
731
90
80
Liquid limit: %
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Clay content
0.8
0.8
(a)
110
100
90
80
70
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Clay content
(b)
ln cu
Gs
(12)
732
90
Water content: %
80
Clay content: %
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
70
60
50
40
30
20
1
10
Undrained shear strength: kPa
(a)
110
Clay matrix water content: %
Clay content: %
100
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
Best fit
90
80
70
60
1
10
Undrained shear strength: kPa
(b)
I P Gs
ln 100
(13)
OEDOMETER RESULTS
Specific volume
4
Clay content: %
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
1
10
100
Vertical effective stress: kPa
1000
(a)
Clay content: %
10
5
4
20
3
SCL
30
40100
2
10
100
1000
10000
0.7
Clay content: %
0.6
90
0.5
70
80
60
0.4
50
0.3
40
0.2
20
30
10
f 50.4
f 50.5
0.1
0
10
733
100
1000
Vertical effective stress: kPa
10000
(c)
734
v
9v
(14)
The pattern is claried when the results are presented in terms of clay specic volume (equation
(7)) (Fig. 6(b)) and it then becomes clear that,
broadly, the behaviour is independent of clay content for clay contents above 30%although the
independence of clay content is more convincing
for stresses greater than about 60 kPa. The corresponding compressibilities, now labelled c1 and
c2 , are also shown in Fig. 7: c1 falls with decreasing clay content whereas c2 is essentially
constant for clay contents above 30%. It might be
suggested that the water contents at which the
mixtures were prepared should have been increased
as the clay content fell but the study using the fall
cone demonstrated by mixing the clay matrix on
its own initially at a single water content (equal to
15 times the liquid limit), that, since the liquid
limit varies linearly with clay content, the initial
water content of each mixture was in fact 15 times
the liquid limit of that mixture.
Although steps were taken to lubricate the inside
surface of the oedometers there may have been
some side friction: the actual vertical effective
stress experienced by the clay may have been
somewhat lower than that estimated from the ex-
ternally applied stresses. The correspondence between the results from the Rowe cell and from the
consolidation tube tends to suggest that this may
not be a large effect. A frictional loss proportional
to the lateral stress (and hence presumably to the
vertical stress) would tend to produce a rightward
shift of the compression relationship in the semilogarithmic plot. The initial height of the samples,
prepared with a common clay water content, falls
as the clay content reduces so that the error in
vertical stress in the low-stress regime might be
expected to decrease as the clay content fallsand
this could account for the reduction of c1 with
clay content.
The value of c2 is roughly constant at about
0221 which is essentially identical to the values
deduced from the strength data of the fall cone
tests and from the plasticity of the clay on its own.
Data from the unloading stages of the compression tests performed in the Rowe cell are gathered
together in Fig. 8. The changes in specic volume
from the start of unloading are shown: the observed volume changes are remarkably insensitive
to clay content even for clay contents down to
10%. Testing of these low-clay-content mixtures
using the same procedures as for the more clayrich materials is not easy but the results show no
obvious trend of changing response with falling
clay content. It is perhaps reasonable to expect
that, whereas during loading the hard gravel particles eventually start to interact, during unloading it
is the clay matrix which controls the response as
0.6
0.5
Compressibilities
c1
0.4
0.3
c2
0.2
2
0.1
0
0
20
40
60
Clay content: %
80
100
735
Clay content %
0.2
Change in specific volume
100
90
80
70
60
0.1
50
40
30
20
10
0
10
100
1000
v v100
ln 10
ln 10
and
v100 0:325 0:905 vL 0:137 v2L 0:016 v3L
(17)
The measured liquid limit of the clay is about 08,
implying vL 3:12. From equation (16),
0:218, which is very consistent with the measured
value of c2 . From equation (17), v100 2:301; this
value is too low by comparison with the experimental results from the present study and needs to
be increased by about 036 in order that the
relationship between specic volume and vertical
effective stress from equation (15) should match
the results for vertical stresses above 60 kPa.
Looking closely at the data gathered by Burland,
it is clear that the overall spread of the band
relating v100 and vL is of the order of 04 and that
equation (17) lies towards the lower bound of the
data. It is also signicant that he notes two expected exceptions to the simple correlation which
he proposes for remoulded soils: (a) for soils
which plot below the A-line in the plasticity chart
linking the plasticity index I P and the liquid limit
wL , and (b) for soils compressed from slurries (for
example, those reported by Nakase et al. (1988))
(19)
Ip
C
(20)
so that the plasticity index (and hence, from equation (19), the plastic limit) is expected to change
linearly with clay content. Then equation (18) can
be rearranged to give
w CwLc CA
CA
wc wLc
1
A
A
IL
(21)
736
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0.3
SCL
ICL
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Liquid limit
0.8
0.9
737
d
fg p
(22)
3 2 s
This has a maximum value of 074 when s d
and varies with s=d as shown in Fig. 10. If threshold values of f g equal to 04 and 05 are inserted
in equation (22) the critical spacings that emerge
are 123 and 114 times the particle diameter. The
subangular to subrounded particles of gravel in the
present study are of course not spherical but it is
perhaps, nevertheless, surprising that the particles
have on average to be as close as this before any
detectable mechanical interaction occurs.
It has been seen in Fig. 6 that for vertical
effective stresses greater than about 60 kPa the
relationship between clay specic volume and vertical effective stress is essentially independent of
738
Volume fraction
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
Spacing/diameter
1.8
2.0
(23)
Threshold volume
fraction
0.5
100
0.4
10
1
20
25
30
35
Clay fraction: %
40
45
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
British Standards Institution (1991). Methods of test for
soils for civil engineering purposes, BS 1377. BSI,
Milton Keynes.
Burland, J. B. (1990). On the compressibility and shear
strength of natural clays: 30th Rankine Lecture. Geotechnique 40, No. 3, 329378
Chau, H. & Needham, J. (1998). Study of the mechanical
behaviour of mixtures of sand and clay, 3rd year
research project. Department of Civil Engineering,
University of Bristol.
Dumbleton, M. J. & West, G. (1966). The inuence of the
coarse fraction on the plastic properties of clay soils,
Report 36. Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne.
Fukue, M., Okusa, S. & Nakamura, T. (1986). Consolidation of sandclay mixtures. In Consolidation of soils:
testing and evaluation (eds R. N. Yong and F. C.
Townsend), STP892, pp. 627641. Philadelphia:
American Society for Testing and Materials.
Graham, J., Saadat, F., Gray, M. N., Dixon, D. A. &
Zhang, Q.-Y. (1989). Strength and volume change
behaviour of a sand-bentonite mixture. Can. Geotech.
J. 26, 292-305.
Hallworth, M. A. & Huppert, H. E. (1998). Abrupt transitions in high-concentration, particle-driven gravity
currents. Phys. Fluids, 10, No. 5, 10831087.
739
Holtz, W. G. & Ellis, W. (1961). Triaxial shear characteristics of clayey gravel soils. Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Soil
Mech. Found. Engng, Paris 1, 143149.
Kolbuszewski, J. J. (1948). An experimental study of the
maximum and minimum porosities of sands. Proc.
2nd Int. Conf. Soil Mech. Found. Engng, Rotterdam 1,
158165.
Kumar, G. V. (1996). Some aspects of the mechanical
behaviour of mixtures of kaolin and coarse sand. PhD
thesis, University of Glasgow.
Kumar, G. V. & Muir Wood, D. (1996). Mechanical
behaviour of mixtures of kaolin and coarse sand.
IUTAM symposium on mechanics of granular and
porous materials (eds N. A. Fleck and A. C. F.
Cocks), pp. 5768. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Lupini, J. F., Skinner, A. E. & Vaughan, P. R. (1981). The
drained residual strength of cohesive soils. Geotechnique 31, No. 2, 181213.
Menzies, B. K. (1988). A computer controlled hydraulic
triaxial testing system. In Advanced triaxial testing of
soil and rock (eds R. T. Donaghe, R. C. Chaney and
M. L. Silver), STP977, pp. 8294. Philadelphia:
American Society for Testing and Materials.
Muir Wood, D. (1990). Soil behaviour and critical state
soil mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Nagaraj, T. S., Murthy, B. R. S. & Bindumadhava (1987).
Liquid limit determination further simplied. Geotech.
Test. J. 12, No. 4, 302307.
Nakase, A., Kamei, T. & Kusakabe, O. (1988). Constitutive parameters estimated by plasticity index. J. Geotech. Engng, Div., ASCE 114, No. 7, 844858.
Rowe, P. W. & Barden, L. (1966). A new consolidation
cell. Geotechnique 16, No. 2, 162170.
Schoeld, A. N. & Wroth, C. P. (1968). Critical state soil
mechanics. McGraw-Hill, London.
Seed, H. B., Woodward, R. J. & Lundgren, R. (1964).
Fundamental aspects of the Atterberg limits. J. Soil
Mech. Found. Div., ASCE 90, No. SM6, 75105.
Skempton, A. W. (1953). The colloidal `activity' of clays.
Proc 3rd Int. Conf. Soil Mech. Found. Engng, Zurich
1, 5761.
Skempton, A. W. (1970). The consolidation of clays by
gravitational compaction. Q. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 125,
No. 3, 373411.
Statens Jarnvagars Geotekniska Kommission 19141922
(1922). Slutbetankande avgivet till Kungl. Jarnvagsstyrelsen, Geotekniska Meddelanden 2. Stockholm:
Statens Jarnvagar.
Tan, T.-S., Goh, T.-C., Karunaratne, G. P. & Lee, S.-L.
(1994). Shear strength of very soft claysand mixtures. Geotech. Test. J. 17, No. 1, 2734.
Winter, M. G., Holmgeirsdottir, T. & Suhardi (1998). The
effect of large particles on acceptability determination
for earthworks compaction. Q. J. Engng Geol. 31,
247268.
Wood, D. M. (1985). Some fall cone tests. Geotechnique
35, No. 1, 6468.
Wroth, C. P. & Wood, D. M. (1978). The correlation
of index properties with some basic engineering
properties of soils. Can. Geotech. J. 15, No. 2,
137145.