Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 3, Issue 3, March 2013)
PG Student, Mechanical Dept. DKTE Societys Textile and Engineering institute, Ichalkaranji. India.
1
Senior Engineer Design & Development, Dies and fixtures, Adventtooltech Pvt. Ltd. Pune, India.
2
Associate Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, DKTE Societys Textile and Engineering institute, Ichalkaranji. India
Abstract Achieving high standard quality products in
almost no time with great economy in industry demands
for a technology that helps exceed the engineering
requirement of products. This paper highlights development
of draw component and the changes made in product design
due to manufacturing and assembly reasons considering the
design intent; and also the advantages of using various CAE
softwares used in designing draw tools. It helps reducing the
complete product development cycle as compared to what
happens with conventional methods. Lesser effort and ease
to model the complete setup and important features with
different design parameters, improved the product
development without compromising quality. Thorough
attempt is aimed for design sheet metal draw die using the
latest technology to make it time and cost effective, identifying
the problem areas through analysis results and Based on the
analysis prepare the query report and suggest revisions/
modifications in the product design. Finally, work out the best
die design to produce defect-free components based on the
inputs received. Thus using the CAE software one can design
economical die because the design changes, modifications and
challenges can be observed and solved in the initial phase of
the design only. Otherwise without these efforts the die design
and the processing could end up as a costly and complicated
assignment.
I. INTRODUCTION
The sheet metal deep drawn technology is one of the
most challenging processes in manufacturing. Drawing
operation is the process forming a flat piece of material into
a hollow shape by means of punch which causes the blank
to flow into the die cavity (refer figure 1). The depth of the
draw may be shallow, moderate or deep, various
geometries and sizes are made by drawing operation, two
extreme examples being bottle caps and automobile panels.
Typical defects that occur due to incorrect flow of material
into the die during the stamping process are wrinkling
caused by excessive compression, tearing or splitting
caused by excessive tension, and spring back caused by
elastic recovery of the material. [6, 7]
30
A. Necking Failures
Necking failures such as shown in Figure 3 are preceded
by localized thinning that may not be visible in the part. [6]
31
Schematic diag.4
Schematic diag.5
4. Areas To Check
The areas where a necking failure or fracture is occur on
a stamping can be predicted with analysis during the
development and die tryout period for new stampings [6].
Once the areas found to thin leading to failure are
identified, regular checks should be made, this permits
corrective action to be taken before a necking failure
becomes visible. Causal factors for a pronounced increase
in thinning include:
1. Excessive blank holder force.
2. Material problems such as a lack of draw ability.
3. Material too thin.
4. Scored die surfaces.
32
Fig.8
B. Drawing force:
As the drawing process progresses the force increase and
reaches to peak and begins to drop until it reaches the
fracture point. It is observed from the curve (Fig.9) that the
fracture point is not at the maximum load condition but it is
after that. The maximum principle stresses occur at fracture
rather than at point of maximum load, material fails after
the maximum load due to its ductile properties. [11]
Fig.7 Rectangular box draw with large outboard tab. The tab may
severely restrict metal movement into the draw cavity and result in a
fracture. [6]
Fig.9
33
Fig.10
I.
Simulation Validity:
Different blank holder forces selected for evaluating the
effect of BHF, on the other hand parameters such as
drawing speed, blank dimensions etc. are kept constant.
Refer fig.11, if we apply 350 KN BHF the wrinkling is
more & risk of crack is less, on the other hand if we
increase the BHF to 800KN the crack area is visible,
thinning and tearing is also increased at this BHF.
34
35
Fig.14
Fig.16
Design Iteration 2:
As shown in fig.15. some draft angle is given as shown
and emboss added and as mentioned earlier the oil should
be collect at one point after it is used for lubrication
purpose so taper is given to front side of the oil pan as
shown so that all the oil is collected at one corner and it
will be drained out from drain plug easily.
Design iteration 4:
In this iteration(Fig.17), the depth of second chamber is
decreased and depth of first chamber is increased
somewhat, Due to Engine block assembly is fouling with
the oil pan hump shape is given as shown to center of oil
pan. But such revert draw is not possible and design is
changed again.
Fig.15
Fig.17
Design Iteration 3:
Some design changes were done in the lower side of the
engine assembly so automatically the shape of the oil pan is
changed and is made as shown in fig.16, the depth of first
chamber is decreased and depth of second chamber is
increased so that it will not affect the volume of the oil. But
in this design the depth of second chamber is very deep and
is not possible to form the components with this depth. To
give technical support to this statement we have done
simulation of the same design and in that we see due to
extra deep material gets cracks due to thinning and some
wrinkles are also observed. So design is changed.
Design iteration 5:
In this design depth of second chamber is decreased so
that it will be possible to form the component and depth of
first chamber is increased somewhat. The sharp corners
provided in the earlier designs are given fillets so that there
should not be any problem of cracking of material at the
corners. After such changes the design is finalized and
approved (Fig.18). [1, 2]
36
Fig.18
37
IV. CONCLUSION
The problem areas such as wrinkling, thinning, spring
back are the biggest challenges to the industry now a days
but these problems can be tackled and sorted out in the
initial phases of the design by using simulation techniques.
While designing new product for a particular
requirement, the product designer and tool designer should
have good communication between them and each of them
should share their thoughts and queries in front of
development team and final product should validate all the
functional and manufacturing requirements.
Decreasing the lead time for product development along
with the cost and time is the real challenge to the industry.
It can be achieved with latest CAE techniques such as
simulation, efficient use of simulation method at the
earliest stages of design can help to make necessary
corrections and improvement when it takes least cost.
Defects can be minimized or eliminated before try-out. So
that lead time along with time and cost can be minimized.
H. Validation
The components received as a consequence of the above
trial are referred to as the sample pieces exhibiting the test
results. The die validation process would be said as
complete while the sample component received from the
Die over the test run matches the requirements specified
over the drawing by using the CMM, following figures 22
will show some of the snaps of the CMM report.
38
REFERENCES
[1]
Acknowledgement
Authors would like to take this opportunity to express
sincere and whole hearted thanks to Mr. Shailesh
Bhadade from Icon Technologies, Pune for giving the
opportunity to work with the development of oil pan
through-out the process. We would also thankful to Dr. V.
R. Naik, Head, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
DKTES, Textile & Engineering Institute, Ichalkaranji for
continuous encouragement during this work. We are
extremely thankful to Prof. Dr. P.V.KADOLE, Principal
of DKTES, Textile & Engineering Institute, Ichalkaranji
for his help provided during this work.
39