Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Increased capacity of local communities (especially women) to identify and address the needs of most
vulnerable populations (including women, men, children, disabled and elderly) in the wake of disasters
Vulnerable communities face less risk to potential disasters through planning, mitigation and adaptation
Leading agencies and government authorities demonstrate increased awareness and acceptance of gendered
community-based DRR
To what extent were the project results and indicators achieved during the project?
Are the actual project outputs (e.g. the small-scale mitigations, new technologies, the community rescue teams
trained, DRR centres, green laboratories, resilient communities, village disaster management, local disaster
management plans, etc.) present within a community at the time of evaluation, and to what extent are they
actually utilized (or could be meaningfully utilized) by the project beneficiaries?
To what extent can the preparedness-related project outputs potentially be used in actual emergency situations
(e.g. whether a rescue team already rescued people, whether it would be physically available during an
emergency, whether it could or had the means to - assemble in time, whether the community was ever
evacuated in time during drills and simulation exercises etc)?
What impact has the programme had on gender equality and womens realities? (e.g. increased decision
making, control over resources/assets, leadership roles within community management structures etc)
What steps were undertaken to ensure the active participation of women within the programme and what steps
could be taken in the future to improve this practice?
Did the programme meet specific gender indicators and targets outlined within the project document?
How were vulnerable groups (including children and the elderly) involved in the project? What impact has the
programme had on reducing vulnerabilities of these age groups?
Sustainability, institutionalisation and replication of Oxfam and partners interventions;
To what extent are changes made/achieved likely to be sustained?1
Are there examples of replication of developed models?
Do communities (or the final beneficiaries) genuinely have ownership of the project outputs? Will there be
motivation to continue and develop the project activities after Oxfam and partners withdraw?
1
o
o
o
o
How successfully did the project maximise government, community and other agency resources?
To what extent does Oxfams projects fit into and strengthen the existing local government or wider national or
regional emergency response and DRR government systems, institutions or plans?
To what extent has the programme worked with the government (participated in design of activities, utilised
government resources, worked to support the capacity development of the government structures)?
To what extent the level of coordination amongst partners and other NGOs contributed to useful exchange of
information, sharing of resources, prevention of duplication and did this impact on the beneficiary
communities?
How successfully did the project connect with other Oxfam projects and how could a one-programme
approach on resilience encompassing several Oxfam projects be designed?
Regional End of Programme Workshop & Evaluation Process
The evaluator will be requested to actively participate in the Regional End of Programme Workshop to be held in
Armenia at the beginning of September. During this workshop country teams will present successes and challenges
faced during the implementation of the project. The evaluator will also conduct evaluation field trips in Georgia
(Adjara, Tbilisi, Mtskheta) and Armenia (Vayots Dzor, Tavush, Yerevan), conduct a review meeting in Tbilisi and will
develop the evaluation report. The evaluator will be asked to do a desk work prior to the Regional Learning Review
and field visits.
Documentation review/ Existing data to be used in evaluation
Overview of programme
Briefings with each country team including partners on key progress and challenges: review of data collected
including media work, photographs plus overview of mitigation and adaptation work including process and
documentation as outlined in log-frame. Country specific indicators and activities will have to be taken into
account when evaluating the programme.
Field based data collection
Interviews with other actors (DIPECHO partners, ECHO local representative plus one other per country)
Some members of communities (particularly in Georgia) leave for upper mountains for cattle-herding
Key outputs
Executive summary and full report in English including key recommendations (max 22 pages plus annexes).
Please note that as per donor requirement the evaluator must be an external candidate and not an
existing Oxfam member of staff
Consultant should have permission to travel in the region (Georgia and Armenia) visa or non-visa
travel right, and be based in one of the countries.
Essential - Skills & Experience
Knowledge and proven experience in managing and leading evaluation assignments for a range of major aid
agencies or NGOs in particular evaluating complex multi-country or large donor programmes e.g. EC, ECHO
Broad knowledge of development issues and national policy and practice in DRR (in particular community
based DRR)
Fluency in English
Desirable - Skills & Experience
Proven analytical skills and ability to work with others with a dynamic and proactive attitude
Recruitment procedure
Candidates are asked to submit a copy of their CV, a cover letter outlining how they meet the key competencies as
well as a writing sample (ideally a previous evaluation authored by the candidate) and a financial proposal for the
assignment with a lump sum covering a fee and per diems. In addition, Oxfam will provide travel and
accommodation in both countries.
Assignment dates
31 August - 23 September 2015
Timeline and deliverables
Work will be carried out during the following times and reports shared with Oxfam on end dates:
Preparatory work, desk analysis of delivered documentation & materials: 31 August 1 September 2015
Participation in Regional End of Programme Workshop in Armenia, Field visits and Interviews in Armenia (Vayots
Dzor, Yerevan and Tavush) and Georgia (Adjara, Mtskheta and Tbilisi): 2-15 September 2015
Summary review meeting in Tbilisi: 16 September 2015
Report development and delivery of the evaluation report: 23 September 2015
Application deadline: 17 August 2015