Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
The long case is the main focus of interest in the physicians examination. Candidates
at the FRACP examination are given two long cases. It is very important to perform well
in the long cases, to secure a comfortable overall pass at the examination. This book
introduces the long case to the novice in the field and attempts to correct some flaws
in more experienced players. These instructions are aimed mainly at candidates taking
postgraduate clinical examinations. However, there is also useful advice and information for medical students preparing for the clinical component of their examinations
and for students participating in their clinical rotations. The case discussions in the latter section of this book are also aimed at providing useful guidance to medical students
involved in problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) modules.
The long case is an art that needs mastering. Long case mastery will not only help
candidates to pass the examination but will also equip the trainee with the skills and
expertise to handle any complicated medical case. These skills are vital to the candidates future life as a physician. While preparing for the clinical examination, the
candidate is expected to acquire as much expertise as possible within a very short time.
Such intense learning will not happen at any other time in your career. Therefore, it
is important to approach this time of preparation knowing what to do and how to go
about doing it. The preparatory period should be well planned and executed, with
utmost commitment to your goal. It is important to plan this preparation systematically, so that no aspect of clinical medicine is missed or omitted. It is also important to
achieve your peak level of performance at the right time. Peaking too early can lead to
exhaustion and a lacklustre performance by the time of the examination, and peaking
too late may mean missing the boat.
An ideal way to start preparing is to fully understand what the preparation is for.
It is therefore important to become familiar with the examination and what exactly
will take place on the day. At the examination the candidate is usually given 1 hour
to spend with the patient unobserved by the examiners or the bulldog (the bulldog
is a basic trainee registrar from the host hospital assigned to attend to the candidate
on the day of the examination). During this period, a detailed history needs to be
obtained, and a thorough physical examination performed, focusing particularly on
the main system involved. The candidate is usually given a warning 10 minutes before the end of his or her time with the patient. Then another 10 minutes is given
as preparation time before the candidate is introduced to the examiners. There are
usually two examiners for each candidate on the long case, one being a member of
the National Examining Panel (college representative or censor). Occasionally there
may be a third member present, acting as an observer. This member of the examining team is usually a new examiner learning the examination process. The grilling
is carried out by the two main members of the examining team; later in the day, the
observer may swap seats with the college censor to actively participate in the grilling process.
The examinee is expected to present a clear, sufficiently detailed and well-organised
long case within 710 minutes and develop a comprehensive management plan. The
candidate may be interrupted at any time during this period if further clarification is
needed on any aspect of the case. The candidate usually spends 25 minutes with the
examiners, and after the presentation there should be sufficient time for the examiners
to assess the candidates knowledge. Of course, this is extremely valuable time for the
candidate to demonstrate as much knowledge and clinical wisdom as they can. Ideally,
if the candidate is confident with the case, they will be able to control the discussion,
and this will convey an air of competence.
During the discussion, the candidate should mention the relevant investigations
that they would perform. At this point, the examiners will present a radiological
imaging study or a blood or serology test result and ask the candidate for an interpretation. Other investigation resultsincluding electrocardiograms, lung function
studies, nerve conduction studies, hormonal studies and nuclear medicine scans (but
not pathological specimens)may also be produced.
A practical tip
It is important to have a set approach to the long case, and to use this system repeatedly
during practice cases until you have mastered the long case. Candidates should develop
a format to address the history and the physical examination, and thereby avoid any
fatal mistakes or omissions.
A stack of cards can be very convenient for taking notes when with the patient.
This also provides a hard surface to write on, as often there will not be a table available
by the bedside. The best technique is to use the cards according to a prepared format.
Mnemonics (see p 5) can be used to remember the format even in the stressful circumstances of the practice exams and the real exam. The way you organise the cards
is also important. The long case can be divided into sections, and cards organised accordingly; this will make your presentation easier as well as neater. An average case
may need about 20 cards, and these should be clearly numbered at the top right-hand
corner.
Card 1 should contain the patients name, age and the opening statement, which
is a concise but sufficiently detailed introductory overview of the case.
Card 2 should be for the presenting complaint and then associated conditions.
Past history, medications, allergies, family history, occupational history and
social history should be placed in that order.
The social history has to be very detailed; accordingly, this section comes as a subset
of cards, with a separate mnemonic to help remember all aspects of the social history.
Another advantage of using cards is that they can be held close to eye level with your
head held high, thus facilitating constant eye contact with the examiners. It is important to maintain eye contact. (In fact, some senior examiners expect so much of it that
one examiner advised his candidates to learn the long case by heart and stop using
written records of the case at all.)
Taking a history
Establishing trust and confidence
The first 20 minutes of the hour with the patient should be spent on history taking. In
the exam setting you should try to obtain as much help as you can from the patient
by quickly explaining how important the exercise is to you. A strong bonding with
the patient can be achieved from the outset by being very courteous and polite. Smile
broadly and shake the patients hand warmly, using both hands. Generate genuine empathy with the patient and be considerate at all times. Try to create an atmosphere of
trust and confidence. Establishing a good rapport will ensure that the patient opens up
without any hesitation. It is easiest to begin by asking the patient about the medications
he or she is currently taking. This may give you a comprehensive overview of the
patients problems and save much valuable time. On some occasions at the real examination, the examiners leave the list of medications with the patient, with instructions
to hand it to the candidate only if they request it.
Mnemonics
History and physical examination are the cornerstones of your clinical assessment of
the patient.Your whole plan of investigation and management as well projections on the
prognosis will be based on what is garnered during your clinical assessment and the
case that is built upon this vital information. Therefore, it is essential that your history
taking and physical examination be comprehensive, foolproof and watertightyou
cannot afford to miss anything! One proven way of ensuring that you dont miss anything is to have a ready-made, comprehensive and complete checklist consisting of
everything you need to learn during history taking and physical examination. You will
need to memorise this checklist and be able to recall it readily during the examination.
Mnemonics are a very useful tool in this regard. This section of the chapter introduces
some mnemonics that have been developed for this purpose. Or you might find it
easier to develop your own set of mnemonics.
The following mnemonic for history taking is comprehensive and covers almost all
aspects of the history:
PPMAFOST
P Presenting complaint and the details thereof
P Past history, intercurrent illnesses and relevant details
For each disease mentioned in this section of the history, it is important to get the
following details:
1 When, how and who made the diagnosis.
2 What treatment has been administered and whether there have been any
complications or side effects associated with it. For each drug the patient is
currently taking, mention the dosage and frequency. The candidate is expected
to know the generic name of each drug and should be able to identify the
generic names of almost all the commonly used drugs.
3 What the current level of disease activity is and how the patient is affected
by it.
M Medication history
If all the patients current medications have been mentioned already in the previous
section, it will be sufficient just to mention the list of medications again as a brief
summary. Some examiners like to hear the list separately. Listing the medications
may also provide the candidate with an opportunity to see whether there are any
drugs with significant interactions.
A Allergies
F Family history
O Occupational history
S Social history
T Travel history
Relevant in cases with infectious diseases and exotic conditions.
Social history
Many a fatal mistake can be made by not addressing the social history adequately.
Therefore it is important to have a separate mnemonic to probe into all the important
aspects of the social history. The mnemonic for the social history is:
SEMIG CHDP NS DIP VASP
(It is easier to remember this if you break it up into five segments as suggested here
and review it many times a day.)
S Smoking history
E Ethanol/alcohol history
M Marriage
Marital status, previous marriages and, if single, reason for not marrying etc.
I Independence
Level of independence with activities of daily living. If the patient needs assistance,
find out who the main care provider is and how well they are coping.
G GP
Relationship with the patients general practitioner, frequency of visits etc.
C Children
Number of children and other relevant details such as ages, gender, who they live
with if the patient has a broken relationship with their partner.
H House/home
This should include details such as the number of steps needed to climb to enter
or exit the house, the number of steps the patient has to climb inside the house,
whether the patient has any disability, how she or he manages at home, and whether
the house has been modified to accommodate the patients needs.
D Driving
Ask whether the patient drives and, if not, how they get around.
P Pets
Whether the patient keeps any pets.This may be important in situations of socially isolated
patients and also in patients suspected of having zoonotic infections such as psittacosis.
N Nutrition
Obtain details about the main meals. A detailed dietary history may be necessary in
an obese or malnourished patient.
S Sleep
A sk questions to exclude obstructive sleep apnoea, such as whether the patient has
been told by their bed partner that they snore, whether the patient feels refreshed in
the morning on waking up, any early-morning headaches, early-morning diuresis,
daytime somnolence (e.g. falling asleep at the steering wheel of a vehicle while driving). Also ask about insomniawhether it is initial (difficulty falling asleep, associated
with depressive situations) or terminal (waking up too early, associated with anxiety
disorders)or any complaints from the bed partner about distressing leg movements
(restless legs syndrome).
D Depression
A sk whether the patient has ever been depressed and, if so, when, why and what treatment they have had. Ask whether the patient is currently depressedhere it may be
necessary to enquire into the presence of any vegetative symptoms of depression, such
as anorexia, anhedonia (lack of interest in pleasurable activities) or initial insomnia.
I Insight
Check the patients insight into their medical condition. This also includes
enquiring into the patients knowledge about the disease, about living with it and
its prognosis.
P Problem
A
sk what the patients biggest problem currently is, as they perceive it. For
example, a patient who is critically ill with infective exacerbation of end-stage
emphysema may still be more worried about his disabled wife, who is alone
at home, than about his own illness. In such a situation, as much importance
should be given to organising adequate care for the wife as to the treatment of the
patients medical condition.
V Visits
If the patients usual residence is far from the hospital, it is important to ask who
visits the patient at the hospital and how often this happens.
A Associations
A
sk whether the patient belongs to any relevant association or an organised body
(e.g. Multiple Sclerosis Association, Blind Society), where they can obtain information and support.
S Support
A
sk who provides the main social support base for the patient while in hospital and
when discharged to the community.
P Pastime
A
sk what the patients usual pastime is. This is important particularly in retired or
disabled, homebound patients.
Physical examination
On completing the history, an adequately detailed physical examination should be performed, with the main emphasis on the system involved with the patients current
presentation (Fig 1.1). It is wise to spend about 20 minutes on the physical examination. Elements of the physical examination include vital observations of the pulse rate,
respiratory rate, temperature and blood pressure (postural pulse and blood pressure if
indicated), and the systems-specific examination.
A - Appearance
B - Body habitus
C - Cognition
D - Devices/attachments
Neck
Lymph nodes
Trachea
JVP
Carotid arteries
Thyroid gland
Cervical spine
Chest
Spider naevi
Breast
Cardiac examination
Lungs
Vertebral column
Lower limbs
Appearance
Deformities
Neurological examination
Foot examination
Peripheral pulse
Face
Eyes
Cranial nerves
Oral cavity/pharynx
Upper limbs
Appearance
Pulse/blood pressure
Joints/flap
Neurological function
Axillary lymph nodes
Abdomen
Appearance
Palpation
Organomegaly
Masses
Auscultation
Flank dullness
Gait
Standing up from
squatting position
Figure 1.1 General physical examination. Ask for: temperature chart, report of urine analysis, result
of per rectal examination.
Gait disorders
Wide-based gait (ataxic-drunkard) cerebellar disorders
Shuffling gait (marche petit pas) Parkinsons disease
Steppage gait
(high-stepping) peripheral neuropathy, foot drop
Circumductionhemiparesis
Trendelenburg gaithip joint pain
Scissor gait lower limb spasticity
Remember to ask (the bulldog) for the results of the urine analysis and the per
rectal examination, and for the temperature chart.
Presentation
In the presentation, the candidate can start off with the vital observations and go on
to describe different systems, commencing with the main system involved. It is important to mention relevant negatives and the absence of signs that would be expected
to have been present in the classic setting. If no abnormality was found in a certain
system and the system is not involved in the presenting pathology, it may be adequate
just to mention that the examination of the particular system was unremarkable. This
may leave more time for the discussion.
If the history is very detailed and time is running short, it may be necessary to
complete the latter part of the history while examining the patient. The mnemonics
mentioned above may help in such a situation, and can be used as a checklist.
The last 20 minutes should be spent on clerical pursuits. It is important to arrange
the presentation appropriately, to decide on which components to mention and what
to withhold, and to prepare strong opening and closing statements. A comprehensive
list of differential diagnoses should be thought of and relevant investigations should
be decided on. When mentioning a particular test, it is vital to mention what is being
looked for (e.g. I would like to see the full blood countlooking for a polymorphonuclear leucocytosis).
Discussion
Introduction
Much time and mental energy should go into preparing a suitable opening statement
(Fig 1.2). This should be concise but detailed enough to give the examiners a broad
overview of what is about to be presented. It should demonstrate the clinical maturity
of the candidate, and a good opening statement can always put the examiners at ease
and give vital points to the candidate. It is important to maintain full eye contact with
the examiners during the opening statement and this can be achieved only by learning the statement by heart. A rambling and overly detailed opening statement will
bore the examiners and give the impression that the candidate has not identified the
crux of the case.
The 10 minutes of preparation time, before being introduced to the examiners,
should be spent on revising the case and learning by heart the opening (introductory)
and closing statements.
10
Physical examination
Social problems
Analysis of the problem
Reasons
Management strategies
Goals/expectations
Statement on prognosis
Closing statement
The closing statement is a recapitulation of the essential aspects of the case. This must
be concise but sufficiently detailed, like the opening statement. The difference between
the opening and the closing statements is that the former is an anticipatory statement,
and the latter a conclusive statement with indications of diagnostic possibilities and
management options. After the closing statement comes the main issues section.
11
The issue(s)
Most cases may have a single extremely important issue, which is the main plot, and
identification of this issue is consistent with the expected level of maturity of the candidate
at the examination. There may then be significant other issues that need to be identified.
These can be discussed under two major headings: acute issues and long-term issues.
Each of these can be further analysed under two subheadings: social issues and medical
issues. Candidates should also mention how many problems they have identified before
coming up with the list (e.g. I have identified two acute medical problems and a social
problem. There is also a long-term medical problem that needs addressing.).
Management plan
After describing the issues that matter, a broad management plan should be introduced.
The problems identified can be expanded under the medical and social subheadings
according to the following compartmentalisation:
The main problem
Possible differential diagnoses
Relevant investigations and the expected results
Proposed treatment or management:
Medical
Social
With regard to investigations, the candidate is expected to propose the most judicious investigation appropriate to the clinical setting, and to avoid giving long lists of
non-specific investigations. When suggesting an invasive investigation, the candidate
should be able to justify the risks involved in view of the benefits expected. The candidate should be aware of the costs involved with different investigations, and all decisions should be cost-effective in the general setting.
The candidates treatment plan should be comprehensive, and he or she is expected
to make decisions with confidence and the competence of a general physician, with a
MEDICAL
Problem
Differential diagnoses
Investigations
1.
2.
3.
SOCIAL
Problem
Management plan
1.
2.
12
Expected results
Treatment
sound knowledge of all specialties of internal medicine. The candidate should be capable of defending the plan of management based on the most up-to-date evidence. It
therefore pays to be thorough with the current treatment guidelines and pathways developed and introduced by various authorities (e.g. National Heart Foundation), reputed
institutions and hospitals (e.g. Mayo Clinic). I cannot over-emphasise the importance
of being familiar with the latest results of major randomised controlled multi-centre
trials and other ground-breaking large-scale studies that define the practice of contemporary evidence-based medicine.
It is very important to emphasise a team approach to the management of issues in
the broader sense, with the participation of the relevant specialists, the patients general
practitioner (GP) and allied health workers, such as disease educators, social worker,
occupational therapist, physiotherapist, speech pathologist and, of course, a diversional
therapist as required. If the patients management problem is discharge planning and
post-discharge care, it is important to demonstrate a sound knowledge of the community resources available for such patients. Here the family conference and liaison with
the GP are important concepts.
Contemporary medicine attaches great significance to after-care and follow-up of
patients. Candidates need to have a wide appreciation of the different chronic disease
management programs and ambulatory care programs available for the ongoing care
of patients in the community setting. The candidate is also required to provide plans
on how to educate the patient, develop satisfactory insight into their condition and
ensure good compliance with the management plan.
This book aims to provide an introduction for medical students entering and progressing through the clinical years of their training. Clinical integration involves putting
together the subject matter learnt in the preclinical stages (also called basic science information) in the context of the patient. This programs your thinking to exercise clinical
rationalising based on the background knowledge gained in the preclinical learning.
Essentially it is an exercise for the student to start thinking like a doctor.
This book aims to aid the system of problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based
learning (CBL) that has become the cornerstone of teaching in many medical schools. It
provides the basic clinical information required to approach the more commonly encountered clinical challenges in internal medicine. Students are introduced to thinking
in a systematic manner when approaching a patient. When you have become proficient
in obtaining a general history and performing a good general physical examination
(as discussed earlier in this chapter), you will then be ready to take on the more specialised clinical scenarios discussed in this book.
The physician plays the role of detective, gathering all the vital clues and evidence
to build the case at hand. The clues are gathered during your history and physical
examination. Therefore it is important that you have a clear idea of what you are looking for when taking the history and performing the physical examination. Once you
have obtained a detailed history and have performed a thorough physical examination,
you are then ready to put your thoughts together, to build the case. This involves coming
up with a set of differential diagnoses based on the evidence you have gathered and your
clinical reasoning. Then you should think of the investigations you need to order or
refer the patient to, for the purpose of proving or excluding the various differential
diagnoses. Based on the results of the investigations, you can reorganise your list of
13
differential diagnoses and rank them from the most likely to the least likely. If you can
identify a single diagnosis as the absolute based on the evidence at hand, it becomes
your definitive diagnosis.
Now you are ready to come up with your plan of management. This needs to be
comprehensive and should include direct therapeutics (pharmacological, interventional
or surgical) and supportive measures (patient education, psychosocial aid, physiotherapy,
rehabilitation etc). You should know what outcomes to expect from the different therapeutic decisions you make. Optimal monitoring of the patients response to treatment is
very important.
Once the patient is treated for the acute condition, you should think of ongoing
management once discharged from the care of the acute care provider. This involves
building a long-term management plan in the setting of ambulatory care (outpatient follow-up), general practice and community care.
Remember: clinical medicine can only be learnt at the patients bedside! Only practice will make you a good clinician. Proactively participating in ward rounds, spending time with the resident staff, performing clinical duties under the supervision of
junior medical staff, and participating in departmental clinical and teaching meetings
are some activities that will help you immensely and facilitate your efforts to make the
most of what is available for learning in the teaching hospital setting.
So, in summary, when approaching the patient (see box on p 15) you should be alert
to the important clues with diagnostic, prognostic and management implications. Look
for these initially during the clinical assessment (history and physical examination). Once
you have completed your clinical assessment, you must develop a list of differential diagnoses. The next step in the clinical work-up is to decide on and perform the relevant investigations. The investigations are aimed at proving or excluding the differential diagnoses
in order to narrow them down to a definitive diagnosis. Investigations need to be relevant
and cost effective. (Medical students and inexperienced junior doctors are notorious for
blindly ordering all the tests in the book.) Once you have arrived at the definitive diagnosis, the next step is to plan the management. Management has two main arms: treating
the presenting complaints, and preventing recurrences or future clinical events.
The clinical vignettes in the coming chapters are there to stimulate your thoughts.
Once you have gained a good insight into the vignette you may find answers to some
of your questions in the text that follows. Some questions may require further more
specialised and detailed research. The text sets the stage and guides you through this
learning exercise.
The case discussions in the third part of the book will give you an in-depth appreciation of how advanced clinical reasoning is done. Although this is aimed at medical
registrars, these cases will give you a solid foundation upon which to build your clinical career.
14
15
02
Approach to various
common symptoms
SYMPTOMS ASSESSMENT
Symptoms assessment is where it all begins: the patient presents with symptoms. As
the clinician you decide on your path of assessment according to what the patient
complains of as symptoms. It is therefore extremely important for the clinician to be
thorough in understanding and evaluating symptoms. The questions asked and the
information focused on in analysing the patients symptoms help the clinician to establish a roadmap of enquiry. Your subsequent progression to the cascade of steps in your
clinical evaluation, such as physical examination, investigational testing, formation of
the list of differential diagnoses and making a definitive diagnosis, are all based on the
information you obtain during the taking of the history. Therefore, the foundation of
your clinical involvement with every patient is the history you take of their presenting
symptoms.
It is useful to have a ready-to-use aid in the form of a checklist for approaching the various symptoms a candidate might encounter in the long case. Below are
discussed the commonly encountered symptoms, together with the relevant issues
that need to be investigated. When encountering each problem, ask for details as
described.
PAIN
Ascertain:
1 The nature of the onset and the events surrounding the onset (gradual
or sudden). If the pain was of sudden onset, what was the patient doing
at the time?
2 Precipitating factors
3 Exact location and radiation
4 Severity and character
5 Factors that exacerbate or relieve the pain
6 Duration, diurnal pattern, temporal pattern, progression
7 What the patient has done so far in addressing the pain (e.g. doctors
involved, medication taken), including non-pharmacological means
that have been tried, such as acupuncture, chiropractic and
physiotherapy.
16
Back pain
Back pain is very common. In addition to the following salient clinical features, it is
important to enquire into the occupational and functional difficulties associated with
the symptom. Clinical features to concentrate on include:
1 The points listed above under Pain
2 Neurological symptoms in the lower limbs
3 Bladder and bowel function abnormalities
4 Radicular pain.
The differential diagnoses that need to be considered can be grouped under six
broad subheadings for ease of comprehension and memorising:
Traumatic injury
Mechanicalmuscular, postural, spondylosis (prolapse of the vertebral disc),
spinal stenosis, diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), spondylolisthesis,
fibromyalgia
Inflammatoryankylosing spondylitis, sacroiliitis due to any seronegative arthro
pathy, septic arthritis of the sacroiliac joint (more common in the young male adult)
Metabolicosteoporosis-associated pathological fracture, osteomalacia, Pagets
disease of bone, renal osteodystrophy
Neoplasiametastatic cancer, multiple myeloma, primary bone tumour
Referred pain
Headache
Chest pain
DYSPNOEA
Crepitations
Define the character of the crepitationsfine, medium or coarse. Describe the distribution
and also identify other associated sounds such as wheezing and bronchial breath sounds.
Common differential diagnoses include:
pulmonary fibrosis / interstitial lung disease (fine crepitations)
bronchiectasis (coarse crepitations)
pulmonary congestion / pulmonary oedema (may associate with wheezing)
atelectasis (basal).
FEVER
Fever is a common symptom that can indicate many different types of pathology.
A thorough initial evaluation therefore is invaluable. Features of the presentation that
need to be focused on include:
1 Onset and duration
2 Temporal pattern and variation
3 Any new medications taken prior to the onset of fever
4 Associated other features, such as:
cough, sputum production, chest pain and dyspnoeasuggesting pulmonary
sepsis
previously known valve pathology, palpitations, intravenous drug use, recent
invasive procedures such as dental worksuggesting infective endocarditis
diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal painsuggesting gastrointestinal sepsis
headache, neck stiffness, photophobiasuggesting central nervous system
sepsis (encephalitis, cerebritis or meningitis)
joint pain, skin lesionssuggesting a vasculitis or connective tissue disease
previous or existing intravenous devices and inflamed cannula sites.
Pyrexia of unknown origin (PUO) by definition is a fever that has persisted for more
than 3 weeks without an identifiable cause, despite extensive investigation. Some possible causes include:
sub-acute bacterial endocarditis
concealed abscess (e.g. subphrenic, pelvic, dental)
malignancy (melanoma, lymphoma, sarcoma)
connective tissue disorders
HIV
parasitic infestations
osteomyelitis
tuberculosis
glandular fever / Epstein Barr virus
exotic infections such as Lyme disease, Ross River virus etc in the traveller.
19
JOINT PAIN/STIFFNESS
Arthritis
FALLS
Falls could be due to general debility, neurological deficit, visual impairment or musculo
skeletal pathologies. Vital information about the symptoms includes:
1 Onset, duration, frequency
2 Exact causative associations with the falls, such as leg weakness, visual
impairment, tripping over and difficulty with steps
3 Functional status and mobility, currently and prior to the onset of falls
4 Association with micturition, standing and coughing
5 Other symptoms such as presyncope, syncope and vertigo
6 Time of the fall, what the patient was doing immediately before the fall,
position/posture before the fall
7 Any difficulty with balance and coordination
8 Possible precipitating conditions, especially in the elderly, such as urinary tract
infection, sedative hypnotic medications, tricyclic antidepressants, Parkinsons
disease, alcohol consumption and stroke
9 Palpitations
10 Any injury sustained due to the fall
11 Use of assisting devices, such as a walking frame or stick.
vasovagal syncope
micturition syncope
cough syncope
postural hypotension
drug effects
pulmonary embolism
cataplexy
stroke, especially in the brainstem region.
DIZZINESS
It is important to question the patient closely to ascertain exactly what they mean
by dizziness. If the features of the presentation include imbalance associated with a
sensation of the surrounding environment rotating or moving, it may be indicative of
vertigo. However, if the patient complains of blacking out, impending blackout or loss
of consciousness, it may in fact indicate presyncope or syncope. An eyewitness account
would be invaluable in this setting (asking about associated fitting, incontinence, presence of arterial pulse etc). Differential diagnoses include:
Vertigobenign positional vertigo, tinnitus, labyrinthitis, acoustic neuroma
Syncopeneurocardiogenic shock, severe bradycardia, ventricular tachycardia,
vasovagal attack, postural hypotension, carotid body hypersensitivity, micturition
syncope, ischaemia in the vertebrobasilar system, migraine, grand mal epilepsy.
There are some disease conditions that are often encountered in the long case.
Examiners expect candidates to be very thorough with these conditions because
they are common in the candidates clinical practice. These bread-and-butter conditions include:
alcoholic liver disease
anaemia
asthma
chronic airway limitation
chronic corticosteroid use
congestive heart failure
diabetes mellitus
diarrhoea
HIV infection
inflammatory bowel disease
ischaemic heart disease
multiple sclerosis
renal transplantation
stroke
rheumatoid arthritis.
In each condition encountered in the long case setting, four questions need to be
addressed:
1 What do you ask in the history?
2 What signs do you look for in the physical examination?
21
22