Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
2, 2014
102
Entropy Based Grey Relational Analysis Method for MultiAttribute Decision Making under Single Valued Neutrosophic
Assessments
Pranab Biswas1*, Surapati Pramanik2, and Bibhas C. Giri3
1*
Department of Mathematics, Nandalal Ghosh B.T. College, Panpur, 743126, India. Email: sura_pati@yahoo.co.in
3
Keywords: Neutrosophic set; Single-valued neutrosophic set; Grey relational analysis; Information Entropy; Multi-attribute decision
making.
1 Introduction
Multiple attribute decision making (MADM) problems in
the area of operation research, management science,
economics, systemic optimization, urban planning and
many other fields have achieved very much attention to the
researchers during the last several decades. It is often used
to solve various decision making and/or selection problems.
These problems generally consist of choosing the most
desirable alternative that has the highest degree of
satisfaction from a set of alternatives with respect to their
attributes. In this approach, the decision makers have to
provide qualitative and/ or quantitative assessments for
determining the performance of each alternative with
respect to each attribute, and the relative importance of
evaluation attribute.
In classical MADM methods, such as TOPSIS (Hwang &
Yoon [1]), PROMETHEE (Brans et al. [2]), VIKOR (Opricovic [3-4]), ELECTRE (Roy [5]) the weight of each attributes and rating of each alternative are naturally considered with crisp numbers. However, in real complex
situation, decision maker may prefer to evaluate the
attributes by using linguistic variables rather than exact
values due to his time pressure, lack of knowledge and lack
of information processing capabilities about the problem
domain. In such situations, the preference information of
alternatives provided by the decision maker may be vague,
imprecise or incomplete. Fuzzy set (Zadeh [6]) is one of
Pranab Biswas, Surapati Pramanik, Bibhas C. Giri, Entropy Based Grey Relational Analysis Method for Multi-Attribute
Decision Making under Single Valued Neutrosophic Assessments
103
F c ( x ) = {1 } FA ( x )
A
Pranab Biswas, Surapati Pramanik, Bibhas C. Giri, Entropy Based Grey Relational Analysis Method for Multi-Attribute
Decision Making under Single Valued Neutrosophic Assessments
(2)
(3)
104
~
Definition 6 A SVNS NA is contained in the other SVNS
~
~
~
NB , denoted as NA NB , if and only if
I N~ ( x ) = max ( I N~ ( x ), I N~ ( x )) ;
C
I N~ ( x ) = min ( I N~ ( x ), I N~ ( x )) ;
C
~
Definition 7 Two single valued neutrosophic sets NA and
~
~
~
~
~
NB are equal, i.e. NA = NB , if and only if NA NB and
~
~
NA NB .
~
Definition 8 (Union) The union of two SVNSs NA and
~
~
~
~
~
NB is a SVNS NC , written as NC = NA NB . Its truth
membership, indeterminacy-membership and falsity mem~
~
bership functions are related to those of NA and NB by
, x X
and
(6)
1
1
1
NB
NA
NB
~ ~
n
NA 1
d N~ NA , NB =
i=1
+ FN~ ( x1 ) FN~ ( x1 )
A
B
(7)
105
~ ~
d N~ NA ,NB =
1 n
T ~ ( x1 ) TN~ ( x1 ) + I N~ ( x1 ) I N~ ( x1 ) + FN~ ( x1 ) FN~ ( x1 )
B
A
B
A
B
3n i=1 NA
}
(8)
(9)
(10)
C1
A1 d11
A 2 d 21
D = d ij
= . ...
mn
.
...
A m d m1
C2
d12
d 22
...
...
d m2
...
...
Cn
d1n
... d 2 n
... ...
... ...
... d mn
C
C
: C j C .
,..., n
, 2
Ai = 1
Tin , I in , Fin
Ti 2 , I i 2 , Fi 2
Ti1 , I i1 , Fi1
(11)
Cj
Tij , Iij , Fij
:C j C
for j = 1, 2,, n.
Pranab Biswas, Surapati Pramanik, Bibhas C. Giri, Entropy Based Grey Relational Analysis Method for Multi-Attribute
Decision Making under Single Valued Neutrosophic Assessments
106
A2
=.
.
Am
~
E i (NA ) = 1 if
3.
mn
C1
A1
2.
C2
T ,I ,F
21 21 21
...
...
T ,I ,F
m1 m1 m1
Cn
...
...
T2 n , I 2 n , F2 n
...
...
...
...
...
...
Tm 2 , I m 2 , Fm 2
...
Tmn , I mn , Fmn
(12)
I N~ ( x i ) I N~ ( x i ) I N~ ( x i ) I N~ ( x i )
A
4.
Ac
Bc
~
~
E i (NA ) = E i (N c ) x X .
A
~
1 m
E i (NA ) =1 TN~ ( x i ) + FN~ ( x i ) IN~ ( x i ) ICN~ ( x i )
A
A
A
n i =1 A
(13)
x X .
j =1
1 m
C
Tij ( x i ) + Fij ( x i ) Iij ( x i ) Iij ( x i )
n i =1
(14)
for i = 1, 2,..,m; j = 1, 2,,n.
It is also noticed that E j [0,1]. Due to Hwang and Yoon
[1], and Wang and Zhang [29] the entropy weight of the jth attibute Cj is presented by
1 E j
wj = n
(15)
(1 E j )
E j =1
m n
component q
+
~
Nj
I +j = min{Iij} and
i
+
j
Fj+ = min{Fij} in
i
mn
the
neutrosophic
for i = 1, 2, .., m; j = 1,
2, , n.
Pranab Biswas, Surapati Pramanik, Bibhas C. Giri, Entropy Based Grey Relational Analysis Method for Multi-Attribute
Decision Making under Single Valued Neutrosophic Assessments
form q
~
Nj
= T ,I ,F
, where Tj = min{Tij},
i
mn
for i = 1, 2,..,m; j = 1,
2,,n.
Step 6 Calculate neutrosophic grey relational
coefficient of each alternative from INERS and
INEURS.
+ ij + max max + ij
, where
+
~ , q ~ , for i= 1, 2,,m. and j=1, 2,,n.
+ ij = d q N
j
Nij
(16)
ij
ij + max max ij
i
d q N~ij , q
~
Nj
, where, ij =
(17)
= w j
j=1
+
ij
(18)
i+
, for i = 1, 2,, m.
+ i
(20)
+
i
5 . Illustrative Examples
In this section, a multi-attribute decision-making problem
is considered to demonstrate the application as well as the
effectiveness of the proposed method. We consider the decision-making problem adapted from Ye [39]. Suppose
there is an investment company, which wants to invest a
sum of money to the best one from these four possible
alternatives (1) A1 is a car company; (2) A2 is a food
company; (3) A3 is a computer company; and (4) A4 is an
arms company. The investment company must take a
decision according to the following three criteria: (1) C1 is
the risk analysis; (2) C2 is the growth analysis; and (3) C3
is the environmental impact analysis. Thus, when the four
possible alternatives with respect to the above three criteria
are evaluated by the expert, we can obtain the following
single-valued neutrosophic decision matrix:
=
D N~ = Tij , Iij , Fij
4 3
(19)
j =1
+
ij
107
C1
A1
A2
A3
A4
C2
C3
0.2, 0 .2, 0.5
(21)
Pranab Biswas, Surapati Pramanik, Bibhas C. Giri, Entropy Based Grey Relational Analysis Method for Multi-Attribute
Decision Making under Single Valued Neutrosophic Assessments
108
+
+
+
+
~ = [ q ~ ,q ~ ,q ~ ]=
QN
N
N
N
1
i
i
i
~ = [q ~ ,q ~ ,q ~ ]=
QN
N
N
N
1
i
i
i
Step 3: Calculation of the neutrosophic grey relational coefficient of each alternative from INERS and INEURS.
0.3636
0.5714
=
0.3333
1.0000
0.5000 0.4000
1.0000 1.0000
0.5714 0.8000
1.0000 0.6666
(22)
[ ]
ij 4 3
1.0000
0.4667
=
0.7778
0.3333
1.0000 0.7778
0.4667 0.3333
0.7778 0.3684
0.4667 0.4111
+
2
= 0.91004
References
[1]
+
3
(1998).
S. Opricovic, and G. H. Tzeng. Compromise solution by
MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and
(24)
(25)
S. Opricovic. Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade
[4]
6 Conclusion
(23)
[6]
[7]
Pranab Biswas, Surapati Pramanik, Bibhas C. Giri, Entropy Based Grey Relational Analysis Method for Multi-Attribute
Decision Making under Single Valued Neutrosophic Assessments
[8]
109
[20]
114(2000), 1-9.
[9]
[10]
Wuhan (2005).
decision
making,
Tsinghua
Science
[21]
and
[13]
[14]
[15]
Expert
11677.
[24]
15(2007), 285-297.
298306.
[25]
linguistic
environment,
Fuzzy
Sets
and
Systems,
158(2007), 16081617.
Ma-
thematical
doi:
Modeling
(2013),
10.1016/j.apm.2013.07.020.
[19]
[18]
[23]
[16]
(2012).
[12]
[29]
Pranab Biswas, Surapati Pramanik, Bibhas C. Giri, Entropy Based Grey Relational Analysis Method for Multi-Attribute
Decision Making under Single Valued Neutrosophic Assessments
110
[30] C. E. Shannon. A Mathematical Theory of Communications, The Bell System Technical Journal. 27(1948), 379423.
[31] C. E. Shannon, and W. Weaver. The Mathematical Theory
of Communications, The University of Illinois Press,
Urbana. (1947).
[32] L. A. Zadeh. Fuzzy sets and systems, in: Proceedings of
the Symposium on Systems, Theory polytechnic Institute
of Brooklyn, Newyork (1965), 29-37.
[33] H. Bustince, and P. Burillo. Entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy
sets and on interval-valued fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and
Systems, 78 (1996), 305-316.
[34] E. Szmidt, and J, Kacprzyk. Entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy
sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 118 (2001), 467-477.
[35] A. S. De Luca, S. Termini. A definition of nonprobabilistic entropy in the setting of fuzzy set theory.
Information Control, 20 (1972), 301-312.
[36] I. K. Valchos, G. D. Sergiadis. Intuitionistic fuzzy
information- a pattern recognition, Pattern Recognition
Letters, 28 (2007), 197-206.
[37] P. Majumder, S. K. Samanta. On similarity and entropy of
neutrosophic sets, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems
(2013), doi: 10.3233/IFS-130810.
[38] J. Dezert. Open questions in neutrosophic inferences,
Multiple-Valued Logic: An International Journal, 8(2002),
439-472.
[39] J. Ye. Fuzzy decision-making method based on the
weighted correlation coefficient under intuitionistic fuzzy
environment. European Journal of Operational Research,
205(2010), 202204.
Received: December 31st, 2013. Accepted: January 10th, 2014
Pranab Biswas, Surapati Pramanik, Bibhas C. Giri, Entropy Based Grey Relational Analysis Method for Multi-Attribute
Decision Making under Single Valued Neutrosophic Assessments