Você está na página 1de 2

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No.

72 / Monday, April 14, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 19971

Issued in Renton, Washington, on March McCauley Propeller Systems, P.O. Box Conclusion
28, 2008. 7704, Wichita, KS 67277–7704, We have carefully reviewed the
Ali Bahrami, telephone (800) 621–7767. available data, including the comments
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, The Docket Operations office is received, and determined that air safety
Aircraft Certification Service. located at Docket Management Facility, and the public interest require adopting
[FR Doc. E8–7176 Filed 4–11–08; 8:45 am] U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 the AD as proposed.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Costs of Compliance
Washington, DC 20590–0001. We estimate that this AD will affect
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff 22 propeller assemblies installed on
Janusz, Aerospace Engineer, Wichita airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate
Federal Aviation Administration Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Small that it will take about 47 work-hours per
Airplane Directorate, 1801 Airport propeller to perform the required
14 CFR Part 39 Road, Room 100, Wichita, KS 67209; e- actions, and that the average labor rate
[Docket No. FAA–2006–25173; Directorate mail: jeff.janusz@faa.gov; telephone: is $80 per work-hour. Required parts
Identifier 2006–NE–24–AD; Amendment 39– (316) 946–4148; fax: (316) 946–4107. will cost about $260 per propeller.
15453; AD 2008–08–01] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA Based on these figures, we estimate the
RIN 2120–AA64 proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 by total cost of the AD to U.S. operators to
superseding AD 2003–15–01, be $88,440.
Airworthiness Directives; McCauley Amendment 39–13243 (68 FR 42244,
Propeller Systems Propeller Models July 17, 2003); AD 2003–17–10, Authority for This Rulemaking
B5JFR36C1101/114GCA–0, Amendment 39–13285 (68 FR 50462, Title 49 of the United States Code
C5JFR36C1102/L114GCA–0, August 21, 2003); and AD 2006–15–13, specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
B5JFR36C1103/114HCA–0, and Amendment 39–14693 (71 FR 42258, rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
C5JFR36C1104/L114HCA–0 July 26, 2006), with a proposed AD. The Section 106, describes the authority of
proposed AD applies to McCauley the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Aviation Programs, describes in more
Propeller Systems propeller models
Administration (FAA), Department of detail the scope of the Agency’s
B5JFR36C1101/114GCA–0,
Transportation (DOT). authority.
C5JFR36C1102/L114GCA–0,
ACTION: Final rule. B5JFR36C1103/114HCA–0, and We are issuing this rulemaking under
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding three C5JFR36C1104/L114HCA–0. We the authority described in Subtitle VII,
existing airworthiness directives (ADs) published the proposed AD in the Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
for McCauley Propeller Systems Federal Register on November 1, 2007 ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
propeller models B5JFR36C1101/ (72 FR 61824). That action proposed to section, Congress charges the FAA with
114GCA–0, C5JFR36C1102/L114GCA–0, require the same initial inspections as promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
B5JFR36C1103/114HCA–0, and the three ADs being superseded, but to air commerce by prescribing regulations
C5JFR36C1104/L114HCA–0. Those ADs extend the compliance times and for practices, methods, and procedures
currently require fluorescent penetrant intervals, to add repetitive inspections, the Administrator finds necessary for
inspections (FPI) and eddy current and to mandate a life limit for the safety in air commerce. This regulation
inspections (ECI) of propeller blades for blades. is within the scope of that authority
cracks, and if any crack indications are because it addresses an unsafe condition
Examining the AD Docket
found, removing the blade from service. that is likely to exist or develop on
You may examine the AD docket on products identified in this rulemaking
This AD requires the same initial
the Internet at http:// action.
inspections, but extends the compliance
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
times and intervals, adds repetitive Regulatory Findings
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
inspections, and mandates a life limit
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, We have determined that this AD will
for the blades. This AD results from our
except Federal holidays. The AD docket not have federalism implications under
determination that we must require
contains this AD, the regulatory Executive Order 13132. This AD will
repetitive inspections for cracks, and
evaluation, any comments received, and not have a substantial direct effect on
from reports of blunt leading edges of
other information. The street address for the States, on the relationship between
the propeller blades due to erosion. We
the Docket Operations office (telephone the national government and the States,
are issuing this AD to detect cracks in
(800) 647–5527) is provided in the or on the distribution of power and
the propeller blade that could cause
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be responsibilities among the various
failure and separation of the propeller
available in the AD docket shortly after levels of government.
blade and loss of control of the airplane,
receipt. For the reasons discussed above, I
and to detect blunt leading edges on the
propeller blades, which could cause Comments certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
airplane single engine climb We provided the public the action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
performance degradation and could opportunity to participate in the (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
result in an increased risk of collision development of this AD. We have DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
with terrain. considered the one comment received. (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
DATES: This AD becomes effective May The commenter supports the proposal. (3) Will not have a significant
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC62 with RULES

19, 2008. The Director of the Federal We also found we needed to clarify that economic impact, positive or negative,
Register approved the incorporation by blades that had crack indications were on a substantial number of small entities
reference of certain publications listed no longer eligible for installation on any under the criteria of the Regulatory
in the regulations as of May 19, 2008. other airframe or in any other Flexibility Act.
ADDRESSES: You can get the service configuration. We clarified the AD on We prepared a summary of the costs
information identified in this AD from the point. to comply with this AD and placed it in

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:37 Apr 11, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM 14APR1
19972 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 72 / Monday, April 14, 2008 / Rules and Regulations

the AD Docket. You may get a copy of new airworthiness directive, for cracks, and from reports of blunt leading
this summary at the address listed Amendment 39–15453, to read as edges of the propeller blades due to erosion.
under ADDRESSES. follows: We are issuing this AD to detect cracks in the
propeller blade that could cause failure and
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 2008–08–01 McCauley Propeller Systems: separation of the propeller blade and loss of
Amendment 39–15453. Docket No. control of the airplane, and to detect blunt
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation FAA–2006–25173; Directorate Identifier
safety, Incorporation by reference, leading edges on the propeller blades, which
2006–NE–24–AD.
Safety. could cause airplane single engine climb
Effective Date performance degradation and could result in
Adoption of the Amendment (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) an increased risk of collision with terrain.
■ Accordingly, under the authority becomes effective May 19, 2008. Compliance
delegated to me by the Administrator, Affected ADs (e) You are responsible for having the
the Federal Aviation Administration (b) This AD supersedes AD 2003–15–01, actions required by this AD performed within
amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: Amendment 39–13243; AD 2003–17–10, the compliance times specified unless the
Amendment 39–13285; and AD 2006–15–13, actions have already been done.
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS Amendment 39–14693. Life Limit
DIRECTIVES
Applicability (f) Remove all 114GCA–0, L114GCA–0,
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 (c) This AD applies to McCauley Propeller 114HCA–0, and L114HCA–0 propeller blades
continues to read as follows: Systems propeller models B5JFR36C1101/ upon reaching 10,000 operating hours time-
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 114GCA–0, C5JFR36C1102/L114GCA–0, since-new.
B5JFR36C1103/114HCA–0, and Initial Propeller Blade Inspection
§ 39.13 [Amended] C5JFR36C1104/L114HCA–0. These
propellers are installed on BAE Systems (g) Perform an initial fluorescent penetrant
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by inspection and eddy current inspection of
removing Amendment 39–13243 (68 FR (Operations) Limited Jetstream Model 4100
and 4101 series airplanes (Jetstream 41). propeller blades. Use the Equipment
42244, July 17, 2003), Amendment 39– Required and Accomplishment Instructions
13285 (68 FR 50462, August 21, 2003), Unsafe Condition of McCauley Propellers Alert Service Bulletin
and Amendment 39–14693 (71 FR (d) This AD results from our determination ASB255, dated January 8, 2007, and the
42258, July 26, 2006), and by adding a that we must require repetitive inspections following compliance schedule:

TABLE 1.—COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE


If the propeller blade: Then inspect the propeller blade:

(1) Has more than 2,400 operating hours time-since-new (TSN), time- Within 100 operating hours time-in-service (TIS) after the effective date
since-last inspection (TSLI), or time-since-overhaul (TSO). of this AD.
(2) Has 2,400 or fewer operating hours TSN, TSLI, or TSO ................... Upon reaching 2,500 operating hours TSN, TSLI, or TSO.

Propeller Blades Found Cracked (l) The Office of Management and Budget Road, Room 100, Wichita, KS 67209; e-mail:
(h) Remove from service propeller blades (OMB) has approved the reporting jeff.janusz@faa.gov; telephone: (316) 946–
found with any crack indications. Blades requirements and assigned OMB control 4148; fax: (316) 946–4107, for more
found with crack indications are no longer number 2120–0056. information about this AD.
eligible for installation in any configuration. Alternative Methods of Compliance Material Incorporated by Reference
Do not install them in any configuration on (m) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft (p) You must use the McCauley Propellers
any airframe. Certification Office, has the authority to Alert Service Bulletin ASB255, dated January
Repetitive Propeller Blade Inspection approve alternative methods of compliance 8, 2007, to perform the inspections required
for this AD if requested using the procedures by this AD. The Director of the Federal
(i) Thereafter, inspect the propeller blades
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Register approved the incorporation by
within 2,500 operating hours TSLI or TSO.
Use the Equipment Required and Special Flight Permits reference of this service bulletin in
Accomplishment Instructions of McCauley accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
(n) Under 39.23, we are limiting the part 51. Contact McCauley Propeller Systems,
Propellers Alert Service Bulletin ASB255, availability of special flight permits for this P.O. Box 7704, Wichita, KS 67277–7704,
dated January 8, 2007. AD. Special flight permits are available only telephone (800) 621–7767, for a copy of this
Inspection for Blunt Erosion on the Leading if: service information. You may review copies
Edge of the Propeller Blade (1) The operator has not seen signs of at the FAA, New England Region, 12 New
external oil leakage from the hub; and England Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or
(j) Every time the propeller is removed for (2) The operator has not observed abnormal
the inspection for cracks, inspect the blade at the National Archives and Records
propeller vibration or abnormal engine Administration (NARA). For information on
for erosion and, if necessary, repair the vibration; and
erosion. The McCauley Propeller Systems the availability of this material at NARA, call
(3) The operator has not observed any other 202–741–6030, or go to: http://
Blade Overhaul Manual No., BOM 100, abnormal operation from the propeller; and
contains information on inspecting and www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-
(4) The operator has not made earlier locations.html.
repairing erosion on the propeller blade. reports of abnormal propeller vibration,
abnormal engine vibration, or other abnormal Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
Reporting Requirements
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC62 with RULES

propeller operations that have not been March 31, 2008.


(k) Within 10 calendar days of the addressed. Peter A. White,
inspection, use the Reporting Form for
Service Bulletin 255 to report all inspection Related Information Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller
findings to McCauley Propeller Systems, P.O. Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
(o) Contact Jeff Janusz, Aerospace Engineer,
Box 7704, Wichita, KS 67277–7704, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, [FR Doc. E8–7162 Filed 4–11–08; 8:45 am]
telephone (800) 621–7767. Small Airplane Directorate, 1801 Airport BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:37 Apr 11, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM 14APR1

Você também pode gostar