Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Outline of Presentation
Introduction
Numerical modeling
Results and discussion
Conclusions
Introduction
Why is jet grouting considered to improve lateral
capacity?
Insufficient lateral capacity of pile group
Scour occurs at bridge pile foundation
Tighter design code
Solutions
9 Structural retrofit
9 Jet grouting
Introduction
Why is jet grouting considered to improve lateral
capacity?
Insufficient lateral capacity of pile group
Scour occurs at bridge pile foundation
Tighter design code
Solutions
9 Structural retrofit
9 Jet grouting
Introduction
What is the objective of this study?
Perform a numerical simulation of laterally loaded
pile group test in soft clay
before improved by jet grouting
after improved by jet grouting
Overall goal
Parametric study
Improving mechanism due to jet grouting
Numerical modeling
0.55 m
Ft
Corbel
2.84 m
Test pile
0.76 m
3.2 m
13.4 m
2.75 m
3.0 m
0.9 m
0.9 m
FLAC3D
Mohr-Coulomb model
Jet grouted
zone
4.57 m
(Adsero 2008)
Numerical modeling
Pile properties
Parameters of test piles
Pipe pile
Concrete
Equivalent
pile
(Adsero 2008)
Youngs Poissons
Diameter, Thickness, Length, Moment of
modulus,
ratio,
D (m)
t (m)
L (m) inertia, I (m4) E (kN/m2)
Qp
0.324
0.009
13.4
(1.42x10-4)a
2.0x108
0.3
2.1 x107
0.306
13.4
(4.30 x10-4)b
0.324
13.4
(5.41x10-4)c
6.9x107
E p _ eq
( E p I A Ec I int ) / I out
0.3
Numerical modeling
Soil properties
Model 1
Depth
measured
from top of
pile cap (m)
0-0.76
0.76-3
3-10
10-18.2
Poissons
ratio,
Xp
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
Plasticity
Index,
PI (%)
20.5
23
13
21.3
Model 2
Es
150Cu
PI
(Adsero 2008)
Numerical modeling
Grouted soil properties
EG = 3,175 MPaqu
XG = 0.3
3000
2500
2000
1500
Improved (Field)
1000
Improved (Model 1)
500
Improved (Model 2)
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
Lateral displacement at pile cap (mm)
60
2500
Natural (Field)
Natural (Model)
Improved (Field)
Improved (Model)
2000
1500
1000
500
0
-5
15
35
Lateral displacement at pile cap (mm)
55
Depth (m)
-4
Improved (Model)
-6
Natural (Model)
-8
-10
Load
-12
-14
-16
-100
-50
50
100
150
Shear force (kN)
200
250
Depth (m)
-4
-6
Load
-8
-10
Improved (Model)
-12
Improved (Field)
-14
Natural (Model)
-16
-100
-50
0
50
Bending moment (kN-m)
100
150
Conclusions
(1) The soil moduli based on 200 to 600 times soil undrained
shear strengths yielded reasonable results
(2) The numerical results showed that jet grouting around
piles in the group significantly increased the lateral resistance
(3) Distributions of lateral pile responses (i.e. shear forces and
bending moments) before and after jet grouting below the
certain depth were almost the same.
(4) A further study is needed to investigate the reasons for the
difference in the magnitudes of the bending moments.
Thanks,
Questions?